1
|
Pham JH, Razonable RR. Management of resistant and Refractory Cytomegalovirus infections after transplantation. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2024. [PMID: 39225411 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2024.2399647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Revised: 08/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a classic opportunistic infection in transplant recipients. Treatment-refractory CMV infections are of concern, with growing identification of strains that have developed genetic mutations which confer resistance to standard antiviral therapy. Resistant and refractory CMV infections are associated with worse patient outcomes, prolonged hospitalization, and increased healthcare costs. AREAS COVERED This article provides a comprehensive practical overview of resistant and refractory CMV infections in transplant recipients. We review the updated definitions for these infections, antiviral pharmacology, mechanisms of drug resistance, diagnostic workup, management strategies, and host-related factors including immune optimization. EXPERT OPINION Resistant and refractory CMV infections are a significant contributor to post-transplant morbidity and mortality. This is likely the result of a combination of prolonged antiviral exposure and active viral replication in the setting of intense pharmacologic immunosuppression. Successful control of resistant and refractory infections in transplant recipients requires a combination of immunomodulatory optimization and appropriate antiviral drug choice with sufficient treatment duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin H Pham
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Razonable RR. Pathogen-specific cell-mediated immunity to guide the management of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplantation: state of the art clinical review. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2024:1-14. [PMID: 39039915 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2024.2384060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection after solid organ transplantation, with significant impact on morbidity and long-term survival. Despite advances in diagnostics and therapeutics, the management of CMV remains very challenging. AREAS COVERED This article reviews emerging data on the clinical utility of laboratory assays that quantify cell-mediated immune responses to CMV. Observational studies have consistently demonstrated that a deficiency in pathogen-specific cell-mediated immunity is correlated with a heightened risk of primary, reactivation or recurrent CMV after transplantation. A limited number of interventional studies have recently investigated cell-mediated immune assays in guiding the prevention and treatment of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation. EXPERT OPINION The pathogenesis and outcome of CMV after solid organ transplantion reflect the interplay between viral replication and CMV-specific immune reconstitution. Research in CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity paved way for the development of several laboratory assays that may assist clinicians in predicting the risk of CMV after transplantation, individualize the approach to CMV disease prevention, guide the need and duration of treatment of CMV infection, and predict the risk of relapse after treatment. More interventional studies are needed to further solidify the role of cell-mediated immune assays in various clinical situations after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, and the William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wolf PJW, Finger MA, Rossi Neto JM, Santos CC, Mattos VBDM, Rossi R, Damiani LP. Absolute Lymphocyte Count: a Predictor of Positive Serum PCR for Trypanosoma cruzi in Patients with Chagas Disease Undergoing Heart Transplantation. Arq Bras Cardiol 2024; 121:e20230588. [PMID: 39016410 PMCID: PMC11216328 DOI: 10.36660/abc.20230588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unknown whether lymphopenia is a risk factor for the reactivation of Chagas disease in heart transplantation (HTx), as recently described in the reactivation of cytomegalovirus in transplant patients. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether lymphopenia in the perioperative period of heart transplantation is related to early Trypanosoma cruzi parasitemia. METHODS This observational, retrospective study analyzed a sample from January 2014 to January 2023). Parasitemia was evaluated in the first 3 months after HTx using serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and compared with the total lymphocyte count in the perioperative period of HTx using receiver operating characteristic curves. Baseline characteristics were compared with PCR for Chagas using independent Cox proportional hazards models. A significance level of 5% was adopted. RESULTS The sample (n = 35) had a mean age of 52.5 ± 8.1 years, and 22 patients (62.8%) had positive PCR for Chagas. The mean lowest lymphocyte values in the first 14 days after HTx were 398 ± 189 and 755 ± 303 cells/mm3 in patients with and without parasitemia, respectively, within 3 months after HTx (area under the curve = 0.857; 95% confidence interval: 0.996 to 0.718, sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 86.4%). A cutoff value of less than 550 lymphocytes/mm3 was determined as a risk factor for the presence of parasitemia. Patients with lymphocytes < 550 units/mm3 in the first 14 days after HTx presented positive PCR in 80% of cases. For every increase of 100 lymphocytes/mm3, the risk of PCR positivity was reduced by 26% (hazard rate ratio = 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.59 to 0.93, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION There was an association between lymphopenia in the perioperative period of HTx and early T. cruzi parasitemia detected by PCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Raphael Rossi
- Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP - Brasil
| | - Lucas Petri Damiani
- Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP - Brasil
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - ARO, São Paulo, SP - Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reusing JO, Agena F, Kotton CN, Campana G, Pierrotti LC, David-Neto E. QuantiFERON-CMV as a Predictor of CMV Events During Preemptive Therapy in CMV-seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2024; 108:985-995. [PMID: 37990351 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after kidney transplantation is costly and burdensome. METHODS Given its promising utility in risk stratification, we evaluated the use of QuantiFERON-CMV (QFCMV) and additional clinical variables in this prospective cohort study to predict the first clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMV, ranging from asymptomatic viremia requiring treatment to CMV disease) in the first posttransplant year. A cost-effectiveness analysis for guided prevention was done. RESULTS One hundred adult kidney transplant recipients, CMV IgG + , were given basiliximab induction and maintained on steroid/mycophenolate/tacrolimus with weekly CMV monitoring. Thirty-nine patients developed CS-CMV infection (viral syndrome, n = 1; end-organ disease, n = 9; and asymptomatic viremia, n = 29). A nonreactive or indeterminate QFCMV result using the standard threshold around day 30 (but not before transplant) was associated with CS-CMV rates of 50% and 75%, respectively. A higher QFCMV threshold for reactivity (>1.0 IU interferon-γ/mL) outperformed the manufacturer's standard (>0.2 IU interferon-γ/mL) in predicting protection but still allowed a 16% incidence of CS-CMV. The combination of recipient age and type of donor, along with posttransplant QFCMV resulted in a prediction model that increased the negative predictive value from 84% (QFCMV alone) to 93%. QFCMV-guided preemptive therapy was of lower cost than preemptive therapy alone ( P < 0.001, probabilistic sensitivity analysis) and was cost-effective (incremental net monetary benefit of 210 USD) assuming willingness-to-pay of 2000 USD to avoid 1 CMV disease. CONCLUSIONS Guided CMV prevention by the prediction model with QFCMV is cost-effective and would spare from CMV surveillance in 42% of patients with low risk for CS-CMV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José O Reusing
- Renal Transplant Service, Instituto Central, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabiana Agena
- Renal Transplant Service, Instituto Central, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ligia Camera Pierrotti
- Medical Director Department, Dasa, Barueri, Brazil
- Division of Infectious Disease, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Elias David-Neto
- Renal Transplant Service, Instituto Central, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stewart AG, Kotton CN. What's New: Updates on Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation. Transplantation 2024; 108:884-897. [PMID: 37899366 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common infections occurring after solid organ transplantation. This high burden of disease, which incurs sizeable morbidity, may be worsening with the proportion of high-risk D+/R- solid organ transplantation recipients increasing in some regions globally. Cohort studies continue to support either universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy as effective prevention strategies. Letermovir prophylaxis was noninferior to valganciclovir in adult high-risk D+/R- kidney transplant recipients with fewer drug-related adverse events in a recent clinical trial and has now been approved for such use in some regions. Maribavir preemptive therapy failed to demonstrate noninferiority when compared with valganciclovir in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients but looked promising for safety. Donor matching could be useful in prevention CMV disease with a survival advantage demonstrated in seronegative recipients waiting up to 30 mo for a seronegative kidney. Immune-guided prophylaxis resulted in fewer CMV infection episodes in lung transplant recipients when compared with fixed-duration prophylaxis in a recent clinical trial. For treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infection, maribavir was more efficacious and better tolerated when compared with investigator-initiated therapy in its registration trial for this condition. Further research regarding best treatment and prophylaxis of resistant or refractory CMV infection is needed to reflect best clinical practice choices. Optimal use of immune globulin or CMV-specific T cells for prevention or treatment of CMV disease remains undefined. Standardized definitions for the design of CMV clinical trials have been developed. In this review, we highlight recent updates in the field from data published since 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam G Stewart
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roberts MB, Kotton CN. Conversion to mTOR Inhibitor to Reduce the Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Recurrence in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Preemptive Treatment: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Transplantation 2024; 108:e63. [PMID: 38277258 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B Roberts
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kotton CN. How low should we go? Potential and challenges of ultrasensitive CMV assays and solid organ transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2024; 26:e14239. [PMID: 38269440 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Nelson Kotton
- Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Trappe M, Affeldt P, Grundmann F, Kann M, Koehler FC, Müller RU, Stippel D, Kaiser R, Knops E, Heger E, Steger G, Klein F, Kurschat C, Di Cristanziano V. Five-year single-center analysis of cytomegalovirus viremia in kidney transplant recipients and possible implication for novel prophylactic therapy approaches. Transpl Infect Dis 2024; 26:e14233. [PMID: 38180168 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are a common complication after kidney transplantation (KTx) and negatively affecting patient outcome. Valganciclovir (VGC) prophylaxis is often limited by drug-induced side effects and dose reduction due to decline in kidney function. METHOD In the present study, episodes of CMV viremia in the first year after KTx in a cohort of 316 recipients were analyzed retrospectively to identify risk factors linked to persistent infections. RESULTS In the studied cohort, 18.7% of patients showed a high-risk (HR) constellation (D+/R-) for CMV infections. CMV viremia affected 22% of our cohort, with HR patients being the most affected cohort (44.1%). Within this group, most viremic events (65.3%) occurred while patients were still on prophylactic therapy, showing significantly higher viral loads and a longer duration compared to seropositive recipients. CONCLUSION The analysis at hand revealed that detection of viremia under ongoing antiviral prophylaxis bears an increased risk for sustained viral replication and antiviral drug resistance in HR patients. We identified low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and lower dose VGC prophylaxis post-KTx as a risk factor for breakthrough infections in HR patients in our single center cohort. These patients might benefit from a closer CMV monitoring or novel prophylactic agents as letermovir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Trappe
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Patrick Affeldt
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Franziska Grundmann
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Kann
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix C Koehler
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roman-Ulrich Müller
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Rare Diseases Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Stippel
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | - Rolf Kaiser
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena Knops
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eva Heger
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gertrud Steger
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Klein
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christine Kurschat
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Veronica Di Cristanziano
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yetmar ZA, Kudva YC, Seville MT, Bosch W, Huskey JL, Jarmi T, Kukla A, Dean PG, Razonable RR, Beam E. Risk of cytomegalovirus infection and subsequent allograft failure after pancreas transplantation. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:271-279. [PMID: 37839709 PMCID: PMC10843403 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of infection after transplantation, but few studies have evaluated its epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes among pancreas transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent pancreas transplantation from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2020, at 3 sites in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. The primary outcome was clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi), defined as CMV disease or infection requiring antiviral therapy. The secondary outcome was pancreas allograft failure. Among 471 pancreas transplant recipients, 117 (24.8%) developed csCMVi after a median of 226 (interquartile range 154-289) days. CMV donor (D)+/R- patients had a significantly higher incidence of csCMVi (hazard ratio [HR] 4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-7.64; P < .001). In adjusted analysis, a lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was associated with a greater risk of csCMVi among seropositive recipients (HR 1.39 per 50% decrease, 95% CI 1.13-1.73; P = .002) but not among D+/R- patients (HR 1.04 per 50% decrease, 95% CI 0.89-1.23; P = .595). csCMVi, lower ALC, and acute rejection (P < .001) were independently associated with pancreas allograft failure. In conclusion, CMV D+/R- was associated with csCMVi in pancreas recipients, although ALC was associated with csCMVi only among seropositive patients. The development of csCMVi in pancreas recipients was associated with poor pancreas allograft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Yetmar
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Maria Teresa Seville
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Wendelyn Bosch
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Janna L Huskey
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Tambi Jarmi
- Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick G Dean
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elena Beam
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Namsiripongpun W, Kantachuvesiri S, Bruminhent J. Utility of the Interferon-Gamma Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot Assay to Predict Risk of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transpl Int 2024; 36:11527. [PMID: 38249787 PMCID: PMC10796607 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Non-specific interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISpot) responses after solid organ transplant (SOT) and their relationship with cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation have hardly been investigated. Adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients underwent measurement of IFN-γ-producing T cells using the ELISpot assay before and 1 month after transplantation. Data for CMV infection episodes were collected. Risk factors for post-transplant CMV infection, based on IFN-γ responses, were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 93 KT recipients were enrolled in the study and 84 evaluable participants remained at 1 month post KT. Thirty-three (39%) recipients developed subsequent CMV infection within 6 months post-transplant. At 1-month post-transplant, IFN-γ-producing T cells with <250 spot-forming units (SFUs)/2.5 × 105 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were significantly associated with CMV infection (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-7.1, p = 0.007). On multivariable analysis, posttransplant IFN-γ-producing T cells with <250 SFUs/2.5 × 105 PBMCs remained independently associated with CMV infection (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-7.8, p = 0.019). Conclusions: KT recipients with low IFN-γ-producing T cells measured by the ELISpot assay are more likely to develop CMV infection after transplantation. Therefore, measurement of nonspecific cell-mediated immunity ELISpot responses could potentially stratify recipients at risk of CMV infection (Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20210216004).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Warunyu Namsiripongpun
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Surasak Kantachuvesiri
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jackrapong Bruminhent
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Ramathibodi Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dioverti MV, Bhaimia E, Yetmar ZA, Melendez DP, Misner L, Beito E, Deziel PJ, Theel ES, Razonable RR. Clinical utility of a cytomegalovirus-specific T cell assay in assessing the risk of post-prophylaxis cytomegalovirus infection and post-treatment relapse. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15143. [PMID: 37805968 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes significant morbidity in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Measuring cell-mediated immunity (CMI) may inform the risk of CMV infection after antiviral prophylaxis and predict relapse after CMV treatment. METHODS We serially assessed CMV CMI using the QuantiFERON-CMV assay (QF-CMV; Qiagen, Germantown, MD) in two cohorts of SOTRs: during valganciclovir prophylaxis and during treatment of CMV viremia. Results of CMI were correlated with post-prophylaxis CMV infection and post-treatment relapse, respectively. RESULTS Only one (4.2%) of 24 CMV D+/R- patients demonstrated positive QF-CMV by the end of valganciclovir prophylaxis. Four (16.6%) patients developed post-prophylaxis CMV infection; all four had undetectable QF-CMV at end of prophylaxis. Among 20 patients treated for CMV infection, 18 (90%) developed QF-CMV levels >.2 IU/mL by end of antiviral treatment and none developed CMV relapse. In contrast, the single patient who relapsed after completing treatment had a CMV CMI <.2 IU/ml (p = .0036). CONCLUSION Since CMV D+/R- SOTRs are unlikely to develop adequate CMV CMI while receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis, the utility of CMV CMI monitoring for risk stratification during time of prophylaxis had limited value. Conversely, CMV CMI testing may be a useful marker of the risk of CMV relapse after antiviral treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Bhaimia
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - Zachary A Yetmar
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Dante P Melendez
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Lori Misner
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elaine Beito
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Paul J Deziel
- William J von Leibig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elitza S Theel
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine and the William J von Leibig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Perry WA, Chow JK, Nelson J, Kent DM, Snydman DR. A Clinical Model to Predict the Occurrence of Select High-risk Infections in the First Year Following Heart Transplantation. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1542. [PMID: 37928481 PMCID: PMC10624471 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Invasive infection remains a dangerous complication of heart transplantation (HT). No objectively defined set of clinical risk factors has been established to reliably predict infection in HT. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical prediction model for use at 1 mo post-HT to predict serious infection by 1 y. Methods A retrospective cohort study of HT recipients (2000-2018) was performed. The composite endpoint included cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex or varicella zoster virus infection, blood stream infection, invasive fungal, or nocardial infection occurring 1 mo to 1 y post-HT. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was constructed using 10 candidate variables. A concordance statistic, calibration curve, and mean calibration error were calculated. A scoring system was derived for ease of clinical application. Results Three hundred seventy-five patients were analyzed; 93 patients experienced an outcome event. All variables remained in the final model: aged 55 y or above, history of diabetes, need for renal replacement therapy in first month, CMV risk derived from donor and recipient serology, use of induction and/or early lymphodepleting therapy in the first month, use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis at 1 mo, lymphocyte count under 0.75 × 103cells/µL at 1 mo, and inpatient status at 1 mo. Good discrimination (C-index 0.80) and calibration (mean absolute calibration error 3.6%) were demonstrated. Conclusion This model synthesizes multiple highly relevant clinical parameters, available at 1 mo post-HT, into a unified, objective, and clinically useful prediction tool for occurrence of serious infection by 1 y post-HT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney A. Perry
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer K. Chow
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jason Nelson
- Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - David M. Kent
- Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - David R. Snydman
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yetmar ZA, Kudva YC, Seville MT, Bosch W, Dean PG, Huskey JL, Budhiraja P, Jarmi T, Kukla A, Beam E. BK polyomavirus DNAemia in pancreas transplant recipients compared to pancreas-kidney recipients. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15135. [PMID: 37705389 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is a common complication of kidney transplantation. While BKV has been described in non-kidney transplant recipients, data are limited regarding its epidemiology and outcomes in pancreas transplant recipients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent pancreas transplantation from 2010-2020. The primary outcome was BKV DNAemia. Secondary outcomes were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reduction by 30%, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , endstage kidney disease, and pancreas allograft failure. Cox regression with time-dependent variables was utilized. RESULTS Four hundred and sixty-six patients were analyzed, including 74, 46, and 346 with pancreas transplant alone (PTA), pancreas-after-kidney, or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, respectively. PTA recipients experienced a lower incidence of BKV DNAemia (8.8% vs. 32.9%; p < .001) and shorter duration of DNAemia (median 28.0 vs. 84.5 days). No PTA recipients with BKV DNAemia underwent kidney biopsy or developed endstage kidney disease. Lymphopenia, non-PTA transplantation, and older age were associated with BKV DNAemia, which itself was associated with pancreas allograft failure (adjusted hazard ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.27-3.60; p = .004). Among PTA recipients, BKV DNAemia was not associated with eGFR reduction or eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 . CONCLUSIONS BKV DNAemia was common among PTA recipients, though lower than a comparable group of pancreas-kidney recipients. However, BKV DNAemia was not associated with adverse native kidney outcomes and no PTA recipients developed endstage kidney disease. Conversely, BKV DNAemia was associated with pancreas allograft failure. Further studies are needed to estimate the rate of BKV nephropathy in this population, and further evaluate long-term kidney outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Yetmar
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism & Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Maria Teresa Seville
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Wendelyn Bosch
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick G Dean
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Janna L Huskey
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Pooja Budhiraja
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Tambi Jarmi
- Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elena Beam
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Eichenberger EM, Zamora D, Schaenman J, Hill JA. Like watching a soccer game through a keyhole: Cytomegalovirus cell-mediated immunity incompletely reveals risk for clinically significant cytomegalovirus reactivation in cord blood transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25:e14116. [PMID: 37577924 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M Eichenberger
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Danniel Zamora
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Joanna Schaenman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joshua A Hill
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bharati J, Anandh U, Kotton CN, Mueller T, Shingada AK, Ramachandran R. Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Infections in Kidney Transplantation. Semin Nephrol 2023; 43:151486. [PMID: 38378396 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Kidney transplant often is complicated by infections in the recipient from therapy-related and patient-related risk factors. Infections in kidney transplant recipients are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and allograft dysfunction. There is a predictable timeline after kidney transplant regarding the types of pathogens causing infections, reflecting the net state of immunosuppression. In the early post-transplant period, bacterial infections comprise two thirds of all infections, followed by viral and fungal infections. Infections occurring early after kidney transplantation are generally the result of postoperative complications. In most cases, opportunistic infections occur within 6 months after kidney transplantation. They may be caused by a new infection, a donor-derived infection, or reactivation of a latent infection. Community-acquired pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal infections are the most common infections in the late period after transplantation when the net immunosuppression is minimal. It is crucial to seek information on the time after transplant, reflecting the net state of immunosuppression, previous history of exposure/infections, geography, and seasonal outbreaks. It is imperative that we develop regionally specific guidelines on screening, prevention, and management of infections after kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyita Bharati
- Section of Nephrology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
| | - Urmila Anandh
- Department of Nephrology, Amrita Hospitals, Faridabad, Delhi National Capital Region, India
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas Mueller
- Renal Transplant Program, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Raja Ramachandran
- Department of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kotton CN. The Best Method for CMV Prevention in High-risk Kidney Transplant Recipients? Either, per National Norwegian Transplant Database: Commentary on Blom et al, Cytomegalovirus High-risk Kidney Transplant Recipients Show No Difference in Long-term Outcomes Following Preemptive Versus Prophylactic Management. Transplantation 2023; 107:1671-1672. [PMID: 37211634 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Nelson Kotton
- Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schoeberl AK, Zuckermann A, Kaider A, Aliabadi-Zuckermann A, Uyanik-Uenal K, Laufer G, Goekler J. Absolute Lymphocyte Count as a Marker for Cytomegalovirus Infection After Heart Transplantation. Transplantation 2023; 107:748-752. [PMID: 36228318 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies indicate an association between reduced absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after solid organ transplantation and have therefore highlighted the potential of ALC as a simple tool to predict CMV infection in transplant patients. This study aimed to examine the utility of ALC as a valuable marker for CMV infection in heart transplant patients. METHODS Clinical information and ALC data of all adult patients who received orthotopic heart transplantation at the Medical University of Vienna between January 2004 and May 2019 were collected. We performed a multivariable Cox regression model that incorporates repeated measurements of ALC as a time-varying continuous factor in 2 ways, first as continuous logarithmic factor considering a 50% decrease of ALC levels and second as binary factor using a threshold of 610 cells/μL. RESULTS One hundred fifty-eight (39%) patients developed CMV infection over the course of 2 y. Patients with lymphopenia were shown to be at higher risk of developing CMV infection both in the continuous approach (HR [per 50% reduction] 1.29; confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.53; P = 0.003) and the binary approach with a cutoff of 610 cells/μL (HR 1.74; CI, 1.20-2.51; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a strong association between reduced ALC and the development of CMV infection after heart transplantation. ALC value monitoring could provide an additional tool to assess individualized CMV risk after solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin-Kai Schoeberl
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Zuckermann
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandra Kaider
- Department of Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems (CeMSIIS), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Guenther Laufer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Goekler
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Khawaja F, Spallone A, Kotton CN, Chemaly RF. Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients: newly approved additions to our armamentarium. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023; 29:44-50. [PMID: 35843567 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden that cytomegalovirus (CMV) portends for haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients cannot be understated. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir have successfully been used for prevention and treatment of CMV infections, although with serious side effects such as leucopenia and some development of resistance. Until recently, available therapies for ganciclovir-resistant CMV have significant toxicities. Although advances have been made in the field, the unmet medical needs for effective and well-tolerated therapies are significant. OBJECTIVES This review aims to summarise the current and emerging CMV antiviral drugs and discusses future perspectives in the field. SOURCES We searched for relevant articles with pertinent keywords: "Cytomegalovirus OR CMV", "Transplant" and "Antiviral". Articles published after 2019 were given preference. Articles were reviewed by the authors for relevance and impact to the subject of interest. CONTENT We outline in this review current advances in prophylaxis of CMV infection with letermovir, breakthrough CMV infections while on or after prophylaxis, the development of resistant and refractory CMV infections, and the newly approved anti-CMV agent, maribavir, in haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients. IMPLICATIONS Prevention of CMV infections after transplant has improved greatly over the past few years. Despite major advancements, breakthrough CMV infections and development of refractory and resistant CMV infections remain major complications post transplantation. We highlight emerging therapeutics that tolerably and effectively prevent and treat CMV infections, especially refractory and resistant cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fareed Khawaja
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Spallone
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Transplant Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roy F Chemaly
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang J, Cao J, Zheng R, Yu M, Lin Z, Wang C, McCluskey J, Yang J, Chen Z, Corbett AJ, Cao P, Mo W, Wang Z. The establishment of a cytomegalovirus -specific CD8+ T-cell threshold by kinetic modeling for the prediction of post-hemopoietic stem cell transplant reactivation. iScience 2022; 25:105340. [PMID: 36325063 PMCID: PMC9618782 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The dynamic interaction between the CMV virus and host immune response remains obscure, thus hindering the diagnosis and therapeutic management of patients with HSCT. The current diagnosis of CMV viremia depends on viral load estimation. Medical intervention based on viral load, can be unnecessary or poorly timed for many patients. Here we examined the clinical features and blood samples of patients with HSCT and assessed the CMV reactivation kinetics and corresponding CMV antigen-specific T-cell response in individual patients based on a peptide pool stimulation T-cell assay, which showed that CMV-specific CD8+ T cells were more suitable to be a diagnosis indicator for suppressing CMV reactivation. Using ROC analysis, we defined and verified a CMV-specific CD8+ T-cell counts threshold (925 cells/106 PBMCs) as an indicator of CMV reactivation post-HSCT, and suggested that use of this threshold would provide more accurate guidance for prompt medication and better management of CMV infection post-HSCT.
Collapse
|
20
|
Deng R, Wu Y, Xu L, Liu K, Huang X, Zhang X. Clinical risk factors and prognostic model for idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies. Am J Hematol 2021; 96:1407-1419. [PMID: 34350623 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IIDDs) of the central nervous system (CNS) are rare but serious neurological complications of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). However, the risk factors and a method to predict the prognosis of post-transplantation CNS IIDDs are not available. This retrospective study first reviewed data from 4532 patients who received haplo-HSCT during 2008-2019 in our center, and 184 patients (4.1%) with IIDDs after haplo-HSCT were identified. Grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (p < 0.001) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (p = 0.009) were identified as risk factors for developing IIDDs after haplo-HSCT. We then divided the 184 IIDD patients into a derivation cohort and validation cohort due to transplantation time to develop and validate a model for predicting the prognosis of IIDDs. In the multivariate analysis of the derivation cohort, four candidate predictors were entered into the final prognostic model: cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, IgG synthesis (IgG-syn) and spinal cord lesions. The prognostic model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.803-0.925) in the internal validation cohort and 0.871 (95% CI: 0.806-0.931) in the external validation cohort. The calibration plots showed a high agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes. Decision curve analysis indicated that IIDD patients could benefit from the clinical application of the prognostic model. The identification of IIDD patients after allo-HSCT who have a poor prognosis might allow timely treatment and improve patient survival and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui‐Xin Deng
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| | - Ye‐Jun Wu
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| | - Lan‐Ping Xu
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| | - Kai‐Yan Liu
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| | - Xiao‐Jun Huang
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| | - Xiao‐Hui Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Saeed H, Thoendel M, Razonable RR. Individualized management of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2021.1964951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Huma Saeed
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and the William J Von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Matthew Thoendel
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and the William J Von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and the William J Von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bruminhent J, Autto S, Rotjanapan P, Ngarmjanyaporn P, Bushyakanist A, Kirdlarp S, O-Charoen P, Setthaudom C, Pisitkun P. A Prospective Study of Cytomegalovirus-Specific Cell-Mediated Immune Monitoring and Cytomegalovirus Infection in Patients With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Receiving Immunosuppressants. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8:ofab248. [PMID: 34189173 PMCID: PMC8231397 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The effects of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) on CMV infection in patients with autoimmune diseases receiving immunosuppressants have not been explored. Methods Patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were preemptively monitored for clinically significant CMV infection (CsCMVI; defined as plasma CMV DNA loads >3 log10 IU/mL). CMV-specific CMI was assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (QuantiFERON-CMV [QF]) before as well as 1 and 3 months after intense immunosuppressive therapy. Results The study included 55 patients with active SLE; patients were a mean age (SD) of 34 (13) years and had a median SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 score (SD) of 14 (8), and 93% were female. Most patients had renal involvement (67%), received methylprednisolone (93%), and were CMV-seropositive (95%). Thirteen (23.6%) patients developed CsCMVI. Among patients with active SLE who were QF-negative (QF-) and QF-positive (QF+) before receiving immunosuppressive therapy, 28.6% and 25% developed CsCMVI, respectively (P = .69). However, 1 month postimmunosuppression, more QF- than QF+ patients developed CsCMVI (44.4% vs 11.8%; P = .03; adjusted hazard ratio, 4.97; 95% CI, 1.07-23.10; P = .04). Conclusions Patients with active SLE and low CMV-specific T-cell responses could develop CMV infection after receiving immunosuppressants. Further studies should focus on CMV-specific CMI among patients with autoimmune diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackrapong Bruminhent
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Suphanan Autto
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Porpon Rotjanapan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pintip Ngarmjanyaporn
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Asalaysa Bushyakanist
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Deparment of Medicine, Rayong Hospital in Honor of Her Royal Highness Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn, Rayong, Thailand
| | - Suppachok Kirdlarp
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand
| | - Pichaya O-Charoen
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chavachol Setthaudom
- Immunology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Prapaporn Pisitkun
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kirisri S, Vongsakulyanon A, Kantachuvesiri S, Razonable RR, Bruminhent J. Predictors of CMV Infection in CMV-Seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients: Impact of Pretransplant CMV-Specific Humoral Immunity. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8:ofab199. [PMID: 34113686 PMCID: PMC8186243 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive solid organ transplant recipients have a relatively lower risk of CMV infection than CMV-seronegative recipients who receive allograft from CMV-seropositive donors, some patients remain at risk of CMV infection after transplant. We investigated the pretransplant CMV-specific humoral immunity (CHI) and other CMV infection predictors in CMV-seropositive kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Methods This retrospective study was conducted on adult CMV-seropositive KT recipients during 2017 and 2018. The cumulative incidence of CMV infection was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. CHI, measured with an enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay and other predictors for CMV infection, was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of the 340 CMV-seropositive KT recipients (37% female; mean ± SD age, 43 ± 11 years), 69% received deceased-donor allograft and 64% received induction therapy. During a mean follow-up of 14 months, the cumulative incidence of CMV infection was 14.8%. In multivariate analysis, low pretransplant CHI (defined as anti-CMV immunoglobulin [IgG] titer <20 AU/mL) was significantly associated with CMV infection (hazard ratio [HR], 2.98; 95% CI, 1.31–6.77; P = .009). Other significant predictors of CMV infection included older donor age (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.06; P = .005), antithymocyte induction therapy (HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.09–7.74; P = .033), and prolonged cold ischemic time (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02–1.10; P = .002). Conclusions A low pretransplant CHI is independently associated with post-transplant CMV infection in CMV-seropositive KT recipients. A quantitative anti-CMV IgG assay could potentially stratify CMV-seropositive patients at risk of CMV infection after KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Similan Kirisri
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Apirom Vongsakulyanon
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Surasak Kantachuvesiri
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jackrapong Bruminhent
- Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wagner-Drouet E, Teschner D, Wolschke C, Janson D, Schäfer-Eckart K, Gärtner J, Mielke S, Schreder M, Kobbe G, Kondakci M, Hilgendorf I, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Klein S, Heidenreich D, Kreil S, Verbeek M, Grass S, Ditschkowski M, Gromke T, Koch M, Lindemann M, Hünig T, Schmidt T, Rascle A, Guldan H, Barabas S, Deml L, Wagner R, Wolff D. Standardized monitoring of cytomegalovirus-specific immunity can improve risk stratification of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 2021; 106:363-374. [PMID: 31879324 PMCID: PMC7849569 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2019.229252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Recurrence of cytomegalovirus reactivation remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity using a standardized assay might improve the risk stratification of patients. A prospective multicenter study was conducted in 175 intermediate- and high-risk allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients under preemptive antiviral therapy. Cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity was measured using a standardized IFN-γ ELISpot assay (T-Track® CMV). Primary aim was to evaluate the suitability of measuring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity after end of treatment for a first cytomegalovirus reactivation to predict recurrent reactivation. 40/101 (39.6%) patients with a first cytomegalovirus reactivation experienced recurrent reactivations, mainly in the high-risk group (cytomegalovirus-seronegative donor/cytomegalovirus-seropositive recipient). The positive predictive value of T-Track® CMV (patients with a negative test after the first reactivation experienced at least one recurrent reactivation) was 84.2% in high-risk patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a higher probability of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation in high-risk patients with a negative test after the first reactivation (hazard ratio 2.73; p=0.007). Interestingly, a post-hoc analysis considering T-Track® CMV measurements at day 100 post-transplantation, a time point highly relevant for outpatient care, showed a positive predictive value of 90.0% in high-risk patients. Our results indicate that standardized cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity monitoring may allow improved risk stratification and management of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02156479.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Wagner-Drouet
- Dpt of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Pneumology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Teschner
- Dpt of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Pneumology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christine Wolschke
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Dietlinde Janson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart
- Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Klinikum Nord, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Gärtner
- Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Klinikum Nord, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Mielke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Schreder
- First Department of Medicine, Center for Oncology and Hematology, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guido Kobbe
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Mustafa Kondakci
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Inken Hilgendorf
- Klinik f. Innere Medizin II, Abt. Haematol. und Internist. Onkologie, Univ.-Klinikum Jena, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Klein
- Dpt of Hematology and Oncology, Univ. Medical Center Mannheim, Univ. of Heidelberg, Mannheim,Germany
| | - Daniela Heidenreich
- Dpt of Hematology and Oncology, Univ. Medical Center Mannheim, Univ. of Heidelberg, Mannheim,Germany
| | - Sebastian Kreil
- Dpt of Hematology and Oncology, Univ. Medical Center Mannheim, Univ. of Heidelberg, Mannheim,Germany
| | - Mareike Verbeek
- III. Medical Department, Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM, Munich, Germany
| | - Sandra Grass
- III. Medical Department, Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Gromke
- Innere Klinik, Tumorforschung, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Martina Koch
- Dpt of Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center of the JGU, Mainz, Germany
| | - Monika Lindemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas Hünig
- Institute of Virology and Immunobiology, University Medical Center Würzburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ralf Wagner
- Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wolff
- Dpt of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Post-transplant absolute lymphocyte count predicts early cytomegalovirus infection after heart transplantation. Sci Rep 2021; 11:1426. [PMID: 33446808 PMCID: PMC7809401 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80790-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunosuppressive therapy can decrease rejection episodes and increase the risk of severe and fatal infections in heart transplantation (HT) recipients. Immunosuppressive therapy can also decrease the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), but the relationship between early post-transplant ALC and early cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is largely unknown, especially in HT. We retrospectively analyzed 58 HT recipients who tested positive for CMV IgG antibody and received basiliximab induction therapy. We collected preoperative and 2-month postoperative data on ALC and CMV load. The CMV load > 1200 IU/mL was used as the cutoff value to define early CMV infection. Post-transplant lymphopenia was defined as an ALC of < 500 cells/μL at postoperative day (POD) #7. On POD #7, 29 (50.0%) patients had post-transplant lymphopenia and 29 (50.0%) patients did not. The incidence of CMV infection within 1 or 2 months of HT was higher in the post-transplant lymphopenia group than in the non-lymphopenia group (82.8% vs. 48.3%, P = 0.013; 89.7% vs. 65.5%, P = 0.028, respectively). ALC < 500 cells/μL on POD #7 was an independent risk factor for early CMV infection within 1 month of HT (odds ratio, 4.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-14.77; P = 0.029). A low ALC after HT was associated with a high risk of early CMV infection. Post-transplant ALC monitoring is simple and inexpensive and can help identify patients at high risk of early CMV infection.
Collapse
|
26
|
Limaye AP, Babu TM, Boeckh M. Progress and Challenges in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplantation. Clin Microbiol Rev 2020; 34:34/1/e00043-19. [PMID: 33115722 PMCID: PMC7920732 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00043-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hosts with compromised or naive immune systems, such as individuals living with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients, and fetuses, are at the highest risk for complications from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Despite substantial progress in prevention, diagnostics, and treatment, CMV continues to negatively impact both solid-organ transplant (SOT) and hematologic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In this article, we summarize important developments in the field over the past 10 years and highlight new approaches and remaining challenges to the optimal control of CMV infection and disease in transplant settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajit P Limaye
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Tara M Babu
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Overlake Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington, USA
| | - Michael Boeckh
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Perry WA, Paulus JK, Price LL, Snydman DR, Chow JK. Association between lymphopenia at one month post-transplant and infectious outcomes or death in heart transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 73:e3797-e3803. [PMID: 33279963 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cell-mediated immunity is a specific target of several medications used to prevent or treat rejection in orthotopic heart transplantation. Low absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) has potential to be a useful and accessible clinical indicator of overall infection risk. Though some studies have demonstrated this association in other transplant populations, it has not been assessed in heart transplant recipients. METHODS A single-center retrospective cohort study examined adult heart transplant recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2018. The exposure of interest was ALC less than 0.75 x10 3cells/µL at one month post-transplant and the primary endpoint was a composite outcome of infection (including cytomegalovirus [CMV], herpes simplex I/II or varicella zoster virus [HSV/VZV], blood stream infection [BSI], invasive fungal infection [IFI]) or death occurring after one month and before one year post-transplant. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was created to control for confounders identified using clinical judgment and statistical criteria. RESULTS Of 375 subjects analyzed, 101 (27%) developed the composite outcome (61 CMV, 3 HSV/VZV, 19 BSI, 10 IFI, 8 deaths). Lymphopenia (ALC<0.75 x10 3cells/µL) at one month was associated with a greater than two fold higher rate of the composite outcome (hazard ratio 2.26, 95% confidence interval 1.47-3.46, p-value <0.001) compared to patients without lymphopenia at one month. After adjustment for confounding variables, the presence of lymphopenia remained statistically significantly associated with the composite outcome (HR 1.72 95% CI 1.08-2.75, p=0.02). Conclusion: ALC measured at one month post-heart transplant is associated with an increased risk of infectious outcomes or death in the ensuing 11months. This is a simple, accessible laboratory measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney A Perry
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica K Paulus
- Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center, Tufts Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,The Institute for Clinical and Health Research Policy Studies (ICRHPS), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lori Lyn Price
- The Institute for Clinical and Health Research Policy Studies (ICRHPS), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David R Snydman
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer K Chow
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wu YJ, Hou M, Liu HX, Peng J, Ma LM, Yang LH, Feng R, Liu H, Liu Y, Feng J, Zhang HY, Zhou ZP, Wang WS, Shen XL, Zhao P, Fu HX, Zeng QZ, Wang XL, Huang QS, He Y, Jiang Q, Jiang H, Lu J, Zhao XY, Zhao XS, Chang YJ, Xu LP, Li YY, Wang QF, Zhang XH. A risk score for predicting hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia in ITP using nationally representative data. Blood Adv 2020; 4:5846-5857. [PMID: 33232474 PMCID: PMC7686895 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Infection is one of the primary causes of death from immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and the lungs are the most common site of infection. We identified the factors associated with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in nonsplenectomized adults with ITP and established the [corrected] (ACPA) prediction model to predict the incidence of hospitalization for CAP. This was a retrospective study of nonsplenectomized adult patients with ITP from 10 large medical centers in China. The derivation cohort included 145 ITP inpatients with CAP and 1360 inpatients without CAP from 5 medical centers, and the validation cohort included the remaining 63 ITP inpatients with CAP and 526 inpatients without CAP from the other 5 centers. The 4-item ACPA model, which included age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, initial platelet count, and initial absolute lymphocyte count, was established by multivariable analysis of the derivation cohort. Internal and external validation were conducted to assess the performance of the model. The ACPA model had an area under the curve of 0.853 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.818-0.889) in the derivation cohort and 0.862 (95% CI, 0.807-0.916) in the validation cohort, which indicated the good discrimination power of the model. Calibration plots showed high agreement between the estimated and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis indicated that ITP patients could benefit from the clinical application of the ACPA model. To summarize, the ACPA model was developed and validated to predict the occurrence of hospitalization for CAP, which might help identify ITP patients with a high risk of hospitalization for CAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye-Jun Wu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Hou
- Department of Hematology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Hui-Xin Liu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Peng
- Department of Hematology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Liang-Ming Ma
- Affiliated Shanxi Big Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Lin-Hua Yang
- Department of Hematology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Ru Feng
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Geriatric Hematology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Feng
- Department of Hematology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hong-Yu Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Ze-Ping Zhou
- Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Wen-Sheng Wang
- Department of Hematology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xu-Liang Shen
- Department of Hematology, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China
| | - Peng Zhao
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Hai-Xia Fu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Qiao-Zhu Zeng
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Xing-Lin Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Qiu-Sha Huang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Yun He
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Jiang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Jiang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Lu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang-Yu Zhao
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Su Zhao
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Ying-Jun Chang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Lan-Ping Xu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Yue-Ying Li
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, China; and
- Beijing Institute of Genomics (BIG), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qian-Fei Wang
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, China; and
- Beijing Institute of Genomics (BIG), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Hui Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
El Helou G, Lahr B, Razonable R. Absolute lymphocyte count as marker of cytomegalovirus and allograft rejection: Is there a "Safe Corridor" after kidney transplantation? Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 23:e13489. [PMID: 33037728 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The contrasting outcomes of lymphocyte manipulation after solid organ transplantation are allograft rejection and infections, commonly with cytomegalovirus (CMV). Peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) may serve as a predictive marker for these outcomes. Using a retrospective review of clinical and laboratory dataset, we aimed to determine whether a range of ALC (termed "safe ALC corridor") exists where CMV infection and rejection outcomes are minimal in a cohort of 381 kidney transplant recipients. In an extended Cox model using a time-dependent covariate for peripheral blood ALC, a value below the cut-off of 610 cells/uL was associated with the development of CMV infection both in the overall cohort (Hazard Ratio [HR] 2.25 (95% confidence internal [CI] 1.02-4.96; P = .043) and the subgroup of high-risk CMV D+/R- mismatch patients (HR 2.91 [95% CI 1.09-7.77]; P = .033). In contrast, a time-dependent Cox analysis did not show any significant association between ALC and rejection (per IQR decrease, HR 1.2 [95% CI: 0.76-1.9]; P = .434). Accordingly, a "safe ALC corridor" could not be defined. In conclusion, a low peripheral blood ALC (ie, threshold of 610 cells/uL) can be used to stratify the risk of CMV disease after kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy El Helou
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of Infectious Disease and Global Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Brian Lahr
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Raymund Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Meesing A, Germer JJ, Yao JD, Gartner ML, Digmann BJ, Razonable RR. Differences in Duration and Degree of Cytomegalovirus DNAemia Observed With Two Standardized Quantitative Nucleic Acid Tests and Implications for Clinical Care. J Infect Dis 2020; 221:251-255. [PMID: 31504626 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral loads overall were 0.29 log IU/mL higher with cobas CMV for use on the cobas 6800/8800 System (cobas CMV) compared with Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan CMV Test (CAP/CTM CMV). Cytomegalovirus DNAemia was detected 11.5 days earlier by cobas CMV, whereas clearance was delayed by 12.8 days. Cytomegalovirus remained detectable by cobas CMV in 44.2% of patients at the time of viral clearance as determined by CAP/CTM CMV. Undetectable viral load by cobas CMV at end of treatment was associated with reduced risk for retreatment (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.99; P = .05). The use of different quantitative cytomegalovirus nucleic acid tests may affect direct patient care as a result of significant differences in reporting the degree of CMV DNAemia and the time to first detection and clearance of CMV DNAemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atibordee Meesing
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khonkean, Thailand
| | - Jeffrey J Germer
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Joseph D Yao
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michelle L Gartner
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Benjamin J Digmann
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fernández-Ruiz M, López-Medrano F, Aguado JM. Predictive tools to determine risk of infection in kidney transplant recipients. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2020; 18:423-441. [PMID: 32084326 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1733976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Infection represents a major complication after kidney transplantation (KT). Therapeutic drug monitoring is essentially the only approach for the adjustment of immunosuppression in current practice, with suboptimal results. The implementation of immune monitoring strategies may contribute to minimizing the risk of adverse events attributable to over-immunosuppression without compromising graft outcomes.Areas covered: The present review (based on PubMed/MEDLINE searches from database inception to November 2019) is focused on immune biomarkers with no antigen specificity (non-pathogen-specific), including serum levels of immunoglobulins and complement factors, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations, soluble CD30, intracellular ATP production by stimulated CD4+ T-cells, and other cell-based immune assays. We also summarized recent advances in the use of replication kinetics of latent viruses to assess the functionality of T-cell immunity, with focus on the nonpathogenic anelloviruses. Finally, the composite risk scores reported in the literature are critically discussed.Expert opinion: Notable efforts have been made to develop an enlarging repertoire of immune biomarkers and prediction models, although most of them still lack technical standardization and external validation. Preventive interventions based on these tools (prolongation of prophylaxis, tapering of immunosuppression, or immunoglobulin replacement therapy in hypogammaglobulinemic patients) remain to be defined, ideally in the context of controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Fernández-Ruiz
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (Imas12), Madrid, Spain.,Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0002), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco López-Medrano
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (Imas12), Madrid, Spain.,Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0002), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - José María Aguado
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (Imas12), Madrid, Spain.,Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0002), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Clinical experience with a novel assay measuring cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell immunity by flow cytometry and intracellular cytokine staining to predict clinically significant CMV events. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:58. [PMID: 31952516 PMCID: PMC6969482 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-4787-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most common opportunistic infections following organ transplantation, despite administration of CMV prophylaxis. CMV-specific T-cell immunity (TCI) has been associated with reduced rates of CMV infection. We describe for the first time clinical experience using the CMV T-Cell Immunity Panel (CMV-TCIP), a commercially available assay which measures CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses, to predict clinically significant CMV events. METHODS Adult (> 18-year-old) patients with CMV-TCIP results and ≥ 1 subsequent assessment for CMV DNAemia were included at Brown University and the University of Maryland Medical Center-affiliated hospitals between 4/2017 and 5/2019. A clinically significant CMV event was defined as CMV DNAemia prompting initiation of treatment. We excluded indeterminate results, mostly due to background positivity, allogeneic hematopoetic cell transplant (HCT) recipients, or patients who were continued on antiviral therapy against CMV irrespective of the CMV-TCIP result, because ongoing antiviral therapy could prevent a CMV event. RESULTS We analyzed 44 samples from 37 patients: 31 were solid organ transplant recipients, 4 had hematologic malignancies, 2 had autoimmune disorders. The CMV-protection receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) was significant for %CMV-specific CD4+ (AUC: 0.78, P < 0.001) and borderline for CD8+ (AUC: 0.66, P = 0.064) T-cells. At a cut-off value of 0.22% CMV-specific CD4+ T-cells, positive predictive value (PPV) for protection against CMV was 85% (95%CI 65-96%), and negative predictive value (NPV) was 67% (95%CI 41-87%). CONCLUSIONS The CMV-TCIP, in particular %CMV-specific CD4+ T-cells, showed good diagnostic performance to predict CMV events. The CMV-TCIP may be a useful test in clinical practice, and merits further validation in larger prospective studies.
Collapse
|
33
|
Gardiner BJ, Chow JK, Brilleman SL, Peleg AY, Snydman DR. The impact of recurrent cytomegalovirus infection on long-term survival in solid organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2019; 21:e13189. [PMID: 31581352 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality following solid organ transplantation (SOT). While recurrent infection occurs in up to 30% of patients, its impact on mortality is unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between recurrent CMV infection and long-term survival in SOT recipients. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of SOT recipients who completed treatment for an episode of CMV infection. Patients were followed until death, loss to follow-up or 10 years following CMV treatment completion. Univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HR) were calculated, treating relapse and rejection following CMV as time-varying. RESULTS About 79 kidney, 52 heart, 34 liver, and 5 liver-kidney transplant recipients were included. About 62/170 died, at a median of 3.8 years (IQR 0.8-6.6 years). Median follow-up among the 108 survivors was 7.4 years (IQR 3.7-10 years). Recurrent CMV infection occurred in 49/170 (29%), 67% within 6 months of treatment completion. Mortality among those who relapsed was 39% (19/49) vs 36% (43/121) in those who remained relapse-free (unadjusted HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.92-2.75, P = .10). After adjusting for age and transplanted organ, findings were similar (HR 1.68, 95% CI 0.93-3.04, P = .09). CONCLUSIONS Mortality following CMV remains high even in the valganciclovir era. Although our findings suggest a possible increased risk of death among patients with recurrent CMV, these did not reach statistical significance. The complex nature of these patients, multiple potential confounders, and limited statistical power made detection of small effects difficult. Larger prospective studies evaluating the clinical impact of strategies to reduce recurrence are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J Gardiner
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Disease, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jennifer K Chow
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Disease, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samuel L Brilleman
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Anton Y Peleg
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - David R Snydman
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Disease, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Predictive Value of the Combination of Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Count and Urinary Cytology in BK Polyomavirus-associated Nephropathy. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:1410-1414. [PMID: 31056251 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graft biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN), and polymerase chain reaction is the most specific screening technique. Development of a noninvasive, cost-effective marker for BKPyVAN is important. METHODS We reviewed 492 adult kidney transplant patients. We investigated peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) count and urinary cytology at graft biopsy in patients with BKVPyAN (n = 21), acute T-cell-mediated rejection (n = 79), and no evidence of acute rejection (n = 149). We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses to compare the test performance of PBL count, urinary cytology, and their combination for diagnosis of BKPyVAN. RESULTS The PBL count at biopsy was significantly lower in the BKPyVAN group than the acute T-cell-mediated rejection and no acute rejection groups (959 ± 290/μL, 1433 ± 673/μL, and 1531 ± 549/μL, respectively; P < .01). The PBL count was 959 ± 290/μL at diagnosis of BKPyVAN and increased to 1123 ± 377/μL, 1238 ± 419/μL, and 1292 ± 491/μL at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment, respectively (P < .05). On univariate analysis, the area under the curve was significantly higher for the combined model than for PBL and cytology alone (0.930, 0.797, and 0.875, respectively; P < .01). The improved test performance in the combined model remained significant after multivariate adjustment (0.972, 0.844, and 0.928, respectively; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Decreased PBL count was found in BKPyVAN, and the predictive performance of the combination of PBL count and urinary cytology was significantly enhanced for diagnosis of BKPyVAN.
Collapse
|
35
|
Razonable RR, Humar A. Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13512. [PMID: 30817026 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 385] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common opportunistic infections that affect the outcome of solid organ transplantation. This updated guideline from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice provides evidence-based and expert recommendations for screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. CMV serology to detect immunoglobulin G remains as the standard method for pretransplant screening of donors and transplant candidates. Antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is highlighted, as a result of variability of CMV nucleic acid testing, even in the contemporary era when calibrators are standardized. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management. Strategies for managing drug-resistant CMV infection are presented. There is an increasing use of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, but their role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts has yet to be demonstrated. Specific issues related to pediatric transplant recipients are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atul Humar
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Transplant Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|