More active human L1 retrotransposons produce longer insertions

A novel role of TRIM28 B box domain in L1 retrotransposition and ORF2p-mediated cDNA synthesis

The long interspersed element 1 (LINE-1 or L1) integration is affected by many cellular factors through various mechanisms. Some of these factors are required for L1 amplification, while others either suppress or enhance specific steps during L1 propagation. Previously, TRIM28 has been identified to suppress transposable elements, including L1 expression via its canonical role in chromatin remodeling. Here, we report that TRIM28 through its B box domain increases L1 retrotransposition and facilitates shorter cDNA and L1 insert generation in cultured cells. Consistent with the latter, we observe that tumor specific L1 inserts are shorter in endometrial, ovarian, and prostate tumors with higher TRIM28 mRNA expression than in those with lower TRIM28 expression. We determine that three amino acids in the B box domain that are involved in TRIM28 multimerization are critical for its effect on both L1 retrotransposition and cDNA synthesis. We provide evidence that B boxes from the other two members in the Class VI TRIM proteins, TRIM24 and TRIM33, also increase L1 retrotransposition. Our findings could lead to a better understanding of the host/L1 evolutionary arms race in the germline and their interplay during tumorigenesis.

A comprehensive analysis of gorilla-specific LINE-1 retrotransposons

BACKGROUND

Long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) is the most abundant retrotransposons in the primate genome. They have approximately 520,000 copies and make up ~ 17% of the primate genome. Full-length L1s can mobilize to a new genomic location using their enzymatic machinery. Gorilla is the second closest species to humans after the chimpanzee, and human-gorilla split 7-12 million years ago. The gorilla genome provides an opportunity to explore primate origins and evolution.

OBJECTIVE

L1s have contributed to genome diversity and variations during primate evolution. This study aimed to identify gorilla-specific L1s using a more recent version of the gorilla reference genome (Mar. 2016 GSMRT3/gorGor5).

METHODS

We collected gorilla-specific L1 candidates through computational analysis and manual inspection. L1Xplorer was used to identify whether full-length gorilla-specific L1s were intact. In addition, to determine the level of sequence conservation between intact fulllength gorilla-specific L1s, two ORFs of intact L1s were aligned with the L1PA2 consensus sequence.

RESULTS

2002 gorilla-specific L1 candidates were identified through computational analysis. Among them, we manually inspected 1,883 gorilla-specific L1s, among which most of them belong to the L1PA2 subfamily and 12 were intact L1s that could influence genomic variations in the gorilla genome. Interestingly, the 12 intact full-length gorilla-specific L1s have 14 highly conserved nonsynonymous mutations, including 6 mutations and 8 mutations in ORF1 and ORF2, respectively. In comparison to the intact full-length chimpanzee-specific L1s and human-specific hot-L1s, two of these in ORF1 (L256F and E293G) were shown as gorilla-specific nonsynonymous mutations.

CONCLUSION

The gorilla-specific L1s may have had significantly affected the gorilla genome to compose a genome different form that of other primates during primate evolution.

Amplification dynamics of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements and their impact on rice trait variability

Transposable elements (TEs) are a rich source of genetic variability. Among TEs, miniature inverted-repeat TEs (MITEs) are of particular interest as they are present in high copy numbers in plant genomes and are closely associated with genes. MITEs are deletion derivatives of class II transposons, and can be mobilized by the transposases encoded by the latter through a typical cut-and-paste mechanism. However, MITEs are typically present at much higher copy numbers than class II transposons. We present here an analysis of 103 109 transposon insertion polymorphisms (TIPs) in 738 Oryza sativa genomes representing the main rice population groups. We show that an important fraction of MITE insertions has been fixed in rice concomitantly with its domestication. However, another fraction of MITE insertions is present at low frequencies. We performed MITE TIP-genome-wide association studies (TIP-GWAS) to study the impact of these elements on agronomically important traits and found that these elements uncover more trait associations than single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on important phenotypes such as grain width. Finally, using SNP-GWAS and TIP-GWAS we provide evidence of the replicative amplification of MITEs.

Mouse germ line mutations due to retrotransposon insertions

Transposable element (TE) insertions are responsible for a significant fraction of spontaneous germ line mutations reported in inbred mouse strains. This major contribution of TEs to the mutational landscape in mouse contrasts with the situation in human, where their relative contribution as germ line insertional mutagens is much lower. In this focussed review, we provide comprehensive lists of TE-induced mouse mutations, discuss the different TE types involved in these insertional mutations and elaborate on particularly interesting cases. We also discuss differences and similarities between the mutational role of TEs in mice and humans.

L1 Mosaicism in Mammals: Extent, Effects, and Evolution

The retrotransposon LINE-1 (long interspersed element 1, L1) is a transposable element that has extensively colonized the mammalian germline. L1 retrotransposition can also occur in somatic cells, causing genomic mosaicism, as well as in cancer. However, the extent of L1-driven mosaicism arising during ontogenesis is unclear. We discuss here recent experimental data which, at a minimum, fully substantiate L1 mosaicism in early embryonic development and neural cells, including post-mitotic neurons. We also consider the possible biological impact of somatic L1 insertions in neurons, the existence of donor L1s that are highly active ('hot') in specific spatiotemporal niches, and the evolutionary selection of donor L1s driving neuronal mosaicism.

The carboxy-terminal segment of the human LINE-1 ORF2 protein is involved in RNA binding

The human LINE-1/L1 ORF2 protein is a multifunctional enzyme which plays a vital role in the life cycle of the human L1 retrotransposon. The protein consists of an endonuclease domain, followed by a central reverse transcriptase domain and a carboxy-terminal C-domain with unknown function. Here, we explore the nucleic acid binding properties of the 180-amino acid carboxy-terminal segment (CTS) of the human L1 ORF2p in vitro. In a series of experiments involving gel shift assay, we demonstrate that the CTS of L1 ORF2p binds RNA in non-sequence-specific manner. Finally, we report that mutations destroying the putative Zn-knuckle structure of the protein do not significantly affect the level of RNA binding and discuss the possible functional role of the CTS in L1 retrotransposition.

Transduction-specific ATLAS reveals a cohort of highly active L1 retrotransposons in human populations

Long INterspersed Element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) retrotransposons are the only autonomously active transposable elements in the human genome. The average human genome contains ∼80-100 active L1s, but only a subset of these L1s are highly active or 'hot'. Human L1s are closely related in sequence, making it difficult to decipher progenitor/offspring relationships using traditional phylogenetic methods. However, L1 mRNAs can sometimes bypass their own polyadenylation signal and instead utilize fortuitous polyadenylation signals in 3' flanking genomic DNA. Retrotransposition of the resultant mRNAs then results in lineage specific sequence "tags" (i.e., 3' transductions) that mark the descendants of active L1 progenitors. Here, we developed a method (Transduction-Specific Amplification Typing of L1 Active Subfamilies or TS-ATLAS) that exploits L1 3' transductions to identify active L1 lineages in a genome-wide context. TS-ATLAS enabled the characterization of a putative active progenitor of one L1 lineage that includes the disease causing L1 insertion L1RP , and the identification of new retrotransposition events within two other "hot" L1 lineages. Intriguingly, the analysis of the newly discovered transduction lineage members suggests that L1 polyadenylation, even within a lineage, is highly stochastic. Thus, TS-ATLAS provides a new tool to explore the dynamics of L1 lineage evolution and retrotransposon biology.

HPV E7 viral oncoprotein disrupts transcriptional regulation of L1Md retrotransposon

Murine L1Md-A5 retrotransposon is a redox-inducible element regulated by Nrf-2/JunD and E2F/Rb-binding sites within its promoter (5'-UTR). Because the human papillomavirus (HPV) oncoprotein E7 interacts with retinoblastoma (pRb) and members of the AP1 family, studies were conducted to examine functional interactions between HPV E7, pRb, and histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) in the regulation of L1Md-A5. Using a transient heterologous transcription system we found that HPV E7 alone, or in combination with HDAC2, disrupted pRb-mediated L1MdA-5 transactivation. HPV E7 also ablated the transcriptional response of L1Md-A5 to genotoxic stress, but did not interfere with basal activity. We conclude that HPV E7 associates with proteins involved in the assembly of macromolecular complexes that regulate antioxidant and E2F/Rb sites within L1MdA-5 to regulate biological activity.

The non-autonomous retrotransposon SVA is trans-mobilized by the human LINE-1 protein machinery

SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA) elements are non-autonomous, hominid-specific non-LTR retrotransposons and distinguished by their organization as composite mobile elements. They represent the evolutionarily youngest, currently active family of human non-LTR retrotransposons, and sporadically generate disease-causing insertions. Since preexisting, genomic SVA sequences are characterized by structural hallmarks of Long Interspersed Elements 1 (LINE-1, L1)-mediated retrotransposition, it has been hypothesized for several years that SVA elements are mobilized by the L1 protein machinery in trans. To test this hypothesis, we developed an SVA retrotransposition reporter assay in cell culture using three different human-specific SVA reporter elements. We demonstrate that SVA elements are mobilized in HeLa cells only in the presence of both L1-encoded proteins, ORF1p and ORF2p. SVA trans-mobilization rates exceeded pseudogene formation frequencies by 12- to 300-fold in HeLa-HA cells, indicating that SVA elements represent a preferred substrate for L1 proteins. Acquisition of an AluSp element increased the trans-mobilization frequency of the SVA reporter element by ~25-fold. Deletion of (CCCTCT)_n repeats and Alu-like region of a canonical SVA reporter element caused significant attenuation of the SVA trans-mobilization rate. SVA de novo insertions were predominantly full-length, occurred preferentially in G+C-rich regions, and displayed all features of L1-mediated retrotransposition which are also observed in preexisting genomic SVA insertions.

LINE-1 elements in structural variation and disease

The completion of the human genome reference sequence ushered in a new era for the study and discovery of human transposable elements. It now is undeniable that transposable elements, historically dismissed as junk DNA, have had an instrumental role in sculpting the structure and function of our genomes. In particular, long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) and short interspersed elements (SINEs) continue to affect our genome, and their movement can lead to sporadic cases of disease. Here, we briefly review the types of transposable elements present in the human genome and their mechanisms of mobility. We next highlight how advances in DNA sequencing and genomic technologies have enabled the discovery of novel retrotransposons in individual genomes. Finally, we discuss how L1-mediated retrotransposition events impact human genomes.

Phenotype based functional gene screening using retrovirus-mediated gene trapping in quasi-haploid RAW 264.7 cells

In vitro random mutagenesis, followed by phenotype screening, provides a rapid and convenient tool for identifying novel genes involved in the phenotype of interest. However, the forward mutagenic approach in mammalian somatic cells is seriously limited by the diploidic nature of the genome. To overcome this impediment, we developed a method that allows functional screening for both haploid insufficient and sufficient genes involved in the phenotype of interest, utilizing a retrovirus gene trap mutagenesis in chemical mutagen-generated quasi-haploid cells. This method was used to identify novel host genes that are required for macrophage sensitivity to anthrax lethal toxin.

The L1 retrotransposition assay: a retrospective and toolkit

LINE1s (L1s) are a class of mammalian non-LTR (long terminal repeat) retroelements that make up nearly 20% of the human genome. Because of the difficulty of studying the mobilization of endogenous L1s, an exogenous cell culture retrotransposition assay has become integral to research in L1 biology. This assay has allowed for investigation of the mechanism and consequences of mobilization of this retroelement, both in cell lines and in whole animal models. In this paper, we outline the genesis of in vitro retrotransposition systems which led to the development of the L1 retrotransposition assay in the mid-1990s. We then provide a retrospective, describing the many uses and variations of this assay, ending with caveats and predictions for future developments. Finally, we provide detailed protocols on the application of the retrotransposition assay, including lists of constructs available in the L1 research community and cell lines in which this assay has been applied.

Genetic evidence that the non-homologous end-joining repair pathway is involved in LINE retrotransposition

Long interspersed elements (LINEs) are transposable elements that proliferate within eukaryotic genomes, having a large impact on eukaryotic genome evolution. LINEs mobilize via a process called retrotransposition. Although the role of the LINE-encoded protein(s) in retrotransposition has been extensively investigated, the participation of host-encoded factors in retrotransposition remains unclear. To address this issue, we examined retrotransposition frequencies of two structurally different LINEs—zebrafish ZfL2-2 and human L1—in knockout chicken DT40 cell lines deficient in genes involved in the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair of DNA and in human HeLa cells treated with a drug that inhibits NHEJ. Deficiencies of NHEJ proteins decreased retrotransposition frequencies of both LINEs in these cells, suggesting that NHEJ is involved in LINE retrotransposition. More precise characterization of ZfL2-2 insertions in DT40 cells permitted us to consider the possibility of dual roles for NHEJ in LINE retrotransposition, namely to ensure efficient integration of LINEs and to restrict their full-length formation.

Long interspersed elements (LINEs) are transposable elements that mobilize and amplify their own copies within eukaryotic genomes. Although LINEs had been considered as “junk” DNA, recent studies have suggested that the LINE-induced alterations of host chromosomes are a major driving force for eukaryotic genome evolution. LINEs mobilize via a mechanism called retrotransposition, in which transcribed LINE RNA is reverse transcribed into DNA that is then integrated into the host chromosome. Although the role of LINE-encoded proteins in retrotransposition has been revealed, the participation of host-encoded proteins has not been well investigated. Here, using knockout chicken DT40 cell lines, we present genetic evidence that the host-encoded proteins involved in repair of DNA double-strand breaks participate in LINE retrotransposition. More precise characterization of LINE insertions in DT40 cells suggested dual roles for these host DNA repair proteins in LINE retrotransposition; one function is required for efficient integration of LINEs and the other restricts their full-length formation.

Mutagenesis in rodents using the L1 retrotransposon

LINE1 (L1) retrotransposons are genetic elements that are present in all mammalian genomes. L1s are active in both humans and mice, and are capable of copying themselves and inserting the copy into a new genomic location. These de novo insertions occasionally result in disease. Endogenous L1 retrotransposons can be modified to increase their activity and mutagenic power in a variety of ways. Here we outline the advantages of using modified L1 retrotransposons for performing random mutagenesis in rodents and discuss several potential applications.

Mechanism of Alu integration into the human genome

LINE-1 or L1 has driven the generation of at least 10% of the human genome by mobilising Alu sequences. Although there is no doubt that Alu insertion is initiated by L1-dependent target site-primed reverse transcription, the mechanism by which the newly synthesised 3' end of a given Alu cDNA attaches to the target genomic DNA is less well understood. Intrigued by observations made on 28 pathological simple Alu insertions, we have sought to ascertain whether microhomologies could have played a role in the integration of shorter Alu sequences into the human genome. A meta-analysis of the 1624 Alu insertion polymorphisms deposited in the Database of Retrotransposon Insertion Polymorphisms in Humans (dbRIP), when considered together with a re-evaluation of the mechanism underlying how the three previously annotated large deletion-associated short pathological Alu inserts were generated, enabled us to present a unifying model for Alu insertion into the human genome. Since Alu elements are comparatively short, L1 RT is usually able to complete nascent Alu cDNA strand synthesis leading to the generation of full-length Alu inserts. However, the synthesis of the nascent Alu cDNA strand may be terminated prematurely if its 3' end anneals to the 3' terminal of the top strand's 5' overhang by means of microhomology-mediated mispairing, an event which would often lead to the formation of significantly truncated Alu inserts. Furthermore, the nascent Alu cDNA strand may be 'hijacked' to patch existing double strand breaks located in the top-strand's upstream regions, leading to the generation of large genomic deletions.

Engineering mutations: deconstructing the mouse gene by gene

Over the past years new vectors and methodologies have been developed to carry out large-scale genome-wide insertional mutagenesis screens in the mouse. Gene trapping, the most commonly used technique, is based on the insertion of a retroviral- or plasmid-based vector into a gene, resulting in a loss-of-function mutation, while simultaneously reporting its expression pattern and providing a molecular tag to facilitate cloning. The discovery of vertebrate DNA transposons in the mouse and recent improvements has also led to their increased use in insertional mutagenesis screens. Several public resources have been set-up recently by the academic community to distribute information and materials generated from these large-scale screens. These new resources should accelerate the study and understanding of biological and developmental processes.

Extensive individual variation in L1 retrotransposition capability contributes to human genetic diversity

Despite being scarce in the human genome, active L1 retrotransposons continue to play a significant role in its evolution. Because of their recent expansion, many L1s are not fixed in humans, and, when present, their mobilization potential can vary among individuals. Previously, we showed that the great majority of retrotransposition events in humans are caused by highly active, or hot, L1s. Here, in four populations of diverse geographic origins (160 haploid genomes), we investigated the degree of sequence polymorphism of three hot L1s and the extent of individual variation in mobilization capability of their allelic variants. For each locus, we found one previously uncharacterized allele in every three to five genomes, including some with nonsense and insertion/deletion mutations. Single or multiple nucleotide substitutions drastically affected the retrotransposition efficiency of some alleles. One-third of elements were no longer hot, and these so-called cool alleles substantially increased the range of individual susceptibility to retrotransposition events. Adding the activity of the three elements in each individual resulted in a surprising degree of variation in mobilization capability, ranging from 0% to 390% of a reference L1. These data suggest that individual variation in retrotransposition potential makes an important contribution to human genetic diversity.

Gamma radiation increases endonuclease-dependent L1 retrotransposition in a cultured cell assay

Long Interspersed Elements (LINE-1s, L1s) are the most active mobile elements in the human genome and account for a significant fraction of its mass. The propagation of L1 in the human genome requires disruption and repair of DNA at the site of integration. As Barbara McClintock first hypothesized, genotoxic stress may contribute to the mobilization of transposable elements, and conversely, element mobility may contribute to genotoxic stress. We tested the ability of genotoxic agents to increase L1 retrotransposition in a cultured cell assay. We observed that cells exposed to gamma radiation exhibited increased levels of L1 retrotransposition. The L1 retrotransposition frequency was proportional to the number of phosphorylated H2AX foci, an indicator of genotoxic stress. To explore the role of the L1 endonuclease in this context, endonuclease-deficient tagged L1 constructs were produced and tested for their activity in irradiated cells. The activity of the endonuclease-deficient L1 was very low in irradiated cells, suggesting that most L1 insertions in irradiated cells still use the L1 endonuclease. Consistent with this interpretation, DNA sequences that flank L1 insertions in irradiated cells harbored target site duplications. These results suggest that increased L1 retrotransposition in irradiated cells is endonuclease dependent. The mobilization of L1 in irradiated cells potentially contributes to genomic instability and could be a driving force for secondary mutations in patients undergoing radiation therapy.

DNA polymerization by the reverse transcriptase of the human L1 retrotransposon on its own template in vitro

L1 elements (LINE-1s) account for 17% of the human genome and have achieved this abundance by transpositions via an RNA intermediate, or retrotransposition. Reverse transcription is a crucial event in the retrotransposition of the active human L1 element and is carried out by the L1-encoded ORF2 protein. Previously, we performed biochemical characterization of the human L1 ORF2 protein with reverse transcriptase (RT) activity (referred to as L1 RT), expressed in baculovirus-infected insect cells. In the present study, we describe the properties of DNA- and RNA-dependent DNA synthesis catalyzed by the L1 RT on the L1 templates in vitro. We found that L1 RT synthesized at least 620 of nucleotides per template binding event utilizing L1 RNA in vitro. Under processive conditions the L1 RT synthesized cDNA over 5 times longer than that Moloney murine leukemia virus RT on the heteropolymeric RNA template used in these studies. These data are the first to demonstrate that RT from the human L1 element is a highly processive polymerase among RT enzymes. This report also presents a strong evidence of lack of RNase H activity for the L1 ORF2 protein in vitro, distinguishing L1 RT from retroviral RTs. Finally, we found strong pausing for of the L1 RT during DNA polymerization within the 3' untranslated region of L1 mRNA, that is result of contribution both rGs runs of the polypurine stretch and immediately adjacent stem-loop structure. A mechanism facilitating minus-strand DNA synthesis during reverse transcription of L1 element in vivo is discussed.

A novel chimeric gene, siren, with retroposed promoter sequence in the Drosophila bipectinata complex

Retrotransposons often produce a copy of host genes by their reverse transcriptase activity operating on host gene transcripts. Since transcripts normally do not contain promoter, a retroposed gene copy usually becomes a retropseudogene. However, in Drosophila bipectinata and a closely related species we found a new chimeric gene, whose promoter was likely produced by retroposition. This chimeric gene, named siren, consists of a tandem duplicate of Adh and a retroposed fragment of CG11779 containing the promoter and a partial intron in addition to the first exon. We found that this unusual structure of a retroposed fragment was obtained by retroposition of nanos, which overlaps with CG11779 on the complementary strand. The potential of retroposition to produce a copy of promoter and intron sequences in the context of gene overlapping was demonstrated.

Multiple fates of L1 retrotransposition intermediates in cultured human cells

LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons comprise approximately 17% of human DNA, yet little is known about L1 integration. Here, we characterized 100 retrotransposition events in HeLa cells and show that distinct DNA repair pathways can resolve L1 cDNA retrotransposition intermediates. L1 cDNA resolution can lead to various forms of genetic instability including the generation of chimeric L1s, intrachromosomal deletions, intrachromosomal duplications, and intra-L1 rearrangements as well as a possible interchromosomal translocation. The L1 retrotransposition machinery also can mobilize U6 snRNA to new genomic locations, increasing the repertoire of noncoding RNAs that are mobilized by L1s. Finally, we have determined that the L1 reverse transcriptase can faithfully replicate its own transcript and has a base misincorporation error rate of approximately 1/7,000 bases. These data indicate that L1 retrotransposition in transformed human cells can lead to a variety of genomic rearrangements and suggest that host processes act to restrict L1 integration in cultured human cells. Indeed, the initial steps in L1 retrotransposition may define a host/parasite battleground that serves to limit the number of active L1s in the genome.

Dimerization of CUL7 and PARC is not required for all CUL7 functions and mouse development

CUL7, a recently identified member of the cullin family of E3 ubiquitin ligases, forms a unique SCF-like complex and is required for mouse embryonic development. To further investigate CUL7 function, we sought to identify CUL7 binding proteins. The p53-associated, parkin-like cytoplasmic protein (PARC), a homolog of CUL7, was identified as a CUL7-interacting protein by mass spectrometry. The heterodimerization of PARC and CUL7, as well as homodimerization of PARC and CUL7, was confirmed in vivo. To determine the biological role of PARC by itself and in conjunction with CUL7, a targeted deletion of Parc was created in the mouse. In contrast to the neonatal lethality of the Cul7 knockout mice, Parc knockout mice were born at the expected Mendelian ratios and exhibited no apparent phenotype. Additionally, Parc deletion did not appear to affect the stability or function of p53. These results suggest that PARC and CUL7 form an endogenous complex and that PARC and CUL7 functions are at least partially nonoverlapping. In addition, although PARC and p53 form a complex, the absence of effect of Parc deletion on p53 stability, localization, and function suggests that p53 binding to PARC may serve to control PARC function.

Insertional mutagenesis in mice: new perspectives and tools

Insertional mutagenesis has been at the core of functional genomics in many species. In the mouse, improved vectors and methodologies allow easier genome-wide and phenotype-driven insertional mutagenesis screens. The ability to generate homozygous diploid mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells allows prescreening for specific null phenotypes prior to in vivo analysis. In addition, the discovery of active transposable elements in vertebrates, and their development as genetic tools, has led to in vivo forward insertional mutagenesis screens in the mouse. These new technologies will greatly contribute to the speed and ease with which we achieve complete functional annotation of the mouse genome.

A systematic analysis of LINE-1 endonuclease-dependent retrotranspositional events causing human genetic disease

Diverse long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1)-dependent mutational mechanisms have been extensively studied with respect to L1 and Alu elements engineered for retrotransposition in cultured cells and/or in genome-wide analyses. To what extent the in vitro studies can be held to accurately reflect in vivo events in the human genome, however, remains to be clarified. We have attempted to address this question by means of a systematic analysis of recent L1-mediated retrotranspositional events that have caused human genetic disease, with a view to providing a more complete picture of how L1-mediated retrotransposition impacts upon the architecture of the human genome. A total of 48 such mutations were identified, including those described as L1-mediated retrotransposons, as well as insertions reported to contain a poly(A) tail: 26 were L1 trans-driven Alu insertions, 15 were direct L1 insertions, four were L1 trans-driven SVA insertions, and three were associated with simple poly(A) insertions. The systematic study of these lesions, when combined with previous in vitro and genome-wide analyses, has strengthened several important conclusions regarding L1-mediated retrotransposition in humans: (a) approximately 25% of L1 insertions are associated with the 3' transduction of adjacent genomic sequences, (b) approximately 25% of the new L1 inserts are full-length, (c) poly(A) tail length correlates inversely with the age of the element, and (d) the length of target site duplication in vivo is rarely longer than 20 bp. Our analysis also suggests that some 10% of L1-mediated retrotranspositional events are associated with significant genomic deletions in humans. Finally, the identification of independent retrotranspositional events that have integrated at the same genomic locations provides new insight into the L1-mediated insertional process in humans.

Sleeping Beauty Transposon‐Mediated Gene Therapy for Prolonged Expression

The Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon system represents a new vector for non-viral gene transfer that melds advantages of viruses and other forms of naked DNA transfer. The transposon itself is comprised of two inverted terminal repeats of about 340 base pairs each. The SB system directs precise transfer of specific constructs from a donor plasmid into a mammalian chromosome. The excision of the transposon from a donor plasmid and integration into a chromosomal site is mediated by Sleeping Beauty transposase, which can be delivered to cells vita its gene or its mRNA. As a result of its integration in chromosomes, and its lack of viral sequences that are often detected by poorly understood cellular defense mechanisms, a gene in a chromosomally integrated transposon can be expressed over the lifetime of a cell. SB transposons integrate nearly randomly into chromosomes at TA-dinucleotide base pairs although the sequences flanking the TAs can influence the probability of integration at a given site. Although random integration of vectors into human genomes is often thought to raise significant safety issues, evidence to date does not indicate that random insertions of SB transposons represent risks that are equal to those of viral vectors. Here we review the activities of the SB system in mice used as a model for human gene therapy, methods of delivery of the SB system, and its efficacy in ameliorating disorders that model human disease.