Rationale and design of ARTS: a randomized, double-blind study of BAY 94-8862 in patients with chronic heart failure and mild or moderate chronic kidney disease

Novel drug design and repurposing: An opportunity to improve translational research in cardiovascular diseases?

Drug repurposing is defined as the use of approved therapeutic drugs for indications different from those for which they were originally designed. Repositioning diminishes both the time and cost for drug development by omitting the discovery stage, the analysis of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion routes, as well as the studies of the biochemical and physiological effects of a new compound. Besides, drug repurposing takes advantage of the increased bioinformatics knowledge and availability of big data biology. There are many examples of drugs with repurposed indications evaluated in in vitro studies, and in pharmacological, preclinical, or retrospective clinical analyses. Here, we briefly review some of the experimental strategies and technical advances that may improve translational research in cardiovascular diseases. We also describe exhaustive research from basic science to clinical studies that culminated in the final approval of new drugs and provide examples of successful drug repurposing in the field of cardiology.

Optimizing Finerenone in People With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: An Opportunity for the Pharmacist

Objective: This review aims to emphasize the role of pharmacists for optimization of evidence-based outcomes of finerenone in multidisciplinary kidney care teams during the early detection process of CKD patients. Data Sources: A PubMed literature search was performed using keywords pharmacists, chronic kidney disease (CKD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and finerenone. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language studies on the role of pharmacists in managing CKD patients or finerenone prescriptions were evaluated. Data Synthesis: CKD is a major health problem affecting millions worldwide, especially those with T2D. In recent years, new drugs have been added to the treatment options for patients with T2D and CKD, which have been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular and renal complications in large clinical trials. Conclusions: Pharmacists can help detect and treat CKD in patients with T2D. They may use indicators to identify potential candidates for appropriate finerenone therapy, such as stage of CKD, albuminuria level, serum potassium concentration, and use of RAAS inhibitors. Pharmacists can provide education on the benefits and usage of finerenone, monitor response to therapy, adjust the medications and doses, prevent drug interactions, help with adherence and tolerability issues, and coordinate with other healthcare providers.

Challenges in Diagnosing and Managing the Spectrum of Primary Aldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism, characterized by the dysregulated production of aldosterone from 1 or both adrenal glands, is the most common endocrine cause of hypertension. It confers a high risk of cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic complications that can be ameliorated with targeted medical therapy or surgery. Diagnosis can be achieved with a positive screening test (elevated aldosterone to renin ratio) followed by confirmatory testing (saline, captopril, fludrocortisone, or oral salt challenges) and subtyping (adrenal imaging and adrenal vein sampling). However, the diagnostic pathway may be complicated by interfering medications, intraindividual variations, and concurrent autonomous cortisol secretion. Furthermore, once diagnosed, careful follow-up is needed to ensure that treatment targets are reached and adverse effects, or even recurrence, are promptly addressed. These challenges will be illustrated in a series of case studies drawn from our endocrine hypertension clinic. We will offer guidance on strategies to facilitate an accurate and timely diagnosis of primary aldosteronism together with a discussion of treatment targets which should be achieved for optimal patient outcomes.

Pharmacokinetics of the Novel Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Ocedurenone (KBP-5074) in Individuals with Moderate Hepatic Impairment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ocedurenone (KBP-5074) is a novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that has demonstrated safety and efficacy in clinical trials in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and stage 3b/4 chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of ocedurenone in individuals with moderate hepatic impairment.

METHODS

This study was an open-label, nonrandomized, multi-center study investigating the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single dose of 0.5 mg ocedurenone administered orally in male and female subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B, score 7-9) compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. Serial blood samples were obtained from predose through 264 h postdose for analysis of ocedurenone concentrations using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Free ocedurenone concentrations in plasma were determined ex vivo using equilibrium dialysis.

RESULTS

Following a single oral dose of 0.5 mg ocedurenone administered to subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function, ocedurenone was steadily absorbed with median time to peak drug concentration (Tmax) values of 4 and 3 h, respectively. After reaching maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the disposition of ocedurenone appeared to be biphasic. The geometric mean t1/2 values for the moderate hepatic impairment group and normal hepatic function group were 75.6 and 65.7 h, respectively. Ocedurenone systemic exposure, as assessed by area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was 23.5-26.6% lower in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment versus subjects with normal hepatic function, whereas Cmax was 41.2% lower. Ocedurenone was determined to be > 99.7% bound to total protein in plasma. Hepatic impairment appeared not to change plasma protein binding or the unbound free fraction. Ocedurenone was safe and well-tolerated in all participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the long half-life of ocedurenone and previously completed clinical studies using 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg doses demonstrating efficacy and safety, the observed decreases in AUC and Cmax do not warrant a dose adjustment in patients with moderate hepatic impairment. A single 0.5 mg dose of ocedurenone was safe and well-tolerated when administered to subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER ( WWW.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV ): NCT04534699.

Non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major health challenge associated with a disproportionately high burden of end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular disease and death. This review summarizes the rationale, clinical evidence and practical implementation for non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (nsMRAs), a drug class now approved and recommended for patients with T2D and CKD at risk of cardiorenal disease progression. Three nsMRAs (finerenone, esaxerenone and apararenone) have been evaluated but finerenone is currently the only approved nsMRA for this indication. Two large-scale, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 studies evaluated finerenone added to a maximally tolerated dose of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker. Over >2 years of treatment, finerenone was associated with a significant reduction in composite endpoints of renal and cardiovascular outcomes versus placebo. Esaxerenone or apararenone have both shown significant improvements in albuminuria versus placebo. In general, nsMRAs were well tolerated. Hyperkalaemia was the most notable treatment-related adverse event and could generally be managed through serum potassium monitoring and dose adjustments. The nsMRAs are now an important component of recommended treatment for CKD associated with T2D, providing a significant reduction in the risk of cardiorenal progression beyond what can be achieved with glucose and blood pressure control.

Tumor risks of finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the tumor risk of finerenone in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) aggravated by chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: A thorough search in the OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from their creation through 2 November 2022 yielded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on the tumor risks of finerenone in patients with T2DM complicated with CKD. A pair of reviewers selected the relevant studies based on selection criteria, collected data, and assessed the methodological quality of eligible RCTs. The Peto odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated, and subgroup analysis of tumor nature, tumor origin system, tumor origin organ, and follow-up time was performed. Furthermore, Egger's test was implemented to determine publication bias. Results: Four RCTs with 14,875 participants who had a low-to-moderate risk of bias were included. Compared with placebo treatment, finerenone did not increase the risk of overall neoplasms (Peto OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.83-1.14), malignant neoplasms (Peto OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.86-1.23), benign neoplasms (Peto OR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.50-1.80), or in situ neoplasms (Peto OR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.01-2.17). Subgroup analysis of the tumor origin system showed that finerenone was associated with an increased risk of malignant neoplasms of urinary tract compared with placebo treatment (Peto OR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.07-2.67). The results were found to be robust in sensitivity analysis, and there was no indication of publication bias. Discussion: Finerenone is not associated with an increased risk of overall tumors, but it may be linked to an increased risk of malignant neoplasms in urinary tract. Additional well-planned cohort studies in larger research populations are needed to corroborate these findings. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022374101, Identifier CRD42022374101.

Cardiovascular and Renal Benefit of Novel Non-steroidal Mineralocorticoid Antagonists in Patients with Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists (MRAs) are a new class of drugs blocking adverse MR-mediated effects with an improved benefit-risk profile compared to steroidal MRAs. This review will provide information on the preclinical and clinical pharmacology of this new drug class and will discuss their future clinical applications in patients with cardiorenal disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non-steroidal MRAs such as esaxerenone, AZD9977, apararenone, ocedurenone (KBP-5074), and finerenone are newly approved or in clinical development for patients with cardiorenal disease including type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension -/+ CKD or heart failure. Unlike steroidal MRAs, non-steroidal MRAs do not induce sex hormone-related side effects and appear to mediate a lower risk of hyperkalemia while maintaining compelling clinical efficacy. Recently, new data from several clinical trials with non-steroidal MRAs have been published (e.g., FIDELIO-DKD, FIGARO-DKD, ESAX-DN, and BLOCK-CKD), and additional studies are currently underway (e.g., FINEARTS-HF and CLARION-CKD). These data and the clinical scientific basis for the ongoing studies will be discussed. Non-steroidal MRAs have been extensively explored in diabetic kidney disease. Selected candidates of this drug class reduced UACR in patients with varying degrees of CKD and T2D and have shown convincing cardiorenal protection, in particular finerenone. Furthermore, finerenone is currently tested in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Pharmacotherapy considerations with finerenone in the treatment of chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE

This review provides an overview of the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), how the novel treatment class of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) fits within the treatment landscape, and how pharmacists can contribute to the multidisciplinary care of patients with CKD associated with T2D.

SUMMARY

Optimizing pharmacotherapy for patients with CKD associated with T2D is critical to prevent or slow progression to end-stage kidney disease and reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. However, many patients with CKD receive suboptimal treatment, in part because of the high complexity of care required, a lack of disease recognition among providers and patients, and a failure to utilize new kidney-protective therapies. Finerenone is the first nonsteroidal, selective MRA to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of adult patients with CKD associated with T2D. Clinical trials have demonstrated that finerenone significantly reduces the risk of cardiorenal disease progression vs placebo and has a reduced risk of hyperkalemia compared to traditional steroidal MRAs. Initiation of finerenone should follow evaluation of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum potassium levels. Consideration of potential drug-drug interactions, follow-up monitoring of potassium levels, and coordination of changes in pharmacotherapy across the patient care team are also important.

CONCLUSION

Finerenone is a valuable addition to the treatment landscape for CKD associated with T2D. Through their expertise in -medication -management, transitions of care, and patient education, clinical pharmacists are well positioned to ensure patients receive safe and effective -treatment.

Finerenone: Questions and Answers-The Four Fundamental Arguments on the New-Born Promising Non-Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most common complications of diabetes mellitus and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Despite guideline-directed therapy of CKD in patients with type 2 diabetes, the risk of renal failure and cardiovascular events still remains high, and diabetes remains the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease in affected patients. To date, current medications for CKD and type 2 diabetes mellitus have not reset residual risk in patients due to a high grade of inflammation and fibrosis contributing to kidney and heart disease. This question-and-answer-based review will discuss the pharmacological and clinical differences between finerenone and other mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and then move on to the main evidence in the cardiovascular and renal fields, closing, finally, on the potential role of therapeutic combination with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is).

Effectiveness of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with diabetic kidney disease

Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are a new class of drugs developed to address the medical need for effective and safer treatment to protect the kidney and the heart in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). There are several drugs within this class at varying stages of clinical development. Finerenone is the first nonsteroidal MRA approved in the US for treating patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In clinical studies, finerenone slowed CKD progression without inducing marked antihypertensive effects. Esaxerenone is a nonsteroidal MRA with proven blood pressure-lowering efficacy that is currently licensed in Japan for treating hypertension. There are also three other nonsteroidal MRAs in mid-to-late stages of clinical development. Here we overview evidence addressing pharmacological and clinical differences between the nonsteroidal MRAs and the steroidal MRAs spironolactone and eplerenone. First, we describe a framework that highlights the role of aldosterone-mediated pathological overactivation of the mineralocorticoid receptor and inflammation as important drivers of CKD progression. Second, we discuss the benefits and adverse events profile of steroidal MRAs, the latter of which are often a limiting factor to their use in routine clinical practice. Finally, we show that nonsteroidal MRAs differ from steroidal MRAs based on pharmacology and clinical effects, giving the potential to expand the therapeutic options for patients with DKD. In the recently completed DKD outcome program comprising two randomized clinical trials - FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD - and the FIDELITY analysis of both trials evaluating more than 13,000 patients, the nonsteroidal MRA finerenone demonstrated beneficial effects on the kidney and the heart across a broad spectrum of patients with CKD and T2D. The long-term efficacy of finerenone on cardiac and renal morbidity and mortality endpoints, along with the anti-hypertensive efficacy of esaxerenone, widens the scope of available therapies for patients with DKD.

Effect of finerenone on ambulatory blood pressure in chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Finerenone is a selective nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist with a short half-life. Its effects on cardiorenal outcomes were thought to be mediated primarily via nonhemodynamic pathways, but office blood pressure (BP) measurements were insufficient to fully assess hemodynamic effects. This analysis assessed the effects of finerenone on 24-h ambulatory BP in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

ARTS-DN (NCT01874431) was a phase 2b trial that randomized 823 patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, with urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30-90 ml/min per 1.73 m2 to placebo or finerenone (1.25-20 mg once daily in the morning) administered over 90 days. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) over 24 h was performed in a subset of 240 patients at screening, Day 60, and Day 90.

RESULTS

Placebo-adjusted change in 24-h ABPM systolic BP (SBP) at Day 90 was -8.3 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], -16.6 to 0.1) for finerenone 10 mg (n = 27), -11.2 mmHg (95% CI, -18.8 to -3.6) for finerenone 15 mg (n = 34), and -9.9 mmHg (95% CI, -17.7 to -2.0) for finerenone 20 mg (n = 31). Mean daytime and night-time SBP recordings were similarly reduced and finerenone did not increase the incidence of SBP dipping. Finerenone produced a persistent reduction in SBP over the entire 24-h interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Finerenone reduced 24-h, daytime, and night-time SBP. Despite a short half-life, changes in BP were persistent over 24 h with once-daily dosing in the morning.

An overview of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as a treatment option for patients with heart failure: the current state-of-the-art and future outlook

INTRODUCTION

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure. These benefits of MRAs vary in different heart failure populations based on left ventricular ejection fraction and associated comorbidities.

AREAS COVERED

We define the pharmacologic properties of MRAs and the pathophysiological rationale for their utility in heart failure. We outline the current literature on the use of MRAs in different heart failure populations, including reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF/ HFpEF), and acute heart failure decompensation. Finally, we describe the limitations of currently available data and propose future directions of study.

EXPERT OPINION

While there is strong evidence supporting the use of MRAs in HFrEF, evidence in patients with HFpEF or acute heart failure is less definitive. Comorbidities such as obesity or atrial fibrillation could be clinical modifiers of the response to MRAs and potentially alter the risk/benefit ratio in these subpopulations. Emerging evidence for new non-steroidal MRAs reveal promising preliminary results that, if confirmed in large randomized clinical trials, could favor a change in clinical practice.

Evolution of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most frequent complications associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is also an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is a nuclear receptor expressed in many tissue types, including kidney and heart. Aberrant and long-term activation of MR by aldosterone in patients with T2DM triggers detrimental effects (eg, inflammation and fibrosis) in these tissues. The suppression of aldosterone at the early stage of T2DM has been a therapeutic strategy for patients with T2DM-associated CKD. Although patients have been treated with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers for decades, RAS blockers alone are not sufficient to prevent CKD progression. Steroidal MR antagonists (MRAs) have been used in combination with RAS blockers; however, undesired adverse effects have restricted their usage, prompting the development of nonsteroidal MRAs with better target specificity and safety profiles. Recently conducted studies, Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIDELIO-DKD) and Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIGARO-DKD), have reported that finerenone, a nonsteroidal MRA, improves both renal and cardiovascular outcomes compared with placebo. In this article, we review the history of MRA development and discuss the possibility of its combination with other treatment options, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and potassium binders for patients with T2DM-associated CKD.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism by Finerenone Attenuates Established Pulmonary Hypertension in Rats

BACKGROUND

We studied the ability of the nonsteroidal MR (mineralocorticoid receptor) antagonist finerenone to attenuate vascular remodeling and pulmonary hypertension using two complementary preclinical models (the monocrotaline and sugen/hypoxia rat models) of severe pulmonary hypertension.

METHODS

We first examined the distribution pattern of MR in the lungs of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and in monocrotaline and sugen/hypoxia rat lungs. Subsequent studies were performed to explore the effect of MR inhibition on proliferation of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells derived from patients with idiopathic PAH. To validate the functional importance of MR activation in the pulmonary vascular remodeling characteristic of pulmonary hypertension, mice overexpressing MR (hMR+) were studied, and curative treatments with finerenone (1 mg/kg per day by gavage), started 2 weeks after monocrotaline injection or 5 weeks after Sugen injection were realized.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that MR is overexpressed in experimental and human PAH and that its inhibition following siRNA-mediated MR silencing or finerenone treatment attenuates proliferation of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells derived from patients with idiopathic PAH. In addition, we obtained evidence that hMR+ mice display increased right ventricular systolic pressure, right ventricular hypertrophy, and remodeling of pulmonary arterioles. Consistent with these observations, curative treatments with finerenone partially reversed established pulmonary hypertension, reducing total pulmonary vascular resistance and vascular remodeling. Finally, we found that continued finerenone treatment decreases inflammatory cell infiltration and vascular cell proliferation in monocrotaline and sugen/hypoxia rat lungs.

CONCLUSIONS

Finerenone treatment appears to be a potential therapy for PAH worthy of investigation and evaluation for clinical use in conjunction with current PAH treatments.

Improving the residual risk of renal and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic kidney disease: A review of pathophysiology, mechanisms, and evidence from recent trials

Based on global estimates, almost 10% of adults have diabetes, of whom 40% are estimated to also have chronic kidney disease (CKD). Almost 2 decades ago, treatments targeting the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) were shown to slow the progression of kidney disease. More recently, studies have reported the additive benefits of antihyperglycaemic sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in combination with RAS inhibitors on both CKD progression and cardiovascular outcomes. However, these recent data also showed that patients continue to progress to kidney failure or die from kidney- or cardiovascular-related causes. Therefore, new agents are needed to address this continuing risk. Overactivation of the mineralocorticoid (MR) receptor contributes to kidney inflammation and fibrosis, suggesting that it is an appropriate treatment target in patients with diabetes and CKD. Novel, selective non-steroidal MR antagonists are being studied in these patients, and the results of two large recently completed clinical trials have shown that one such treatment, finerenone, significantly reduces CKD progression and cardiovascular events compared with standard of care. This review summarizes the pathogenic mechanisms of CKD in type 2 diabetes and examines the potential benefit of novel disease-modifying agents that target inflammatory and fibrotic factors in these patients.

Differentiation between emerging non-steroidal and established steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: head-to-head comparisons of pharmacological and clinical characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists (MRAs) provide cardiorenal protection. However steroidal MRAs might induce hyperkalemia and sex hormone-related adverse effects. Several novel non-steroidal MRAs are being developed that are highly selective for the MR and may have an improved safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review summarizes data from head-to-head comparisons of emerging non-steroidal MRAs with older steroidal MRAs, including pharmacological characteristics, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical outcomes, and safety, and highlights similarities and differences between emerging agents and established steroidal MRAs.

EXPERT OPINION

Head-to-head comparisons in phase 2 trials suggest that the new non-steroidal MRAs exhibit at least equivalent efficacy to steroidal MRAs but may have a better safety profile in patients with heart failure and/or kidney disease. When also taking into account data from recent phase 3 placebo-controlled trials, these novel non-steroidal MRAs have the potential to provide a cardiorenal benefit above that of current optimized standard-of-care treatment in a high-risk population with reduced renal function, and with a lower risk of hyperkalemia. To optimize therapy, further research is needed to clarify the molecular differences in the mode of action of non-steroidal MRAs versus steroidal MRAs, and biomarkers that are predictive of MRA response need to be identified and validated.

Novel Non-Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Cardiorenal Disease

Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists (MRAs) are key agents in guideline-oriented drug therapy for cardiovascular (CV) diseases such as chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and resistant hypertension. Currently available steroidal MRAs are efficacious in reducing morbidity and mortality, however, they can be associated with intolerable side effects including hyperkalemia in everyday clinical practice. Recently, a new class of non-steroidal MRAs including esaxerenone, AZD9977, apararenone, KBP-5074, and finerenone have been developed with an improved benefit-risk profile and a novel indication for finerenone for diabetic kidney disease. To better understand the non-steroidal MRAs, this review provides information on the molecular pharmacology as well as relevant current preclinical and clinical data on cardiorenal outcomes. A comparative review of all compounds in the class is discussed with regard to clinical efficacy and safety as well as a perspective outlining their future use in clinical practice.

An evaluation of KBP-5074 in advanced chronic kidney disease with uncontrolled hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Resistant hypertension (RH) is more prevalent in the advanced stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and contributes to a greater likelihood of poor cardiovascular and renal outcomes. However, RH often goes untreated in this population as the currently available recommended add-on therapy, steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) such as spironolactone and eplerenone, may lead to unacceptable side effects, mainly hyperkalemia in a cohort with reduced kidney function. KBP-5074 is a novel non-steroidal MRA that addresses the unmet need of treating RH in the CKD population without hyperkalemia.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an overview of the current state of RH treatment in stage 3B/4 CKD as it relates to available steroidal MRAs and the current limitations of this treatment. We then explore the emerging data on nonsteroidal MRAs, particularly the novel agent KBP-5074 and its applicability to treatment in this context.

EXPERT OPINION

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial, the novel nonsteroidal MRA KBP-5074 demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety in treating RH in stage 3B/4 CKD and offers a potential new treatment option in this population at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CKD progression.

Finerenone: First Approval

Finerenone (Kerendia^®), a first-in-class, orally administered, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), is being developed by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and heart failure (HF), including chronic HF (CHF). Finerenone has been approved in the USA to reduce the risk of sustained estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, end stage renal disease (ESRD), cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and hospitalization for HF in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Finerenone is undergoing regulatory assessment in the EU and in China. A phase III trial is investigating finerenone in patients who have HF with preserved ejection fraction. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of finerenone leading to this first approval to reduce the risk of serious kidney and heart complications in adults with CKD and T2D.

Nonsteroidal mineralcorticoid receptor antagonists: Novel therapeutic implication in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes

Growing evidencehas described a correlation between aldosterone, obesity, and insulin resistance, suggesting that adipocyte-related factors and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) overactivation may alter aldosterone secretion, potentially leading to obesity and glucose intolerance. Preclinical studies showed that pharmacological antagonism of MR prevents white adipose tissue dysfunction(s) and expansion, activates brown adipose tissue, and improves glucose tolerance. The clinical use of nonsteroidal MR antagonists has been shown to reduce the risk of diabetic kidney disease progression and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. This review aims to summarize the effects of pharmacological MR blockade on obesity and its associated metabolic comorbidities, with a particular focus on the therapeutic implications of nonsteroidal MR antagonists in the management of patients with diabetes.

Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism for cardiovascular and renal disorders - New perspectives for combination therapy

During the recent 30 years, there has been a dramatic increase in knowledge about the role of aldosterone and the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular (CV) and kidney diseases. The scientific perspective on the aldosterone/MR ensemble extended from a previously renal epithelial-centered focus on sodium-potassium exchange to a broader view as systemic modulators of extracellular matrix, inflammation and fibrosis. Spironolactone was launched as the first antagonist of aldosterone 27 years before the MR was cloned. It was classified as a potassium-sparing diuretic, based on its initial clinical characterization as a diuretic and its preferred activity to compensate for the potassium loss induced by loop diuretics when used in combination. The second steroidal MR antagonist was eplerenone which was discovered at a time when the role of aldosterone and MR in cardiac fibrosis was rediscovered. The constraint of developing potentially life-threatening hyperkalaemia when used in combination with other inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) in patients with reduced kidney function initiated extensive research and development activities with the goal to identify novel nonsteroidal MR antagonists with an improved benefit-risk ratio. Here we summarize major current clinical trials with MRAs in different CV and renal diseases. Addition of the nonsteroidal MRA finerenone to optimal RAS blockade recently reduced CV and kidney outcomes in two large phase III trials in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We provide an outlook on further opportunities for combination therapy of nonsteroidal MRA finerenone with RAS inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i).

Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade with finerenone improves heart function and exercise capacity in ovariectomized mice

Aims

In post‐menopausal women, incidence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is higher than in men. Hormonal replacement therapies did not demonstrate benefits. We tested whether the non‐steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone limits the progression of heart failure in ovariectomized (OVX) mice with metabolic disorders.

Methods and results

Ovariectomy was performed in 4‐month‐old mice, treated or not at 7 months old for 1 month with finerenone (Fine) 1 mg/kg/day. Left ventricular (LV) cardiac and coronary endothelial functions were assessed by echocardiography, catheterization, and myography. Blood pressure was measured by plethysmography. Insulin and glucose tolerance tests were performed. Exercise capacity and spontaneous activity were measured on treadmill and in combined indirect calorimetric cages equipped with voluntary running wheel. OVX mice presented LV diastolic dysfunction without modification of ejection fraction compared with controls (CTL), whereas finerenone improved LV filling pressure (LV end‐diastolic pressure, mmHg: CTL 3.48 ± 0.41, OVX 6.17 ± 0.30**, OVX + Fine 3.65 ± 0.55^†, **P < 0.01 vs. CTL, ^†P < 0.05 vs. OVX) and compliance (LV end‐diastolic pressure–volume relation, mmHg/RVU: CTL 1.65 ± 0.42, OVX 4.77 ± 0.37***, OVX + Fine 2.87 ± 0.26^††, ***P < 0.001 vs. CTL, ^††P < 0.01 vs. OVX). Acetylcholine‐induced endothelial‐dependent relaxation of coronary arteries was impaired in ovariectomized mice and improved by finerenone (relaxation, %: CTL 86 ± 8, OVX 38 ± 3**, OVX + Fine 83 ± 7^††, **P < 0.01 vs. CTL, ^††P < 0.01 vs. OVX). Finerenone improved decreased ATP production by subsarcolemmal mitochondria after ovariectomy. Weight gain, increased blood pressure, and decreased insulin and glucose tolerance in OVX mice were improved by finerenone. The exercise capacity at race was diminished in untreated OVX mice only. Spontaneous activity measurements in ovariectomized mice showed decreased horizontal movements, reduced time spent in a running wheel, and reduced VO₂ and VCO₂, all parameters improved by finerenone.

Conclusions

Finerenone improved cardiovascular dysfunction and exercise capacity after ovariectomy‐induced LV diastolic dysfunction with preserved ejection fraction.

Aldosterone antagonists in addition to renin angiotensin system antagonists for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) is used to reduce proteinuria and retard the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, resolution of proteinuria may be incomplete with these therapies and the addition of an aldosterone antagonist may be added to further prevent progression of CKD. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009 and updated in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of aldosterone antagonists (selective (eplerenone), non-selective (spironolactone or canrenone), or non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists (finerenone)) in adults who have CKD with proteinuria (nephrotic and non-nephrotic range) on: patient-centred endpoints including kidney failure (previously know as end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)), major cardiovascular events, and death (any cause); kidney function (proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and doubling of serum creatinine); blood pressure; and adverse events (including hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury, and gynaecomastia).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 13 January 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared aldosterone antagonists in combination with ACEi or ARB (or both) to other anti-hypertensive strategies or placebo in participants with proteinuric CKD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Data were summarised using random effects meta-analysis. We expressed summary treatment estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean difference (SMD) when different scales were used together with their 95% confidence interval (CI). Risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane tool. Evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-four studies (5745 participants) were included. Risk of bias in the evaluated methodological domains were unclear or high risk in most studies. Adequate random sequence generation was present in 12 studies, allocation concealment in five studies, blinding of participant and investigators in 18 studies, blinding of outcome assessment in 15 studies, and complete outcome reporting in 24 studies. All studies comparing aldosterone antagonists to placebo or standard care were used in addition to an ACEi or ARB (or both). None of the studies were powered to detect differences in patient-level outcomes including kidney failure, major cardiovascular events or death. Aldosterone antagonists had uncertain effects on kidney failure (2 studies, 84 participants: RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.33 to 27.65, I² = 0%; very low certainty evidence), death (3 studies, 421 participants: RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.10 to 3.50, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), and cardiovascular events (3 studies, 1067 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.56; I² = 42%; low certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Aldosterone antagonists may reduce protein excretion (14 studies, 1193 participants: SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.20, I² = 82%; very low certainty evidence), eGFR (13 studies, 1165 participants, MD -3.00 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI -5.51 to -0.49, I² = 0%, low certainty evidence) and systolic blood pressure (14 studies, 911 participants: MD -4.98 mmHg, 95% CI -8.22 to -1.75, I² = 87%; very low certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Aldosterone antagonists probably increase the risk of hyperkalaemia (17 studies, 3001 participants: RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.22, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), acute kidney injury (5 studies, 1446 participants: RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.97, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), and gynaecomastia (4 studies, 281 participants: RR 5.14, 95% CI 1.14 to 23.23, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Non-selective aldosterone antagonists plus ACEi or ARB had uncertain effects on protein excretion (2 studies, 139 participants: SMD -1.59, 95% CI -3.80 to 0.62, I² = 93%; very low certainty evidence) but may increase serum potassium (2 studies, 121 participants: MD 0.31 mEq/L, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.45, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) compared to diuretics plus ACEi or ARB. Selective aldosterone antagonists may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia (2 studies, 500 participants: RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.95, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) compared ACEi or ARB (or both). There were insufficient studies to perform meta-analyses for the comparison between non-selective aldosterone antagonists and calcium channel blockers, selective aldosterone antagonists plus ACEi or ARB (or both) and nitrate plus ACEi or ARB (or both), and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists and selective aldosterone antagonists.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of aldosterone antagonists when added to ACEi or ARB (or both) on the risks of death, major cardiovascular events, and kidney failure in people with proteinuric CKD are uncertain. Aldosterone antagonists may reduce proteinuria, eGFR, and systolic blood pressure in adults who have mild to moderate CKD but may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury and gynaecomastia when added to ACEi and/or ARB.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) can reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure and ischemic heart disease. In addition, these agents have been used in patients with diabetic nephropathy to control proteinuria and slow down chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Current guidelines recommend against the use of MRAs in patients with advanced CKD. However, there is growing interest on their use in this population that has unmet needs (high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality) and unique challenges (risk of acute kidney injury or hyperkalemia). This narrative review discusses the emerging role of MRAs for the management of cardiovascular disease and/or the prevention of CKD progression, highlighting results from randomized controlled trials and presenting real-world data from available registries. Results from recent trials in patients on maintenance dialysis are also discussed.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism by finerenone is sufficient to improve function in preclinical muscular dystrophy

Aims

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X‐linked inherited disease due to dystrophin deficiency causing skeletal and cardiac muscle dysfunction. Affected patients lose ambulation by age 12 and usually die in the second to third decades of life from cardiac and respiratory failure. Symptomatic treatment includes the use of anti‐inflammatory corticosteroids, which are associated with side effects including weight gain, osteoporosis, and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Novel treatment options include blockade of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, because angiotensin as well as aldosterone contribute to persistent inflammation and fibrosis, and aldosterone blockade represents an efficacious anti‐fibrotic approach in cardiac failure. Recent preclinical findings enabled successful clinical testing of a combination of steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in DMD boys. The efficacy of MRAs alone on dystrophic skeletal muscle and heart has not been investigated. Here, we tested efficacy of the novel non‐steroidal MRA finerenone as a monotherapy in a preclinical DMD model.

Methods and results

The dystrophin‐deficient, utrophin haploinsufficient mouse model of DMD was treated with finerenone and compared with untreated dystrophic and wild‐type controls. Grip strength, electrocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, muscle force measurements, histological quantification, and gene expression studies were performed. Finerenone treatment alone resulted in significant improvements in clinically relevant functional parameters in both skeletal muscle and heart. Normalized grip strength in rested dystrophic mice treated with finerenone (40.3 ± 1.0 mN/g) was significantly higher (P = 0.0182) compared with untreated dystrophic mice (35.2 ± 1.5 mN/g). Fatigued finerenone‐treated dystrophic mice showed an even greater relative improvement (P = 0.0003) in normalized grip strength (37.5 ± 1.1 mN/g) compared with untreated mice (29.7 ± 1.1 mN/g). Finerenone treatment also led to significantly lower (P = 0.0075) susceptibility to limb muscle damage characteristic of DMD measured during a contraction‐induced injury protocol. Normalized limb muscle force after five lengthening contractions resulted in retention of 71 ± 7% of baseline force in finerenone‐treated compared with only 51 ± 4% in untreated dystrophic mice. Finerenone treatment also prevented significant reductions in myocardial strain rate (P = 0.0409), the earliest sign of DMD cardiomyopathy. Moreover, treatment with finerenone led to very specific cardiac gene expression changes in clock genes that might modify cardiac pathophysiology in this DMD model.

Conclusions

Finerenone administered as a monotherapy is disease modifying for both skeletal muscle and heart in a preclinical DMD model. These findings support further evaluation of finerenone in DMD clinical trials.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists for Hypertension Management in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: BLOCK-CKD Trial

Spironolactone, a steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, is recommended as add-on therapy for treatment-resistant/uncontrolled hypertension. However, caution is advised in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to an increased risk for hyperkalemia. KBP-5074 is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist under investigation for the treatment of treatment-resistant and uncontrolled hypertension in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD. BLOCK-CKD is a phase 2, international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KBP-5074, on top of current therapy, in patients with stage 3B/4 CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥15 and ≤44 mL/[min·1.73 m²]) and resistant hypertension (trough cuff seated systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, despite treatment with maximally tolerated doses of 2 or more antihypertensive medicines with complementary mechanisms). Patients (n=240) will be randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily treatment with KBP-5074 0.25 mg, KBP-5074 0.5 mg, or placebo, stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (≥30 versus <30 mL/[min·1.73 m²]) and systolic blood pressure (≥160 versus <160 mm Hg). Approximately 30% of enrolled patients should have an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15 to 29 mL/(min·1.73 m²). The primary efficacy analysis is the change in trough cuff seated systolic blood pressure from baseline to day 84 for the KBP-5074 doses compared with placebo. Changes in urinary albumin-creatinine ratio will be assessed along with changes in serum potassium/incidence of hyperkalemia and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine. BLOCK-CKD will determine whether the addition of KBP-5074 will effectively lower blood pressure without an increased risk of hyperkalemia in patients who are not candidates for steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists due to advanced CKD. Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03574363.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockers: Novel Selective Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recently, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists (MRAs), which have been proposed to be called MR blockers (MRBs), have become available for clinical use, but their clinical role is unknown. We reviewed the clinical roles of MRAs and MRBs based on previous knowledge and as demonstrated in representative clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Steroidal MRAs, such as spironolactone and eplerenone, inhibit the action of aldosterone and cortisol in MRs expressed in several organs and cell types, and accumulating clinical studies have revealed that they exert hypotensive and cardiorenal protective effects. Recently, MRBs, including finerenone and esaxerenone, have been developed and are expected to lower the risk of hyperkalemia, which is common when steroidal MRAs are used. Although the differences between MRAs and MRBs in clinical practice have not yet been established, further studies in this field are expected to broaden our understanding. MRBs exert antihypertensive and cardiorenal protective effects, and their potency is thought to be far superior to that of MRAs, because MRBs have both strong MR inhibitory action and high selectivity. Thus, MRBs could be a promising agent for the treatment of hypertension and cardiorenal, cerebral, and metabolic disorders.

Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Approximately half of people with heart failure have chronic kidney disease (CKD). Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with CKD have the potential to reduce death (any cause) or hospitalisations for decompensated heart failure. However, these interventions are of uncertain benefit and may increase the risk of harm, such as hypotension and electrolyte abnormalities, in those with CKD.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to look at the benefits and harms of pharmacological interventions for HF (i.e., antihypertensive agents, inotropes, and agents that may improve the heart performance indirectly) in people with HF and CKD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies through 12 September 2019 in consultation with an Information Specialist and using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials of any pharmacological intervention for acute or chronic heart failure, among people of any age with chronic kidney disease of at least three months duration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened the records to identify eligible studies and extracted data on the following dichotomous outcomes: death, hospitalisations, worsening heart failure, worsening kidney function, hyperkalaemia, and hypotension. We used random effects meta-analysis to estimate treatment effects, which we expressed as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. We applied the GRADE methodology to rate the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and twelve studies met our selection criteria: 15 were studies of adults with CKD; 16 studies were conducted in the general population but provided subgroup data for people with CKD; and 81 studies included individuals with CKD, however, data for this subgroup were not provided. The risk of bias in all 112 studies was frequently high or unclear. Of the 31 studies (23,762 participants) with data on CKD patients, follow-up ranged from three months to five years, and study size ranged from 16 to 2916 participants. In total, 26 studies (19,612 participants) reported disaggregated and extractable data on at least one outcome of interest for our review and were included in our meta-analyses. In acute heart failure, the effects of adenosine A1-receptor antagonists, dopamine, nesiritide, or serelaxin on death, hospitalisations, worsening heart failure or kidney function, hyperkalaemia, hypotension or quality of life were uncertain due to sparse data or were not reported. In chronic heart failure, the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) (4 studies, 5003 participants: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02; I² = 78%; low certainty evidence), aldosterone antagonists (2 studies, 34 participants: RR 0.61 95% CI 0.06 to 6.59; very low certainty evidence), and vasopressin receptor antagonists (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.89; 2 studies, 1840 participants; low certainty evidence) on death (any cause) were uncertain. Treatment with beta-blockers may reduce the risk of death (any cause) (4 studies, 3136 participants: RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.79; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). Treatment with ACEi or ARB (2 studies, 1368 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.90; I² = 97%; very low certainty evidence) had uncertain effects on hospitalisation for heart failure, as treatment estimates were consistent with either benefit or harm. Treatment with beta-blockers may decrease hospitalisation for heart failure (3 studies, 2287 participants: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.05; I² = 87%; low certainty evidence). Aldosterone antagonists may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia compared to placebo or no treatment (3 studies, 826 participants: RR 2.91, 95% CI 2.03 to 4.17; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). Renin inhibitors had uncertain risks of hyperkalaemia (2 studies, 142 participants: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.49; I² = 0%; very low certainty). We were unable to estimate whether treatment with sinus node inhibitors affects the risk of hyperkalaemia, as there were few studies and meta-analysis was not possible. Hyperkalaemia was not reported for the CKD subgroup in studies investigating other therapies. The effects of ACEi or ARB, or aldosterone antagonists on worsening heart failure or kidney function, hypotension, or quality of life were uncertain due to sparse data or were not reported. Effects of anti-arrhythmic agents, digoxin, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, renin inhibitors, sinus node inhibitors, vasodilators, and vasopressin receptor antagonists were very uncertain due to the paucity of studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with CKD are uncertain and there is insufficient evidence to inform clinical practice. Study data for treatment outcomes in patients with heart failure and CKD are sparse despite the potential impact of kidney impairment on the benefits and harms of treatment. Future research aimed at analysing existing data in general population HF studies to explore the effect in subgroups of patients with CKD, considering stage of disease, may yield valuable insights for the management of people with HF and CKD.

Design and Baseline Characteristics of the Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease Trial

BACKGROUND

Among people with diabetes, those with kidney disease have exceptionally high rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality and progression of their underlying kidney disease. Finerenone is a novel, nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that has shown to reduce albuminuria in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) while revealing only a low risk of hyperkalemia. However, the effect of finerenone on CV and renal outcomes has not yet been investigated in long-term trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Finerenone in Reducing CV Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIGARO-DKD) trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of finerenone compared to placebo at reducing clinically important CV and renal outcomes in T2D patients with CKD. FIGARO-DKD is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, event-driven trial running in 47 countries with an expected duration of approximately 6 years. FIGARO-DKD randomized 7,437 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m2 and albuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30 to ≤5,000 mg/g). The study has at least 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in the risk of the primary outcome (overall two-sided significance level α = 0.05), the composite of time to first occurrence of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

FIGARO-DKD will determine whether an optimally treated cohort of T2D patients with CKD at high risk of CV and renal events will experience cardiorenal benefits with the addition of finerenone to their treatment regimen.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT number: 2015-000950-39; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02545049.

Mineralocorticoid Antagonism and Diabetic Kidney Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased risk of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), cardiovascular disease, and heart failure, in part through activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Although recent cardiovascular outcome trials have identified newer therapeutic agents such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-receptor agonists that reduce the risk of these complications, patients still exhibit residual cardiorenal morbidity and mortality. Accordingly, the identification of pharmacological agents that attenuate micro- and macrovascular complications related to T2D is a major priority. Our aim was to review evidence for the role of novel mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) that are being developed as adjunctive therapies to reduce the risk of DKD and cardiovascular disease in the setting of T2D.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dual RAAS blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor plus angiotensin receptor blockade (ARB) or ARB plus renin inhibition increases serious adverse events such as acute kidney injury and stroke. Due to the potential for these serious side effects, more recent interest has focused on newer, more selective non-steroidal MRAs such as finerenone as cardiorenal protective therapies. Finerenone reduces albuminuria in the setting of DKD in patients with T2D and has a lower risk of hyperkalemia compared to currently available MRAs. Novel MRAs such as finerenone have the potential to reduce the risk of DKD progression in patients with T2D. The impact of finerenone on hard, long-term cardiorenal endpoints is being examined in the FIGARO and FIDELIO trials in patients with DKD.

Biotransformation of Finerenone, a Novel Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist, in Dogs, Rats, and Humans, In Vivo and In Vitro

Mass balance and biotransformation of finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, were investigated in four healthy male volunteers following a single oral administration of 10 mg (78 μCi) of [¹⁴C]finerenone and compared with data from studies in dogs and rats. The total recovery of the administered radioactivity was 101% in humans, 94.7% in dogs, and 95.2% in rats. In humans, radioactivity was mainly excreted renally (80%); in rats, it was primarily the biliary/fecal route (76%); and in dogs, excretion was more balanced. Finerenone was extensively metabolized in all species by oxidative biotransformation, with minor amounts of unchanged drug in excreta (humans: 1%; dogs, rats: <9%). In vitro studies suggested cytochrome P450 3A4 was the predominant enzyme involved in finerenone metabolism in humans. Primary metabolic transformation involved aromatization of the dihydronaphthyridine moiety of metabolite M1 as a major clearance pathway with a second oxidative pathway leading to M4. These were both prone to further oxidative biotransformation reactions. Naphthyridine metabolites (M1-M3) were the dominant metabolites identified in human plasma, with no on-target pharmacological activity. In dog plasma, finerenone and metabolite M2 constituted the major components; finerenone accounted almost exclusively for drug-related material in rat plasma. For metabolites M1-M3, axial chirality was observed, represented by two atropisomers (e.g., M1a and M1b). Analysis of plasma and excreta showed one atropisomer (a-series, >79%) of each metabolite predominated in all three species. In summary, the present study demonstrates that finerenone is cleared by oxidative biotransformation, mainly via naphthyridine derivatives.

Deleting Death and Dialysis: Conservative Care of Cardio-Vascular Risk and Kidney Function Loss in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

The uremic syndrome, which is the clinical expression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), is a complex amalgam of accelerated aging and organ dysfunctions, whereby cardio-vascular disease plays a capital role. In this narrative review, we offer a summary of the current conservative (medical) treatment options for cardio-vascular and overall morbidity and mortality risk in CKD. Since the progression of CKD is also associated with a higher cardio-vascular risk, we summarize the interventions that may prevent the progression of CKD as well. We pay attention to established therapies, as well as to novel promising options. Approaches that have been considered are not limited to pharmacological approaches but take into account lifestyle measures and diet as well. We took as many randomized controlled hard endpoint outcome trials as possible into account, although observational studies and post hoc analyses were included where appropriate. We also considered health economic aspects. Based on this information, we constructed comprehensive tables summarizing the available therapeutic options and the number and kind of studies (controlled or not, contradictory outcomes or not) with regard to each approach. Our review underscores the scarcity of well-designed large controlled trials in CKD. Nevertheless, based on the controlled and observational data, a therapeutic algorithm can be developed for this complex and multifactorial condition. It is likely that interventions should be aimed at targeting several modifiable factors simultaneously.

Treatment of Hyperkalemia in Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this paper is to discuss strategies for prevention and management of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure, including the role of novel therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) antagonists, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure but increase the risk of hyperkalemia, especially when used in combination. Prevention of hyperkalemia and its associated complications requires careful patient selection, counseling regarding dietary potassium intake, awareness of drug interactions, and regular laboratory surveillance. Recent data suggests that the risk of hyperkalemia may be further moderated through the use of combined angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitors, novel MRAs, and novel potassium binding agents. Clinicians should be mindful of the risk of hyperkalemia when prescribing RAAS inhibitors to patients with heart failure. In patients at highest risk, such as those with diabetes, the elderly, and advanced chronic kidney disease, more intensive laboratory surveillance of potassium and creatinine may be required. Novel therapies hold promise for reducing the risk of hyperkalemia and enhancing the tolerability of RAAS antagonists.

Influence of renal impairment on aldosterone status, calcium metabolism, and vasopressin activity in outpatients with systolic heart failure

Aims

Renal dysfunction (RD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF). At present, no specific treatment for patients with RD, to prevent progression of HF, has been developed. How different hormone axes—and thereby potential treatment options—are affected by RD in HF warrants further investigations.

Methods and results

Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <0.45% were enrolled prospectively from an outpatient HF clinic. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (eGFR), and patients were grouped by eGFR: eGFR group I, ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m²; eGFR group II, 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m²; and eGFR group III, ≤59 mL/min/1.73 m². Multivariate linear regression models were developed to evaluate the associations between eGFR groups and hormones. A total of 149 patients participated in the study. Median age was 69 [interquartile range (IQR): 64–73] and 26% were female; LVEF was 33% (IQR: 27–39), 78% were in functional class II–III, median eGFR was 74 (54–89) mL/min/1.73 m², and median N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide was 1303 pg/mL (IQR: 441–2740). RD was associated with increased aldosterone, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and copeptin concentrations (P < 0.05 for all) after adjustment for traditional confounders and medical treatment.

Conclusions

RD is associated with increased concentrations of aldosterone, PTH, and copeptin in systolic HF outpatients. Our results underscore the importance of treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in systolic HF in particular in patients with RD and suggest that vasopressin and parathyroid receptor antagonism are potential treatment options in HF patients with known RD.

Osthole protects against inflammation in a rat model of chronic kidney failure via suppression of nuclear factor-κB, transforming growth factor-β1 and activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B/nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 signaling

Multiple pharmacological applications of osthole have been previously recognized, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti‑platelet and estrogenic effects, and resistance to pain. The present study investigated the protective effects of osthole against inflammation in a rat model of chronic kidney failure (CRF) and the underlying mechanisms. Osthole treatment with significantly reversed CRF‑induced changes in serum creatinine, calcium, phosphorus and blood urea nitrogen levels in CRF rats. Male Sprague‑Dawley rats (age, 8 weeks) received 200 mg/kg 2% adenine suspension to induce CRF in the model group. In the osthole‑treated group, rats received 200 mg/kg 2% adenine suspension + osthole (40 mg/kg, intravenously). The results revealed that treatment with osthole significantly inhibited CRF‑induced tumor necrosis factor‑α, interleukin (IL)‑8 and IL‑6 expression, and suppressed nuclear factor‑κB (NF‑κB) protein expression in CRF rats. Osthole treatment significantly attenuated the protein expression of transforming growth factor‑β1 (TGF‑β1), reduced monocyte chemoattractant protein‑1 activity and increased the phosphoinositide 3‑kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) ratio in CRF rats. These results suggested that osthole protects against inflammation in a rat model of CRF via suppression of NF‑κB and TGF‑β1, and activation of PI3K/Akt/nuclear factor (erythroid‑derived 2)‑like 2 signaling. Therefore, osthole may represent a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of CRF.

30 YEARS OF THE MINERALOCORTICOID RECEPTOR: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: 60 years of research and development

The cDNA of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) was cloned 30 years ago, in 1987. At that time, spirolactone, the first generation of synthetic steroid-based MR antagonists (MRAs), which was identified in preclinical in vivo models, had already been in clinical use for 30 years. Subsequent decades of research and development by Searle & Co., Ciba-Geigy, Roussel Uclaf and Schering AG toward identifying a second generation of much more specific steroidal MRAs were all based on the initial 17-spirolactone construct. The salient example is eplerenone, first described in 1987, coincidentally with the cloning of MR cDNA. Its launch on the market in 2003 paralleled intensive drug discovery programs for a new generation of non-steroidal MRAs. Now, 30 years after the cDNA cloning of MR and 60 years of clinical use of steroidal MRAs, novel non-steroidal MRAs such as apararenone, esaxerenone and finerenone are in late-stage clinical trials in patients with heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension and liver disease. Finerenone has already been studied in over 2000 patients with heart failure plus chronic kidney disease and/or diabetes, and in patients with diabetic kidney disease, in five phase II clinical trials. Here, we reflect on the history of the various generations of MRAs and review characteristics of the most important steroidal and non-steroidal MRAs.

Steroidal and Novel Non-steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure and Cardiorenal Diseases: Comparison at Bench and Bedside

Characterization of mice with cell-specific deletion or overexpression of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) shed a new light on its role in health and disease. Pathophysiological MR activation contributes to a plethora of deleterious molecular mechanisms in the development of cardiorenal diseases like chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF). Accordingly, the available steroidal MR antagonists (MRAs) spironolactone (first generation MRA) and eplerenone (second generation MRA) have been shown to be effective in reducing cardiovascular (CV) mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic HF and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, they remain underutilized, in large part owing to the risk inducing severe adverse events including hyperkalemia and worsening of kidney function, particularly when given on top of inhibitors of the renin angiotensin system (RAS) to patients with concomitant kidney dysfunction. Novel, potent, and selective non-steroidal MRAs (third generation) were identified in drug discovery campaigns and a few entered clinical development recently. One of these is finerenone with different physicochemical, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacological properties in comparison with the steroidal MRAs. Available data from five clinical phase II trials with finerenone in more than 2,000 patients with HF and additional CKD and/or diabetes as well as in patients with diabetic kidney disease demonstrated that neither hyperkalemia nor reductions in kidney function were limiting factors to its use. Moreover, finerenone demonstrated a nominally improved outcome compared to eplerenone in a phase IIb trial with 1,066 patients with HFrEF and concomitant type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or CKD.

Third-generation Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists: Why Do We Need a Fourth?

The first mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist, spironolactone, was developed almost 60 years ago to treat primary aldosteronism and pathological edema. Its use waned in part because of its lack of selectivity. Subsequently, knowledge of the scope of MR function was expanded along with clinical evidence of the therapeutic importance of MR antagonists to prevent the ravages of inappropriate MR activation. Forty-two years elapsed between the first and MR-selective second generation of MR antagonists. Fifteen years later, despite serious shortcomings of the existing antagonists, a third-generation antagonist has yet to be marketed. Progress has been slowed by the lack of appreciation of the large variety of cell types that express the MR and its diverse cell-type-specific actions, and also its unique complex interaction actions at the molecular level. New MR antagonists should preferentially target the inflammatory and fibrotic effects of MR and perhaps its excitatory effects on sympathetic nervous system, but not the renal tubular epithelium or neurons of the cortex and hippocampus. This review briefly describes efforts to develop a third-generation MR antagonist and why fourth generation antagonists and selective agonists based on structural determinants of tissue and ligand-specific MR activation should be contemplated.

Aldosterone in vascular and metabolic dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will highlight recent developments in mineralocorticoid receptor research which impact aldosterone-associated vascular and cardiometabolic dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

The mineralocorticoid receptor is also expressed in vascular smooth muscle and vascular endothelium, and contributes to vascular function and remodeling. Adipocyte-derived leptin stimulates aldosterone secretion, which may explain the observed link between obesity and hyperaldosteronism. Adipocyte mineralocorticoid receptor overexpression produces systemic changes consistent with metabolic syndrome. Ongoing studies with novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may provide a novel treatment for diabetic nephropathy and heart failure in patients with chronic kidney disease, with reduced risk of hyperkalemia.

SUMMARY

Ongoing research continues to demonstrate novel roles of the vascular and adipocyte mineralocorticoid receptor function, which may explain the beneficial metabolic and vascular benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.

New agents modulating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-Will there be a new therapeutic option?

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is more complex than it was originally regarded. According to the current subject knowledge, there are two main axes of the RAAS: (1) angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-angiotensin II-AT₁ receptor axis and (2) ACE2-angiotensin-(1-7)-Mas receptor axis. The activation of the first axis leads to deleterious effects, including vasoconstriction, endothelial dysfunction, thrombosis, inflammation, and fibrosis; therefore, blocking the components of this axis is a highly rational and commonly used therapeutic procedure. The ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas receptor axis has a different role, since it often opposes the effects induced by the classical ACE-Ang II-AT₁ axis. Once the positive effects of the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis were discovered, the alternative ways of pharmacotherapy activating this axis of RAAS appeared. This article briefly describes new molecules affecting the RAAS, namely: recombinant human ACE2, ACE2 activators, angiotensin-(1-7) peptide and non-peptide analogs, aldosterone synthase inhibitors, and the third and fourth generation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The results of the experimental and clinical studies are encouraging, which leads us to believe that these new molecules can support the treatment of cardiovascular diseases as well as cardiometabolic disorders.

Translational In Vivo Models for Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular diseases are still the first leading cause of death and morbidity in developed countries. Experimental cardiology research and preclinical drug development in cardiology call for appropriate and especially clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo studies. The use of animal models has contributed to expand our knowledge and our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and accordingly provided new approaches focused on the improvement of diagnostic and treatment strategies of various cardiac pathologies.Numerous animal models in different species as well as in small and large animals have been developed to address cardiovascular complications, including heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and thrombotic diseases. However, a perfect model of heart failure or other indications that reproduces every aspect of the natural disease does not exist. The complexity and heterogeneity of cardiac diseases plus the influence of genetic and environmental factors limit to mirror a particular disease with a single experimental model.Thus, drug development in the field of cardiology is not only very challenging but also inspiring; therefore animal models should be selected that reflect as best as possible the disease being investigated. Given the wide range of animal models, reflecting critical features of the human pathophysiology available nowadays increases the likelihood of the translation to the patients. Furthermore, this knowledge and the increase of the predictive value of preclinical models help us to find more efficient and reliable solutions as well as better and innovative treatment strategies for cardiovascular diseases.

Nonsteroidal antagonists of the mineralocorticoid receptor

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The broad clinical use of steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) is limited by the potential risk of inducing hyperkalemia when given on top of renin-angiotensin system blockade. Drug discovery campaigns have been launched aiming for the identification of nonsteroidal MRAs with an improved safety profile. This review analyses the evidence for the potential of improved safety profiles of nonsteroidal MRAs and the current landscape of clinical trials with nonsteroidal MRAs.

RECENT FINDINGS

At least three novel nonsteroidal MRAs have reportedly demonstrated an improved therapeutic index (i.e. less risk for hyperkalemia) in comparison to steroidal antagonists in preclinical models. Five pharmaceutical companies have nonsteroidal MRAs in clinical development with a clear focus on the treatment of chronic kidney diseases. No clinical data have been published so far for MT-3995 (Mitsubishi), SC-3150 (Daiichi-Sankyo), LY2623091 (Eli Lilly) and PF-03882845 (Pfizer). In contrast, data from two clinical phase II trials are available for finerenone (Bayer) which demonstrated safety and efficacy in patients with heart failure and additional chronic kidney diseases, and significantly reduced albuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Neither hyperkalemia nor reductions in kidney function were limiting factors to its use.

SUMMARY

Novel, nonsteroidal MRAs are currently tested in clinical trials. Based on preclinical and first clinical data, these nonsteroidal MRAs might overcome the limitations of today's steroidal antagonists.

[Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. Positions in 2015]

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MCRA) are part of standard medical therapy for heart failure (HF). The clinical efficacy of MCRA in patients with systolic HF has been proven by randomized clinical trials. The efficacy of this drug group in patients with chronic HF with preserved left ventricular systolic function and the advent and practical introductions of safer new-generation MCRA remain to be answered.

Finerenone, a novel selective nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist protects from rat cardiorenal injury

Pharmacological blockade of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) ameliorates end-organ damage in chronic heart failure. However, the clinical use of available steroidal MR antagonists is restricted because of concomitant hyperkalemia especially in patients with diminished kidney function. We have recently identified a novel nonsteroidal MR antagonist, finerenone, which uniquely combines potency and selectivity toward MR. Here, we investigated the tissue distribution and chronic cardiorenal end-organ protection of finerenone in comparison to the steroidal MR antagonist, eplerenone, in 2 different preclinical rat disease models. Quantitative whole-body autoradiography revealed that [C]-labeled finerenone equally distributes into rat cardiac and renal tissues. Finerenone treatment prevented deoxycorticosterone acetate-/salt-challenged rats from functional as well as structural heart and kidney damage at dosages not reducing systemic blood pressure. Finerenone reduced cardiac hypertrophy, plasma prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, and proteinuria more efficiently than eplerenone when comparing equinatriuretic doses. In rats that developed chronic heart failure after coronary artery ligation, finerenone (1 mg·kg·d), but not eplerenone (100 mg·kg·d) improved systolic and diastolic left ventricular function and reduced plasma prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels. We conclude that finerenone may offer end-organ protection with a reduced risk of electrolyte disturbances.