1
|
Zohura F, Thomas ED, Masud J, Bhuyian MSI, Parvin T, Monira S, Faruque ASG, Alam M, George CM. Formative Research for the Development of the CHoBI7 Cholera Rapid Response Program for Cholera Hotspots in Bangladesh. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:13352. [PMID: 36293930 PMCID: PMC9603179 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Cholera is a severe form of acute watery diarrhea that if left untreated can result in death. Globally, there are 2.9 million cholera cases annually. Individuals living in close proximity to cholera cases are at a higher risk for developing cholera compared to the general population. Targeted water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions have the potential to reduce cholera transmission in cholera hotspots around cholera cases. The objective of this study was to expand the scope of the Cholera-Hospital-Based-Intervention-for-7-Days (CHoBI7) program, focused on cholera patient households, for delivery in cholera hotspots in urban slums in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Thirty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted in cholera hotspots around cholera patients, and three intervention planning workshops were conducted to inform modifications needed to the CHoBI7 program. After exploratory interviews, a two-phase, iterative pilot study was conducted for 9 months to test the developed CHoBI7 Cholera Rapid Response program among 180 participants to further inform modifications to intervention content and delivery. Findings from pilot participant interviews highlighted the need to adapt intervention content for delivery at the compound-rather than household-level, given an environment with multiple households sharing a water source, toilets, and kitchen facilities. This was addressed by conducting a "ring session" for intervention delivery in cholera hotspots for households to discuss how to improve their shared facilities together and encourage a compound-level commitment to promoted WASH behaviors and placement of soapy water bottles in shared spaces. Based on the low number of soapy water bottles observed in communal spaces during the first iteration of the pilot, we also added context-specific examples using the narratives of families in mobile messages to encourage WASH behavioral recommendations. Formative research identified important considerations for the modifications needed to tailor the CHoBI7 program for delivery in cholera hotspots in urban Bangladesh.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatema Zohura
- Research, Training and Management International, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, icddr,b, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Elizabeth D. Thomas
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Jahed Masud
- Research, Training and Management International, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, icddr,b, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Md Sazzadul Islam Bhuyian
- Research, Training and Management International, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, icddr,b, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Tahmina Parvin
- Research, Training and Management International, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, icddr,b, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Shirajum Monira
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, icddr,b, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Abu S. G. Faruque
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, icddr,b, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Munirul Alam
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, icddr,b, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Christine Marie George
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
George CM, Parvin T, Bhuyian MSI, Uddin IM, Zohura F, Masud J, Monira S, Sack DA, Perin J, Alam M, Faruque ASG. Randomized Controlled Trial of the Cholera-Hospital-Based-Intervention-for-7-Days (CHoBI7) Cholera Rapid Response Program to Reduce Diarrheal Diseases in Bangladesh. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12905. [PMID: 36232205 PMCID: PMC9566036 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
(a) Objective: To build an evidence base on effective water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrheal diseases in cholera hotspots, we developed the CHoBI7 Cholera Rapid Response Program. (b) Methods: Once a cholera patient (confirmed by bacterial culture) is identified at a health facility, a health promoter delivers a targeted WASH intervention to the cholera hotspot (households within 20 m of a cholera patient) through both in-person visits during the first week and bi-weekly WASH mobile messages for the 3-month program period. A randomized controlled trial of the CHoBI7 Cholera Rapid Response Program was conducted with 284 participants in 15 cholera hotspots around cholera patients in urban Dhaka, Bangladesh. This program was compared to the standard message in Bangladesh on the use of oral rehydration solution for dehydration. Five-hour structured observation of handwashing with soap and diarrhea surveillance was conducted monthly. (c) Findings: Handwashing with soap at food- and stool-related events was significantly higher in the CHoBI7 Cholera Rapid Response Program arm compared to the standard message arm at all timepoints (overall 54% in the CHoBI7 arm vs. 23% in the standard arm, p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in diarrheal prevalence for all participants (adults and children) (Prevalence Ratio (PR) 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14-0.85) and for children under 5 years of age (PR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.085-0.87) during the 3-month program. (d) Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the CHoBI7 Cholera Rapid Response Program is effective in lowering diarrhea prevalence and increasing handwashing with soap for a population at high risk of cholera.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Marie George
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205-2103, USA
| | - Tahmina Parvin
- Research Training and Management International, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Md. Sazzadul Islam Bhuyian
- Research Training and Management International, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Ismat Minhaj Uddin
- Research Training and Management International, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Fatema Zohura
- Research Training and Management International, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Jahed Masud
- Research Training and Management International, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Shirajum Monira
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - David A. Sack
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205-2103, USA
| | - Jamie Perin
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205-2103, USA
| | - Munirul Alam
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - A. S. G. Faruque
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ratnayake R, Peyraud N, Ciglenecki I, Gignoux E, Lightowler M, Azman AS, Gakima P, Ouamba JP, Sagara JA, Ndombe R, Mimbu N, Ascorra A, Welo PO, Mukamba Musenga E, Miwanda B, Boum Y, Checchi F, Edmunds WJ, Luquero F, Porten K, Finger F. Effectiveness of case-area targeted interventions including vaccination on the control of epidemic cholera: protocol for a prospective observational study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061206. [PMID: 35793924 PMCID: PMC9260795 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cholera outbreaks in fragile settings are prone to rapid expansion. Case-area targeted interventions (CATIs) have been proposed as a rapid and efficient response strategy to halt or substantially reduce the size of small outbreaks. CATI aims to deliver synergistic interventions (eg, water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions, vaccination, and antibiotic chemoprophylaxis) to households in a 100-250 m 'ring' around primary outbreak cases. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We report on a protocol for a prospective observational study of the effectiveness of CATI. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) plans to implement CATI in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Cameroon, Niger and Zimbabwe. This study will run in parallel to each implementation. The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of cholera in each CATI ring. CATI will be triggered immediately on notification of a case in a new area. As with most real-world interventions, there will be delays to response as the strategy is rolled out. We will compare the cumulative incidence among rings as a function of response delay, as a proxy for performance. Cross-sectional household surveys will measure population-based coverage. Cohort studies will measure effects on reducing incidence among household contacts and changes in antimicrobial resistance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The ethics review boards of MSF and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine have approved a generic protocol. The DRC and Niger-specific versions have been approved by the respective national ethics review boards. Approvals are in process for Cameroon and Zimbabwe. The study findings will be disseminated to the networks of national cholera control actors and the Global Task Force for Cholera Control using meetings and policy briefs, to the scientific community using journal articles, and to communities via community meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruwan Ratnayake
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Epicentre, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew S Azman
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland
- Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Placide Okitayemba Welo
- Programme National d'Elimination du Choléra et de lutte contre les autres Maladies Diarrhéiques, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the)
| | | | - Berthe Miwanda
- Institut National de Recherche Biologique, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the)
| | | | - Francesco Checchi
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - W John Edmunds
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Francisco Luquero
- Epicentre, Paris, France
- GAVI the Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
White S, Mutula AC, Buroko MM, Heath T, Mazimwe FK, Blanchet K, Curtis V, Dreibelbis R. How does handwashing behaviour change in response to a cholera outbreak? A qualitative case study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266849. [PMID: 35413080 PMCID: PMC9004767 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Handwashing with soap has the potential to curb cholera transmission. This research explores how populations experienced and responded to the 2017 cholera outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and how this affected their handwashing behaviour. Methods Cholera cases were identified through local cholera treatment centre records. Comparison individuals were recruited from the same neighbourhoods by identifying households with no recent confirmed or suspected cholera cases. Multiple qualitative methods were employed to understand hand hygiene practices and their determinants, including unstructured observations, interviews and focus group discussions. The data collection tools and analysis were informed by the Behaviour Centred Design Framework. Comparisons were made between the experiences and practices of people from case households and participants from comparison households. Results Cholera was well understood by the population and viewed as a persistent and common health challenge. Handwashing with soap was generally observed to be rare during the outbreak despite self-reported increases in behaviour. Across case and comparison groups, individuals were unable to prioritise handwashing due to competing food-scarcity and livelihood challenges and there was little in the physical or social environments to cue handwashing or make it a convenient, rewarding or desirable to practice. The ability of people from case households to practice handwashing was further constrained by their exposure to cholera which in addition to illness, caused profound non-health impacts to household income, productivity, social status, and their sense of control. Conclusions Even though cholera outbreaks can cause disruptions to many determinants of behaviour, these shifts do not automatically facilitate an increase in preventative behaviours like handwashing with soap. Hygiene programmes targeting outbreaks within complex crises could be strengthened by acknowledging the emic experiences of the disease and adopting sustainable solutions which build upon local disease coping mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sian White
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Anna C. Mutula
- Independent Consultant, Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | | | | | | | - Karl Blanchet
- Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Val Curtis
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Dreibelbis
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
D'Mello-Guyett L, Cumming O, Rogers E, D'hondt R, Mengitsu E, Mashako M, Van den Bergh R, Welo PO, Maes P, Checchi F. Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015-2018: a scoping review. Confl Health 2022; 16:12. [PMID: 35351171 PMCID: PMC8966369 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-022-00445-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholera epidemics occur frequently in low-income countries affected by concurrent humanitarian crises. Evaluations of these epidemic response remains largely unpublished and there is a need to generate evidence on response efforts to inform future programmes. This review of MSF cholera epidemic responses aimed to describe the main characteristics of the cholera epidemics and related responses in these three countries, to identify challenges to different intervention strategies based on available data; and to make recommendations for epidemic prevention and control practice and policy. METHODS Case studies from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Malawi and Mozambique were purposively selected by MSF for this review due to the documented burden of cholera in each country, frequency of cholera outbreaks, and risk of humanitarian crises. Data were extracted on the characteristics of the epidemics; time between alert and response; and, the delivery of health and water, sanitation and hygiene interventions. A Theory of Change for cholera response programmes was built to assess factors that affected implementation of the responses. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 20 epidemic response reports were identified, 15 in DRC, one in Malawi and four in Mozambique. All contexts experienced concurrent humanitarian crises, either armed conflict or natural disasters. Across the settings, median time between the date of alert and date of the start of the response by MSF was 23 days (IQR 14-41). Almost all responses targeted interventions community-wide, and all responses implemented in-patient treatment of suspected cholera cases in either established health care facilities (HCFs) or temporary cholera treatment units (CTUs). In three responses, interventions were delivered as case-area targeted interventions (CATI) and four responses targeted households of admitted suspected cholera cases. CATI or delivery of interventions to households of admitted suspected cases occurred from 2017 onwards only. Overall, 74 factors affecting implementation were identified including delayed supplies of materials, insufficient quantities of materials and limited or lack of coordination with local government or other agencies. Based on this review, the following recommendations are made to improve cholera prevention and control efforts: explore improved models for epidemic preparedness, including rapid mobilisation of supplies and deployment of trained staff; invest in and strengthen partnerships with national and local government and other agencies; and to standardise reporting templates that allow for rigorous and structured evaluations within and across countries to provide consistent and accessible data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren D'Mello-Guyett
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
- Environmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Oliver Cumming
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elliot Rogers
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Rob D'hondt
- Environmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Maria Mashako
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Rafael Van den Bergh
- LuxOR, Luxembourg Operational Research Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Placide Okitayemba Welo
- Programme National d'Elimination du Choléra et de lutte contre les autres Maladies Diarrhéiques, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Peter Maes
- WASH Section, UNICEF, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Francesco Checchi
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sikder M, Altare C, Doocy S, Trowbridge D, Kaur G, Kaushal N, Lyles E, Lantagne D, Azman AS, Spiegel P. Case-area targeted preventive interventions to interrupt cholera transmission: Current implementation practices and lessons learned. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021; 15:e0010042. [PMID: 34919551 PMCID: PMC8719662 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholera is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in low-resource and humanitarian settings. It is transmitted by fecal-oral route, and the infection risk is higher to those living in and near cholera cases. Rapid identification of cholera cases and implementation of measures to prevent subsequent transmission around cases may be an efficient strategy to reduce the size and scale of cholera outbreaks. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS We investigated implementation of cholera case-area targeted interventions (CATIs) using systematic reviews and case studies. We identified 11 peer-reviewed and eight grey literature articles documenting CATIs and completed 30 key informant interviews in case studies in Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. We documented 15 outbreaks in 12 countries where CATIs were used. The team composition and the interventions varied, with water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions implemented more commonly than those of health. Alert systems triggering interventions were diverse ranging from suspected cholera cases to culture confirmed cases. Selection of high-risk households around the case household was inconsistent and ranged from only one case to approximately 100 surrounding households with different methods of selecting them. Coordination among actors and integration between sectors were consistently reported as challenging. Delays in sharing case information impeded rapid implementation of this approach, while evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions varied. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE CATIs appear effective in reducing cholera outbreaks, but there is limited and context specific evidence of their effectiveness in reducing the incidence of cholera cases and lack of guidance for their consistent implementation. We propose to 1) use uniform cholera case definitions considering a local capacity to trigger alert; 2) evaluate the effectiveness of individual or sets of interventions to interrupt cholera, and establish a set of evidence-based interventions; 3) establish criteria to select high-risk households; and 4) improve coordination and data sharing amongst actors and facilitate integration among sectors to strengthen CATI approaches in cholera outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Sikder
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Chiara Altare
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Shannon Doocy
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Daniella Trowbridge
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Gurpreet Kaur
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Natasha Kaushal
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Emily Lyles
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Daniele Lantagne
- Consultant, Public Health Engineer, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Andrew S. Azman
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Paul Spiegel
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
D'Mello-Guyett L, Cumming O, Bonneville S, D'hondt R, Mashako M, Nakoka B, Gorski A, Verheyen D, Van den Bergh R, Welo PO, Maes P, Checchi F. Effectiveness of hygiene kit distribution to reduce cholera transmission in Kasaï-Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo, 2018: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050943. [PMID: 34649847 PMCID: PMC8522665 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Household contacts of cholera cases are at a greater risk of Vibrio cholerae infection than the general population. There is currently no agreed standard of care for household contacts, despite their high risk of infection, in cholera response strategies. In 2018, hygiene kit distribution and health promotion was recommended by Médecins Sans Frontières for admitted patients and accompanying household members on admission to a cholera treatment unit in the Democratic Republic of Congo. METHODS To investigate the effectiveness of the intervention and risk factors for cholera infection, we conducted a prospective cohort study and followed household contacts for 7 days after patient admission. Clinical surveillance among household contacts was based on self-reported symptoms of cholera and diarrhoea, and environmental surveillance through the collection and analysis of food and water samples. RESULTS From 94 eligible households, 469 household contacts were enrolled and 444 completed follow-up. Multivariate analysis suggested evidence of a dose-response relationship with increased kit use associated with decreased relative risk of suspected cholera: household contacts in the high kit-use group had a 66% lower incidence of suspected cholera (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.03, p=0.055), the mid-use group had a 53% lower incidence (aRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.29, p=1.44) and low-use group had 22% lower incidence (aRR 0.78, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.53, p=0.684), compared with household contacts without a kit. Drinking water contamination was significantly reduced among households in receipt of a kit. There was no significant effect on self-reported diarrhoea or food contamination. CONCLUSION The integration of a hygiene kit intervention to case-households may be effective in reducing cholera transmission among household contacts and environmental contamination within the household. Further work is required to evaluate whether other proactive localised distribution among patients and case-households or to households surrounding cholera cases can be used in future cholera response programmes in emergency contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren D'Mello-Guyett
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Oliver Cumming
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gallandat K, Jeandron A, Ross I, Mufitini Saidi J, Bashige Rumedeka B, Lumami Kapepula V, Cousens S, Allen E, MacDougall A, Cumming O. The impact of improved water supply on cholera and diarrhoeal diseases in Uvira, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation. Trials 2021; 22:408. [PMID: 34154636 PMCID: PMC8215491 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05249-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diarrhoeal disease remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Cholera alone is estimated to cause 95,000 deaths per year, most of which occur in endemic settings with inadequate water access. Whilst a global strategy to eliminate cholera by 2030 calls for investment in improved drinking water services, there is limited rigorous evidence for the impact of improved water supply on endemic cholera transmission in low-income urban settings. Our protocol is designed to deliver a pragmatic health impact evaluation of a large-scale water supply intervention in Uvira (Democratic Republic of the Congo), a cholera transmission hotspot. METHODS/DESIGN A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (SW-CRT) was designed to evaluate the impact of a large-scale drinking water supply intervention on cholera incidence among the 280,000 inhabitants of Uvira. The city was divided into 16 clusters, where new community and household taps will be installed following a randomised sequence over a transition period of up to 8 weeks in each cluster. The primary trial outcomes are the monthly incidence of "confirmed" cholera cases (patients testing positive by rapid detection kit) and of "suspected" cholera cases (patients admitted to the cholera treatment centre). Concurrent process and economic evaluations will provide further information on the context, costs, and efficiency of the intervention. DISCUSSION In this protocol, we describe a pragmatic approach to conducting rigorous research to assess the impacts of a complex water supply intervention on severe diarrhoeal disease and cholera in an unstable, low-resource setting representative of cholera-affected areas. In particular, we discuss a series of pre-identified risks and linked mitigation strategies as well as the value of combining different data collection methods and preparation of multiple analysis scenarios to account for possible deviations from the protocol. The study described here has the potential to provide robust evidence to support more effective cholera control in challenging, high-burden settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02928341 , 10th October 2016) and has received ethics approval from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (8913, 10603) and from the Ethics Committee from the School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (ESP/CE/088/2015).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Gallandat
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Aurélie Jeandron
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ian Ross
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jaime Mufitini Saidi
- Ministère de la Santé Publique, Division Provinciale de la Santé Publique, District Sanitaire d'Uvira, Uvira, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Baron Bashige Rumedeka
- Ministère de la Santé Publique, Division Provinciale de la Santé Publique, District Sanitaire d'Uvira, Uvira, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Vercus Lumami Kapepula
- Department of Hydrology, Centre de Recherche en Hydrobiologie, Uvira, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Simon Cousens
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Allen
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Amy MacDougall
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Oliver Cumming
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roskosky M, Ali M, Upreti SR, Sack D. Spatial clustering of cholera cases in the Kathmandu Valley: implications for a ring vaccination strategy. Int Health 2021; 13:170-177. [PMID: 32761173 PMCID: PMC7902685 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In mid-2016, a cholera outbreak occurred in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. This retrospective study aims to determine if a reactive, ring vaccination strategy would have been useful in preventing cholera transmission during that outbreak. Methods Data on cholera cases were collected as part of hospital-based surveillance in the Kathmandu Valley in 2016. Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates were obtained during household visits. Geographic clusters of cases were visually determined and tested statistically for clustering. Cluster size was determined based on the distribution of cases around the index case. Results GPS coordinates for 69 cases were analysed. Six geographic clusters were identified, all of which showed significant clustering of cases. Approximately 85% of cases within a cluster occurred more than 7 d after the index case. The median ring size was 1 km, with a population of 14 000 people. Conclusions Cholera cases were clustered in space and the majority of cases occurred over 1 week after the initial cases in the cluster, allowing for an opportunity to prevent transmission through the use of the vaccine soon after the initial case was identified. A ring vaccination strategy may be especially useful for large urban areas with recurrent seasonal outbreaks but where the specific locations for such outbreaks are not predictable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mellisa Roskosky
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, 615 N Wolfe Street, MD-21205, USA
| | - Mohammad Ali
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, 615 N Wolfe Street, MD-21205, USA
| | | | - David Sack
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, 615 N Wolfe Street, MD-21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Holmgren J. An Update on Cholera Immunity and Current and Future Cholera Vaccines. Trop Med Infect Dis 2021; 6:tropicalmed6020064. [PMID: 33925118 PMCID: PMC8167659 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed6020064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Individual resistance to cholera infection and disease depends on both innate host factors and adaptive immunity acquired by a previous infection or vaccination. Locally produced, intestinal-mucosal secretory IgA (SIgA) antibodies against bacterial surface lipopolysaccharide (LPS) O antigens and/or secreted cholera toxins are responsible for the protective adaptive immunity, in conjunction with an effective mucosal immunologic memory that can elicit a rapid anamnestic SIgA antibody response upon re-exposure to the antigen/pathogen even many years later. Oral cholera vaccines (OCVs), based on inactivated Vibrio cholerae whole-cell components, either together with the cholera toxin B subunit (Dukoral™) or administered alone (Shanchol™/Euvichol-Plus™) were shown to be consistently safe and effective in large field trials in all settings. These OCVs are recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO) for the control of both endemic cholera and epidemic cholera outbreaks. OCVs are now a cornerstone in WHO’s global strategy found in “Ending Cholera: A Global Roadmap to 2030.” However, the forecasted global demands for OCV, estimated by the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) to 1.5 billion doses for the period 2020–2029, markedly exceed the existing manufacturing capacity. This calls for an increased production capacity of existing OCVs, as well as the rapid introduction of additional and improved vaccines under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Holmgren
- University of Gothenburg Vaccine Research Institute, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg Vaccine Research Institute, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gallandat K, Huang A, Rayner J, String G, Lantagne DS. Household spraying in cholera outbreaks: Insights from three exploratory, mixed-methods field effectiveness evaluations. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020; 14:e0008661. [PMID: 32866145 PMCID: PMC7485970 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Household spraying is a commonly implemented, yet an under-researched, cholera response intervention where a response team sprays surfaces in cholera patients' houses with chlorine. We conducted mixed-methods evaluations of three household spraying programs in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Haiti, including 18 key informant interviews, 14 household surveys and observations, and 418 surface samples collected before spraying, 30 minutes and 24 hours after spraying. The surfaces consistently most contaminated with Vibrio cholerae were food preparation areas, near the patient's bed and the latrine. Effectiveness varied between programs, with statistically significant reductions in V. cholerae concentrations 30 minutes after spraying in two programs. Surface contamination after 24 hours was variable between households and programs. Program challenges included difficulty locating households, transportation and funding limitations, and reaching households quickly after case presentation (disinfection occurred 2-6 days after reported cholera onset). Program advantages included the concurrent deployment of hygiene promotion activities. Further research is indicated on perception, recontamination, cost-effectiveness, viable but nonculturable V. cholerae, and epidemiological coverage. We recommend that, if spraying is implemented, spraying agents should: disinfect surfaces systematically until wet using 0.2/2.0% chlorine solution, including kitchen spaces, patients' beds, and latrines; arrive at households quickly; and, concurrently deploy hygiene promotion activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Gallandat
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
| | - Annie Huang
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Justine Rayner
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Gabrielle String
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Daniele S. Lantagne
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nanzaluka FH, Davis WW, Mutale L, Kapaya F, Sakubita P, Langa N, Gama A, N’cho HS, Malambo W, Murphy J, Blackstock A, Mintz E, Riggs M, Mukonka V, Sinyange N, Yard E, Brunkard J. Risk Factors for Epidemic Cholera in Lusaka, Zambia-2017. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:646-651. [PMID: 32458780 PMCID: PMC7410454 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
On October 6, 2017, the Zambia Ministry of Health declared a cholera outbreak in Lusaka. By December, 1,462 cases and 38 deaths had occurred (case fatality rate, 2.6%). We conducted a case-control study to identify risk factors and inform interventions. A case was any person with acute watery diarrhea (≥ 3 loose stools in 24 hours) admitted to a cholera treatment center in Lusaka from December 16 to 21, 2017. Controls were neighbors without diarrhea during the same time period. Up to two controls were matched to each case by age-group (1-4, 5-17, and ≥ 18 years) and neighborhood. Surveyors interviewed cases and controls, tested free chlorine residual (FCR) in stored water, and observed the presence of soap in the home. Conditional logistic regression was used to generate matched odds ratios (mORs) based on subdistricts and age-groups with 95% CIs. We enrolled 82 cases and 132 controls. Stored water in 71% of case homes had an FCR > 0.2 mg/L. In multivariable analyses, those who drank borehole water (mOR = 2.4, CI: 1.1-5.6), had close contact with a cholera case (mOR = 6.2, CI: 2.5-15), and were male (mOR = 2.5, CI: 1.4-5.0) had higher odds of being a cholera case than their matched controls. Based on these findings, we recommended health education about household water chlorination and hygiene in the home. Emergency responses included providing chlorinated water through emergency tanks and maintaining adequate FCR levels through close monitoring of water sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis H. Nanzaluka
- Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - William W. Davis
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lwito Mutale
- Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Fred Kapaya
- Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Patrick Sakubita
- Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Nelia Langa
- Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Angela Gama
- Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Hammad S. N’cho
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Warren Malambo
- Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jennifer Murphy
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anna Blackstock
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Eric Mintz
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Margaret Riggs
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Victor Mukonka
- Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia
- School of Medicine, Copperbelt University, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Nyambe Sinyange
- Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia
- Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Ellen Yard
- Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joan Brunkard
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
D'Mello-Guyett L, Greenland K, Bonneville S, D'hondt R, Mashako M, Gorski A, Verheyen D, Van den Bergh R, Maes P, Checchi F, Cumming O. Distribution of hygiene kits during a cholera outbreak in Kasaï-Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo: a process evaluation. Confl Health 2020; 14:51. [PMID: 32760439 PMCID: PMC7379792 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-020-00294-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cholera remains a leading cause of infectious disease outbreaks globally, and a major public health threat in complex emergencies. Hygiene kits distributed to cholera case-households have previously shown an effect in reducing cholera incidence and are recommended by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) for distribution to admitted patients and accompanying household members upon admission to health care facilities (HCFs). Methods This process evaluation documented the implementation, participant response and context of hygiene kit distribution by MSF during a 2018 cholera outbreak in Kasaï-Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The study population comprised key informant interviews with seven MSF staff, 17 staff from other organisations and a random sample of 27 hygiene kit recipients. Structured observations were conducted of hygiene kit demonstrations and health promotion, and programme reports were analysed to triangulate data. Results and conclusions Between Week (W) 28-48 of the 2018 cholera outbreak in Kasaï-Oriental, there were 667 suspected cholera cases with a 5% case fatality rate (CFR). Across seven HCFs supported by MSF, 196 patients were admitted with suspected cholera between W43-W47 and hygiene kit were provided to patients upon admission and health promotion at the HCF was conducted to accompanying household contacts 5-6 times per day. Distribution of hygiene kits was limited and only 52% of admitted suspected cholera cases received a hygiene kit. The delay of the overall response, delayed supply and insufficient quantities of hygiene kits available limited the coverage and utility of the hygiene kits, and may have diminished the effectiveness of the intervention. The integration of a WASH intervention for cholera control at the point of patient admission is a growing trend and promising intervention for case-targeted cholera responses. However, the barriers identified in this study warrant consideration in subsequent cholera responses and further research is required to identify ways to improve implementation and delivery of this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren D'Mello-Guyett
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Environmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Katie Greenland
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Rob D'hondt
- Environmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maria Mashako
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Alexandre Gorski
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Dorien Verheyen
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Rafael Van den Bergh
- LuxOR, Luxembourg Operational Research Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg
| | - Peter Maes
- Environmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Francesco Checchi
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Oliver Cumming
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bompangue D, Moore S, Taty N, Impouma B, Sudre B, Manda R, Balde T, Mboussou F, Vandevelde T. Description of the targeted water supply and hygiene response strategy implemented during the cholera outbreak of 2017-2018 in Kinshasa, DRC. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:226. [PMID: 32183745 PMCID: PMC7079479 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-4916-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rapid control of cholera outbreaks is a significant challenge in overpopulated urban areas. During late-2017, Kinshasa, the capital of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, experienced a cholera outbreak that showed potential to spread throughout the city. A novel targeted water and hygiene response strategy was implemented to quickly stem the outbreak. Methods We describe the first implementation of the cluster grid response strategy carried out in the community during the cholera outbreak in Kinshasa, in which response activities targeted cholera case clusters using a grid approach. Interventions focused on emergency water supply, household water treatment and safe storage, home disinfection and hygiene promotion. We also performed a preliminary community trial study to assess the temporal pattern of the outbreak before and after response interventions were implemented. Cholera surveillance databases from the Ministry of Health were analyzed to assess the spatiotemporal dynamics of the outbreak using epidemic curves and maps. Results From January 2017 to November 2018, a total of 1712 suspected cholera cases were reported in Kinshasa. During this period, the most affected health zones included Binza Météo, Limeté, Kokolo, Kintambo and Kingabwa. Following implementation of the response strategy, the weekly cholera case numbers in Binza Météo, Kintambo and Limeté decreased by an average of 57% after 2 weeks and 86% after 4 weeks. The total weekly case numbers throughout Kinshasa Province dropped by 71% 4 weeks after the peak of the outbreak. Conclusion During the 2017–2018 period, Kinshasa experienced a sharp increase in cholera case numbers. To contain the outbreak, water supply and hygiene response interventions targeted case households, nearby neighbors and public areas in case clusters using a grid approach. Following implementation of the response, the outbreak in Kinshasa was quickly brought under control. A similar approach may be adapted to quickly interrupt cholera transmission in other urban settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didier Bompangue
- Ministry of Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.,Laboratory Chrono-Environnement, UMR 6249, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France
| | | | - Nadège Taty
- Ministry of Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Benido Impouma
- World Health Organization, African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Republic of, Congo
| | - Bertrand Sudre
- Laboratory Chrono-Environnement, UMR 6249, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France
| | - Richard Manda
- Ministry of Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Thierno Balde
- World Health Organization, African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Republic of, Congo
| | - Franck Mboussou
- World Health Organization, African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Republic of, Congo
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roskosky M, Acharya B, Shakya G, Karki K, Sekine K, Bajracharya D, von Seidlein L, Devaux I, Lopez AL, Deen J, Sack DA. Feasibility of a Comprehensive Targeted Cholera Intervention in The Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 100:1088-1097. [PMID: 30887946 PMCID: PMC6493959 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
A comprehensive targeted intervention (CTI) was designed and deployed in the neighborhoods of cholera cases in the Kathmandu Valley with the intent of reducing rates among the neighbors of the case. This was a feasibility study to determine whether clinical centers, laboratories, and field teams were able to mount a rapid, community-based response to a case within 2 days of hospital admission. Daily line listings were requested from 15 participating hospitals during the monsoon season, and a single case initiated the CTI. A standard case definition was used: acute watery diarrhea, with or without vomiting, in a patient aged 1 year or older. Rapid diagnostic tests and bacterial culture were used for confirmation. The strategy included household investigation of cases; water testing; water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) intervention; and health education. A CTI coverage survey was conducted 8 months postintervention. From June to December of 2016, 169 cases of Vibrio cholerae O1 were confirmed by bacterial culture. Average time to culture result was 3 days. On average, the CTI Rapid Response Team (RRT) was able to visit households 1.7 days after the culture result was received from the hospital (3.9 days from hospital admission). Coverage of WASH and health behavior messaging campaigns were 30.2% in the target areas. Recipients of the intervention were more likely to have knowledge of cholera symptoms, treatment, and prevention than non-recipients. Although the RRT were able to investigate cases at the household within 2 days of a positive culture result, the study identified several constraints that limited a truly rapid response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mellisa Roskosky
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Bhim Acharya
- Epidemiology Disease Control Division, Department of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Geeta Shakya
- National Public Health Laboratory, Department of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | | | - Kazutaka Sekine
- United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | | | - Lorenz von Seidlein
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Isabelle Devaux
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Anna Lena Lopez
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
| | - Jacqueline Deen
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
| | - David A Sack
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
D’Mello-Guyett L, Gallandat K, Van den Bergh R, Taylor D, Bulit G, Legros D, Maes P, Checchi F, Cumming O. Prevention and control of cholera with household and community water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions: A scoping review of current international guidelines. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0226549. [PMID: 31914164 PMCID: PMC6948749 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cholera remains a frequent cause of outbreaks globally, particularly in areas with inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services. Cholera is spread through faecal-oral routes, and studies demonstrate that ingestion of Vibrio cholerae occurs from consuming contaminated food and water, contact with cholera cases and transmission from contaminated environmental point sources. WASH guidelines recommending interventions for the prevention and control of cholera are numerous and vary considerably in their recommendations. To date, there has been no review of practice guidelines used in cholera prevention and control programmes. METHODS We systematically searched international agency websites to identify WASH intervention guidelines used in cholera programmes in endemic and epidemic settings. Recommendations listed in the guidelines were extracted, categorised and analysed. Analysis was based on consistency, concordance and recommendations were classified on the basis of whether the interventions targeted within-household or community-level transmission. RESULTS Eight international guidelines were included in this review: three by non-governmental organisations (NGOs), one from a non-profit organisation (NPO), three from multilateral organisations and one from a research institution. There were 95 distinct recommendations identified, and concordance among guidelines was poor to fair. All categories of WASH interventions were featured in the guidelines. The majority of recommendations targeted community-level transmission (45%), 35% targeted within-household transmission and 20% both. CONCLUSIONS Recent evidence suggests that interventions for effective cholera control and response to epidemics should focus on case-centred approaches and within-household transmission. Guidelines did consistently propose interventions targeting transmission within households. However, the majority of recommendations listed in guidelines targeted community-level transmission and tended to be more focused on preventing contamination of the environment by cases or recurrent outbreaks, and the level of service required to interrupt community-level transmission was often not specified. The guidelines in current use were varied and interpretation may be difficult when conflicting recommendations are provided. Future editions of guidelines should reflect on the inclusion of evidence-based approaches, cholera transmission models and resource-efficient strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren D’Mello-Guyett
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Environmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Karin Gallandat
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rafael Van den Bergh
- LuxOR, Luxembourg Operational Research Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg
| | - Dawn Taylor
- Public Health Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gregory Bulit
- Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, UNICEF, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Dominique Legros
- Global Task Force on Cholera Control, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Peter Maes
- Environmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Francesco Checchi
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Cumming
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Michel E, Gaudart J, Beaulieu S, Bulit G, Piarroux M, Boncy J, Dely P, Piarroux R, Rebaudet S. Estimating effectiveness of case-area targeted response interventions against cholera in Haiti. eLife 2019; 8:50243. [PMID: 31886768 PMCID: PMC7041943 DOI: 10.7554/elife.50243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Case-area targeted interventions (CATIs) against cholera are conducted by rapid response teams, and may include various activities like water, sanitation, hygiene measures. However, their real-world effectiveness has never been established. We conducted a retrospective observational study in 2015-2017 in the Centre department of Haiti. Using cholera cases, stool cultures and CATI records, we identified 238 outbreaks that were responded to. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that a prompt response could reduce the number of accumulated cases by 76% (95% confidence interval, 59 to 86) and the outbreak duration by 61% (41 to 75) when compared to a delayed response. An intense response could reduce the number of accumulated cases by 59% (11 to 81) and the outbreak duration by 73% (49 to 86) when compared to a weaker response. These results suggest that prompt and repeated CATIs were significantly effective at mitigating and shortening cholera outbreaks in Haiti.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwige Michel
- Ministry of Public Health and Population, Directorate of Epidemiology Laboratory and Research, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Jean Gaudart
- Aix-Marseille Université, APHM, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Hop Timone, BiSTIC, Biostatistics and ICT, Marseille, France
| | | | - Gregory Bulit
- United Nations Children's Fund, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Martine Piarroux
- Centre d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique des Armées, Service de Santé des Armées, Marseille, France
| | - Jacques Boncy
- Ministry of Public Health and Population, National Laboratory of Public Health, Delmas, Haiti
| | - Patrick Dely
- Ministry of Public Health and Population, Directorate of Epidemiology Laboratory and Research, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Renaud Piarroux
- Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Stanislas Rebaudet
- APHM, Hôpital Européen, Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, IPLESP, Marseille, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sociocultural Influences on Dietary Practices and Physical Activity Behaviors of Rural Adolescents-A Qualitative Exploration. Nutrients 2019; 11:nu11122916. [PMID: 31810284 PMCID: PMC6950241 DOI: 10.3390/nu11122916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
In the aftermath of nutrition transition and ever-increasing sedentarism, adolescents globally are exposed to negative health consequences. Diverse sociocultural influences play a critical role in their adoption of unhealthy dietary practices and suboptimal physical activity behaviors. Context-specific understandings of how these sociocultural influences shape adolescents’ dietary and physical activity patterns in a rural, resource-limited setting remained elusive. Aiming to address the gap, this qualitative study explored adolescents’ and mothers’ perception of broader sociocultural aspects that sculpt the food choices, eating habits and physical activity behaviors of adolescents in Matlab, Bangladesh. Six digitally-recorded focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim, translated into English and analyzed thematically. Marked taste-driven dietary preference of adolescents and its prioritization within family by the mothers, popularity of street foods, better understanding of the importance of food hygiene and safety contrasting with narrow perception of balance and diversity in diet, peer influence along with deficient school and community food environment, internalization and rigidity of gender norms were found to be exerting major influence. The findings highlighted key targets for community-based nutrition interventions and endorsed thorough consideration of socio-cultural factors in formulating strategies to promote healthful eating and physical activity behaviors among the adolescents.
Collapse
|
19
|
Rebaudet S, Bulit G, Gaudart J, Michel E, Gazin P, Evers C, Beaulieu S, Abedi AA, Osei L, Barrais R, Pierre K, Moore S, Boncy J, Adrien P, Duperval Guillaume F, Beigbeder E, Piarroux R. The case-area targeted rapid response strategy to control cholera in Haiti: a four-year implementation study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019; 13:e0007263. [PMID: 30990822 PMCID: PMC6485755 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In October 2010, Haiti was struck by a large-scale cholera epidemic. The Haitian government, UNICEF and other international partners launched an unprecedented nationwide alert-response strategy in July 2013. Coordinated NGOs recruited local rapid response mobile teams to conduct case-area targeted interventions (CATIs), including education sessions, household decontamination by chlorine spraying, and distribution of chlorine tablets. An innovative red-orange-green alert system was also established to monitor the epidemic at the communal scale on a weekly basis. Our study aimed to describe and evaluate the exhaustiveness, intensity and quality of the CATIs in response to cholera alerts in Haiti between July 2013 and June 2017. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS We analyzed the response to 7,856 weekly cholera alerts using routine surveillance data and severity criteria, which was based on the details of 31,306 notified CATIs. The odds of CATI response during the same week (exhaustiveness) and the number of complete CATIs in responded alerts (intensity and quality) were estimated using multivariate generalized linear mixed models and several covariates. CATIs were carried out significantly more often in response to red alerts (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) [95%-confidence interval, 95%-CI], 2.52 [2.22-2.87]) compared with orange alerts. Significantly more complete CATIs were carried out in response to red alerts compared with orange alerts (adjusted incidence ratio (aIR), 1.85 [1.73-1.99]). Over the course of the eight-semester study, we observed a significant improvement in the exhaustiveness (aOR, 1.43 [1.38-1.48] per semester) as well as the intensity and quality (aIR, 1.23 [1.2-1.25] per semester) of CATI responses, independently of funds available for the strategy. The odds of launching a CATI response significantly decreased with increased rainfall (aOR, 0.99 [0.97-1] per each accumulated cm). Response interventions were significantly heterogeneous between NGOs, communes and departments. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE The implementation of a nationwide case-area targeted rapid response strategy to control cholera in Haiti was feasible albeit with certain obstacles. Such feedback from the field and ongoing impact studies will be very informative for actors and international donors involved in cholera control and elimination in Haiti and in other affected countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanislas Rebaudet
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Marseille, France
- Hôpital Européen Marseille, Marseille, France
- Institut Pierre-Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean Gaudart
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Marseille, France
- Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, INSERM, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
| | - Edwige Michel
- Direction d’Epidémiologie de Laboratoire et de Recherche, Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population, Haiti
| | - Pierre Gazin
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Aaron Aruna Abedi
- United Nations Children's Fund, Haiti
- Direction de la Lutte contre la Maladie, Ministère de la Santé Publique, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Lindsay Osei
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Marseille, France
- United Nations Children's Fund, Haiti
| | - Robert Barrais
- Direction d’Epidémiologie de Laboratoire et de Recherche, Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population, Haiti
| | - Katilla Pierre
- Direction d’Epidémiologie de Laboratoire et de Recherche, Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population, Haiti
| | | | - Jacques Boncy
- Laboratoire National de Santé Publique, Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population, Haiti
| | - Paul Adrien
- Direction d’Epidémiologie de Laboratoire et de Recherche, Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population, Haiti
| | | | | | - Renaud Piarroux
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre-Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Osei FB, Stein A. Temporal trend and spatial clustering of cholera epidemic in Kumasi-Ghana. Sci Rep 2018; 8:17848. [PMID: 30552392 PMCID: PMC6294804 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36029-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge of the temporal trends and spatial patterns will have significant implications for effective preparedness in future epidemics. Our objective was to investigate the temporal trends and the nature of the spatial interaction of cholera incidences, dwelling on an outbreak in the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. We developed generalized nonparametric and segmented regression models to describe the epidemic curve. We used the pair correlation function to describe the nature of spatial clustering parameters such as the maximum scale of interaction and the scale of maximal interaction. The epidemic rose suddenly to a peak with 40% daily increments of incidences. The decay, however, was slower with 5% daily reductions. Spatial interaction occurred within 1 km radius. Maximal interaction occurred within 0.3 km, suggesting a household level of interactions. Significant clustering during the first week suggests secondary transmissions sparked the outbreak. The nonparametric and segmented regression models, together with the pair correlation function, contribute to understanding the transmission dynamics. The issue of underreporting remains a challenge we seek to address in future. These findings, however, will have innovative implications for developing preventive measures during future epidemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Badu Osei
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
| | - Alfred Stein
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
George CM, Sack DA. Integration of water, sanitation and hygiene intervention delivery at health facilities with a reactive ring vaccination programme to reduce cholera. Int J Epidemiol 2018; 46:2093-2094. [PMID: 28338776 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Marie George
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David A Sack
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Richterman A, Sainvilien DR, Eberly L, Ivers LC. Individual and Household Risk Factors for Symptomatic Cholera Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Infect Dis 2018; 218:S154-S164. [PMID: 30137536 PMCID: PMC6188541 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cholera has caused 7 global pandemics, including the current one which has been ongoing since 1961. A systematic review of risk factors for symptomatic cholera infection has not been previously published. Methods In accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual and household risk factors for symptomatic cholera infection. Results We identified 110 studies eligible for inclusion in qualitative synthesis. Factors associated with symptomatic cholera that were eligible for meta-analysis included education less than secondary level (summary odds ratio [SOR], 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-4.92; I2 = 8%), unimproved water source (SOR, 3.48; 95% CI, 2.18-5.54; I2 = 77%), open container water storage (SOR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.09-3.76; I2 = 62%), consumption of food outside the home (SOR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.62-4.69; I2 = 64%), household contact with cholera (SOR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.62-5.25; I2 = 89%), water treatment (SOR, 0.37; 95% CI, .21-.63; I2 = 74%), and handwashing (SOR, 0.29; 95% CI, .20-.43; I2 = 37%). Other notable associations with symptomatic infection included income/wealth, blood group, gastric acidity, infant breastfeeding status, and human immunodeficiency virus infection. Conclusions We identified potential risk factors for symptomatic cholera infection including environmental characteristics, socioeconomic factors, and intrinsic patient factors. Ultimately, a combination of interventional approaches targeting various groups with risk-adapted intensities may prove to be the optimal strategy for cholera control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Richterman
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Lauren Eberly
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Louise C Ivers
- Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review describes the basic epidemiologic, clinical, and microbiologic aspects of cholera, highlights new developments within these areas, and presents strategies for applying currently available tools and knowledge more effectively. RECENT FINDINGS From 1990 to 2016, the reported global burden of cholera fluctuated between 74,000 and 595,000 cases per year; however, modeling estimates suggest the real burden is between 1.3 and 4.0 million cases and 95,000 deaths yearly. In 2018, the World Health Assembly endorsed a new initiative to reduce cholera deaths by 90% and eliminate local cholera transmission in 20 countries by 2030. New tools, including localized GIS mapping, climate modeling, whole genome sequencing, oral vaccines, rapid diagnostic tests, and new applications of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions, could support this goal. Challenges include a high proportion of fragile states among cholera-endemic countries, urbanization, climate change, and the need for cholera treatment guidelines for pregnant women and malnourished children. SUMMARY Reducing cholera morbidity and mortality depends on real-time surveillance, outbreak detection and response; timely access to appropriate case management and cholera vaccines; and provision of safe water, sanitation, and hygiene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Davis
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop H24-9, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Rupa Narra
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop H24-9, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Eric D. Mintz
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop H24-9, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nazia N, Ali M, Jakariya M, Nahar Q, Yunus M, Emch M. Spatial and population drivers of persistent cholera transmission in rural Bangladesh: Implications for vaccine and intervention targeting. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol 2018; 24:1-9. [PMID: 29413709 DOI: 10.1016/j.sste.2017.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Revised: 09/02/2017] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We identify high risk clusters and measure their persistence in time and analyze spatial and population drivers of small area incidence over time. The geographically linked population and cholera surveillance data in Matlab, Bangladesh for a 10-year period were used. Individual level data were aggregated by local 250 × 250 m communities. A retrospective space-time scan statistic was applied to detect high risk clusters. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify risk factors for cholera. We identified 10 high risk clusters, the largest of which was in the southern part of the study area where a smaller river flows into a large river. There is persistence of local spatial patterns of cholera and the patterns are related to both the population composition and ongoing spatial diffusion from nearby areas over time. This information suggests that targeting interventions to high risk areas would help eliminate locally persistent endemic areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nushrat Nazia
- Department of Environmental Science & Management, North South University Plot # 15, Block # B, Bashundhara, Dhaka-1229, Bangladesh.
| | - Mohammad Ali
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA
| | - Md Jakariya
- Department of Environmental Science & Management, North South University Plot # 15, Block # B, Bashundhara, Dhaka-1229, Bangladesh
| | - Quamrun Nahar
- icddr,b, 68,Shahid Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Mohammad Yunus
- icddr,b, 68,Shahid Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Michael Emch
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Finger F, Bertuzzo E, Luquero FJ, Naibei N, Touré B, Allan M, Porten K, Lessler J, Rinaldo A, Azman AS. The potential impact of case-area targeted interventions in response to cholera outbreaks: A modeling study. PLoS Med 2018; 15:e1002509. [PMID: 29485987 PMCID: PMC5828347 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholera prevention and control interventions targeted to neighbors of cholera cases (case-area targeted interventions [CATIs]), including improved water, sanitation, and hygiene, oral cholera vaccine (OCV), and prophylactic antibiotics, may be able to efficiently avert cholera cases and deaths while saving scarce resources during epidemics. Efforts to quickly target interventions to neighbors of cases have been made in recent outbreaks, but little empirical evidence related to the effectiveness, efficiency, or ideal design of this approach exists. Here, we aim to provide practical guidance on how CATIs might be used by exploring key determinants of intervention impact, including the mix of interventions, "ring" size, and timing, in simulated cholera epidemics fit to data from an urban cholera epidemic in Africa. METHODS AND FINDINGS We developed a micro-simulation model and calibrated it to both the epidemic curve and the small-scale spatiotemporal clustering pattern of case households from a large 2011 cholera outbreak in N'Djamena, Chad (4,352 reported cases over 232 days), and explored the potential impact of CATIs in simulated epidemics. CATIs were implemented with realistic logistical delays after cases presented for care using different combinations of prophylactic antibiotics, OCV, and/or point-of-use water treatment (POUWT) starting at different points during the epidemics and targeting rings of various radii around incident case households. Our findings suggest that CATIs shorten the duration of epidemics and are more resource-efficient than mass campaigns. OCV was predicted to be the most effective single intervention, followed by POUWT and antibiotics. CATIs with OCV started early in an epidemic focusing on a 100-m radius around case households were estimated to shorten epidemics by 68% (IQR 62% to 72%), with an 81% (IQR 69% to 87%) reduction in cases compared to uncontrolled epidemics. These same targeted interventions with OCV led to a 44-fold (IQR 27 to 78) reduction in the number of people needed to target to avert a single case of cholera, compared to mass campaigns in high-cholera-risk neighborhoods. The optimal radius to target around incident case households differed by intervention type, with antibiotics having an optimal radius of 30 m to 45 m compared to 70 m to 100 m for OCV and POUWT. Adding POUWT or antibiotics to OCV provided only marginal impact and efficiency improvements. Starting CATIs early in an epidemic with OCV and POUWT targeting those within 100 m of an incident case household reduced epidemic durations by 70% (IQR 65% to 75%) and the number of cases by 82% (IQR 71% to 88%) compared to uncontrolled epidemics. CATIs used late in epidemics, even after the peak, were estimated to avert relatively few cases but substantially reduced the number of epidemic days (e.g., by 28% [IQR 15% to 45%] for OCV in a 100-m radius). While this study is based on a rigorous, data-driven approach, the relatively high uncertainty about the ways in which POUWT and antibiotic interventions reduce cholera risk, as well as the heterogeneity in outbreak dynamics from place to place, limits the precision and generalizability of our quantitative estimates. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we found that CATIs using OCV, antibiotics, and water treatment interventions at an appropriate radius around cases could be an effective and efficient way to fight cholera epidemics. They can provide a complementary and efficient approach to mass intervention campaigns and may prove particularly useful during the initial phase of an outbreak, when there are few cases and few available resources, or in order to shorten the often protracted tails of cholera epidemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavio Finger
- Laboratory of Ecohydrology, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Enrico Bertuzzo
- Laboratory of Ecohydrology, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Informatica e Statistica, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Venice, Italy
| | - Francisco J. Luquero
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Epicentre, Paris, France
| | - Nathan Naibei
- Communauté des Amis de l’Informatique pour le Développement–Tchad, N’Djamena, Chad
| | | | | | | | - Justin Lessler
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Andrea Rinaldo
- Laboratory of Ecohydrology, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile ed Ambientale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Andrew S. Azman
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ali M, Kim DR, Kanungo S, Sur D, Manna B, Digilio L, Dutta S, Marks F, Bhattacharya SK, Clemens J. Use of oral cholera vaccine as a vaccine probe to define the geographical dimensions of person-to-person transmission of cholera. Int J Infect Dis 2017; 66:90-95. [PMID: 29174695 PMCID: PMC7413038 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cholera is known to be transmitted from person to person, and inactivated oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) have been shown to confer herd protection via interruption of this transmission. However, the geographic dimensions of chains of person-to-person transmission of cholera are uncertain. The ability of OCVs to confer herd protection was used to define these dimensions in two cholera-endemic settings, one in rural Bangladesh and the other in urban India. Methods Two large randomized, placebo-controlled trials of inactivated OCVs, one in rural Matlab, Bangladesh and the other in urban Kolkata, India, were reanalyzed. Vaccine herd protection was evaluated by relating the risk of cholera in placebo recipients to vaccine coverage of surrounding residents residing within concentric rings. In Matlab, concentric rings in 100-m increments up to 700 m were evaluated; in Kolkata, 50-m increments up to 350m were evaluated. Results One hundred and eight cholera cases among 24 667 placebo recipients were detected during 1 year of post-vaccination follow-up at Matlab; 128 cholera cases among 34 968 placebo recipients were detected during 3 years of follow-up in Kolkata. Consistent inverse relationships were observed between vaccine coverage of the ring and the risk of cholera in the central placebo recipient for rings with radii up to 500 m in Matlab and up to 150 m in Kolkata. Conclusions These results suggest that the dimensions of chains of person-to-person transmission in endemic settings can be quite large and may differ substantially from setting to setting. Using OCVs as 'probes' to define these dimensions can inform geographical targeting strategies for the deployment of these vaccines in endemic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Ali
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Deok Ryun Kim
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Suman Kanungo
- National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India
| | - Dipika Sur
- National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India
| | - Byomkesh Manna
- National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India
| | - Laura Digilio
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Shanta Dutta
- National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India
| | - Florian Marks
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - John Clemens
- icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh; UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, USA; Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Parker LA, Rumunu J, Jamet C, Kenyi Y, Lino RL, Wamala JF, Mpairwe AM, Muller V, Llosa AE, Uzzeni F, Luquero FJ, Ciglenecki I, Azman AS. Neighborhood-targeted and case-triggered use of a single dose of oral cholera vaccine in an urban setting: Feasibility and vaccine coverage. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017; 11:e0005652. [PMID: 28594891 PMCID: PMC5478158 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In June 2015, a cholera outbreak was declared in Juba, South Sudan. In addition to standard outbreak control measures, oral cholera vaccine (OCV) was proposed. As sufficient doses to cover the at-risk population were unavailable, a campaign using half the standard dosing regimen (one-dose) targeted high-risk neighborhoods and groups including neighbors of suspected cases. Here we report the operational details of this first public health use of a single-dose regimen of OCV and illustrate the feasibility of conducting highly targeted vaccination campaigns in an urban area. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Neighborhoods of the city were prioritized for vaccination based on cumulative attack rates, active transmission and local knowledge of known cholera risk factors. OCV was offered to all persons older than 12 months at 20 fixed sites and to select groups, including neighbors of cholera cases after the main campaign ('case-triggered' interventions), through mobile teams. Vaccination coverage was estimated by multi-stage surveys using spatial sampling techniques. 162,377 individuals received a single-dose of OCV in the targeted neighborhoods. In these neighborhoods vaccine coverage was 68.8% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 64.0-73.7) and was highest among children ages 5-14 years (90.0%, 95% CI 85.7-94.3), with adult men being less likely to be vaccinated than adult women (Relative Risk 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.96). In the case-triggered interventions, each lasting 1-2 days, coverage varied (range: 30-87%) with an average of 51.0% (95% CI 41.7-60.3). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE Vaccine supply constraints and the complex realities where cholera outbreaks occur may warrant the use of flexible alternative vaccination strategies, including highly-targeted vaccination campaigns and single-dose regimens. We showed that such campaigns are feasible. Additional work is needed to understand how and when to use different strategies to best protect populations against epidemic cholera.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A. Parker
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Department of Public Health, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - John Rumunu
- Republic of South Sudan Ministry of Health, Juba, South Sudan
| | | | - Yona Kenyi
- Republic of South Sudan Ministry of Health, Juba, South Sudan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Francisco J. Luquero
- Epicentre, Paris, France
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Andrew S. Azman
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|