Removing race from the CKD-EPI equation and its impact on prognosis in a predominantly White European population

What every clinician needs to know about chronic kidney disease: Detection, classification and epidemiology

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major healthcare challenge, affecting >800 million people worldwide. Implications for population health result from the strong associations of CKD with increased rates of cardiovascular disease, heart failure, progressive CKD leading to kidney failure, acute kidney injury (AKI), and mortality. In addition to a single disease perspective, CKD commonly coexists alongside other long-term conditions, in particular type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. CKD is therefore an important component of multimorbidity that influences individual management and impacts prognosis. CKD is defined by abnormalities of kidney structure or function of any cause with implications for health that are present for longer than 3 months. The diagnosis is usually made on the basis of an abnormal glomerular filtration rate (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and/or the presence of proteinuria (urine albumin to creatinine ratio > 30 mg/g or >3 mg/mmol). GFR is usually estimated from serum creatinine concentration using a variety of validated equations. However, serum creatinine is closely related to muscle mass and may therefore not be an accurate marker of GFR in people with high or low muscle mass (sarcopaenia). Cystatin C is an alternative endogenous marker of GFR that is increasingly being used but also has limitations. An estimate of GFR based on both creatinine and cystatin C is the most accurate. Diagnosis should be followed by classification and risk stratification to guide the development of a risk-based, personalized care plan. Improved detection and widespread implementation of optimal CKD management has the potential to bring major benefits to population health.

Laboratory-based surveillance of chronic kidney disease in people with private health coverage in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Although approximately 25% of Brazilians have private health coverage (PHC), studies on the surveillance of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in this population are scarce. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of CKD in individuals under two PHC regimes in Brazil, who total 8,335,724 beneficiaries.

METHODS

Outpatient serum creatinine and proteinuria results of individuals from all five regions of Brazil, ≥ 18 years of age, and performed between 10/01/2021 and 10/31/2022, were analyzed through the own laboratory network database. People with serum creatinine measurements were evaluated for the prevalence and staging of CKD, and those with simultaneous measurements of serum creatinine and proteinuria were evaluated for the risk category of the disease. CKD was classified according to current guidelines and was defined as a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² estimated by the 2021 CKD-EPI equation.

RESULTS

The number of adults with serum creatinine results was 1,508,766 (age 44.0 [IQR, 33.9-56.8] years, 62.3% female). The estimated prevalence of CKD was 3.8% (2.6%, 0.8%, 0.2% and 0.2% in CKD stages 3a, 3b, 4 and 5, respectively), and it was higher in males than females (4.0% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001, respectively) and in older age groups (0.2% among 18-29-year-olds, 0.5% among 30-44-year-olds, 2.0% among 45-59-year-olds, 9.4% among 60-74-year-olds, and 32.4% among ≥ 75-year-olds, p < 0.001) Adults with simultaneous results of creatinine and proteinuria were 64,178 (age 57.0 [IQR, 44.8-67.3] years, 58.1% female). After adjusting for age and gender, 70.1% were in the low-risk category of CKD, 20.0% were in the moderate-risk category, 5.8% were in the high-risk category, and 4.1% were in the very high-risk category.

CONCLUSION

The estimated prevalence of CKD was 3.8%, and approximately 10% of the participants were in the categories of high or very high-risk of the disease. While almost 20% of beneficiaries with PHC had serum creatinine data, fewer than 1% underwent tests for proteinuria. This study was one of the largest ever conducted in Brazil and the first one to use the 2021 CKD-EPI equation to estimate the prevalence of CKD.

Implications of Implementing the 2021 CKD-EPI Equation Without Race on Managing Patients With Kidney Disease in British Columbia, Canada

Introduction

We investigated the implications of implementing race-free Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2021 equation among real-world patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from British Columbia (BC), Canada.

Methods

This study included nondialysis-dependent patients with CKD aged ≥19 years who were registered in the Patient Records and Outcome Management Information System (PROMIS) as of March 31, 2016 (index date) with ≥1 serum creatinine measurement within 1 year before the index date. Patients with a history of kidney transplantation before the index date were excluded. CKD-EPI 2021 versus 2009 equation was the exposure variable. Difference in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and number (%) of patients reclassified to a different eGFR category were estimated. We used Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model to investigate the association between change in eGFR category and progression to kidney failure (incident maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation) within 2 years.

Results

A total of 11,604 patients (median age 73 years, 52% male) were included. Compared to the 2009 equation, eGFR from 2021 equation was on average 2.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2 higher. Variation was higher among males. Overall, ∼17% of the study sample were reclassified to a category with higher eGFR by 2021 equation (switchers). The highest proportion (28%) of patients were reclassified from G5 to G4. The risk of progressing to kidney failure was 22% less among switchers compared to nonswitchers; adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) is 0.78 (0.65, 0.94).

Conclusion

CKD-EPI 2021 equation appeared to provide higher eGFR compared to 2009 equation. This higher eGFR values appeared to be concordant with subsequent real-world CKD progression outcomes. Higher eGFR from the 2021 equation may have substantial clinical implications in both diagnosis as well as long-term care of patients with CKD.

Evaluation of risk stratification for acute kidney injury: a comparative analysis of EKFC, 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI glomerular filtration estimating equations

BACKGROUND

The adoption of the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation provided a race-free eGFR calculation. However, the discriminative performance for AKI risk has been rarely validated. We aimed to evaluate the differences in acute kidney injury (AKI) prediction or reclassification power according to the three eGFR equations.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study within a tertiary hospital from 2011 to 2021. Acute kidney injury was defined according to KDIGO serum creatinine criteria. Glomerular filtration rate estimates were calculated by three GFR estimating equations: 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPIcr, and EKFC. In three equations, AKI prediction performance was evaluated with area under receiver operator curves (AUROC) and reclassification power was evaluated with net reclassification improvement analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 187,139 individuals, including 27,447 (14.7%) AKI and 159,692 (85.3%) controls, were enrolled. In the multivariable regression prediction model, the 2009 CKD-EPIcr model (continuous eGFR model 2, 0.7583 [0.755-0.7617]) showed superior performance in AKI prediction to the 2021 CKD-EPIcr (0.7564 [0.7531-0.7597], < 0.001) or EKFC model in AUROC (0.7577 [0.7543-0.761], < 0.001). Moreover, in reclassification of AKI, the 2021 CKD-EPIcr and EKFC models showed a worse classification performance than the 2009 CKD-EPIcr model. (- 7.24 [- 8.21-- 6.21], - 2.38 [- 2.72-- 1.97]).

CONCLUSION

Regarding AKI risk stratification, the 2009 CKD-EPIcr equation showed better discriminative performance compared to the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation in the study population.

Association of Low Glomerular Filtration Rate With Adverse Outcomes at Older Age in a Large Population With Routinely Measured Cystatin C

BACKGROUND

The commonly accepted threshold of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to define chronic kidney disease (CKD) is less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. This threshold is based partly on associations between estimated GFR (eGFR) and the frequency of adverse outcomes. The association is weaker in older adults, which has created disagreement about the appropriateness of the threshold for these persons. In addition, the studies measuring these associations included relatively few outcomes and estimated GFR on the basis of creatinine level (eGFRcr), which may be less accurate in older adults.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate associations in older adults between eGFRcr versus eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C levels (eGFRcr-cys) and 8 outcomes.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Stockholm, Sweden, 2010 to 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

82 154 participants aged 65 years or older with outpatient creatinine and cystatin C testing.

MEASUREMENTS

Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT); incidence rate ratios for recurrent hospitalizations, infection, myocardial infarction or stroke, heart failure, and acute kidney injury.

RESULTS

The associations between eGFRcr-cys and outcomes were monotonic, but most associations for eGFRcr were U-shaped. In addition, eGFRcr-cys was more strongly associated with outcomes than eGFRcr. For example, the adjusted hazard ratios for 60 versus 80 mL/min/1.73 m2 for all-cause mortality were 1.2 (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.3) for eGFRcr-cys and 1.0 (CI, 0.9 to 1.0) for eGFRcr, and for KFRT they were 2.6 (CI, 1.2 to 5.8) and 1.4 (CI, 0.7 to 2.8), respectively. Similar findings were observed in subgroups, including those with a urinary albumin-creatinine ratio below 30 mg/g.

LIMITATION

No GFR measurements.

CONCLUSION

Compared with low eGFRcr in older patients, low eGFRcr-cys was more strongly associated with adverse outcomes and the associations were more uniform.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Swedish Research Council, National Institutes of Health, and Dutch Kidney Foundation.

An increase in albuminuria is associated with a higher incidence of malignancies

Background

A single albuminuria measurement is reported to be an independent predictor of cancer risk. Whether change in albuminuria is also independently associated with cancer is not known.

Methods

We included 64 303 subjects of the Stockholm CREAtinine Measurements (SCREAM) project without a history of cancer and with at least two urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) tests up to 2 years apart. Albuminuria changes were quantified by the fold-change in ACR over 2 years, and stratified into the absence of clinically elevated albuminuria (i.e. never), albuminuria that remained constant, and albuminuria that increased or decreased. The primary outcome was overall cancer incidence. Secondary outcomes were site-specific cancer incidences.

Results

During a median follow-up of 3.7 (interquartile range 3.6-3.7) years, 5126 subjects developed de novo cancer. After multivariable adjustment including baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate and baseline ACR, subjects with increasing ACR over 2 years had a 19% (hazard ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.31) higher risk of overall cancer compared with those who never had clinically elevated ACR. No association with cancer risk was seen in the groups with decreasing or constant ACR. Regarding site-specific cancer risks, subjects with increasing ACR or constant ACR had a higher risk of developing urinary tract and lung cancer. No other associations between 2-year ACR changes and site-specific cancers were found.

Conclusions

Increases in albuminuria over a 2-year period are associated with a higher risk of developing overall, urinary tract and lung cancer, independent of baseline kidney function and albuminuria. These data add important weight to the link that exists between albuminuria and cancer incidence.

Comparison of three creatinine-based equations to predict adverse outcome in a cardiovascular high-risk cohort: an investigation using the SPRINT research materials

Background

Novel creatinine-based equations have recently been proposed but their predictive performance for cardiovascular outcomes in participants at high cardiovascular risk in comparison to the established CKD-EPI 2009 equation is unknown.

Method

In 9361 participants from the United States included in the randomized controlled SPRINT trial, we calculated baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the CKD-EPI 2009, CKD-EPI 2021, and EKFC equations and compared their predictive value of cardiovascular events. The statistical metric used is the net reclassification improvement (NRI) presented separately for those with and those without events.

Results

During a mean follow-up of 3.1 ± 0.9 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 559 participants (6.0%). When using the CKD-EPI 2009, the CKD-EPI 2021, and the EKFC equations, the prevalence of CKD (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or >60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with an ACR ≥30 mg/g) was 37% vs. 35.3% (P = 0.02) vs. 46.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. The corresponding mean eGFR was 72.5 ± 20.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 73.2 ± 19.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001) vs. 64.6 ± 17.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001). Neither reclassification according to the CKD-EPI 2021 equation [CKD-EPI 2021 vs. CKD-EPI 2009: NRIevents: -9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) -13.0% to -5.9%); NRInonevents: 4.8% (95% CI 3.9% to 5.7%)], nor reclassification according to the EKFC equation allowed better prediction of cardiovascular events compared to the CKD-EPI 2009 equation (EKFC vs. CKD-EPI 2009: NRIevents: 31.2% (95% CI 27.5% to 35.0%); NRInonevents: -31.1% (95% CI -32.1% to -30.1%)).

Conclusion

Substituting the CKD-EPI 2009 with the CKD-EPI 2021 or the EKFC equation for calculation of eGFR in participants with high cardiovascular risk without diabetes changed the prevalence of CKD but was not associated with improved risk prediction of cardiovascular events for both those with and without the event.

Comparison and evaluation of the 2009 and 2021 chronic kidney disease-epidemiological collaboration equations among Jordanian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

This study compared the 2009 versus 2021 chronic kidney disease (CKD) Epidemiological Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) among Jordanian patients with T2DM to assess their agreement and impact on CKD staging.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 2382 adult Jordanian patients with T2DM. The 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI equations were used to calculate eGFR. Patients were reclassified according to kidney disease-Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) categories. Agreement between the equations was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and Lin's concordance correlation.

RESULTS

The 2021 equation significantly increased eGFR by a median of 2.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (interquartile range: 0.6-3.6 mL/min/1.73 m2). However, there was significant agreement between equations (Kappa: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.00), independent of age, sex, and the presence of hypertension. In total, 202 patients (8.5%) were reclassified to higher KDIGO categories using the 2021 equation, with category G3 being most affected. The overall prevalence of patients in the high to highest risk categories decreased (28.0% vs. 26.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was significant agreement with the 2009 equation, the 2021 equation increased eGFR and resulted in the reclassification of a subset of subjects according to KDIGO criteria. The uncertain impact of reducing high-risk category patients raises concerns about potential delays in referral and intervention, while holding the potential to enhance high-risk patient categorization, thus alleviating healthcare burden.

Kidney function predicts new-onset cardiorenal events and mortality in primary aldosteronism: approach of the 2021 race-free eGFR equation

Individuals with primary aldosteronism (PA) exhibit glomerular hyperfiltration, which may conceal underlying kidney damage. This observational cohort study enrolled 760 coronary artery disease-naive patients diagnosed with PA between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2018 (male, 45%; mean age, 52.3 ± 11.9 years). The baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, which includes serum creatinine and cystatin C but omits the race variable. During a mean follow-up of 5.8 ± 3.2 years, new-onset composite cardiovascular events (total death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization procedure) occurred at a crude incidence rate of 10.9 per 1,000 person-years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that baseline eGFR was independently associated with composite cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]). Penalized splines smoothing in multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that the risk of composite cardiovascular events increased negatively and linearly when patients had a baseline eGFR less than 85 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients with baseline eGFR <85 mL/min/1.73 m2 were independently associated with higher risks of composite cardiovascular events (HR, 2.39 [95% CI, 1.16-4.93]), all-cause mortality (HR, 4.63 [95% CI, 1.59-13.46]), and adverse kidney events (sub-distribution HR, 5.96 [95% CI, 3.69-9.62], with mortality as a competing risk). Our data support baseline eGFR as a predictor for new-onset adverse cardiorenal events and emphasizes the importance of the early detection of kidney function impairment in hypertensive patients with PA. We also firstly validate the 2021 race-free CKD-EPI eGFR equation in Asian patents with PA. Even with the glomerular hyperfiltration phenomenon, baseline eGFR in patients with primary aldosteronism is associated with subsequent cardiorenal outcomes. The results also firstly point to the validity of the 2021 race-free CKD-EPI eGFR equation in healthcare and clinical decision-making.

Performance of the race-free CKD-EPI creatinine-based eGFR equation in a Danish cohort with measured GFR

Background

In 2021, an updated Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) without a coefficient for race (CKD-EPI21) was developed. The performance of this new equation has yet to be examined among specific patient groups.

Methods

We compared the performances of the new CKD-EPI21 equation and the 2009 equation assuming non-Black race (CKD-EPI09-NB) in patients with GFR measured by chromium-51-EDTA plasma clearance at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark during 2010-18. We examined bias, accuracy, precision and correct classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage using chromium-51-EDTA clearance as the reference standard. We assessed the performance in the total cohort, cancer patients and potential living kidney donors. We also assessed the performance stratified by CKD stage in the total cohort.

Results

In this predominantly white population, the CKD-EPI21 equation performed slightly better than the CKD-EPI09-NB equation in both the total cohort (N = 4668), and in cancer patients (N = 3313) and potential living kidney donors (N = 239). In the total cohort, the CKD-EPI21 equation demonstrated a slightly lower median absolute bias (-0.2 versus -4.4 mL/min/1.73 m2), and a similar accuracy, precision and correct classification of CKD stage compared with the CKD-EPI09-NB equation. When stratified by CKD stage, the CKD-EPI09-NB equation performed slightly better than the CKD-EPI21 equation among patients with a measured GFR (mGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Conclusions

In a selected cohort of Danish patients with mGFR, the CKD-EPI21 equation performed slightly better than the CKD-EPI09-NB equation except for patients with a mGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, where CKD-EPI09-NB performed slightly better although the differences were considered clinically insignificant.

Diagnostic challenges of diabetic kidney disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the most common microvascular complications of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes and the most common cause of the end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It has been evidenced that targeted interventions at an early stage of DKD can efficiently prevent or delay the progression of kidney failure and improve patient outcomes. Therefore, regular screening for DKD has become one of the fundamental principles of diabetes care. Long-established biomarkers such as serum-creatinine-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria are currently the cornerstone of diagnosis and risk stratification in routine clinical practice. However, their immanent biological limitations and analytical variations may influence the clinical interpretation of the results. Recently proposed new predictive equations without the variable of race, together with the evidence on better accuracy of combined serum creatinine and cystatin C equations, and both race- and sex-free cystatin C-based equation, have enabled an improvement in the detection of DKD, but also require the harmonization of the recommended laboratory tests, wider availability of cystatin C testing and specific approach in various populations. Considering the complex pathophysiology of DKD, particularly in type 2 diabetes, a panel of biomarkers is needed to classify patients in terms of the rate of disease progression and/or response to specific interventions. With a personalized approach to diagnosis and treatment, in the future, it will be possible to respond to DKD better and enable improved outcomes for numerous patients worldwide.

New and old GFR equations: a European perspective

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated in clinical practice from equations based on the serum concentration of endogenous biomarkers and demographic data. The 2009 creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI2009) was recommended worldwide until 2021, when it was recalibrated to remove the African-American race factor. The CKD-EPI2009 and CKD-EPIcr2021 equations overestimate GFR of adults aged 18-30 years, with a strong overestimation in estimated GFR (eGFR) at age 18 years. CKD-EPICr2021 does not perform better than CKD-EPI2009 in US population, overestimating GFR in non-Black subjects, and underestimating it in Black subjects with the same magnitude. CKD-EPICr2021 performed worse than the CKD-EPI2009 in White Europeans, and provides no or limited performance gains in Black European and Black African populations. The European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation, which incorporates median normal value of serum creatinine in healthy population, overcomes the limitations of the CKD-EPI equations: it provides a continuity of eGFR at the transition between pediatric and adult care, and performs reasonably well in diverse populations, assuming dedicated scaling of serum creatinine (Q) values is used. The new EKFC equation based on cystatin C (EKFCCC) shares the same mathematical construction, namely, it incorporates the median cystatin C value in the general population, which is independent of sex and ethnicity. EKFCCC is therefore a sex-free and race-free equation, which performs better than the CKD-EPI equation based on cystatin C. Despite advances in the field of GFR estimation, no equation is perfectly accurate, and GFR measurement by exogenous tracer clearance is still required in specific populations and/or specific clinical situations.

Retaining Race in Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

The best overall measure of kidney function is glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as commonly estimated from serum creatinine concentrations (eGFRcr) using formulas that correct for the higher average creatinine concentrations in Blacks. After two decades of use, these formulas have come under scrutiny for estimating GFR differently in Blacks and non-Blacks. Discussions of whether to include race (Black vs. non-Black) in the calculation of eGFRcr fail to acknowledge that the original race-based eGFRcr provided the same CKD treatment recommendations for Blacks and non-Blacks based on directly (exogenously) measured GFR. Nevertheless, the National Kidney Foundation and the American Society of Nephrology Task Force on Reassessing the Inclusion of Race in Diagnosing Kidney Disease removed race in CKD treatment guidelines and pushed for the immediate adoption of a race-free eGFRcr formula by physicians and clinical laboratories. This formula is projected to negate CKD in 5.51 million White and other non-Black adults and reclassify CKD to less severe stages in another 4.59 million non-Blacks, in order to expand treatment eligibility to 434,000 Blacks not previously diagnosed and to 584,000 Blacks previously diagnosed with less severe CKD. This review examines: 1) the validity of the arguments for removing the original race correction, and 2) the performance of the proposed replacement formula. Excluding race in the derivation of eGFRcr changed the statistical bias from +3.7 to -3.6 ml/min/1.73m2 in Blacks and from +0.5 to +3.9 in non-Blacks, i.e., promoting CKD diagnosis in Blacks at the cost of restricting diagnosis in non-Blacks. By doing so, the revised eGFRcr greatly exaggerates the purported racial disparity in CKD burden. Claims that the revised formulas identify heretofore undiagnosed CKD in Blacks are not supported when studies that used kidney failure replacement therapy and mortality are interpreted as proxies for baseline CKD. Alternatively, a race-stratified eGFRcr (i.e., separate equations for Blacks and non-Blacks) would provide the least biased eGFRcr for both Blacks and non-Blacks and the best medical treatment for all patients.

Long and Short-Term Effects of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion vs. Cold Storage on Transplanted Kidneys from Expanded Criteria Donors-A Matched Comparison Study

Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has been shown to reduce delayed graft function (DGF)-rates in kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD) and may increase graft survival compared with static cold storage (SCS). This single-center, retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate this effect. The primary endpoint was the DGF-rate, defined as the use of dialysis in the first postoperative week, excluding the first 24 h. The main secondary endpoint was graft survival at 5 years. Recipients of ECD-kidneys between 2013 and 2021 with ≤2 grafts were included (n = 438). The SCS-kidneys were marginal-matched by propensity score to the HMP-group for donor age, cold ischemia time, and graft number. Multivariable adjusted analysis for confounders in the unmatched cohort and caliper-based ID-matching constituted sensitivity analyses. HMP showed a trend to lower DGF-rate in the marginal-matched comparison (9.2% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.063). This was strengthened by a significant benefit observed for HMP in both the sensitivity analyses: an adjusted OR of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.24; 0.84; p = 0.012) in the multivariable analysis and DGF-rate of 8.7% vs. 17.4% (p = 0.024) after ID-matching. The 5-year graft survival rate was >90% in both groups, with no benefit using HMP (HR = 0.79; 95% CI:0.39-1.16; p = 0.52). Our results suggest that HMP may be effective in decreasing DGF-rates, however, without any significant benefit in graft survival.

Development and validation of a new equation based on plasma creatinine and muscle mass assessed by CT scan to estimate glomerular filtration rate: a cross-sectional study

Background

Inter-individual variations of non-glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determinants of serum creatinine, such as muscle mass, account for the imperfect performance of estimated GFR (eGFR) equations. We aimed to develop an equation based on creatinine and total lumbar muscle cross-sectional area measured by unenhanced computed tomography scan at the third lumbar vertebra.

Methods

The muscle mass-based eGFR (MMB-eGFR) equation was developed in 118 kidney donor candidates (iohexol clearance) using linear regression. Validation cohorts included 114 healthy subjects from another center (⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance, validation population 1), 55 patients with chronic diseases (iohexol, validation population 2), and 60 patients with highly discordant creatinine and cystatin C-based eGFR, thus presumed to have atypical non-GFR determinants of creatinine (⁵¹Cr-EDTA, validation population 3). Mean bias was the mean difference between eGFR and measured GFR, precision the standard deviation (SD) of the bias, and accuracy the percentage of eGFR values falling within 20% and 30% of measured GFR.

Results

In validation population 1, performance of MMB-eGFR was not different from those of CKD-EPI_Cr2009 and CKD-EPI_Cr2021. In validation population 2, MMB-eGFR was unbiased and displayed better precision than CKD-EPI_Cr2009, CKD-EPI_Cr2021 and EKFC (SD of the biases: 13.1 vs 16.5, 16.8 and 15.9 mL/min/1.73 m²). In validation population 3, MMB-eGFR had better precision and accuracy {accuracy within 30%: 75.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64.0-86.0] vs 51.5% (95% CI 39.0-64.3) for CKD-EPI_Cr2009, 43.3% (95% CI 31.0-55.9) for CKD-EPICr2021, and 53.3% (95% CI 40.7-66.0) for EKFC}. Difference in bias between Black and white subjects was -2.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI -7.2 to 3.0), vs -8.4 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI -13.2 to -3.6) for CKD-EPI_Cr2021.

Conclusion

MMB-eGFR displayed better performances than equations based on demographics, and could be applied to subjects of various ethnic backgrounds.

Chronic kidney disease in the elderly and frail patient: perspectives with opinions and comments

Chronic kidney disease is common in elderly and frail people. The importance of age in staging chronic kidney disease is discussed as well as the possible constraints of staging what is actually a 'continuum' of disease progression. Frailty is a biological state characterized by the decline of several physiological systems and strongly correlated with adverse health outcomes, including mortality. Frailty is measured by the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, which focuses on quantitative rating scales that determine not only the clinical profile and pathological risk of frail individuals, but also their residual capacities, functional status, and quality of life. There is circumstantial evidence that Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment can improve both survival and quality of life in elderly chronic kidney disease patients. Despite the long list of emerging risk factors and markers of chronic kidney disease progression, it is the authors' opinion that a single biochemical parameter can hardly cover the complexity of chronic kidney disease in elderly and frail patients. Among the numerous clinical scores proposed, the European Renal Best Practice guidelines recommend the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network score and the Kidney Failure Risk Equations. The former provides a reasonable estimate of short-term mortality risk, the latter provides the risk of chronic kidney disease progression. In conclusion, the elderly individual with advanced chronic kidney disease is often comorbid and frail with peculiarities in terms of disease grading, clinical assessment and monitoring. The time has come to reshape the care of this growing number of patients by focusing on multidisciplinary teams both in the hospital and in the community.

The new, race-free, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Consortium (CKD-EPI) equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate: is it applicable in Europe? A position statement by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

The EFLM recommends not to implement the race-free Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Consortium (CKD-EPI) equation in European laboratories and to keep the 2009 version of the CKD-EPI equation, without applying a race correction factor. This recommendation is completely in line with a recent Editorial published by the European Renal Association who has also proposed to change to a novel equation only when it has considerably better performance, trying to reach global consensus before implementing such a new glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation equation. In Europe, this equation could be for instance the new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation, which is population-specific, developed from European cohorts and accurate from infants to the older old. Beyond serum creatinine, the estimating equations based on cystatin C will probably gain in popularity, especially because cystatin C seems independent of race. Finally, we must keep in mind that all GFR equations remain an estimation of GFR, especially rough at the individual level. Measuring GFR with a reference method, such as iohexol clearance, remains indicated in specific patients and/or specific situations, and here also, the role of the clinical laboratories is central and should still evolve positively in the future.

[Diabetic kidney disease (update 2023) : Position paper of the Austrian Diabetes Association and the Austrian Society for Nephrology]

Epidemiological investigations have shown that approximately 2-3% of all Austrians have diabetes mellitus with renal involvement, leaving 250,000 people in Austria affected. The risk of occurrence and progression of this disease can be attenuated by lifestyle interventions as well as optimization of blood pressure, blood glucose control and special drug classes. The present article represents the joint recommendations of the Austrian Diabetes Association and the Austrian Society of Nephrology for the diagnostic and treatment strategies of diabetic kidney disease.

Circulating Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 Levels Can Predict Rapid Kidney Function Decline in a Healthy Population: A Community-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) associates with decreased kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the correlation between circulating FGF-23 levels and the rate of renal function decline in healthy individuals is largely unknown. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of FGF-23 for rapid kidney function decline (RKFD) in a community-based study.

METHODS

A total of 2963 people residing in northern Taiwan were enrolled from August 2013 to May 2018 for an annual assessment of kidney function for five years. The baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were calculated using the 2009 and 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, which aggregates the values of serum creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys). The outcome was RKFD-a 15% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) within the first four years, and a reduction in eGFR without improvement in the 5th year. A generalized additive model (GAM) was used to determine the cut-off value of FGF-23 to predict RKFD.

RESULTS

The incidence of RKFD was 18.0% (114/634). After matching for age and sex at a 1:1 ratio, a total of 220 subjects were analyzed. eGFRcr-cys was negatively correlated with total vitamin D level but seemed irrelevant to FGF-23. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that FGF-23, eGFRcr-cys, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) were independent predictors of the possibility of RKFD. FGF-23 showed the best predictive performance for RKFD (AUROC: 0.803), followed by baseline eGFRcr-cys (AUROC: 0.639) and UACR (AUROC: 0.591). From the GAM, 32 pg/mL was the most appropriate cut-off value of FGF-23 with which to predict RKFD. The subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed consistent results that high-FGF-23 subjects had higher risks of RKFD.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating FGF-23 level could be a helpful predictor for RKFD in this community-based population.