Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Evaluation and Management of Pain in the Outpatient Setting, 2006-2015

Managing Pain in an Era of Opioid Addiction

Managing pain, whether acute or chronic, has taken a whole new look during the past 3 decades. Pain management continues to be a long-standing public health concern. The ongoing opioid epidemic has changed how the term pain is not only treated but viewed throughout all lenses of society. The following content will focus on pain management of clients aged 18 years or older with acute and/or chronic pain in the outpatient setting. As advocates and gatekeepers, primary care providers must have knowledge of evidence-based guidelines and recommendations of pain management to provide the competent, holistic care and education clients deserve.

From maca to marijuana: cultural influences on joint pain symptoms and management in urban perimenopausal and early postmenopausal Latinas

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the symptom experience and coping strategies for managing joint pain during the menopause transition in urban Latina women.

METHODS

We conducted focus groups with 13 English-speaking peri and early postmenopausal Latinas living in Upper Manhattan in New York City in 2014. Eligible participants were self-identified Latinas aged 45 to 60 years with new onset or worsening joint pain and spontaneous amenorrhea, recruited through flyers and snowball sampling. Focus group interviews conducted in English were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed by a bilingual research team, using NVivo software (QSR International) to organize and code themes.

RESULTS

On average, participants were aged 51.7 ± 4.8 years and overweight (body mass index of 29.3 ± 6.7 kg/m 2 ); 10 (76.9%) were Puerto Rican, and the last menstrual period was 1 month to 5 years ago. The following four themes emerged: 1) menopause and joint pain are an alarming package; 2) pain disrupts life and livelihood; 3) medical management is unsatisfactory and raises worries about addiction; and 4) home remedies for coping with pain-from maca to marijuana. Despite access to a world-class medical facility in their neighborhood, women seeking pain relief preferred to self-manage joint pain with exercise, over-the-counter products, and other culturally valued home remedies. Many suffered through it.

CONCLUSIONS

For midlife Latinas, joint pain symptoms may emerge or worsen unexpectedly as part of the menopause transition and carry distressing consequences for daily activities and quality of life. There is a need to develop more culturally specific approaches for menopause-related pain management in this underserved population.

High-risk use of prescription opioids among patients treated for alcohol problems in New York State. A repeated cross-sectional study, 2005-2018

Background

Patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and high-risk opioid use are at risk of serious complications. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with high-risk opioid use in patients with an alcohol use problem from 2005 to 2018.

Methods

This repeated cross-sectional study analyzed data from first admissions for alcohol treatment (2005-2018) to the NYS Office of Addiction Services and Supports merged with Medicaid Claims Data. High-risk opioid use was defined as opioid dose ≥50 morphine mg equivalents (MME) per day; opioid prescriptions overlapping ≥7 days; opioids for chronic pain >90 days or opioids for acute pain >7 days.

Results

Patients receiving ≥50 MME increased from 690 to 3226 from 2005 to 2010; then decreased to 2330 in 2018. From 2005-2011, patients with opioid prescriptions overlapping ≥7 days increased from 226 to 1594 then decreased to 892 in 2018. From 2005-2010, opioid use >7 days for acute pain increased from 133 to 970 and plateaued after 2010. From 2005-2018, patients who received opioids >90 days for chronic pain trended from 186 to 1655. White patients, females, age 36-55, patients with chronic and acute pain diagnoses had the highest rates of high-risk use.

Conclusions

The prevalence of high-risk opioid use in patients with alcohol use problems increased from 2005 to 2011, and generally decreased after 2010. However, prevalence of opioids >90 days for chronic pain trended up from 2005 to 2018. High-risk opioid use among patients with AUD emphasizes the need to develop interventional strategies to improve patient care.

Cannabis and opioid perceptions, co-use, and substitution among patients across 4 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers

Prescription opioids are used for managing pain in persons with cancer, however, there are socioeconomic and racial disparities in medication access. Cannabis is increasingly used for cancer symptom management and as an opioid alternative. Limited data are available about patterns of opioid and cannabis use among patients with cancer. We used survey data from 4 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in 3 states (n = 1220) to assess perceptions, use of cannabis and opioids for pain, their substitution, and racial and ethnic differences in each outcome. Compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to use opioids for pain (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66; P = .035) and more likely to report that cannabis was more effective than opioids (OR = 2.46; P = .03). Race effects were mitigated (P > .05) after controlling for socioeconomic factors. Further research is needed to understand cannabis and opioid use patterns and how overlapping social determinants of health create a disadvantage in cancer symptom management for Black patients.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Prescribing of Pain Medication in US Primary Care Settings, 1999-2019: Where Are We Now?

BACKGROUND

Policy initiatives have attempted to reduce healthcare inequalities in the USA, but evidence on whether these initiatives have reduced racial and ethnic disparities in pain treatment in primary care is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether racial and ethnic disparities in medication prescribed for pain in primary care settings have diminished over a 21-year period from 1999 to 2019.

DESIGN

An annual, representative cross-sectional probability sample of visits to US primary care physicians, taken from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

PATIENTS

Pain-related visits to primary care physicians.

MAIN MEASURES

Prescriptions for opioid and non-opioid analgesics.

KEY RESULTS

Of 599,293 (16%) sampled visits, 94,422 were pain-related, representing a population-weighted estimate of 143 million visits made annually to primary care physicians for pain. Relative risk analysis controlling for insurance, pain type, and other potential confounds showed no difference in pain medication prescribed between Black and White patients (p = .121). However, White patients were 1.61 (95% CI 1.32-1.97) and Black patients 1.57 (95% CI 1.26-1.95) times more likely to be prescribed opioids than a more underrepresented group consisting of Asian, Native-Hawaiian/Pacific-Islander, and American-Indian/Alaska-Natives (ps < .001). Non-Hispanic/Latino patients were 1.32 (95% CI 1.18-1.45) times more likely to receive opioids for pain than Hispanic/Latino patients (p < .001). Penalized cubic spline regression found no substantive narrowing of disparities over time.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that additional intervention strategies, or better implementation of existing strategies, are needed to eliminate ethnic and racial disparities in pain treatment towards the goal of equitable healthcare.

Short-acting opioid prescriptions and Workers' Compensation using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

BACKGROUND

Short-acting opioids have been utilized for pain management with little known about their use in patients on Workers' Compensation (WC) insurance. Our goal was to investigate this association in the ambulatory care setting.

METHODS

Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, visits from patients aged 18-64 during the years 2010 until 2018 were evaluated (excluding 2017 due to data availability). Demographic and co-morbidity data from each visit was obtained along with the visit year. The first short-acting opioid medication prescribed in the database was considered. Survey-weighted frequencies were evaluated. Logistic regression estimated the crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals for the use of short-acting opioid prescription.

RESULTS

There were 155,947 included visits with 62.5% for female patients. Most patients were White with 11.7% identifying as Black, and 6% identifying as another race. Over 13% of the sample was of Hispanic descent. WC was the identified insurance type in 1.6% of the sample population. Of these patients, 25.6% were prescribed a short-acting opioid, compared with 10.1% of those with another identified insurance. On multivariable regression, Black patients had increased odds of being prescribed a short-acting opioid compared to white patients (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.11-1.34). Those on WC had 1.7-fold higher odds of being prescribed short-acting opioids (95% CI: 1.46-2.06).

CONCLUSION

Certain patient characteristics, including having WC insurance, increased the odds of a short-acting opioid prescription. Further work is needed to identify prescribing patterns in specific high-risk occupational groups, as well as to elicit potential associated health outcomes.

Racial Disparities in Opioid Use and Lumbar Spine Surgery for Chronic Pain and in Pain and Function Over 3 Years: A Retrospective Cohort Study

This study aims to compare treatments and outcomes among Black and White patients with chronic low back pain in the United States. A retrospective cohort study was conducted within a pain research registry, including 1,443 participants with up to 3 years of follow-up. Pain treatments were measured at quarterly research encounters using reported current opioid use and prior lumbar spine surgery. Pain intensity and functional disability were also measured quarterly with a numerical rating scale and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, respectively. Longitudinal data were analyzed with generalized estimating equations, including multivariable models to measure temporal trends and adjust for potential confounders. The mean baseline age of participants was 53.5 years (SD, 13.1 years); 1,074 (74.4%) were female, and 260 (18.0%) were Black. In longitudinal multivariable analyses, Black participants reported more frequent current opioid use (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.91; P = .03) and less frequent lumbar spine surgery (odds ratio, .45; 95% CI, .28-.72; P < .001). Black participants also reported greater pain intensity (mean, 6.6; 95% CI, 6.3-6.9 vs mean, 5.6; 95% CI, 5.4-5.8; P < .001) and functional disability (mean, 15.3; 95% CI, 14.6-16.0 vs mean, 13.8; 95% CI, 13.2-14.3; P = .002). Racial disparities were clinically important (risk ratio = 1.28 and risk ratio = .49, respectively, for opioid use and surgery; and d = .46 and d = .24, respectively, for pain and function). Racial disparities in pain and function also widened over time. Thus, barriers to guideline-adherent and specialized pain care among Black patients may affect pain and function outcomes. Greater efforts are needed to address the observed racial disparities. PERSPECTIVE: Widening racial disparities in pain and function over time indicate that new approaches to chronic pain management are needed in the United States. Considering race as a social framework represents an emerging strategy for planning and improving pain treatment services for Black patients.

Trends in Racial Inequalities in the Administration of Opioid and Non-opioid Pain Medication in US Emergency Departments Across 1999-2020

BACKGROUND

Despite initiatives to eradicate racial inequalities in pain treatment, there is no clear picture on whether this has translated to changes in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether racial disparities in the receipt of pain medication in the emergency department have diminished over a 22-year period from 1999 to 2020.

DESIGN

We used data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual, cross-sectional probability sample of visits to emergency departments of non-federal general and short-stay hospitals in the USA.

PATIENTS

Pain-related visits to the ED by Black or White patients.

MAIN MEASURES

Prescriptions for opioid and non-opioid analgesics.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 203,854 of all sampled 625,433 ED visits (35%) by Black or White patients were pain-related, translating to a population-weighted estimate of over 42 million actual visits to US emergency departments for pain annually across 1999-2020. Relative risk regression found visits by White patients were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.22-1.30; p<0.001) times more likely to result in an opioid prescription for pain compared to Black patients (40% vs. 32%). Visits by Black patients were also 1.25 (95% CI, 1.21-1.30; p<0.001) times more likely to result in non-opioid analgesics only being prescribed. Results were not substantively altered after adjusting for insurance status, type and severity of pain, geographical region, and other potential confounders. Spline regression found no evidence of meaningful change in the magnitude of racial disparities in prescribed pain medication over 22 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiatives to create equitable healthcare do not appear to have resulted in meaningful alleviation of racial disparities in pain treatment in the emergency department.

Pain Care Disparities and the Use of Virtual Care Among Racial-Ethnic Minority Groups During COVID-19

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

COVID-19 led to an unprecedented reliance on virtual modalities to maintain care continuity for patients living with chronic pain. We examined whether there were disparities in virtual specialty pain care for racial-ethnic minority groups during COVID-19.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a retrospective national cohort study with two comparison groups: primary care patients with chronic pain seen immediately prior to COVID-19 (3/1/19-2/29/20) (N = 1,649,053) and a cohort of patients seen in the year prior (3/1/18-2/28-19; n = 1,536,954).

MAIN MEASURES

We assessed use of telehealth (telephone or video) specialty pain care, in-person care specialty pain care, and any specialty pain care for both groups at 6 months following cohort inclusion. We used quasi-Poisson regressions to test associations between patient race and ethnicity and receipt of care.

KEY RESULTS

Prior to COVID-19, there were Black-White (RR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.62, 0.67]) and Asian-White (RR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.54, 0.75]) disparities in telehealth use, and these lessened during COVID-19 (Black-White: RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.73, 0.77], Asian-White: RR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.74, 0.89]) but did not disappear. Individuals identifying as American Indian/Alaska Native used telehealth less than White individuals during early COVID-19 (RR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.85, 1.13] to RR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.79, 0.96]). Hispanic/Latinx individuals were less likely than non-Hispanic/Latinx individuals to use telehealth prior to COVID-19 but more likely during early COVID-19 (RR = 0.70, 95% CI [0.66, 0.75] to RR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.02, 1.09]). Disparities in virtual pain care occurred over the backdrop of overall decreased specialty pain care during the early phase of the pandemic (raw decrease of n = 17,481 specialty care encounters overall from pre-COVID to COVID-era), including increased disparities in any VA specialty pain care for Black (RR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.80, 0.83] to RR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.77, 0.80]) and Asian (RR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.86, 0.97] to RR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.82, 0.94]) individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in virtual specialty pain care were smaller during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic than prior to the pandemic but did not disappear entirely, despite the rapid growth in telehealth. Targeted efforts to increase access to specialty pain care need to be concentrated among racial-ethnic minority groups.

Association of race and ethnicity with opioid prescribing for Medicare beneficiaries following total joint replacements

BACKGROUND

Profound racial and ethnic disparities exist in the use and outcomes of total hip/knee replacements (total joint replacements [TJR]). Whether similar disparities extend to post-TJR pain management remains unknown. Our objective is to examine the association of race and ethnicity with opioid fills following elective TJRs for White, Black, and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

We used the 2019 national Medicare data to identify beneficiaries who underwent total hip/knee replacements. Primary outcomes were at least one opioid fill in the period from discharge to 30 days post-discharge, and 31-90 days following discharge. Secondary outcomes were morphine milligram equivalent per day and number of opioid fills. Key independent variable was patient race-ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic). We estimated multivariable hierarchical logistic regressions and two-part models with state-level clustering.

RESULTS

Among 67,550 patients, 93.36% were White, 3.69% were Black, and 2.95% were Hispanic. Compared to White patients, more Black patients and fewer Hispanic patients filled an opioid script (84.10% [Black] and 80.11% [Hispanic] vs. 80.33% [White], p < 0.001) in the 30-day period. On multivariable analysis, Black patients had 18% higher odds of filling an opioid script in the 30-day period (odds ratio [OR]: 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.33, p = 0.004), and 39% higher odds in the 31-90-day period (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.26-1.54, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the endpoints between Hispanic and White patients in the 30-day period. However, Hispanic patients had 20% higher odds of filling an opioid script in the 31- to 90-day period (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.34, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Important race- and ethnicity-based differences exist in post-TJR pain management with opioids. The mechanisms leading to the higher use of opioids by racial/ethnic minority patients need to be carefully examined.

Racial disparities in pain management: Historical maleficence and solutions for equity

ABSTRACT

Medical journals from the 1800s described differences in disease susceptibility, skin thickness, and pain tolerance among races. These misconceptions about biologic differences, the historical exploitation of minorities in research, and implicit biases among healthcare workers have all affected patient care. Discrepancies still exist in pain assessment and management for minority patients compared with their White counterparts and lead to poor health outcomes. By implementing specific changes in policy and practice, including standardization, implicit bias training, and building a diverse workforce, clinicians can begin to provide care that more equitably manages pain for all patients, regardless of race.

Health disparities in ethnic and racial minority populations with pain and opioid use disorder

Healthcare providers are not prepared to address health disparities among ethnic and racial minority populations with either persistent and chronic pain or substance use disorder (SUD). Recognizing biases from policies to provide pain management and treatment for SUD in our healthcare systems, from our individual state laws and federal guidelines, is necessary. Biases are embedded in the screening and treatment of patients with chronic pain through the use of screening tools, opioid treatment agreements, and prescription drug monitoring programs. Additionally, the punitive treatment of people of ethnic and racial minority populations who experience persistent and chronic pain, opioid use disorders, or other SUDs needs to be redirected to facilitate solutions rooted in equity.

Listening to Remotely Monitored Home-based Preferred Music for Pain in Older Black Adults with Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study of Feasibility and Acceptability

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is a complex condition that is widespread among older Black adults. Nonpharmacologic interventions are recommended as first-line therapy, but their use in practice is limited, possibly due to misunderstanding of their analgesic characteristics.

AIM

To determine the feasibility and acceptability of listening to preferred music at home to relieve pain in older Black adults aged 65 years or older with LBP.

METHOD

We recruited 20 community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years) with LBP to use noise-isolating headphones to listen to their preferred music for 20 minutes twice daily for four days via the MUSIC CARE® app. Feasibility was determined using enrollment, adherence, and attrition rates, and acceptability was determined using the Treatment Acceptance and Preference (TAP) scale. Average pain scores were self-reported using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) after the second intervention of the day. Pain scores were evaluated using paired sample t test and repeated-measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

Enrollment, adherence, and attrition rates were 95.25%, 100.00%, and 0.00%, respectively. Most participants rated the TAP scale at ≥3, indicating acceptance. Pain scores decreased significantly from baseline (M = 46.90, SD = 21.47) to post-intervention (M = 35.70, SD = 16.57), t (19) = 2.29, p = .03. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant decrease in mean pain scores over time [F (2.36, 44.88) = 5.61, p = .004, η2 = .23].

CONCLUSIONS

Listening to preferred music for 20 minutes twice a day is a feasible and acceptable intervention that can considerably reduce pain in older Black adults with LBP.

Cultural Framing and the Impact On Acute Pain and Pain Services

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Optimal treatment requires a thorough understanding of all factors contributing to pain in the individual patient. In this review, we investigate the influence of cultural frameworks on pain experience and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

The loosely defined concept of culture in pain management integrates a predisposing set of diverse biological, psychological and social characteristics shared within a group. Cultural and ethnic background strongly influence the perception, manifestation, and management of pain. In addition, cultural, racial and ethnic differences continue to play a major role in the disparate treatment of acute pain. A holistic and culturally sensitive approach is likely to improve pain management outcomes, will better cover the needs of diverse patient populations and help reduce stigma and health disparities. Mainstays include awareness, self-awareness, appropriate communication, and training.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Opioid Prescriptions for Patients with Abdominal Pain: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

BACKGROUND

Disparities in pain control have been extensively studied in the hospital setting, but less is known regarding the racial/ethnic disparities in opioid prescriptions for patients with abdominal pain in ambulatory clinics.

METHODS

We examined opioid prescriptions during visits by patients presenting with abdominal pain between the years of 2006 and 2015, respectively, in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey database. Data weights for national-level estimates were applied.

RESULTS

We identified 4006 outpatient visits, equivalent to 114 million weighted visits. Rates of opioid use was highest among non-Hispanic White patients (12%), and then non-Hispanic Black patients (11%), and was the lowest in Hispanic patients (6%). Hispanic patients had lower odds of receiving opioid prescriptions compared to non-Hispanic White patients (OR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77, p = 0.002) and all non-Hispanic patients (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.30-0.75; p = 0.002). No significant differences were noted in non-opioid analgesia prescriptions (p = 0.507). A higher frequency of anti-depressants/anti-psychotic prescriptions and alcohol use was recorded amongst the non-Hispanic patients (p = 0.027 and p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of opioid prescriptions for abdominal pain patients were substantially lower for the Hispanic patients compared with the non-Hispanic patients, despite having a decreased rate of high-risk features, such as alcohol use and depression. The root cause of this disparity needs further research to ensure equitable access to pain management.

Racial Disparities in the 30-Day Outcomes of Gender-affirming Chest Surgeries

OBJECTIVE

To determine if and how race impacts the 30-day outcomes of gender-affirming chest surgeries.

BACKGROUND

Little is currently known about how race may affect the outcomes of gender-affirming surgeries.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database of 30-day complications of gender-affirming chest surgeries from 2005 to 2019. All participants had a postoperative diagnosis code for gender dysphoria and at least one procedure code for bilateral mastectomy, bilateral breast reduction, or bilateral augmentation mammoplasty. Differences by racial group were analyzed through Pearson χ 2 and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were no racial differences in the all-complication rates for both transmasculine and transfeminine individuals undergoing gender-affirming chest surgeries. Black patients undergoing masculinizing procedures were significantly more likely to experience mild systemic [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-4.65] and severe complications (aOR: 5.63, 95% CI: 1.99-15.98) when compared with White patients. Patients of unknown race had increased odds of experiencing severe complications for masculinizing procedures compared with White patients (aOR: 3.77, 95% CI: 1.39-10.24). Transmasculine individuals whose race was unknown were 1.98 times more likely (95% CI: 1.03-3.81) to experience an unplanned reoperation compared with White individuals. Black transfeminine individuals were 10.50 times more likely to experience an unplanned reoperation (95% CI: 1.15-95.51) than their White peers.

CONCLUSIONS

Although overall complications are uncommon, there is evidence to suggest that there are racial disparities in certain 30-day outcomes of gender-affirming chest surgeries.

Racial/Ethnic Patterns in Opioid Dispensing among Medicaid-Funded Young Children

Racial differences in opioid dispensing for diseases of the respiratory system (RESP) and injury (INJURY) outpatient visits among patients ≤ 3 years old were examined. Outpatient claims data of South Carolina Medicaid children were analyzed over three three-year periods. The variable of interest was the triennial rate of dispensed opioid prescriptions per 1000 visits for RESP and INJURY diagnoses across racial/ethnic groups. Overall, dispensed opioid prescription rates related to RESP declined for all racial/ethnic categories. White children had the highest dispensing rate for RESP indications in the first period (5.6), followed by Black (4.5), and Hispanic (4.1). The likelihood of White children being prescribed opioids was higher than Blacks, and this was persistent over the studied time (rate ratios from 1.24 to 1.22, respectively). Overall opioid dispensing rates related to injury declined during the studied time. Hispanics had the highest dispensing rate for INJURY (20.1 to 14.8 to 16.1, respectively) followed by White (16.1 to 13.1 to 10.4, respectively). Relative differences in the dispensing rates across groups increased over time (Hispanics vs. White: rate ratios from 1.25 to 1.55, Hispanics vs. Black: from 1.52 to 2.24, and White vs. Black: from 1.24 to 1.44, respectively). There are considerable differences in the dispensing rates across racial/ethnic groups, especially in injury-related prescribing.

Racial and ethnic differences in the use of lumbar imaging, opioid analgesics and spinal surgery for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There is a substantial gap between evidence and clinical care for low back pain (LBP) worldwide despite recommendations of best practice specified in clinical practice guidelines. The aim of this systematic review was to identify disparities associated with race or ethnicity in the use of lumbar imaging, opioid analgesics, and spinal surgery in people with LBP.

DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT

We included observational studies which compared the use of lumbar imaging, opioid analgesics, and spinal surgery for the management of non-serious LBP between people from different racial/ethnic populations. We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from January 2000 to June 2021. Risk of bias of included studies was appraised in six domains. For each type of care, we pooled data stratified by race and ethnicity using random effects models.

RESULTS

We identified 13 eligible studies; all conducted in the United States. Hispanic/Latino (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.49-0.96) and Black/African American (OR 0.59, 95%CI 0.46-0.75) people with LBP were less likely to be prescribed opioid analgesics than White people. Black/African Americans were less likely to undergo or be recommended spinal surgery for LBP (OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.33-0.67) than White people. There was a lack of high certainty evidence on racial/ethnic disparities in the use of lumbar imaging.

CONCLUSION

This review reveals lower rate of the use of guideline-discordant care, especially opioid prescription and spinal surgery, in racial/ethnic minority populations with LBP in the United States. Future studies in other countries evaluating care equity for LBP are warranted. PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42021260668.

SIGNIFICANCE

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that people with low back pain from the minority racial/ethnic backgrounds were less likely to be prescribed opioid analgesics and undergo spinal surgery than the majority counterparts. Strategic interventions to improve the access to, and the value of, clinical care for minority populations with low back pain are warranted.

Sociodemographic Differences in Patient-Reported Pain and Pain Management of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer in a Community Oncology Setting

PURPOSE

While pain is prevalent among survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC), there is a lack of data on pain management in the community oncology setting. We described sociodemographic correlates and disparities associated with patient-reported pain among patients with HNC.

METHODS

We used the 2017-2021 nationwide community oncology data set from Navigating Cancer, which included electronic patient-reported outcomes. We identified a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with HNC (N = 25,572), with ≥ 1 patient-reported pain event. We adjusted for demographic (sex, age, smoking history, marital status) and clinical (cancer site) factors associated with pain reporting and pain resolution by new pain prescription on the basis of race (White v non-White patients), using multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Our analytic cohort included 2,331 patients, 90.58% White, 58.62% married, with an average age of 66.47 years. Of these, 857 patients (36.76%) reported ≥ 1 pain event during study period. Mean resolution time (in minutes) for pain incidents was significantly longer for White patients than non-White patients (99.6 ± 3.2 v 74.9 ± 7.2, P < .05). After adjusting for covariates, smoking was associated with a 25% increased odds of reporting pain incidents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.52). There was no statistically significant difference in odds of pain reporting between White versus non-White patients (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.30). However, White patients were significantly more likely to receive new prescription for pain than non-White patients (aOR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.09 to 5.86).

CONCLUSION

We found racial differences in patient-reported pain management, with White patients significantly more likely to receive new pain prescriptions. As pain management is a mainstay in cancer care, equity in pain management is critical to optimize quality of life for patients with HNC.

A qualitative assessment of factors contributing to Spanish-speaking federally qualified health center patients' chronic pain experiences

People of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (Latinx people) experience pain diagnosis, treatment, and care disparities relative to non-Latinx Whites. Those whose preferred language is Spanish may experience additional disparities when receiving care in a language-discordant environment. In order to better understand medically underserved Spanish-speaking Latinx patients' pain care experience in primary care, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with federally qualified health center staff members (n = 9) and Spanish-speaking adult Latinx patients with chronic pain (n = 12) to capture data on their perspectives. Interview data were mapped to the individual (microsystem), interpersonal (mesosystem), organizational (exosystem), and environmental (macrosystem) levels of Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory and analyzed using thematic content analysis informed by the Framework Method. Findings suggest that Spanish-speaking patients and English-speaking care team members may interpret information about pain state and severity differently, may have misaligned expectations about care, treatment methodologies, and treatment goals, and may experience difficulty forming a mutual understanding during health care encounters due to cross-linguistic and cross-cultural miscommunication. Patients preferred to describe their pain in words rather than with numbers or standardized scales, and both patients and frontline care team members expressed frustration with medical interpretation services, which added time and complexity to visits. Patients and health center staff emphasized the diversity of experiences among Spanish-speaking Latinx people, and the need to account for both linguistic and cultural differences during care encounters. Both groups supported hiring more Spanish-speaking, Latinx healthcare personnel who better resemble the patient population, which has the potential to improve linguistic and cultural concordance and competence, with the aim of improving care outcomes and patient satisfaction. Further study is warranted to examine how linguistic and cultural communication barriers impact pain assessment and treatment in primary care, the extent to which patients feel understood by their care teams, and their confidence in their ability to understand and interpret treatment recommendations.

Racial disparities in post-operative pain experience and treatment following cesarean birth

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate racial/ethnic differences in post-operative pain experience and opioid medication use (morphine milligram equivalent) in the first 24 h following cesarean birth.

METHODS

This study was a single-center retrospective cohort of birthing persons who underwent cesarean deliveries between 1/1/16 and 12/31/17. A total of 2,228 cesarean deliveries were analyzed. The primary outcome was average pain, which was the mean of all documented self-reported pain scores (0-10 scale) during the first 24 h post-delivery. The secondary outcome included oral morphine equivalents used in the first 24 h post-delivery. Linear regression was performed to examine whether the race/ethnicity of the birthing parent was associated with mean pain scores and oral morphine equivalents, controlling for confounding variables.

RESULTS

In multivariate analyses non-Hispanic Black birthing persons reported higher mean pain scores (Coefficient: 0.61, 95% confidence interval [0.39-0.82], p < .001]) than non-Hispanic White birthing persons, but received similar quantities of morphine milligram equivalent (Coefficient: -0.98 mg, 95% confidence interval [-5.93-3.97], p = .698]). Non-Hispanic Asian birthing persons reported similar reported mean pain scores to those of non-Hispanic White birthing persons (Coefficient: 0.02 mg, 95% confidence interval [-0.17-0.22], p = .834]), but received less morphine milligram equivalent (Coefficient: -5.47 mg, 95% confidence interval [-10.05 to -0.90], p = .019). When controlling for reported mean pain scores, both non-Hispanic Black (Coefficient: -6.36 mg, 95% confidence interval [-10.97 to -1.75], p = .007) and non-Hispanic Asian birthing persons (Coefficient: -5.66 mg, 95% confidence interval [-9.89 to -1.43], p = .009) received significantly less morphine milligram equivalents.

CONCLUSION

Despite reporting higher mean pain scores, non-Hispanic Black birthing persons did not receive higher quantities of morphine milligram equivalent. Non-Hispanic Asian birthing persons received lower quantities of morphine milligram equivalent despite reporting similar pain scores to non-Hispanic White birthing persons. These differences suggest disparities in post-operative pain management for birthing persons of color in our study population.

Electronic Advisories Increase Naloxone Prescribing Across Health Care Settings

BACKGROUND

Naloxone is a life-saving, yet underprescribed, medication that is recommended to be provided to patients at high risk of opioid overdose.

OBJECTIVE

We set out to evaluate the changes in prescriber practices due to the use of an electronic health record (EHR) advisory that prompted opioid prescribers to co-prescribe naloxone when prescribing a high-dose opioid. It also provided prescribers with guidance on decreasing opioid doses for safety.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective chart abstraction study looking at all opioid prescriptions and all naloxone prescriptions written as emergency department (ED) discharge, inpatient hospital discharge, or outpatient medications, between July 1, 2018, and February 1, 2020. The EHR advisory went live on June 1, 2019.

SUBJECTS

Included in the analysis were all adult patients seen in the abovementioned settings at a large county hospital and associated outpatient clinics.

MAIN MEASURES

We performed an interrupted time series analysis looking at naloxone prescriptions and daily opioid dosing in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), before and after initiation of the EHR advisory.

KEY RESULTS

The EHR advisory was associated with changes in prescribers' behavior, leading to increased naloxone prescriptions and decreased prescribed opioid doses.

CONCLUSIONS

EHR advisories are an effective systems-level intervention to enhance the safety of prescribed opioids and increase rates of naloxone prescribing.

CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022

This guideline provides recommendations for clinicians providing pain care, including those prescribing opioids, for outpatients aged ≥18 years. It updates the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016 (MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65[No. RR-1]:1-49) and includes recommendations for managing acute (duration of <1 month), subacute (duration of 1-3 months), and chronic (duration of >3 months) pain. The recommendations do not apply to pain related to sickle cell disease or cancer or to patients receiving palliative or end-of-life care. The guideline addresses the following four areas: 1) determining whether or not to initiate opioids for pain, 2) selecting opioids and determining opioid dosages, 3) deciding duration of initial opioid prescription and conducting follow-up, and 4) assessing risk and addressing potential harms of opioid use. CDC developed the guideline using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Recommendations are based on systematic reviews of the scientific evidence and reflect considerations of benefits and harms, patient and clinician values and preferences, and resource allocation. CDC obtained input from the Board of Scientific Counselors of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (a federally chartered advisory committee), the public, and peer reviewers. CDC recommends that persons with pain receive appropriate pain treatment, with careful consideration of the benefits and risks of all treatment options in the context of the patient's circumstances. Recommendations should not be applied as inflexible standards of care across patient populations. This clinical practice guideline is intended to improve communication between clinicians and patients about the benefits and risks of pain treatments, including opioid therapy; improve the effectiveness and safety of pain treatment; mitigate pain; improve function and quality of life for patients with pain; and reduce risks associated with opioid pain therapy, including opioid use disorder, overdose, and death.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Opioid Prescriptions in Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Disease in the United States

OBJECTIVES

Racial-ethnic disparities in pain management are common but not known among pancreatic disease patients. We sought to evaluate racial-ethnic disparities in opioid prescriptions for pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were used to examine racial-ethnic and sex differences in opioid prescriptions for ambulatory visits by adult pancreatic disease patients.

RESULTS

We identified 207 pancreatitis and 196 pancreatic cancer patient visits, representing 9.8 million visits, but weights were repealed for analysis. No sex differences in opioid prescriptions were found among pancreatitis (P = 0.78) or pancreatic cancer patient visits (P = 0.57). Opioids were prescribed at 58% of Black, 37% of White, and 19% of Hispanic pancreatitis patient visits (P = 0.05). Opioid prescriptions were less common in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic pancreatitis patients (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.91; P = 0.03). We found no racial-ethnic differences in opioid prescriptions among pancreatic cancer patient visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial-ethnic disparities in opioid prescriptions were observed in pancreatitis, but not pancreatic cancer patient visits, suggesting possible racial-ethnic bias in opioid prescription practices for patients with benign pancreatic disease. However, there is a lower threshold for opioid provision in the treatment of malignant, terminal disease.

Racial Variations in Pain Management and Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common cause of hospitalization. Black AP patients have higher risk for alcoholic etiology and hospitalization than White patients. We evaluated outcomes and treatment disparities by race in hospitalized AP patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed Black and White AP patients admitted 2008-2018. Primary outcomes were length of stay, intensive care unit admission, 30-day readmissions, and mortality. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid dosing, and complications.

RESULTS

We identified 630 White and 186 Black AP patients. Alcoholic AP (P < 0.001), tobacco use (P = 0.013), and alcohol withdrawal (P < 0.001) were more common among Blacks. There were no differences in length of stay (P = 0.113), intensive care unit stay (P = 0.316), 30-day readmissions (P = 0.797), inpatient (P = 0.718) or 1-year (P = 0.071) mortality, complications (P = 0.080), or initial (P = 0.851) and discharge pain scores (P = 0.116). Discharge opioids were prescribed more frequently for Whites (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalized Black and White AP patients had similar treatment and outcomes. Standardized protocols used to manage care may eliminate racial biases. Disparities in discharge opioid prescriptions may be explained by higher alcohol and tobacco use by Black patients.

Trajectories and correlates of opioid prescription receipt among patients experiencing interpersonal violence

Interpersonal violence increases vulnerability to the deleterious effects of opioid use. Increased opioid prescription receipt is a major contributor to the opioid crisis; however, our understanding of prescription patterns and risk factors among those with a history of interpersonal violence remains elusive. This study sought to identify 5-year longitudinal patterns of opioid prescription receipt among patients experiencing interpersonal violence within a large healthcare system and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with prescription patterns. This secondary analysis examined electronic health record data from January 2004–August 2019 for a cohort of patients (N = 1,587) referred for interpersonal violence services. Latent class growth analysis was used to estimate trajectories of opioid prescription receipt over a 5-year period. Standardized differences were calculated to assess variation in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics between classes. Our cohort had a high prevalence of prescription opioid receipt (73.3%) and underlying co-morbidities, including chronic pain (54.6%), substance use disorders (39.0%), and mental health diagnoses (76.9%). Six prescription opioid receipt classes emerged, characterized by probability of any prescription opioid receipt at the start and end of the study period (high, medium, low, never) and change in probability over time (increasing, decreasing, stable). Classes with the highest probability of prescription opioids also had the highest proportions of males, chronic pain diagnoses, substance use disorders, and mental health diagnoses. Black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic patients were more likely to be in low or no prescription opioid receipt classes. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring for synergistic co-morbidities when providing pain management and offering treatment that is trauma-informed, destigmatizing, and integrated into routine care.

Intersectional invisibility experiences of low-income African-American women in healthcare encounters

BACKGROUND

The disparities that Black/African-American women experience in health care are persistent and staggering. Findings from health outcomes research continue to demonstrate poorer outcomes for African-American women compared to women of other race/ethnicity in several conditions. These racial/ethnic and gender health disparities observed are complex, heavily nuanced and multi-factorial. To understand these, there is a need to apply an 'intersectionality' lens. Intersectionality refers to the experience of persons with multiple intersecting statuses. The objective of this exploratory study was to gain insight into the healthcare experiences of low-income African-American women.

METHODS

In-depth one-on-one interviews were conducted with 22 women and 2 focus group discussions with community leaders and advocates. Investigators conducted a thematic analysis of the transcripts.

RESULTS

The thematic analysis revealed four major themes, which tell the story of the intersectional invisibility experienced by low-income AA women in the healthcare system. These included (1) the perception of 'not feeling heard'; (2) patient as 'expert of her own body'; (3) disregard of patient preferences; and (4) the need for self-advocacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Black/African-American women, and particularly those with socioeconomic disadvantage, experience intersectional invisibility resulting from provider implicit bias, stereotypical assumptions, and systemic structures that enable discriminatory practices in healthcare delivery. Healthcare provider education that more explicitly addresses these biases and stereotypes should be complemented with system-level interventions that aim to dismantle the structural racism inherent in healthcare policies and practices.

Delivering Value Through Equitable Care for Low Back Pain: A Renewed Call to Action

Equitable care for low back pain (LBP) is key to ensuring the value and sustainability of services delivered by physical therapists. In this Viewpoint, we discuss how social determinants of health, implicit provider biases, structural characteristics of the health care system, and health care policies contribute to disparate care for many individuals with LBP. We aim to increase awareness of equity as a key component of value in physical therapy and highlight steps physical therapists can take to improve equitable LBP care. This "call to action" underscores the need to study, demonstrate, and advance equitable care for LBP by physical therapists to improve outcomes for patients and ensure the growth and sustainability of the physical therapy profession. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(7):414-418. Epub: 17 May 2022. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.10815.

How Can We Get to Equitable and Effective Postpartum Pain Control?

Postpartum pain is common, yet patient experiences and clinical management varies greatly. In the United States, pain-related expectations and principles of adequate pain management have been framed within established norms of Western clinical medicine and a biomedical understanding of disease processes. Unfortunately, this positioning of postpartum pain and the corresponding coping strategies and pain treatments is situated within cultural biases and systemic racism. This paper summarizes the history and existing literature that examines racial inequities in pain management to propose guiding themes and suggestions for innovation. This work is critical for advancing ethical practice and establishing more effective care for all patients.

Pain management practices for outpatients with breast cancer

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

•

One in four women office visits for breast cancer received pain medication prescriptions.

•

Among the patients receiving pain medications, one in seven women received opioids.

•

Both patient and provider characteristics contribute to variations in pain management in breast cancer patients.

Race Roundtable Series: Structural Racism in Palliative Care

This series will focus on addressing the intersection of race and racism in palliative care through a series of roundtable discussions with interdisciplinary clinicians, researchers, educators, and leaders in palliative care. These short discussions are intended to stimulate readers to examine issues of race and racism within the field of hospice and palliative care - in the various forms that it appears - as well as serve as a continual call to action to facilitate and promote equity.

Dispensed Opioid Prescription Patterns, by Racial/Ethnic Groups, Among South Carolina Medicaid-Funded Children Experiencing Limb Fracture Injuries

OBJECTIVE

To examine dispensed opioid prescription patterns for limb fractures across racial/ethnic groups in a pediatric population.

METHODS

We used South Carolina's Medicaid claims data 2000 to 2018 for pediatric limb fracture cases (under age 19) discharged from the emergency department. The key independent variable was the child's race/ethnicity. The outcomes were: 1) whether the patient had a dispensed opioid prescription; and 2) whether dispensed opioid supply was longer than 5 days among cases with any dispensed opioid prescriptions. Logistic regression models were used to test the association between race/ethnicity and the outcomes. Covariates included age-at-service, gender, service year, and having multiple fracture injuries.

RESULTS

Compared with non-Hispanic White cases (NHW), the odds of receiving dispensed opioid prescriptions were lower for cases of non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (OR = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71, 0.75), Asian (OR = 0.69; CI: 0.53, 0.90), Other/Unknown (OR = 0.86; CI: 0.80, 0.92), and Hispanic (OR = 0.84; CI: 0.79, 0.90) race/ethnicity. The odds of receiving >5 days of dispensed opioid prescription supply did not differ significantly among race/ethnic categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms previous findings that as compared to NHW, the NHB children were less likely to receive dispensed opioid prescriptions. Also, it reveals that the different minority race/ethnic groups are not homogenous in their likelihoods of receiving dispensed opioid prescriptions after a limb fracture compared to NHW, findings underreported in previous studies. Children in the Other/Unknown race/ethnicity category have prescribing patterns different from those of other minority race/ethnic groups and should be analyzed separately.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Utilization of TKA Among Patients with Posttraumatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Advanced posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the knee is a cause of substantial disability, particularly in younger individuals, and the treatment of choice is total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in the use of TKA, but, to our knowledge, there have been no studies examining these disparities among patients with PTOA.

Association of Patient Race and Ethnicity With Differences in Opioid Prescribing by Primary Care Physicians for Older Adults With New Low Back Pain

Question

Finding

Meaning

Importance

Objective

Design, Setting, and Participants

Main Outcomes and Measures

Results

Conclusions and Relevance

Patient, Provider, and Clinic Characteristics Associated with Opioid and Non-Opioid Pain Prescriptions for Patients Receiving Low Back Imaging in Primary Care

BACKGROUND

To describe characteristics of patients, providers, and clinics associated with opioid or non-opioid pain medication prescribing patterns for patients who received lower spine imaging in primary care clinics.

METHODS

In these secondary analyses of the Lumbar Imaging with Reporting of Epidemiology (LIRE) study, a randomized controlled trial conducted in 4 health systems in the United States, we evaluated characteristics associated with receipt of pain medication prescriptions. The outcomes were receipt of prescriptions for opioid or, separately, non-opioid pain medications within 90 days after imaging. Among patients who received opioid or non-opioid prescriptions, we evaluated receipt of multiple prescriptions in the year following imaging. Mixed models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Compared with whites, patients identified as Asian (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.51-0.56), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.83), multiracial (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98) or Black (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96) had significantly reduced odds for receiving prescriptions for opioids within 90 days. Patients identified as Native American/Alaska Native had greater odds for receiving prescriptions for non-opioid pain medications within 90 days (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24). Receipt of pain prescriptions 120 days before imaging was strongly predictive of subsequent receipt of pain prescriptions across all categories.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for factors that could affect prescribing, the strongest differences observed in pain-medication prescribing were across racial categories and for patients with previous pain prescriptions. Further research is needed to understand these differences and to optimize prescribing.

Racial Inequality in Prescription Opioid Receipt - Role of Individual Health Systems

BACKGROUND

Historically, the receipt of prescription opioids has differed among racial groups in the United States. Research has not sufficiently explored the contribution of individual health systems to these differences by examining within-system prescription opioid receipt according to race.

METHODS

We used 2016 and 2017 Medicare claims data from a random 40% national sample of fee-for-service, Black and White beneficiaries 18 to 64 years of age who were attributed to health systems. We identified 310 racially diverse systems (defined as systems with ≥200 person-years each for Black and White patients). To test representativeness, we compared patient characteristics and opioid receipt among the patients in these 310 systems with those in the national sample. Within the 310 systems, regression models were used to explore the difference between Black and White patients in the following annual opioid measures: any prescription filled, short-term receipt of opioids, long-term receipt of opioids (one or more filled opioid prescriptions in all four calendar quarters of a year), and the opioid dose in morphine milligram equivalents (MME); models controlled for patient characteristics, state, and system.

RESULTS

The national sample included 2,197,153 person-years, and the sample served by 310 racially diverse systems included 896,807 person-years (representing 47.4% of all patients and 56.1% of Black patients in the national sample). The national sample and 310-systems sample differed meaningfully only in the percent of person-years contributed by Black patients (21.3% vs. 25.9%). In the 310-systems sample, the crude annual prevalence of any opioid receipt differed slightly between Black and White patients (50.2% vs. 52.2%), whereas the mean annual dose was 36% lower among Black patients than among White patients (5190 MME vs. 8082 MME). Within systems, the adjusted race differences in measures paralleled the population trends: the annual prevalence of opioid receipt differed little, but the mean annual dose was higher among White patients than among Black patients in 91% of the systems, and at least 15% higher in 75% of the systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Within individual health systems, Black and White patients received markedly different opioid doses. These system-specific findings could facilitate exploration of the causes and consequences of these differences. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.).

Educational needs and challenges in axial spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) affects 0.5-1% of the population in many regions of the world. This review summarizes the challenges in medical education around axSpA with attention to evidence around delayed diagnosis, clinician familiarity with typical axSpA features, such as inflammatory back pain and adherence to accepted management principles.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinicians who commonly manage patients with chronic back pain or other typical axSpA features are not consistently aware of the concept of inflammatory back pain and common extra-spinal manifestations. Further, clinicians may not be familiar with the nonradiographic spectrum of axSpA. Management of patients with possible axSpA does not consistently follow principles that would establish an axSpA diagnosis, and diagnosis of axSpA remains delayed by 6-7 years on average, with evidence suggesting management disparities on the basis of sex and race in some cases. Referral recommendations have increased the probability of axSpA diagnosis up to about 40% and, may complement educational efforts in axSpA.

SUMMARY

Educational efforts in axSpA should focus on providing front-line clinicians with a better understanding of inflammatory back pain, the nonradiographic form of axSpA, and accepted principles in axSpA management.

Evaluation of a Chronic Pain Screening Program Implemented in Primary Care

IMPORTANCE

Although pain is among the most common symptoms reported by patients, primary care practitioners (PCPs) face substantial challenges identifying and assessing pain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a 2-step process for chronic pain screening and follow-up in primary care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A cross-sectional study of patients with a primary care visit between July 2, 2018, and June 1, 2019, was conducted at a statewide, multisite federally qualified health center. Participants included 68 PCPs and 58 medical assistants from 13 sites who implemented the screening process in primary care, and 38 866 patients aged 18 years or older with a primary care visit during that time.

EXPOSURES

Single-question assessment of pain frequency, followed by a 3-question PEG (pain, enjoyment of life, general activity) functional assessment for patients with chronic pain.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Adherence to a 2-step chronic pain screening and PEG process, proportion of patients with positive screening results, mean PEG pain severity greater than or equal to 7, and documented chronic painful condition diagnosis in patient's electronic health record between 1 year before and 90 days after screening.

RESULTS

Of 38 866 patients with a primary care visit, 31 600 patients (81.3%) underwent screening. Mean (SD) age was 46.2 (15.4) years, and most were aged 35 to 54 years (12 987 [41.1%]), female (18 436 [58.3%]), Hispanic (14 809 [46.9%]), and English-speaking (22 519 [71.3%]), and had Medicaid insurance (18 442 [58.4%]). A total of 10 262 participants (32.5%) screened positive and, of these, 9701 (94.5%) completed the PEG questionnaire. PEG responses indicated severe pain interference with activities of daily living (PEG ≥7) in 5735 (59.1%) participants. A chronic painful condition had not been diagnosed in 4257 (43.9%) patients in the year before screening. A new chronic painful condition was diagnosed at screening or within 90 days in 2250 (52.9%) patients. Care teams found the workflow acceptable, but cited lengthy administration time, challenges with comprehension of the PEG questions, and limited comprehensiveness as implementation barriers.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

A systematic, 2-step process for chronic pain screening and functional assessment in primary care appeared to identify patients with previously undocumented chronic pain and was feasible to implement. Patient-provided information on the frequency of pain, pain level, and pain interference can help improve the assessment and monitoring of pain in primary care.

The impact of race on postpartum opioid prescribing practices: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To identify the association between inpatient postpartum opioid consumption, race, and amount of opioids prescribed at discharge after vaginal or cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A total of 416 women who were prescribed an oral opioid following vaginal or cesarean delivery at a single tertiary academic institution between July 2018 and October 2018 were identified. Women with postoperative wound complications, third and fourth degree lacerations, cesarean hysterectomy, or a history of opioid abuse were excluded. The primary outcome was the number of oxycodone 5 mg tablets prescribed at discharge, stratified by race and mode of delivery. Only "Black" and "White" women were included in analyses due to low absolute numbers of other identities. Black women were compared to white women using multivariable logistic regression. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The median number of oxycodone tablets consumed during hospitalization following cesarean delivery was seven (IQR: 2.5-12 tablets) and following vaginal delivery was one (IQR: 0-3). White women were more likely to be older at delivery regardless of route (median 32 vs. 30 years for cesarean delivery, and 29 vs. 27 years for vaginal delivery; p < 0.01 for both). White women undergoing cesarean delivery did so at a lower maternal BMI (31.6 vs. 34.5; p = 0.02). White women were also significantly more likely to have private insurance and to experience perineal lacerations following vaginal delivery. The number of inpatient opioid tablets consumed, as well as the number prescribed at discharge, were not statistically different between Black and White women, regardless of mode of delivery. These findings persisted in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

At our large, academic hospital the number of tablets prescribed at discharge had no association with patient race or inpatient usage regardless of mode of delivery.

Closing the gap in representation of racial and ethnic minorities in pain medicine: A 2018-2019 status report

Racial health disparities persist despite increased public awareness of systemic racism. Due to the inherent subjectivity of pain perception, assessment and management, physician-patient bias in pain medicine remains widespread. It is broadly accepted that increasing racial diversity in the field of medicine is a critical step towards addressing persistent inequities in patient care. To assess the current racial demographics of the pain medicine pipeline, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of medical school matriculants and graduates, residents, and pain fellows in 2018. Our results show that the 2018 anesthesiology residency ERAS applicant pool consisted of 46.2% non-Hispanic White, 7.0% non-Hispanic Black and 5.8% Hispanic students. The population of 2018 anesthesiology residents included 63% non-Hispanic White, 6.8% non-Hispanic Black and 5.4% Hispanic persons. Of the total eligible resident pool for pain fellowships (n = 30,415) drawn from core specialties, 44% were non-Hispanic White, 4.9% non-Hispanic Black and 5.1% Hispanic. Similar proportions were observed for pain medicine and regional anesthesia fellows. We briefly discuss the implications of the shortage of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic representation in pain medicine as it relates to the COVID-19 pandemic and suggest approaches to improving these disparities.

The influence of gender and race on heart failure self-care

OBJECTIVES

To explore gender and racial differences in heart failure (HF) self-care processes and examine whether gender and race predict HF self-care.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of baseline data (n = 107) from a longitudinal HF study (54.2% males; 56% non-Caucasians) was conducted. The self-care of heart failure index was used to measure self-care maintenance, management, and confidence. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses examined gender and racial differences in HF self-care outcomes. Multiple linear regression examined whether gender and race predicted HF self-care maintenance, management, and confidence.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses indicated that Caucasians reported significantly better self-care maintenance (p = 0.042), while non-Caucasians reported significantly better self-care management (p = 0.003). Males had significantly higher self-care confidence scores versus women (p = 0.017). Multiple regression analysis indicated Caucasian race predicted significantly worse self-care management (β = -11.188; p = 0.006) versus non-Caucasian, while male gender predicted significantly higher self-care confidence scores (β = 7.592; p = 0.010) versus female gender. Gender nor race significantly predicted self-care maintenance.

DISCUSSION

Although gender and race may influence HF self-care, other factors may be more important. More research is needed to identify individual factors that contribute to HF self-care to improve education and intervention.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Treatment of Chronic Pain

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current literature on disparities in the treatment of chronic pain.

METHODS

We focused on studies conducted in the United States and published from 2000 and onward. Studies of cross-sectional, longitudinal, and interventional designs were included.

RESULTS

A review of the current literature revealed that an adverse association between non-White race and treatment of chronic pain is well supported. Studies have also shown that racial differences exist in the long-term monitoring for opioid misuse among patients suffering from chronic pain. In addition, a patient's sociodemographic profile appears to influence the relationship between chronic pain and quality of life. Results from interventional studies were mixed.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities exist within the treatment of chronic pain. Currently, it is unclear how to best combat these disparities. Further work is needed to understand why disparities exist and to identify points in patients' treatment when they are most vulnerable to unequal care. Such work will help guide the development and implementation of effective interventions.

Race and satisfaction with pain management among patients with HIV receiving long-term opioid therapy

INTRODUCTION

Management of chronic pain is an essential aspect of HIV primary care. Previous literature in the general population has elucidated racial disparities in the evaluation and treatment of pain. This study examined racial/ethnic differences in patient satisfaction and barriers to pain management among a cohort of PWH receiving LTOT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient-reported survey and EMR data were compared between non-white (n = 135; 81.3 %) and white (n = 31; 18.7 %) patients in a cohort of 166 PWH receiving LTOT in two clinics in Atlanta and Boston. Quantile and linear regression were used to evaluate the association between race and pain management outcomes: 1) satisfaction with pain management (0-10) and 2) patient-related barriers to pain management, including patient perceptions of pain medications, fatalism, and communication about pain. Models were adjusted for sex, age, clinical site, and baseline general health.

RESULTS

Non-white participants were noted to receive chronic opioids for a shorter mean duration of time than white participants (6.0 versus 11.0 years, p < 0.001) and lower mean morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) than white participants (28.1 versus 66.9 mg, p < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, there was no significant difference in satisfaction with pain management among non-white and white participants (p = 0.101). There was no significant difference in barriers to pain management in unadjusted (p = 0.335) nor adjusted models (p = 0.397).

CONCLUSION

While non-white PWH were noted to have received lower doses of chronic opioids and for shorter duration than white PWH, satisfaction with pain management was similar. Patient-related barriers to pain management were similar among non-white and white PWH.

Diversity of Pain Medicine Trainees and Faculty in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Fellowship Training from 2009-2019

OBJECTIVE

Diversity and equity in medicine remain pivotal to care delivery. Data analysis on sex and racial diversity of pain medicine fellowship trainees and faculty in the United States are scant. We sought to characterize demographic and retention patterns among pain medicine fellows and faculty, who represent the emerging chronic pain management workforce.

DESIGN

cross-sectional retrospective analysis.

METHOD

We conducted an analysis of data from the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the United States Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved residency and fellowship training-programs for each year from 2009 through 2019, inclusively. We compared changes in sex, racial/ethnicity composition and retention rates of fellows and faculty in the United States by practice setting.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2019, there was a 14% increase in the number of ACGME pain fellowship programs. From 2009 to 2019, the ratio of men to women pain fellows ranged from 5:1 to 3.7:1. Compared with their self-identified White peers, Asian (OR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.34-0.58), Black (OR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30-0.72), and Native American/Alaskan Native (OR 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08-0.80) identifying individuals had significantly lower odds of being a pain fellow, P < 0.05. There was no significant difference in female (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.148-1.09) and Black (OR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.11-1.12) program-directors. Pain-fellow in-state retention was 53%.

CONCLUSIONS

The demographics of pain medicine training programs reflect a persistent male vs. female gap with underrepresentation of racial minorities. Further research is needed to elucidate reasons underlying these disparities.

How the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey has been used to identify health disparities in the care of patients in the United States

BACKGROUND

Healthcare disparities negatively impact patient health outcomes; addressing disparities could improve quality of life and decrease overall healthcare cost. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) is an objective and reliable source for collecting information on United States (U.S.) ambulatory medical care service visits and may be a useful tool for identifying potential disparities in care.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this literature review is to describe studies utilizing NAMCS to capture U.S. healthcare disparities.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for scientific articles that utilized NAMCS to determine health disparities in the U.S. The keywords queried included "NAMCS" or "National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey" and "disparity" or "disparities" as a pair or additionally paired with one of the following: "race", "ethnicity", "age", "gender", "geography", or "insurance".

RESULTS

66 studies were found that incorporated NAMCS data from 1980-2016 into their methods to measure outcomes relating to health disparities. Disparities were found in the following categories: race/ethnicity, geographic location, age, insurance type, gender, specialist care versus primary care, body habitus, and preexisting conditions affecting patient outcomes. Disparities were identified in pain management, neurology, dermatology, psychiatry, patient communication access, and non-specialty specific or primary care visits related to disease conditions, screening, and treatment plans.

LIMITATIONS

Only PubMed was utilized as a search engine and may not encompass all studies on NAMCS and health disparities. NAMCS is a cross-sectional database and does not allow for longitudinal analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

NAMCS may be an underused tool given the limited number of articles that identify health disparities using it. Research studies utilizing NAMCS may identify potential disparities ultimately leading to better healthcare outcomes.

Racial/ethnic differences in prescription opioid misuse and heroin use among a national sample, 1999-2018

OBJECTIVE

To characterize racial/ethnic differences in past-year prescription opioid misuse and heroin use.

METHODS

Data on 1,117,086 individuals age 12 and older were from the 1999-2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. We compared relative prevalences across 6 racial/ethnic groups for prescription opioid misuse analyses and 4 racial/ethnic groups for heroin analyses. Unadjusted and gender- and age-adjusted prevalences are reported for 5 time periods (1999-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2010, 2011-2014, 2015-2018). Survey-weighted Poisson regression models with robust variance were used to estimate risk ratios by race/ethnicity and to test for time trends.

RESULTS

Prescription opioid misuse was significantly higher among non-Hispanic White individuals than among Black, Hispanic, and Asian individuals across all time periods, yet was highest among Native American individuals in every time period. The relative difference between White and both Hispanic and Asian individuals significantly widened over time, whereas the gap between Black and White individuals significantly decreased. Early in the study period, heroin use was highest among Black and Hispanic individuals. Heroin use among White individuals first surpassed all other groups in 2007-2010 and continued to steadily increase, more than doubling from 1999-2002 to 2015-2018.

CONCLUSIONS

While heroin use has risen among all racial/ethnic groups, the demographics of heroin use have changed significantly in the past two decades such that prevalence is now highest among White individuals. Opioid prevention and treatment initiatives should both be informed by the changing demographics of heroin use and seek to reduce opioid-related harms and expand treatment access equitably for all racial/ethnic groups.

Assessing opioid administration in pediatric burn patients with nonsurgical management

BACKGROUND

Despite the vast literature studying the opioid crisis, sparse data describe this in the pediatric burn population. This study sought to assess patient-level characteristics and their potential effects on opioid administration in nonsurgical pediatric burn inpatients.

METHODS

Admitted burn patients from 2013 to 2018 with nonsurgical management at an American Burn Association (ABA) verified pediatric burn center were retrospectively identified. Morphine milligram equivalents by weight (MME/kg) per admission were evaluated through a multiple loglinear regression with race, sex, age, total body surface area burned (TBSA), and burn depth as predictors. Simple linear regression was used to evaluate the temporal trend of median opioid utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 806 patients (55% White, 35% Black, 5% Hispanic, 5% Other) were included. In an adjusted analysis, no differences in opioid administration were seen by sex, burn degree, or for Blacks and Hispanics when compared with Whites. Increased MME/kg was associated with older age (10-18 years; p<0.0001) and larger burns (>5% TBSA burned; p<0.0001). From 2013 to 2018, median MME/kg per admission declined significantly (2013:0.21, 2018:0.09; p=0.0103).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsurgical burn patients who were older and presented with larger TBSA experienced marked increases in opioid utilization. Overall, opioid administration decreased over time.