1
|
Bakas S, Vollmuth P, Galldiks N, Booth TC, Aerts HJWL, Bi WL, Wiestler B, Tiwari P, Pati S, Baid U, Calabrese E, Lohmann P, Nowosielski M, Jain R, Colen R, Ismail M, Rasool G, Lupo JM, Akbari H, Tonn JC, Macdonald D, Vogelbaum M, Chang SM, Davatzikos C, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Huang RY. Artificial Intelligence for Response Assessment in Neuro Oncology (AI-RANO), part 2: recommendations for standardisation, validation, and good clinical practice. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e589-e601. [PMID: 39481415 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00315-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/02/2024]
Abstract
Technological advancements have enabled the extended investigation, development, and application of computational approaches in various domains, including health care. A burgeoning number of diagnostic, predictive, prognostic, and monitoring biomarkers are continuously being explored to improve clinical decision making in neuro-oncology. These advancements describe the increasing incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, including the use of radiomics. However, the broad applicability and clinical translation of AI are restricted by concerns about generalisability, reproducibility, scalability, and validation. This Policy Review intends to serve as the leading resource of recommendations for the standardisation and good clinical practice of AI approaches in health care, particularly in neuro-oncology. To this end, we investigate the repeatability, reproducibility, and stability of AI in response assessment in neuro-oncology in studies on factors affecting such computational approaches, and in publicly available open-source data and computational software tools facilitating these goals. The pathway for standardisation and validation of these approaches is discussed with the view of trustworthy AI enabling the next generation of clinical trials. We conclude with an outlook on the future of AI-enabled neuro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridon Bakas
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Division of Computational Pathology, Indiana University, Indianopolis, IN, USA; Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianopolis, IN, USA; Department of Computer Science, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Division for Computational Radiology and Clinical AI, Clinic for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Division for Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Thomas C Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hugo J W L Aerts
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Program, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Pallavi Tiwari
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Division of Computational Pathology, Indiana University, Indianopolis, IN, USA
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Division of Computational Pathology, Indiana University, Indianopolis, IN, USA; Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianopolis, IN, USA
| | - Evan Calabrese
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Martha Nowosielski
- Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Rajan Jain
- Department of Radiology and Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rivka Colen
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Center for Artificial Intelligence Innovation in Medical Imaging, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marwa Ismail
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ghulam Rasool
- Department of Machine Learning, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Janine M Lupo
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Joerg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Michael Vogelbaum
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Artificial Intelligence for Integrated Diagnostics and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Villanueva-Meyer JE, Bakas S, Tiwari P, Lupo JM, Calabrese E, Davatzikos C, Bi WL, Ismail M, Akbari H, Lohmann P, Booth TC, Wiestler B, Aerts HJWL, Rasool G, Tonn JC, Nowosielski M, Jain R, Colen RR, Pati S, Baid U, Vollmuth P, Macdonald D, Vogelbaum MA, Chang SM, Huang RY, Galldiks N. Artificial Intelligence for Response Assessment in Neuro Oncology (AI-RANO), part 1: review of current advancements. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e581-e588. [PMID: 39481414 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00316-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/02/2024]
Abstract
The development, application, and benchmarking of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to improve diagnosis, prognostication, and therapy in neuro-oncology are increasing at a rapid pace. This Policy Review provides an overview and critical assessment of the work to date in this field, focusing on diagnostic AI models of key genomic markers, predictive AI models of response before and after therapy, and differentiation of true disease progression from treatment-related changes, which is a considerable challenge based on current clinical care in neuro-oncology. Furthermore, promising future directions, including the use of AI for automated response assessment in neuro-oncology, are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Division of Computational Pathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Biostatistics & Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Computer Science, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Pallavi Tiwari
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Janine M Lupo
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Evan Calabrese
- Duke University Center for Artificial Intelligence in Radiology, Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marwa Ismail
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Thomas C Booth
- Department of Neuroradiology, Ruskin Wing, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; London Regional Cancer Program, London, UK
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hugo J W L Aerts
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, CARIM & GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ghulam Rasool
- Department of Machine Learning, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joerg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Martha Nowosielski
- Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Rajan Jain
- Department of Radiology and Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rivka R Colen
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, CARIM & GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Division of Computational Pathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- Division of Computational Pathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Macdonald
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neurosurgery, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Machine Learning, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany; Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gongala S, Garcia JA, Korakavi N, Patil N, Akbari H, Sloan A, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sun J, Griffith B, Poisson LM, Booth TC, Jain R, Mohan S, Nasralla MP, Bakas S, Tippareddy C, Puig J, Palmer JD, Shi W, Colen RR, Sotiras A, Ahn SS, Park YW, Davatzikos C, Badve C. Sex-Specific Differences in Patients with IDH1-Wild-Type Grade 4 Glioma in the ReSPOND Consortium. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024; 45:1299-1307. [PMID: 38684319 PMCID: PMC11392364 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a8319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Understanding sex-based differences in patients with glioblastoma is necessary for accurate personalized treatment planning to improve patient outcomes. Our purpose was to investigate sex-specific differences in molecular, clinical, and radiologic tumor parameters, as well as survival outcomes in patients with glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 wild-type (IDH1-WT), grade 4. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective data of 1832 patients with glioblastoma, IDH1-WT with comprehensive information on tumor parameters was acquired from the Radiomics Signatures for Precision Oncology in Glioblastoma consortium. Data imputation was performed for missing values. Sex-based differences in tumor parameters, such as age, molecular parameters, preoperative Karnofsky performance score (KPS), tumor volumes, epicenter, and laterality were assessed through nonparametric tests. Spatial atlases were generated by using preoperative MRI maps to visualize tumor characteristics. Survival time analysis was performed through log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS Glioblastoma was diagnosed at a median age of 64 years in women compared with 61.9 years in men (false discovery rate [FDR] = 0.003). Men had a higher KPS (above 80) as compared with women (60.4% women versus 69.7% men, FDR = 0.044). Women had lower tumor volumes in enhancing (16.7 cm3 versus 20.6 cm3 in men, FDR = 0.001), necrotic core (6.18 cm3 versus 7.76 cm3 in men, FDR = 0.001), and edema regions (46.9 cm3 versus 59.2 cm3 in men, FDR = 0.0001). The right temporal region was the most common tumor epicenter in the overall population. Right as well as left temporal lobes were more frequently involved in men. There were no sex-specific differences in survival outcomes and mortality ratios. Higher age, unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase promoter and undergoing subtotal resection increased the mortality risk in both men and women. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates significant sex-based differences in clinical and radiologic tumor parameters of patients with glioblastoma. Sex is not an independent prognostic factor for survival outcomes and the tumor parameters influencing patient outcomes are identical for men and women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sree Gongala
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., N.K., J.S., C.T., C.B.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Radiology (S.G., N.K., C.T., C.B.), University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jose A Garcia
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) (J.A.G., C.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Radiology (J.A.G., S.M., C.D.), Division of Neuroradiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nisha Korakavi
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., N.K., J.S., C.T., C.B.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Radiology (S.G., N.K., C.T., C.B.), University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nirav Patil
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences (N.P.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- University Hospitals Health System (N.P.), Research and Education Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Department of Bioengineering (H.A.), Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California
| | - Andrew Sloan
- Neuroscience Service line (A.Sloan), Department of Neurosurgery, Piedmont Health, Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Cancer Biology (A.Sloan), Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology (J.S.B.-S.), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
- Trans-Divisional Research Program (J.S.B.-S.), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jessie Sun
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., N.K., J.S., C.T., C.B.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Brent Griffith
- Department of Radiology (B.G.), Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Laila M Poisson
- Department of Radiology (L.M.P.), Wayne State University School of Medicine Henry Ford, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Thomas C Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences (L.M.P.), King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neuroradiology (L.M.P.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rajan Jain
- Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery (R.J., M.P.N.), New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology (J.A.G., S.M., C.D.), Division of Neuroradiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - MacLean P Nasralla
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (C.D), at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery (R.J., M.P.N.), New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (M.P.N.), at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center (M.P.N.), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Division of Computational Pathology (S.B.), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (S.B.), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Department of Neurological Surgery (S.B.), School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Charit Tippareddy
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., N.K., J.S., C.T., C.B.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Radiology (S.G., N.K., C.T., C.B.), University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Josep Puig
- Radiology Department CDI (J.P.), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery (J.D.P.), The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology (W.S.), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rivka R Colen
- Department of Radiology (R.R.C.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Hillman Cancer Center (R.R.C.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Department of Radiology (A.Sotiras), WA University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- Institute for Informatics (A.Sotiras), Data Science & Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sung Soo Ahn
- Department of Radiology (S.S.A., Y.W.P.), Section of Neuroradiology, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yae Won Park
- Department of Radiology (S.S.A., Y.W.P.), Section of Neuroradiology, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology (J.A.G., S.M., C.D.), Division of Neuroradiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) (J.A.G., C.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Radiology (J.A.G., S.M., C.D.), Division of Neuroradiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (C.D), at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chaitra Badve
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., N.K., J.S., C.T., C.B.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Radiology (S.G., N.K., C.T., C.B.), University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pati S, Kumar S, Varma A, Edwards B, Lu C, Qu L, Wang JJ, Lakshminarayanan A, Wang SH, Sheller MJ, Chang K, Singh P, Rubin DL, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Bakas S. Privacy preservation for federated learning in health care. PATTERNS (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2024; 5:100974. [PMID: 39081567 PMCID: PMC11284498 DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.100974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) shows potential to improve health care by leveraging data to build models that can inform clinical workflows. However, access to large quantities of diverse data is needed to develop robust generalizable models. Data sharing across institutions is not always feasible due to legal, security, and privacy concerns. Federated learning (FL) allows for multi-institutional training of AI models, obviating data sharing, albeit with different security and privacy concerns. Specifically, insights exchanged during FL can leak information about institutional data. In addition, FL can introduce issues when there is limited trust among the entities performing the compute. With the growing adoption of FL in health care, it is imperative to elucidate the potential risks. We thus summarize privacy-preserving FL literature in this work with special regard to health care. We draw attention to threats and review mitigation approaches. We anticipate this review to become a health-care researcher's guide to security and privacy in FL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Pati
- Center for Federated Learning in Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Division of Computational Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sourav Kumar
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amokh Varma
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Charles Lu
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Clinical Data Science, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liangqiong Qu
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Justin J. Wang
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology, and Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ken Chang
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Praveer Singh
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Daniel L. Rubin
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology, and Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Federated Learning in Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Division of Computational Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bhattacharya K, Rastogi S, Mahajan A. Post-treatment imaging of gliomas: challenging the existing dogmas. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:e376-e392. [PMID: 38123395 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Gliomas are the commonest malignant central nervous system tumours in adults and imaging is the cornerstone of diagnosis, treatment, and post-treatment follow-up of these patients. With the ever-evolving treatment strategies post-treatment imaging and interpretation in glioma remains challenging, more so with the advent of anti-angiogenic drugs and immunotherapy, which can significantly alter the appearance in this setting, thus making interpretation of routine imaging findings such as contrast enhancement, oedema, and mass effect difficult to interpret. This review details the various methods of management of glioma including the upcoming novel therapies and their impact on imaging findings, with a comprehensive description of the imaging findings in conventional and advanced imaging techniques. A systematic appraisal for the existing and emerging techniques of imaging in these settings and their clinical application including various response assessment guidelines and artificial intelligence based response assessment will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bhattacharya
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - S Rastogi
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - A Mahajan
- Department of imaging, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L7 8YA, UK; University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guo J, Fathi Kazerooni A, Toorens E, Akbari H, Yu F, Sako C, Mamourian E, Shinohara RT, Koumenis C, Bagley SJ, Morrissette JJD, Binder ZA, Brem S, Mohan S, Lustig RA, O'Rourke DM, Ganguly T, Bakas S, Nasrallah MP, Davatzikos C. Integrating imaging and genomic data for the discovery of distinct glioblastoma subtypes: a joint learning approach. Sci Rep 2024; 14:4922. [PMID: 38418494 PMCID: PMC10902376 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55072-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a highly heterogeneous disease, with variations observed at both phenotypical and molecular levels. Personalized therapies would be facilitated by non-invasive in vivo approaches for characterizing this heterogeneity. In this study, we developed unsupervised joint machine learning between radiomic and genomic data, thereby identifying distinct glioblastoma subtypes. A retrospective cohort of 571 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients were included in the study, and pre-operative multi-parametric MRI scans and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) data were collected. L21-norm minimization was used to select a subset of 12 radiomic features from the MRI scans, and 13 key driver genes from the five main signal pathways most affected in glioblastoma were selected from the genomic data. Subtypes were identified using a joint learning approach called Anchor-based Partial Multi-modal Clustering on both radiomic and genomic modalities. Kaplan-Meier analysis identified three distinct glioblastoma subtypes: high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk, based on overall survival outcome (p < 0.05, log-rank test; Hazard Ratio = 1.64, 95% CI 1.17-2.31, Cox proportional hazard model on high-risk and low-risk subtypes). The three subtypes displayed different phenotypical and molecular characteristics in terms of imaging histogram, co-occurrence of genes, and correlation between the two modalities. Our findings demonstrate the synergistic value of integrated radiomic signatures and molecular characteristics for glioblastoma subtyping. Joint learning on both modalities can aid in better understanding the molecular basis of phenotypical signatures of glioblastoma, and provide insights into the biological underpinnings of tumor formation and progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Guo
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7Th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7Th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Division of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Erik Toorens
- Penn Genomic Analysis Core, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Fanyang Yu
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7Th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7Th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mamourian
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7Th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7Th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization (PennSIVE) Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Constantinos Koumenis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer J D Morrissette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zev A Binder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7Th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert A Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tapan Ganguly
- Penn Genomic Analysis Core, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7Th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of Computational Pathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7Th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7Th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee MD, Patel SH, Mohan S, Akbari H, Bakas S, Nasrallah MP, Calabrese E, Rudie J, Villanueva-Meyer J, LaMontagne P, Marcus DS, Colen RR, Balana C, Choi YS, Badve C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Booth TC, Palmer JD, Dicker AP, Flanders AE, Shi W, Griffith B, Poisson LM, Chakravarti A, Mahajan A, Chang S, Orringer D, Davatzikos C, Jain R. Association of partial T2-FLAIR mismatch sign and isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation in WHO grade 4 gliomas: results from the ReSPOND consortium. Neuroradiology 2023; 65:1343-1352. [PMID: 37468750 PMCID: PMC11058040 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-023-03196-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE While the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign is highly specific for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant, 1p/19q-noncodeleted astrocytomas among lower-grade gliomas, its utility in WHO grade 4 gliomas is not well-studied. We derived the partial T2-FLAIR mismatch sign as an imaging biomarker for IDH mutation in WHO grade 4 gliomas. METHODS Preoperative MRI scans of adult WHO grade 4 glioma patients (n = 2165) from the multi-institutional ReSPOND (Radiomics Signatures for PrecisiON Diagnostics) consortium were analyzed. Diagnostic performance of the partial T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was evaluated. Subset analyses were performed to assess associations of imaging markers with overall survival (OS). RESULTS One hundred twenty-one (5.6%) of 2165 grade 4 gliomas were IDH-mutant. Partial T2-FLAIR mismatch was present in 40 (1.8%) cases, 32 of which were IDH-mutant, yielding 26.4% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 80.0% positive predictive value, and 95.8% negative predictive value. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated IDH mutation was significantly associated with partial T2-FLAIR mismatch (odds ratio [OR] 5.715, 95% CI [1.896, 17.221], p = 0.002), younger age (OR 0.911 [0.895, 0.927], p < 0.001), tumor centered in frontal lobe (OR 3.842, [2.361, 6.251], p < 0.001), absence of multicentricity (OR 0.173, [0.049, 0.612], p = 0.007), and presence of cystic (OR 6.596, [3.023, 14.391], p < 0.001) or non-enhancing solid components (OR 6.069, [3.371, 10.928], p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated cystic components (p = 0.024) and non-enhancing solid components (p = 0.003) were associated with longer OS, while older age (p < 0.001), frontal lobe center (p = 0.008), multifocality (p < 0.001), and multicentricity (p < 0.001) were associated with shorter OS. CONCLUSION Partial T2-FLAIR mismatch sign is highly specific for IDH mutation in WHO grade 4 gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Lee
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Sohil H Patel
- Department of Radiology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Glioblastoma Multiforme Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Evan Calabrese
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey Rudie
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Javier Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pamela LaMontagne
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Daniel S Marcus
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rivka R Colen
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carmen Balana
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yoon Seong Choi
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chaitra Badve
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Trans-Divisional Research Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrew E Sloan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Seidman Cancer Center and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Thomas C Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Ruskin WingLondon, UK
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam E Flanders
- Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Brent Griffith
- Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Laila M Poisson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Center for Bioinformatics, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Abhishek Mahajan
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Orringer
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rajan Jain
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mahajan A, Burrewar M, Agarwal U, Kss B, Mlv A, Guha A, Sahu A, Choudhari A, Pawar V, Punia V, Epari S, Sahay A, Gupta T, Chinnaswamy G, Shetty P, Moiyadi A. Deep learning based clinico-radiological model for paediatric brain tumor detection and subtype prediction. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2023; 4:669-684. [PMID: 37720352 PMCID: PMC10501890 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2023.00159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim Early diagnosis of paediatric brain tumors significantly improves the outcome. The aim is to study magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of paediatric brain tumors and to develop an automated segmentation (AS) tool which could segment and classify tumors using deep learning methods and compare with radiologist assessment. Methods This study included 94 cases, of which 75 were diagnosed cases of ependymoma, medulloblastoma, brainstem glioma, and pilocytic astrocytoma and 19 were normal MRI brain cases. The data was randomized into training data, 64 cases; test data, 21 cases and validation data, 9 cases to devise a deep learning algorithm to segment the paediatric brain tumor. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the deep learning model were compared with radiologist's findings. Performance evaluation of AS was done based on Dice score and Hausdorff95 distance. Results Analysis of MRI semantic features was done with necrosis and haemorrhage as predicting features for ependymoma, diffusion restriction and cystic changes were predictors for medulloblastoma. The accuracy of detecting abnormalities was 90%, with a specificity of 100%. Further segmentation of the tumor into enhancing and non-enhancing components was done. The segmentation results for whole tumor (WT), enhancing tumor (ET), and non-enhancing tumor (NET) have been analyzed by Dice score and Hausdorff95 distance. The accuracy of prediction of all MRI features was compared with experienced radiologist's findings. Substantial agreement observed between the classification by model and the radiologist's given classification [K-0.695 (K is Cohen's kappa score for interrater reliability)]. Conclusions The deep learning model had very high accuracy and specificity for predicting the magnetic resonance (MR) characteristics and close to 80% accuracy in predicting tumor type. This model can serve as a potential tool to make a timely and accurate diagnosis for radiologists not trained in neuroradiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Mahajan
- Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Foundation Trust, L7 8YA, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mayur Burrewar
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ujjwal Agarwal
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Apparao Mlv
- Endimension Technology Pvt Ltd, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amrita Guha
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
| | - Arpita Sahu
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit Choudhari
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vivek Pawar
- Endimension Technology Pvt Ltd, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vivek Punia
- Endimension Technology Pvt Ltd, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sridhar Epari
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Ayushi Sahay
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
| | - Girish Chinnaswamy
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Prakash Shetty
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Aliasgar Moiyadi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Godoy LL, Chawla S, Brem S, Mohan S. Taming Glioblastoma in "Real Time": Integrating Multimodal Advanced Neuroimaging/AI Tools Towards Creating a Robust and Therapy Agnostic Model for Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:2588-2592. [PMID: 37227179 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
The highly aggressive nature of glioblastoma carries a dismal prognosis despite aggressive multimodal therapy. Alternative treatment regimens, such as immunotherapies, are known to intensify the inflammatory response in the treatment field. Follow-up imaging in these scenarios often mimics disease progression on conventional MRI, making accurate evaluation extremely challenging. To this end, revised criteria for assessment of treatment response in high-grade gliomas were successfully proposed by the RANO Working Group to distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression, with intrinsic constraints related to the postcontrast T1-weighted MRI sequence. To address these existing limitations, our group proposes a more objective and quantifiable "treatment agnostic" model, integrating into the RANO criteria advanced multimodal neuroimaging techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), dynamic susceptibility contrast-perfusion weighted imaging (DSC-PWI), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI, MR spectroscopy, and amino acid-based positron emission tomography (PET) imaging tracers, along with artificial intelligence (AI) tools (radiomics, radiogenomics, and radiopathomics) and molecular information to address this complex issue of treatment-related changes versus tumor progression in "real-time", particularly in the early posttreatment window. Our perspective delineates the potential of incorporating multimodal neuroimaging techniques to improve consistency and automation for the assessment of early treatment response in neuro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laiz Laura de Godoy
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Paudyal R, Shah AD, Akin O, Do RKG, Konar AS, Hatzoglou V, Mahmood U, Lee N, Wong RJ, Banerjee S, Shin J, Veeraraghavan H, Shukla-Dave A. Artificial Intelligence in CT and MR Imaging for Oncological Applications. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092573. [PMID: 37174039 PMCID: PMC10177423 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer care increasingly relies on imaging for patient management. The two most common cross-sectional imaging modalities in oncology are computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which provide high-resolution anatomic and physiological imaging. Herewith is a summary of recent applications of rapidly advancing artificial intelligence (AI) in CT and MRI oncological imaging that addresses the benefits and challenges of the resultant opportunities with examples. Major challenges remain, such as how best to integrate AI developments into clinical radiology practice, the vigorous assessment of quantitative CT and MR imaging data accuracy, and reliability for clinical utility and research integrity in oncology. Such challenges necessitate an evaluation of the robustness of imaging biomarkers to be included in AI developments, a culture of data sharing, and the cooperation of knowledgeable academics with vendor scientists and companies operating in radiology and oncology fields. Herein, we will illustrate a few challenges and solutions of these efforts using novel methods for synthesizing different contrast modality images, auto-segmentation, and image reconstruction with examples from lung CT as well as abdome, pelvis, and head and neck MRI. The imaging community must embrace the need for quantitative CT and MRI metrics beyond lesion size measurement. AI methods for the extraction and longitudinal tracking of imaging metrics from registered lesions and understanding the tumor environment will be invaluable for interpreting disease status and treatment efficacy. This is an exciting time to work together to move the imaging field forward with narrow AI-specific tasks. New AI developments using CT and MRI datasets will be used to improve the personalized management of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| | - Akash D Shah
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| | - Oguz Akin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| | - Richard K G Do
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| | - Amaresha Shridhar Konar
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| | - Usman Mahmood
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| | - Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | - Harini Veeraraghavan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cepeda S, Luppino LT, Pérez-Núñez A, Solheim O, García-García S, Velasco-Casares M, Karlberg A, Eikenes L, Sarabia R, Arrese I, Zamora T, Gonzalez P, Jiménez-Roldán L, Kuttner S. Predicting Regions of Local Recurrence in Glioblastomas Using Voxel-Based Radiomic Features of Multiparametric Postoperative MRI. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1894. [PMID: 36980783 PMCID: PMC10047582 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The globally accepted surgical strategy in glioblastomas is removing the enhancing tumor. However, the peritumoral region harbors infiltration areas responsible for future tumor recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate a predictive model that identifies areas of future recurrence using a voxel-based radiomics analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. This multi-institutional study included a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma who underwent surgery with complete resection of the enhancing tumor. Fifty-five patients met the selection criteria. The study sample was split into training (N = 40) and testing (N = 15) datasets. Follow-up MRI was used for ground truth definition, and postoperative structural multiparametric MRI was used to extract voxel-based radiomic features. Deformable coregistration was used to register the MRI sequences for each patient, followed by segmentation of the peritumoral region in the postoperative scan and the enhancing tumor in the follow-up scan. Peritumoral voxels overlapping with enhancing tumor voxels were labeled as recurrence, while non-overlapping voxels were labeled as nonrecurrence. Voxel-based radiomic features were extracted from the peritumoral region. Four machine learning-based classifiers were trained for recurrence prediction. A region-based evaluation approach was used for model evaluation. The Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) classifier obtained the best performance on the testing dataset with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 ± 0.09 and an accuracy of 0.84 ± 0.06, using region-based evaluation. There was a clear visual correspondence between predicted and actual recurrence regions. We have developed a method that accurately predicts the region of future tumor recurrence in MRI scans of glioblastoma patients. This could enable the adaptation of surgical and radiotherapy treatment to these areas to potentially prolong the survival of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Cepeda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital, 47014 Valladolid, Spain
| | - Luigi Tommaso Luppino
- Department of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Angel Pérez-Núñez
- Department of Neurosurgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ole Solheim
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sergio García-García
- Department of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital, 47014 Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Anna Karlberg
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Live Eikenes
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Rosario Sarabia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital, 47014 Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Arrese
- Department of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital, 47014 Valladolid, Spain
| | - Tomás Zamora
- Department of Pathology, Río Hortega University Hospital, 47014 Valladolid, Spain
| | - Pedro Gonzalez
- Department of Neurosurgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Jiménez-Roldán
- Department of Neurosurgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Samuel Kuttner
- Department of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
- The PET Imaging Center, University Hospital of North Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang R, Chaudhari P, Davatzikos C. Editorial for "Non-Invasive Evaluation of the Notch Signaling Pathway via Radiomic Signatures Based on Multiparametric MRI in Association With Biological Functions of Patients With Glioma: A Multi-Institutional Study". J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:897-898. [PMID: 35903917 PMCID: PMC10077882 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rongguang Wang
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pratik Chaudhari
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Glioma radiogenomics and artificial intelligence: road to precision cancer medicine. Clin Radiol 2023; 78:137-149. [PMID: 36241568 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.08.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Radiogenomics refers to the study of the relationship between imaging phenotypes and gene expression patterns/molecular characteristics, which might allow improved diagnosis, decision-making, and predicting patient outcomes in the context of multiple diseases. Central nervous system (CNS) tumours contribute to significant cancer-related mortality in the present age. Although historically CNS neoplasms were classified and graded based on microscopic appearance, there was discordance between two histologically similar tumours that showed varying prognosis and behaviour, attributable to their molecular signatures. These led to the incorporation of molecular markers in the classification of CNS neoplasms. Meanwhile, advancements in imaging technology such as diffusion-based imaging (including tractography), perfusion, and spectroscopy in addition to the conventional imaging of glial neoplasms, have opened an avenue for radiogenomics. This review touches upon the schema of the current classification of gliomas, concepts behind molecular markers, and parameters that are used in radiogenomics to characterise gliomas and the role of artificial intelligence for the same. Further, the role of radiomics in the grading of brain tumours, prediction of treatment response and prognosis has been discussed. Use of automated and semi-automated tumour segmentation for radiotherapy planning and follow-up has also been discussed briefly.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mahajan A, Chakrabarty N, Majithia J, Ahuja A, Agarwal U, Suryavanshi S, Biradar M, Sharma P, Raghavan B, Arafath R, Shukla S. Multisystem Imaging Recommendations/Guidelines: In the Pursuit of Precision Oncology. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractWith an increasing rate of cancers in almost all age groups and advanced screening techniques leading to an early diagnosis and longer longevity of patients with cancers, it is of utmost importance that radiologists assigned with cancer imaging should be prepared to deal with specific expected and unexpected circumstances that may arise during the lifetime of these patients. Tailored integration of preventive and curative interventions with current health plans and global escalation of efforts for timely diagnosis of cancers will pave the path for a cancer-free world. The commonly encountered circumstances in the current era, complicating cancer imaging, include coronavirus disease 2019 infection, pregnancy and lactation, immunocompromised states, bone marrow transplant, and screening of cancers in the relevant population. In this article, we discuss the imaging recommendations pertaining to cancer screening and diagnosis in the aforementioned clinical circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Mahajan
- Department of Radiology, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Nivedita Chakrabarty
- Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Jinita Majithia
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Ujjwal Agarwal
- Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shubham Suryavanshi
- Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahesh Biradar
- Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Prerit Sharma
- Radiodiagnosis, Sharma Diagnostic Centre, Wardha, India
| | | | | | - Shreya Shukla
- Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mahajan A, Chakrabarty N. Editorial: The use of deep learning in mapping and diagnosis of cancers. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1077341. [PMID: 36582789 PMCID: PMC9793849 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1077341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Mahajan
- Department of Radiology, The Clatterbridge Cancer Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Nivedita Chakrabarty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pati S, Baid U, Edwards B, Sheller M, Wang SH, Reina GA, Foley P, Gruzdev A, Karkada D, Davatzikos C, Sako C, Ghodasara S, Bilello M, Mohan S, Vollmuth P, Brugnara G, Preetha CJ, Sahm F, Maier-Hein K, Zenk M, Bendszus M, Wick W, Calabrese E, Rudie J, Villanueva-Meyer J, Cha S, Ingalhalikar M, Jadhav M, Pandey U, Saini J, Garrett J, Larson M, Jeraj R, Currie S, Frood R, Fatania K, Huang RY, Chang K, Balaña C, Capellades J, Puig J, Trenkler J, Pichler J, Necker G, Haunschmidt A, Meckel S, Shukla G, Liem S, Alexander GS, Lombardo J, Palmer JD, Flanders AE, Dicker AP, Sair HI, Jones CK, Venkataraman A, Jiang M, So TY, Chen C, Heng PA, Dou Q, Kozubek M, Lux F, Michálek J, Matula P, Keřkovský M, Kopřivová T, Dostál M, Vybíhal V, Vogelbaum MA, Mitchell JR, Farinhas J, Maldjian JA, Yogananda CGB, Pinho MC, Reddy D, Holcomb J, Wagner BC, Ellingson BM, Cloughesy TF, Raymond C, Oughourlian T, Hagiwara A, Wang C, To MS, Bhardwaj S, Chong C, Agzarian M, Falcão AX, Martins SB, Teixeira BCA, Sprenger F, Menotti D, Lucio DR, LaMontagne P, Marcus D, Wiestler B, Kofler F, Ezhov I, Metz M, Jain R, Lee M, Lui YW, McKinley R, Slotboom J, Radojewski P, Meier R, Wiest R, Murcia D, Fu E, Haas R, Thompson J, Ormond DR, Badve C, Sloan AE, Vadmal V, Waite K, Colen RR, Pei L, Ak M, Srinivasan A, Bapuraj JR, Rao A, Wang N, Yoshiaki O, Moritani T, Turk S, Lee J, Prabhudesai S, Morón F, Mandel J, Kamnitsas K, Glocker B, Dixon LVM, Williams M, Zampakis P, Panagiotopoulos V, Tsiganos P, Alexiou S, Haliassos I, Zacharaki EI, Moustakas K, Kalogeropoulou C, Kardamakis DM, Choi YS, Lee SK, Chang JH, Ahn SS, Luo B, Poisson L, Wen N, Tiwari P, Verma R, Bareja R, Yadav I, Chen J, Kumar N, Smits M, van der Voort SR, Alafandi A, Incekara F, Wijnenga MMJ, Kapsas G, Gahrmann R, Schouten JW, Dubbink HJ, Vincent AJPE, van den Bent MJ, French PJ, Klein S, Yuan Y, Sharma S, Tseng TC, Adabi S, Niclou SP, Keunen O, Hau AC, Vallières M, Fortin D, Lepage M, Landman B, Ramadass K, Xu K, Chotai S, Chambless LB, Mistry A, Thompson RC, Gusev Y, Bhuvaneshwar K, Sayah A, Bencheqroun C, Belouali A, Madhavan S, Booth TC, Chelliah A, Modat M, Shuaib H, Dragos C, Abayazeed A, Kolodziej K, Hill M, Abbassy A, Gamal S, Mekhaimar M, Qayati M, Reyes M, Park JE, Yun J, Kim HS, Mahajan A, Muzi M, Benson S, Beets-Tan RGH, Teuwen J, Herrera-Trujillo A, Trujillo M, Escobar W, Abello A, Bernal J, Gómez J, Choi J, Baek S, Kim Y, Ismael H, Allen B, Buatti JM, Kotrotsou A, Li H, Weiss T, Weller M, Bink A, Pouymayou B, Shaykh HF, Saltz J, Prasanna P, Shrestha S, Mani KM, Payne D, Kurc T, Pelaez E, Franco-Maldonado H, Loayza F, Quevedo S, Guevara P, Torche E, Mendoza C, Vera F, Ríos E, López E, Velastin SA, Ogbole G, Soneye M, Oyekunle D, Odafe-Oyibotha O, Osobu B, Shu'aibu M, Dorcas A, Dako F, Simpson AL, Hamghalam M, Peoples JJ, Hu R, Tran A, Cutler D, Moraes FY, Boss MA, Gimpel J, Veettil DK, Schmidt K, Bialecki B, Marella S, Price C, Cimino L, Apgar C, Shah P, Menze B, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Martin J, Bakas S. Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection. Nat Commun 2022; 13:7346. [PMID: 36470898 PMCID: PMC9722782 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33407-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Although machine learning (ML) has shown promise across disciplines, out-of-sample generalizability is concerning. This is currently addressed by sharing multi-site data, but such centralization is challenging/infeasible to scale due to various limitations. Federated ML (FL) provides an alternative paradigm for accurate and generalizable ML, by only sharing numerical model updates. Here we present the largest FL study to-date, involving data from 71 sites across 6 continents, to generate an automatic tumor boundary detector for the rare disease of glioblastoma, reporting the largest such dataset in the literature (n = 6, 314). We demonstrate a 33% delineation improvement for the surgically targetable tumor, and 23% for the complete tumor extent, over a publicly trained model. We anticipate our study to: 1) enable more healthcare studies informed by large diverse data, ensuring meaningful results for rare diseases and underrepresented populations, 2) facilitate further analyses for glioblastoma by releasing our consensus model, and 3) demonstrate the FL effectiveness at such scale and task-complexity as a paradigm shift for multi-site collaborations, alleviating the need for data-sharing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Satyam Ghodasara
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gianluca Brugnara
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Felix Sahm
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) within the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Maier-Hein
- Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Zenk
- Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) within the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Evan Calabrese
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Rudie
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Javier Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Soonmee Cha
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Madhura Ingalhalikar
- Symbiosis Center for Medical Image Analysis, Symbiosis International University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Manali Jadhav
- Symbiosis Center for Medical Image Analysis, Symbiosis International University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Umang Pandey
- Symbiosis Center for Medical Image Analysis, Symbiosis International University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jitender Saini
- Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - John Garrett
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Matthew Larson
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert Jeraj
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Stuart Currie
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Department of Radiology, Leeds, UK
| | - Russell Frood
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Department of Radiology, Leeds, UK
| | - Kavi Fatania
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Department of Radiology, Leeds, UK
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ken Chang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Josep Puig
- Department of Radiology (IDI), Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IdIBGi), Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain
| | - Johannes Trenkler
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Neuromed Campus (NMC), Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Josef Pichler
- Department of Neurooncology, Neuromed Campus (NMC), Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Georg Necker
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Neuromed Campus (NMC), Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Andreas Haunschmidt
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Neuromed Campus (NMC), Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Stephan Meckel
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Neuromed Campus (NMC), Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christiana Care Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Spencer Liem
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gregory S Alexander
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph Lombardo
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Adam E Flanders
- Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Haris I Sair
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, The Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Craig K Jones
- The Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, The Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Archana Venkataraman
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meirui Jiang
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tiffany Y So
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Cheng Chen
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Qi Dou
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Michal Kozubek
- Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Filip Lux
- Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Michálek
- Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Matula
- Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Miloš Keřkovský
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tereza Kopřivová
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marek Dostál
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Václav Vybíhal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, and University Hospital and Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neuro Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - J Ross Mitchell
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Joaquim Farinhas
- Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Marco C Pinho
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Divya Reddy
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - James Holcomb
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CaA, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CaA, USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Talia Oughourlian
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Chencai Wang
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Minh-Son To
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Sargam Bhardwaj
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Chee Chong
- South Australia Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Marc Agzarian
- South Australia Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Bernardo C A Teixeira
- Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Flávia Sprenger
- Department of Radiology, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - David Menotti
- Department of Informatics, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Diego R Lucio
- Department of Informatics, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Pamela LaMontagne
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Daniel Marcus
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TranslaTUM (Zentralinstitut für translationale Krebsforschung der Technischen Universität München), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kofler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TranslaTUM (Zentralinstitut für translationale Krebsforschung der Technischen Universität München), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Image-Based Biomedical Modeling, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ivan Ezhov
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- TranslaTUM (Zentralinstitut für translationale Krebsforschung der Technischen Universität München), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Image-Based Biomedical Modeling, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marie Metz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rajan Jain
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Lee
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yvonne W Lui
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard McKinley
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Slotboom
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Piotr Radojewski
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Meier
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Wiest
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Derrick Murcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Eric Fu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rourke Haas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - John Thompson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - David Ryan Ormond
- Department of Neurosurgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Chaitra Badve
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew E Sloan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals-Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vachan Vadmal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kristin Waite
- National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rivka R Colen
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Linmin Pei
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Murat Ak
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ashok Srinivasan
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - J Rajiv Bapuraj
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Arvind Rao
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicholas Wang
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ota Yoshiaki
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Toshio Moritani
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sevcan Turk
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Joonsang Lee
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Snehal Prabhudesai
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Fanny Morón
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jacob Mandel
- Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Konstantinos Kamnitsas
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ben Glocker
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Luke V M Dixon
- Department of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Williams
- Computational Oncology Group, Institute for Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Peter Zampakis
- Department of NeuroRadiology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Panagiotis Tsiganos
- Clinical Radiology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Sotiris Alexiou
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Ilias Haliassos
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Evangelia I Zacharaki
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sung Soo Ahn
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bing Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Laila Poisson
- Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ning Wen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- SJTU-Ruijin-UIH Institute for Medical Imaging Technology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200025, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Ruchika Verma
- Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rohan Bareja
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ipsa Yadav
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Neeraj Kumar
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sebastian R van der Voort
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ahmed Alafandi
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fatih Incekara
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten M J Wijnenga
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Georgios Kapsas
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Renske Gahrmann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joost W Schouten
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hendrikus J Dubbink
- Department of Pathology, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arnaud J P E Vincent
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pim J French
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefan Klein
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yading Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tzu-Chi Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Saba Adabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simone P Niclou
- NORLUX Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Olivier Keunen
- Translation Radiomics, Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Ann-Christin Hau
- NORLUX Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Luxembourg Center of Neuropathology, Laboratoire National De Santé, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Martin Vallières
- Department of Computer Science, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalière Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - David Fortin
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalière Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Martin Lepage
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalière Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Sherbrooke Molecular Imaging Centre, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Bennett Landman
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Karthik Ramadass
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kaiwen Xu
- Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Silky Chotai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lola B Chambless
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Akshitkumar Mistry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Reid C Thompson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yuriy Gusev
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics (ICBI), Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Krithika Bhuvaneshwar
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics (ICBI), Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anousheh Sayah
- Division of Neuroradiology & Neurointerventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Camelia Bencheqroun
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics (ICBI), Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anas Belouali
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics (ICBI), Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Subha Madhavan
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics (ICBI), Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Thomas C Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neuroradiology, Ruskin Wing, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alysha Chelliah
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Marc Modat
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Haris Shuaib
- Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Mandeville Road, Aylesbury, UK
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Carmen Dragos
- Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Mandeville Road, Aylesbury, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Shady Gamal
- University of Cairo School of Medicine, Giza, Egypt
| | | | | | | | - Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jihye Yun
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Abhishek Mahajan
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mark Muzi
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sean Benson
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - William Escobar
- Clínica Imbanaco Grupo Quirón Salud, Cali, Colombia
- Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | | | - Jose Bernal
- Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
- The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Joseph Choi
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa, USA
| | - Stephen Baek
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Yusung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Heba Ismael
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Bryan Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - John M Buatti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Hongwei Li
- Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Weiss
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Bink
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bertrand Pouymayou
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Prateek Prasanna
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Sampurna Shrestha
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Kartik M Mani
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - David Payne
- Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Tahsin Kurc
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Scientific Data Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
| | - Enrique Pelaez
- Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador
| | | | - Francis Loayza
- Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador
| | | | | | | | | | - Franco Vera
- Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Biobío, Chile
| | - Elvis Ríos
- Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Biobío, Chile
| | - Eduardo López
- Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Biobío, Chile
| | - Sergio A Velastin
- School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Godwin Ogbole
- Department of Radiology, University College Hospital Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria
| | - Mayowa Soneye
- Department of Radiology, University College Hospital Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria
| | - Dotun Oyekunle
- Department of Radiology, University College Hospital Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria
| | | | - Babatunde Osobu
- Department of Radiology, University College Hospital Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria
| | - Mustapha Shu'aibu
- Department of Radiology, Muhammad Abdullahi Wase Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Adeleye Dorcas
- Department of Radiology, Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, Ile-Ife, Osun, Nigeria
| | - Farouk Dako
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Global Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amber L Simpson
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Mohammad Hamghalam
- School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
| | - Jacob J Peoples
- School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Ricky Hu
- School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Anh Tran
- School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Danielle Cutler
- The Faculty of Arts & Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Fabio Y Moraes
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Michael A Boss
- Center for Research and Innovation, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James Gimpel
- Center for Research and Innovation, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Deepak Kattil Veettil
- Center for Research and Innovation, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kendall Schmidt
- Data Science Institute, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA
| | - Brian Bialecki
- Data Science Institute, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA
| | - Sailaja Marella
- Center for Research and Innovation, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cynthia Price
- Center for Research and Innovation, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lisa Cimino
- Center for Research and Innovation, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Charles Apgar
- Center for Research and Innovation, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Bjoern Menze
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cost Matrix of Molecular Pathology in Glioma-Towards AI-Driven Rational Molecular Testing and Precision Care for the Future. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123029. [PMID: 36551786 PMCID: PMC9775648 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common and aggressive primary brain tumors. Gliomas carry a poor prognosis because of the tumor's resistance to radiation and chemotherapy leading to nearly universal recurrence. Recent advances in large-scale genomic research have allowed for the development of more targeted therapies to treat glioma. While precision medicine can target specific molecular features in glioma, targeted therapies are often not feasible due to the lack of actionable markers and the high cost of molecular testing. This review summarizes the clinically relevant molecular features in glioma and the current cost of care for glioma patients, focusing on the molecular markers and meaningful clinical features that are linked to clinical outcomes and have a realistic possibility of being measured, which is a promising direction for precision medicine using artificial intelligence approaches.
Collapse
|
18
|
Pati S, Baid U, Edwards B, Sheller MJ, Foley P, Reina GA, Thakur S, Sako C, Bilello M, Davatzikos C, Martin J, Shah P, Menze B, Bakas S. The federated tumor segmentation (FeTS) tool: an open-source solution to further solid tumor research. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac9449. [PMID: 36137534 PMCID: PMC9592188 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective.De-centralized data analysis becomes an increasingly preferred option in the healthcare domain, as it alleviates the need for sharing primary patient data across collaborating institutions. This highlights the need for consistent harmonized data curation, pre-processing, and identification of regions of interest based on uniform criteria.Approach.Towards this end, this manuscript describes theFederatedTumorSegmentation (FeTS) tool, in terms of software architecture and functionality.Main results.The primary aim of the FeTS tool is to facilitate this harmonized processing and the generation of gold standard reference labels for tumor sub-compartments on brain magnetic resonance imaging, and further enable federated training of a tumor sub-compartment delineation model across numerous sites distributed across the globe, without the need to share patient data.Significance.Building upon existing open-source tools such as the Insight Toolkit and Qt, the FeTS tool is designed to enable training deep learning models targeting tumor delineation in either centralized or federated settings. The target audience of the FeTS tool is primarily the computational researcher interested in developing federated learning models, and interested in joining a global federation towards this effort. The tool is open sourced athttps://github.com/FETS-AI/Front-End.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Siddhesh Thakur
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Bjoern Menze
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhao R, Zhuge Y, Camphausen K, Krauze AV. Machine learning based survival prediction in Glioma using large-scale registry data. Health Informatics J 2022; 28:14604582221135427. [PMID: 36264067 PMCID: PMC10673681 DOI: 10.1177/14604582221135427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common central nervous system tumors exhibiting poor clinical outcomes. The ability to estimate prognosis is crucial for both patients and providers in order to select the most appropriate treatment. Machine learning (ML) allows for sophisticated approaches to survival prediction using real world clinical parameters needed to achieve superior predictive accuracy. We employed Cox Proportional hazards (CPH) model, Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, Random Forest (RF) model in a large glioma dataset (3462 patients, diagnosed 2000-2018) to explore the most optimal approach to survival prediction. Features employed were age, sex, surgical resection status, tumor histology and tumor site, administration of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy status. Concordance index (c-index) was employed to assess the accuracy of survival time prediction. All three models performed well with prediction accuracy (CI 0.767, 0.771, 0.57 for CPH, SVM, RF models respectively) with the best performance achieved when incorporating RT and chemotherapy administration status which emerged as key predictive features. Within the subset of glioblastoma patients, similar prediction accuracy was achieved. These findings should prompt stricter clinician oversight over registry data accuracy through quality assurance as we move towards meaningful predictive ability using ML approaches in glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Andra V Krauze
- 3421National Cancer Institute, NIH, USA; 184934BC Cancer Surrey, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bakas S, Sako C, Akbari H, Bilello M, Sotiras A, Shukla G, Rudie JD, Santamaría NF, Kazerooni AF, Pati S, Rathore S, Mamourian E, Ha SM, Parker W, Doshi J, Baid U, Bergman M, Binder ZA, Verma R, Lustig RA, Desai AS, Bagley SJ, Mourelatos Z, Morrissette J, Watt CD, Brem S, Wolf RL, Melhem ER, Nasrallah MP, Mohan S, O'Rourke DM, Davatzikos C. The University of Pennsylvania glioblastoma (UPenn-GBM) cohort: advanced MRI, clinical, genomics, & radiomics. Sci Data 2022; 9:453. [PMID: 35906241 PMCID: PMC9338035 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01560-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive adult brain tumor. Numerous studies have reported results from either private institutional data or publicly available datasets. However, current public datasets are limited in terms of: a) number of subjects, b) lack of consistent acquisition protocol, c) data quality, or d) accompanying clinical, demographic, and molecular information. Toward alleviating these limitations, we contribute the "University of Pennsylvania Glioblastoma Imaging, Genomics, and Radiomics" (UPenn-GBM) dataset, which describes the currently largest publicly available comprehensive collection of 630 patients diagnosed with de novo glioblastoma. The UPenn-GBM dataset includes (a) advanced multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging scans acquired during routine clinical practice, at the University of Pennsylvania Health System, (b) accompanying clinical, demographic, and molecular information, (d) perfusion and diffusion derivative volumes, (e) computationally-derived and manually-revised expert annotations of tumor sub-regions, as well as (f) quantitative imaging (also known as radiomic) features corresponding to each of these regions. This collection describes our contribution towards repeatable, reproducible, and comparative quantitative studies leading to new predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christiana Care Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Rudie
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Natali Flores Santamaría
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mamourian
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sung Min Ha
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - William Parker
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jimit Doshi
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark Bergman
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zev A Binder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ragini Verma
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert A Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Arati S Desai
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zissimos Mourelatos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Morrissette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher D Watt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ronald L Wolf
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elias R Melhem
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Clinical measures, radiomics, and genomics offer synergistic value in AI-based prediction of overall survival in patients with glioblastoma. Sci Rep 2022; 12:8784. [PMID: 35610333 PMCID: PMC9130299 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12699-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Multi-omic data, i.e., clinical measures, radiomic, and genetic data, capture multi-faceted tumor characteristics, contributing to a comprehensive patient risk assessment. Here, we investigate the additive value and independent reproducibility of integrated diagnostics in prediction of overall survival (OS) in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GBM patients, by combining conventional and deep learning methods. Conventional radiomics and deep learning features were extracted from pre-operative multi-parametric MRI of 516 GBM patients. Support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were trained on the radiomic features in the discovery cohort (n = 404) to categorize patient groups of high-risk (OS < 6 months) vs all, and low-risk (OS ≥ 18 months) vs all. The trained radiomic model was independently tested in the replication cohort (n = 112) and a patient-wise survival prediction index was produced. Multivariate Cox-PH models were generated for the replication cohort, first based on clinical measures solely, and then by layering on radiomics and molecular information. Evaluation of the high-risk and low-risk classifiers in the discovery/replication cohorts revealed area under the ROC curves (AUCs) of 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.85)/0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.79) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.84)/0.63 (95% CI 0.52-0.71), respectively. Cox-PH modeling showed a concordance index of 0.65 (95% CI 0.6-0.7) for clinical data improving to 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.79) for the combination of all omics. This study signifies the value of integrated diagnostics for improved prediction of OS in GBM.
Collapse
|
22
|
Booth TC, Grzeda M, Chelliah A, Roman A, Al Busaidi A, Dragos C, Shuaib H, Luis A, Mirchandani A, Alparslan B, Mansoor N, Lavrador J, Vergani F, Ashkan K, Modat M, Ourselin S. Imaging Biomarkers of Glioblastoma Treatment Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Machine Learning Studies. Front Oncol 2022; 12:799662. [PMID: 35174084 PMCID: PMC8842649 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.799662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Monitoring biomarkers using machine learning (ML) may determine glioblastoma treatment response. We systematically reviewed quality and performance accuracy of recently published studies. METHODS Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Diagnostic Test Accuracy, we extracted articles from MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Register between 09/2018-01/2021. Included study participants were adults with glioblastoma having undergone standard treatment (maximal resection, radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide), and follow-up imaging to determine treatment response status (specifically, distinguishing progression/recurrence from progression/recurrence mimics, the target condition). Using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Two/Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging, we assessed bias risk and applicability concerns. We determined test set performance accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, balanced accuracy). We used a bivariate random-effect model to determine pooled sensitivity, specificity, area-under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). Pooled measures of balanced accuracy, positive/negative likelihood ratios (PLR/NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. PROSPERO registered (CRD42021261965). RESULTS Eighteen studies were included (1335/384 patients for training/testing respectively). Small patient numbers, high bias risk, applicability concerns (particularly confounding in reference standard and patient selection) and low level of evidence, allow limited conclusions from studies. Ten studies (10/18, 56%) included in meta-analysis gave 0.769 (0.649-0.858) sensitivity [pooled (95% CI)]; 0.648 (0.749-0.532) specificity; 0.706 (0.623-0.779) balanced accuracy; 2.220 (1.560-3.140) PLR; 0.366 (0.213-0.572) NLR; 6.670 (2.800-13.500) DOR; 0.765 ROC-AUC. CONCLUSION ML models using MRI features to distinguish between progression and mimics appear to demonstrate good diagnostic performance. However, study quality and design require improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas C. Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neuroradiology, King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mariusz Grzeda
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alysha Chelliah
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrei Roman
- Department of Radiology, Guy’s & St. Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, The Oncology Institute “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă” Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Ayisha Al Busaidi
- Department of Neuroradiology, King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carmen Dragos
- Department of Radiology, Buckinghamshire Healthcare National Health Service Trust, Amersham, United Kingdom
| | - Haris Shuaib
- Department of Medical Physics, Guy’s & St. Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aysha Luis
- Department of Neuroradiology, King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ayesha Mirchandani
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Burcu Alparslan
- Department of Neuroradiology, King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Kocaeli University, İzmit, Turkey
| | - Nina Mansoor
- Department of Neuroradiology, King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jose Lavrador
- Department of Neurosurgery, King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Francesco Vergani
- Department of Neurosurgery, King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Keyoumars Ashkan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Modat
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastien Ourselin
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Thakur SP, Pati S, Panchumarthy R, Karkada D, Wu J, Kurtaev D, Sako C, Shah P, Bakas S. Optimization of Deep Learning Based Brain Extraction in MRI for Low Resource Environments. BRAINLESION : GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES. BRAINLES (WORKSHOP) 2022; 12962:151-167. [PMID: 36331281 PMCID: PMC9627678 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-08999-2_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Brain extraction is an indispensable step in neuro-imaging with a direct impact on downstream analyses. Most such methods have been developed for non-pathologically affected brains, and hence tend to suffer in performance when applied on brains with pathologies, e.g., gliomas, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injuries. Deep Learning (DL) methodologies for healthcare have shown promising results, but their clinical translation has been limited, primarily due to these methods suffering from i) high computational cost, and ii) specific hardware requirements, e.g., DL acceleration cards. In this study, we explore the potential of mathematical optimizations, towards making DL methods amenable to application in low resource environments. We focus on both the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of such optimizations on an existing DL brain extraction method, designed for pathologically-affected brains and agnostic to the input modality. We conduct direct optimizations and quantization of the trained model (i.e., prior to inference on new data). Our results yield substantial gains, in terms of speedup, latency, through-put, and reduction in memory usage, while the segmentation performance of the initial and the optimized models remains stable, i.e., as quantified by both the Dice Similarity Coefficient and the Hausdorff Distance. These findings support post-training optimizations as a promising approach for enabling the execution of advanced DL methodologies on plain commercial-grade CPUs, and hence contributing to their translation in limited- and low- resource clinical environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhesh P Thakur
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ravi Panchumarthy
- Intel Health and Life Sciences, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Deepthi Karkada
- Intel Health and Life Sciences, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Junwen Wu
- Intel Health and Life Sciences, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Dmitry Kurtaev
- Intel Health and Life Sciences, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Prashant Shah
- Intel Health and Life Sciences, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Krauze AV, Camphausen K. Molecular Biology in Treatment Decision Processes-Neuro-Oncology Edition. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:13278. [PMID: 34948075 PMCID: PMC8703419 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Computational approaches including machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence are growing in importance in all medical specialties as large data repositories are increasingly being optimised. Radiation oncology as a discipline is at the forefront of large-scale data acquisition and well positioned towards both the production and analysis of large-scale oncologic data with the potential for clinically driven endpoints and advancement of patient outcomes. Neuro-oncology is comprised of malignancies that often carry poor prognosis and significant neurological sequelae. The analysis of radiation therapy mediated treatment and the potential for computationally mediated analyses may lead to more precise therapy by employing large scale data. We analysed the state of the literature pertaining to large scale data, computational analysis, and the advancement of molecular biomarkers in neuro-oncology with emphasis on radiation oncology. We aimed to connect existing and evolving approaches to realistic avenues for clinical implementation focusing on low grade gliomas (LGG), high grade gliomas (HGG), management of the elderly patient with HGG, rare central nervous system tumors, craniospinal irradiation, and re-irradiation to examine how computational analysis and molecular science may synergistically drive advances in personalised radiation therapy (RT) and optimise patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra V. Krauze
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fathi Kazerooni A, Bagley SJ, Akbari H, Saxena S, Bagheri S, Guo J, Chawla S, Nabavizadeh A, Mohan S, Bakas S, Davatzikos C, Nasrallah MP. Applications of Radiomics and Radiogenomics in High-Grade Gliomas in the Era of Precision Medicine. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235921. [PMID: 34885031 PMCID: PMC8656630 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiomics and radiogenomics offer new insight into high-grade glioma biology, as well as into glioma behavior in response to standard therapies. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the role of radiomics in providing more accurate diagnoses, prognostication, and surveillance of patients with high-grade glioma, and on the potential application of radiomics in clinical practice, with the overarching goal of advancing precision medicine for optimal patient care. Abstract Machine learning (ML) integrated with medical imaging has introduced new perspectives in precision diagnostics of high-grade gliomas, through radiomics and radiogenomics. This has raised hopes for characterizing noninvasive and in vivo biomarkers for prediction of patient survival, tumor recurrence, and genomics and therefore encouraging treatments tailored to individualized needs. Characterization of tumor infiltration based on pre-operative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) scans may allow prediction of the loci of future tumor recurrence and thereby aid in planning the course of treatment for the patients, such as optimizing the extent of resection and the dose and target area of radiation. Imaging signatures of tumor genomics can help in identifying the patients who benefit from certain targeted therapies. Specifying molecular properties of gliomas and prediction of their changes over time and with treatment would allow optimization of treatment. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the promise of radiomics and radiogenomics for allowing personalized treatments of patients with gliomas and discuss the challenges and limitations of these methods in multi-institutional clinical trials and suggestions to mitigate the issues and the future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Stephen J. Bagley
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sina Bagheri
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Jun Guo
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Ali Nabavizadeh
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - MacLean P. Nasrallah
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Predicting Short-Term Survival after Gross Total or Near Total Resection in Glioblastomas by Machine Learning-Based Radiomic Analysis of Preoperative MRI. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13205047. [PMID: 34680199 PMCID: PMC8533879 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiomics, in combination with artificial intelligence, has emerged as a powerful tool for the development of predictive models in neuro-oncology. Our study aims to find an answer to a clinically relevant question: is there a radiomic profile that can identify glioblastoma (GBM) patients with short-term survival after complete tumor resection? A retrospective study of GBM patients who underwent surgery was conducted in two institutions between January 2019 and January 2020, along with cases from public databases. Cases with gross total or near total tumor resection were included. Preoperative structural multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) sequences were pre-processed, and a total of 15,720 radiomic features were extracted. After feature reduction, machine learning-based classifiers were used to predict early mortality (<6 months). Additionally, a survival analysis was performed using the random survival forest (RSF) algorithm. A total of 203 patients were enrolled in this study. In the classification task, the naive Bayes classifier obtained the best results in the test data set, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.769 and classification accuracy of 80%. The RSF model allowed the stratification of patients into low- and high-risk groups. In the test data set, this model obtained values of C-Index = 0.61, IBS = 0.123 and integrated AUC at six months of 0.761. In this study, we developed a reliable predictive model of short-term survival in GBM by applying open-source and user-friendly computational means. These new tools will assist clinicians in adapting our therapeutic approach considering individual patient characteristics.
Collapse
|
27
|
Sulman EP, Eisenstat DD. World Cancer Day 2021 - Perspectives in Pediatric and Adult Neuro-Oncology. Front Oncol 2021; 11:659800. [PMID: 34041027 PMCID: PMC8142853 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.659800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Significant advances in our understanding of the molecular genetics of pediatric and adult brain tumors and the resulting rapid expansion of clinical molecular neuropathology have led to improvements in diagnostic accuracy and identified new targets for therapy. Moreover, there have been major improvements in all facets of clinical care, including imaging, surgery, radiation and supportive care. In selected cohorts of patients, targeted and immunotherapies have resulted in improved patient outcomes. Furthermore, adaptations to clinical trial design have facilitated our study of new agents and other therapeutic innovations. However, considerable work remains to be done towards extending survival for all patients with primary brain tumors, especially children and adults with diffuse midline gliomas harboring Histone H3 K27 mutations and adults with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type, O6 guanine DNA-methyltransferase gene (MGMT) promoter unmethylated high grade gliomas. In addition to improvements in therapy and care, access to the advances in technology, such as particle radiation or biologic therapy, neuroimaging and molecular diagnostics in both developing and developed countries is needed to improve the outcome of patients with brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik P. Sulman
- Section of Neuro-oncology & Neurosurgical Oncology, Frontiers in Oncology and Frontiers in Neurology, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Brain and Spine Tumor Center, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - David D. Eisenstat
- Section of Neuro-oncology & Neurosurgical Oncology, Frontiers in Oncology and Frontiers in Neurology, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Children’s Cancer Centre, Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The 2016 World Health Organization brain tumor classification is based on genomic and molecular profile of tumor tissue. These characteristics have improved understanding of the brain tumor and played an important role in treatment planning and prognostication. There is an ongoing effort to develop noninvasive imaging techniques that provide insight into tissue characteristics at the cellular and molecular levels. This article focuses on the molecular characteristics of gliomas, transcriptomic subtypes, and radiogenomic studies using semantic and radiomic features. The limitations and future directions of radiogenomics as a standalone diagnostic tool also are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaitra Badve
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, BSH 5056, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | - Sangam Kanekar
- Department of Radiology and Neurology, Division of Neuroradiology, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton Hershey Medical Center, Mail Code H066 500, University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Menze B, Isensee F, Wiest R, Wiestler B, Maier-Hein K, Reyes M, Bakas S. Analyzing magnetic resonance imaging data from glioma patients using deep learning. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2021; 88:101828. [PMID: 33571780 PMCID: PMC8040671 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The quantitative analysis of images acquired in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with brain tumors has seen a significant rise in the clinical use of computational tools. The underlying technology to the vast majority of these tools are machine learning methods and, in particular, deep learning algorithms. This review offers clinical background information of key diagnostic biomarkers in the diagnosis of glioma, the most common primary brain tumor. It offers an overview of publicly available resources and datasets for developing new computational tools and image biomarkers, with emphasis on those related to the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge. We further offer an overview of the state-of-the-art methods in glioma image segmentation, again with an emphasis on publicly available tools and deep learning algorithms that emerged in the context of the BraTS challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjoern Menze
- Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | | | - Roland Wiest
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rathore S, Mohan S, Bakas S, Sako C, Badve C, Pati S, Singh A, Bounias D, Ngo P, Akbari H, Gastounioti A, Bergman M, Bilello M, Shinohara RT, Yushkevich P, O'Rourke DM, Sloan AE, Kontos D, Nasrallah MP, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Davatzikos C. Multi-institutional noninvasive in vivo characterization of IDH, 1p/19q, and EGFRvIII in glioma using neuro-Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (neuro-CaPTk). Neurooncol Adv 2021; 2:iv22-iv34. [PMID: 33521638 PMCID: PMC7829474 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gliomas represent a biologically heterogeneous group of primary brain tumors with uncontrolled cellular proliferation and diffuse infiltration that renders them almost incurable, thereby leading to a grim prognosis. Recent comprehensive genomic profiling has greatly elucidated the molecular hallmarks of gliomas, including the mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2), loss of chromosomes 1p and 19q (1p/19q), and epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII). Detection of these molecular alterations is based on ex vivo analysis of surgically resected tissue specimen that sometimes is not adequate for testing and/or does not capture the spatial tumor heterogeneity of the neoplasm. Methods We developed a method for noninvasive detection of radiogenomic markers of IDH both in lower-grade gliomas (WHO grade II and III tumors) and glioblastoma (WHO grade IV), 1p/19q in IDH-mutant lower-grade gliomas, and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma. Preoperative MRIs of 473 glioma patients from 3 of the studies participating in the ReSPOND consortium (collection I: Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania [HUP: n = 248], collection II: The Cancer Imaging Archive [TCIA; n = 192], and collection III: Ohio Brain Tumor Study [OBTS, n = 33]) were collected. Neuro-Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (neuro-CaPTk), a modular platform available for cancer imaging analytics and machine learning, was leveraged to extract histogram, shape, anatomical, and texture features from delineated tumor subregions and to integrate these features using support vector machine to generate models predictive of IDH, 1p/19q, and EGFRvIII. The models were validated using 3 configurations: (1) 70-30% training-testing splits or 10-fold cross-validation within individual collections, (2) 70-30% training-testing splits within merged collections, and (3) training on one collection and testing on another. Results These models achieved a classification accuracy of 86.74% (HUP), 85.45% (TCIA), and 75.15% (TCIA) in identifying EGFRvIII, IDH, and 1p/19q, respectively, in configuration I. The model, when applied on combined data in configuration II, yielded a classification success rate of 82.50% in predicting IDH mutation (HUP + TCIA + OBTS). The model when trained on TCIA dataset yielded classification accuracy of 84.88% in predicting IDH in HUP dataset. Conclusions Using machine learning algorithms, high accuracy was achieved in the prediction of IDH, 1p/19q, and EGFRvIII mutation. Neuro-CaPTk encompasses all the pipelines required to replicate these analyses in multi-institutional settings and could also be used for other radio(geno)mic analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chaitra Badve
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ashish Singh
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dimitrios Bounias
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Phuc Ngo
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aimilia Gastounioti
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark Bergman
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Paul Yushkevich
- Penn Image Computing and Science Lab (PICSL), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew E Sloan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Despina Kontos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Beig N, Bera K, Tiwari P. Introduction to radiomics and radiogenomics in neuro-oncology: implications and challenges. Neurooncol Adv 2020; 2:iv3-iv14. [PMID: 33521636 PMCID: PMC7829475 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuro-oncology largely consists of malignancies of the brain and central nervous system including both primary as well as metastatic tumors. Currently, a significant clinical challenge in neuro-oncology is to tailor therapies for patients based on a priori knowledge of their survival outcome or treatment response to conventional or experimental therapies. Radiomics or the quantitative extraction of subvisual data from conventional radiographic imaging has recently emerged as a powerful data-driven approach to offer insights into clinically relevant questions related to diagnosis, prediction, prognosis, as well as assessing treatment response. Furthermore, radiogenomic approaches provide a mechanism to establish statistical correlations of radiomic features with point mutations and next-generation sequencing data to further leverage the potential of routine MRI scans to serve as "virtual biopsy" maps. In this review, we provide an introduction to radiomic and radiogenomic approaches in neuro-oncology, including a brief description of the workflow involving preprocessing, tumor segmentation, and extraction of "hand-crafted" features from the segmented region of interest, as well as identifying radiogenomic associations that could ultimately lead to the development of reliable prognostic and predictive models in neuro-oncology applications. Lastly, we discuss the promise of radiomics and radiogenomic approaches in personalizing treatment decisions in neuro-oncology, as well as the challenges with clinical adoption, which will rely heavily on their demonstrated resilience to nonstandardization in imaging protocols across sites and scanners, as well as in their ability to demonstrate reproducibility across large multi-institutional cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niha Beig
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kaustav Bera
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Pallavi Tiwari
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sheller MJ, Edwards B, Reina GA, Martin J, Pati S, Kotrotsou A, Milchenko M, Xu W, Marcus D, Colen RR, Bakas S. Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Sci Rep 2020; 10:12598. [PMID: 32724046 PMCID: PMC7387485 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69250-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 280] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Several studies underscore the potential of deep learning in identifying complex patterns, leading to diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Identifying sufficiently large and diverse datasets, required for training, is a significant challenge in medicine and can rarely be found in individual institutions. Multi-institutional collaborations based on centrally-shared patient data face privacy and ownership challenges. Federated learning is a novel paradigm for data-private multi-institutional collaborations, where model-learning leverages all available data without sharing data between institutions, by distributing the model-training to the data-owners and aggregating their results. We show that federated learning among 10 institutions results in models reaching 99% of the model quality achieved with centralized data, and evaluate generalizability on data from institutions outside the federation. We further investigate the effects of data distribution across collaborating institutions on model quality and learning patterns, indicating that increased access to data through data private multi-institutional collaborations can benefit model quality more than the errors introduced by the collaborative method. Finally, we compare with other collaborative-learning approaches demonstrating the superiority of federated learning, and discuss practical implementation considerations. Clinical adoption of federated learning is expected to lead to models trained on datasets of unprecedented size, hence have a catalytic impact towards precision/personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah J Sheller
- Intel Corporation, 2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA, 95052, USA
| | - Brandon Edwards
- Intel Corporation, 2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA, 95052, USA
| | - G Anthony Reina
- Intel Corporation, 2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA, 95052, USA
| | - Jason Martin
- Intel Corporation, 2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA, 95052, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Floor 7, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Floor 7, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Aikaterini Kotrotsou
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1881 East Rd, 3SCRB4, Houston, TX, 77054, USA
| | - Mikhail Milchenko
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Weilin Xu
- Intel Corporation, 2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA, 95052, USA
| | - Daniel Marcus
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Rivka R Colen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1881 East Rd, 3SCRB4, Houston, TX, 77054, USA
- Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Floor 7, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Floor 7, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Floor 7, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mahajan A, Bothra M. Mining artificial intelligence in oncology: Tata Memorial Hospital journey. CANCER RESEARCH, STATISTICS, AND TREATMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/crst.crst_59_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
|