Relationship between maternal asthma, its severity and control and abortion

Prevalence of pregnancy termination and associated factors among married women in Papua New Guinea: A nationally representative cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy termination or induced abortion is not decriminalized, and access to safe abortion services is largely unavailable in Papua New Guinea (PNG). However, the practice is common throughout the country. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and determine factors associated with pregnancy termination among married women aged 15-49 years in PNG.

METHODS

Secondary data from the 2016-2018 PNG Demographic and Health Survey (PNGDHS) was used. A total weighted sample of 6,288 married women were included. The Complex Sample Analysis method was used to account for the cluster design and sample weight of the study. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess factors associated with pregnancy termination. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were reported.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pregnancy termination was 5.3%. Nearly half (45.2%) of all pregnancy terminations occurred in the Highlands region. Women aged 35-44 years (aOR = 8.54; 95% CI: 1.61-45.26), not working (aOR = 6.17; 95% CI: 2.26-16.85), owned a mobile phone (aOR = 3.77; 95% CI: 1.60-8.84), and lived in urban areas (aOR = 5.66; 95% CI: 1.91-16.81) were more likely to terminate a pregnancy. Women who experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) were 2.27 times (aOR = 2.27; 95% CI: 1.17-4.41) more likely to terminate a pregnancy compared to those who did not experience IPV. Women with unplanned pregnancies were 6.23 times (aOR = 6.23; 95% CI: 2.61-14.87) more likely to terminate a pregnancy. Women who knew about modern contraceptive methods and made independent decisions for contraceptive use were 3.38 and 2.54 times (aOR = 3.38; 95% CI: 1.39-8.18 and aOR = 2.54; 95% CI: 1.18-5.45, respectively) more likely to terminate a pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the role of sociodemographic and maternal factors in pregnancy termination among married women in PNG. Efforts aimed at reducing unplanned pregnancies and terminations should focus on comprehensive sexual and reproductive health education and improving easy access to contraceptives for married couples. Post-abortion care should also be integrated into the country's legal framework and added as an important component of existing sexual and reproductive health services.

Treatable Traits in Pregnant Women with Asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease in pregnancy, affecting approximately 8-10% of pregnant women. Uncontrolled asthma is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, including low birth weight, preterm birth, and maternal complications such as pre-eclampsia.

SUMMARY

A current approach to the management of chronic airway diseases is based on targeting treatable traits. The aim of this review was to define treatable traits in pregnant women with asthma based on recent literature and to determine personalized treatment options according to these traits. Traits addressed in this review that may improve asthma control and pregnancy outcomes are fractional exhaled nitric oxide-based asthma monitoring and treatment, medication adherence and inhalation technique, impaired lung function, smoking cessation and comorbidity including psychological conditions (depression and anxiety), obesity, rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps, and sleep apnea.

KEY MESSAGES

All the treatable traits discussed have the potential to improve asthma control and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with asthma. Further research is needed to determine which management approaches are best to improve asthma control during pregnancy, to identify other relevant treatable traits, and to determine whether the treatable trait approach is feasible and beneficial in pregnant women with asthma.

Managing Asthma During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in pregnancy and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Asthma symptoms worsen in approximately 40% of women, and exacerbations requiring medical intervention occur in at least 20% of women. Factors associated with exacerbation and worsening asthma include multiparity, obesity, Black race, exacerbations before pregnancy, and poor asthma control. Exacerbations are associated with further increased risks for poor perinatal outcomes, including low birth weight, preterm birth, and small for gestational age (SGA) status, as well as an increase in the development of asthma in early childhood. Common medications used for asthma, including short-acting β-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids, are considered safe to use in pregnancy. Whereas guidelines generally suggest traditional step therapy for managing asthma in pregnancy, there are alternative models of care and management approaches that may be effective in pregnancy, but require more research. These include single-inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy, treatment adjustment with FeNO, treatable traits personalized medicine approaches, and telemedicine. Little is known about changes to asthma in the postpartum period. However, low adherence to medication and the potential effects of postpartum depression on asthma exacerbation risk warrant further research.

Maternal Mortality in the United States: Trends and Opportunities for Prevention

Maternal mortality is unusually high in the United States compared to other wealthy nations and is characterized by major disparities in race/ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic factors. Similar to other developed nations, the United States has seen a shift in the underlying causes of pregnancy-related death, with a relative increase in mortality resulting from diseases of the cardiovascular system and preexisting medical conditions. Improved continuity of care aimed at identifying reproductive-age women with preexisting conditions that may heighten the risk of maternal death, preconception management of risk factors for major adverse pregnancy outcomes, and primary care visits within the first year after delivery may offer opportunities to address gaps in medical care contributing to the unacceptable rates of maternal mortality in the United States.

Asthma in pregnancy

Background: Asthma is a frequent and potentially life-threatening disease that complicates many pregnancies. There are extensive data with regard to the diagnosis and treatment of asthma during pregnancy. Medical providers require an up-to-date summary of the critical aspects of asthma management during pregnancy. Objective: This review aimed to summarize the available data from clinical trials, cohort studies, expert opinions, and guideline recommendations with regard to asthma in pregnancy. Methods: A search through PubMed was conducted by using keywords previously mentioned and MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terminology. Clinical trials, observational studies, expert opinions, guidelines, and other reviews were included. The quality of the studies was assessed, and data were extracted and summarized. Results: Asthma worsens in ∼40% of pregnant women, which can be associated with maternal and fetal complications. Physiologic changes in the respiratory, cardiovascular, and immune systems during pregnancy play a critical role in the manifestations of asthma. The diagnosis and the treatment of asthma are similar to that of patients who are not pregnant. Nonetheless, concern for fetal malformations, preterm birth, and low birth weight must be considered when managing pregnant patients with asthma. Importantly, cornerstones of the pharmacotherapy of asthma seem to be safe during pregnancy. Conclusion: Asthma in pregnancy is associated with adverse outcomes. Roadblocks to management include associated comorbidities, medication nonadherence, atopy, lack of education, and smoking habits. These need to be acknowledged and addressed for successful asthma management during pregnancy.

The obstetric aspects of maternal asthma

Asthma is the commonest chronic medical condition encountered in pregnancy. Poor asthma control and exacerbations are frequently encountered due to treatment non-adherence, pregnancy-related aggravating factors such as increased susceptibility to viral infections, and comorbidities that are commonly associated. Asthma-related inflammatory reactions and placental effects, the effect of medications, and respiratory symptoms and hypoxia are probably to interact to result in an increased adverse obstetric outcomes including miscarriage, foetal congenital anomalies, pregnancy hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes, preterm labour and birth, antepartum haemorrhage, low birthweight and foetal growth restriction (FGR), caesarean delivery, postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), maternal intensive care admission, and even mortality, while the offspring also has increased long-term morbidity. Interdisciplinary management with frequent assessment by symptoms, spirometry, and biomarkers, together with removal of risk factors such as smoking and appropriate instigation of treatment including short courses of systemic corticosteroid, could ensure optimal and tailored treatment to control symptoms, prevent exacerbations, and ultimately enhancing maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Infertility, pregnancy loss and assisted reproduction in women with asthma: a population-based cohort study

STUDY QUESTION

Is the chance of childbirth, and risk of infertility, pregnancy loss and need for assisted reproduction different for women with asthma compared to women without asthma?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Women with asthma had comparable chances of giving birth compared to the reference population, however, their risk of both infertility and pregnancy loss, as well their need for medically assisted reproduction, was higher.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Reproductive dysfunction has been reported among women with asthma, including longer time to pregnancy, increased risk of pregnancy loss and a higher need of medically assisted reproduction, but their risk of clinical infertility is unknown.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This longitudinal register-based cohort study included all women with a healthcare visit for delivery, infertility, pregnancy loss or induced abortion in the southernmost county in Sweden, over the last 20 years.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Using the Skåne Healthcare Register, we identified all women aged 15-45 between 1998 and 2019, who received a diagnosis of asthma before their first reproductive outcome (n = 6445). Chance of childbirth and risk of infertility, pregnancy loss and assisted reproduction were compared to a healthcare seeking population of women without any asthma (n = 200 248), using modified Poisson regressions.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The chance of childbirth was not different between women with asthma versus those without, adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03. The risk of seeking care for infertility was increased, aRR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.21-1.39, and women with asthma more often needed assisted reproduction aRR = 1.34 95% CI: 1.18-1.52. The risk of suffering a pregnancy loss was higher, aRR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.15-1.28, and induced abortions were more common, aRR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.11-1.20, among women with asthma.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study was an observational study based on healthcare visits and lacked detailed anthropometric data, thus residual confounding cannot be excluded. Only women with a healthcare visit for a reproductive outcome were included, which cannot be translated into pregnancy intention. A misclassification, presumed to be non-differential, may arise from an incorrect or missing diagnosis of asthma or female infertility, biasing the results towards the null.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study points towards reproductive dysfunction associated with asthma, specifically in regards to the ability to maintain a pregnancy and the risk of needing medically assisted reproduction following clinical infertility, but reassuringly the chance of subsequently giving birth was not lower for these women.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This article is part of the ReproUnion collaborative study, co-financed by EU Interreg ÖKS, Capital Region of Denmark, Region Skåne and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Asthma Is Associated With Pregnancy Loss and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Women with asthma appear to have an increased risk of pregnancy loss (PL). The impact of asthma on recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), defined as 3 consecutive losses, is, however, unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether having asthma before or during the fertile age is associated with PL and RPL.

METHODS

Based on Danish national health registers, we identified all women aged 6 to 45 years with at least 2 filled prescriptions of an antiasthma drug during the period 1977 to 2019. Women with asthma were compared with women without asthma. Pregnancy outcomes were retrieved for both groups from national health registers. Logistic regression with adjustment for the year of birth and educational level provided odds ratios (ORs) for the number of PLs. Subgroup analyses were conducted for early-onset (age 6-15 years), adult-onset (age 16-39 years), and late-onset (age 40-45 years) asthma. Lastly, we compared uncontrolled asthma (defined as ≥ 400 doses of a short-acting beta-2 agonist in a year) to controlled asthma (defined as < 400 doses of a short-acting beta-2 agonist in a year).

RESULTS

In a population of 1,309,786 women, we identified 128,553 women with asthma and 1,297,233 women without asthma. Compared with nonasthmatic women, women with asthma had ORs for 1, 2, and 3 or more PLs of 1.05 (95% CI 1.03-1.07), 1.09 (95% CI 1.05-1.13), and 1.18 (95% CI1.11-1.24), respectively, and for RPL of 1.19 (95% CI 1.12-1.27). In women with early-onset asthma, the OR of 3 or more PLs was 1.47 (95% CI 1.24-1.72). For women classified as having uncontrolled asthma compared with controlled asthma, we found a significant OR of 1.60 (95% CI 1.16-2.16) for 3 or more PLs.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant positive association between asthma and number of PLs and RPLs. Early-onset asthma and uncontrolled asthma were more strongly associated with PL than adult-onset and late-onset asthma and controlled asthma.

Challenges in the successful management of asthma during conception, pregnancy and delivery

Asthma and infertility are the most common disorders among women of reproductive age. Time to pregnancy is prolonged in women with asthma, and importantly, age seems to be a more important risk factor regarding fertility in women with asthma compared to women without asthma. Some data have shown a higher frequency of miscarriages in women with asthma, although the data are conflicting on this issue as studies have observed no association between asthma and pregnancy loss. Furthermore, studies have shown no negative effect of asthma on the total number of offspring. Pregnancy may, thus, have a significant impact on women with asthma, as well as on their offspring.

The age of the women has an important impact on ability to conceive, but also for the pregnancy itself, with higher risk of uncontrolled asthma as well as asthma exacerbations with increasing age. Well-controlled asthma decreases the risk of maternal and fetal complications, while poorly controlled and undertreated asthma is associated with a range of risks for both mother and fetus. Asthma treatment should follow the general guidelines for asthma therapy, irrespective of pregnancy status, including treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, β2-agonists and muscarinic antagonists. Targeted treatment with biologics for severe asthma seems to be without important adverse effects. The use of systemic corticosteroids may be associated with adverse events during the first trimester; however, an exacerbation with the associated risk of hypoxaemia is worse for the fetus. Best possible asthma control may be achieved using repeated measurements of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), as the use of FENO compared with symptoms registration only has been shown to reduce exacerbation rate.

In conclusion, women with asthma should be encouraged to conceive at an early age, might experience miscarriages, but the number of offspring are the same as in women without asthma. Well treated asthma is important for the well-being of both the mother and the unborn fetus.

A prospective study of preconception asthma and spontaneous abortion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationships among history of asthma, asthma severity, and spontaneous abortion (SAB).

METHODS

Pregnancy Study Online is a preconception cohort study of North American couples. During the preconception period, female participants reported their history of physician-diagnosed asthma, age at first diagnosis, and use of asthma medications in the previous 4 weeks. Asthma severity was classified by medication use proximal to conception, from level 0 to 3 in increasing severity. Pregnancy and SAB were identified using data from follow-up questionnaires. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Among 6325 participants who conceived, 19% experienced SAB and 17% reported a history of asthma. There was no appreciable association between asthma history and SAB incidence (HR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.14). HRs comparing severity levels 0, 1, and 2-3 with no asthma were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.01), 1.20 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.60), and 1.31 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.78), respectively. Among women who conceived without the use of fertility treatment, level 2-3 severity was associated with SAB (HR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.89).

CONCLUSIONS

While history of asthma diagnosis was not materially associated with SAB, having severe asthma (based on medication use) was associated with greater SAB risk.

[Management of asthma during pregnancy]

Asthma is the most common chronic condition in pregnant women. The risks of complications associated with asthma for the mother, the foetus and the pregnancy are mainly due to uncontrolled asthma and the occurrence of exacerbations. These events are promoted by the patient's difficulty in complying with treatment or by prescription insufficiency for an unjustified fear of teratogenicity. The challenge of the management of asthma during pregnancy is to ensure optimal maternal asthma control in order to prevent foetal hypoxia and thus, reduce the risk of complications. Preventing the occurrence of asthma symptoms and exacerbations, ensuring optimal lung function and managing the risk factors of poor asthma outcomes and comorbidities are the principles necessary to achieve this goal. Because of the low or non-existent risks of the main treatments of asthma for the foetus and the mother, it is widely recommended that all therapies initiated before conception are continued, in particular inhaled corticosteroids, and to adjust the dosage to the minimum effective dose. During the preconception period and throughout pregnancy, coordination of the different healthcare professionals (general practitioner, respiratory specialist and gynecologist) is essential, with the mother-to-be playing a central role in the management of her asthma.

Association between Low House Cleaning Frequency, Cough and Risk of Miscarriage: A Case Control Study in China

This study investigated the association between house cleaning frequency and the risk of miscarriage in a case control sample of Chinese population. We recruited 59 pregnant women with clinical pregnancy loss as cases and 122 women who chose to conduct induced abortion as controls. All participants were aged 20~40 years and completed a questionnaire of lifestyle exposure with a trained nurse. The effect of frequency of cleaning up on risk of miscarriage was estimated using multivariable logistic regressions, adjusting for potential confounders. In the present study, it was shown that house cleaning of less than twice per week was significantly associated with cough during day or night with odds ratio (OR) of 2.97 (95% CI: 1.36~6.75, p = 0.007), and cough during day or night was significantly associated with risk of miscarriage with OR of 2.69 (95% CI: 1.22~6.02, p = 0.014). Thus, house cleaning of less than twice per week was statistically significantly associated with miscarriage with OR of 3.05 (95% CI: 1.51~6.31, p = 0.002). We found that females who have their house cleaned less than twice per week are at elevated risk for miscarriage. Therefore, the home of pregnant woman should be cleaned at least twice per week in order to avoid miscarriage.

Risk of miscarriage in women with chronic diseases in Norway: A registry linkage study

BACKGROUND

Increased risk of miscarriage has been reported for women with specific chronic health conditions. A broader investigation of chronic diseases and miscarriage risk may uncover patterns across categories of illness. The objective of this study was to study the risk of miscarriage according to various preexisting chronic diseases.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a registry-based study. Registered pregnancies (n = 593,009) in Norway between 2010 and 2016 were identified through 3 national health registries (birth register, general practitioner data, and patient registries). Six broad categories of illness were identified, comprising 25 chronic diseases defined by diagnostic codes used in general practitioner and patient registries. We required that the diseases were diagnosed before the pregnancy of interest. Miscarriage risk according to underlying chronic diseases was estimated as odds ratios (ORs) using generalized estimating equations adjusting for woman's age. The mean age of women at the start of pregnancy was 29.7 years (SD 5.6 years). We observed an increased risk of miscarriage among women with cardiometabolic diseases (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.31; p-value <0.001). Within this category, risks were elevated for all conditions: atherosclerosis (2.22; 1.42 to 3.49; p-value <0.001), hypertensive disorders (1.19; 1.13 to 1.26; p-value <0.001), and type 2 diabetes (1.38; 1.26 to 1.51; p-value <0.001). Among other categories of disease, risks were elevated for hypoparathyroidism (2.58; 1.35 to 4.92; p-value 0.004), Cushing syndrome (1.97; 1.06 to 3.65; p-value 0.03), Crohn's disease (OR 1.31; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.45; p-value 0.001), and endometriosis (1.22; 1.15 to 1.29; p-value <0.001). Findings were largely unchanged after mutual adjustment. Limitations of this study include our inability to adjust for measures of socioeconomic position or lifestyle characteristics, in addition to the rareness of some of the conditions providing limited power.

CONCLUSIONS

In this registry study, we found that, although risk of miscarriage was largely unaffected by maternal chronic diseases, risk of miscarriage was associated with conditions related to cardiometabolic health. This finding is consistent with emerging evidence linking cardiovascular risk factors to pregnancy complications.

Association between the timing of asthma diagnosis and medication use during pregnancy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess whether asthma medication use during pregnancy differs in women newly diagnosed with asthma early in pregnancy (first 19 weeks of pregnancy) compared to those newly diagnosed up to 2 years pre-pregnancy.

DESIGN

A retrospective population-based cohort study.

DATA SOURCE

To conduct this study, we used the Quebec Asthma and Pregnancy Database (QAPD) constructed by linking two administrative health databases from the province of Quebec (Canada): the Régie de l'Assurance Maladie du Québec and Maintenance et Exploitation des Données pour l'Étude de la Clientèle Hospitalière databases.

PATIENTS

A cohort comprising pregnant women newly diagnosed with asthma at any time in the 2 years prior to pregnancy or during the first 19 weeks of pregnancy was selected from the QAPD.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We assessed the number of filled prescriptions of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), ICS/long-acting β2 agonists (LABA), and short-acting β2 agonists (SABA), as well as the number of days' supply of oral corticosteroid (OCS) from the 20^th week of pregnancy until delivery. Poisson regression was used to compare the rates of asthma medication use in women diagnosed pre-pregnancy versus early in pregnancy. The cohort included 1731 women newly diagnosed with asthma pre-pregnancy and 359 women newly diagnosed with asthma early in pregnancy. Women diagnosed early in pregnancy were more likely to use ICS (adjusted rate ratio: 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-2.3) and SABA (adjusted rate ratio: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.7-2.4) from the 20th week of pregnancy until delivery than those newly diagnosed pre-pregnancy. No significant differences were observed in the use of ICS/LABA [adjusted rate ratio: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.7-1.3] and OCS [adjusted rate ratio: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-1.2].

CONCLUSION

The higher use of ICS and SABA observed in women newly diagnosed with asthma early in pregnancy may suggest a more persistent asthma phenotype caused by pregnancy-triggered hormonal changes.

Degree of pregnancy planning and recommended pregnancy planning behavior among women with and without chronic medical conditions - A large hospital-based cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Pregnancy planning allows women to engage in pregnancy planning behaviors to optimize health status in the preconception period. Women with chronic medical conditions have a higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and therefore preconception care is recommended. The aim was to compare pregnancy planning among women with and without chronic medical conditions, and to assess adherence to the recommended pregnancy planning behaviors on folic acid intake, physical activity and abstention from smoking and alcohol, among women with and without chronic medical conditions stratified by pregnancy planning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study with data from 28 794 pregnancies. Pregnancy planning was measured with the Swedish Pregnancy Planning Scale. Multiple Poisson regression with robust variance estimates was used to assess the associations between chronic medical condition (yes/no and main categories) and pregnancy planning, and chronic medical condition status and pregnancy planning behaviors stratified by pregnancy planning.

RESULTS

In the study population, 74% reported high degree of pregnancy planning, and 22% had one or more chronic medical conditions. We found no overall association between chronic medical condition and pregnancy planning (adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.01). However, women with type 2 diabetes and mental illness were significantly less likely to plan their pregnancies than women without these conditions (aRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.88; aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.96, respectively). Women with chronic medical conditions were more likely to adhere to the recommended planning behaviors; intake of folic acid, abstention from alcohol prior to pregnancy and no binge drinking in early pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, pregnancies were highly planned. Women with chronic medical conditions did not show a higher degree of pregnancy planning than women without chronic medical conditions but were, however. more likely to adhere to the generally recommended pregnancy planning behaviors (ie intake of folic acid and abstention from alcohol intake). Only women with mental illness and type 2 diabetes reported a lower degree of pregnancy planning. It is important that we continuously address pregnancy planning and planning behaviors for both women with and women without chronic medical conditions, especially women with type 2 diabetes and mental illness.

Biologicals in atopic disease in pregnancy: An EAACI position paper

Biologicals have transformed the management of severe disease phenotypes in asthma, atopic dermatitis, and chronic spontaneous urticaria. As a result, the number of approved biologicals for the treatment of atopic diseases is continuously increasing. Although atopic diseases are among the most common diseases in the reproductive age, investigations, and information on half-life, pharmacokinetics defining the neonatal Fc receptors (FcRn) and most important safety of biologicals in pregnancy are lacking. Given the complex sequence of immunological events that regulate conception, fetal development, and the intrauterine and postnatal maturation of the immune system, this information is of utmost importance. We conducted a systematic review on biologicals in pregnancy for indications of atopic diseases. Evidence in this field is scarce and mainly reserved to reports on the usage of omalizumab. This lack of evidence demands the establishment of a multidisciplinary approach for the management of pregnant women who receive biologicals and multicenter registries for long-term follow-up, drug trial designs suitable for women in the reproductive age, and better experimental models that represent the human situation. Due to the very long half-life of biologicals, preconception counseling and healthcare provider education are crucial to offer the best care for mother and fetus. This position paper integrates available data on safety of biologicals during pregnancy in atopic diseases via a systematic review with a detailed review on immunological considerations how inhibition of different pathways may impact pregnancy.

Management of Asthma Exacerbations in the Emergency Department

Asthma exacerbations occur across a wide spectrum of chronic severity; they contribute to millions of emergency department (ED) visits in both children and adults every year. Management of asthma exacerbations is an important part of the continuum of asthma care. The best strategy for ED management of an asthma exacerbation is early recognition and intervention, continuous monitoring, appropriate disposition, and, once improved, multifaceted transitional care that optimizes subacute and chronic asthma management after ED discharge. This article concisely reviews ED evaluation, treatment, disposition, and postdischarge care for patients with asthma exacerbations, based on high-quality evidence (eg, systematic reviews from the Cochrane Collaboration) and current international guidelines (eg, the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 3, Global Initiative for Asthma, and Australian guidelines). Special populations (young children, pregnant women, and the elderly) also are addressed. Despite advances in asthma science, there remain many important evidence gaps in managing ED patients with asthma exacerbation. This article summarizes several of these controversial areas and challenges that merit further investigation.

The genetic architecture of sporadic and multiple consecutive miscarriage

Miscarriage is a common, complex trait affecting ~15% of clinically confirmed pregnancies. Here we present the results of large-scale genetic association analyses with 69,054 cases from five different ancestries for sporadic miscarriage, 750 cases of European ancestry for multiple (≥3) consecutive miscarriage, and up to 359,469 female controls. We identify one genome-wide significant association (rs146350366, minor allele frequency (MAF) 1.2%, P = 3.2 × 10-8, odds ratio (OR) = 1.4) for sporadic miscarriage in our European ancestry meta-analysis and three genome-wide significant associations for multiple consecutive miscarriage (rs7859844, MAF = 6.4%, P = 1.3 × 10-8, OR = 1.7; rs143445068, MAF = 0.8%, P = 5.2 × 10-9, OR = 3.4; rs183453668, MAF = 0.5%, P = 2.8 × 10-8, OR = 3.8). We further investigate the genetic architecture of miscarriage with biobank-scale Mendelian randomization, heritability, and genetic correlation analyses. Our results show that miscarriage etiopathogenesis is partly driven by genetic variation potentially related to placental biology, and illustrate the utility of large-scale biobank data for understanding this pregnancy complication.

The Effect of Asthma Severity on Perinatal Outcomes: A Tertiary Hospital Experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of asthma severity and disease exacerbation on pregnancy outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pregnancies were classified into 3 groups as mild (n=195), moderate (n=63), and severe (n=26) according to preconceptional asthma severity. Demographic features, clinical characteristics, and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Delivery characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were also compared between the pregnancies with or without asthma exacerbation (43 and 241 pregnancies, respectively).

RESULTS

Worsening of symptoms during pregnancy was higher in moderate and severe asthma groups (p<0.001). Rates of spontaneous abortion, fetal structural anomaly, preterm delivery, preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction (FGR), oligohydramnios, gestational diabetes, and intrauterine fetal demise were higher in moderate and severe asthma groups (p-values were < 0.001, 0.01, 0.008, 0.02, 0.01, < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.007, respectively). Admissions to neonatal intensive care units and neonatal complication rates were higher among moderate and severe asthma groups (p=0.035 and < 0.001). Spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery, preeclampsia, FGR, oligohydramnios, and neonatal complication rates were higher (p<0.001) in the group with exacerbated symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Moderate to severe asthma before pregnancy and the exacerbation of asthma symptoms during pregnancy may lead to increased rates of perinatal complications.

Timing of Maternal Asthma Diagnosis in Relation to Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if asthma diagnosed during pregnancy puts the fetus at a higher risk of poor perinatal outcomes than pre-existing asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To assess if the risks of prematurity, major malformations, and small-for-gestational age (SGA) are higher in women with asthma diagnosed during versus pre-pregnancy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of pregnant women aged ≥15 years with and without incident asthma, constructed from health administrative databases. Follow-up began 24 months before pregnancy onset (cohort entry) and ended at delivery. Incident asthma was defined as a first diagnosis among those without asthma in the 8 years before cohort entry. Time was classified into pre-pregnancy and each trimester until delivery. We fit inverse probability weighted Poisson models to estimate marginal relative risks (RRs) for prematurity (delivery <37th week), major malformations, and SGA (birth weight <10th percentile) comparing women with and without asthma, assessing the asthma timing of diagnosis interaction term via a Wald test.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 122,880 deliveries, the increased risk of prematurity, but not SGA, due to incident asthma was higher in those diagnosed during the second (RR, 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.65; Wald P = .05) and third (RR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.62-2.29; Wald P < .01) trimesters relative to pre-pregnancy (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98-1.15). A trend toward an increased risk of major malformations was observed in those diagnosed during the first trimester (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.94-1.49; Wald P = .15) than pre-pregnancy (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92-1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma diagnosed during, versus before, pregnancy was associated with a greater prematurity risk, suggesting an important role of preconception and prenatal screening.

Asthma and/or hay fever as predictors of fertility/impaired fecundity in U.S. women: National Survey of Family Growth

This study addresses whether asthma and/or hay fever predict fertility and impaired fecundity. The lifetime number of pregnancies (fertility) and spontaneous pregnancy losses (impaired fecundity) in 10,847 women representative of the U.S. population 15 to 44 years of age with histories of diagnosed asthma and/or hay fever are analyzed in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth using multivariable Poisson regression with multiple covariates and adjustments for complex sampling. Smokers have significantly increased fertility compared to nonsmokers. Smokers with asthma only have significantly increased fertility compared to other smokers. Higher fertility is associated with impaired fecundity (ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth). Women with asthma (with and without hay fever) have significantly higher pregnancy losses than women without asthma. With increasing number of pregnancies, smokers have increased pregnancy losses compared to nonsmokers. Smokers, especially those with asthma only, have increased fertility and require special attention as to their family planning needs, reproductive health, and smoking cessation. Women with asthma, regardless of number of pregnancies, and smokers with higher numbers of pregnancies have high risk pregnancies that require optimal asthma/medical management prenatally and throughout pregnancy. Whether a proinflammatory asthma endotype underlies both the increased fertility and impaired fecundity associated with age and smoking is discussed.

Impact of allergic diseases on fertility

The incidence of allergic diseases has been increasing in recent decades, and currently, nearly 30% of the European population suffer from some type of allergy. Also, an increasing number of people are suffering from infertility. Both diseases are related to the hormonal and immune systems, which prompts the question as to whether there is a causal relationship between allergic disorders and the reproductive system. The purpose of this review is to evaluate whether there is a link between allergic diseases and infertility, using the available literature.

Methods for the assessment of selection bias in drug safety during pregnancy studies using electronic medical data

Electronic health data are routinely used for population drug studies. Due to the ethical dilemma in carrying out experimental drug studies on pregnant women, the effects of medication usage during pregnancy on fetal and maternal outcomes are largely evaluated using this data collection medium. One major limitation in this type of study is the delayed inclusion of pregnancies in the cohort. For example, in the province of Quebec, Canada, a major pregnancy cohort only captured pregnancies after 20 weeks gestation. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate three methods that can be used to assess the extent of selection bias due to the delayed inclusion of pregnancies. We use causal directed acyclic graphs to explain the source of this selection bias. In an example involving a cohort of pregnant asthmatic women reconstructed from the linkage of administrative health databases from the province of Quebec, we use numerical derivations, a simulation study and a sensitivity analysis to investigate the potential for bias and loss of power due to the delayed inclusion. We find that this selection bias can be partially mitigated by controlling for variables related to (spontaneous or therapeutic) abortion and the outcome of interest. The three proposed methods allow for the pre and post hoc ascertainment of the bias. While delayed pregnancy inclusion selection bias (which includes "live birth bias") can produce substantial bias in pregnancy drug studies, all three methods are effective at producing estimates of the size of the bias.

Asthma Outcomes and Management During Pregnancy

Asthma during pregnancy poses a common, increasingly prevalent threat to the health of women and their children. The present article reviews recent insights gained from the epidemiology of asthma during pregnancy, demonstrating the many short- and long-term risks to mother and fetus incurred by poorly controlled maternal asthma. We further discuss emerging evidence that active management of asthma during pregnancy can positively influence and perhaps completely mitigate these poor outcomes. Recent high-quality trials examining best methods for asthma treatment are reviewed and synthesized to offer an evidence-based pathway for comprehensive treatment of asthma in the outpatient setting. Safe and effective medications, as well as nonpharmacologic interventions, for asthma during pregnancy are discussed, and treatment options for related conditions of pregnancy, including depression, rhinitis, and gastroesophageal reflux, are presented. Throughout, we emphasize that an effective treatment strategy relies on a detailed patient evaluation, patient education, objective measurement of asthma control, and frequent and supportive follow-up. The cardiovascular and respiratory physiology of pregnancy is reviewed, as well as its implications for the management of patients with asthma, including patients requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. For the situation when outpatient asthma management has failed, an approach to the critically ill pregnant patient with status asthmaticus is detailed. Multidisciplinary teams that include pulmonary specialists, obstetricians, primary care providers, nurses, pharmacists, and asthma educators improve the care of pregnant women with asthma.

The Influence of Asthma and/or Hay Fever on Pregnancy: Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth

BACKGROUND

Asthma is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. At the same time there is a worldwide increase in asthma and hay fever.

OBJECTIVE

This study addresses whether asthma and/or hay fever adversely influence pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth that include a history of diagnosed asthma, hay fever, and adverse pregnancy outcomes in 10,847 women representative of the US population aged 15 to 44 years were analyzed.

RESULTS

Women with the allergic phenotypes asthma and hay fever and hay fever only had no significant increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes (spontaneous pregnancy loss, preterm birth, infant low birth weight), whereas women with the nonatopic phenotype asthma only (without hay fever) did. The study did not evaluate endotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides new data that the allergic phenotypes, asthma and hay fever and hay fever only, are compatible with healthy pregnancy, whereas the nonatopic asthma phenotype, asthma only, adversely impacts pregnancy.

Assessing asthma severity based on claims data: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in Germany. Substantial economic evaluation of asthma cost requires knowledge of asthma severity, which is in general not part of claims data. Algorithms need to be defined to use this data source.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to systematically review the international literature to identify algorithms for the stratification of asthma patients according to disease severity based on available information in claims data.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in September 2015 using the DIMDI SmartSearch, a meta search engine including several databases with a national and international scope, e.g. BIOSIS, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Claims data based studies that categorize asthma patients according to their disease severity were identified.

RESULTS

The systematic research yielded 54 publications assessing asthma severity based on claims data. Thirty-nine studies used a standardized algorithm such as HEDIS, Leidy, the GINA based approach or CACQ. Sixteen publications applied a variety of different criteria for the severity categorisation such as asthma diagnoses, asthma-related drug prescriptions, emergency department visits, and hospitalisations.

CONCLUSION

There is no best practice method for the categorisation of asthma severity with claims data. Rather, a combination of algorithms seems to be a pragmatic approach. A transfer to the German context is not entirely possible without considering particular conditions associated with German claims data.

Management of critical asthma syndrome during pregnancy

One-third of pregnant asthmatics experience a worsening of their asthma that may progress to a critical asthma syndrome (CAS) that includes status asthmaticus (SA) and near-fatal asthma (NFA). Patients with severe asthma before pregnancy may experience more exacerbations, especially during late pregnancy. Prevention of the CAS includes excellent asthma control involving targeted early and regular medical care of the pregnant asthmatic, together with medication compliance. Spontaneous abortion risk is higher in pregnant women with uncontrolled asthma than in non-asthmatics. Should CAS occur during pregnancy, aggressive bronchodilator therapy, montelukast, and systemic corticosteroids can be used in the context of respiratory monitoring, preferably in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Systemic epinephrine should be avoided due to potential teratogenic side-effects and placental/uterine vasoconstriction. Non-invasive ventilation has been used in some cases. Intratracheal intubation can be hazardous and rapid-sequence intubation by an experienced physician is recommended. Mechanical ventilation parameters are adjusted based on changes to respiratory mechanics in the pregnant patient. An inhaled helium-oxygen gas admixture may promote laminar airflow and improve gas exchange. Permissive hypercapnea is controversial, but may be unavoidable. Sedation with propofol which itself has bronchodilating properties is preferred to benzodiazepines. Case reports delineating good outcomes for both mother and fetus despite intubation for SA suggest that multidisciplinary ICU care of the pregnant asthmatic with critical asthma are feasible especially if hypoxemia is avoided.

The Prevalence, Risk Factors and Changes in Symptoms of Self Reported Asthma, Rhinitis and Eczema Among Pregnant Women in Ogbomoso, Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Allergic disorders have become a major public health concern worldwide. No Nigerian study has examined the epidemiology of allergic diseases among women.

AIM

To document the prevalence, risk factors and the changes in the symptoms of allergic disorders during pregnancy.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Cross-sectional study conducted at the booking and antenatal clinics of LAUTECH Teaching Hospital and Millennium Development Goals (MDG) Clinic of the Comprehensive Health Center, Oja Igbo, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study enrolled 432 women from two public hospitals. Sociodemographic and clinical history were obtained and allergic disorders were diagnosed using ISAAC questionnaires.

RESULTS

The prevalence of wheezing, eczema and rhinitis in pregnancy are 7.5%, 4.0% and 5.8% respectively. The prevalence of wheezing and eczema was slightly higher among the pregnant in past 12 months. Wheeze worsened in 70% (18/26), improved in 15% (2/26), and stable in 15% (2/26). Eczema worsened in 50% (7/14), improved in 7.1% (1/14) and stable in 42.9% (6/14), while allergic rhinitis worsened in 50% (11/22), improved in 22.7% (5/22) and stabilized in 27.3 % (6/22). In multivariate analysis, the risk of allergic diseases in pregnancy was increase 2 times by low income earning (CI: 1.2 - 2.1, p = 0.002), low level education (OR = 0.6, CI: 0.3 - 0.9, p = 0.011) and by family history of asthma, OR-4.3, CI - 1.3 - 13.9, p = 0.015. Family history of asthma increase the chances of asthma by 18.7 times, CI-2.3 - 152.2, p = 0.006, while the odd of eczema was increased 9.1 times (CI-2.7 - 30.6, p<0.001) and 2.4 times (CI: 1.2 - 4.7, p = 0.008) by second hand home smoking and low-family income respectively. The risk of allergic rhinitis were raised 1.8 times by low family income (CI 1.1 - 2.8, p = 0.013) and 3.9 times by family history of rhinitis (OR = 3.9, CI 1.2 - 12.7, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of wheezing and eczema are higher in pregnancy probably due to exacerbation induced by pregnancy. Social and genetic factors are important risk factors for allergic disorders in pregnancy.

Improved management of acute asthma among pregnant women presenting to the ED

BACKGROUND

A multicenter study in the late 1990s demonstrated suboptimal emergency asthma care for pregnant women in US EDs. After a decade, follow-up data are lacking. We aimed to examine changes in emergency asthma care of pregnant women since the 1990s.

METHODS

We combined data from four multicenter observational studies of ED patients with acute asthma performed in 1996 to 2001 (three studies) and 2011 to 2012 (one study). We restricted the data so that comparisons were based on the same 48 EDs in both time periods. We identified all pregnant patients aged 18 to 44 years with acute asthma. Primary outcomes were treatment with systemic corticosteroids in the ED and, among those sent home, at ED discharge.

RESULTS

Of 4,895 ED patients with acute asthma, the analytic cohort comprised 125 pregnant women. Between the two time periods, there were no significant changes in patient demographics, chronic asthma severity, or initial peak expiratory flow. In contrast, ED systemic corticosteroid treatment increased significantly from 51% to 78% across the time periods (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.27-7.60; P = .01); systemic corticosteroids at discharge increased from 42% to 63% (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.97-6.37; P = .054). In the adjusted analyses, pregnant women in recent years were more likely to receive systemic corticosteroids, both in the ED (OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 1.63-13.9; P = .004) and at discharge (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.05-9.61; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Between the two time periods, emergency asthma care in pregnant women significantly improved. However, with one in three pregnant women being discharged home without systemic corticosteroids, further improvement is warranted.

Asthma in pregnancy: Physiology, diagnosis, and management

Asthma is a common, potentially serious, medical condition that affects an estimated 8% of pregnant patients, with 4% of all pregnant patients experiencing an exacerbation in the past year. Practitioners must be able to diagnose, educate, and treat such patients as they undergo significant physiological and immunologic change. But staying current can be challenging given over 3000 citations for "asthma and pregnancy" in a recent PubMed search, with 750 described as review articles. Patients have even more difficulty navigating information, with 29 million Google search results for this same query and 1.2 million alone for the question whether asthma medications are safe during pregnancy. This review provides brief answers to important management questions followed by supporting background literature.

Asthma in pregnancy

Asthma affects approximately 8% of women during pregnancy. Pregnancy results in a variable course for asthma control, likely contributed to by physiological changes affecting the respiratory, immune, and hormonal systems. While asthma during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of maternal and fetal complications including malformations, available data also suggest that active asthma management and monitoring can decrease the risk of adverse outcomes. The diagnosis, disease classification, and goals for asthma management in the pregnant woman are the same as for nonpregnant patients. However, evidence shows that pregnant asthmatics are more likely to be undertreated, resulting in asthma exacerbations occurring in approximately one third and hospitalization in one tenth of patients. Pharmacotherapeutic management of asthma exacerbations in pregnant patients follows standard treatment guidelines. In contrast, the principles of asthma maintenance therapy are slightly modified in the pregnant patient. Patients and practitioners may avoid use of asthma medications due to concern for a risk of fetal complications and malformations. A variable amount of information is available regarding the risk of a given asthma medication to cause adverse fetal outcomes, and it is preferable to use an inhaled product. Nevertheless, based on available data, the majority of asthma medications are regarded as safe for use during pregnancy. And, any increased risk to either the mother or fetus from medication use appears to be small compared to that associated with poor asthma control.

Omalizumab in pregnant women treated due to severe asthma: two case reports of good outcomes of pregnancies

The article presents case reports of 2 women who became pregnant during therapy with omalizumab. Both subjects suffered from very severe asthma and were treated chronically with all available medications including systemic steroids (first - 20 mg prednisolone/day, second - 40 mg prednisolone/day). Both were enrolled into treatment with omalizumab and started regular therapy in 2007. The course of asthma significantly improved in both cases (withdrawal of oral steroids or significant reduction of their dose, better asthma control). The first woman, 32-year-old, became pregnant in 2010 and gave birth in Oct 2010 - it was her 3(rd) pregnancy, and 3(rd) labor. The second woman, 31-year-old, also became pregnant in 2010 and gave birth in Jan 2011 - it was her 5(th) pregnancy and 2(nd) labor. Both had severe asthma exacerbations during previous pregnancies and labors, and decided to continue therapy with omalizumab. The first woman, besides omalizumab, was treated with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β agonists (LABA) while the second one was treated with high doses of ICS, LABA and 2.5 mg to 5 mg prednisone/day. The pregnancies proceeded without asthma exacerbations. The first woman delivered a healthy girl (Apgar 9, weight 3200 g, length 56 cm) in the 40(th) week of pregnancy by caesarean section due to the narrow pelvis. The second one delivered a healthy boy (Apgar 9, weight 3800 g, length 56 cm) in week 40 by caesarean section due to the aggravating obstetrical history. In both cases, treatment with omalizumab did not affect pregnancies and newborns.

Female asthma has a negative effect on fertility: what is the connection?

Reproductive changes such as impaired fertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes have been related to female asthma. We recently found that time to pregnancy is prolonged in asthmatic females especially in women with moderate to severe asthma and in those above 30 years of age. Despite their reproductive difficulties the asthmatics ultimately conceived just as many biological children as healthy throughout their reproductive lives. This knowledge therefore raises questions about how asthma affects fertility pathophysiologically. The purpose of this review is to describe the existing knowledge in this field and suggest hypotheses of causal relationships, which may form the basis for future studies in this field. The aim is, in particular, in the literature to examine whether there is any evidence to suggest that the systemic inflammation that characterizes asthma, can affect fertility. The issue is potentially clinically important for asthmatic, infertile individuals and society because treatment of the general systemic inflammation associated with the asthmatic disease combined with hormone stimulation might be the optimal target for an effective infertility therapy, possibly decreasing the need for in vitro fertilization.