1
|
Ufere NN, Serper M, Kaplan A, Horick N, Indriolo T, Li L, Satapathy N, Donlan J, Castano Jimenez JC, Lago-Hernandez C, Lieber S, Gonzalez C, Keegan E, Schoener K, Bethea E, Dageforde LA, Yeh H, El-Jawahri A, Park ER, Vodkin I, Schonfeld E, Nipp R, Desai A, Lai JC. Financial burden following adult liver transplantation is common and associated with adverse recipient outcomes. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:918-931. [PMID: 38353602 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
The financial impact of liver transplantation has been underexplored. We aimed to identify associations between high financial burden (≥10% annual income spent on out-of-pocket medical costs) and work productivity, financial distress (coping behaviors in response to the financial burden), and financial toxicity (health-related quality of life, HRQOL) among adult recipients of liver transplant. Between June 2021 and May 2022, we surveyed 207 adult recipients of liver transplant across 5 US transplant centers. Financial burden and distress were measured by 25 items adapted from national surveys of cancer survivors. Participants also completed the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment and EQ-5D-5L HRQOL questionnaires. In total, 23% of recipients reported high financial burden which was significantly associated with higher daily activity impairment (32.9% vs. 23.3%, p =0.048). In adjusted analyses, the high financial burden was significantly and independently associated with delayed or foregone medical care (adjusted odds ratio, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.85-8.42) and being unable to afford basic necessities (adjusted odds ratio, 5.12; 95% CI: 1.61-16.37). Recipients experiencing high financial burden had significantly lower self-reported HRQOL as measured by the EQ-5D-5L compared to recipients with low financial burden (67.8 vs. 76.1, p =0.008) and an age-matched and sex-matched US general population (67.8 vs. 79.1, p <0.001). In this multicenter cohort study, nearly 1 in 4 adult recipients of liver transplant experienced a high financial burden, which was significantly associated with delayed or foregone medical care and lower self-reported HRQOL. These findings underscore the need to evaluate and address the financial burden in this population before and after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nneka N Ufere
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Division, Liver Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marina Serper
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alyson Kaplan
- Department of Medicine, Tufts Abdominal Transplant Institute, Tufts University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nora Horick
- Department of Statistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Teresa Indriolo
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Division, Liver Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lucinda Li
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Division, Liver Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nishant Satapathy
- University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - John Donlan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Janeth C Castano Jimenez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Carlos Lago-Hernandez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Sarah Lieber
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Carolina Gonzalez
- Department of Social Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eileen Keegan
- Department of Social Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kimberly Schoener
- Department of Social Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Emily Bethea
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Division, Liver Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leigh-Anne Dageforde
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Heidi Yeh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Areej El-Jawahri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elyse R Park
- Department of Psychiatry, Mongan Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Irine Vodkin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Emily Schonfeld
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ryan Nipp
- Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Archita Desai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jennifer C Lai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng Z, Hu X, Banegas MP, Han X, Zhao J, Shi KS, Yabroff KR. Health-related social needs, medical financial hardship, and mortality risk among cancer survivors. Cancer 2024; 130:2938-2947. [PMID: 38695561 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer survivors may face challenges affording food, housing, and other living necessities, which are known as health-related social needs (HRSNs). However, little is known about the associations of HRSNs and mortality risk among adult cancer survivors. METHODS Adult cancer survivors were identified from the 2013-2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and linked with the NHIS Mortality File with vital status through December 31, 2019. HRSNs, measured by food insecurity, and nonmedical financial worries (e.g., housing costs), was categorized as severe, moderate, and minor/none. Medical financial hardship, including material, psychological, and behavioral domains, was categorized as 2-3, 1, or 0 domains. Using age as the time scale, the associations of HRSNs and medical financial hardship and mortality risk were assessed with weighted adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Among cancer survivors 18-64 years old (n = 5855), 25.5% and 18.3% reported moderate and severe levels of HRSNs, respectively; among survivors 65-79 years old (n = 5918), 15.6% and 6.6% reported moderate and severe levels of HRSNs, respectively. Among cancer survivors 18-64 years old, severe HRSNs was associated with increased mortality risk (hazards ratio [HR], 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.93, p < .001; reference = minor/none) in adjusted analyses. Among cancer survivors 65-79 years old, 2-3 domains of medical financial hardship was associated with increased mortality risk (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.13-2.20, p = .007; reference = 0 domain). CONCLUSIONS HSRNs and financial hardship are associated with increased mortality risk among cancer survivors; comprehensive assessment of HRSN and financial hardship connecting patients with relevant services can inform efforts to mitigate adverse consequences of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyuan Zheng
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Xin Hu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center and School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Matthew P Banegas
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jingxuan Zhao
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kewei Sylvia Shi
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yanez B, Perry LM, Peipert JD, Kuharic M, Taub C, Garcia SF, Diaz A, Buitrago D, Mai Q, Gharzai LA, Cella D, Kircher SM. Exploring the Relationship Among Financial Hardship, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients With Cancer: A Longitudinal Study. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400025. [PMID: 39146505 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial hardship (FH) is a complex issue in cancer care, affecting material conditions, well-being, and coping behaviors. This study aimed to longitudinally examine FH, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and their associations while incorporating social determinants of health and health care cost covariates in a sample of patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS This prospective, longitudinal cohort study analyzed data from 2,305 participants from the Northwestern University Improving the Management of Symptoms during and following Cancer Treatment trial. Outcomes assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postbaseline included depressive symptoms, anxiety, and FH. Analysis involved random intercept cross-lagged panel models to explore between- and within-person effects, incorporating factors such as age, sex, insurance status, neighborhood area deprivation, health care charges, out-of-pocket costs, and health literacy. RESULTS The cohort had a mean age of 60.7 (standard deviation [SD] = 12.7) years and was mostly female (64.9%) and White (86.2%). Correlations were found between FH and depressive symptoms (r = 0.310) and anxiety (r = 0.289). A predictive relationship was observed between FH and depressive symptoms, with baseline and 6-month depressive symptom levels predicting later FH (baseline β = .079, P = .070; 6-month β = .072, P = .081) and 9-month FH significantly predicting 12-month depressive symptoms (β = .083, P = .025), even after accounting for health care charges and out-of-pocket costs. Baseline and 9-month anxiety showed a predictive relationship with subsequent FH (baseline β = .097, P = .023; 9-month β = .071, P = .068). CONCLUSION FH emerged as a prominent issue, with nearly half of participants experiencing some level of FH. Depressive symptoms and anxiety were related to FH. These findings underscore the need for a comprehensive approach in cancer care that concurrently addresses anxiety, depressive symptoms, and FH, recognizing their interconnected impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betina Yanez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Laura M Perry
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Center for Health Outcomes, Implementation, and Community-Engaged Science, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
- Louisiana Cancer Research Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Maja Kuharic
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL
| | - Chloe Taub
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Sofia F Garcia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Alma Diaz
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Diana Buitrago
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Quan Mai
- The Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW), Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Laila A Gharzai
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Sheetal M Kircher
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anderson-Buettner AS, Janitz AE, Doescher MP, Madison SD, Khoussine MA, Harjo KL, Bear MB, Dartez S, Buckner SK, Rhoades DA. Financial hardship screening among Native American patients with cancer: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:928. [PMID: 39138428 PMCID: PMC11323667 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11357-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-related financial hardship is an increasingly recognized concern for patients, families, and caregivers. Many Native American (NA) patients are at increased risk for cancer-related financial hardship due to high prevalence of low income, medical comorbidity, and lack of private health insurance. However, financial hardship screening (FHS) implementation for NA patients with cancer has not been reported. The objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to FHS implementation for NA patients. METHODS We conducted key informant interviews with NA patients with cancer and with clinical staff at an academic cancer center. Included patients had a confirmed diagnosis of cancer and were referred to the cancer center through the Indian Health Service, Tribal health program, or Urban Indian health program. Interviews included questions regarding current financial hardship, experiences in discussing financial hardship with the cancer care and primary care teams, and acceptability of completing a financial hardship screening tool at the cancer center. Clinical staff included physicians, advanced practice providers, and social workers. Interviews focused on confidence, comfort, and experience in discussing financial hardship with patients. Recorded interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed using MAXQDA® software. RESULTS We interviewed seven patients and four clinical staff. Themes from the interviews included: 1) existing resources and support services; 2) challenges, gaps in services, and barriers to care; 3) nuances of NA cancer care; and 4) opportunities for improved care and resources. Patients identified financial challenges to receiving cancer care including transportation, lodging, food insecurity, and utility expenses. Patients were willing to complete a FHS tool, but indicated this tool should be short and not intrusive of the patient's financial information. Clinical staff described discomfort in discussing financial hardship with patients, primarily due to a lack of training and knowledge about resources to support patients. Having designated staff familiar with I/T/U systems was helpful, but perspectives differed regarding who should administer FHS. CONCLUSIONS We identified facilitators and barriers to implementing FHS for NA patients with cancer at both the patient and clinician levels. Findings suggest clear organizational structures and processes are needed for financial hardship to be addressed effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber S Anderson-Buettner
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| | - Amanda E Janitz
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Mark P Doescher
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Stefanie D Madison
- Oklahoma City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Keri L Harjo
- Oklahoma City Indian Clinic, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Marvin B Bear
- Little Axe Health Center, Absentee Shawnee Tribe, Norman, OK, USA
| | - Stephnie Dartez
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Sheryl K Buckner
- Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Dorothy A Rhoades
- Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kennedy K, Jusue-Torres I, Buller ID, Rossi E, Mallisetty A, Rodgers K, Lee B, Menchaca M, Pasquinelli M, Nguyen RH, Weinberg F, Rubinstein I, Herman JG, Brock M, Feldman L, Aldrich MC, Hulbert A. Neighborhood-level deprivation and survival in lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:959. [PMID: 39107707 PMCID: PMC11301857 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12720-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recent advances in lung cancer therapeutics and improving overall survival, disparities persist among socially disadvantaged populations. This study aims to determine the effects of neighborhood deprivation indices (NDI) on lung cancer mortality. This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study assessing the relationship between NDI and overall survival adjusted for age, disease stage, and DNA methylation among biopsy-proven lung cancer patients. State-specific NDI for each year of sample collection were computed at the U.S. census tract level and dichotomized into low- and high-deprivation. RESULTS A total of 173 non small lung cancer patients were included, with n = 85 (49%) and n = 88 (51%) in the low and high-deprivation groups, respectively. NDI was significantly higher among Black patients when compared with White patients (p = 0.003). There was a significant correlation between DNA methylation and stage for HOXA7, SOX17, ZFP42, HOXA9, CDO1 and TAC1. Only HOXA7 DNA methylation was positively correlated with NDI. The high-deprivation group had a statistically significant shorter survival than the low-deprivation group (p = 0.02). After adjusting for age, race, stage, and DNA methylation status, belonging to the high-deprivation group was associated with higher mortality with a hazard ratio of 1.81 (95%CI: 1.03-3.19). CONCLUSIONS Increased neighborhood-level deprivation may be associated with liquid biopsy DNA methylation, shorter survival, and increased mortality. Changes in health care policies that consider neighborhood-level indices of socioeconomic deprivation may enable a more equitable increase in lung cancer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Kennedy
- Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ignacio Jusue-Torres
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI, USA
| | - Ian D Buller
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
- Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Emily Rossi
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Apurva Mallisetty
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center, University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago, 909 South Wolcott Ave COMRB Suite 5140, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Kristen Rodgers
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Beverly Lee
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Martha Menchaca
- Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mary Pasquinelli
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ryan H Nguyen
- Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Frank Weinberg
- Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Israel Rubinstein
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Division of Research Services, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James G Herman
- Lung Cancer Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, The Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Malcolm Brock
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lawrence Feldman
- Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Division of Research Services, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Melinda C Aldrich
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Alicia Hulbert
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center, University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago, 909 South Wolcott Ave COMRB Suite 5140, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
- Division of Research Services, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chelsea NN, Posever N, Hsieh TYJ, Patterson S, Sweeney C, Dalrymple JL, Dottino J, Wiechert AC, Garrett L, Hacker MR, Esselen KM. Implementation of a financial navigation program in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 189:119-124. [PMID: 39096589 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.07.672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND "Financial Toxicity" (FT) is the financial burden imposed on patients due to disease and its treatment. Approximately 50% of gynecologic oncology patients experience FT. This study describes the implementation and outcomes of a novel financial navigation program (FNP) in gynecologic oncology. METHODS Patients presenting for initial consultation with a gynecologic oncologist from July 2022 to September 2023 were included. A FNP was launched inclusive of hiring a financial navigator (FN) in July 2022, and implementing FT screening in October 2022. We prospectively captured patient referrals to the FN, collecting clinical, demographic, financial and social needs information, along with FN interventions and institutional support service referrals. Referrals to the FN and support services were quantified before and after screening implementation. RESULTS There were 1029 patients with 21.6% seen before and 78.4% after screening initiation. Median age was 58 (IQR 46-68). The majority were non-Hispanic white (60%) with private insurance (61%). A total of 10.5% patients were referred to the FN. Transportation (32%), financial assistance (20.5%) and emotional support (15.4%) were the most common needs identified. A higher proportion of patients referred to the FN identified as Black, had government-funded insurance or diagnoses of uterine or cervical cancers (p < 0.05). Post-screening referrals to FN increased (5% vs. 12.9%, p < 0.001), while referrals to other support services decreased (9.5% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of the FNP was feasible, though presence of both a FN and FT screening maximized its effectiveness. Further investigation is needed to understand screening barriers and evaluate longer-term impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadiha Noor Chelsea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Natalie Posever
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Tina Yi Jin Hsieh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street Suite 514, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Sutania Patterson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Christine Sweeney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - John L Dalrymple
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Joseph Dottino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Andrew C Wiechert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Leslie Garrett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Michele R Hacker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Katharine M Esselen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kirstein 3, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Nápoles AM. Financial strain, neighborhood cohesion, and health-related quality of life among rural and urban Spanish-speaking Latina breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1275-1284. [PMID: 36991270 PMCID: PMC11324799 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01369-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Among Latina breast cancer survivors, explore associations between rural/urban residence and health-related quality of life (HRQL), and whether associations are moderated by financial strain and low neighborhood cohesion. METHODS We combined baseline data from two randomized controlled trials of a stress management intervention conducted among 151 urban and 153 rural dwelling Latinas with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Generalized linear models estimated associations between rural/urban status and HRQL (overall, emotional, social-family, physical, and functional well-being), and we examined moderation effects of financial strain and low neighborhood cohesion, controlling for age, marital status, and breast cancer characteristics. RESULTS Rural women reported better emotional (β = 1.85; 95% CI = 0.37, 3.33), functional (β = 2.23; 95% CI = 0.69, 3.77), and overall (β = 5.68; 95% CI = 1.12, 10.25) well-being than urban women, regardless of degree of financial strain or neighborhood cohesion; moderation effects were not statistically significant. Financial strain was inversely associated with emotional (β = -2.34; 95% CI = 3.63, -1.05), physical (β = -2.56; 95% CI = -4.12, -1.01), functional (β = -1.61; 95% CI = -2.96, -0.26), and overall (β = -6.67; 95% CI = -10.96, -2.98) well-being. Low neighborhood cohesion was inversely associated with emotional (β = -1.27; 95% CI = -2.50, -0.04), social-family (β = -1.72; 95% CI = -3.02, -0.42), functional (β = -1.63; 95% CI = -2.92, -0.34), and overall (β = -5.95; 95% CI = 9.76, -2.14) well-being. CONCLUSIONS Rural Latina breast cancer survivors reported better emotional, functional and overall well-being than their urban counterparts. Greater financial strain and less neighborhood cohesion were associated with worse HRQL on most domains regardless of rural/urban context. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Interventions that focus on increasing perceived neighborhood cohesion and reducing or better managing financial strain, could help improve Latina cancer survivors' well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson
- University of California San Francisco, Division of Internal Medicine, 490 Illinois Street, 9th floor, Box 0856, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
- University of California Berkeley, School of Public Health, 2121 Berkeley Way, Room 5302, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
| | - Anita L Stewart
- University of California San Francisco, Institute for Health & Aging, Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, 490 Illinois Street, 12th floor, Box 0646, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Anna María Nápoles
- Division of Intramural Research, National Institute On Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 3, Floor 5, Room E08, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Badr H, Han J, Mims M. Development and validation of FinTox: A new screening tool to assess cancer-related financial toxicity. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7306. [PMID: 39113222 PMCID: PMC11306290 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to develop and validate FinTox, a concise tool for screening and managing financial toxicity in oncology settings. METHODS Development involved qualitative interviews with healthcare providers and patients, and feedback from a 7-member expert panel resulting in a 5-item measure that evaluates financial strain, psychological responses, and care modifications. Psychometric evaluations examined factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent and convergent validity. Associations between FinTox scores and sociodemographic/medical factors were also analyzed using univariate and multivariable regression models. RESULTS Twelve healthcare providers and 20 patients were interviewed, and 268 patients (69.8% female, 47.4% non-Hispanic White) completed surveys including FinTox, the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures, and sociodemographic questions. FinTox demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95). Significant correlations with the COST (r = -0.62, p < 0.001) and HRQOL measures corroborated content and convergent validity. Diagnostic accuracy was evidenced by a sensitivity of 72.3%, specificity of 85.2%, positive predictive value of 83.2%, and negative predictive value of 70.3%. Higher FinTox scores were also associated with receiving care at a safety-net hospital, Black race, household income <600% of the federal poverty level, and Stage 4 cancer. CONCLUSION FinTox's robust psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy position it as a reliable tool for detecting financial toxicity. Future research should evaluate its responsiveness to changes over time and integration into clinical workflows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoda Badr
- Department of MedicineBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Jessie Han
- Department of MedicineBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Martha Mims
- Department of MedicineBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Myers SP, Aviki E, Sevilimedu V, Thom B, Gemignani ML. Financial Toxicity Among Women with Breast Cancer Varies by Age and Race. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15895-5. [PMID: 39078600 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15895-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Financial toxicity negatively affects clinical outcomes in breast cancer. Underrepresented demographics may be at higher risk for financial toxicity. We characterized disparities on the basis of age and other factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Surveys completed by women with stage 0-IV breast cancer treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 06/2022 and 05/2023 were analyzed. The comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST) scale was used to assess financial toxicity. Descriptive statistics were calculated for differences in financial toxicity/related factors, and outcomes by age and race. Associations between variables of interest and COST scores were analyzed using linear regression. RESULTS Of 8512 respondents (75% white, 9.3% Asian, 8.4% Black), most (68%) had clinical stage 0/I disease. Stratified by age, young Black women had higher financial toxicity than young white or Asian women (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, women age < 45 years experienced higher financial toxicity than older women (coefficient - 2.0, 95% CI - 2.8 to - 1.1, p < 0.001). Compared with white women, financial toxicity was greater among Black (coefficient - 6.8, 95% CI - 7.8 to - 5.8) and Asian women (coefficient - 3.5, 95% CI - 4.4 to - 2.5). Cost-related medication non-adherence was more frequent among Black and Asian women (p < 0.001). Asian women more often paid for treatment with savings than white and Black women (p < 0.001). Young women reported using savings for treatment-related costs more than older (45% vs. 32%); p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Racial minorities and young patients are disproportionately affected by financial toxicity. Further studies are planned to determine how financial toxicity evolves over time and whether referral to financial services effectively reduces toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara P Myers
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emeline Aviki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NYU Langone Health, Mineola, NY, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bridgette Thom
- School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Nursing, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary L Gemignani
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alishahi Tabriz A, Turner K, Hemati H, Baugh C, Elston Lafata J. Assessing the Validity of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Measure in Identifying Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Visits by Patients With Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400160. [PMID: 39038257 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented chemotherapy measures (OP-35) to reduce potentially preventable emergency department visits (PPEDVs) and hospitalizations. This study evaluated the validity of the OP-35 measure in identifying PPEDVs among patients with cancer. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study, which used data from the 2012-2022 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. ED visits are assessed and compared on the basis of three measures: immediacy using Emergency Severity Index (ESI), disposition (discharge v hospitalization), and OP-35 criteria. RESULTS Between 2012 and 2022, a weighted sample of 46,723,524 ED visits were made by patients with cancer. Among reported ESI cases, 25.2% (8,346,443) was high urgency. In addition, 30.3% (14,135,496) of ED visits among patients with cancer led to hospitalizations. Using the OP-35 measure, it was found that 20.85% (9,743,977) was PPEDVs. A 21.9% (10,232,102) discrepancy between discharge diagnosis (CMS billing codes) and chief complaints was identified. Further analysis showed that 19.2% (1,872,556) of potentially preventable ED visits (CMS OP-35) were high urgency and 32.6% (3,181,280) resulted in hospitalization. CONCLUSION The CMS approach to identifying PPEDVs has limitations. First, it may overcount preventable visits by including high-urgency or hospitalization-requiring cases. Second, relying on final diagnoses for retrospective preventability judgment can be misleading as they may not reflect the initial reason for the visit. In addition, differentiating causes for ED visits in patients with cancer undergoing various treatments is challenging as the approach does not distinguish between chemotherapy-related complications and others. Identification inconsistencies arise because of varying coding practices and chosen preventable conditions, lacking consensus and alignment with specific hospital or patient needs. Finally, the model fails to consider crucial nonclinical factors like social support, economic barriers, and alternative care access, potentially unfairly penalizing hospitals serving underserved populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Alishahi Tabriz
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | - Kea Turner
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | - Homa Hemati
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Christopher Baugh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer Elston Lafata
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jung J, Mukherjee K, Brown M, Sadigh G. Association between financial hardship and psychological burden and the role of social and mental health support: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e38871. [PMID: 38996144 PMCID: PMC11245238 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000038871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
We aimed to assess the association between medical financial hardship and psychological burden and the moderating role of social and mental health support. 2021 United States National Health Interview Survey was used. Financial hardship was defined as having financial worry, material hardship, or cost-related care nonadherence. Psychological burden was measured using perceived general health status, satisfaction with life, and serious psychological distress (SPD). Of 29,370 included adults, 49% experienced financial hardship in the last 12 months. Financial hardship was associated with a higher psychological burden (odds ratio [OR], 3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.43-5.47 for SPD). Eleven percent received counseling/therapy from mental health professionals, and 90% had experienced frequent social support. Frequent social support was associated with lower financial hardship (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80) and psychological burden (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.42 for SPD). Previous mental health support was associated with higher financial hardship (OR,1.40; 95% CI, 1.28-1.54) and psychological burden (OR, 9.75; 95% CI, 6.97-13.94 for SPD). Those experiencing financial hardship had lower odds of SPD if they received mental health support in the last 12 months (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.85). Future interventions should also focus on improving social support and mental health for patients as a way of mitigating medical financial hardship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinho Jung
- School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Kumar Mukherjee
- School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Suwanee, GA
| | | | - Gelareh Sadigh
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Waters AR, Wheeler SB, Tan KR, Rosenstein DL, Roberson ML, Kirchhoff AC, Kent EE. Material, Psychological, and Behavioral Financial Hardship Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Cancer Survivors in the United States. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400114. [PMID: 38991169 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Driven by anti-LGBTQ+ stigma, emerging literature suggests that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) cancer survivors experience financial hardship (FH) more frequently than heterosexual survivors. However, few studies have used nationally representative samples to estimate this inequity. METHODS National Health Interview Survey data from 2019 to 2022 were pooled and weighted. Outcomes included material, psychological, and behavioral FH. The behavioral domain was further broken down into subdomains including medical care, prescription medications, and mental health care. Multivariable logit models controlling for a variety of factors were used to generate LGB and heterosexual predicted probabilities and differential effects for each FH outcome. Stratified estimates were generated by sex and age groups. RESULTS A total of N = 374 LGB and N = 12,757 heterosexual cancer survivors were included in this analysis. In adjusted analyses, LGB cancer survivors had significantly higher material (19%, 95% CI, 15 to 24 v 12%, 95% CI, 11 to 13; P = .004), psychological (44%, 95% CI, 38 to 51 v 37%, 95% CI, 36 to 38; P = .035), and behavioral (23%, 95% CI, 18 to 28 v 13%, 95% CI, 13 to 14; P < .0001) FH than heterosexual survivors. LGB cancer survivors also had higher medical behavioral (11%, 95% CI, 7 to 15 v 7%, 95% CI, 6 to 7; P = .030), prescription medication behavioral (14%, 95% CI, 10 to 19 v 10%, 95% CI, 9 to 10; P = .032), and mental health behavioral (9%, 95% CI, 6 to 13 v 3%, 95% CI, 3 to 4; P < .0001) FH than heterosexual survivors. Stratified estimates revealed young LGB cancer survivors had the highest probability of each outcome (material: 31%, 95% CI, 23 to 40; psychological: 58%, 95% CI, 50 to 66; behavioral: 45%, 95% CI, 36 to 53). CONCLUSION In this nationally representative analysis, LGB cancer survivors experience substantial inequities in all FH outcomes. It is crucial that future FH interventional work should prioritize populations at the highest risk of FH, such as LGB cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin R Waters
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kelly R Tan
- Department of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Hillman Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Donald L Rosenstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Mya L Roberson
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Erin E Kent
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Degeling K, To YH, Trapani K, Athan S, Gibbs P, IJzerman MJ, Franchini F. Predicting the Population Health Economic Impact of Current and New Cancer Treatments for Colorectal Cancer: A Data-Driven Whole Disease Simulation Model for Predicting the Number of Patients with Colorectal Cancer by Stage and Treatment Line in Australia. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024:S1098-3015(24)02745-1. [PMID: 38977190 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Effective healthcare planning, resource allocation, and budgeting require accurate predictions of the number of patients needing treatment at specific cancer stages and treatment lines. The Predicting the Population Health Economic Impact of Current and New Cancer Treatments (PRIMCAT) for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) simulation model (PRIMCAT-CRC) was developed to meet this requirement for all CRC stages and relevant molecular profiles in Australia. METHODS Real-world data were used to estimate treatment utilization and time-to-event distributions. This populated a discrete-event simulation, projecting the number of patients receiving treatment across all disease stages and treatment lines for CRC and forecasting the number of patients likely to utilize future treatments. Illustrative analyses were undertaken, estimating treatments across disease stages and treatment lines over a 5-year period (2022-2026). We demonstrated the model's applicability through a case study introducing pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for mismatch-repair-deficient stage IV. RESULTS Clinical registry data from 7163 patients informed the model. The model forecasts 15 738 incident and 2821 prevalent cases requiring treatment in 2022, rising to 15 921 and 2871, respectively, by 2026. Projections show that over 2022 to 2026, there will be a total of 116 752 treatments initiated, with 43% intended for stage IV disease. The introduction of pembrolizumab is projected for 706 patients annually, totaling 3530 individuals starting treatment with pembrolizumab over the forecasted period, without significantly altering downstream utilization of subsequent treatments. CONCLUSIONS PRIMCAT-CRC is a versatile tool that can be used to estimate the eligible patient populations for novel cancer therapies, thereby reducing uncertainty for policymakers in decisions to publicly reimburse new treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen Degeling
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yat Hang To
- Personalized Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen Trapani
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sophy Athan
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalized Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fanny Franchini
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Salsman JM, Nightingale CL, Canzona MR, Howard DS, Tucker-Seeley RD, Wiseman KD, Victorson DE, Robles JM, Roth M, Smith R, Reeve BB, Danhauer SC. Asking the "Right" Questions about Financial Hardship: Using Cognitive Interviews with Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Caregivers to Inform Measure Development. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38959182 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2024.0041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Financial hardship as a result of cancer treatment can have a significant and lasting negative impact on adolescents and young adults (AYAs) and their families. To address a lack of developmentally informed and psychometrically sound measures of financial hardship for AYAs and their caregivers, we used rigorous measurement development methods recommended by the National Institutes of Health's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) to determine comprehensibility and relevance of measure content. Methods: Our multi-step approach involved item identification, refinement, and generation; translatability and reading level review; and cognitive interviews. A purposive sample of 25 AYAs and 10 caregivers participated, ensuring representation across age, education, gender, race/ethnicity, and cancer type. Results: Fifty patient-reported and caregiver-reported items were developed across material, psychosocial, and behavioral subdomains of financial hardship. Translatability and reading level reviews resulted in 22 patient-reported and 25 caregiver-reported items being rewritten. Eighty-eight percent of patients and all caregivers described the items as easy to answer. Younger AYAs (15 to 25 years of age) were more likely to say the items were less relevant for them. Forty-six patient-reported and 48 caregiver-reported items were recommended for further testing. Conclusion: This study is the first to use in-depth qualitative methods to center AYA patient and caregiver experiences in the creation of new measures of financial hardship. Data support the comprehensibility and content validity of these preliminary item banks. Future large-scale, quantitative testing will lead to additional refinements and support the use of short forms and computer-adaptive testing for a diverse sample of AYAs and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Salsman
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
- The Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Chandylen L Nightingale
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
- The Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mollie R Canzona
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
- The Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Communication, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dianna S Howard
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Kimberly D Wiseman
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
- The Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David E Victorson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Joanna M Robles
- The Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Roth
- Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Regina Smith
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Measurement, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Suzanne C Danhauer
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
- The Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Potosky AL, Ahn J, Xia Y, Lin L, Chen RC, Graves KD, Pan W, Fall-Dickson JM, Keegan THM, Paddock LE, Wu XC, Shrestha A, Reeve BB. Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality-of-Life Profiles Among Prostate Cancer Survivors. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:921-931. [PMID: 38466917 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to describe the prevalence and predictors of symptom and function clusters related to physical, emotional, and social components of general health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a population-based sample of prostate cancer (PCa) survivors. METHODS Participants (N = 1,162) completed a baseline survey at a median of 9 months after diagnosis to ascertain the co-occurrence of eight symptom and functional domains that are common across all cancers and not treatment-specific. We used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify subgroup profiles of survivors with low, moderate, or high HRQOL levels. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to identify clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with survivors' membership in the low versus moderate or high HRQOL profile. RESULTS The LPA identified 16% of survivors who were categorized in the low HRQOL profile at baseline, indicative of the highest symptom burden and lowest functioning. Factors related to survivors' membership in the low versus higher HRQOL profile groups included less than age 65 years at diagnosis, identifying as non-Hispanic Black race, not working, being a former versus never smoker, systemic therapy, less companionship, more comorbidities, lower health care financial well-being, or less spirituality. Several factors remained associated with remaining in the low versus higher HRQOL profiles on the follow-up survey (n = 699), including younger age, Black race, comorbidity, and lower financial and spiritual well-being. CONCLUSION About one of six PCa survivors experienced elevated physical and psychosocial symptoms that were independent of local curative therapy, but with younger age, race, comorbidity, and lower financial and spiritual well-being as stable risk factors for poor HRQOL over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnold L Potosky
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Yi Xia
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Li Lin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Measurement, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Kristi D Graves
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Wei Pan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Jane M Fall-Dickson
- Georgetown University School of Nursing, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
- Daniel K. Inouye School of Nursing, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| | - Theresa H M Keegan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California-Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Lisa E Paddock
- Rutgers School of Public Health and Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, Louisiana Tumor Registry, New Orleans, LA
| | - Anshu Shrestha
- Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, CA
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Measurement, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Walker-Pow R, Bruun A, Kupeli N, Bosco A, White N. A systematic review on the impact of financial insecurity on the physical and psychological well-being for people living with terminal illness. Palliat Med 2024; 38:692-710. [PMID: 38835188 PMCID: PMC11290032 DOI: 10.1177/02692163241257583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with terminal illness are at higher risk of experiencing financial insecurity. The variance in definitions of financial insecurity, in addition to its impact on the well-being of this population has not yet been systematically analysed. AIM To understand the definition, prevalence and impact of financial insecurity on the physical and psychological well-being of people living with terminal illness. DESIGN A systematic review with a narrative synthesis (prospectively registered; CRD42023404516). DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO, ProQuest Central and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to May 2023. Included studies had to measure or describe the impact of financial insecurity on an aspect of participants' physical or mental well-being. Study quality was assessed using the Hawker tool. RESULTS A total of 26 studies were included in the review. Financial insecurity was defined using many different definitions and terminology. Out of 4824 participants, 1126 (23%) reported experiencing high levels of financial insecurity. Nine studies reported 21 unique analyses across three domains of physical well-being. Out of those 21 analyses, 10 (48%) reported a negative result (an increase in financial insecurity was reported with a decrease in physical well-being). Twenty-one studies reported 51 unique analyses across nine domains of psychological well-being. Out of these analyses, 35 (69%) reported a negative result (an increase in financial insecurity was reported with a decrease in psychological well-being). CONCLUSIONS People living with terminal illness require support with their financial situation to ensure their well-being is not negatively impacted by financial insecurity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross Walker-Pow
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Bruun
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, School of Nursing, Allied and Public Health, Kingston University London, London, UK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alessandro Bosco
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola White
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Belen HM, Sarikoç G. Cancer Patients: Forgiveness, Discomfort Intolerance and Psychiatric Symptoms. J Palliat Care 2024; 39:227-237. [PMID: 37306189 DOI: 10.1177/08258597231172838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: Cancer patients try to find answers in the light of their individual experiences and if they cannot adapt in line with the answers, various psychiatric symptoms may occur. There are studies supporting that "forgiveness" helps reduce the emotional burden of patients with cancer in their ability to discomfort intolerance of the disease, find meaning in the life. The aim of this study is to evaluate forgiveness, discomfort intolerance, and psychiatric symptoms in cancer patients. Methods: The data of this study, which was conducted with 208 cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy treatment, Personal Information Form was collected with Heartland Forgiveness Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory, and Discomfort Intolerance Scale. Result: It has been determined that cancer patients have a high level of forgiveness, a moderate tolerance to tolerate discomfort, and enable low level of occurrence of psychiatric symptoms. As the level of self-forgiveness and forgiveness of patients increases, the incidence of psychiatric symptoms decreases. Conclusion: In line with the findings, it can be thought that the high level of forgiveness of cancer patients towards their illness allows them to experience less psychiatric symptoms and increase their tolerance to the disorder. Awareness of both patients and healthcare personnel can be increased by preparing training programs that address forgiveness in individuals diagnosed with cancer in healthcare institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilal Merve Belen
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gamze Sarikoç
- Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Gulhane Faculty of Nursing, University of Health Science Turkey, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ritter AR, Prasad RN, Jhawar SR, Bazan JG, Gokun Y, Vudatala S, Diaz DA. Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy: A Cross-sectional Survey Study of US Radiation Oncologists. Am J Clin Oncol 2024:00000421-990000000-00200. [PMID: 38907597 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES For many malignancies, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) is an accepted standard associated with decreased treatment time and costs. United States provider beliefs regarding HFRT likely impact its adoption but are poorly studied. We surveyed US-based radiation oncologists (ROs) to gauge HFRT utilization rates for prostate (PC), breast (BC), and rectal cancer (RC) and to characterize the beliefs governing these decisions. METHODS From July to October 2021, an anonymized, online survey was electronically distributed to ROs actively practicing in the United States. Demographic and practice characteristic information was collected. Questions assessing rates of offering HFRT for PC, BC, and RC and perceived limitations towards using HFRT were administered. RESULTS A total of 203 eligible respondents (72% male, 72% White, 53% nonacademic practice, 69% with 11+ years in practice) were identified. Approximately 50% offered stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early/favorable intermediate risk PC. Although >90% of ROs offered whole-breast HFRT for early-stage BC, only 33% offered accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). Overall, 41% of ROs offered short-course neoadjuvant RT for RC. The primary reported barriers to HFRT utilization were lack of data, inexperience, and referring provider concerns. CONCLUSIONS HFRT is safe, effective, and beneficial, yet underutilized-particularly prostate SBRT, APBI, and short-course RT for RC. Skills retraining and education of ROs and referring providers may increase utilization rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yevgeniya Gokun
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Sundari Vudatala
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Davis ES, Poulson MR, Yarbro AA, Franks JA, Bhatia S, Kenzik KM. Understanding racial differences in financial hardship among older adults surviving cancer. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38888939 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite Medicare coverage, financial hardship is a prevalent issue among those diagnosed with cancer at age 65 years and older, particularly among those belonging to a racial or ethnic minority group. Sociodemographic, clinical, and area-level factors may mediate this relationship; however, no studies have assessed the extent to which these factors contribute to the racial/ethnic disparities in financial hardship. METHODS Surveys assessing financial hardship were completed by 721 White (84%) or Black (16%) patients (aged 65 years and older) who were diagnosed with breast (34%), prostate (27%), lung (17%), or colorectal (14%) cancer or lymphoma (9%) at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 2000 and 2019. Financial hardship included material, psychological, and behavioral domains. Nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca effect decomposition methods were used to evaluate the extent to which individual and area-level factors contribute to racial disparities in financial hardship. RESULTS Black patients reported lower income (65% vs. 34% earning <$50,000) and greater scores on the Area Deprivation Index (median, 93.0 vs. 55.0). Black patients reported significantly higher rates of overall (39% vs. 18%), material (29% vs. 11%), and psychological (27% vs. 11%) hardship compared with White patients. Overall, the observed characteristics explained 51% of racial differences in financial hardship among cancer survivors, primarily because of differences in income (23%) and area deprivation (11%). CONCLUSIONS The current results identify primary contributors to racial disparities in financial hardship among older cancer survivors, which can be used to develop targeted interventions and allocate resources to those at greatest risk for financial hardship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S Davis
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael R Poulson
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alaina A Yarbro
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Franks
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Smita Bhatia
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Kelly M Kenzik
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yabroff KR, Mittu K, Halpern MT. Cost-of-care discussions for individuals with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma: Findings from a large, population-based pilot study. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38869706 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Costs of cancer care can result in patient financial hardship; many professional organizations recommend provider discussions about treatment costs as part of high-quality care. In this pilot study, the authors examined patient-provider cost discussions documented in the medical records of individuals who were diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma-cancers with recently approved, high-cost treatment options. METHODS Individuals who were newly diagnosed in 2017-2018 with stage III/IV NSCLC (n = 1767) and in 2018 with stage III/IV melanoma (n = 689) from 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results regions were randomly selected for the National Cancer Institute Patterns of Care Study. Documentation of cost discussions was abstracted from the medical record. The authors examined patient, treatment, and hospital factors associated with cost discussions in multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Cost discussions were documented in the medical records of 20.3% of patients with NSCLC and in 24.0% of those with melanoma. In adjusted analyses, privately insured (vs. publicly insured) patients were less likely to have documented cost discussions (odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.80). Patients who did not receive systemic therapy or did not receive any cancer-directed treatment were less likely to have documented cost discussions than those who did receive systemic therapy (OR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.19-0.81] and 0.46 [95% CI, 0.30-0.70], respectively), as were patients who were treated at hospitals without residency programs (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98). CONCLUSIONS Cost discussions were infrequently documented in the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with advanced NSCLC and melanoma, which may hinder identifying patient needs and tracking outcomes of associated referrals. Efforts to increase cost-of-care discussions and relevant referrals, as well as their documentation, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Karen Mittu
- Information Management Services, Calverton, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael T Halpern
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Thomy LB, Crichton M, Jones L, Yates PM, Hart NH, Collins LG, Chan RJ. Measures of financial toxicity in cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:403. [PMID: 38831061 PMCID: PMC11147933 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08601-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Comprehensive cancer-related financial toxicity (FT) measures as a multidimensional construct are lacking. The aims of this systematic review were to (1) identify full measures designed explicitly for assessing FT and evaluate their psychometric properties (content validity, structural validity, reliability, and other measurement properties) using Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN), and (2) provide an analysis of the domains of FT covered in these measures. METHODS MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for quantitative studies published from January 2000 to July 2023 that reported psychometric properties of FT measures in cancer survivors. The psychometric properties of FT measures and study risk of bias were analysed using COSMIN. Each FT measure was compared against the six domains of FT recommended by Witte and colleagues. Results were synthesized narratively. The detailed search strategies are available in Table S1. RESULTS Six FT tools including the COST-FACIT, PROFFIT, FIT, SFDQ, HARDS, and ENRICh-Spanish were identified. The COST-FACIT measure had good measurement properties. No measure reached an excellent level for overall quality but was mostly rated as sufficient. The SFDQ, HARDS, and ENRICh-Spanish were the most comprehensive in the inclusion of the six domains of FT. CONCLUSION This review emphasizes the need for validated multidimensional FT measures that can be applied across various cancer types, healthcare settings, and cultural backgrounds. Furthermore, a need to develop practical screening tools with high predictive ability for FT is highly important, considering the significant consequences of FT. Addressing these gaps in future research will further enhance the understanding of FT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L B Thomy
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba Q4102, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - M Crichton
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - L Jones
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - P M Yates
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - N H Hart
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Human Performance Research Centre, INSIGHT Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Perth, WA, Australia
- Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - L G Collins
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australia School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - R J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fiala MA, Leblanc MR, Coccia KW, Bandaru S, Silberstein AE, Coles T, Vij R. Mixed-Methods Study on the Responsiveness of the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity Among People With Multiple Myeloma. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:835-842. [PMID: 38447085 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity is a contributor to the psychosocial burden of cancer care. There is no consensus measure of financial toxicity; however, recent studies have adopted the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). Despite its growing popularity, data on the responsiveness to change of the COST instrument are lacking. To address this gap in the literature, we performed a sequential mixed-methods study of people with multiple myeloma. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the quantitative phase of the study, we collected COST scores at two time points approximately 8 weeks apart from 72 patients. In the qualitative phase, we conducted semistructured interviews with a subset of 12 patients who reported the largest changes in scores. The qualitative data were analyzed using a deductive coding scheme developed using the Framework Method in the context of a commonly cited conceptual model of financial toxicity. RESULTS The median absolute change in COST scores was four points (IQR, 2-6). Only 13% of the sample had the same COST scores at both assessments; 38% had an improved score and 50% had a worsened score. Only, seven of the 12 patients (58%) interviewed reported changes to one or more of the constructs in the conceptual model of financial toxicity. Most commonly, changes to out-of-pocket medical costs were reported (5/12). Changes to nonmedical expenses (n = 2) and subjective financial distress without changes to objective financial burden (n = 2) were also reported. CONCLUSION Additional research is needed to explicate changes in COST scores over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Fiala
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
- School of Social Work, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO
| | - Matthew R Leblanc
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | - Theresa Coles
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Ravi Vij
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Berghuijs KMVT, Kaddas HK, Trujillo G, Rouhani G, Chevrier A, Ose J, Shibata D, Toriola AT, Figueiredo JC, Peoples AR, Li CI, Hardikar S, Siegel EM, Gigic B, Schneider M, Ulrich CM, Kirchhoff AC. Age-related differences in employment, insurance, and financial hardship among colorectal cancer patients: a report from the ColoCare Study. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1075-1084. [PMID: 36949233 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01362-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Employment and financial hardships are common issues for working-age colorectal cancer patients. We surveyed colorectal cancer survivors to investigate employment, insurance, and financial outcomes by age at diagnosis. METHODS Cross-sectional survey of six ColoCare Study sites regarding employment, insurance, and financial hardship outcomes. Eligible participants were 1 to 5 years from colorectal cancer diagnosis. Diagnosis age (18-49, 50-64, 65+ years) with outcomes of interest were compared using chi-square and t-tests. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions were fit to examine association of demographic factors with any material/psychological hardship (yes/no) and the count of hardships. RESULTS N = 202 participants completed the survey (age: 18-49 (n = 42, 20.8%), 50-64 (n = 79, 39.1%), 65+ (n = 81, 40.1%)). Most diagnosed age < 65 worked at diagnosis (18-49: 83%; 50-64: 64%; 65+ : 14%, p < 0.001) and continued working after diagnosis (18-49: 76%; 50-64: 59%; 65+ : 13%; p < 0.001). Participants age 18-49 reported cancer-related difficulties with mental (81.3%) and physical (89%) tasks at work more than those working in the older age groups (45%-61%). In regression models, among those reporting any hardship, the rates of material and psychological hardships were higher among those age 18-64 (Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) range 1.5-2.3 vs. age 65+) and for those with < college (IRR range 1.3-1.6 vs. college +). CONCLUSIONS Younger colorectal cancer patients are more likely to work after a cancer diagnosis and during cancer treatment, but report higher levels of financial hardship than older patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Younger colorectal cancer patients may encounter financial hardship, thus may feel a need to work during and after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heydon K Kaddas
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Gillian Trujillo
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gazelle Rouhani
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Amy Chevrier
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jennifer Ose
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David Shibata
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Adetunji T Toriola
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jane C Figueiredo
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anita R Peoples
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Sheetal Hardikar
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Erin M Siegel
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Biljana Gigic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia M Ulrich
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Patra A, deSouza R, Nag S, Pant HB, Agiwal V, A Y N, Kumar Y, Murthy G. Burden of Financial Hardship Among Breast Cancer Survivors in Maharashtra, India. Cureus 2024; 16:e61625. [PMID: 38966461 PMCID: PMC11222713 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improved breast cancer treatments have increased survival rates, but prolonged and costly therapies strain survivors financially. This study addresses the dearth of research on financial difficulties among breast cancer survivors (BCS) in India. METHODS A mixed-methods study was employed; we assessed financial hardship (FH) using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT), a validated 12-item questionnaire. The minimum score represents FH (FH was categorized based on scores <27). RESULTS Out of 80 surveyed BCS, 60% experienced FH and had a median age of 48 years (40.5-56.5 years). Factors such as occupation, education, income, expenditures, insurance coverage, and impact on savings exhibited significant associations with FH. With only one-third having health insurance and 43.8% self-funding treatment, this research sheds light on the urgent need for targeted support and policies to alleviate the financial burdens faced by BCS in the Indian context. CONCLUSION Financial hardship harms the mental and physical health of BCS. Collaborative efforts among policymakers, healthcare professionals, and insurers are crucial to establishing a compassionate healthcare system that addresses both immediate health and long-term financial concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhilash Patra
- Epidemiology and Public Health, Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, IND
| | | | - Shona Nag
- Oncology, Sahyadri Group of Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Hira B Pant
- Data Management and Biostatistics, Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, IND
| | - Varun Agiwal
- Data Management and Biostatistics, Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, IND
| | - Nirupama A Y
- Epidemiology and Public Health, Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, IND
| | - Yashaswini Kumar
- Epidemiology and Public Health, Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, IND
| | - Gvs Murthy
- Epidemiology and Public Health, Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, IND
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Surachman A, Harhay M, Santos AR, Daw J, Alexander LM, Almeida DM, Coe CL. Financial Hardship and Age-Related Decrements in Kidney Function Among Black and White Adults in the Midlife in the United States Study. Psychosom Med 2024; 86:431-442. [PMID: 37982543 PMCID: PMC11082066 DOI: 10.1097/psy.0000000000001263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This analysis examined if financial hardship was associated with age-related decrements in kidney function using a material-psychosocial-behavioral framework. We also tested if this association was mediated by comorbidity of cardiometabolic risk factors (obesity, elevated blood pressure, and insulin resistance). METHODS Data from 1361 non-Hispanic Black and White adults (ages 26-94 years; non-Hispanic Black = 258) were obtained from the Wave 3 and Refresher phases of the Midlife in the United States project. Kidney function was based on serum creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula without race adjustment). Financial hardship was evaluated in three domains: material (income to poverty line ratio, health insurance coverage, and public/government financial assistance), psychological (perceived financial status, control over financial status, and perceived financial strains), and behavioral responses (financial adjustment/coping such as sold possessions and cutting back on spending). RESULTS More severe financial hardship (overall score and in each domain) was associated with age-related decrements in eGFR, even after adjusting for sociodemographic, education, and health-related covariates. The association between financial hardship and age-related decrements in eGFR was conditional on sex but not race. Finally, cardiometabolic risk factors mediated the association between financial hardship and age-related decrements in eGFR. CONCLUSIONS These findings affirm the negative effects of financial hardship on age-related decrements in renal clearance. In addition to incorporating traditionally used indicators of SES, such as education and income, future research on social hallmarks of aging should also consider the role of financial hardship on the aging process and age-related diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agus Surachman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Meera Harhay
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexis R. Santos
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
- Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan Daw
- Department of Sociology and Criminology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Lacy M. Alexander
- Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
- Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - David M. Almeida
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
- Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Christopher L. Coe
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Al-Rawashdeh N, Damsees R, Abaza H, Ammar K, Alananzeh I, Abu Ghosh A, Al-Awady S, Abu Serhan H, Al-Jafari K, Awadallah O, Al-Jafari Z, Abu Serhan L, Irshaidat S, Obeidat E, Al-Omari A. Mapping the supportive care needs and quality of life of adult survivors of childhood cancer at a comprehensive cancer center in the Middle East. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12356. [PMID: 38811661 PMCID: PMC11136995 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60567-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Assessing unmet needs is crucial to achieving quality care and patient satisfaction. Between September and December 2021, we assessed unmet supportive care needs in a consecutive sample of adult survivors of childhood cancer at KHCC (King Hussien Cancer Center). Two hundred and ninety-seven adult survivors of childhood cancer completed the study questionnaire. The average needs score across all domains was 24.80 (SD = 19.65), with the financial domain scoring the highest 30.39 (SD = 31.95) and sexuality scoring the lowest 7.67 (SD = 19.67). Using a multivariate linear regression model, female gender was independently associated with significantly high scores in all need domains (p < 0.001), except for sexuality. Monthly income, comorbidities, socioeconomic challenges, time since diagnosis, and age at diagnosis have emerged as predictors of needs in many domains. Mean quality of life (QoL) was significantly and inversely associated with the mean score in multiple domains: psychological (p < 0.001), sexuality (p = 0.038), financial (p < 0.001), and overall needs (p = 0.004). Following a content analysis of qualitative data, educational difficulties, and work-related challenges were identified as other unmet needs. Cancer experiences during childhood significantly influence supportive care needs in adulthood. There is a need for more tailored studies assessing different populations of cancer survivors and avoiding the one-size-fits-all survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nedal Al-Rawashdeh
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
- Clinical Trials Unit, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Rana Damsees
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
- Department of Science, Technology and Research, Ministry of Education, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Haneen Abaza
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Khawlah Ammar
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Ibrahim Alananzeh
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
| | - Amal Abu Ghosh
- Departments of Pediatrics, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Shireen Al-Awady
- Departments of Pediatrics, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Hashem Abu Serhan
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Khaled Al-Jafari
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Omar Awadallah
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Zaid Al-Jafari
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Leen Abu Serhan
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Sarah Irshaidat
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Emad Obeidat
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Amal Al-Omari
- The Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Takemura N, Jia S, Lin CC. Financial hardship experience in middle- and older-aged patients with advanced lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:372. [PMID: 38775918 PMCID: PMC11111556 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08571-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advancements in medical treatments have resulted in increased medical costs for cancer patients. More than half of the patients with advanced lung cancer reported unmet financial needs. The purpose of this study is to examine the differences in the prevalence and correlates of financial hardship between middle- and older-aged patients with advanced lung cancer, and its impact on multiple health-related outcomes. METHODS This study presents a cross-sectional analysis involving 226 patients with advanced lung cancer, who were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial conducted between 2018 and 2020. Data collection was performed through self-reported questionnaires and electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were adopted for analysis. RESULTS 58.0% reported experiencing financial hardships. Middle-aged participants who were single and had a lower education level were more likely to experience financial difficulties. However, males and higher performance status were associated with a lower likelihood of experiencing financial difficulties among older-aged participants. Financial hardship was significantly associated with anxiety (p < 0.001), depression (p < 0.001), sleep disturbances (p < 0.001), quality of life, global health status (p = 0.002), functional scale score (p < 0.001), symptom scale score (p < 0.001), and lung cancer-specific scale score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS More than half of the patients with advanced lung cancer experienced financial hardships caused by cancer or its treatment, with a higher prevalence reported in middle-aged patients. Different sociodemographic and clinical variables correlated with financial hardship in middle- and older-aged participants, respectively. More attention should be paid to middle-aged patients with advanced lung cancer, particularly during routine assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Takemura
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Academic Building, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F3 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Shumin Jia
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Academic Building, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F3 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Chia-Chin Lin
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Academic Building, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F3 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
- Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Charity Foundation Professor in Nursing, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hu J, Khan M, Chen X, Revere L, Hong YR. Comparison of Financial Hardship and Healthcare Utilizations Associated with Cancer in the United States Medicare Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1049. [PMID: 38786459 PMCID: PMC11121441 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12101049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer often face significant financial challenges due to the expensive nature of cancer treatments and increased cost-sharing responsibilities. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the financial hardships and healthcare utilizations faced by those enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) compared to those in traditional fee-for-service Medicare (TM) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study aims to investigate the subjective financial hardships experienced by individuals enrolled in TM and MA and to determine whether these two Medicare programs exhibit differences in healthcare utilization during the pandemic. METHODS We utilized data from the 2020-2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), focusing on nationally representative samples of cancer survivors aged 65 or older. Financial hardship was categorized into three distinct groups: material (e.g., problems with medical bills), psychological (e.g., worry about paying), and behavioral (e.g., delayed care due to cost). Healthcare utilization included wellness visits (preventive care), emergency care services, hospitalizations, and telehealth. We used survey design-adjusted analysis to compare the study outcomes between MA and TM. RESULTS Among a weighted sample of 4.4 million Medicare beneficiaries with cancer (mean age: 74.9), 76% were enrolled in MA plans. Cancer survivors with a college degree (59.3% vs. 49.8%) and high family income (38.2% vs. 31.1%) were more likely to enroll in MA plans. There were no significant differences in any material, psychological, or behavioral financial hardship domains between beneficiaries with MA and TM plans except forgone counseling due to cost. For healthcare utilization measures, cancer survivors in MA were more likely than those in TM to have flu vaccination (77.2% vs. 70.1%) and experience lower hospitalizations (16.0% vs. 20.0%). However, there were no differences in other health service utilizations between MA and TM. CONCLUSION While no significant differences were observed in any materialized, psychological, or behavioral financial hardships, older cancer survivors enrolled in MA plans were more likely to receive vaccinations and lower hospitalization rates during COVID-19. Although other preventive or primary care visits (i.e., wellness visits) were higher, their difference did not reach statistical significance. As MA grows in popularity, it is essential to consistently monitor and evaluate the performance and outcomes of Medicare plans for cancer survivors as we navigate the post-pandemic landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiamin Hu
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.H.); (M.K.); (L.R.)
| | - Mishal Khan
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.H.); (M.K.); (L.R.)
| | - Xiaobei Chen
- College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA;
| | - Lee Revere
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.H.); (M.K.); (L.R.)
| | - Young-Rock Hong
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.H.); (M.K.); (L.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jones SMW, Yi J, Henrikson NB, Panattoni L, Shankaran V. Financial hardship after cancer: revision of a conceptual model and development of patient-reported outcome measures. Future Sci OA 2024; 10:FSO983. [PMID: 38827796 PMCID: PMC11140643 DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2023-0229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: This qualitative study refined a conceptual model of financial hardship and developed measures corresponding to model constructs. Methods: Eighteen women with breast cancer recruited through a comprehensive cancer center completed interviews. A qualitative framework analysis was conducted of the interviews. Results: Participants experienced varying levels of financial hardship. Protective factors included good health insurance, work accommodations and social support. Participants worried about cancer care costs and employment. Programs for alleviating financial hardship had high administrative burdens. Four preliminary financial hardship measures were developed: coping, impacts, depression and worry. Conclusion: Reducing administrative barriers to benefits could reduce financial hardship after cancer. More research is needed on the effects of out-of-network/formulary care and denials of coverage and to validate the measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salene MW Jones
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Jean Yi
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Nora B Henrikson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Laura Panattoni
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Veena Shankaran
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Carrera PM, Curigliano G, Santini D, Sharp L, Chan RJ, Pisu M, Perrone F, Karjalainen S, Numico G, Cherny N, Winkler E, Amador ML, Fitch M, Lawler M, Meunier F, Khera N, Pentheroudakis G, Trapani D, Ripamonti CI. ESMO expert consensus statements on the screening and management of financial toxicity in patients with cancer. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102992. [PMID: 38626634 PMCID: PMC11033153 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial toxicity, defined as both the objective financial burden and subjective financial distress from a cancer diagnosis and its treatment, is a topic of interest in the assessment of the quality of life of patients with cancer and their families. Current evidence implicates financial toxicity in psychosocial, economic and other harms, leading to suboptimal cancer outcomes along the entire trajectory of diagnosis, treatment, supportive care, survivorship and palliation. This paper presents the results of a virtual consensus, based on the evidence base to date, on the screening and management of financial toxicity in patients with and beyond cancer organized by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) in 2022. METHODS A Delphi panel of 19 experts from 11 countries was convened taking into account multidisciplinarity, diversity in health system contexts and research relevance. The international panel of experts was divided into four working groups (WGs) to address questions relating to distinct thematic areas: patients with cancer at risk of financial toxicity; management of financial toxicity during the initial phase of treatment at the hospital/ambulatory settings; financial toxicity during the continuing phase and at end of life; and financial risk protection for survivors of cancer, and in cancer recurrence. After comprehensively reviewing the literature, statements were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment, and voting. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A total of 25 evidence-informed consensus statements were developed, which answer 13 questions on financial toxicity. They cover evidence summaries, practice recommendations/guiding statements and policy recommendations relevant across health systems. These consensus statements aim to provide a more comprehensive understanding of financial toxicity and guide clinicians globally in mitigating its impact, emphasizing the importance of further research, best practices and guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M Carrera
- German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Healtempact: Health/Economic Insights-Impact, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan
| | - D Santini
- Oncologia Medica A, Policlinico Umberto 1, La Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - L Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - R J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - M Pisu
- University of Alabama in Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - F Perrone
- National Cancer Institute IRCCS G. Pascale Foundation, Naples, Italy
| | | | - G Numico
- Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - N Cherny
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - E Winkler
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M L Amador
- Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC), Madrid, Spain
| | - M Fitch
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - M Lawler
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - F Meunier
- European Initiative on Ending Discrimination against Cancer Survivors and Belgian Royal Academy of Medicine (ARMB), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - D Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fauer AJ, Qiu W, Huang IC, Ganz PA, Casillas JN, Yabroff KR, Armstrong GT, Leisenring W, Howell R, Howell CR, Kirchhoff AC, Yasui Y, Nathan PC. Financial hardship and neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage in long-term childhood cancer survivors. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae033. [PMID: 38676662 PMCID: PMC11126153 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term survivors of childhood cancer face elevated risk for financial hardship. We evaluate whether childhood cancer survivors live in areas of greater deprivation and the association with self-reported financial hardships. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study between 1970 and 1999 and self-reported financial information from 2017 to 2019. We measured neighborhood deprivation with the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) based on current zip code. Financial hardship was measured with validated surveys that captured behavioral, material and financial sacrifice, and psychological hardship. Bivariate analyses described neighborhood differences between survivors and siblings. Generalized linear models estimated effect sizes between ADI and financial hardship adjusting for clinical factors and personal socioeconomic status. RESULTS Analysis was restricted to 3475 long-term childhood cancer survivors and 923 sibling controls. Median ages at time of evaluation was 39 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 33-46 years and 47 years (IQR = 39-59 years), respectively. Survivors resided in areas with greater deprivation (ADI ≥ 50: 38.7% survivors vs 31.8% siblings; P < .001). One quintile increases in deprivation were associated with small increases in behavioral (second quintile, P = .017) and psychological financial hardship (second quintile, P = .009; third quintile, P = .014). Lower psychological financial hardship was associated with individual factors including greater household income (≥$60 000 income, P < .001) and being single (P = .048). CONCLUSIONS Childhood cancer survivors were more likely to live in areas with socioeconomic deprivation. Neighborhood-level disadvantage and personal socioeconomic circumstances should be evaluated when trying to assist childhood cancer survivors with financial hardships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex J Fauer
- Family Caregiving Institute, Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, Sacramento, CA, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Weiyu Qiu
- University of Alberta, University of Alberta, School of Public Health, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - I-Chan Huang
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacqueline N Casillas
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Gregory T Armstrong
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Wendy Leisenring
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rebecca Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carrie R Howell
- Nutrition Obesity Research Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Yutaka Yasui
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Paul C Nathan
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Edward J, Northrip KD, Rayens MK, Welker A, O’Farrell R, Knuf J, Fariduddin H, Costich J, D’Orazio J. Financial-legal navigation reduces financial toxicity of pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancers. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae025. [PMID: 38552323 PMCID: PMC11087728 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with cancer and their caregivers are at high risk of financial toxicity, and few evidence-based oncology financial and legal navigation programs exist to address it. We tested the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of Financial and Insurance Navigation Assistance, a novel interdisciplinary financial and legal navigation intervention for pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients and their caregivers. METHODS We used a single-arm feasibility and acceptability trial design in a pediatric hematology and oncology clinic and collected preintervention and postintervention surveys to assess changes in financial toxicity (3 domains: psychological response/Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity [COST], material conditions, and coping behaviors); health-related quality of life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical and Mental Health, Anxiety, Depression, and Parent Proxy scales); and perceived feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness. RESULTS In total, 45 participants received financial navigation, 6 received legal navigation, and 10 received both. Among 15 adult patients, significant improvements in FACIT-COST (P = .041) and physical health (P = .036) were noted. Among 46 caregivers, significant improvements were noted for FACIT-COST (P < .001), the total financial toxicity score (P = .001), and the parent proxy global health score (P = .0037). We were able to secure roughly $335 323 in financial benefits for 48 participants. The intervention was rated highly for feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS Integrating financial and legal navigation through Financial and Insurance Navigation Assistance was feasible and acceptable and underscores the benefit of a multidisciplinary approach to addressing financial toxicity. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NCT05876325.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Edward
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Kimberly D Northrip
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Mary Kay Rayens
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Andrea Welker
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Rachel O’Farrell
- Danceblue Pediatric Hematology Oncology Clinic, Kentucky Children’s Hospital, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jennifer Knuf
- Danceblue Pediatric Hematology Oncology Clinic, Kentucky Children’s Hospital, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Haafsah Fariduddin
- Markey STRONG, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Julia Costich
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - John D’Orazio
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Danceblue Pediatric Hematology Oncology Clinic, Kentucky Children’s Hospital, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hong YR, Wang R, Case S, Jo A, Turner K, Ross KM. Association of food insecurity with overall and disease-specific mortality among cancer survivors in the US. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:309. [PMID: 38664265 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08495-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the association of food insecurity with overall and disease-specific mortality among US cancer survivors. METHODS Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 1999-2018) were used to examine the impact of food insecurity on mortality risks among cancer survivors in the US. Study participants aged ≥ 20 years who had a history of cancer and completed the Adult Food Security Survey Module were included. Mortality data [all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular (CVD) specific] through December 31, 2019 were obtained through linkage to the National Death Index. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, hazard ratios of mortality based on food security status were estimated. RESULTS Among 5032 cancer survivors (mean age 62.5 years; 58.0% women; 86.2% non-Hispanic White), 596 (8.8%) reported food insecurity. Overall, 1913 deaths occurred (609 cancer deaths and 420 CVD deaths) during the median follow-up of 6.8 years. After adjusting for age, food insecurity was associated with a higher risk of overall (HR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.56-2.39), CVD-specific (HR = 1.95; 95% CI = 1.24-3.05), and cancer-specific (HR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.20-2.42) mortality (P < 0.001). However, after adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics and health-related factors (physical activity, diet quality measured by healthy eating index), the association between food insecurity and overall mortality was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Food insecurity was associated with a greater risk of overall mortality among cancer survivors. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate whether the observed association represents a causal phenomenon and, if so, whether the effect is modifiable with food assistance programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Rock Hong
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Ruixuan Wang
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Stuart Case
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ara Jo
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kea Turner
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kathryn M Ross
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
van de Wal D, den Hollander D, Desar IME, Gelderblom H, Oosten AW, Reyners AKL, Steeghs N, Husson O, van der Graaf WTA. Financial difficulties experienced by patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) in the Netherlands: data from a cross-sectional multicentre study. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:279. [PMID: 38594390 PMCID: PMC11004045 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08451-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to (1) explore the prevalence of patient-reported financial difficulties among GIST patients, differentiating between those currently undergoing tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and those who are not; (2) investigate associations between financial difficulties and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, work, cancer-related concerns, anxiety and depression and (3) study the impact of financial difficulties on health-related quality of life. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted among Dutch GIST patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2018, who were invited to complete a one-time survey between September 2020 and June 2021. Patients completed nine items of the EORTC item bank regarding financial difficulties, seven work-related questions, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Cancer Worry Scale and EORTC QLQ-C30. RESULTS In total, 328 GIST patients participated (response rate 63.0%), of which 110 (33.8%) were on TKI treatment. Patients currently treated with TKIs reported significantly more financial difficulties compared to patients not on TKIs (17.3% vs 8.7%, p = 0.03). The odds of experiencing financial difficulties was 18.9 (95% CI 1.7-214.7, p = 0.02) times higher in patients who were less able to work due to their GIST diagnosis. Patients who experienced financial difficulties had significantly lower global quality of life and functioning, and more frequently reported psychological symptoms as compared to patients who did not report financial difficulties. CONCLUSION Even in a country where the costs of TKIs and follow-up care are covered by health insurance, financial difficulties can be present in GIST patients, especially in patients on TKI treatment, and may negatively influence the quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah van de Wal
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dide den Hollander
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid M E Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid W Oosten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna K L Reyners
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Husson
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Winette T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dona AC, Jewett PI, Hwee S, Brown K, Solomon M, Gupta A, Teoh D, Yang G, Wolfson J, Fan Y, Blaes AH, Vogel RI. Logistic burdens of cancer care: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0300852. [PMID: 38573993 PMCID: PMC10994350 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer treatment often creates logistic conflicts with everyday life priorities; however, these challenges and how they are subjectively experienced have been largely unaddressed in cancer care. Our goal was to describe time and logistic requirements of cancer care and whether and how they interfered with daily life and well-being. We conducted interviews with 20 adults receiving cancer-directed treatment at a single academic cancer center. We focused on participants' perception of the time, effort, and energy-intensiveness of cancer care activities, organization of care requirements, and preferences in how to manage the logistic burdens of their cancer care. Participant interview transcripts were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Burdens related to travel, appointment schedules, healthcare system navigation, and consequences for relationships had roots both at the system-level (e.g. labs that were chronically delayed, protocol-centered rather than patient-centered bureaucratic requirements) and in individual circumstances (e.g. greater stressors among those working and/or have young children versus those who are retired) that determined subjective burdensomeness, which was highest among patients who experienced multiple sources of burdens simultaneously. Our study illustrates how objective burdens of cancer care translate into subjective burden depending on patient circumstances, emphasizing that to study burdens of care, an exclusive focus on objective measures does not capture the complexity of these issues. The complex interplay between healthcare system factors and individual circumstances points to clinical opportunities, for example helping patients to find ways to meet work and childcare requirements while receiving care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison C. Dona
- School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Patricia I. Jewett
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Sharon Hwee
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Katherine Brown
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Matia Solomon
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Arjun Gupta
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Deanna Teoh
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Guang Yang
- Daynamica, Inc., Chanhassen, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Julian Wolfson
- Daynamica, Inc., Chanhassen, Minnesota, United States of America
- Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Yingling Fan
- Daynamica, Inc., Chanhassen, Minnesota, United States of America
- Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Anne H. Blaes
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Rachel I. Vogel
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Narasimman M, Hernaez R, Cerda V, Lee M, Yekkaluri S, Khan A, Sood A, Gurley T, Quirk L, Liu Y, Kramer JR, Lee SC, Tiro JA, Murphy CC, Singal AG. Financial Burden of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening in Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:760-767.e1. [PMID: 37544418 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overall value of hepatocellular carcinoma screening is defined by the balance of benefits and harms. Studies have only reported physical harms with none describing financial harms. METHODS We conducted a multicenter pragmatic randomized clinical trial of hepatocellular carcinoma screening outreach among 2872 patients with cirrhosis from March 2018 to April 2021. Patients with positive or indeterminate results and matched patients with negative results completed surveys at baseline and at follow-up measuring financial harms via Cancer Self-Administered Questionnaire and financial burden via Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy. Univariable and multivariable longitudinal regression analyses were performed to compare changes in financial harms across groups: true positive, true negative, false positive, and indeterminate. Semistructured interviews were conducted in a subset of patients, sampled by center and test result. RESULTS Of 311 patients who completed at least 1 follow-up survey (75% response rate), 37 had true positive, 133 true negative, 64 false positive, and 77 indeterminate results. Financial harms increased in true positive and false positive patients with no significant changes noted among those with true negative or indeterminate results. At follow-up, 21.8% of patients reported moderate-severe financial burden, which was not significantly associated with test results. Semistructured interviews revealed variation in the frequency and severity of financial harms based on test results, with increased harm in those with false positive results. CONCLUSIONS Financial harms of hepatocellular carcinoma screening vary by test result and can pose a barrier that must be considered when determining the optimal screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manasa Narasimman
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ruben Hernaez
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vanessa Cerda
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
| | - MinJae Lee
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sruthi Yekkaluri
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Aisha Khan
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anubha Sood
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Tami Gurley
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Lisa Quirk
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yan Liu
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer R Kramer
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Simon Craddock Lee
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jasmin A Tiro
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Caitlin C Murphy
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Liang MI, Dholakia JD, Lee GM, Wang L, Kako TD, Blair I, Williams CP, Arend RC, Huh WK, Rocque GB, Pisu M. Dedicated financial hardship screening adds value to routine distress screening among gynecologic cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 183:53-60. [PMID: 38518528 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate existing distress screening to identify patients with financial hardship (FH) compared to dedicated FH screening and assess patient attitudes toward FH screening. METHODS We screened gynecologic cancer patients starting a new line of therapy. Existing screening included: (1) Moderate/severe distress defined as Distress Thermometer score ≥ 4, (2) practical concerns identified from Problem Checklist, and (3) a single question assessing trouble paying for medications. FH screening included: (1) Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) tool and (2) 10-item Financial Needs Checklist to guide referrals. FH was defined as COST score < 26. We calculated sensitivity (patients with moderate/severe distress + FH over total patients with FH) and specificity (patients with no/mild distress + no FH over total patients with no FH) to assess the extent distress screening could capture FH. Surveys and exit interviews assessed patient perspectives toward screening. RESULTS Of 364 patients screened for distress, average age was 62 years, 25% were Black, 45% were Medicare beneficiaries, 32% had moderate/severe distress, 15% reported ≥1 practical concern, and 0 reported trouble paying for medications. Most (n = 357, 98%) patients also completed FH screening: of them, 24% screened positive for FH, 32% reported ≥1 financial need. Distress screening had 57% sensitivity and 77% specificity for FH. Based on 79 surveys and 43 exit interviews, FH screening was acceptable with feedback to improve the timing and setting of screening. CONCLUSIONS Dedicated FH screening was feasible and acceptable, but sensitivity was low. Importantly, 40% of women with FH would not have been identified with distress screening alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jhalak D Dholakia
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Grace M Lee
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Lingling Wang
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Tavonna D Kako
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Isabella Blair
- School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Courtney P Williams
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rebecca C Arend
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Warner K Huh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Gabrielle B Rocque
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Maria Pisu
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Williams CP, Deng L, Caston NE, Gallagher K, Angove R, Pisu M, Azuero A, Arend R, Rocque GB. Understanding the financial cost of cancer clinical trial participation. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7185. [PMID: 38629264 PMCID: PMC11022148 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Though financial hardship is a well-documented adverse effect of standard-of-care cancer treatment, little is known about out-of-pocket costs and their impact on patients participating in cancer clinical trials. This study explored the financial effects of cancer clinical trial participation. METHODS This cross-sectional analysis used survey data collected in December 2022 and May 2023 from individuals with cancer previously served by Patient Advocate Foundation, a nonprofit organization providing social needs navigation and financial assistance to US adults with a chronic illness. Surveys included questions on cancer clinical trial participation, trial-related financial hardship, and sociodemographic data. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted using Cramer's V to estimate the in-sample magnitude of association. Associations between trial-related financial hardship and sociodemographics were estimated using adjusted relative risks (aRR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) from modified Poisson regression models with robust standard errors. RESULTS Of 650 survey respondents, 18% (N = 118) reported ever participating in a cancer clinical trial. Of those, 47% (n = 55) reported financial hardship as a result of their trial participation. Respondents reporting trial-related financial hardship were more often unemployed or disabled (58% vs. 43%; V = 0.15), Medicare enrolled (53% vs. 40%; V = 0.15), and traveled >1 h to their cancer provider (45% vs. 17%; V = 0.33) compared to respondents reporting no hardship. Respondents who experienced trial-related financial hardship most often reported expenses from travel (reported by 71% of respondents), medical bills (58%), dining out (40%), or housing needs (40%). Modeling results indicated that respondents traveling >1 h vs. ≤30 min to their cancer provider had a 2.2× higher risk of financial hardship, even after adjusting for respondent race, income, employment, and insurance status (aRR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.8). Most respondents (53%) reported needing $200-$1000 per month to compensate for trial-related expenses. Over half (51%) of respondents reported less willingness to participate in future clinical trials due to incurred financial hardship. Notably, of patients who did not participate in a cancer clinical trial (n = 532), 13% declined participation due to cost. CONCLUSION Cancer clinical trial-related financial hardship, most often stemming from travel expenses, affected almost half of trial-enrolled patients. Interventions are needed to reduce adverse financial participation effects and potentially improve cancer clinical trial participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luqin Deng
- University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | | | | | | | - Maria Pisu
- University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Andres Azuero
- University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Rebecca Arend
- University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gu C, Jewett PI, Yabroff KR, Vogel RI, Parsons HM, Gangnon RE, Purani H, Blaes AH. Forgoing physician visits due to cost: regional clustering among cancer survivors by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:385-397. [PMID: 35316473 PMCID: PMC9492897 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01201-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovative treatments have improved cancer survival but also increased financial hardship for patients. While demographic factors associated with financial hardship among cancer survivors are known in the USA, the role of geography is less clear. METHODS We evaluated prevalence of forgoing care due to cost within 12 months by US Census region (Northeast, North Central/Midwest [NCMW], South, West) by demographic factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity) among 217,981 cancer survivors aged 18 to 82 years from the 2015-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey. We summarized region- and group-specific prevalence of forgoing physician visits due to cost and used multilevel logistic regression models to compare regions. RESULTS The prevalence of forgoing physician visits due to cost was highest in the South (aged < 65 years: 19-38%; aged ≥ 65: 4-21%; adjusted odds ratios [OR], NCMW versus South, OR: 0.63 [0.56-0.71]; Northeast versus South, OR: 0.63 [0.55-0.73]; West versus South, OR: 0.73 [0.64-0.84]). Across the USA, including regions with broad Medicaid expansion, younger, female, and persons of color most often reported cost-related forgoing physician visits. CONCLUSION Forgoing physician visits due to cost among cancer survivors is regionally clustered, raising concerns for concentrated poor long-term cancer outcomes. Underlying factors likely include variation in regional population compositions and contextual factors, such as Medicaid expansion and social policies. Disproportionate cost burden among survivors of color in all regions highlight systemic barriers, underscoring the need to improve access to the entire spectrum of care for cancer survivors, and especially for those most vulnerable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Gu
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| | - Patricia I Jewett
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rachel I Vogel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Helen M Parsons
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ronald E Gangnon
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Himal Purani
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Anne H Blaes
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Vasquez-Trespalacios EM, Rivera Rivera JN, McIntyre M, Santiago-Datil W, Wenham RM, Vadaparampil ST, Buras AL, Conley CC. High Financial Hardship among Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK IN END-OF-LIFE & PALLIATIVE CARE 2024; 20:120-132. [PMID: 38635421 DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2024.2342285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is considered the most fatal and costly gynecologic cancer. Although personalized therapies have improved ovarian cancer prognosis, they have resulted in increased financial toxicity concerns among this population. This study evaluated financial toxicity in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Using secondary data from a study of barriers to palliative care, financial toxicity (FT) was measured through the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity scale. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used to assess the relationship between selected demographic (i.e., age, race, ethnicity, education, place of birth, insurance type, yearly household income, employment status) and treatment-specific variables (i.e., years since diagnosis, surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, hormonal and targeted therapy) with clinically relevant financial toxicity. Characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact or chi squared tests. A total of 38 participants with advanced ovarian cancer were included in this study; 24% (n = 9) reported clinically significant FT. Income (p = .001), place of birth (p = .048) and employment status (p = .001) were related to FT. Study findings highlight that advanced ovarian cancer patients experience high FT, particularly those with low income, who are not able to work and were born outside the US. Further research using larger datasets and more representative samples is needed to inform intervention development and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - McKenzie McIntyre
- Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Robert M Wenham
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Andrea L Buras
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Lacks Cancer Center, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Claire C Conley
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ohlsen TJD, Wang H, Buchbinder D, Huang IC, Desai AD, Zheng Z, Kirchhoff AC, Park ER, Krull K, Conti RM, Yasui Y, Leisenring W, Armstrong GT, Yabroff KR, Nathan PC, Chow EJ. Financial hardship among siblings of long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A Childhood Cancer Survivor Study report. Cancer 2024; 130:1125-1136. [PMID: 38100563 PMCID: PMC10939878 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Siblings of children with cancer may experience adverse household economic consequences, but their financial outcomes in adulthood are unknown. METHODS A total of 880 siblings (aged 18-64 years) of adult-aged childhood cancer survivors were surveyed to estimate the prevalence of financial hardship by three established domains (behavioral, material, and psychological). For individual financial hardship items matching the contemporaneous National Health Interview Survey or Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, siblings were compared with the general population by calculating adjusted prevalence odds ratios (ORs) to sample-weighted responses. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between sibling characteristics and each hardship domain and between sibling hardship and survivors' cancer/treatment characteristics. RESULTS Behavioral, material, and psychological hardship was reported by 24%, 35%, and 28%, respectively. Compared with national survey respondents, siblings were more likely to report worries about medical bills (OR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.22), difficulty affording nutritious foods (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.54-2.07), and forgoing needed medical care (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.73), prescription medications (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.99-3.20), and dental care (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.15-1.57) because of cost. Sibling characteristics associated with reporting financial hardship in one or more domains included female sex, older age, chronic health conditions, lower income, not having health insurance, high out-of-pocket medical expenditures, and nonmedical/nonhome debt. No survivor cancer/treatment characteristics were associated with sibling financial hardship. CONCLUSIONS Adult siblings of childhood cancer survivors were more likely to experience financial hardship compared with the general population. Childhood cancer may adversely affect entire households, with potentially lasting implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J. D. Ohlsen
- Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Huiqi Wang
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - I-Chan Huang
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Arti D. Desai
- Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Anne C. Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Kevin Krull
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Rena M. Conti
- Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yutaka Yasui
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Paul C. Nathan
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eric J. Chow
- Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Beauchemin MP, Solomon S, Michaels CL, McHenry K, Turi E, Khurana R, Sanabria G. Toward identification and intervention to address financial toxicity and unmet health-related social needs among adolescents and emerging adults with cancer and their caregivers: A cross-cultural perspective. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7197. [PMID: 38659403 PMCID: PMC11043682 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We qualitatively explored the unique needs and preferences for financial toxicity screening and interventions to address financial toxicity among adolescents and emerging adults (younger AYAs: 15-25 years) with cancer and their caregivers. METHODS We recruited English- or Spanish-speaking younger AYAs who were treated for cancer within the past 2 years and their caregivers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore preferences for screening and interventional study development to address financial toxicity. The data were coded using conventional content analysis. Codes were reviewed with the study team, and interviews continued until saturation was reached; codes were consolidated into categories and themes during consensus discussions. RESULTS We interviewed 17 participants; nine were younger AYAs. Seven of the 17 preferred to speak Spanish. We identified three cross-cutting themes: burden, support, and routine, consistent, and clear. The burden came in the form of unexpected costs such as transportation to appointments, as well as emotional burdens such as AYAs worrying about how much their family sacrificed for their care or caregivers worrying about the AYA's physical and financial future. Support, in the form of familial, community, healthcare institution, and insurance, was critical to mitigating the effects of financial toxicity in this population. Participants emphasized the importance of meeting individual financial needs by routinely and consistently asking about financial factors and providing clear guidance to navigate these needs. CONCLUSION Younger AYAs and their caregivers experience significant financial challenges and unmet health-related social needs during cancer treatment and often rely on key supports to alleviate these unmet needs. When developing interventions to mitigate financial toxicity, clinicians and health systems should prioritize clear, consistent, and tailorable approaches to support younger AYA cancer survivors and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa P. Beauchemin
- School of NursingColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Samrawit Solomon
- School of NursingColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Claudia L. Michaels
- School of NursingColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Kathryn McHenry
- School of MedicineColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Eleanor Turi
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Rhea Khurana
- School of NursingColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kwon Y, Roberts ET, Degenholtz HB, Jacobs BL, Sabik LM. Association of Medicare eligibility with access to and affordability of care among older cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-024-01562-x. [PMID: 38520599 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01562-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Older cancer survivors have substantial needs for ongoing care, but they may encounter difficulties accessing care due to cost concerns. We examined whether near-universal insurance coverage through Medicare-a key source of health insurance coverage in this population-is associated with improvements in care access and affordability among older cancer survivors around age 65. METHODS In a nationally representative sample of cancer survivors (aged 50-80) from 2006-2018 National Health Interview Survey, we employed a quasi-experimental, regression discontinuity design to estimate changes in insurance coverage, delayed/skipped care due to cost, and worries about or problems paying medical bills at age 65. RESULTS Medicare coverage sharply increased from 8.3% at age 64 to 98.2% at age 65, ensuring near-universal insurance coverage (99.5%). Medicare eligibility at age 65 was associated with reductions in delayed/skipped care due to cost (discontinuity, - 5.7 percentage points or pp; 95% CI, - 8.1, - 3.3; P < .001), worries about paying for medical bills (- 7.7 pp; 95% CI, - 12.0, - 3.2; P = .001), and problems paying medical bills (- 3.2 pp; 95% CI, - 6.1, - 0.2; P = .036). However, a sizable proportion reported any access or affordability problems (29.7%) between ages 66 and 80. CONCLUSIONS Near-universal Medicare coverage at age 65 was associated with a reduction-but not elimination-of access and affordability problems among cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS These findings reaffirm the role of Medicare in improving access and affordability for older cancer survivor and highlight opportunities for reforms to further alleviate financial burden of care in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngmin Kwon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, School of Public Health, A610 Public Health, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
| | - Eric T Roberts
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Howard B Degenholtz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, School of Public Health, A610 Public Health, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| | - Bruce L Jacobs
- Department of Urology, Division of Health Services Research, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 801, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Lindsay M Sabik
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, School of Public Health, A610 Public Health, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sparano F, Giesinger JM, Gaidano G, Anota A, Cavo M, Brini A, Voso MT, Venditti A, Perrone F, Di Maio M, Luppi M, Baron F, Platzbecker U, Fazi P, Vignetti M, Efficace F. Financial Toxicity and Health-Related Quality of Life Profile of Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Treated in a Universal Health Care System. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:438-447. [PMID: 38207239 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the association of financial toxicity (FT) with the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) profile of patients with hematologic malignancies treated in a universal health care system. METHODS We did a secondary analysis of six multicenter studies enrolling patients with hematologic malignancies. FT was evaluated using the financial difficulties item of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Multivariable linear regression models were used to assess the mean differences in HRQoL scores between patients with or without FT, while adjusting for key potential confounding factors. We also examined the prevalence of clinically important problems and symptoms by the experience of FT, using established thresholds for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the risk factors associated with FT. RESULTS Overall, 1,847 patients were analyzed, of whom 441 (23.9%) reported FT. We observed statistically and clinically relevant worse scores for patients with FT compared with those without FT for all the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales. The three largest clinically relevant mean differences between patients with and without FT were observed in pain (∆ = 19.6 [95% CI, 15.7 to 23.5]; P < .001), social functioning (∆ = -18.9 [95% CI, -22.5 to -15.2]; P < .001), and role functioning (Δ = -17.7 [95% CI, -22.1 to -13.3]; P < .001). Patients with FT tended to report a higher prevalence of clinically important problems and symptoms across all EORTC QLQ-C30 scales. In the univariable and multivariable analyses, the presence of FT was associated with the presence of comorbidities, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥1, and not receiving a salary. CONCLUSION Patients with hematologic malignancies treated in the setting of a universal health care system who experience FT have a worse HRQoL profile compared with those without FT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Sparano
- Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Haematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy
| | - Johannes M Giesinger
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gianluca Gaidano
- Division of Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Amelie Anota
- Biostatistics Unit, Direction of Clinical Research and Innovation, Human and Social Sciences Department, and French National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Michele Cavo
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Brini
- Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Haematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Voso
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Adriano Venditti
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Unit, University of Torino, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Mario Luppi
- Section of Hematology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, AOU Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Frederic Baron
- Department of Hematology, University and CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Uwe Platzbecker
- Clinic and Policlinic of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Oncology and Hemostaseology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Paola Fazi
- Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Haematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Vignetti
- Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Haematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Haematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wu VS, Shen X, de Moor J, Chino F, Klein J. Financial Toxicity in Radiation Oncology: Impact for Our Patients and for Practicing Radiation Oncologists. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101419. [PMID: 38379894 PMCID: PMC10876607 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
With rising costs of diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship, financial burdens on patients with cancer and negative effects from high costs, called financial toxicity (FT), are growing. Research suggests that FT may be experienced by more than half of working-age cancer survivors and a similar proportion may incur debt or avoid recommended prescription medications due to treatment costs. As FT can lead to worse physical, psychological, financial, and survival outcomes, there is a discrete need to identify research gaps around this issue that constrain the development and implementation of effective screening and innovative care delivery interventions. Prior research, including within a radiation oncology-specific context, has sought to identify the scope of FT among patients with cancer, develop assessment tools to evaluate patient risk, quantify financial sacrifices, and qualify care compromises that occur when cancer care is unaffordable. FT is a multifactorial problem and potential solutions should be pursued at all levels of the health care system (patient-provider, institutional, and systemic) with specific regard for patients' individual/local contexts. Solutions may include selecting alternative treatment schedules, discussing financial concerns with patients, providing financial navigation services, low-cost transportation options, and system-wide health policy shifts. This review summarizes existing FT research, describes tools developed to measure FT, and suggests areas for intervention and study to help improve FT and outcomes for radiation oncology patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria S. Wu
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Xinglei Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Janet de Moor
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Affordability Working Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan Klein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maimonides Medical Center and State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Degu A, Karimi PN, Opanga SA, Nyamu DG. Health-related quality of life among patients with esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2024; 7:e2038. [PMID: 38507287 PMCID: PMC10953834 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.2038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the advancement of modern treatment approaches, several studies indicated a diminished health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. However, there is insufficient data about the HRQoL of gastrointestinal cancer patients in Kenya. AIMS The study aimed to investigate HRQoL and its determinants in gastrointestinal cancer patients at Kenyatta National Hospital. METHODS A cross-sectional study was employed among 160 esophageal, 103 gastric, and 96 colorectal cancer patients. The patient list, identified by unique hospital identification numbers, was obtained from records. Eligibility was assessed based on predetermined criteria, and the hospital identification numbers were reshuffled. Study participants were then randomly selected daily during the data collection period. Data were collected using a researcher-administered European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire. The data entry and analysis were carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 26.0 statistical software. A bivariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate determinants of HRQoL at a 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS Most esophageal (N = 118, 73.7%), gastric (N = 75, 72.8%), and colorectal (N = 72, 75%) cancer patients had poor overall HRQoL. In the social (p = .04) and cognitive (p = .02) domain of HRQoL, esophageal cancer patients had a significantly lower mean score as compared to gastric cancer patients. Colorectal cancer patients had the highest mean score in physical functioning (p = .01) as compared with gastric cancer patients. Nonetheless, gastric cancer patients had the highest mean score in emotional functioning domains of quality of life as compared to esophageal (p = .04) and colorectal (p < .001) cancer patients The study revealed a low mean HRQoL score in the majority of the symptom domains of quality of life. A statistically significant difference in all domains of HRQoL was not observed in various treatment modalities of gastrointestinal cancer. Advanced-stage (stages III and IV) and co-morbidities were significant determinants of poor HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS The overall HRQoL of gastrointestinal cancer patients was poor. Advanced-stage cancer and co-morbidities were significant determinants of poor HRQoL. Therefore, intensification of routine monitoring of the disease and the treatments should be actively implemented to improve the HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amsalu Degu
- United States International University–Africa, Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy PracticeSchool of Pharmacy and Health SciencesNairobiKenya
- University of Nairobi, Department of PharmacologyClinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practices, Faculty of Health SciencesNairobiKenya
| | - Peter N. Karimi
- University of Nairobi, Department of PharmacologyClinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practices, Faculty of Health SciencesNairobiKenya
| | - Sylvia A. Opanga
- University of Nairobi, Department of PharmacologyClinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practices, Faculty of Health SciencesNairobiKenya
| | - David G. Nyamu
- University of Nairobi, Department of PharmacologyClinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practices, Faculty of Health SciencesNairobiKenya
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Yabroff KR, Sylvia Shi K, Zhao J, Freedman AN, Zheng Z, Nogueira L, Han X, Klabunde CN, de Moor JS. Importance of Patient Health Insurance Coverage and Out-of-Pocket Costs for Genomic Testing in Oncologists' Treatment Decisions. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:429-437. [PMID: 38194620 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Use of genomic testing, especially multimarker panels, is increasing in the United States. Not all tests and related treatments are covered by health insurance, which can result in substantial patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Little is known about oncologists' treatment decisions with respect to patient insurance coverage and OOP costs for genomic testing. METHODS We identified 1,049 oncologists who used multimarker tumor panels from the 2017 National Survey of Precision Medicine in Cancer Treatment. Separate multivariable ordinal logistic regressions examined associations of oncologist-, practice-, and area-level characteristics and oncologists' ratings of importance (very, somewhat, or a little/not important) of insurance coverage and OOP costs for genomic testing in treatment decisions, adjusting for oncologist years of experience, sex, race and ethnicity, specialty, use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests, region, tumor boards, patient insurance mix, and area-level socioeconomic characteristics. RESULTS Among oncologists, 47.3%, 32.7%, and 20.0% reported that patient insurance coverage for genomic testing was very, somewhat, or a little/not important, respectively, in treatment decisions. In addition, 56.9%, 28.0%, and 15.2% reported that OOP costs for testing were very, somewhat, or a little/not important, respectively. In adjusted analyses, oncologists who used NGS tests were more likely to report patient insurance and OOP costs as important (odds ratio [OR], 2.00 [95% CI, 1.16 to 3.45] and OR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.22 to 3.68], respectively) in treatment decisions compared with oncologists who did not use these tests, as were oncologists who treated solid tumors, rather than only hematological cancers. More years of experience and higher percentages of Medicaid or self-paid/uninsured patients in the practice were associated with reporting insurance coverage (OR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.89]) and OOP costs (OR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.13 to 2.01]) as important. Oncologists in practices with molecular tumor boards for genomic tests were less likely to report coverage (OR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.85]) and OOP costs (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.97]) as important than their counterparts in practices without these tumor boards. CONCLUSION Most oncologists rate patient health insurance and OOP costs for genomic tests as important considerations in subsequent treatment recommendations. Modifiable factors associated with these ratings can inform interventions to support patient-physician decision making about care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kewei Sylvia Shi
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jingxuan Zhao
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Andrew N Freedman
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Zhiyuan Zheng
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Leticia Nogueira
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Carrie N Klabunde
- Office of Disease Prevention, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Janet S de Moor
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Alacevich C, Abi Nehme AM, Lee JH, Li D, Mobley EM, Close JL, George TJ, LeLaurin JH, Hong YR, Shenkman EA, Gutter MS, Salloum RG. A point-of-care pilot randomized intervention to connect patients with cancer-induced financial toxicity to telehealth financial counseling. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:393-403. [PMID: 37794203 PMCID: PMC10872295 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01794-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Elevated costs of cancer treatment can result in economic and psychological "financial toxicity" distress. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of a point-of-care intervention to connect adult patients with cancer-induced financial toxicity to telehealth-delivered financial counseling. METHODS We conducted a three-armed parallel randomized pilot study, allocating newly referred patients with cancer and financial toxicity to individual, group accredited telehealth financial counseling, or usual care with educational material (1:1:1). We assessed the feasibility of recruitment, randomization, retention, baseline and post-intervention COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), and Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) scores. RESULTS Of 382 patients screened, 121 were eligible and enrolled. 58 (48%) completed the intervention (9 individual, 9 group counseling, 40 educational booklet). 29 completed follow-up surveys: 45% female, 17% African American, 79% white, 7% Hispanic, 55% 45-64 years old, 31% over 64, 34% lived in rural areas, 24% had cancer stage I, 21% II, 7% III, 31% IV. Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms, retention status, surveys completion. Mean (SD) COST was 12.4 (6.1) at baseline and 16.0 (8.4) post-intervention. Mean (SD) COST score differences were 6.3 (11.6) after individual counseling, 5.8 (8.5) after group counseling, and 2.5 (6.4) after usual care. Mean TUQ score among nine counseling participants was 5.5 (0.9) over 7.0. Non-parametric comparisons were not statistically meaningful. CONCLUSION Recruitment and randomization were feasible, while study retention presented challenges. Nine participants reported good usability and satisfaction with telehealth counseling. Larger-scale trials focused on improving participation, retention, and impact of financial counseling among patients with cancer are justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Alacevich
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
| | - Anna Maria Abi Nehme
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Ji-Hyun Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, USA
| | - Derek Li
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, USA
| | - Erin M Mobley
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Jacksonville, USA
| | - Julia L Close
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Thomas J George
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Jennifer H LeLaurin
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Young-Rock Hong
- Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Shenkman
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Michael S Gutter
- Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
- Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA
| | - Ramzi G Salloum
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ciftci Y, Radomski SN, Johnston FM, Greer JB. Predictors of Financial Toxicity Risk Among Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1980-1989. [PMID: 38044348 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14577-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the preferred treatment for select patients with peritoneal malignancies. However, the procedure is resource intensive and costly. This study aimed to determine the risk of financial toxicity for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC at a single institution from 2016 to 2022. We utilized insurance status, out-of-pocket expenditures, and estimated post-subsistence income to determine risk of financial toxicity. A multivariable logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for financial toxicity. RESULTS Our final study cohort consisted of 163 patients. Average age was 58 [standard deviation 10] years, and 52.8% (n = 86) were male. A total of 52 patients (31.9%) were at risk of financial toxicity. A total of 36 patients (22.1%) were from the lower income quartiles (first or second) and 127 patients (77.9%) were from the higher income quartiles (third or fourth). A total of 47 patients (29%) were insured by Medicare, and 116 patients (71%) had private insurance. The median out-of-pocket expenditure across the study cohort was $3500, with a median of $5000 ($3341-$7350) for the at-risk group and $3341 ($2500-$4022) for the not at-risk group (p < 0.001). Risk factors for financial toxicity included high out-of-pocket expenditures and a lower income quartile. CONCLUSIONS An estimated one-third of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC at our institution were at risk for financial toxicity. Several preoperative factors were associated with an increased risk and could be utilized to identify patients who might benefit from interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuf Ciftci
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shannon N Radomski
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan B Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Li L, Zhang D, Li Y, Jain M, Lin X, Hu R, Liu J, Thapa J, Mu L, Chen Z, Liu B, Pagán JA. Medical financial hardship between young adult cancer survivors and matched individuals without cancer in the United States. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae007. [PMID: 38366027 PMCID: PMC10903972 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adult cancer survivors face medical financial hardships that may lead to delaying or forgoing medical care. This study describes the medical financial difficulties young adult cancer survivors in the United States experience in the post-Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act period. METHOD We identified 1009 cancer survivors aged 18 to 39 years from the National Health Interview Survey (2015-2022) and matched 963 (95%) cancer survivors to 2733 control individuals using nearest-neighbor matching. We used conditional logistic regression to examine the association between cancer history and medical financial hardship and to assess whether this association varied by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and region of residence. RESULTS Compared with those who did not have a history of cancer, young adult cancer survivors were more likely to report material financial hardship (22.8% vs 15.2%; odds ratio = 1.65, 95% confidence interval = 1.50 to 1.81) and behavior-related financial hardship (34.3% vs 24.4%; odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval = 1.49 to 1.76) but not psychological financial hardship (52.6% vs 50.9%; odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval = 0.99 to 1.16). Young adult cancer survivors who were Hispanic or lived in the Midwest and South were more likely to report psychological financial hardship than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS We found that young adult cancer survivors were more likely to experience material and behavior-related financial hardship than young adults without a history of cancer. We also identified specific subgroups of young adult cancer survivors that may benefit from targeted policies and interventions to alleviate medical financial hardship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihua Li
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Institute for Health Care Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donglan Zhang
- Division of Health Services Research, Department of Foundations of Medicine, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, USA
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Mayuri Jain
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Institute for Health Care Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xingyu Lin
- Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca Hu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Junxiu Liu
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Janani Thapa
- Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Lan Mu
- Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Zhuo Chen
- Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Bian Liu
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - José A Pagán
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|