Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in older persons: multi-organ complications and mortality

Increased risk of arrhythmias, heart failure, and thrombosis in SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals persists at one year post-infection

Risk of cardiovascular events is increased after COVID-19. However, information on cardiovascular risk trends after COVID-19 infection is lacking and estimates by sex are inconsistent. Our aim was to examine cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in a large cohort (164,346 participants) of SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals compared to non-positive individuals, stratified by sex. Data were obtained from the Spanish Health System's electronic medical records. Selected individuals were ≥ 45 years old with/without a positive SARS-CoV-2 test in the period March-May 2020. Follow-up was obtained until January 31, 2021, for cardiovascular events (angina/myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, bypass/revascularization, heart failure, peripheral artery disease, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and thrombosis), and until March 31, 2021, for mortality. Individuals were matched by propensity score. Incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality was compared with accelerated failure time models. The effect of matching and of COVID-19 severity was assessed with sensitivity analyses. In the first 3 months of follow-up, SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals had a higher risk of mortality and of all cardiovascular events. From 4-12 months, there was increased risk of mortality in SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals overall, of heart failure in SARS-CoV-2 positive females (HR= 1.26 [1.11-1.42]), and of arrhythmias and thrombosis in SARS-CoV-2 positive males (HR= 1.29 [1.14-1.47] and HR= 1.35 [1.03-1.77], respectively). When COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU were excluded, incidence of thrombosis was similar in males regardless of positive/non-positive SARS-CoV-2 status. In the full year of follow-up, increased incidence of heart failure and of arrhythmias and thrombosis was observed in SARS-CoV-2 positive females and males, respectively.

Cardiovascular disease risk after a SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To our knowledge, there is no systematic review examining CVD risks after a SARS-CoV-2 infection over time, while also taking into account disease severity. All evidence on the risk for pulmonary embolism (PE), myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic stroke (IS), haemorrhagic stroke (HS), and arterial thrombosis following infection was evaluated.

METHODS

The protocol was registered with PROSPERO. We searched Pubmed, Embase, MedRxiv and screened the titles/abstracts and full texts. We extracted the included studies, assessed their quality, and estimated pooled risks by time after infection and according to disease severity.

RESULTS

Risks were highest in the acute phase [PE: 27.1 (17.8-41.10); MI: 4.4 (1.6-12.4); stroke: 3.3 (2.1-5.2); IS: 5.6 (2.1-14.8); HS: 4.0 (0.1-326.2)] compared to the post-acute phase [PE: 2.9 (2.6-3.3); MI: 1.4 (1.1-1.9); stroke: 1.4 (1.0-2.0); IS: 1.6 (0.9-2.7)]. Highest risks were observed after infection confirmation, dropping during the first month post-infection (e.g. PE: RR(7 days) = 31; RR(1 month) = 8.1). A doubled risk was still observed until 4.5 months for PE, one month for MI and two months for IS. Risks decreased with decreasing disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of increased risk of CVD outcomes, management of persons who survived a severe SARS-CoV-2 infection is required, especially during the first nine months post-infection.

Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Long COVID) in older adults

Long COVID, also known as PASC (post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2), is a complex infection-associated chronic condition affecting tens of millions of people worldwide. Many aspects of this condition are incompletely understood. Among them is how this condition may manifest itself in older adults and how it might impact the older population. Here, we briefly review the current understanding of PASC in the adult population and examine what is known on its features with aging. Finally, we outline the major gaps and areas for research most germane to older adults.

Long-term outcomes of older adults with acute COVID-19 following inpatient geriatric rehabilitation: a prospective cohort study from the Republic of Ireland

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of research reporting the long-term outcomes of older adults who have completed geriatric rehabilitation following COVID-19.

AIM

The primary aim of this study is to describe the long-term functional outcomes of a cohort of older adults with acute COVID-19 who have completed inpatient geriatric rehabilitation.

METHODS

This is a subgroup analysis of Irish data from a pan-European prospective cohort study. Functional ability, patient reported symptoms, and quality of life were measured using the Barthel index, the COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Screen, and the EQ-5D-5L, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty patients enrolled in the study. The rate of mortality was 23.3% at 6 months after discharge from rehabilitation. Patients achieved a return to pre-admission functional ability but reported a significant increase in patient reported symptoms and their quality of life did not return to pre-admission levels when assessed at 6 months after discharge from rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older adults with acute COVID-19 infection can assist patients to return to their premorbid functional ability. On discharge from rehabilitation, ongoing follow-up of older adults is recommended to assist them to negotiate and manage ongoing symptomatology such as breathlessness or fatigue.

Risk of incident atrial fibrillation after COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) during the post-acute phase of COVID-19 are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the risk of incident AF in COVID-19 recovered patients by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched Medline and Scopus to locate all articles published up to December 1, 2023, reporting the risk of AF in patients recovered from COVID-19 infection compared with noninfected patients in whom the arrhythmia developed during the same follow-up period. AF risk was evaluated by the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model with hazard ratio as the effect measure with 95% confidence interval (CI); heterogeneity was assessed by Higgins I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Overall, 19,478,173 patients (mean age, 56.5 years; 63.0% male) enrolled in 5 observational studies were included in the analysis. Of these, 5,692,510 recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. During a mean follow-up of 14.5 ± 3.2 months, a random effects model revealed a pooled incidence of new-onset AF in 2.6% of cases (95% CI, 1.8%-6.18%). Recovered COVID-19 patients presented with a higher risk of incident AF (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.24-1.99; P < .0001; I2 = 77.9%) compared with noninfected patients during the same follow-up period. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the yielded results. A multivariable metaregression including age, male sex, history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and length of follow-up was able to explain a significant part of the heterogeneity (R2 = 54.3%; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Recovered COVID-19 patients have a higher risk of AF events compared with individuals from the general population.

Long-term risks of respiratory diseases in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a longitudinal, population-based cohort study

Background

In the post-pandemic era, growing apprehension exists regarding the potential sequelae of COVID-19. However, the risks of respiratory diseases following SARS-CoV-2 infection have not been comprehensively understood. This study aimed to investigate whether COVID-19 increases the long-term risk of respiratory illness in patients with COVID-19.

Methods

In this longitudinal, population-based cohort study, we built three distinct cohorts age 37-73 years using the UK Biobank database; a COVID-19 group diagnosed in medical records between January 30th, 2020 and October 30th, 2022, and two control groups, a contemporary control group and a historical control group, with cutoff dates of October 30th, 2022 and October 30th, 2019, respectively. The follow-up period of all three groups was 2.7 years (the median (IQR) follow-up time was 0.8 years). Respiratory outcomes diagnosed in medical records included common chronic pulmonary diseases (asthma, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD), pulmonary vascular disease (PVD), and lung cancer. For the data analysis, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) along with their 95% CIs using Cox regression models, following the application of inverse probability weights (IPTW).

Findings

A total of 3 cohorts were included in this study; 112,311 individuals in the COVID-19 group with a mean age (±SDs) of 56.2 (8.1) years, 359,671 in the contemporary control group, and 370,979 in the historical control group. Compared with the contemporary control group, those infected with SARS-CoV-2 exhibited elevated risks for developing respiratory diseases. This includes asthma, with a HR of 1.49 and a 95% CI 1.28-1.74; bronchiectasis (1.30; 1.06-1.61); COPD (1.59; 1.41-1.81); ILD (1.81; 1.38-2.21); PVD (1.59; 1.39-1.82); and lung cancer (1.39; 1.13-1.71). With the severity of the acute phase of COVID-19, the risk of pre-described respiratory outcomes increases progressively. Besides, during the 24-months follow-up, we observed an increasing trend in the risks of asthma and bronchiectasis over time. Additionally, the HR of lung cancer for 0-6 month follow-up was 3.07 (CI 1.73-5.44), and the association of lung cancer with COVID-19 disease disappeared at 6-12 month follow-up (1.06; 0.43-2.64) and at 12-24 months (1.02; 0.45-2.34). Compared to those with one SARS-CoV-2 infection, reinfected patients were at a higher risk of asthma (3.0; 1.32-6.84), COPD (3.07; 1.42-6.65), ILD (3.61; 1.11-11.8), and lung cancer (3.20; 1.59-6.45). Similar findings were noted when comparing with a historical cohort serving as a control group, including asthma (1.31; 1.13-1.52); bronchiectasis (1.53; 1.23-1.89); COPD (1.41; 1.24-1.59); ILD (2.53; 2.05-3.13); PVD (2.30; 1.98-2.66); and lung cancer (2.23; 1.78-2.79).

Interpretation

Our research suggests that patients with COVID-19 may have an increased risk of developing respiratory diseases, and the risk increases with the severity of infection and reinfection. Even during the 24-month follow-up, the risk of asthma and bronchiectasis continued to increase. Hence, implementing appropriate follow-up strategies for these individuals is crucial to monitor and manage potential long-term respiratory health issues. Additionally, the increased risk in lung cancer in the COVID-19 individuals was probably due to the diagnostic tests conducted and incidental diagnoses.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China of China Regional Innovation and Development Joint Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Program for High-level Foreign Expert Introduction of China; Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Guangdong Province; Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation; Climbing Program of Introduced Talents and High-level Hospital Construction Project of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital; VA Clinical Merit and ASGE clinical research funds.

Association between vitamin D deficiency and post-acute outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the association between vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and post-acute outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

METHODS

This retrospective study used the TriNetX research network to identify COVID-19 patients between January 1 and November 30, 2022. Patients were matched using propensity score matching (PSM) and divided into VDD (< 20 ng/mL) and control (≥ 20 ng/mL) groups. The primary outcome was a composite of post-COVID-19 condition (identified by ICD-10 code), all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalization, and death during the follow-up period (90-180 days) after the diagnosis of COVID-19.

RESULTS

From an initial recruitment of 42,674 non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and known 25(OH)D status, a VDD group of 8300 was identified and propensity matched with 8300 controls. During the follow-up period, the VDD group had a higher risk of the primary outcome than did the control group [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.122; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.041-1.210]. The VDD group also had a higher risk of all-cause ED visits (HR = 1.114; 95% CI = 1.012-1.226), all-cause hospitalization (HR = 1.230; 95% CI = 1.105-1.369), and all-cause death (HR = 1.748; 95% CI = 1.047-2.290) but not post-COVID-19 condition (HR = 0.980; 95% CI = 0.630-1.523), individually.

CONCLUSION

Among the COVID-19 patients, VDD might be associated with a higher risk of all-cause ED visits, hospitalization, and death during the post-acute phase.

Understanding COVID-19-associated endothelial dysfunction: role of PIEZO1 as a potential therapeutic target

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Due to its high infectivity, the pandemic has rapidly spread and become a global health crisis. Emerging evidence indicates that endothelial dysfunction may play a central role in the multiorgan injuries associated with COVID-19. Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover and validate novel therapeutic strategies targeting endothelial cells. PIEZO1, a mechanosensitive (MS) ion channel highly expressed in the blood vessels of various tissues, has garnered increasing attention for its potential involvement in the regulation of inflammation, thrombosis, and endothelial integrity. This review aims to provide a novel perspective on the potential role of PIEZO1 as a promising target for mitigating COVID-19-associated endothelial dysfunction.

Lung function assessment in children with Long-Covid syndrome

INTRODUCTION

A significant percentage of patients who survived the Coronavirus Infection Disease 2019 (COVID-19) showed persistent general and respiratory symptoms even months after recovery. This condition, called Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 or Long-Covid syndrome (LCS), has been described also in children with positive history for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Little is known about the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying this syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate any difference between children with LCS and asymptomatic peers with previous COVID-19 in terms of lung function and lung ultrasound (LUS) patterns. Secondly, we tested associations between lung function abnormalities and LUS findings with Long-Covid.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective, descriptive, observational study including 58 children aged 5-17 years: 28 with LCS compared to 30 asymptomatic children with previous COVID-19. We collected demographic data, history of asthma, allergy or smoke exposure, and acute COVID-19 symptoms. After a median period of 4.5 months (1%-95% range 2-21) since the infection, lung function was assessed by spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Airways inflammation was investigated by fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). LUS was performed independently by two experienced clinicians.

RESULTS

We found that children with LCS were older than controls (mean (SD) 12 (4.1) vs. 9.7 (2.6); p = .04). Children with LCS complained more frequently fatigue (46.4%), cough (17.9%), exercise intolerance (14.3%) and dyspnea (14.3%). Lung function was normal and similar between the two groups. The frequency of LUS abnormalities was similar between the two groups (43.3% children with LCS vs. 56.7% controls; p = .436). Children with LCS showed lower FeNO values (log difference -0.30 (CI 95% -0.50, -0.10)), but no association of LCS with a lower lung function and abnormal LUS findings was found.

CONCLUSIONS

LCS seems to be more frequent in older age children. Lung functional and structural abnormalities were not different between children with LCS and asymptomatic subjects with previous COVID-19. In addition, children with LCS showed lower FeNO values than controls, suggesting its potential role as a marker in LCS. However, further and larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

The Value of the COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale in the Assessment of Post-COVID among Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities

The COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRS) is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the long-term effects of COVID-19. The scale was validated and is commonly used in the general population. In this study, we assess the utility of the C19-YRS in evaluating the post-COVID burden among residents of long-term care facilities with a mean age of 79. C19-YRS and Barthel index evaluations were performed among 144 residents of long-term care facilities reporting new or worsened symptoms or functioning three months after convalescence from COVID-19. The C19-YRS-based screening showed that 70.9% of COVID-19 convalescents had ≥1 complaint three months after recovery. The highest C19-YRS-scored symptoms (indicating a higher burden) were breathlessness, fatigue, and cognitive and continence problems; however, symptomatology was very heterogeneous, revealing a high complexity of the disease in older persons. The mean total C19-YRS score was higher in hospitalized patients (n = 78) than in the outpatient group (n = 66) (p = 0.02). The functioning subscale of the C19-YRS strongly correlated with the Barthel index, with r = -0.8001 (p < 0.0001). A moderately strong correlation existed between retrospectively reported C19-YRS-based functioning and the Barthel index score reported before illness (r = 0.7783, p < 0.0001). The C19-YRS is instrumental in evaluating the consequences of COVID-19 among long-term-care residents. The assessment allows for a broad understanding of rehabilitation needs.

Bivalent mRNA-1273.214 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 omicron XBB* infections

Effectiveness of the 50-μg mRNA-1273.214 bivalent vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection was modest at 25% in a matched, retrospective, cohort study in Qatar comparing infection incidence in the bivalent cohort to that in the national no-recent-vaccination resident cohort. XBB* immune evasion, immune imprinting effects, or both, may explain findings.