1
|
Robertson FC, Nahed BV, Barkhoudarian G, Veeravagu A, Berg D, Kalkanis S, Olson JJ, Germano IM. American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of the Neurological Surgeons Section on Tumors Guidelines: Assessing Their Impact on Brain Tumor Clinical Practice. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01294. [PMID: 39028201 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical guidelines direct healthcare professionals toward evidence-based practices. Evaluating guideline impact can elucidate information penetration, relevance, effectiveness, and alignment with evolving medical knowledge and technological advancements. As the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Section on Tumors marks its 40th anniversary in 2024, this article reflects on the tumor guidelines established by the Section over the past decade and explores their impact on other publications, patents, and information dissemination. Six tumor guideline categories were reviewed: low-grade glioma, newly diagnosed glioblastoma, progressive glioblastoma, metastatic brain tumors, vestibular schwannoma, and pituitary adenomas. Citation data were collected from Google Scholar and PubMed. Further online statistics, such as social media reach, and features in policy, news, and patents were sourced from Altmetric. Online engagement was assessed through website and CNS+ mobile application visits. Data were normalized to time since publication. Metastatic Tumor guidelines (2019) had the highest PubMed citation rate at 26.1 per year and webpage visits (29 100 page views 1/1/2019-9/30/2023). Notably, this guideline had two endorsement publications by partner societies, the Society of Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology, concerning antiepileptic prophylaxis and steroid use, and the greatest reach on X (19.7 mentions/y). Citation rates on Google Scholar were led by Vestibular Schwannoma (2018). Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenoma led Mendeley reads. News, patent, or policy publications were led by low-grade glioma at 1.5/year. Our study shows that the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Section on Tumors guidelines go beyond citations in peer-reviewed publications to include patents, online engagement, and information dissemination to the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith C Robertson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian V Nahed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Garni Barkhoudarian
- Neurosurgery Division, Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Anand Veeravagu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David Berg
- Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Steven Kalkanis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Medical System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Isabelle M Germano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zoghbi M, Moussa MJ, Dagher J, Haroun E, Qdaisat A, Singer ED, Karam YE, Yeung SCJ, Chaftari P. Brain Metastasis in the Emergency Department: Epidemiology, Presentation, Investigations, and Management. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2583. [PMID: 39061222 PMCID: PMC11274762 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) are the most prevalent type of cerebral tumor, significantly affecting survival. In adults, lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the primary cancers associated with BMs. Symptoms often result from brain compression, and patients may present to the emergency department (ED) with life-threatening conditions. The goal of treatment of BMs is to maximize survival and quality of life by choosing the least toxic therapy. Surgical resection followed by cavity radiation or definitive stereotactic radiosurgery remains the standard approach, depending on the patient's condition. Conversely, whole brain radiation therapy is becoming more limited to cases with multiple inoperable BMs and is less frequently used for postoperative control. BMs often signal advanced systemic disease, and patients usually present to the ED with poorly controlled symptoms, justifying hospitalization. Over half of patients with BMs in the ED are admitted, making effective ED-based management a challenge. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and current treatment options of patients with BMs. Additionally, it provides an overview of ED management and highlights the challenges faced in this setting. An improved understanding of the reasons for potentially avoidable hospitalizations in cancer patients with BMs is needed and could help emergency physicians distinguish patients who can be safely discharged from those who require observation or hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Zoghbi
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Mohammad Jad Moussa
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jim Dagher
- Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1100, Lebanon
| | - Elio Haroun
- Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1100, Lebanon
| | - Aiham Qdaisat
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Emad D. Singer
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yara E. Karam
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sai-Ching J. Yeung
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Chaftari
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shalmani AA, Wang A, Ahmed Z, Sheybanifard M, Mihyar R, Buhl EM, Pohl M, Hennink WE, Kiessling F, Metselaar JM, Shi Y, Lammers T, Peña Q. Tunable polymeric micelles for taxane and corticosteroid co-delivery. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2023:10.1007/s13346-023-01465-x. [PMID: 37962836 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-023-01465-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Nanomedicine holds promise for potentiating drug combination therapies. Increasing (pre)clinical evidence is available exemplifying the value of co-formulating and co-delivering different drugs in modular nanocarriers. Taxanes like paclitaxel (PTX) are widely used anticancer agents, and commonly combined with corticosteroids like dexamethasone (DEX), which besides for suppressing inflammation and infusion reactions, are increasingly explored for modulating the tumor microenvironment towards enhanced nano-chemotherapy delivery and efficacy. We here set out to develop a size- and release rate-tunable polymeric micelle platform for co-delivery of taxanes and corticosteroids. We synthesized amphiphilic mPEG-b-p(HPMAm-Bz) block copolymers of various molecular weights and used them to prepare PTX and DEX single- and double-loaded micelles of different sizes. Both drugs could be efficiently co-encapsulated, and systematic comparison between single- and co-loaded formulations demonstrated comparable physicochemical properties, encapsulation efficiencies, and release profiles. Larger micelles showed slower drug release, and DEX release was always faster than PTX. The versatility of the platform was exemplified by co-encapsulating two additional taxane-corticosteroid combinations, demonstrating that drug hydrophobicity and molecular weight are key properties that strongly contribute to drug retention in micelles. Altogether, our work shows that mPEG-b-p(HPMAm-Bz) polymeric micelles serve as a tunable and versatile nanoparticle platform for controlled co-delivery of taxanes and corticosteroids, thereby paving the way for using these micelles as a modular carrier for multidrug nanomedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Azadkhah Shalmani
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Alec Wang
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Zaheer Ahmed
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Maryam Sheybanifard
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Rahaf Mihyar
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Eva Miriam Buhl
- Electron Microscopy Facility, Institute of Pathology, RWTH University Hospital, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michael Pohl
- DWI - Leibniz-Institute for Interactive Materials, Forckenbeckstrasse 50, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Wim E Hennink
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, 3508 TB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Fabian Kiessling
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Josbert M Metselaar
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Yang Shi
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Twan Lammers
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Quim Peña
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstrasse 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agar MR, Nowak AK, Hovey EJ, Barnes EH, Simes J, Vardy JL, Wheeler HR, Kong BY, Leonard R, Hall M, Tim E, Spyridopoulos D, Sim HW, Lwin Z, Dowling A, Harrup R, Jennens R, Kichenadasse G, Dunlop T, Gzell C, Koh ES. Acetazolamide versus placebo for cerebral oedema requiring dexamethasone in recurrent and/or progressive high-grade glioma: phase II randomised placebo-controlled double-blind study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023; 13:354-362. [PMID: 36807048 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Symptoms of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) in recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) generally require corticosteroid treatment, often causing toxicity with variable effects on ICP symptoms. Acetazolamide reduces ICP when used in other clinical non-cancer settings. The aim of the study was to explore whether the addition of oral acetazolamide enables safe dexamethasone dose reduction in management of raised ICP in recurrent HGG. METHODS Participants had recurrent HGG with any of dexamethasone recommencement, dose increase or dependency; prior/current bevacizumab was an exclusion. Eligible participants were randomised 1:1 to acetazolamide or placebo for 8 weeks. Standardised protocols were used for dexamethasone dosing, with planned dose decrease from day 5 once ICP symptoms were stable. The primary endpoint was a composite of dexamethasone dose reduction and stable Karnofsky Performance Status Secondary endpoints included toxicity and feasibility. RESULTS Thirty participants (15 per group) were enrolled (mean age 58 years) from seven Australian sites. The mean baseline dexamethasone dose was 6.2 mg. Mean duration on study treatment was 38 days (placebo group) and 31 days (acetazolamide group) with nine participants (30%) completing all study treatments (six placebo, three acetazolamide). Study withdrawal was due to adverse events (n=6; one placebo, five acetazolamide) and disease progression (n=6 (three per arm)). Four participants (13%) (two per arm) were stable responders. Ten participants experienced a total of 13 serious adverse events (acetazolamide arm: five participants (33%), six events, two related). CONCLUSIONS The study closed early due to poor accrual and increasing availability of bevacizumab. The addition of acetazolamide did not facilitate dexamethasone reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12615001072505.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meera R Agar
- Palliative Care, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Hovey
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - John Simes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janette L Vardy
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Helen R Wheeler
- Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Benjamin Y Kong
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Leonard
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Merryn Hall
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Evonne Tim
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Hao-Wen Sim
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Zarnie Lwin
- Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anthony Dowling
- Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rosemary Harrup
- Medical Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Ross Jennens
- Medical Oncology, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ganessan Kichenadasse
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Health Care, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tracey Dunlop
- Medical Oncology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cecelia Gzell
- Genesis Care Pty Ltd, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
He J, He S, Zhang Y, Tian Y, Hao P, Li T, Xiao Y, Peng L, Feng Y, Cheng X, Deng H, Wang P, Chong W, Hai Y, Chen L, You C, Jia L, Chen D, Fang F. Association between intraoperative steroid and postoperative mortality in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1153392. [PMID: 37456646 PMCID: PMC10339830 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1153392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the widespread use of intraoperative steroids in various neurological surgeries to reduce cerebral edema and other adverse symptoms, there is sparse evidence in the literature for the optimal and safe usage of intraoperative steroid administration in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumors. We aimed to investigate the effects of intraoperative steroid administration on postoperative 30-day mortality in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumors. Methods Adult patients who underwent craniotomy for brain tumors between January 2011 to January 2020 were included at West China Hospital, Sichuan University in this retrospective cohort study. Stratified analysis based on the type of brain tumor was conducted to explore the potential interaction. Results This study included 8,663 patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumors. In patients with benign brain tumors, intraoperative administration of steroids was associated with a higher risk of postoperative 30-day mortality (adjusted OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.09-3.57). However, in patients with malignant brain tumors, no significant association was found between intraoperative steroid administration and postoperative 30-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.55-1.35). Additionally, administration of intraoperative steroids was not associated with acute kidney injury (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.73), pneumonia (adjusted OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74-1.07), surgical site infection (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.50-1.22) within 30 days, and stress hyperglycemia (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.81-1.38) within 24 h after craniotomy for brain tumor. Conclusion In patients undergoing craniotomy for benign brain tumors, intraoperative steroids were associated with 30-day mortality, but this association was not significant in patients with malignant brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialing He
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shuanghong He
- Health Management Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yixin Tian
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Pengfei Hao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Tiangui Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Longquan Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yangchun Xiao
- Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Liyuan Peng
- Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuning Feng
- Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xin Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Haidong Deng
- Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Peng Wang
- Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Weelic Chong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Yang Hai
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Lvlin Chen
- Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Chao You
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lu Jia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Dengkui Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Friendship Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Fang Fang
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yao J, Novosel M, Bellampalli S, Kapo J, Joseph J, Prsic E. Lung Cancer Supportive Care and Symptom Management. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:609-622. [PMID: 37024385 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Lung cancer carries significant mortality and morbidity. In addition to treatment advances, supportive care may provide significant benefit for patients and their caregivers. A multidisciplinary approach is critical in addressing complications of lung cancer, including disease- and treatment-related complications, oncologic emergencies, symptom management and supportive care, and addressing the psychosocial needs of affected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnathan Yao
- Yale Internal Medicine-Traditional Residency Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208030, New Haven, CT 06520-8030, USA
| | - Madison Novosel
- Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Shreya Bellampalli
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Jennifer Kapo
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208025, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Julia Joseph
- Yale Internal Medicine-Traditional Residency Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208030, New Haven, CT 06520-8030, USA
| | - Elizabeth Prsic
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208028, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ius T, Sabatino G, Panciani PP, Fontanella MM, Rudà R, Castellano A, Barbagallo GMV, Belotti F, Boccaletti R, Catapano G, Costantino G, Della Puppa A, Di Meco F, Gagliardi F, Garbossa D, Germanò AF, Iacoangeli M, Mortini P, Olivi A, Pessina F, Pignotti F, Pinna G, Raco A, Sala F, Signorelli F, Sarubbo S, Skrap M, Spena G, Somma T, Sturiale C, Angileri FF, Esposito V. Surgical management of Glioma Grade 4: technical update from the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®): a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2023; 162:267-293. [PMID: 36961622 PMCID: PMC10167129 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04274-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The extent of resection (EOR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with Glioma Grade 4 (GG4). The aim of the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®) was to provide a general overview of the current trends and technical tools to reach this goal. METHODS A systematic review was performed. The results were divided and ordered, by an expert team of surgeons, to assess the Class of Evidence (CE) and Strength of Recommendation (SR) of perioperative drugs management, imaging, surgery, intraoperative imaging, estimation of EOR, surgery at tumor progression and surgery in elderly patients. RESULTS A total of 352 studies were identified, including 299 retrospective studies and 53 reviews/meta-analysis. The use of Dexamethasone and the avoidance of prophylaxis with anti-seizure medications reached a CE I and SR A. A preoperative imaging standard protocol was defined with CE II and SR B and usefulness of an early postoperative MRI, with CE II and SR B. The EOR was defined the strongest independent risk factor for both OS and tumor recurrence with CE II and SR B. For intraoperative imaging only the use of 5-ALA reached a CE II and SR B. The estimation of EOR was established to be fundamental in planning postoperative adjuvant treatments with CE II and SR B and the stereotactic image-guided brain biopsy to be the procedure of choice when an extensive surgical resection is not feasible (CE II and SR B). CONCLUSIONS A growing number of evidences evidence support the role of maximal safe resection as primary OS predictor in GG4 patients. The ongoing development of intraoperative techniques for a precise real-time identification of peritumoral functional pathways enables surgeons to maximize EOR minimizing the post-operative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Ius
- Division of Neurosurgery, Head-Neck and NeuroScience Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Giovanni Sabatino
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Pier Paolo Panciani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Marco Maria Fontanella
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10094, Torino, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10094, Torino, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Hospital of Castelfranco Veneto, 31033, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
| | - Antonella Castellano
- Department of Neuroradiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Vincenzo Barbagallo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies (G.F. Ingrassia), Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco" University Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Brain Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Francesco Belotti
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Catapano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Della Puppa
- Neurosurgical Clinical Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Meco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Filippo Gagliardi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Garbossa
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Iacoangeli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Azienda Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Federico Pessina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Italy
- Neurosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Pignotti
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Giampietro Pinna
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonino Raco
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of NESMOS, AOU Sant'Andrea, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Sala
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicines and Movement Sciences, Institute of Neurosurgery, University of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Signorelli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Neurosurgery Unit, University "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Silvio Sarubbo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale Per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Miran Skrap
- Division of Neurosurgery, Head-Neck and NeuroScience Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Teresa Somma
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Vincenzo Esposito
- Department of Neurosurgery "Giampaolo Cantore"-IRCSS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
- Department of Human, Neurosciences-"Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pellerino A, Garbossa D, Rudà R, Soffietti R. The role of the neurologist in the diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases and carcinomatous meningitis. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:464-474. [PMID: 36990824 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, in the past, most of central nervous system metastases from solid tumors were associated with an advanced phase of the disease needing palliation only, while to date they increasingly develop as an early and/or solitary relapse in patients with the systemic disease under control. This review will cover all the aspects of a modern management of brain and leptomeningeal metastases from diagnosis to the different therapeutic options, either local (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance) or systemic. Particular emphasis is reserved to the new-targeted drugs, that allow to target specifically driver molecular alterations. These new compounds pose new problems in terms of monitoring efficacy and adverse events, but increasingly they allow improvement of outcome in comparison to historical controls.
Collapse
|
9
|
Vacher E, Rodriguez Ruiz M, Rees JH. Management of brain tumour related epilepsy (BTRE): a narrative review and therapy recommendations. Br J Neurosurg 2023:1-8. [PMID: 36694327 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2023.2170326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Brain Tumour Related Epilepsy (BTRE) has a significant impact on Quality of Life with implications for driving, employment, and social activities. Management of BTRE is complex due to the higher incidence of drug resistance and the potential for interaction between anti-cancer therapy and anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Neurologists, neurosurgeons, oncologists, palliative care physicians and clinical nurse specialists treating these patients would benefit from up-to-date clinical guidelines. We aim to review the current literature and to outline specific recommendations for the optimal treatment of BTRE, encompassing both Primary Brain Tumours (PBT) and Brain Metastases (BM). A comprehensive search of the literature since 1995 on BTRE was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMCARE. A broad search strategy was used, and the evidence evaluated and graded based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Seizure frequency varies between 10 and 40% in patients with Brain Metastases (BM) and from 30% (high-grade gliomas) to 90% (low-grade gliomas) in patients with PBT. In patients with BM, risk factors include number of BM and melanoma histology. In patients with PBT, BTRE is more common in patients with lower grade histology, frontal and temporal tumours, presence of an IDH mutation and cortical infiltration. All patients with BTRE should be treated with ASMs. Non-enzyme inducing ASMs are recommended as first line treatment for BTRE, but up to 50% of patients with BTRE due to PBT remain resistant. There is no proven benefit for the use of prophylactic ASMs, although there are no randomised trials testing newer agents. Surgical and oncological treatments i.e. radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve BTRE. Vagus Nerve Stimulation has been used with partial success. The review highlights the relative dearth of high-quality evidence for the management of BTRE and provides a framework for further studies aiming to improve seizure control, quality of life, and indications for ASMs.KEY POINTSOffer levetiracetam or lamotrigine to all patients with primary or metastatic brain tumours who have seizure(s), irrespective of whether these are partial or generalised.ASM withdrawal for patients in remission is not recommended due to high rates of seizure recurrence.ASM prophylaxis is not generally recommended in the management of seizure-naïve patients.Both levetiracetam and lamotrigine are safe in pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Vacher
- UCL Medical School, London, UK
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | | | - Jeremy H Rees
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goldman M, Lucke-Wold B, Martinez-Sosa M, Katz J, Mehkri Y, Valisno J, Quintin S. Steroid utility, immunotherapy, and brain tumor management: an update on conflicting therapies. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2022; 3:659-675. [PMID: 36338521 PMCID: PMC9630032 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2022.00106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Steroid use is a widely accepted practice for both the treatment and prevention of tumor-induced edema, but there are many unknowns regarding their current clinical utility with modern anti-tumor therapies. This decreases edema and relieves the symptomatic mass effect. There are clearly understood benefits and commonly accepted complications of methylprednisolone (MP) use, but the topic is recently controversial. With immunotherapy advancing, a robust immune response is crucial for full therapeutic efficacy. The immunosuppression of MP may interfere with future and current therapeutics relying on the integrity of the patient’s immune system. This further emphasizes the need for alternative agents to effectively treat tumor-induced cerebral edema. This review highlights the current clinical utility of steroids to treat brain tumor-related edema and the underlying pathophysiology. It also reviews details regarding different steroid formulations and dosing. Research available regarding concurrent steroid use with immunotherapy is detailed next, followed by alternatives to steroids and barriers to their adoption. Finally, this paper discusses pre-clinical findings and emerging treatments aimed to augment or replace steroid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brandon Lucke-Wold
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Curtaz CJ, Kiesel L, Meybohm P, Wöckel A, Burek M. Anti-Hormonal Therapy in Breast Cancer and Its Effect on the Blood-Brain Barrier. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205132. [PMID: 36291916 PMCID: PMC9599962 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The molecular receptor status of breast cancer has implications for prognosis and long-term metastasis. Although metastatic luminal B-like, hormone-receptor-positive, HER2−negative, breast cancer causes brain metastases less frequently than other subtypes, though tumor metastases in the brain are increasingly being detected of this patient group. Despite the many years of tried and tested use of a wide variety of anti-hormonal therapeutic agents, there is insufficient data on their intracerebral effectiveness and their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. In this review, we therefore summarize the current state of knowledge on anti-hormonal therapy and its intracerebral impact and effects on the blood-brain barrier in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin J. Curtaz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Münster, 48143 Münster, Germany
| | - Patrick Meybohm
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Malgorzata Burek
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aizer AA, Lamba N, Ahluwalia MS, Aldape K, Boire A, Brastianos PK, Brown PD, Camidge DR, Chiang VL, Davies MA, Hu LS, Huang RY, Kaufmann T, Kumthekar P, Lam K, Lee EQ, Lin NU, Mehta M, Parsons M, Reardon DA, Sheehan J, Soffietti R, Tawbi H, Weller M, Wen PY. Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1613-1646. [PMID: 35762249 PMCID: PMC9527527 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayal A Aizer
- Corresponding Author: Dr. Ayal A. Aizer, MD/MHS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA ()
| | | | | | - Kenneth Aldape
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Departments of Neuro-Oncology and Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - D Ross Camidge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology at The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and The Malnati Brain Tumor Institute at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Keng Lam
- Department of Neurology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Parsons
- Departments of Oncology and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Makwana M, Hussain H, Merola JP, Zaben M, Jesurasa AR, Patel C, Leach P. Pre-operative dosing of dexamethasone for the management of children with posterior fossa tumours: are we getting it right? Br J Neurosurg 2022; 36:609-612. [PMID: 35176921 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2022.2040948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Posterior fossa (PF) tumours are associated with vasogenic oedema causing symptoms of raised intracranial pressure. Preoperatively this is managed with dexamethasone. To minimise steroid related complications, the lowest effective dose should be administered. No neurosurgical guidelines exist for pre-operative dosing of dexamethasone in PF tumours. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of surgically managed cases for patients under 16 years of age between 2013 and 2018 to ascertain the initial dose of dexamethasone with symptomatic PF tumours. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were identified of which 30 notes were available. Sixteen were male. Median age was 6 years (range 10 months - 15 years). Twenty-two (73%) were referrals from DGH and 8 (27%) presented to our neurosurgical centre. All patients presented with symptomatic PF tumours including headache (97%), vomiting (93%), gait disturbance (43%), and nystagmus (17%). Four (13%) had papilloedema. Average initial stat dexamethasone dose was 9.15 mg; 0.31 mg/kg (range 1-16.7 mg; 0.05 - 1.77 mg/kg). Stratified according to weight, average dose (and range) was 8.8 mg; 0.94 mg/kg (1-16.6 mg; 0.13 - 1.77 mg/kg) in those weighing <10 kg; 9.7 mg; 0.66 mg/kg (4-16.7 mg; 0.21 - 1.35 mg/kg) in 10-20 kg; 12.3 mg;0.52 mg/kg (8-16.7 mg; 0.27 - 0.73mg/kg) in 20-30 kg and 7.8 mg; 0.17mg/kg (2-16.7 mg; 0.0 - 0.39 mg/kg) in >30 kg up to a maximum of 16.6 mg in any 24h period. These results suggest that dosage was higher in those children weighing less. PPI was used in 24 (80%) of cases. All doses were reduced after review by the neurosurgical team and a PPI added. CONCLUSION Pre-operative dexamethasone dosing does not always reflect the severity of clinical symptoms for PF tumours. Guidelines are required to correlate clinical symptoms with a suggested suitable dose of dexamethasone to prevent overdose and complications associated with corticosteroid use. We recommend a weight-based regimen as provided by the Food and Drug Administration. The current advice is for 0.02-0.3mg/kg/day in 3-4 divided doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Makwana
- Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales & Noah's Ark Children's Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom.,School of Medicine, Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Humaira Hussain
- Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales & Noah's Ark Children's Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph P Merola
- Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales & Noah's Ark Children's Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom.,School of Medicine, Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Malik Zaben
- Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales & Noah's Ark Children's Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom.,School of Medicine, Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony R Jesurasa
- Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales & Noah's Ark Children's Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Chirag Patel
- Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales & Noah's Ark Children's Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Leach
- Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales & Noah's Ark Children's Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chumbala Na Ayudhaya A, Morrison SR, Kaliaperumal C, Gallo P. A 10-year retrospective observational study on the utility and prescription standards of dexamethasone in pediatric neuro-oncosurgery in a tertiary care center. Childs Nerv Syst 2022; 38:1707-1715. [PMID: 35674829 PMCID: PMC9463277 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-022-05569-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT This study aimed to retrospectively assess dexamethasone utility in pediatric CNS tumor patients over a 10-year period, to better understand dosing variability, and highlight optimal practice. METHODS All pediatric CNS tumor cases managed operatively for a 10-year period at a single center were reviewed. Information was gathered on demographics, dexamethasone doses, course durations, weaning regimes, PPI co-prescription, adverse events, and route of administration. Comparison within these groups was analyzed through use of statistical testing. RESULTS One hundred twenty-seven patients received 193 dexamethasone courses. Median age was 7 years, with a median weight of 27.9 kg. Most common tumor type was astrocytoma (24.8%). Median daily dose was 8 mg, with twice-daily dosing most common. Median course duration was 8 days, ranging from 1 to 1103 days. Median weaning duration was 11.5 days. Daily dose was not correlated with patient weight and the median daily dose per kg was 0.2319 mg/kg. Incidence of adverse effects was 14.5% across all course lengths, with weight gain most common. The short-term course duration (<14 days) had the lowest adverse event incidence, with direct correlation between course length and adverse effect incidence. Dexamethasone dose per kg was not significantly different between patients with and without adverse effects. No relationship was noted between adverse effects incidence and administration route (intravenous compared to oral). 64.2% of patients received concurrent PPI with 35.8% receiving no PPI, with 1 gastrointestinal side effect noted in the PPI-receiving population. CONCLUSIONS Large variation was seen in practice, with prescriptions appearing based on clinician preference and symptom severity rather than patient age or weight. Future guidelines should consider lower dose regimens than are currently presented with less frequent dosing as these may benefit quality of life. Weaning period can be relatively rapid for most patients, taking place in 2-3 days. PPI co-prescription does not seem to add significant benefit. We recommend using a standardized guideline of 0.2 mg/kg/day (max 8 mg/day) given OD or BD, with PPI cover where necessary. For acute presentations, we recommend limiting dexamethasone treatment to <14 days. These recommendations can be adjusted for individual cases to yield optimal results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Chandrasekaran Kaliaperumal
- Consultant Adult and Paediatric Neurosurgeon, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Pasquale Gallo
- Consultant Adult and Paediatric Neurosurgeon, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dono A, Zhu P, Holmes E, Takayasu T, Zhu JJ, Blanco AI, Hsu S, Bhattacharjee MB, Ballester LY, Kim DH, Esquenazi Y, Tandon N. Impacts of genotypic variants on survival following reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2022; 156:353-363. [PMID: 34997451 PMCID: PMC9338692 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03917-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) prognosis is dismal. In the absence of effective adjuvant treatments for rGBM, re-resections remain prominent in our arsenal. This study evaluates the impact of reoperation on post-progression survival (PPS) considering rGBM genetic makeup. METHODS To assess the genetic heterogeneity and treatment-related changes (TRC) roles in re-operated or medically managed rGBMs, we compiled demographic, clinical, histopathological, and next-generation genetic sequencing (NGS) characteristics of these tumors from 01/2005 to 10/2019. Survival data and reoperation were analyzed using conventional and random survival forest analysis (RSF). RESULTS Patients harboring CDKN2A/B loss (p = 0.017) and KDR mutations (p = 0.031) had notably shorter survival. Reoperation or bevacizumab were associated with longer PPS (11.2 vs. 7.4-months, p = 0.006; 13.1 vs 6.2, p < 0.001). Reoperated patients were younger, had better performance status and greater initial resection. In 136/273 (49%) rGBMs undergoing re-operation, CDKN2A/B loss (p = 0.03) and KDR mutations (p = 0.02) were associated with shorter survival. In IDH-WT rGBMs with NGS data (n = 166), reoperation resulted in 7.0-month longer survival (p = 0.004) than those managed medically. This reoperation benefit was independently identified by RSF analysis. Stratification analysis revealed that EGFR-mutant, CDKN2A/B-mutant, NF1-WT, and TP53-WT rGBM IDH-WT subgroups benefit most from reoperation (p = 0.03). Lastly, whether or not TRC was prominent at re-operation does not have any significant impact on PPS (10.5 vs. 11.5-months, p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS Maximal safe re-resection significantly lengthens PPS regardless of genetic makeup, but reoperations are especially beneficial for IDH-WT rGBMs with EGFR and CDKN2A/B mutations with TP53-WT, and NF1-WT. Histopathology at recurrence may be an imperfect gauge of disease severity at progression and the imaging progression may be more reflective of the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Dono
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ping Zhu
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma Holmes
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Takeshi Takayasu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay-jiguang Zhu
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA,Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Angel I. Blanco
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA,Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sigmund Hsu
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA,Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Meenakshi B. Bhattacharjee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA,Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Leomar Y. Ballester
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA,Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dong H. Kim
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA,Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yoshua Esquenazi
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA,Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nitin Tandon
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, USA,Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, TX, USA,Texas Institute for Restorative Neurotechnologies, UT Health, Houston, TX, USA,Department of Neurosurgery, Texas Institute of Restorative Neurotechnology, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 2800, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van der Meer PB, Dirven L, van den Bent MJ, Preusser M, Taphoorn MJB, Rudá R, Koekkoek JAF. Prescription preferences of antiepileptic drugs in brain tumor patients: An international survey among EANO members. Neurooncol Pract 2021; 9:105-113. [PMID: 35371521 PMCID: PMC8965049 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed at investigating antiepileptic drug (AED) prescription preferences in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) among the European neuro-oncology community, the considerations that play a role when initiating AED treatment, the organization of care, and practices with regard to AED withdrawal. Methods A digital survey containing 31 questions about prescription preferences of AEDs was set out among members of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO). Results A total of 198 respondents treating patients with BTRE participated of whom 179 completed the entire survey. Levetiracetam was the first choice in patients with BTRE for almost all respondents (90% [162/181]). Levetiracetam was considered the most effective AED in reducing seizure frequency (72% [131/181]) and having the least adverse effects (48% [87/181]). Common alternatives for levetiracetam as equivalent first choice included lacosamide (33% [59/181]), lamotrigine (22% [40/181]), and valproic acid (21% [38/181]). Most crucial factors to choose a specific AED were potential adverse effects (82% [148/181]) and interactions with antitumor treatments (76% [137/181]). In the majority of patients, neuro-oncologists were involved in the treatment of seizures (73% [132/181])). Other relevant findings were that a minority of respondents ever prescribe AEDs in brain tumor patients without epilepsy solely as prophylaxis (29% [53/181]), but a majority routinely considers complete AED withdrawal in BTRE patients who are seizure-free after antitumor treatment (79% [141/179]). Conclusions Our results show that among European professionals treating patients with BTRE levetiracetam is considered the first choice AED, with the presumed highest efficacy and least adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim B van der Meer
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands,Corresponding Author: Pim B. van der Meer, BSc, Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands ()
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Roberta Rudá
- Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto Hospital, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy,Department of Neuro-Oncology, City of Health and Science and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Johan A F Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tagami K, Matsuoka H, Ariyoshi K, Oyamada S, Hiratsuka Y, Kizawa Y, Koyama A, Inoue A. The current clinical use of adjuvant analgesics for refractory cancer pain in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 50:1434-1441. [PMID: 32869060 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although adjuvant analgesics are used to treat opioid-refractory cancer pain, there is insufficient evidence to support this practice and limited data to guide the choice depending on cancer pain pathophysiology, dose titration and starting dose. This survey aimed to clarify the current use of adjuvant analgesics for treating opioid-refractory cancer pain. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, we sent an online survey questionnaire to 208 certified palliative care specialists. Primary outcomes were (i) effective pathophysiological mechanism of cancer pain and (ii) initiating doses and time period to the first response to each adjuvant analgesic therapy. RESULTS In total, 87 (42%) palliative care specialists responded. Of all patients with cancer pain, 40% of patients (median) with refractory cancer pain were prescribed adjuvant analgesics. Additionally, 94.3, 93.1 and 86.2% of palliative care specialists found dexamethasone/betamethasone effective for neuropathic pain caused by tumor-related spinal cord compression, pregabalin effective for malignant painful radiculopathy and dexamethasone/betamethasone effective for brain tumor or leptomeningeal metastases-related headache, respectively. The median starting dose of pregabalin, dexamethasone/betamethasone, lidocaine and ketamine were 75, 4, 200, and 50 mg/day, respectively, and the median time to the first response of those medications were 5, 3, 2 and 3 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Many palliative care specialists select adjuvant analgesics depending on the pathophysiological mechanism of cancer pain in each case. They used such adjuvant analgesics in low doses for cancer pain with short first-response periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keita Tagami
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Matsuoka
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.,Department of Psycho-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Yusuke Hiratsuka
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kizawa
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Atsuko Koyama
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Akira Inoue
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Monsour MA, Kelly PD, Chambless LB. Antiepileptic Drugs in the Management of Cerebral Metastases. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2020; 31:589-601. [PMID: 32921354 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2020.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Seizures represent a common and debilitating complication of central nervous system metastases. The use of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the preoperative period remains controversial, but the preponderance of evidence suggests that it is not helpful in preventing seizure and instead poses a significant risk of adverse events. Studies of postoperative seizure prophylaxis have not shown substantial benefit, but this practice remains widespread. Careful analysis of the risk of seizure based on patient-specific factors, such as tumor location and primary tumor histology, should guide the physician's decision on the initiation and cessation of prophylactic AED therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith A Monsour
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2209 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN 37240-0002, USA
| | - Patrick D Kelly
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, T-4224 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232-2380, USA
| | - Lola B Chambless
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, T-4224 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232-2380, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Cancer occurs most frequently in patients aged 65 and older. With the increasing age of the world's population, there will be a significant increase in cancer diagnoses in older adults. Aging imposes a wide variety of physiological responses, comorbidities, and ailments, but older patients are less represented in clinical studies. Specific needs of older patients with cancer often go under-recognized and consequently unmet. In this review, common diagnoses that can affect the outcomes of this population, including frailty, malnutrition, and delirium, are discussed. Areas that need further research to improve the care of geriatric cancer patients, particularly in the hospital settings, are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M Meehan
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lena Kassab
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Haixia Qin
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kim SK, Moon J, Cho JM, Kim KH, Kim SH, Kim YI, Kim YZ, Kim HS, Dho YS, Park JS, Park JE, Seo Y, Sung KS, Song JH, Wee CW, Yoon WS, Yoon HI, Lee SH, Lim DH, Im JH, Chang JH, Han MH, Hong JB, Hwang K, Park CK, Lee YS, Gwak HS. A National Consensus Survey for Current Practice in Brain Tumor Management I: Antiepileptic Drug and Steroid Usage. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2020; 8:1-10. [PMID: 32390348 PMCID: PMC7221462 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2020.8.e5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Guideline Working Group of the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey for diverse queries faced in the treatment of brain tumors. As part I of the survey, the aim of this study is to evaluate national patterns of clinical practice about antiepileptic drug (AED) and steroid usage for management of brain tumors. METHODS A web-based survey was sent to all members of the KSNO by email. The survey included 9 questions of AED usage and 5 questions of steroid usage for brain tumor patients. All questions were developed by consensus of the Guideline Working Group. RESULTS The overall response rate was 12.8% (54/423). Regarding AED usage, the majority of respondents (95.2%) routinely prescribed prophylactic AEDs for patients with seizure at the peri/postoperative period. However, as many as 72.8% of respondents prescribed AED routinely for seizure-naïve patients, and others prescribed AED as the case may be. The duration of AED prophylaxis showed wide variance according to the epilepsy status and the location of tumor. Levetiracetam (82.9%) was the most preferred AED for epilepsy prophylaxis. Regarding steroid usage, 90.5% of respondents use steroids in perioperative period, including 34.2% of them as a routine manner. Presence of peritumoral edema (90.9%) was considered as the most important factor determining steroid usage followed by degree of clinical symptoms (60.6%). More than half of respondents (51.2%) replied to discontinue the steroids within a week after surgery if there are no specific medical conditions, while 7.3% preferred slow tapering up to a month after surgery. CONCLUSION The survey demonstrated the prevailing practice patterns on AED and steroid usage in neuro-oncologic field among members of the KSNO. This information provides a point of reference for establishing a practical guideline in the management of brain tumor patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Kwon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| | - Jangsup Moon
- Department of Neurology, Rare Disease Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Mo Cho
- Department of Neurosurgery, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University, Incheon, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Se Hoon Kim
- Department of Pathology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Il Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Young Zoon Kim
- Division of Neurooncology and Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yun Sik Dho
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea
| | - Jae Sung Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngbeom Seo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Kyoung Su Sung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jin Ho Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Woo Wee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wan Soo Yoon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hong In Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Hoon Lee
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Do Hoon Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Im
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jong Hee Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Hoon Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
| | - Je Beom Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kihwan Hwang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Chul Kee Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Youn Soo Lee
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Ho Shin Gwak
- Department of Cancer Control, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
| | | |
Collapse
|