Ceftaroline-Associated Neutropenia: Case Series and Literature Review of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes

Safety and effectiveness of fifth generation cephalosporins for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a narrative review exploring past, present, and future

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major issue in healthcare, since it is often associated with endocarditis or deep site foci. Relevant morbidity and mortality associated with MRSA-BSIs forced the development of new antibiotic strategies; in particular, this review will focus the attention on fifth-generation cephalosporins (ceftaroline/ceftobiprole), that are the only ß-lactams active against MRSA.

AREAS COVERED

The review discusses the available randomized controlled trials and real-world observational studies conducted on safety and effectiveness of ceftaroline/ceftobiprole for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs. Finally, a proposal of MRSA-BSI treatment flowchart, based on fifth-generation cephalosporins, is described.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of anti-MRSA cephalosporins is an acceptable choice either in monotherapy or combination therapy for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs due to their relevant effectiveness and safety. Particularly, their use may be advisable in combination therapy in case of severe infections (including endocarditis or persistent bacteriemia) or in monotherapy in subjects at higher risk of drugs-induced toxicity with older regimens. On the contrary, caution should be taken in case of suspected/ascertained central nervous system infections due to inconsistent data regarding penetration of these drugs in cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissues.

Ceft-to-Ceft Study: Real-Life Experience with Ceftaroline and Ceftobiprole in Treatment of the Principal Infectious Syndromes in a Spanish Multicenter Hospital Cohort

BACKGROUND

To compare the real-life effectiveness and safety of ceftaroline fosamil (ceftaroline-F) and ceftobiprole medocaril (ceftobiprole-M) for infections in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

This comparative, observational, retrospective, and multicenter Spanish study included patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and hospitalized patients treated for at least 48 h with ceftaroline-F or ceftobiprole-M between their first incorporation in the clinical protocol of each hospital and 31 July 2022.

RESULTS

Ceftaroline-F was administered to 227 patients and ceftobiprole-M to 212. In comparison to the latter, ceftaroline-F-treated participants were younger (63.02 vs. 66.40 years, OR 1.1; 95%CI: 1.001-1.05) and had higher rates of septic shock (OR 0.27; 95%CI: 0.09-0.81) and higher frequencies of targeted (57.7 vs. 29.7%; OR: 0.35; 95%CI: 0.18-0.69) and combined (89.0 vs. 45.8%, OR: 0.13; 95%CI: 0.06-0.28) therapies that were second line or more (82.4% vs. 64.6%%; OR 0.35; 95%CI: 0.18-0.69), and higher rates of infections due to Gram-positive cocci (92.7 vs. 64.7%, p = 0.001), bacteremia (51.9 vs. 21.7%, p = 0.001), infective endocarditis (24.2 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.0001), and mechanical ventilation-associated pneumonia (8.8 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.0001). Ceftobiprole-M was more frequently administered against polymicrobial infections (38.1 vs. 14.0%, p = 0.001), those produced by Gram-negative bacilli (19.7 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.0001), nosocomial pneumonia (33 vs. 10.6%, p = 0.0001), and skin and soft-tissue infections (25.4 vs. 10.1%, p = 0.0001). Patients treated with ceftaroline-F had a longer hospital stay (36 (IQR: 19-60) vs. 19.50 (IQR: 12-30.75, p = 0.0001) days), with no difference in infection-related mortality at 14 (13.2 vs. 8.0%, p = 0.078) or 28 (4.8 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.415) days or in dropout rate for adverse effects (2.2 vs. 0.9%; p = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The fifth-generation cephalosporins, ceftaroline-F and ceftobiprole-M, are safe and effective in real life, with no difference between them in health outcomes.

Optimal drug therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Staphylococcus aureus is a significant human pathogen, causing a variety of infections, from skin and soft tissue infections to endocarditis, bone and joint infections and deep tissue abscesses. Mortality from S. aureus bacteraemia remains high, without major therapeutic advances in recent decades.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, optimized dosing of antibiotics is increasingly being recognized as a cornerstone of management for severe infections including S. aureus bacteraemia. This comprehensive review details the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) targets for commonly used antistaphylococcal antibiotics and the doses predicted to achieve them in clinical practice. Recent advances in dosing of teicoplanin and use of cefazolin in CNS infections and findings from combination therapy studies are discussed. Drug exposure relationships related to toxicity are also detailed.

SUMMARY

This review details the different PK/PD targets for drugs used to treat S. aureus bacteraemia and how to apply them in various scenarios. The drug doses that achieve them, and the risks of toxicity are also provided.

New Antimicrobials for Gram-Positive Sustained Infections: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Antibiotic resistance is a public health problem with increasingly alarming data being reported. Gram-positive bacteria are among the protagonists of severe nosocomial and community infections. The objective of this review is to conduct an extensive examination of emerging treatments for Gram-positive infections including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin, omadacycline, tedizolid, and delafloxacin. From a methodological standpoint, a comprehensive analysis on clinical trials, molecular structure, mechanism of action, microbiological targeting, clinical use, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features, and potential for therapeutic drug monitoring will be addressed. Each antibiotic paragraph is divided into specialized microbiological, clinical, and pharmacological sections, including detailed and appropriate tables. A better understanding of the latest promising advances in the field of therapeutic options could lead to the development of a better approach in managing antimicrobial therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens, which increasingly needs to be better stratified and targeted.

Vancomycin plus ceftaroline for persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The preferred antibiotic salvage regimen for persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSAB) is unclear. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vancomycin plus ceftaroline for persistent MRSAB. The primary outcome was time to MRSAB clearance post-ceftaroline initiation. Secondary outcomes included microbiological cure, hospital length of stay, 90-day readmission for MRSAB, 90-day all-cause mortality, MRSAB-related mortality, and incidence of antibiotic-associated adverse effects.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021.

SETTING

State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, a 748-bed tertiary care, academic medical center in Syracuse, NY.

PATIENTS

Adult patients were included if they had blood cultures positive for MRSA ≥72 h, received vancomycin monotherapy initially, and received vancomycin plus ceftaroline for ≥24 h. Patients were excluded if they received other anti-MRSA antibiotics, were pregnant, or were incarcerated. Of the 178 patients identified, 30 unique patients were evaluated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were medically complex with a median Pitt bacteremia score of 3, 63.3% (19/30) were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 66.7% (20/30) had infective endocarditis. Vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury was observed in 10% (3/30) of patients, which resulted in dose adjustments. No patients experienced ceftaroline-associated neutropenia or Clostridioides difficile infection, but 6.7% (2/30) developed a rash attributed to ceftaroline. Median time to MRSAB clearance post-ceftaroline initiation was 2.6 days. Microbiologic cure occurred in nearly all patients 96.7% (29/30). Median hospital length of stay was 19.5 days, and 6.7% (2/30) of patients had 90-day readmission for MRSAB. 90-day all-cause mortality and MRSAB-related mortality occurred in 26.7% (8/30) and 13.3% (4/30) of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin plus ceftaroline may represent an effective and well-tolerated salvage regimen option for persistent MRSAB.

The bacterial microbiota regulates normal hematopoiesis via metabolite-induced type 1 interferon signaling

Antibiotic therapy, especially when administered long term, is associated with adverse hematologic effects such as cytopenia. Signals from the intestinal microbiota are critical to maintain normal hematopoiesis, and antibiotics can cause bone marrow suppression through depletion of the microbiota. We reported previously that STAT1 signaling is necessary for microbiota-dependent hematopoiesis, but the precise mechanisms by which the gut microbiota signals to the host bone marrow to regulate hematopoiesis remain undefined. We sought to identify the cell type(s) through which STAT1 promotes microbiota-mediated hematopoiesis and to elucidate which upstream signaling pathways trigger STAT1 signaling. Using conditional knockout and chimeric mice, we found that the microbiota induced STAT1 signaling in non-myeloid hematopoietic cells to support hematopoiesis and that STAT1 signaling was specifically dependent on type I interferons (IFNs). Indeed, basal type I IFN signaling was reduced in hematopoietic progenitor cells with antibiotic treatment. In addition, we discovered that oral administration of a commensal-derived product, NOD1 ligand, rescues the hematopoietic defects induced by antibiotics in mice. Using metabolomics, we identified additional microbially produced candidates that can stimulate type I IFN signaling to potentially rescue the hematopoietic defects induced by antibiotics, including phosphatidylcholine and γ-glutamylalanine. Overall, our studies define a signaling pathway through which microbiota promotes normal hematopoiesis and identify microbial metabolites that may serve as therapeutic agents to ameliorate antibiotic-induced bone marrow suppression and cytopenia.

Ceftaroline versus vancomycin for treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis in adults

OBJECTIVES

Vancomycin remains a first-line treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-mediated acute pulmonary exacerbations (APEs) in adult cystic fibrosis (CF) patients; however, optimal alternatives remain poorly defined. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline for MRSA-mediated APEs of CF in adults.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study comparing ceftaroline with vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA-mediated APEs in adult CF patients. The primary endpoint was the return to at least 90% of baseline lung function measured by discharge FEV1% predicted in comparison with baseline FEV1% predicted.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were included in the analysis (22 receiving ceftaroline and 33 receiving vancomycin). Of the patients included in the analysis, 13 patients (59%) in the ceftaroline group and 24 patients (73%) in the vancomycin group met the primary outcome (P = 0.38). FEV1 measurements at baseline, admission and discharge were not different between treatments. Secondary outcomes including 30-day re-admission rate, 30-day mortality, treatment duration and adverse events (neutropenia, Clostridioides difficile infection and acute kidney injury) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Our small cohort study supports ceftaroline as an alternative treatment option for MRSA-mediated APE of CF in adults.

[Risk factors for neutropenia of late newborns]

OBJECTIVE

To study the risk factors and treatment for neutropenia of late newborns (NLN).

METHODS

Related clinical data were collected from the preterm infants and critically ill neonates who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit from July 2019 to January 2020. A total of 46 newborns with a blood absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of < 1.5×10⁹/L for two consecutive times at weeks 2-4 after birth were enrolled as the NLN group. A total of 92 late newborns with a blood ANC of ≥ 1.5×10⁹/L, matched at a ratio of 1:2, were enrolled as the control group. Possible risk factors associated with NLN and the treatment process were recorded. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for NLN.

RESULTS

Among the 46 neonates in the NLN group, 29 had a gestational age of < 32 weeks, 14 had a gestational age of 32-37 weeks, and 3 had a gestational age of > 37 weeks. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence rates of gestational hypertension, premature rupture of membranes > 18 hours and intrauterine distress, 5-minute Apgar score, the duration of positive pressure ventilation, the incidence rate of early-onset sepsis, and the type of initially used antibiotics (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, the NLN group had a higher incidence rate of late-onset sepsis and a longer duration of antibiotic use (P < 0.05). Late-onset sepsis and prolonged duration of antibiotic use were independent risk factors for NLN (P < 0.05). With the presence of late-onset sepsis, the risk of NLN was increased by 1.537 times in neonates, and the risk of NLN was increased by 76.9% for every 3-day increase in the duration of antibiotic use. The mean age at the diagnosis of NLN was (21±6) days for the 46 neonates in the NLN group. Thirteen neonates with NLN were administered with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, 10 μg/kg) once or twice. O the 13 neonates, 6 had an ANC of < 0.5×10⁹/L and 7 had a gestational age of < 32 weeks or severe disease conditions. After treatment the ANC returned to > 1.0×10⁹/L in the 13 neonates. No drug-related adverse reactions were found. After the diagnosis of NLN, 2 neonates developed sepsis, and the remaining 44 neonates did not develop any common purulent infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of NLN increases with the presence of late-onset sepsis and the increase in the duration of antibiotic use. NLN is generally a benign process. G-CSF appears to be safe and effective for NLN with severe disease conditions or severe reduction in ANC.

[Risk factors for neutropenia of late newborns]

OBJECTIVE

To study the risk factors and treatment for neutropenia of late newborns (NLN).

METHODS

Related clinical data were collected from the preterm infants and critically ill neonates who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit from July 2019 to January 2020. A total of 46 newborns with a blood absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of < 1.5×109/L for two consecutive times at weeks 2-4 after birth were enrolled as the NLN group. A total of 92 late newborns with a blood ANC of ≥ 1.5×109/L, matched at a ratio of 1:2, were enrolled as the control group. Possible risk factors associated with NLN and the treatment process were recorded. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for NLN.

RESULTS

Among the 46 neonates in the NLN group, 29 had a gestational age of < 32 weeks, 14 had a gestational age of 32-37 weeks, and 3 had a gestational age of > 37 weeks. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence rates of gestational hypertension, premature rupture of membranes > 18 hours and intrauterine distress, 5-minute Apgar score, the duration of positive pressure ventilation, the incidence rate of early-onset sepsis, and the type of initially used antibiotics (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, the NLN group had a higher incidence rate of late-onset sepsis and a longer duration of antibiotic use (P < 0.05). Late-onset sepsis and prolonged duration of antibiotic use were independent risk factors for NLN (P < 0.05). With the presence of late-onset sepsis, the risk of NLN was increased by 1.537 times in neonates, and the risk of NLN was increased by 76.9% for every 3-day increase in the duration of antibiotic use. The mean age at the diagnosis of NLN was (21±6) days for the 46 neonates in the NLN group. Thirteen neonates with NLN were administered with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, 10 μg/kg) once or twice. O the 13 neonates, 6 had an ANC of < 0.5×109/L and 7 had a gestational age of < 32 weeks or severe disease conditions. After treatment the ANC returned to > 1.0×109/L in the 13 neonates. No drug-related adverse reactions were found. After the diagnosis of NLN, 2 neonates developed sepsis, and the remaining 44 neonates did not develop any common purulent infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of NLN increases with the presence of late-onset sepsis and the increase in the duration of antibiotic use. NLN is generally a benign process. G-CSF appears to be safe and effective for NLN with severe disease conditions or severe reduction in ANC.

A Review of β-Lactam-Associated Neutropenia and Implications for Cross-reactivity

OBJECTIVE

To review the incidence, management, and current understanding of the pathophysiology of β-lactam-induced neutropenia and to critically evaluate the practicality and safety of direct substitution to an alternative β-lactam in the setting of this reaction.

DATA SOURCES

A literature analysis using the PubMed and Ovid search engines (July 1968 to October 2020) was performed using the search terms neutropenia, leukopenia, β-lactam, nonchemotherapy, agranulocytosis, and G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

The included English-language studies evaluated the incidence, mechanism, and/or management of β-lactam-induced neutropenia in pediatric or adult patients.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Drug-induced neutropenia is a well-documented adverse reaction of β-lactam antibiotics, with an incidence of approximately 10% following at least 2 weeks of intravenous therapy. However, multiple gaps in knowledge remain in the mechanism of pathophysiology and optimal management of this reaction. Both direct toxic and immune-mediated mechanisms have been implicated. Although the cornerstone of management includes cessation of the offending agent, controversy exists on the appropriateness of direct substitution or future use of an alternative β-lactam.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Given the frequency of use and superiority of β-lactams over alternative therapy for several infectious disease states, practical recommendations are needed on the management and safe use of β-lactams following β-lactam-induced neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Future use of β-lactams with differing R1 side chains, particularly those from a separate class, should not be deemed contraindicated following β-lactam-induced neutropenia and may be considered when indicated, with close laboratory monitoring.

Differential effects of antibiotics on neutrophils exposed to lipoteichoic acid derived from Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND

Persistent bacteremia occurs in at least 30% of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) and may be attributable to a dysregulated host immune response. Neutrophils interact with a variety of S. aureus microbial factors, including lipoteichoic acid (LTA), to activate phagocytic function in a concentration-dependent manner. Antibiotics have been shown to exert both direct antimicrobial action as well as immunomodulatory effects. In this study, we compared the effects of different anti-staphylococcal antibiotics on LTA-mediated immune activation of neutrophils.

METHODS

Neutrophils obtained from healthy volunteers were exposed to two levels of LTA (1 and 10 μg/ml) with or without addition of antibiotics from different pharmacologic classes (vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftaroline). Neutrophil function was assessed by examining phagocytic response, activation (CD11b, CD62L expression), Toll-like receptor-2 expression, cell survival and apoptosis, and CXCL8 release.

RESULTS

Differential LTA-mediated antibiotic effects on neutrophil function were observed primarily at the high LTA exposure level. Ceftaroline in the presence of 10 μg/ml LTA had the most prominent effects on phagocytosis and CD11b and CD62L expression, with trends towards increased neutrophil survival and preservation of CXCL8 release when compared to daptomycin and vancomycin with the latter significantly dampening PMN CXCL8 release.

CONCLUSIONS

Select antimicrobial agents, such as ceftaroline, exert immunostimulatory effects on neutrophils exposed to S. aureus LTA, which when confirmed in vivo, could be leveraged for its dual immunomodulatory and antibacterial actions for the treatment of persistent SAB mediated by a dysregulated host response.

The Emerging Role of β-Lactams in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Monotherapy with first-line antimicrobials such as vancomycin (VAN; glycopeptide) and daptomycin (DAP; lipopeptide) are inadequate in some cases due to reduced antibiotic susceptibilities or therapeutic failure. In recent years, β-lactam antibiotics have emerged as a potential option for combination therapy with VAN and DAP that may meet an unmet therapeutic need for MRSA BSI. Ceftaroline (CPT), the only commercially available β-lactam in the United States with intrinsic in vitro activity against MRSA, has been increasingly studied in the setting of VAN and DAP failures. Novel combinations of first-line agents (VAN and DAP) with β-lactams have been the subject of many recent investigations due to in vitro findings such as the "seesaw effect," where β-lactam susceptibility may be improved in the presence of decreased glycopeptide and lipopeptide susceptibility. The combination of CPT and DAP, in particular, has become the focus of many scientific evaluations, due to intrinsic anti-MRSA activities and potent in vitro synergistic activity against various MRSA strains. This article reviews the available literature describing these innovative therapeutic approaches for MRSA BSI, focusing on preclinical and clinical studies, and evaluates the potential benefits and limitations of each strategy.

Important new therapies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections represent a leading cause of infection-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. There has been a welcome increase in the number of agents available for the treatment of MRSA infection over the last decade and several clinical trials are currently investigating the role of new experimental strategies.Areas covered: The purpose of this manuscript is to review the efficacy and safety of recently approved anti-MRSA molecules as well as some newer agents currently under investigation with a specific focus on the potential role of these drugs in everyday clinical practice.Expert opinion: Many new drugs with an activity against MRSA have been recently approved or are in an advanced stage of development. All these compounds represent promising options to enhance our antibiotic armamentarium. However, data regarding the use of these new compounds in real-life terms are limited and their best placement in therapy and in terms of optimization of medical resources and balance of cost-effectiveness requires further investigation.