1
|
Nyberg J, Rosenbacke R, Ben-Menachem E. Digital clinics for diagnosing and treating migraine. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2024; 18:107-112. [PMID: 38990711 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Several innovative digital technologies have begun to be applied to diagnosing and treating migraine. We reviewed the potential benefits and opportunities from delivering migraine care through comprehensive digital clinics. RECENT FINDINGS There are increasing applications of digitization to migraine diagnosis and management, including e-diaries, and patient self-management, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital care delivery appears to better engage chronic migraine sufferers who may struggle to present to physical clinics. SUMMARY Digital clinics appear to be a promising treatment modality for patients with chronic migraine. They potentially minimize travel time, shorten waiting periods, improve usability, and increase access to neurologists. Additionally, they have the potential to provide care at a much lower cost than traditional physical clinics. However, the current state of evidence mostly draws on case-reports, suggesting a need for future randomized trials comparing digital interventions with standard care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Nyberg
- Stortorgets neurologmottagning, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Rikard Rosenbacke
- Centre for Corporate Governance, Department of Accounting, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Elinor Ben-Menachem
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mínguez-Olaondo A, Días PA, de Munáin EL, Grozeva V, Laspra-Solís C, Villalba IM, García-Martín V, Vila-Pueyo M, Barandiarán M, Zabalza RJ, Bengoetxea A. Behavioral therapy in migraine: Expanding the therapeutic arsenal. Eur J Neurol 2024:e16414. [PMID: 39034641 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The US Headache Consortium developed evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of migraine and found grade A evidence in support of behavior therapy (BT). Understanding the mechanisms of BT may improve the management of migraine and reduce its burden. METHODS We performed a narrative review to define the current evidence of BT and determine its usefulness in migraine management. RESULTS The information was obtained from 116 publications, with 56 of them retrieved through direct searches in PubMed (2011-2020) and the remainder selected by the authors to complete the content. BT might reduce migraine impact by decreasing the sympathetic nervous system's response to stress and increasing pain tolerance. Acting in headache-related surroundings can be improved, together with headache duration and self-efficacy. Applications such as mobile health and electronic health applications can help to carry out healthier lifestyle patterns. Regarding medication overuse, BT seems to be a good choice, with similar results to pharmacological prophylaxis. Advantages of using BT are the lack of adverse effects and the unrestricted use in children, where BT is postulated to be even more effective than the standardized pharmacopeia. CONCLUSIONS BT is an interesting tool that can be used as an add-on therapy in migraine. Through BT, the autonomy and empowerment of migraine patients is enhanced. BT may not cure migraine, but it could help to reduce pain severity perception, disability, and migraine impact, adding an emotive and cognitive approach to the perceptive role of pharmacopeia. Thus, a better approach in migraine, implementing specific therapeutic management, can improve migraine control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ane Mínguez-Olaondo
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-Osakidetza , Neuroscience Area, Biogipuzkoa Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
- Athenea Neuroclinics, Donostia, Spain
- Department of Medicine and Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao and San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Patricia Alves Días
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-Osakidetza , Neuroscience Area, Biogipuzkoa Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
- Athenea Neuroclinics, Donostia, Spain
- Department of Medicine and Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao and San Sebastian, Spain
| | | | | | - Carmen Laspra-Solís
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Valvanuz García-Martín
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-Osakidetza , Neuroscience Area, Biogipuzkoa Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
| | - Marta Vila-Pueyo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Myriam Barandiarán
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-Osakidetza , Neuroscience Area, Biogipuzkoa Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
- Athenea Neuroclinics, Donostia, Spain
- Department of Medicine and Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao and San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Ramon J Zabalza
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-Osakidetza , Neuroscience Area, Biogipuzkoa Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
| | - Ana Bengoetxea
- Athenea Neuroclinics, Donostia, Spain
- Unité de Recherche en Sciences de l'Ostéopathie, Faculté des Sciences de la Motricité, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delage N, Cantagrel N, Soriot-Thomas S, Frost M, Deleens R, Ginies P, Eschalier A, Corteval A, Laveyssière A, Phalip J, Bertin C, Pereira B, Chenaf C, Doreau B, Authier N, Kerckhove N. Mobile Health App and Web Platform (eDOL) for Medical Follow-Up of Patients With Chronic Pain: Cohort Study Involving the French eDOL National Cohort After 1 Year. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024; 12:e54579. [PMID: 38865173 PMCID: PMC11208841 DOI: 10.2196/54579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain affects approximately 30% of the general population, severely degrades quality of life and professional life, and leads to additional health care costs. Moreover, the medical follow-up of patients with chronic pain remains complex and provides only fragmentary data on painful daily experiences. This situation makes the management of patients with chronic pain less than optimal and may partly explain the lack of effectiveness of current therapies. Real-life monitoring of subjective and objective markers of chronic pain using mobile health (mHealth) programs could better characterize patients, chronic pain, pain medications, and daily impact to help medical management. OBJECTIVE This cohort study aimed to assess the ability of our mHealth tool (eDOL) to collect extensive real-life medical data from chronic pain patients after 1 year of use. The data collected in this way would provide new epidemiological and pathophysiological data on chronic pain. METHODS A French national cohort of patients with chronic pain treated at 18 pain clinics has been established and followed up using mHealth tools. This cohort makes it possible to collect the determinants and repercussions of chronic pain and their evolutions in a real-life context, taking into account all environmental events likely to influence chronic pain. The patients were asked to complete several questionnaires, body schemes, and weekly meters, and were able to interact with a chatbot and use educational modules on chronic pain. Physicians could monitor their patients' progress in real time via an online platform. RESULTS The cohort study included 1427 patients and analyzed 1178 patients. The eDOL tool was able to collect various sociodemographic data; specific data for characterizing pain disorders, including body scheme; data on comorbidities related to chronic pain and its psychological and overall impact on patients' quality of life; data on drug and nondrug therapeutics and their benefit-to-risk ratio; and medical or treatment history. Among the patients completing weekly meters, 49.4% (497/1007) continued to complete them after 3 months of follow-up, and the proportion stabilized at 39.3% (108/275) after 12 months of follow-up. Overall, despite a fairly high attrition rate over the follow-up period, the eDOL tool collected extensive data. This amount of data will increase over time and provide a significant volume of health data of interest for future research involving the epidemiology, care pathways, trajectories, medical management, sociodemographic characteristics, and other aspects of patients with chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates that the mHealth tool eDOL is able to generate a considerable volume of data concerning the determinants and repercussions of chronic pain and their evolutions in a real-life context. The eDOL tool can incorporate numerous parameters to ensure the detailed characterization of patients with chronic pain for future research and pain management. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04880096; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04880096.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noémie Delage
- Centre d'évaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nathalie Cantagrel
- Centre d'évaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Marie Frost
- Centre d'évaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Rodrigue Deleens
- Centre d'évaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Patrick Ginies
- Centre d'évaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | - Jules Phalip
- Analgesia Institute, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Célian Bertin
- Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Direction de la recherche clinique et de l'innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Chouki Chenaf
- Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bastien Doreau
- Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Modélisation et d'Optimisation des Systèmes, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Authier
- Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Kerckhove
- Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Minen M, George A, Lebowitz N, Katara A, Snyder I. Headache providers' perspectives of headache diaries in the era of increasing technology use: a qualitative study. Front Neurol 2024; 14:1270555. [PMID: 38322798 PMCID: PMC10844531 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1270555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background No matter what type of headache is being considered across various populations, one of the mainstays of headache medicine is headache tracking. This self-management tool enables patients and their providers to understand patients' underlying symptoms and the effects of treatments they have tried. This is important to determining whether headaches are related to menses for women's health, to determining the time of headache occurrence, e.g., hypnic headache, and the location and duration of symptoms, e.g., trigeminal autonomic cephalgia. Prior research has investigated what people with headaches perceive about headache diary use and how people with headaches utilize electronic headache diaries. However, headache providers' perspectives on the important factors related to headache diaries are less known. Previously, using the Modified Delphi Process, a panel of four experts opined what they perceived as the most important factors for a headache diary. We sought to better understand headache providers' perspectives about headache diary/app usage from providers working in various institutions nationwide. Methods We conducted 20 semi-structured qualitative interviews of headache providers across the US from various institutions and asked them their perspectives on headache diary use. We transcribed the interviews, which two independent coders then coded. Themes and subthemes were developed using grounded theory qualitative analysis. Results Six themes emerged: (1) Providers were generally agnostic regarding the headache tracking method, but nearly all recommend the use of smartphones for tracking; (2) Providers had concerns regarding the accessibility of headache trackers; (3) Providers noted benefits to integrating headache tracking data into the EMR but had mixed opinions on how this integration might be done; (4) Providers had mixed opinions regarding the utility and interpretation of the data, specifically regarding data accuracy and efficiency; (5) Providers generally felt that headache tracking lends itself to more collaborative plan management; (6) Providers recommend behavioral health apps for patients but stated that there are few digital behavioral health interventions for headache specifically. Conclusion Interviews of headache providers, recommenders, and users of headache data are vital informants who can provide a robust amount of information about headache diary development, use in different populations, integration, and more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Minen
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Alexis George
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Naomi Lebowitz
- Barnard College, New York, NY, United States
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, New York, NY, United States
| | - Aarti Katara
- Barnard College, New York, NY, United States
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ivy Snyder
- Department of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lackovic M, Jankovic M, Mihajlovic S, Milovanovic Z, Nikolic D. Exploring the Connection between Migraines and Pregnancy: The Impact of Physical Activity on Symptom Management. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 60:49. [PMID: 38256310 PMCID: PMC10820455 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder that significantly impacts the quality of life for affected individuals. The pathogenesis behind migraines is not yet fully understood, but hormonal changes, especially fluctuations in, estrogen and progesterone levels, have a significant role in the susceptibility of women to migraines. Pregnancy introduces a unique set of challenges for women who experience migraines, as they must navigate the complexities of managing their condition while safeguarding the health of both them and their unborn child. Pharmacological options for treating migraines during pregnancy are limited, and, therefore, there is a growing interest in exploring alternative approaches to migraine symptom relief and management. Physical activity during pregnancy provides a range of benefits, and it has gained attention as a potentially valuable tool for alleviating migraine symptoms in pregnant patients. This review explores the intricate relationship between migraines and pregnancy, emphasizing how physical activity and other alternative approaches may influence the frequency, severity, and overall experience of migraines during pregnancy. Through collaboration with healthcare providers and the adoption of personalized management strategies, women can strike a balance that supports both their own well-being and the healthy development of their unborn child. By examining existing research and emerging insights, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential benefits and considerations of incorporating physical activity and other treatment options into migraine management strategies for pregnant women. Further research is needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms linking migraines, pregnancy, and physical activity, enabling the development of more targeted interventions and guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Lackovic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital “Dragisa Misovic”, Milana Tepica 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.L.); (S.M.)
| | - Milena Jankovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.J.); (Z.M.)
- Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Sladjana Mihajlovic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital “Dragisa Misovic”, Milana Tepica 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.L.); (S.M.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.J.); (Z.M.)
| | - Zagorka Milovanovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.J.); (Z.M.)
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics “Narodni Front”, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Dejan Nikolic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.J.); (Z.M.)
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Children’s Hospital, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Young NP, Ridgeway JL, Haddad TC, Harper SB, Philpot LM, Christopherson LA, McColley SM, Phillips SA, Brown JK, Zimmerman KS, Ebbert JO. Feasibility and Usability of a Mobile App-Based Interactive Care Plan for Migraine in a Community Neurology Practice: Development and Pilot Implementation Study. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e48372. [PMID: 37796560 PMCID: PMC10587810 DOI: 10.2196/48372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a common and major cause of disability, poor quality of life, and high health care use. Access to evidence-based migraine care is limited and projected to worsen. Novel mobile health app-based tools may effectively deliver migraine patient education to support self-management, facilitate remote monitoring and treatment, and improve access to care. The risk that such an intervention may increase the care team workload is a potential implementation barrier. OBJECTIVE This study aims to describe a novel electronic health record-integrated mobile app-based Migraine Interactive Care Plan (MICP) and evaluate its feasibility, usability, and impact on care teams in a community neurology practice. METHODS Consecutive enrollees between September 1, 2020, and February 16, 2022, were assessed in a single-arm observational study of usability, defined by 74.3% (127/171) completing ≥1 assigned task. Task response rates, rate and type of care team escalations, and patient-reported outcomes were summarized. Patients were prospectively recruited and randomly assigned to routine care with or without the MICP from September 1, 2020, to September 1, 2021. Feasibility was defined by equal to or fewer downstream face-to-face visits, telephone contacts, and electronic messages in the MICP cohort. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables for those with at least 3 months of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 171 patients were enrolled, and of these, 127 (74.3%) patients completed ≥1 MICP-assigned task. Mean escalations per patient per month was 0.9 (SD 0.37; range 0-1.7). Patient-confirmed understanding of the educational materials ranged from 26.6% (45/169) to 56.2% (95/169). Initial mean headache days per week was 4.54 (SD 2.06) days and declined to 2.86 (SD 1.87) days at week 26. The percentage of patients reporting favorable satisfaction increased from a baseline of 35% (20/57) to 83% (15/18; response rate of 42/136, 30.9% to 28/68, 41%) over the first 6 months. A total of 121 patients with MICP were compared with 62 patients in the control group. No differences were observed in the rate of telephone contacts or electronic messages. Fewer face-to-face visits were observed in the MICP cohort (13/121, 10.7%) compared with controls (26/62, 42%; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS We describe the successful implementation of an electronic health record-integrated mobile app-based care plan for migraine in a community neurology practice. We observed fewer downstream face-to-face visits without increasing telephone calls, medication refills, or electronic messages. Our findings suggest that the MICP has the potential to improve patient access without increasing care team workload and the need for patient input from diverse populations to improve and sustain patient engagement. Additional studies are needed to assess its impact in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan P Young
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Integrated Community Specialty Practice, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Jennifer L Ridgeway
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Tufia C Haddad
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Center for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Sarah B Harper
- Center for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Lindsey M Philpot
- Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Qualitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Samantha M McColley
- Center for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Clinical Informatics and Practice Support, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Sarah A Phillips
- Center for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Julie K Brown
- Center for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Kelly S Zimmerman
- Integrated Community Specialty Practice, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Jon O Ebbert
- Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen X, Luo Y. Digital Therapeutics in Migraine Management: A Novel Treatment Option in the COVID-19 Era. J Pain Res 2023; 16:111-117. [PMID: 36660558 PMCID: PMC9842514 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s387548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a chronic and often lifelong disease that directly affects over one billion people globally. Because access to migraine medical services is limited, only a minority of migraine patients are treated adequately. This situation worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital therapeutics (DTx) is an emerging therapeutic approach that opens up many new possibilities for remote migraine management. For instance, migraine management tools, online migraine diagnosis, guideline-based treatment options, digitally networked patients, and collecting anonymized information about migraine attacks and course parameters for scientific evaluation. Various applications of DTx in migraine management have been studied in recent years, such as the usefulness of digital migraine self-management tools in diagnosing and tracking migraine attacks, and the efficacy and safety of digital cognitive behavioural therapy. However, the development of DTx is still in its infancy and still faces many obstacles. The primary goal of this study is to review the latest research on DTx in migraine management, identify challenges, and outline future trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingchen Chen
- Tianjin Baodi Hospital, Baodi Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 301800, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yujia Luo
- Department of Pain Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, People’s Republic of China,Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia,Correspondence: Yujia Luo, Email
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Agbetou M, Adoukonou T. Lifestyle Modifications for Migraine Management. Front Neurol 2022; 13:719467. [PMID: 35370920 PMCID: PMC8971279 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.719467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a disabling disease that inflicts a heavy burden on individuals who suffer from it. Significant advances are being made in understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of the disease. The role of lifestyle modifications has become increasingly predominant. We reviewed the current and available data on the role of a healthy lifestyle in the management of migraine. Physical activity, management of obesity, a healthy diet, and a better lifestyle, such as adequate sleep and avoidance of drug abuse, significantly contribute to reducing the frequency and severity of attacks. It is important to consider these factors in the overall management strategies for migraine sufferers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mendinatou Agbetou
- Department of Neurology, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin
- Clinic of Neurology, Teaching Hospital of Parakou, Parakou, Benin
| | - Thierry Adoukonou
- Department of Neurology, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin
- Clinic of Neurology, Teaching Hospital of Parakou, Parakou, Benin
- Inserm U1094, IRD U270, Univ. Limoges, CHU Limoges, EpiMaCT - Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases in Tropical Zone, Institute of Epidemiology and Tropical Neurology, OmegaHealth, Limoges, France
- *Correspondence: Thierry Adoukonou
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kerckhove N, Delage N, Cambier S, Cantagrel N, Serra E, Marcaillou F, Maindet C, Picard P, Martiné G, Deleens R, Trouvin AP, Fourel L, Espagne-Dubreuilh G, Douay L, Foulon S, Dufraisse B, Gov C, Viel E, Jedryka F, Pouplin S, Lestrade C, Combe E, Perrot S, Perocheau D, De Brisson V, Vergne-Salle P, Mertens P, Pereira B, Djiberou Mahamadou AJ, Antoine V, Corteval A, Eschalier A, Dualé C, Attal N, Authier N. eDOL mHealth App and Web Platform for Self-monitoring and Medical Follow-up of Patients With Chronic Pain: Observational Feasibility Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e30052. [PMID: 35234654 PMCID: PMC8928045 DOI: 10.2196/30052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain affects approximately 30% of the general population, severely degrades quality of life (especially in older adults) and professional life (inability or reduction in the ability to work and loss of employment), and leads to billions in additional health care costs. Moreover, available painkillers are old, with limited efficacy and can cause significant adverse effects. Thus, there is a need for innovation in the management of chronic pain. Better characterization of patients could help to identify the predictors of successful treatments, and thus, guide physicians in the initial choice of treatment and in the follow-up of their patients. Nevertheless, current assessments of patients with chronic pain provide only fragmentary data on painful daily experiences. Real-life monitoring of subjective and objective markers of chronic pain using mobile health (mHealth) programs can address this issue. OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that regular patient self-monitoring using an mHealth app would lead physicians to obtain deeper understanding and new insight into patients with chronic pain and that, for patients, regular self-monitoring using an mHealth app would play a positive therapeutic role and improve adherence to treatment. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a new mHealth app called eDOL. METHODS We conducted an observational study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the eDOL tool. Patients completed several questionnaires using the tool over a period of 2 weeks and repeated assessments weekly over a period of 3 months. Physicians saw their patients at a follow-up visit that took place at least 3 months after the inclusion visit. A composite criterion of the acceptability and feasibility of the eDOL tool was calculated after the completion of study using satisfaction surveys from both patients and physicians. RESULTS Data from 105 patients (of 133 who were included) were analyzed. The rate of adherence was 61.9% (65/105) after 3 months. The median acceptability score was 7 (out of 10) for both patients and physicians. There was a high rate of completion of the baseline questionnaires and assessments (mean 89.3%), and a low rate of completion of the follow-up questionnaires and assessments (63.8% (67/105) and 61.9% (65/105) respectively). We were also able to characterize subgroups of patients and determine a profile of those who adhered to eDOL. We obtained 4 clusters that differ from each other in their biopsychosocial characteristics. Cluster 4 corresponds to patients with more disabling chronic pain (daily impact and comorbidities) and vice versa for cluster 1. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates that eDOL is highly feasible and acceptable for both patients with chronic pain and their physicians. It also shows that such a tool can integrate many parameters to ensure the detailed characterization of patients for future research works and pain management. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03931694; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03931694.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Kerckhove
- Service de Pharmacologie médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Noémie Delage
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sébastien Cambier
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nathalie Cantagrel
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Eric Serra
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Fabienne Marcaillou
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Caroline Maindet
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Pascale Picard
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Gaelle Martiné
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Rodrigue Deleens
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Anne-Priscille Trouvin
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Lauriane Fourel
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Bayeux, Bayeux, France
| | - Gaelle Espagne-Dubreuilh
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Ludovic Douay
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Stéphane Foulon
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Bénédicte Dufraisse
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Christian Gov
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Hospices Civils de Lyon Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
| | - Eric Viel
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - François Jedryka
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - Sophie Pouplin
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Cécile Lestrade
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Emmanuel Combe
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Serge Perrot
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Perocheau
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Valentine De Brisson
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Bayeux, Bayeux, France
| | - Pascale Vergne-Salle
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Patrick Mertens
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Hospices Civils de Lyon Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Violaine Antoine
- Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Modélisation et d'Optimisation des Systèmes, Université Clermont Auvergne, Aubière, France
| | | | | | - Christian Dualé
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nadine Attal
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 987 - Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Ambroise Paré, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Authier
- Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hogan TP, Etingen B, McMahon N, Bixler FR, Am L, Wacks RE, Shimada SL, Reilly ED, Frisbee KL, Smith BM. Understanding Adoption and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Mobile App for Chronic Pain Management Among US Military Veterans: Pre-Post Mixed Methods Evaluation. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e33716. [PMID: 35049515 PMCID: PMC8814923 DOI: 10.2196/33716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Veterans Health Administration Pain Coach mobile health app was developed to support veterans with chronic pain. Objective Our objective was to evaluate early user experiences with the Pain Coach app and preliminary impacts of app use on pain-related outcomes. Methods Following a sequential, explanatory, mixed methods design, we mailed surveys to veterans at 2 time points with an outreach program in between and conducted semistructured interviews with a subsample of survey respondents. We analyzed survey data using descriptive statistics among veterans who completed both surveys and examined differences in key outcomes using paired samples t tests. We analyzed semistructured interview data using thematic analysis. Results Of 1507 veterans invited and eligible to complete the baseline survey, we received responses from 393 (26.1%). These veterans received our outreach program; 236 (236/393, 60.1%) completed follow-up surveys. We conducted interviews with 10 app users and 10 nonusers. Among survey respondents, 10.2% (24/236) used Pain Coach, and 58% (14/24) reported it was easy to use, though interviews identified various app usability issues. Veterans who used Pain Coach reported greater pain self-efficacy (mean 23.1 vs mean 16.6; P=.01) and lower pain interference (mean 34.6 vs mean 31.8; P=.03) after (vs before) use. The most frequent reason veterans reported for not using the app was that their health care team had not discussed it with them (96/212, 45.3%). Conclusions Our findings suggest that future efforts to increase adoption of Pain Coach and other mobile apps among veterans should include health care team endorsement. Our findings regarding the impact of Pain Coach use on outcomes warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P Hogan
- eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Bella Etingen
- eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Nicholas McMahon
- eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - Felicia R Bixler
- eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Linda Am
- eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - Rachel E Wacks
- eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - Stephanie L Shimada
- eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States
| | - Erin D Reilly
- Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Social and Community Reintegration Research (SoCRR), Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - Kathleen L Frisbee
- eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Office of Connected Care, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Bridget M Smith
- eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, IL, United States.,Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Minen MT, Busis NA, Friedman S, Campbell M, Sahu A, Maisha K, Hossain Q, Soviero M, Verma D, Yao L, Foo FYA, Bhatt JM, Balcer LJ, Galetta SL, Thawani S. The use of virtual complementary and integrative therapies by neurology outpatients: An exploratory analysis of two cross-sectional studies assessing the use of technology as treatment in an academic neurology department in New York City. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221109545. [PMID: 35874862 PMCID: PMC9297463 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221109545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, about half of patients from populations that sought care in neurology tried complementary and integrative therapies (CITs). With the increased utilization of telehealth services, we sought to determine whether patients also increased their use of virtual CITs. Methods We examined datasets from two separate cross-sectional surveys that included cohorts of patients with neurological disorders. One was a dataset from a study that examined patient and provider experiences with teleneurology visits; the other was a study that assessed patients with a history of COVID-19 infection who presented for neurologic evaluation. We assessed and reported the use of virtual (and non-virtual) CITs using descriptive statistics, and determined whether there were clinical characteristics that predicted the use of CITs using logistic regression analyses. Findings Patients who postponed medical treatment for non-COVID-19-related problems during the pandemic were more likely to seek CITs. Virtual exercise, virtual psychotherapy, and relaxation/meditation smartphone applications were the most frequent types of virtual CITs chosen by patients. In both studies, age was a key demographic factor associated with mobile/virtual CIT usage. Interpretations Our investigation demonstrates that virtual CIT-related technologies were utilized in the treatment of neurologic conditions during the pandemic, particularly by those patients who deferred non-COVID-related care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia T Minen
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neil A Busis
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven Friedman
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maya Campbell
- Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ananya Sahu
- The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kazi Maisha
- Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Quazi Hossain
- Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mia Soviero
- The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Leslie Yao
- Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jaydeep M Bhatt
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura J Balcer
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven L Galetta
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sujata Thawani
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Raffaelli B, Mecklenburg J, Overeem LH, Scholler S, Dahlem MA, Kurth T, Oliveira Gonçalves AS, Reuter U, Neeb L. Determining the Evolution of Headache Among Regular Users of a Daily Electronic Diary via a Smartphone App: Observational Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021; 9:e26401. [PMID: 34255716 PMCID: PMC8295831 DOI: 10.2196/26401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Smartphone-based apps represent a major development in health care management. Specifically in headache care, the use of electronic headache diaries via apps has become increasingly popular. In contrast to the soaring volume of available data, scientific use of these data resources is sparse. Objective In this analysis, we aimed to assess changes in headache and migraine frequency, headache and migraine intensity, and use of acute medication among people who showed daily use of the headache diary as implemented in the freely available basic version of the German commercial app, M-sense. Methods The basic version of M-sense comprises an electronic headache diary, documentation of lifestyle factors with a possible impact on headaches, and evaluation of headache patterns. This analysis included all M-sense users who had entered data into the app on a daily basis for at least 7 months. Results We analyzed data from 1545 users. Mean MHD decreased from 9.42 (SD 5.81) at baseline to 6.39 (SD 5.09) after 6 months (P<.001; 95% CI 2.80-3.25). MMD, AMD, and migraine intensity were also significantly reduced. Similar results were found in 985 users with episodic migraine and in 126 users with chronic migraine. Conclusions Among regular users of an electronic headache diary, headache and migraine frequency, in addition to other headache characteristics, improved over time. The use of an electronic headache diary may support standard headache care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jasper Mecklenburg
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Tobias Kurth
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lars Neeb
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Minen MT, Friedman BW, Adhikari S, Corner S, Powers SW, Seng EK, Grudzen C, Lipton RB. Introduction of a smartphone based behavioral intervention for migraine in the emergency department. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2021; 69:12-19. [PMID: 33485090 PMCID: PMC8721519 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether a smartphone application (app) with an electronic headache diary and a progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) intervention is feasible and acceptable to people presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with migraine. METHODS This single arm prospective study assessed feasibility by actual use of the app and acceptability by satisfaction with the app. We report preliminary data on change in migraine disability and headache days. RESULTS The 51 participants completed PMR sessions on a mean of 13 ± 19 (0,82) days for the 90-day study period, lasting a median of 11 min (IQR 6.5, 17) each. Median number of days of diary use was 34 (IQR 10, 77). Diaries were completed at least twice a week in half of study weeks (337/663). Participants were likely (≥4/5 on a 5-point Likert scale) to recommend both the app (85%) and PMR (91%). MIDAS scores significantly decreased by a mean of 38 points/participant (p < 0.0001). More frequent PMR use was associated with a higher odds of headache free days (p = 0.0148). CONCLUSION Smartphone-based PMR introduced to patients who present to the ED for migraine is feasible and acceptable. More frequent users have more headache free days. Future work should focus on intervention engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia T Minen
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America; Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.
| | - Benjamin W Friedman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, The Bronx, NY 10461, United States of America
| | - Samrachana Adhikari
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
| | - Sarah Corner
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
| | - Scott W Powers
- Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Headache Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth K Seng
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University; Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1165 Morris Park Ave, The Bronx, NY 10461, United States of America
| | - Corita Grudzen
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Montefiore Headache Center; Departments of Neurology, Population Health, and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 250 Waters Pl #8, The Bronx, NY 10461, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Minen MT, Adhikari S, Padikkala J, Tasneem S, Bagheri A, Goldberg E, Powers S, Lipton RB. Smartphone-Delivered Progressive Muscle Relaxation for the Treatment of Migraine in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Headache 2020; 60:2232-2246. [PMID: 33200413 PMCID: PMC8721526 DOI: 10.1111/head.14010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Scalable, accessible forms of behavioral therapy for migraine prevention are needed. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) delivered by a smartphone application (app) in the Primary Care setting. METHODS This pilot study was a non-blinded, randomized, parallel-arm controlled trial of adults with migraine and 4+ headache days/month. Eligible participants spoke English and owned a smartphone. All participants were given the RELAXaHEAD app which includes an electronic headache diary. Participants were randomized to receive 1 of the 2 versions of the app-one with PMR and the other without PMR. The primary outcomes were measures of feasibility (adherence to the intervention and diary entries during the 90-day interval) and acceptability (satisfaction levels). We conducted exploratory analyses to determine whether there was a change in Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores or a change in headache days. RESULTS Of 139 participants (77 PMR, 62 control), 116 (83%) were female, mean age was 41.7 ± 12.8 years. Most patients 108/139 (78%) had moderate-severe disability. Using a 1-5 Likert scale, participants found the app easy to use (mean 4.2 ± 0.7) and stated that they would be happy to engage in the PMR intervention again (mean 4.3 ± 0.6). For the first 6 weeks, participants practiced PMR 2-4 days/week. Mean per session duration was 11.1 ± 8.3 minutes. Relative to the diary-only group, the PMR group showed a greater non-significant decline in mean MIDAS scores (-8.7 vs -22.7, P = .100) corresponding to a small-moderate mean effect size (Cohen's d = 0.38). CONCLUSION Smartphone-delivered PMR may be an acceptable, accessible form of therapy for migraine. Mean effects show a small-moderate mean effect size in disability scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia T Minen
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jane Padikkala
- Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sumaiya Tasneem
- Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashley Bagheri
- Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Goldberg
- Department of Medicine Faculty Group Practices, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott Powers
- Behavioral Medicine, Headache Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Montefiore Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Montefiore Headache Center, Department of Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Montefiore Headache Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Smartphone based behavioral therapy for pain in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients: A feasibility acceptability randomized controlled study for the treatment of comorbid migraine and ms pain. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 46:102489. [PMID: 32950893 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Migraine are comorbid neurologic conditions. Migraine prevalence is three times higher in the MS clinic population compared to the general population, and patients with MS and migraine are more symptomatic than patients with MS without migraine. OBJECTIVE We sought to conduct a pilot feasibility and acceptability study of the RELAXaHEAD app in MS-Migraine patients and to assess whether there was any change in migraine disability and MS pain-related disability. METHODS Randomized controlled study of patients with MS-migraine ages 18-80 years with 4+ headache days/ month who were willing to engage in smartphone based behavioral therapy. Half received the RELAXaHEAD app with progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) and the other half received the app without the PMR. Data was collected for 90 days on measures of recruitment, retention, engagement, and adherence to RELAXaHEAD. Preliminary data was also collected on migraine disability (MIDAS) and MS pain (PES). RESULTS Sixty-two subjects with MS-migraine were enrolled in the study (34 in PMR arm, 28 in monitored usual care arm). On average, during the 90 days, participants played the PMR on average 1.8 times per week, and for 12.9 min on days it was played. Forty-one percent (14/34) of the participants played the PMR two or more times weekly on average. Data was entered into the daily diaries, on average, 49% (44/90) of the days. There were major challenges in reaching subjects in follow-up for the efficacy data, and there was no significant change in migraine disability (MIDAS) scores or MS Pain (PES) scores from baseline to the endpoints. During the six-month follow-up, most patients felt either positively or neutral about the relaxation therapy. CONCLUSION There was interest in scalable accessible forms of behavioral therapy to treat migraine and MS-related pain in patients with MS and comorbid migraine. Similar to prior studies, a significant minority were willing to practice the PMR at least twice weekly. In the societal shift from telephone to more text and internet-based interactions, follow up was challenging, but those reached indicated that they appreciated the PMR and would recommend it to others. Future work should focus on engagement and efficacy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Usmani S, Balcer L, Galetta S, Minen M. Feasibility of Smartphone-Delivered Progressive Muscle Relaxation in Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache Patients. J Neurotrauma 2020; 38:94-101. [PMID: 32484070 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2019.6601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Persistent post-traumatic headache (PPTH) is often the most common injury after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), reported by 47-95% of patients. Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) has level A evidence in preventing migraine and tension headaches. However, research on this behavioral therapy for PPTH, let alone smartphone delivered, is limited. We performed a single-arm study of prospective patients calling our Concussion Center between June 2017 and July 2018. Inclusion criteria were that subjects had to meet International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition criteria for PPTH secondary to mTBI, have four or more headache days a month, be age 18-85 years and 3-12 months post-injury, own a smartphone, and not tried headache behavioral therapy within the year. We recorded baseline headache and neuropsychiatric data. Using the RELAXaHEAD smartphone application, which has a headache diary and PMR audio files, participants were instructed to record headache symptoms and practice 20 min of PMR daily. There were three monthly follow-up assessments. There were 49 subjects enrolled. Basic demographics were: 33 (67%) female with mean age 40.1 ± 14.6 [20, 75] years. Of the 49 subjects, 15 (31%) had pre-existing headaches. In 11 (22%) subjects, mTBI was sports related. Subjects reported 17.7 ± 9.3 [4, 31] headache days in the month before enrollment, and 49 (100%) experienced over three concussion symptoms. Participants inputted data in the RELAXaHEAD app on average 18.3 ± 12.0 days [0, 31] the first month. Number of participants who did PMR over four times per week was 12 (24.5%) the first month, 9 (22.5%) the second month, and 6 (15%) the third month. After 3 months, 17 (42.5 %) participants continued doing PMR. Participants cited time constraints, forgetfulness, application glitches, and repetitiveness as obstacles to practicing PMR. It is feasible to get PPTH subjects to practice behavioral therapy through low-cost smartphone-based PMR two times weekly. Future work will assess efficacy and examine how to optimize barriers to PMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saima Usmani
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Laura Balcer
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Steven Galetta
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mia Minen
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Minen MT, Jaran J, Boyers T, Corner S. Understanding What People With Migraine Consider to be Important Features of Migraine Tracking: An Analysis of the Utilization of Smartphone‐Based Migraine Tracking With a Free‐Text Feature. Headache 2020; 60:1402-1414. [DOI: 10.1111/head.13851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mia T. Minen
- Department of Neurology NYU Langone Health New York NY USA
| | - Jana Jaran
- Department of Neuroscience and Behavior Barnard College New York NY USA
| | - Talia Boyers
- Department of Neuroscience and Behavior Barnard College New York NY USA
| | - Sarah Corner
- Department of Neurology NYU Langone Health New York NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van de Graaf DL, Schoonman GG, Habibović M, Pauws SC. Towards eHealth to support the health journey of headache patients: a scoping review. J Neurol 2020; 268:3646-3665. [PMID: 32529582 PMCID: PMC8463346 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09981-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to (1) review the digital health tools that have been used in headache studies, and (2) discuss the effectivity and reliability of these tools. Background Many headache patients travel a long and troublesome journey from first symptoms until a meaningful care plan. eHealth, mHealth, and digital therapeutic modalities have been advocated as the way forward to improve patient care. Method Online databases PubMed, Cinahl, and PsycINFO were searched using a predefined search query. A data extraction form was used to gather relevant data elements from the selected papers. Results A total of 39 studies were selected. The studies included 94,127 participants. The majority of studies focused on diaries (N = 27 out of 39). Digital (cognitive) behavioral therapy were also quite common (N = 7 out of 39). Other digital health tool categories were tele-consultations, telemonitoring and patient portals. Conclusion Many digital health tools for headache patients regarding diaries and behavioral/therapeutical treatment are described in scientific research with limited information on effectivity and reliability. Scientific knowledge with regard to other categories such as tele-consultations, patient portals, telemonitoring including medication adherence, online information resources, wearable, symptom checkers, digital peer support is still scarce or missing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Guus G Schoonman
- Department of Neurology, Elizabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Mirela Habibović
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Department of Cardiology, Elizabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Steffen C Pauws
- TiCC-Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Philips Research, Healthcare, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Minen MT, Morio K, Schaubhut KB, Powers SW, Lipton RB, Seng E. Focus group findings on the migraine patient experience during research studies and ideas for future investigations. Cephalalgia 2020; 40:712-734. [PMID: 31870189 PMCID: PMC7754244 DOI: 10.1177/0333102419888230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We conducted focus groups in people who had participated in mobile health (mHealth) studies of behavioral interventions for migraine to better understand: (a) Participant experience in the recruitment/enrollment process; (b) participant experience during the studies themselves; (c) ideas for improving participant experience for future studies. METHODS We conducted four focus groups in people who had agreed to participate in one of three studies involving mHealth and behavioral therapy for migraine. Inclusion criteria were being age 18-80, owning a smartphone, and having four or more headache days per month. All participants met the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition beta version criteria for migraine. Exclusion criteria were not speaking English and having had behavioral therapy for migraine in the past year. Focus groups were audio recorded, fully transcribed and coded using general thematic analysis. RESULTS The 12 focus group participants had a mean age of 45 ± 15, a mean age of headache onset of 21 ± 13 and mean MIDAS disability score was 39 ± 56. Participants were women (100%), white (50%), Asian (33.3%) or members of other racial groups (16.7%). Certain themes emerged from each topic area. With regard to recruitment/enrollment (a), key themes were: (i) Participants joined their study out of an interest in research and/or a desire to try a new migraine treatment modality (behavioral therapy). (ii) Enrollment should be simple and study requirements should be carefully explained prior to enrollment. When asked about their experiences during the studies (b), the following themes emerged: (i) It is difficult to participate in study follow-up and compliance phone calls; (ii) participants prefer to choose from among various options for contact with the study team; (iii) there are barriers that limit app use related to migraine itself, as well as other barriers; (iv) completing diaries on a daily basis is challenging; (v) technical difficulties and uncertainties about app features limit use; (vi) being part of a research study promoted daily behavioral therapy use; (vii) progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) is enjoyable, and has a positive impact on life; (viii) behavioral therapy was a preferred treatment to reduce migraine pain. Ideas for improving study design or patient experience (c) included: (i) Increased opportunity to interact with other people with migraine would be beneficial; (ii) navigating the app and data entry should be easier; (iii) more varied methods for viewing the data and measures of adherence are needed; (iv) more information on and more varied behavioral treatment modalities would be preferred. CONCLUSION Though people with migraine are motivated to participate in mHealth and behavioral treatment studies, better communication up front about interventions as well as greater flexibility in interventions and follow-up methods are desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Scott W Powers
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Perlini C, Donisi V, Del Piccolo L. From research to clinical practice: a systematic review of the implementation of psychological interventions for chronic headache in adults. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:459. [PMID: 32450871 PMCID: PMC7247180 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05172-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological interventions have been proved to be effective in chronic headache (CH) in adults. Nevertheless, no data exist about their actual implementation into standard clinical settings. We aimed at critically depicting the current application of psychological interventions for CH into standard care exploring barriers and facilitators to their implementation. Secondarily, main outcomes of the most recent psychological interventions for CH in adults have been summarized. METHODS We conducted a systematic review through PubMed and PsycINFO in the time range 2008-2018. A quality analysis according to the QATSDD tool and a narrative synthesis were performed. We integrated results by: contacting the corresponding author of each paper; exploring the website of the clinical centers cited in the papers. RESULTS Of the 938 identified studies, 28 papers were selected, whose quality largely varied with an average %QATSDD quality score of 64.88%. Interventions included CBT (42.85%), multi-disciplinary treatments (22.43%), relaxation training (17.86%), biofeedback (7.14%), or other interventions (10.72%). Treatments duration (1 day-9 months) and intensity varied, with a prevalence of individual-basis implementation. The majority of the studies focused on all primary headaches; 4 studies focused on medication-overuse headache. Most of the studies suggest interventions as effective, with the reduction in frequency of attacks as the most reported outcome (46.43%). Studies were distributed in different countries, with a prevalent and balanced distribution in USA and Europe. Ten researches (35.71%) were performed in academic contexts, 11 (39.28%) in clinical settings, 7 (25%) in pain/headache centres. Interventions providers were professionals with certified experience. Most of the studies were funded with private or public funding. Two contacted authors answered to our e-mail survey, with only one intervention implemented in the routine clinical practice. Only in three out of the 16 available websites a reference to the implementation into the clinical setting was reported. CONCLUSION Analysis of contextual barriers/facilitators and cost-effectiveness should be included in future studies, and contents regarding dissemination/implementation of interventions should be incorporated in the professional training of clinical scientists. This can help in filling the gap between the existing published research and treatments actually offered to people with CH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Perlini
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
- USD Clinical Psychology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Valeria Donisi
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- USD Clinical Psychology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Lidia Del Piccolo
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- USD Clinical Psychology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Minen MT, Jalloh A, Begasse de Dhaem O, Seng EK. Behavioral Therapy Preferences in People With Migraine. Headache 2020; 60:1093-1102. [PMID: 32207148 DOI: 10.1111/head.13790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are safe and well-tolerated level A evidence-based behavioral therapies for the prevention of migraine. They are biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, and relaxation. However, the behavioral therapies for the prevention of migraine are underutilized. OBJECTIVES We sought to examine whether people with migraine with 4 or more headache days a month had preferences regarding the type of delivery of the behavioral therapy (in-person, smartphone based, telephone) and whether they would be willing to pay for in-person behavioral therapy. We also sought to determine the predictors of likelihood to pursue the behavioral therapy. METHODS Using a cross-sectional study design, we developed an online survey using TurkPrime, an online survey platform, to assess how likely TurkPrime participants who screened positive for migraine using the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention screen were to pursue different delivery methods of the behavioral therapy. We report descriptive statistics and quantitative analyses. RESULTS There were 401 participants. Median age was 34 [IQR: 29, 41] years. More than two thirds of participants (70.3%, 282/401) were women. Median number of headache days/ month was 5 [IQR: 2.83, 8.5]. Some (12.5%, 50/401) used evidence-based behavioral therapy for migraine. The participants reported that they were "somewhat likely" to pursue in-person or smartphone behavioral therapy and behavioral therapy covered by insurance but were neutral about pursuing the telephone-based behavioral therapy. Participants were "not very likely" to pay out of pocket for the behavioral therapy. Migraine-related disability as measured by the MIDAS grading score was associated with likelihood to pursue the behavioral therapy in-person (P = .004), via telephone (P = .015), and via smart phone (P < .001), and covered by insurance (P = .001). However, migraine-related disability was not associated with likelihood to pursue out of pocket (P = .769) behavioral therapy. Pain intensity was predictive of likelihood of pursuing the behavioral therapy for migraine when covered by insurance. Other factors including education, employment, and headache days were not predictors. CONCLUSION People with migraine prefer in-person and smartphone-based behavioral therapy to telephone-based behavioral therapy. Migraine-related disability is associated with likelihood to pursue the behavioral therapy (independent of type of delivery of the behavioral therapy-in-person, telephone based or smartphone based). However, participants were not very likely to pay for the behavioral therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia T Minen
- Departments of Neurology and Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adama Jalloh
- Department of Psychology, City College of New York Ringgold Standard Institution, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth K Seng
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Almeida AF, Rocha NP, Silva AG. Methodological Quality of Manuscripts Reporting on the Usability of Mobile Applications for Pain Assessment and Management: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E785. [PMID: 32012674 PMCID: PMC7038093 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been increasing use of mobile mHealth applications, including pain assessment and pain self-management apps. The usability of mHealth applications has vital importance as it affects the quality of apps. Thus, usability assessment with methodological rigor is essential to minimize errors and undesirable consequences, as well as to increase user acceptance. OBJECTIVE this study aimed to synthesize and evaluate existing studies on the assessment of the usability of pain-related apps using a newly developed scale. METHODS an electronic search was conducted in several databases, combining relevant keywords. Then titles and abstracts were screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria. The eligible studies were retrieved and independently screened for inclusion by two authors. Disagreements were resolved by discussion until consensus was reached. RESULTS a total of 31 articles were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment revealed that most manuscripts did not assess usability using valid instruments or triangulation of methods of usability assessment. Most manuscripts also failed to assess the three domains of usability (effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction). CONCLUSIONS future studies should consider existing guidelines on usability assessment design, development and assessment of pain-related apps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana F. Almeida
- Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA), Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal (N.P.R.)
| | - Nelson P. Rocha
- Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA), Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal (N.P.R.)
- Department of Medical Sciences, Universidade de Aveiro - Edifício 30, Agras do Crasto - Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Anabela G. Silva
- School of Health Sciences, Universidade de Aveiro - Edifício 30, Agras do Crasto - Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Universidade de Aveiro (CINTESIS.UA), Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Smartphone-based migraine behavioral therapy: a single-arm study with assessment of mental health predictors. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2:46. [PMID: 31304392 PMCID: PMC6550263 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0116-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) is an under-utilized Level A evidence-based treatment for migraine prevention. We studied the feasibility and acceptability of smartphone application (app)-based PMR for migraine in a neurology setting, explored whether app-based PMR might reduce headache (HA) days, and examined potential predictors of app and/or PMR use. In this single-arm pilot study, adults with ICHD3 migraine, 4+ HA days/month, a smartphone, and no prior behavioral migraine therapy in the past year were asked to complete a daily HA diary and do PMR for 20 min/day for 90 days. Outcomes were: adherence to PMR (no. and duration of audio plays) and frequency of diary use. Predictors in the models were baseline demographics, HA-specific variables, baseline PROMIS (patient-reported outcomes measurement information system) depression and anxiety scores, presence of overlapping pain conditions studied and app satisfaction scores at time of enrollment. Fifty-one patients enrolled (94% female). Mean age was 39 ± 13 years. The majority (63%) had severe migraine disability at baseline (MIDAS). PMR was played 22 ± 21 days on average. Mean/session duration was 11 ± 7 min. About half (47%) of uses were 1+ time/week and 35% of uses were 2+ times/week. There was a decline in use/week. On average, high users (PMR 2+ days/week in the first month) had 4 fewer days of reported HAs in month 2 vs. month 1, whereas low PMR users (PMR < 2 days/week in the first month) had only 2 fewer HA days in month 2. PROMIS depression score was negatively associated with the log odds of using the diary at least once (vs. no activity) in a week (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = [0.55, 0.85]) and of doing the PMR at least once in a week (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = [0.68, 0.91]). PROMIS anxiety was positively associated with using the diary at least once every week (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = [1.09, 1.73]) and with doing the PMR at least once every week (OR = 1.14 [95% CI = [1.02, 1.31]). In conclusion, about half of participants used smartphone-based PMR intervention based upon a brief, initial introduction to the app. App use was associated with reduction in HA days. Higher depression scores were negatively associated with diary and PMR use, whereas higher anxiety scores were positively associated.
Collapse
|
24
|
Adherence to Behavioral Therapy for Migraine: Knowledge to Date, Mechanisms for Assessing Adherence, and Methods for Improving Adherence. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2019; 23:3. [PMID: 30661135 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-019-0739-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In other disease states, adherence to behavioral therapies has gained attention, with a greater amount of studies discussing, defining, and optimizing adherence. For example, a meta-analysis formally discussed adherence in 25 studies of CBT for 11 different disorders, with only 6 of the 25 omitting addressing or defining adherence. Many studies have discussed the use of text messages, graph-based adherence rates, and email/telephone reminders to improve adherence. This paper examined the available literature regarding adherence to behavioral therapy for migraine as well as adherence to similar therapies in other disease states. The goal of this research is to apply lessons learned from adherence to behavioral therapy for other diseases in better understanding how we can improve adherence to behavioral therapy for migraine. RECENT FINDINGS Treatment for migraine typically includes both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies, including progressive muscle relaxation (PMR), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and biofeedback. Behavioral therapies have been shown to significantly reduce headache frequency and intensity, but high attrition rates and suboptimal adherence can undermine their efficacy. Traditionally, adherence to behavioral therapy has been defined by self-report, including paper headache diaries and assignments. In person attendance has also been employed as a method of defining and monitoring adherence. With the advent of personal electronics, measurements of adherence have shifted to include electronic-based methods such as computer-based programs and mobile-based therapies. Furthermore, some studies have taken advantage of electronic methods such as email reminders, push notifications, and other mobile-based reminders to optimize adherence. The JITA-I, a novel method of engaging individual patient adherence, has also been suggested as a possible method to improve adherence by tailoring engagement with a mobile health app-based on patient input. These novel methods may be utilized in behavioral therapy for migraine for further optimizing adherence. Few intervention studies to date have addressed the optimal ways to impact adherence to migraine behavioral therapy. Further research is required regarding adherence with behavioral therapies, specifically via mobile health interventions to better understand how to define and improve adherence via this novel forum. Once we are able to understand optimal methods of tracking adherence, we will be better equipped to understand the role of adherence in shaping outcomes for behavioral therapy in migraine.
Collapse
|