Progress in renal transplantation. A single center study of 3359 patients over 25 years

Shear wave elastography parameters adds prognostic value to adverse outcome in kidney transplantation recipients

INTRODUCTION

The tissue stiffness of donor kidneys in transplantation may increase due to pathological changes such as glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis, and those changes associate worse outcomes in kidney transplantation recipients. Ultrasound elastography is a noninvasive imaging examination with the ability to quantitatively reflect tissue stiffness. Aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of ultrasound elastography for adverse kidney outcome in kidney transplantation recipients.

METHODS

Shear wave elastography (SWE) examinations were performed by two independent operators in kidney transplantation recipients. The primary outcome was a composite of kidney graft deterioration, all-cause re-hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Survival analysis was calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves with the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients (mean age 46 years, 63.4% men) were followed for a median of 20.1 months. 27 patients (16.77%) reached the primary endpoint. The mean and median tissue stiffness at the medulla (hazard ratio: 1.265 and 1.229, respectively), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and serum albumin level were associated with the primary outcome in univariate Cox regression. Adding mean or median medulla SWE to a baseline model containing eGFR and albumin significantly improved its discrimination (C-statistics: 0.736 for the baseline, 0.766 and 0.772 for the model added mean and median medulla SWE, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The medullary tissue stiffness of kidney allograft measured by shear wave elastography may provide incremental prognostic value to adverse outcomes in kidney transplantation recipients. Including SWE parameters in kidney transplantation recipients management could be considered to improve risk stratification.

The risk factors for treatment-related mortality within first three months after kidney transplantation

Mortality at an early stage after kidney transplantation is a disastrous event. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) within 1 or 3 months after kidney transplantation has been rarely reported. We designed a cohort study using the national Korean Network for Organ Sharing database that includes information about kidney recipients between 2002 and 2016. Their demographic, and laboratory data were collected to analyze risk factors of TRM. A total of 19,815 patients who underwent kidney transplantation in any of 40 medical centers were included. The mortality rates 1 month (early TRM) and 3 months (TRM) after transplantation were 1.7% (n = 330) and 4.1% (n = 803), respectively. Based on a multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.044), deceased donor (HR = 2.210), re-transplantation (HR = 1.675), ABO incompatibility (HR = 1.811), higher glucose (HR = 1.002), and lower albumin (HR = 0.678) were the risk factors for early TRM. Older age (HR = 1.014), deceased donor (HR = 1.642), and hyperglycemia (HR = 1.003) were the common independent risk factors for TRM. In contrast, higher serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (HR = 1.010) was associated with TRM only. The identified risk factors should be considered in patient counselling, and management to prevent TRM. The recipients assigned as the high-risk group require intensive management including glycemic control at the initial stage after transplant.

The risk factors associated with treatment-related mortality in 16,073 kidney transplantation-A nationwide cohort study

Mortality at an early stage after kidney transplantation is a catastrophic event. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) within 1 or 3 months after kidney transplantation has been seldom reported. We designed a retrospective observational cohort study using a national population-based database, which included information about all kidney recipients between 2003 and 2016. A total of 16,073 patients who underwent kidney transplantation were included. The mortality rates 1 month (early TRM) and 3 months (TRM) after transplantation were 0.5% (n = 74) and 1.0% (n = 160), respectively. Based on a multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06; P < 0.001), coronary artery disease (HR = 3.02; P = 0.002), and hemodialysis compared with pre-emptive kidney transplantation (HR = 2.53; P = 0.046) were the risk factors for early TRM. Older age (HR = 1.07; P < 0.001), coronary artery disease (HR = 2.88; P < 0.001), and hemodialysis (HR = 2.35; P = 0.004) were the common independent risk factors for TRM. In contrast, cardiac arrhythmia (HR = 1.98; P = 0.027) was associated only with early TRM, and fungal infection (HR = 2.61; P < 0.001), and epoch of transplantation (HR = 0.34; P < 0.001) were the factors associated with only TRM. The identified risk factors should be considered in patient counselling, selection, and management to prevent TRM.

Frequency of Hepatotropic Viruses Leading To Deranged Liver Function Tests in Renal Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

The preferred modality for renal replacement therapy is renal transplantation. Marked improvements in early graft survival and long-term graft function have made renal transplantation a more cost-effective alternative to dialysis. The presence of liver disease in the posttransplant period adversely affects graft function and survival. Determining the cause of deranged liver function tests can be helpful in treating the underlying cause, leading to improved graft survival and overall quality of life in patients after renal transplant. Here, we determined the frequency of hepatotropic viral infections leading to deranged liver function tests in renal transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study included 132 patients with deranged liver function tests who had undergone renal transplant within the past 6 months. Reactivity and nonreactivity of hepatotropic viruses leading to deranged liver function tests were recorded.

RESULTS

Average age of patients was 37.17 ± 8.75 years. There were 84 male (63.64%) and 48 female (36.36%) patients. Rates of hepatitis C virus antibodies and hepatitis B surface antigen were 62.88% (83/132) and 37.12% (49/132), respectively, whereas no patients had hepatitis E virus immunoglobulin M antibodies or hepatitis A virus immunoglobulin M antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the hepatotropic viral infections leading to deranged liver function tests in renal transplant recipients, hepatitis B virus accounted for a small fraction. In contrast, hepatitis C virus was highly prevalent in transplant recipients who developed deranged liver function tests. Renal transplant recipients with hepatic viral infections have worse patient and allograft survival after transplant compared with noninfected renal transplant recipients. We recommend that transplant candidates be screened for hepatitis B and C virus infection, thus allowing increased graft survival and improved quality of life in renal transplant recipients.

Tuberculosis in renal transplant recipients: Our decade long experience with an opportunistic invader

AIM

To study the incidence, pattern of tuberculosis, Its risk factors, and prognosis in renal transplantation recipients in Indian population.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This study retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent renal transplantation at Ramaiah medical college Hospitals, India from 2004 to 2015.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

The study enrolled 244 patients. Diagnosis was based on radio0imaging, sputum smear, culture and polymerase chainreaction and histology.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

A descriptive univariate analysis was performed to identify the individual risk factors.

RESULTS

The TB infection was present in 21/244 (8.6%) renal transplantation patients (mean age ± SD = 44.3 ± 12.9 years). Pulmonary tuberculosis was the commonest (57%) followed by extrapulmonary tuberculosis (43%). Type II diabetes mellitus (DM) (14.6%; p = 0.0169)was significant risk factor. Majority of the patients (n = 18, 10.7%) were on standard tripledrug immunosuppression. The median duration of anti0tubercular therapy was 14 months and crude mortality was 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

High index of suspicion for tuberculosis is require d in renal transplant recipients owing to their immunocompromised status and atypical presentations. Higher age, DM and use of immunosuppressants increase the risk for post0renal transplantation tuberculosis. Interactions between anti0tubercular drugs and immunosuppressants need to be considered in these patients.

Kidney Graft Survival in Italy and Factors Influencing it

Purpose

National registry data are often a suitable basis for examination of transplant outcomes. Using data supplied by the Italian National Transplant Registry, established in 1995, we performed the first nationwide analysis of this kind.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 4893 recipients of cadaveric kidneys transplanted in all Italian centers from 1995 through 2000 was done to study 5-year graft survival. The association between some donor and recipient variables and outcomes in renal transplantation was analyzed. Graft survival was 93% at 3 months, 89% at 1 year, 82% at 3 years, and 80% at 5 years after transplantation.

Results

A significant association between graft survival and donor age (old vs young, relative risk [RR] = 1.62, 95% CI 1.27–2.06) and recipient age (old vs young, RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.53). Graft survival was also associated with cold ischemia time (24–36 hours, RR=1.39, 95% CI 1.05–1.85 and >36 hours, RR=1.94, 95% CI 1.32–2.86 vs 0–24 hours) and donor/recipient sex mismatch (female/male vs male/male, RR=1.50, 95% CI 1.17–1.93).

Conclusion

The quality of kidney transplantation in Italy is satisfactory and is comparable to that in other developed countries. Furthermore, our experience confirms that both donor and recipient factors are major determinants of renal allograft function.

Comparison of clinical outcomes in hepatitis B virus-positive kidney transplant recipients with or without pretransplantation antiviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Antiviral agents have improved the outcomes of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Preemptive therapy has been the main approach to forestall HBV reactivation. We sought to compare prophylactic and preemptive approaches.

METHODS

We divided the 69 HBV-positive KTRs into treatment and historical control groups, according to the time of starting pretransplantation antiviral therapy. The treatment group was further divided into prophylactic and preemptive therapy groups.

RESULTS

The treatment group showed a significant improvement in 10-year graft (82% vs 34%) and patient (91% vs 57%) survivals. Among the historical control group, the main causes of graft failure were patient deaths (68%), which were mostly caused by liver diseases. In contrast, there was no liver-related death in the treatment group. In addition, there was no difference in graft or patient survival between the prophylactic and preemptive groups, but the incidence of HBV reactivation was lower in the prophylactic group. Antiviral therapy was an independent factor for the improved patient survival (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplantation antiviral therapy is essential to improve clinical outcomes. Prophylactic may be better than preemptive antiviral therapy to decrease HBV reactivation.

Causes of death in renal transplant recipients with functioning allograft

The survival of transplant recipients is significantly lower than age-matched controls in the general population. The aim of this study was to analyze the trends in mortality of renal allograft recipients at our centre. We retrospectively analyzed data from all patients who were transplanted between October 1988 and June 2010 and were followed at our center. Patients were considered to have death with graft function (DWGF) if death was not preceded by return to dialysis or re-transplantation. The study included 98 renal allograft recipients (male : female – 7.99 : 1). The mean recipient and donor ages were 35.06 ± 11.84 (range: 15–69) and 41.17 ± 10.44 (range: 22–60) years, respectively. Basic kidney diseases were CGN (chronic glomerulonephritis) (60.20%), CIN (chronic interstitial nephritis) (15.31%), DN (diabetic nephropathy) (8.16%), ADPKD (autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease) (2.04%) and others (14.29%). They were followed up for a mean 79.91 ± 60.05 patient-months. Mortality occurred in 25 (25.51%) patients (male : female – 4 : 1). Causes of death were sepsis/infection (36%), coronary artery disease (28%), CVA (8%), failed graft (4%), and rest unknown (24%). DWGF was 88% of total death and contributed to 78.57% of total graft loss. Overall patient survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years were 90.8%, 80.2%, 65.6%, and 59.1%, respectively (Kaplan–Meier analysis). Those who died exhibited significant differences in recipient's age (median 40 years vs 31 years, P=0.007), pretransplantation hypertension (HTN) (100% vs 65.75%, P<0.001), post-transplant infection (76% vs 42.47%, P=0.005), coronary artery disease (28% vs 1.37%, P<0.001), and serum creatinine at last follow up (median 2.3mg/dL vs 1.56mg/dL, P=0.003). Cardiovascular disease, in addition to infection, is an important cause of death during the first 15 years following renal transplantation even in nondiabetic recipients. Death with functioning graft is of concern.

Serum phosphate measured at 6 and 12 months after successful kidney transplant is independently associated with subsequent graft loss

OBJECTIVES

Serum phosphate concentrations have been shown to predict graft loss in prevalent, but not incident, kidney transplant populations. The reasons for this are unknown. We investigated whether serum phosphate at 6 or 12 months posttransplant was associated with graft loss in the same cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected for 325 patients transplanted and followed up at a single center (1996-2004). The association between serum phosphate at 6 and 12 months posttransplant and graft failure was analyzed.

RESULTS

Univariable associations with death-censored graft failure were seen for serum phosphate at 6 and 12 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.48; P < .001, and HR 1.40; CI 1.27-1.54; P < .001). On bivariable analysis (phosphate at 6 vs 12 mo), a significant association remained for both variables and increased graft failure rate (HR 1.19; CI 1.07-1.34; P = .002, and HR 1.37; CI 1.21-1.55; P < .001). These associations persisted in multivariable models (HR 1.27; CI 1.07-1.51; P = .007, and HR 1.34; CI 1.14-1.57; P < .001 for phosphate at 6 and 12 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum phosphate at 6 and 12 months posttransplant is an independent predictor of graft loss. Any future trial designed to investigate the benefits of phosphate lowering should consider recruiting patients as early as 6 months posttransplant.

Hepatitis B virus infection and renal transplantation

Although the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has declined in renal transplant recipients (RTRs), it remains a relevant clinical problem with high morbidity and mortality in long-term follow up. A thorough evaluation, including liver biopsy as well as assessment of HBV replication in serum (i.e. hepatitis B e antigen and/or HBV DNA) is required before transplantation. Interferon should not be used in this setting because of low efficacy and precipitation on acute allograft rejection. The advent of effective antiviral therapies offers the opportunity to prevent the progression of liver disease after renal transplantation. However, as far as we are aware, no studies have compared prophylactic and preemptive strategies. To date, the majority of RTRs with HBV-related liver disease have had a high virological and biochemical response to lamivudine use. However, lamivudine resistance is frequent with a prolonged course of therapy. Considering long-term treatment, antiviral agents with a high genetic barrier to resistance and lack of nephrotoxicity are suggested. The optimal strategy in RTRs with HBV infection remains to be established in the near future.

Immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplantation: impact on patient survival, and incidence of cardiovascular disease, malignancy and infection

Renal transplant recipients have increased mortality rates when compared with the general population. The new immunosuppressive drugs have improved short-term patient survival up to 95% at 1-2 years, but these data have to be confirmed in long-term follow-up. Furthermore, no particular regimen has proved to be superior over others with regard to patient survival. Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of mortality in renal transplant recipients and while no immunosuppressive drug has been directly associated with cardiovascular events, immunosuppressive drugs have different impacts on traditional risk factors. Corticosteroids and ciclosporin are the agents with the most negative impact on weight gain, blood pressure and lipids. Tacrolimus increases the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus. Sirolimus and everolimus have the most impact on risk factors for post-transplant hyperlipidaemia. Modifications in immunosuppression could improve the cardiovascular profile but there is little evidence regarding the beneficial effects of these changes on patient outcomes. Malignancies are also an increasing cause of mortality, overtaking cardiovascular disease in some series. Induction therapy, azathioprine and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are probably the immunosuppressive agents most linked with post-transplant malignancies. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has no negative impact on the incidence of malignancies. Target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have antioncogenic properties and they are associated with a lower incidence of malignancies. In addition, these agents have been recommended for use to decrease the dose or withdrawal of CNIs in patients with malignancies. Infections are still an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Some immunosuppressive agents such as MMF increase the incidence of cytomegalovirus infection and the need for prophylactic measures in risk recipients. The use of potent immunosuppressive therapy has resulted in the appearance of BK virus nephropathy, which progresses to graft failure in a high percentage of patients. Although first associated with tacrolimus and MMF immunosuppression, recent data suggest that BK nephropathy appears with any kind of triple therapy. In conclusion, reducing risk factors for patient death should be a major target to improve outcomes after renal transplantation. Effort should be made to control cardiovascular diseases, malignancies and infections with improved use of immunosuppressive drugs. Preliminary results with belatacept suggest its safety and efficacy, and open new perspectives in the immunosuppression of de novo renal transplant recipients.

Prospective registry-based observational cohort study of the long-term risk of malignancies in renal transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil

This large prospectively conducted observational cohort study examined the risk of lymphoma and other malignancies with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in de novo renal transplant recipients. A total of 6751 patients receiving MMF, and an equal number of matched controls receiving non-MMF-based immunosuppression, were identified from two large registries (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) and Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS)) and followed for 3 years. The primary endpoint was development of lymphoma. Secondary endpoints included development of any malignancy. There was no evidence of any increased risk of developing lymphoma or malignancy with MMF. The risk of developing lymphoma with MMF compared with the non-MMF cohort was not higher in either the CTS registry (relative risk (95% confidence interval); 0.4 (0.17-0.94)) or the OPTN/UNOS registry (1.04 (0.61-1.78)). In the MMF group, there was a trend toward a lower risk of malignancy in both registries (OPTN/UNOS 0.86 (0.69-1.07); CTS 0.79 (0.61-1.02)) and a significant increase in time to malignancy in the CTS dataset (p < 0.026). This study has demonstrated that MMF is not associated with an increased risk of lymphoma or other malignancies post-renal transplant, and may even be associated with a lower risk in some populations.

Surgical management of spinal disease in renal recipients

OBJECT AND BACKGROUND

The survival of renal recipients improved dramatically and long-term survival of renal graft patients is common, which in turn increases the chance of these patients requiring spinal surgery. However, there are few appropriate reports about the results of spine surgery on renal recipients. This study was undertaken to analyze the authors' experience of spine surgery after renal transplantation.

METHODS

Thirty-two renal recipients who underwent spine surgery with regular follow-up of more than 24 months were included in this study. The patients' medical records and the radiological reports were reviewed retrospectively and their postoperative conditions were evaluated during their regular visits or by telephone.

RESULTS

The mean duration from the renal transplantation to spinal surgery was 6 +/- 1.2 yr. Among spinal diseases of renal recipients, there were 23 cases of degenerative spinal diseases, seven cases of vertebral compression fracture, and two spinal cord tumors. The operation methods were conventional spine surgery with or without bone fusion (27 cases), percutaneous vertebroplasty (three cases) and tumor resection (two cases). The mean values of the Prolo scale in the preoperative (4.5 +/- 0.3) and postoperative (7.4 +/- 0.4) period showed significant clinical improvement after the operation. Postoperative renal function was not deteriorated in any patients and there were no major complications.

CONCLUSION

Spine surgery can be performed with acceptable clinical results and without major complications in renal recipients. Spine surgery has no aggravating effect on the patients' renal function. Surgery is a valuable, safe option for the treatment of spinal disease in this rare distinct group of patients.

Racial and ethnic variations in incidence and pattern of malignancies after kidney transplantation

Malignancies are a well-recognized complication of renal transplantation. Although the problem is well studied in developed countries, less is known about it in developing countries. Although geographic and ethnic variations have been alluded to in several reports, to our knowledge the subject has not been investigated formally. From April 1976 through March 1999, 41 (7.6%) patients were diagnosed with cancer among a heterogeneous population of renal allograft recipients treated at our institution in Cape Town, South Africa. The incidence of malignancies was comparable in white and nonwhite patients. However, squamous cell cancer and basal cell cancer of the skin (in that order) were the most common cancers in white patients, in whom they occurred exclusively. On the other hand, Kaposi sarcoma was the most common cancer in nonwhite renal allograft recipients, in whom it accounted for almost 80% of all cancers. Review of the world literature suggests that posttransplant cancers are less common in developing countries; Kaposi sarcoma is the most common lesion, with few exceptions. Malignant lymphomas are also more common in developing countries. The impact of different immunosuppressive regimens is controversial. In general, cyclosporine is not associated with a significant increase in the incidence of cancer after renal transplantation, although the time to the first cancer may be reduced. In our experience, the pattern of posttransplant cancers in white and nonwhite patients living in the same geographic region epitomizes the world experience of the disease and suggests that genetic factors, rather than geography, are the more important determinants of cancer development after renal transplantation.

Renal transplant recipient outcome after losing the first graft

Renal transplantation is the optimal therapy for end-stage renal failure and considerable attention has been given to graft and patient survival and the effectiveness of immunosuppressive regimens. However, little attention has been given to outcome for patients who lose their grafts. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of the 793 first renal transplants performed at our institution between November 1979 and December 2001. A total of 348 patients lost their grafts, 116 by death with a functioning graft (33.3%) and 232 patients for other causes (66.7%). Eighty-six patients (37.1%) received a second transplant 3.5+/-2.4 years after returning to dialysis and the remainder continued on dialysis. Retransplanted patients were younger at the time of the first transplant (P=.000), and both time on dialysis (P=.012) and duration of graft function (P=.057) were shorter than for those remaining on dialysis. Therefore, retransplant patient survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was better than among those patients on dialysis not included on the waiting list (P<.001), but when compared with the relisted patients the survival rate was almost identical (96%, 85%, and 67% vs 97%, 82%, and 67%; P=NS). Almost 40% of patients who lost their first grafts were retransplanted. We did not observe differences in patient survival between retransplant and relisted patients. Because the number of cases is limited, our results need to be confirmed by larger series.

The use of basiliximab in solid organ transplantation

The risk of acute rejection is at its highest early post-transplant. The use of various antibodies early after transplant achieves potent immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection, allowing the clinician the opportunity to optimise baseline immunosuppressive management and to delay the use of nephrotoxic agents (calcineurin inhibitors), while the graft reaches a baseline function. Basiliximab (Simulect trade mark, Novartis) is a monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the alpha-subunit of the human high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2r) complex, consequently inhibiting interleukin-2 (IL-2) binding. IL-2 receptors are selectively expressed on the surface of the activated lymphocytes. Administration of basiliximab inhibits IL-2 mediated activation of lymphocytes, a critical pathway involved in allograft rejection. Several clinical studies have shown that basiliximab administration as an induction agent significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection, even in high risk patients. In addition, basiliximab is well-tolerated with minimal side effects.

Trends in mortality and graft failure for renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Several important advances in general medical management both before and after renal transplantation have occurred over the last 5-15 years, however, few studies have formally examined trends in the outcomes of renal transplantation. We, therefore, aimed to determine the degree to which these advances have resulted in improved outcomes such as survival of patient and graft.

METHODS

We analyzed the rates of death and graft failure among the 11,482 Canadians with end-stage renal disease who received a kidney transplant in 1981-98. Patients were followed from the date of transplantation to the date of graft failure, the date of death or the end of the observation period, namely, Dec. 31, 1998, depending on which was the earliest. Rate ratios for mortality and graft failure--ratios of the rate for each calendar period to the rate for the arbitrarily chosen reference period, 1981-85--were estimated with a piece-wise exponential model that adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, primary renal diagnosis, follow-up time and donor-organ source.

RESULTS

The rates and adjusted rate ratios for death and graft failure decreased significantly and steadily over time. Relative to 1981-85, the adjusted mortality rate ratios were 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.89), 0.65 (95% CI 0.52-0.82) and 0.53 (95% CI 0.41-0.67) for 1986-89, 1990-94 and 1995-98 respectively, and the adjusted graft failure rate ratios were 0.68 (95% CI 0.60-0.78), 0.62 (95% CI 0.54-0.70) and 0.51 (95% CI 0.44-0.58) respectively. The decrease was mostly among the cadaveric-organ recipients. Calendar period was as important a predictor of outcome as well-known prognostic factors such as age and primary renal diagnosis.

INTERPRETATION

Decreases in mortality rates are probably related to refinements in patient management. Decreases in graft failure rates are probably the result of a combination of improved immunotherapy and better management of nonimmunologic conditions such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia.

The changing causes of graft loss and death after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The results of kidney transplantation have improved markedly over the last three decades. Despite this, patients still lose grafts and die. We sought to determine whether the causes of graft loss and death have changed over the last 30 years.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent transplantation or who died between January 1, 1970 and December 31, 1999. We compared the causes of graft loss or death for three decades: 1970 to 1979, 1980 to 1989, and 1990 to 1999.

RESULTS

From January 1, 1970 to December 31, 1999, we performed 2501 kidney transplantations in 2225 patients. For the three periods, 210, 588, and 383 patients lost their grafts, respectively. Graft survival increased substantially. Graft loss occurred later after transplantation, with 36.0% losing grafts in the first year during 1970 to 1970, 22.8% during 1980 to 1989, and 11.4% during 1990 to 1999. Death with a functioning graft increased from 23.8% for 1970 to 1979 to 37.5% for 1990 to 1999. Concomitantly, rejection as a cause of graft loss fell from 65.7% for 1970 to 1979 to 44.6% for 1990 to 1999. Approximately two thirds of the patients who died after transplantation died with a functioning graft and one third died after returning to dialysis. Cardiac disease as a cause of death increased from 9.6% for 1970 to 1979 to 30.3% for 1990 to 1999. Deaths from cancer and stroke also increased significantly over the three decades from 1.2% and 2.4%, respectively, for 1970 to 1979, to 13.2% and 8.0%, respectively, for 1990 to 1999.

CONCLUSIONS

The causes of graft loss and death have changed over the last three decades. By better addressing the main causes of death, cardiac disease, and stroke with better prevention, graft loss due to death with a functioning graft will be reduced.

A randomized prospective trial of OKT3 induction in the current immunosuppression era

Recent improvements in immunosuppression and subsequent decreases in the incidence of acute rejection have brought into question the benefit of the use peri-transplant antibody therapy (i.e. induction therapy). In the current era of immunosuppression that includes mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine emulsion (Neoral, Novartis, Basle, Switzerland), we designed and have completed a prospective, randomized trial to address this question. Cadaveric and living donor renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive either OKT3/MMF/delayed Neoral/prednisone or MMF/immediate Neoral/prednisone without OKT3. The incidence of rejection episodes was the primary end point. Patients with delayed graft function were excluded. All rejection episodes were biopsy proven and all patients have been followed for a minimum of 2 yr. Fifty-four patients received OKT3 induction, of which 6 patients suffered a rejection episode (11%), while 13 patients (27%) not receiving OKT3 (p=0.04) had a rejection episode. Four patients in the no OKT3 group suffered multiple rejections, while there were only 2 with more than one episode in the OKT3 group. There was no increased incidence of infectious complications in the group receiving OKT3. Hospital costs tended to be higher in the OKT3-treated group, but were not significantly different. The low incidence of rejection in the OKT3-treated group was intriguing and validates the use of antibody therapy in the early post-operative periods even in the era of improved baseline immunosuppression.

Prolongation of corneal allograft survival using cyclosporine in a polylactide-co-glycolide polymer

PURPOSE

To test for prolongation of corneal transplant survival with cyclosporine in a polymer placed in the anterior chamber of corneal allograft recipients.

METHODS

Wistar inbred rats with vascularized corneas were recipients of corneal allografts from Sprague-Dawley donor rats. Grafted rats were randomized into six groups: untreated control animals, cyclosporine-polymer anterior chamber recipients, cyclosporine-polymer subconjunctival recipients, cyclosporine-olive oil drop recipients, polymer-only anterior chamber recipients, and autografted Wistar rats. Grafts were examined by slit lamp every 3 days and the clinical condition scored. The cyclosporine concentration in the aqueous humor was assayed at 1, 2, and 4 weeks. At 2 and 4 weeks after transplantation, the eyes were collected for histopathologic evaluation of the grafts.

RESULTS

The median survival time of untreated corneal allografts was 8.2 +/- 1.48 days for grafts treated with topical cyclosporine, 8.5 +/- 1.50 days for polymer-only anterior chamber implants, 10.6 +/- 1.90 days for 1% cyclosporine drops, 11.4 +/- 2.50 days for grafts given subconjunctival cyclosporine-polymer, 17 +/- 3.05 days for grafts given cyclosporine-polymer implants in the anterior chamber, and more than 3 months in autografted rats. There was a statistically significant difference ( p < 0.05) between the survival time of the allografts in the animals treated with the cyclosporine-polymer in the anterior chamber compared with the other groups of graft recipients. Significantly higher concentrations of cyclosporine were found in the eyes given an anterior chamber implant of cyclosporine-polymer than in the other treatment groups or the untreated rats. The cyclosporine-polymer implants placed in the anterior chamber induced a transient inflammatory response in transplanted eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine-polymer placed in the anterior chamber significantly prolongs corneal allograft survival in a high-risk corneal graft rejection. This intraocular delivery system may be a valuable adjunct for the suppression of immune graft rejection in high-risk recipients of corneal transplants.

What happens to renal transplant recipients who lose their grafts?

Little attention has been given to the fate of patients who lose their grafts. We reviewed outcomes of 438 recipients of first renal allografts who underwent transplantation at our institution between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1997, and lost their grafts or died with a functioning transplant. Of the 438 patients, 168 patients died with a functioning transplant. The most common causes of death were cardiac disease, infection, and cancer. Patients who died with a functioning graft were older (>49 years, 64.3%) than patients who died after returning to dialysis therapy or who are still alive (>49 years, 25.9%). Eighty-six patients (39%) who returned to dialysis therapy were again placed on a cadaveric waiting list. Only 44 patients received a second transplant, of which 30 transplants (68.2%) are still functioning. Our study shows that relatively few patients who lose kidney transplants are returned to the cadaveric waiting list and even fewer undergo retransplantation.

Kidney transplantation in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: is the prognosis worse?

The impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on the long-term outcome of kidney transplant patients is controversial. A total of 34 chronic hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers among 143 renal allograft recipients were identified in this study (mean follow-up period: 5.6+/-3.3 years; range: 1-13 years). During the follow-up, one HBsAg-positive recipient with preexisting cirrhosis died of liver failure, and seven (21%) others developed serious HBV-related complications (four fulminant hepatitis, two hepatocellular carcinoma, one cirrhosis), and four died. Although HBsAg-positive recipients had a higher rate of liver-related complications and deaths than HBsAg-negative recipients did, there were no significant differences in the long-term graft and patient survival between the two groups. The survival rates, liver-related complications, and deaths in HBsAg-positive allograft recipients and 28 HBsAg-positive uremic patients under dialysis were similar. In conclusion, HBV infection is not a contraindication to kidney transplantation. However, pretransplant candidates should be warned of potentially serious liver-related complications.

Living unrelated donors in kidney transplants: better long-term results than with non-HLA-identical living related donors?

BACKGROUND

Given the severe organ shortage and the documented superior results obtained with living (vs. cadaver) donor kidney transplants, we have adopted a very aggressive policy for the use of living donors. Currently, we make thorough attempts to locate a living related donor (LRD) or a living unrelated donor (LURD) before proceeding with a cadaver transplant.

METHODS

We compared the results of our LURD versus LRD transplants to determine any significant difference in outcome.

RESULTS

Between 1/1/84 and 6/30/98, we performed 711 adult kidney transplants with non-HLA-identical living donors. Of these, 595 procedures used LRDs and 116 used LURDs. Immunosuppression for both groups was cyclosporine-based, although LURD recipients received 5-7 days of induction therapy (antilymphocyte globulin or antithymocyte globulin), whereas LRD recipients did not. LURD recipients tended to be older, to have inferior HLA matching, and to have older donors than did the LRD recipients (all factors potentially associated with decreased graft survival). Short-term results, including initial graft function and incidence of acute rejection, were similar in the two groups. LURD recipients had a slightly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus disease (P=NS). We found no difference in patient and graft survival rates. However, the incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection was significantly lower among LURD recipients (16.7% for LRD recipients and 10.0% for LURD recipients at 5 years posttransplant; P=0.05). LRD recipients also had a greater incidence of late (>6 months posttransplant) acute rejection episodes than did the LURD recipients (8.6% vs. 2.6%, P=0.04). The exact reason for these findings is unknown.

CONCLUSION

Although LURD recipients have poorer HLA matching and older donors, their patient and graft survival rates are equivalent to those of non-HLA-identical LRD recipients. The incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection is lower in LURD transplants. Given this finding and the superior results of living donor (vs. cadaver) transplants, a thorough search should be made for a living donor-LRD or LURD-before proceeding with a cadaver transplant.

Outcome after myocardial revascularization and renal transplantation: a 25-year single-institution experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cardiac disease is a common cause of death in renal transplant recipients. This study retrospectively analyzes the results of myocardial revascularization procedures in these patients and makes recommendations for managing coronary atherosclerosis in patients with renal disease who already have a transplanted kidney or who may receive a kidney transplant.

METHODS

Patients who had myocardial revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA]) and renal transplantation at the authors' institution between 1968 and 1994 were analyzed. Patient, procedural, and institutional variables were used for actuarial analyses of survival, as well as multivariate analyses of risk factors for death.

RESULTS

Eighty-three of 2989 renal transplant patients required myocardial revascularization either before or after their transplant, and diabetes mellitus was the cause of renal failure in 42% of these patients. Standard coronary angiography, CABG, and PTCA techniques were used without periprocedural renal allograft loss. Actuarial patient survival was 89%, 77%, and 65% at 1, 3, and 5 years after the last procedure (transplantation or revascularization). Cardiac disease was the most common mode of death. Early-phase risk factors for death by multivariate analysis included hypertension and revascularization before 1989. Late-phase risk factors for death included diabetes mellitus, higher number of pre-CABG myocardial infarctions, renal transplantation before 1984, older age, and unstable angina before CABG.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial revascularization can be performed with acceptable short- and long-term results in patients with renal disease who have renal transplantation either before or after the revascularization procedure. Diabetes mellitus was a highly prevalent condition among these patients, and cardiac disease was their most common mode of death. PTCA and CABG, as performed at this institution, posed little risk for renal allograft loss. Modification of risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis, rigorous cardiac evaluation of patients at risk for coronary artery disease before renal transplantation, and aggressive use of revascularization procedures to decrease the incidence of myocardial infarction are proposed as ways to prolong the survival of renal transplant patients with ischemic heart disease.

Ischemic preconditioning attenuates functional, metabolic, and morphologic injury from ischemic acute renal failure in the rat

Ischemic preconditioning has been shown to ameliorate injury due to subsequent ischemia in several organs. However, relatively little is known about preconditioning and the kidney. To address this, rats were randomized to control (C, N = 14), 2 min of ischemic preconditioning (P2 N = 10), 3 periods of 2 min of ischemia separated by 5 min periods of reflow (P2,3 N = 7), or three 5 min periods of ischemia separated by 5 min of reflow (P5,3 N = 6) prior to 45 min of bilateral renal ischemia followed by 24 hours of reperfusion. We observed a lower serum creatinine after 24 hours of reflow in P2, P2, 3 but not P5, 3 rats compared with C. Histology was examined in the C and P2, 3 groups and demonstrated less severe injury in the P2, 3 group. To gain insight into the mechanism by which preconditioning ameliorated ischemic injury, we performed near IR spectroscopy and 31P NMR spectroscopy. Based on near IR spectroscopy, the P2, 3 group had closer coupling of cytochrome aa3 redox state with that of hemoglobin during reflow. In the 31P NMR studies, the changes in ATP and pHi were similar during ischemia, but the P2, 3 group recovered ATP and pHi faster than C. These data suggest that ischemic preconditioning may ameliorate ischemic renal injury as assessed by functional, metabolic and morphological methods. The mechanism(s) by which this occurs requires additional study.

Impact of hepatitis B and C virus on kidney transplantation outcome

The impact of hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) on patient survival after kidney transplantation is controversial. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the independent prognostic values of HBsAg and anti-HCV in a large renal transplant population, (2) to compare infected patients with noninfected patients matched for factors possibly associated with graft and patient survival, and (3) to assess the prognostic value of biopsy-proven cirrhosis. Eight hundred thirty-four transplanted patients were included: 128 with positive HBsAg (group I), 216 with positive anti-HCV (group II), and 490 without serological markers of HBV and HCV (group III). Fifteen percent and 29% of patients were HBsAg-positive and anti-HCV-positive, respectively. Ten-year survivals of group I (55 +/- 6%) and group II (65 +/- 5%) were significantly lower than survival of group III (80 +/- 3%, P <.001). At 10 years, among overall patients with HCV screening (n = 834), four variables had independent prognostic values in patient survival: age at transplantation (P <.0001), year of transplantation (P =.02), biopsy-proven cirrhosis (P =.03), and presence of HCV antibodies (P =.02). In the case control study, comparison of infected patients with their matched control patients showed that age at transplantation (P <.05), HBsAg (P =.005), and anti-HCV (P =.005) were independent prognostic factors. HCV, biopsy-proven cirrhosis, and age are independent prognostic factors of 10-year survival in patients with kidney grafts. The case-control study showed that anti-HCV and HBsAg were independently associated with patient and graft survivals. In infected patients, a routine liver histological analysis would improve selection of patients for renal transplantation.

Living unrelated renal donation: the University of Wisconsin experience

BACKGROUND

Living unrelated renal donation (LURD) has the potential to reduce the current waiting list significantly for kidney transplantation. The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term results of 150 LURDs performed at our center during a 16-year period.

METHODS

From Dec 23, 1981, to Feb 13, 1998, 150 LURDs, 219 human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical, 577 haploidentical, and 1789 cadaveric kidney transplant procedures were performed. Surgical complications, rejection episodes, infectious complications, and the cause of graft loss and death were examined. Ten-year patient and graft survival rates between groups were compared.

RESULTS

Fourteen surgical complications including lymphocele (n = 7), ureteral stricture (n = 4), and ureteral leak (n = 3) were seen. Seventy-eight patients (52%) had 123 rejection episodes and 66 patients (44%) had 1 or more infections. Thirty-six allografts were lost and 25 deaths occurred. Patient survival rates at 10 years for HLA-identical, haploidentical, LURD, and cadaveric transplant procedures were 86%, 82%, 63%, and 64%, respectively. Allograft survival rates at 10 years for HLA-identical, haploidentical, LURD, and cadaver transplant procedures were 75%, 59%, 56%, and 44%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term LURD allograft survival rates are lower than those for HLA-identical but equivalent to those of haploidentical and better than those of cadaveric kidney transplantations. Spousal and nonspousal LURDs should be actively encouraged to help alleviate the current donor kidney shortage.

Benefits of continued cyclosporine through an indigent drug program

Financial circumstances force some stable renal transplant recipients to discontinue cyclosporine (CsA). Previous results from our center document a subgroup of these patients at increased risk for acute rejection and allograft loss, namely, those of African ancestry. After 1988, such disadvantaged recipients have been able to receive CsA at no charge through the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD). At the University of Alabama at Birmingham, 54 patients were enrolled in the NORD program between 1988 and 1994. Acute rejection, allograft survival, and patient survival in these patients were compared with those in 42 patients who, prior to 1988, were withdrawn from CsA for financial reasons. Both groups were similar socioeconomically. The mean follow-up was 69 +/- 33 months (+/-SD) in the withdrawal group and 45 +/- 14 months in those entering the NORD program. Acute rejections occurred with similar frequency in both groups before CsA withdrawal (45%) or NORD enrollment (48%). In contrast, acute rejections were more common in patients after the onset of CsA withdrawal (38%) than after NORD enrollment (11%) (P < 0.01). Black patients withdrawn from CsA experienced more acute rejections than their counterparts in the NORD program (57% v 15%) (P < 0.01). White NORD recipients also experienced fewer acute rejections, although the difference was not statistically significant (withdrawal group 16% v NORD group 4%; P = 0.29). Rejection episodes were accompanied by reduced graft survival in black patients withdrawn from CsA, while significant improvement was seen in those remaining on CsA-based therapy (P < 0.05). No difference in allograft survival was seen among white patients in either group (withdrawal group 74% v NORD group 82%; P = 0.33). Thus, long-term access to CsA through the NORD program reduced acute rejections and improved allograft survival in an economically disadvantaged subgroup of renal transplant recipients. These findings emphasize the importance of continued access to CsA in black renal transplant recipients and its influence on long-term allograft survival.

The results of 1009 kidney transplantations performed in Hungary

Kidney transplantation is a widely used method throughout the world for the treatment of end-stage renal disease. Following the pioneering work of Szeged Medical University Hospital and Miskolc District General Hospital, the first successful kidney transplantation in Hungary was performed at the Department of Transplantation and Surgery at Semmelweis Medical University on November 16, 1973. This patient is still alive with a functioning kidney graft after 21 years. We report herein our review of the global results of Hungarian kidney transplantation. Hungary is a medium-developed country with a population of over 10 million where the gross national product is about 4000 U.S. dollars per person per year. In Hungary there are 49 dialysis centers, 4 immunological laboratories, and 4 transplantation centers.