Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections after liver transplantation: Drug resistance, risk factors and impact on prognosis

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant (LT) recipients are susceptible to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. Comprehensive research addressing the incidence, timing, infection sites, resistance patterns, treatment options, and associated risk factors among LT recipients with CRKP is now lacking.

AIM

To assess the incidence, resistance, therapy, and risk factors of CRKP infections post-LT, and to evaluate the impact of them on prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted, including 430 consecutive patients who underwent LT between January 2015 and June 2023. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for CRKP infections and their influence on outcomes using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 430 patients who underwent LT, 20 (4.7%) experienced at least one documented CRKP infection within 3 months post-transplantation. The median time from LT to the onset of CRKP infections was 6.5 days. The lungs and bloodstream were the most common sites of CRKP infections. CRKP isolates were relatively susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam (93.7%), polymyxin B (90.6%), and tigecycline (75.0%) treatment. However, all isolates were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, meropenem, and levofloxacin treatment. Recipients with CRKP infections had a mortality rate of 35%, the rate was 12.5% for those receiving ceftazidime/avibactam therapy. Multivariate analysis identified female sex [odds ratio (OR) = 3.306; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.239-8.822; P = 0.017], intraoperative bleeding ≥ 3000 mL (OR = 3.269; 95%CI: 1.018-10.490; P = 0.047), alanine aminotransferase on day 1 post-LT ≥ 1500 U/L (OR = 4.370; 95%CI: 1.686-11.326; P = 0.002), and post-LT mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.772; 95%CI: 1.077-7.135; P = 0.035) as significant variables associated with CRKP. CRKP infections were related to an intensive care unit length (ICU) of stay ≥ 7 days and 6-month all-cause mortality post-LT.

CONCLUSION

CRKP infections were frequent complications following LT, with poor associated outcomes. Risk factors for post-LT CRKP infections included female sex, significant intraoperative bleeding, elevated alanine aminotransferase levels, and the need for mechanical ventilation. CRKP infections negatively impacted survival and led to prolonged ICU stays.

Mortality-related risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection with focus on antimicrobial regimens optimization: a real-world retrospective study in China

OBJECTIVES

To determine the mortality-related risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infection in hospitalized patients and to compare the clinical efficacy of different antimicrobial regimen.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from a 3,500-bed regional medical center between January 2021 and June 2022. Mortality-related risk factors were analyzed by the Cox proportional regression model for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

120 patients were included and the all-cause mortality was 20.8% (25/120). Multivariate analysis showed that age (HR = 1.035, 95%CI: 1.002-1.070, P = 0.036), SOFA score (HR = 1.169,95%CI: 1.066-1.281, P = 0.001), central venous catheter (HR = 3.858, 95%CI: 1.411-10.547, P = 0.009), the length of hospital stay (HR = 0.868, 95% CI: 0.806-0.936, P = 0.000) and combination therapy (HR = 3.152, 95%CI: 1.205-8.245, P = 0.019) were independent mortality risk factors after CRE infection. All patients received definitive therapy and 65.0% (78/120) received sensitive drug treatment. Among those 65.4% (51/78) received combination therapy and 34.6% (27/78) received monotherapy. Subgroup analysis of the non-sepsis group showed significantly lower mortality in monotherapy than in combination therapy (0% versus 22.2%, P = 0.034). Patients who received carbapenem-containing therapy had significantly higher mortality than those who received carbapenem-sparing therapy (31.3% versus 13.9%, P = 0.022). CAZ-AVI-containing therapy presented a lower mortality (19.0%) and a higher 7-day microbiological clearance (47.6%) compared to other antimicrobial regimens, but there were no statistical significance (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with older age, higher SOFA score, central venous catheter, shorter hospital stay after CRE infection may had poor outcomes. Since patients with non-sepsis have a lower mortality rate from monotherapy, combination antibiotic treatment should not be routinely recommended. Patients who received CAZ-AVI-containing therapy presented a lower mortality compared to other antimicrobial regimens without statistical significance, further larger sample size is needed for verification.

Ceftazidime with avibactam for treating severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections: technology evaluation to inform a novel subscription-style payment model

Background

To limit the use of antimicrobials without disincentivising the development of novel antimicrobials, there is interest in establishing innovative models that fund antimicrobials based on an evaluation of their value as opposed to the volumes used. The aim of this project was to evaluate the population-level health benefit of ceftazidime-avibactam in the NHS in England, for the treatment of severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections when used within its licensed indications. The results were used to inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance in support of commercial discussions regarding contract value between the manufacturer and NHS England.

Methods

The health benefit of ceftazidime-avibactam was first derived for a series of high-value clinical scenarios. These represented uses that were expected to have a significant impact on patients' mortality risks and health-related quality of life. Patient-level costs and health-related quality of life of ceftazidime-avibactam under various usage scenarios compared with alternative management strategies in the high-value clinical scenarios were quantified using decision modelling. Results were reported as incremental net health effects expressed in quality-adjusted life-years, which were scaled to 20-year population in quality-adjusted life-years using infection number forecasts based on data from Public Health England. The outcomes estimated for the high-value clinical scenarios were extrapolated to other expected uses for ceftazidime-avibactam.

Results

The clinical effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam relative to its comparators was estimated by synthesising evidence on susceptibility of the pathogens of interest to the antimicrobials in a network meta-analysis. In the base case, ceftazidime-avibactam was associated with a statistically significantly higher susceptibility relative to colistin (odds ratio 7.24, 95% credible interval 2.58 to 20.94). The remainder of the treatments were associated with lower susceptibility than colistin (odds ratio < 1). The results were sensitive to the definition of resistance and the studies included in the analysis. In the base case, patient-level benefit of ceftazidime-avibactam was between 0.08 and 0.16 quality-adjusted life-years, depending on the site of infection and the usage scenario. There was a high degree of uncertainty surrounding the benefits of ceftazidime-avibactam across all subgroups, and the results were sensitive to assumptions in the meta-analysis used to estimate susceptibility. There was substantial uncertainty in the number of infections that are suitable for treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam, so population-level results are presented for a range of scenarios for the current infection numbers, the expected increases in infections over time, and rates of emergence of resistance. The population-level benefit varied substantially across the scenarios, from 531 to 2342 quality-adjusted life-years over 20 years.

Conclusion

This work has provided quantitative estimates of the value of ceftazidime-avibactam within its areas of expected usage within the NHS.

Limitations

Given existing evidence, the estimates of the value of ceftazidime-avibactam are highly uncertain.

Future work

Future evaluations of antimicrobials would benefit from improvements to NHS data linkages, research to support appropriate synthesis of susceptibility studies, and application of routine data and decision modelling to assess enablement value.

Study registration

No registration of this study was undertaken.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135592), conducted through the Policy Research Unit in Economic Methods of Evaluation in Health and Social Care Interventions, PR-PRU-1217-20401, and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 73. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy versus monotherapy for treating carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infection: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy with that of monotherapy in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB).

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until September 1, 2023. Only studies that compared CZA combination therapy with monotherapy for CR-GNB infections were included.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies (23 retrospective observational studies and 2 prospective studies) involving 2676 patients were included. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the study group receiving combination therapy and the control group receiving monotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.18). In addition, no significant differences were observed between the study and the control group in terms of in-hospital mortality (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.79-1.27), 14-day mortality (RR 1.54; 95% CI 0.24-9.91), 90-day mortality (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.62-2.22), and clinical cure rate (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.84-1.08). However, the combination group had a borderline higher microbiological eradication rate than the control group (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to monotherapy, CZA combination therapy did not yield additional clinical benefits. However, combination therapy may be associated with favorable microbiological outcomes.

Assessment of in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam on carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales from Iran: An experimental study

Background and Aims

The prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) continues to increase worldwide. Combination of β-lactam and novel β-lactamase inhibitors introduce a revolutionary treatment option for CPE. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVB) has been recently developed for treatment of severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. We aimed to evaluate in vitro activity of CAZ/AVB on a collection of 85 ESBL-producing-carbapenemase negative and CPE from Iran.

Methods

ESBL and carbapenemase production was phenotypically confirmed by combined disk test and modified carbapenem inactivation method respectively. The presence of clinically important carbapenemase encoding genes was examined using PCR. Susceptibility of all isolates to CAZ/AVB was determined using discs containing 30 μg ceftazidime +20 μg avibactam (AVB). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CAZ/AVB in 28 CPE (4 Escherichia coli and 24 Klebsiella pneumoniae) was determined by gradient diffusion method using MIC test strips (0.016-256 mg/L ceftazidime +4 mg/L AVB).

Results

All phenotypically identified ESBL positive-carbapenemase negative isolates were found to be susceptible to CAZ/AVB. Among the carbapenem resistant isolates, CAZ/AVB showed potent inhibitory activity against all OXA-48-like (MIC ranges 0.125/4-0.75/4 mg/L) and KPC positive isolates (MIC ranges <0.016/4-0.19/4 mg/L). However, AVB could not restore the activity of ceftazdime against isolates producing metallo-β-lactamases (MLBs) including VIM, NDM (MIC > 256/4 mg/L) and IMP (MIC > 8/4 mg/L).

Conclusion

Our data highlighted the excellent in vitro performance of CAZ/AVB against ESBL-producing and CPE suggesting that this combination can efficiently be used as therapeutic option for management of CPE infections particularly in regions with high prevalence of KPC and/or OXA-48-like positive but MBL-negative Enterobacterales.

Non-KPC Attributes of Newer β-lactam/β-lactamase Inhibitors, Part 1: Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Gram-negative antibiotic resistance continues to grow as a global problem due to the evolution and spread of β-lactamases. The early β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) are characterized by spectra limited to class A β-lactamases and ineffective against carbapenemases and most extended spectrum β-lactamases. In order to address this therapeutic need, newer BLIs were developed with the goal of treating carbapenemase producing, carbapenem resistant organisms (CRO), specifically targeting the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). These BL/BLI combination drugs, avibactam/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and imipenem/relebactam, have proven to be indispensable tools in this effort. However, non-KPC mechanisms of resistance are rising in prevalence and increasingly challenging to treat. It is critical for clinicians to understand the unique spectra of these BL/BLIs with respect to non-KPC CRO. In Part 1of this 2-part series, we describe the non-KPC attributes of the newer BL/BLIs with a focus on utility against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Patients with Bacteremia or Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a combination of the third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime and the novel, non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam that is approved for the treatment of pediatric (≥ 3 months) and adult patients with complicated infections including hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP), and bacteremia. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022362856) aimed to provide a quantitative and qualitative synthesis to evaluate the effectiveness of CAZ-AVI in treating adult patients with bacteremia or nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains) and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

METHODS

The databases included in the search, until November 7, 2022, were Embase and PubMed. A total of 24 studies (retrospective: 22, prospective: 2) with separate outcomes for patients with bacteremia or pneumonia were included.

RESULTS

The outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, clinical cure, and microbiological cure. Qualitative (24 studies) and quantitative (8/24 studies) syntheses were performed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the MINORS checklist and the overall risk of bias was moderate to high.

CONCLUSIONS

In studies included in the meta-analysis, lower all-cause mortality for patients with bacteremia (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.46) and improved rates of clinical cure for patients with bacteremia (OR = 4.90, 95% CI 2.60-9.23) and nosocomial pneumonia (OR = 3.20, 95% CI 1.55-6.60) was observed in the CAZ-AVI group compared with the comparator group. Data provided here may be considered while using CAZ-AVI for the treatment of patients with difficult-to-treat infections.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022362856.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Use in a Case Series of Difficult-to-Treat or Recurrent Infections in Pediatric Patients with Complex Chronic Conditions: Effectiveness and Absence of Resistance Development

The prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, particularly carbapenem-resistant strains, has become a significant global health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) has emerged as a promising treatment option. However, data on its efficacy and safety in children are scarce, necessitating further investigation. We conducted a descriptive case series at a tertiary hospital in Spain from February 2019 to January 2022. Pediatric patients (<16 years) treated with CZA for confirmed or suspected multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections were included. The clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes were examined. Eighteen children received CZA treatment. All had complex chronic conditions, with the most frequent underlying main diseases being liver transplantation (n = 8) and biliary atresia (n = 4). The predominant type of infection for which they received CZA was intra-abdominal infection caused or suspected to be caused by OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. CZA was generally well tolerated. Within the first month of starting CZA therapy, two patients died, with one case directly linked to the infection's fatal outcome. Some patients needed repeated courses of therapy due to recurrent infections, yet no resistance development was noted. In summary, the use of CZA showed effectiveness and safety, while the lack of resistance development highlights CZA's potential as a primary treatment option against OXA-48-producing infections.

Real-world utilization of ceftazidime/avibactam among inpatients in the national Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

PURPOSE

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections are challenging to treat due to underlying patient conditions, pathogen characteristics, and high antibiotic resistance rates. As newer antibiotic therapies come to market, limited data exist about their real-world utilization.

METHODS

This was a national retrospective cohort study of ceftazidime/avibactam (approved in 2015) utilization among inpatients from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, from 2015 through 2021. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate time trends in utilization.

RESULTS

Ceftazidime/avibactam use increased by 52.3% each year (days of therapy per 1,000 bed days; 95% confidence interval, 12.4%-106.4%). We identified 1,048 unique predominantly male (98.3%) and white (66.2%; Black, 27.7%) patients treated with ceftazidime/avibactam, with a mean (SD) age of 71.5 (11.9) years. The most commonly isolated organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (36.3%; carbapenem resistant, 80.6%; MDR, 65.0%) and Klebsiella species (34.1%; carbapenem resistant, 78.4%; extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistant, 90.7%). Common comorbid conditions included hypertension (74.8%), nervous system disorders (60.2%), diabetes mellitus (48.7%), and cancer (45.1%). Median time to ceftazidime/avibactam initiation from admission was 6 days, with a median of 3 changes in therapy before ceftazidime/avibactam initiation and a subsequent median length of inpatient stay of 14 days (median of 8 days of ceftazidime/avibactam therapy). Treatment heterogeneity was high, both before ceftazidime/avibactam initiation (89.6%) and during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment (85.6%), and common concomitant antibiotics included vancomycin (41.4%), meropenem (24.1%), cefepime (15.2%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (15.2%). The inpatient mortality rate was 23.6%, and 20.8% of patients had a subsequent admission with ceftazidime/avibactam treatment.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of ceftazidime/avibactam increased from 2015 to 2021 in the national VA Healthcare System. Ceftazidime/avibactam was utilized in complex, difficult-to-treat patients, with substantial treatment heterogeneity and variation in the causative organism and culture sites.

Indian consensus on the managemeNt of carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales infection in critically ill patients II (ICONIC II)

INTRODUCTION

The rising challenge of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections in Indian healthcare settings calls for clear clinical guidance on the management of these infections. The Indian consensus on the management of CRE infection in critically ill patients (ICONIC-II) is a follow-up of the ICONIC-I study, which was undertaken in 2019.

AREAS COVERED

A modified Delphi method was used to build expert consensus on CRE management in India, involving online surveys, face-to - face expert meetings, and a literature review. A panel of 12 experts was formed to develop potential clinical consensus statements (CCSs), which were rated through two survey rounds. The CCSs were finalized in a final face-to - face discussion. The finalized CCSs were categorized as consensus, near consensus, and no consensus.

EXPERT OPINION

The outcomes included 46 CCSs (consensus: 40; near consensus: 3; and no consensus: 3). The expert panel discussed and achieved consensus on various strategies for managing CRE infections, emphasizing the significance of existing and emerging resistance mechanisms, prompt and tailored empiric therapy, and use of combination therapies. The consensus statements based on the collective expertise of the panel can potentially assist clinicians in the management of CRE infections that lack high-level evidence.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: Focus on solid organ transplantation recipients

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a new option to treat KPC- and OXA-48 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. However, clinical evidence is limited regarding its use in treating CRKP infections, especially in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of CAZ-AVI in treating CRKP infections in both the general population and the SOT recipients in comparison with other antibiotic regimens.

METHODS

This is a single-centre retrospective cohort study of patients admitted between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2021 with the diagnosis of CRKP infections receiving either CAZ-AVI or other regimens ≥ 72 hours and clinical outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Of 200 patients with CRKP infections, 67 received CAZ-AVI, 133 received other regimens, and 50 were SOT recipients. In the SOT cohort, 30 patients received CAZ-AVI, and 20 received other regimens. The overall 30-day mortality was 38% in the SOT cohort. Compared with patients receiving other regimens, CAZ-AVI therapy resulted in lower 30-day mortality (23.3% vs. 60%, P = 0.014) and 90-day mortality (35.7% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.003), higher clinical cure (93.3% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) and microbiological clearance. Similar promising results of CAZ-AVI were also shown in the whole population cohort. Moreover, clinical outcomes of SOT recipients receiving CAZ-AVI were not inferior to those without SOT.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI therapy was associated with better clinical outcomes in CRKP infections in both the general population and SOT recipients. Considering the limitations of the present study, well-conducted RCTs are still warranted to confirm these findings.

The burden of antibiotic resistance of the main microorganisms causing infections in humans - review of the literature

One of the biggest threats to human well-being and public health is antibiotic resistance. If allowed to spread unchecked, it might become a major health risk and trigger another pandemic. This proves the need to develop antibiotic resistance-related global health solutions that take into consideration microdata from various global locations. Establishing positive social norms, guiding individual and group behavioral habits that support global human health, and ultimately raising public awareness of the need for such action could all have a positive impact. Antibiotic resistance is not just a growing clinical concern but also complicates therapy, making adherence to current guidelines for managing antibiotic resistance extremely difficult. Numerous genetic components have been connected to the development of resistance; some of these components have intricate paths of transfer between microorganisms. Beyond this, the subject of antibiotic resistance is becoming increasingly significant in medical microbiology as new mechanisms underpinning its development are identified. In addition to genetic factors, behaviors such as misdiagnosis, exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics, and delayed diagnosis contribute to the development of resistance. However, advancements in bioinformatics and DNA sequencing technology have completely transformed the diagnostic sector, enabling real-time identification of the components and causes of antibiotic resistance. This information is crucial for developing effective control and prevention strategies to counter the threat.

Ceftazidime-avibactam induced renal disorders: past and present

With the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial pathogens worldwide, antimicrobial resistance has become a significant public health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) exhibited excellent in vitro activity against many carbapenemase-producing pathogens, and was widely used for the treatment of various complicated infections. CAZ-AVI is well tolerated across all dosing regimens, and its associated acute kidney injury (AKI) in phase II/III clinical trials is rare. However, recent real-world studies have demonstrated that CAZ-AVI associated AKI was more frequent in real-world than in phase II and III clinical trials, particularly in patients receiving concomitant nephrotoxic agents, with critically ill patients being at a higher risk. Herein, we reviewed the safety data related to renal impairment of CAZ-AVI, and discussed its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets and dosage adjustment in patients with impaired renal function. This review aimed to emphasize the importance for healthcare professionals to be aware of this adverse event of CAZ-AVI and provide practical insights into the dosage optimization in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction.

Inoculum effect of CTX-M-15, OXA-48, and KPC-2 producing Klebsiella pneumoniae on meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam efficacy

The inoculum effect, characterized by diminished antibacterial activity at high bacterial inocula, is studied in the context of beta-lactam and beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations against beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. The inhibition of ESBL + OXA-48 and KPC enzymes, in combination with ceftazidime, demonstrates encouraging results. In this study, 20 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were tested with different inocula (1-5 × 105 and 1-5 × 107 cfu/ml) using broth microdilution methods. The inoculum effect was observed in meropenem against OXA-48 + CTX-M-15- and KPC-2-producing isolates but not with ceftazidime/avibactam. Notably, meropenem exhibited inoculum effect against carbapenemase-producing strains, whereas ceftazidime-avibactam remained effective. We conclude that ceftazidime-avibactam is recommended for high-inoculum infections.

Production of OXA-48 carbapenemase acts as an independent risk factor for poor outcome in Klebsiella pneumoniae infection

PURPOSE

To know whether the production of OXA-48 carbapenemase exerts an independent impact on the outcome of Klebsiella pneumoniae infection, once adjusted by clinical syndrome and baseline risk factors.

METHODS

We performed a case-cohort study including 117 infectious episodes due to OXA-48-producing K. pneumoniae (OXA-48-Kp) and 117 episodes due to non-OXA-48-producing strains (non-OXA-48-Kp). Both groups were matched (1:1 ratio) by clinical syndrome (source of infection, preceding invasive procedures and indwelling devices, and associated bacteremia) and hospitalization ward at infection onset. Multivariate Cox regression was used to investigate the association between OXA-48-Kp infection and clinical cure by day 14 (primary outcome) and 30-day all-cause mortality (secondary outcome).

RESULTS

Both study groups were well balanced regarding underlying conditions and comorbidity burden. Sepsis or septic shock were more frequent in OXA-48-Kp cases than non-OXA-48-Kp controls (41 [35.0%] vs. 17 [14.5%]; P-value < 0.0001). Clinical cure by day 14 was less commonly achieved in OXA-48-Kp cases (49 [41.9%] vs. 95 [81.2%]; P-value < 0.001), whereas 30-day all-cause mortality was higher (33 [28.2%] vs. 18 [15.4%]; P-value = 0.018). Multivariate analysis confirmed that OXA-48-Kp infection was independently associated with the lack of 14-day clinical cure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.45; 95% confidential interval [95%CI]: 0.29-0.70; P-value < 0.0001). A non-significant association was observed for 30-day all-cause mortality (aHR: 1.65; 95%CI: 0.92-2.94; P-value = 0.093).

CONCLUSION

Our matched analysis suggests that the production of OXA-48 carbapenemase acts as an independent risk factor for poor outcome in K. pneumoniae infection as compared to episodes due to non-carbapenemase-producing strains.

Ceftazidime-avibactam use for the treatment of OXA-48- and/or New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in cancer patients: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Infection is the second-leading cause of death among cancer patients, but there have been few studies on the effectiveness of novel antimicrobial agents to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the mortality and clinical outcomes of ceftazi-dime-avibactam for OXA-48- and/or New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing Enterobacterales infection in cancer patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study included patients who had cancer and received ceftazidime-avibactam for at least 72 hours for infections caused by OXA-48- and/or NDM-producing Enterobacterales. We excluded patients who died within 72 hours of treatment, patients with polymicrobial infections, and patients who did not receive appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical cure, relapse, and reinfection.

SAMPLE SIZE

32 cancer patients.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality among all patients was 15/32 (47%), clinical cure was achieved in 19/32 (59%) of the patients, and the relapse and reinfection rates were 2/19 (10.5%) and 4/17 (23.5%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with infections caused by OXA-48- and/or NDM-producing Enterobacterales in cancer patients. The mortality rate remains high; however, ceftazidime-avibactam is an encouraging alternative for treating severe infections in cancer patients.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and single center.

In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review

Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. We aimed to evaluate in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) combination regimens with CZA alone against CRE and/or MDR-PA isolates or infections.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the relevant literature in CINAHL/MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus until December 1, 2022. Review articles, grey literature, abstracts, comments, editorials, non-peer reviewed articles, non-English articles, and in vitro synergy studies conducted on single isolates were excluded.

Results

22 in vitro, 7 in vivo and 20 clinical studies were evaluated. In vitro studies showed reliable synergy between CZA and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing isolates. Some studies indicated good in vitro synergy between CZA and amikacin, meropenem, fosfomycin and polymyxins against CRE isolates. For MDR-PA isolates, there are comparatively fewer in vitro or in vivo studies. In observational clinical studies, mortality, clinical cure, adverse events, and development of CZA resistance after exposure were generally similar in monotherapy and combination therapy groups. However, antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity and infection relapses were higher in patients receiving CZA combination therapies.

Discussion

The benefit, if any, of CZA combination regimens in MDR-PA infections is elusive, as very few clinical studies have included these infections. There is no currently documented clinical benefit for the use of CZA combination regimens rather than CZA monotherapy. CZA combined with aztreonam for serious infections due to MBL producers should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278552, CRD42021278552.

Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Characterization in a Tertiary Care Center from El Bajio, Mexico

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) are a major public health concern. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of CR-GNB and the frequency of carbapenemase-encoding genes in a tertiary referral center from El Bajio, Mexico. A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and October 2022; Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) were screened for in vitro resistance to at least one carbapenem. CR-GNB were further analyzed for carbapenemase-production through phenotypical methods and by real-time PCR for the following genes: blaKPC, blaGES, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaIMP, and blaOXA-48. In total, 37 out of 508 GNB were carbapenem-resistant (7.3%, 95% CI 5.2-9.9). Non-fermenters had higher rates of carbapenem resistance than Enterobacterales (32.5% vs. 2.6%; OR 18.3, 95% CI 8.5-39, p < 0.0001), and Enterobacter cloacae showed higher carbapenem resistance than other Enterobacterales (27% vs. 1.4%; OR 25.9, 95% CI 6.9-95, p < 0.0001). Only 15 (40.5%) CR-GNB had a carbapenemase-encoding gene; Enterobacterales were more likely to have a carbapenemase-encoding gene than non-fermenters (63.6% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.08); blaNDM-1 and blaNDM-5 were the main genes found in Enterobacterales; and blaIMP-75 was the most common for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The mcr-2 gene was harbored in one polymyxin-resistant E. cloacae. In our setting, NDM was the most common carbapenemase; however, less than half of the CR-GNB showed a carbapenemase-encoding gene.

Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.

METHODS

A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.

RESULTS

These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.

The place of new antibiotics for Gram-negative bacterial infections in intensive care: report of a consensus conference

INTRODUCTION

New beta-lactams, associated or not with beta-lactamase inhibitors (NBs/BIs), can respond to the spread of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriales and nonfermenting carbapenem-resistant bacteria. The risk of emergence of resistance to these NBs/BIs makes guidelines necessary. The SRLF organized a consensus conference in December 2022.

METHODS

An ad hoc committee without any conflict of interest (CoI) with the subject identified the molecules (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and cefiderocol); defined 6 generic questions; drew up a list of subquestions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model; and reviewed the literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Seven experts in the field proposed their own answers to the questions in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 10 critical-care physicians without any CoI) and the public. The jury then met alone for 48 h to write its recommendations. Due to the frequent lack of powerful studies that have used clinically important criteria of judgment, the recommendations were formulated as expert opinions as often as necessary.

RESULTS

The jury provided 17 statements answering 6 questions: (1) Is there a place in the ICU for the probabilistic use of new NBs/IBs active against Gram-negative bacteria? (2) In the context of documented infections with sensitivity to several of these molecules, are there pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, ecological or medico-economic elements for prioritization? (3) What are the possible combinations with these molecules and in what context? (4) Should we integrate these new molecules into a carbapenem-sparing strategy? (5) What pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are available to optimize their mode of administration in critically ill patients? (6) What are the dosage adaptations in cases of renal insufficiency, hepatocellular insufficiency or obesity?

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should optimize the use of NBs/BIs in ICU patients.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Survey on the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections With Innovative Antibiotics: Focus on Ceftazidime-Avibactam

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health dilemma and a chief health concern globally. The rising incidence of resistance against carbapenems, which are considered most effective against gram-negative bacteria, has added to the concern and has limited the number of available treatment options. Newer antibiotic options may be required to tackle the mounting concern of antibiotic resistance. However, only a few antimicrobials are in the pipeline for managing infections instigated by multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria. This justifies the prudent application of already available antibiotics. Among newer antibiotics available to healthcare professionals (HCPs), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has shown good efficacy in the management of MDR gram-negative infections.

METHOD

A cross-sectional survey on the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) among HCPs was carried out using a questionnaire comprising 21 parameters related to AMR patterns on the need for innovative antibiotics to manage MDR gram-negative infections and the usage of CAZ-AVI by HCPs while managing such infections. The KAP scores were calculated to rank respondents' KAP levels.

RESULT

Out of the 204 study respondents, the majority (~80%) (n=160) believed that renewed efforts should be made to seek antimicrobial agents that will add to the armamentarium of treatment options for MDR gram-negative infections. CAZ-AVI is an important treatment alternative for managing MDR gram-negative infections (n=90, 45%). Further, it can be the first choice of definitive therapy for oxacillinases (OXA)-48-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (n=84, 42%). HCPs also believed that the use of CAZ-AVI in clinical practice will require high levels of antimicrobial stewardship (n=100, 49%).

CONCLUSION

Novel and innovative antibiotics are the need of the hour in the management of MDR gram-negative infections. CAZ-AVI has established its effectiveness in treating these infections; however, the molecule must be utilized prudently while keeping stewardship principles in mind.

Phenotypes, genotypes and breakpoints: an assessment of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against OXA-48

BACKGROUND

Two of the three recently approved β-lactam agent (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.

METHODS

OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae wild-type, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.

RESULTS

On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs, and 96% (49/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates.

The Clash of the Titans: COVID-19, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales, and First mcr-1-Mediated Colistin Resistance in Humans in Romania

(1) Background: Antibiotic resistance and coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) represent a dual challenge in daily clinical practice, inducing a high burden on public health systems. Hence, we aimed to dynamically evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) urinary tract infections (UTIs), as well as the antibiotic resistance trends after the onset of the pandemic. (2) Methods: We conducted a prospective study including patients with CRE UTIs who were enrolled both pre- and during the pandemic from 2019 to 2022. We further performed a standardized and comparative clinical, paraclinical, and microbiological assessment between patients with and without COVID-19. (3) Results: A total of 87 patients with CRE UTIs were included in this study (46 pre-pandemic and 41 during the pandemic, of which 21 had associated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 infection). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the main etiological agent of the UTIs, with the majority of strains (82.7%) being carbapenemase producers (mainly OXA-48 producers), while five of the 34 colistin-resistant isolates were harboring the mobile colistin resistance-1 (mcr-1) gene. COVID-19 patients presented a significantly worse outcome with higher rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (66.7% for COVID patients vs. 18.2% for non-COVID patients, p < 0.001), while the fatality rates were also considerably higher among patients with concomitant viral infection (33.3% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001). Besides COVID-19, additional risk factors associated with increased mortality were urinary catheterization, sepsis with K. pneumoniae, impaired liver and kidney function, and an inappropriate initial empiric antibiotic therapy. (4) Conclusions: COVID-19 showed a pronounced negative impact on patients with CRE UTIs, with significantly longer hospitalizations and higher ICU admissions and mortality rates.

Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: Virulence Factors, Molecular Epidemiology and Latest Updates in Treatment Options

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen responsible for a variety of community and hospital infections. Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) constitute a major threat for public health and are strongly associated with high rates of mortality, especially in immunocompromised and critically ill patients. Adhesive fimbriae, capsule, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and siderophores or iron carriers constitute the main virulence factors which contribute to the pathogenicity of K. pneumoniae. Colistin and tigecycline constitute some of the last resorts for the treatment of CRKP infections. Carbapenemase production, especially K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), constitutes the basic molecular mechanism of CRKP emergence. Knowledge of the mechanism of CRKP appearance is crucial, as it can determine the selection of the most suitable antimicrobial agent among those most recently launched. Plazomicin, eravacycline, cefiderocol, temocillin, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam constitute potent alternatives for treating CRKP infections. The aim of the current review is to highlight the virulence factors and molecular pathogenesis of CRKP and provide recent updates on the molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial treatment options.

New antibiotics for Gram-negative pneumonia

Pneumonia is frequently encountered in clinical practice, and Gram-negative bacilli constitute a significant proportion of its aetiology, especially when it is acquired in a hospital setting. With the alarming global rise in multidrug resistance in Gram-negative bacilli, antibiotic therapy for treating patients with pneumonia is challenging and must be guided by in vitro susceptibility results. In this review, we provide an overview of antibiotics newly approved for the treatment of pneumonia caused by Gram-negative bacilli. Ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam have potent activity against some of the carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, especially Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase producers. Several novel antibiotics have potent activity against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, such as ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relabactam and cefiderocol. Cefiderocol may also play an important role in the management of pneumonia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, along with plazomicin and eravacycline.

Mortality-Related Risk Factors and Novel Antimicrobial Regimens for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has become a significant public health problem in the last decade. We aimed to explore the risk factors of mortality in patients with CRE infections and to focus on the current evidence on antimicrobial regimens for CRE infections, particularly from the perspective of mortality.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies that evaluated mortality-related risk factors and antimicrobial regimens for CRE infections published from 2012 to 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 33 and 28 studies were included to analyze risk factors and antibiotic treatment, respectively. The risk factors most frequently reported as significantly associated with CRE mortality were antibiotic use (92.9%; 26/28 studies), comorbidities (88.7%; 23/26 studies), and hospital-related factors (82.8%; 24/29 studies). In 10 studies that did not contain ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) therapy, seven demonstrated significantly lower mortality in combination therapy than in monotherapy. However, 5 of 6 studies identified no substantial difference between CAZ-AVI monotherapy and CAZ-AVI combination therapy. Six studies reported substantially lower mortality in CAZ-AVI regimens than in other regimens.

CONCLUSION

Several risk factors, particularly antibiotic use and patients' comorbidities, are strong risk factors for CRE mortality. The optimal regimen for CRE infections remains controversial. Combination therapy should be considered when carbapenems, colistin, tigecycline, or aminoglycosides are administered. CAZ-AVI appears to be a promising antibiotic for CRE infections. Most importantly, treatment should be individualized according to the source and severity of the disease or other highly related risk factors.

Treatment strategies for OXA-48-like and NDM producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections

INTRODUCTION

OXA-48 and NDM are amongst the most prevalent carbapenemase types associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae worldwide, with an increase in their prevalence in recent years. Knowledge on the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) comes from KPC-producing CRKP with limited data available for OXA-48-like and NDM producers. Our aim is to review the literature on the treatment of OXA-48-like and NDM-producing CRKP with the goal of providing an update on the available antibiotic treatment strategies, particularly in light of changing carbapenemase epidemiology and increasing antimicrobial resistance.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed studies looking at the antibiotic treatment and outcome of OXA-48-like and/or NDM-producing CRKP.

EXPERT OPINION

The best available treatment option for OXA-48 producers is ceftazidime-avibactam, where available and when the price permits its use. Colistin remains as the second-line option if in vitro susceptibility is demonstrated with an appropriate method. There is not enough evidence to support the use of meropenem-containing combination therapies for meropenem-resistant OXA-48 producers. Treatment of NDM producers is an unmet need. Ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam combination or cefiderocol can be used for NDM producers, where available. Higher cefiderocol MICs against NDM producers is concerning. Aztreonam-avibactam provides hope for the treatment of NDM producers.

Best practices: Appropriate use of the new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam in South Africa

Antibiotic stewardship of hospital-acquired infections because of difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) Gram-negative bacteria is a global challenge. Their increasing prevalence in South Africa has required a shift in prescribing in recent years towards colistin, an antibiotic of last resort. High toxicity levels and developing resistance to colistin are narrowing treatment options further. Recently, two new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam were registered in South Africa, bringing hope of new options for management of these life-threatening infections. However, with increased use in the private sector, increasing levels of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam are already being witnessed, putting their long-term viability as treatment options of last resort, in jeopardy. This review focuses on how these two vital new antibiotics should be stewarded within a framework that recognises the resistance mechanisms currently predominant in South Africa's multi-drug and DTR Gram-negative bacteria. Moreover, the withholding of their use for resistant infections that can be treated with currently available antibiotics is a critical part of stewardship, if these antibiotics are to be conserved in the long term.

Evaluation of ceftazidime/avibactam for treatment of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales with OXA-48 and/or NDM genes with or without combination therapy

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is an urgent public health threat of significant global concern. Few observational studies have evaluated the clinical outcomes for treatment of CRE harbouring OXA-48 or NDM genes with ceftazidime/avibactam. Previous findings showed lower 30 day mortality with ceftazidime/avibactam ranges between 8.3% and 22%.

Method

This single-centre retrospective cohort study included adult patients aged ≥18 years admitted to King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) who had received ceftazidime/avibactam for at least 72 h for infections caused by CRE with genes encoding for carbapenemase production (CP-CRE).

Results

A total of 211 patients, mostly male (57%), having CP-CRE infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam were included, with an average age of 62 years. More than 50% of patients were critically ill, for which 46% received invasive ventilation and 36% were on inotropes. The most frequent infectious disease was hospital/ventilator-acquired pneumonia with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most frequent causative pathogen. The majority of isolates harboured OXA-48 (81%), followed by NDM ± OXA-48 (19%). The overall clinical cure and 30 day mortality was 78% and 21% respectively (stratified per gene: 79% and 21.6% for OXA-48 and 75% and 17.5% for NDM ± OXA-48).

Conclusions

This was the largest study that evaluated clinical outcomes associate with CP-CRE harbouring OXA-48 gene infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam. Clinical cure and 30 day mortality were consistent with those of previous studies. Findings suggested that combination therapy with ceftazidime/avibactam had no direct impact on clinical outcomes for CP-CRE with OXA-48.

Gastrointestinal colonization by OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales: risk factors for persistent carriage

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections are a major health problem. Intestinal colonization is a key factor in developing infection. However, factors associated with persistent colonization by CRE are unknown. The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with persistent CRE gut colonization. This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study of adult patients with CRE gut colonization between January 2015 and January 2020. Epidemiologic characteristics, comorbidities, infectious events, duration of hospitalization and antimicrobial treatment received in the follow-up period were collected. Colonization was defined as isolation in at least 2 rectal swab culture samples of CRE. Decolonization was defined as 3 negative rectal swab cultures or 2 negative cultures and a negative molecular test. A cohort of 86 patients with CRE gut colonization was selected: 44 patients with spontaneous decolonization (DC) and 42 patients with persistent colonization (PC). The mean follow-up period was 24 months (IQR 14-33) in the DC group vs. 25 months (IQR 16-36) in the PC group (p = 0.478). Patient characteristics were similar between both groups. Colonization by other MDR microorganisms was high (44 patients, 51%) and slightly more common in the PC group (PC 60% vs. DC 43%, p = 0.139). The use of ceftazidime-avibactam was more common among the PC group (PC 33% vs. DC 14%, p = 0.041). We observed a higher percentage of antimicrobial therapy in the previous 30 days (PC 68% vs. DC 57%, p = 0.371) and 90 days (PC 81% vs. DC 82%, p = 0.353) in the PC group. Multivariable analysis showed that patients that have received ceftazidime-avibactam therapy (OR 4.9 95% CI [1.45-16.39], p = 0.010), and those colonized by other MDR microorganisms (OR 2.5, 95% CI [0.96-6.25], p = 0.060) presented a higher risk of PC. Ceftazidime-avibactam use and colonization by other MDR microorganisms might be associated with CRE persistent gut colonization.

Early appropriate diagnostics and treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections

The term difficult-to-treat resistance has been recently coined to identify Gram-negative bacteria exhibiting resistance to all fluoroquinolones and all β-lactam categories, including carbapenems. Such bacteria are posing serious challenges to clinicians trying to identify the best therapeutic option for any given patient. Delayed appropriate therapy has been associated with worse outcomes including increase in length of stay, increase in total in-hospital costs and ∼20% increase in the risk of in-hospital mortality. In addition, time to appropriate antibiotic therapy has been shown to be an independent predictor of 30 day mortality in patients with resistant organisms. Improving and anticipating aetiological diagnosis through optimizing not only the identification of phenotypic resistance to antibiotic classes/agents, but also the identification of specific resistance mechanisms, would have a major impact on reducing the frequency and duration of inappropriate early antibiotic therapy. In light of these considerations, the present paper reviews the increasing need for rapid diagnosis of bacterial infections and efficient laboratory workflows to confirm diagnoses and facilitate prompt de-escalation to targeted therapy, in line with antimicrobial stewardship principles. Rapid diagnostic tests currently available and future perspectives for their use are discussed. Early appropriate diagnostics and treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections require a multidisciplinary approach that includes multiple different diagnostic methods and further consensus of algorithms, protocols and guidelines to select the optimal antibiotic therapy.

Phenotypes, genotypes and breakpoints: an assessment of β-lactam/ β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against OXA-48

BACKGROUND

Two out of the three recently approved β-lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.

METHODS

OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae WT, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.

RESULTS

On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs and 73% (37/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates.

Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Resistance and Treatment Algorithm for Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: An Expert Panel Opinion

Antimicrobial resistance represents a serious threat for global health, causing an unacceptable burden in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. In particular, in 2017, carbapenem-resistant organisms were listed by the WHO among the group of pathogens for which novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Fortunately, several drugs and combinations have been introduced in recent years to treat multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, a correct use of these molecules is needed to preserve their efficacy. In the present paper, we will provide an overview on the epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of the most common MDR Gram-negative bacteria, proposing a treatment algorithm for the management of infections due to carbapenem-resistant bacteria based on the most recent clinical evidence.

Activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefiderocol and comparators against Gram-negative organisms causing bloodstream infections in Northern Italy (2019-2021): emergence of complex resistance phenotypes

Herein we assessed the frequency of Gram-negative organisms causing bloodstream infections and activity spectrum of ceftolozane-tazobactam (CTZ), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), cefiderocol (CFDC) and comparators. Overall, 1605 Gram-negative isolates were consecutively collected during 2019-2021. Enterobacterales represented more than 75% and exhibited >90% susceptibility to CZA (97%), amikacin (91.8%) and meropenem (90.6%). ESBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates showed high rates of susceptibility towards CZA (100%), carbapenems (89.1-100%) and CTZ (84.9-95.1%). MEV displayed the highest activity against KPC-producing Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 0.75/4 mg/L; 92.9% susceptible) followed by CZA (MIC50/90, ≤2/>8 mg/L; 89.3% susceptible), CFDC (MIC50/90, 0.25/4 mg/L, 87.5% susceptible) and colistin (MIC50/90, ≤2/4 mg/L, 83.9% susceptible). High proportions of P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to colistin (97.8%), CZA (97.2%), CTZ (96.1%) and amikacin (94.5%). CFDC showed potent activity against Acinetobacter baumannii (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/L; 97.2% susceptible), multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L; 96% susceptible), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L; 100% susceptible).

Current Positioning against Severe Infections Due to Klebsiella pneumoniae in Hospitalized Adults

Infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae have been increasing in intensive care units (ICUs) in the last decade. Such infections pose a serious problem, especially when antimicrobial resistance is present. We created a task force of experts, including specialists in intensive care medicine, anaesthesia, microbiology and infectious diseases, selected on the basis of their varied experience in the field of nosocomial infections, who conducted a comprehensive review of the recently published literature on the management of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) infections in the intensive care setting from 2012 to 2022 to summarize the best available treatment. The group established priorities regarding management, based on both the risk of developing infections caused by K. pneumoniae and the risk of poor outcome. Moreover, we reviewed and updated the most important clinical entities and the new antibiotic treatments recently developed. After analysis of the priorities outlined, this group of experts established a series of recommendations and designed a management algorithm.

Early and Appropriate Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in the Indian Scenario

The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens exerts a substantial burden on the healthcare infrastructure worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared that multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens, especially, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as the topmost priority while developing newer antimicrobials. The increasing prevalence of infectious diseases caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria also poses a challenge when choosing the empiric antimicrobial therapy for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The infections caused by MDR Gram-negative organisms ultimately result in increased mortality, morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and increased cost of management. To tackle these challenges, newer antimicrobials like ceftazidime-avibactam were explored. The article also discusses the in vitro activity and therapeutic efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam along with its pharmacokinetic properties and the role it will play in the management of MDR Gram-negative organisms in the Indian setting. Several studies have highlighted the role of early and appropriate antibiotic use in the reduction of mortality in patients with Gram-negative infections. Timely initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy for serious infections leads to favorable clinical outcomes. Early and appropriate use of ceftazidime-avibactam while treating MDR Gram-negative infections has been associated with improved clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to highlight the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections. We have also summarized the information on outcomes achieved by early and appropriate use of ceftazidime-avibactam.

OXA-48-Like β-Lactamases: Global Epidemiology, Treatment Options, and Development Pipeline

Modern medicine is threatened by the rising tide of antimicrobial resistance, especially among Gram-negative bacteria, where resistance to β-lactams is most often mediated by β-lactamases. The penicillin and cephalosporin ascendancies were, in their turn, ended by the proliferation of TEM penicillinases and CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases. These class A β-lactamases have long been considered the most important. For carbapenems, however, the threat is increasingly from the insidious rise of a class D carbapenemase, OXA-48, and its close relatives. Over the past 20 years, OXA-48 and "OXA-48-like" enzymes have proliferated to become the most prevalent enterobacterial carbapenemases across much of Europe, Northern Africa, and the Middle East. OXA-48-like enzymes are notoriously difficult to detect because they often cause only low-level in vitro resistance to carbapenems, meaning that the true burden is likely underestimated. Despite this, they are associated with carbapenem treatment failures. A highly conserved incompatibility complex IncL plasmid scaffold often carries bla_OXA-48 and may carry other antimicrobial resistance genes, leaving limited treatment options. High conjugation efficiency means that this plasmid is sometimes carried by multiple Enterobacterales in a single patient. Producers evade most β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, though promising agents have recently been licensed, notably ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol. The molecular machinery enabling global spread, current treatment options, and the development pipeline of potential new therapies for Enterobacterales that produce OXA-48-like β-lactamases form the focus of this review.

Ceftazidime-avibactam treatment in bacteremia caused by OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Therapeutic options for bacteremia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) OXA-48-type are limited. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical success of CAZ-AVI compared with best available therapy (BAT) in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing OXA-48-type bacteremia (CRKp-OXA-48). We conducted a retrospective, single-center observational study in adult patients with CRKp-OXA-48 between December 2015 and May 2019. We collected the patients' clinical and epidemiological characteristics, antibiotic treatment (CAZ-AVI vs. BAT), and evolution. Factors associated with clinical success were analyzed using binary logistic regression. The study included 76 patients with CRKp-OXA-48-type bacteremia 33 received CAZ-AVI and 43 BAT. CAZ-AVI was mainly used in monotherapy (91%). Clinical success was more common in patients < 70-year-old (OR 4.79, 95% CI [1.435-16.002], p = 0.011) and CAZ-AVI treatment (OR 6.69, 95% CI [1.68-26.604], p = 0.007). Kaplan-Meier survival curve of 14-day mortality showed a lower mortality in patients who received CAZ-AVI (log rank 0.013). However, CAZ-AVI did not achieve statistical difference in IPTW for 14- and 30-day mortality (aOR 0.1, 95% CI [0.02-1.22], p = 0.076 and aOR 1.7, 95% CI [0.48-5.98], p = 0.413, respectively). CAZ-AVI treatment might be associated with a greater clinical success in CRKp-OXA-48 bacteremia.

Drug Resistance and Risk Factors for Acquisition of Gram-Negative Bacteria and Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms Among Liver Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

Infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, in particular carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO), pose a great threat to liver transplant (LT) recipients. Understanding the risk factors for Gram-negative and CRO infections and the drug resistance of corresponding bacteria will help guide the prevention and treatment of these infections.

METHODS

Data on the composition, distribution and drug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria and CRO among LT recipients were collected. The risk factors for Gram-negative and CRO infections were identified via univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 45 episodes of Gram-negative infection, including 20 episodes of CRO infection, occurred in 19.9% (27/136) of LT recipients. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the dominant pathogenic bacteria (14/45; 31.1%). The most common site of infection was the abdominal cavity/bile duct (11/27; 40.7%). Eleven (8.1%) patients died within 2 months after LT, and two deaths were related to Gram-negative infection. Gram-negative bacteria were relatively sensitive to tigecycline and polymyxin B, with resistance of 26.7 and 11.1%, respectively. CRO had lower resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (45.5%) and polymyxin B (10%). A univariate analysis showed that male sex, infection within 2 months prior to LT, duration of surgery ≥ 400 min, reoperation, indwelling urethral catheter use ≥ 3 days and elevated alanine aminotransferase on day 1 post-LT were associated with Gram-negative infection. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that infection within 2 months prior to LT [odds ratio (OR) = 4.426, 95%CI: 1.634-11.99, P = 0.003], duration of surgery ≥ 400 min [OR = 3.047, 95%CI: 1.194-7.773, P = 0.02] and indwelling urethral catheter use ≥ 3 days [OR = 5.728, 95%CI: 1.226-26.763, P = 0.026] were independent risk factors for Gram-negative infection after LT, and that only carbapenem use ≥ 3 days within 15 days prior to infection [OR = 14, 95%CI: 1.862-105.268, P = 0.01] was related to the occurrence of CRO infections.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of Gram-negative and CRO infections was high in the early post-LT period. The most common infection site was the abdominal cavity/bile duct, and the dominant pathogen was K. pneumoniae. Patients with infections within 2 months prior to LT, prolonged surgery time or delayed urethral catheter removal were prone to Gram-negative infection. Carbapenem exposure was correlated with CRO infections.

Diagnosis and management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria: guideline endorsed by the Italian Society of Infection and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT), the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI) and the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM)

Management of patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach to achieve successful clinical outcomes. The aim of this paper is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and optimal management of these infections, with a focus on targeted antibiotic therapy. The document was produced by a panel of experts nominated by the five endorsing Italian societies, namely the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM), the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT) and the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA). Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) questions about microbiological diagnosis, pharmacological strategies and targeted antibiotic therapy were addressed for the following pathogens: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A systematic review of the literature published from January 2011 to November 2020 was guided by the PICO strategy. As data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were expected to be limited, observational studies were also reviewed. The certainty of evidence was classified using the GRADE approach. Recommendations were classified as strong or conditional. Detailed recommendations were formulated for each pathogen. The majority of available RCTs have serious risk of bias, and many observational studies have several limitations, including small sample size, retrospective design and presence of confounders. Thus, some recommendations are based on low or very-low certainty of evidence. Importantly, these recommendations should be continually updated to reflect emerging evidence from clinical studies and real-world experience.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam as Salvage Therapy in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Patients with Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Objective

There are few therapeutic options for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in children following liver transplantation. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), a recently licensed antibacterial in China, was utilized as a salvage therapy against CRE in our center, and its efficacy and safety were therefore assessed.

Methods

The retrospective, observational study was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Pediatric liver transplantation patients (≤12 years) who received CAZ-AVI as a salvage therapy against CRE infections were included from January 2020 to December 2021. Clinical success and all-cause death during hospitalization were the primary outcomes. Recurrence of infection, drug-related adverse events, and changes in inflammatory biomarkers were collected.

Results

Six children were enrolled, with a median age of 10.1 (interquartile range (IQR) 5.5–13.8) months. Primary intraperitoneal infections occurred in all patients, with five patients developing bloodstream infections. KPC carbapenemases were detected in most isolates, and the susceptibility results showed general sensitivity to tigecycline, polymyxin B, and CAZ-AVI. Tigecycline-based therapy was taken as the initial treatment and withdrawn because of clinical failure (5 cases) or cholestasis (1 case). After CRE infection, the median time to convert to CAZ-AVI was 7.5 (IQR 7.0–8.8) days, and the median CAZ-AVI treatment length was 21.0 (IQR 20.3–28.5) days. Clinical success was achieved in all patients, with a zero percent all-cause death rate. No CRE infections recurred throughout hospitalization, and no resistance to CAZ-AVI was detected. Patients experienced vomiting (1/6), skin rash (1/6), and a transient increase in cystatin C (2/6), γ-glutamyltransferase (2/6), and alkaline phosphatase (3/6).

Conclusion

CAZ-AVI was shown to be a successful salvage treatment for CRE infection in pediatric liver transplant recipients, with minor and temporary drug-related side effects.

Microbiological, Clinical, and PK/PD Features of the New Anti-Gram-Negative Antibiotics: β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors in Combination and Cefiderocol-An All-Inclusive Guide for Clinicians

Bacterial resistance mechanisms are continuously and rapidly evolving. This is particularly true for Gram-negative bacteria. Over the last decade, the strategy to develop new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLs/BLIs) combinations has paid off and results from phase 3 and real-world studies are becoming available for several compounds. Cefiderocol warrants a separate discussion for its peculiar mechanism of action. Considering the complexity of summarizing and integrating the emerging literature data of clinical outcomes, microbiological mechanisms, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of the new BL/BLI and cefiderocol, we aimed to provide an overview of data on the following compounds: aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol, ceftaroline/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/nacubactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Each compound is described in a dedicated section by experts in infectious diseases, microbiology, and pharmacology, with tables providing at-a-glance information.

Prognostic factors of OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in a tertiary-care Spanish hospital: A retrospective single-center cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To describe the determinants of outcome of infections due to OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (OXA-48-Kp).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 117 episodes of OXA-48-Kp infection were conducted. Multivariate Cox models identified factors predicting 14-day clinical response and 30-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven (65.8%) isolates were susceptible to imipenem/meropenem. 14-day clinical response and 30-day mortality rates were 41.9% and 28.2%. Catheter-related bloodstream infection (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 8.33; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 3.19-21.72; P-value <0.001), urinary tract infection (aHR: 3.04; 95%CI: 1.39-6.66; P-value = 0.006) and early appropriate treatment (aHR: 1.77; 95%CI: 0.97-3.22; P-value = 0.064) predicted clinical response, whereas severe sepsis had a deleterious impact (aHR: 0.22; 95%CI: 0.10-0.50; P-value <0.001). Lower respiratory tract infection (aHR: 6.58; 95%CI: 2.83-15.29; P-value <0.001) and bloodstream infection (aHR: 2.33; 95%CI: 1.05-5.15; P-value = 0.037) were associated with 30-day mortality, whereas definitive therapy including ≥1 active agent (aHR: 0.26; 95%CI: 0.11-0.63; P-value = 0.003) and source control (aHR: 0.35; 95%CI: 0.14-0.91; P-value = 0.030) were protective. Combination therapy did not seem to be associated with better outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate antimicrobial treatment was protective for 30-day mortality in OXA-48-Kp infections. Carbapenems are usually active, whereas combination therapy appeared not to confer additional benefit.

Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparators against Pathogens Harboring OXA-48 and AmpC Alone or in Combination with Other β-Lactamases Collected from Phase 3 Clinical Trials and an International Surveillance Program

In vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and key comparators against AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from four Phase 3 clinical trials and against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales with multiple resistance mechanisms from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program were evaluated. Susceptibility to CAZ-AVI and comparators was determined by reference broth microdilution methods. Clinical response at test of cure (TOC) was assessed in patients from Phase 3 trials with baseline OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales or AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa treated with CAZ-AVI or comparators. Against 77 AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales isolates from Phase 3 trials, meropenem-vaborbactam (98.7% susceptible [S]), CAZ-AVI (96.1% S), and meropenem (96.1% S) had similar in vitro activity and were more active than ceftolozane-tazobactam (24.7% S). Clinical cure rates in patients with baseline AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales were 80.7% (n = 21/26) and 85.0% (n = 17/20) for CAZ-AVI and comparators. Against 53 AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa isolates from Phase 3 trials, CAZ-AVI (73.6% S) was more active in vitro than ceftolozane-tazobactam (58.5% S) and meropenem (37.7% S). Clinical cure rates in patients with baseline AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa were 85.7% (n = 12/14) and 75.0% (n = 9/12) for CAZ-AVI and comparators, respectively. Of 113 OXA-48-producing isolates from the ATLAS program, 99.1% were susceptible to CAZ-AVI. Four patients with baseline OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates treated with CAZ-AVI in Phase 3 trials were clinical cures at TOC and had favorable microbiological response. CAZ-AVI was among the most active agents against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and had greater in vitro activity against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales than meropenem-vaborbactam, meropenem, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and other comparators.

The Distribution of K. pneumoniae in Different Specimen Sources and Its Antibiotic Resistance Trends in Sichuan, China From 2017 to 2020

Objective

We aim to analyze the distribution of Klebsiella pneumoniae in different specimen sources and its antibiotic resistance trends from the Antimicrobial Resistant Investigation Network of Sichuan Province (ARINSP) between 2017 and 2020.

Methods

According to the monitoring scheme, each participating hospital identified the bacteria and performed antimicrobial susceptibility tests using approved procedures. The data of non-repetitive isolates collected from outpatients and inpatients were submitted to ARINSP. The WHONET 5.6 software was used to analyze the results according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).

Results

Between 2017 and 2020, 833,408 non-repetitive clinical isolates of bacteria were isolated in total. The bacterial strains isolated from sputum and broncho-alveolar lavage accounted for 48.7, 56.4, 49.2, and 43.7% from 2017 to 2020 respectively, among all sources. The number of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from sputum and broncho-alveolar lavage increased from 18,809 in 2018, 19,742 in 2019, to 19,376 in 2020, playing a predominant role among all specimens. Meropenem-resistant K. pneumoniae occurrences (5.7% in 2017, 7.3% in 2018, 8.0% in 2019, and 7.5% in 2020) remained highest among carbapenems, and increased slightly over time. The resistance rate to tigecycline remained lowest, and declined from 2.4% in 2017, to 0.4% in 2018, and from 0.7% in 2019, to 0.6% in 2020.

Conclusion

The overall resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to carbapenems increased in Sichuan Province, giving a significant challenge to control K. pneumoniae related infections. Tigecycline has retained activity to against K. pneumoniae. Ongoing surveillance is essential. It can help for implementing intervention programs to reduce the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance and to provide with a rational use of antimicrobials.

Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Difficult-to-Treat Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Cystitis, Pyelonephritis, and Prostatitis: A Narrative Review

Urinary tract infections, including cystitis, acute pyelonephritis, and prostatitis, are among the most common diagnoses prompting antibiotic prescribing. The rise in antimicrobial resistance over the past decades has led to the increasing challenge of urinary tract infections because of multidrug-resistant and "difficult-to-treat resistance" among Gram-negative bacteria. Recent advances in pharmacotherapy and medical microbiology are modernizing how these urinary tract infections are treated. Advances in pharmacotherapy have included not only the development and approval of novel antibiotics, such as ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, and glycylcyclines, but also the re-examination of the potential role of legacy antibiotics, including older aminoglycosides and tetracyclines. Recent advances in medical microbiology allow phenotypic and molecular mechanism of resistance testing, and thus antibiotic prescribing can be tailored to the mechanism of resistance in the infecting pathogen. Here, we provide a narrative review on the clinical and pre-clinical studies of drugs that can be used for difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria, with a particular focus on data relevant to the urinary tract. We also offer a pragmatic framework for antibiotic selection when encountering urinary tract infections due to difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria based on the organism and its mechanism of resistance.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection

Purpose

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) monotherapy and polymyxin B-based combination therapy are currently two treatment options for patients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection; however, few studies have contrasted the relative efficacy of the two antibiotic regimens. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of CAZ/AVI and polymyxin B against CRPA infection and analyze the independent predictors of 30-day mortality or survival.

Patients and Methods

This single-center retrospective observational study included patients with CRPA infection treated with CAZ/AVI or polymyxin B between January 2018 and December 2020. The primary outcomes were the 14-day and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and bacterial clearance. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups, and COX regression analysis was used to identify predictors of 30-day mortality.

Results

A total of 136 patients with CRPA infection were enrolled, including 51 patients in the CAZ/AVI group and 85 patients in the polymyxin B group. The 14-day mortality (5.9% vs 27.1%, p=0.002), 30-day mortality (13.7% vs 47.1%, p<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (29.4% vs 60.0%, p=0.001) in the CAZ/AVI group were significantly lower than the polymyxin B group. The bacterial clearance rate (45.1% vs 12.9%, p<0.001) in the CAZ/AVI group were higher than in the polymyxin B group. After adjustment by propensity score matching, the CAV/AVI group still had lower 30-day mortality (14.3% vs 42.9%, p=0.018) and higher bacterial clearance rate (42.9% vs 14.3%, p=0.018) than the polymyxin B group. The multivariate COX analysis showed that the age was identified as independent predictor of 30-day mortality while CAZ/AVI therapy and central venous catheterization emerged as independent predictors of 30-day survival.

Conclusion

CAZ/AVI therapy was superior to polymyxin B therapy for patients with CRPA infection, and provided significant survival benefits, but further larger studies were needed to substantiate our findings.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam as Salvage Treatment for Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Liver Transplantation Recipients

Background

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) has been approved in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP), but the experience for the treatment of CRKP in liver transplantation (LT) recipients was limited, and previous data on its efficacy in this setting are lacking.

Methods

LT recipients with CRKP infection who received CZA treatment were reviewed retrospectively, microbiological and clinical response, adverse events were also assessed. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after CZA administration.

Results

CZA was used in 21 LT recipients (including 4 pediatric patients) with CRKP infections after failure with other antimicrobials. CZA was administered as monotherapy in 4 patients. Median time from the onset of CRKP infection until the initiation of CZA treatment was 2 days (IQR, 1–6.5), and the median treatment duration was 12 days (IQR, 8.5–18.5). The mortality at 14 days, 30 days and all-cause was 28.6%, 38.1% and 42.9%, respectively. In adult patients, clinical response of 14 days and 30 days was 70.6% (12/17) and 58.8% (10/17), respectively, while in pediatric patients the 14-day and 30-day clinical response were both 75%, respectively. The relapse rate during the treatment developed in 3 patients after 30 days with the cessation of CZA monotherapy. CZA resistance was not detected in any case and 3 (3/21, 14.3%) patients developed acute kidney injury related to uncontrolled infection.

Conclusion

CZA shows promising results, even in monotherapy, for the treatment of patients with severe infections due to carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae among LT recipients. The emergence of resistance to CZA was not observed.