Risks and complications in 160 living kidney donors who underwent nephroureterectomy

Renal function is a major predictor of circulating acyl-CoA-binding protein/diazepam-binding inhibitor

Objective

Acyl-CoA-binding protein (ACBP)/diazepam-binding inhibitor has lately been described as an endocrine factor affecting food intake and lipid metabolism. ACBP is dysregulated in catabolic/malnutrition states like sepsis or systemic inflammation. However, regulation of ACBP has not been investigated in conditions with impaired kidney function, so far.

Design/methods

Serum ACBP concentrations were investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay i) in a cohort of 60 individuals with kidney failure (KF) on chronic haemodialysis and compared to 60 individuals with a preserved kidney function; and ii) in a human model of acute kidney dysfunction (AKD). In addition, mACBP mRNA expression was assessed in two CKD mouse models and in two distinct groups of non-CKD mice. Further, mRNA expression of mACBP was measured in vitro in isolated, differentiated mouse adipocytes - brown and white - after exposure to the uremic agent indoxyl sulfate.

Results

Median [interquartile range] serum ACBP was almost 20-fold increased in KF (514.0 [339.3] µg/l) compared to subjects without KF (26.1 [39.1] µg/l) (p<0.001). eGFR was the most important, inverse predictor of circulating ACBP in multivariate analysis (standardized β=-0.839; p<0.001). Furthermore, AKD increased ACBP concentrations almost 3-fold (p<0.001). Increased ACBP levels were not caused by augmented mACBP mRNA expression in different tissues of CKD mice in vivo or in indoxyl sulfate-treated adipocytes in vitro.

Conclusions

Circulating ACBP inversely associates with renal function, most likely through renal retention of the cytokine. Future studies need to investigate ACBP physiology in malnutrition-related disease states, such as CKD, and to adjust for markers of renal function.

To Study the Impact of Donor Nephrectomy on Blood Pressure as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Renal Function

Prospective living kidney donors need meticulous evaluation prior to kidney donation. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is considered the reference standard for diagnosing hypertension. With no prior study available in India in this context, we undertook this study to evaluate the utility of ABPM in kidney donors and effect of donor nephrectomy on renal function. This was a prospective observational study involving healthy prospective kidney donors between 18 and 70 years with normal office blood pressure measurements (OBPM). Detailed clinical and biochemical parameters were recorded. OBPM and 24-hour ABPM was done preoperatively and 3 months following donor nephrectomy. There were 51 donors with a mean age of 46.1 ± 11.3 years, of which 40 (78.4%) were females. Preoperatively, three (5.8%) donors were hypertensive on ABPM but normal on OBPM (P = 0.08). Three months post nephrectomy, hypertension was present in seven (13.7%) donors by ABPM, while only two (3.9%) donors were diagnosed as hypertensive by OBPM (P = 0.02). Median pre-nephrectomy proteinuria was 70 mg (10 mg-180 mg) with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula of 86.86 ± 19.1 ml/min. Six donors developed >300 mg/day proteinuria, and 17 (33.3%) had a 24-hour urinary protein excretion greater than 150 mg/day. Mean serum creatinine (0.79 ± 0.11 vs 1.03 ± 0.16 mg/dl) significantly increased post donation, more so in donors >55 years of age (1.14 ± 0.25 mg/dl). Our study shows that in transplant donors, ABPM is better for diagnosing hypertension, which otherwise remains masked in 10% of the donors on routine OBPM. Significance of post-nephrectomy hypertension and increasing proteinuria needs further evaluation.

Short- and Intermediate-Term Outcomes in Living-Related Renal Transplant Donors

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the short- and intermediate-term outcomes of living-related kidney donors in terms of renal function and postnephrectomy complications at a single center in Pakistan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study included healthy donors who underwent unilateral nephroureterectomy for living-related renal transplant procedures at the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (Karachi, Pakistan) between January 2005 and January 2006. All patients were evaluated for early postoperative complications and renal functions at last follow-up. The mean follow-up duration was 1.7 ± 1.3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 256 living-related donors underwent nephroureterectomy during the study period, which included 142 men (55.5%) and 114 women (44.5%). The mean age of donors was 33.7 ± 10.0 years. Most donors were between 21 and 40 years old. Of total donors, most were siblings (n = 143, 55.8%), followed by offspring, parents, and spouses. Left nephrectomy was performed in 206 donors (80.4%) and right in 50 donors (19.5%). There were no deaths during transplant. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.37 ± 0.95 days. A total of 38 donors (14.8%) had one or more surgical complication. Hypertension developed in 25 (9.7%) and diabetes mellitus in 9 donors (5%). Creatinine clearance was > 90 mL/min in 96 (41%), 60 to 90 mL/min in 120 (51%), and ≤ 60 mL/min in 18 donors (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Living-related donor nephrectomy remains a valuable source of kidneys for transplant procedures and carries a small risk. With careful donor selection and good surgical management, operative complications can be minimized.

The National Landscape of Living Kidney Donor Follow-Up in the United States

In 2013, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/ United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) mandated that transplant centers collect data on living kidney donors (LKDs) at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postdonation, with policy-defined thresholds for the proportion of complete living donor follow-up (LDF) data submitted in a timely manner (60 days before or after the expected visit date). While mandated, it was unclear how centers across the country would perform in meeting thresholds, given potential donor and center-level challenges of LDF. To better understand the impact of this policy, we studied Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for 31,615 LKDs between January 2010 and June 2015, comparing proportions of complete and timely LDF form submissions before and after policy implementation. We also used multilevel logistic regression to assess donor- and center-level characteristics associated with complete and timely LDF submissions. Complete and timely 2-year LDF increased from 33% prepolicy (January 2010 through January 2013) to 54% postpolicy (February 2013 through June 2015) (p < 0.001). In an adjusted model, the odds of 2-year LDF increased by 22% per year prepolicy (p < 0.001) and 23% per year postpolicy (p < 0.001). Despite these annual increases in LDF, only 43% (87/202) of centers met the OPTN/UNOS-required 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year LDF thresholds for LKDs who donated in 2013. These findings motivate further evaluation of LDF barriers and the optimal approaches to capturing outcomes after living donation.

Evaluation of renal function in a specific population of living kidney donors

BACKGROUND

The increase in candidates for kidney transplant has led to growth in the number of living donor transplants. Therefore, studies that adequately evaluate the possible long-term consequences of elective transplant nephrectomy are needed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possible long-term adverse effects of transplant nephrectomy on the renal function of living kidney donors.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-three living kidney donors registered in the transplant programme of a centre in Alagoas, Brazil.

MEASUREMENTS

Demographic characteristics, anthropometric measures, clinical data and biomarkers (creatinine, eGFR, microalbuminuria, cholesterol and triglycerides) were measured. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulae.

RESULTS

Of the 33 individuals, 63.63% were female, and the median age was 45 years. Additionally, 24.24% of these individuals had altered blood pressure, 39.39% had altered abdominal circumference (AC) and 36.36% were obese, with a body mass index ≥30. Furthermore, 33.33% of these individuals had elevated triglyceride levels. The average eGFR was 97.33 (33.03-175.9) ml/min/1.73 m² (CG) and 84.14 (29.4-131) ml/min/1.73 m² (MDRD). The microalbuminuria level was altered in 12.12% patients.

CONCLUSION

Kidney donation is unquestionably a safe procedure. However, a better understanding of the long-term consequences of living donor kidney transplantation is still needed. This knowledge may have important implications for the follow-up of these patients. Our study has demonstrated a non-negligible presence of an early marker of glomerular injury and a decrease in the GFR of some patients, thereby reinforcing the proposal for long-term follow-up of living kidney donors.

A prospective controlled study of living kidney donors: three-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

There have been few prospective controlled studies of kidney donors. Understanding the pathophysiologic effects of kidney donation is important for judging donor safety and improving our understanding of the consequences of reduced kidney function in chronic kidney disease.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, controlled, observational cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

3-year follow-up of kidney donors and paired controls suitable for donation at their donor's center.

PREDICTOR

Kidney donation.

OUTCOMES

Medical history, vital signs, glomerular filtration rate, and other measurements at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after donation.

RESULTS

At 36 months, 182 of 203 (89.7%) original donors and 173 of 201 (86.1%) original controls continue to participate in follow-up visits. The linear slope of the glomerular filtration rate measured by plasma iohexol clearance declined 0.36±7.55mL/min per year in 194 controls, but increased 1.47±5.02mL/min per year in 198 donors (P=0.005) between 6 and 36 months. Blood pressure was not different between donors and controls at any visit, and at 36 months, all 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure parameters were similar in 126 controls and 135 donors (mean systolic blood pressure, 120.0±11.2 [SD] vs 120.7±9.7mmHg [P=0.6]; mean diastolic blood pressure, 73.4±7.0 vs 74.5±6.5mmHg [P=0.2]). Mean arterial pressure nocturnal dipping was manifest in 11.2% ± 6.6% of controls and 11.3% ± 6.1% of donors (P=0.9). Urinary protein-creatinine and albumin-creatinine ratios were not increased in donors compared with controls. From 6 to 36 months postdonation, serum parathyroid hormone, uric acid, homocysteine, and potassium levels were higher, whereas hemoglobin levels were lower, in donors compared with controls.

LIMITATIONS

Possible bias resulting from an inability to select controls screened to be as healthy as donors, short follow-up duration, and dropouts.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney donors manifest several of the findings of mild chronic kidney disease. However, at 36 months after donation, kidney function continues to improve in donors, whereas controls have expected age-related declines in function.

Renal function decline in recipients and donors of kidney grafts: role of aortic stiffness

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Renal function decreases over time as a result of reduction in the number of functioning nephrons with age. In recipients and donors of kidney grafts, renal function decline may be linked differently to various parameters, namely arterial stiffness.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study including 101 recipients of kidney grafts and their donors aiming at determining the factors correlated to the renal function decline over time. Aortic stiffness was evaluated by the non-invasive measurement of aortic pulse wave velocity. The glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and the annualized change was determined.

RESULTS

Decline in renal function was estimated at 1-year post-transplantation and annually thereafter (median follow-up 8 years, range 3.6-18.3), as the mean of the annualized decrease in the glomerular filtration rate. In recipients, filtration rate decreased by 4.8 ± 19.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2) the first post-transplant year and at a yearly rate of 2.2 ± 3.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2) thereafter. The first-year decline was related to smoking and acute rejection. Later decline was significantly associated with donor age and aortic stiffness. In living donors, renal function decline after the first year corresponded to 0.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2), was significantly lower than that of recipients (p < 0.001), and was determined by donor age at nephrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Recipients of kidney grafts show a glomerular filtration rate decline over time that is significantly associated with donor age and aortic stiffness after the first post-transplant year, while donors demonstrate a lower decline that is mostly determined by age at nephrectomy.

Serum levels of fibroblast growth factor-21 are increased in chronic and acute renal dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-21 has recently been introduced as a circulating adipokine which reverses insulin resistance and obesity in rodents. In this study, regulation of FGF-21 in renal dysfunction was elucidated in both chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney dysfunction (AKD).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Serum concentrations of total FGF-21 were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 499 patients with CKD stages 1-5 (study population 1). Furthermore, total FGF-21 was determined before and within 30 h after unilateral nephrectomy, a model of AKD, in 32 patients (study population 2). FGF-21 levels were correlated to anthropometric and biochemical parameters of renal function, glucose and lipid metabolism, as well as inflammation, in both studies.

RESULTS

In study population 1, median [interquartile range] circulating FGF-21 adjusted for age, gender and body mass index was significantly different between CKD stages with highest values detectable in stage 5 (stage 1: 86·4 [132·9]; 2: 206·4 [223·1]; 3: 289·8 [409·3]; 4: 591·3 [789·0]; 5: 1918·1 [4157·0] ng/l). Furthermore, estimated glomerular filtration rate remained a strong independent and negative predictor of FGF-21. In study population 2, FGF-21 increased significantly postsurgically (325·0 [984·0] ng/l) as compared to presurgical values (255·5 [243·0] ng/l). Furthermore, relative changes of FGF-21 were independently and positively predicted by relative changes of creatinine.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that circulating FGF-21 is increased in both CKD and AKD. Our results suggest renal excretion as a major route for FGF-21 elimination. The pathophysiological significance of these findings needs to be elucidated in more detail.

Controversies related to living kidney donors

Background

Increasing the living-donor pool by accepting donors with an isolated medical abnormality (IMA) can significantly decrease the huge gap between limited supply and rising demand for organs. There is a wide range of variation among different centres in dealing with these categories of donors. We reviewed studies discussing living kidney donors with IMA, including greater age, obesity, hypertension, microscopic haematuria and nephrolithiasis, to highlight the effect of these abnormalities on both donor and recipient sides from medical and surgical perspectives.

Methods

We systematically searched MEDLINE, ISI Science Citation Index expanded, and Google scholar, from the inception of each source to January 2011, using the terms ‘kidney transplant’, ‘renal’, ‘graft’, ‘living donor’, ‘old’, ‘obesity’, ‘nephrolithiasis’, ‘haematuria’ and ‘hypertension’. In all, 58 studies were found to be relevant and were reviewed comprehensively.

Results

Most of the reviewed studies confirmed the safety of using elderly, moderately obese and well-controlled hypertensive donors. Also, under specific circumstances, donors with nephrolithiasis can be accepted. However, persistent microscopic haematuria should be considered seriously and renal biopsy is indicated to exclude underlying renal disease.

Conclusion

Extensive examination and cautious selection with tailored immunosuppressive protocols for these groups can provide a satisfactory short- and medium-term outcome. Highly motivated elderly, obese, controlled hypertensive and the donor with a unilateral small stone (<1.5 cm, with normal metabolic evaluation) could be accepted. Donors with dysmorphic and persistent haematuria should not be accepted. A close follow-up after donation is crucial, especially for obese donors who developed microalbuminuria.

Long-term outcomes of kidney donors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Partial renal ablation in laboratory animals leads initially to compensatory glomerular hyperfiltration and progressive, sclerotic kidney disease. In addition, modest declines in kidney function are associated with premature mortality in epidemiological studies. Hence, the long-term safety of living-kidney donation is an important issue. The purpose of this review was to examine existing research on outcomes among living-kidney transplant donors, with a focus on longer term outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although studies with sibling controls are unavailable, the current evidence base suggests that kidney donors have mortality and end-stage renal disease risks that are equivalent to similar individuals in the general population. Although findings for albuminuria and hypertension vary between studies, risks may be acceptable if donors receive optimal follow-up and care. Parenthetically, viewed as an experimental model of kidney-function loss, the neutrality of outcomes among donors may have major implications for the population at large: the robust associations between modest declines in kidney function and mortality seen in the general population suggest a confounded relationship and finding these confounders could have major implications for future research directions and for public health.

SUMMARY

Long-term outcomes suggest that kidney donation is not a major threat to longevity.

Short- and long-term donor outcomes after kidney donation: analysis of 601 cases over a 35-year period at Japanese single center

BACKGROUND

The lack of deceased donors in Japan means that living-donor kidney transplantation is necessary in as many as 80% of cases. However, there are few data on perioperative complications and long-term outcome for live kidney donors.

METHODS

To determine associated perioperative morbidity and long-term mortality among live kidney donors, we reviewed 601 donor nephrectomies performed at our institution between 1970 and 2006 and attempted to contact all of the donors (or their families) to ascertain their present physical status. The survival rate and causes of death were compared with an age- and gender-matched cohort from the general population.

RESULTS

Although three donors (0.5%) experienced major perioperative complications, that is, femoral nerve compression, pulmonary thrombosis, and acute renal failure, all of the donors recovered and left hospital without complications. Among 481 donors (80%) for whom details were available at the time of inspection, 426 (88.5%) were still surviving. Donor survival rates at 5, 10, 20, and 30 years were 98.3%, 94.7%, 86.4%, and 66.2%, respectively. The mean interval between kidney donation and death was 183+/-102 (7-375) months, and the mean age at death was 70+/-11 years. The survival rate of kidney donors was better than the age- and gender-matched cohort from the general population, and the patterns and causes of death were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that continuation of living-donor kidney transplantation programs is justified in short- and long-term donor safety.

Health outcomes for living kidney donors with isolated medical abnormalities: a systematic review

Individuals with isolated medical abnormalities (IMAs) are undergoing living donor nephrectomy more frequently. Knowledge of health risks for these living donors is important for donor selection, informed consent and follow-up. We systematically reviewed studies with > or = 3 living kidney donors with preexisting IMAs, including older age, obesity, hypertension, reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria, microscopic hematuria and nephrolithiasis. We abstracted data on study and donor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, longer term renal and blood pressure outcomes and mortality and compared them to those of non-IMA donors. We found 22 studies on older donors (n = 987), 10 on obese donors (n = 484), 6 on hypertensive donors (n = 125), 4 on donors with nephrolithiasis (n = 32), 2 on donors with microscopic hematuria and one study each on donors with proteinuria or reduced GFR. Perioperative outcomes for donors with and without IMAs were similar. Few studies reported longer term (> or = 1 year) rates of hypertension, proteinuria or renal function. Studies were frequently retrospective and without a comparison group. Given the variability among studies and their methodological limitations, uncertainties remain regarding long-term medical outcomes for IMA donors. As transplant centers continue to cautiously screen and counsel potential IMA donors, rigorously conducted, longer term prospective cohort studies are needed.

Health status and renal function evaluation of kidney vendors: a report from Pakistan

Unrelated kidney transplants have lead to commerce and kidney vending in Pakistan. This study on 104 vendors reports demographics, history, physical and systemic examination, ultrasound findings, renal and liver function and GFR by Cockcroft-Gault. Results were compared with 184 age, sex and nephrectomy duration matched living-related donors controls. Comparison of vendors versus controls showed mean age of 30.55 +/- 8.1 versus 30.65 +/- 7.85 (p = 0.91) years, M:F of 4.5:1 versus 4.2:1 and nephrectomy period of 33.89 +/- 30 versus 32.01 +/- 29.71 (p = 0.60) months respectively. Of the vendors 67% were bonded laborers earning <50 $/month as compared to controls where 68% were skilled laborers and self-employed earning >100 $/month. History of vendors revealed jaundice in 8%, stone disease in 2% and urinary tract symptoms in 4.8%. Postnephrectomy findings between vendors versus donors showed BMI of 21.02 +/- 2.8 versus 23.02 +/- 4.2 (p = 0.0001), hypertension in 17% versus 9.2% (p = 0.04), serum creatinine (mg/dL) of 1.17+/-0.21 versus 1.02 +/- 0.27 (p = 0.0001), GFR (mL/min) of 70.94 +/- 14.2 versus 95.4 +/- 20.44 (p = 0.0001), urine protein/creatinine of 0.150 +/- 0.109 versus 0.10 +/- 0.10 (p = 0.0001), hepatitis C positivity in 27% versus 1.0% (p = 0.0001) and hepatitis B positive 5.7% versus 0.5% (p = 0.04), respectively. In conclusion, vendors had compromised renal function suggesting inferior selection and high risk for developing chronic kidney disease in long term.

Evidence for a need to mandate kidney transplant living donor registries

Kidney disease is a global public health problem of growing proportions. Currently the best treatment for end-stage renal failure is transplantation. Living organ donation remains a complex ethical, moral and medical issue. It is based on a premise that kidney donation is associated with short-term minimal risks to harm the donor, and is outweighed by the definite advantages to the recipient. A growing number of patients with end-stage renal disease and shortage of kidney donors poses a pressing need to expand the criteria needed to accept kidney donors. The current donor registries are structured and are driven to expand donor pool. As living kidney donation is not without risks, more attention should be given to protect the donor health. After kidney donation, mild to moderate renal insufficiency may occur. Renal insufficiency, even mild, is associated with increased risks of hypertension, proteinuria and cardiovascular morbidity. We, therefore, foresee a need to mandate the establishment of renal transplant donor registries at all transplanting programs as a prerequisite to protect the long-term well being of kidney donors. These registries can collect the database necessary to develop standards of practice and guidelines for future kidney donation.

Nephrectomy modifies renal angiotensin II effects in kidney donors

BACKGROUND

Age, gender, menopausal status, a family history of hypertension, and renal vascular response to angiotensin II are involved in the progression of renal failure from its very beginning.

METHODS

In order to investigate their importance on this progression, we measured effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and calculated glomerular pressure (Pglo) and afferent and efferent arteriole resistances (by means of Gomez formulae) in 26 normotensive kidney donors before and after nephrectomy.

RESULTS

Renal reactivity to angiotensin was the only variable that affected changes in renal and glomerular hemodynamics after the loss of renal tissue: in subjects with greater angiotensin reactivity, higher afferent resistances (Ra) and lower glomerular filtration and pressure before nephrectomy change to higher efferent resistances (Re) and higher Pglo and filtration after nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In normotensive donors with a normal compensatory response to nephrectomy, baseline renal reactivity to angiotensin II can influence renal and glomerular hemodynamics 1 year after nephrectomy.

Medical risk analysis of renal transplant donors

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term medical risks of living-related donors in our center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

185 living-related donors participated in the study. The factors assessed were creatinine clearance rate (CrCl), serum creatinine (SCr), BUN, hematocrit levels, proteinuria, microalbuminuria and hypertension rates, and renal parenchyma thickness and kidney dimensions predonation as well as at the last follow-up. In addition, we examined postoperative complications. A lombotomy incision was the choice for donor nephrectomy procedure routinely.

RESULTS

The mean length of hospital stay after donor nephrectomy was 3.2 +/- 0.6 days (range, 2-5 days). Seven donors readmitted during the first month after operation with surgical site infection were treated successfully. Four donors were reoperated for incisional hernia repairs and discharged without complication. The mean follow-up period was 61.6 +/- 50.4 months (range, 2-180 months). Mean ages of the donors at operation and at the last follow-up were 50.9 +/- 12.7 years (range, 20-81 years) and 56.5 +/- 11.9 years (range, 29-77 years), respectively. The male-to-female ratio was 0.69. Mean SCr levels and CrCl rates predonation and at the last follow-up were 0.83 +/- 0.22 mg/dL versus 1.1 +/- 0.2 mg/dL (P < .001), and 103.9 +/- 28.8 mL/min versus 88.3 +/- 25.9 mL/min (P = .03), respectively. SCr levels were within normal limits in all donors at predonation and at the last follow-up. At the last follow-up, CrCl was also within expected normal limits in all donors. Hypertension was detected in 13 donors. Mean predonation and at the last follow-up renal parenchymal thickness, BUN, and hematocrit levels were similar. Kidney dimensions were significantly different at the last follow-up after donation (P = .001). Eleven donors displayed proteinuria and 19 had microalbuminuria at the last follow-up, which had been negative for all donors predonation. There were seven surgical site infections and 4 incisional herniae.

CONCLUSION

Donor nephrectomy was performed with low surgical morbidity and comparable results of clinical and laboratory data to the age-matched general population.

Rosiglitazone treatment attenuates expression of inflammatory hallmarks in the remaining kidney following contralateral nephrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Following kidney donation, living kidney donors have been reported to develop anemia and pronounced inflammation. Therapeutic strategies for ameliorating unilateral nephrectomy-induced inflammation would be beneficiary for the living donors. We applied rosiglitazone to attenuate inflammatory processes ongoing within the remaining kidney following contralateral nephrectomy.

METHODS

20 Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to left unilateral nephrectomy and 20 others to sham operation. Half of each group was treated for 2 weeks with rosiglitazone (5 mg/kg body weight). After sacrifice, intrarenal transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, angiotensin-II (A-II), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-4 and nitric oxide (NO) were assessed, and histologic sections stained to assess the inflammatory cell infiltration. Renal function was evaluated by creatinine, urea, cystatin C measurements.

RESULTS

Intrarenal IL-6, A-II and TGF-beta were significantly augmented, while NO was significantly decreased in kidneys remaining after contralateral nephrectomy. Rosiglitazone treatment abrogated augmented IL-6, A-II and TGF-beta synthesis and restored intrarenal NO availability in the remaining kidneys. Rosiglitazone also augmented anti-inflammatory IL-4 cytokine synthesis, while IL-10 production, leukocyte infiltration and renal function parameters remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Rosiglitazone treatment attenuates the proinflammatory responses, represented by augmented IL-6, A-II and TGF-beta production, developing in the remaining kidney following contralateral nephrectomy. In addition, by stimulating IL-4 synthesis and restoring NO availability, rosiglitazone treatment initiates counteractive anti-inflammatory responses in the remaining kidney.

Is living kidney donation really safe?

OBJECTIVE

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) yields the best results of all renal replacement therapies in terms of patient and graft survival. It is the main method in many countries because of worsening patient outcomes due to the accumulation of aged patients with long periods on dialysis and no possibility to increase the number of cadaver donor transplantations. Because of concerns dealing the risks inflicted on the donors, we sought to evaluate the long-term complications of LDKT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated over 3 years 86 living kidney donors (58 men, 28 women) whose procedures were >1 year ago. The mean time postoperatively was 17.24 +/- 5.04 months and their mean age, 28.97 +/- 4.75 years. Basic information regarding current health status, including physical examination and blood pressure as well as serum urea, creatinine serum albumin, blood glucose, lipid profile, urinanalysis, and 24-hour urine protein were evaluated every 6 months after donation. Also an ultrasound of the kidney, urinary tract, and testis was performed at these times.

RESULTS

Donor nephrectomies were left sided in 60 (69.8%) cases and right sided in 26 (30.2%) cases. The majority of the donors (n=80) were unrelated (93%). There was a total complication rate of 54.6%. The most common complication was hypertension (37.5%). Serious complications occurred in five cases (5.8%). In six (6.9%) the patients serum creatinine was >or=1.4 mg/dL. Microalbuminuria was found in 10.4%; hematuria in 13.9%; pyuria in 8.1%; and renal stone in 6.9%. Varicocele was found in 24.1% of male patients (23.3% of patients who had left nephrectomised). Persistent pain was reported by 44.1%. Antidepressants were prescribed to 9.3% of donors because of severe depression.

CONCLUSION

Living kidney donation is not so safe and has some late complications. Precise predonation evaluation and long-term follow-up of kidney donors for detection and prevention of complications is necessary.

Does mini-incision donor nephrectomy improve quality of life in living kidney donors?

BACKGROUND

Living kidney donation helps to avoid or reduce the time period of dialysis and on waiting lists in patients requiring a new organ. Mini-incision donor nephrectomy (MIDN) shows to result in better clinical outcome in comparison with traditional open donor nephrectomy (ODN). This study was performed to evaluate the impact of different surgical procedures on the quality of life (QoL) in patients that underwent donor nephrectomy.

METHODS

The aim of the study was to detect differences in QoL assessed with the Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire between MIDN (n = 34) and ODN (n = 36). Furthermore, the development of QoL from prior to surgery until one yr afterwards, as well as outcomes of QoL in comparison with norm-based scores was investigated.

RESULTS

Sixty-one of 70 patients, which is 87% (MIDN: 86%, ODN: 88%) resent a whole set questionnaires. QoL was similar at all time-points (prior to surgery, one wk, three months and one yr) in both groups. A tendency of better QoL in MIDN (Bodily Pain) after one wk was detectable (p = 0.075). Physical Component Summaries (PCS) significantly decreased from prior to surgery until one wk after surgery (p = 0.001) and improved significantly until three months (MIDN: p = 0.006, ODN: p = 0.001) and also until one yr after surgery (p = 0.002). Mental Component Summaries (MCS) were stable throughout the whole investigated time period. In comparison with norm-based scores, MIDN (p = 0.005) and ODN (p = 0.001) showed significantly higher PCS prior to, lower scores one wk after (p = 0.001), similar scores three months after and better scores (MIDN: p = 0.023, ODN: 0.015) one yr after surgery. Mental Component Scores were similar in both prior to and one wk after surgery. After three months and one yr scores were significantly better in MIDN (three months: p = 0.049, one yr: p = 0.037) and ODN (three months: 0.020, one yr: 0.073).

CONCLUSION

Quality of life after living donor nephrectomy is not influenced by the surgical technique. Nevertheless the standardized instrument of the SF-36v2 Health Survey is a useful, practicable and universally interpretable tool to gain and estimate recovery from surgical procedures in the perioperative period and its development thereafter.

Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation

OBJECTIVE

To assess how different imputation methods used to account for missing variance data in primary studies influence tests of heterogeneity and pooled results from a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Point and variance estimates for changes in serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were variably reported among 48 primary longitudinal studies of living kidney donors (71%-78% of point estimates were reported, 8%-13% of variance data were reported). We compared the results of meta-analysis, which either were restricted to available data or used four methods to impute missing variance data. These methods used reported P-values, reported nonparametric summaries, results from other similar studies using multiple imputation, or results from estimated correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Significant heterogeneity was present in all four outcomes regardless of the imputation methods applied. The random effects point estimates and 95% confidence intervals varied little across imputation methods, and the differences were not clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Different methods to impute the variance data in the primary studies did not alter the conclusions from this meta-analysis of continuous outcomes. Such reproducibility increases confidence in the results. However, as with most meta-analyses, there was no gold standard of truth, and results must be interpreted judiciously. The generalization of these findings to other meta-analyses, which differ in outcomes, missing data, or between-study heterogeneity, requires further consideration.

Proteinuria and reduced kidney function in living kidney donors: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

We reviewed any study where 10 or more healthy adults donated a kidney, and proteinuria, or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was assessed at least 1 year later. Bibliographic databases were searched until November 2005. 31 primary authors provided additional information. Forty-eight studies from 27 countries followed a total of 5048 donors. An average of 7 years after donation (range 1-25 years), the average 24 h urine protein was 154 mg/day and the average GFR was 86 ml/min. In eight studies which reported GFR in categories, 12% of donors developed a GFR between 30 and 59 ml/min (range 0-28%), and 0.2% a GFR less than 30 ml/min (range 0-2.2%). In controlled studies urinary protein was higher in donors and became more pronounced with time (three studies totaling 59 controls and 129 donors; controls 83 mg/day, donors 147 mg/day, weighted mean difference 66 mg/day, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24-108). An initial decrement in GFR after donation was not accompanied by accelerated losses over that anticipated with normal aging (six studies totaling 189 controls and 239 donors; controls 96 ml/min, donors 84 ml/min, weighted mean difference 10 ml/min, 95% CI 6-15; difference not associated with time after donation (P=0.2)). Kidney donation results in small increases in urinary protein. An initial decrement in GFR is not followed by accelerated losses over a subsequent 15 years. Future studies will provide better estimates, and identify those donors at least risk of long-term morbidity.

Living-donor kidney transplantation: the Freiburg experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The objective of this study was to determine outcome after living-donor kidney transplantation in a single-center institution in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1976 to May 2005, a total of 298 living-donor kidney transplants were performed at the University of Freiburg. Most recipients (78.8%) were placed on cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids maintenance immunosuppression. Cox proportional hazard model was applied to analyze predictors for patient and graft survival. Mean follow-up was 5.3 years.

RESULTS

According to Kaplan-Meier calculation, 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival was 98.6, 92.7, and 86.8%, respectively. Kidney function rate was 95.5, 82.8, and 67.9%, respectively. A 5-year graft function rate continued to increase from 79.5% in patients transplanted before 1996 to 83.6% in patients transplanted thereafter. In a Cox regression model recipient age above 50 years, duration of dialysis above 2 years and preexisting type 1 diabetes mellitus were associated with a decreased patient survival. Graft survival was mostly influenced by the type of immunosuppression and preexisting hypertension of the recipient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that living-donor kidney transplantation is a highly effective therapy for patients with end stage renal failure. Updates in immunosuppression, recipient selection, and operative technique may have contributed to the improved graft survival over the past three decades.

The Impact of Living-Related Kidney Transplantation on the Donor’s Life

BACKGROUND

Living-donation kidney transplantation (LDKT) is increasingly performed for treatment of chronic renal failure. Recently, risks for the donor and problems in decision-making have been stressed. This study was conducted to illuminate the decision making-process and consequences of LDKT on family life, the financial and occupational situation. Moreover, quality of life (QOL) and mental distress were explored.

METHODS

All German residents at Essen University, who donated their kidney between 1999 and 2003, were included in the study. Donors filled out the questionnaire of the European Multicenter Study of Transplantation Using Living Donors, the Short Form 36-Health Survey, and the Brief Symptom Inventory.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 65 donors, 47 replied (72%) at an average 2.5 years postdonation. No fatalities occurred in the whole sample (n=65), medical complications were experienced by 28%. Most donors decided voluntarily (94%) and spontaneously (66%) to donate, after donation 96% stated that they would decide in the same way again. QOL was within the norm. On the other hand, 10% experienced family conflicts, every eighth donor suffered from clinically relevant distress, financial disadvantages were experienced by every fourth donor, with 25% not answering this question.

CONCLUSION

Seen from the donor's perspective, LDKT is a relatively safe procedure. However, increased rates of donors with mental distress and intra-familial conflicts emphasize the need for a careful selection process. Regular postdonation psychosocial screening and provision of specific interventions to those in need are recommended. Donors should not suffer from financial and occupational disadvantages resulting from donation.

Medical Risks in Living Kidney Donors: Absence of Proof Is Not Proof of Absence

Living-kidney donation has become increasingly widespread, yet there has been little critical analysis of existing studies of long-term medical outcomes in living donors. This review analyzes issues in study design that affect the quality of the evidence and summarizes possible risk factors in living donors. Virtually all studies of long-term outcomes in donors are retrospective, many with large losses to follow-up, and therefore are subject to selection bias. Most studies have small sample sizes and are underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences between donors and comparison groups. Many studies compare donors with the general population, but donors are screened to be healthier than the general population and this may not be a valid comparison group. Difficulties in measurement of BP and renal function may underestimate the impact of donation on these outcomes. Several studies have identified possible risk factors for development of hypertension, proteinuria, and ESRD, but potential vulnerability factors in donors have not been well explored and there is a paucity of data on cardiovascular risk factors in donors. Prospective registration of living kidney donors and prospective studies of diverse populations of donors are essential to protect living donors and preserve living-kidney donation.

Living Kidney Donation: Anemia and Inflammation in the Early Postoperative Period

Studies on living donor kidney transplantation primarily address the recipients; few publications focus on kidney donors. The aim of the present study was to detect changes in and compensations of defined parameters of anemia and inflammation in the immediate postnephrectomy period. We included six living kidney donors who underwent an open anterior-extraperitoneal nephrectomy. We excluded donors with complications, such as significant blood loss or infection. Blood samples were taken before nephrectomy as well as on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7, and at discharge for measurements of hemoglobin (Hb), serum erythropoietin (Epo), reticulocytes (Reti), pentraxin 3 (PTX3), and C-reactive protein (CRP). There was a significant decrease in Hb (>3 g/dL), reaching a maximum on day 3 followed by a significant threefold increase in Epo levels on day 5 and a nonsignificant elevation of Reti count. CRP increased approximately 80-fold on day 3. PTX3 showed a similar course, peaking on day 3 with an approximate 70-fold increase. After living donor nephrectomy, there was an unexpectedly pronounced inflammatory reaction in the absence of any signs of bacterial infection simultaneous with a significant decrease in Hb. These parameters improved during the hospital stay, in some cases they achieved the prenephrectomy level at discharge. These data may assist in interpreting laboratory results after nephrectomy among living kidney donors.

Dyslipidemia and weight gain secondary to lifestyle changes in living renal transplant donors

We evaluated renal function, lipid profile, body weight, and physical activity of living donors in long-term follow-up after nephrectomy. A total of 121 living donors were compared with 81 healthy subjects with normal renal function and no history of any surgery or disease. Before and after donor nephrectomies, we recorded age, body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, lipids, and serum glucose levels of the donors. Preoperative (baseline) and postoperative (last visit) physical activities of donors and controls were evaluated through the Modified Baecke Questionnaire (occupational activities, sports activities, leisure-time activities). There were no differences between donors and controls for age (P = .772), gender (P = .927), and follow-up period (P = .564). According to baseline levels, blood pressure and serum creatinine were increased and creatinine clearance was decreased (P < .001 for all). The mean increases in body weight (P = .012), LDL (P = .004), and triglyceride (P < .001) were higher in donors than in controls. But the mean decrease in HDL was not different between controls and donors (P = .057). Indices of sports and total activities were lower in donors than in controls on the last visit (P < .001). Indices of occupational and leisure-time activities were similar on the last visit in donors and in controls (P = .126, P = .083). The alterations in total cholesterol and total activity showed significant negative correlations in donors (r = -.581, P < .001). Also, the alterations in total cholesterol and body weight showed a significant correlation (r = .25, P = .02). We followed donors together with serum lipid levels, body weight, and total physical activities as well as blood pressure and renal function tests.

Intra- and postoperative complications of donor nephrectomies

INTRODUCTION

Living-donor renal transplantation has become common worldwide. However, living-donor nephrectomy is not a complication-free procedure. This retrospective study reviews the intra-and postoperative risks and complications of donor nephrectomies at our institution between 1994 and 2002.

METHOD

Two hundred fifty-seven consecutive donor nephrectomy patients were evaluated using medical records and anesthetic charts.

RESULTS

The mean age of living donors was 42 +/- 12 years: 19 were older than 61 years, and 143 (55.6%) were women. Anesthesia for donor nephrectomy included general anesthesia, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE), general + CSE, and general + epidural anesthesia. We observed 51 intra- and postoperative complications in 26 patients. The minor complication rate was 10.1%. The duration of surgery was 3.56 +/- 0.26 hours (range, 2 to 5 hours). Serum creatinine levels were increased significantly (P < .05) on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 compared with the preoperative levels (P < .05). There was no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Like other surgical operations, living-donor nephrectomy is associated with intra- and postoperative complications. Although these complications are minor, maximal efforts must be applied in the anesthetic approach to minimize donor complications, and donors should be informed about potential risks.