1
|
Schlegel M, Bachmann S. Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medical Management and on Healthcare Delivery of Immune-Mediated Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases during the First Pandemic Period February to July 2020: A Systematic Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:596. [PMID: 38674242 PMCID: PMC11052197 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
(1) Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the management of patients with immune-mediated rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (imRMDs) in various ways. The goal of our systematic review was to determine the influence of the first period of the COVID-19 pandemic (February 2020 to July 2020) on the management of imRMDs regarding the availability of drugs, adherence to therapy and therapy changes and on healthcare delivery. (2) Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases (carried out 20-26 October 2021), including studies with adult patients, on the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of imRMDs. There were no restrictions regarding to study design except for systematic reviews and case reports that were excluded as well as articles on the disease outcomes in case of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two reviewers screened the studies for inclusion, and in case of disagreement, a consensus was reached after discussion. (3) Results: A total of 5969 potentially relevant studies were found, and after title, abstract and full-text screening, 34 studies were included with data from 182,746 patients and 2018 rheumatologists. The non-availability of drugs (the impossibility or increased difficulty to obtain a drug), e.g., hydroxychloroquine and tocilizumab, was frequent (in 16-69% of patients). Further, medication non-adherence was reported among patients with different imRMDs and between different drugs in 4-46% of patients. Changes to preexisting medication were reported in up to 33% of patients (e.g., reducing the dose of steroids or the cessation of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs). Physical in-office consultations and laboratory testing decreased, and therefore, newly implemented remote consultations (particularly telemedicine) increased greatly, with an increase of up to 80%. (4) Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the management of imRMDs, especially at the beginning. The influences were wide-ranging, affecting the availability of pharmacies, adherence to medication or medication changes, avoidance of doctor visits and laboratory testing. Remote and telehealth consultations were newly implemented. These new forms of healthcare delivery should be spread and implemented worldwide to routine clinical practice to be ready for future pandemics. Every healthcare service provider treating patients with imRMDs should check with his IT provider how these new forms of visits can be used and how they are offered in daily clinical practice. Therefore, this is not only a digitalization topic but also an organization theme for hospitals or outpatient clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Schlegel
- Department of Rheumatology, Rehabilitations Zentrum Valens, Kliniken Valens, 7317 Valens, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Bachmann
- Department of Rheumatology, Rehabilitations Zentrum Valens, Kliniken Valens, 7317 Valens, Switzerland
- Department of Geriatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olmastroni E, Galimberti F, Tragni E, Catapano AL, Casula M. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Adherence to Chronic Therapies: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3825. [PMID: 36900831 PMCID: PMC10001666 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20053825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a sudden and significant disruption in healthcare services, especially for patients suffering from chronic diseases. We aimed at evaluating the impact of the pandemic on adherence to chronic therapies through a systematic review of available studies. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched since inception to June 2022. Inclusion criteria were: (1) observational studies or surveys; (2) studies on patients with chronic diseases; (3) reporting the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to chronic pharmacological treatment, as a comparison of adherence during the pandemic period vs. pre-pandemic period (primary outcome) or as rate of treatment discontinuation/delay specifically due to factors linked to COVID-19 (secondary outcome). Findings from 12 (primary outcome) and 24 (secondary outcome) studies showed that many chronic treatments were interrupted or affected by a reduced adherence in the pandemic period, and that fear of infection, difficulty in reaching physicians or healthcare facilities, and unavailability of medication were often reported as reasons for discontinuation or modification of chronic therapies. For other therapies where the patient was not required to attend the clinic, continuity of treatment was sometimes ensured through the use of telemedicine, and the adherence was guaranteed with drug stockpiling. While the effects of the possible worsening of chronic disease management need to be monitored over time, positive strategies should be acknowledged, such as the implementation of e-health tools and the expanded role of community pharmacists, and may play an important role in preserving continuity of care for people with chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Olmastroni
- Epidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Elena Tragni
- Epidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Alberico L. Catapano
- Epidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
- IRCCS MultiMedica, 20099 Sesto San Giovanni (MI), Italy
| | - Manuela Casula
- Epidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
- IRCCS MultiMedica, 20099 Sesto San Giovanni (MI), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van der Groef R, de Jong PHP, Hijnen DJ, van der Woude CJ, van Laar JAM, van der Kuy PHM, Brugma JD, Pasma A. Impact of the First SARS-CoV-2 Lockdown on Adherence to Biological Treatment in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases in the Netherlands. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:167-174. [PMID: 36698858 PMCID: PMC9869789 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s392290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, national and international societies have recommended continuing biological agents in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms. However, adherence to biological treatment might decrease, because these recommendations contradict patients' beliefs. Especially an increased concern about side effects could have influenced the adherence to biological treatment during the first lockdown. The primary objective was to investigate the impact of the first SARS-CoV-2 lockdown on adherence to biological treatment in IMID patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this prospective cohort study, IMID patients who received a biological agent before and during the first SARS-CoV-2 lockdown (March 2020- June 2020) were included. Patients were excluded if they did not complete the medication adherence report scale-5 (MARS-5) questionnaire at ≥1 visit before the lockdown and ≥1 visit during the lockdown. Adherence to biological treatment was measured with the MARS-5 and Medication Possession Ratio (MPR). RESULTS We included 157 IMID patients. The percentage of adherent patients, defined as MARS-5 score >21, was significantly lower during the lockdown compared to the period before the lockdown (88.5% vs 84.1%, p<0.001). Additionally, the overall percentage of adherent patients during the lockdown based on the MPR ≥90% was significantly lower compared to adherence based upon the MARS-5 (65.1% vs 84.1%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION This study showed that the first SARS-CoV-2 lockdown negatively impacts adherence to biological treatment in IMID patients. Therefore, treating physicians should be aware of this problem to minimize the potential harmful effects of non-adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy van der Groef
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Correspondence: Romy van der Groef, Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Rheumatology, Room Na-523, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Tel +31 648284141, Email
| | - Pascal H P de Jong
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk Jan Hijnen
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christien J van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan A M van Laar
- Department of Internal Medicine and Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Hugo M van der Kuy
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Dietert Brugma
- Department of Outpatient Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annelieke Pasma
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Naddei R, Alfani R, Bove M, Discepolo V, Mozzillo F, Guarino A, Alessio M. Increased Relapse Rate During COVID-19 Lockdown in an Italian Cohort of Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2022; 75:326-331. [PMID: 34397168 PMCID: PMC8426691 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Changes of routine disease management associated with COVID-19 lockdown might have potentially affected the clinical course of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The aim of our study was to assess the rate of disease flare before and during COVID-19 lockdown to investigate its impact on disease course in children with JIA. METHODS A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including patients presenting with inactive JIA between September 1, 2018 and March 9, 2019 (group A) and between September 1, 2019 and March 9, 2020 (group B). For each patient, demographic and clinical data were collected. The rate of JIA flare from March 10, 2019 to June 30, 2019 for group A and from March 10, 2020 to June 30, 2020 for group B was compared. RESULTS Group A included 126 patients, and group B 124 patients. Statistical analysis did not show significant differences among the 2 cohorts with respect to age, sex, age at JIA onset, JIA subtype, co-occurrence of uveitis, antinuclear antibody positivity, and past or ongoing medications. The rate of disease flare during lockdown at the time of the first COVID-19 pandemic wave was significantly higher in comparison to the previous year (16.9% versus 6.3%; P = 0.009). CONCLUSION Our study showed that COVID-19 lockdown was associated with a higher rate of joint inflammation in children with JIA. This finding has a considerable clinical implication, as restrictive measures may be necessary in order to contain pandemics. Our data highlight the need for rearrangement in the home and health care management of children with JIA during lockdowns.
Collapse
|
5
|
Tanaka E, Inoue E, Abe M, Saka K, Sugano E, Ochiai M, Yamaguchi R, Ikari K, Yamanaka H, Harigai M. Changes in treatment adherence and behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from cross-sectional study in the IORRA cohort. Mod Rheumatol 2022; 32:1193-1195. [PMID: 35445721 PMCID: PMC9047218 DOI: 10.1093/mr/roab120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eiichi Tanaka
- Correspondence: Eiichi Tanaka; ; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medial University School of Medicine, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan
| | - Eisuke Inoue
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medial University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,Research Administration Center, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mai Abe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medial University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kumiko Saka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medial University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eri Sugano
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medial University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Moeko Ochiai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medial University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rei Yamaguchi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medial University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsunori Ikari
- Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan,Division of Multidisciplinary Management of Rheumatic Diseases, Tokyo Women’s Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women’s Medial University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisashi Yamanaka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medial University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,Rheumatology, Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan,Department of Rheumatology, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Harigai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medial University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bandiera C, Pasquier J, Locatelli I, Niquille A, Wuerzner G, Dotta-Celio J, Hachfeld A, Wandeler G, Wagner AD, Csajka C, Zanchi A, Cavassini M, Schneider MP. Medication Adherence Evaluated Through Electronic Monitors During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Switzerland: A Longitudinal Analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:2313-2320. [PMID: 36046500 PMCID: PMC9423122 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s377780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown, patients included in the Interprofessional Medication Adherence Program (IMAP) in Switzerland continued to use electronic monitors (EMs) that registered daily drug-dose intake. We aimed to understand to what extent patients' medication implementation (ie, the extent to which the patient took the prescribed medicine), measured with EMs, was impacted by the lockdown. METHODS Patients participating in the IMAP were diagnosed with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), solid cancer, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and miscellaneous long-term diseases (MLTD). Patient implementation was defined through a proxy: if all patient EMs were opened at least once daily, implementation was considered active (=1), and no implementation was considered (=0) otherwise. Implementation before (from December 2019 to March 2020), during (March to June 2020) and after (June to September 2020) the lockdown was compared. Subanalyses were performed according to the patients' diseases. Subanalyses were performed in patients who used at least one EM in 2018-2019 during the same periods (defined as winter, spring and summer). The logistic regression models used to estimate medication implementation according to the period were fitted using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS In 2020, patient implementation (n = 118) did not differ significantly before versus during (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.84-1.15, p = 0.789) and before versus after (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.79-1.06, p = 0.217) the lockdown. These findings remained stable when separately analyzing the implementation of patients with HIV (n = 61), DKD (n = 25) or MLTD (n = 22). Too few patients with cancer were included (n = 10) to interpret the results. In 2019, the implementation of 61/118 (51.7%) patients was significantly lower during summertime versus wintertime (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.89, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION Medication implementation remained steady before, during and after the lockdown in 2020. The IMAP before, during and after the lockdown may have supported the adherence of most patients, by ensuring continuity of care during periods of routine disturbances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Bandiera
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Pasquier
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Isabella Locatelli
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anne Niquille
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Grégoire Wuerzner
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Dotta-Celio
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anna Hachfeld
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gilles Wandeler
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anna Dorothea Wagner
- Service of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Chantal Csajka
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
- Center for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anne Zanchi
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Service of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Cavassini
- Service of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marie P Schneider
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
- Correspondence: Marie P Schneider, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Rue Michel Servet 1, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland, Tel + 41 22 379 53 16, Email
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Evaluation of a Non-Face-to-Face Multidisciplinary Health Care Model in a Population with Rheumatoid Arthritis Vulnerable to COVID-19 in a Health Emergency Situation. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9121744. [PMID: 34946471 PMCID: PMC8701032 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9121744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated a non-face-to-face-multidisciplinary consultation model in a population with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is an analytical observational study of a prospective cohort with simple random sampling. RA patients were followed for 12 weeks (Jul-Oct 2020). Two groups were included: patients in telemedicine care (TM), and patients in the usual face-to-face care (UC). Patients could voluntarily change the care model (transition model (TR)). Activity of disease, quality of life, disability, therapeutic adherence, and self-care ability were analyzed. Bivariate analysis was performed. A qualitative descriptive exploratory study was conducted. At the beginning, 218 adults were included: (109/TM-109/UC). The groups didn't differ in general characteristics. At the end of the study, there were no differences in TM: (n = 71). A significant (p < 0.05) decrease in adherence, and increase in self-care ability were found in UC (n = 18) and TR (n = 129). Seven patients developed COVID-19. Four categories emerged from the experience of the subjects in the qualitative assessment (factors present in communication, information and communication technologies management, family support and interaction, and adherence to treatment). The telemedicine model keeps RA patients stable without major differences compared to the usual care or mixed model.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hasseli R, Ladner UM. [COVID-19 and inflammatory rheumatic diseases]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2021; 146:1564-1568. [PMID: 34826845 DOI: 10.1055/a-1616-8742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Older age, cardiovascular comorbidities, chronic lung diseases, and GC use were identified as independent risk factors for severe courses of COVID-19 resulting in the need of hospitalization. Glucocorticoid dosis of > 10 mg over a longer period of time should be very carefully used as there are various immunomodulatory alternatives. Of particular note, disease activity of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) was also identified as an independent predictor of COVID-19 related hospitalization.Already in the early phase of the pandemic case reports of fatal courses of IRD patients under treatment with rituximab were reported. Meanwhile, several data could demonstrate higher rates of hospitalization and COVID-19-related deaths. Whether a similar effect is detectable regarding Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is currently under investigation.Preliminary data indicate that all available COVID-19 vaccines in Europe are not associated with higher rates of disease flares or differences of side effect profiles compared to the general population. There is no recommendation to discontinue or reduce immunomodulatory treatment in general to achieve better immune response. In the case of Rituximab, consideration should be given to postponing or switching to alternative therapies, taking into account the risk of reactivation of the underlying disease on the one hand and the improvement of a potential vaccine response on the other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Hasseli
- Abteilung für Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie. Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Campus Kerckhoff Bad Nauheim
| | - Ulf Müller Ladner
- Abteilung für Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie. Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Campus Kerckhoff Bad Nauheim
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Regierer AC, Hasseli R, Schäfer M, Hoyer BF, Krause A, Lorenz HM, Pfeil A, Richter J, Schmeiser T, Schulze-Koops H, Strangfeld A, Voll RE, Specker C, Mueller-Ladner U. TNFi is associated with positive outcome, but JAKi and rituximab are associated with negative outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with RMD. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2021-001896. [PMID: 34670840 PMCID: PMC8529615 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Several risk factors for severe COVID-19 specific for patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) have been identified so far. Evidence regarding the influence of different RMD treatments on outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection is still poor. Methods Data from the German COVID-19-RMD registry collected between 30 March 2020 and 9 April 2021 were analysed. Ordinal outcome of COVID-19 severity was defined: (1) not hospitalised, (2) hospitalised/not invasively ventilated and (3) invasively ventilated/deceased. Independent associations between demographic and disease features and outcome of COVID-19 were estimated by multivariable ordinal logistic regression using proportional odds model. Results 2274 patients were included. 83 (3.6%) patients died. Age, male sex, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, chronic lung diseases and chronic kidney disease were independently associated with worse outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Compared with rheumatoid arthritis, patients with psoriatic arthritis showed a better outcome. Disease activity and glucocorticoids were associated with worse outcome. Compared with methotrexate (MTX), TNF inhibitors (TNFi) showed a significant association with better outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.6, 95% CI0.4 to 0.9). Immunosuppressants (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide and ciclosporin) (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.9), Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.7) and rituximab (OR 5.4, 95% CI 3.3 to 8.8) were independently associated with worse outcome. Conclusion General risk factors for severity of COVID-19 play a similar role in patients with RMDs as in the normal population. Influence of disease activity on COVID-19 outcome is of great importance as patients with high disease activity—even without glucocorticoids—have a worse outcome. Patients on TNFi show a better outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection than patients on MTX. Immunosuppressants, rituximab and JAKi are associated with more severe course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca Hasseli
- Department of Rheumatology, Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Martin Schäfer
- Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bimba F Hoyer
- Department for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Schleswig-Holstein at Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andreas Krause
- Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Osteology, Immanuel Hospital Berlin-Wannsee Branch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Jutta Richter
- Policlinic for Rheumatology and Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Hendrik Schulze-Koops
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Internal Medicine IV, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany
| | - Anja Strangfeld
- Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reinhard E Voll
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Centre of Chronic Immunodeficiency, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christof Specker
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, KEM Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Rheumatology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Ulf Mueller-Ladner
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Giessen University, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hasseli R, Pfeil A, Hoyer BF, Lorenz HM, Regierer AC, Richter JG, Schmeiser T, Strangfeld A, Voll RE, Krause A, Schulze-Koops H, Müller-Ladner U, Specker C. [German registry www.Covid19-Rheuma.de : Status report after 1 year of the pandemic]. Z Rheumatol 2021; 80:641-646. [PMID: 34196793 PMCID: PMC8246125 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-021-01034-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 registry ( www.covid19-rheuma.de ) of the German Society of Rheumatology was the first registry for the acquisition and systemic evaluation of viral infections in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD). This has enabled rapid generation of scientific data that will help to improve the care of patients with IRD in the context of the pandemic. In addition to confirming general risk factors, such as patient age and comorbidities (e.g. cardiovascular, chronic lung and kidney diseases), the use of glucocorticoids and the disease activity of the rheumatic disease could be identified as disease-specific independent risk factors for the need of hospitalization due to COVID-19. Evaluations of the continuously growing cohort of patients with IRD and COVID-19 enable recommendations for patient care to be based on better evidence. Cooperation with international rheumatology registries (e.g. European COVID-19 registry for IRD) enables analyses of aggregated cohorts of patients with IRD and COVID-19 for international comparisons and statistically even more reliable statements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Hasseli
- Abteilung für Rheumatologie, Klinische Immunologie, Osteologie und Physikalische Medizin, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Campus Kerckhoff, Benekestr. 2-8, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Deutschland.
| | - Alexander Pfeil
- Funktionsbereich Rheumatologie und Osteologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - Bimba Franziska Hoyer
- Sektion für Rheumatologie, 1. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätskrankenhaus Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Hanns-Martin Lorenz
- Sektion Rheumatologie, Medizinische Klinik V, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Anne C Regierer
- Programmbereich Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jutta G Richter
- Poliklinik, Funktionsbereich und Hiller Forschungszentrum für Rheumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | | | - Anja Strangfeld
- Programmbereich Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Reinhard E Voll
- Klinik für Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Krause
- Abteilung für Rheumatologie, Osteologie und Klinische Immunologie, Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Hendrik Schulze-Koops
- Sektion Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Ulf Müller-Ladner
- Abteilung für Rheumatologie, Klinische Immunologie, Osteologie und Physikalische Medizin, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Campus Kerckhoff, Benekestr. 2-8, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Deutschland
| | - Christof Specker
- Klinik für Rheumatologie & Klinische Immunologie, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|