Impact of cancer diagnosis on distribution and trends of cardiovascular hospitalizations in the USA between 2004 and 2017

Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors vs Clopidogrel in Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) experience a higher risk of both ischemic and bleeding events. Our aim in this study was to assess ischemic and bleeding risks after PCI in cancer patients treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors (P2Y12i; prasugrel and ticagrelor) compared with clopidogrel.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with cancer undergoing PCI at a tertiary center between 2012 and 2022 and discharged on P2Y12i were included in this study. Propensity score covariate adjustment was used to account for baseline differences between patients treated with potent P2Y12i and clopidogrel. Key clinical endpoints included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs---composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and major bleeding.

RESULTS

Of the 1702 included patients, 373 (21.9%) were treated with potent P2Y12i and 1329 (78.1%) with clopidogrel. Factors associated with potent P2Y12i use were acute coronary syndrome presentation and lesion length, whereas clopidogrel use was associated with active cancer status, thrombocytopenia, older age, and femoral access. MACCEs at 1 year occurred in 3.5% of patients treated with potent P2Y12i vs 6.8% of those receiving clopidogrel (log-rank test, P = 0.035; adjusted hazard ratio [adj HR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-1.10), but no differences in bleeding risk were detected (5.5% vs 7.0%, adj HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.53-1.60). The reduction in MACCEs was significant in patients with remission but not active cancer (Pinteraction = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Among cancer patients undergoing PCI, potent P2Y12i use was associated with similar bleeding risk and lower incidence of ischemic events compared with clopidogrel, but with no significant difference after propensity score adjustment.

Ischaemic and bleeding risk after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with active cancer: a nationwide study

Aims

Treatment of patients with cancer presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is complex given the increased risk of both thrombotic and major bleeding complications.

Methods and results

A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 was obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project and the UK National Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registries. The primary outcomes were major bleeding and re-infarction at 1 year following admission with STEMI. Major bleeding was defined as bleeding events that require hospital admission. Re-infarction was defined as acute MI according to the fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. A total of 322 776 STEMI-indexed admissions were identified between January 2005 and March 2019. Of those, 7050 (2.2%) patients were diagnosed with active cancer. Cancer patients were older with more cardiovascular comorbidities. Cancer patients received invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs. 72.7%, P < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (58.4% vs. 69.5%, P < 0.001) less often compared with patients without cancer and were less likely to be prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy (85% vs. 95.4%, P < 0.001). The incidence of major bleeding (6.5% vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001) and re-infarction (cancer 5.7%, no cancer 5.1%, P = 0.01) was higher in cancer patients at 1 year. After adjustment for differences in baseline covariates, a similar risk of re-infarction (sub-hazard ratios (SHR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.27) and a 50% increased risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30-1.71) were observed in cancer patients.

Conclusion

Compared with non-cancer patients, cancer patients have a higher risk of major bleeding but not of re-infarction. Mitigating bleeding risk in STEMI patients with cancer is of paramount importance to improve outcomes.

The role of imaging in defining cardiovascular risk to help cancer patient management: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review explores the potential role of cancer-staging chest CT scans in assessing cardiovascular (CV) risk in cancer patients. It aims to evaluate: (1) the correlation between non-gated chest CT and the conventional Agatston score from cardiac CT; (2) the association between coronary calcium scores from non-gated chest CT and CV risk in non-oncological patients; (3) the link between coronary calcium assessed by non-gated chest CT and CV events or endothelial damage in cancer patients.

METHODS

Three different searches were performed on PubMed, according to the three steps described above. Both original articles and systematic reviews were included.

RESULTS

Many studies in the literature have found a strong correlation between coronary calcium scores from non-gated chest CTs and the conventional Agatston scores from gated cardiac CTs. Various methodologies, including Agatston scoring, ordinal scoring, and the "extent" and "length" methods, have been successfully adapted for use with non-gated chest CTs. Studies show that non-gated scans, even those using iodinated contrast, can accurately assess coronary calcification and predict CV risk, with correlations as high as r = 0.94 when compared to cardiac CTs. In oncological settings, studies demonstrated a significant link between coronary calcium levels on non-gated chest CTs and higher CV risk, including MACE and overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiological assessment of coronary calcium on non-gated CT scans shows potential for improving CV risk prediction.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Non-gated chest CT scans can detect endothelial damage in cancer patients, highlighting the need for standardized radiological practices to assess CV risks during routine oncological follow-up, thereby enhancing radiology's role in comprehensive cancer care.

KEY POINTS

Cancer therapies improve outcomes but increase cardiovascular risk, requiring balanced management. Coronary calcification on non-gated CT correlates with Agatston scores, predicting cardiovascular risk. Routinely performed CTs predict cardiovascular risk, optimizing the management of cancer patients.

Integration and Potential Applications of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography in Cardio-Oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) is a versatile, readily available, and non-invasive imaging tool with high-resolution capabilities in many cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Our review explains the increased risk of CVD among patients with cancer due to chemoradiotherapies, shared risk factors and cancer itself and explores the expanding role of CCT in the detection, surveillance, and management of numerous CVD among these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research has highlighted the versatility and enhanced resolution capabilities of CCT in assessing a wide range of cardiovascular diseases. Early detection of cardiac changes and monitoring of disease progression in asymptomatic patients with cancer may lessen the severity of CVD. It offers an essential means to assess for coronary artery disease when patients are either unable to safely undergo stress testing for ischemia evaluation or at risk of complications from invasive coronary angiography. Furthermore, CCT extends its utility to valvular diseases, cardiomyopathies, pericardial diseases, cardiac masses, and radiation-induced cardiovascular diseases, allowing for a comprehensive, noninvasive assessment of the entire spectrum of cancer treatment associated CVD. Looking to the future, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms holds potential for automated image interpretation, improved precision and earlier detection of subclinical cardiac deterioration, allowing opportunities for earlier intervention and disease prevention. CCT is a useful imaging modality for assessing the myriad cardiovascular manifestations of diseases such as coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathies, pericardial disesaes, cardiac masses and radiation-induced cardiovascular diseases. CCT has several advantages. Readily available non-cardiac chest CT scans of patients with cancer may help with improved cardiovascular care, enhanced ASCVD risk stratification and toxicity surveillance.

The Risk and Reversibility of Osimertinib-Related Cardiotoxicity in a Real-World Population

INTRODUCTION

Although osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as the first-line therapy for metastatic NSCLC was found to have substantial survival benefits, concerns have arisen regarding its potential cardiotoxicity, particularly in real-world clinical settings. We aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and reversibility of osimertinib-related cardiotoxicity.

METHODS

We analyzed 1126 patients with NSCLC treated with osimertinib from May 2016 to April 2023 in two cancer centers. Osimertinib-related cardiotoxicity was defined as a composite of osimertinib-related cardiac dysfunction (ORCD), newly developed arrhythmia, and cardiac death. Total follow-up duration was 20.6 (10.8-35.2) months.

RESULTS

The osimertinib was administered for a median of 12.4 months. The incidence of osimertinib-related cardiotoxicity was 4.7%. Advanced age (adjusted hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval: 1.07 [1.04-1.09], p < 0.001), a history of heart failure (3.35 [1.67-9.64], p = 0.025), atrial fibrillation (3.42 [1.27-9.22], p = 0.015), and baseline low left ventricle strain (0.87 [0.79-0.96], p = 0.005) were independently associated with development of cardiotoxicity. The recovery rate of ORCD was 82.4%, which did not differ between patients who discontinued medication and those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world practice, the incidence of osimertinib-related cardiotoxicity was 4.7%, including 3.4% for ORCD requiring cardiologic intervention, which is higher than previously reported. Given the long-term medication of osimertinib and increased mortality associated with cardiotoxicity, vigilant monitoring is crucial, especially in patients with advanced age, history of heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or decreased baseline left ventricular strain.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer hospitalized with new onset acute heart failure

AIMS

Limited evidence exists regarding the outcomes of cancer patients hospitalized with new onset acute heart failure (AHF). We assessed the in-hospital mortality and 1 year outcomes of cancer patients admitted for new onset AHF, taking into account both past and active cancer status as well as cancer site.

METHODS

We examined administrative data of adult patients hospitalized with a first episode of AHF from 2003 to 2018 in Lombardy, Italy. Patients were categorized based on their cancer history. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality with secondary endpoints including 1 year all-cause mortality and 1 year re-hospitalization for AHF.

RESULTS

Among 283 144 patients AHF hospitalizations, 55 145 (19%) involved patients with a history of cancer (60% past cancer, 40% active cancer). Both in-hospital and 1 year mortality rates were higher among cancer patients compared with those without (9.3% vs. 6.4% and 34.9% vs. 22.3%, respectively; P < 0.0001). After adjustment, cancer patients exhibited increased risk of in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.40; 99% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-1.46] and 1 year mortality (HR 1.35; 99% CI 1.32-1.39), particularly among those with lung cancer. Patients with active and past cancer had a similar in-hospital mortality risk (OR 0.99; 99% CI 0.91-1.07) while 1 year mortality risk was higher among those with active cancer (HR 1.26; 99% CI 1.21-1.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer is a prevalent comorbidity in patients hospitalized with new onset AHF, and it is associated with a poorer prognosis. Mortality risk appears to vary based on cancer status and type.

Cardiovascular diseases in patients with cancer: A comprehensive review of epidemiological trends, cardiac complications, and prognostic implications

ABSTRACT

This article provides an overview of the current evidence on the epidemiology, overlapping risk factors, and pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with cancer. It explores the cardiotoxic effects of anticancer therapy and their impact on prognosis. Although cancer survival rates have improved over the last two decades, the risk of CVD has risen over time in patients with cancer. CVD and cancer share similar risk factors and a common pathophysiology involving inflammation. Many chemotherapeutic agents used to treat cancer are associated with cardiovascular complications (such as heart failure, myocardial infarction, and thrombosis). Current evidence indicates a significant burden of CVD in patients with cancer, particularly in the first year following cancer diagnosis, with elevated risk persisting beyond this period. This short- and long-term risk of CVD may vary depending on the cancer type and treatment regimen. Early identification of potential cardiovascular risk in patients with cancer, can lead to more favorable clinical and survival outcomes. Given the acute and long-term consequences, patients with cancer require increased cardiovascular care and lifestyle optimization. This article offers valuable insights into the cardiovascular burden and needs of patients with cancer. It is intended for a general medical research readership interested in the intersection of cardiology and oncology.

Anthracycline-induced cardiovascular toxicity: validation of the Heart Failure Association and International Cardio-Oncology Society risk score

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Baseline cardiovascular toxicity risk stratification is critical in cardio-oncology. The Heart Failure Association (HFA) and International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS) score aims to assess this risk but lacks real-life validation. This study validates the HFA-ICOS score for anthracycline-induced cardiovascular toxicity.

METHODS

Anthracycline-treated patients in the CARDIOTOX registry (NCT02039622) were stratified by the HFA-ICOS score. The primary endpoint was symptomatic or moderate to severe asymptomatic cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD), with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1066 patients (mean age 54 ± 14 years; 81.9% women; 24.5% ≥65 years). According to the HFA-ICOS criteria, 571 patients (53.6%) were classified as low risk, 333 (31.2%) as moderate risk, 152 (14.3%) as high risk, and 10 (0.9%) as very high risk. Median follow-up was 54.8 months (interquartile range 24.6-81.8). A total of 197 patients (18.4%) died, and 718 (67.3%) developed CTRCD (symptomatic: n = 45; moderate to severe asymptomatic: n = 24; and mild asymptomatic: n = 649). Incidence rates of symptomatic or moderate to severe symptomatic CTRCD and all-cause mortality significantly increased with HFA-ICOS score [hazard ratio 28.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.33-88.5; P < .001, and hazard ratio 7.43, 95% CI 3.21-17.2; P < .001) for very high-risk patients. The predictive model demonstrated good calibration (Brier score 0.04, 95% CI 0.03-0.05) and discrimination (area under the curve 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.82; Uno's C-statistic 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.84) for predicting symptomatic or severe/moderate asymptomatic CTRCD at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The HFA-ICOS score effectively categorizes patients by cardiovascular toxicity risk and demonstrates strong predictive ability for high-risk anthracycline-related cardiovascular toxicity and all-cause mortality.

Atherosclerosis and the Bidirectional Relationship Between Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: From Bench to Bedside, Part 2 Management

The first part of this review highlighted the evolving landscape of atherosclerosis, noting emerging cardiometabolic risk factors, the growing impact of exposomes, and social determinants of health. The prominent role of atherosclerosis in the bidirectional relationship between cardiovascular disease and cancer was also discussed. In this second part, we examine the complex interplay between multimorbid cardio-oncologic patients, cardiometabolic risk factors, and the harmful environments that lend a "syndemic" nature to these chronic diseases. We summarize management strategies targeting disordered cardiometabolic factors to mitigate cardiovascular disease and explore molecular mechanisms enabling more tailored therapies. Importantly, we emphasize the early interception of atherosclerosis through multifactorial interventions that detect subclinical signs (via biomarkers and imaging) to treat modifiable risk factors and prevent clinical events. A concerted preventive effort-referred to by some as a "preventome"-is essential to reduce the burden of atherosclerosis-driven chronic diseases, shifting from mere chronic disease management to the proactive promotion of "chronic health".

Assessment of cardio-oncology knowledge and practice among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia: a comprehensive nationwide survey

INTRODUCTION

The evolving field of oncology necessitates effective management of cancer-related cardiovascular diseases. In Saudi Arabia, the incidence of cancer is rising, and there is a critical need for cardio-oncology services to address cancer treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and practices of healthcare providers (HCPs) in Saudi Arabia regarding cardio-oncology.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2024 to April 2024 using an online survey targeting cardiologists, oncologists, and clinical pharmacists. The survey assessed demographics, perceptions of cardio-oncology, availability of services, and current practices. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and bivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The survey received responses from 116 HCPs, including cardiologists (63.79%), oncologists (23.28%), and clinical pharmacists (12.93%). Most participants had over six years of experience, and only one had formal cardio-oncology training. While 84.48% recognized the importance of managing cardiac complications in cancer patients, only 42.24% were familiar with existing guidelines. Limited training programs and institutional resources were significant barriers to implementing cardio-oncology services. Despite agreement on the need for cardiotoxicity management, only one-third recommended cardioprotective agents as standard care.

CONCLUSION

There is a notable deficiency in formal training and resources for cardio-oncology in Saudi Arabia. To bridge this gap, integrating cardio-oncology into training programs, establishing institutional guidelines, and adopting multidisciplinary care models are crucial. These measures will enhance the quality of care for cancer patients and improve their cardiovascular outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer and New versus Preexistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

There is limited information on the prognostic impact of new onset versus preexistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the clinical impact of new onset AF (NOAF) compared with preexistent AF in hospitalized patients with cancer.

METHODS

All patients with cancer hospitalized over the course of 1 year with clinically manifest new or preexistent AF were enrolled in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center AF registry. The relationship of NOAF to the primary composite outcome of all cause death, cardiovascular (CV) rehospitalization, or cerebrovascular event (CVE), as well as secondary CV endpoints, were analysed using proportional hazards regression. Where applicable, the competing risk of death was accounted for using methodology described by Fine and Gray.

RESULTS

Among 606 patients included in the analysis, 313 (51.7%) had NOAF and 293 (48.3%) had preexistent AF. Patients with NOAF were younger and had less frequent prior history of CV disease compared with patients with preexistent AF. At follow-up, patients with NOAF had a higher adjusted hazard for the primary composite outcome versus patients with prior AF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 2.13, P = 0.002), as well as the secondary CV composite outcome of clinical AF recurrence, CV death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.57, 2.99, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized patients with cancer and electrocardiographically manifest new versus preexistent AF, NOAF was associated with a higher risk for the primary composite outcome of all-cause death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE.

Breast cancer and cardiovascular health

Modern cancer therapies greatly improve clinical outcomes for both early and advanced breast cancer patients. However, these advances have raised concerns about potential short- and long-term toxicities, including cardiovascular toxicities. Therefore, understanding the common risk factors and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to cardiovascular toxicity is essential to ensure best breast cancer outcomes. While cardio-oncology has emerged as a sub-speciality to address these challenges, it is essential that all cardiologists recognize and understand the cardiovascular consequences of cancer therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential adverse cardiovascular effects associated with modern breast cancer therapies. A preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic workflow to minimize the impact of cardiovascular toxicity on patient outcomes is presented. Key aspects of this workflow include regular monitoring of cardiovascular function, early detection and management of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicities, and optimization of cardiovascular risk factor control. By highlighting the gaps in knowledge in some areas, this review aims to emphasize the critical role of cardio-oncology research in ensuring the holistic well-being of patients with breast cancer.

Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease among adult cancer patients: results from NHANES 2007-2018

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and CVD is a major challenge for cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and association of MetS and CVD among adult cancer patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included cancer patients aged > 18 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007 to 2018. The prevalence of MetS and CVD was calculated using weighted analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between MetS and CVD.

RESULTS

The study included 2658 adult cancer patients, of whom 1260 exhibited MetS and 636 had CVD. The weighted prevalence of MetS and CVD in cancer patients was 45.44%, and 19.23%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression showed a 79% increased risk in higher CVD prevalence in cancer patients with MetS, with the OR (95% CI) of 1.79 (1.31, 2.44). Notably, obesity, elevated blood pressure (BP), high glucose, and low high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in the MetS components were significantly associated with higher CVD prevalence after adjusting for covariates. Moreover, the risk of CVD prevalence in cancer patients increased with more MetS components. Notably, MetS was more strongly linked to CVD in patients aged < 65 and women.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adult cancer patients, over two-fifths (45.44%) were estimated to have MetS, while about one-fifth (19.23%) were considered to have CVD. Notably, obesity, elevated BP, high glucose, low HDL-C, and higher number of MetS components were found to be significantly associated with higher CVD prevalence among cancer adults. Cancer patients under 65 and women with MetS may be at increased risk of CVD.

Association of Cardiovascular Health Metrics and Mortality Among Individuals With and Without Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although metrics of cardiovascular health have been associated with improved mortality, whether the association remains among individuals with a history of cancer has not been well characterized.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 2009 to 2018 were used to identify individuals with and without a history of cancer. For each participant, American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 cardiovascular health metrics of health behaviors (diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, and sleep) and health factors (body mass index, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood glucose, and blood pressure) were obtained. All-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer-related mortality were noted. Out of 21 967 individuals, 8% had a history of cancer. In analyses adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, sex, and income among the whole cohort, better Life's Essential 8 cardiovascular health metrics were associated with lower all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR ], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.29-0.49]; P<0.001), cardiovascular (aHR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.22-0.49]; P<0.001), and cancer mortality (aHR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.31-0.79]; P=0.001). This association was driven by better health behaviors that were associated with lower all-cause (aHR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.26-0.35]; P<0.001), cardiovascular (aHR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.26-0.52]; P<0.001), and cancer mortality (aHR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.26-0.47]; P<0.001), whereas better health factors were not associated with lower mortality. There were no significant interactions in these associations between individuals with and without cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Better metrics of cardiovascular health, particularly health behaviors, are associated with improved all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality to a similar extent in individuals with and without cancer. Attempts to improve cardiovascular health should be prioritized similarly among individuals with and without cancer.

Heart Failure Readmission in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Active Cancer

Background

Although numerous studies have examined readmission with heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), limited data are available on HF readmission in cancer patients post-AMI.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the rates and factors associated with HF readmission in cancer patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 were obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project registry and the UK national Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registry. Multivariable Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to evaluate HF readmission at 30 days and 1 year.

Results

A total of 326,551 STEMI indexed admissions were included, with 7,090 (2.2%) patients having active cancer. The cancer group was less likely to be admitted under the care of a cardiologist (74.5% vs 81.9%) and had lower rates of invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs 72.7%; P < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (58.4% vs. 69.5%). There was a significant prescription gap in the administration of post-AMI medications upon discharge such as an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (49.5% vs 71.1%) and beta-blockers (58.4% vs 68.0%) in cancer patients. The cancer group had a higher rate of HF readmission at 30 days (3.2% vs 2.3%) and 1 year (9.4% vs 7.3%). However, after adjustment, cancer was not independently associated with HF readmission at 30 days (subdistribution HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.86-1.28) or 1 year (subdistribution HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.92-1.16). The opportunity-based quality indicator was associated with higher rates of HF readmission independent of cancer diagnosis.

Conclusions

Cancer patients receive care that differs in important ways from patients without cancer. Greater implementation of evidence-based care may reduce HF readmissions, including in cancer patients.

Cardiovascular Health Metrics Differ Between Individuals With and Without Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although individuals with cancer experience high rates of cardiovascular morbidity, there are limited data on the potential differences in cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics between individuals with and without cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2015 and 2020 was queried to evaluate the prevalence of health metrics that comprise the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 construct of cardiovascular health among adult individuals with and without cancer in the United States. Health metric scores were also evaluated according to important patient demographics including age, sex, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Among 4370 participants representing >180 million US adults, 9.4% had a history of cancer. Individuals with cancer had lower overall cardiovascular health scores (67.1 versus 69.1, P<0.001) compared with individuals without cancer. Among individual components of the cardiovascular health score, those with cancer had better health scores on key behaviors including physical activity, diet, and sleep compared with those without cancer, although variation was noted based on age. Higher scores on these modifiable health behaviors among those with cancer compared with those without cancer were noted in older individuals, in White individuals compared with other races and ethnicities, and in individuals with higher socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSIONS

We highlight important variations in simple cardiovascular health metrics among individuals with cancer compared with individuals without cancer and demonstrate differences among health metrics based on age, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. These findings may explain ongoing racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic status disparities in the cancer population and provide a framework for optimizing cardiovascular health among individuals with cancer.

Burden and prognostic impact of cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer

The number of patients at the intersection of cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increasing, reflecting ageing global populations, rising burden of shared cardiometabolic risk factors, and improved cancer survival. Many cancer treatments carry a risk of cardiotoxicity. Baseline cardiovascular risk assessment is recommended in all patients with cancer and requires consideration of individual patient risk and the cardiotoxicity profile of proposed anticancer therapies. Patients with pre-existing CVD are potentially at high or very high risk of cancer-therapy related cardiovascular toxicity. The detection of pre-existing CVD should prompt cardiac optimisation and planning of surveillance during cancer treatment. In patients with severe CVD, the risk of certain cancer therapies may be prohibitively high. Such decisions require multidisciplinary discussion with consideration of alternative anti-cancer therapies, risk-benefit assessment, and patient preference. Current practice is primarily guided by expert opinion and data from select clinical cohorts. There is need for development of a stronger evidence base to guide clinical practice in cardio-oncology. The establishment of multicentre international registries and national-level healthcare data linkage projects are important steps towards facilitating enrichment of cardio-oncology research programmes. In this narrative review, we consider epidemiological trends of cancer and CVD comorbidities and the impact of their co-occurrence on clinical outcomes, current approach to supporting cancer patients with pre-existing CVD and gaps in existing knowledge.

Prevalence and temporal trends of prostate diseases among inpatients with cardiovascular disease: a nationwide real-world database survey in Japan

Introduction

Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) are major prostate diseases that potentially share cardiometabolic risk factors and an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the prevalence of prostate diseases among patients with established CVD remains unclear.

Materials and methods

This nationwide retrospective study assessed the prevalence and temporal trend of prostate diseases (i.e., BPH or PCa) among patients hospitalized for CVDs in Japan. We used a claims database (the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnosis Procedure Combination), which included data on 6,078,487 male patients recorded from 1,058 hospitals between April 2012 and March 2020. We conducted the Cochran-Armitage trend test and calculated the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

The prevalence of prostate diseases over the entire study period was 5.7% (BPH, 4.4%; PCa, 1.6%). When dividing the overall cohort into age categories (<65, 65-74, and ≥75 years old), the prevalence was 1.1%, 4.7%, and 9.9%, respectively (P for trend <0.05). In addition, the annual prevalence showed a modest increasing trend over time. Patients admitted for heart failure (HF) were significantly associated with a higher incidence of coexisting prostate diseases than those admitted for non-HF causes [aOR 1.02 (95% CI, 1.01-1.03)] or acute coronary syndrome [aOR 1.19 (95% CI, 1.17-1.22)].

Conclusions

The nationwide real-world database revealed that the prevalence of prostate diseases is increasing among patients hospitalized for CVD, particularly HF. Attention to detailed causality and continued surveillance are needed to further clarify the clinical characteristics of prostate diseases among patients with CVD.

Association of Chronic Kidney Disease with Cardiovascular Disease in Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Due to the cardiotoxicity of cancer treatment and traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) such as obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, cancer patients are at higher risk of developing CVD. However, limited research exists on the correlation between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and CVD risk in cancer patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study selected cancer patients aged ≥20 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted from 2015 to 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between CKD and CVD in cancer patients. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the association among different groups of cancer patients.

RESULTS

We included 1,700 adult cancer patients (52.53% were females). After multivariable adjustment for covariates including traditional CVD factors, CKD was significantly associated with CVD, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) and p value of 1.61 (1.18, 2.19) and 0.004. Subgroup analyses after multivariable adjustment showed a significant correlation between CKD and increased CVD risk in the following cancer patients: age ≥60 years, males, white ethnicity, and individuals with or without traditional CVD factors (obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension).

CONCLUSIONS

CKD remains a significant factor in the higher risk of CVD among adult cancer patients in the United States, even after adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors. Therefore, to reduce the risk of CVD in cancer patients, it is important to treat CKD as a non-traditional risk factor for CVD and actively manage it.

Atrial fibrillation, cancer and anticancer drugs

Active cancer is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), which varies depending on the pre-existing substrate (particularly in older patients), the cancer type and stage, and the anticancer therapeutics being taken. To date, studies have not been able to identify the individual contribution of each factor. During anticancer drug therapy, AF may occur with a frequency of ≈ 15-20% according to several factors, including the patient's baseline cardiovascular toxicity risk and the AF-detection strategies used. Many anticancer drugs have been associated with AF or AF reporting, both in terms of incident and recurrent AF, but robust data are lacking. Only bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor associated AF (mainly ibrutinib) has a high level of evidence, with a ≈ 3-4-fold higher risk of AF. AF in patients with active cancer is associated with a twofold higher risk of systemic thromboembolism or stroke, and the "TBIP" (Thromboembolic risk, Bleeding risk, drug-drug Interactions, Patient preferences) structured approach must be used to evaluate the need for anticoagulation therapy. AF in patients with active cancer is also associated with a sixfold higher risk of heart failure, and optimal symptom control must be targeted, usually with rate-control drugs (beta-blockers), but a rhythm-control strategy may be proposed in patients remaining symptomatic despite optimal rate-control. AF is generally manageable, with the continuation of anticancer drugs (including ibrutinib); interruption of cancer drugs must be avoided whenever possible and weighed against the risk of cancer progression.