1
|
Malagón T, Trottier H, El-Zein M, Villa LL, Franco EL. Human Papillomavirus Intermittence and Risk Factors Associated With First Detections and Redetections in the Ludwig-McGill Cohort Study of Adult Women. J Infect Dis 2023; 228:402-411. [PMID: 36790831 PMCID: PMC10428201 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiad043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed the incidence and risk factors for first detection and redetection with the same human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype, and prevalence of cytological lesions during HPV redetections. METHODS The Ludwig-McGill cohort study followed women aged 18-60 years from São Paulo, Brazil in 1993-1997 for up to 10 years. Women provided cervical samples for cytology testing and HPV DNA testing at each visit. A redetection was defined as a recurring genotype-specific HPV positive result after 1 or more intervening negative visits. Predictors of genotype-specific redetection were assessed using adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with Cox regression modeling. RESULTS In total, 2184 women contributed 2368 incident HPV genotype-specific first detections and 308 genotype-specific redetections over a median follow-up of 6.5 years. The cumulative incidence of redetection with the same genotype was 6.6% at 1 year and 14.8% at 5 years after the loss of positivity of the first detection. Neither age (aHR 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], .54-1.47 for ≥45 years vs < 25 years) nor new sexual partner acquisition (aHR 0.98; 95% CI, .70-1.35) were statistically associated with genotype-specific redetection. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion prevalence was similar during first HPV detections (2.9%) and redetection (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest many HPV redetections were likely reactivations of latent recurring infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talía Malagón
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Helen Trottier
- Département de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Centre de Recherche, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada
| | - Mariam El-Zein
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Luisa L Villa
- Center for Translational Research in Oncology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eduardo L Franco
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roberts JM, Machalek DA, Butler BC, Crescini J, Garland SM, Farnsworth A. Older women testing positive for HPV16/18 on cervical screening and risk of high-grade cervical abnormality. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:1593-1600. [PMID: 36468183 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
In Australia's HPV-based cervical screening program, we previously showed that risk of histological high-grade abnormality at 1 year post screening decreased with age in women with oncogenic HPV. In this study, we followed 878 HPV16/18 positive women aged 55 years and over for up to 3 years post screening test, to determine the proportion with histological high-grade abnormality (HGA, incorporating high-grade squamous intraepithelial abnormality (HSIL), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma) and to correlate risk of HGA with liquid-based cytology result and with prior screening history. HGA was detected in 7.8% at 1 year and 10.0% at 3 years, with no significant difference (P = .136), despite the number of women with follow-up information significantly increasing from 82.9% to 91.0% (P < .0001). The proportion of HPV16/18 positive women with HGA at 3 years was highest in those with an HSIL cytology result (79.0%) and lowest in those with negative cytology (6.2%). Women with an adequate screening history had fewer HGA than such women with inadequate prior screening (6.6% vs 16.0%, P = .001) or with a history of an abnormality (6.6% vs 14.4%, P = .001). HPV16/18 infection in women over 55 years may have a different natural history from that in younger women, in whom HGA are more common after HPV16/18 detection. In HPV-based cervical screening programs, management algorithms for screen-detected abnormalities based on risk stratification should include factors such as age, screening history and index cytology result, so that women receive appropriate investigation and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dorothy A Machalek
- Centre for Women's Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bethan C Butler
- Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joanne Crescini
- Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Suzanne M Garland
- Centre for Women's Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Molecular Microbiology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Annabelle Farnsworth
- Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine Sydney Campus, Department of Pathology, University of Notre Dame, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giovannetti O, Tomalty D, Adams MA. Sexual health and quality-of-life concerns of cervical dysplasia treatments: Review. THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN SEXUALITY 2022. [DOI: 10.3138/cjhs.2022-0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Thorough investigations have defined underlying disease mechanisms, determining effective cervical dysplasia (CD) treatments. Previous work has assessed the effects of different treatments on women’s sexual health. Recently however, several published studies have expanded the scope of findings, revealing the need for an updated examination and integration of knowledge to appropriately contextualize this clinical approach within sexual medicine and women’s healthcare. A review of relevant literature was completed. The findings indicate that treatments for CD may be correlated with sexual issues such as decreased interest and sexual functioning, and decreased QoL including psychosocial elements like anxiety. Methodological variations used to investigate different CD treatment outcomes were observed and should be streamlined to facilitate comparison in future studies. There is a need for additional research into alternative non-surgical CD treatments which could mitigate unintended outcomes, and consideration should be given to accessibility of these treatments across different regions in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Giovannetti
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diane Tomalty
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael A. Adams
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Inturrisi F, Bogaards JA, Siebers AG, Meijer CJ, Heideman DA, Berkhof J. Women with a positive high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) test remain at increased risk of HPV infection and cervical precancer ≥15 years later. Tumour Virus Res 2022; 14:200240. [PMID: 35640823 PMCID: PMC9190048 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvr.2022.200240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Little is known about the long-term association between high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test results in women participating in a hrHPV-based cervical cancer screening program. To address this question, we collected data of 2217 women who participated in the POBASCAM hrHPV-based screening trial (enrolment 1999/2002) and also attended the Dutch hrHPV-based screening program between January 2017 and March 2018. Among 143 women who tested hrHPV-positive in 1999/2002, 45 (31.5%) had ≥ CIN2 or hysterectomy before 2017 and 17 (11.9%) tested hrHPV-positive at the 2017/2018 screen. In comparison, among 2074 women who tested hrHPV-negative in 1999/2002, 10 (0.5%) had ≥ CIN2 or hysterectomy before 2017 and 119 (5.7%) tested hrHPV-positive at the 2017/2018 screen. It follows that in the group of women who were not treated for ≥ CIN2 or had a hysterectomy in between the two screens 15 years apart (N = 2162), women who were hrHPV-positive in 1999/2002 had a higher risk of being hrHPV-positive in 2017/2018 than those who were hrHPV-negative in 1999/2002 (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.8-6.1). A similar association was found at the genotype level for genotype-concordant results (5.1, 1.0-11.3) and for genotype non-concordant results (3.7, 1.6-6.7). Women who were hrHPV-positive in 2017/2018 had a higher risk of CIN3 after a hrHPV-positive result in 1999/2002 than after a hrHPV-negative result (5.8, 1.0-27.8). In conclusion, a positive hrHPV result in screening gives a long-term increased risk of a hrHPV-positive result, also for different genotypes, and a long-term increased risk of CIN3. This supports the concept of risk-stratification in hrHPV-based cervical cancer screening where previous hrHPV results are included in screening recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Inturrisi
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Corresponding author. Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Johannes A. Bogaards
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Chris J.L.M. Meijer
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle A.M. Heideman
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Corresponding author. Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Demarco M, Egemen D, Hyun N, Chen X, Moscicki AB, Cheung L, Carter-Pokras O, Hammer A, Gage JC, Clarke MA, Castle PE, Befano B, Chen J, Dallal C, He X, Desai K, Lorey T, Poitras N, Raine-Bennett TR, Perkins RB, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M. Contribution of Etiologic Cofactors to CIN3+ Risk Among Women With Human Papillomavirus-Positive Screening Test Results. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2022; 26:127-134. [PMID: 35249974 PMCID: PMC8940696 DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The US screening and management guidelines for cervical cancer are based on the absolute risk of precancer estimated from large clinical cohorts and trials. Given the widespread transition toward screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, it is important to assess which additional factors to include in clinical risk assessment to optimize management of HPV-infected women. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed data from HPV-infected women, ages 30-65 years, in the National Cancer Institute-Kaiser Permanente Northern California Persistence and Progression study. We estimated the influence of HPV risk group, cytology result, and selected cofactors on immediate risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or higher (CIN 3+) among 16,094 HPV-positive women. Cofactors considered included, age, race/ethnicity, income, smoking, and hormonal contraceptive use. RESULTS Human papillomavirus risk group and cytology test result were strongly correlated with CIN 3+ risk. After considering cytology and HPV risk group, other cofactors (age, race/ethnicity, income, smoking, and hormonal contraceptive use) had minimal impact on CIN 3+ risk and did not change recommended management based on accepted risk thresholds. We had insufficient data to assess the impact of long-duration heavy smoking, parity, history of sexually transmitted infection, or immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS In our study at the Kaiser Permanente Northern California, the risk of CIN 3+ was determined mainly by HPV risk group and cytology results, with other cofactors having limited impact in adjusted analyses. This supports the use of HPV and cytology results in risk-based management guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Demarco
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Didem Egemen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Noorie Hyun
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Xiaojian Chen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Li Cheung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Olivia Carter-Pokras
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Julia C. Gage
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Megan A. Clarke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Philip E. Castle
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Brian Befano
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jie Chen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Cher Dallal
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Xin He
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Kanan Desai
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Thomas Lorey
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nancy Poitras
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mark Schiffman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Butler EN, Umar A, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Kundrod KA, Signorello LB, Castle PE. Redefining precision cancer prevention to promote health equity. Trends Cancer 2022; 8:295-302. [PMID: 35181273 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Precision cancer prevention as it is currently envisioned is a targeted, molecular-based approach to intercept carcinogenesis before cancer develops or before it becomes untreatable. Unfortunately, due to systemic biases, current precision cancer prevention interventions might not be effective in all populations, especially in minoritized communities. In addition, not all cancer risk is attributable to genetic or even biological factors, but includes social determinants of health (SDH). Here, we propose a broader framework for precision cancer prevention, anchored in optimizing the benefits to harms for all people. We propose that precision cancer prevention considers not only what is being delivered, but also for whom, where, and how, with a goal of achieving cancer prevention health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eboneé N Butler
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Asad Umar
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Kathryn A Kundrod
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Lisa B Signorello
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Philip E Castle
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gage JC, Raine-Bennett T, Schiffman M, Clarke MA, Cheung LC, Poitras NE, Varnado NE, Katki HA, Castle PE, Befano B, Chandra M, Rydzak G, Lorey T, Wentzensen N. The Improving Risk Informed HPV Screening (IRIS) Study: Design and Baseline Characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 31:486-492. [PMID: 34789470 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer screening with high-risk HPV (HrHPV) testing is being introduced. Most HrHPV infections are transient, requiring triage tests to identify individuals at highest risk for progression to cervical cancer. Head-to-head comparisons of available strategies for screening and triage are needed. Endometrial and ovarian cancers could be amenable to similar testing. METHODS Between 2016-2021 discard cervical cancer screening specimens from women ages 25-65 undergoing screening at Kaiser Permanente Northern California were collected. Specimens were aliquoted, stabilized, and stored frozen. HPV, cytology and histopathology results as well as demographic and co-factor information were obtained from electronic medical records. Follow-up collection of specimens was conducted for 2 years and EMR-based data collection was planned five years. RESULTS Collection of enrollment and follow-up specimens are complet and EMR-based follow-up data collection is ongoing. At baseline, specimens were collected from 54,971 HPV-positive, 10,219 HPV-negative/Pap-positive and 12,751 HPV-negative/Pap-negative women. Clinical history prior to baseline was available for 72.6% of individuals, of which 53.9% were undergoing routine screening, 8.6% recently had an abnormal screen, 30.3% had previous colposcopy, and 7.2% had previous treatment. As of November 2020, 55.6% had one or more colposcopies, yielding 5,515 CIN2, 2,735 CIN3 and 147 cancer histopathology diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS This robust population-based cohort study represents all stages of cervical cancer screening, management, and post-treatment follow-up. IMPACT The IRIS study is a unique and highly relevant resource allowing for natural history studies and rigorous evaluation of candidate HrHPV screening and triage markers, while permitting studies of biomarkers associated with other gynecological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia C Gage
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS
| | | | - Mark Schiffman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS
| | - Megan A Clarke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS
| | - Li C Cheung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS
| | | | | | - Hormuzd A Katki
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS
| | - Philip E Castle
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
| | | | - Malini Chandra
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California
| | | | - Thomas Lorey
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Strang THR, Gottschlich A, Cook DA, Smith LW, Gondara L, Franco EL, van Niekerk DJ, Ogilvie GS, Krajden M. Long-term cervical precancer outcomes after a negative DNA- or RNA-based human papillomavirus test result. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225:511.e1-511.e7. [PMID: 34081897 PMCID: PMC8578173 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer, a preventable disease associated with the human papillomavirus, is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality globally. Primary human papillomavirus testing is more sensitive in detecting precancerous cervical lesions than cytologic screening and can be conducted using either DNA- or RNA-based assays. Screening programs must select the most appropriate assay from several available assays for their population. It is not yet known whether these assays perform equivalently in the long term, particularly among women with a negative human papillomavirus test result. This study aims to compare long-term safety after a negative human papillomavirus test result across both DNA- and RNA-based testing assays. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare long-term high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (grade 2 or higher and grade 3 or higher) outcomes of 2 DNA-based assays (Digene Hybrid Capture 2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test and cobas 4800 HPV Test) and 1 messenger RNA-based assay (Aptima HPV Assay) using data from the Human Papillomavirus For Cervical Cancer Trial-DECADEl (FOCAL-DECADE) cohort, by first comparing the positive and negative rates between the assays and then investigating the cumulative incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and higher and grade 3 or higher detection among participants in the FOCAL DECADE cohort over follow-up according to human papillomavirus testing assays. STUDY DESIGN The FOCAL Trial was a randomized controlled trial that evaluated human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical cancer screening. The FOCAL-DECADE cohort subsequently followed FOCAL Trial participants passively through the British Columbia Cervix Screening Program Database for approximately 10 years after the FOCAL Trial study exit to examine the rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher and grade 3 or higher. For this study, eligible participants had baseline human papillomavirus-negative results from at least 1 assay and had 1 or more cytologic screens after baseline (9509 participants for DNA-based and 3473 participants for DNA- vs RNA-based assay comparisons). We constructed cumulative incidence curves and compared the hazard ratios for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher and grade 3 or higher detection according to the assays. RESULTS Over 10 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher and grade 3 or higher did not significantly differ between the DNA-based assays (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.06; P=.35 and hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.01; P=.06 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or higher, respectively) or between the DNA- and RNA-based assays (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.06; P=.48 and hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.13; P=.52 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or higher, respectively). CONCLUSION Among participants who tested negative for human papillomavirus at baseline, the long-term risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher and grade 3 or higher did not significantly differ regardless of whether DNA- or RNA-based human papillomavirus testing assays were used. Screening program decision makers can be confident that for women who test negative for human papillomavirus, DNA- and RNA-based assays exhibit similar cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher outcomes over several years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia H R Strang
- Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anna Gottschlich
- Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Darrel A Cook
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laurie W Smith
- Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lovedeep Gondara
- Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eduardo L Franco
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dirk J van Niekerk
- Cervix Screening Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lower Mainland Laboratories, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gina S Ogilvie
- Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mel Krajden
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lower Mainland Laboratories, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Natural History of HPV Infection Latency and Clearance. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40944-021-00531-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
10
|
Gottschlich A, van Niekerk D, Smith LW, Gondara L, Melnikow J, Cook DA, Lee M, Stuart G, Martin RE, Peacock S, Franco EL, Coldman A, Krajden M, Ogilvie G. Assessing 10-Year Safety of a Single Negative HPV Test for Cervical Cancer Screening: Evidence from FOCAL-DECADE Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:22-29. [PMID: 33082202 PMCID: PMC8284866 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term safety of a single negative human papillomavirus (HPV) test for cervical cancer screening is unclear. The HPV FOr cerviCAL Cancer Trial (FOCAL) was a randomized trial comparing HPV testing with cytology. The FOCAL-DECADE cohort tracked women who received one HPV test during FOCAL, and were HPV negative, for up to 10 years to identify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) detected through a provincial screening program. METHODS FOCAL participants who received one HPV test, were negative, and had at least one post-FOCAL cervix screen were included (N = 5,537). We constructed cumulative incidence curves of CIN2+/CIN3+ detection, analyzed cumulative risk of detection at intervals post-HPV test, calculated average incidence rates for detection, and compared hazard across ages. RESULTS Ten years after one negative HPV test, the probability of CIN2+ detection was lower than 1%, with most lesions detected 7 years or later. Average incidence rates of CIN2+/CIN3+ lesions over follow-up were 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31-0.78] and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.07-0.36) per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Hazards were higher for younger ages (nonsignificant trend). CONCLUSIONS Among women with a single negative HPV test, long-term risk of CIN2+ detection was low, particularly through 7 years of follow-up; thus, one negative HPV test appears to confer long-term protection from precancerous lesions. Even 10-year risk is sufficiently low to support extended testing intervals in average-risk populations. IMPACT Our findings support the safety of screening policies using HPV testing alone at 5-year or longer intervals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gottschlich
- Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dirk van Niekerk
- Lower Mainland Laboratories, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Cervical Cancer Screening Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laurie W Smith
- Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Cervical Cancer Screening Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lovedeep Gondara
- Cervical Cancer Screening Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joy Melnikow
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Darrel A Cook
- Cervical Cancer Screening Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Marette Lee
- Cervical Cancer Screening Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gavin Stuart
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ruth E Martin
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stuart Peacock
- Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eduardo L Franco
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrew Coldman
- Cervical Cancer Screening Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mel Krajden
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gina Ogilvie
- Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2020; 24:90-101. [PMID: 32243306 PMCID: PMC7147416 DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Supplemental digital content is available in the text. Objective To manage cervical screening abnormalities, the 2019 ASCCP management consensus guidelines will recommend clinical action on the basis of risk of cervical precancer and cancer. This article details the methods used to estimate risk, to determine the risk-based management, and to validate that the risk-based recommendations are of general use in different settings. Methods Based on 1.5 million patients undergoing triennial cervical screening by cotesting at the Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2003 to 2017, we estimated risk profiles for different clinical scenarios and combinations of past and current human papillomavirus and cytology test results. We validated the recommended management by comparing with the estimated risks in several external data sources. Results Risk and management tables are presented separately by Egemen et al.1 and Demarco et al.2 Risk-based management derived from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California largely agreed with the management implied from the estimated risks of the other data sources. Conclusions The new risk-based guidelines present management of abnormal cervical screening results. By describing the steps used to develop these guidelines, the methods presented in this article can provide a basis for future extensions of the risk-based guidelines.
Collapse
|
12
|
Xu XQ, Rezhake R, Hu SY, Chen F, Zhang X, Pan QJ, Zhang WH, Ma JF, Qiao YL, Zhao FH, Cruickshank M. Effect of Sequential Rounds of Cervical Cancer Screening on Management of HPV-positive Women: A 15-year Population-based Cohort Study from China. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2020; 14:363-372. [PMID: 33303694 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Women are anticipated to go through more than two rounds of cervical screening in their lifetime. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is increasingly used as the primary cervical cancer screening test. However, triage strategies for HPV-positive women were usually evaluated at baseline screening. We assessed the effect of sequential rounds of cervical screening on several algorithms for HPV triage. A total of 1,997 women ages 35-45 years were enrolled in 1999 in Shanxi, P.R. China and followed up three times at approximately 5-year intervals. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) prevalence by prior HPV results and performance of 12 triage algorithms with cytology, genotyping, and prior HPV were examined among 229 HPV-positive women at the fourth round. CIN2+ prevalence varied from 56.5% (95% confidence interval, 36.8%-74.4%) following 15 years HPV persistence to 3.5% (1.2%-9.9%) with an incident HPV within 15 years. Triage with cytology (with threshold of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) yielded positive predictive value (PPV) of 21.4% (13.8%-29.0%), entailing immediate colposcopic referral, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.4% (94.6%-100%), permitting retesting at short intervals. Triage with genotyping (16/18/31/33/45/52/58) or prior HPV results showed comparable performance with cytology. Among 11 triage algorithms with similar NPV to cytology, triage with prior HPV results and reflex genotyping (16/18) achieved highest PPV of 28.9% (18.8%-39.1%) and lowest colposcopy referral of 33.2% (27.4%-39.5%). HPV persistence across rounds is an effective risk stratifier in HPV-positive women. Mainstream cytology and genotyping, with or without consideration of prior HPV results, remain effective for HPV triage at fourth round. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: The study highlights the sustained effectiveness of mainstream HPV triage methods, such as cytology and genotyping, after sequential rounds of cervical screening. It also suggests that use of HPV persistence across rounds can improve management of HPV-positive women in cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Qian Xu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Remila Rezhake
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Shang-Ying Hu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xun Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Qin-Jing Pan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Wen-Hua Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Jun-Fei Ma
- Xiangyuan Maternal and Child Health Care and Family Planning Service Center, Changzhi, Shanxi, P.R. China
| | - You-Lin Qiao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Fang-Hui Zhao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China.
| | - Margaret Cruickshank
- Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fontham ETH, Wolf AMD, Church TR, Etzioni R, Flowers CR, Herzig A, Guerra CE, Oeffinger KC, Shih YCT, Walter LC, Kim JJ, Andrews KS, DeSantis CE, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, Wender RC, Smith RA. Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70:321-346. [PMID: 32729638 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 416] [Impact Index Per Article: 104.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends that individuals with a cervix initiate cervical cancer screening at age 25 years and undergo primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every 5 years through age 65 years (preferred); if primary HPV testing is not available, then individuals aged 25 to 65 years should be screened with cotesting (HPV testing in combination with cytology) every 5 years or cytology alone every 3 years (acceptable) (strong recommendation). The ACS recommends that individuals aged >65 years who have no history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe disease within the past 25 years, and who have documented adequate negative prior screening in the prior 10 years, discontinue all cervical cancer screening (qualified recommendation). These new screening recommendations differ in 4 important respects compared with the 2012 recommendations: 1) The preferred screening strategy is primary HPV testing every 5 years, with cotesting and cytology alone acceptable where access to US Food and Drug Administration-approved primary HPV testing is not yet available; 2) the recommended age to start screening is 25 years rather than 21 years; 3) primary HPV testing, as well as cotesting or cytology alone when primary testing is not available, is recommended starting at age 25 years rather than age 30 years; and 4) the guideline is transitional, ie, options for screening with cotesting or cytology alone are provided but should be phased out once full access to primary HPV testing for cervical cancer screening is available without barriers. Evidence related to other relevant issues was reviewed, and no changes were made to recommendations for screening intervals, age or criteria for screening cessation, screening based on vaccination status, or screening after hysterectomy. Follow-up for individuals who screen positive for HPV and/or cytology should be in accordance with the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk-based management consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew M D Wolf
- Division of General Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Timothy R Church
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Public Health and Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minneapolis
| | - Ruth Etzioni
- Public Health Sciences Division, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Biostatistics, University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christopher R Flowers
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Abbe Herzig
- University of Albany School of Public Health, Albany, New York
| | - Carmen E Guerra
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Onco-Primary Care, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Louise C Walter
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Division of Geriatrics, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| | - Jane J Kim
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimberly S Andrews
- Prevention and Early Detection Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Carol E DeSantis
- Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Debbie Saslow
- Prevention and Early Detection Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Richard C Wender
- Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert A Smith
- Prevention and Early Detection Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nayar R, Chhieng DC, Crothers B, Darragh TM, Davey DD, Eisenhut C, Goulart R, Huang EC, Tabbara SO. Moving forward-the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors and beyond: implications and suggestions for laboratories. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2020; 9:291-303. [PMID: 32565297 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The 2019 ASCCP Risk Based Management Consensus Guidelines for prevention of cervical cancer promote clinical management recommendations aligned with our increased understanding of HPV biology and cervical carcinogenesis. They employ HPV-based testing as the basis for risk estimation, allow for personalized risk-based management by incorporating knowledge of current results with prior results, and streamline incorporation of new test methods as they are validated. They continue to support the principles of "equal management for equal risk" and "balancing harms and benefits" adopted in the 2012 version of the guidelines. These updated guidelines will be able to adjust for decreasing CIN3+ risks as more patients who received HPV vaccination reach screening age. Pathology organizations were closely involved in the development of these guidelines. Herein the pathologists who served as representatives to the 2019 ASCCP guidelines steering committee and workgroups, summarize the changes that are relevant to laboratories, pathologists, and cytotechnologists. Prior relevant screening and reporting recommendations that have not been widely and/or inconsistently adopted by laboratories are also discussed and considerations for modification of laboratory practices offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu Nayar
- Department of Pathology and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - David C Chhieng
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Diane D Davey
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida
| | | | - Robert Goulart
- New England Pathology Associates, Trinity Health of New England, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Eric C Huang
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sana O Tabbara
- Department of Pathology, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hammer A, Demarco M, Campos N, Befano B, Gravitt PE, Cheung L, Lorey TS, Poitras N, Kinney W, Wentzensen N, Castle PE, Schiffman M. A study of the risks of CIN3+ detection after multiple rounds of HPV testing: Results of the 15-year cervical cancer screening experience at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:1612-1620. [PMID: 32141607 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Many countries are transitioning to HPV testing for cervical cancer screening, despite a lack of long-term experience. To anticipate multi-round screening performance, we analyzed 15-year HPV testing results at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). We evaluated HPV test result patterns among women aged 30-64 undergoing triennial HPV/cytology cotesting at KPNC during 2003-2018. We calculated incidence rates and proportion of CIN3+ diagnoses associated with the most frequent HPV testing patterns overall and stratified by age. From 2003 to 2018, a total of 1,361,581 women had a valid HPV test result, and 7,087 were diagnosed with CIN3+. Incidence rates of CIN3+ after HPV positivity were lowest when HPV detection was new and highest in women with prevalent infections (770 vs. 13,910/100,000 person-years). Repeat test negativity reduced subsequent incidence rates of CIN3+ to extremely low levels (18/100,000 person-years following four consecutive negative results). For mixed patterns of positivity/negativity, the recency and frequency of positive tests were associated with increased rates of CIN3+ diagnosis. Most CIN3+ cases (76%) were diagnosed in women who were positive at baseline (the first known positive HPV result); 16% were attributed to apparent newly detected infections and 3% to possible reappearing infections. These results corroborate previous findings that current HPV positivity, particularly when prevalent rather than new, is associated with the highest rates of CIN3+. In a screening program implementing HPV testing, most CIN3+ is detected at the first HPV positive test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Hammer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herning Hospital, Herning, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Demarco
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Clinical Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicole Campos
- Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian Befano
- Information Management Services Inc., Calverton, MD, USA
| | - Patti E Gravitt
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Li Cheung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Clinical Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Thomas S Lorey
- Regional Laboratory, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Poitras
- Regional Laboratory, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Clinical Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Mark Schiffman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Clinical Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aitken CA, van Agt HME, Siebers AG, van Kemenade FJ, Niesters HGM, Melchers WJG, Vedder JEM, Schuurman R, van den Brule AJC, van der Linden HC, Hinrichs JWJ, Molijn A, Hoogduin KJ, van Hemel BM, de Kok IMCM. Introduction of primary screening using high-risk HPV DNA detection in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study. BMC Med 2019; 17:228. [PMID: 31829241 PMCID: PMC6907114 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1460-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In January 2017, the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme transitioned from cytomorphological to primary high-risk HPV (hrHPV) DNA screening, including the introduction of self-sampling, for women aged between 30 and 60 years. The Netherlands was the first country to switch to hrHPV screening at the national level. We investigated the health impact of this transition by comparing performance indicators from the new hrHPV-based programme with the previous cytology-based programme. METHODS We obtained data from the Dutch nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology (PALGA) for 454,573 women eligible for screening in 2017 who participated in the hrHPV-based programme between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018 (maximum follow-up of almost 21 months) and for 483,146 women eligible for screening in 2015 who participated in the cytology-based programme between 1 January 2015 and 31 March 2016 (maximum follow-up of 40 months). We compared indicators of participation (participation rate), referral (screen positivity; referral rate) and detection (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection; number of referrals per detected CIN lesion). RESULTS Participation in the hrHPV-based programme was significantly lower than that in the cytology-based programme (61% vs 64%). Screen positivity and direct referral rates were significantly higher in the hrHPV-based programme (positivity rate: 5% vs 9%; referral rate: 1% vs 3%). CIN2+ detection increased from 11 to 14 per 1000 women screened. Overall, approximately 2.2 times more clinical irrelevant findings (i.e. ≤CIN1) were found in the hrHPV-based programme, compared with approximately 1·3 times more clinically relevant findings (i.e. CIN2+); this difference was mostly due to a national policy change recommending colposcopy, rather than observation, of hrHPV-positive, ASC-US/LSIL results in the hrHPV-based programme. CONCLUSIONS This is the first time that comprehensive results of nationwide implementation of hrHPV-based screening have been reported using high-quality data with a long follow-up. We have shown that both benefits and potential harms are higher in one screening round of a well-implemented hrHPV-based screening programme than in an established cytology-based programme. Lower participation in the new hrHPV programme may be due to factors such as invitation policy changes and the phased roll-out of the new programme. Our findings add further to evidence from trials and modelling studies on the effectiveness of hrHPV-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare A. Aitken
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heleen M. E. van Agt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Albert G. Siebers
- PALGA, the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands, De Bouw 123, 3991 SZ Houten, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Folkert J. van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hubert G. M. Niesters
- Division of Clinical Virology, Department of Medical Microbiology, The University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Willem J. G. Melchers
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Judith E. M. Vedder
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rob Schuurman
- Facilitaire Samenwerking Bevolkingsonderzoeken, Godebaldkwartier 435, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Hans C. van der Linden
- Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Pathologie-DNA, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ ‘s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - John W. J. Hinrichs
- Symbiant Pathology Expert Centre Hoorn (Westfriesgasthuis), Maelsonstraat 3, 1624 NP Hoorn, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anco Molijn
- NMDL-LCPL, Visseringlaan 25, 2288 ER Rijswijk, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bettien M. van Hemel
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, the University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Inge M. C. M. de Kok
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|