Collecting Objective Measures of Visual and Auditory Function in a National in-Home Survey of Older Adults

Vision Impairment and the Population Attributable Fraction of Dementia in Older Adults

Importance

Vision impairment is a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia. Although few prior studies have estimated the contribution of vision impairments to dementia, none have reported on multiple objectively measured vision impairments (eg, distance and near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity) in a nationally representative sample of older adults.

Objective

To quantify population attributable fractions of dementia from objective vision impairments in older adults, stratified by age, self-reported sex, self-reported race and ethnicity, and educational attainment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a population-based cross-sectional analysis in the National Health and Aging Trends Study, which gathers nationally representative information on Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older in the US. A total of 2767 community-dwelling adults eligible for vision and cognitive testing in 2021 were included. Data were analyzed from April to August 2023.

Exposures

Near and distance visual acuity impairments were each defined as >0.30 logMAR. Contrast sensitivity impairment was defined as <1.55 logCS. At least 1 vision impairment was defined as impairment to either near acuity, distance acuity, or contrast sensitivity.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Adjusted population attributable fractions of prevalent dementia, defined using a standardized algorithmic diagnosis (≥1.5 SDs below mean on 1 or more cognitive domains, self- or proxy-reported dementia diagnosis, or the Ascertain Dementia-8 Dementia Screening Interview Score of probable dementia).

Results

The survey-weighted prevalence of vision impairment among participants aged 71 and older (1575 [54.7%] female and 1192 [45.3%] male; 570 [8.0%] non-Hispanic Black, 132 [81.7%] Hispanic, 2004 [81.7%] non-Hispanic White, and 61 [3.3%] non-Hispanic other) was 32.2% (95% CI, 29.7-34.6). The population attributable fraction of prevalent dementia from at least 1 vision impairment was 19.0% (95% CI, 8.2-29.7). Contrast sensitivity impairment yielded the strongest attributable fraction among all impairments (15.0%; 95% CI, 6.6-23.6), followed by near acuity (9.7%; 95% CI, 2.6-17.0) and distance acuity (4.9%; 95% CI, 0.1-9.9). Population attributable fractions from at least 1 impairment were highest among participants aged 71 to 79 years (24.3%; 95% CI, 6.6-41.8), female (26.8%; 95% CI, 12.2-39.9), and non-Hispanic White (22.3%; 95% CI, 9.6-34.5) subpopulations, with estimates consistent across educational strata.

Conclusions and Relevance

The population attributable fraction of dementia from vision impairments ranged from 4.9%-19.0%. While not proving a cause-and-effect relationship, these findings support inclusion of multiple objective measures of vision impairments, including contrast sensitivity and visual acuity, to capture the total potential impact of addressing vision impairment on dementia.

COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination Among US Older Adults with Vision Impairment: The National Health and Aging Trends Study 2021

PURPOSE

To examine the associations between vision impairment (VI) and COVID-19 testing and vaccination services in older US adults.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study assessed data from adults ≥ 65 years who participated in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (year 2021), a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Exposure: Distance VI (<20/40), near VI (<20/40), contrast sensitivity impairment (CSI) (<1.55 logCS), and any VI (distance, near, or CSI). Outcomes: Self-reported COVID-19 testing and vaccination.

RESULTS

Of 2,822 older adults, the majority were female (weighted; 55%) and White (82%), and 32% had any VI. In fully-adjusted regression analyses, older adults with any VI had similar COVID-19 vaccination rates to adults without any VI (OR:0.77, 95% CI:0.54-1.09), but had lower odds of COVID-19 testing (OR:0.82, 95% CI:0.68-0.97). Older adults with distance (OR:0.47, 95% CI:0.22-0.99) and near (OR:0.68, 95% CI:0.47-0.99) VI were less likely to be vaccinated for COVID-19, while those with CSI were less likely to test for COVID-19 (OR:0.76, 95% CI:0.61-0.95), as compared to peers without respective impairments. The remaining associations were not significant (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings highlight inequities in the COVID-19 pandemic response for people with vision disability and emphasize the need for equitable prioritization of accessibility of healthcare services for all Americans.

Longitudinal Changes in Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity and Incident Dementia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of baseline and change in vision on the risk of developing dementia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

This longitudinal analysis utilized data from the 2021 and 2022 National Health and Aging Trends Study. Binocular presenting vision was assessed, including distance (DVA) and near (NVA) visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity (CS). Dementia status was defined based on: (1) medical diagnosis of dementia, (2) dementia score, or (3) poor cognitive test performance.

RESULTS

Of the 2,159 adults included in this study, weighted mean (SD) age was 77.9 years (5.2), with the majority being female (weighted: 54%), and White (88%). The baseline median (interquartile range [IQR]) DVA was 0.08 (0-0.20) logMAR, NVA was 0.17 (0.09-0.26) logMAR, and CS was 1.80 (1.65-1.85) logCS. Over the 1-year follow up period, 192 (6.6%) adults developed dementia. In time-to-event analyses, baseline DVA (HR: 1.08 [95% CI: 1.02-1.14], per 0.1 logMAR), NVA (HR: 1.07 [95% CI: 1.01-1.13], per 0.1 logMAR), and CS (HR: 1.09 [95% CI: 1.03-1.15], per 0.1 logCS) were associated with greater likelihood of incident dementia. Further, change in CS (HR: 1.14 [95% CI: 1.04-1.25], per 0.1 logCS worse/year), but not VA, was associated with greater likelihood of incident dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

Worse baseline VA and CS are associated with greater likelihood of incident dementia. Further, worsening CS over time, but not VA, was associated with higher likelihood of incident dementia. Future work is needed to study interventions targeted at improving vision deficits and examine their impact on decreasing dementia risk.

The Quantitative Impact of Visual Function on Accelerometer-measured Physical Activity in Older United States Adults: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Analysis

Purpose

To explore the impact of objective vision measures on novel metrics of objectively-measured physical activity (PA) in a nationally representative sample of United States (US) older adults.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.

Participants

Adults had their distance and near visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) tested. Any objective vision impairment (VI), defined as any VI in distance VA, near VA, or CS, was the primary exposure. Physical activity data were collected using the Actigraph CentrePoint Insight Watch worn for 7 days.

Methods

Multivariable regression models were used to investigate the association between vision and PA measures. All analyses accounted for the survey design and models were adjusted for age, sex, race, living arrangement, education, and comorbidities.

Main Outcome Measures

Physical activity metrics included (1) total daily activity (active minutes per day, number of active bouts, and mean length of active bouts), (2) activity fragmentation, and (3) time until 75% activity. An active bout was defined as ≥ 1 consecutive active minute. Activity fragmentation was defined as the probability of an active minute being followed by a sedentary minute, with higher values indicating more fragmented activity. Time until 75% activity was defined as the time taken to complete 75% of daily PA starting from their first active bout.

Results

Among 723 participants, sampled from 10 443 338 older adults in the US, 30% had any objective VI. Any objective VI was significantly associated with lower number of active minutes per day (7.8% fewer [95% confidence interval {CI}: -13.6% to -1.7%]), shorter active bouts (7.0% shorter [95% CI: -12.3% to -1.4%]), and greater activity fragmentation (2.5% [95% CI: 0.8% to 4.2%]), while no associations were found with number of active bouts. Time until 75% activity did not significantly differ between adults with any objective VI and those without (P = 0.34).

Conclusions

Older US adults with any objective VI displayed lower total daily activity, as well as more fragmented, shorter periods of PA, despite having a similar number of active bouts compared to their normally sighted counterparts. Implementing interventions that increase bout duration may help promote PA in adults with VI.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Concordance between Self-Reported Visual Difficulty and Objective Visual Impairment: The National Health and Aging Trends Study

PURPOSE

To examine the performance of self-reported visual difficulty (VD) in predicting objective visual impairment (VI) in older adults and explore factors that influence discordance.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2022).

METHODS

Participants reporting blindness or difficulties with distance or near vision were characterized as having VD. Presenting binocular distance visual acuity (VA), near VA, and contrast sensitivity (CS) were assessed. Objective VI was defined as having VI in distance VA (worse than 20/40), near VA (worse than 20/40), or CS (worse than 1.55 logCS). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare performance of VD in predicting VI. To investigate factors that influence discordance, we limited our sample to adults with VI and used a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with not reporting VD. Similar analyses were performed to explore factors associated with reporting VD in adults without VI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Discordance factors.

RESULTS

Four thousand nine hundred ninety-nine adults were included in the 2022 cohort. Visual difficulty achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 56.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.2-56.9) in predicting VI, with a sensitivity of 15.8 (95% CI, 14.2-17.5) and specificity of 96.3 (95% CI, 95.5-96.9). Characteristics associated with not reporting VD in adults with VI included female gender (odds ratio [OR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.99]), Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.31-0.78), higher income (≥75 000, OR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.14-3.45]), ≥4 comorbidities (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.29-0.72]), and depressive symptoms (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.25-0.93]). Factors associated with self-reporting VD in the absence of VI included Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.15-3.86]), higher income (≥$75 000, OR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.12-0.63]), and anxiety symptoms (OR, 3.05 [95% CI, 1.56-5.97]).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported VD is a distinct measure assessing disability and has limited ability in predicting objective VI. Caution is advised when using self-reported VD as a surrogate measure for objective VI in epidemiological studies, although it may still be an effective way to capture risk of current or future disability.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Vision impairment and food insecurity in the national health and aging trends study

Introduction

Vision impairment (VI) may further exacerbate older adults' vulnerability to experiencing food insecurity and may be a unique and important target for policies addressing access to nutritional food. The purpose of this study is to determine the association of VI in older adults with food insecurity.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional analysis of round 11 (2021) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative survey of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older. Participants include 2,815 older adults with complete data on at least one objective measure of vision (distance, near or contrast sensitivity) and food insecurity. Food insecurity was assessed using a previously developed indicator of food insecurity in NHATS. VI was defined as binocular visual acuity (VA) worse than 0.3 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/40) at distance or its near equivalent, or contrast sensitivity (CS) worse than 1.55 logUnits. Continuous VI measures included distance and near VA (per 0.1 logMAR), and CS (per 0.1 logCS).

Results

Participants were majority White (82%) and female (55%), and 3% had food insecurity. Older adults with any VI had a greater prevalence of food insecurity than adults without VI (5.0% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.05). In fully adjusted regression analyses, individuals with any VI experienced double the odds of food insecurity than individuals without VI (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2-3.6). Distance VI (measured continuously) was associated with 1.2 times the odds of food insecurity (OR = 1.2; 95% CI: 1.0-1.3, per 0.1 logMAR). All other vision measures trended towards higher odds of food insecurity, though not statistically significant.

Discussion

Older adults with VI experience higher rates of food insecurity than their peers. Interventions to improve food security should be targeted towards addressing the specific barriers faced by visually impaired older adults.

Association between vision impairment and increased prevalence of falls in older US adults

BACKGROUND

Vision impairment (VI) is associated with falls in older adults. However, past studies have relied on geographically constrained samples with limited generalizability or self-reports of visual difficulty. To date, there have not been nationally representative studies on the association of objective measures of visual function and falls outcomes.

METHODS

We used cross-sectional data from Round 11 of National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative panel study of age-eligible Medicare beneficiaries (N = 2951). We performed Poisson regression to calculate the prevalence and prevalence ratio (PR) of >1 fall in the past year, any fall in the past month, fear of falling (FoF), and activity limitation due to FoF as a function of distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. Models were adjusted for demographic and health covariates and were weighted to make nationally representative parameter estimates.

RESULTS

The weighted proportion of participants with VI was 27.6% (95% CI, 25.4%-29.9%). Individuals with any VI had a higher prevalence of falls compared with those without VI (18.5% vs. 14.1%, PR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53). Specifically, contrast sensitivity impairment was associated with a higher prevalence of recurrent falls (20.8% vs. 14.7%; PR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.01-1.67) and recent falls (17.1% vs. 9.9%; PR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.01-1.94). This relationship existed even independent of near and distance visual acuity. Distance and near visual acuity were not significantly associated with falls. Having any VI was also associated with a higher prevalence of FoF (38.4% vs. 30.5%, PR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.34).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of falls is associated with poor contrast sensitivity but not with near or distance visual acuity. Findings suggest greater collaboration between geriatricians and eye care providers may be warranted to assess and address fall risk in older adults with VI.

Vision Impairment and Psychosocial Function in US Adults

Importance

Vision impairment and psychosocial function, including symptoms of depression and anxiety and social isolation, are a major cause of morbidity in the US. However, there is a lack of nationally representative studies assessing associations between both objective and subjective vision impairment with psychosocial function following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective

To provide updated national estimates on the associations of vision impairment with depressive and anxiety symptoms and social isolation in US adults 65 years and older.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Study round 9 (2019) and 11 (2021), a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older. Binocular distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity were tested. Objectively measured vision impairment was defined as having vision impairment in either distance visual acuity (worse than 20/40), near visual acuity (worse than 20/40), or contrast sensitivity (worse than 1.55 logCS). Self-reported vision impairment was defined based on participants' report on their vision status. Data were analyzed in May 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Depressive and anxiety symptoms assessed via the Patient Health Questionnaire. Social isolation was defined based on living arrangement, communication frequency, and activity participation responses.

Results

Among 2822 community-dwelling adults sampled from a population of 26 182 090, the mean (SD) age was 78.5 (5.6) years; 1605 individuals (54.7%) were female; 1077 (32.3%) had objectively measured vision impairment, and 203 (6.4%) had self-reported vision impairment. In adjusted models, all outcomes were significantly associated with objectively measured vision impairment, including depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95% CI, 1.26-2.58), anxiety symptoms (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.13-2.67), and severe social isolation (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.05-3.87). Similarly, depressive symptoms (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.44-3.88) and anxiety symptoms (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.09-4.05) but not severe social isolation symptoms (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.78-5.49) were significantly associated with self-reported vision impairment.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, vision impairment was associated with several psychosocial outcomes, including symptoms of depression and anxiety and social isolation. These findings provide evidence to support prioritizing research aimed at enhancing the health and inclusion of people with vision impairment.

Using Objective Vision Measures to Explore the Association of Vision Impairment With Cognition Among Older Adults in the United States

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between vision impairment (VI) and cognitive function using objective measures.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis with a nationally representative sample.

METHODS

The association between VI and dementia was investigated in a US population-based, nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries, the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years, using objective vision measures. Exposures included distance VI (>20/40), near VI (>20/40), contrast sensitivity impairment (CSI) (<1.55), any objective VI (distance and near visual acuity, or contrast), and self-reported VI. The main outcome measure was dementia status defined based on survey reports, interviews, and cognitive tests.

RESULTS

A total of 3026 adults were included in this study; the majority were female (55%) and White (82%). The weighted prevalence rates were 10% for distance VI, 22% for near VI, 22% for CSI, 34% for any objective VI, and 7% for self-reported VI. Across all measures of VI, dementia was more than twice as prevalent in adults with VI compared to their peers without (P < .001 for all). In adjusted models, all measures of VI were associated with higher odds of dementia (distance VI: OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.24-2.44; near VI: OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.29-2.18; CSI: OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.45-2.62; any objective VI: OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.43-2.35; self-reported VI: OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.20-2.89).

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationally representative sample of older US adults, VI was associated with increased odds of dementia. These results suggest that maintaining good vision and eye health may help preserve cognitive function in older age, although more research is needed to investigate the potential benefits of interventions that focus on vision and eye health on cognitive outcomes.

Objectively Measured Visual Impairment and Dementia Prevalence in Older Adults in the US

Importance

Estimates of the association between visual impairment (VI) and dementia in the US population are based on self-reported survey data or measures of visual function that are at least 15 years old. Older adults are at high risk of VI and dementia so there is a need for up-to-date national estimates based on objective assessments.

Objective

To estimate the association between VI and dementia in older US adults based on objective visual and cognitive function testing.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This secondary analysis of the 2021 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a population-based, nationally representative panel study, included 3817 respondents 71 years and older. Data were analyzed from January to March 2023.

Intervention

In 2021, NHATS incorporated tablet-based tests of distance and near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (CS) with habitual correction.

Main Outcomes and Measures

VI was defined as distance visual acuity more than 0.30 logMAR, near visual acuity more than 0.30 logMAR, and CS more than 1 SD below the sample mean. Dementia was defined as scoring 1.5 SDs or more below the mean in 1 or more cognitive domains, an AD8 Dementia Screening Interview Score indicating probable dementia, or diagnosed dementia. Poisson regression estimated dementia prevalence ratios adjusted for covariates.

Results

Of 2967 included participants, 1707 (weighted percentage, 55.3%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 76.9 (77-86) years. The weighted prevalence of dementia was 12.3% (95% CI, 10.9-13.7) and increased with near VI (21.5%; 95% CI, 17.7-25.3), distance VI (mild: 19.1%; 95% CI, 13.0-25.2; moderate, severe, or blind: 32.9%; 95% CI, 24.1- 41.8), and CS impairment (25.9%; 95% CI, 20.5-31.3). Dementia prevalence was higher among participants with near VI and CS impairment than those without (near VI prevalence ratio: 1.40; 95% CI, 1.16-1.69; CS impairment prevalence ratio: 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.66) and among participants with moderate to severe distance VI or blindness (prevalence ratio: 1.72; 95% CI, 1.26-2.35) after adjustment for covariates.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this survey study, all types of objectively measured VI were associated with a higher dementia prevalence. As most VI is preventable, prioritizing vision health may be important for optimizing cognitive function.

Population Prevalence of Vision Impairment in US Adults 71 Years and Older: The National Health and Aging Trends Study

Importance

Existing estimates of the prevalence of vision impairment (VI) in the United States are based on self-reported survey data or measures of visual function that are at least 14 years old. Older adults are at high risk for VI and blindness. There is a need for up-to-date, objectively measured, national epidemiological estimates.

Objective

To present updated national epidemiological estimates of VI and blindness in older US adults based on objective visual function testing.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This survey study presents a secondary data analysis of the 2021 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a population-based, nationally representative panel study of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older. NHATS includes community-dwelling older adults or their proxies who complete in-person interviews; annual follow-up interviews are conducted regardless of residential status. Round 11 NHATS data were collected from June to November 2021, and data were analyzed in August 2022.

Interventions

In 2021, NHATS incorporated tablet-based tests of distance and near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with habitual correction.

Main Outcomes and Measures

National prevalence of impairment in presenting distance visual acuity (>0.30 logMAR, Snellen equivalent worse than 20/40), presenting near visual acuity (>0.30 logMAR, Snellen equivalent worse than 20/40), and contrast sensitivity (>1 SD below the sample mean). Prevalence estimates stratified by age and socioeconomic and demographic data were calculated.

Results

In the 2021 round 11 NHATS sample, there were 3817 respondents. After excluding respondents who did not complete the sample person interview (n = 429) and those with missing vision data (n = 362), there were 3026 participants. Of these, 29.5% (95% CI, 27.3%-31.8%) were 71 to 74 years old, and 55.2% (95% CI, 52.8%-57.6%) were female respondents. The prevalence of VI in US adults 71 years and older was 27.8% (95% CI, 25.5%-30.1%). Distance and near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity impairments were prevalent in 10.3% (95% CI, 8.9%-11.7%), 22.3% (95% CI, 20.3%-24.3%), and 10.0% (95% CI, 8.5%-11.4%), respectively. Older age, less education, and lower income were associated with all types of VI. A higher prevalence of near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity impairments was associated with non-White race and Hispanic ethnicity.

Conclusions and Relevance

More than 1 in 4 US adults 71 years and older had VI in 2021, higher than prior estimates. Differences in the prevalence of VI by socioeconomic and demographic factors were observed. These data could inform public health planning.

Visual Difficulty, Race and Ethnicity, and Activity Limitation Trajectories Among Older Adults in the United States: Findings From the National Health and Aging Trends Study

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the influence of visual difficulty on activity limitation trajectories in older U.S. adults and investigate whether this varied across racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

We used data from 8,077 participants in the nationally representative National Health and Aging Trends Study from 2011 to 2019. Using mixed-effects regression models, we investigated the association of self-reported visual difficulty and race/ethnicity with activity limitation trajectories.

RESULTS

Higher levels of visual difficulty and belonging to a minority racial/ethnic group were associated with greater mobility, self-care, and household activity limitations. Visual difficulty was associated with mobility and self-care activity limitation trajectories, and race/ethnicity was significantly associated with mobility and household activity limitation trajectories. Among those with the highest levels of visual difficulty, non-Hispanic Black participants experienced a faster rate of decline in self-care activities compared to non-Hispanic White participants.

DISCUSSION

Promoting optimal aging for all requires an understanding of the factors that influence disparities in key outcomes. Our study provides evidence from a diverse national sample that visual difficulty appears to disproportionately affect activity limitation trajectories among older adults from minority racial/ethnic groups and particularly among non-Hispanic "Black individuals." Further research is needed to determine whether interventions to promote healthy vision may positively affect overall activity and independence and ameliorate disparities in late-life activity limitation trajectories.

Development and Validation of a Novel Indicator of Visual Disability in the National Health and Aging Trends Study

Background and Objectives

The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) is an ongoing, nationally representative panel study of older adults that collects data on health and disability, including measures on self-reported visual disability (SRVD). Prior studies assessing the association of SRVD with other measures of healthy aging have classified participants as having or not having SRVD, which does not capture the full spectrum of SRVD reported by participants. Therefore, we sought to develop and validate an ordinal indicator of SRVD to facilitate research on the impact of late-life SRVD on health and disability in NHATS.

Research Design and Methods

We used 2015 NHATS data with community-dwelling participants who answered survey questions about visual functioning and vision aid use. Based on responses, participants were categorized into one of 6 groups: blind, near and distance SRVD without vision aid use, near and distance SRVD with vision aid use, near or distance SRVD without vision aid use, near or distance SRVD with vision aid use, or no SRVD. Multivariable Poisson regression models assessed convergent validity of the ordinal SRVD scale with functional activity and well-being scores, while adjusting for demographic factors and medical comorbidities.

Results

Of the 7061 eligible individuals, 8.3% (n = 742) reported SRVD. Using our novel ordinal indicator of SRVD in NHATS, higher levels of SRVD were significantly associated with lower functional activity scores (p < .001 for all) and subjective well-being (p < .001), except for participants reporting blindness. Significant differences between SRVD groups were found, which could not be captured using a binary SRVD variable.

Discussion and Implications

A novel 6-level SRVD scale in NHATS demonstrated convergent validity with functional activity and well-being scales. This scale provides a new tool with improved measurement precision to study the impact of late-life SRVD on health and disability in a nationally representative study of older adults.