Long-Term Antipsychotic Effectiveness in First Episode of Psychosis: A 3-Year Follow-Up Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Aripiprazole, Quetiapine, and Ziprasidone

Effects of aripiprazole on prolactin levels and differences in effectiveness in patients with schizophrenia: a post-hoc analysis of the real-world data of a multicenter study

Objectives

To investigate the effect of aripiprazole on prolactin levels in patients with schizophrenia and analyze whether varying baseline prolactin levels affect the effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole, in a real-life diagnostic and therapeutic setting in a post-hoc analysis.

Methods

In this post-hoc analysis, patients with schizophrenia in the acute phase were divided into an elevated-prolactin group and a normal-prolactin group. After 8 weeks of aripiprazole treatment, changes in the proportion of patients with an abnormal prolactin level were analyzed in both groups, and the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole were compared between the two groups.

Results

The elevated-prolactin group had more women, a longer duration of disease, and lower Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale scores at baseline compared with the normal-prolactin group (all P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with prior use of antipsychotic medication between the two groups. Regardless of previous antipsychotic use, patients in both groups developed hyperprolactinemia (23/168 [13.7%] in those who had taken antipsychotics vs. 43/375 [11.4%] in those who had not). After 8 weeks of aripiprazole treatment, the proportion of patients with abnormal prolactin in the elevated-prolactin group significantly decreased with prolonged treatment (P < 0.001), and aripiprazole had no significant effect on the normal-prolactin group (P = 0.250). Normal-prolactin group showed better efficacy than the elevated-prolactin group, and the differences in efficacy between the two groups was observed from week 4 to the endpoint (all p<0.05). In total, 87.2% (68/78) patients experienced mild to moderate adverse events in the elevated-prolactin group, which was significantly more frequent compared with the normal-prolactin group 71.0% (365/514).

Conclusions

In this real-world study, for patients with acute schizophrenia, aripiprazole was effective in lowering the proportion of patients with abnormal prolactin levels, while it had no significant effect on patients with normal baseline prolactin. After adjusting for factors such as sex, age, prior antipsychotic drugs use history and disease severity, effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole in patients with normal baseline prolactin was significantly better than that in patients with elevated baseline prolactin.

Comparative analysis of third-generation antipsychotics in first-episode schizophrenia: efficacy, safety, and cognitive impacts. A narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Schizophrenia is a chronic, complex mental health disorder requiring effective management to mitigate its broad personal and societal impacts. This narrative review assesses the efficacy, effectiveness, and side effects of third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs) like aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine, focusing on their use in first-episode schizophrenia. These drugs aim to reduce side effects typical of earlier antipsychotics while more effectively addressing positive and cognitive symptoms.

METHODS

Our extensive literature review, using PubMed and Scopus, includes randomized controlled trials and observational studies, showing TGAs may match older antipsychotics in efficacy with fewer side effects, notably in reducing extrapyramidal symptoms and enhancing cognitive outcomes.

RESULTS

Aripiprazole appears effective in both acute and maintenance phases of schizophrenia, while brexpiprazole and cariprazine show potential in managing negative symptoms and improving social functioning, essential for patient recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

This review emphasizes the need for personalized treatment and further research to fully determine the long-term benefits and safety of TGAs. These findings can inform clinical decisions and underline the ongoing need for innovation in schizophrenia pharmacotherapy.

Dry Mouth Dilemma: A Comprehensive Review of Xerostomia in Complete Denture Wearers

Xerostomia, commonly known as dry mouth, presents a significant challenge for individuals wearing complete dentures, affecting their oral health and quality of life. This review explores the relationship between saliva and complete dentures, highlighting the varied management strategies for xerostomia. Saliva plays a critical role in denture retention, lubrication, and oral environment buffering. Complete denture wearers often experience reduced salivary flow, aggravating symptoms of xerostomia. Various management approaches are discussed, including general measures such as hydration and salivary stimulation techniques which aim to boost saliva production naturally. The use of salivary substitutes provides artificial lubrication and moisture to alleviate dry mouth discomfort. Oral lubricating devices, such as sprays, gels, and lozenges, offer relief by mimicking saliva's lubricating properties, thereby improving denture stability and comfort. This review addresses the etiology of xerostomia in complete denture wearers and explores preventive measures to reduce its impact. A comprehensive approach has been discussed for the management of xerostomia which will help to improve the oral health and well-being of complete denture wearers experiencing dry mouth.

Efficacy and Tolerance of Antipsychotics Used for the Treatment of Patients Newly Diagnosed with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review compared the efficacy and tolerance of oral antipsychotics (APDs) used in the treatment of schizophrenia following the PRISMA-P© statement (n = 21). The primary outcomes of interest were clinical response measured with symptoms' improvement, tolerance to side effects and discontinuation reasons. There was better individual patients' response to aripiprazole vs. ziprasidone and quetiapine ((CDSS p = 0.04), BPRS p = 0.02, YMRS p = 0.001) and ziprasidone vs. quetiapine (CGI p = 0.02, CDSS p = 0.02). Aripiprazole was more tolerated than risperidone, ziprasidone and quetiapine (p < 0.05). Quetiapine was more tolerated than aripiprazole, ziprasidone and risperidone (p < 0.05). Ziprasidone was more tolerated than quetiapine haloperidol and olanzapine (p < 0.05). Risperidone was more tolerated than olanzapine (p = 0.03) and haloperidol was more tolerated than olanzapine and quetiapine (p < 0.05). Olanzapine caused less discontinuation than quetiapine; quetiapine caused less discontinuation than ziprasidone, aripiprazole and haloperidol; ziprasidone caused less discontinuation than quetiapine, aripiprazole and haloperidol; aripiprazole caused less discontinuation than quetiapine, ziprasidone and olanzapine and olanzapine caused less discontinuation than ziprasidone and haloperidol (p < 0.05). It was concluded that individual patient clinical response, tolerance to side effects and life-threatening side effects remain the most reliable basis for selecting and continuing the use of APD.

Metabolic Adverse Effects of Psychotropic Drug Therapy: A Systematic Review

This review aimed to investigate the metabolic alterations associated with psychopharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, which can significantly impact patients' physical health and overall quality of life. The study utilized the PRISMA methodology and included cross-sectional, retrospective studies, and randomized clinical trials from reputable databases like SCOPUS, CLARIVATE, SCIENCE DIRECT, and PUBMED. Out of the 64 selected studies, various psychotropic drug classes were analyzed, including antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and antipsychotics. Among the antidepressants, such as amitriptyline, Imipramine, and clomipramine, weight gain, constipation, and cardiovascular effects were the most commonly reported metabolic adverse effects. SSRI antidepressants like Fluoxetine, Sertraline, Citalopram, Escitalopram, and Paroxetine exhibited a high prevalence of gastrointestinal and cardiac alterations. Regarding anticonvulsants, valproic acid and Fosphenytoin were associated with adverse reactions such as weight gain and disturbances in appetite and sleep patterns. As for antipsychotics, drugs like Clozapine, Olanzapine, and Risperidone were linked to weight gain, diabetes, and deterioration of the lipid profile. The findings of this review emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring for adverse effects, particularly considering that the metabolic changes caused by psychopharmacological medications may vary depending on the age of the patients. Future research should focus on conducting field studies to further expand knowledge on the metabolic effects of other commonly prescribed psychotropic drugs. Overall, the study highlights the significance of understanding and managing metabolic alterations induced by psychopharmacological treatment to enhance patient care and well-being.

Strategies for Treatment of Disease-Associated Dementia Beyond Alzheimer's Disease: An Update

Memory, cognition, dementia, and neurodegeneration are complexly interlinked processes with various mechanistic pathways, leading to a range of clinical outcomes. They are strongly associated with pathological conditions like Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and stroke and are a growing concern for their timely diagnosis and management. Several cognitionenhancing interventions for management include non-pharmacological interventions like diet, exercise, and physical activity, while pharmacological interventions include medicinal agents, herbal agents, and nutritional supplements. This review critically analyzed and discussed the currently available agents under different drug development phases designed to target the molecular targets, including cholinergic receptor, glutamatergic system, GABAergic targets, glycine site, serotonergic targets, histamine receptors, etc. Understanding memory formation and pathways involved therein aids in opening the new gateways to treating cognitive disorders. However, clinical studies suggest that there is still a dearth of knowledge about the pathological mechanism involved in neurological conditions, making the dropouts of agents from the initial phases of the clinical trial. Hence, a better understanding of the disease biology, mode of drug action, and interlinked mechanistic pathways at a molecular level is required.

Aripiprazole vs Risperidone Head-to-Head Effectiveness in First-Episode Non-Affective-Psychosis: A 3-Month Randomized, Flexible-Dose, Open-Label Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic choice for the acute phase of a first episode of psychosis (FEP) is of the utmost importance since it may influence long-term outcome. However, head-to-head comparisons between second-generation antipsychotics remain scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness in the short term of aripiprazole and risperidone after FEP outbreak.

METHODS

From February 2011 to October 2018, a prospective, randomized, open-label study was undertaken. Two hundred-sixty-six first-episode drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n = 136) or risperidone (n = 130) and followed-up for 12 weeks. The primary effectiveness measure was all-cause treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted to assess clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

The overall dropout rate at 12 weeks was small (6.39%). Effectiveness measures were similar between treatment arms as treatment discontinuation rates (χ 2 = 0,409; P = .522), and mean time to all-cause discontinuation (log rank χ 2 = -1.009; P = .316) showed no statistically significant differences. Despite no statistically significant differences between groups regarding clinical efficacy, aripiprazole required higher chlorpromazine equivalent dosage (χ 2 = 2.160; P = .032) and extended mean time (W = 8183.5; P = .008) to reach clinical response. Sex-related adverse events and rigidity were more frequent in the risperidone group, whereas sialorrhea was on the aripiprazole group.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences regarding effectiveness were found between aripiprazole and risperidone for the short-phase treatment of FEP. Despite the importance of efficacy during this phase, differences in side effect profiles and patient's preferences are essential factors that may lead clinical decisions for these patients.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV

NCT02532491. Effectiveness of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in First Episode Psychosis Patients: 1-year Follow-up (PAFIP3_1Y).

Long-Term Antipsychotic Effectiveness and Comparison of the Efficacy of Monotherapy and Polypharmacy in Schizophrenia: A 3-Years Follow-Up “Real World” Study in China

Background: Discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment is a common problem in patients with schizophrenia and could reduce the effectiveness of treatment. Time to discontinuation (TTD) is one of the indicators of compliance and may also be an effective indicator of medication efficacy. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and aripiprazole in the real-world treatment of schizophrenia with 3-years follow-up.

Method: A multi-center, open, cohort, prospective, real-world study was conducted. 706 patients were analyzed without intervention in medication selection and use, followed up for 3 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to draw the treatment discontinuation rates (TDR) curves at each time point. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the relative risk of TTD of antipsychotics.

Results: There was a significant difference among monotherapy groups in all-cause antipsychotic treatment discontinuation (p = 0.0057). Among the four medications, the TDR of risperidone was the highest. Compared with polypharmacy, except for aripiprazole, the TDR of other three monotherapy medications were lower than that of polypharmacy, and olanzapine was statistically different (p = 0.0325). The cox regression analysis showed that after correction of Hochberg with multiple tests, only olanzapine had a relative risk lower than risperidone (p &lt; 0.0083).

Conclusions: The findings indicated that risperidone monotherapy and polypharmacy had the highest TDR and the shortest TTD. Olanzapine monotherapy had a relative risk lower than risperidone and was superior to polypharmacy.

Antipsychotic-Induced Constipation: A Review of the Pathogenesis, Clinical Diagnosis, and Treatment

Antipsychotic-induced gastrointestinal hypomotility and, in particular, its manifestation of constipation are common adverse effects in patients with schizophrenia in clinical practice. Serious complications of antipsychotic-induced constipation include ileus, ischaemic bowel disease, colon perforation, aspiration pneumonia, and bacterial septicaemia, which can be life threatening if left untreated, especially in patients prescribed clozapine. The aim of this paper is to review the latest research on the epidemiology, clinical examination methods, pathophysiology, and treatment options and preventive measures for antipsychotic-induced constipation. While clinicians are normally aware of the overall side effects caused by antipsychotics, constipation is often an under-recognized condition despite its relatively high incidence and its impact on daily living. The incidence of constipation differs among individual antipsychotics, but more than 50% of patients prescribed antipsychotics suffer from constipation. Limited fluid intake, poor dietary habits, and a sedentary lifestyle can also worsen constipation. The mechanisms of antipsychotic-induced constipation may be antagonism of cholinergic, histaminergic, and serotonergic receptors, with both parent drug and metabolite(s) contributing to the effects on gastrointestinal motility. Numerous methods, mainly divided into scale evaluations and objective examinations, are applied to evaluate antipsychotic-induced constipation; however, objective examinations have a greater ability to identify cases of gastrointestinal hypomotility since there is often an under-reporting of symptoms in subjective reporting and scale evaluation due to a higher pain threshold, an inability to express pain sensations, and a lack of symptom awareness in these patients. Antipsychotic drug-induced constipation should be closely monitored in patients receiving these medications, with timely intervention to avoid serious gastrointestinal consequences. There is currently no consensus on the efficacy of laxatives in these patients. Further in-depth studies should explore the underlying mechanisms and devise optimal therapeutic approaches to minimize constipation during antipsychotic treatment.

Weight gain and metabolic screening in young people with early psychosis on long acting injectable antipsychotic medication (aripiprazole vs paliperidone)

AIM

Long-acting injectable (LAI)antipsychotics are often used in psychosis to assist with medication compliance and relapse prevention, although the weight gain and metabolic effects in young people are yet to be examined. This study examined the long-term effects of aripiprazole and paliperidone in LAI formulation on weight gain and metabolic parameters in young people with early episode psychosis.

METHODS

Weight gain and other metabolic effects of aripiprazole and paliperidone in LAI formulation were examined in 59 young people with early episode psychosis over a 12-month period. Changes in outcome measurements were examined at baseline and 3 monthly intervals.

RESULTS

The results showed that both aripiprazole and paliperidone were associated with time-dependent increases in weight. At 12 months, weight increased by an average of 7% (6 kg) with both aripiprazole and paliperidone relative to the baseline, and the percentage of overweight or obese people increased from 33% to 60%. There was no advantage of aripiprazole compared to paliperidone with regards to weight change, although aripiprazole was associated with lower triglycerides and prolactin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LAI medications were associated with substantial weight increases over time. These results build on emerging evidence showing that aripiprazole is not weight neutral in young people. Our recommendation is that weight-management programs should be offered from the start of medication initiation.

Aripiprazole vs Risperidone for the acute-phase treatment of first-episode psychosis: A 6-week randomized, flexible-dose, open-label clinical trial

Selecting the first antipsychotic agent for the acute phase of a first episode of psychosis (FEP) is a critical task that may impact on the long-term outcome. Despite that, there is a lack of research comparing head-to-head different second-generation antipsychotics at this stage. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of aripiprazole and risperidone in the treatment of the acute phase after a FEP. For that purpose, from February 2011 to October 2018, a prospective, randomized, open-label study was undertaken. Two hundred-sixty-six first-episode, drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n = 136), or risperidone (n = 130) and followed-up for 6-weeks. The primary effectiveness measure was all-cause treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted to assess clinical efficacy. The overall dropout rate at 6-week reached 19.5%. Effectiveness measures were similar between both treatment groups as treatment discontinuation rates (χ2 = 1.863; p = 0.172) and mean time until all-cause discontinuation (log rank = 1.421; p = 0.233) showed no statistically significant differences. In terms of clinical efficacy, risperidone proved a statistically significant better performance according to BPRS mean change between baseline and 6-week total score (t = 3.187; p = 0.002). Patients under risperidone treatment were significantly more likely to suffer sex-related adverse events. In conclusion, no differences regarding effectiveness were found between aripiprazole and risperidone for the acute-phase treatment of FEP. Despite the importance of efficacy during this phase of treatment, selecting the most effective treatment for the long-term outcome, requires addressing safety and patient´s preferences.

A 3-year prospective study on the metabolic effect of aripiprazole, quetiapine and ziprasidone: A pragmatic clinical trial in first episode psychosis patients

Schizophrenia is a severe brain disorder with an excess morbidity and mortality partly due to a higher incidence of metabolic disturbances and cardio-vascular events. The exposure to antipsychotic treatment has been observed linked to these metabolic abnormalities. This study explores the metabolic effects of aripiprazol, quetiapine and ziprasidone in drug-naïve patients with a first-episode of psychosis, at long-term. Two-hundred and two patients with first-episode of psychosis were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive quetiapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole. Clinical, sociodemographic and anthropometric measures, as well as lipid and glyceamic parameters, were recorded at baseline and after three years of initiating antipsychotic treatment. Body weight and BMI increased significantly after 3 years of follow-up (F = 35.0, p<0.001; and F = 37.6, p<0.001, respectively). Most of the increase in weight occurred within the first year of treatment. The proportion of patients meeting criteria for obesity (5.6% vs 25.7%; p<0.001), hypercholesterolemia (23.2% vs 41.7%; p<0.001) and hypertriglyceridemia (5.8% vs 23.0%; p<0.001) increased significantly. Head-to-head comparisons between antipsychotic groups revealed that the ziprasidone group presented significantly smaller increments in weight (p = 0.034) and BMI (p = 0.020) than aripiprazole group. After 3 years of having presented a first episode of psychosis, patients show significant increments in body weight and BMI, as well as in lipid and glycaemic parameters leading to clinical metabolic disturbances. In this context, the first year is the critical period for weight gain and development of metabolic changes. In this study, ziprasidone produced smaller weight gain than aripiprazole.

Antipsychotic Treatment Effectiveness in First Episode of Psychosis: PAFIP 3-Year Follow-Up Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Haloperidol, Olanzapine, Risperidone, Aripiprazole, Quetiapine, and Ziprasidone

BACKGROUND

Different effectiveness profiles among antipsychotics may be a key point to optimize treatment in patients suffering a first episode of psychosis to impact on long-term outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and quetiapine in the treatment of first episode of psychosis at 3-year follow-up.

METHOD

From February 2001 to January 2011, 2 phases of a prospective, randomized, open-label study were undertaken. A total of 376 first-episode drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to olanzapine (n = 55), risperidone (n = 63), haloperidol (n = 56), aripiprazole (n = 78), ziprasidone (n = 62), or quetiapine (n = 62) and followed up for 3 years. The primary effectiveness measure was all cause of treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted in the analysis for clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

The overall dropout rate at 3 years reached 20.75%. Treatment discontinuation rates were significantly different among treatment groups (olanzapine = 69.09, risperidone = 71.43, aripiprazole = 73.08%, ziprasidone = 79.03%, haloperidol = 89.28%, and quetiapine = 95.53%) (χ2 = 79.86; P = .000). Statistically significant differences in terms of lack of efficacy, adherence, and tolerability were observed among treatment groups along the 3-year follow-up, determining significant differences in time to all-cause discontinuation (log-rank = 92.240; P = .000). Significant differences between treatments were found in the categories of sleepiness/sedation, increased sleep duration, akinesia, weight gain, ejaculatory dysfunction, extrapyramidal-symptoms, and amenorrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Olanzapine, risperidone, and aripiprazole presented advantages for the first-line treatment of first episode of psychosis in terms of effectiveness. Identifying different discontinuation patterns may contribute to optimize treatment selection after first episode of psychosis.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02526030 https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02526030.

Effect of cannabis on weight and metabolism in first-episode non-affective psychosis: Results from a three-year longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Cannabis smoking is highly prevalent among patients with psychotic disorders. Its use has been found to be related to clinical characteristics and the prognosis of the disorder. Recent evidence indicates a protective effect of cannabis on weight gain and related metabolic alterations. However, there are no previous studies on the long-term longitudinal effects of cannabis on first-episode drug-naïve patients, which would thereby avoid the confounding effects of chronicity and previous treatment exposure. We aimed to explore the effect of cannabis smoking on weight and lipid/glycaemic metabolic measures in a sample of first-episode non-affective psychosis patients.

METHOD

Anthropometric measurements and glycaemic and lipid parameters were obtained at baseline and three years after initiation of treatment. Patients self-reported their cannabis use at both time points. To explore the longitudinal effect of cannabis, patients were divided into three groups: continuers, discontinuers and non-users.

RESULTS

Cannabis users at baseline presented a lower weight ( F=14.85, p<0.001), body mass index ( F=13.14, p<0.001), total cholesterol ( F=4.85, p=0.028) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ( F=6.26, p=0.013) compared to non-users. These differences were also observed after three years: weight ( F=8.07, p=0.005), body mass index ( F=4.66, p=0.032) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ( F=3.91, p=0.049). Moreover, those patients discontinuing cannabis use presented a higher increase in weight ( F=2.98, p=0.052), body mass index ( F=2.73, p=0.067) and triglyceride-high-density lipoprotein ratio ( F=2.72, p=0.067) than the 'non-users' and 'continuers'.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that cannabis use may produce a protective effect against weight gain and related metabolic alterations in psychosis. However, these results need to be replicated in a larger sample size.