1
|
Yadav S, Couch FJ, Domchek SM. Germline Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Current Concepts in Risk Evaluation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2024; 14:a041318. [PMID: 38151326 PMCID: PMC11293548 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Our understanding of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has significantly improved over the past two decades. In addition to BRCA1/2, pathogenic variants in several other DNA-repair genes have been shown to increase the risks of breast and ovarian cancer. The magnitude of cancer risk is impacted not only by the gene involved, but also by family history of cancer, polygenic risk scores, and, in certain genes, pathogenic variant type or location. While estimates of breast and ovarian cancer risk associated with pathogenic variants are available, these are predominantly based on studies of high-risk populations with young age at diagnosis of cancer, multiple primary cancers, or family history of cancer. More recently, breast cancer risk for germline pathogenic variant carriers has been estimated from population-based studies. Here, we provide a review of the field of germline genetic testing and risk evaluation for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in high-risk and population-based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhartha Yadav
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55901, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fabi A, Cortesi L, Duranti S, Cordisco EL, Di Leone A, Terribile D, Paris I, de Belvis AG, Orlandi A, Marazzi F, Muratore M, Garganese G, Fuso P, Paoletti F, Dell'Aquila R, Minucci A, Scambia G, Franceschini G, Masetti R, Genuardi M. Multigenic panels in breast cancer: Clinical utility and management of patients with pathogenic variants other than BRCA1/2. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 201:104431. [PMID: 38977141 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Multigene panels can analyze high and moderate/intermediate penetrance genes that predispose to breast cancer (BC), providing an opportunity to identify at-risk individuals within affected families. However, considering the complexity of different pathogenic variants and correlated clinical manifestations, a multidisciplinary team is needed to effectively manage BC. A classification of pathogenic variants included in multigene panels was presented in this narrative review to evaluate their clinical utility in BC. Clinical management was discussed for each category and focused on BC, including available evidence regarding the multidisciplinary and integrated management of patients with BC. The integration of both genetic testing and counseling is required for customized decisions in therapeutic strategies and preventative initiatives, as well as for a defined multidisciplinary approach, considering the continuous evolution of guidelines and research in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Fabi
- Precision Medicine Unit in Senology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Modena Hospital University, Modena Italy (Cortesi)
| | - Simona Duranti
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Emanuela Lucci Cordisco
- Section of Genomic Medicine, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Laboratory and Infectious Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alba Di Leone
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Terribile
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Giulio de Belvis
- Value Lab, Faculty of Economics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Armando Orlandi
- Unit of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Marazzi
- UOC Oncological Radiotherapy, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Margherita Muratore
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Fuso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Paoletti
- Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Dell'Aquila
- Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Minucci
- Genomics Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park (GSTeP), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Genuardi
- Section of Genomic Medicine, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Laboratory and Infectious Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Apostolou P, Dellatola V, Papathanasiou A, Kalfakakou D, Fountzilas E, Tryfonopoulos D, Karageorgopoulou S, Yannoukakos D, Konstantopoulou I, Fostira F. Genetic Testing of Breast Cancer Patients with Very Early-Onset Breast Cancer (≤30 Years) Yields a High Rate of Germline Pathogenic Variants, Mainly in the BRCA1, TP53, and BRCA2 Genes. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2368. [PMID: 39001430 PMCID: PMC11240773 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Early-onset breast cancer constitutes a major criterion for genetic testing referral. Nevertheless, studies focusing on breast cancer patients (≤30 years) are limited. We investigated the contribution and spectrum of known breast-cancer-associated genes in 267 Greek women with breast cancer ≤30 years while monitoring their clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes. In this cohort, a significant proportion (39.7%) carried germline pathogenic variants (PVs) distributed in 8 genes. The majority, namely 36.7%, involved BRCA1, TP53, and BRCA2. PVs in BRCA1 were the most prevalent (28.1%), followed by TP53 (4.5%) and BRCA2 (4.1%) PVs. The contribution of PVs in CHEK2, ATM, PALB2, PTEN, and RAD51C was limited to 3%. In the patient group ≤26 years, TP53 PVs were significantly higher compared to the group 26-30 years (p = 0.0023). A total of 74.8% of TP53 carriers did not report a family history of cancer. Carriers of PVs receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed an improved event-free survival (p < 0.0001) compared to non-carriers. Overall, many women with early-onset breast cancer carry clinically actionable variants, mainly in the BRCA1/2 and TP53 genes. The inclusion of timely testing of TP53 in these patients provides essential information for appropriate clinical management. This is important for countries where reimbursement involves the cost of genetic analysis of BRCA1/2 only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevi Apostolou
- Human Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", 15341 Athens, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Dellatola
- Human Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", 15341 Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Papathanasiou
- Human Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", 15341 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Elena Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Lukes's Hospital, 55236 Thessaloniki, Greece
- European University Cyprus, 6, Diogenes 2404 Engomi, Nicosia 1516, Cyprus
| | | | | | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Human Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", 15341 Athens, Greece
| | - Irene Konstantopoulou
- Human Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", 15341 Athens, Greece
| | - Florentia Fostira
- Human Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", 15341 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Baumont AC, Cadore NA, Pedrotti LG, Curzel GD, Schuch JB, Bessel M, Bordignon C, Rosa ML, Macedo GDS, Rosa DD. Germline rare variants in HER2-positive breast cancer predisposition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1395970. [PMID: 38978731 PMCID: PMC11228612 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Approximately 10% of breast cancer (BC) cases result from hereditary causes. Genetic testing has been widely implemented in BC care to determine hereditary cancer syndromes and personalized medicine. Thus, identification of individuals carrying germline pathogenic variants could be useful to provide appropriate prophylactic or screening measures for each BC subtype, however, there are few formal recommendations for genetic testing in this sense so far. In this study, we assessed rare germline variants in a specific group of genes in order to determine the association with human epidermal growth factor 2 enriched (HER2+) BC phenotype through a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing subtypes overexpressing HER2 with other clinically recognized subtypes of BC. This review was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023447571). Methods We conducted an online literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and EMBASE databases. We included original studies that investigated germline variants in HER2+ BC patients and selected the studies that reported only rare and/or pathogenic germline variants. We assessed the risk of bias and quality of the studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal checklists and the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Genetic Studies, respectively. Considering hormone receptor and HER2 expression status, we compared gene-based risks initially in HR-HER2-, HR+HER2-, HR+HER2+, and HR-HER2+ groups, conducting separate meta-analyses using the random effects model for each comparison, and within them for each gene. Results Of the total 36 studies describing germline variants, 11 studies provided information on the prevalence of variants in the different clinically relevant BC subtypes and allowed comparisons. Germline variants within eight genes showed significant differences when meta-analyzed between the BC groups: BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, and BARD1. Notably, TP53, ATM, and CHEK2 germline variants were identified as predisposing factors for HER2+ subtypes, whereas BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, and BARD1 germline variants were associated with a predisposition to low HER2 expression. Main concerns about bias and quality assessment were the lack of confounding factors control; and comparability or outcome assessment, respectively. Discussion Our findings underscore the connection between germline variants and differential expression of the HER2 protein and BC subtypes. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023447571.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathan Araujo Cadore
- Responsabilidade Social, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Marina Bessel
- Responsabilidade Social, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Cláudia Bordignon
- Responsabilidade Social, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Mahira Lopes Rosa
- Responsabilidade Social, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | | | - Daniela Dornelles Rosa
- Responsabilidade Social, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Calabrese A, von Arx C, Tafuti AA, Pensabene M, De Laurentiis M. Prevention, diagnosis and clinical management of hereditary breast cancer beyond BRCA1/2 genes. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 129:102785. [PMID: 38870570 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 05/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
The detection of germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in BRCA1/2 and other breast cancer (BC) genes is rising exponentially thanks to the advent of multi-gene panel testing. This promising technology, coupled with the availability of specific therapies for BC BRCA-related, has increased the number of patients eligible for genetic testing. Implementing multi-gene panel testing for hereditary BC screening holds promise to maximise benefits for patients at hereditary risk of BC. These benefits range from prevention programs to antineoplastic-targeted therapies. However, the clinical management of these patients is complex and requires guidelines based on recent evidence. Furthermore, applying multi-gene panel testing into clinical practice increases the detection of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). This augments the complexity of patients' clinical management, becoming an unmet need for medical oncologists. This review aims to collect updated evidence on the most common BC-related genes besides BRCA1/2, from their biological role in BC development to their potential impact in tailoring prevention and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Calabrese
- Department Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS, 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli, NA, Italy
| | - C von Arx
- Department Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS, 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli, NA, Italy.
| | - A A Tafuti
- Department Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS, 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli, NA, Italy
| | - M Pensabene
- Department Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS, 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli, NA, Italy
| | - M De Laurentiis
- Department Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS, 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli, NA, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sanabria-Salas MC, Pedroza-Duran A, Díaz-Casas SE, Nuñez Lemus M, Grillo-Ardila CF, Briceño-Morales X, García-Mora M, Ángel-Aristizábal J, Mariño Lozano IF, Suarez Rodríguez RA, Guzmán Abisaab LH. Management and Clinical Outcomes of Breast Cancer in Women Diagnosed with Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in a Clinic-Based Sample from Colombia. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2020. [PMID: 38893140 PMCID: PMC11171067 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate prognosis and survival differences in 82 breast cancer patients with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs) treated and followed at the Breast Unit of the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Colombia (INC-C) between 2018 and 2021. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years, with 62.2% presenting locally advanced tumors, 47.6% histological grade 3, and 35.4% with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. Most carriers, 74.4% (61/82), had PVs in known breast cancer susceptibility genes (i.e., "associated gene carriers" group, considered inherited breast cancer cases): BRCA2 (30), BRCA1 (14), BARD1 (4), RAD51D (3), TP53 (2), PALB2 (2), ATM (2), CHEK2 (1), RAD51C (1), NF1 (1), and PTEN (1). BRCA1-2 represented 53.7%, and homologous recombination DNA damage repair (HR-DDR) genes associated with breast cancer risk accounted for 15.9%. Patients with PVs in non-breast-cancer risk genes were combined in a different category (21/82; 25.6%) (i.e., "non-associated gene carriers" group, considered other breast cancer cases). Median follow-up was 38.1 months, and 24% experienced recurrence, with 90% being distant. The 5-year Disease-Free Survival (DFS) for inherited breast cancer cases was 66.5%, and for other breast cancer cases it was 88.2%. In particular, for carriers of PVs in the BRCA2 gene, it was 37.6%. The 5-year Overall Survival (OS) rates ranged from 68.8% for those with PVs in BRCA2 to 100% for those with PVs in other HR-DDR genes. Further studies are crucial for understanding tumor behavior and therapy response differences among Colombian breast cancer patients with germline PVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Carolina Sanabria-Salas
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Ana Pedroza-Duran
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Sandra E. Díaz-Casas
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Marcela Nuñez Lemus
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Carlos F. Grillo-Ardila
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Avenida Carrera 30 N. 45-3, Bogotá 111321, Colombia;
| | - Ximena Briceño-Morales
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Mauricio García-Mora
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Javier Ángel-Aristizábal
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Iván Fernando Mariño Lozano
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Raúl Alexis Suarez Rodríguez
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Luis Hernán Guzmán Abisaab
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Woodward ER, Lalloo F, Forde C, Pugh S, Burghel GJ, Schlecht H, Harkness EF, Howell A, Howell SJ, Gandhi A, Evans DG. Germline testing of BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and CHEK2 c.1100delC in 1514 triple negative familial and isolated breast cancers from a single centre, with extended testing of ATM, RAD51C and RAD51D in over 400. J Med Genet 2024; 61:385-391. [PMID: 38123987 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The identification of germline pathogenic gene variants (PGVs) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is important to inform further primary cancer risk reduction and TNBC treatment strategies. We therefore investigated the contribution of breast cancer associated PGVs to familial and isolated invasive TNBC. METHODS Outcomes of germline BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2_c.1100delC testing were recorded in 1514 women (743-isolated, 771-familial), and for PALB2 in 846 women (541-isolated, 305-familial), with TNBC and smaller numbers for additional genes. Breast cancer free controls were identified from Predicting Risk Of Cancer At Screening and BRIDGES (Breast cancer RIsk after Diagnostic GEne Sequencing) studies. RESULTS BRCA1_PGVs were detected in 52 isolated (7.0%) and 195 (25.3%) familial cases (isolated-OR=58.9, 95% CI: 16.6 to 247.0), BRCA2_PGVs in 21 (2.8%) isolated and 67 (8.7%) familial cases (isolated-OR=5.0, 95% CI: 2.3 to 11.2), PALB2_PGVs in 9 (1.7%) isolated and 12 (3.9%) familial cases (isolated-OR=8.8, 95% CI: 2.5 to 30.4) and CHEK2_c.1100delC in 0 isolated and 3 (0.45%) familial cases (isolated-OR=0.0, 95% CI: 0.00 to 2.11). BRCA1_PGV detection rate was >10% for all familial TNBC age groups and significantly higher for younger diagnoses (familial: <50 years, n=165/538 (30.7%); ≥50 years, n=30/233 (12.9%); p<0.0001). Women with a G3_TNBC were more likely to have a BRCA1_PGV as compared with a BRCA2 or PALB2_PGV (p<0.0001). 0/743 isolated TNBC had the CHEK2_c.1100delC PGV and 0/305 any ATM_PGV, but 2/240 (0.83%) had a RAD51D_PGV. CONCLUSION PGVs in BRCA1 are associated with G3_TNBCs. Familial TNBCs and isolated TNBCs <30 years have a >10% likelihood of a PGV in BRCA1. BRCA1_PGVs are associated with younger age of familial TNBC. There was no evidence for any increased risk of TNBC with CHEK2 or ATM PGVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire Forde
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Pugh
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Helene Schlecht
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Prevent Breast Cancer Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sacha J Howell
- Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Prevent Breast Cancer Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Ashu Gandhi
- Prevent Breast Cancer Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stravodimou A, Voutsadakis IA. Neo-adjuvant therapies for ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancers: from chemotherapy to hormonal therapy, CDK inhibitors, and beyond. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024; 24:117-135. [PMID: 38475990 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2330601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chemotherapy has been traditionally used as neo-adjuvant therapy in breast cancer for down-staging of locally advanced disease in all sub-types. In the adjuvant setting, genomic assays have shown that a significant proportion of ER positive/HER2 negative patients do not derive benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant endocrine therapy. An interest in hormonal treatments as neo-adjuvant therapies in ER positive/HER2 negative cancers has been borne by their documented success in the adjuvant setting. Moreover, cytotoxic chemotherapy is less effective in ER positive/HER2 negative disease compared with other breast cancer subtypes in obtaining pathologic complete responses. AREAS COVERED Neo-adjuvant therapies for ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancers and associated biomarkers are reviewed, using a Medline survey. A focus of discussion is the prediction of patients that are unlikely to derive extra benefit from chemotherapy and have the highest probabilities of benefiting from hormonal and other targeted therapies. EXPERT OPINION Predictive biomarkers of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapies are instrumental for selecting ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancer patients for each treatment. Chemotherapy remains the standard of care for many of those patients requiring neo-adjuvant treatment, but other neo-adjuvant therapies are increasingly used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina Stravodimou
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ioannis A Voutsadakis
- Algoma District Cancer Program, Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste Marie, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Clinical Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bedrosian I, Somerfield MR, Achatz MI, Boughey JC, Curigliano G, Friedman S, Kohlmann WK, Kurian AW, Laronga C, Lynce F, Norquist BS, Plichta JK, Rodriguez P, Shah PD, Tischkowitz M, Wood M, Yadav S, Yao K, Robson ME. Germline Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer: ASCO-Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:584-604. [PMID: 38175972 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop recommendations for germline mutation testing for patients with breast cancer. METHODS An ASCO-Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) panel convened to develop recommendations based on a systematic review and formal consensus process. RESULTS Forty-seven articles met eligibility criteria for the germline mutation testing recommendations; 18 for the genetic counseling recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS BRCA1/2 mutation testing should be offered to all newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer ≤65 years and select patients >65 years based on personal history, family history, ancestry, or eligibility for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy. All patients with recurrent breast cancer who are candidates for PARP inhibitor therapy should be offered BRCA1/2 testing, regardless of family history. BRCA1/2 testing should be offered to women who develop a second primary cancer in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast. For patients with prior history of breast cancer and without active disease, testing should be offered to patients diagnosed ≤65 years and selectively in patients diagnosed after 65 years, if it will inform personal and family risk. Testing for high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes beyond BRCA1/2 should be offered to those with supportive family histories; testing for moderate-penetrance genes may be offered if necessary to inform personal and family cancer risk. Patients should be provided enough pretest information for informed consent; those with pathogenic variants should receive individualized post-test counseling. Variants of uncertain significance should not impact management, and patients with such variants should be followed for reclassification. Referral to providers experienced in clinical cancer genetics may help facilitate patient selection and interpretation of expanded testing, and provide counseling of individuals without pathogenic germline variants but with significant family history.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- University of Milan, Italy
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Sue Friedman
- FORCE (Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered), Tampa, FL
| | - Wendy K Kohlmann
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Patricia Rodriguez
- Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment Program, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Arlington, VA
| | - Payal D Shah
- Basser Center for BRCA & Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Katherine Yao
- Division of Surgical Oncology at NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL
| | - Mark E Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang Y, Wu H, Gan C, Rao H, Wang Q, Guo X. BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Chinese Hakka breast cancer patients. BMC Med Genomics 2024; 17:3. [PMID: 38167124 PMCID: PMC10763220 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-023-01772-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the prevalence of BRCA1/2 gene variants and evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics associated with these variants in Chinese Hakka breast cancer patients. METHODS A total of 409 breast cancer patients were analyzed based on next-generation sequencing results, with 337 categorized as non-carriers and 72 as carriers of BRCA1/2 variants. Data on the patients' BRCA1/2 gene mutation status, clinical and pathological characteristics, as well as menstrual and reproductive information, were collected, analyzed, compared, and tabulated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the relationship between clinical characteristics and pathogenic variants. RESULTS Among the patients, 72 were identified as carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, while 337 had likely benign or benign mutations. The BRCA1 c.2635G > T (p. Glu879*) variant was detected at a high frequency, accounting for 12.5% (4/32) of the BRCA1 mutations, while the c.5164_5165del (p.Ser1722Tyrfs*4) variant was common among the BRCA2 mutations, accounting for 17.5% (7/40). It was observed that a higher proportion of BRCA1 carriers had the triple-negative breast cancer subtype, whereas more BRCA2 carriers exhibited estrogen receptor (ER) + and progesterone receptor (PR) + subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a family history of cancer (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.00-5.54), bilateral cancer (OR = 4.78, 95% CI 1.61-14.20), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- (OR = 8.23, 95% CI 3.25-20.84), and Ki67 ≥ 15% (OR = 3.88, 95% CI 1.41-10.65) were associated with BRCA1/2 mutations, with the age at diagnosis, age at menarche, and premenopausal status serving as covariates. CONCLUSIONS The most common pathogenic variant of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer patients was c.2635G > T and c.5164_5165del, respectively. Additionally, a family history of cancer, bilateral cancer, HER2-, and Ki67 ≥ 15% were identified as independent predictors of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinmei Zhang
- Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No 63 Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, P. R. China
- Guangdong Engineering Technological Research Center of Clinical Molecular Diagnosis and Antibody Drugs, Meizhou, China
| | - Heming Wu
- Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No 63 Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, P. R. China
| | - Caiyan Gan
- Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No 63 Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, P. R. China
- Guangdong Engineering Technological Research Center of Clinical Molecular Diagnosis and Antibody Drugs, Meizhou, China
| | - Hui Rao
- Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No 63 Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, P. R. China
| | - Qiuming Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xueming Guo
- Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No 63 Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, P. R. China.
- Guangdong Engineering Technological Research Center of Clinical Molecular Diagnosis and Antibody Drugs, Meizhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Incorvaia L, Badalamenti G, Novo G, Gori S, Cortesi L, Brando C, Cinieri S, Curigliano G, Ricciardi GR, Toss A, Chiari R, Berardi R, Ballatore Z, Bono M, Bazan Russo TD, Gristina V, Galvano A, Damerino G, Blasi L, Bazan V, Russo A. Anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer harboring mutational signature of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). ESMO Open 2024; 9:102196. [PMID: 38118367 PMCID: PMC10837774 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The BRCA proteins play a key role in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Beyond BRCA1/2, other genes are involved in the HR repair (HRR). Due to the prominent role in the cellular repair process, pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) in HRR genes may cause inadequate DNA damage repair in cardiomyocytes. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study to investigate the heart toxicity from anthracycline-containing regimens (ACRs) in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer (BC) patients carrying germline BRCA PV/LPVs and no-BRCA HRR pathway genes. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed using cardiac ultrasound before starting ACR therapy and at subsequent time points according to clinical indications. RESULTS Five hundred and three BC patients were included in the study. We predefined three groups: (i) BRCA cohort; (ii) no-BRCA cohort; (iii) variant of uncertain significance (VUS)/wild-type (WT) cohort. When baseline (T0) and post-ACR (T1) LVEFs between the three cohorts were compared, pre-treatment LVEF values were not different (BRCA1/2 versus HRR-no-BRCA versus VUS/WT cohort). Notably, during monitoring (T1, median 3.4 months), patients carrying BRCA or HRR no-BRCA germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants showed a statistically significant reduction of LVEF compared to baseline (T0). To assess the relevance of HRR on the results, we included the analysis of the subgroup of 20 BC patients carrying PV/LPVs in other genes not involved in HRR, such as mismatch repair genes (MUTYH, PMS2, MSH6). Unlike HRR genes, no significant differences in T0-T1 were found in this subgroup of patients. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that deleterious variants in HRR genes, leading to impaired HR, could increase the sensitivity of cardiomyocytes to ACR in early BC patients. In this subgroup of patients, other measurements, such as the global longitudinal strain, and a more in-depth assessment of risk factors may be proposed in the future to optimize cardiovascular risk management and improve long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Incorvaia
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - G Badalamenti
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - G Novo
- Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Paolo Giaccone, Palermo; Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE) "G. D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - S Gori
- Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella
| | - L Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena
| | - C Brando
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - S Cinieri
- Complex Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Brindisi Senatore Antonio Perrino Hospital, Brindisi
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan
| | - G R Ricciardi
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O. Papardo & Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina
| | - A Toss
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena
| | - R Chiari
- Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Padova Sud, Monselice
| | - R Berardi
- Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I-GM Lancisi-G Salesi, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona
| | - Z Ballatore
- Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I-GM Lancisi-G Salesi, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona
| | - M Bono
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - T D Bazan Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - V Gristina
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - A Galvano
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - G Damerino
- Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Paolo Giaccone, Palermo
| | - L Blasi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ARNAS Civico, Palermo
| | - V Bazan
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bind), Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - A Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cheng HF, Tsai YF, Liu CY, Hsu CY, Lien PJ, Lin YS, Chao TC, Lai JI, Feng CJ, Chen YJ, Chen BF, Chiu JH, Tseng LM, Huang CC. Prevalence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 genomic alterations among 924 Taiwanese breast cancer assays with tumor-only targeted sequencing: extended data analysis from the VGH-TAYLOR study. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:152. [PMID: 38098088 PMCID: PMC10722686 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01751-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway for DNA damage, particularly the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, has become a target for cancer therapy, with poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors showing significant outcomes in treating germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutated breast cancer. Recent studies suggest that some patients with somatic BRCA1/2 (sBRCA1/2) mutation or mutations in HR-related genes other than BRCA1/2 may benefit from PARP inhibitors as well, particularly those with PALB2 mutations. The current analysis aims to evaluate the prevalence of genetic alterations specific to BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 in a large cohort of Taiwanese breast cancer patients through tumor-targeted sequencing. METHODS A total of 924 consecutive assays from 879 Taiwanese breast cancer patients underwent tumor-targeted sequencing (Thermo Fisher Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3). We evaluated BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 mutational profiles, with variants annotated and curated by the ClinVAR, the Oncomine™ Knowledgebase Reporter, and the OncoKB™. We also conducted reflex germline testing using either whole exome sequencing (WES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS), which is ongoing. RESULTS Among the 879 patients analyzed (924 assays), 130 had positive mutations in BRCA1 (3.1%), BRCA2 (8.6%), and PALB2 (5.2%), with a total of 14.8% having genetic alterations. Co-occurrence was noted between BRCA1/BRCA2, BRCA1/PALB2, and BRCA2/PALB2 mutations. In BRCA1-mutated samples, only p.K654fs was observed in three patients, while other variants were observed no more than twice. For BRCA2, p.N372H was the most common (26 patients), followed by p.S2186fs, p.V2466A, and p.X159_splice (5 times each). For PALB2, p.I887fs was the most common mutation (30 patients). This study identified 176 amino acid changes; 60.2% (106) were not documented in either ClinVAR or the Oncomine™ Knowledgebase Reporter. Using the OncoKB™ for annotation, 171 (97.2%) were found to have clinical implications. For the result of reflex germline testing, three variants (BRCA1 c.1969_1970del, BRCA1 c.3629_3630del, BRCA2 c.8755-1G > C) were annotated as Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants by ClinVar and as likely loss-of-function or likely oncogenic by OncoKB; while one variant (PALB2 c.448C > T) was not found in ClinVar but was annotated as likely loss-of-function or likely oncogenic by OncoKB. CONCLUSION Our study depicted the mutational patterns of BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 in Taiwanese breast cancer patients through tumor-only sequencing. This highlights the growing importance of BRCA1/2 and PALB2 alterations in breast cancer susceptibility risk and the treatment of index patients. We also emphasized the need to meticulously annotate variants in cancer-driver genes as well as actionable mutations across multiple databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Fang Cheng
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yi-Fang Tsai
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chun-Yu Liu
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chih-Yi Hsu
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Pei-Ju Lien
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Nurse, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yen-Shu Lin
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Ta-Chung Chao
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Jiun-I Lai
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chin-Jung Feng
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yen-Jen Chen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Bo-Fang Chen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Jen-Hwey Chiu
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- Center for Traditional Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
- Institue of Traditional Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Ling-Ming Tseng
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
| | - Chi-Cheng Huang
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abdel-Razeq H. Surgical options for patients with early-stage breast cancer and pathogenic germline variants: an oncologist perspectives. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1265197. [PMID: 37781190 PMCID: PMC10539549 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1265197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer continues to be the most common cancer diagnosed among women worldwide. Family history of breast cancer is frequently encountered, and 5-15% of patients may carry inherited pathogenic germline variants, identification of which can be helpful for both; patients themselves and their unaffected close relatives. The availability and affordability of molecular diagnostics, like next generation sequencing (NGS), had resulted in wider adoption of such technologies to detect pathogenic variants of cancer-predisposing genes. International guidelines had recently broadened the indications for germline genetic testing to include much more patients, and also expanded the testing to include multi-gene panels, while some professional societies are calling for universal testing of all newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer, regardless of their age, personal or family history. The risk of experiencing a contralateral breast cancer (CBC) or ipsilateral recurrence, is well known. Such risk is highest with variants like BRCA1 and BRCA2, but less well-studied with other less common variants. The optimal local therapy for women with BRCA-associated breast cancer remains controversial, but tends to be aggressive and may involve bilateral mastectomies, which may not have any survival advantage. Additionally, surgical management of unaffected women, known to carry a pathogenic cancer-predisposing gene, may vary from surveillance to bilateral mastectomies, too. The oncological safety, and the higher satisfaction of unaffected women and patients with new surgical techniques, like the skin-sparing (SSM) and nipple-sparing (NSM) mastectomies, eased up the process of counselling. In this review, we address the oncological safety of less aggressive surgical options for both; patients and unaffected carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
- School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang QL, Zhang Y, Zeng E, Grassmann F, He W, Czene K. Risk of estrogen receptor-specific breast cancer by family history of estrogen receptor subtypes and other cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1020-1028. [PMID: 37243749 PMCID: PMC10483332 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent to which the risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-specific breast cancer is associated with ER status of breast cancer and other cancers among first-degree relatives is unclear. METHODS This population-based cohort included 464 707 cancer-free women in Stockholm, Sweden, during 1978-2019. For ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancers, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) associated with ER status of female first-degree relatives with breast cancer and of other cancers in all first-degree relatives. Associations between ER-negative and ER-positive status by family cancer history were estimated using logistic regression in a case-only design. RESULTS Women with familial ER-positive breast cancer had 1.87 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.77 to 1.97) higher risk of ER-positive subtype, whereas the corresponding hazard ratio for ER-negative was 2.54 (95% CI = 2.08 to 3.10) when having familial ER-negative breast cancer. The risk increased with an increasing number of female first-degree relatives having concordant subtypes and younger age at diagnosis (Ptrend <.001 for both). Nonbreast cancers among first-degree relatives were associated with both ER-positive (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.17) and ER-negative (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.16) breast cancers. Compared with women with ER-positive breast cancer, women with ER-negative breast cancer were more likely to have family history of liver (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.67), ovary (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.61), and testicle cancer (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.01 to 3.16) but less likely to have family history of endometrial cancer (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.00) and leukemia (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS Risk of ER-specific breast cancer differs according to ER status of female first-degree relatives with breast cancer and some other cancers of first-degree relatives. This family history information should be considered in the individual risk prediction for ER subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiao-Li Wang
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yuqi Zhang
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erwei Zeng
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Felix Grassmann
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wei He
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Chronic Disease Research Institute, The Children’s Hospital, and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Frénel JS, Nguyen F. Mammary carcinoma: Comparative oncology between small animals and humans-New therapeutic tools. Reprod Domest Anim 2023; 58 Suppl 2:102-108. [PMID: 37312625 DOI: 10.1111/rda.14408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The poor outcomes associated with mammary carcinomas (MCs) in dogs and cats in terms of locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis and survival, highlight the need for better management of mammary cancers in small animals. By contrast, the outcomes of women with breast cancer (BC) have dramatically improved during the last 10 years, notably thanks to new therapeutic strategies. The aim of this article was to imagine what could be the future of therapy for dogs and cats with MCs if it became inspired from current practices in human BC. This article focuses on the importance of taking into account cancer stage and cancer subtypes in therapeutic plans, on locoregional treatments (surgery, radiation therapy), new developments in endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy. Ideally, multimodal treatment regimens would be chosen according to cancer stage and cancer subtypes, and according to predictive factors that are still to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Sébastien Frénel
- Nantes Université, University of Angers, INSERM, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Site René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Frédérique Nguyen
- Nantes Université, University of Angers, INSERM, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France
- Oniris, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guo B, Knerr S, Kauffman TL, Mittendorf KF, Keast E, Gilmore MJ, Feigelson HS, Lynch FL, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Zepp JM, Veenstra DL, Hsu L, Phipps AI, Lindström S, Leo MC, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS, Devine B. Risk management actions following genetic testing in the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) Study: A prospective cohort study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:19112-19125. [PMID: 37644850 PMCID: PMC10557878 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic testing can identify cancer risk early, enabling prevention and early detection. We describe use of risk management interventions following genetic testing in the Cancer Health Assessment Reaching Many (CHARM) study. CHARM assessed risk and provided genetic testing to low income, low literacy, and other underserved populations that historically face barriers to accessing cancer genetic services. METHODS CHARM was implemented in Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) and Denver Health (DH) between 2018 and 2020. We identified post-testing screening (mammography, breast MRI, colonoscopy) and surgical (mastectomy, oophorectomy) procedures using electronic health records. We examined utilization in participants who did and did not receive actionable risk management recommendations from study genetic counselors following national guidelines. RESULTS CHARM participants were followed for an average of 15.4 months (range: 0.4-27.8 months) after results disclosure. Less than 2% (11/680) received actionable risk management recommendations (i.e., could be completed in the initial years following testing) based on their test result. Among those who received actionable recommendations, risk management utilization was moderate (54.5%, 6/11 completed any procedure) and varied by procedure (mammogram: 0/3; MRI: 2/4; colonoscopy: 4/5; mastectomy: 1/5; oophorectomy: 0/3). Cancer screening and surgery procedures were rare in participants without actionable recommendations. CONCLUSION Though the number of participants who received actionable risk management recommendations was small, our results suggest that implementing CHARM's risk assessment and testing model increased access to evidence-based genetic services and provided opportunities for patients to engage in recommended preventive care, without encouraging risk management overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boya Guo
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Sarah Knerr
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Kathleen F. Mittendorf
- Vanderbilt‐Ingram Cancer CenterVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Erin Keast
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Marian J. Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied GenomicsCenter for Health ResearchPortlandOregonUSA
| | | | - Frances L. Lynch
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Kristin R. Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied GenomicsCenter for Health ResearchPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Division of Oncology, Denver Health and Hospital AuthorityDenverColoradoUSA
| | - Jamilyn M. Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied GenomicsCenter for Health ResearchPortlandOregonUSA
| | - David L. Veenstra
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of PharmacyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Li Hsu
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Amanda I. Phipps
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Sara Lindström
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Michael C. Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Katrina A. B. Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied GenomicsCenter for Health ResearchPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric BioethicsSeattle Children's Research InstituteSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative CareUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Beth Devine
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of PharmacyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Toss A, Ponzoni O, Riccò B, Piombino C, Moscetti L, Combi F, Palma E, Papi S, Tenedini E, Tazzioli G, Dominici M, Cortesi L. Management of PALB2-associated breast cancer: A literature review and case report. Clin Case Rep 2023; 11:e7747. [PMID: 37621724 PMCID: PMC10444947 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.7747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants (PV) of the PALB2 tumor suppressor gene are associated with an increased risk of breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer. In previous research, PALB2-associated breast cancer showed aggressive clinicopathological phenotypes, particularly triple-negative subtype, and higher mortality regardless of tumor stage, type of chemotherapy nor hormone receptor status. The identification of this germline alteration may have an impact on clinical management of breast cancer (BC) from the surgical approach to the systemic treatment choice. We herein report the case of a patient with a germline PV of PALB2, diagnosed with locally advanced PD-L1 positive triple-negative BC, who progressed after an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen and then experienced a pathologic complete response after platinum-based chemotherapy. This case report hints a major role of the germline PALB2 alteration compared to the PD-L1 expression as cancer driver and gives us the opportunity to extensively review and discuss the available literature on the optimal management of PALB2-associated BC. Overall, our case report and review of the literature provide additional evidence that the germline analysis of PALB2 gene should be included in routine genetic testing for predictive purposes and to refine treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Ornella Ponzoni
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Beatrice Riccò
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Claudia Piombino
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Francesca Combi
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, International Doctorate School in Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Enza Palma
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Simona Papi
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Elena Tenedini
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Diagnostic Hematology and Clinical Genomics UnitAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Giovanni Tazzioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Massimo Dominici
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Oropeza E, Seker S, Carrel S, Mazumder A, Lozano D, Jimenez A, VandenHeuvel SN, Noltensmeyer DA, Punturi NB, Lei JT, Lim B, Waltz SE, Raghavan SA, Bainbridge MN, Haricharan S. Molecular portraits of cell cycle checkpoint kinases in cancer evolution, progression, and treatment responsiveness. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadf2860. [PMID: 37390209 PMCID: PMC10313178 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf2860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
Cell cycle dysregulation is prerequisite for cancer formation. However, it is unknown whether the mode of dysregulation affects disease characteristics. Here, we conduct comprehensive analyses of cell cycle checkpoint dysregulation using patient data and experimental investigations. We find that ATM mutation predisposes the diagnosis of primary estrogen receptor (ER)+/human epidermal growth factor (HER)2- cancer in older women. Conversely, CHK2 dysregulation induces formation of metastatic, premenopausal ER+/HER2- breast cancer (P = 0.001) that is treatment-resistant (HR = 6.15, P = 0.01). Lastly, while mutations in ATR alone are rare, ATR/TP53 co-mutation is 12-fold enriched over expected in ER+/HER2- disease (P = 0.002) and associates with metastatic progression (HR = 2.01, P = 0.006). Concordantly, ATR dysregulation induces metastatic phenotypes in TP53 mutant, not wild-type, cells. Overall, we identify mode of cell cycle dysregulation as a distinct event that determines subtype, metastatic potential, and treatment responsiveness, providing rationale for reconsidering diagnostic classification through the lens of the mode of cell cycle dysregulation..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Oropeza
- Aging and Cancer Immunology, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
- NCI-designated Cancer Center, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sinem Seker
- Aging and Cancer Immunology, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
- NCI-designated Cancer Center, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sabrina Carrel
- Aging and Cancer Immunology, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
- NCI-designated Cancer Center, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Aloran Mazumder
- Aging and Cancer Immunology, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
- NCI-designated Cancer Center, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Lozano
- Aging and Cancer Immunology, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
- NCI-designated Cancer Center, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Athena Jimenez
- Aging and Cancer Immunology, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
- NCI-designated Cancer Center, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Nindo B. Punturi
- Aging and Cancer Immunology, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
- NCI-designated Cancer Center, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan T. Lei
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bora Lim
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Oncology/Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan E. Waltz
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Research Service, Cincinnati Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, 3200 Vine St., Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Svasti Haricharan
- Aging and Cancer Immunology, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
- NCI-designated Cancer Center, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nerone M, Rossi L, Condorelli R, Ratti V, Conforti F, Palazzo A, Graffeo R. Beyond PARP Inhibitors in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients with Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations: Focus on CDK4/6-Inhibitors and Data Review on Other Biological Therapies. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3305. [PMID: 37444415 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
We explored the outcomes of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) in the endocrine-sensitive disease treated with first-line standard of care cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. Three studies retrospectively showed a reduction in the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in gBRCA1/2m patients compared to both the germinal BRCA1/2 wild type (gBRCA1/2wt) and the untested population. Regarding the efficacy of PI3Kα inhibitors, there are no subgroups or biomarker analyses in which germinal BRCA status was explored. However, the biological interactions between the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway and BRCA1/2 at a molecular level could help us to understand the activity of these drugs when used to treat BC in BRCA1/2 PVs/LPVs carriers. The efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting HER2 for HER2-low and HER2-positive (HER2+) BC, has been increasingly described. Unfortunately, data on T-DXd in HER2+ or HER2-low metastatic BC harboring germinal BRCA1/2 PVs/LPVs is lacking. Including germinal BRCA1/2 status in the subgroup analysis of the registration trials of this ADC would be of great interest, especially in the phase III trial DESTINY-breast04. This trial enrolled patients with HER2-negative (HER2-) and both HR+ and HR- metastatic disease, which can now be categorized as HER2-low. The HER2-low subgroup includes tumors that were previously classified as triple negative, so it is highly likely that some women were germline BRCA1/2 PVs/LPVs carriers and this data was not reported. Germline BRCA1/2 status will be available for a higher number of individuals with BC in the near future, and data on the prognostic and predictive role of these PVs/LPVs is needed in order to choose the best treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Nerone
- Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Lorenzo Rossi
- Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Rosaria Condorelli
- Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Vilma Ratti
- Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Conforti
- Oncology Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Antonella Palazzo
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Graffeo
- Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lipsyc-Sharf M, Jain E, Collins LC, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Come SE, Peppercorn JM, Borges VF, Warner E, Snow C, Krop IE, Kim D, Weiss J, Zanudo JGT, Partridge AH, Wagle N, Waks AG. Genomics of ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer in Young Women Before and After Exposure to Chemotherapy Plus Trastuzumab. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300076. [PMID: 37364233 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2)-positive breast cancer (BC) is particularly common in young women. Genomic features of ERBB2-positive tumors before and after chemotherapy and trastuzumab (chemo + H) have not been described in young women and are important for guiding study of therapeutic resistance in this population. METHODS From a large prospective cohort of women age 40 years or younger with BC, we identified patients with ERBB2-positive BC and tumor tissue available before and after chemo + H. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on each tumor and on germline DNA from blood. Tumor-normal pairs were analyzed for mutations and copy number (CN) changes. RESULTS Twenty-two women had successful WES on samples from at least one time point; 12 of these had paired sequencing results from before and after chemo + H and 10 had successful sequencing from either time point. TP53 was the only significantly recurrently mutated gene in both pre- and post-treatment samples. MYC gene amplification was observed in four post-treatment tumors. Seven of 12 patients with paired samples showed acquired and/or clonally enriched alterations in cancer-related genes. One patient had an increased clonality putative activating mutation in ERBB2. Another patient acquired a clonal hotspot mutation in TP53. Other genomic changes acquired in post-treatment specimens included alterations in NOTCH2, STIL, PIK3CA, and GATA3. There was no significant change in median ERBB2 CN (20.3 v 22.6; Wilcoxon P = .79) between paired samples. CONCLUSION ERBB2-positive BCs in young women displayed substantial genomic evolution after treatment with chemo + H. Approximately half of patients with paired samples demonstrated acquired and/or clonally enriched genomic changes in cancer genes. ERBB2 CN changes were uncommon. We identified several genes warranting exploration as potential mechanisms of resistance to therapy in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla Lipsyc-Sharf
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Esha Jain
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Repare Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA
| | - Laura C Collins
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Steven E Come
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Breast Medical Oncology Program, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Ellen Warner
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig Snow
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Ian E Krop
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
| | - Dewey Kim
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Jakob Weiss
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Jorge Gomez Tejeda Zanudo
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Adrienne G Waks
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liu Q, Liu Y, Li X, Wang D, Zhang A, Pang J, He J, Chen X, Tang NJ. Perfluoroalkyl substances promote breast cancer progression via ERα and GPER mediated PI3K/Akt and MAPK/Erk signaling pathways. ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY 2023; 258:114980. [PMID: 37148752 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a classic environmental endocrine disruptor with carcinogenic risk. Epidemiological studies have shown that PFASs contamination is associated with breast cancer development, but the mechanism remains largely unknown. This study first obtained complex biological information about PFASs-induced breast cancer through the comparative toxicogenomics database (CTD). The Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) analysis were utilized to investigate molecular pathways. The ESR1 and GPER expression levels at different pathological stages and the prognosis of Breast Cancer patients were confirmed using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Furthermore, we verified this by cellular experiments and the results showed breast cancer cell migration and invasion were promoted by PFOA. Two estrogen receptors (ER), ERα and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), mediated the promoting effects of PFOA by activating MAPK/Erk and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways. These pathways were regulated by ERα and GPER in MCF-7 cells or independently by GPER in MDA-MB-231 cells. Overall, our study provides a better overview of the mechanisms associated with PFASs-induced breast cancer development and progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianfeng Liu
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
| | - Yongzhe Liu
- Department of Toxicology and Sanitary Chemistry, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
| | - Xiaoyu Li
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
| | - Dan Wang
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
| | - Ai Zhang
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
| | - Jing Pang
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China; Hohhot Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hohhot 010070, China
| | - Jiayu He
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
| | - Nai-Jun Tang
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Osman K, Ahmet K, Hilmi T, İlker N, Ercan Ö, Devrim Ç, Murat S, Emre Ç, İlhan H, Mustafa G, Yüksel Ü, Bahiddin Y, Cihan E, Mehmet Ali NŞ, Emrah E, Umut D, Zeynep O, Mehmet Ali K, Ali G, İvo G, Erkan Ö, Muhammet B, Bülent E, Selma D, Sernaz U, Mahmut G, Hakan G, İrfan Ç. BRCA 1/BRCA 2 Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic Variant Patients with Breast, Ovarian, and Other Cancers. Balkan J Med Genet 2023; 25:5-14. [PMID: 37265975 PMCID: PMC10230841 DOI: 10.2478/bjmg-2022-0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who have BRCA 1/BRCA 2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants may differ from their relatives who had BRCA-related cancer. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the clinical and demographic findings of patients who had BRCA-related cancer and to assess the differences comparing their relatives who had BRCA-related cancer with breast, genital tract, prostate, and pancreas cancers as well. The results of sequencing analysis of 200 cancer patients (190 women, 10 men) who have been directed to genetic counseling with an indication of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing from different regions across 9 medical oncology centers were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 200 consecutive cancer patients who harbored the BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (130 (65%) patients harbored BRCA 1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant, and 70 harbored BRCA 2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant) were included. Of these, 64.0% had breast cancer (43.8% of them had the triple-negative disease, and about 2.3% had only the HER-2 mutant), 31.5% had genital cancers (92.1% of them had ovarian cancer, 3.2% had endometrium, and 1.6% had peritoneum cancer as the primary site and mostly serous adenocarcinoma was the most common histopathology and 14.3% of the patients had endometrioid adenocarcinoma), 3.5% had prostate (median time from metastasis to castration-resistant status was 28 months) and 1.0% had pancreas cancer. Newly diagnosed cancer (breast and ovary) patients who had BRCA 1/BRCA 2 pathogenic/ likely pathogenic variant were younger than their previous cancer diagnosed (breast, ovary, and pancreas) parents who harbored BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant. We suggest that the genetic screening of BRCA 1/ BRCA 2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant is needed as a routine screening for those with a personal or family history of breast, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer. In addition, once BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 germline pathogenic variant has been identified in a family, testing of at-risk next-generation relatives earlier can identify those family members who also have the familial pathogenic variant, and thus need increased surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Osman
- Marmara University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - K. Ahmet
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Oncology, Edirne, Turkey
| | - T. Hilmi
- Namık Kemal University, Department of Medical Genetic, Tekirdag, Turkey
| | - N.O. İlker
- Medeniyet University, Department of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ö. Ercan
- Kocaeli University, Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Ç. Devrim
- Kocaeli University, Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - S. Murat
- Marmara University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ç. Emre
- Sakarya University, Department of Medical Oncology, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - H. İlhan
- Sakarya University, Department of Medical Oncology, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - G. Mustafa
- Ankara university, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ü. Yüksel
- Ankara university, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Y. Bahiddin
- Ondokuz Mayıs University, Department of Medical Oncology, Samsun, Turkey
| | - E. Cihan
- Ankara City Hospital, Yildirim Beyazit University, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - N. Ş. Mehmet Ali
- Ankara City Hospital, Yildirim Beyazit University, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - E. Emrah
- University of Health Sciences, Dr. A.Y Ankara Oncology Research and Education Hospital, Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - D. Umut
- University of Health Sciences, Dr. A.Y Ankara Oncology Research and Education Hospital, Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey
| | - O. Zeynep
- Dicle University, Department of Medical Oncology, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - K. Mehmet Ali
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Genetic, Edirne, Turkey
| | - G. Ali
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Oncology, Edirne, Turkey
| | - G. İvo
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Oncology, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Ö. Erkan
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Oncology, Edirne, Turkey
| | - B.H. Muhammet
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Oncology, Edirne, Turkey
| | - E. Bülent
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Oncology, Edirne, Turkey
| | - D. Selma
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Genetic, Edirne, Turkey
| | - U. Sernaz
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Oncology, Edirne, Turkey
| | - G. Mahmut
- Medeniyet University, Department of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - G. Hakan
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Genetic, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Ç. İrfan
- Trakya University, Department of Medical Oncology, Edirne, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nacer DF, Vallon-Christersson J, Nordborg N, Ehrencrona H, Kvist A, Borg Å, Staaf J. Molecular characteristics of breast tumors in patients screened for germline predisposition from a population-based observational study. Genome Med 2023; 15:25. [PMID: 37060015 PMCID: PMC10103478 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-023-01177-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in certain genes are linked to higher lifetime risk of developing breast cancer and can influence preventive surgery decisions and therapy choices. Public health programs offer genetic screening based on criteria designed to assess personal risk and identify individuals more likely to carry PGVs, dividing patients into screened and non-screened groups. How tumor biology and clinicopathological characteristics differ between these groups is understudied and could guide refinement of screening criteria. METHODS Six thousand six hundred sixty breast cancer patients diagnosed in South Sweden during 2010-2018 were included with available clinicopathological and RNA sequencing data, 900 (13.5%) of which had genes screened for PGVs through routine clinical screening programs. We compared characteristics of screened patients and tumors to non-screened patients, as well as between screened patients with (n = 124) and without (n = 776) PGVs. RESULTS Broadly, breast tumors in screened patients showed features of a more aggressive disease. However, few differences related to tumor biology or patient outcome remained significant after stratification by clinical subgroups or PAM50 subtypes. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the subgroup most enriched for PGVs, showed the most differences between screening subpopulations (e.g., higher tumor proliferation in screened cases). Significant differences in PGV prevalence were found between clinical subgroups/molecular subtypes, e.g., TNBC cases were enriched for BRCA1 PGVs. In general, clinicopathological differences between screened and non-screened patients mimicked those between patients with and without PGVs, e.g., younger age at diagnosis for positive cases. However, differences in tumor biology/microenvironment such as immune cell composition were additionally seen within PGV carriers/non-carriers in ER + /HER2 - cases, but not between screening subpopulations in this subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Characterization of molecular tumor features in patients clinically screened and not screened for PGVs represents a relevant read-out of guideline criteria. The general lack of molecular differences between screened/non-screened patients after stratification by relevant breast cancer subsets questions the ability to improve the identification of screening candidates based on currently used patient and tumor characteristics, pointing us towards universal screening. Nevertheless, while that is not attained, molecular differences identified between PGV carriers/non-carriers suggest the possibility of further refining patient selection within certain patient subsets using RNA-seq through, e.g., gene signatures. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network - Breast (SCAN-B) was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT02306096.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah F Nacer
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, SE-22381, Sweden
| | | | - Nicklas Nordborg
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hans Ehrencrona
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Laboratory Medicine, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anders Kvist
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Åke Borg
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johan Staaf
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, SE-22381, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Morra A, Mavaddat N, Muranen TA, Ahearn TU, Allen J, Andrulis IL, Auvinen P, Becher H, Behrens S, Blomqvist C, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Brauch H, Camp NJ, Carvalho S, Castelao JE, Cessna MH, Chang-Claude J, Chenevix-Trench G, Czene K, Decker B, Dennis J, Dörk T, Dorling L, Dunning AM, Ekici AB, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Figueroa JD, Flyger H, Gago-Dominguez M, García-Closas M, Geurts-Giele WRR, Giles GG, Guénel P, Gündert M, Hahnen E, Hall P, Hamann U, Harrington PA, He W, Heikkilä P, Hooning MJ, Hoppe R, Howell A, Humphreys K, Jakubowska A, Jung AY, Keeman R, Kristensen VN, Lubiński J, Mannermaa A, Manoochehri M, Manoukian S, Margolin S, Mavroudis D, Milne RL, Mulligan AM, Newman WG, Park-Simon TW, Peterlongo P, Pharoah PDP, Rhenius V, Saloustros E, Sawyer EJ, Schmutzler RK, Shah M, Spurdle AB, Tomlinson I, Truong T, van Veen EM, Vreeswijk MPG, Wang Q, Wendt C, Yang XR, Nevanlinna H, Devilee P, Easton DF, Schmidt MK. The impact of coding germline variants on contralateral breast cancer risk and survival. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:475-486. [PMID: 36827971 PMCID: PMC10027471 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Evidence linking coding germline variants in breast cancer (BC)-susceptibility genes other than BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2 with contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the association of protein-truncating variants (PTVs) and rare missense variants (MSVs) in nine known (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) and 25 suspected BC-susceptibility genes with CBC risk and BCSS. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with Cox regression models. Analyses included 34,401 women of European ancestry diagnosed with BC, including 676 CBCs and 3,449 BC deaths; the median follow-up was 10.9 years. Subtype analyses were based on estrogen receptor (ER) status of the first BC. Combined PTVs and pathogenic/likely pathogenic MSVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 and PTVs in CHEK2 and PALB2 were associated with increased CBC risk [HRs (95% CIs): 2.88 (1.70-4.87), 2.31 (1.39-3.85), 8.29 (2.53-27.21), 2.25 (1.55-3.27), and 2.67 (1.33-5.35), respectively]. The strongest evidence of association with BCSS was for PTVs and pathogenic/likely pathogenic MSVs in BRCA2 (ER-positive BC) and TP53 and PTVs in CHEK2 [HRs (95% CIs): 1.53 (1.13-2.07), 2.08 (0.95-4.57), and 1.39 (1.13-1.72), respectively, after adjusting for tumor characteristics and treatment]. HRs were essentially unchanged when censoring for CBC, suggesting that these associations are not completely explained by increased CBC risk, tumor characteristics, or treatment. There was limited evidence of associations of PTVs and/or rare MSVs with CBC risk or BCSS for the 25 suspected BC genes. The CBC findings are relevant to treatment decisions, follow-up, and screening after BC diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Morra
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Molecular Pathology, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Nasim Mavaddat
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Taru A Muranen
- University of Helsinki, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Thomas U Ahearn
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jamie Allen
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Department of Molecular Genetics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Päivi Auvinen
- University of Eastern Finland, Translational Cancer Research Area, Kuopio, Finland; University of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oncology, Kuopio, Finland; Kuopio University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Heiko Becher
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Behrens
- German Cancer Research Center, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- University of Helsinki, Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany; University of Tübingen, iFIT-Cluster of Excellence, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nicola J Camp
- University of Utah, Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sara Carvalho
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jose E Castelao
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo-SERGAS, Oncology and Genetics Unit, Vigo, Spain
| | | | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- German Cancer Research Center, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | -
- Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway; Vestre Viken Hospital, Department of Research, Drammen, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Department of Oncology, Division of Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation Medicine, Oslo, Norway; Akershus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Lørenskog, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo Breast Cancer Research Consortium, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo, Norway; The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Community Medicine, Tromsø, Norway; The Arctic University of Norway, Core Facility for Biobanking, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kamila Czene
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brennan Decker
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Pathology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Joe Dennis
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Hannover Medical School, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover, Germany
| | - Leila Dorling
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alison M Dunning
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Arif B Ekici
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute of Human Genetics, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Gareth Evans
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jonine D Figueroa
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA; The University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK; The University of Edinburgh, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Genomic Medicine Group, International Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology Group, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash University, Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Pascal Guénel
- INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Melanie Gündert
- German Cancer Research Center, Molecular Epidemiology Group, C080, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Per Hall
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden; Södersjukhuset, Department of Oncology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- German Cancer Research Center, Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patricia A Harrington
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Wei He
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Päivi Heikkilä
- University of Helsinki, Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany; University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anthony Howell
- University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, UK
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | -
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Research Department, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Szczecin, Poland; Pomeranian Medical University, Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Audrey Y Jung
- German Cancer Research Center, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Renske Keeman
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Molecular Pathology, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- University of Oslo, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- University of Eastern Finland, Translational Cancer Research Area, Kuopio, Finland; University of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Kuopio, Finland; Kuopio University Hospital, Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mehdi Manoochehri
- German Cancer Research Center, Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Margolin
- Södersjukhuset, Department of Oncology, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- University Hospital of Heraklion, Department of Medical Oncology, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash University, Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- University of Toronto, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Laboratory Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William G Newman
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Paolo Peterlongo
- IFOM ETS - the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Genome Diagnostics Program, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK; University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Valerie Rhenius
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Elinor J Sawyer
- King's College London, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Guy's Campus, London, UK
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mitul Shah
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Program, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- University of Birmingham, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Birmingham, UK; University of Oxford, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Thérèse Truong
- INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Elke M van Veen
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, UK
| | - Maaike P G Vreeswijk
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Qin Wang
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Camilla Wendt
- Södersjukhuset, Department of Oncology, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xiaohong R Yang
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- University of Helsinki, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Douglas F Easton
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK; University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Molecular Pathology, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 Amsterdam, the Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fencer MG, Krupa KA, Bleich GC, Grumet S, Eladoumikdachi FG, Kumar S, Kowzun MJ, Potdevin LB. Diagnosis, Management, and Surveillance for Patients With PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM Gene Mutations. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:e194-e199. [PMID: 36966080 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to capture clinical and surgical practice patterns of patients with deleterious mutations in partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2), checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) and ataxia telangiesctasia mutated (ATM) genes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is a retrospective chart review of patients with PALB2, CHEK2 or ATM mutations. Patient demographics, testing indications, management decisions, and surveillance strategies were recorded. RESULTS Sixty-two patients were found to have deleterious mutations: 14 (23%) with a PALB2 mutation, 30 (48%) with a CHEK2 mutation, and 18 (29%) patients with an ATM mutation. Thirty-one (50%) patients have a history of breast cancer. Twenty-three patients were diagnosed and treated prior to genetic testing while 8 patients learned of their mutation status and breast cancer diagnosis simultaneously. Of these 8 patients, 4 sought treatment at our institution, 3 underwent bilateral mastectomy, and 1 patient opted for lumpectomy and surveillance. Thirty-one patients had no history of breast cancer. After genetic diagnosis, 3 of the 9 patients who continued clinical follow-up proceeded with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy within 2 years. Clinical surveillance continued for 23 months on average. CONCLUSION Most patients who learned of their genetic and breast cancer diagnoses simultaneously underwent bilateral mastectomy, whereas only a third of patients without cancer opted for bilateral prophylactic mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria G Fencer
- Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
| | - Kelly A Krupa
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Sherry Grumet
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Shicha Kumar
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Maria J Kowzun
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Keskin Karakoyun H, Yüksel ŞK, Amanoglu I, Naserikhojasteh L, Yeşilyurt A, Yakıcıer C, Timuçin E, Akyerli CB. Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer. Front Genet 2023; 14:1052383. [PMID: 36896237 PMCID: PMC9988940 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1052383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Identifying pathogenic missense variants in hereditary cancer is critical to the efforts of patient surveillance and risk-reduction strategies. For this purpose, many different gene panels consisting of different number and/or set of genes are available and we are particularly interested in a panel of 26 genes with a varying degree of hereditary cancer risk consisting of ABRAXAS1, ATM, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, EPCAM, MEN1, MLH1, MRE11, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53, and XRCC2. In this study, we have compiled a collection of the missense variations reported in any of these 26 genes. More than a thousand missense variants were collected from ClinVar and the targeted screen of a breast cancer cohort of 355 patients which contributed to this set with 160 novel missense variations. We analyzed the impact of the missense variations on protein stability by five different predictors including both sequence- (SAAF2EC and MUpro) and structure-based (Maestro, mCSM, CUPSAT) predictors. For the structure-based tools, we have utilized the AlphaFold (AF2) protein structures which comprise the first structural analysis of this hereditary cancer proteins. Our results agreed with the recent benchmarks that computed the power of stability predictors in discriminating the pathogenic variants. Overall, we reported a low-to-medium-level performance for the stability predictors in discriminating pathogenic variants, except MUpro which had an AUROC of 0.534 (95% CI [0.499-0.570]). The AUROC values ranged between 0.614-0.719 for the total set and 0.596-0.682 for the set with high AF2 confidence regions. Furthermore, our findings revealed that the confidence score for a given variant in the AF2 structure could alone predict pathogenicity more robustly than any of the tested stability predictors with an AUROC of 0.852. Altogether, this study represents the first structural analysis of the 26 hereditary cancer genes underscoring 1) the thermodynamic stability predicted from AF2 structures as a moderate and 2) the confidence score of AF2 as a strong descriptor for variant pathogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilal Keskin Karakoyun
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Şirin K Yüksel
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ilayda Amanoglu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Lara Naserikhojasteh
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ahmet Yeşilyurt
- Acibadem Labgen Genetic Diagnosis Centre, Acibadem Health Group, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Cengiz Yakıcıer
- Acibadem Pathology Laboratories, Acibadem Health Group, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Emel Timuçin
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Cemaliye B Akyerli
- Department of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Germline Variants in 32 Cancer-Related Genes among 700 Chinese Breast Cancer Patients by Next-Generation Sequencing: A Clinic-Based, Observational Study. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231911266. [PMID: 36232564 PMCID: PMC9570072 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is associated with hereditary components, and some deleterious germline variants have been regarded as effective therapeutic targets. We conducted a clinic-based, observational study to better understand the distribution of deleterious germline variants and assess any clinicopathological predictors related to the variants among Chinese BC patients using a 32 cancer-related genes next-generation sequencing panel. Between November 2020 and February 2022, a total of 700 BC patients were recruited, and 13.1% (92/700) of them carried deleterious germline variants in 15 cancer-related genes, including 37 (37/700, 5.3%) in BRCA2, 29 (29/700, 4.1%) in BRCA1, 8 (8/700, 1.1%) in PALB2, 4 (4/700, 0.6%) in NBN, 3 (3/700, 0.4%) in MRE11A, 3 (3/700, 0.4%) in TP53 and 12 (12/700, 1.7%) in other genes. There were 28 novel variants detected: 5 in BRCA1, 14 in BRCA2, and 9 in non-BRCA1/2 genes. The variants in panel genes, HRR (homologous recombination repair)-related genes, and BRCA1/2 were significantly associated with the following clinicopathological factors: age at the initial diagnosis of BC, family history of any cancer, molecular subtype, Ki-67 index, and hereditary risk. In conclusion, we further expanded the spectrum of germline deleterious variants in Chinese BC patients, and the clinicopathological predictors of variants were identified to facilitate clinical genetic testing and counseling for appropriate individuals.
Collapse
|
28
|
Yang G, Lu T, Weisenberger DJ, Liang G. The Multi-Omic Landscape of Primary Breast Tumors and Their Metastases: Expanding the Efficacy of Actionable Therapeutic Targets. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13091555. [PMID: 36140723 PMCID: PMC9498783 DOI: 10.3390/genes13091555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) mortality is almost exclusively due to metastasis, which is the least understood aspect of cancer biology and represents a significant clinical challenge. Although we have witnessed tremendous advancements in the treatment for metastatic breast cancer (mBC), treatment resistance inevitably occurs in most patients. Recently, efforts in characterizing mBC revealed distinctive genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic (multi-omic) landscapes to that of the primary tumor. Understanding of the molecular underpinnings of mBC is key to understanding resistance to therapy and the development of novel treatment options. This review summarizes the differential molecular landscapes of BC and mBC, provides insights into the genomic heterogeneity of mBC and highlights the therapeutically relevant, multi-omic features that may serve as novel therapeutic targets for mBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang Yang
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211121, China
- China Grand Enterprises, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Tao Lu
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211121, China
- State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211121, China
| | - Daniel J. Weisenberger
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Gangning Liang
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fiesco-Roa MÓ, García-de Teresa B, Leal-Anaya P, van ‘t Hek R, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Frías S, Rodríguez A. Fanconi anemia and dyskeratosis congenita/telomere biology disorders: Two inherited bone marrow failure syndromes with genomic instability. Front Oncol 2022; 12:949435. [PMID: 36091172 PMCID: PMC9453478 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.949435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) are a complex and heterogeneous group of genetic diseases. To date, at least 13 IBMFS have been characterized. Their pathophysiology is associated with germline pathogenic variants in genes that affect hematopoiesis. A couple of these diseases also have genomic instability, Fanconi anemia due to DNA damage repair deficiency and dyskeratosis congenita/telomere biology disorders as a result of an alteration in telomere maintenance. Patients can have extramedullary manifestations, including cancer and functional or structural physical abnormalities. Furthermore, the phenotypic spectrum varies from cryptic features to patients with significantly evident manifestations. These diseases require a high index of suspicion and should be considered in any patient with abnormal hematopoiesis, even if extramedullary manifestations are not evident. This review describes the disrupted cellular processes that lead to the affected maintenance of the genome structure, contrasting the dysmorphological and oncological phenotypes of Fanconi anemia and dyskeratosis congenita/telomere biology disorders. Through a dysmorphological analysis, we describe the phenotypic features that allow to make the differential diagnosis and the early identification of patients, even before the onset of hematological or oncological manifestations. From the oncological perspective, we analyzed the spectrum and risks of cancers in patients and carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moisés Ó. Fiesco-Roa
- Laboratorio de Citogenética, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, Mexico
- Maestría y Doctorado en Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | | | - Paula Leal-Anaya
- Departamento de Genética Humana, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Renée van ‘t Hek
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autoínoma de Meíxico (UNAM), Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Talia Wegman-Ostrosky
- Subdirección de Investigación Básica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Sara Frías
- Laboratorio de Citogenética, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, Mexico
- Departamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Alfredo Rodríguez, ; Sara Frías,
| | - Alfredo Rodríguez
- Departamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México, Mexico
- Unidad de Genética de la Nutrición, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Alfredo Rodríguez, ; Sara Frías,
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Guo F, Scholl M, Fuchs EL, Berenson AB, Kuo YF. BRCA testing and testing results among women 18–65 years old. Prev Med Rep 2022; 26:101738. [PMID: 35242503 PMCID: PMC8866899 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA testing rate increased from 2007 to 2017. Documented positive test rate was decreasing 2007 to 2017. The trend in documented positive test rate differed across races/ethnicities. It suggests of a divergent application of the same testing criteria.
Since the 1990 s discovery of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in breast or ovarian cancer patients, genetic testing has been recommended as part of a targeted, individualized approach for cancer prevention and treatment in eligible individuals. The aim of this study was to assess trends in BRCA test rates and results among adult women aged 18 to 65 in the US between 2007 and 2017. Using Clinformatics© Data Mart (CDM) Electronic Health Records, we included 223,211 women 18–65 years old with documented BRCA testing results from 1/1/2007–9/30/2017. Positive results indicated the presence of pathogenic variantss. BRCA test rates increased significantly from 34 per 100,000 women in 2007 to 488 per 100,000 women in 2016 (APC 30.8, 95% confidence interval 26.6–35.1). Documented positive results decreased from 86.1% in 2007 to 78.0% in 2017(APC −0.6, 95% confidence interval −1.4–0.2). From 2007 to 2017, decreasing trends in the rates of documented positive results were observed among all three age groups (18–39, 40–54, and 55–65 years; largest in 40–54 group). In 2015–2017, women with positive test results were less likely to be non–Hispanic Whites, cancer patients, or living in the Northeast or an area with average household income ≥$50,000. Between 2007 and 2017, increasing use of BRCA testing for cancer prevention and treatment occurred, correlating to the observed decreasing documented positive test rate. The utilization of testing and corresponding test results differed significantly across races/ethnicities, suggestive of a divergent application of the same testing criteria.
Collapse
|
31
|
Rhiem K, Auber B, Briest S, Dikow N, Ditsch N, Dragicevic N, Grill S, Hahnen E, Horvath J, Jaeger B, Kast K, Kiechle M, Leinert E, Morlot S, Püsken M, Schäfer D, Schott S, Schroeder C, Siebers-Renelt U, Solbach C, Weber-Lassalle N, Witzel I, Zeder-Göß C, Schmutzler RK. Consensus Recommendations of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:199-207. [PMID: 35702495 PMCID: PMC9149395 DOI: 10.1159/000516376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) has established a multigene panel (TruRisk®) for the analysis of risk genes for familial breast and ovarian cancer. SUMMARY An interdisciplinary team of experts from the GC-HBOC has evaluated the available data on risk modification in the presence of pathogenic mutations in these genes based on a structured literature search and through a formal consensus process. KEY MESSAGES The goal of this work is to better assess individual disease risk and, on this basis, to derive clinical recommendations for patient counseling and care at the centers of the GC-HBOC from the initial consultation prior to genetic testing to the use of individual risk-adapted preventive/therapeutic measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bernd Auber
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Susanne Briest
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Neda Dragicevic
- Institute of Human Genetics, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Grill
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Judit Horvath
- Institute for Human Genetics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Bernadette Jaeger
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Elena Leinert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Susanne Morlot
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Püsken
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dieter Schäfer
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christopher Schroeder
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Christine Solbach
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nana Weber-Lassalle
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christine Zeder-Göß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Toss A, Quarello P, Mascarin M, Banna GL, Zecca M, Cinieri S, Peccatori FA, Ferrari A. Cancer Predisposition Genes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs): a Review Paper from the Italian AYA Working Group. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:843-860. [PMID: 35320498 PMCID: PMC9170630 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01213-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The present narrative systematic review summarizes current knowledge on germline gene mutations predisposing to solid tumors in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). RECENT FINDINGS AYAs with cancer represent a particular group of patients with specific challenging characteristics and yet unmet needs. A significant percentage of AYA patients carry pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) in cancer predisposition genes. Nevertheless, knowledge on spectrum, frequency, and clinical implications of germline variants in AYAs with solid tumors is limited. The identification of PV/LPV in AYA is especially critical given the need for appropriate communicative strategies, risk of second primary cancers, need for personalized long-term surveillance, potential reproductive implications, and cascade testing of at-risk family members. Moreover, these gene alterations may potentially provide novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets that are lacking in AYA patients. Among young adults with early-onset phenotypes of malignancies typically presenting at later ages, the increased prevalence of germline PV/LPVs supports a role for genetic counseling and testing irrespective of tumor type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Paola Quarello
- Paediatric Onco-Haematology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Division, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy
- Department of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Maurizio Mascarin
- AYA Oncology and Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Luigi Banna
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, SP142, km 3.95, 10060, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
| | - Marco Zecca
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- Medical Oncology Unit and Breast Unit Ospedale Perrino ASL, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mavaddat N, Dorling L, Carvalho S, Allen J, González-Neira A, Keeman R, Bolla MK, Dennis J, Wang Q, Ahearn TU, Andrulis IL, Beckmann MW, Behrens S, Benitez J, Bermisheva M, Blomqvist C, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Briceno I, Brüning T, Camp NJ, Campbell A, Castelao JE, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Chenevix-Trench G, Christiansen H, Czene K, Dörk T, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Figueroa JD, Flyger H, Gabrielson M, Gago-Dominguez M, Geisler J, Giles GG, Guénel P, Hadjisavvas A, Hahnen E, Hall P, Hamann U, Hartikainen JM, Hartman M, Hoppe R, Howell A, Jakubowska A, Jung A, Khusnutdinova EK, Kristensen VN, Li J, Lim SH, Lindblom A, Loizidou MA, Lophatananon A, Lubinski J, Madsen MJ, Mannermaa A, Manoochehri M, Margolin S, Mavroudis D, Milne RL, Mohd Taib NA, Morra A, Muir K, Obi N, Osorio A, Park-Simon TW, Peterlongo P, Radice P, Saloustros E, Sawyer EJ, Schmutzler RK, Shah M, Sim X, Southey MC, Thorne H, Tomlinson I, Torres D, Truong T, Yip CH, Spurdle AB, Vreeswijk MPG, Dunning AM, García-Closas M, Pharoah PDP, Kvist A, Muranen TA, Nevanlinna H, Teo SH, Devilee P, Schmidt MK, Easton DF. Pathology of Tumors Associated With Pathogenic Germline Variants in 9 Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:e216744. [PMID: 35084436 PMCID: PMC8796069 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Rare germline genetic variants in several genes are associated with increased breast cancer (BC) risk, but their precise contributions to different disease subtypes are unclear. This information is relevant to guidelines for gene panel testing and risk prediction. OBJECTIVE To characterize tumors associated with BC susceptibility genes in large-scale population- or hospital-based studies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The multicenter, international case-control analysis of the BRIDGES study included 42 680 patients and 46 387 control participants, comprising women aged 18 to 79 years who were sampled independently of family history from 38 studies. Studies were conducted between 1991 and 2016. Sequencing and analysis took place between 2016 and 2021. EXPOSURES Protein-truncating variants and likely pathogenic missense variants in ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The intrinsic-like BC subtypes as defined by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and ERBB2 (formerly known as HER2) status, and tumor grade; morphology; size; stage; lymph node involvement; subtype-specific odds ratios (ORs) for carrying protein-truncating variants and pathogenic missense variants in the 9 BC susceptibility genes. RESULTS The mean (SD) ages at interview (control participants) and diagnosis (cases) were 55.1 (11.9) and 55.8 (10.6) years, respectively; all participants were of European or East Asian ethnicity. There was substantial heterogeneity in the distribution of intrinsic subtypes by gene. RAD51C, RAD51D, and BARD1 variants were associated mainly with triple-negative disease (OR, 6.19 [95% CI, 3.17-12.12]; OR, 6.19 [95% CI, 2.99-12.79]; and OR, 10.05 [95% CI, 5.27-19.19], respectively). CHEK2 variants were associated with all subtypes (with ORs ranging from 2.21-3.17) except for triple-negative disease. For ATM variants, the association was strongest for the hormone receptor (HR)+ERBB2- high-grade subtype (OR, 4.99; 95% CI, 3.68-6.76). BRCA1 was associated with increased risk of all subtypes, but the ORs varied widely, being highest for triple-negative disease (OR, 55.32; 95% CI, 40.51-75.55). BRCA2 and PALB2 variants were also associated with triple-negative disease. TP53 variants were most strongly associated with HR+ERBB2+ and HR-ERBB2+ subtypes. Tumors occurring in pathogenic variant carriers were of higher grade. For most genes and subtypes, a decline in ORs was observed with increasing age. Together, the 9 genes were associated with 27.3% of all triple-negative tumors in women 40 years or younger. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this case-control study suggest that variants in the 9 BC risk genes differ substantially in their associated pathology but are generally associated with triple-negative and/or high-grade disease. Knowing the age and tumor subtype distributions associated with individual BC genes can potentially aid guidelines for gene panel testing, risk prediction, and variant classification and guide targeted screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nasim Mavaddat
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Leila Dorling
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Sara Carvalho
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Jamie Allen
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Anna González-Neira
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Renske Keeman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Thomas U Ahearn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Javier Benitez
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain.,Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Bermisheva
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Natalia V Bogdanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Thomas Brüning
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nicola J Camp
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Archie Campbell
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.,Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Jose E Castelao
- Oncology and Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo-SERGAS, Vigo, Spain
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, England.,North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, England
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.,David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles
| | - Jonine D Figueroa
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.,Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Marike Gabrielson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Jürgen Geisler
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Campus at Akershus University Hospital, Norway
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, Gustave Roussy, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - Andreas Hadjisavvas
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics and Ultrastructural Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.,Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jaana M Hartikainen
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.,University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Audrey Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elza K Khusnutdinova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia.,Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State University, Ufa, Russia
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jingmei Li
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Human Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Swee Ho Lim
- Breast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Breast Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria A Loizidou
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Therapeutics and Ultrastructural Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.,Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Artitaya Lophatananon
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Michael J Madsen
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mehdi Manoochehri
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine University of Malaya, UM Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kenneth Muir
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - Nadia Obi
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ana Osorio
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Genome Diagnostics Program, IFOM-the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Elinor J Sawyer
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Guy's Campus, King's College London, London, England
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Xueling Sim
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Heather Thorne
- Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.,Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | - Diana Torres
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute of Human Genetics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, Gustave Roussy, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - Cheng Har Yip
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine University of Malaya, UM Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Maaike P G Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.,Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Anders Kvist
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Taru A Muranen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Soo Hwang Teo
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine University of Malaya, UM Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Breast Cancer Research Programme, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.,Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Collet L, Péron J, Penault-Llorca F, Pujol P, Lopez J, Freyer G, You B. PARP Inhibitors: A Major Therapeutic Option in Endocrine-Receptor Positive Breast Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030599. [PMID: 35158866 PMCID: PMC8833594 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary OlympiAD and EMBRACA trials demonstrated the efficacy of PARPi, compared to chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers (mBC) carrying a germline BRCA mutation. Patients with ER+/HER2-BRCA-mutated mBC seemed to have a higher risk of early disease progression while on CDK4/6 inhibitors and benefit from PARPi, especially when prescribed before chemotherapy. Importantly, the frequency of BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) carriers among ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients has been underestimated, and 50% of all BRCA1/2 mutated breast cancers are actually of ER+/HER2- subtype. Recent studies also highlight the benefit of PARPi in BRCA wild type mBC with HRD representing up to 20% of ER+/HER2- breast cancers. The OLYMPIA trial also demonstrated PARPi utility in patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancers with BRCA PV at high risk of relapse. Consequently, implementation of early genotyping and new strategies for identifying patients with high-risk ER+/HER2- HRD breast cancers likely to benefit from PARPi is of high importance. Abstract Recently, OlympiAD and EMBRACA trials demonstrated the favorable efficacy/toxicity ratio of PARPi, compared to chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers (mBC) carrying a germline BRCA mutation. PARPi have been largely adopted in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer, but their place has been less clearly defined in endocrine-receptor positive, HER2 negative (ER+/ HER2-) mBC. The present narrative review aims at addressing this question by identifying the patients that are more likely benefit from PARPi. Frequencies of BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) carriers among ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients have been underestimated, and many experts assume than 50% of all BRCA1/2 mutated breast cancers are of ER+/HER2- subtype. Patients with ER+/HER2- BRCA-mutated mBC seemed to have a higher risk of early disease progression while on CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARPi are effective especially when prescribed before exposure to chemotherapy. The OLYMPIA trial also highlighted the utility of PARPi in patients with early breast cancers at high risk of relapse and carrying PV of BRCA. PARPi might also be effective in patients with HRD diseases, representing up to 20% of ER+/HER2- breast cancers. Consequently, the future implementation of early genotyping strategies for identifying the patients with high-risk ER+/HER2- HRD breast cancers likely to benefit from PARPi is of high importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laetitia Collet
- Oncology Department, CITOHL, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Cancer Institute of Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France; (L.C.); (J.P.); (G.F.)
- Lyon-Sud Medicine School, University of Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Julien Péron
- Oncology Department, CITOHL, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Cancer Institute of Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France; (L.C.); (J.P.); (G.F.)
- Lyon-Sud Medicine School, University of Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Equipe Biostatistique-Santé, CNRS UMR 5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Frédérique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology and Biopathology, Jean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Center, UMR INSERM 1240, University Clermont Auvergne, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
| | - Pascal Pujol
- Department of Cancer Genetics, CHU Montpellier, UMR IRD 224-CNRS 5290, Université Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France;
- Centre de Recherches Écologiques et Évolutives sur le Cancer (CREEC), UMR 224 CNRS-5290, University of Montpellier, 34394 Montpellier, France
| | - Jonathan Lopez
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Hopital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Gilles Freyer
- Oncology Department, CITOHL, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Cancer Institute of Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France; (L.C.); (J.P.); (G.F.)
- Lyon-Sud Medicine School, University of Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Benoît You
- Oncology Department, CITOHL, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Cancer Institute of Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France; (L.C.); (J.P.); (G.F.)
- Lyon-Sud Medicine School, University of Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-(0)4-78-86-43-18; Fax: +33-(0)4-78-86-43-56
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ueno S, Sudo T, Hirasawa A. ATM: Functions of ATM Kinase and Its Relevance to Hereditary Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:523. [PMID: 35008949 PMCID: PMC8745051 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) functions as a key initiator and coordinator of DNA damage and cellular stress responses. ATM signaling pathways contain many downstream targets that regulate multiple important cellular processes, including DNA damage repair, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, oxidative sensing, and proliferation. Over the past few decades, associations between germline ATM pathogenic variants and cancer risk have been reported, particularly for breast and pancreatic cancers. In addition, given that ATM plays a critical role in repairing double-strand breaks, inhibiting other DNA repair pathways could be a synthetic lethal approach. Based on this rationale, several DNA damage response inhibitors are currently being tested in ATM-deficient cancers. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge related to the structure of the ATM gene, function of ATM kinase, clinical significance of ATM germline pathogenic variants in patients with hereditary cancers, and ongoing efforts to target ATM for the benefit of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayaka Ueno
- Section of Translational Research, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70 Kita-Oji-cho, Akashi-shi 673-8558, Japan;
- Department of Clinical Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan;
| | - Tamotsu Sudo
- Section of Translational Research, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70 Kita-Oji-cho, Akashi-shi 673-8558, Japan;
| | - Akira Hirasawa
- Department of Clinical Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Liu X, Yue J, Pervaiz R, Zhang H, Wang L. Association between fertility treatments and breast cancer risk in women with a family history or BRCA mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:986477. [PMID: 36176466 PMCID: PMC9513064 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.986477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Women with hereditary breast cancer factors are more likely to be infertile and tend to receive fertility treatments. The safety of fertility treatments that contain hormone-related medications for ovarian stimulation has gained wide attention; however, evidence of the safety of fertility treatments is limited. This study aims to assess the association between fertility treatments and the incidence rate of breast cancer in women with a family history of breast cancer or BRCA mutations. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Studies concerning the effect of fertility treatments on breast cancer risk in genetically susceptible women were included. The fixed and random effects models were used to estimate the summary effects. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions instrument was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. A total of 5,282 studies were screened. Five cohort studies and three case-control studies were included. Breast cancer risk was not significantly increased by fertility treatments in general genetically susceptible women [pooled odds ratio (OR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.45], women with a family history of breast cancer (pooled OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.97-1.89), or women with BRCA mutations (pooled OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.74-1.4). In subgroup analyses, there was no significant increase in breast cancer risk whether in BRCA1 mutation carriers (pooled OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.81-1.72), BRCA2 mutation carriers (pooled OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.09-3.34), or in the women treated with in vitro fertilization (pooled OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.51-1.1), clomiphene citrate (pooled OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.78-1.45) or gonadotropins (pooled OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.8-2.18). This is the first meta-analysis concerning the impact of fertility treatments on breast cancer risk in genetically susceptible women. Despite the finding that fertility treatment did not significantly increase breast cancer risk in genetically susceptible women, large prospective cohorts with more detailed information are required. Further investigations are needed to explore subtypes of breast cancer, genetic background of hormone-related breast cancer, and the association between BRCA mutations and the incidence of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO(CRD42021281336).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojing Liu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jing Yue
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ruqiya Pervaiz
- Faculty of Chemical and Life Science, Department of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan
| | - Hanwang Zhang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- *Correspondence: Lan Wang, ; Hanwang Zhang,
| | - Lan Wang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- *Correspondence: Lan Wang, ; Hanwang Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yadav S, Hu C, Nathanson KL, Weitzel JN, Goldgar DE, Kraft P, Gnanaolivu RD, Na J, Huang H, Boddicker NJ, Larson N, Gao C, Yao S, Weinberg C, Vachon CM, Trentham-Dietz A, Taylor JA, Sandler DR, Patel A, Palmer JR, Olson JE, Neuhausen S, Martinez E, Lindstrom S, Lacey JV, Kurian AW, John EM, Haiman C, Bernstein L, Auer PW, Anton-Culver H, Ambrosone CB, Karam R, Chao E, Yussuf A, Pesaran T, Dolinsky JS, Hart SN, LaDuca H, Polley EC, Domchek SM, Couch FJ. Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes Among Women With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3918-3926. [PMID: 34672684 PMCID: PMC8660003 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the contribution of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in hereditary cancer testing panel genes to invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 2,999 women with ILC from a population-based cohort and 3,796 women with ILC undergoing clinical multigene panel testing (clinical cohort). Frequencies of germline PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) were compared between women with ILC and unaffected female controls and between women with ILC and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC). RESULTS The frequency of PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes among women with ILC was 6.5% in the clinical cohort and 5.2% in the population-based cohort. In case-control analysis, CDH1 and BRCA2 PVs were associated with high risks of ILC (odds ratio [OR] > 4) and CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2 PVs were associated with moderate (OR = 2-4) risks. BRCA1 PVs and CHEK2 p.Ile157Thr were not associated with clinically relevant risks (OR < 2) of ILC. Compared with IDC, CDH1 PVs were > 10-fold enriched, whereas PVs in BRCA1 were substantially reduced in ILC. CONCLUSION The study establishes that PVs in ATM, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, and PALB2 are associated with an increased risk of ILC, whereas BRCA1 PVs are not. The similar overall PV frequencies for ILC and IDC suggest that cancer histology should not influence the decision to proceed with genetic testing. Similar to IDC, multigene panel testing may be appropriate for women with ILC, but CDH1 should be specifically discussed because of low prevalence and gastric cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Katherine L. Nathanson
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Peter Kraft
- Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | - Jie Na
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Hongyan Huang
- Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Chi Gao
- Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Song Yao
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Alpa Patel
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Christopher Haiman
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Paul W. Auer
- UWM Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Susan M. Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ho PJ, Khng AJ, Loh HW, Ho WK, Yip CH, Mohd-Taib NA, Tan VKM, Tan BKT, Tan SM, Tan EY, Lim SH, Jamaris S, Sim Y, Wong FY, Ngeow J, Lim EH, Tai MC, Wijaya EA, Lee SC, Chan CW, Buhari SA, Chan PMY, Chen JJC, Seah JCM, Lee WP, Mok CW, Lim GH, Woo E, Kim SW, Lee JW, Lee MH, Park SK, Dunning AM, Easton DF, Schmidt MK, Teo SH, Li J, Hartman M. Germline breast cancer susceptibility genes, tumor characteristics, and survival. Genome Med 2021; 13:185. [PMID: 34857041 PMCID: PMC8638193 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00978-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mutations in certain genes are known to increase breast cancer risk. We study the relevance of rare protein-truncating variants (PTVs) that may result in loss-of-function in breast cancer susceptibility genes on tumor characteristics and survival in 8852 breast cancer patients of Asian descent. METHODS Gene panel sequencing was performed for 34 known or suspected breast cancer predisposition genes, of which nine genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) were associated with breast cancer risk. Associations between PTV carriership in one or more genes and tumor characteristics were examined using multinomial logistic regression. Ten-year overall survival was estimated using Cox regression models in 6477 breast cancer patients after excluding older patients (≥75years) and stage 0 and IV disease. RESULTS PTV9genes carriership (n = 690) was significantly associated (p < 0.001) with more aggressive tumor characteristics including high grade (poorly vs well-differentiated, odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 3.48 [2.35-5.17], moderately vs well-differentiated 2.33 [1.56-3.49]), as well as luminal B [HER-] and triple-negative subtypes (vs luminal A 2.15 [1.58-2.92] and 2.85 [2.17-3.73], respectively), adjusted for age at diagnosis, study, and ethnicity. Associations with grade and luminal B [HER2-] subtype remained significant after excluding BRCA1/2 carriers. PTV25genes carriership (n = 289, excluding carriers of the nine genes associated with breast cancer) was not associated with tumor characteristics. However, PTV25genes carriership, but not PTV9genes carriership, was suggested to be associated with worse 10-year overall survival (hazard ratio [CI] 1.63 [1.16-2.28]). CONCLUSIONS PTV9genes carriership is associated with more aggressive tumors. Variants in other genes might be associated with the survival of breast cancer patients. The finding that PTV carriership is not just associated with higher breast cancer risk, but also more severe and fatal forms of the disease, suggests that genetic testing has the potential to provide additional health information and help healthy individuals make screening decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peh Joo Ho
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alexis J. Khng
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hui Wen Loh
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Weang-Kee Ho
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Jalan Broga, 43500 Semenyih, Selangor Malaysia
- Cancer Research Malaysia, 1 Jalan SS12/1A, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
| | - Cheng Har Yip
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Jalan SS 12/1A, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
| | - Nur Aishah Mohd-Taib
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- UM Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Veronique Kiak Mien Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benita Kiat-Tee Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Su-Ming Tan
- Division of Breast Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ern Yu Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, 308433 Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Swee Ho Lim
- KK Breast Department, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, 229899 Singapore
| | - Suniza Jamaris
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- UM Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yirong Sim
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Fuh Yong Wong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Genetics Service, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke NUS, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elaine Hsuen Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mei Chee Tai
- Cancer Research Malaysia, 1 Jalan SS12/1A, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
| | | | - Soo Chin Lee
- Department of Hematology-oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Health System, Singapore, 119074 Singapore
| | - Ching Wan Chan
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shaik Ahmad Buhari
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Patrick M. Y. Chan
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, 308433 Singapore
| | - Juliana J. C. Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, 308433 Singapore
| | | | - Wai Peng Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chi Wei Mok
- Division of Breast Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Geok Hoon Lim
- KK Breast Department, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, 229899 Singapore
| | - Evan Woo
- KK Breast Department, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, 229899 Singapore
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Breast Care Center, Daerim St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Hyuk Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University and Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sue K. Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marjanka K. Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia, 1 Jalan SS12/1A, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50630 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jingmei Li
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Clinicopathological features and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in a prospective cohort of young women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2021; 126:302-309. [PMID: 34703009 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01597-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer in young women is more likely to have higher risk features and be associated with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. We present the clinicopathologic features of breast cancers in a prospective cohort of young women, and associations between surrogate molecular subtype and BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status. METHODS Histopathological features, biomarker status, tumour stage and BRCA status were collected. Invasive tumours were categorised as luminal A-like (ER + and/or PR + , HER2-, grade 1/2), luminal B-like (ER + and/or PR + , HER2 + , or ER + and/or PR + , HER2-, and grade 3), HER2-enriched (ER/PR-, HER2 + ) or triple-negative. RESULTS In all, 57.3% (654/1143) of invasive tumours were high grade. In total, 32.9% were luminal A-like, 42.4% luminal B-like, 8.3% HER2-enriched, and 16.4% triple-negative. Among different age groups, there were no differences in molecular phenotype, stage, grade or histopathology. 11% (131) of tumours were from BRCA mutation carriers; 64.1% BRCA1 (63.1% triple-negative), and 35.9% BRCA2 (55.3% luminal B-like). DISCUSSION The opportunity to provide comparisons across young age groups, BRCA mutation status, surrogate molecular phenotype, and the identification of more aggressive hormone receptor-positive phenotypes in this population provides direction for future work to further understand and improve disparate outcomes for young women with luminal B-like cancers, particularly BRCA2-associated cancers, with potential implications for tailored prevention and treatment.
Collapse
|
40
|
Identification of women at risk of hereditary breast-ovarian cancer among participants in a population-based breast cancer screening. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:309-318. [PMID: 34669096 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00281-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Women attending mammography screening may benefit from family history (FH) assessment for the identification of Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer (HBOC). Few studies explored the efficacy of tailored educational interventions in driving the attention on FH-associated risk among these women. To compare the efficacy of two educational tools in increasing attention towards FH, 6.802 women with a negative mammography were randomized to receive a note on FH of breast/ovarian cancer (letter A, n = 3.402) or a note with details on possible implication of FH patterns (letter B, n = 3.200). Upon women's request, a brief questionnaire was administered on phone at the Screening Unit (S.U.) to select those eligible for an in-depth FH evaluation at the Genetic Unit (G.U.). Each affected relative was scored 1-3 according to type of cancer, age at diagnosis, gender, position in the family tree. In all, 401 women contacted the S.U.: 244 (6.6%) in group A and 177 (5.2%) in group B (adjOR 1.27; 95%CI 1.03-1.56). FH scored ≥ 3 for 164 women: 177 (47.5%) in group B and 224 (35.7%) in group A, (adjOR 1.59, 95%CI 1.06-2.38). The G.U. traced and interviewed 148 women, 65 (43.9%) were offered an in-person consultation: 38 attended and 30 were eligible for testing. A test was performed for 24 women: no BRCA pathogenic variant was found. Among mammographic screening attendees, educational material with a simple description of FH may improve self-referral of women deserving an in-depth evaluation for HBOC identification. Additional educational efforts are needed to enhance the efficiency of the intervention.
Collapse
|
41
|
Toh M, Ngeow J. Homologous Recombination Deficiency: Cancer Predispositions and Treatment Implications. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1526-e1537. [PMID: 34021944 PMCID: PMC8417864 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination (HR) is a highly accurate DNA repair mechanism. Several HR genes are established cancer susceptibility genes with clinically actionable pathogenic variants (PVs). Classically, BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline PVs are associated with significant breast and ovarian cancer risks. Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs display worse clinical outcomes but respond better to platinum-based chemotherapies and poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, a trait termed "BRCAness." With the advent of whole-exome sequencing and multigene panels, PVs in other HR genes are increasingly identified among familial cancers. As such, several genes such as PALB2 are reclassified as cancer predisposition genes. But evidence for cancer risks remains unclear for many others. In this review, we will discuss cancer predispositions and treatment implications beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2, with a focus on 24 HR genes: 53BP1, ATM, ATR, ATRIP, BARD1, BLM, BRIP1, DMC1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RIF1, RMI1, RMI2, RPA1, TOP3A, TOPBP1, XRCC2, and XRCC3. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This review provides a comprehensive reference for readers to quickly identify potential cancer predisposing homologous recombination (HR) genes, and to generate research questions for genes with inconclusive evidence. This review also evaluates the "BRCAness" of each HR member. Clinicians can refer to these discussions to identify potential candidates for future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MingRen Toh
- Duke–National University of Singapore Medical SchoolSingapore
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer CenterSingapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Vaidyanathan A, Kaklamani V. Understanding the Clinical Implications of Low Penetrant Genes and Breast Cancer Risk. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:85. [PMID: 34424438 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00887-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Since the 2013 Supreme Court declaration, panel testing for hereditary cancer syndromes has evolved into the gold standard for oncology germline genetic testing. With the advent of next-generation sequencing, competitive pricing, and developing therapeutic options, panel testing is now well integrated into breast cancer management and surveillance. Although many established syndromes have well-defined cancer risks and management strategies, several breast cancer genes are currently classified as limited-evidence genes by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Follow-up for individuals with mutations in these genes is a point of contention due to conflicting information in the literature. The most recent NCCN guidelines have stratified management based on gene-specific cancer risks indicating that expanding data will allow for better recommendations as research progresses. The evolving management for these genes emphasizes the clinicians' need for evidence-based understanding of low penetrance breast cancer genes and their implications for patient care. This article reviews current literature for limited evidence genes, detailing cancer risks, association with triple-negative breast cancer, and recommendations for surveillance. A brief review of the challenges and future directions is outlined to discuss the evolving nature of cancer genetics and the exciting opportunities that can impact management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anusha Vaidyanathan
- UT Health Science Center San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Road, San Antonio, TX, 79229, USA.
| | - Virginia Kaklamani
- UT Health Science Center San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Road, San Antonio, TX, 79229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Franchet C, Hoffmann JS, Dalenc F. Recent Advances in Enhancing the Therapeutic Index of PARP Inhibitors in Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164132. [PMID: 34439286 PMCID: PMC8392832 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Two to three percent of breast cancer patients harbor germline mutation of either BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Their tumor cells are deficient in homologous recombination, a BRCA-dependent DNA repair machinery. These deficient cells survive thanks to the PARP-mediated alternative pathway. Therefore, PARP inhibitors have already shown some level of efficiency in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients. Unfortunately, some tumor cells inevitably resist PARP inhibitors by different mechanisms. In this review, we (i) present the notion of homologous recombination deficiency and its evaluation methods, (ii) detail the PARP inhibitor clinical trials in breast cancer, (iii) briefly describe the mechanisms to PARP inhibitors resistance, and (iv) discuss some strategies currently under evaluation to enhance the therapeutic index of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer. Abstract As poly-(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition is synthetic lethal with the deficiency of DNA double-strand (DSB) break repair by homologous recombination (HR), PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are currently used to treat breast cancers with mutated BRCA1/2 HR factors. Unfortunately, the increasingly high rate of PARPi resistance in clinical practice has dented initial hopes. Multiple resistance mechanisms and acquired vulnerabilities revealed in vitro might explain this setback. We describe the mechanisms and vulnerabilities involved, including newly identified modes of regulation of DSB repair that are now being tested in large cohorts of patients and discuss how they could lead to novel treatment strategies to improve the therapeutic index of PARPi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Franchet
- Laboratoire de Pathologie and Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1 Av. Irène Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France;
| | - Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann
- Laboratoire d’Excellence Toulouse Cancer (TOUCAN), Laboratoire de Pathologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer-Toulouse, 31037 Toulouse, France;
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1 Av. Irène Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Davies-Teye BB, Medeiros M, Chauhan C, Baquet CR, Mullins CD. Pragmatic patient engagement in designing pragmatic oncology clinical trials. Future Oncol 2021; 17:3691-3704. [PMID: 34337970 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Oncology trials are the cornerstone of effective and safe therapeutic discoveries. However, there is increasing demand for pragmatism and patient engagement in the design, implementation and dissemination of oncology trials. Many researchers are uncertain about making trials more practical and even less knowledgeable about how to meaningfully engage patients without compromising scientific rigor to meet regulatory requirements. The present work provides practical guidance for addressing both pragmaticism and meaningful patient engagement. Applying evidence-based approaches like PRECIS-2-tool and the 10-Step Engagement Framework offer practical guidance to make future trials in oncology truly pragmatic and patient-centered. Consequently, such patient-centered trials have improved participation, faster recruitment and greater retention, and uptake of innovative technologies in community-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Bright Davies-Teye
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.,The PATIENTS Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Michelle Medeiros
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.,The PATIENTS Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Cynthia Chauhan
- The PATIENTS Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Claudia Rose Baquet
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.,The PATIENTS Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - C Daniel Mullins
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.,The PATIENTS Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Clinical utility of testing for PALB2 and CHEK2 c.1100delC in breast and ovarian cancer. Genet Med 2021; 23:1969-1976. [PMID: 34113003 PMCID: PMC8486655 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01234-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the contribution of PALB2 pathogenic gene variants (PGVs, PALB2_PGV) and the CHEK2 c.1100delC (CHEK2_1100delC) PGV to familial breast and ovarian cancer, and PALB2_PGV associated breast cancer pathology. Methods Outcomes of germline PALB2_PGV and CHEK2_1100delC testing were recorded in 3,127 women with histologically confirmed diagnoses of invasive breast cancer, carcinoma in situ, or epithelial nonmucinous ovarian cancer, and 1,567 female controls. Breast cancer pathology was recorded in PALB2_PGV cases from extended families. Results Thirty-five PALB2 and 44 CHEK2_1100delC PGVs were detected in patients (odds ratio [OR] PALB2 breast–ovarian = 5.90 [95% CI: 1.92–18.36], CHEK2 breast–ovarian = 4.46 [95% CI: 1.86–10.46], PALB2 breast = 6.16 [95% CI: 1.98–19.21], CHEK2 breast = 4.89 [95% CI: 2.01–11.34]). Grade 3 ER-positive HER2-negative, grade 3 and triple negative (TN) tumors were enriched in cases with PALB2 PGVs compared with all breast cancers known to our service (respectively: 15/43, 254/1,843, P = 0.0005; 28/37, 562/1,381, P = 0.0001; 12/43, 204/1,639, P < 0.0001). PALB2_PGV likelihood increased with increasing Manchester score (MS) (MS < 15 = 17/1,763, MS 20–39 = 11/520, P = 0.04) but not for CHEK2_1100delC (MS < 15 = 29/1,762, MS 20–39 = 4/520). PALB2 PGVs showed perfect segregation in 20/20 first-degree relatives with breast cancer, compared with 7/13 for CHEK2_1100delC (P = 0.002). Conclusion PALB2 PGVs and CHEK2_1100delC together account for ~2.5% of familial breast/ovarian cancer risk. PALB2 PGVs are associated with grade 3, TN, and grade 3 ER-positive HER2-negative breast tumors.
Collapse
|
46
|
Bueno-Martínez E, Sanoguera-Miralles L, Valenzuela-Palomo A, Lorca V, Gómez-Sanz A, Carvalho S, Allen J, Infante M, Pérez-Segura P, Lázaro C, Easton DF, Devilee P, Vreeswijk MPG, de la Hoya M, Velasco EA. RAD51D Aberrant Splicing in Breast Cancer: Identification of Splicing Regulatory Elements and Minigene-Based Evaluation of 53 DNA Variants. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2845. [PMID: 34200360 PMCID: PMC8201001 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
RAD51D loss-of-function variants increase lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Splicing disruption is a frequent pathogenic mechanism associated with variants in susceptibility genes. Herein, we have assessed the splicing and clinical impact of splice-site and exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) variants identified through the study of ~113,000 women of the BRIDGES cohort. A RAD51D minigene with exons 2-9 was constructed in splicing vector pSAD. Eleven BRIDGES splice-site variants (selected by MaxEntScan) were introduced into the minigene by site-directed mutagenesis and tested in MCF-7 cells. The 11 variants disrupted splicing, collectively generating 25 different aberrant transcripts. All variants but one produced negligible levels (<3.4%) of the full-length (FL) transcript. In addition, ESE elements of the alternative exon 3 were mapped by testing four overlapping exonic microdeletions (≥30-bp), revealing an ESE-rich interval (c.202_235del) with critical sequences for exon 3 recognition that might have been affected by germline variants. Next, 26 BRIDGES variants and 16 artificial exon 3 single-nucleotide substitutions were also assayed. Thirty variants impaired splicing with variable amounts (0-65.1%) of the FL transcript, although only c.202G>A demonstrated a complete aberrant splicing pattern without the FL transcript. On the other hand, c.214T>C increased efficiency of exon 3 recognition, so only the FL transcript was detected (100%). In conclusion, 41 RAD51D spliceogenic variants (28 of which were from the BRIDGES cohort) were identified by minigene assays. We show that minigene-based mapping of ESEs is a powerful approach for identifying ESE hotspots and ESE-disrupting variants. Finally, we have classified nine variants as likely pathogenic according to ACMG/AMP-based guidelines, highlighting the complex relationship between splicing alterations and variant interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Bueno-Martínez
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer Laboratory, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (E.B.-M.); (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.)
| | - Lara Sanoguera-Miralles
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer Laboratory, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (E.B.-M.); (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.)
| | - Alberto Valenzuela-Palomo
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer Laboratory, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (E.B.-M.); (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.)
| | - Víctor Lorca
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (V.L.); (A.G.-S.); (P.P.-S.)
| | - Alicia Gómez-Sanz
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (V.L.); (A.G.-S.); (P.P.-S.)
| | - Sara Carvalho
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (S.C.); (J.A.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Jamie Allen
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (S.C.); (J.A.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Mar Infante
- Cancer Genetics, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain;
| | - Pedro Pérez-Segura
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (V.L.); (A.G.-S.); (P.P.-S.)
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL and CIBERONC, 08908 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain;
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (S.C.); (J.A.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (P.D.); (M.P.G.V.)
| | - Maaike P. G. Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (P.D.); (M.P.G.V.)
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (V.L.); (A.G.-S.); (P.P.-S.)
| | - Eladio A. Velasco
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer Laboratory, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (E.B.-M.); (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.)
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tischkowitz M, Balmaña J, Foulkes WD, James P, Ngeow J, Schmutzler R, Voian N, Wick MJ, Stewart DR, Pal T. Management of individuals with germline variants in PALB2: a clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2021; 23:1416-1423. [PMID: 33976419 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01151-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE PALB2 germline pathogenic variants are associated with increased breast cancer risk and smaller increased risk of pancreatic and likely ovarian cancer. Resources for health-care professionals managing PALB2 heterozygotes are currently limited. METHODS A workgroup of experts sought to outline management of PALB2 heterozygotes based on current evidence. Peer-reviewed publications from PubMed were identified to guide recommendations, which arose by consensus and the collective expertise of the authors. RESULTS PALB2 heterozygotes should be offered BRCA1/2-equivalent breast surveillance. Risk-reducing mastectomy can be considered guided by personalized risk estimates. Pancreatic cancer surveillance should be considered, but ideally as part of a clinical trial. Typically, ovarian cancer surveillance is not recommended, and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy should only rarely be considered before the age of 50. Given the mechanistic similarities, PALB2 heterozygotes should be considered for therapeutic regimens and trials as those for BRCA1/2. CONCLUSION This guidance is similar to those for BRCA1/2. While the range of the cancer risk estimates overlap with BRCA1/2, point estimates are lower in PALB2 so individualized estimates are important for management decisions. Systematic prospective data collection is needed to determine as yet unanswered questions such as the risk of contralateral breast cancer and survival after cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - William D Foulkes
- Departments of Human Genetics, Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Paul James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Genomic Medicine, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,University Hospital of Cologne, Center of Integrated Oncology, CIO and Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicoleta Voian
- Genetic Risk Clinic, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Myra J Wick
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Douglas R Stewart
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Unravelling Structure, Localization, and Genetic Crosstalk of KLF3 in Human Breast Cancer. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2020:1354381. [PMID: 33490232 PMCID: PMC7803292 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1354381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most prevailing disease among women. It actually develops from breast tissue and has heterogeneous and complex nature that constitutes multiple tumor quiddities. These features are associated with different histological forms, distinctive biological characteristics, and clinical patterns. The predisposition of breast cancer has been attributed to a number of genetic factors, associated with the worst outcomes. Unfortunately, their behavior with relevance to clinical significance remained poorly understood. So, there is a need to further explore the nature of the disease at the transcriptome level. The focus of this study was to explore the influence of Krüppel-like factor 3 (KLF3), tumor protein D52 (TPD52), microRNA 124 (miR-124), and protein kinase C epsilon (PKCε) expression on breast cancer. Moreover, this study was also aimed at predicting the tertiary structure of KLF3 protein. Expression of genes was analyzed through real-time PCR using the delta cycle threshold method, and statistical significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA in Graphpad Prism. For the construction of a 3D model, various bioinformatics software programs, Swiss Model and UCSF Chimera, were employed. The expression of KLF3, miR-124, and PKCε genes was decreased (fold change: 0.076443, 0.06969, and 0.011597, respectively). However, there was 2-fold increased expression of TPD52 with p value < 0.001 relative to control. Tertiary structure of KLF3 exhibited 80.72% structure conservation with its template KLF4 and was 95.06% structurally favored by a Ramachandran plot. These genes might be predictors of stage, metastasis, receptor, and treatment status and used as new biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis. However, extensive investigations at the tissue level and in in vivo are required to further strengthen their role as a potential biomarker for prognosis of breast cancer.
Collapse
|
49
|
Walsh T, Gulsuner S, Lee MK, Troester MA, Olshan AF, Earp HS, Perou CM, King MC. Inherited predisposition to breast cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:6. [PMID: 33479248 PMCID: PMC7820260 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-00214-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) phases I-II was a case-control study of biological and social risk factors for invasive breast cancer that enrolled cases and controls between 1993 and 1999. Case selection was population-based and stratified by ancestry and age at diagnosis. Controls were matched to cases by age, self-identified race, and neighborhood of residence. Sequencing genomic DNA from 1370 cases and 1635 controls yielded odds ratios (with 95% confidence limits) for breast cancer of all subtypes of 26.7 (3.59, 189.1) for BRCA1, 8.8 (3.44, 22.48) for BRCA2, and 9.0 (2.06, 39.60) for PALB2; and for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) of 55.0 (7.01, 431.4) for BRCA1, 12.1 (4.18, 35.12) for BRCA2, and 10.8 (1.97, 59.11) for PALB2. Overall, 5.6% of patients carried a pathogenic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, or TP53, the four most highly penetrant breast cancer genes. Analysis of cases by tumor subtype revealed the expected association of TNBC versus other tumor subtypes with BRCA1, and suggested a significant association between TNBC versus other tumor subtypes with BRCA2 or PALB2 among African-American (AA) patients [2.95 (1.18, 7.37)], but not among European-American (EA) patients [0.62 (0.18, 2.09)]. AA patients with pathogenic variants in BRCA2 or PALB2 were 11 times more likely to be diagnosed with TNBC versus another tumor subtype than were EA patients with pathogenic variants in either of these genes (P = 0.001). If this pattern is confirmed in other comparisons of similarly ascertained AA and EA breast cancer patients, it could in part explain the higher prevalence of TNBC among AA breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Walsh
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Suleyman Gulsuner
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Ming K Lee
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Andrew F Olshan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - H Shelton Earp
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Charles M Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Mary-Claire King
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ali RMM, McIntosh SA, Savage KI. Homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancer: Implications for risk, cancer development, and therapy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2020; 60:358-372. [DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rayhaan M. M. Ali
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
| | - Stuart A. McIntosh
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
| | - Kienan I. Savage
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
| |
Collapse
|