1
|
Yao W, Wu J, Wang H, Jia Z, Zhou Y, Yang C, Xu F, Kong Y, Huang Y. Association between visceral adiposity index and prostate cancer in men aged 40 years and older: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Aging Male 2025; 28:2449341. [PMID: 39773306 DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2024.2449341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2024] [Revised: 12/29/2024] [Accepted: 12/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to elucidate the correlation of Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) with prostate cancer (PCa) among men aged 40 years and older in the United States. METHODS Analysis included multivariate linear and logistic regression, smoothing curve fitting, and threshold effect evaluation using 2003-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. The stability of this relationship across demographic groups was assessed via subgroup analyses and interaction tests. RESULTS Among 2,768 participants, those with elevated VAI displayed lower total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) levels and reduced PCa risk. Each VAI unit elevation corresponded to a 0.075 ng/mL tPSA reduction [-0.075 (-0.145, -0.005)] and 18.8% PCa risk reduction [0.812 (0.687, 0.960)]. Top-quartile VAI individuals exhibited 0.282 ng/mL reduced tPSA [-0.282 (-0.557, -0.007)] and 49.7% reduced PCa risk [0.503 (0.282, 0.896)] relative to bottom-quartile counterparts. This inverse relationship was more pronounced in men ≥70 years. Moreover, VAI-tPSA in other races demonstrated a U-shaped pattern, with a 2.09 inflection point. At the same time, a Mexican American subgroup exhibited an inverted U-shape for VAI and PCa risk, with a 1.42 inflection point. CONCLUSION In men aged ≥70, VAI indicates an inverse PCa relationship. However, PSA-based PCa screening may be influenced in visceral-obese individuals aged <70.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Yao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, China
| | - Jiacheng Wu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University & Nantong Tumor Hospital, Nantong, China
| | - Hongzhi Wang
- Department of Urology, Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, China
| | - Zongming Jia
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yinyi Zhou
- Department of Urology, Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, China
| | - Chendi Yang
- Department of Urology, Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, China
| | - Feng Xu
- Department of Urology, Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, China
| | - Ying Kong
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yuhua Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng Y, Mao J, Yang L, Zhu Q. Recent trends in the incidence of early-onset prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 2025; 34:89-95. [PMID: 38837196 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Early-onset prostate cancer (EOPC) is relatively uncommon. It is unclear if the incidence of EOPC is evolving. Utilizing data from the SEER database from 2000 to 2020, the study identified prostate cancer cases in men under 55 years, focusing on trends in annual age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIR), stage at presentation, race/ethnicity, and local treatment patterns. The study encompassed 93 071 cases of EOPC, with the median age at diagnosis being 51 years. From 2000 to 2007, the AAIR of EOPC experienced a wave-like increase from 6.9 to 8.3 per 100 000 people. It then sharply declined to 5.4 by 2014, followed by 6 years of stability, and by 2020 it had dropped to its lowest point of 4.5. The trend observed across different racial groups was consistent with the overall pattern, where non-Hispanic Black patients consistently exhibited the highest incidence and the least reduction rate (annual percent change, -1.0; 95% confidence interval, -1.8 to -0.2; P < 0.05). Stage II was the most commonly diagnosed, although its AAIR declined from 4.9 to 1.2 per 100 000 people. From 2010 through 2020, the proportion of receiving prostatectomy decreased from 63.0 to 43.6%. The declining rates of EOPC across diverse racial groups emphasize the critical need for focused research and interventions. Specifically, there is an urgent call to establish a tailored screening protocol for prostate cancer targeting Black youth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanjun Zheng
- Department of Urology, Quzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Quzhou
| | - Jinshui Mao
- Department of Urology, Quzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Quzhou
| | - Lina Yang
- Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Basic Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao
| | - Qiansan Zhu
- Department of Urology, Wenzhou TCM Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirli Bolukbas M, Figen M, Kocak Uzel E. Cancer awareness across borders: a comparative study of internet search trends for breast and prostate cancer in Europe and Turkey. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:1563. [PMID: 39707258 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13346-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 12/23/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The governments and private organizations strongly support cancer awareness campaigns. It remains unknown whether the campaigns during the awareness months have the same effect in every country. This study aims to compare the impact of awareness campaigns conducted in October for breast cancer and September for prostate cancer on internet search trends among the most populous European countries and Turkey. The research is framed within the context of comparing awareness campaign effects between countries for the first time. MATERIAL AND METHOD Utilizing Google Trends data from 2018 to 2022, we collected search term data for breast and prostate cancer in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, and Turkey. Search volumes were standardized based on each country's population and internet user rates. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to assess the influence of awareness campaigns on internet search volumes. RESULTS The MANOVA results indicated that the awareness campaigns had a significant impact on internet search volumes for breast and prostate cancer. The campaigns were found to be statistically significant in Italy, France, United Kingdom for breast cancer. And also, the internet search volumes of Italy, France, and Germany increased statistically significant for prostate cancer. CONCLUSION The internet search data of Turkey, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Spain were analyzed, revealing that both Italy and France responded positively to awareness campaigns for both breast and prostate cancer, resulting in increased awareness. These findings can serve as a guiding framework for developing effective strategies to enhance cancer awareness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meltem Kirli Bolukbas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences University Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam Street, Bakirkoy-Istanbul, 34140, Turkey.
| | - Metin Figen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences University Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam Street, Bakirkoy-Istanbul, 34140, Turkey
| | - Esengul Kocak Uzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences University Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam Street, Bakirkoy-Istanbul, 34140, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wiesen BM, Flaig TW, Gershman B, Konety B, Warren A, Kuna EM, Robin T, Kessler ER, Eule CJ, Breyer BN, Achua J, Kim SP. Racial Disparities in Clinical Trial Enrollment Among Patients Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort of Oncology Practices. Adv Urol 2024; 2024:8871425. [PMID: 39735345 PMCID: PMC11671626 DOI: 10.1155/aiu/8871425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Although clinical trials should be accessible to all patients, persistent racial and ethnic disparities in clinical trial enrollment exist. Herein, we examine racial disparities in clinical trial enrollment among prostate cancer patients from a large population-based cohort of oncology practices in the United States. Methods: Using CancerLinQ Discovery, we identified men with regional (N1+) and/or metastatic (M1) prostate cancer diagnosed from 2011 to 2023. Enrollment into a clinical trial for prostate cancer was the primary outcome. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression were used for analysis. Results: Within our dataset, we identified 17,028 patients with advanced prostate cancer, of which only 2.6% of patients were enrolled in a clinical trial (n = 450). There was variance in the proportion of patients accrued over time with a low of 0.30% in 2011 to a high of 3.94% in 2018 and decreasing to 2.37% in 2023. On multivariable analysis, older age was associated with lower odds of clinical trial enrollment (p < 0.001). Compared to White patients, Hispanics/Latino (OR: 0.35; CI: 0.161-0.744, p=0.04) and patients with self-identified other race or ethnicity (OR: 0.23; CI: 0.295-0.931, p < 0.01) had lower odds of clinical trial enrollment on multivariable analysis. Black men with prostate cancer did not have a statistically significant difference compared to White men for clinical trial enrollment. (OR: 1.033; CI: 0.771-1.384, p=0.828). Conclusion: While clinical trial enrollment remains low for men with advanced prostate cancer in this contemporary population-based cohort, rates of participation for Hispanic/Latino men, but not Black men, are significantly lower. Increased attention is needed to better understand the reasons behind these racial disparities and to develop effective interventions to promote access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett M. Wiesen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Thomas W. Flaig
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Coloarado, USA
| | - Boris Gershman
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Badrinath Konety
- Department of Urology, Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Adam Warren
- Population Health Shared Resource (PHSR) Department, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Elizabeth Molina Kuna
- Population Health Shared Resource (PHSR) Department, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Tyler Robin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Corbin J. Eule
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Coloarado, USA
| | - Benjamin N. Breyer
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Justin Achua
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Simon P. Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shen M, García-Marqués F, Muruganantham A, Liu S, White JR, Bermudez A, Rice MA, Thompson K, Chen CL, Hung CN, Zhang Z, Huang TH, Liss MA, Pienta KJ, Pitteri SJ, Stoyanova T. Identification of a 5-gene signature panel for the prediction of prostate cancer progression. Br J Cancer 2024; 131:1748-1761. [PMID: 39402324 PMCID: PMC11589118 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02854-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Revised: 09/04/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 10/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite nearly 100% 5-year survival for localised prostate cancer, the survival rate for metastatic prostate cancer significantly declines to 32%. Thus, it is crucial to identify molecular indicators that reflect the progression from localised disease to metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS To search for molecular indicators associated with prostate cancer metastasis, we performed proteomic analysis of rapid autopsy tissue samples from metastatic prostate cancer (N = 8) and localised prostate cancer (N = 2). Then, we utilised multiple independent, publicly available prostate cancer patient datasets to select candidates that also correlate with worse prostate cancer clinical prognosis. RESULTS We identified 154 proteins with increased expressions in metastases relative to localised prostate cancer through proteomic analysis. From the subset of these candidates that correlate with prostate cancer recurrence (N = 28) and shorter disease-free survival (N = 37), we identified a 5-gene signature panel with improved performance in predicting worse clinical prognosis relative to individual candidates. CONCLUSIONS Our study presents a new 5-gene signature panel that is associated with worse clinical prognosis and is elevated in prostate cancer metastasis on both protein and mRNA levels. Our 5-gene signature panel represents a potential modality for the prediction of prostate cancer progression towards the onset of metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Shen
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Shiqin Liu
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Abel Bermudez
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Meghan A Rice
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kelsey Thompson
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chun-Liang Chen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
- School of Nursing, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Chia-Nung Hung
- Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Zhao Zhang
- Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Tim H Huang
- Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Liss
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Tanya Stoyanova
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tinsley S, Mahabadi N, Hamel L, Dyson G, Lutz M, Hamilton A, Powell I, Heath EI. A Ten Year Experience of Men's Health Events in a Socioeconomically Diverse City in the United States - Lessons Learned. J Community Health 2024; 49:1010-1016. [PMID: 38643316 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01354-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Community-based health events provide an opportunity to increase knowledge, awareness, and screening for acute and chronic diseases among individuals living in a socioeconomically diverse community. Because there are limited reports of such events, here we describe our ten-year experience of annual men's health fairs. This retrospective study of the Michigan Institute of Urology Foundation evaluated Men's Health Events held in Detroit, Michigan, from 2012 to 2021. Over 10 years, 11,129 men were screened and > 100,000 screenings were performed. The majority of the attendees were African-American men (61%), had a college degree (67%) or a high school diploma (26%), and had an annual income of <$35K (47%) or $35-60 K (30%). From 2012 to 2021, participants who saw a doctor in the past year rose from 62 to 70%; the median age of men rose from 52 to 58; their median testosterone levels increased from 353 ng/dL to 412 ng/dL, and men with concerning prostate-specific antigen values (≥ 4 ng/mL) doubled from 5% to 10%. Among participants, 59% had cholesterol levels of < 200 mg/dL, 28% of 200-240 mg/dL, and 13% of > 240 mg/dL; 7% had glucose levels of < 70 mg/dL, 68% of 70-105 mg/dL, and 25% of > 105 mg/dL ; 24% had ≥ 140 mmHg systolic and 18% had ≥ 90 mmHg diastolic blood pressure. Our findings suggest that community health events are successful at attracting and screening diverse community members. Such events should emphasize screening of high-risk individuals for acute and chronic diseases and promote other health-related behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane Tinsley
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | | | - Lauren Hamel
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Gregory Dyson
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Michael Lutz
- Michigan Institute of Urology, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA
| | | | - Isaac Powell
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Elisabeth I Heath
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Owens L, Brahme O, Gulati R, Etzioni R. Trends in age and prostate-specific antigen at prostate cancer diagnosis between 2010 and 2019. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae106. [PMID: 39441819 PMCID: PMC11578289 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that de novo metastatic prostate cancer incidence in the United States increased from 2010 to 2019. Plausible explanations include delayed detection after recommendations against prostate cancer screening or upstaging associated with use of more sensitive imaging technologies. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results patient cases and controlling for aging of the population, we found the median age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at prostate cancer diagnosis increased by 1.4 years of age (95% CI = 1.3 to 1.5 years) and 1.4 ng/mL (95% CI = 1.4 to 1.5 ng/mL) over this period, consistent with the delayed detection hypothesis. Racial differences were noted, with 75th percentiles of PSA at diagnosis increasing by 4.3 ng/mL (95% CI = 3.7 to 4.8 ng/mL) over this time period for non-Hispanic Black men compared with 3.0 ng/mL (95% CI = 2.8 to 3.2 ng/mL) for non-Hispanic White men. Overall, patient characteristics at diagnosis suggest that delayed detection contributed at least in part to increases in de novo metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Owens
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ojas Brahme
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Roman Gulati
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ruth Etzioni
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Qian Z, Chen YJ, Feldman J, Beatrici E, Filipas DK, Moore CM, Trinh QD, Kibel AS, Lipsitz SR, Cole AP. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging utilization and its relationship with advanced prostate cancer detection. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:370.e1-370.e7. [PMID: 39013714 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rise in advanced prostate cancer has coincided with increased use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), leading to the hypothesis that this increase in surveillance registries is an artifact of more sensitive imaging tools. We assessed the association between regional variation in prostate MRI and advanced prostate cancer diagnoses. METHODS We utilized SEER-Medicare data (2004-2015), including men > 65 diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. The predictor variable was the utilization of prostate MRI in each hospital referral region (HRR, representing regional healthcare markets). We compared the proportion of disease recorded as locally advanced or of regional risk group (cT3, cT4, and cN1) which would plausibly have been detected by prostate MRI. We conducted adjusted multivariable analysis and performed correlation analysis with Spearman rank coefficient at the level of the HRR. Sensitivity analysis for years 2011 to 2015 was conducted. RESULTS Of 98,921 men diagnosed, 4.01% had locally advanced or regional disease. The median prostate MRI utilization rate was 4.58% (IQR [3.03%, 8.12%]). Adjusted multivariable analysis revealed no statistically significant correlation between MRI utilization and proportion of advanced prostate cancer (aOR = 1.01, 95% CI, [0.99,1.03]) in each region. The correlation between MRI usage and advanced diagnosis was not significant (Spearman Ρ = 0.09, P = 0.4). Sensitivity analysis conducted between 2011 and 2015 showed similar results (aOR = 1.008, 95% CI, [0.989, 1.027]; Spearman Ρ = 0.16, P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS During our study period, HRR-level utilization of MRI was not associated with higher incidences of advanced prostate cancer. This suggests the rising advanced prostate cancer diagnoses observed in this period are unlikely an artifact of greater sensitivity of modern imaging tests, but potentially due to other factors such as changes in screening or risk factors. With increased utilization and evolving techniques in recent years, the association between MRI and advanced prostate cancer detection warrants continued monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyu Qian
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Yu-Jen Chen
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Julia Feldman
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Edoardo Beatrici
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Urology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Dejan K Filipas
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhu A, Strasser MO, McClure TD, Gereta S, Cheng E, Pandit K, Hu JC. Comparative Effectiveness of Partial Gland Cryoablation Versus Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for Cancer Control. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:843-850. [PMID: 38677913 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE There is an absence of high-level evidence comparing oncologic endpoints for partial gland ablation, and most series use prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rather than biopsy endpoints. Our aim was to compare oncologic outcomes between partial gland cryoablation (PGC) and radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. METHODS This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of subjects treated with PGC (n = 98) or RP (n = 536) between January 2017 and December 2022 as primary treatment for intermediate-risk (Gleason grade group [GG] 2-3) prostate cancer. Oncologic endpoints included surveillance biopsies per protocol after PGC in comparison to serial PSA testing after RP. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a need for any salvage treatment or development of metastatic disease. Treatment failure and survival analyses were conducted using Cox proportional-hazard regression and Kaplan Meier survival curves. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the PGC (n = 75) and RP (n = 298) groups were compared. PGC patients were significantly older (71 vs 64 yr; p < 0.001), but there were no differences in PSA, biopsy GG, or treatment year between the groups. The PGC group had higher rates of treatment failures at 24 mo (33% vs 11%; p < 0.001) and 48 mo (43% vs 14%; p < 0.001). One PGC patient (2.1%) and one RP patient (0.7%) developed metastases by 48-mo follow-up (p = 0.4). On adjusted analysis, PGC was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure (hazard ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 2.7-7.9; p < 0.001). Limitations include observational biases associated with the retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS This is the first comparative effectiveness study of cancer control outcomes for PGC versus RP. The results demonstrate an almost fivefold higher risk of treatment failure with PGC during short-term follow-up. PATIENT SUMMARY We compared cancer control outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with partial gland cryoablation versus radical prostatectomy. We found that partial gland cryoablation had an almost fivefold higher risk of treatment failure. Men with prostate cancer should be counseled regarding this difference in treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Zhu
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary O Strasser
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy D McClure
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sofia Gereta
- Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Emily Cheng
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kshitij Pandit
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jim C Hu
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Karsh L, Du S, He J, Waters D, Muser E, Shore N. Differences in real-world outcomes by risk classification for localized prostate cancer patients after radiation therapy. Prostate 2024; 84:1047-1055. [PMID: 38685667 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited real-world evidence exists on the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with localized prostate cancer (LPC) who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) as the initial treatment. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of US patients with high-risk LPC (HR-LPC) and low/intermediate-risk LPC (LIR-LPC) who received EBRT. METHODS This retrospective study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data from 2012 to 2019 included patients ≥ 65 years old who received EBRT as initial therapy. Baseline patient characteristics were summarized, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival, and time to initiation of advanced prostate cancer treatment were compared using Kaplan-Meier (KM) and adjusted Cox proportional hazard (PH) models. 5-year survival probabilities stratified by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic [NH] White, NH Black, NH Asian, and Hispanic) were assessed. RESULTS Of 11,313 eligible patients, 41% (n = 4600) had HR-LPC and 59% (n = 6713) had LIR-LPC. Patient characteristics for both groups were comparable, with mean age at EBRT initiation > 70 years, 86% white, and mean follow-up time >40 months. More patients in the HR-LPC than LIR-LPC groups (78% vs 34%) had concurrent androgen deprivation therapy use and for a longer duration (median 10.4 months vs. 7.4 months). A higher proportion of HR-LPC patients developed metastasis, died, or received advanced prostate cancer treatment. Adjusted Cox PH survival analyses showed significantly (p < 0.0001) higher risk of mortality (hazard ratios [HR], 1.57 [1.38, 2.34]), metastasis or death (HR, 1.97 [1.78, 2.17]), and advanced prostate cancer therapy use (HR, 2.57 [2.11, 3.14]) for HR-LPC than LIR-LPC patients. Within 5 years after the initial EBRT treatment, 18%-26% of patients with HR-LPC are expected to have died or developed metastasis. The 5-year MFS rate in the HR-LPC group was lower than the LIR-LPC group across all racial/ethnic subgroups. NH Black patients with HR-LPC had the highest all-cause mortality rate and lowest rate of receiving advanced prostate cancer treatment, compared to other racial/ethnic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS This real-world study of clinical outcomes in patients with LPC treated with EBRT suggests substantial disease burden in patients with HR-LPC and highlights the need for additional treatment strategies to improve clinical outcomes in patients with HR-LPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shawn Du
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jinghua He
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dexter Waters
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Erik Muser
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hu JC, Assel M, Allaf ME, Ehdaie B, Vickers AJ, Cohen AJ, Ristau BT, Green DA, Han M, Rezaee ME, Pavlovich CP, Montgomery JS, Kowalczyk KJ, Ross AE, Kundu SD, Patel HD, Wang GJ, Graham JN, Shoag JE, Ghazi A, Singla N, Gorin MA, Schaeffer AJ, Schaeffer EM. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Prostate Biopsy to Prevent Infectious Complications: The PREVENT Randomized Trial. Eur Urol 2024; 86:61-68. [PMID: 38212178 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The transrectal biopsy approach is traditionally used to detect prostate cancer. An alternative transperineal approach is historically performed under general anesthesia, but recent advances enable transperineal biopsy to be performed under local anesthesia. We sought to compare infectious complications of transperineal biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis versus transrectal biopsy with targeted prophylaxis. METHODS We assigned biopsy-naïve participants to undergo transperineal biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis versus transrectal biopsy with targeted prophylaxis (rectal culture screening for fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria and antibiotic targeting to culture and sensitivity results) through a multicenter, randomized trial. The primary outcome was post-biopsy infection captured by a prospective medical review and patient report on a 7-d survey. The secondary outcomes included cancer detection, noninfectious complications, and a numerical rating scale (0-10) for biopsy-related pain and discomfort during and 7-d after biopsy. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 658 participants were randomized, with zero transperineal versus four (1.4%) transrectal biopsy infections (difference -1.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.2%, 0.3%; p = 0.059). The rates of other complications were very low and similar. Importantly, detection of clinically significant cancer was similar (53% transperineal vs 50% transrectal, adjusted difference 2.0%; 95% CI -6.0, 10). Participants in the transperineal arm experienced worse periprocedural pain (0.6 adjusted difference [0-10 scale], 95% CI 0.2, 0.9), but the effect was small and resolved by 7-d. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Office-based transperineal biopsy is tolerable, does not compromise cancer detection, and did not result in infectious complications. Transrectal biopsy with targeted prophylaxis achieved similar infection rates, but requires rectal cultures and careful attention to antibiotic selection and administration. Consideration of these factors and antibiotic stewardship should guide clinical decision-making. PATIENT SUMMARY In this multicenter randomized trial, we compare prostate biopsy infectious complications for the transperineal versus transrectal approach. The absence of infectious complications with transperineal biopsy without the use of preventative antibiotics is noteworthy, but not significantly different from transrectal biopsy with targeted antibiotic prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim C Hu
- Brady Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medicine Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Melissa Assel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mohamad E Allaf
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Cohen
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Benjamin T Ristau
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - David A Green
- Brady Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medicine Queens, New York, NY, USA
| | - Misop Han
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael E Rezaee
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christian P Pavlovich
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Keith J Kowalczyk
- Department of Urology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ashley E Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Shilajit D Kundu
- Department of Urology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hiten D Patel
- Department of Urology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gerald J Wang
- Brady Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medicine Queens, New York, NY, USA
| | - John N Graham
- Brady Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medicine Brooklyn, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan E Shoag
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ahmed Ghazi
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nirmish Singla
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael A Gorin
- Department of Urologic Surgery, The Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anthony J Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yao W, Wu J, Kong Y, Xu F, Zhou Y, Sun Q, Gao Q, Cai Z, Yang C, Huang Y. Associations of systemic immune-inflammation index with high risk for prostate cancer in middle-aged and older US males: A population-based study. Immun Inflamm Dis 2024; 12:e1327. [PMID: 38923408 PMCID: PMC11194977 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.1327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) provides convincing evaluation of systemic immune and inflammatory condition in human body. Its correlation with prostate cancer (PCa) risk remains uncharted. The principal objective of this investigation was to elucidate the association between SII and the risk for PCa in middle-aged and elderly males. MATERIALS AND METHODS Analysis entailed multivariate linear and logistic regression, generalized additive model, and smoothing curve fitting using resource from 2007 to 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). To ascertain robustness and consistency of this association across different demographic strata, we conducted rigorous subgroup analyses and interaction tests. RESULTS Among 3359 participants, those with elevated SII displayed higher total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) levels, higher risk for PCa, and lower free/total PSA (f/t PSA) ratio. Specifically, each unit increase of log2 (SII) was associated with a 0.22 ng/mL increase in tPSA (β: 0.22, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.05-0.38), a 2.22% decline in f/t PSA ratio (β: -2.22, 95% CI -3.20 to -1.23), and a 52% increased odds of being at high risk for PCa (odds ratio [OR]: 1.52, 95% CI 1.13-2.04). People in the top quartile of log2 (SII) exhibited 0.55 ng/mL increased tPSA (β: 0.55, 95% CI 0.19-0.90), 4.39% reduced f/t PSA ratio (β: -4.39, 95% CI -6.50 to -2.27), and 168% increased odds of being at high risk for PCa (OR: 2.68, 95% CI 1.32-5.46) compared to those in the bottom quartile. CONCLUSION Systemic immune and inflammatory condition, as represented by SII, is independently and positively associated with tPSA levels and the risk for PCa, as well as independently and negatively associated with f/t PSA ratio among middle-aged and older US males. These findings may enhance the effectiveness of PCa screening in predicting positive biopsy results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Yao
- Department of UrologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityChina
- Department of UrologySuzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina
| | - Jiacheng Wu
- Department of UrologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityChina
- Department of UrologyAffiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University & Nantong Tumor HospitalChina
| | - Ying Kong
- Department of UrologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityChina
| | - Feng Xu
- Department of UrologySuzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina
| | - Yinyi Zhou
- Department of UrologySuzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina
| | - Qing Sun
- Department of UrologySuzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina
| | - Qingqing Gao
- Department of Preventive MedicineSuzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina
| | - Zhenyu Cai
- Department of UrologySuzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina
| | - Chendi Yang
- Department of UrologySuzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina
| | - Yuhua Huang
- Department of UrologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityChina
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tosoian JJ, Zhang Y, Xiao L, Xie C, Samora NL, Niknafs YS, Chopra Z, Siddiqui J, Zheng H, Herron G, Vaishampayan N, Robinson HS, Arivoli K, Trock BJ, Ross AE, Morgan TM, Palapattu GS, Salami SS, Kunju LP, Tomlins SA, Sokoll LJ, Chan DW, Srivastava S, Feng Z, Sanda MG, Zheng Y, Wei JT, Chinnaiyan AM. Development and Validation of an 18-Gene Urine Test for High-Grade Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:726-736. [PMID: 38635241 PMCID: PMC11190811 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Importance Benefits of prostate cancer (PCa) screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) alone are largely offset by excess negative biopsies and overdetection of indolent cancers resulting from the poor specificity of PSA for high-grade PCa (ie, grade group [GG] 2 or greater). Objective To develop a multiplex urinary panel for high-grade PCa and validate its external performance relative to current guideline-endorsed biomarkers. Design, Setting, and Participants RNA sequencing analysis of 58 724 genes identified 54 markers of PCa, including 17 markers uniquely overexpressed by high-grade cancers. Gene expression and clinical factors were modeled in a new urinary test for high-grade PCa (MyProstateScore 2.0 [MPS2]). Optimal models were developed in parallel without prostate volume (MPS2) and with prostate volume (MPS2+). The locked models underwent blinded external validation in a prospective National Cancer Institute trial cohort. Data were collected from January 2008 to December 2020, and data were analyzed from November 2022 to November 2023. Exposure Protocolized blood and urine collection and transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy. Main Outcomes and Measures Multiple biomarker tests were assessed in the validation cohort, including serum PSA alone, the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator, and the Prostate Health Index (PHI) as well as derived multiplex 2-gene and 3-gene models, the original 2-gene MPS test, and the 18-gene MPS2 models. Under a testing approach with 95% sensitivity for PCa of GG 2 or greater, measures of diagnostic accuracy and clinical consequences of testing were calculated. Cancers of GG 3 or greater were assessed secondarily. Results Of 761 men included in the development cohort, the median (IQR) age was 63 (58-68) years, and the median (IQR) PSA level was 5.6 (4.6-7.2) ng/mL; of 743 men included in the validation cohort, the median (IQR) age was 62 (57-68) years, and the median (IQR) PSA level was 5.6 (4.1-8.0) ng/mL. In the validation cohort, 151 (20.3%) had high-grade PCa on biopsy. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values were 0.60 using PSA alone, 0.66 using the risk calculator, 0.77 using PHI, 0.76 using the derived multiplex 2-gene model, 0.72 using the derived multiplex 3-gene model, and 0.74 using the original MPS model compared with 0.81 using the MPS2 model and 0.82 using the MPS2+ model. At 95% sensitivity, the MPS2 model would have reduced unnecessary biopsies performed in the initial biopsy population (range for other tests, 15% to 30%; range for MPS2, 35% to 42%) and repeat biopsy population (range for other tests, 9% to 21%; range for MPS2, 46% to 51%). Across pertinent subgroups, the MPS2 models had negative predictive values of 95% to 99% for cancers of GG 2 or greater and of 99% for cancers of GG 3 or greater. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, a new 18-gene PCa test had higher diagnostic accuracy for high-grade PCa relative to existing biomarker tests. Clinically, use of this test would have meaningfully reduced unnecessary biopsies performed while maintaining highly sensitive detection of high-grade cancers. These data support use of this new PCa biomarker test in patients with elevated PSA levels to reduce the potential harms of PCa screening while preserving its long-term benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J. Tosoian
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Yuping Zhang
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Lanbo Xiao
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Cassie Xie
- Department of Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nathan L. Samora
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Zoey Chopra
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Javed Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Heng Zheng
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Grace Herron
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Hunter S. Robinson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Bruce J. Trock
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ashley E. Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Todd M. Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | | | | | - Scott A. Tomlins
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Strata Oncology, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lori J. Sokoll
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel W. Chan
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sudhir Srivastava
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ziding Feng
- Department of Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Yingye Zheng
- Department of Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - John T. Wei
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Arul M. Chinnaiyan
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gao Y, Kim H, Kitata RB, Lin TT, Swensen AC, Shi T, Liu T. Multiplexed quantitative proteomics in prostate cancer biomarker development. Adv Cancer Res 2024; 161:31-69. [PMID: 39032952 DOI: 10.1016/bs.acr.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-skin cancer among men in the United States. However, the widely used protein biomarker in PCa, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), while useful for initial detection, its use alone cannot detect aggressive PCa and can lead to overtreatment. This chapter provides an overview of PCa protein biomarker development. It reviews the state-of-the-art liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomics technologies for PCa biomarker development, such as enhancing the detection sensitivity of low-abundance proteins through antibody-based or antibody-independent protein/peptide enrichment, enriching post-translational modifications such as glycosylation as well as information-rich extracellular vesicles, and increasing accuracy and throughput using advanced data acquisition methodologies. This chapter also summarizes recent PCa biomarker validation studies that applied those techniques in diverse specimen types, including cell lines, tissues, proximal fluids, urine, and blood, developing novel protein biomarkers for various clinical applications, including early detection and diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic intervention of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqian Gao
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Hyeyoon Kim
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Reta Birhanu Kitata
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Tai-Tu Lin
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Adam C Swensen
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Tujin Shi
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Tao Liu
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Qian Z, Chen X, Cole AP, Abdollah F, Choueiri TK, Kibel AS, Lipsitz SR, Iyer HS, Trinh QD. Changes in Prostate-specific Antigen Screening after the 2018 United States Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and Through the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:151-154. [PMID: 37487814 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
We analyzed trends in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer, with a focus on the impact of the 2018 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations and the COVID-19 outbreak. Using National Health Interview Survey data, we performed difference-in-difference (DID) analyses to examine the PSA screening trend for men aged 55-69 yr, the target population in the 2018 USPSTF update, with men aged >69 yr included as the reference and adjustment for sociodemographic factors. We found that PSA screening increased for men aged 55-69 yr (+4.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-7.5%) or >69 yr (+6.5%, 95% CI 2.7-10.4%) in 2019 (after the 2018 recommendations) in comparison to 2015. There was a decrease in PSA screening for men aged 55-69 yr in 2021 in comparison to 2019 (after the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020) of -3.1% (95%CI -0.4% to -5.8%). Adjusted DID analysis revealed no significant variations in the rate of change in PSA screening between the two age groups following both events. Despite its observational nature, our design mitigates major challenges in inferring causal relationships. Our results suggest a causal relationship between the 2018 screening guidelines and an increase in screening rates for men aged 55-69 yr. Conversely, they also indicate that preventive care disruptions related to COVID-19 may have induced deceleration or potentially reversal of these advances. PATIENT SUMMARY: We used data from a large national survey to study the rate of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer in the USA in response to the 2018 United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and to the COVID-19 pandemic. We found an increase in PSA screening in 2019 among men aged 55-69 yr, the target population in the 2018 recommendations, as well as men aged >69 yr. However, this increase was reduced after the COVID-19 outbreak. It remains to be seen how PSA screening continues to change as the world recovers from COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyu Qian
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xi Chen
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hari S Iyer
- Section of Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Wallis CJD, Penson DF, Huang LC, Zhao Z, Conwill R, Talwar R, Morgans AK, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Wu XC, Paddock LE, Stroup A, O’Neil BB, Koyama T, Hoffman KE, Barocas DA. Functional Outcomes After Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment. JAMA 2024; 331:302-317. [PMID: 38261043 PMCID: PMC10807259 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.26491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Importance Adverse outcomes associated with treatments for localized prostate cancer remain unclear. Objective To compare rates of adverse functional outcomes between specific treatments for localized prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants An observational cohort study using data from 5 US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program registries. Participants were treated for localized prostate cancer between 2011 and 2012. At baseline, 1877 had favorable-prognosis prostate cancer (defined as cT1-cT2bN0M0, prostate-specific antigen level <20 ng/mL, and grade group 1-2) and 568 had unfavorable-prognosis prostate cancer (defined as cT2cN0M0, prostate-specific antigen level of 20-50 ng/mL, or grade group 3-5). Follow-up data were collected by questionnaire through February 1, 2022. Exposures Radical prostatectomy (n = 1043), external beam radiotherapy (n = 359), brachytherapy (n = 96), or active surveillance (n = 379) for favorable-prognosis disease and radical prostatectomy (n = 362) or external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy (n = 206) for unfavorable-prognosis disease. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes were patient-reported sexual, urinary, bowel, and hormone function measured using the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (range, 0-100; 100 = best). Associations of specific therapies with each outcome were estimated and compared at 10 years after treatment, adjusting for corresponding baseline scores, and patient and tumor characteristics. Minimum clinically important differences were 10 to 12 for sexual function, 6 to 9 for urinary incontinence, 5 to 7 for urinary irritation, and 4 to 6 for bowel and hormone function. Results A total of 2445 patients with localized prostate cancer (median age, 64 years; 14% Black, 8% Hispanic) were included and followed up for a median of 9.5 years. Among 1877 patients with favorable prognosis, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence (adjusted mean difference, -12.1 [95% CI, -16.2 to -8.0]), but not worse sexual function (adjusted mean difference, -7.2 [95% CI, -12.3 to -2.0]), compared with active surveillance. Among 568 patients with unfavorable prognosis, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence (adjusted mean difference, -26.6 [95% CI, -35.0 to -18.2]), but not worse sexual function (adjusted mean difference, -1.4 [95% CI, -11.1 to 8.3), compared with external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy. Among patients with unfavorable prognosis, external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with worse bowel (adjusted mean difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.2 to -0.7]) and hormone (adjusted mean difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.5 to -0.3]) function compared with radical prostatectomy. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients treated for localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence but not worse sexual function at 10-year follow-up compared with radiotherapy or surveillance among people with more favorable prognosis and compared with radiotherapy for those with unfavorable prognosis. Among men with unfavorable-prognosis disease, external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with worse bowel and hormone function at 10-year follow-up compared with radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher J. D. Wallis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David F. Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Nashville
| | - Li-Ching Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Zhiguo Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ralph Conwill
- Office of Patient and Community Education, Patient Advocacy Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ruchika Talwar
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alicia K. Morgans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ann S. Hamilton
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans
| | - Lisa E. Paddock
- Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Brock B. O’Neil
- Department of Urology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City
| | - Tatsuki Koyama
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Karen E. Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston
| | - Daniel A. Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Berlin A, Ramotar M, Santiago AT, Liu Z, Li J, Wolinsky H, Wallis CJD, Chua MLK, Paner GP, van der Kwast T, Cooperberg MR, Vickers AJ, Urbach DR, Eggener SE. The influence of the "cancer" label on perceptions and management decisions for low-grade prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1364-1373. [PMID: 37285311 PMCID: PMC10637044 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Grade Group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer should be managed with active surveillance (AS). Global uptake of AS remains disappointingly slow and heterogeneous. Removal of cancer labels has been proposed to reduce GG1 overtreatment. We sought to determine the impact of GG1 disease terminology on individual's perceptions and decision making. METHODS Discrete choice experiments were conducted on 3 cohorts: healthy men, canonical partners (partners), and patients with GG1 (patients). Participants reported preferences in a series of vignettes with 2 scenarios each, permuting key opinion leader-endorsed descriptors: biopsy (adenocarcinoma, acinar neoplasm, prostatic acinar neoplasm of low malignant potential [PAN-LMP], prostatic acinar neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential), disease (cancer, neoplasm, tumor, growth), management decision (treatment, AS), and recurrence risk (6%, 3%, 1%, <1%). Influence on scenario selection were estimated by conditional logit models and marginal rates of substitution. Two additional validation vignettes with scenarios portraying identical descriptors except the management options were embedded into the discrete choice experiments. RESULTS Across cohorts (194 healthy men, 159 partners, and 159 patients), noncancer labels PAN-LMP or prostatic acinar neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential and neoplasm, tumor, or growth were favored over adenocarcinoma and cancer (P < .01), respectively. Switching adenocarcinoma and cancer labels to PAN-LMP and growth, respectively, increased AS choice by up to 17%: healthy men (15%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10% to 20%, from 76% to 91%, P < .001), partners (17%, 95% CI = 12% to 24%, from 65% to 82%, P < .001), and patients (7%, 95% CI = 4% to 12%, from 75% to 82%, P = .063). The main limitation is the theoretical nature of questions perhaps leading to less realistic choices. CONCLUSIONS "Cancer" labels negatively affect perceptions and decision making regarding GG1. Relabeling (ie, avoiding word "cancer") increases proclivity for AS and would likely improve public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; TECHNA Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew Ramotar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; TECHNA Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna T Santiago
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zhihui Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joyce Li
- The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Howard Wolinsky
- AnCan Active Surveillance Virtual Support Group; The Active Surveillor Newsletter, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christopher J D Wallis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, and University Hospital Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Melvin L K Chua
- Divisions of Radiation Oncology and Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Gladell P Paner
- Departments of Pathology and Surgery, University of Chicago. Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Departments of Urology and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David R Urbach
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Department of Surgery, University of Toronto; Perioperative Services, Women’s College Hospital and Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott E Eggener
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wei G, Ranasinghe W, Evans M, Bolton D, Dodds L, Frydenberg M, Kearns P, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy DG, Millar J, Papa N. Decade-long trends in prostate cancer biopsy grade groups and treatment within a population-based registry. BJU Int 2023; 131 Suppl 4:36-42. [PMID: 37099558 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess changes in diagnosis prostate cancer (PCa) grade, biopsy and treatment approach over a decade (2011-2020) at a population level within a clinical quality cancer registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed by prostate biopsy between 2011 and 2020 were retrieved from the Victorian Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry, a prospective, state-wide clinical quality registry in Australia. Distributions of each grade group (GG) proportion over time were modelled with restricted cubic splines, separately by biopsy technique, age group and subsequent treatment method. RESULTS From 2011 to 2020, 24 308 men were diagnosed with PCa in the registry. The proportion of GG 1 disease declined from 36-23%, with commensurate rises in GG 2 (31-36%), GG 3 (14-17%) and GG 5 (9.3-14%) disease. This pattern was similar for men diagnosed by transrectal ultrasonography or transperineal biopsy. Patients aged <55 years had the largest absolute reduction in GG 1 PCa, from 56-35%, compared to patients aged 55-64 (41-31%), 65-74 (31-21%), and ≥75 years (12-10%). The proportion of prostatectomies performed for patients with GG 1 disease fell from 28% to 7.1% and, for primary radiation therapy, the proportion fell from 22% to 3.5%. CONCLUSION From 2011 to 2020, there has been a substantial decrease in the proportion of GG 1 PCa diagnosed, particularly in younger men. The percentage of interventional management performed in GG 1 disease has fallen to very low levels. These results reflect the implementation of major changes to diagnostic and treatment guidelines and inform the future allocation of treatment methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Wei
- Department of Urology, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Weranja Ranasinghe
- Department of Urology, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Melanie Evans
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Lachlan Dodds
- Department of Urology, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Vic., Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Cabrini Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Paul Kearns
- Department of Urological Surgery, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jeremy Millar
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Nathan Papa
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baboudjian M, Rouprêt M, Ploussard G. Redefining Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer Nomenclature: The Surgeon's Perspective. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1492-1493. [PMID: 36459674 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baboudjian
- Michael Baboudjian, MD, Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France; Morgan Rouprêt, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France; and Guillaume Ploussard, MD, PhD, Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Michael Baboudjian, MD, Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France; Morgan Rouprêt, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France; and Guillaume Ploussard, MD, PhD, Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Michael Baboudjian, MD, Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France; Morgan Rouprêt, MD, PhD, Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France; and Guillaume Ploussard, MD, PhD, Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:17-48. [PMID: 36633525 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7685] [Impact Index Per Article: 3842.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence and outcomes using incidence data collected by central cancer registries and mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2023, 1,958,310 new cancer cases and 609,820 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Cancer incidence increased for prostate cancer by 3% annually from 2014 through 2019 after two decades of decline, translating to an additional 99,000 new cases; otherwise, however, incidence trends were more favorable in men compared to women. For example, lung cancer in women decreased at one half the pace of men (1.1% vs. 2.6% annually) from 2015 through 2019, and breast and uterine corpus cancers continued to increase, as did liver cancer and melanoma, both of which stabilized in men aged 50 years and older and declined in younger men. However, a 65% drop in cervical cancer incidence during 2012 through 2019 among women in their early 20s, the first cohort to receive the human papillomavirus vaccine, foreshadows steep reductions in the burden of human papillomavirus-associated cancers, the majority of which occur in women. Despite the pandemic, and in contrast with other leading causes of death, the cancer death rate continued to decline from 2019 to 2020 (by 1.5%), contributing to a 33% overall reduction since 1991 and an estimated 3.8 million deaths averted. This progress increasingly reflects advances in treatment, which are particularly evident in the rapid declines in mortality (approximately 2% annually during 2016 through 2020) for leukemia, melanoma, and kidney cancer, despite stable/increasing incidence, and accelerated declines for lung cancer. In summary, although cancer mortality rates continue to decline, future progress may be attenuated by rising incidence for breast, prostate, and uterine corpus cancers, which also happen to have the largest racial disparities in mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Siegel
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kimberly D Miller
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nikita Sandeep Wagle
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Iczkowski KA, Molina M, Egevad L, Bostwick DG, van Leenders GJLH, La Rosa FG, van der Kwast T, Berney DM, Evans AJ, Wheeler TM, Leite KRM, Samaratunga H, Srigley J, Varma M, Tsuzuki T, Lucia MS, Crawford ED, Harris RG, Stricker P, Lawrentschuk N, Woo HH, Fleshner NE, Shore ND, Yaxley J, Bratt O, Wiklund P, Roberts M, Cheng L, Delahunt B. Low-Grade Prostate Cancer Should Still be Labeled Cancer. BJU Int 2022; 130:741-743. [PMID: 36083240 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mariel Molina
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Lars Egevad
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David G Bostwick
- Bostwick Laboratories, a division of Poplar Healthcare, Orlando, FL
| | | | - Francisco G La Rosa
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Theodorus van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network and Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
| | - Daniel M Berney
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS TRUST, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Evans
- Department of Pathology, Mackenzie Health, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas M Wheeler
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Katia R M Leite
- Urology Department, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Department of Pathology, University of Queensland School of Medicine, and Aquesta Uropathology, Queensland, Australia
| | - John Srigley
- Dept. of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Murali Varma
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Japan
| | - M Scott Lucia
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - E David Crawford
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Philip Stricker
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Private Hospital and Clinic, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Urology Department of the Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Henry H Woo
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University and SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Neil E Fleshner
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - John Yaxley
- Wesley Medical Center, Auchenflower, Australia
| | - Ola Bratt
- Department of Urology and Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenberg, Sweden
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institutet.,Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Matthew Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Brett Delahunt
- Pathology and Molecular Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Takahashi T. RE: Grade Migration of Prostate Cancer in the United States During the Last Decade. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1553-1554. [PMID: 35880870 PMCID: PMC9664172 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Takahashi
- Correspondence to: Takeshi Takahashi, MD, PhD, Health and Welfare Bureau,
Kitakyushu City Office, Jyonai 1-1, Kitakyushu 803-8501, Japan (e-mail:
)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rampariag R, Chernyavskiy I, Al-Ajam M, Tsay JCJ. Controversies and challenges in lung cancer screening. Semin Oncol 2022; 49:191-197. [PMID: 35907666 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Two large randomized controlled trials have shown mortality benefit from lung cancer screening (LCS) in high-risk groups. Updated guidelines by the United State Preventative Service Task Force in 2020 will allow for inclusion of more patients who are at high risk of developing lung cancer and benefit from screening. As medical clinics and lung cancer screening programs around the country continue to work on perfecting the LCS workflow, it is important to understand some controversial issues surrounding LCS that should be addressed. In this article, we identify some of these issues, including false positive rates of low-dose CT, over-diagnosis, cost expenditure, LCS disparities in minorities, and utility of biomarkers. We hope to provide clarity, potential solutions, and future directions on how to address these controversies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravindra Rampariag
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Administration (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System, NY, USA
| | - Igor Chernyavskiy
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Administration (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System, NY, USA; Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Administration (VA) Northport Healthcare System, NY, USA
| | - Mohammad Al-Ajam
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Administration (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System, NY, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Jun-Chieh J Tsay
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Administration (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System, NY, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|