Monitoring of BK virus replication in the first year following renal transplantation

Diagnostic value of three urine miRNAs composite score in BK virus nephropathy

Noninvasive detection of BK virus, for early detection of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy post-renal transplantation, is currently an active subject of investigation. In this study, we developed and validated a novel risk score diagnostic assay (PymiR Score) based on measurements of three urine miRNAs, including BKV-related miRNA (bkv-miR-B1-5p), polyomavirus-related miRNA (bkv-miR-B1-3p) and renal tubular injury-related miRNA (miR-21-5p), by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The limit of detection of the three miRNAs was 2 × 103 copies/mL, while the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were in the ranges of 2.13 %-3.59 % and 2.30 %-3.35 %, respectively. In the training set, we identified that at a PymiR Score of 71.78, the maximum sensitivity and specificity for the detection of BKVAN were 76.9 % and 100 % respectively, with the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis showing an area under the curve of 0.8681. In the validation set, we observed a significant difference in the PymiR Score between BKV infection and biopsy-proven BKVAN (P ＜ 0.05), with the ROC analysis showing a sensitivity of 72.73 %, specificity of 100 %, and an AUC of 0.8571. Compared with the area under the ROC curve of plasma BK virus DNA load (AUC = 0.7266), the PymiR Score exhibited higher discrimination capacity (P＜0.05) between BKV infection and biopsy-proven BKVAN. Overall, this non-invasive approach offers a robust and convenient alternative for the diagnosis of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation phase I/II multicenter trial of low-dose cidofovir for BK polyomavirus nephropathy

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is an important cause of allograft dysfunction and failure in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and there are no proven effective treatments. Case reports and in vitro data support the potential activity of cidofovir against BK polyomavirus (BKPyV).

METHODS

We report the results of a phase I/II, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized dose-escalation trial of cidofovir in KTRs with biopsy-confirmed BKPyVAN and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min. Intravenous cidofovir (0.25 mg/kg/dose or 0.5 mg/kg/dose) or placebo was administered on days 0, 7, 21, and 35, with final follow-up through day 49.

RESULTS

The trial was prematurely discontinued due to slow accrual after 22 KTRs had completed the study. Cidofovir was safe and tolerated at the doses and duration studied. The proportion of subjects with any adverse event (AE) was similar between groups (9/14 [64%] in the combined cidofovir dose groups and 6/8 [75%] in the placebo group); 84% of AEs were mild. BKPyV DNAemia reduction by day 49 was similar between groups (>1 log10 reduction in (2/9 [22.2%] of 0.25 mg/kg group, 1/5 [20%] of 0.5 mg/kg group, and 2/8 [25%] of placebo group).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results indicate that low-dose cidofovir was safe and tolerated but had no significant BKPyV-specific antiviral effect in KTRs with BKPyVAN.

Serum and urine nucleic acid screening tests for BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) occurs when BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) affects a transplanted kidney, leading to an initial injury characterised by cytopathic damage, inflammation, and fibrosis. BKPyVAN may cause permanent loss of graft function and premature graft loss. Early detection gives clinicians an opportunity to intervene by timely reduction in immunosuppression to reduce adverse graft outcomes. Quantitative nucleic acid testing (QNAT) for detection of BKPyV DNA in blood and urine is increasingly used as a screening test as diagnosis of BKPyVAN by kidney biopsy is invasive and associated with procedural risks. In this review, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of QNAT tests in patients with BKPyVAN.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the diagnostic test accuracy of blood/plasma/serum BKPyV QNAT and urine BKPyV QNAT for the diagnosis of BKPyVAN after transplantation. We also investigated the following sources of heterogeneity: types and quality of studies, era of publication, various thresholds of BKPyV-DNAemia/BKPyV viruria and variability between assays as secondary objectives.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), and BIOSIS, and requested a search of the Cochrane Register of diagnostic test accuracy studies from inception to 13 June 2023. We also searched ClinicalTrials.com and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included cross-sectional or cohort studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of two index tests (blood/plasma/serum BKPyV QNAT or urine BKPyV QNAT) for the diagnosis of BKPyVAN, as verified by the reference standard (histopathology). Both retrospective and prospective cohort studies were included. We did not include case reports and case control studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently carried out data extraction from each study. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic-Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) assessment criteria. We used the bivariate random-effects model to obtain summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity for the QNAT test with one positivity threshold. In cases where meta-analyses were not possible due to the small number of studies available, we detailed the descriptive evidence and used a summative approach. We explored possible sources of heterogeneity by adding covariates to meta-regression models.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 31 relevant studies with a total of 6559 participants in this review. Twenty-six studies included kidney transplant recipients, four studies included kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients, and one study included kidney, kidney-pancreas and kidney-liver transplant recipients. Studies were carried out in South Asia and the Asia-Pacific region (12 studies), North America (9 studies), Europe (8 studies), and South America (2 studies).

INDEX TEST

blood/serum/plasma BKPyV QNAT The diagnostic performance of blood BKPyV QNAT using a common viral load threshold of 10,000 copies/mL was reported in 18 studies (3434 participants). Summary estimates at 10,000 copies/mL as a cut-off indicated that the pooled sensitivity was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 0.93) while the pooled specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.97). A limited number of studies were available to analyse the summary estimates for individual viral load thresholds other than 10,000 copies/mL. Indirect comparison of thresholds of the three different cut-off values of 1000 copies/mL (9 studies), 5000 copies/mL (6 studies), and 10,000 copies/mL (18 studies), the higher cut-off value at 10,000 copies/mL corresponded to higher specificity with lower sensitivity. The summary estimates of indirect comparison of thresholds above 10,000 copies/mL were uncertain, primarily due to a limited number of studies with wide CIs contributed to the analysis. Nonetheless, these indirect comparisons should be interpreted cautiously since differences in study design, patient populations, and methodological variations among the included studies can introduce biases. Analysis of all blood BKPyV QNAT studies, including various blood viral load thresholds (30 studies, 5658 participants, 7 thresholds), indicated that test performance remains robust, pooled sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.94) and specificity 0.93 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.95). In the multiple cut-off model, including the various thresholds generating a single curve, the optimal cut-off was around 2000 copies/mL, sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.97) and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.93). However, as most of the included studies were retrospective, and not all participants underwent the reference standard tests, this may result in a high risk of selection and verification bias.

INDEX TEST

urine BKPyV QNAT There was insufficient data to thoroughly investigate both accuracy and thresholds of urine BKPyV QNAT resulting in an imprecise estimation of its accuracy based on the available evidence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to suggest the use of urine BKPyV QNAT as the primary screening tool for BKPyVAN. The summary estimates of the test sensitivity and specificity of blood/serum/plasma BKPyV QNAT test at a threshold of 10,000 copies/mL for BKPyVAN were 0.86 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.93) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.97), respectively. The multiple cut-off model showed that the optimal cut-off was around 2000 copies/mL, with test sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.97) and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.93). While 10,000 copies/mL is the most commonly used cut-off, with good test performance characteristics and supports the current recommendations, it is important to interpret the results with caution because of low-certainty evidence.

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Visual, rapid, and cost-effective BK virus detection system for renal transplanted patients using gold nanoparticle coupled loop-mediated isothermal amplification (nanoLAMP)

A substantial percentage of kidney transplant recipients show transplant failure due to BK virus-induced nephropathy. This can be clinically controlled by the rapid and timely detection of BK virus infection in immune-compromised patients. We report a rapid (two hours from sample collection, processing, and detection), cost-effective (< 2$), highly sensitive and BKV-specific nanoLAMP (loop-mediated isothermal amplification) diagnostic methodology using novel primers and gold nanoparticles complex-based visual detection. The standardized nanoLAMP showed an analytical sensitivity of 25 copies/µl and did not cross-react with closely related JC and SV40 viruses. This nanoLAMP showed diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as 91% and 96%, respectively, taking 50 BK virus-negative (confirmed by qPCR from the plasma of healthy donors) and 57 positive BKV patient samples (confirmed by clinical parameters and qPCR assay). This simple two-step, low-cost, and quick (1-2 h/test) detection would be advantageous over the currently used diagnostic methodology. It may change the paradigm for polyomavirus infection-based failure of renal transplant.

Evaluating the Efficiency of the Cobas 6800 System for BK Virus Detection in Plasma and Urine Samples

We evaluated the overall performance of the Cobas 6800 BKV test in detecting BK virus (BKV). We examined the imprecision of the Cobas 6800 BKV test and compared the qualitative and quantitative results obtained from the Cobas 6800 BKV test and the Real-Q BKV quantification assay. We assessed 88 plasma and 26 urine samples collected between September and November 2022 from patients with BKV infection using the Real-Q BKV quantitative assay. The lognormal coefficient of variation indicated that the inter-assay precision of the Cobas 6800 BKV test ranged from 13.86 to 33.83%. A strong correlation was observed between the quantitative results obtained using the Cobas 6800 BKV test and the Real-Q BKV quantification assay for plasma samples. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (ρ) for plasma, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) media-stabilized urine, and raw urine samples were 0.939, 0.874, and 0.888, respectively. Our analyses suggest that the Cobas 6800 BKV test is suitable for clinical applications owing to the strong correlation between the results obtained using this test and the Real-Q BKV quantification assay in plasma and urine samples. Furthermore, utilizing fresh raw urine samples can be a viable approach for the Cobas 6800 BKV test as it is less labor- and time-intensive.

A Nomogram for Predicting BK Virus Activation in Kidney Transplantation Recipients Using Clinical Risk Factors

BK virus is a common opportunistic viral infection that could cause BK virus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data associated with a higher risk of BK virus activation from 195 renal transplant recipients by the multivariate logistic regression analysis and performed the external validation. Results showed that patients with BK virus active infection were associated with a deceased donor, had lower direct bilirubin levels, a higher proportion of albumin in serum protein electrophoresis, and lower red blood cells and neutrophil counts. The multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the living donor, direct bilirubin, and neutrophil counts were significantly associated with BK virus activation. The logistic regression model displayed a modest discriminability with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.689 (95% CI: 0.607–0.771; P < 0.01) and also demonstrated a good performance in the external validation dataset (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.699, 95% CI: 0.5899–0.8081). The novel predictive nomogram achieved a good prediction of BK virus activation in kidney transplant recipients.

Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management

Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.

Usefulness of BK virus-specific interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay for predicting the outcome of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate if BK virus (BKV)-specific T cell immunity measured by an interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay can predict the outcome of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

METHODS

We included 68 KTRs with different viremia status (no viremia [n = 17], BK viremia [n = 27], and cleared viremia [n = 24]) and 44 healthy controls (HCs). The BK viremia group was divided into controller (< 3 months) and noncontroller (> 3 months) according to sustained duration of BKV infection. We compared BKV-ELISPOT results against five BKV peptides (large tumor antigen [LT], St, VP1-3).

RESULTS

BKV-ELISPOT results were higher in three KTRs groups with different BKV infection status than the HCs group (p < 0.05). In KTR groups, they were higher in cleared viremia group than no viremia or BK viremia group. Within the BK viremia group, controller group had higher LT-ELISPOT results compared to noncontroller group (p = 0.032). Also, KTRs without BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) had higher LT, St, VP1, and VP2-ELISPOT results than those with BKVN (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BKV-ELISPOT assay may be effective in predicting clinical outcomes of BKV infection in terms of clearance of BK virus and development of BKVN.

Beyond Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus: a Review of Viruses Composing the Blood Virome of Solid Organ Transplant and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Viral primary infections and reactivations are common complications in patients after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Among these patients, viral infections are frequently associated with viremia. Beyond the usual well-known viruses that are part of the routine clinical management of transplant recipients, numerous other viral signatures or genomes can be identified in the blood of these patients. The identification of novel viral species and variants by metagenomic next-generation sequencing has opened up a new field of investigation and new paradigms. Thus, there is a need to thoroughly describe the state of knowledge in this field with a review of all viral infections that should be scrutinized in high-risk populations. Here, we review the eukaryotic DNA and RNA viruses identified in blood, plasma, or serum samples of pediatric and adult SOT/HSCT recipients and the prevalence of their detection, with a particular focus on recently identified viruses and those for which their potential association with disease remains to be investigated, such as members of the Polyomaviridae, Anelloviridae, Flaviviridae, and Astroviridae families. Current knowledge of the clinical significance of these viral infections with associated viremia among transplant recipients is also discussed. To ensure a comprehensive description in these two populations, individuals described as healthy (mostly blood donors) are considered for comparative purposes. The list of viruses that should be on the clinicians' radar is certainly incomplete and will expand, but the challenge is to identify those of possible clinical significance.

Decoy Cells versus Plasma Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Detection of Polyomaviruses in Renal Transplant Patients: A Single Institutional Experience

Background and Aims:

Microscopic detection of decoy cells is routinely performed in urine samples from renal transplant patients for the evaluation of polyomaviruses. However, they are scanty papers evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of decoy cells in urine samples. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of decoy cells in urine samples and compare with plasma real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a gold standard method. In addition, to compare the findings of this study with other similar studies.

Methods:

A retrospective study over a period of four years from January 2014 to December 2017 was performed. A total of 89 urine samples from renal transplant patients were assessed for the presence of polyomaviruses and compared with plasma RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were measured.

Results:

There were 29 males and 18 females. The mean patient age was 40.3 years. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were 86.6%, 67.5%, 70.7%, 35.1% and 96.1%, respectively. Other similar studies reported a sensitivity of 41.9-84.6%, specificity of 65.8-100% and accuracy of 69.9-82%.

Conclusion:

The findings of this study show that the detection of decoy cells in urine samples is a sensitive screening method for polyomaviruses. The findings of this study are compatible with other similar studies.

Polyomaviruses shedding in stool of patients with hematological disorders: detection analysis and study of the non-coding control region's genetic variability

Fragmented data are available on the human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) prevalence in the gastrointestinal tract. Rearrangements in the non-coding control region (NCCR) of JCPyV and BKPyV have been extensively studied and correlated to clinical outcome; instead, little information is available for KIPyV, WUPyV and MCPyV NCCRs. To get insights into the role of HPyVs in the gastrointestinal tract, we investigated JCPyV, BKPyV, KIPyV, WUPyV and MCPyV distribution among hematological patients in concomitance with gastrointestinal symptoms. In addition, NCCRs and VP1 sequences were examined to characterize the strains circulating among the enrolled patients. DNA was extracted from 62 stool samples and qPCR was carried out to detect and quantify JCPyV, BKPyV, KIPyV, WUPyV and MCPyV genomes. Positive samples were subsequently amplified and sequenced for NCCR and VP1 regions. A phylogenetic tree was constructed aligning the obtained VP1 sequences to a set of reference sequences. qPCR revealed low viral loads for all HPyVs searched. Mono and co-infections were detected. A significant correlation was found between gastrointestinal complications and KIPyV infection. Archetype-like NCCRs were found for JCPyV and BKPyV, and a high degree of NCCRs stability was observed for KIPyV, WUPyV and MCPyV. Analysis of the VP1 sequences revealed a 99% identity with the VP1 reference sequences. The study adds important information on HPyVs prevalence and persistence in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointestinal signs were correlated with the presence of KIPyV, although definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. HPyVs NCCRs showed a high degree of sequence stability, suggesting that sequence rearrangements are rare in this anatomical site.

Successful Treatment for BK Virus Nephropathy by Leflunomide in a Kidney Transplant Patient: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

The immunosuppressant agents in kidney transplantation (KT) may lead to various complications such as opportunistic infections and malignancies. BK virus associated nephropathy is a significant complication following KT, and it can result in graft failure. BK virus causes tubulointerstitial nephritis, ureter stenosis, and even graft failure in KT recipients with impaired immune system. We described a 63-year-old woman, who was a hepatitis C carrier and on dialysis for 22 years before KT, who received cadaveric-donor KT 2 years previously. She reported decreasing urine output and general weakness. The serum creatinine level was slightly increased from 2.94 to 4.38 mg/dL.

METHODS

Immunosuppressant medications including prednisolone, everolimus, cyclosporin, and mycophenolate sodium were continued as maintenance therapy post KT. Kidney biopsy was performed due to deterioration of graft function.

RESULTS

The kidney biopsy showed consistent results with early-stage polyomavirus nephropathy, characterized by focal viral cytopathic changes with positive immunohistochemical signals and mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis, immune-complex-mediated (Fig 1 and Fig 2). Negative C4d staining at peritubular capillary was reported. The dosage of mycophenolate sodium was tapered from 720 to 360 mg daily and that of everolimus increased from 0.5 to 1.0 mg daily due to BK viral infection with BK nephropathy. The serum creatinine level was 2.75 mg/dL after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Early detection of BK nephropathy and decreasing immunosuppressant agents are the mainstay of treatment. Substituting leflunomide for mycophenolate sodium and increasing dosage of everolimus has been proposed to solve BK nephropathy. We presented that the use of leflunomide in such situation is in a timely manner.

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

The present AST-IDCOP guidelines update information on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection, replication, and disease, which impact kidney transplantation (KT), but rarely non-kidney solid organ transplantation (SOT). As pretransplant risk factors in KT donors and recipients presently do not translate into clinically validated measures regarding organ allocation, antiviral prophylaxis, or screening, all KT recipients should be screened for BKPyV-DNAemia monthly until month 9, and then every 3 months until 2 years posttransplant. Extended screening after 2 years may be considered in pediatric KT. Stepwise immunosuppression reduction is recommended for KT patients with plasma BKPyV-DNAemia of >1000 copies/mL sustained for 3 weeks or increasing to >10 000 copies/mL reflecting probable and presumptive BKPyV-associated nephropathy, respectively. Reducing immunosuppression is also the primary intervention for biopsy-proven BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Hence, allograft biopsy is not required for treating BKPyV-DNAemic patients with baseline renal function. Despite virological rationales, proper randomized clinical trials are lacking to generally recommend treatment by switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine-A, from mycophenolate to mTOR inhibitors or leflunomide or by the adjunct use of intravenous immunoglobulins, leflunomide, or cidofovir. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for prophylaxis or therapy. Retransplantation after allograft loss due to BKPyV nephropathy can be successful if BKPyV-DNAemia is definitively cleared, independent of failed allograft nephrectomy.

Determination of viremia cut-off for risk to develop BKPyV-associated nephropathy among kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a consequence of BKPyV replication in the urinary tract in kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to determine the prevalence of BKPyV replication and BKPyVAN, risk factors associated to sustained viremia and BKPyVAN, and viremia cut-off that best predict the occurrence of sustained viremia and nephropathy in KTR of a single University Hospital Kidney Transplant Center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All KTR undergoing transplantation from August 2010 to December 2011 were enrolled and monitored up to 2 years posttransplantation for BKPyV viruria by decoy cells shedding or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and viremia by PCR. Kidney biopsy was indicated if sustained viremia (two or more viremia above 10 000 copies/mL) to confirm BKPyVAN diagnosis.

RESULTS

In this study, 326 transplants were performed and 246 patients were included. Prevalence of viruria was 36.9%, viremia 22.3% and nephropathy 3.2%. Male gender was the only risk factor associated to sustained viremia or nephropathy. Cut-off value of viremia that best discriminates the progression to sustained viremia and to BKPyVAN was 37 488 and 44 956 copies/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of viruria, viremia, and nephropathy were similar to those reported in literature but the cut-off value of viremia that best discriminates the risk of progression to nephropathy was greater than the value usually reported, which is 10 000 copies/mL.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of late-onset BK virus nephropathy in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK virus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a major complication in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and typically occurs within 1 year of transplant. Guidelines vary in recommendations for BKPyV screening beyond 1 year. A systematic characterization of risk factors and outcomes of late-onset (>1 year) BKPyVAN has not previously been reported.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared characteristics and outcomes of early- (<1 year) and late-onset BKPyVAN (definitive [biopsy-confirmed] or presumptive [plasma BKPyV >10 000 copies/mL]) in a cohort of 671 KTR and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SPK) recipients between 2008 and 2013 at a single US transplant center. Proportions were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test with P < .05 considered significant.

RESULTS

BKPyVAN was diagnosed in 96 (14.3%) patients (proven 16.7%, presumptive 83.3%): 79 (82.3%) early- and 17 (17.7%) late-onset. The proportion with late-onset BKPyVAN was significantly higher among SPK than KTR (4 of 7 [57.1%] vs 13 of 89 [14.6%], P = .017). Late-onset represented "de novo" infection (no BKPyV detection within the first year) in 14 (82.4%) and progression of earlier lower grade BKPyV reactivation in 3 (17.6%). Clinical outcomes were similar for early- and late-onset BKPyVAN (P > .05 all comparisons). In a pooled analysis of prior studies of BKPyVAN in SPK recipients, 62.9% (17 of 27) were late-onset.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of BKPyVAN is late-onset, especially among SPK recipients, and supports a longer duration of BKPyV monitoring for SPK recipients than recommended in some guidelines.

Feasibility of BK Virus Real-Time PCR Testing in Renal Graft Biopsies With Negative SV40 Staining

BACKGROUND

BK virus (BKV)-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is often associated with renal graft dysfunction. When renal transplant recipients present with high clinical suspicion for BKVAN (high serum and urine BKV titer with graft dysfunction) but their graft biopsies stain negatively for BKV, non-correlated situations between the two tests often lead to a dilemma about how to treat them.

METHODS

This retrospective investigation was conducted to determine how real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for BKV, routinely applied to serum and urine, could be helpful in identifying the existing BKV in biopsy tissue stained negatively for BKV.

RESULTS

DNA was extracted from each specimen through the use of five 10-μm curls from the tissue block with use of the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen), followed by BKV qPCR to determine copies of BKV/μg of biopsy tissue DNA. Group 1 (11 negative renal controls for BKV) demonstrated 0 to 9 BKV copies/μg DNA. Except for 3 focally staining cases showing low BKV, the remaining 10 positive renal controls in group 2 (13 positive transplant biopsies staining positively) demonstrated elevated BKV up to 160 million copies/μg DNA. Group 3 transplants (13 uncertain transplants with negative BKV staining but positive liquid BKV) were negative for BKV (0-12 copies/μg) in 4 of 13, had low BKV copies (36-346 copies/μg) in 5 of 13, and had high BKV copies (17,240-526,945 copies/μg) in 4 of 13 cases, through the use of qPCR.

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate that qPCR from paraffin-embedded tissue as a backup test is sensitive for ruling in/out BKV infection in renal transplant biopsies, particularly in uncertain cases.

BK Polyomavirus: Clinical Aspects, Immune Regulation, and Emerging Therapies

BK polyomavirus (BKV) causes frequent infections during childhood and establishes persistent infections within renal tubular cells and the uroepithelium, with minimal clinical implications. However, reactivation of BKV in immunocompromised individuals following renal or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may cause serious complications, including BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), ureteric stenosis, or hemorrhagic cystitis. Implementation of more potent immunosuppression and increased posttransplant surveillance has resulted in a higher incidence of BKVAN. Antiviral immunity plays a crucial role in controlling BKV replication, and our increasing knowledge about host-virus interactions has led to the development of improved diagnostic tools and clinical management strategies. Currently, there are no effective antiviral agents for BKV infection, and the mainstay of managing reactivation is reduction of immunosuppression. Development of immune-based therapies to combat BKV may provide new and exciting opportunities for the successful treatment of BKV-associated complications.

BK polyomavirus infection after renal transplantation: Surveillance in a resource-challenged setting

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data available about BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection after renal transplantation (RTX) in resource-limited countries with a predominantly living-donor, ABO-compatible RTX program. We aimed to assess BKPyV infection in such patients in a public hospital in India.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated plasma BKPyV replication in 62 patients at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after RTX. Sustained significant BK viremia (SSBKV) was defined as significant viremia (≥10 000 copies/mL) detected ≥2 times, and BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) as histologic changes of BKVAN with BK viremia with/without graft dysfunction.

RESULTS

All patients underwent RTX without requiring desensitization. Incidence of BK viremia was: 17.7%, 41.9%, 16.1%, 25.8%, and 17.7% at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Of 62 patients, 64.5% had BKPyV viremia during the study, 32.2% had significant viremia, all except one detected in the first 6 months. Nine (14.5%) patients had SSBKV. There was no biopsy-proven BKVAN. At the end of 1 year, mean serum creatinine was higher and graft dysfunction was significantly more common in patients with SSBKV compared to those without SSBKV.

CONCLUSION

Transient BK viremia is common in low/intermediate immunologic risk RTX recipients in India, with a peak occurring at 3-6 months. Most clear their viremia by 12 months. Graft dysfunction seems to be more frequent in patients with SSBKV, although BKVAN is uncommon on biopsy in these patients.

BK polyomavirus nephropathy in two kidney transplant patients with distinct diagnostic strategies for BK virus and similar clinical outcomes: two case reports

Background

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is an important cause of post-transplantation renal failure. We present two cases of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy who were submitted to contrasting strategies of clinical follow-up to BK polyomavirus reactivation, but progressed to a similar final outcome.

Case presentation

Case 1 is a 37-year-old white man whose graft had never presented a good glomerular filtration rate function, with episodes of tacrolimus nephrotoxicity, and no urinary monitoring for BK polyomavirus; stage B BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy was diagnosed by biopsy at 14 months post-transplant. Despite clinical treatment (dosage decrease and immunosuppressive drug change), he progressed to stage C BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy and loss of graft function 30 months post-transplant. Case 2 is a 49-year-old mulatto man in his second renal transplantation who was submitted to cytological urinary monitoring for BK polyomavirus; he presented early, persistent, and massive urinary decoy cell shedding and concomitant tacrolimus nephrotoxicity. Even with decreasing immunosuppression, he developed BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy 1-year post-transplant. Loss of graft function occurred 15 months post-transplant.

Conclusions

Cytological urinary monitoring was an efficient strategy for monitoring BK virus reactivation. Decoy cell shedding may be related to BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy when extensive and persistent. The presence of associated tacrolimus nephrotoxicity may be a confounding factor for the clinical diagnosis of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

Incidence of BK polyomavirus infection after kidney transplantation is independent of type of immunosuppressive therapy

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection and BKV nephropathy (BKVN) are risk factors for allograft function and survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed BK viremia and BKVN in 348 patients who received a kidney transplantation donated after brain death (n=232) or living donation (n=116) between 2008 and 2013. A total of 266 patients were treated with standard immunosuppression consisting of basiliximab induction, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), and mycophenolic acid (MPA, n=219) or everolimus (n=47); 82 patients received more intense immunosuppression with lymphocyte depletion, CNI and MPA (n=38) or everolimus (n=44).

RESULTS

BK viremia occurred in 33 (9.5%) patients in the first year and in 7 (2.0%) recipients in the second year after transplantation. BKVN occurred in 4 (1.1%) patients in the first year. Donor and recipient age, diabetes, previous transplantation, and type of transplantation (donated after brain death vs living donation) were not risk factors (P>.05). BK incidence did not differ depending on induction or maintenance immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of BK viremia is independent of recipient characteristics, type of transplantation as well as induction and maintenance immunosuppression.

Prevalence of polyoma BK virus infection among living-donor renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) mainly caused by BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains the most common productive viral infection of the kidney in immunosuppressed patients. The diagnosis of PVN is based on the detection of BK viruria and BK viremia in conjunction with histological findings in the graft biopsy.

METHODS

Our study was aimed to estimate the prevalence of productive BKPyV infection among renal transplant patients within the first year post-transplant and identify those at risk of developing PVN. Our cross-sectional study was conducted on 134 kidney transplant patients. Evidence of BKPyV replication was assessed by viral quantification of blood and urine samples of studied patients using a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR)PCR), detection of decoy cells in urine cytology smears, histological examination of graft biopsies from Q-PCR BKPyV-positive patients, and immunohistochemical staining by simian virus 40 (SV40) antibody.

RESULTS

Significant BKPyV infection was prevalent in 8% (n = 11) of our patients, with a peak of BKPyV infection about 8 months post transplant. BKPyV viral load by Q-PCR assay in these patients varied from 1350 to 20,000,000 (1.35 × 10(3) to 2 × 10(7) ) copies/mL for urine samples and 935 to 18,920 (9.35 × 10(2) to 1.89 × 10(4) ) copies/mL for blood samples. All the 11 patients were positive for decoy cells but only 3 developed PVN based on histology and positive SV40 staining. BKPyV infection was more prevalent in older patients. All patients responded to reduction in their immunosuppressive regimens, apart from 2 patients who required replacement of calcineurin inhibitors-based regimen with mammalian target of ramapycin inhibitors with an overall good response.

CONCLUSION

Protocol screening programs based on detection of viral replication by viruria, viremia, and decoy cells in urine are necessary to shed light on patients with high virus replication and hence increased risk of developing PVN, and to allow early diagnosis and intervention.

Development of a BK virus real-time quantitative assay using the bioMérieux analyte-specific reagents in plasma specimens

OBJECTIVES

Viral load testing for BK virus (BKV) has become the standard of care for diagnosing BKV infection and monitoring therapy in kidney transplant patients. However, there are currently no US Food and Drug Administration-approved assays and no standardization among available tests.

METHODS

This study evaluated the performance of the analyte-specific reagent (ASR) BKV primers r-gene and probe r-gene reagents (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Étoile, France) soon to become available on the US market for accuracy, linearity, precision, analytical sensitivity, specificity, and correlation with the Qiagen (Germantown, MD) BKV ASR test using commercial material and patient plasma samples.

RESULTS

The assay was linear from 204 to 3.92 million (2.31-6.6 log10) DNA copies/mL (coefficient of determination: R(2) =0.999). A dilution series demonstrated limits of detection and quantitation of 2.14 log10 and 2.30 log10 copies/mL (95% hit rate detection), respectively. Interrun precision was highly reproducible, with coefficients of variance ranging from 2.2% to 6.0%. A comparison of 34 matched samples showed a good agreement (R(2) = 0.87) between the bioMérieux BKV laboratory test and the Qiagen BKV ASR assay results, with an average negative bias (-0.28 log10 copies/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

The laboratory-developed test with bioMérieux BKV reagents is a reliable and sensitive assay for BKV DNA quantitation compared with the Qiagen ASR test.

Clinical impact of BK virus surveillance on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of BK virus surveillance on graft injury in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated by use of plasma quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The prevalence of BK viremia and BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) and the clinical impact of BK viremia on graft outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

This study took place between January 2008 and June 2013. A total of 213 kidney transplant recipients were included. The prevalence of BK viremia and high BK viremia (≥1 × 10(4) copies/mL) was 66.7% (142/213) and 17.4% (37/213), respectively. A diagnosis of BKVAN was confirmed by means of allograft biopsy in 9 patients (4.2%). The estimated glomerular filtration rate after transplantation was similar in both the low BK viremia (<1 × 10(4) copies/mL) and non-BK viremia groups but was significantly lower in the high BK viremia group after 18 months. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve value of plasma polymerase chain reaction was 0.980. We found that a viral load >92,850 copies/mL was able to predict BKVAN with 89% sensitivity and 94.6% specificity. The risk factors for viral loads ≥1 × 10(4) copies/mL were cytomegalovirus infection, steroid pulse therapy, and acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

High BK viremia was associated with poor graft function after kidney transplantation. The serial monitoring of BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients was helpful in predicting BKVAN and might prevent further progression.

Risk factors in the progression of BK virus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is an important cause of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. It has an unfavorable clinical course, and no definite treatment guidelines have yet been established. Here, we report our center's experience with biopsy-proven BKVAN and investigate factors associated with its progression.

METHODS

From January 2004 to April 2013, 25 patients with BKVAN were diagnosed by biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Of the 25 patients, 10 were deceased-donor transplant recipients and 15 were living-donor transplant recipients. Three of the patients underwent retransplantation. The primary immunosuppressant used was tacrolimus in 17 patients and cyclosporine in eight patients.

RESULTS

BKVAN was observed at a mean duration of 22.8 ± 29.1 months after transplantation. The mean serum creatinine level at biopsy was 2.2 ± 0.7 mg/dL. BKVAN occurred with acute rejection in eight patients (28%). Immunosuppression modification was performed in 21 patients (84%). Additionally, leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin were administered to 13 patients (52%) and two (8%), respectively. Allograft loss occurred in five patients (27.8%) during the follow- up period at 0.7, 17.1, 21.8, 39.8, and 41.5 months after the BKVAN diagnosis. Advanced stages of BKVAN, increased creatinine levels, and accompanying acute rejection at the time of BKVAN diagnosis increased the risk of allograft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven BKVAN were unfavorable in the present study, especially in patients with advanced-stage BKVAN, poor renal function, and acute allograft rejection.

Correlation between urine and serum BK virus levels after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Quantification of the serum level of BK virus is used as a surrogate marker for the early onset of BK virus nephropathy. However, little is known about the diagnostic value of the urine level of BK virus for nephropathy or the relationship between the serum and urine viral load. We investigated the correlation between urine and serum BK virus levels after renal transplantation.

METHODS

From November 2008 to August 2013, a total of 270 renal transplant patients who were followed at our institution were included in this study. Urine and serum were collected simultaneously. BK virus levels were quantified in 894 urine and serum samples using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay.

RESULTS

BK virus was detected in 178 urine samples and 36 serum samples. Among the BK virus-positive urine subjects, the positive predictive value for viral detection in the serum was 9% (13/147) when the urinary virus level was <10(7) copies/mL and 74% (23/31) when the urinary virus was ≥ 10(7) copies/mL. Serum BK viral levels were ∼2-3 log units lower than those in urine.

CONCLUSIONS

BK virus was detected more frequently in serum when present in urine at ≥ 10(7) copies/mL after renal transplantation.

Association of interferon gamma gene polymorphisms with BK virus infection among Hispanic renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

BK virus nephropathy is one of the most common viral infections that affect up to 10% of renal transplant recipients (RTRs), causing allograft dysfunction and graft loss. Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) gene polymorphisms have been associated with parvovirus B19, hepatitis C virus, HIV-1/AIDS infection, cytomegalovirus viremia, and disease. IFN-γ is known to have potent inhibitory effects on BK virus gene expression, both at the level of transcription and translation.

METHODS

It was investigated whether IFN-γ polymorphisms are associated with BKV infection. Genotyping of four single-nucleotide polymorphisms located in the IFN-γ gene were performed on DNA collected from a total of 251 RTRs (71 RTRs with BKV infection and 180 without BKV infection).

RESULTS

Analysis of the results showed that IFN-γ (rs12369470) CC genotype was significantly associated with susceptibility to BKV infection (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.29-6.44, P=0.007) while the IFN-γ +874 (rs2435061) TT and (rs2406918) CC genotypes appear to be markers for protection against BKV infection (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.1-0.83, P=0.01 for rs245061; OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.4-0.94, P=0.02 for rs24069718). A haplotype analysis using the combination of rs2435061-rs2406918-rs2870953 showed that the A-G-T haplotype was associated with a significantly reduced risk for BKV infection (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.25-0.73, P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Polymorphisms in the IFN-γ gene may confer certain protection or predisposition for BKV infection.

Test performance characteristics of quantitative nucleic acid testing for polyomaviruses in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

Screening for polyoma BK virus (BK) using nucleic testing (NAT) is recommended for kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients, but the performance characteristics of quantitative BK NAT at different thresholds of plasma BK viral loads are unclear. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative BK NAT as an add-on test to qualitative polyoma NAT for the diagnosis of BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in kidney and kidney transplant recipients. We calculated the test sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values at the different thresholds of plasma BK viral load for BKVAN. At the recommended threshold of >1 × 10(3) serum BK copies/mL serum for test positivity, the sensitivity for BKVAN was 92.9% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 66.1-99.8) and specificity 79.1% (95%: CI 67.4-88.1), with corresponding positive and negative predictive values of 42.0% (95% CI: 24.8-57.7%) and 98.6% (95% CI: 98.3-99.9%), respectively. The overall area under curve for the quantitative BK NAT was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.97). Quantitative BK NAT displays properties of high sensitivity and specificity that are fit for purpose as an add-on test to qualitative polyomavirus NAT for kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients at risk of BKVAN.

The impact of surveillance and rapid reduction in immunosuppression to control BK virus-related graft injury in kidney transplantation

We prospectively screened 609 consecutive kidney (538) and kidney-pancreas (71) transplant recipients for BK viremia over a 4-year interval using polymerase chain reaction viral load detection and protocol kidney biopsies. We found that BK viremia is common at our center: total cases 26.7%, cases during first year 21.3% (mean 4 months), and recipients with ≥ 10 000 copies/ml 12.3%. We found few predictive clinical or demographic risk factors for any BK viremia or viral loads ≥ 10,000 copies/ml, other than prior treatment of biopsy confirmed acute rejection and/or higher immunosuppressive blood levels of tacrolimus (P = 0.001) or mycophenolate mofetil (P = 0.007). Viral loads at diagnosis (<10 000 copies/ml) demonstrated little impact on graft function or survival. However, rising copy numbers demand early reductions in immunosuppressive drug doses of at least 30-50%. Viral loads >185 000 copies/ml at diagnosis were predictive of BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN; OR: 113.25, 95% CI: 17.22-744.6, P < 0.001). Surveillance for BK viremia and rapid reduction of immunosuppression limited the incidence of BKVAN to 1.3%. The addition of leflunomide or ciprofloxacin to immunosuppressive dose reduction did not result in greater rates of viral clearance. These data support the role of early surveillance for BK viremia to limit the impact on transplant outcome, although the most effective schedule for screening awaits further investigation.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

Polyomaviruses BK and JC are ubiquitous viruses with high seroprevalence rates in general population. Following primary infection, polyomaviruses BK and JC persist latently in different sites, particularly in the reno-urinary tract. Reactivation from latency may occur in normal subjects with asymptomatic viruria, while it can be associated to nephropathy (PVAN) in kidney transplantat recipients. PVAN may occur in 1%-10% of renal transplant patients with loss of the transplanted organ in 30% up to 80% of the cases. Etiology of PVAN is mainly attributable to BK virus, although approximately 5% of the cases may be due to JC. Pathogenesis of PVAN is still unknown, although viral replication and the lack of immune control play a major role. Immunosuppression represents the condicio sine qua non for the development of PVAN and the modulation of anti-rejection treatment represents the first line of intervention, given the lack of specific antiviral agents. At moment, an appropriate immunemodulation can only be accomplished by early identification of viral reactivacation by evaluation of polyomavirus load on serum and/or urine specimens, particularly in the first year post-trasplantation. Viro-immunological monitoring of specific cellular immune response could be useful to identify patients unable to recover cellular immunity posttransplantation, that are at higher risk of viral reactivation with development of PVAN. Herein, the main features of polyomaviruses BK and JC, biological properties, clinical characteristics, etiopathogenesis, monitoring and diagnosing of PVAN will be described and discussed, with an extended citation of related relevant literature data.

Molecular networks involved in the immune control of BK polyomavirus

BK polyomavirus infection is the important cause of virus-related nephropathy following kidney transplantation. BK virus reactivates in 30%–80% of kidney transplant recipients resulting in BK virus-related nephropathy in 1%–10% of cases. Currently, the molecular processes associated with asymptomatic infections in transplant patients infected with BK virus remain unclear. In this study we evaluate intrarenal molecular processes during different stages of BKV infection. The gene expression profiles of 90 target genes known to be associated with immune response were evaluated in kidney graft biopsy material using TaqMan low density array. Three patient groups were examined: control patients with no evidence of BK virus reactivation (n = 11), infected asymptomatic patients (n = 9), and patients with BK virus nephropathy (n = 10). Analysis of biopsies from asymptomatic viruria patients resulted in the identification of 5 differentially expressed genes (CD3E, CD68, CCR2, ICAM-1, and SKI) (P < 0.05), and functional analysis showed a significantly heightened presence of costimulatory signals (e.g., CD40/CD40L; P < 0.05). Gene ontology analysis revealed several biological networks associated with BKV immune control in comparison to the control group. This study demonstrated that asymptomatic BK viruria is associated with a different intrarenal regulation of several genes implicating in antiviral immune response.

Genotyping of polyomavirus BK by Real Time PCR for VP1 gene

Polyomavirus BK latently persist in different sites, including the renourinary tract, and may reactivate causing nephropathy in renal transplant recipients or hemorrhagic cystitis in bone marrow recipients. Based on the sequence of the VP1 gene, four genotypes have been described, corresponding to the four serologically differentiated subtypes I-IV, with different prevalence and geographic distribution. In this study, the development and clinical validation of four different Real-Time PCR assays for the detection and discrimination of BKV genotypes as a substitute of DNA sequencing are described. 379 BK VP1 sequences, belonging to the main four genotypes, were aligned and "hot spots" of mutation specific for all the strains or isolates were identified. Specific primers and probes for the detection and discrimination of each genotype by four Real-Time PCR assays were designed and technically validated. Subsequently, the four Real-Time PCR assays were used to test 20 BK-positive urine specimens from renal transplant patients, and evidenced a prevalence of BK genotype I, as previously reported in Europe. Results were confirmed by sequencing. The availability of a rapid and simple genotyping method could be useful for the evaluation of BK genotypes prevalence and studies on the impact of the infecting genotype on viral biological behavior, pathogenic role, and immune evasion strategies.

Combined measurement of serum DNA and urine VP1 messenger RNA in monitoring BK virus replication in kidney graft recipients

Evaluation of BK virus replication is a fundamental tool in the monitoring of renal transplant recipients. Herein, we investigated the role of urine VP1 messenger RNA (mRNA) quantification and combined measurement of serum DNA and urine VP1 mRNA in 428 kidney allograft recipients. BK viremia and viruria were detected in 24 (5.6%) and 54 (12.6%) patients, respectively. A diagnosis of BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) was established in 2 patients, both within the first year posttransplantation. Based on urine VP1 mRNA measurement, BKV replication was observed in 10 (2.1%) patients, 2 of whom displayed BKVAN. Urine VP1 mRNA was detected in all cases in association with viremia except 5 and in all cases with viruria. No difference among VP1 mRNA levels was noted between the 2 BKVAN patients and the highest values in patients without BKVAN. The urine VP1 mRNA result by analysis using the operating characteristics was not superior to viremia, despite the improvement obtained with the combined measurement of viremia (cut-off, 16,000 copies/mL) and urine VP1 mRNA (>10,000 copies/10(3) cells). In conclusion, VP1 mRNA measurements may complement viremia and viruria to monitor BKV replication, although its use is limited by its technical complexity in comparison with DNA detection.

BK polyomavirus infection and nephropathy: the virus-immune system interplay

Reactivation of latent BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection continues to be a major challenge in renal graft recipients. Progression of BKV infection to BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) leads to graft loss in up to 60% of affected patients. Interestingly, although >80% of healthy adults are seropositive for BKV, BKVAN occurs almost exclusively in transplanted kidneys, which raises questions about its underlying pathogenetic mechanisms. Intragraft inflammation and an insufficient antiviral immune response seem to be the most important risk factors. Early studies revealed an association between the rate of recovery of BKV-specific cellular immunity (which shows high interindividual variation) and BK viral clearance, which determines the clinical course of BKV infection. In patients with prompt recovery of BKV-specific T cells, BKV infection can be controlled at the early reactivation stage and does not progress to BKVAN. By contrast, in patients with persistent BKV reactivation caused by insufficient BKV-specific immunity, continued viral replication and inflammation ultimately lead to graft injury and/or BKVAN. As the chronic course of BKV infection can be prevented in most patients by prompt restoration of BKV-specific immunity, frequent monitoring of BK viral load and targeted, timely modification or reduction of immunosuppression is strongly recommended for affected patients.

Serial measurements of hepatitis C viral load by real-time polymerase chain reaction among recipients of living-donor renal transplants: a short-term follow-up study from a single center

There is a high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among immunosuppressed patients including renal transplant recipients. The study investigated serum viral loads for up to 6 months posttransplantation among these patients. Serum viral load was serially monitored using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 25 HCV-positive renal transplant recipients pretransplantation as well as day 10 and 6 months posttransplantation. A liver biopsy specimen obtained under vision at the time of transplantation was analyzed for viral load as well as for histological changes. There was increased viremia at day 10 followed by a significant (2 log) reduction at 6 months posttransplantation. Pretransplantation serum and intrahepatic viral load showed significant positive correlations (r = 0.727; P = .001), the latter also reflecting liver fibrosis score (r = 0.423; P = .05). The findings suggested that serum viral load reflects intrahepatic viral load, which in turn correlates with liver fibrosis. At 6 months posttransplantation, the modulatory effects of immunosuppressive drugs and of the host immune response may lead to a reduced viral load.

Monthly screening for BK viremia is an effective strategy to prevent BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus virus (BKV) nephropathy (BKVN) is the most common viral infection that affects renal allografts. Because a specific antiviral therapy is lacking, BKVN may result in graft dysfunction and/or loss. We prospectively analyzed whether monthly nucleic acid testing (NAT) for BKV replication in blood and immediate reduction of immunosuppression (IS) could prevent BKVN.

METHODS

NAT was performed at monthly intervals for 6 months and then at 12 months in 119 de novo renal transplant recipients. In viremic patients (presumptive BKVN), a graft biopsy was systematically performed and IS was immediately reduced.

RESULTS

BKV viremia occurred in 13 (10.9%) patients after a median time of 90 days (23-241); 77% of patients were viremic before month 4. After reduction of IS, viral load was undetectable in 11 patients, remained low in 1, and continued to increase in 1 patient who developed definitive BKVN despite reduction of IS, and finally returned to dialysis 6 months after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

BKV infection is an early complication. Monthly NAT in blood during the first 6 months and immediate reduction of IS in viremic patients almost completely prevent definitive BKVN.

Prevalence and clinical impact of polyomaviruses KI and WU in lung transplant recipients

The newly discovered polyomaviruses KI and WU (KIV and WUV) were isolated from secretions of patients with respiratory symptoms as well as in blood, spleen, lymphoid tissues, and stools, especially in immunocompromised conditions. The aim of this work was to evaluate the prevalence of KIV and WUV in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from lung transplant recipients. We also examined potential correlations between these viruses and occurrences of pneumonia, acute respiratory insufficiency, or other acute respiratory conditions and acute rejection episodes. Discharge diagnosis was based on the International Classification of Diseases-Italian version 2002, based on the 9th-revision clinical modification. A rejection episode was diagnosed by transbronchial lung biopsy in accordance with the 2007 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Working Formulation. Overall, we analyzed 53 BALs obtained from 24 transplant recipients. Positive polymerase chain reaction results were observed in 6 samples (11.3%) from 6 patients (25%), versus 7 samples (13.2%) from 7 patients (29.2%) for KIV and WUV, respectively. Regarding the diagnosis of pneumonia, the prevalence was 22.2% and 33.3% for KIV and WUV, respectively. In cases of acute respiratory insufficiency or other acute respiratory conditions, 2 out of 9 samples were positive for KIV (22.2%) and 4 out of 9 for WUV (44.4%). An Acute rejection episode (ARE) was diagnosed in 7 instances among 6 lung transplant patients: The corresponding BAL specimens showed positive results for KIV in 3 out of 7 (42.8%) cases with ARE vs 3 out of 46 (6.5%) without an ARE (P < .05), and for WUV in 3 out of 7 (42.8%) vs 4 out of 46 (8.7%) (P < .05), respectively. Although the small number of specimens limits the statistical analysis, our results showed a higher prevalence of WUV compared with KIV. The compromised pulmonary environment in the lung allograft may cause reactivation of these viruses. Their roles in this context need to be further evaluated.

Evaluation of fluoroquinolones for the prevention of BK viremia after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Nearly 30% of renal transplant recipients develops BK viremia, a prerequisite for BK nephropathy. Case reports have evaluated treatment options for BK virus, but no controlled studies have assessed prophylactic therapies. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics were studied for prevention of BK viremia after renal transplantation.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This retrospective analysis evaluated adult renal transplant recipients with at least one BK viral load (blood) between 90 and 400 days after transplantation. Six to 12 months of co-trimoxazole was used for Pneumocystis prophylaxis. In sulfa-allergic/-intolerant patients, 6 to 12 months of atovaquone with 1 month of a fluoroquinolone was used. Fluoroquinolones can inhibit BK DNA topoisomerase. The two groups studied were those that received 30 days of levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin after transplantation and those that did not. The primary endpoint was BK viremia rates at 1 year. Of note, of the 160 patients not receiving fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, 40 received a fluoroquinolone for treatment of a bacterial infection within 3 months after transplantation. Subgroup analysis evaluating these 40 patients against the 120 who had no exposure to fluoroquinolones was completed.

RESULTS

A 1-month fluoroquinolone course after transplantation was associated with significantly lower rates of BK viremia at 1 year compared with those with no fluoroquinolone. In the subgroup analysis, exposure to fluoroquinolone for treatment of bacterial infections within 3 months after transplantation was associated with significantly lower 1-year rates of BK viremia.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates that fluoroquinolones are effective at preventing BK viremia after renal transplantation.

Monitoring of BK viral load in renal allograft recipients by real-time PCR assays

BK virus (BKV) is a nonenveloped, double-stranded DNA virus of the polyomavirus family that primarily affects immunocompromised people. BKV may cause nephropathy in renal transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, resulting in renal dysfunction and, possibly, graft loss. Monitoring of BK viral load in urine and blood has been used as a surrogate marker of BKV nephropathy (BKVN). Although real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the method of choice, currently there is no US Food and Drug Administration-approved or standardized BK viral load assay. Different PCR assays vary significantly in sample types, DNA extraction method, PCR primers and probes, and reference materials used to generate a standard curve. These differences can affect the accuracy, specificity, and dynamic ranges of various real-time PCR assays. These analytic differences cause difficulty in comparing test results, making it impossible to establish universal standardized cutoff values that correlate with clinical manifestations of BKVN. In this review, we summarize real-time PCR assays used for managing BKVN.