Preliminary, Real-world, Multicenter Experience With Omadacycline for Mycobacterium abscessus Infections

Omadacycline drug susceptibility testing for non-tuberculous mycobacteria using oxyrase to overcome challenges with drug degradation

BACKGROUND

Drug susceptibility testing (DST) protocol of omadacycline against non-tuberculous mycobacteria has not yet been established. We developed a method to accurately determine MIC omadacycline MIC against Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab), Mycobacterium avium-complex (MAC), and Mycobacterium kansasii (Mkn).

METHODS

First, we identified the oxyrase concentration not affecting Mab, MAC, and Mkn growth followed by omadacycline MIC experiments with and without oxyrase using reference and clinical strains.

RESULTS

Oxyrase 0.5 % (v/v) stabilized omadacycline in the culture medium. The median omadacycline MIC was 1 mg/L for Mab and 8 mg/L for Mkn. For MAC, the median omadacycline MIC was 2 mg/L for M. avium, 256 mg/L for M. intracellulare, and 4 mg/L for M. chimaera (p < 0.0001). Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test revealed statistically lower MICs with oxyrase for all MAC subspecies (p < 0.0001), all Mab subspecies (p < 0.0001), and Mkn (p = 0.0002). The decrease in MICs with oxyrase was 17/18 of Mab, 14/19 of Mkn, 8/8 of M. avium, 4/5 M. chimera, but only 11/18 of M. intracellulare (p < 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Use of 0.5 % oxyrase could be a potential solution to reliable and reproducible omadacycline MIC of Mab. However, oxyrase demonstrated a variable effect in reducing MICs against MAC and Mkn.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycobacterium abscessus and treatment of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary infections

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) is the mycobacterial species least susceptible to antimicrobials. Infections are difficult to treat, and cure rates are below 50% even after a combination of 4-5 drugs for many months.

OBJECTIVES

To examine antimicrobial susceptibilities and treatment recommendations in light of what is known about mechanisms of resistance and pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics (PK/PD) interactions.

SOURCES

Original papers on the topics of 'antimicrobials', 'susceptibility', 'treatment', and 'outcome' from 2019 onwards, in the context of the evidence brought by the guidelines published in 2020 for pulmonary infections.

CONTENT

MAB is susceptible in vitro to only a few antimicrobials. Breakpoints were set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and are revised by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for epidemiological cut-off values. Innate resistance is due to multiple resistance mechanisms involving efflux pumps, inactivating enzymes, and low drug-target affinity. In addition, MAB may display acquired resistance to macrolides and amikacin through mutations in drug binding sites. Treatment outcomes are better for macrolide-based combinations and MAB subspecies massiliense. New compounds in the family of cyclines, oxazolidinones, and penem-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (described in another paper), as well as bedaquiline, a new antituberculous agent, are promising, but their efficacy remains to be proven. PK/PD studies, which are critical for establishing optimal dosing regimens, were mainly done for monotherapy and healthy individuals.

IMPLICATIONS

Medical evidence is poor, and randomized clinical trials or standardized cohorts are needed to compare outcomes of patients with similar underlying disease, clinical characteristics, and identified MAB subspecies/sequevar. Microbiological diagnosis and susceptibility testing need to be harmonized to enable the comparison of agents and the testing of new compounds. Testing antimicrobial combinations requires new methods, especially for PK/PD parameters. Molecular testing may help in assessing MAB resistance prior to treatment. New antimicrobials need to be systematically tested against MAB to find an effective antimicrobial regimen.

In vitro activity of omadacycline against clinical isolates of Nocardia

Nocardiosis typically requires a prolonged treatment duration of ≥6 months and initial combination therapy with 2-3 antibiotics. First-line regimens for nocardiosis are associated with considerable toxicity; therefore, alternative therapies are needed. Omadacycline is an aminomethylcycline with broad antimicrobial activity whose in vitro activity against Nocardia species has not been formally assessed. The in vitro potency of omadacycline was evaluated against 300 Nocardia clinical isolates by broth microdilution. The most common Nocardia species tested were N. cyriacigeorgica (21%), N. nova (20%), and N. farcinica (12%). The most common specimens were respiratory (178 isolates, 59%) and wound (57 isolates, 19%). Omadacycline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) across all Nocardia species ranged from 0.06 µg/mL to 8 µg/mL, with an MIC50 of 2 µg/mL and MIC90 of 4 µg/mL. The lowest MICs were found among N. paucivorans (MIC50 = 0.25 µg/mL, MIC90 = 0.25 µg/mL), N. asiatica (MIC50 = 0.25 µg/mL, MIC90 = 1 µg/mL), N. abscessus complex (MIC50 = 0.5 µg/mL, MIC90 = 1 µg/mL), N. beijingensis (MIC50 = 0.5 µg/mL, MIC90 = 2 µg/mL), and N. otitidiscaviarum (MIC50 = 1 µg/mL, MIC90 = 2 µg/mL). The highest MICs were found among N. farcinica (MIC50 = 4 µg/mL, MIC90 = 8 µg/mL). In vitro potency differed by species among Nocardia clinical isolates. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the potential clinical utility of omadacycline for nocardiosis.

Efficacies of three drug regimens containing omadacycline to treat Mycobacteroides abscessus disease

Mycobacteroides abscessus (Mab, also known as Mycobacterium abscessus) causes opportunistic pulmonary and soft tissue infections that are difficult to cure with existing treatments. Omadacycline, a new tetracycline antibiotic, exhibits potent in vitro and in vivo activity against Mab. As regimens containing multiple antibiotics are required to produce a durable cure for Mab disease, we assessed efficacies of three three-drug combinations in a pre-clinical mouse model of pulmonary Mab disease to identify companion drugs with which omadacycline exhibits the highest efficacy. Additionally, we assessed the susceptibility of Mab recovered from mouse lungs after four weeks of exposure to the three triple-drug regimens. Among the three-drug regimens, omadacycline + imipenem + amikacin produced the largest reduction in Mab burden, whereas omadacycline + imipenem + linezolid exhibited the most effective early bactericidal activity. Omadacycline + linezolid + clofazimine, a regimen that can be administered orally, lacked early bactericidal activity but produced a gradual reduction in the lung Mab burden over time. The robust efficacy exhibited by these three regimens in the mouse model supports their further evaluation in patients with Mab lung disease. As we were unable to isolate drug-resistant Mab mutants at the completion of four weeks of treatment, these triple-drug combinations show promise of producing durable cure and minimizing selection of resistant mutants.

Pharmacotherapeutic Considerations in the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections: A Primer for Clinicians

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) can cause a variety of infections, including serious pulmonary disease. Treatment encompasses polypharmacy, with a targeted regimen of 2-5 active medications, depending on site of infection, species, and clinical characteristics. Medications may include oral, intravenous, and inhalational routes. Medication acquisition can be challenging for numerous reasons, including investigational status, limited distribution models, and insurance prior authorization. Additionally, monitoring and managing adverse reactions and drug interactions is a unique skill set. While NTM is primarily medically managed, clinicians may not be familiar with the intricacies of medication selection, procurement, and monitoring. This review offers insights into the pharmacotherapeutic considerations of this highly complex disease state, including regimen design, medication acquisition, safety monitoring, relevant drug-drug interactions, and adverse drug reactions.

Omadacycline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and efficacy against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the hollow fiber system model

Seventy-five years ago, first-generation tetracyclines demonstrated limited efficacy in the treatment of tuberculosis but were more toxic than efficacious. We performed a series of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) experiments with a potentially safer third-generation tetracycline, omadacycline, for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) H37Rv and an MDR-TB clinical strain (16D) were used in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and static concentration-response studies in test tubes, followed by a PK/PD study using the hollow fiber system model of TB (HFS-TB) that examined six human-like omadacycline doses. The inhibitory sigmoid maximal effect (Emax) model and Monte Carlo experiments (MCEs) were used for data analysis and clinical dose-finding, respectively. The omadacycline MIC for both Mtb H37Rv and MDR-TB clinical strain was 16 mg/L but dropped to 4 mg/L with daily drug supplementation to account for omadacycline degradation. The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube MIC was 2 mg/L. In the test tubes, omadacycline killed 4.39 log10 CFU/mL in 7 days. On Day 28 of the HFS-TB study, the Emax was 4.64 log10 CFU/mL, while exposure mediating 50% of Emax (EC50) was an area under the concentration-time curve to MIC (AUC0-24/MIC) ratio of 22.86. This translates to PK/PD optimal exposure or EC80 as AUC0-24/MIC of 26.93. The target attainment probability of the 300-mg daily oral dose was 90% but fell at MIC ≧4 mg/L. Omadacycline demonstrated efficacy and potency against both drug-susceptible and MDR-TB. Further studies are needed to identify the omadacycline effect in combination therapy for the treatment of both drug-susceptible and MDR-TB.

Cystic Fibrosis-Related Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection is a major cause of morbidity in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) with rates of infection increasing worldwide. Accurate diagnosis and decisions surrounding best management remain challenging. Treatment guidelines have been developed to assist physicians in managing NTM in pwCF, but involve prolonged and complex mycobacterial regimens, often associated with significant toxicity. Fortunately, current management and outcomes of NTM in CF are likely to evolve due to improved understanding of disease acquisition, better diagnostics, emerging antimycobacterial therapies, and the widespread uptake of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies.

Omadacycline therapy for Mycobacterium abscessus species infections

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance and therapy-related adverse effects make Mycobacterium abscessus treatment challenging. Omadacycline is a novel, bioavailable aminomethylcycline with favourable in vitro activity against M. abscessus.

AIMS

To describe a case report and review the published literature describing outcomes for M. abscessus infections treated with omadacycline.

METHODS

Systematic literature review.

RESULTS

We identified three articles that, in addition to our case report, describe 18 patients. Pulmonary infections were most frequent. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were reported for two isolates (0.25 and 0.5 mg/L). Despite half the patients starting omadacycline because of failure of prior therapy, 15 (83%) had a favourable outcome, defined as 'cure', 'improvement' or 'clinical success' as determined by the primary study authors. One patient (6%) discontinued omadacycline because of gastrointestinal intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the limited observational data and in vitro susceptibility results are encouraging, randomised control trials are required to determine the role of omadacycline as part of combination therapy for this most difficult-to-treat pathogen.

Treatment Approaches to Mycobacterium abscessus Pulmonary Disease

Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease is highly antibiotic-resistant, and the current armamentarium of antibiotics yields poor treatment outcomes with significant drug toxicity. Macrolide susceptibility is a key prognostic factor. Optimal drug combinations, duration of therapy, and management of refractory disease are unknown. Surgical resection, performed at centers with experience in surgical management of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease, may produce favorable outcomes in select patients. Multiple emerging therapeutic candidates hold promise for more efficacious and tolerable treatment options.

Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease: When Should I Treat and What Therapy Should I Start?

Treatment of M avium pulmonary disease requires a three-drug, macrolide-based regimen that is administered for 12 months beyond culture conversion. The regimen can be administered 3 days a week in non-cavitary, nodular bronchiectatic disease but should be given daily when cavitary disease is present. For treatment refractory disease, amikacin liposome inhalation suspension is added to the regimen. Parenteral amikacin or streptomycin should be administered in the setting of extensive radiographic involvement or macrolide resistance. Recurrence of disease is common and often due to reinfection. Novel and repurposed agents are being evaluated in clinical trials.

Long-term evaluation of clinical success and safety of omadacycline in nontuberculous mycobacteria infections: a retrospective, multicenter cohort of real-world health outcomes

Infections due to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) continue to increase in prevalence, leading to problematic clinical outcomes. Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic with FDA orphan drug and fast-track designations for pulmonary NTM infections, including Mycobacteroides abscessus (MAB). This multicenter retrospective study across 16 U.S. medical institutions from January 2020 to March 2023 examined the long-term clinical success, safety, and tolerability of OMC for NTM infections. The cohort included patients aged ≥18 yr, who were clinically evaluable, and` had been treated with OMC for ≥3 mo without a previous diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. The primary outcome was 3 mo clinical success, with secondary outcomes including clinical improvement and mortality at 6- and 12 mo, persistence or reemergence of infection, adverse effects, and reasons for OMC utilization. Seventy-five patients were included in this analysis. Most patients were female (48/75, 64.0%) or Caucasian (58/75, 77.3%), with a median (IQR) age of 59 yr (49-67). Most had NTM pulmonary disease (33/75, 44.0%), skin and soft tissue disease (19/75, 25.3%), or osteomyelitis (10/75, 13.3%), and Mycobacterium abscessus (60/75, 80%) was the most commonly isolated NTM pathogen. The median (IQR) treatment duration was 6 mo (4 - 14), and the most commonly co-administered antibiotic was azithromycin (33/70, 47.1%). Three-month clinical success was observed in 80.0% (60/75) of patients, and AEs attributable to OMC occurred in 32.0% (24/75) of patients, leading to drug discontinuation in 9.3% (7/75).

Non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease: progress and advances in the development of novel candidate and repurposed drugs

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are opportunistic pathogens that can infect all body tissues and organs. In particular, the lungs are the most commonly involved organ, with NTM pulmonary diseases causing serious health issues in patients with underlying lung disease. Moreover, NTM infections have been steadily increasing worldwide in recent years. NTM are also naturally resistant to many antibiotics, specifically anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) drugs. The lack of drugs targeting NTM infections and the increasing drug resistance of NTM have further made treating these mycobacterial diseases extremely difficult. The currently recommended NTM treatments rely on the extended indications of existing drugs, which underlines the difficulties of new antibiotic discovery against NTM. Another challenge is determining which drug combinations are most effective against NTM infection. To a certain extent, anti-NTM drug development depends on using already available antibiotics and compounds. Here, we aimed to review new antibiotics or compounds with good antibacterial activity against NTM, focusing on their mechanisms of action, in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities.

New Antimicrobials for Gram-Positive Sustained Infections: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Antibiotic resistance is a public health problem with increasingly alarming data being reported. Gram-positive bacteria are among the protagonists of severe nosocomial and community infections. The objective of this review is to conduct an extensive examination of emerging treatments for Gram-positive infections including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin, omadacycline, tedizolid, and delafloxacin. From a methodological standpoint, a comprehensive analysis on clinical trials, molecular structure, mechanism of action, microbiological targeting, clinical use, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features, and potential for therapeutic drug monitoring will be addressed. Each antibiotic paragraph is divided into specialized microbiological, clinical, and pharmacological sections, including detailed and appropriate tables. A better understanding of the latest promising advances in the field of therapeutic options could lead to the development of a better approach in managing antimicrobial therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens, which increasingly needs to be better stratified and targeted.

Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Omadacycline for the Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus Infections

Background

Mycobacterium abscessus is a virulent human pathogen. Treatment is complex and often poorly tolerated with suboptimal rates of eradication, highlighting the need for improved therapeutics. This study reports clinical experience with omadacycline for treatment of M abscessus infections at five large nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease clinics across the United States to better understand long-term safety and tolerability.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective chart review of adults with M abscessus infections. All patients treated with omadacycline as part of a multidrug therapeutic regimen through December 2021 were included. Clinical data from time of omadacycline initiation and up to 12 months of follow-up were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

Analysis included 117 patients. Among patients with M abscessus isolate subspeciation, 58 of 71 (81.7%) were M abscessus spp abscessus. In isolates with reported drug susceptibility testing, 15 of 70 (21.4%) had confirmed susceptibility to macrolides. The most common site of infection was lungs. Median duration omadacycline treatment was 8 months (range, 0.25-33 months; interquartile range, 4-15 months). Omadacycline was discontinued in 60 patients (51.3%); 20 completed planned treatment course, 23 experienced intolerance or adverse event leading to drug cessation, and 17 stopped due to cost, death (unrelated to NTM infection or therapy), or another reason. In those with pulmonary disease, 44 of 95 (46%) had 1 or more negative cultures at time of final microbiological assessment, with 17 of 95 (18%) achieving culture conversion.

Conclusions

This study reports data supporting long-term safety and tolerability of omadacycline along with signal of effectiveness in treatment of M abscessus infections.

Omadacycline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in the hollow fiber model and clinical validation of efficacy to treat pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus disease

BACKGROUND

Guideline-based therapy (GBT) for pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) disease achieves sustained sputum culture conversion (SSCC) rates of 30%; this is reflected by poor efficacy of GBT in the hollow fiber system model of Mab (HFS-Mab), which killed ∼1.22 log10 CFU/mL. This study was performed to determine which clinical dose of omadacycline, a tetracycline antibiotic, should be used in combination therapy to treat pulmonary Mab disease for relapse-free cure.

METHODS

First, omadacycline intrapulmonary concentration-time profiles of seven daily doses were mimicked in the HFS-Mab model and exposures associated with optimal efficacy were identified. Second, 10,000 subject Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to determine whether oral omadacycline 300 mg/day achieved these optimal exposures. Third, a retrospective clinical study on omadacycline vs. primarily tigecycline-based salvage therapy was conducted to assess rates of SSCC and toxicity. Fourth, a single patient was recruited to validate the findings.

RESULTS

Omadacycline efficacy in the HFS-Mab was 2.09 log10 CFU/mL at exposures achieved in >99% of patients on 300 mg/day omadacycline. In the retrospective study of omadacycline 300 mg/day-based combinations vs. comparators, SSCC was achieved in 8/10 vs. 1/9 (P=0.006), symptom improvement in 8/8 vs. 5/9 (P=0.033), toxicity in 0 vs. 9/9 (P<0.001), and therapy discontinuation due to toxicity in 0 vs. 3/9 (P<0.001) cases, respectively. In one prospectively recruited patient, omadacycline 300 mg/day salvage therapy achieved SSCC and symptom-resolution in 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Based on the preclinical and clinical data, omadacycline 300 mg/day in combination regimens could be appropriate for testing in Phase III trials in patients with Mab pulmonary disease.

In Vitro Synergistic Effects of Omadacycline with Other Antimicrobial Agents against Mycobacterium abscessus

The clinical importance of Mycobacterium abscessus species (MABS) infections has been increasing. However, the standard treatment regimens recommended in the current guidelines often result in unfavorable outcomes. Therefore, we investigated the in vitro activity of omadacycline (OMC), a novel tetracycline, against MABS to explore its potential as a novel therapeutic option. The drug susceptibilities of 40 Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus (Mab) clinical strains obtained from the sputum of 40 patients from January 2005 to May 2014 were investigated. The MIC results for OMC, amikacin (AMK), clarithromycin (CLR), clofazimine (CLO), imipenem (IPM), rifabutin (RFB), and tedizolid (TZD) alone and their combined effects (with OMC) were examined using the checkerboard method. Additionally, we studied the differences in the effectiveness of the antibiotic combinations based on the colony morphotype of Mab. The MIC50 and MIC90 of OMC alone were 2 and 4 μg/mL, respectively. The combinations of OMC with AMK, CLR, CLO, IPM, RFB, and TZD showed synergy against 17.5%, 75.8%, 25.0%, 21.1%, 76.9%, and 34.4% of the strains, respectively. Additionally, OMC combined with CLO (47.1% versus 9.5%, P = 0.023) or TZD (60.0% versus 12.5%, P = 0.009) showed significantly higher synergy against strains with rough morphotypes than those with smooth morphotypes. In conclusion, the checkerboard analyses revealed that the synergistic effects of OMC were observed most frequently with RFB, followed by CLR, TZD, CLO, IPM, and AMK. Furthermore, OMC tended to be more effective against rough-morphotype Mab strains.

Efficacy of Omadacycline-Containing Regimen in a Mouse Model of Pulmonary Mycobacteroides abscessus Disease

Mycobacteroides abscessus is an opportunistic pathogen in people with structural lung conditions such as bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cystic fibrosis. Pulmonary M. abscessus infection causes progressive symptomatic and functional decline as well as diminished lung function and is often incurable with existing antibiotics. We investigated the efficacy of a new tetracycline, omadacycline, in combination with existing antibiotics recommended to treat this indication, in a mouse model of M. abscessus lung disease. Amikacin, azithromycin, bedaquiline, biapenem, cefoxitin, clofazimine, imipenem, linezolid, and rifabutin were selected as companions to omadacycline. M. abscessus burden in the lungs of mice over a 4-week treatment duration was considered the endpoint. Omadacycline in combination with linezolid, imipenem, cefoxitin, biapenem, or rifabutin exhibited early bactericidal activity compared to any single drug. Using three M. abscessus isolates, we also determined the in vitro frequency of spontaneous resistance against omadacycline to be between 1.9 × 10-10 and 6.2 × 10-10 and the frequency of persistence against omadacycline to be between 5.3 × 10-6 and 1.3 × 10-5. Based on these findings, the combination of omadacycline and select drugs that are included in the recent treatment guidelines may exhibit improved potency to treat M. abscessus lung disease. IMPORTANCE M. abscessus disease incidence is increasing in the United States. This disease is difficult to cure with existing antibiotics. In this study, we describe the efficacy of a new tetracycline antibiotic, omadacycline, in combination with an existing antibiotic to treat this disease. A mouse model of M. abscessus lung disease was used to assess the efficacies of these experimental treatment regimens. Omadacycline in combination with select existing antibiotics exhibited bactericidal activity during the early phase of treatment.

Skin and soft tissue infections due to rapidly growing mycobacteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to review skin and soft tissue infections due to rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM), with a particular focus on recently published literature (2021-2022).

RECENT FINDINGS

RGM are increasingly reported as a cause of skin and soft tissue infections, both in the community setting and as a cause of nosocomial outbreaks. Recent advances in molecular methods have expanded the number of species of RGM and resulted in increased diagnosis. New treatment options are under evaluation particularly for Mycobacterium abscessus , the most difficult-to-treat among RGM.

SUMMARY

RGM are an uncommon cause of skin and soft tissue infections and a high clinical suspicion together with advanced laboratory facilities are required for diagnosis. Species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are essential to drive appropriate treatment, which combines surgical debridement with prolonged antimycobacterial combination therapy.

Omadacycline in treating community-based infections: a review and expert perspective

INTRODUCTION

Omadacycline is approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infection (ABSSSI). The integration of newer agents into clinical use involves understanding the nuances of clinical decision-making. This review will provide an in-depth focus on omadacycline in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

Literature review of omadacycline utilizing PubMed was performed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of omadacycline pharmacology, microbiology, registrational Phase 3 clinical trials, and post-marketing clinical studies. In addition, the immunomodulatory and other attributes of tetracycline class of antibiotics, of which omadacycline is a member, are reviewed, introducing the concept of antibiotic selection with attention to the bacterial pathogen and human host relationship.

EXPERT OPINION

Omadacycline builds upon the favorable attributes of tetracycline antibiotics and provides very reliable empiric coverage for both Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp. Clinicians require a more robust understanding of antibiotics, including omadacycline, in order to optimize patient outcomes, streamline care, and reduce medical costs.

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of Tigecycline, Eravacycline, Omadacycline, and Sarecycline against Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria

Infections caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) have increased globally. Chemotherapy against these infections is challenging due to the minimal antimicrobial choices available. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro susceptibilities of four tetracyclines against different RGM species. The MICs of eravacycline (ERC), omadacycline (OMC), sarecycline (SAC), and tigecycline (TGC) against the reference strains of 27 RGM species and 121 RGM clinical isolates were determined by microtiter plate assay. The minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) and cytotoxicities of these antibiotics were also tested. Except for SAC, the other three tetracyclines had MICs of ≤0.5 μg/mL against all 27 RGM reference strains. ERC generally presented the lowest MICs, with MIC₉₀s against the clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus, Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense, and Mycobacterium fortuitum of 0.25 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, and 0.06 μg/mL, respectively. TGC and OMC also showed equivalent in vitro inhibitory activities against the isolates, while the TGC MIC₉₀s for M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and M. fortuitum were lower than or equal to the OMC MIC₉₀s (1, 1, and 0.25 μg/mL versus 1, 2, and 2 μg/mL). In addition, the MIC₅₀s of three of the antibiotics for each species were always 2-fold lower than the corresponding MIC₉₀s. MBC and cytotoxicity assays indicated that all four tetracycline antibiotics tested were bacteriostatic agents with low toxicity to the THP-1 cell line. Tetracycline antibiotics are efficacious in RGM infection treatment, with omadacycline showing the best promise for clinical application due to its potent antimicrobial activity, safety, and convenient administration route. IMPORTANCE The global rise in antibiotic-resistant nontuberculous mycobacteria has prompted the urgent need for new antimicrobials, especially oral antibiotics. Currently, adverse effects have limited the use of tetracycline-class antibiotics, particularly tigecycline (TGC), in the treatment of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM). However, several new tetracycline-class antibiotics might overcome the limitations of TGC. We assessed the in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities of four tetracyclines (eravacycline, omadacycline, sarecycline, and tigecycline) against reference RGM strains and clinical isolates of different RGM species. We showed that three of these antibiotics (tigecycline, eravacycline, and omadacycline) might be efficacious in M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and M. fortuitum treatment. Furthermore, omadacycline was more promising for clinical application for M. abscessus infections as an oral drug, whereas sarecycline, which had the best safety parameters, should be considered a potential antibiotic for M. abscessus infections caused by susceptible strains. Our work underscores the possible clinical applications of tetracycline-class antibiotics in the treatment of RGM infections.

Contemporary Pharmacotherapies for Nontuberculosis Mycobacterial Infections: A Narrative Review

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are a group of atypical bacteria that may cause a spectrum of clinical manifestations, including pulmonary, musculoskeletal, skin and soft tissue, and cardiac infections. Antimycobacterial medication regimens for NTM infections require multiple agents with prolonged treatment courses and are often associated with poor tolerance in patients and suboptimal clinical outcomes. This review summarizes NTM pharmacotherapy, including treatment concepts, preferred medication regimens according to NTM species and site of infection, and emerging treatment methods for difficult-to-treat species.

Omadacycline for the treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus infections: Case series and review of the literature

Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus infections are problematic due to inherent multidrug resistance and lack of response to antibacterials commonly used as therapy for other mycobacterial infections. We report the clinical success of five patients who received definitive-treatment with an omadacycline-containing combination regimen for M. abscessus infection.

Use of Omadacycline as a Component of Mycobacterium Abscessus Eradication in an Adolescent With Cystic Fibrosis

Lung damage caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections can be devastating to individuals that are predisposed to chronic respiratory colonization. Cystic fibrosis patients are at increased risk for diminished lung function and increased mortality from NTM pulmonary infections. Treatment regimens are often intense and prolonged. The case described in this report is of a 16-year-old male with cystic fibrosis infected with Mycobacterium abscessus who showed evidence of severe nodular pulmonary disease on chest computerized tomography. His intensive treatment phase was complicated by neutropenia and drug resistance, leading to the use of omadacycline. Because of rapid improvement clinically and on computed tomography, he was successfully treated with a modified, less intense continuation phase that included azithromycin, omadacycline, and inhaled amikacin. The patient also was switched from tezacaftor/ivacaftor to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor during the course of NTM treatment.

Challenges and a potential solution to perform drug susceptibility testing of omadacycline against nontuberculous mycobacteria

BACKGROUND

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of slow growing mycobacteria (SGM) often do not correlate with the treatment response. Among the challenges is the identification of MIC of drugs that degrade in solution faster than the doubling time of the SGM.

METHODS

First, we identified the rate of omadacycline degradation in solution, and its effect on the rapidly growing methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We then identified doubling times versus MICs for Mycobacterium abscessus, M. avium, and M. kansasii, with and without supplementation for degraded drug.

RESULTS

Omadacycline concentration in solution declined ∼50% over 24hr. In the MRSA experiments, omadacycline demonstrated 66.48 ± 19.38% loss in potency over 24hr, confirming the degradation rate in solution. M. abscessus had a doubling time of 8.75 ± 1.23hr and the omadacycline MIC after 24hr of incubation was 2mg/L with and without 50% daily drug supplementation, indicating that drug degradation had no effect on this rapid grower. The doubling time for M. avium was 29.52hr (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.18-33.89hr) and 31.15hr (95%CI: 19.45-38.49 hr) for M. kansasii. The M. avium MICs ±50% daily omadacycline supplementation were 1mg/L and 0.5mg/L on day 7, whereas the M. kansasii MICs ±50% daily supplementation were >128mg/L and 32mg/L on day 7.

CONCLUSION

Omadacycline degradation in solution leads to falsely high MICs when SGM doubling time exceed the drug degradation rates in solution. The challenge could be overcome by daily drug supplementation to account for the loss of potency, which is laborious, or perhaps stabilizing the drug from degradation.

Omadacycline for management of Mycobacterium abscessus infections: a review of its effectiveness, place in therapy, and considerations for use

The Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) is a group of acid-fast, rapidly dividing non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) that include a number of clinically important subspecies, including M. abscessus, M. bolletii, and M. massiliense. These organisms are prevalent in the environment and are primarily associated with human pulmonary or skin and skin structure infections (SSSI) but may cause more deep-seeded disseminated infections and bacteremia in the immunocompromised. Importantly, these NTM are resistant to most first-line anti-tuberculous agents and, due to intrinsic or acquired resistance, exhibit exceedingly low, variable, and geographically distinct susceptibilities to commonly used antibacterial agents including older tetracyclines, macrolides, aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. Omadacycline is a novel third-generation member of the tetracycline family of antibacterials that has recently been demonstrated to have potent anti-NTM effects and clinical efficacy against MABC, including M. abscessus. The purpose of this review is to present a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment on the body of literature on the role of omadacycline for M. abscessus infections. Specifically, the in vitro and in vivo microbiology, mechanisms of action, mechanisms of resistance, clinical pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, dosage and administration, and place in therapy of omadacycline in management of M. abscessus infections will be detailed.

Antibiotic Therapy for Difficult-to-Treat Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Practical Approach

Lung transplant recipients are at higher risk to develop infectious diseases due to multi-drug resistant pathogens, which often chronically colonize the respiratory tract before transplantation. The emergence of these difficult-to-treat infections is a therapeutic challenge, and it may represent a contraindication to lung transplantation. New antibiotic options are currently available, but data on their efficacy and safety in the transplant population are limited, and clinical evidence for choosing the most appropriate antibiotic therapy is often lacking. In this review, we provide a summary of the best evidence available in terms of choice of antibiotic and duration of therapy for MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia complex, Mycobacterium abscessus complex and Nocardia spp. infections in lung transplant candidates and recipients.

Management of Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease: therapeutic advances and emerging treatments

Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) remains a challenging condition to diagnose and treat effectively. Treatment of NTM-PD is prolonged, frequently associated with adverse effects and has variable success. In this review, we consider the factors influencing clinicians when treating NTM-PD and discuss outcomes from key studies on the pharmacological management of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease and M. abscessus pulmonary disease. We highlight issues relating to treatment-related toxicity and provide an overview of repurposed and emerging therapies for NTM-PD.

Anti-Mycobacterial Drug Resistance in Japan: How to Approach This Problem?

Mycobacteriosis is mainly caused by two groups of species: Mycobacterium tuberculosis and non-tuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM). The pathogens cause not only respiratory infections, but also general diseases. The common problem in these pathogens as of today is drug resistance. Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health concern. A major challenge in the treatment of TB is anti-mycobacterial drug resistance (AMR), including multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Recently, the success rate of the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) has improved significantly with the introduction of new and repurposed drugs, especially in industrialized countries such as Japan. However, long-term treatment and the adverse events associated with the treatment of DR-TB are still problematic. To solve these problems, optimal treatment regimens designed/tailor-made for each patient are necessary, regardless of the location in the world. In contrast to TB, NTM infections are environmentally oriented. Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus species (MABS) are the major causes of NTM infections in Japan. These bacteria are naturally resistant to a wide variation of antimicrobial agents. Macrolides, represented by clarithromycin (CLR) and amikacin (AMK), show relatively good correlation with treatment success. However, the efficacies of potential drugs for the treatment of macrolide-resistant MAC and MABS are currently under evaluation. Thus, it is particularly difficult to construct an effective treatment regimen for macrolide-resistant MAC and MABS. AMR in NTM infections are rather serious in Japan, even when compared with challenges associated with DR-TB. Given the AMR problems in TB and NTM, the appropriate use of drugs based on accurate drug susceptibility testing and the development of new compounds/regimens that are strongly bactericidal in a short-time course will be highly expected.

Potency of omadacycline against Mycobacteroides abscessus clinical isolates in vitro and in a mouse model of pulmonary infection

The incidence of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases in the United States is rising and has surpassed that of tuberculosis. Most notable among the nontuberculous mycobacteria is Mycobacteroides abscessus, an emerging environmental opportunistic pathogen capable of causing chronic infections. M. abscessus disease is difficult to treat, and the current treatment recommendations include repurposed antibiotics, several of which are associated with undesirable side effects. In this study, we have evaluated the activity of omadacycline, a new tetracycline derivative, against M. abscessus using in vitro and in vivo approaches. Omadacycline exhibited an MIC₉₀ of 0.5 µg/mL against a panel of 32 contemporary M. abscessus clinical isolates, several of which were resistant to antibiotics that are commonly used for treatment of M. abscessus disease. Omadacycline combined with clarithromycin, azithromycin, cefdinir, rifabutin, or linezolid also exhibited synergism against several M. abscessus strains and did not exhibit antagonism when combined with an additional nine antibiotics also commonly considered to treat M. abscessus disease. Concentration-dependent activity of omadacycline was observed in time-kill assessments. Efficacy of omadacycline was evaluated in a mouse model of lung infection against four M. abscessus strains. A dose equivalent to the 300-mg standard oral human dose was used. Compared to the untreated control group, within 4 weeks of treatment, 1 to 3 log₁₀ fewer M. abscessus CFU were observed in the lungs of mice treated with omadacycline. Treatment outcome was biphasic, with bactericidal activity observed after the first 2 weeks of treatment against all four M. abscessus strains.

Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus Pulmonary Disease

Mycobacterium abscessus is the second most common nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease pathogen and comprises three subspecies: abscessus, massiliense, and bolletii. Subspecies identification is critical for disease management, as subspecies abscessus and bolletii have an inducible macrolide resistance gene [erm(41)] that results in clinical macrolide resistance. In contrast, subspecies massiliense does not have an active erm(41) gene and is therefore susceptible in vitro and clinically to macrolide-containing regimens. M abscessus is also vulnerable to acquired mutational macrolide resistance. Macrolide resistance has such a profoundly negative impact on M abscessus treatment response that preserving macrolide susceptibility with adequate companion drugs for macrolides is among the highest treatment priorities. After the macrolides, amikacin is regarded as the next most important drug for M abscessus treatment, although data validating that assertion are lacking. The considerations for preventing acquired macrolide resistance also apply to amikacin. Recent guidelines suggest that treatment should be guided by in vitro susceptibilities but, aside from macrolides and amikacin, no other antibiotics have a validated minimum inhibitory concentration for M abscessus. Currently, phase therapy (intensive and continuation) is recommended for M abscessus. This approach is successful with macrolide-susceptible M abscessus but not with macrolide-resistant M abscessus, in which even more aggressive therapy is not predictably successful. Newer drugs have become available, with encouraging in vitro activity against M abscessus, but in vivo validation of their superiority to current agents is not yet available. In the absence of unequivocally effective regimens, we offer suggestions for managing this treatment-refractory organism.

Antibiotic Approvals in the Last Decade: Are We Keeping Up With Resistance?

OBJECTIVE

To review the spectrum of activity, efficacy, safety, and role in therapy of all antibiotics and related biologics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the last decade.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (2010 to end May 2021) with the search terms' name of the antibiotic or the biologic. Data were also obtained from the prescribing information, FDA, and ClinicalTrials.gov websites.

STUDY SELECTION

All relevant English-language, late phase clinical trials assessing the safety and efficacy of the identified drugs were included. Review articles and references of retrieved articles were evaluated for relevant data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Antibiotic resistance is a public health crisis, and antibiotic development is imperative to outpace the ability of bacteria to develop resistance. Only 17 new systemic antibiotics and 1 related biologic have been approved by the FDA since 2010. Among these drugs, 14 were approved for common bacterial infections, 1 was approved for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), 1 was licensed to prevent CDI recurrence, and 2 were approved for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Very few antibiotics are in clinical development.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

The arrival of these new antibiotics was welcomed with great enthusiasm, particularly when they met previously unmet medical needs. Unfortunately, the majority of them represent modifications to existing chemical structures rather than new drug classes. Despite the availability of these antibiotics, managing patients with deep-seated infections and those with extensively resistant gram-negative organisms remains challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of new antibiotics and their indications are not keeping up with resistance and the needs of the patients.