1
|
Hansen BT, Nygård M, Castle PE, Burger EA, Aasbø G. Sociodemographic characteristics associated with cervical cancer screening participation by send-to-all and opt-in HPV self-sampling: Who benefits? Results from a randomized controlled trial among long-term non-attending women in Norway. Int J Cancer 2024; 155:1053-1067. [PMID: 38751040 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
With the objective to investigate associations between sociodemographic characteristics and participation in interventions designed to increase participation in cervical cancer screening among under-screened women, we randomized a random sample of 6000 women in Norway aged 35-69 years who had not attended cervical screening for ≥10 years to receive either (i) a reminder to attend regular screening (control), (ii) an offer to order a self-sampling kit (opt-in), or (iii) a self-sampling kit unsolicited (send-to-all). We analyzed how sociodemographic characteristics were associated with screening participation within and between screening arms. In the send-to-all arm, increased screening participation ranged from 17.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 10.3% to 23.8%) to 30.0% (95% CI = 21.5% to 38.6%) between sociodemographic groups. In the opt-in arm, we observed smaller, and at times, non-significant increases within the range 0.7% (95% CI = -5.8% to 7.3%) to 19.1% (95% CI = 11.6% to 26.7%). In send-to-all versus control comparisons, there was greater increase in participation for women in the workforce versus not (6.1%, 95% CI = 1.6% to 10.6%), with higher versus lower income (7.6%, 95% CI = 2.2% to 13.1%), and with university versus primary education (8.5%, 95% CI = 2.4% to 14.6%). In opt-in versus control comparisons, there was greater increase in participation for women in the workforce versus not (4.6%, 95% CI = 0.7% to 8.5%), with higher versus lower income (6.3%, 95% CI = 1.5% to 11.1%), but lower increase for Eastern European versus Norwegian background (-12.7%, 95% CI = -19.7% to -5.7%). Self-sampling increased cervical screening participation across all sociodemographic levels, but inequalities in participation should be considered when introducing self-sampling, especially with the goal to reach long-term non-attending women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo T Hansen
- Department of Infection Control and Vaccine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mari Nygård
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Phil E Castle
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Emily A Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Harvard Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gunvor Aasbø
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sun L, Patel S, Fiorina C, Glass A, Rochaix L, Foss AM, Legood R. A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of interventions to increase cervical cancer screening among underserved women in Europe. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:829-844. [PMID: 37726429 PMCID: PMC11192698 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01627-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness studies of interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake rates in underserved women in Europe. METHODS A search of Embase, Medline, Global Health, PsychINFO, and NHS Economic Evaluation Database was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and September 2022. Studies were eligible if they analysed the cost-effectiveness of any interventions to improve participation in cervical cancer screening among underserved women of any age eligible to participate in cervical cancer screening in European countries, in any language. Study characteristics and cost-effectiveness results were summarised. Study quality was assessed using the Drummond Checklist, and methodological choices were further compared. RESULTS The searches yielded 962 unique studies, with 17 of these (from twelve European countries) meeting the eligibility criteria for data extraction. All studies focused on underscreened women as an overarching group, with no identified studies focusing on specific subgroups of underserved women. Generally, self-HPV testing and reminder interventions were shown to be cost-effective to increase the uptake rates. There was also research showing that addressing access issues and adopting different screening modalities could be economically attractive in some settings, but the current evidence is insufficient due to the limited number of studies. CONCLUSION This systematic review has revealed a gap in the literature on the cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve uptake rates of cervical cancer screening through tailored provision for specific groups of underserved women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Sun
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Shruti Patel
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Anna M Foss
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leinonen MK, Igland J, Dreier JW, Alvestad S, Cohen JM, Gilhus NE, Gissler M, Sun Y, Tomson T, Zoega H, Vegrim HM, Christensen J, Bjørk MH. Socioeconomic differences in use of antiseizure medication in pregnancies with maternal epilepsy: A population-based study from Nordic universal health care systems. Epilepsia 2024. [PMID: 38804650 DOI: 10.1111/epi.18022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Research points to disparities in disease burden and access to medical care in epilepsy. We studied the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and antiseizure medication (ASM) use in pregnancies with maternal epilepsy. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study consisting of 21 130 pregnancies with maternal epilepsy identified from Nordic registers during 2006-2017. SES indicators included cohabitation status, migrant background, educational attainment, and household income. Main outcomes were the proportion and patterns of ASM use from 90 days before pregnancy to birth. We applied multiple imputation to handle SES variables with 2%-4% missingness. We estimated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using modified Poisson regression with the highest SES category as reference. RESULTS Mothers with the highest education and the highest income quintile used ASMs least frequently (56% and 53%, respectively). We observed increased risks of ASM discontinuation prior to or during the first trimester for low SES. The risk estimates varied depending on the SES indicator from aRR = 1.27 for low income (95% CI: 1.03-1.57) to aRR = 1.66 for low education (95% CI: 1.30-2.13). Migrant background was associated with ASM initiation after the first trimester (aRR 2.17; 95% CI 1.88-2.52). Low education was associated with the use of valproate during pregnancy in monotherapy (aRR 1.70; 95% CI 1.29-2.24) and in polytherapy (aRR 2.65; 95% CI 1.66-4.21). Low education was also associated with a 37% to 39% increased risk of switching from one ASM to another depending on the ASM used. For the other SES indicators, aRRs of switching varied from 1.16 (foreign origin; 95% CI 1.08-1.26) to 1.26 (not married or cohabiting; 95% CI 1.17-1.36). SIGNIFICANCE Low SES was associated with riskier patterns of ASM use: discontinuation, late initiation, and switching during pregnancy. These findings may reflect unplanned pregnancies, disparities in access to preconception counseling, and suboptimal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarit K Leinonen
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Knowledge Brokers, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Affiliated Member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jannicke Igland
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Julie Werenberg Dreier
- National Centre for Register-Based Research, Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Silje Alvestad
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- National Centre for Epilepsy, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jacqueline M Cohen
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nils Erik Gilhus
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Mika Gissler
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Knowledge Brokers, Helsinki, Finland
- Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yuelian Sun
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Torbjörn Tomson
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helga Zoega
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Håkon M Vegrim
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jakob Christensen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Affiliated Member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE, Aarhus, Denmark
- National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Marte-Helene Bjørk
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Enden MR, Møen K, Igland J, Diaz E. Trends in cervical cancer screening in Norway 2012-2017: a comparison study of non-immigrant and immigrant women. Scand J Public Health 2024:14034948231217636. [PMID: 38166571 DOI: 10.1177/14034948231217636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Immigrant women in Norway have lower cervical cancer screening participation than non-immigrant women. Our aim in this study was to assess whether the observed increase in screening participation during 2012-2017 was different between Norwegian-born women and immigrant women. METHODS Data were collected from three national registries. The study included 1,409,561 women, categorized according to country of birth and immigrant background: (i) Norway, Norwegian parents; (ii) Norway, immigrant parent(s); (iii) Europe, excluding Norway; (iv) Africa; (v) Asia, including Turkey; and (vi) other countries. Trends and differences between groups were analyzed using Poisson regression analyses with adjustments for variables other studies have found to influence screening participation. Trends were assessed by including half-years as a continuous variable in the models and reported as prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Screening participation increased in all groups, but was not statistically significant among women from Africa in the adjusted model. The highest increase was among Norwegian women, with a 2.2% increase per year. Interaction tests showed significantly smaller increases in screening among women born in Europe (p interaction < 0.0001), Africa (p interaction < 0.0001), Asia (p interaction < 0.0001), and countries in the "Other" category (p interaction = 0.004). There was also a smaller increase among Norwegian-born women with one or more immigrant parent(s), but this was not significant (p interaction = 0.178). CONCLUSIONS The gap in screening participation and the increasing differences in trends suggest that healthcare services do not reach all women in Norway to the same extent. One should attempt to improve this while working toward further increasing screening participation for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Røttingen Enden
- Institute of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Kathy Møen
- Institute of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Jannicke Igland
- Institute of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Esperanza Diaz
- Institute of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barrio-Ruiz C, Ruiz de Viñaspre-Hernandez R, Colaceci S, Juarez-Vela R, Santolalla-Arnedo I, Durante A, Di Nitto M. Language and Cultural Barriers and Facilitators of Sexual and Reproductive Health Care for Migrant Women in High-Income European Countries: An Integrative Review. J Midwifery Womens Health 2024; 69:71-90. [PMID: 37531180 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dealing with intercultural communicative barriers in European countries' national health services is an increasing and necessary challenge to guarantee migrant women's right to health care. This integrative review describes the communication barriers and facilitators that migrant women encounter to access and use sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Europe. METHODS A literature search was performed to identify original studies in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus, using keywords associated with migrant women and SRH services. This was supplemented by scanning the reference lists from relevant studies and similar reviews. Studies exploring the perspective of migrant women about communication barriers and facilitators to the access and use of SRH services were included, whereas those that solely explored health professional's experiences were excluded. Findings were organized into 4 themes: (1) verbal-linguistic barriers, (2) nonverbal language barriers, (3) cultural barriers, and (4) communication facilitators. RESULTS Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that when women had problems understanding or being understood by health professionals, they experienced feelings of anxiety, fear, insecurity, and discrimination that discouraged them from using SRH services. The most requested facilitators by women were health education, access to professional interpreters and translation of written information, and increasing the practitioners' cultural competence. DISCUSSION Communication barriers undermine migrant women's right to benefit from preventive SRH programs and to make informed decisions concerning their health. It is necessary to establish tailored plans in each health care center to improve intercultural communication that integrate facilitators proposed by women. Future research should provide solid evidence on the effectiveness of each facilitator implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sofia Colaceci
- Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, Rome, Italy
| | - Raul Juarez-Vela
- GRUPAC, Predepartment Unit of Nursing, University of La Rioja, La Rioja, Spain
| | | | - Angela Durante
- GRUPAC, Predepartment Unit of Nursing, University of La Rioja, La Rioja, Spain
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale "Amedeo Avogadro,", Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Di Nitto
- Azienda Usl Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Center for Clinical Excellence and Quality of Care, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Al-Oseely S, Abdul Manaf R, Ismail S. Factors affecting cervical cancer screening among Yemeni immigrant women in Klang Valley, Malaysia: A cross sectional study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290152. [PMID: 38100481 PMCID: PMC10723656 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cervical cancer is a significant public health problem for women worldwide. It is the fourth most frequent cancer in women globally. While early detection of cancerous lesions through screening tests leads to a better prognosis and a better chance of being cured, the number of people who go for screening is still low, especially for groups that are marginalized, like immigrant women. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify cervical cancer screening practices and factors influencing screening status among Yemeni immigrant women living in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. METHOD A cross-sectional study among 355 randomly selected respondents between the ages of 20 and 65 was conducted through an online survey. A questionnaire was sent directly to the participants via WhatsApp. The analysis was conducted using SPSS 25 with a significance level of 0.05. It included descriptive analysis, chi-square and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS The response rate was 59%, with the majority of the respondents being married and between the ages of 35 and 49. Screening was reported at 23.1% in the previous three years. The final model revealed that age group 50-65 years (AOR = 5.39, 95% CI: 1.53-18.93), insurance status (AOR 2.22, 95% CI = 1.15-4.3), knowledge (AOR = 6.67, 95% CI = 3.45-12.9), access to health care facilities (AOR = 4.64, 95% CI = 1.29-16.65), and perceived barriers (AOR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.3-4.83) were significant predictors of cervical screening uptake among Yemeni immigrant women in Malaysia (p<0.05). CONCLUSION According to the results, cervical cancer screening was found to be low among Yemeni immigrant women. The predictors were age group 50-65 years, insurance status, knowledge, access to health care facilities and perceived barriers. Efforts to enhance immigrant women's participation in cervical cancer screening must tackle barriers to access to healthcare services as well as expand cervical cancer screening education programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Al-Oseely
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| | - Rosliza Abdul Manaf
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| | - Suriani Ismail
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bhargava S, Botteri E, Berthelsen M, Iqbal N, Randel KR, Holme Ø, Berstad P. Lower participation among immigrants in colorectal cancer screening in Norway. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1254905. [PMID: 37822535 PMCID: PMC10562536 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1254905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Organized cancer screening programs should be equally accessible for all groups in society. We assessed differences in participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among different immigrant groups. Methods Between 2012 and 2019, 140,000 individuals aged 50 to 74 years were randomly invited to sigmoidoscopy or repeated faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in a CRC screening trial. In this study, we included 46,919 individuals invited to sigmoidoscopy and 70,018 invited to the first round of FIT between 2012 and 2017. We examined difference in participation between non-immigrants and immigrants, and within different immigrant groups by geographic area of origin, using logistic regression models, adjusted for several sociodemographic factors and health factors. Results In total, we included 106,695 non-immigrants and 10,242 immigrants. The participation rate for FIT was 60% among non-immigrants, 58% among immigrants from Western countries and 37% among immigrants from non-Western countries. The participation rate for sigmoidoscopy was 53% among non-immigrants, 48% among immigrants from Western countries and 23% among immigrants from non-Western countries. Compared to non-immigrants, multivariate adjusted odds ratio for non-participation in FIT screening was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.23) and 1.82 (1.69-1.96) for immigrants from Western and non-Western countries. The corresponding numbers in sigmoidoscopy screening were 1.34 (1.21-1.48) and 2.83 (2.55-3.14). The lowest participation was observed in immigrants from Eastern Europe, Northern Africa and Western Asia, and South-Central Asia. Conclusion Participation in CRC screening in Norway was particularly low among non-Western immigrants, which could put them at increased risk for late stage diagnosis of CRC. Participation was lower in sigmoidoscopy screening than in FIT screening, especially among immigrants from non-Western countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Bhargava
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mona Berthelsen
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nadia Iqbal
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Research, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aasbø G, Hansen BT, Waller J, Nygård M, Solbrække KN. Unpacking the Lay Epidemiology of Cervical Cancer: A Focus Group Study on the Perceptions of Cervical Cancer and Its Prevention among Women Late for Screening in Norway. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11101441. [PMID: 37239727 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11101441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Nonattendance for cervical cancer screening is often understood in terms of a lack of 'appropriate' or 'correct' knowledge about the risks and prevention of the disease. Few studies have explored how lay persons-the users themselves-interpret and contextualise scientific knowledge about cervical cancer. In this study, we address the following research question: How is the epidemiology of cervical cancer and its prevention discussed among women who are late for cervical cancer screening in Norway? We completed nine focus group interviews (FGIs) with 41 women who had postponed cervical screening. The analyses were both inductive and explorative, aiming to unpack the complexity of lay understandings of cervical cancer. Interactive associations expressed in the FGIs reflected multiple understandings of aetiology and risk factors, screening, and interpretations of responsibility for acquiring cervical cancer. The term 'candidacy' was employed to provide an enhanced understanding of lay reasoning about the explanations and predictions of cervical cancer, as reflected in the FGIs. Both interpretations of biomedical concepts and cultural values were used to negotiate acceptable and nuanced interpretations of candidacy for cervical cancer. Uncertainties about risk factors for acquiring cervical cancer was an important aspect of such negotiations. The study's findings provide an in-depth understanding of the contexts in which screening may be rendered less relevant or significant for maintaining health. Lay epidemiology should not be considered inappropriate knowledge but rather as a productive component when understanding health behaviours, such as screening attendance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunvor Aasbø
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, 0304 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Science, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| | - Bo T Hansen
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, 0304 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Infection Control and Vaccine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0213 Oslo, Norway
| | - Jo Waller
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Mari Nygård
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, 0304 Oslo, Norway
| | - Kari N Solbrække
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Science, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marques P, Geraldes M, Gama A, Heleno B, Dias S. What is the role of attitudinal barriers on cervical cancer screening non-attendance? Findings from a cross-sectional study with migrant women in Portugal. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23:52. [PMID: 36759781 PMCID: PMC9909634 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02198-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is a common disease which can be effectively and timely detected by cervical cancer screening. However, access to cervical cancer screening is unequal, and it is known that migrant women have a lower attendance to cervical cancer screening. These inequalities are associated with several factors, including attitudes and beliefs of the women regarding screening practices, which prevents them from participating. This study aims to explore the attitudinal barriers to cervical cancer screening among migrant women in Portugal. METHODS A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted with 1100 migrant women residing in Portugal. Women were recruited through social media platforms. The survey included items on socioeconomic characteristics, cervical cancer screening history and an 11-item attitudinal questionnaire to assess attitudinal barriers. Logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS The attitudinal barriers to CCS most often reported by participants were fear of the test result (25.3%), worry about seeing a male health professional (23.8%), perceiving the test as painful (23.1%), embarrassment (18.5%), difficulties scheduling the test (14.3%), and having a negative experience in screening (12.4%). Low perceived need in absence of symptoms and lack of motivation to be screened were reported by less than 5% of the women. However, the results suggest that most of the attitudinal barriers with higher agreement percentage have no association with cervical cancer screening attendance. Among all the attitudinal barriers, low perceived need of screening and lack of motivation were associated with CCS non-attendance. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings, out of all the factors analyzed, low perceived need of screening and lack of motivation are the most relevant factors associated with non-attendance among migrants in Portugal. Promoting health literacy and empowering women with knowledge about benefits of screening may help overcoming these barriers. Therefore, this study provides a foundation for stakeholders on which areas should be prioritized when developing strategies aiming to reduced cervical cancer screening non-attendance among migrant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrícia Marques
- grid.10772.330000000121511713NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Avenida Padre Cruz, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Mariana Geraldes
- grid.10772.330000000121511713NOVA Nacional School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, NOVA University Lisbon, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Gama
- grid.10772.330000000121511713NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Avenida Padre Cruz, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Bruno Heleno
- grid.10772.330000000121511713CHRC, NOVA Medical School, NOVA University Lisbon, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sónia Dias
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Avenida Padre Cruz, 1600-560, Lisbon, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rosato I, Dalla Zuanna T, Tricarico V, Barbiellini Amidei C, Canova C. Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Migrant Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2200. [PMID: 36767568 PMCID: PMC9915157 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Organized cervical cancer screening programs to promote the early identification of precancerous lesions have proven to be effective in decreasing the burden associated with cervical cancer, but knowledge regarding screening adherence among migrant women compared to that of native women has not been summarized. A systematic search of the literature on PubMed, Scopus and Embase led to the identification of 772 papers that were published up to July 2022 and reported population-based data regarding adherence to cervical screening. The screening participation rates among migrant women, compared to native women, were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. A total of 18 papers were included in the review, with most of them being conducted in Europe (83.3%). Overall, migrants showed a significantly lower participation rate compared to native women (OR for screening adherence: 0.54, 95% CI = 0.42-0.70). This discrepancy was especially evident for migrant women from North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.35-0.63, and OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.24-0.49, respectively). The results of this systematic review emphasize the importance of increasing cervical cancer screening adherence among migrant women. A significant heterogeneity in screening adherence was observed based on the country of origin. Interventions aimed at reducing the disparities in screening participation should specifically consider how to improve the recruitment of migrant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Rosato
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy
| | - Teresa Dalla Zuanna
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy
| | - Valentina Tricarico
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy
| | - Claudio Barbiellini Amidei
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy
- Epidemiological Department, Azienda Zero, Veneto Region, 35131 Padua, Italy
| | - Cristina Canova
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nygård M, Nygård S. The Future of Cervical Cancer Prevention: From "One-Size-Fits-All" to Personalized Screening. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020161. [PMID: 36836396 PMCID: PMC9966965 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening represents an excellent model system for the development of personalized cancer-prevention strategies [...].
Collapse
|
12
|
Factors associated with cervical cancer screening behaviors among young married female (aged 20-29) immigrants in South Korea. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2023; 66:26-33. [PMID: 36325754 PMCID: PMC9849726 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.22008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors that affect the participation of female immigrants in their 20s in the national cervical cancer screening programs. METHODS Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Services from 2016 to 2017. A total of 17,730 women who agreed to undergo cervical cancer screening during 2016-2017 were included in the study. RESULTS Of the 17,730 women, 8,149 (46%) participated in cervical cancer screening, whereas, 9,581 (54%) did not. Logistic regression analysis of factors related to cervical cancer screening showed that the odds ratio (OR) of screening was higher in short duration of stay (OR, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.35), Chinese nationality (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.28-1.59), unemployment (OR, 1; 95% CI, reference), participation in general health screening (OR, 4.16; 95% CI, 3.24-5.33), and comorbidities (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.24) when compared to the other populations. The highest OR was associated with participation in general health screening. CONCLUSION Appropriate programs should be developed to increase participation of socially vulnerable groups in cervical cancer screening. Such programs will improve awareness regarding cervical cancer screening and reduce disparities in healthcare.
Collapse
|
13
|
Chandrakumar A, Hoon E, Benson J, Stocks N. Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening for women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds; a qualitative study of GPs. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062823. [PMID: 36375978 PMCID: PMC9664274 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore general practitioners' (GPs) perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening (CCS) for women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds. DESIGN Qualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews, with interview guide informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. SETTING Adelaide, South Australia. PARTICIPANTS Twelve GPs with experience in providing CCS to women from CALD backgrounds participated. RESULTS Four main themes emerged: 'importance of clinician-patient relationship', 'patients' cultural understanding regarding health care and CCS', 'communication and language' and 'health system related'. Each theme had several subthemes. GPs' professional relationship with their patients and repeated advice from other clinicians, together with the provision of opportunistic CCS, were described as facilitators, and encompassed the theme of 'importance of clinician-patient relationship'. This theme also raised the possibility of self-collection human papilloma virus tests. Lack of awareness and knowledge, lower priority for cancer screening and patients' individual circumstances contributed to the theme of 'patients' cultural understanding regarding health care and CCS', and often acted as barriers to CCS. 'Communication and language' consisted of language difficulties, interpreter use and use of appropriate resources. Language difficulties were a barrier to the provision of CCS, and GPs used interpreters and written handouts to help overcome this. The theme of 'health system related' involved the increased time needed for CCS consults for CALD women, access to appointments, funding, health promotion and effective use of practice management software. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights that multiple, inter-related barriers and facilitators influence CALD women's engagement with CCS, and that GPs needed to manage all of these factors in order to encourage CCS participation. More efforts are needed to address the barriers to ensure that GPs have access to appropriate resources, and CALD patients have access to GPs they trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abira Chandrakumar
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- GPEx Ltd, Unley, South Australia, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Hoon
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Nigel Stocks
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bhargava S, Czapka E, Hofvind S, Kristiansen M, Diaz E, Berstad P. Polish immigrants’ access to colorectal cancer screening in Norway – a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1332. [DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08719-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Norwegian colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme started in May 2022. Inequities in uptake of CRC screening is a concern, and we expect that immigrants are at risk of non-uptake. Immigrants from Poland are the most populous immigrant group in Norway. The purpose of this study was to identify and explore factors that may facilitate Polish immigrants’ access to the Norwegian CRC screening programme.
Material and methods
This study was based on qualitative interviews with ten Polish immigrants in Norway. The participants represented a convenience sample that varied in terms of gender, education, employment, time in Norway, place of residence, Norwegian language skills and ties to the Norwegian-Polish community. We performed thematic content analysis to understand CRC screening from the perspective of Polish immigrants, using transnationalism and Levesque’s conceptualization of accessibility as theoretical frameworks.
Results
We grouped our findings into three themes; “understanding of CRC development and the need to access health care”, “binationalism” and “improving accessibility through information”. Within these themes, various factors influenced the participants’ accessibility to CRC screening, namely knowledge about the screening and about causes, development and prevention of the disease, language, choice of screening country, trust in health personnel’s competence, information needs, methods and sources, as well as participants’ perception of the faecal immunochemical test screening user manual. These factors were further influenced by communication between the Polish community in Norway and Poland, as well as travel between the countries.
Conclusion
We identified several factors that can be targeted with an aim to increase Polish immigrants’ access to the Norwegian CRC screening programme. Effective measures could include increasing cultural competence among health care providers and providing information in Polish through Polish-speaking health care professionals, general practitioners and internet portals used by the Polish-speaking community. Focusing on accessibility in a transnational setting, our findings may be of interest for policy makers and service providers planning preventive health measures for immigrants.
Collapse
|
15
|
HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1816-1826. [PMID: 35995936 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01954-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer screening participation is suboptimal in most settings. We assessed whether human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling may increase screening participation among long-term non-attenders in Norway. METHODS A pragmatic randomised controlled trial with participation as the primary outcome was initiated in the national cervical screening programme in March 2019. A random sample of 6000 women aged 35-69 years who had not attended screening for at least 10 years were randomised 1:1:1 to receive either (i) a reminder to attend regular screening (control), (ii) an offer to order a self-sampling kit (opt-in) for HPV testing or (iii) a self-sampling kit unsolicited (send-to-all) for HPV testing. RESULTS Total participation was 4.8%, 17.0% and 27.7% among control, opt-in and send-to-all (P < 0.0001; participation difference (%) send-to-all vs. control: 22.9 (95%CI: 20.7, 25.2); opt-in vs. control: 12.3 (95%CI: 10.3, 14.2); send-to-all vs. opt-in: 10.7 (95% CI: 8.0, 13.3)). High-risk HPV was detected in 11.5% of self-samples and 9.2% of clinician-collected samples (P = 0.40). Most women (92.5%) who returned a positive self-sample attended the clinic for triage testing. Of the 933 women screened, 33 (3.5%) had CIN2 + (1.1%, 3.7%, 3.8% among control, opt-in, and send-to-all, respectively), and 11 (1.2%) had cervical cancer (0%, 1.2%, 1.3% among control, opt-in, send-to-all, respectively). CONCLUSION Opt-in and send-to-all self-sampling increased screening participation among long-term, higher-risk non-attenders. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03873376.
Collapse
|
16
|
Vallone F, Lemmo D, Martino ML, Donizzetti AR, Freda MF, Palumbo F, Lorenzo E, D'Argenzio A, Caso D. Factors Promoting Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screenings participation: A Systematic Review. Psychooncology 2022; 31:1435-1447. [PMID: 35793430 PMCID: PMC9541457 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Objective The present study aims at systematically reviewing research conducted on factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation. Methods A literature search in MEDLINE/PubMed and PsycInfo from January 2017 to October 2021 was performed. Data extraction, researchers' full agreement and the inclusion criteria produced 102 eligible studies. Data were narratively synthesized and critically interpreted. Results Multiple factors favoring or hindering breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings were identified and summarized as factors operating at the individual level (background information, individual characteristics, emotions related to screening procedure and to cancer, knowledge and awareness), at the relational level (relationships with healthcare staff, significant others, community members), and at the healthcare system level (systems barriers/policy, lack of staff). A critical appraisal of studies revealed a fragmentation in the literature, with a compartmentalization of studies by type of cancer screening, country and specific populations of destination. Conclusions Overall findings indicated that greater integration of research results obtained independently for each cancer diagnosis and within the different countries/populations could foster a more comprehensive understanding of factors potentially enhancing the participation in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings worldwide. This review, which is grounded in the current context of globalization and superdiversification in population, can help to enhance a better integration between research and practices, by supporting the development of more effective and inclusive evidence‐based interventions and health‐promotion campaigns worldwide. Research and practical implications are highlighted and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Vallone
- University of Naples Federico II, Department of Humanities, Napoli, Italy.,Dynamic Psychology Laboratory, Department of Political Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Daniela Lemmo
- University of Naples Federico II, Department of Humanities, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Francesco Palumbo
- Department of Political Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Elvira Lorenzo
- Regione Campania, Direzione Generale per la Tutela della Salute ed il Coordinamento del Sistema Sanitario Regionale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Angelo D'Argenzio
- Regione Campania, Direzione Generale per la Tutela della Salute ed il Coordinamento del Sistema Sanitario Regionale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Daniela Caso
- University of Naples Federico II, Department of Humanities, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yu XQ, Feletto E, Smith MA, Yuill S, Baade PD. Cancer Incidence in Migrants in Australia: Patterns of Three Infection-Related Cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1394-1401. [PMID: 35322272 PMCID: PMC9306400 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Australia provides an ideal population-base for cancer migration studies because of its multicultural society and high-quality cancer registrations. Among migrant groups there is considerable variability in the incidence of infection-related cancers; thus, the patterns of three such cancers were examined among migrant groups relative to Australian-born residents. METHODS Using national incidence data for cancers of the stomach, liver, and cervix diagnosed during 2005 to 2014, incidence rates were compared for selected migrant groups with the Australian-born population using incidence rate ratios (IRR), from a negative binomial regression model. RESULTS Wide variations in incidence between countries/regions of birth were observed for all three cancers (P < 0.0001). The patterns were similar for cancers of the stomach and liver, in that migrants from countries/regions with higher incidence rates maintained an increased risk in Australia, with the highest being among South American migrants (IRR = 2.35) for stomach cancer and among Vietnamese migrants (5.44) for liver cancer. In contrast, incidence rates of cervical cancer were lower for many migrant groups, with women from Southern Asia (0.39) and North Africa (0.42) having the lowest rates. The rate of cervical cancer was higher in migrants from New Zealand, Philippines, and Polynesia. CONCLUSIONS Several Australian migrant groups were found to experience a disproportionate burden of infection-related cancers; further studies of associated risk factors may inform the design of effective interventions to mediate these disparities. IMPACT By identifying these migrant groups, it is hoped that these results will motivate and inform prevention or early detection activities for these migrant groups. See related commentary Dee and Gomez, p. 1251.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Qin Yu
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Corresponding Author: Xue Qin Yu, The Daffodil Centre, PO Box 572, Kings Cross, New South Wales 1340, Australia. Phone: 612-9334-1851; Fax: 612-8302-3550; E-mail:
| | - Eleonora Feletto
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan A. Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan Yuill
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter D. Baade
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.,School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cervical Cancer Screening by Refugee Category in a Refugee Health Primary Care Clinic in Calgary, Canada, 2011-2016. J Immigr Minor Health 2022; 24:1534-1542. [PMID: 35233682 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-022-01345-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Newly arrived refugees and refugee claimants experience low cervical cancer screening (CCS) rates in Canada. We investigated CCS at a dedicated refugee clinic. We completed a retrospective cohort study among patients at the Mosaic Refugee Health Clinic in Calgary, Canada, between 2011 and 2016. We investigated CCS offers and completion by refugee category. We then used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the association of CCS screening and refugee category, accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. We included 812 refugees. Most were married (71%) and had limited English proficiency (57%). Overall, 88% and 77% of patients were offered and completed screening, respectively. Compared to government assisted refugees, privately sponsored refugees completed CCS more often (OR 1.60, 95% CI [1.02-2.49]). A dedicated refugee clinic may provide effective CCS to newly arrived refugees irrespective of refugee category, insurance status or other barriers.
Collapse
|
19
|
Explaining Correlates of Cervical Cancer Screening among Minority Women in the United States. PHARMACY 2022; 10:pharmacy10010030. [PMID: 35202079 PMCID: PMC8875364 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy10010030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, cervical cancer is the fourth leading cause of death among women. While overall cervical cancer rates have decreased over the last few decades, minority women continue to be disproportionately affected compared to White women. Given the paucity of theory-based interventions to promote Pap smear tests among minority women, this cross-sectional study attempts to examine the correlates of cervical cancer screening by Pap test using the Multi-theory Model (MTM) as a theoretical paradigm among minority women in the United States (U.S.). Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was done for testing the construct validity of the survey instrument. Data were analyzed through bivariate and multivariate tests. In a sample of 364 minority women, nearly 31% (n = 112) of women reported not having received a Pap test within the past three years compared to the national rate (20.8%) for all women. The MTM constructs of participatory dialogue, behavioral confidence, and changes in the physical environment explained a substantial proportion of variance (49.5%) in starting the behavior of getting Pap tests, while the constructs of emotional transformation, practice for change, and changes in the social environment, along with lack of health insurance and annual household income of less than $25,000, significantly explained the variance (73.6%) of the likelihood to sustain the Pap test behavior of getting it every three years. Among those who have had a Pap smear (n = 252), healthcare insurance, emotional transformation, practice for change, and changes in the social environment predicted nearly 83.3% of the variance in sustaining Pap smear test uptake behavior (adjusted R2 = 0.833, F = 45.254, p < 0.001). This study validates the need for health promotion interventions based on MTM to be implemented to address the disparities of lower cervical cancer screenings among minority women.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hjerkind KV, Johansson ALV, Trewin CB, Russnes HG, Ursin G. Incidence of breast cancer subtypes in immigrant and non-immigrant women in Norway. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:4. [PMID: 35012613 PMCID: PMC8751256 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01498-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer incidence differs between non-immigrants and immigrants from low- and middle-income countries. This study investigates whether immigrants also have different subtype-specific incidences. METHODS We used national health registries in Norway and calculated subtype-specific incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for invasive breast cancer among women aged 20-75 and 20-49 years between 2005 and 2015. Immigrant groups were classified by country of birth broadly defined based on WHO regional groupings. Subtype was defined using estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status as luminal A-like (ER+ PR+ HER2-), luminal B-like/HER2- (ER+ PR- HER2-), luminal B-like/HER2+ (ER+ PR any HER2+), HER2+ (ER-PR-HER2+) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ER-PR-HER2-). RESULTS Compared to non-immigrants, incidence of the luminal A-like subtype was lower in immigrants from Sub-Saharan Africa (IRR 0.43 95% CI 0.28-0.66), South East Asia (IRR 0.63 95% CI 0.51-0.79), South Asia (IRR 0.67 95% CI 0.52-0.86) and Eastern Europe (IRR 0.86 95% CI 0.76-0.99). Immigrants from South Asia had higher rates of HER2 + tumors (IRR 2.02 95% CI 1.26-3.23). The rates of TNBC tended to be similar regardless of region of birth, except that women from South East Asia had an IRR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.32-0.91). CONCLUSIONS Women from Eastern Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia had different subtype-specific incidences compared to women from high-income countries (including non-immigrants). These differences in tumor characteristics between immigrant groups should be taken into consideration when planning preventive or screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsti V. Hjerkind
- grid.418941.10000 0001 0727 140XDepartment of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna L. V. Johansson
- grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden ,grid.418941.10000 0001 0727 140XCancer Registry of Norway, Postbox 5313, 0304 Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cassia B. Trewin
- grid.418941.10000 0001 0727 140XDepartment of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G. Russnes
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway ,grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- grid.418941.10000 0001 0727 140XCancer Registry of Norway, Postbox 5313, 0304 Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway ,grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Frick A, Azuaga A, Abdulcadir J. Cervical dysplasia among migrant women with female genital mutilation/cutting type III: A cross-sectional study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 157:557-563. [PMID: 34498291 PMCID: PMC9293473 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the rate of cervical dysplasia in a population of migrant women with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) type III who attended a specialized clinic for FGM/C. Methods Descriptive retrospective cross‐sectional study reviewing electronic medical records of all infibulated women who attended a specialized clinic for women and girls with FGM/C at Geneva University Hospitals (2010–2016). We examined sociodemographic characteristics, parity, FGM/C subtypes, presence/grade of cervical dysplasia, colposcopy follow up/treatment, infections, and history of sexual violence. Results Out of 360 women reviewed, 188 women with FGM/C type III were included. Mean age of the women was 37.7 (±5.14) years. They were mostly from East Africa (n = 116, 61.7%). A total of 113 (60%) had undergone defibulation, the majority (105; 92.9%) without undergoing re‐infibulation. Cervical dysplasia was found in 20 (10.6%): 16 (8.5%) had a low‐grade grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or HPV‐positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, Four (2.1%) had a high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, of which one was a carcinoma in situ. Seven (35%) of the women with dysplasia underwent colposcopies regularly, five (25%) irregularly, and eight (40%) dropped out of colposcopy follow up. Conclusion Cervical dysplasia is frequent among women with FGM/C type III and efforts should be made to guarantee follow up for migrant women. Migrant women with female genital mutilation/cutting type III have a high prevalence of cervical dysplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albertina Frick
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alicia Azuaga
- Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jasmine Abdulcadir
- Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Qureshi SA, Igland J, Møen K, Gele A, Kumar B, Diaz E. Effect of a community-based intervention to increase participation in cervical cancer screening among Pakistani and Somali women in Norway. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1271. [PMID: 34193096 PMCID: PMC8243573 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11319-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Norway implemented a regular cervical cancer screening program based on triennial screening in 1995, recommending participation of all women between 25 and 69 years of age. Somali and Pakistani women have the lowest participation in cervical cancer screening in Norway. This study evaluates the effect of a community-based intervention aimed at increasing participation in the screening program among women from these two groups. METHODS The intervention consisted of an oral 20-25 min presentation in Urdu and Somali on cervical cancer and screening and practical information on how to make an appointment and payment for the test. The participants were invited to pose questions related to the topic after the presentation. This study was carried out in four geographical areas surrounding the capital Oslo between February and October 2017, among women aged 25-69 years from Pakistan and Somalia. We recruited women in the intervention group directly from different community institutions, households, and religious sites. Women from Pakistan and Somalia residing in Oslo were the controls. The absolute intervention effect was measured as difference in absolute proportion of women screened and estimated as the interaction between time and group allocation in a generalized estimation equation model with binomial distribution and identity link function. RESULTS The percentage of women screened in the intervention group increased, from 46 to 51%. The corresponding increase in proportion in the control group was from 44 to 45.5%. After adjustment for potential confounders the intervention group showed a significant larger increase in participation in the screening program as compared to the control group with an absolute difference in change in proportion screened of 0.03 (95% CI; 0.02- 0.06). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that theory-based, culturally and linguistically sensitive educational interventions can raise awareness and motivate immigrant women to participate in cervical cancer screening program. In addition, approaching health professionals as well as immigrant women, might improve participation even more. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03155581 . Retrospectively registered, on 16 May 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samera Azeem Qureshi
- Unit for Migration & Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Jannicke Igland
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kathy Møen
- The Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE) Alrek Helseklynge, Årstadveien 17, 5009, Bergen, Norway
| | - Abdi Gele
- Unit for Migration & Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bernadette Kumar
- Unit for Migration & Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway
| | - Esperanza Diaz
- Unit for Migration & Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Prevalence of positive screening test results and agreement between cytology and human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical cancer screening in North-Western Romania. Eur J Cancer Prev 2021; 29:141-148. [PMID: 31033568 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Using data from a pilot study conducted in North-Western Romania, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of abnormal cytology and positive high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) test results in an ethnically diverse screening population and to assess the agreement between cytology and hr-HPV testing to evaluate the feasibility of integrating the latter as a primary test in the national cervical cancer screening program. The cross-sectional pilot study included Roma women, other ethnic minorities, and women in rural remote areas. Samples were taken for liquid-based cytology and hr-HPV testing (Hybrid Capture 2 DNA test) by a mobile health unit. The prevalence of positive screening results and the agreement between cytology and hr-HPV testing were estimated by κ coefficient. A total of 1019 women were included in the study. The population prevalence of positive screening results was similar for both tests (12%). The prevalence of abnormal cytology increased with increasing age, whereas the prevalence of positive hr-HPV test showed a bimodal age pattern. Substantial differences in the prevalence of abnormal cytology were found by ethnicity, with highest prevalence in Romanian women (14%), followed by Roma women (6%) and women of other ethnicities (5%) (P = 0.002). Similar ethnic differences in the prevalence of positive hr-HPV test were not observed. The overall agreement of positive screening results between the two methods was fair (κ = 0.25; 95% confidence interval = 0.18-0.30, P < 0.001) and ranged from poor to substantial depending on the age group. The prevalence of abnormal cytology result was high and similar to the prevalence of positive hr-HPV test result, which could allow for the implementation of hr-HPV testing as a primary test in the cervical cancer screening program in Romania.
Collapse
|
24
|
Human papillomavirus vaccination in immigrants and descendants of immigrants in Denmark. Eur J Cancer Prev 2021; 29:149-156. [PMID: 31425314 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In Denmark, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been offered at age of 12 to girls born in 1996 and later. In this cohort study, we examined routine HPV vaccination uptake in immigrants and descendants from different countries and regions compared with native Danes, including the influence of socioeconomic characteristics and potential changes in uptake by birth cohort. METHODS In nationwide registers, we identified all girls born in 1996-2003 (n = 260 251) and obtained information on country of origin, HPV vaccinations and parents' income and employment. Vaccination was defined as receiving ≥1 dose within 2 years after eligibility for routine vaccination. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by logistic regression separately for birth cohorts 1996-2000 and 2001-2003. RESULTS Uptake in immigrants and descendants varied by country and region of origin. Overall, immigrants had lower uptake than native Danes, in birth cohorts 1996-2000 [79% vs. 93%, OR = 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.34] and 2001-2003 (63% vs. 73%, OR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.54-0.66). Descendants had lower uptake than native Danes in cohorts 1996-2000 (89% vs. 93%, OR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60-0.68), but higher uptake in cohorts 2001-2003 (76% vs. 73%, OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21). Most associations were attenuated, but not entirely explained, when adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics. CONCLUSION HPV vaccination uptake varied by country and region. Most immigrants had lower uptake than native Danes, and in most groups, this was not fully explained by socioeconomic differences. Patterns in descendants were mixed. Interventions to increase uptake should be tailored to specific groups of immigrants/descendants.
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhao Y, Gjernes T, Hedlund M. Exploring Participation and Interaction in a Bottom-Up Health Promotion Program for Migrant Women in Norway. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2021; 31:691-702. [PMID: 33349151 PMCID: PMC7882997 DOI: 10.1177/1049732320980397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we examine the participation and interactions of migrant women and experts who attended health parties. Based on data from participation observations and semi-structured interviews from participants of health parties, we examine how health parties may be considered an innovative bottom-up community program that could influence how migrant women focus, learn, and discuss health issues as well as interact with health care. Through a qualitative analysis, the article demonstrates two ways of organizing health parties and different approaches to the health expert role, and how this impacts the social setting and interactions of a health party. In the Norwegian setting, migrant women are considered by health authorities to be the most difficult group to reach due to cultural and language barriers. Health parties may represent an alternative for bridging these barriers and may create a useful context for active participation and learning about health for migrant women.
Collapse
|
26
|
Investigating the decrease in participation in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: The role of personal and organisational characteristics. Prev Med Rep 2021; 22:101328. [PMID: 33680719 PMCID: PMC7930587 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Declining attendance in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme was recently observed, coinciding with preparations for implementing primary hrHPV-based screening, which was implemented in January 2017. We aimed to investigate which factors were related to decreased attendance. We conducted a population-based cohort study including all women aged 30 to 60 years who were eligible for screening between 2014 and 2018. Attendance was defined as participation in the screening programme within 15 months of the start of the invitation-eligible year. We used data from the Dutch pathology archive (PALGA) linked with data from Statistics Netherlands to investigate population characteristics (position in the household, household income, socio-economic status, number of people in the household, migration background, age) and data from the five Dutch screening organisations (SO) to investigate the effect of cessing self-inviting GP's ('inviting organisation'). SO's were termed SO 1 to 5. Higher attendance rates were observed in women who were employed (60.8%), married (62.9%), Dutch (61.2%), in the highest income bracket (63.4%), living in households with four persons (65.3%) and women who were invited by their GP (69.8%). Differences in personal characteristics did not explain the decline in attendance rates. By adjusting for whether the GP or the SO sent the invitation, the differences in attendance rates between 2014 and 2015 and 2016 and between 2014 and 2015 and 2017-2018 were explained in some screening organisations. Removing the possibility for GPs to send invitations explains some of the decline in participation, although this did not account for the total change in attendance.
Collapse
|
27
|
Christie-de Jong F, Reilly S. Barriers and facilitators to cervical screening for Filipino women – a narrative literature review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MIGRATION, HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE 2021. [DOI: 10.1108/ijmhsc-04-2019-0043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
Mortality rates of cervical cancer are high amongst Filipino women; however, uptake of cervical screening is low. The purpose of this paper is to identify known barriers and facilitators to cervical screening for Filipino migrant women.
Design/methodology/approach
A systematic approach was adopted for the search, data extraction, critical appraisal and synthesis processes of this review. Eight electronic databases were searched. Studies published in peer review journals in English between 1995 and 2019 were reviewed.
Findings
In total, 20 relevant studies were identified. Studies were heterogeneous in design and focus and mostly conducted in the USA. A complex multifactorial picture of barriers to cervical screening was identified, which included: demographic, cognitive, access, health-care provider and cultural factors. None of the studies incorporated all factors.
Practical implications
This review demonstrates the complexity and multifactorial characteristic of cervical screening for Filipino migrant women. To increase uptake of screening, barriers to cervical screening for Filipino migrant women need to be fully understood. Future research should be conducted in different locations, focussing on multiple factors.
Originality/value
Aggregation of barriers and facilitators for Asian women combined tends to ignore cultural differences between groups. This review synthesises the existing but scarce literature to identify known barriers and facilitators to cervical screening for this specific population of Filipino migrant women.
Collapse
|
28
|
Jang S, Cho H, Kang C, Jang S. Antidepressant adherence and its predictors in immigrants with depression: A population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e23308. [PMID: 33371064 PMCID: PMC7748329 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000023308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Immigrants in Korea are relatively vulnerable in terms of medication self-management and have low levels of medication adherence. We aimed to evaluate antidepressant adherence and its patterns in immigrants and to identify predictors of nonadherence.In this matched cohort study using the National Health Insurance claims database, immigrants who were newly prescribed antidepressants were identified (n = 2,398). The immigrants were matched with native-born Koreans in a 1:1 ratio. Antidepressant adherence was measured by the medication possession ratio at monthly intervals. Logistic regression was performed to compare antidepressant nonadherence between immigrants and native-born Koreans, and to identify factors affecting immigrants' nonadherence.The average medication possession ratio of immigrants was 27.1%, which was lower than that of native-born Koreans (30.9%) (P = .038). Immigrants had a lower likelihood of adherence than native-born Koreans (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.92). Older age, visiting a psychiatrist for the first diagnosis of depression (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.60-3.13), achieving appropriateness of care (OR 3.54, 95% CI 2.51-4.98), and having a usual source of care (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.25-2.27) were associated with a higher likelihood of adherence in immigrants.This study showed that antidepressant adherence of immigrants was lower than that of native-born Koreans. However, it appears that visiting a psychiatrist, achieving appropriateness of care, and having a usual source of care might increase antidepressant adherence among immigrants. Further research that focuses on cultural and/or linguistic factors affecting immigrants' adherence and healthcare utilization is suggested as a way to increase adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhyun Jang
- College of Pharmacy and Gachon Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gachon University, Incheon
| | - Hyemin Cho
- College of Pharmacy and Gachon Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gachon University, Incheon
| | - Cinoo Kang
- Department of Biostatics and Epidemiology Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunmee Jang
- College of Pharmacy and Gachon Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gachon University, Incheon
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hjerkind KV, Larsen IK, Aaserud S, Møller B, Ursin G. Cancer incidence in non-immigrants and immigrants in Norway. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1275-1283. [PMID: 32930622 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1817549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major cancers are associated with lifestyle, and previous studies have found that the non-immigrant populations in the Nordic countries have higher incidence rates of most cancers than the immigrant populations. However, rates are changing worldwide - so these differences may disappear with time. Here we present recent cancer incidence rates among immigrant and non-immigrant men and women in Norway and investigate whether previous differences still exist. MATERIAL AND METHODS We took advantage of a recent change in the Norwegian Cancer Registry regulations that allow for the registry to have information on country of birth. The number of person years for 2014-2018 was aggregated for every combination of sex, five-year age-group and country of birth, by summing up each year's population in these groups. The number of cancer cases was then counted for the same groups, and age-standardised incidence rates calculated by weighing the age-specific incidence rates by the Nordic and World standard populations. Further, we calculated incidence rate ratios using the non-immigrant population as a reference. RESULTS Immigrants from Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia had lower incidence of total cancer compared to the non-immigrant population in Norway and immigrants born in the other Nordic or high-income countries. However, some cancers were more common in certain immigrant groups. Asian men and women had threefold the incidence of liver cancer than non-immigrant men and women. Men from the other Nordic countries and from Eastern Europe had higher lung cancer rates than non-immigrant men. CONCLUSION National registries should continuously monitor and present cancer incidence stratified on important population subgroups such as country of birth. This can help assess population subgroup specific needs for cancer prevention and treatment, and could eventually help reduce the morbidity and mortality of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Inger K. Larsen
- Department of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein Aaserud
- Department of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Møller
- Department of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Idehen EE, Virtanen A, Lilja E, Tuomainen TP, Korhonen T, Koponen P. Cervical Cancer Screening Participation among Women of Russian, Somali, and Kurdish Origin Compared with the General Finnish Population: A Register-Based Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17217899. [PMID: 33126544 PMCID: PMC7663516 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Migrant-origin women are less prone to cervical screening uptake compared with host populations. This study examined cervical cancer screening participation and factors associated with it in the Finnish mass screening program during 2008–2012 in women of Russian, Somali and Kurdish origin compared with the general Finnish population (Finns) in Finland. The study population consists of samples from the Finnish Migrant Health and Well-being Study 2010–2012 and Health 2011 Survey; aged 30–64 (n = 2579). Data from the Finnish screening register linked with other population-based registry data were utilized. For statistical analysis we employed logistic regression. Age-adjusted screening participation rates were Russians 63% (95% CI: 59.9–66.6), Somalis 19% (16.4–21.6), Kurds 69% (66.6–71.1), and Finns 67% (63.3–69.8). In the multiple-adjusted model with Finns as the reference; odds ratios for screening were among Russians 0.92 (0.74–1.16), Somalis 0.16 (0.11–0.22), and Kurds 1.37 (1.02–1.83). Among all women, the substantial factor for increased screening likelihood was hospital care related to pregnancy/birth 1.73 (1.27–2.35), gynecological 2.47 (1.65–3.68), or other reasons 1.53 (1.12–2.08). Screening participation was lower among students and retirees. In conclusion, screening among the migrant-origin women varies, being significantly lowest among Somalis compared with Finns. Efforts using culturally tailored/population-specific approaches may be beneficial in increasing screening participation among women of migrant-origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther E. Idehen
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +358-503678612
| | - Anni Virtanen
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland;
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki, University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 3, 00029 HUS Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eero Lilja
- Department of Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland;
| | - Tellervo Korhonen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM) University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 20, 00014 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Päivikki Koponen
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland;
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Barriers and Facilitators to Cervical Screening among Migrant Women of African Origin: A Qualitative Study in Finland. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17207473. [PMID: 33066565 PMCID: PMC7602139 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Globally, cervical cancer constitutes a substantial public health concern. Evidence recommends regular cervical cancer screening (CCS) for early detection of "precancerous lesions."Understanding the factors influencing screening participation among various groups is imperative for improving screening protocols and coverage. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to CCS participation in women of Nigerian, Ghanaian, Cameroonian, and Kenyan origin in Finland. We utilized a qualitative design and conducted eight focus group discussions (FGDs) in English, with women aged 27-45 years (n = 30). The FGDs were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed utilizing the inductive content analysis approach. The main barriers to CCS participation included limited language proficiency, lack of screening awareness, misunderstanding of screening's purpose, and miscomprehension of the CCS results. Facilitators were free-of-charge screening, reproductive health services utilization, and women's understanding of CCS's importance for early detection of cervical cancer. In conclusion, among women, the main barriers to CCS participation were language difficulties and lack of screening information. Enhancing screening participation amongst these migrant populations would benefit from appropriate information about the CCS. Those women with limited language skills and not utilizing reproductive health services need more attention from healthcare authorities about screening importance. Culturally tailored screening intervention programs might also be helpful.
Collapse
|
32
|
Pankakoski M, Heinävaara S, Anttila A, Sarkeala T. Differences in cervical test coverage by age, socioeconomic status, ethnic origin and municipality type - A nationwide register-based study. Prev Med 2020; 139:106219. [PMID: 32693176 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
An invitational organized cervical cancer screening together with widely spread opportunistic testing has coexisted for decades in Finland. The aim of this study was to examine the coverage of cervical tests by age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity and municipality type within and outside the organized screening program. We had a cohort of women of whom 1,2 million were in the target age range of screening and residing in Finland in 2010-2014. Data on Pap and/or HPV -tests within and outside the screening program were collected from the Mass Screening Registry, the pathology laboratories and the health insurance reimbursement registry and five-year population coverages of tests were reported. The total test coverage was 86.0%; 95% CI, (85.8-86.1), and was notably lower for those with an unknown socioeconomic status and pensioners (68.8%; 95% CI, (67.9-69.6) and 77.1%; 95% CI, (76.5-77.6), respectively) compared to upper-level employers (89.8%; 95% CI, (89.5-90.2)). Coverage was also lower for non-native speaking women (72.4%; 95% CI, (71.8-73.0)) compared to native speakers (86.9%; 95% CI, (86.7-87.0)) and for women living in urban municipalities (85.5%; 95% CI, (85.3-85.7)) compared to semi-urban (87.4%; 95% CI, (87.0-87.8)). Although overall coverage was high, tests within and outside the program seemed to concentrate on women with presumably good access to health services. Tests outside the program were especially common among young women who are at a low risk of invasive cervical cancer. Efforts should be made to reduce excessive opportunistic testing and to increase attendance at the program among hard-to-reach populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiju Pankakoski
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, 00014, Finland.
| | - Sirpa Heinävaara
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, 00014, Finland
| | - Ahti Anttila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tytti Sarkeala
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tatari CR, Andersen B, Brogaard T, Badre-Esfahani SK, Jaafar N, Kirkegaard P. Perceptions about cancer and barriers towards cancer screening among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark - a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:921. [PMID: 32532227 PMCID: PMC7291658 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09037-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening programmes for cervical cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancer have been implemented in many Western countries to reduce cancer incidence and mortality. Ethnic minority women are less likely to participate in cancer screening than the majority population. In worst case this can result in higher incidence rates, later diagnosis and treatment and ultimately inferior survival. In this paper we explored the perceptions about cancer and perceived barriers towards cancer screening participation among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark. METHODS Interview study with ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark. The interviews were transcribed verbatim followed by an inductive content analysis. RESULTS Cancer was perceived as a deadly disease that could not be treated. Cancer screening was perceived as only relevant if the women had symptoms. Knowledge about cancer screening was fragmented, often due to inadequate Danish language skills and there was a general mistrust in the Danish healthcare system due to perceived low medical competences in Danish doctors. There was, however, a very positive and curious attitude regarding information about the Danish cancer screening programmes and a want for more information. CONCLUSION Ethnic minority women did not have sufficient knowledge about cancer and the purpose of cancer screening. Perceptions about cancer screening were characterised by openness and the study showed positive and curious attitudes towards screening participation. The findings emphasise the importance of culturally adapted interventions for ethnic minority women in attempts to reduce inequality in screening participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Rahr Tatari
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Sara Koed Badre-Esfahani
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Negin Jaafar
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nagamatsu Y, Barroga E, Sakyo Y, Igarashi Y, Hirano O Y. Risks and perception of non-communicable diseases and health promotion behavior of middle-aged female immigrants in Japan: a qualitative exploratory study. BMC Womens Health 2020; 20:88. [PMID: 32357884 PMCID: PMC7195750 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-00955-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ensuring good health of immigrants is a serious issue across countries, including Japan. This study focused on the health of middle-aged female immigrants in Japan who experienced changes to their health as well as an increased risk of non-communicable diseases. Specifically, the study aimed to clarify the risks and perceptions of non-communicable diseases and health promotion behavior of middle-aged female immigrants in Japan. METHODS This investigation used an exploratory design. The participants were a purposive sample of 35 middle-aged female immigrants (age ≥ 40 years) living in urban and rural areas of Japan. Data were generated using mixed methods. A quantitative approach provided data of their risks of non-communicable diseases. Focus group discussions provided insights to identify their health promotion perceptions. RESULTS Blood pressure measurement revealed that 29% of the immigrants had hypertension, 29% had a body mass index of > 30, and 71% had an abdominal girth of > 80 cm. About 31% had a history of chronic disease and 34% had regular medication. There were 80% who received regular health check-up, 49% who received breast cancer screening, and 34% who received cervical cancer screening. The focus group discussions indicated that the middle-aged female immigrants recognized the threat of non-communicable diseases. However, they lacked knowledge about the prevention of non-communicable diseases, and they felt that non-communicable diseases were unavoidable. They also failed to understand the benefits of health promotion behavior. The study revealed that the monolingual Japanese health service prevented immigrant women from understanding their health check-up and cancer screening results, and how to utilize the health service system. CONCLUSIONS Middle-aged female immigrants in Japan had potential risks of non-communicable diseases, and recognized their threat. These settled immigrant women received health check-ups and cancer screenings with the support of their family, and consequently attained the same level of adherence as that of Japanese women. However, lack of knowledge about health promotion and its benefits and the absence of a culturally sensitive health service system for immigrants in Japan constrained their health-promotion behavior. Sociocultural multilingual-tailored interventions including interpretation services by care providers with cultural sensitivities must be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuko Nagamatsu
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044 Japan
| | - Edward Barroga
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044 Japan
| | - Yumi Sakyo
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044 Japan
| | - Yukari Igarashi
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044 Japan
| | - Yuko Hirano O
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, 8528520 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Møen KA, Kumar B, Igland J, Diaz E. Effect of an Intervention in General Practice to Increase the Participation of Immigrants in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e201903. [PMID: 32236530 PMCID: PMC7113727 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Immigrant women have lower participation in cervical cancer screening (CCS) programs. At the same time, some groups of immigrants have higher prevalence of cervical cancer. Targeted interventions are therefore necessary. OBJECTIVE To determine whether an intervention among general practitioners (GPs) could influence immigrant women's participation in the Norwegian CCS program. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cluster-randomized clinical trial using the 20 subdistricts of the Bergen, Norway, municipality as clusters. The clusters were matched in 10 pairs according to the number of immigrant women living in them and randomized thereafter. The intervention was implemented between January and June 2017 among urban, primary care, general practices in Bergen. Follow-up ended in January 2018. General practices belonging to the control areas continued treatment as usual. A total of 10 360 women who attended 73 general practices in the 20 subdistricts were included as participants. INTERVENTION The intervention consisted of 3 elements: an educational session for GPs at lunch describing the importance of CCS among immigrants and giving advice about how to invite them to participate, a mouse pad as a reminder, and a poster placed in waiting rooms. In the educational session, we elaborated the need for GPs to ask every immigrant woman about CCS, regardless of their reason for contacting their GP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome, screening status of immigrant women by January 1, 2018, was obtained from the Norwegian Cancer Registry. The effect of the intervention was measured as odds ratio (OR) for CCS status as of January 1, 2018, for the intervention group vs the control group, with 3 levels of adjustments: baseline CCS status at January 1, 2017 (model 1), additional adjustment for women's age, marital status, income level, and region of origin (model 2), and further adjustment for the GP's sex, age, and region of origin (model 3). Two subgroup analyses, screening status at baseline and women's country of origin, were conducted to assess whether these factors had any influence on the effect of the intervention. Data were analyzed as intention to treat. RESULTS A total of 10 360 immigrant women, 5227 (50.4%; mean [SD] age, 44.0 [12.0] years) in the intervention group and 5133 (49.6%; mean [SD] age, 44.5 [11.6] years) in the control group, belonging to 39 general practices in the intervention area and 34 in the control area, were included in the study. The proportion of immigrant women screened increased by 2.6% in the intervention group and 0.6% in the control group. After adjustment for screening status at baseline, women in the intervention group were more likely to have participated in CCS (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.11-1.38]). This statistically significant effect remained unchanged after adjustment for women's characteristics (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.11-1.38]) and was reduced, but still significant, after further adjustment for GP characteristics (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.06-1.34]). In subgroup analyses, the intervention particularly increased participation among women who were not previously screened at baseline (OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.16-1.56]), and those from Poland, Pakistan, and Somalia (OR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.17-2.61]) when adjusting for baseline screening status. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Our intervention targeting general practices significantly increased CCS participation among immigrants, although the absolute effect size of 2% in the fully adjusted model was small. Engaging other primary health professionals such as midwives to perform CCS could further contribute to increasing participation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03155581.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Ainul Møen
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Unit for Migration and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (FHI), Oslo, Norway
| | - Bernadette Kumar
- Unit for Migration and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (FHI), Oslo, Norway
| | - Jannicke Igland
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Esperanza Diaz
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Unit for Migration and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (FHI), Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Brevik TB, Laake P, Bjørkly S. Effect of culturally tailored education on attendance at mammography and the Papanicolaou test. Health Serv Res 2020; 55:457-468. [PMID: 31994187 PMCID: PMC7240773 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To determine the effectiveness of culturally tailored education on attendance at breast and cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority women. Data Sources Systematic database searches in Ovid MEDLINE, ProQuest, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Study Design Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of culturally tailored educational interventions to ethnic minority women in Western countries were investigated for a meta‐analysis. RCTs that assessed attendance at mammography or the Papanicolaou test (Pap test) were eligible for inclusion. Data Collection Methods Study characteristics and results were extracted separately. Independent raters assessed risk of bias by using Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Principal Findings Seven RCTs (n = 4246) were included in the meta‐analysis of mammography attendance, and four RCTs (n = 1750) were included in the meta‐analysis of Pap test attendance. The effect of culturally tailored educational interventions on attendance at mammography was an increase of 18 percent (RR = 1.18, 95% CI, 1.09‐1.28, P < .001), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 30.0, P = .237), and a 54 percent increase at the Pap test (RR = 1.54, 95% CI, 1.14‐2.09, P = .005), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 75.9%, P = .001). Conclusions Interpreted within the limitations set by the low number of studies and substantial heterogeneity for the Pap test, findings from the current meta‐analyses indicate that culturally tailored educational interventions may increase attendance of ethnic minority women at breast and cervical cancer screenings. There is a need for more studies, in particular RCTs conducted outside the United States, to determine if such findings are similar in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thea Beate Brevik
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.,Clinic of Surgery, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Molde Hospital, Molde, Norway
| | - Petter Laake
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.,Oslo Centre for Statistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stål Bjørkly
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.,Centre for Forensic Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Uptake of Gynecological Cancer Screening and Performance of Breast Self-Examination Among 50-Year-Old Migrant and Non-migrant Women in Germany: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study (InEMa). J Immigr Minor Health 2019; 21:674-677. [PMID: 29987640 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-018-0785-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Our aim was to provide data regarding uptake of gynecological early detection measures and performance of breast self-examinations among migrant women in Germany. Cross-sectional self-reported data were collected using paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Descriptive analyses, Chi square-tests, and logistic regression were applied. Results were adjusted for educational level. Of 5387 women, 89.9% were autochthonous, 4.1% German resettlers, 2.8% Turkish, 3.1% other migrants. Participation rates regarding cancer screening differed significantly, with the lowest proportion in Turkish migrants (65.0%), resettlers (67.8%), other migrants (68.2%) and autochthonous population (78.2%). No differences in performance of breast self-examinations were detected. When adjusted for education, results indicated only slight changes in the odds to participate in screening irregularly or not at all. Results support existing evidence by showing lower participation rates in cancer screening among migrant women, but there were no differences regarding breast self-examinations. Migrant women form a potential high-risk group for late-stage diagnosis of cervical or breast cancer.
Collapse
|
38
|
Leonhardt M, Aschenbrenner K, Kreis ME, Lauscher JC. Does migrant background predict to what extent colorectal cancer patients want to be informed about their life expectancy? - a cross-sectional analysis. Int J Equity Health 2019; 18:192. [PMID: 31805943 PMCID: PMC6896741 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-1105-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although migrant health is a topic of interest across Europe and although health care services in Germany consider migrant health issues, people with a migrant background often experience difficulties regarding health care provision. The prevalence of various cancers among migrants is lower relative to non-migrants although this equalizes with increasing duration of residence. There are documented differences in health behavior and disease-coping strategies between migrants and non-migrants, but data are scarce on this subject. This analysis investigates the extent of information migrant and non-migrant colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Germany want about their life expectancy and the level of trust they have in their treating physician. METHOD Data from 522 CRC patients were collected through a self-reported questionnaire. Migrant background was determined by the patients' and/or their parents' birthplace. Bivariate analyses were applied to determine the differences between migrants and non-migrants. A multivariate analysis was used to measure the effect of migration background, demographics, and cancer stage and treatment on the preferred extent of information about life expectancy and trust in their treating physician. RESULTS There were no significant differences regarding demographics or cancer stage and treatment between migrant and non-migrant CRC patients. Having a migrant background had no influence on the level of trust in the treating physician, but migrants preferred to be less informed about their life expectancy than non-migrants (21.4% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.04). The multivariate analysis showed that men (aOR = 2.102, CI: 1.123-3.932) and patients with a non-migrant background (aOR = 5.03, CI: 1.02-24.73) preferred receiving information about the approximate value of their life expectancy, rather than receiving no information. CONCLUSION The study found more similarities than discrepancies between migrant and non-migrant CRC patients regarding demographic factors and stage of disease and treatment, which may be a consequence of an increasingly homogeneous cross-cultural society. However, cultural differences between the minority and host population remain and should always be taken into account in daily clinical practice and in the communication skills training of health care professionals. The study also indicates that recording migration background into health registers would facilitate migrant-sensitive research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marja Leonhardt
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University of Medicine Berlin, 12203, Berlin, Germany. .,Faculty of Health Studies, VID - Specialized University, Mailbox 184 Vinderen, 0319, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Katja Aschenbrenner
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University of Medicine Berlin, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin E Kreis
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University of Medicine Berlin, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes C Lauscher
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University of Medicine Berlin, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
IPVS policy statement. Equity in cervical cancer prevention: for all and not just for some. PAPILLOMAVIRUS RESEARCH 2019; 9:100192. [PMID: 31809806 PMCID: PMC7217985 DOI: 10.1016/j.pvr.2019.100192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
40
|
Badre-Esfahani S, Larsen MB, Seibæk L, Petersen LK, Blaakær J, Støvring H, Andersen B. Non-Adherence To Childhood HPV Vaccination Is Associated With Non-Participation In Cervical Cancer Screening - A Nationwide Danish Register-Based Cohort Study. Clin Epidemiol 2019; 11:969-980. [PMID: 31814770 PMCID: PMC6853196 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s203023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The combination of organized cervical cancer screening and childhood HPV vaccination programs has the potential to eliminate cervical cancer in the future. However, only women participating in both programs gain the full protection, and combined non-attenders remain at high risk of developing cervical cancer. Our aim was to analyze the association between non-adherence to HPV vaccination and non-participation in cervical cancer screening for the total population and stratified by native background and parental education. Participants Women born in 1993 eligible for both childhood HPV vaccination and first cervical cancer screening. Analysis Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of non-participation in cervical cancer screening with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Stratified and adjusted logistic regression models were used along with the Wald test in order to test for interaction. Results 24,828 women were included in the study. Among vaccinated women, 61.4% participated in cervical cancer screening; only 39.0% of unvaccinated women participated in cervical cancer screening. Unvaccinated and unscreened women were often non-native and had the lowest socio-economic status, whereas vaccinated and screened women were often native and had the highest socio-economic status. The adjusted OR for non-participation in cervical cancer screening was 2.07 [95% CI: 1.88–2.28] for unvaccinated compared to vaccinated women. After stratifying by country of origin, unvaccinated natives had the highest adjusted OR of not participating in cervical cancer screening compared to non-native women from both western and non-western countries (adjusted ORs of 2.2 [95% CI: 2.0–2.4], 1.3 [95% CI: 0.6–2.8], and 1.5 [95% CI: 1.1–2.0], respectively) (Wald test p=0.019). Conclusion Among natives, non-adherence to HPV vaccination and non-participation in screening seem to be signs of generally poor health-preventive behavior, whereas among non-natives from non-western countries, non-attendance in HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening seem to be influenced by unrelated factors. Therefore, a differentiated and culturally sensitive approach is needed to enhance overall cervical cancer preventive behavior across different nativities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Badre-Esfahani
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N DK-8200, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark
| | - Lene Seibæk
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N DK-8200, Denmark
| | - Lone Kjeld Petersen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense C DK-5000, Denmark
| | - Jan Blaakær
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense C DK-5000, Denmark
| | - Henrik Støvring
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Leonhardt M, Aschenbrenner K, Gröne J, Kreis ME, Lauscher JC. Sources of Support and Information During Disease: An Exploratory Study, Comparing Migrant and Nonmigrant Colorectal Cancer Patients in Germany. J Transcult Nurs 2019; 31:387-396. [PMID: 31516067 DOI: 10.1177/1043659619875197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of cancer diseases among migrants is lower relative to nonmigrants, although this equalizes with increasing duration of residence. There are differences in the health behaviors and disease coping strategies between these two groups. The aim of this analysis is to compare migrant and nonmigrant colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Germany regarding their sources of support and information during disease. Method: Data from 522 CRC patients, collected through a survey about satisfaction with care, were analyzed by descriptive and multivariate statistics. Results: Migrants and nonmigrants differed in two aspects: Migrants reported to receive the most relevant support during disease more often by nonmedical people, compared with nonmigrants, and they favored videos explaining the therapeutic steps of CRC more than nonmigrants. Discussion: Anticipating which types of support and information sources patients will access during their disease may help guide future diversity management across the field of cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marja Leonhardt
- Charité University of Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Patel H, Sherman SM, Tincello D, Moss EL. Awareness of and attitudes towards cervical cancer prevention among migrant Eastern European women in England. J Med Screen 2019; 27:40-47. [PMID: 31514572 DOI: 10.1177/0969141319869957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objectives It has been hypothesized that, in England, the rise in incidence of cervical cancer and the fall in screening coverage might be attributable in part to the effect of migration of Eastern European born women. We explored the attitudes and behaviours of these women towards cervical cancer prevention strategies. Methods A mixed methods study using quantitative surveys and in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews was conducted between April 2015 and December 2016. Results In total, 331 surveys and 46 interviews were completed. Native English women had greater knowledge that a smear test is a screening test for pre-cancerous cervical cells (90% vs. 71% p≤0.01), whereas migrant Eastern European women believed that it was conducted as part of a full gynaecological examination (46% vs. 21% p≤0.01) and that the screen interval was annual (18% vs. 4% p≤0.01). Distrust of the English healthcare system resulted in some Eastern European women returning to their country of birth for screening. Poor awareness of cervical cancer prior to migration and lack of information at registration with a general practitioner in England were associated with failure to participate in screening. Conclusions The views and attitudes expressed by the migrant Eastern European women in this study suggest that they are not fully participating in cervical screening in England. Targeted education at the point of contact with healthcare services in England is needed to increase cervical screening participation among these women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hersha Patel
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Douglas Tincello
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Esther L Moss
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Aasbø G, Solbrække KN, Waller J, Tropé A, Nygård M, Hansen BT. Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029505. [PMID: 31471438 PMCID: PMC6719771 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The attendance rate for cervical cancer screening in Norway is currently suboptimal at 69%, and an in-depth understanding of postponement of cervical cancer screening from the perspective of non-attenders is lacking. This study aims to generate knowledge about how non-attenders for cervical cancer screening reflect on booking a screening appointment. METHODS Using the Norwegian cervical cancer screening registry, we identified and recruited women who were non-attenders to screening. Nine focus group interviews were carried out, with 41 women participating in the interviews. RESULTS Four main themes were generated, which provide a comprehensive understanding of how women who are overdue for screening reflect on their hesitancy to book a screening appointment: 'It's easy to forget about it', 'Women have to arrange their own appointment', 'It has to be a 'must'' and 'It's a humiliating situation'. CONCLUSION The degree to which women regard screening as important is affected by the nudging strategies employed in the screening programme and the facilitation of attendance provided by healthcare services. Dependence on one's personal initiative to schedule a screening appointment and perception of a lack of responsibility on the part of healthcare services to attend screening may undermine informed and shared decision-making about screening attendance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunvor Aasbø
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Jo Waller
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ameli Tropé
- Cervical Cancer Screening Programme, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mari Nygård
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Qureshi SA, Gele A, Kour P, Møen KA, Kumar B, Diaz E. A community-based intervention to increase participation in cervical cancer screening among immigrants in Norway. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19:147. [PMID: 31299912 PMCID: PMC6626362 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0795-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The attendance to cervical cancer screening is low among immigrants in many high-income countries. Although several interventions have been experimentally tested,implementation remains a challenge. Several factors are an impediment, including the lack of methodological descriptions of the development and implementation of such interventions. In this paper,we present in detail the development, methodological challenges and practical implementation of a community based intervention aimed to increase the participation of immigrant women in cervical cancer screening in Norway. METHODS This study was initially designed as a cluster randomized trial to be carried out in four geographical areas near Oslo between Feb-October 2017. Participants were immigrant women aged 25-69 years from Pakistan and Somalia. This paper describes the theoretical background for the development of the intervention,followed by challenges,the changes in the original design and solutions adopted related to the study design,recruitment and implementation of the intervention. The intervention was developed based on two theoretical frameworks, the Ecological and the Heron's six categories intervention framework. An oral 20-25 min presentation in the language of participants encompassing topics of cervical cancer and screening was given according to the needs detected in focus groups conducted at the beginning of the study,followed by an opportunity to raise questions and answering a short questionnaire. RESULTS Contrary to the initial study design, this had to be converted into a non-randomised trial due to the difficulties associated with randomization of immigrant families who are finely scattered in heavily populated towns and a high risk of contamination. We therefore adopted a pragmatic approach and recruited women in the intervention areas through a variety of channels and institutions. Neighboring areas were considered to be non-randomised controls. Female researchers with Pakistani and Somali background invited as many women as possible in the intervention areas. Among the women who were invited to participate,42% of the Pakistani and 78% of Somali attended the meetings. CONCLUSION Despite the careful development of a culturally adapted health intervention in collaboration with the community; randomization and recruitment of immigrants for community trials remains challenging. Nevertheless, sharing strategies to overcome specific challenges related to promoting health interventions for immigrants, can be of potential help to scale-up interventions and for building new research projects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03155581 . Retrospectively registered, on 16 May 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samera A Qureshi
- Norwegian Centre for Migrant & Minority Health (NAKMI), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O.Box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Abdi Gele
- Norwegian Centre for Migrant & Minority Health (NAKMI), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O.Box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway
| | - Prabhjot Kour
- Norwegian Centre for Migrant & Minority Health (NAKMI), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O.Box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Innlandet Hospital Trust, P.O.Box 104, 2381, Brumunddal, Norway
| | - Kathy A Møen
- Norwegian Centre for Migrant & Minority Health (NAKMI), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O.Box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O.Box 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bernadette Kumar
- Norwegian Centre for Migrant & Minority Health (NAKMI), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O.Box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway
| | - Esperanza Diaz
- Norwegian Centre for Migrant & Minority Health (NAKMI), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), P.O.Box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O.Box 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hertzum-Larsen R, Kjær SK, Frederiksen K, Thomsen LT. Participation in cervical cancer screening among immigrants and Danish-born women in Denmark. Prev Med 2019; 123:55-64. [PMID: 30796926 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
In this nationwide register-based cohort study, we examined cervical cancer screening participation among immigrants in Denmark by country and region of origin. Furthermore, we assessed whether differences in screening participation between immigrants and Danish-born women were explained by sociodemographic or health-related characteristics, and examined predictors of participation among immigrants. Using high-quality registries, we identified women invited for cervical cancer screening during 2008-2009 and retrieved individual-level data on sociodemographic-, health- and immigration-related characteristics. A total of 610,907 women were followed for up to 2.9 years after screening invitation. We estimated the probability of participation using the Aalen-Johansen estimator and the hazard ratios (HRs) of participation using Cox regression. The probability of participation within follow-up was 74.5% (95% CI, 74.4%-74.6%) in Danish-born women; 61.2% (95% CI, 60.4%-62.1%) in Western immigrants; and 61.3% (95% CI, 60.9%-61.8%) in non-Western immigrants. Participation in immigrants varied by region of origin from 44.3% (95% CI, 41.4%-47.4%) in immigrants from North America, New Zealand and Australia to 67.8% (95% CI, 65.4%-70.3%) in immigrants from South- and Central America. Substantial variation was seen between specific countries of origin. Differences in participation between immigrants and Danish-born women were not explained by sociodemographic or health-related characteristics. Predictors of low participation in immigrants included lower income, unemployment, being unmarried, having a history of schizophrenia or other psychoses, and ≤5 years' stay in Denmark. In conclusion, cervical cancer screening participation in immigrants varied by region and country of origin, but all immigrant groups had lower participation than Danish-born women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmus Hertzum-Larsen
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne K Kjær
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Juliane Maries Vej 10, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Frederiksen
- Unit of Statistics and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Louise T Thomsen
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Åkerman E, Larsson EC, Essén B, Westerling R. A missed opportunity? Lack of knowledge about sexual and reproductive health services among immigrant women in Sweden. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2018; 19:64-70. [PMID: 30928137 DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Revised: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Poor sexual and reproductive health (SRH) among immigrant women is often related to limited access, or suboptimal use of healthcare services. This study investigates the knowledge about and use of sexual and reproductive healthcare services among immigrant women in Sweden. METHOD A cross-sectional study of 288 immigrant women. A structured questionnaire was distributed among immigrants speaking Arabic, Dari, Somali or English registered at Swedish language schools for immigrants. Data collection took place in 19 strategically selected schools in Sweden. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regressions were used for the analysis. RESULTS About one-third of the immigrant women reported lack of knowledge of where to go for contraceptive counselling. Experiencing lack of emotional social support and not having had children was associated with this lack of knowledge. An even higher proportion (56%) lacked knowledge of where to go to be HIV tested, and this was associated with not having participated in a health examination. Almost 25% stated that their culture kept them back from using contraception. CONCLUSION Lack of knowledge of where to turn for contraceptive counselling and HIV testing among immigrant women participating in Swedish language schools for immigrants could be considered as a missed opportunity, as all citizens in Sweden have free access to these services. New health policies and strategies should aim to increase knowledge of SRH services among immigrants. Swedish language schools could play an important role in increasing knowledge of SRH-related information as many new immigrants become students during their first years in Sweden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Åkerman
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Social Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Elin C Larsson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, International Maternal and Child Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Birgitta Essén
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, International Maternal and Child Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ragnar Westerling
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Social Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Europe: The Transition Towards HPV Vaccination and Population-Based HPV Testing. Viruses 2018; 10:v10120729. [PMID: 30572620 PMCID: PMC6315375 DOI: 10.3390/v10120729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequently occurring cancer in women around the world and can affect them during their reproductive years. Since the development of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test, screening has been essential in identifying cervical cancer at a treatable stage. With the identification of the human papillomavirus (HPV) as the causative agent of essentially all cervical cancer cases, HPV molecular screening tests and HPV vaccines for primary prevention against the virus have been developed. Accordingly, comparative studies were designed to assess the performance of cervical cancer screening methods in order to devise the best screening strategy possible. This review critically assesses the current cervical cancer screening methods as well as the implementation of HPV vaccination in Europe. The most recent European Guidelines and recommendations for organized population-based programs with HPV testing as the primary screening method are also presented. Lastly, the current landscape of cervical cancer screening programs is assessed for both European Union member states and some associated countries, in regard to the transition towards population-based screening programs with primary HPV testing.
Collapse
|
48
|
Chang HK, Seo SS, Myong JP, Koo JW, Jeong J. Factors Associated with Cervical Cancer Screening among Married Female Immigrants with Korean Husbands in South Korea. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:ijerph15112528. [PMID: 30424504 PMCID: PMC6266390 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15112528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the national cervical cancer screening behaviors of married female immigrants living in South Korea. Methods. The present study dataset was collected by the National Health Insurance Services in 2014–2015. A final study population of 15,935 was considered eligible for inclusion in this study if they met the criteria for participation in the national cervical cancer screening program in 2014–2015. Results. Of the 15,935 subjects, 7837 (49%) participated in cervical cancer screening. Based on the results of the logistic regression analysis of the association between cervical cancer screening behaviors and related factors, the odds ratio (OR) for participation in cervical cancer screening among individuals older than 50 years was the highest (OR: 2.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82–2.51), and the OR increased as their duration of stay in South Korea decreased. The OR of Chinese women for cervical cancer screening participation was higher than that of non-Chinese women (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.69–1.99). The OR value was 29.4 (95% CI: 25.9–33.3) among those who participated in the general health screening compared with those who did not participate. Conclusions. To improve awareness about cervical cancer screening and reduce disparities in access to healthcare, appropriate programs should be developed to promote cervical cancer screening participation to socially vulnerable classes. Continuous social attention is needed to address these issues and encourage participation in general health screening to improve the rate of cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ha Kyun Chang
- Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10408, Korea.
| | - Sang-Soo Seo
- Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10408, Korea.
| | - Jun-Pyo Myong
- Department of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea.
| | - Jung-Wan Koo
- Department of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea.
| | - Jinhee Jeong
- Department of medical benefit, National Health Insurance Company, 32, Geongang-ro, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do 26464, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bacal V, Blinder H, Momoli F, Wu KY, McFaul S. Is Immigrant Status Associated With Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Canada? Results From a Cross-Sectional Study. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2018; 41:824-831.e1. [PMID: 30361160 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 06/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cervical cancer accounts for the highest mortality rate from cancer in women worldwide. Despite widespread availability of cervical cancer screening programs in Canada, immigrant women are largely underscreened. The most recently published Canadian-wide study evaluated screening uptake from 2001 to 2002. The objectives included identifying the prevalence of underscreened women in Canada, determining the risk of underscreening for cervical cancer among immigrant women, and providing an update on Canadian screening practices. METHODS This study included women aged 20 to 69 who completed the Canadian Community Health Survey 2012. The prevalence of underscreening among Canadian-born and immigrant women was estimated. A log-binomial model was fit to estimate the relative risk (RR) of underscreening for immigrant women while controlling for age, income level, visible minority status, smoking status, and access to a regular physician. A secondary analysis compared immigrants residing in Canada for greater or less than 10 years to Canadian-born women. RESULTS Of the 17 854 women eligible for this study, 18.6% of Canadian-born women and 28.9% of immigrant women were underscreened (P < 0.05). Immigrant women were at significantly higher risk of being underscreened compared with Canadian-born women (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.20-1.45). The relative risk did not change when stratifying by length of time since immigration (RRrecent immigrant 1.32; 95% CI 1.16-1.50; and RRlong-term immigrant 1.32; 95% CI 1.19-1.47). CONCLUSION Immigrant status continues to be associated with a significantly higher risk of underscreening, irrespective of time in Canada. Social and educational programs targeted towards immigrants are needed to mitigate the disparity in cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Bacal
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON.
| | - Henrietta Blinder
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - Franco Momoli
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - Kai Yi Wu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - Susan McFaul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lower attendance rates in BreastScreen Norway among immigrants across all levels of socio-demographic factors: a population-based study. J Public Health (Oxf) 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s10389-018-0937-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
|