Brugada syndrome in Iran: Insights from a 12-year longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is characterized by ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads, which is not explained by ischemia, electrolyte disturbances, or obvious structural heart disease.

AIM

In present study, we aim to evaluate presentation, long-term outcome, genetic findings, and therapeutic interventions in patients with BrS.

METHODS

Between September 2001 and June 2022, all consecutive patients with diagnosis of BrS were enrolled in the present study. All patients gave written informed consent for the procedure, and the local ethical committee approved the study.

RESULTS

Of the 76 cases, 79% were proband and 21% were detected during screening after diagnosis of BrS in a family member. Thirty-three (43%) patients had a typical spontaneous electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern. Thirty percent of the patients were symptomatic; symptomatic patients were more likely to have spontaneous type 1 Brugada ECG pattern in their ECGs (p = .01), longer PR interval (p = .03), and SCN5A mutation (p = .01) than asymptomatic patients. The mean PR interval was considerably longer in men than women (p = .034). SCN5A mutation was found in 9 out of 50 (18%) studied patients. Fifteen percent received appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy and inappropriate ICD interventions were observed in 17%. Presentation with aborted SCD or arrhythmic syncope was the only predictor of adverse outcome in follow-up (odds ratio: 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.7-19.6, p = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic patients with BrS are more likely to present with spontaneous type 1 Brugada ECG pattern, longer PR interval, and pathogenic mutation in SCN5A gene. Appropriate ICD interventions are more likely in symptomatic patients and those with SCN5A mutation.

SCN5A mutation is associated with a higher Shanghai Score in patients with type 1 Brugada ECG pattern

AIMS

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited arrhythmic disease characterized by a coved ST-segment elevation in the right precordial electrocardiogram leads (type 1 ECG pattern) and is associated with a risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. In order to assess the predictive value of the Shanghai Score System for the presence of a SCN5A mutation in clinical practice, we studied a cohort of 125 patients with spontaneous or fever/drug-induced BrS type 1 ECG pattern, variably associated with symptoms and a positive family history.

METHODS

The Shanghai Score System items were collected for each patient and PR and QRS complex intervals were measured. Patients were genotyped through a next-generation sequencing (NGS) custom panel for the presence of SCN5A mutations and the common SCN5A polymorphism (H558R).

RESULTS

The total Shanghai Score was higher in SCN5A+ patients than in SCN5A- patients. The 81% of SCN5A+ patients and the 100% of patients with a SCN5A truncating variant exhibit a spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern. A significant increase in PR (P = 0.006) and QRS (P = 0.02) was detected in the SCN5A+ group. The presence of the common H558R polymorphism did not significantly correlate with any of the items of the Shanghai Score, nor with the total score of the system.

CONCLUSION

Data from our study suggest the usefulness of Shanghai Score collection in clinical practice in order to maximize genetic test appropriateness. Our data further highlight SCN5A mutations as a cause of conduction impairment in BrS patients.

Frontier and hotspot evolution in Brugada syndrome: A bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2022

BACKGROUND

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a genetic disorder characterized by a typical electrocardiogram pattern and predisposition to arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Despite our considerably evolved understanding of BrS, no bibliometrics have been performed in this research field. We aimed to analyze and visualize the characteristics of the scientific outputs, topical evolutions, and research trends of BrS over the past 2 decades using bibliometric analysis.

METHODS

The literature associated with BrS was retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection database. Acquired data were then visually analyzed using CiteSpace and VOSviewer.

RESULTS

3042 qualifying records were included in the final analysis. The publication outputs increased over time. The United States was the leading country in the BrS research. The University of Amsterdam (Netherlands) was the most prolific and influential institution. Pedro Brugada, Arthur Wilde, and Charles Antzelevitch exerted notable publication impact and made the most significant contributions in the field of BrS. Heart Rhythm had the highest outputs and Circulation was the most influential journal. Bundle branch block, ST-segment elevation, mechanism, management, right precordial lead, and guideline were the keywords with the strongest citation burst.

CONCLUSION

Research on BrS is prosperous. Keywords and co-citation analysis revealed that the mechanism, diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of BrS were the research hotspots. Besides, the underlying pathophysiology, novel therapies, and personalized risk assessment might be the emerging trends of future research.

Delayed depolarization and histologic abnormalities underlie the Brugada syndrome

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a controversial disease whose pathophysiology is still far from being fully understood. Unlike other cardiological disorders, a definite etiology has not yet been established so that it could be summarized under two main chapters: "functional" or "organic", "repolarization" or "depolarization" disorder. Despite initial descriptions leaned towards the organic substrate and delayed depolarization features, functional and repolarization theories have attracted most of the Cardiological attention for many years. Data from electrocardiography, endocavitary tracings, electroanatomic mapping and histopathology, however, demonstrated that BrS is mainly characterized by structural myocardial changes mostly at the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), but also at the right ventricle (RV) and by delayed conduction at the same sites. Conduction disorders at different levels may also be present and identify patients at high risk for major arrhythmic events. The aim of the present review is to provide the current state of art of the pathophysiology of BrS, focusing on electro-vectorcardiography and electrophysiological features, histopathology, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI).

Type of syncope and outcome in Brugada syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Introduction

Brugada syndrome is an inherited arrhythmic disease associated with major arrhythmic events (MAE). The importance of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in Brugada syndrome is well recognized; however, ventricular arrhythmia risk stratification remains challenging and controversial. We aimed to assess the association of type of syncope with MAE via systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2021. Included studies were cohort (prospective or retrospective) studies that reported the types of syncope (cardiac, unexplained, vasovagal, and undifferentiated) and MAE. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Seventeen studies from 2005 to 2019 were included in this meta-analysis involving 4355 Brugada syndrome patients. Overall, syncope was significantly associated with an increased risk of MAE in Brugada syndrome (OR = 3.90, 95% CI: 2.22-6.85, p < .001, I ² = 76.0%). By syncope type, cardiac (OR = 4.48, 95% CI: 2.87-7.01, p < .001, I ² = 0.0%) and unexplained (OR = 4.71, 95% CI: 1.34-16.57, p = .016, I ² = 37.3%) syncope was significantly associated with increased risk of MAE in Brugada syndrome. Vasovagal (OR = 2.90, 95% CI: 0.09-98.45, p = .554, I ² = 70.9%) and undifferentiated syncope (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.00-4.03, p = .050, I ² = 64.6%, respectively) were not.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that cardiac and unexplained syncope was associated with MAE risk in Brugada syndrome populations but not in vasovagal syncope and undifferentiated syncope. Unexplained syncope is associated with a similar increased risk of MAE compared to cardiac syncope.

The Utility of Sodium Channel Provocation in Unexplained Cardiac Arrest Survivors and Electrocardiographic Predictors of Ventricular Fibrillation Recurrence

BACKGROUND

The implications of a drug-induced type 1 Brugada ECG pattern following sodium channel blocker provocation (SCBP) are not fully understood.

METHODS

Baseline clinical and ECG data were obtained from consecutive unexplained cardiac arrest survivors undergoing SCBP at 3 centers. A further 15 SCBP positive (SCBP+) unexplained cardiac arrest survivors were recruited from 3 additional centers to explore ventricular fibrillation recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 121 consecutive unexplained cardiac arrest survivors underwent SCBP. The yield of the drug-induced type 1 Brugada ECG pattern was 17%. A baseline type 2/3 Brugada pattern (T2/3BP) (adjusted odds ratio, 19.36 [2.74-136.61]; P=0.003) and PR interval (odds ratio, 1.03 [1.01-1.05] per ms; P=0.017) were independent predictors of SCBP+ response. A pathogenic SCN5A variant was identified in 36% of the SCBP+ group versus 0% in the SCBP- group (P<0.001). Amongst SCBP+ patients, a spontaneous type 1 Brugada pattern was identified in 19% during follow up and in 24% a type 1 Brugada pattern was identified in a relative. Prior syncope (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.83 [1.36-10.78]; P=0.011) and the presence of global early repolarization (hazard ratio, 7.91 [3.22-19.44]; P<0.001) were independent predictors of 5-year ventricular fibrillation recurrence. There was a nonsignificant trend toward greater 5-year ventricular fibrillation recurrence in the SCBP- group (23/95 [24%] versus 3/34 [9%]; P=0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

The yield of the drug-induced type 1 Brugada ECG pattern in consecutive unexplained cardiac arrest survivors undergoing SCBP is 17%. A baseline T2/3BP and PR interval were independent predictors of the drug-induced type 1 Brugada ECG pattern. Greater heritability of BrS phenotype in this group was evidenced by a greater prevalence of pathogenic SCN5A variants and relatives with a type 1 Brugada pattern. A history of prior syncope and the presence of global early repolarization were independent predictors of ventricular fibrillation recurrence.

Predictors of late arrhythmic events after generator replacement in Brugada syndrome treated with prophylactic ICD

Introduction

Predictors of late life-threatening arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients who received a prophylactic ICD implantation remain to be evaluated. The aim of the present long-term multicenter study was to assess the incidence and clinical-electrocardiographic predictors of late life-threatening arrhythmic events in BrS patients with a prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and undergoing generator replacement (GR).

Methods

The study population included 105 patients (75% males; mean age 45 ± 14years) who received a prophylactic ICD and had no arrhythmic event up to first GR.

Results

The median period from first ICD implantation to last follow-up was 155 (128-181) months and from first ICD Implantation to the GR was 84 (61-102) months. During a median follow-up of 57 (38-102) months after GR, 10 patients (9%) received successful appropriate ICD intervention (1.6%/year). ICD interventions included shock on ventricular fibrillation (n = 8 patients), shock on ventricular tachycardia (n = 1 patient), and antitachycardia pacing on ventricular tachycardia (n = 1 patient). At survival analysis, history of atrial fibrillation (log-rank test; P = 0.02), conduction disturbances (log-rank test; P < 0.01), S wave in lead I (log-rank test; P = 0.01) and first-degree atrioventricular block (log-rank test; P = 0.04) were significantly associated with the occurrence of late appropriate ICD intervention. At Cox-regression multivariate analysis, S-wave in lead I was the only independent predictor of late appropriate ICD intervention (HR: 9.17; 95%CI: 1.15-73.07; P = 0.03).

Conclusions

The present study indicates that BrS patient receiving a prophylactic ICD may experience late appropriate intervention after GR in a clinically relevant proportion of cases. S-wave in lead I at the time of first clinical evaluation was the only independent predictor of persistent risk of life-threatening arrhythmic events. These findings support the need for GR at the end of service regardless of previous appropriate intervention, mostly in BrS patients with conduction abnormalities.

Electrocardiographic Markers Indicating Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Conduction Delay as a Predictor of Major Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Brugada Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Risk stratification in Brugada Syndrome (BrS) patients is still challenging due to the heterogeneity of clinical presentation; thus, some additional risk markers are needed. Several studies investigating the association between RVOT conduction delay sign on electrocardiography (ECG) and major arrhythmic events (MAE) in BrS patients showed inconclusive results. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association between RVOT conduction delay signs presented by aVR sign and large S wave in lead I, and MAE in BrS patients.

Methods

The literature search was performed using several online databases from the inception to March 16th, 2022. We included studies consisting of two main components, including ECG markers of RVOT conduction delay (aVR sign and large S wave in lead I) and MAE related to BrS (syncope/VT/VF/SCD/aborted SCD/appropriate ICD shocks)

Results

Meta-analysis of eleven cohort studies with a total of 2,575 participants showed RVOT conduction delay sign was significantly associated with MAE in BrS patients [RR = 1.87 (1.35, 2.58); p &lt; 0.001; I2= 52%, Pheterogeneity = 0.02]. Subgroup analysis showed that aVR sign [RR = 2.00 (1.42, 2.83); p &lt; 0.001; I2= 0%, Pheterogeneity = 0.40] and large S wave in lead I [RR = 1.74 (1.11, 2.71); p = 0.01; I2= 60%, Pheterogeneity = 0.01] were significantly associated with MAE. Summary receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed the aVR sign [AUC: 0.77 (0.73–0.80)] and large S wave in lead I [AUC: 0.69 (0.65–0.73)] were a good predictor of MAE in BrS patients.

Conclusion

RVOT conduction delay sign, presented by aVR sign and large S wave in the lead I, is significantly associated with an increased risk of MAE in BrS patients. Hence, we propose that these parameters may be useful as an additional risk stratification tool to predict MAE in BrS patients.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier: CRD42022321090.

Prognostic significance of first-degree atrioventricular block in a large Asian population: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic significance of first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) in Asian populations.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Participants (N=9634) from the Northeast China Rural Cardiovascular Health Study were included. The first-degree AVB was defined as PR (from the beginning of the P wave to the beginning of the QRS complex on an electrocardiogram) interval >200 ms, and primary composite outcome (all events) included new onset cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Cox regression and restricted cubic spline were used to identify the associations of PR interval or first-degree AVB with end points. Furthermore, the relationship between new-onset CVD and mortality and first-degree AVB was separately evaluated. The value of first-degree AVB for predicting adverse events was evaluated by reclassification and discrimination analyses.

RESULTS

During a median of 4.65 years follow-up, 524 participants developed CVD and 371 died. Compared with participants with PR ≤200 ms, those with first-degree AVB had an increased risk of all events (HR: 1.84; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.88). Furthermore, first-degree AVB was predictive of incident CVD (1.96, 1.18 to 3.23) and stroke (2.22, 1.27 to 3.90) after adjusting for conventional risk. These statistically significant associations remained unchanged after further stratification by potential confounding factors. Discrimination and reclassification analyses suggested that first-degree AVB addition could improve the conventional model for predicting adverse outcomes within 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that first-degree AVB was an independent risk factor for adverse events, suggesting that it should not be considered as inconsequential factor in general population. These results have potential clinical value for identifying individuals at high risk for adverse outcomes.

Recent Non-Invasive Parameters to Identify Subjects at High Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death

Cardiovascular diseases remain among the leading causes of death worldwide and sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for ~25% of these deaths. Despite its epidemiologic relevance, there are very few diagnostic strategies available useful to prevent SCD mainly focused on patients already affected by specific cardiovascular diseases. Unfortunately, most of these parameters exhibit poor positive predictive accuracy. Moreover, there is also a need to identify parameters to stratify the risk of SCD among otherwise healthy subjects. This review aims to provide an update on the most relevant non-invasive diagnostic features to identify patients at higher risk of developing malignant ventricular arrhythmias and SCD.

Assessment of atrial functional remodeling in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with and without drug-induced type 1 Brugada pattern: A case-control study

PURPOSE

The time interval between the onset of the P-wave on electrocardiogram (ECG) and peak A' velocity of the lateral left atrial wall assessed by tissue Doppler imaging (PA-TDI interval) determine total atrial conduction time (TACT) which reflects atrial remodeling and arrhythmic substrate. In this retrospective study, we aimed to assess TACT in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with and without drug-induced type 1 Brugada electrocardiogram ECG pattern (DI-Type 1 BrP) and control subjects.

METHODS

Study population consisted of 62 consecutive patients (46 women; mean age 44 ± 12 years) undergoing electrophysiological study and ablation for symptomatic, drug-resistant AVNRT, and 42 age-matched and sex-matched control subjects. All patients and control subjects underwent ajmaline challenge test and tissue Doppler imaging.

RESULTS

A DI-Type 1 BrP was uncovered in 24 of 62 patients with AVNRT (38.7%). PA-TDI interval was similar among AVNRT patients with and without DI-Type 1 BrP (124 ± 12 ms vs 119 ± 14 ms, respectively, P = .32), but significantly longer in patients with AVNRT with as well as without DI-Type 1 BrP than in control subjects (124 ± 12 ms and 119 ± 14 ms vs 105 ± 11 ms, respectively, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The TACT assessed by PA-TDI interval is longer in patients with AVNRT with and without DI-Type 1 BrP than in age-matched and sex-matched healthy control subjects.

Does the Age of Sudden Cardiac Death in Family Members Matter in Brugada Syndrome?

Background Brugada syndrome is an inherited cardiac channelopathy associated with major arrhythmic events (MAEs). The presence of a positive family history of sudden cardiac death (SCD) as a risk predictor of MAE remains controversial. We aimed to examine the association between family history of SCD and MAEs stratified by age of SCD with a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods and Results We searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1992 to January 2020. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model. Fitted metaregression was performed to evaluate the association between the age of SCD in families and the risk of MAE. Twenty-two studies from 2004 to 2019 were included in this meta-analysis involving 3386 patients with Brugada syndrome. The overall family history of SCD was not associated with increased risk of MAE in Brugada syndrome (pooled odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82-1.51; P=0.489, I²=45.0%). However, a history of SCD in family members of age younger than 40 years of age did increase the risk of MAE by ≈2-fold (pooled OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.11-3.73; P=0.022, I²=0.0%). When stratified by the age of cut point at 50, 45, 40, and 35 years old, a history of SCD in younger family member was significantly associated with a higher risk of MAE (pooled OR, 0.49, 1.30, 1.51, and 2.97, respectively; P=0.046). Conclusions A history of SCD among family members of age younger than 40 years was associated with a higher risk of MAE.

Standard ECG in Brugada Syndrome as a Marker of Prognosis: From Risk Stratification to Pathophysiological Insights

Background

The 12‐lead ECG plays a key role in the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome (BrS). Since the spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern was first described, several other ECG signs have been linked to arrhythmic risk, but results are conflicting.

Methods and Results

We performed a systematic review to clarify the associations of these specific ECG signs with the risk of syncope, sudden death, or equivalents in patients with BrS. The literature search identified 29 eligible articles comprising overall 5731 patients. The ECG findings associated with an incremental risk of syncope, sudden death, or equivalents (hazard ratio ranging from 1.1–39) were the following: localization of type 1 Brugada pattern (in V2 and peripheral leads), first‐degree atrioventricular block, atrial fibrillation, fragmented QRS, QRS duration >120 ms, R wave in lead aVR, S wave in L1 (≥40 ms, amplitude ≥0.1 mV, area ≥1 mm²), early repolarization pattern in inferolateral leads, ST‐segment depression, T‐wave alternans, dispersion of repolarization, and Tzou criteria.

Conclusions

At least 12 features of standard ECG are associated with a higher risk of sudden death in BrS. A multiparametric risk assessment approach based on ECG parameters associated with clinical and genetic findings could help improve current risk stratification scores of patients with BrS and warrants further investigation.

Registration

URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/. Unique identifier: CRD42019123794.

Role of Provocable Brugada ECG Pattern in The Correct Risk Stratification for Major Arrhythmic Events

The so-called Brugada syndrome (BS), first called precordial early repolarization syndrome (PERS), is characterized by the association of a fascinating electrocardiographic pattern, namely an aspect resembling right bundle branch block with a coved and sometime upsloping ST segment elevation in the precordial leads, and major ventricular arrhythmic events that could rarely lead to sudden death. Its electrogenesis has been related to a conduction delay mostly, but not only, located on the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), probably due to a progressive fibrosis of the conduction system. Many tests have been proposed to identify people at risk of sudden death and, among all, ajmaline challenge, thanks to its ability to enhance latent conduction defects, became so popular, even if its role is still controversial as it is neither specific nor sensitive enough to guide further invasive investigations and managements. Interestingly, a type 1 pattern has also been induced in many other cardiac diseases or systemic diseases with a cardiac involvement, such as long QT syndrome (LQTS), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and myotonic dystrophy, without any clear arrhythmic risk profile. Evidence-based studies clearly showed that a positive ajmaline test does not provide any additional information on the risk stratification for major ventricular arrhythmic events on asymptomatic individuals with a non-diagnostic Brugada ECG pattern.

Territory-wide cohort study of Brugada syndrome in Hong Kong: predictors of long-term outcomes using random survival forests and non-negative matrix factorisation

OBJECTIVES

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an ion channelopathy that predisposes affected patients to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and sudden cardiac death. The aim of this study is to examine the predictive factors of spontaneous VT/VF.

METHODS

This was a territory-wide retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with BrS between 1997 and 2019. The primary outcome was spontaneous VT/VF. Cox regression was used to identify significant risk predictors. Non-linear interactions between variables (latent patterns) were extracted using non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) and used as inputs into the random survival forest (RSF) model.

RESULTS

This study included 516 consecutive BrS patients (mean age of initial presentation=50±16 years, male=92%) with a median follow-up of 86 (IQR: 45-118) months. The cohort was divided into subgroups based on initial disease manifestation: asymptomatic (n=314), syncope (n=159) or VT/VF (n=41). Annualised event rates per person-year were 1.70%, 0.05% and 0.01% for the VT/VF, syncope and asymptomatic subgroups, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed initial presentation of VT/VF (HR=24.0, 95% CI=1.21 to 479, p=0.037) and SD of P-wave duration (HR=1.07, 95% CI=1.00 to 1.13, p=0.044) were significant predictors. The NMF-RSF showed the best predictive performance compared with RSF and Cox regression models (precision: 0.87 vs 0.83 vs. 0.76, recall: 0.89 vs. 0.85 vs 0.73, F1-score: 0.88 vs 0.84 vs 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical history, electrocardiographic markers and investigation results provide important information for risk stratification. Machine learning techniques using NMF and RSF significantly improves overall risk stratification performance.

High-risk atrioventricular block in Brugada syndrome patients with a history of syncope

BACKGROUND

Determining the etiology of syncope is challenging in Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement is recommended in BrS patients who are presumed to have arrhythmic syncope. However, arrhythmic syncope in BrS patients can occur in the setting of atrioventricular block (AVB), which should be managed by cardiac pacing. The clinical characteristics of BrS patients with high-risk AVB remain unknown.

METHODS

This study included 223 BrS patients with a history of syncope from two centers. The clinical characteristics of patients with high-risk AVB (Mobitz type II second-degree AVB, high-degree AVB, or third-degree AVB) were investigated.

RESULTS

During the 99 ± 78 months of follow-up, we identified six BrS patients (2.7%) with high-risk AVB. Three of the six patients (50%) with AVB presented with syncope associated with prodromes or specific triggers. Four patients (67%) were found to have paroxysmal third-degree AVB during the initial evaluation for BrS and syncope, while two patients developed third-degree AVB during the follow-up period. The incidence of first-degree AVB was significantly higher in AVB patients than in non-AVB patients (83% vs. 15%; p = .0005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of ventricular fibrillation between AVB and non-AVB patients (AVB [17%], non-AVB [12%]; p = .56).

CONCLUSION

High-risk AVB can occur in BrS patients with various clinical presentations. Although rare, the incidence is worth considering, especially in BrS patients with first-degree AVB.

Prediction of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with a spontaneous Brugada type 1 pattern: the key is in the electrocardiogram

AIMS

There is currently no reliable tool to quantify the risks of ventricular fibrillation or sudden cardiac arrest (VF/SCA) in patients with spontaneous Brugada type 1 pattern (BrT1). Previous studies showed that electrocardiographic (ECG) markers of depolarization or repolarization disorders might indicate elevated risk. We aimed to design a VF/SCA risk prediction model based on ECG analyses for adult patients with spontaneous BrT1.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective multicentre international study analysed ECG data from 115 patients (mean age 45.1 ± 12.8 years, 105 males) with spontaneous BrT1. Of these, 45 patients had experienced VF/SCA and 70 patients did not experience VF/SCA. Among 10 ECG markers, a univariate analysis showed significant associations between VF/SCA and maximum corrected Tpeak-Tend intervals ≥100 ms in precordial leads (LMaxTpec) (P < 0.001), BrT1 in a peripheral lead (pT1) (P = 0.004), early repolarization in inferolateral leads (ER) (P < 0.001), and QRS duration ≥120 ms in lead V2 (P = 0.002). The Cox multivariate analysis revealed four predictors of VF/SCA: the LMaxTpec [hazard ratio (HR) 8.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-28.5; P < 0.001], LMaxTpec + ER (HR 14.9, 95% CI 4.2-53.1; P < 0.001), LMaxTpec + pT1 (HR 17.2, 95% CI 4.1-72; P < 0.001), and LMaxTpec + pT1 + ER (HR 23.5, 95% CI 6-93; P < 0.001). Our multidimensional penalized spline model predicted the 1-year risk of VF/SCA, based on age and these markers.

CONCLUSION

LMaxTpec and its association with pT1 and/or ER indicated elevated VF/SCA risk in adult patients with spontaneous BrT1. We successfully developed a simple risk prediction model based on age and these ECG markers.

Brugada Syndrome: Clinical Care Amidst Pathophysiological Uncertainty

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a complex clinical entity with ongoing conjecture regarding its genetic basis, underlying pathophysiology, and clinical management. Within this paradigm of uncertainty, clinicians are faced with the challenge of caring for patients with this uncommon but potentially fatal condition. This article reviews the current understanding of BrS and highlights the "known unknowns" to reinforce the need for flexible clinical practice in parallel with ongoing scientific discovery.

Association between PR Interval, First-degree atrioventricular block and major arrhythmic events in patients with Brugada syndrome - Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic Brugada Syndrome is challenging, and despite recent advances, there is no clear evidence. The first-degree atrioventricular block was hypothesized to be a predictor of arrhythmic events. Measurement of the PR interval and diagnosing atrioventricular block from surface ECG is easy, noninvasive, and cost-effective. We aimed to assess the latest evidence on PR interval or first-degree atrioventricular block and major arrhythmic events related to Brugada Syndrome.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed for "atrioventricular block" OR "PR interval" and "Brugada syndrome." We included studies that have a component of PR interval and/or first-degree atrioventricular block and major arrhythmic events related to Brugada Syndrome including syncope/VT/VF/appropriate ICD shocks/ICD implantation.

RESULTS

We included 1526 subjects from 7 studies. Pooled mean difference of PR interval in 4 studies showed a significant difference [MD 10.77 ms (2.97-18.57) P = 0.007, moderate-high heterogeneity I2 = 53% P = 0.08]. On sensitivity analysis by removing a study, it became MD 6.50 ms [1.97-11.03], P = 0.005, heterogeneity I2 = 0% P = 0.52. Indicating that PR interval was prolonged by small margin. Pooled analysis of the association between a first-degree atrioventricular block and major arrhythmic events was significant [OR 3.33 (2.02-5.50) P < 0.001, low heterogeneity I2 = 0% P = 0.57].

CONCLUSION

First-degree AV block is associated with more frequent major arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome patients. PR interval seemed to be prolonged but is yet to be determined whether the PR interval association is still significant if it did not cross the first-degree AVB threshold.

Insights for Stratification of Risk in Brugada Syndrome

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited disease with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, testing identifies genetic disorders in only 20-30% of patients analysed, indicating a gap in knowledge of its genetic aetiology. Diagnosis relies on ECG, and risk stratification in BrS patients is challenging, primarily because of the complexity of the issue. As a result, clinicians fail to provide the appropriate strategy for SCD prevention for many patients. Several variables and interventions are being studied to improve diagnostics and maximise patient protection. In addition, the scientific community must increase efforts to provide patient care according to knowledge and research for improving stratification of risk. In this article, the authors summarise contemporary evidence on clinical variables and provide an overview of future directions in risk stratification and SCD prevention.