1
|
Sirangelo TM, Ludlow RA, Spadafora ND. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Potential Pathogen Resistance in Cannabis sativa. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 12:2764. [PMID: 37570918 PMCID: PMC10420965 DOI: 10.3390/plants12152764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
Cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) is one of the earliest cultivated crops, valued for producing a broad spectrum of compounds used in medicinal products and being a source of food and fibre. Despite the availability of its genome sequences, few studies explore the molecular mechanisms involved in pathogen defense, and the underlying biological pathways are poorly defined in places. Here, we provide an overview of Cannabis defence responses against common pathogens, such as Golovinomyces spp., Fusarium spp., Botrytis cinerea and Pythium spp. For each of these pathogens, after a summary of their characteristics and symptoms, we explore studies identifying genes involved in Cannabis resistance mechanisms. Many studies focus on the potential involvement of disease-resistance genes, while others refer to other plants however whose results may be of use for Cannabis research. Omics investigations allowing the identification of candidate defence genes are highlighted, and genome editing approaches to generate resistant Cannabis species based on CRISPR/Cas9 technology are discussed. According to the emerging results, a potential defence model including both immune and defence mechanisms in Cannabis plant-pathogen interactions is finally proposed. To our knowledge, this is the first review of the molecular mechanisms underlying pathogen resistance in Cannabis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziana M. Sirangelo
- ENEA-Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development-Division Biotechnologies and Agroindustry, 00123 Rome, Italy
| | - Richard A. Ludlow
- School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK;
| | - Natasha D. Spadafora
- Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Havill JS, Richardson BJ, Rohwer CL, Gent DH, Henning JA, Muehlbauer GJ. Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with R1-mediated resistance to powdery mildew and sex determination in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). TAG. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS. THEORETISCHE UND ANGEWANDTE GENETIK 2023; 136:154. [PMID: 37318664 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-023-04399-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE Two QTL were identified using linkage mapping approaches, one on hop linkage group 3 (qHl_Chr3.PMR1) associated with powdery mildew resistance and a second on linkage group 10 (cqHl_ChrX.SDR1) associated with sex determination. Hop (Humulus lupulus L.) is a dioecious species cultivated for use in beer. Hop powdery mildew, caused by Podosphaera macularis, is a constraint in many growing regions. Thus, identifying markers associated with powdery mildew resistance and sex provides the opportunity to pyramid R-genes and select female plants as seedlings, respectively. Our objectives were to characterize the genetic basis of R1-mediated resistance in the cultivar Zenith which provides resistance to pathogen races in the US, identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with R1 and sex, and develop markers for molecular breeding-based approaches. Phenotypic evaluation of the population indicated that R1-based resistance and sex are inherited monogenically. We constructed a genetic map using 1339 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based upon genotype-by-sequencing of 128 F1 progeny derived from a Zenith × USDA 21058M biparental population. SNPs were assigned to 10 linkage groups comprising a map length of 1204.97 cM with an average density of 0.94 cM/marker. Quantitative trait locus mapping identified qHl_Chr3.PMR1, associated with R1 on linkage group 3 (LOD = 23.57, R2 = 57.2%), and cqHl_ChrX.SDR1, associated with sex on linkage group 10 (LOD = 5.42, R2 = 25.0%). Kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) assays were developed for both QTL and assessed against diverse germplasm. Our results indicate that KASP markers associated with R1 may be limited to materials that are pedigree-related to Zenith, whereas markers associated with sex may be transferable across populations. The high-density map, QTL, and associated KASP markers will enable selecting for sex and R1-mediated resistance in hop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S Havill
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA
| | - Briana J Richardson
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| | - Charlie L Rohwer
- Southern Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Waseca, MN, 56093, USA
| | - David H Gent
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
- Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, USA Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| | - John A Henning
- Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, USA Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| | - Gary J Muehlbauer
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gent DH, Claassen BJ, Wiseman MS, Wolfenbarger SN. Temperature Influences on Powdery Mildew Susceptibility and Development in the Hop Cultivar Cascade. PLANT DISEASE 2022; 106:1681-1689. [PMID: 34978868 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-10-21-2133-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The hop cultivar 'Cascade' possesses partial resistance to powdery mildew (Podosphaera macularis) that can be overcome by recently emerged, virulent isolates of the fungus. Given that hop is a long-lived perennial and that brewers still demand Cascade, there is a need to better understand factors that influence the development of powdery mildew on this cultivar. Growth chamber experiments were conducted to quantify the effect of constant, transient, and fluctuating temperature on Cascade before, concurrent to, and after inoculation as contrasted with another powdery mildew-susceptible cultivar, 'Symphony'. Exposure of plants to supraoptimal temperature (26 and 32°C) before inoculation led to more rapid onset of ontogenic resistance in intermediately aged leaves in Cascade as compared with Symphony. Cascade was overall less susceptible to powdery mildew when exposed to constant temperature ranging from 18 to 32°C directly after inoculation. However, cultivar also interacted with temperature such that proportionately fewer and smaller colonies developed on Cascade than Symphony at supraoptimal yet permissive temperatures for disease. When plants were inoculated and then exposed to high temperature, colonies became progressively more tolerant to temperatures of 26 to 30°C with increasing time from inoculation to exposure, as moderated by cultivar, the specific temperature, and their interaction. Subjecting plants to simulated diurnal temperature regimes at the time of inoculation or 24 h later indicated Cascade and Symphony responded proportionately similarly on days predicted to be marginally unfavorable or marginally favorable for powdery mildew, although Cascade was quantitatively less susceptible than Symphony. In sum, this research indicates that Cascade is overall less susceptible to powdery mildew than Symphony, and supraoptimal temperature before, concurrent to, or after infection may interact differentially to moderate disease risk in Cascade. Therefore, cultivar-specific risk assessments for powdery mildew appear warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gent
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
- Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Briana J Claassen
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Michele S Wiseman
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Sierra N Wolfenbarger
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Claassen BJ, Wolfenbarger SN, Gent DH. Fungicide Physical Mode of Action: Impacts on Suppression of Hop Powdery Mildew. PLANT DISEASE 2022; 106:1244-1252. [PMID: 34818909 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-10-21-2131-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Understanding of the physical mode of action of fungicides allows more efficient and effective application and can increase disease control. Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to explore the preinfection and postinfection duration and translocative properties of fungicides commonly used to control hop powdery mildew, caused by Podosphaera macularis. In greenhouse studies, applications made 24 h before inoculation were almost 100% effective at suppressing powdery mildew, regardless of the fungicide evaluated. However, percentage control of powdery mildew based on the number of pathogen colonies per leaf varied significantly between fungicides with increasing time from inoculation to application, ranging from 50 to 100% disease control depending on the fungicide. Fluopyram or fluopyram + trifloxystrobin was particularly efficacious, suppressing nearly all powdery mildew development independent of application timing. In translocation studies, fluopyram and flutriafol were the most effective treatments in each of two separate experiments, resulting in zones of inhibition of 1,036 and 246.3 mm2, respectively, on adaxial leaf surfaces when a single droplet of each fungicide was applied to the abaxial surface of leaves. In field experiments, all fungicide treatments provided nearly complete control of powdery mildew infection when applied before inoculation. Levels of disease control decreased with time depending on treatment, showing trends similar to those observed in greenhouse studies. In the 2017 field experiments, high levels of disease control (>75%) were observed at postinoculation time points for all treatments tested, whereas the same fungicides were more sensitive to application timing in a different year. Findings from this research indicate that differences in efficacy between fungicides are small when applications are made preventively, but postinfection activity and translaminar movement of certain fungicides may render some more effective depending on application coverage and preexisting infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briana J Claassen
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Sierra N Wolfenbarger
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - David H Gent
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, and Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Block M, Knaus BJ, Wiseman MS, Grünwald NJ, Gent DH. Development of a Diagnostic Assay for Race Differentiation of Podosphaera macularis. PLANT DISEASE 2021; 105:965-971. [PMID: 32915117 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-06-20-1289-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Hop powdery mildew (caused by Podosphaera macularis) was confirmed in the Pacific Northwest in 1996. Before 2012, the most common race of P. macularis was able to infect plants that possessed powdery mildew resistance based on the R-genes Rb, R3, and R5. After 2012, two additional races of P. macularis were discovered that can overcome the resistance gene R6 and the partial resistance found in the cultivar Cascade. These three races now occur throughout the region, which can complicate management and research efforts because of uncertainty on which race(s) may be present in the region and able to infect susceptible hop genotypes. Current methods for determining the races of P. macularis are labor intensive, costly, and typically require more than 14 days to obtain results. We sought to develop a molecular assay to differentiate races of the fungus possessing virulence on plants with R6, referred to as V6-virulent, from other races. The transcriptomes of 46 isolates of P. macularis were sequenced to identify loci and variants unique to V6 isolates. Fourteen primer pairs were designed for 10 candidate loci that contained single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and short insertion-deletion polymorphisms. Two differentially labeled locked nucleic acid probes were designed for a contig that contained a conserved SNP associated with V6-virulence. The resulting duplexed real-time PCR assay was validated against 46 V6 and 54 non-V6 P. macularis isolates collected from the United States and Europe. The assay had perfect discrimination of V6-virulence among isolates of P. macularis originating from the western U.S. but failed to predict V6-virulence in three isolates collected from Europe. The specificity of the assay was tested with different species of powdery mildew fungi and other microorganisms associated with hop. Weak nonspecific amplification occurred with powdery mildew fungi collected from Vitis vinifera, Fragaria sp., and Zinnia sp.; however, nonspecification amplification is not a concern when differentiating pathogen race from colonies on hop. The assay has practical applications in hop breeding, epidemiological studies, and other settings where rapid confirmation of pathogen race is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Block
- Oregon State University, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Brian J Knaus
- Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Michele S Wiseman
- Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Niklaus J Grünwald
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330
| | - David H Gent
- Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, OR 97331
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weldon WA, Knaus BJ, Grünwald NJ, Havill JS, Block MH, Gent DH, Cadle-Davidson LE, Gadoury DM. Transcriptome-Derived Amplicon Sequencing Markers Elucidate the U.S. Podosphaera macularis Population Structure Across Feral and Commercial Plantings of Humulus lupulus. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2021; 111:194-203. [PMID: 33044132 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-07-20-0299-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Obligately biotrophic plant pathogens pose challenges in population genetic studies due to their genomic complexities and elaborate culturing requirements with limited biomass. Hop powdery mildew (Podosphaera macularis) is an obligately biotrophic ascomycete that threatens sustainable hop production. P. macularis populations of the Pacific Northwest (PNW) United States differ from those of the Midwest and Northeastern United States, lacking one of two mating types needed for sexual recombination and harboring two strains that are differentially aggressive on the cultivar Cascade and able to overcome the Humulus lupulus R-gene R6 (V6), respectively. To develop a high-throughput marker platform for tracking the flow of genotypes across the United States and internationally, we used an existing transcriptome of diverse P. macularis isolates to design a multiplex of 54 amplicon sequencing markers, validated across a panel of 391 U.S. samples and 123 international samples. The results suggest that P. macularis from U.S. commercial hop yards form one population closely related to P. macularis of the United Kingdom, while P. macularis from U.S. feral hop locations grouped with P. macularis of Eastern Europe. Included in this multiplex was a marker that successfully tracked V6-virulence in 65 of 66 samples with a confirmed V6-phenotype. A new qPCR assay for high-throughput genotyping of P. macularis mating type generated the highest resolution distribution map of P. macularis mating type to date. Together, these genotyping strategies enable the high-throughput and inexpensive tracking of pathogen spread among geographical regions from single-colony samples and provide a roadmap to develop markers for other obligate biotrophs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A Weldon
- Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - Brian J Knaus
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Niklaus J Grünwald
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330
| | - Joshua S Havill
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
| | - Mary H Block
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - David H Gent
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | - Lance E Cadle-Davidson
- Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Grape Genetics Research Unit, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - David M Gadoury
- Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gent DH, Claassen BJ, Gadoury DM, Grünwald NJ, Knaus BJ, Radišek S, Weldon W, Wiseman MS, Wolfenbarger SN. Population Diversity and Structure of Podosphaera macularis in the Pacific Northwestern United States and Other Populations. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2020; 110:1105-1116. [PMID: 32091314 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-12-19-0448-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Powdery mildew, caused by Podosphaera macularis, is one of the most important diseases of hop. The disease was first reported in the Pacific Northwestern United States, the primary hop-growing region in this country, in the mid-1990s. More recently, the disease has reemerged in newly planted hopyards of the eastern United States, as hop production has expanded to meet demands of local craft brewers. The spread of strains virulent on previously resistant cultivars, the paucity of available fungicides, and the potential introduction of the MAT1-2 mating type to the western United States, all threaten sustainability of hop production. We sequenced the transcriptome of 104 isolates of P. macularis collected throughout the western United States, eastern United States, and Europe to quantify genetic diversity of pathogen populations and elucidate the possible origins of pathogen populations in the western United States. Discriminant analysis of principal components grouped isolates within three to five geographic populations, dependent on stringency of grouping criteria. Isolates from the western United States were phenotyped and categorized into one of three pathogenic races based on disease symptoms generated on differential cultivars. Western U.S. populations were clonal, irrespective of pathogenic race, and grouped with isolates originating from Europe. Isolates originating from wild hop plants in the eastern United States were genetically differentiated from all other populations, whereas isolates from cultivated hop plants in the eastern United States mostly grouped with isolates originating from the west, consistent with origins from nursery sources. Mating types of isolates originating from cultivated western and eastern U.S. hop plants were entirely MAT1-1. In contrast, a 1:1 ratio of MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 was observed with isolates sampled from wild plants or Europe. Within the western United States a set of highly differentiated loci were identified in P. macularis isolates associated with virulence to the powdery mildew R-gene R6. The weight of genetic and phenotypic evidence suggests a European origin of the P. macularis populations in the western United States, followed by spread of the pathogen from the western United States to re-emergent production regions in the eastern United States. Furthermore, R6 compatibility appears to have been selected from an extant isolate within the western United States. Greater emphasis on sanitation measures during propagation and quarantine policies should be considered to limit further spread of novel genotypes of the pathogen, both between and within production areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gent
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A
| | - Briana J Claassen
- Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A
| | - David M Gadoury
- Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY 14456, U.S.A
| | - Niklaus J Grünwald
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330, U.S.A
| | - Brian J Knaus
- Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A
| | | | - William Weldon
- Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY 14456, U.S.A
| | - Michele S Wiseman
- Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A
| | - Sierra N Wolfenbarger
- Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Précigout PA, Claessen D, Makowski D, Robert C. Does the Latent Period of Leaf Fungal Pathogens Reflect Their Trophic Type? A Meta-Analysis of Biotrophs, Hemibiotrophs, and Necrotrophs. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2020; 110:345-361. [PMID: 31577162 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-04-19-0144-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
We performed a meta-analysis to search for a relation between the trophic type and latent period of fungal pathogens. The pathogen incubation period and the level of resistance of the hosts were also investigated. This ecological knowledge would help us to more efficiently regulate crop epidemics for different types of pathogens. We gathered latent period data from 103 studies dealing with 51 fungal pathogens of the three major trophic types (25 biotrophs, 15 hemibiotrophs, and 11 necrotrophs), representing 2,542 mean latent periods. We show that these three trophic types display significantly different latent periods. Necrotrophs exhibited the shortest latent periods (<100 degree-days [DD]), biotrophs had intermediate ones (between 100 and 200 DD), and hemibiotrophs had the longest latent periods (>200 DD). We argue that this relation between trophic type and latent period points to two opposing host exploitation strategies: necrotrophs mount a rapid destructive attack on the host tissue, whereas biotrophs and hemibiotrophs avoid or delay the damaging phase. We query the definition of hemibiotrophic pathogens and discuss whether the length of the latent period is determined by the physiological limits inherent to each trophic type or by the adaptation of pathogens of different trophic types to the contrasting conditions experienced in their interaction with the host.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Antoine Précigout
- Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS-ENS-INSERM UMR8197, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France
- UMR EcoSys, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), AgroParisTech, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France
| | - David Claessen
- Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS-ENS-INSERM UMR8197, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France
| | - David Makowski
- UMR Agronomie, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France
| | - Corinne Robert
- UMR EcoSys, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), AgroParisTech, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sherman J, Burke JM, Gent DH. Cooperation and Coordination in Plant Disease Management. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2019; 109:1720-1731. [PMID: 31148511 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-01-19-0010-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Scaling of management efforts beyond the boundaries of individual farms may require that individuals act collectively. Such approaches have been suggested several times in plant pathology contexts but rarely have been implemented, in part because the institutional structures that enable successful collective action are poorly understood. In this research, we conducted in-depth interviews with hop producers in Oregon and Washington State to identify their motivations for and barriers to collective action regarding communication of disease levels, coordination of management practices, and sharing of best management practices and other data for powdery mildew (caused by Podosphaera macularis). Growers were generally open to and engaged in communication with neighbors and others on disease status in their hop yards and some evidence of higher levels of information sharing on management practices was found. However, growers who had developed extensive knowledge and databases were reluctant to share information viewed as proprietary. Relationships, trust, and reciprocity were facilitating factors for communication and information sharing, whereas lack of these factors and social norms of independence and pride in portions of the grower community were identified as impediments. Given the heterogeneity of trust, lack of confidence in reciprocity, and weak shared norms, communication of disease risk and coordinated management may be most successful if directed at a smaller scale as a series of neighborhood-based partnerships of growers and their immediate neighbors. Developing a disease reporting system and coordinated disease management efforts with more producers and at larger spatial extents would require formalized structures and rules that would provide assurance that there is consistency in disease data collection and reporting, reciprocation, and sanctions for those who use the information for marketing purposes against other growers. Given the analyses presented here, we believe there is potential for collective action in disease management but with limitations on the scope and nature of the actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Sherman
- Department of Sociology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
| | - Jordan M Burke
- Department of Sociology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
| | - David H Gent
- Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, OR
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gent DH, Bhattacharyya S, Ruiz T. Prediction of Spread and Regional Development of Hop Powdery Mildew: A Network Analysis. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2019; 109:1392-1403. [PMID: 30880573 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-12-18-0483-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Dispersal is a fundamental aspect of epidemic development at multiple spatial scales, including those that extend beyond the borders of individual fields and to the landscape level. In this research, we used the powdery mildew of the hop pathosystem (caused by Podosphaera macularis) to formulate a model of pathogen dispersal during spring (May to June) and early summer (June to July) at the intermediate scale between synoptic weather systems and microclimate (mesoscale) based on a census of commercial hop yards during 2014 to 2017 in a production region in western Oregon. This pathosystem is characterized by a low level of overwintering of the pathogen as a result of absence of the ascigerious stage of the fungus and consequent annual cycles of localized survival via bud perennation and pathogen spread by windborne dispersal. An individual hop yard was considered a node in the model, whose disease status in a given month was expressed as a nonlinear function of disease incidence in the preceding month, susceptibility to two races of the fungus, and disease spread from other nodes as influenced by their disease incidence, area, distance away, and wind run and direction in the preceding month. Parameters were estimated by maximum likelihood over all 4 years but were allowed to vary for time transition periods from May to June and from June to July. The model accounted for 34 to 90% of the observed variation in disease incidence at the field level, depending on the year and season. Network graphs and analyses suggest that dispersal was dominated by relatively localized dispersal events (<2 km) among the network of fields, being mostly restricted to the same or adjacent farms. When formed, predicted disease attributable to dispersal from other hop yards (edges) associated with longer distance dispersal was more frequent in the June to July time transition. Edges with a high probability of disease transmission were formed in instances where yards were in close proximity or where disease incidence was relatively high in large hop yards, as moderated by wind run. The modeling approach provides a flexible and generalizable framework for understanding and predicting pathogen dispersal at the regional level as well as the implications of network connectivity on epidemic development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gent
- 1Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | | | - Trevor Ruiz
- 2Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gent DH, Mahaffee WF, Turechek WW, Ocamb CM, Twomey MC, Woods JL, Probst C. Risk Factors for Bud Perennation of Podosphaera macularis on Hop. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2019; 109:74-83. [PMID: 30019996 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-04-18-0127-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The hop powdery mildew fungus Podosphaera macularis persists from season to season in the Pacific Northwestern United States through infection of crown buds because only one of the mating types needed to produce the ascigerous stage is presently found in this region. Bud infection and successful overwintering of the fungus leads to the emergence of heavily infected shoots in early spring (termed flag shoots). Historical data of flag shoot occurrence and incidence in Oregon and Washington State during 2000 to 2017 were analyzed to identify their association with the incidence of powdery mildew, growers' use of fungicides, autumn and winter temperature, and other production factors. During this period, flag shoots were found on 0.05% of plants evaluated in Oregon and 0.57% in Washington. In Oregon, the incidence of powdery mildew on leaves was most severe and the number of fungicide applications made by growers greatest in yards where flag shoots were found in spring. Similarly, the incidence of plants with powdery mildew in Washington was significantly associated with the number of flag shoots present in early spring, although the number of fungicide applications made was independent of flag shoot occurrence. The occurrence of flag shoots was associated with prior occurrence of flag shoots in a yard, the incidence of foliar powdery mildew in the previous year, grower pruning method, and, in Washington, winter temperature. A census of hop yards in the eastern extent of the Oregon production region during 2014 to 2017 found flag shoots in 27 of 489 yards evaluated. In yards without flag shoots, 338 yards (73.2%) were chemically pruning or not pruned, whereas the remaining 124 (26.8%) were mechanically pruned. Of the 27 yards with flag shoots, 22 were either chemically pruned or not pruned and 4 were mechanically pruned in mid-April, well after the initial emergence of flag shoots. The prevalence of yards with flag shoots also was related to thoroughness of pruning in spring (8.1% of yards with incomplete pruning versus 1.9% of yards with thorough pruning). A Bayesian logistic regression model was fit to the data from the intensively assessed yards in Oregon, with binary risk factors for occurrence of a flag shoot in the previous year, occurrence of foliar mildew in the previous year, and thoroughness of pruning in spring. The model indicated that the median and 95% highest posterior density interval of the probability of flag shoot occurrence was 0.0008 (0.0000 to 0.0053) when a yard had no risk factors but risk increased to 0.0065 (0.0000 to 0.0283) to 0.43 (0.175 to 0.709) when one to all three of the risk factors were present. The entirety of this research indicates that P. macularis appears to persist in a subset of chronically affected hop yards, particularly yards where spring pruning is conducted poorly. Targeted management of the disease in a subset of fields most at risk for producing flag shoots could potentially influence powdery mildew development regionwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gent
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Walter F Mahaffee
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - William W Turechek
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Cynthia M Ocamb
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Megan C Twomey
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Joanna L Woods
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Claudia Probst
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gent DH, Claassen BJ, Twomey MC, Wolfenbarger SN, Woods JL. Susceptibility of Hop Crown Buds to Powdery Mildew and its Relation to Perennation of Podosphaera macularis. PLANT DISEASE 2018; 102:1316-1325. [PMID: 30673566 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-10-17-1530-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
In the Pacific Northwestern United States, the hop powdery mildew fungus, Podosphaera macularis, survives overwintering periods in association with living host tissue because the ascigerious stage of the pathogen is not known to occur in this region. Field experiments were conducted over a 5-year period to describe the overwintering process associated with crown bud infection and persistence of P. macularis. Surface crown buds increased in abundance and size beginning in early July and continuing until mid-September. Buds of varying sizes remained susceptible to powdery mildew until late September to early October in each of 3 years of experiments, with susceptibility decreasing substantially thereafter. Potted plants were inoculated sequentially during early summer to autumn, then evaluated in the following year for development of shoots colonized by the powdery mildew fungus (termed flag shoots) due to bud perennation. Emergence of flag shoots was asynchronous and associated with shoot emergence and elongation. Flag shoots emerged over a protracted period from late February to early June, year dependent. In all 4 years of experiments, some infected buds broke and produced flag shoots after chemical desiccation of shoots in spring, a common horticultural practice in hop production conducted to set training timing and eliminate initial inoculum. Flag shoots were most numerous when plants were inoculated with P. macularis in early summer and, consequently, when powdery mildew was present throughout the entire period of crown bud development. The number of flag shoots produced was reduced from 6.8- to 46.6-fold when comparing the latest versus earliest inoculation dates. However, all inoculation timings yielded flag shoots at some level, suggesting that bud infection that occurs over an extended period of time in the previous season may allow the fungus to perennate. In studies in two commercial hop yards in Washington State, fungicide applications made after harvest reduced the level of powdery mildew on leaves in the current year but did not significantly reduce flag shoots in the following year. Given that bud infection occurred over a 10-week period, flag shoots developed even when plants were exposed to inoculum in October and some flag shoots survived chemical pruning practices, management efforts seem best directed to both preventative measures to reduce the likelihood of bud infection and remedial practices to physically eliminate infected crown buds in the ensuing year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gent
- United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, and Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331
| | - Briana J Claassen
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 97331
| | - Megan C Twomey
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 97331
| | | | - Joanna L Woods
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 97331
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
In null hypothesis testing, failure to reject a null hypothesis may have two potential interpretations. One interpretation is that the treatments being evaluated do not have a significant effect, and a correct conclusion was reached in the analysis. Alternatively, a treatment effect may have existed but the conclusion of the study was that there was none. This is termed a Type II error, which is most likely to occur when studies lack sufficient statistical power to detect a treatment effect. In basic terms, the power of a study is the ability to identify a true effect through a statistical test. The power of a statistical test is 1 - (the probability of Type II errors), and depends on the size of treatment effect (termed the effect size), variance, sample size, and significance criterion (the probability of a Type I error, α). Low statistical power is prevalent in scientific literature in general, including plant pathology. However, power is rarely reported, creating uncertainty in the interpretation of nonsignificant results and potentially underestimating small, yet biologically significant relationships. The appropriate level of power for a study depends on the impact of Type I versus Type II errors and no single level of power is acceptable for all purposes. Nonetheless, by convention 0.8 is often considered an acceptable threshold and studies with power less than 0.5 generally should not be conducted if the results are to be conclusive. The emphasis on power analysis should be in the planning stages of an experiment. Commonly employed strategies to increase power include increasing sample sizes, selecting a less stringent threshold probability for Type I errors, increasing the hypothesized or detectable effect size, including as few treatment groups as possible, reducing measurement variability, and including relevant covariates in analyses. Power analysis will lead to more efficient use of resources and more precisely structured hypotheses, and may even indicate some studies should not be undertaken. However, the conclusions of adequately powered studies are less prone to erroneous conclusions and inflated estimates of treatment effectiveness, especially when effect sizes are small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gent
- First author: U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, and Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis 97331; second author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Penn State University, University Park 16802; and third author: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409
| | - Paul D Esker
- First author: U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, and Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis 97331; second author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Penn State University, University Park 16802; and third author: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409
| | - Alissa B Kriss
- First author: U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, and Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis 97331; second author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Penn State University, University Park 16802; and third author: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gent DH, Massie ST, Twomey MC, Wolfenbarger SN. Adaptation to Partial Resistance to Powdery Mildew in the Hop Cultivar Cascade by Podosphaera macularis. PLANT DISEASE 2017; 101:874-881. [PMID: 30682923 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-12-16-1753-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The hop cultivar Cascade has been grown in the Pacific Northwestern U.S. and elsewhere with minimal input for management of powdery mildew (Podosphaera macularis) for nearly 15 years due to the putatively quantitative resistance in this cultivar. While partial resistance is generally thought to be more durable than qualitative resistance, in 2012, powdery mildew was reported on Cascade in Washington State. Field surveys conducted during 2013 to 2016 indicated increasing prevalence of powdery mildew on Cascade, as well as an increasing number of fungicide applications applied to this cultivar in Washington State. Nearly all isolates of P. macularis tested were able to infect Cascade in laboratory inoculations. However, the greatest number of colonies, most conidia produced, and the shortest latent period was only observed with isolates derived originally from Cascade, as compared with other isolates derived from other cultivars. Further, the enhanced aggressiveness of these isolates was only manifested on Cascade and not six other susceptible cultivars, further indicating a specific adaptation to Cascade by the isolates. There was no evidence of a known major R-gene in Cascade, as seven isolates of P. macularis with contrasting virulence all infected Cascade. Among 158 isolates obtained from hop yards planted to Cascade, only two (1.3%) were able to infect the cultivar Nugget, which possesses the resistance factor termed R6, indicating that isolates of P. macularis virulent on Nugget are largely distinct from those adapted to Cascade. Further, race characterization indicated Cascade-adapted isolates of P. macularis were able to overcome R-genes Rb, R3, and R5, but not other known R-genes. Therefore, multiple R-genes and other sources of partial resistance are expected to provide resistance to Cascade-adapted strains of the fungus. Given the plasticity of the powdery mildew fungus, breeding strategies for powdery mildew need to consider the potential for adaptation to both qualitative and partial resistance in the host.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gent
- U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; and Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, 97331
| | - Stephen T Massie
- Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, 97331
| | - Megan C Twomey
- Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis, 97331
| | | |
Collapse
|