1
|
Simonenko M, Hansen D, Niebauer J, Volterrani M, Adamopoulos S, Amarelli C, Ambrosetti M, Anker SD, Bayes-Genis A, Gal TB, Bowen TS, Cacciatore F, Caminiti G, Cavarretta E, Chioncel O, Coats AJS, Cohen-Solal A, D'Ascenzi F, de Pablo Zarzosa C, Gevaert AB, Gustafsson F, Kemps H, Hill L, Jaarsma T, Jankowska E, Joyce E, Krankel N, Lainscak M, Lund LH, Moura B, Nytrøen K, Osto E, Piepoli M, Potena L, Rakisheva A, Rosano G, Savarese G, Seferovic PM, Thompson DR, Thum T, Van Craenenbroeck EM. Prevention and rehabilitation after heart transplantation: A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Heart Failure Association of the ESC, and the European Cardio Thoracic Transplant Association, a section of ESOT. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2024; 31:1385-1399. [PMID: 38894688 DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Little is known either about either physical activity patterns, or other lifestyle-related prevention measures in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. The history of HTx started more than 50 years ago but there are still no guidelines or position papers highlighting the features of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx. The aims of this scientific statement are (i) to explain the importance of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx, and (ii) to promote the factors (modifiable/non-modifiable) that should be addressed after HTx to improve patients' physical capacity, quality of life and survival. All HTx team members have their role to play in the care of these patients and multidisciplinary prevention and rehabilitation programmes designed for transplant recipients. HTx recipients are clearly not healthy disease-free subjects yet they also significantly differ from heart failure patients or those who are supported with mechanical circulatory support. Therefore, prevention and rehabilitation after HTx both need to be specifically tailored to this patient population and be multidisciplinary in nature. Prevention and rehabilitation programmes should be initiated early after HTx and continued during the entire post-transplant journey. This clinical consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Simonenko
- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Research Department, Heart Transplantation Outpatient Department, V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Centre, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Dominique Hansen
- REVAL and BIOMED Rehabilitation Research Center, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
- Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Josef Niebauer
- University Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Stamatis Adamopoulos
- Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation Unit, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Cristiano Amarelli
- Department of Cardiac Surgery and Transplants, Monaldi Hospital, Azienda dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Ambrosetti
- Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, ASST Crema, Santa Marta Hospital, Rivolta d'Adda (CR), Italy
| | - Stefan D Anker
- Department of Cardiology (CVK), Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Tuvia Ben Gal
- Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva and Sackler, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - T Scott Bowen
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Francesco Cacciatore
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | | | - Elena Cavarretta
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy
| | - Ovidiu Chioncel
- Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases 'Prof. C.C. Iliescu', Bucharest, Romania
- University of Medicine Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Alain Cohen-Solal
- Cardiology Department, University of Paris, INSERM UMRS-942, Hopital Lariboisiere, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Flavio D'Ascenzi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | | - Andreas B Gevaert
- Research Group Cardiovascular Diseases, GENCOR, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Finn Gustafsson
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hareld Kemps
- Department of Cardiology, Maxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Loreena Hill
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Tiny Jaarsma
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emer Joyce
- Department of Cardiology, Mater University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nicolle Krankel
- Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Klinik für Kardiologie Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Lars H Lund
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Heart and Vascular Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brenda Moura
- Armed Forces Hospital, Porto, Portugal
- Centre for Health Technologies and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Kari Nytrøen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elena Osto
- Division of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Otto Loewi Research Center for Vascular Biology, Immunology and Inflammation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Massimo Piepoli
- Dipartimento Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Universita' Degli Studi di Milan, Milan, Italy
- Cardiologia Universitaria, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Amina Rakisheva
- Department of Cardiology, Scientific Institution of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- Department of Cardiology, Kapshagai City Hospital, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Giuseppe Rosano
- St. George's Hospital NHS Trust University of London, London, UK
| | - Gianluigi Savarese
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Petar M Seferovic
- Faculty of Medicine and Heart Failure Center, University of Belgrade, Belgrade University Medical Center, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - David R Thompson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Thomas Thum
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Therapeutic Strategies (IMTTS), Hannover Medical School and Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Research, Hannover, Germany
| | - Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck
- Research Group Cardiovascular Diseases, GENCOR, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maclay LM, Yu M, Amaral S, Adler JT, Sandoval PR, Ratner LE, Schold JD, Mohan S, Husain SA. Disparities in Access to Timely Waitlisting Among Pediatric Kidney Transplant Candidates. Pediatrics 2024:e2024065934. [PMID: 39086359 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-065934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Kidney transplantation with minimal or no dialysis exposure provides optimal outcomes for children with end-stage kidney disease. We sought to understand disparities in timely access to transplant waitlisting. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, registry-based cohort study of candidates ages 3 to 17 added to the US kidney transplant waitlist 2015 to 2019. We defined "preemptive waitlisting" as waitlist addition before receiving dialysis and compared demographics of candidates based on preemptive status. We used competing risk regression to determine the association between preemptive waitlisting and transplantation. We then identified waitlist additions age >18 who initiated dialysis as children, thereby missing pediatric allocation prioritization, and evaluated the association between waitlisting with pediatric prioritization and transplantation. RESULTS Among 4506 pediatric candidates, 48% were waitlisted preemptively. Female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, Black race, and public insurance were associated with lower adjusted relative risk of preemptive waitlisting. Preemptive listing was not associated with time from waitlist activation to transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.02). Among transplant recipients waitlisted preemptively, 68% had no pretransplant dialysis, whereas recipients listed nonpreemptively had median 1.6 years of dialysis at transplant. Among 415 candidates initiating dialysis as children but waitlisted as adults, transplant rate was lower versus nonpreemptive pediatric candidates after waitlist activation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.66). CONCLUSIONS Disparities in timely waitlisting are associated with differences in pretransplant dialysis exposure despite no difference in time to transplant after waitlist activation. Young adults who experience delays may miss pediatric prioritization, highlighting an area for policy intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey M Maclay
- Departments of Medicine, Division of Nephrology
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Miko Yu
- Departments of Medicine, Division of Nephrology
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Sandra Amaral
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joel T Adler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - P Rodrigo Sandoval
- Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Lloyd E Ratner
- Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Departments of Medicine, Division of Nephrology
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Syed Ali Husain
- Departments of Medicine, Division of Nephrology
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Simonenko M, Hansen D, Niebauer J, Volterrani M, Adamopoulos S, Amarelli C, Ambrosetti M, Anker SD, Bayes-Genis A, Ben Gal T, Bowen TS, Cacciatore F, Caminiti G, Cavarretta E, Chioncel O, Coats AJS, Cohen-Solal A, D’Ascenzi F, de Pablo Zarzosa C, Gevaert AB, Gustafsson F, Kemps H, Hill L, Jaarsma T, Jankowska E, Joyce E, Krankel N, Lainscak M, Lund LH, Moura B, Nytrøen K, Osto E, Piepoli M, Potena L, Rakisheva A, Rosano G, Savarese G, Seferovic PM, Thompson DR, Thum T, Van Craenenbroeck EM. Prevention and Rehabilitation After Heart Transplantation: A Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Heart Failure Association of the ESC, and the European Cardio Thoracic Transplant Association, a Section of ESOT. Transpl Int 2024; 37:13191. [PMID: 39015154 PMCID: PMC11250379 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.13191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Little is known either about either physical activity patterns, or other lifestyle-related prevention measures in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. The history of HTx started more than 50 years ago but there are still no guidelines or position papers highlighting the features of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx. The aims of this scientific statement are (i) to explain the importance of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx, and (ii) to promote the factors (modifiable/non-modifiable) that should be addressed after HTx to improve patients' physical capacity, quality of life and survival. All HTx team members have their role to play in the care of these patients and multidisciplinary prevention and rehabilitation programmes designed for transplant recipients. HTx recipients are clearly not healthy disease-free subjects yet they also significantly differ from heart failure patients or those who are supported with mechanical circulatory support. Therefore, prevention and rehabilitation after HTx both need to be specifically tailored to this patient population and be multidisciplinary in nature. Prevention and rehabilitation programmes should be initiated early after HTx and continued during the entire post-transplant journey. This clinical consensus statement focuses on the importance and the characteristics of prevention and rehabilitation designed for HTx recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Simonenko
- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Research Department, Heart Transplantation Outpatient Department, V. A. Almazov National Medical Research Centre, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Dominique Hansen
- REVAL and BIOMED Rehabilitation Research Center, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
- Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Josef Niebauer
- University Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Stamatis Adamopoulos
- Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation Unit, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Cristiano Amarelli
- Department of Cardiac Surgery and Transplants, Monaldi Hospital, Azienda dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Ambrosetti
- Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, ASST Crema, Santa Marta Hospital, Rivolta D’Adda, Italy
| | - Stefan D. Anker
- Department of Cardiology (CVK), Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner Site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Tuvia Ben Gal
- Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva and Sackler, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - T. Scott Bowen
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Francesco Cacciatore
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Elena Cavarretta
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy
| | - Ovidiu Chioncel
- Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases “Prof. C. C. Iliescu”, Bucharest, Romania
- University of Medicine Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Alain Cohen-Solal
- Cardiology Department, University of Paris, INSERM UMRS-942, Hopital Lariboisiere, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Flavio D’Ascenzi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | | - Andreas B. Gevaert
- Research Group Cardiovascular Diseases, Genetics, Pharmacology and Physiopathology of Heart, Blood Vessels and Skeleton (GENCOR) Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Finn Gustafsson
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hareld Kemps
- Department of Cardiology, Maxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, Netherlands
- Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Loreena Hill
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Tiny Jaarsma
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ewa Jankowska
- Department of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Emer Joyce
- Department of Cardiology, Mater University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nicolle Krankel
- Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Klinik für Kardiologie Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Lars H. Lund
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Heart and Vascular Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brenda Moura
- Armed Forces Hospital, Porto, Portugal
- Centre for Health Technologies and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Kari Nytrøen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elena Osto
- Division of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Otto Loewi Research Center for Vascular Biology, Immunology and Inflammation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Massimo Piepoli
- Dipartimento Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Universita’ Degli Studi di Milan, Milan, Italy
- Cardiologia Universitaria, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Amina Rakisheva
- Department of Cardiology, Scientific Institution of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- Department of Cardiology, Kapshagai City Hospital, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Giuseppe Rosano
- St. George’s Hospital NHS Trust University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gianluigi Savarese
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Petar M. Seferovic
- Faculty of Medicine and Heart Failure Center, University of Belgrade, Belgrade University Medical Center, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - David R. Thompson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Thum
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Therapeutic Strategies (IMTTS), Hannover Medical School and Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Research, Hannover, Germany
| | - Emeline M. Van Craenenbroeck
- Research Group Cardiovascular Diseases, Genetics, Pharmacology and Physiopathology of Heart, Blood Vessels and Skeleton (GENCOR) Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adelman MW, Connor AA, Hsu E, Saharia A, Mobley CM, Victor DW, Hobeika MJ, Lin J, Grimes KA, Ramos E, Pedroza C, Brombosz EW, Ghobrial RM, Arias CA. Bloodstream infections after solid organ transplantation: clinical epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance (2016-21). JAC Antimicrob Resist 2024; 6:dlad158. [PMID: 38213312 PMCID: PMC10783261 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with MDR organisms (MDROs). Objectives To describe the epidemiology of BSI in the year after several types of SOT, as well as the prevalence of MDRO infections in this population. Methods We conducted a single-centre, retrospective study of kidney, liver, heart, and multi-organ transplantation patients. We examined BSIs ≤1 year from SOT and classified MDRO phenotypes for Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci, Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida spp. We compared BSI characteristics between SOT types and determined risk factors for 90 day mortality. Results We included 2293 patients [1251 (54.6%) kidney, 663 (28.9%) liver, 219 (9.6%) heart and 160 (7.0%) multi-organ transplant]. Overall, 8.5% of patients developed a BSI. BSIs were most common after multi-organ (23.1%) and liver (11.3%) transplantation (P < 0.001). Among 196 patients with BSI, 323 unique isolates were recovered, 147 (45.5%) of which were MDROs. MDROs were most common after liver transplant (53.4%). The most frequent MDROs were VRE (69.8% of enterococci) and ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (29.2% and 27.2% of Enterobacterales, respectively). Mortality after BSI was 9.7%; VRE was independently associated with mortality (adjusted OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.7-21.3). Conclusions BSI incidence after SOT was 8.5%, with a high proportion of MDROs (45.5%), especially after liver transplantation. These data, in conjunction with local antimicrobial resistance patterns and prescribing practices, may help guide empirical antimicrobial selection and stewardship practices after SOT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max W Adelman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Center for Infectious Diseases, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork, NY, USA
| | - Ashton A Connor
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- J.C. Walter, Jr. Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Enshuo Hsu
- Center for Health Data Science and Analytics, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ashish Saharia
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- J.C. Walter, Jr. Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Constance M Mobley
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- J.C. Walter, Jr. Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David W Victor
- J.C. Walter, Jr. Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark J Hobeika
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- J.C. Walter, Jr. Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jiejian Lin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork, NY, USA
| | - Kevin A Grimes
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Center for Infectious Diseases, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Ramos
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Claudia Pedroza
- Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - R Mark Ghobrial
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- J.C. Walter, Jr. Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cesar A Arias
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Center for Infectious Diseases, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Husain SA, Yu ME, King KL, Adler JT, Schold JD, Mohan S. Disparities in Kidney Transplant Waitlisting Among Young Patients Without Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183:1238-1246. [PMID: 37782509 PMCID: PMC10546295 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance Disparities in kidney transplant referral and waitlisting contribute to disparities in kidney disease outcomes. Whether these differences are rooted in population differences in comorbidity burden is unclear. Objective To examine whether disparities in kidney transplant waitlisting were present among a young, relatively healthy cohort of patients unlikely to have medical contraindications to kidney transplant. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used the US Renal Data System Registry to identify patients with end-stage kidney disease who initiated dialysis between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2019. Patients who were older than 40 years, received a preemptive transplant, were preemptively waitlisted, or had documented medical comorbidities other than hypertension or smoking were excluded, yielding an analytic cohort of 52 902 patients. Data were analyzed between March 1, 2022, and February 1, 2023. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) Kidney transplant waitlisting after dialysis initiation. Results Of 52 902 patients (mean [SD] age, 31 [5] years; 31 132 [59%] male; 3547 [7%] Asian/Pacific Islander, 20 782 [39%] Black/African American, and 28 006 [53%] White) included in the analysis, 15 840 (30%) were waitlisted for a kidney transplant within 1 year of dialysis initiation, 11 122 (21%) were waitlisted between 1 and 5 years after dialysis initiation, and 25 940 (49%) were not waitlisted by 5 years. Patients waitlisted within 1 year of dialysis initiation were more likely to be male, to be White, to be employed full time, and to have had predialysis nephrology care. There were large state-level differences in the proportion of patients waitlisted within 1 year (median, 33%; range, 15%-58%). In competing risk regression, female sex (adjusted subhazard ratio [SHR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94), Hispanic ethnicity (SHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.75-0.80), and Black race (SHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.64-0.68) were all associated with lower waitlisting after dialysis initiation. Unemployment (SHR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.45-0.48) and part-time employment (SHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.77) were associated with lower waitlisting compared with full-time employment, and more than 1 year of predialysis nephrology care, compared with none, was associated with greater waitlisting (SHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.46-1.56). Conclusions and Relevance This retrospective cohort study found that fewer than one-third of patients without major medical comorbidities were waitlisted for a kidney transplant within 1 year of dialysis initiation, with sociodemographic disparities in waitlisting even in this cohort of young, relatively healthy patients unlikely to have a medical contraindication to transplantation. Transplant policy changes are needed to increase transparency and address structural barriers to waitlist access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Miko E. Yu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Kristen L. King
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin
| | - Jesse D. Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Edwards B, Marshall LJ, Ahmadzadeh G, Ahmed R, Angarso L, Balaji S, Okoh P, Rogers E, Neves P, Boakye P, Gill J, James CE, Mucsi I. Exploring barriers to living donor kidney transplant for African, Caribbean and Black communities in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario: a qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073176. [PMID: 37586868 PMCID: PMC10432620 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Living donor (LD) kidney transplant (KT) is the best treatment option for many patients with kidney failure as it improves quality of life and survival compared with dialysis and deceased donor KT. Unfortunately, LDKT is underused, especially among groups marginalised by race and ethnicity. African, Caribbean and Black (ACB) patients are 60%-70% less likely to receive LDKT in Canada compared with white patients. Research from the USA and the UK suggests that mistrust, cultural and generational norms, access, and affordability may contribute to inequities. To date, no Canadian studies have explored the beliefs and behaviours related to LDKT in ACB communities. Research approaches that use a critical, community-based approach can help illuminate broader structural factors that may shape individual beliefs and behaviours. In this qualitative study, we will investigate barriers to accessing LDKT in ACB communities in the Greater Toronto Area, to enhance our understanding of the perspectives and experiences of ACB community members, both with and without lived experience of chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS Hospital-based and community-based recruitment strategies will be used to recruit participants for focus groups and individual interviews. Participants will include self-identified ACB individuals with and without experiences of CKD and nephrology professionals. Collaboration with ACB community partners will facilitate a community-based research approach. Data will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and critical race theory. Findings will be revised based on feedback from ACB community partners. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by the University Health Network Research Ethics Board UHN REB file #15-9775. Study findings will contribute to the codevelopment of culturally safe and responsive educational materials to raise awareness about CKD and its treatments and to improve equitable access to high-quality kidney care, including LDKT, for ACB patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Edwards
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Ghazaleh Ahmadzadeh
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ranie Ahmed
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lydia Angarso
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shilpa Balaji
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Princess Okoh
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emma Rogers
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paula Neves
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jagbir Gill
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Istvan Mucsi
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Medicine (Nephrology), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cramer CL, Marsh K, Krebs ED, Mehaffey JH, Beller JP, Chancellor WZ, Teman NR, Yarboro LT. Long term employment following heart transplantation in the United States. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:880-887. [PMID: 36669942 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Employment is an important metric of post-transplant functional status and the quality of life yet remains poorly described after heart transplant. We sought to characterize the prevalence of employment following heart transplantation and identify patients at risk for post-transplant unemployment. METHODS Adults undergoing single-organ heart transplantation (2007-2016) were evaluated using the UNOS database. Univariable analysis was performed after stratifying by employment status at 1-year post-transplant. Fine-Gray competing risk regression was used for risk adjustment. Cox regression evaluated employment status at 1 year with mortality. RESULTS Of 10,132 heart transplant recipients who survived to 1 year and had follow-up, 22.0% were employed 1-year post-transplant. Employment rate of survivors increased to 32.9% by year 2. Employed individuals were more likely white (70.8% vs 60.4%, p < 0.01), male (79.6% vs 70.7% p < 0.01), held a job at listing/transplant (37.6% vs 7.6%, p < 0.01), and had private insurance (79.1% vs 49.5%, p < 0.01). Several characteristics were independently associated with employment including age, employment status at time of listing or transplant, race and ethnicity, gender, insurance status, education, and postoperative complications. Of 1,657 (14.0%) patients employed pretransplant, 58% were working at 1-year. Employment at 1year was independently associated with mortality with employed individuals having a 26% decreased risk of mortality. CONCLUSION Over 20% of heart transplant patients were employed at 1 year and over 30% at 2 years, while 58% of those working pretransplant had returned to work by 1-year. While the major predictor of post-transplant employment is preoperative employment status, our study highlights the impact of social determinants of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katherine Marsh
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | | | - Jared P Beller
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | | | - Leora T Yarboro
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bul KCM, Bannon C, Krishnan N, Dunlop A, Szczepura A. Can eHealth applications improve renal transplant outcomes for adolescents and young adults? A systematic review. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2023; 37:100760. [PMID: 37172527 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2023.100760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Adherence to medical treatment following a kidney transplant is particularly challenging during adolescence and young adulthood. There is increasing evidence of the benefits of the use of computer and mobile technology (labelled as eHealth hereafter) including serious gaming and gamification in many clinical areas. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of such interventions designed to improve self-management skills, treatment adherence and clinical outcomes in young kidney transplant recipients aged 16 to 30 years. METHOD The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, SCOPUS and CINAHL databases were searched for studies published between 01 January 1990 and 20 October 2020. Articles were short-listed by two independent reviewers based on pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Reference lists were screened and authors of published conference abstracts contacted. Two reviewers independently appraised selected articles, systematically extracted data and assessed the quality of individual studies (CASP and SORT). Thematic analysis was used for evidence synthesis; quantitative meta-analysis was not possible. RESULTS A total of 1098 unique records were identified. Short-listing identified four eligible studies, all randomized controlled trials (n = 266 participants). Trials mainly focused on mHealth applications or electronic pill dispensers (mostly for patients >18 years old). Most studies reported on clinical outcome measures. All showed improved adherence but there were no differences in the number of rejections. Study quality was low for all four studies. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review suggest that eHealth interventions can improve treatment adherence and clinical outcomes for young kidney transplant patients. More robust and high-quality studies are now needed to validate these findings. Future studies should also extend beyond short-term outcomes, and consider cost of implementation. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017062469).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim C M Bul
- Coventry University, Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, West Midlands, Coventry, United Kingdom.
| | - Christopher Bannon
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nithya Krishnan
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Renal, West Midlands, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Amber Dunlop
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Library & Knowledge Services, West Midlands, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Ala Szczepura
- Coventry University, Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Centre for Healthcare and Communities, West Midlands, Coventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Psychosocial Characteristics of Patients Evaluated for Kidney, Liver, or Heart Transplantation. Psychosom Med 2023; 85:98-105. [PMID: 36201770 DOI: 10.1097/psy.0000000000001142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychosocial parameters play a pivotal role in organ recipient evaluation before wait-listing for transplantation because of their impact on organ and patient outcome. Patients in need of heart (HTx), liver (LTx), or kidney transplantation (KTx) face distinct physical and psychological challenges. This study compares the psychosocial characteristics and preferences for additional therapy for patients undergoing assessment for these three types of organ transplantation to optimize patient-tailored psychological, social, and other supportive interventions. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study with 1110 potential transplantation candidates (LTx, n = 544; KTx, n = 330; HTx, n = 236), psychosocial status was determined for depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale), anxiety symptoms (seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener), health-related quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey), perceived social support (Perceived Social Support Questionnaire), sense of coherence (SoC; short form of the Sense of Coherence Scale), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Short Scale), and body image (German Body Image Questionnaire-20). Preferences for additional supportive therapy were assessed dichotomously. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance and χ2 tests. RESULTS Patient groups differed significantly regarding depression ( F (2,1107) = 35.283, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.01), anxiety ( F (2,1107) = 15.027, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.03), health-related quality of life (physical: F (2,1107) = 96.772, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.15; mental: F (2,1107) = 11.442, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.02), perceived social support ( F (2,1107) = 20.813, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.04), SoC ( F (2,1107) = 12.920, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.02), self-efficacy ( F (2,1107) = 17.308, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.03), and body image (rejecting body evaluation: F (2,1107) = 5.006, p = .007, partial η2 = 0.01; vital body dynamics: F (2,1107) = 40.216, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.07). Patients evaluated for HTx showed the highest psychosocial impairment and the highest inclination regarding additional supportive therapy. CONCLUSIONS Patients evaluated for HTx, LTx, and KTx have distinct psychosocial characteristics and treatment preferences. HTx patients display the highest psychosocial impairment. We suggest psychocardiological treatment structures for optimal outcome.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kao J, Reid N, Hubbard RE, Homes R, Hanjani LS, Pearson E, Logan B, King S, Fox S, Gordon EH. Frailty and solid-organ transplant candidates: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:864. [PMCID: PMC9667636 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03485-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is currently no consensus as to a standardized tool for frailty measurement in any patient population. In the solid-organ transplantation population, routinely identifying and quantifying frailty in potential transplant candidates would support patients and the multidisciplinary team to make well-informed, individualized, management decisions. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesise the literature regarding frailty measurement in solid-organ transplant (SOT) candidates.
Methods
A search of four databases (Cochrane, Pubmed, EMBASE and CINAHL) yielded 3124 studies. 101 studies (including heart, kidney, liver, and lung transplant candidate populations) met the inclusion criteria.
Results
We found that studies used a wide range of frailty tools (N = 22), including four ‘established’ frailty tools. The most commonly used tools were the Fried Frailty Phenotype and the Liver Frailty Index. Frailty prevalence estimates for this middle-aged, predominantly male, population varied between 2.7% and 100%. In the SOT candidate population, frailty was found to be associated with a range of adverse outcomes, with most evidence for increased mortality (including post-transplant and wait-list mortality), post-operative complications and prolonged hospitalisation. There is currently insufficient data to compare the predictive validity of frailty tools in the SOT population.
Conclusion
Overall, there is great variability in the approach to frailty measurement in this population. Preferably, a validated frailty measurement tool would be incorporated into SOT eligibility assessments internationally with a view to facilitating comparisons between patient sub-groups and national and international transplant services with the ultimate goal of improved patient care.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gleason J, Ho E, Pines R, Gregorowicz P, Wood EH, Waterman AD. A Transplant Recipients International Organization Initiative to Improve Education About Posttransplant Cancer Risk, Prevention, and Treatment. Prog Transplant 2022; 32:15269248221087432. [PMID: 35345935 DOI: 10.1177/15269248221087432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James Gleason
- Transplant Recipients International, Lithia, FL, USA
| | - Erica Ho
- Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Emily H Wood
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, 8783University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amy D Waterman
- Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 23534Houston Methodist Hospital and J.C. Walter Transplant Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Varshney M, Choudhury A, Sahoo B, Pamecha V, Sinha P, Patil N, Mohapatra N, Sharma V, Kumar R. Impact of covid-19 pandemic on quality of life and psychosocial difficulties among liver transplant recipients. J Family Med Prim Care 2022; 11:744-750. [PMID: 35360795 PMCID: PMC8963630 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1798_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected health in all domains i.e., physical, mental, and social aspects. Liver transplant (LT) recipients faced a multitude of challenges during the first wave of lockdown. The aim was to identify the psychosocial difficulties and quality of life during the first year of the pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on LT recipients with a predefined structured questionnaire that included clinical, COVID-19 anxiety scale, and Post-Transplant Quality of life questionnaire (pLTQ). Results: A total of 109 patients were studied; with a mean age of 50.5 ± 11.1 years, with a median post-transplant follow-up of 52.4 months and a live donor transplant in the majority (79.8%). Almost all (99.1%) could come to the hospital for regular follow-up, prior to the pandemic. But during the first wave only 57% could maintain planned hospital visits and about 88% could not pursue their regular activities, and 39% missed their routine exercise because of imposed restrictions. Similarly, financial implications were responsible for 4% defaulting from treatment; while 7.3% managed by curtailing supportive drugs (on their own) leading to deranged liver tests in 4.6%; requiring immediate attention. The psychosocial difficulties raised the stress of pandemic (median score 18), and impacted quality of life (mean total pLTQ score 4.7 ± 0.9) Conclusions: For LT recipients, the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic affected their physical, mental, financial, and social wellbeing; in addition to the disease itself. Awareness, psychosocial support, and comprehensive care are some unmet needs for this special group; especially when it is expected that subsequent waves may continue to occur.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lachman JR, Green CL, Adams SB, Nunley JA, DeOrio JK, Easley ME. Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life After Total Ankle Arthroplasty Compares Well With Other Successful Orthopaedic and Nonorthopaedic Procedures. Foot Ankle Spec 2021; 14:427-437. [PMID: 32396466 DOI: 10.1177/1938640020917782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background. Ankle arthritis is a major cause of disability. Orthopaedic literature suggests improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). This has not been compared with improvements observed in successful orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic procedures, including anterior cervical discectomy/fusion (ACDF), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). We hypothesize that the effects after TAA are comparable to several successful surgical procedures. Methods. 500 consecutive TAA patients were included and grouped with 2 other large series. Short Form-36 (SF36) were collected at standardized intervals. A systematic literature review identified studies comparing preoperative and postoperative SF36 physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. Using meta-analyses, we pooled the data for each procedure to compare with the TAA group. Results. Patients in all cohorts had preoperative SF36 MCS and PCS scores that were significantly lower than that in the general population. Improvements in HRQOL after TAA were not statistically different from improvements reported in PCS and MCS after ACDF, TKA, and OLT. However, improvement in PCS after TAA was better than that observed after CABG. Conclusions. Disability with ankle arthritis is severe. Disability associated with cervical disc disease, knee arthrosis, coronary artery disease, and liver failure is also severe, with surgical intervention providing major improvements in HRQOL postoperatively. The improvement in HRQOL after TAA did not differ statistically from ACDF, TKA, CABG, and OLT. Our investigation suggests that the HRQOL benefits of TAA meet benchmarks set by some of modern medicine's best.Levels of Evidence: Level III: Systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Lachman
- St Luke's University Health Network, Quakertown, Pennsylvania (JRL).,Duke University Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, North Carolina (CLG).,Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (SBA, JAN, JKD, MEE)
| | - Cynthia L Green
- St Luke's University Health Network, Quakertown, Pennsylvania (JRL).,Duke University Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, North Carolina (CLG).,Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (SBA, JAN, JKD, MEE)
| | - Samuel B Adams
- St Luke's University Health Network, Quakertown, Pennsylvania (JRL).,Duke University Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, North Carolina (CLG).,Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (SBA, JAN, JKD, MEE)
| | - James A Nunley
- St Luke's University Health Network, Quakertown, Pennsylvania (JRL).,Duke University Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, North Carolina (CLG).,Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (SBA, JAN, JKD, MEE)
| | - James K DeOrio
- St Luke's University Health Network, Quakertown, Pennsylvania (JRL).,Duke University Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, North Carolina (CLG).,Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (SBA, JAN, JKD, MEE)
| | - Mark E Easley
- St Luke's University Health Network, Quakertown, Pennsylvania (JRL).,Duke University Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, North Carolina (CLG).,Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (SBA, JAN, JKD, MEE)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gallego A, Sarmiento E, Sousa I, Zatarain E, Fernández-Yáñez J, Navarro J, Gil J, Carbone J. Immunologic Abnormalities Associated With Health Status of Heart Recipients Long Term After Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:2724-2727. [PMID: 34598808 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With improvements in survival rates, health-related quality of life is an important outcome parameter to evaluate the effectiveness of transplantation. We aimed to identify potential immunologic abnormalities as factors associated with poorer health-related quality of life at distinct scales of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey in heart transplant recipients long term after transplantation. METHODS One hundred heart transplant recipients were evaluated in a single center. Short-form 36 questionnaires were sent by mail to participants. All patients were clinically and immunologically evaluated after the first year of heart transplantation. RESULTS A high prevalence of several immunologic abnormalities persisted even after the first year of transplantation, including IgG hypogammaglobulinemia, low IgG-specific antipneumococcal antibodies, C4 hypocomplementemia, CD8 T-cell lymphocytopenia, and CD19 B-cell lymphocytopenia. Older recipients (>55 years), posttransplant diabetes, digestive complications, and posttransplant infections were associated with lower physical functioning scores (scale < 60). Older recipients (>55 years), pretransplant diabetes, pretransplant arterial hypertension, posttransplant digestive complications, and lower CD8 counts were associated with lower physical role scores (scale <25). CONCLUSION In a single center study, lower CD8 cell counts were found to be associated with poorer health status in heart recipients after the first year of transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Gallego
- Servicio de Inmunología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elizabeth Sarmiento
- Servicio de Inmunología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Iago Sousa
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduardo Zatarain
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Fernández-Yáñez
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquín Navarro
- Servicio de Inmunología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juana Gil
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Carbone
- Servicio de Inmunología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Inmunología, Oftalmología y ORL, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cordoza M, Koons B, Perlis ML, Anderson BJ, Diamond JM, Riegel B. Self-reported poor quality of sleep in solid organ transplant: A systematic review. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2021; 35:100650. [PMID: 34534733 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High quality sleep of sufficient duration is vital to overall health and wellbeing. Self-reported poor quality of sleep, sleep reported as irregular in timing, marked by frequent awakenings, or shortened in duration, is common across the solid-organ transplant trajectory. AIM This Systematic Review aimed to summarize available literature on rates of self-reported poor quality of sleep among solid organ transplant candidates and recipients. METHODS A systematic search of published literature was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINHAL, and PsychInfo databases with no date restrictions. Original articles in the English language describing self-reported quality of sleep using standardized questionnaires in adults either waitlisted for, or who received a solid organ transplant (heart, lung, kidney, liver, pancreas, or multi-solid organ) were included. RESULTS Of a potential 2054 articles identified, 44 were included (63.6% renal transplant, 20.5% liver transplant, 11.4% lung transplant, and 4.5% included multiple organ transplant populations), with the majority (68.2%) focusing only on post-transplant populations. No included articles focused solely on heart or pancreas transplant populations. On average, the transplant population with the greatest improvement in quality of sleep (reported as poor sleep quality, insomnia, sleep disturbance, or sleep dissatisfaction) from transplant candidacy to post-transplantation were renal transplant (from 53.5% pre, to 38.9% post) followed by liver transplant patients (from 52.8% pre, to 46.3% post), while lung transplant patients remained similar pre- to post-transplantation (55.6% pre, to 52% post). Poor quality of sleep was frequently associated with anxiety and depression, poorer quality of life, restless legs syndrome, and higher comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS Reports of poor quality of sleep are highly prevalent across all solid-organ transplant populations, both pre- and post-transplantation. Future studies should assess quality of sleep longitudinally throughout all phases of the transplantation trajectory, with more research focusing on how to optimize sleep in solid organ transplant populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makayla Cordoza
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Claire M. Fagin Hall, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Brittany Koons
- M. Lousie Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, 800 E. Lancaster Ave, Villanova, PA 19085 and Clinical Nurse, Heart and Vascular ICU, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Michael L Perlis
- Behavioral Sleep Medicine Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Brian J Anderson
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 5036 Gates Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Joshua M Diamond
- Lung Transplantation, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 9039 West Gates, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Barbara Riegel
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Claire M. Fagin Hall, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Oedingen C, Bartling T, Schrem H, Mühlbacher AC, Krauth C. Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: A discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med 2021; 287:114360. [PMID: 34507218 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to assess public preferences for the allocation of donor organs in Germany with the focus on ethical principles of distributive justice. We performed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) using a self-completed online questionnaire. Based on a systematic review and focus group discussions, six attributes, each with two-four levels, were selected (corresponding principle of distributive justice in brackets), including (1) life years gained after transplantation (principle of distributive justice: effectiveness/benefit - utilitarianism), (2) quality of life after transplantation (effectiveness/benefit - utilitarianism), (3) chance for a further donor organ offer (principle of distributive justice: medical urgency - favouring the worst-off), (4) age (medical and social risk factors: sociodemographic status), (5) registered donor (principle of distributive justice: value for society), and (6) individual role in causing organ failure (principle of distributive justice: own fault). Each respondent was presented with eight choice sets and asked to choose between two hypothetical patients without an opt-out. Data were analysed using conditional logit, mixed logit and latent class models. The final sample comprised 1028 respondents. Choice decisions were significantly influenced by all attributes except chance for a further donor organ offer. The attributes of good quality of life after transplantation, younger age, and no individual role in causing organ failure had the greatest impact on choice decisions. Life years gained after transplantation and being a registered donor were less important for the public. The latent class model identified four classes with preference heterogeneities. Respondents preferred to allocate deceased donor organs by criteria related to effectiveness/benefit, whereas medical urgency was of minor importance. Therefore, a public propensity for a rational, utilitarian, ethical model of allocation could be identified. Public preferences can help to inform policy to warrant socially responsible allocation systems and thus improve organ donation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Oedingen
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany; Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Otto-Brenner-Str. 7, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Tim Bartling
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany; Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Otto-Brenner-Str. 7, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Harald Schrem
- Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Otto-Brenner-Str. 7, 30159, Hannover, Germany; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Austria; Transplant Center Graz, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Austria.
| | - Axel C Mühlbacher
- Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Brodaer Str. 2, 17033, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Duke Department of Population Health Sciences and Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany; Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Otto-Brenner-Str. 7, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jorgenson MR, Descourouez JL, Brady BL, Chandran MM, Do V, Kim M, Laub MR, Lichvar A, Park JM, Szczepanik A, Alloway RR. A call for transplant stewardship: The need for expanded evidence-based evaluation of induction and biologic-based cost-saving strategies in kidney transplantation and beyond. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14372. [PMID: 34033140 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Rising expenditures threaten healthcare sustainability. While transplant programs are typically considered profitable, transplant medications are expensive and frequently targeted for cost savings. This review aims to summarize available literature supporting cost-containment strategies used in solid organ transplant. Despite widespread use of these tactics, we found the available evidence to be fairly low quality. Strategies mainly focus on induction, particularly rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG), given its significant cost and the lack of consensus surrounding dosing. While there is higher-quality evidence for high single-dose rATG, and dose-rounding protocols to reduce waste are likely low risk, more aggressive strategies, such as dosing rATG by CD3+ target-attainment or on ideal-body-weight, have less robust support and did not always attain similar efficacy outcomes. Extrapolation of induction dosing strategies to rejection treatment is not supported by any currently available literature. Cost-saving strategies for supportive therapies, such as IVIG and rituximab also have minimal literature support. Deferral of high-cost agents to the outpatient arena is associated with minimal risk and increases reimbursement, although may increase complexity and cost-burden for patients and infusion centers. The available evidence highlights the need for evaluation of unique patient-specific clinical scenarios and optimization of therapies, rather than simple blanket application of cost-saving initiatives in the transplant population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret R Jorgenson
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jillian L Descourouez
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Bethany L Brady
- Department of Pharmacy, Indiana University Health University Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Mary M Chandran
- Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Vincent Do
- Department of Pharmacy, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Miae Kim
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa R Laub
- Department of Pharmacy, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Alicia Lichvar
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeong M Park
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amanda Szczepanik
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rita R Alloway
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brautaset Englund KV, Østby CM, Tjønnås G, Gude E, Andreassen AK, Gullestad L, Broch K. Prevalence of iron deficiency in heart transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14346. [PMID: 33969559 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal iron management is crucial to marginal patients such as heart transplant recipients. As inflammatory mechanisms are present in transplant recipients, the definition of iron deficiency used in the general population might not be appropriate. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prevalence and determinants of iron deficiency in Norwegian heart transplant recipients. METHODS We consecutively assessed iron parameters in all Norwegian heart transplant recipients at their annual follow-up. Several definitions of iron deficiency suggested in the literature were assessed: ferritin <100 µg/L, or ferritin 100-300 µg/L combined with transferrin saturation of <20% (IDHF ); ferritin <100 µg/L (IDF100 ); transferrin saturation of <20% (IDTsat ), and ferritin <30 µg/L (IDF30 ). RESULTS 179 of 378 heart transplant recipients (47%) had iron deficiency defined as IDHF . 152 patients (40%) had IDF100 , and 103 patients (27%) had IDTsat . 17 patients (5%) had IDF30 . 88 patients (23%) had a C-reactive protein (CRP) >5.0 µg/L. CONCLUSION Iron deficiency defined as IDHF , IDF100, or IDTsat is prevalent in the heart transplant population, while IDF30 is not. Further research is required to identify the mechanisms of iron homeostasis in heart transplant recipients and to establish a definition of iron deficiency suitable for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine V Brautaset Englund
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Cardiac Research Center and Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Gry Tjønnås
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Einar Gude
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Cardiac Research Center and Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arne K Andreassen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Cardiac Research Center and Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars Gullestad
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Cardiac Research Center and Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kaspar Broch
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Cardiac Research Center and Center for Heart Failure Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
El-Dassouki N, Wong D, Toews DM, Gill J, Edwards B, Orchanian-Cheff A, Smith M, Neves P, Marshall LJ, Mucsi I. Barriers to Accessing Kidney Transplantation Among Populations Marginalized by Race and Ethnicity in Canada: A Scoping Review Part 1-Indigenous Communities in Canada. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2021; 8:2054358121996835. [PMID: 33738107 PMCID: PMC7934025 DOI: 10.1177/2054358121996835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation (KT), a treatment option for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), is associated with longer survival and improved quality of life compared with dialysis. Inequities in access to KT, and specifically, living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), have been documented in Canada along various demographic dimensions. In this article, we review existing evidence about inequitable access and barriers to KT and LDKT for patients from Indigenous communities in Canada. OBJECTIVE To characterize the current state of literature on access to KT and LDKT among Indigenous communities in Canada and to answer the research question, "what factors may influence inequitable access to KT among Indigenous communities in Canada." ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Databases and gray literature were searched in June and November 2020 for full-text original research articles or gray literature resources addressing KT access or barriers in Indigenous communities in Canada. A total of 26 articles were analyzed thematically. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE Gray literature and CINAHL, OVID Medline, OVID Embase, and Cochrane databases. CHARTING METHODS Literature characteristics were recorded and findings which described rates of and factors that influence access to KT were summarized in a narrative account. Key themes were subsequently identified and synthesized thematically in the review. RESULTS Indigenous communities in Canada experience various barriers in accessing culturally safe medical information and care, resulting in inequitable access to KT. Barriers include insufficient incorporation of Indigenous ways of knowing and being in information dissemination and care for ESKD and KT, spiritual concerns, health beliefs, logistical hurdles to accessing care, and systemic mistrust resulting from colonialism and systemic racism. LIMITATIONS This review included studies that used various methodologies and did not assess study quality. Data on Indigenous status were not reported or defined in a standardized manner. Indigenous communities are not homogeneous and views on organ donation and KT vary by individual. CONCLUSIONS Our scoping review has identified potential barriers that Indigenous communities may face in accessing KT and LDKT. Further research is urgently needed to better understand barriers and support needs and to develop strategies to improve equitable access to KT and LDKT for Indigenous populations in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor El-Dassouki
- Division of Nephrology, Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dorothy Wong
- Division of Nephrology, Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Deanna M. Toews
- Division of Nephrology, Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- Division of Nephrology and Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Beth Edwards
- Division of Nephrology, Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ani Orchanian-Cheff
- Library and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mary Smith
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Paula Neves
- Centre for Living Organ Donation, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lydia-Joi Marshall
- Division of Nephrology, Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Istvan Mucsi
- Division of Nephrology, Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
El-Dassouki N, Wong D, Toews DM, Gill J, Edwards B, Orchanian-Cheff A, Neves P, Marshall LJ, Mucsi I. Barriers to Accessing Kidney Transplantation Among Populations Marginalized by Race and Ethnicity in Canada: A Scoping Review Part 2-East Asian, South Asian, and African, Caribbean, and Black Canadians. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2021; 8:2054358121996834. [PMID: 33738106 PMCID: PMC7934034 DOI: 10.1177/2054358121996834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation (KT), a treatment option for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), is associated with longer survival and improved quality of life compared with dialysis. Inequities in access to KT, and specifically, living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), have been documented in Canada, along various demographic dimensions. In this article, we review existing evidence about inequitable access to KT and LDKT for patients from communities marginalized by race and ethnicity in Canada. OBJECTIVE To characterize the currently published data on rates of KT and LDKT among East Asian, South Asian, and African, Caribbean, and Black (ACB) Canadian communities and to answer the research question, "what factors may influence inequitable access to KT among East Asian, South Asian, and ACB Canadian communities?." ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Databases and gray literature were searched in June and November 2020 for full-text original research articles or gray literature resources addressing KT access or barriers in East Asian, South Asian, and ACB Canadian communities. A total of 25 articles were analyzed thematically. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE Gray literature and CINAHL, OVID Medline, OVID Embase, and Cochrane databases. CHARTING METHODS Literature characteristics were recorded and findings which described rates of and factors that influence access to KT were summarized in a narrative account. Key themes were subsequently identified and synthesized thematically in the review. RESULTS East Asian, South Asian, and ACB communities in Canada face barriers in accessing culturally appropriate medical knowledge and care and experience inequitable access to KT. Potential barriers include gaps in knowledge about ESKD and KT, religious and spiritual concerns, stigma of ESKD and KT, health beliefs, social determinants of health, and experiences of systemic racism in health care. LIMITATIONS This review included literature that used various methodologies and did not assess study quality. Data on ethnicity and race were not reported or defined in a standardized manner. The communities examined in this review are not homogeneous and views on organ donation and KT vary by individual. CONCLUSIONS Our review has identified potential barriers for communities marginalized by race and ethnicity in accessing KT and LDKT. Further research is urgently needed to better understand the barriers and support needs of these communities, and to develop strategies to improve equitable access to LDKT for the growingly diverse population in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor El-Dassouki
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dorothy Wong
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Deanna M. Toews
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Beth Edwards
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ani Orchanian-Cheff
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paula Neves
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lydia-Joi Marshall
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Istvan Mucsi
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Johnstone BH, Messner F, Brandacher G, Woods EJ. A Large-Scale Bank of Organ Donor Bone Marrow and Matched Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Promoting Immunomodulation and Transplant Tolerance. Front Immunol 2021; 12:622604. [PMID: 33732244 PMCID: PMC7959805 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.622604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Induction of immune tolerance for solid organ and vascular composite allografts is the Holy Grail for transplantation medicine. This would obviate the need for life-long immunosuppression which is associated with serious adverse outcomes, such as infections, cancers, and renal failure. Currently the most promising means of tolerance induction is through establishing a mixed chimeric state by transplantation of donor hematopoietic stem cells; however, with the exception of living donor renal transplantation, the mixed chimerism approach has not achieved durable immune tolerance on a large scale in preclinical or clinical trials with other solid organs or vascular composite allotransplants (VCA). Ossium Health has established a bank of cryopreserved bone marrow (BM), termed "hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC), Marrow," recovered from deceased organ donor vertebral bodies. This new source for hematopoietic cell transplant will be a valuable resource for treating hematological malignancies as well as for inducing transplant tolerance. In addition, we have discovered and developed a large source of mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells (MSC) tightly associated with the vertebral body bone fragment byproduct of the HPC, Marrow recovery process. Thus, these vertebral bone adherent MSC (vBA-MSC) are matched to the banked BM obtained from each donor, as opposed to third-party MSC, which enhances safety and potentially efficacy. Isolation and characterization of vBA-MSC from over 30 donors has demonstrated that the cells are no different than traditional BM-MSC; however, their abundance is >1,000-fold higher than obtainable from living donor BM aspirates. Based on our own unpublished data as well as reports published by others, MSC facilitate chimerism, especially at limiting hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) numbers and increase safety by controlling and/or preventing graft-vs.-host-disease (GvHD). Thus, vBA-MSC have the potential to facilitate mixed chimerism, promote complementary peripheral immunomodulatory functions and increase safety of BM infusions. Both HPC, Marrow and vBA-MSC have potential use in current VCA and solid organ transplant (SOT) tolerance clinical protocols that are amenable to "delayed tolerance." Current trials with HPC, Marrow are planned with subsequent phases to include vBA-MSC for tolerance of both VCA and SOT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian H. Johnstone
- Ossium Health, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Marian University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Franka Messner
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gerald Brandacher
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Erik J. Woods
- Ossium Health, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Marian University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Clinical Application of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Organoids as an Alternative to Organ Transplantation. Stem Cells Int 2021; 2021:6632160. [PMID: 33679987 PMCID: PMC7929656 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6632160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Transplantation is essential and crucial for individuals suffering from end-stage organ failure diseases. However, there are still many challenges regarding these procedures, such as high rates of organ rejection, shortage of organ donors, and long waiting lines. Thus, investments and efforts to develop laboratory-grown organs have increased over the past years, and with the recent progress in regenerative medicine, growing organs in vitro might be a reality within the next decades. One of the many different strategies to address this issue relies on organoid technology, a miniaturized and simplified version of an organ. Here, we address recent progress on organoid research, focusing on transplantation of intestine, retina, kidney, liver, pancreas, brain, lung, and heart organoids. Also, we discuss the main outcomes after organoid transplantation, common challenges faced by these promising regenerative medicine approaches, and future perspectives on the field.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kwak EJ, Kim DJ, Choi Y, Joo DJ, Park W. Importance of oral health and dental treatment in organ transplant recipients. Int Dent J 2020; 70:477-481. [DOI: 10.1111/idj.12585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
24
|
Pesce de Souza F, Massierer D, Anand Raje U, Tansey CM, Boruff J, Janaudis-Ferreira T. Exercise interventions in solid organ transplant candidates: A systematic review. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13900. [PMID: 32391965 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Exercise training may be recommended to solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates to improve fitness and tolerance before surgery. We aimed to determine the acceptance, safety, and effectiveness of exercise interventions in SOT candidates. METHODS Online databases were searched. Studies of any design were included. Outcomes of interest were acceptance, safety, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS Twenty-three articles were included. Acceptance ranged from 16% to 100%. In the fifteen studies that assessed adverse events, none mentioned any adverse events occurring during the study. Five out of seven studies reported an increase in maximal exercise capacity post-exercise in the intervention group (range of mean change: 0.45 to 2.9 mL/kg). Eight out of fourteen studies reported an increase in 6-minute walking distance in the intervention group after the training period (range of mean change: 40-105 m). Two articles showed an improvement in the mental composite scores as well as in the physical composite scores post-exercise in the intervention group. CONCLUSION There was a lack of significant findings among most randomized controlled trials. Exercise training is acceptable and safe for selective SOT candidates. The effects of exercise training on exercise capacity and quality of life in SOT candidates are unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela Massierer
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre for Health Outcomes Research (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Uma Anand Raje
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Catherine M Tansey
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jill Boruff
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tania Janaudis-Ferreira
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre for Health Outcomes Research (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Research Institute, McGill University Health Center Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Åberg F. Quality of life after liver transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 46-47:101684. [PMID: 33158471 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) enables rapid transition from critical illness and poor prognosis back to health. After LT, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) generally becomes comparable to that of the general population, although some deficits in mainly physical domains are frequent. However, recipients continue to have symptoms related to immunosuppression, complications, and other things, which impact HRQoL and the recipient's ability to regain independence and re-establish function in everyday life. Less than half of LT recipients return to work. Reportedly, HRQoL seems to deteriorate slightly over the long-term, but still remains satisfactory. Physical fatigue is common, but recent studies show that structured exercise programs improve both fatigue and HRQoL. Emerging evidence also suggests that continued patient information, structured psychosocial support systems, and caregiver involvement might further help improve long-term HRQoL. More research is needed to gain better understanding of the factors affecting long-term HRQoL, and how to best improve HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Åberg
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland; The Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Girgenti R, Tropea A, Buttafarro MA, Ragusa R, Ammirata M. Quality of Life in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17113809. [PMID: 32471157 PMCID: PMC7313086 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17113809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to investigate the quality of life and the therapeutic compliance of the patients who received a liver transplant, from a living or deceased donor, at IRCCS ISMETT in the last three years. Liver transplantation is an effective therapeutic strategy for patients with end-stage liver failure. The quality of life (QOL) of liver disease patients is placed under considerable stress due to the debilitating clinical conditions and related issues experienced in everyday life by these individuals. The concept of QOL is being increasingly used to define the individual perception of health, including physical, mental, and social wellbeing. The success of a liver transplant should therefore be intended not only in terms of survival, but also of recovery of a satisfying quality of life. For this reason, our liver transplant recipients are closely monitored and supported from a psychological standpoint. This is done to monitor their ability to adapt to and comply with their clinical condition and to verify their gradual resumption of their path of life Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data collected by the IRCCS ISMETT Clinical Psychology Service during routine psychological follow-up of liver transplant recipients. Data refer to 82 patients who received a liver transplant between January 2017 and September 2019 and describe their QOL and therapeutic adherence. The obtained results were compared with the main studies on this issue available in literature. RESULTS Ninety-four percent of liver transplant recipients reported high mean scores of quality of life and therapeutic adherence 28% of patients reported at least one persistent annoying symptom after transplantation, although in some cases this did not affect the overall QOL. The results also refer to patients with a pre-transplant diagnosis of alcohol-related cirrhosis, who confirm their complete abstinence from alcohol. CONCLUSIONS Our results confirm the efficacy of the liver transplantation to achieve of a good QOL. Furthermore, these patients seem to maintain high therapeutic adherence, thus ensuring a good outcome of the care received during the transplantation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosario Girgenti
- Clinical Psychology Service, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy; (R.G.); (M.A.B.); (M.A.)
| | - Alessandro Tropea
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy;
- Correspondence:
| | - Maria Antonina Buttafarro
- Clinical Psychology Service, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy; (R.G.); (M.A.B.); (M.A.)
| | - Rosalia Ragusa
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy;
- Health Technology Assessment Committee, University Hospital “G. Rodolico”, 95100 Catania, Italy
| | - Martina Ammirata
- Clinical Psychology Service, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy; (R.G.); (M.A.B.); (M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Beyond Survival in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Summary of Expert Presentations from the Sandoz 6th Standalone Transplantation Meeting, 2018. Transplantation 2020; 103:S1-S13. [PMID: 31449167 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
28
|
Oedingen C, Bartling T, Dierks ML, Mühlbacher AC, Schrem H, Krauth C. Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: Focus group discussions. Health Expect 2020; 23:670-680. [PMID: 32189453 PMCID: PMC7321724 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deceased donor organs are scarce resources because of a large supply-and-demand mismatch. This scarcity leads to an ethical dilemma, forcing priority-setting of how these organs should be allocated and whom to leave behind. OBJECTIVE To explore public preferences for the allocation of donor organs in regard to ethical aspects of distributive justice. METHODS Focus groups were facilitated between November and December 2018 at Hannover Medical School. Participants were recruited locally. Transcripts were assessed with content analysis using the deductive framework method. All identified and discussed criteria were grouped according to the principles of distributive justice and reported following the COREQ statement. RESULTS Six focus groups with 31 participants were conducted. Overall, no group made a final decision of how to allocate donor organ; however, we observed that not only a single criterion/principle but rather a combination of criteria/principles is relevant. Therefore, the public wants to allocate organs to save as many lives as possible by both maximizing success for and also giving priority to urgent patients considering the best compatibility. Age, waiting time, reciprocity and healthy lifestyles should be used as additional criteria, while sex, financial status and family responsibility should not, based on aspects of equality. CONCLUSIONS All participants recognized the dilemma that prioritizing one patient might cause another one to die. They discussed mainly the unclear trade-offs between effectiveness/benefit and medical urgency and did not establish an agreement about their importance. The results suggest a need of preference studies to elucidate public preferences in organ allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Oedingen
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Hannover, Germany
| | - Tim Bartling
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Hannover, Germany
| | - Marie-Luise Dierks
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Axel C Mühlbacher
- Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany.,Duke Department of Population Health Sciences and Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Harald Schrem
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.,Transplant Center Graz, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Blumenthal JA, Smith PJ, Sherwood A, Mabe S, Snyder L, Frankel C, McKee DC, Hamilton N, Keefe FJ, Shearer S, Schwartz J, Palmer S. Remote Therapy to Improve Outcomes in Lung Transplant Recipients: Design of the INSPIRE-III Randomized Clinical Trial. Transplant Direct 2020; 6:e535. [PMID: 32195326 PMCID: PMC7056276 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impaired functional capacity and emotional distress are associated with lower quality of life (QoL) and worse clinical outcomes in post lung transplant patients. Strategies to increase physical activity and reduce distress are needed. METHODS The Investigational Study of Psychological Interventions in Recipients of Lung Transplant-III study is a single site, parallel group randomized clinical trial in which 150 lung transplant recipients will be randomly assigned to 3 months of telephone-delivered coping skills training combined with aerobic exercise (CSTEX) or to a Standard of Care plus Education control group. The primary endpoints are a global measure of distress and distance walked on the 6-Minute Walk Test. Secondary outcomes include measures of transplant-specific QoL, frailty, health behaviors, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival. RESULTS Participants will be evaluated at baseline, at the conclusion of 3 months of weekly treatment, at 1-year follow-up, and followed annually thereafter for clinical events for up to 4 years (median = 2 y). We also will determine whether functional capacity, distress, and health behaviors (eg, physical activity, medication adherence, and volume of air forcefully exhaled in 1 second (FEV1), mediate the effects of the CSTEX intervention on clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Should the CSTEX intervention result in better outcomes compared with the standard of care plus post-transplant education, the remotely delivered CSTEX intervention can be made available to all lung transplant recipients as a way of enhancing their QoL and improving clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A. Blumenthal
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Patrick J. Smith
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Andrew Sherwood
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Stephanie Mabe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Laurie Snyder
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Courtney Frankel
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Daphne C. McKee
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Natalie Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Francis J. Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Sheila Shearer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Jeanne Schwartz
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Scott Palmer
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dolgin NH, Movahedi B, Anderson FA, Brüggenwirth IMA, Martins PN, Bozorgzadeh A. Impact of recipient functional status on 1-year liver transplant outcomes. World J Transplant 2019; 9:145-157. [PMID: 31850158 PMCID: PMC6914386 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v9.i7.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale has been widely validated for clinical practice for over 60 years.
AIM To examine the extent to which poor pre-transplant functional status, assessed using the KPS scale, is associated with increased risk of mortality and/or graft failure at 1-year post-transplantation.
METHODS This study included 38278 United States adults who underwent first, non-urgent, liver-only transplantation from 2005 to 2014 (Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients). Functional impairment/disability was categorized as severe, moderate, or none/normal. Analyses were conducted using multivariable-adjusted Cox survival regression models.
RESULTS The median age was 56 years, 31% were women, median pre-transplant Model for End-Stage for Liver Disease score was 18. Functional impairment was present in 70%; one-quarter of the sample was severely disabled. After controlling for key recipient and donor factors, moderately and severely disabled patients had a 1-year mortality rate of 1.32 [confidence interval (CI): 1.21-1.44] and 1.73 (95%CI: 1.56-1.91) compared to patients with no impairment, respectively. Subjects with moderate and severe disability also had a multivariable-adjusted 1-year graft failure rate of 1.13 (CI: 1.02-1.24) and 1.16 (CI: 1.02-1.31), respectively.
CONCLUSION Pre-transplant functional status is a useful prognostic indicator for 1-year post-transplant patient and graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha H Dolgin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Organ Transplantation, UMass Memorial Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, United States
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Clinical and Population Health Research Program, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, United States
- Department of Surgery, Center for Outcomes Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, United States
| | - Babak Movahedi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Organ Transplantation, UMass Memorial Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, United States
| | - Frederick A Anderson
- Department of Surgery, Center for Outcomes Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, United States
| | - Isabel MA Brüggenwirth
- Department of Surgery, Section of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9713GZ, Netherlands
| | - Paulo N Martins
- Department of Surgery, Division of Organ Transplantation, UMass Memorial Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, United States
| | - Adel Bozorgzadeh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Organ Transplantation, UMass Memorial Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gautier SV, Zacharevich VM, Khalilulin TA, Shevchenko AО, Poptsov VN, Ahmadzai RL, Goltz AM, Zakiryanov AR, Koloskova NN, Zacharevich NY, Nikitina EА, Pozdnyakov OA, Kiryakov KS. Heart transplantation as a radical method of restoring the quality of life in recipients with end-stage heart failure. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.15825/1995-1191-2019-2-7-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. V. Gautier
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenovsky University)
| | - V. M. Zacharevich
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenovsky University)
| | - T. A. Khalilulin
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenovsky University)
| | - A. О. Shevchenko
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenovsky University)
| | - V. N. Poptsov
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
| | - R. L. Ahmadzai
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
| | - A. M. Goltz
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
| | - A. R. Zakiryanov
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
| | - N. N. Koloskova
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
| | - N. Y. Zacharevich
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
| | - E. А. Nikitina
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
| | - O. A. Pozdnyakov
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
| | - K. S. Kiryakov
- V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
A Cross-Sectional Study of Return to Work Rate Following Heart Transplantation and the Contributing Role of Illness Perceptions. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2019; 39:253-258. [DOI: 10.1097/hcr.0000000000000365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
33
|
Cannavò A, Passamonti SM, Vincenti D, Aurelio MT, Torelli R, Poli F, Piccolo G, Cardillo M. Quality of Life Before and After Transplantation in Solid Organ Recipients Referred to the North Italy Transplant program (NITp): A Cross-sectional Study. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:1692-1698. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
34
|
Systematic Review of Public Preferences for the Allocation of Donor Organs for Transplantation: Principles of Distributive Justice. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 12:475-489. [DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00363-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
35
|
Long-Term Physical HRQOL Decreases After Single Lung as Compared With Double Lung Transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 106:1633-1639. [PMID: 30120941 PMCID: PMC6240480 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Revised: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single lung transplantation (SLT) and double lung transplantation (DLT) are associated with differences in morbidity and mortality, although the effects of transplant type on patient-reported outcomes are not widely reported and conclusions have differed. Previous studies compared mean health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores but did not evaluate potentially different temporal trajectories in the context of longitudinal follow-up. To address this uncertainty, this study was designed to evaluate longitudinal HRQOL after SLT and DLT with the hypothesis that temporal trajectories differ between SLT and DLT. METHODS Patients transplanted at a single institution were eligible to be surveyed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and then annually after transplant using the Short Form 36 Health Survey, with longitudinal physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores as the primary outcomes. Multivariable mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the effects of transplant type and time posttransplant on longitudinal PCS and MCS after adjusting age, diagnosis, rejection, Lung Allocation Score quartile, and intubation duration. Time by transplant type interaction effects were used to test whether the temporal trajectories of HRQOL differ between SLT and DLT recipients. HRQOL scores were referenced to general population norms (range, 40 to 60; mean, 50 ± 10) using accepted standards for a minimally important difference (½ SD, 5 points). RESULTS Postoperative surveys (n = 345) were analyzed for 136 patients (52% male, 23% SLT, age 52 ± 13 years, LAS 42 ± 12, follow-up 37 ± 29 months [range, 0.6 to 133]) who underwent lung transplantation between 2005 and 2016. After adjusting for model covariates, overall posttransplant PCS scores have a significant downward trajectory (p = 0.015) whereas MCS scores remain stable (p = 0.593), with both averaging within general population norms. The time by transplant type interaction effect (p = 0.002), however, indicate that posttransplant PCS scores of SLT recipients decline at a rate of 2.4 points per year over the total observation period compared to DLT. At approximately 60 months, the PCS scores of SLT recipients, but not DLT recipients, fall below general population norms. CONCLUSIONS The trajectory of physical HRQOL in patients receiving SLT declines over time compared with DLT, indicating that, in the longer term, SLT recipients are more likely to have physical HRQOL scores that fall substantively below general population norms. Physical HRQOL after 5 years may be a consideration for lung allocation and patient counseling regarding expectations when recommending SLT or DLT.
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) reflects a patient's disease burden, treatment effectiveness, and health status and is summarized by physical, mental, and kidney disease-specific scales among end-stage renal disease patients. Although on average HRQOL improves postkidney transplant (KT), the degree of change depends on the ability of the patient to withstand the stressor of dialysis versus the ability to tolerate the intense physiologic changes of KT. Frail KT recipients may be extra vulnerable to either of these stressors, thus affecting change in HRQOL after KT. METHODS We ascertained frailty, as well as physical, mental, and kidney disease-specific HRQOL in a multicenter prospective cohort of 443 KT recipients (May 2014 to May 2017) using Kidney Disease Quality of Life Instrument Short Form. We quantified the short-term (3 months) rate of post-KT HRQOL change by frailty status using adjusted mixed-effects linear regression models. RESULTS Mean HRQOL scores at KT were 43.3 (SD, 9.6) for physical, 52.8 (SD, 8.9) for mental, and 72.6 (SD, 12.8) for kidney disease-specific HRQOL; frail recipients had worse physical (P < 0.001) and kidney disease-specific HRQOL (P = 0.001), but similar mental HRQOL (P = 0.43). Frail recipients experienced significantly greater rates of improvement in physical HRQOL (frail, 1.35 points/month; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-2.05; nonfrail, 0.34 points/month; 95% CI, -0.17-0.85; P = 0.02) and kidney disease-specific HRQOL (frail, 3.75 points/month; 95% CI, 2.89-4.60; nonfrail, 2.41 points/month; 95% CI, 1.78-3.04; P = 0.01), but no difference in mental HRQOL (frail, 0.54 points/month; 95% CI, -0.17-1.25; nonfrail, 0.46 points/month; 95% CI, -0.06-0.98; P = 0.85) post-KT. CONCLUSIONS Despite decreased physiologic reserve, frail recipients experience improvement in post-KT physical and kidney disease-specific HRQOL better than nonfrail recipients.
Collapse
|
37
|
Eradication of HCV in Renal Transplant Recipients and Its Effects on Quality of Life. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:8953581. [PMID: 30246027 PMCID: PMC6136566 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8953581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background The use of direct antiviral agents (DAA) has radically modified the course of HCV hepatitis in renal patients. Aim of this study was to assess the effects of HCV eradication on quality of life (QOL) in renal transplant recipients (RTR), measured by CLDQ and SF-36. Methods Sixteen RTR with well preserved GFR (mean: 60.3±19.3 ml/min) and chronic HCV infection with moderate liver stiffness (9.3±1.7 kPa) were given a sofosbuvir-based regimen for 12 weeks and had a 1 year follow-up. Results At end of treatment (EOT) a complete viral clearance was observed in all the patients, with normalization of most laboratory data and a consistent reduction in liver stiffness. All these parameters remained stable after 1 year, as well as renal function and proteinuria. Questionnaire data showed consistent amelioration in different “emotional” domains at EOT, which persisted after 1 year and were associated with a globally improved QOL, although there was no change in most of the “physical” domains in both questionnaires. One patient under ribavirin developed an acute anemia and withdrew from the study, but no further adverse episode was observed throughout the study. Conclusions Our data, while confirming the efficacy of oral DAA, show that HCV infection represents a heavy psychological burden in renal transplant recipients, greatly alleviated by viral eradication, which determines a significant improvement in QOL that represents an important outcome in management of all transplant recipients. This trial is registered with ISRCTN97560076.
Collapse
|
38
|
Mucsi I, Novak M, Toews D, Waterman A. Explore Transplant Ontario: Adapting the Explore Transplant Education Program to Facilitate Informed Decision Making About Kidney Transplantation. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2018; 5:2054358118789369. [PMID: 30057772 PMCID: PMC6058418 DOI: 10.1177/2054358118789369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: In this article, we describe a province-wide collaborative project in which we adapted the Explore Transplant (ET) education program for use in Ontario, Canada, to develop Explore Transplant Ontario (ETO). Kidney transplantation (KT), especially living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), is the best treatment for many patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), with the best patient survival and quality of life and also reduced health care costs. Yet KT and LDKT are underutilized both internationally and in Canada. Research has demonstrated that patients with ESKD who receive personalized transplant education are more likely to complete the transplant evaluation process and to receive LDKT compared with patients who do not receive this education. Sources of information: Research expertise of the lead authors and Medline search of studies assessing the impact of education interventions on access to KT and LDKT. Methods: The ET program, developed by Dr Amy Waterman, has been used in thousands of patients with ESKD in the United States to enhance KT and LDKT knowledge. To adapt this program for use in Ontario, we convened a working group, including patient representatives, nephrologists, transplant coordinators, dialysis nurses, and patient educators from all Ontario KT centers and selected dialysis units. In an iterative process concluding in a consensus workshop, the working group reviewed and edited the text of the original ET program and suggested changes to the videos. Key findings: The adapted program reflects the Ontario health care environment and responds to the specific needs of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the province. The videos feature Ontario transplant nephrologists, transplant coordinators, and patients, representative of the ethnic diversity in Ontario, sharing their transplant experience and expertise. Despite the changes, ETO is consistent with the quality and style of the original ET program. At the end of this article, we summarize subsequent steps to test and utilize ETO. Those projects, specifically the ETO pilot study and a multicomponent quality improvement initiative to increase utilization of KT and LDKT across Ontario, will be described in full in future papers. Limitations: This article describes a provincial initiative; therefore, our findings may not be fully generalizable without further considerations. The adapted education program has not yet been tested in large trial for effectiveness. Implications: As a program grounded in the theoretical model of behavior change, ETO places patients with ESKD at the center of a complex process of navigating renal replacement therapy modalities and acknowledges a broad range of patient values, priorities, and states of readiness to pursue KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Istvan Mucsi
- Division of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marta Novak
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Deanna Toews
- Division of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amy Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Forbes RC, Feurer ID, LaNeve D, Concepcion BP, Gamble C, Rega SA, Pinson CW, Shaffer D. Increasing kidney donor profile index sequence does not adversely affect medium-term health-related quality of life after kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13212. [PMID: 29377273 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The United Network for Organ Sharing system allocates deceased donor kidneys based on the kidney donor profile index (KDPI), stratified as sequences (A ≤ 20%, B > 20-<35%, C ≥ 35-≤85%, and D > 85%), with increasing KDPI associated with decreased graft survival. While health-related quality of life (HRQOL) may improve after transplantation, the effect of donor kidney quality, reflected by KDPI sequence, on post-transplant HRQOL has not been reported. METHODS Health-related quality of life was measured using the eight scales and physical and mental component summaries (PCS, MCS) of the SF-36® Health Survey. Multivariable mixed effects models that adjusted for age, gender, rejection, and previous transplant and analysis of variance methods tested the effects of time and KDPI sequence on post-transplant HRQOL. RESULTS A total of 141 waitlisted adults and 505 recipients (>1700 observations) were included. Pretransplant PCS and MCS averaged, respectively, slightly below and within general population norms (GPN; 40-60). At 31 ± 26 months post-transplant, average PCS (41 ± 11) and MCS (51 ± 11), overall and within each KDPI sequence, were within GPN. KDPI sequence was not related to post-transplant HRQOL (P > .134) or its trajectory (interaction P > .163). CONCLUSION Increasing KDPI does not adversely affect the medium-term values and trajectories of HRQOL after kidney transplantation. This may reassure patients and centers when considering using high KDPI kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Forbes
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Irene D Feurer
- Departments of Surgery and Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - David LaNeve
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Beatrice P Concepcion
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Christianna Gamble
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Scott A Rega
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - C Wright Pinson
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - David Shaffer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wentlandt K, Weiss A, O'Connor E, Kaya E. Palliative and end of life care in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:3008-3019. [PMID: 28976070 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2017] [Revised: 09/17/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Palliative care is an interprofessional approach that focuses on quality of life of patients who are facing life-threatening illness. Palliative care is consistently associated with improvements in advance care planning, patient and caregiver satisfaction, quality of life, symptom burden, and lower healthcare utilization. Most transplant patients have advanced chronic disease, significant symptom burden, and mortality awaiting transplant. Transplantation introduces new risks including perioperative death, organ rejection, infection, renal insufficiency, and malignancy. Numerous publications over the last decade identify that palliative care is well-suited to support these patients and their caregivers, yet access to palliative care and research within this population are lacking. This review describes palliative care and summarizes existing research supporting palliative intervention in advanced organ failure and transplant populations. A proposed model to provide palliative care in parallel with disease-directed therapy in a transplant program has the potential to improve symptom burden, quality of life, and healthcare utilization. Further studies are needed to elucidate specific benefits of palliative care for this population. In addition, there is a tremendous need for education, specifically for clinicians, patients, and families, to improve understanding of palliative care and its benefits for patients with advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Wentlandt
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Weiss
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E O'Connor
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Kaya
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sundaram V, Lim J, Tholey DM, Iriana S, Kim I, Manne V, Nissen NN, Klein AS, Tran TT, Ayoub WS, Schlansky B. The Braden Scale, A standard tool for assessing pressure ulcer risk, predicts early outcomes after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2017; 23:1153-1160. [PMID: 28512923 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Revised: 04/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The Braden Scale is a standardized tool to assess pressure ulcer risk that is reported for all hospitalized patients in the United States per requirements of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Previous data have shown the Braden Scale can predict both frailty and mortality risk in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Our aim was to evaluate the association of the Braden Scale score with short-term outcomes after liver transplantation (LT). We performed a retrospective cohort study of deceased donor LT recipients at 2 centers and categorized them according to the Braden Scale at hospital admission as low (>18), moderate (16-18), or high risk (<16) for pressure ulcer. We created logistic and Poisson multiple regression models to evaluate the association of Braden Scale category with in-hospital and 90-day mortality, length of stay (LOS), nonambulatory status at discharge, and discharge to a rehabilitation facility. Of 341 patients studied, 213 (62.5%) were low risk, 59 (17.3%) were moderate risk, and 69 (20.2%) were high risk. Moderate- and high-risk patients had a greater likelihood for prolonged LOS, nonambulatory status, and discharge to a rehabilitation facility, as compared with low-risk patients. High-risk patients additionally had increased risk for in-hospital and 90-day mortality after LT. Multiple regression modeling demonstrated that high-risk Braden Scale score was associated with prolonged LOS (IRR, 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-1.65), nonambulatory status at discharge (odds ratio [OR], 4.15; 95% CI, 1.77-9.71), and discharge to a rehabilitation facility (OR, 5.51; 95% CI, 2.57-11.80). In conclusion, the Braden Scale, which is currently assessed in all hospitalized patients in the United States, independently predicted early disability-related outcomes and greater LOS after LT. Liver Transplantation 23 1153-1160 2017 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Sundaram
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Los Angeles, CA.,Department of Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jane Lim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Danielle M Tholey
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Sentia Iriana
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Irene Kim
- Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA.,Department of Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Vignan Manne
- Department of Medicine, Akron General Hospital, Akron, OH
| | - Nicholas N Nissen
- Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA.,Department of Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrew S Klein
- Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA.,Department of Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Tram T Tran
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Los Angeles, CA.,Department of Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Walid S Ayoub
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Los Angeles, CA.,Department of Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Barry Schlansky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
End-organ failure is associated with high mortality and morbidity, in addition to increased health care costs. Organ transplantation is the only definitive treatment that can improve survival and quality of life in such patients; however, due to the persistent mismatch between organ supply and demand, waiting lists continue to grow across the world. Careful intensive care management of the potential organ donor with goal-directed therapy has the potential to optimize organ function and improve donation yield.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation is the criterion standard treatment for many with end-organ failure and can offer a new independence from the burden of disease. However solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) remain at high risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease, and poor quality of life and physical functioning. Increasing physical activity and exercise can improve the health of the general population; however, the effects on those with a transplant remain unclear. Intensive exercise and sporting activity has the potential to be beneficial, although there remain concerns particularly around the effects on immune function and the CV system. This review summarizes what is known about the effects of exercise on determinants of health in SOTRs and then collates the available literature investigating the consequences of intensive exercise and sport on the health of SOTR. There is a paucity of high-quality research, with most evidence being case studies or anecdotal; this is understandable given the relatively few numbers of SOTRs who are performing sport and exercise at a high level. However, if suitable evidence-based guidelines are to be formed and SOTRs are to be given reassurances that their activity levels are not detrimental to their transplanted organ and overall health, then more high-quality studies are required.
Collapse
|
44
|
Impact of Heart Transplantation on the Functional Status of US Children With End-Stage Heart Failure. Circulation 2017; 135:939-950. [DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.016520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background:
There are limited data describing the functional status (FS) of children after heart transplant (HT). We sought to describe the FS of children surviving at least 1 year after HT, to evaluate the impact of HT on FS, and to identify factors associated with abnormal FS post-HT.
Methods:
Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data were used to identify all US children <21 years of age surviving ≥1 year post-HT from 2005 to 2014 with a functional status score (FSS) available at 3 time points (listing, transplant, ≥1 year post-HT). Logistic regression and generalized estimating equations were used to identify factors associated with abnormal FS (FSS≤8) post-HT.
Results:
A total of 1633 children met study criteria. At the 1-year assessment, 64% were “fully active/no limitations” (FSS=10), 21% had “minor limitations with strenuous activity” (FSS=9); and 15% scored ≤8. In comparison with listing FS, FS at 1 year post-HT increased in 91% and declined/remained unchanged in 9%. A stepwise regression procedure selected the following variables for association with abnormal FS at 1 year post-HT: ≥18 years of age (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–2.7), black race (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0), support with ≥inotropes at HT (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2–2.5), hospitalization status at HT (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0–2.19), chronic steroid use at HT (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0–2.2), and treatment for early rejection (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5–2.7).
Conclusion:
Among US children who survive at least 1 year after HT, FS is excellent for the majority of patients. HT is associated with substantial improvement in FS for most children. Early rejection, older age, black race, chronic steroid use, hemodynamic support at HT, and being hospitalized at HT are associated with abnormal FS post-HT.
Collapse
|
45
|
Hwang Y, Yi M. The Lived Experience of Patients with Heart Transplantation: A Phenomenological Study. J Korean Acad Nurs 2017; 47:110-120. [DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2017.47.1.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Revised: 12/13/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Younghui Hwang
- Nursing Department, Yeoju Institute of Technology, Yeoju, Korea
| | - Myungsun Yi
- College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Organ transplantation improves survival and quality of life in patients with end-organ failure. Waiting lists continue to grow across the world despite remarkable advances in the transplantation process, from the creation of public engagement campaigns to the development of critical pathways for the timely identification, referral, approach, and treatment of the potential organ donor. The pathophysiology of dying triggers systemic changes that are intimately related to organ viability. The intensive care management of the potential organ donor optimizes organ function and improves the donation yield, representing a significant step in reducing the mismatch between organ supply and demand. Different beliefs and cultures reflect diverse legislations and donation practices amongst different countries, creating a challenge to standardized practices. Maintaining public trust is necessary for continued progress in organ donation and transplantation, hence the urge for a joint effort in creating uniform protocols that ensure transparent practices within the medical community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C B Maciel
- Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - D Y Hwang
- Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - D M Greer
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hermann HC, Grimm A, Klapp BF, Neuhaus R, Papachristou C. Body Experience After Liver Transplantation: A Body Grid Examination. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIVIST PSYCHOLOGY 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/10720537.2016.1227736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H. C. Hermann
- Clinic for Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - A. Grimm
- Clinic for Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - B. F. Klapp
- Clinic for Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - R. Neuhaus
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - C. Papachristou
- Clinic for Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kugler C, Strueber M, Tegtbur U, Niedermeyer J, Haverich A. Quality of Life 1 Year after Lung Transplantation. Prog Transplant 2016; 14:331-6. [PMID: 15663018 DOI: 10.1177/152692480401400408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Lung transplantation is a viable therapeutic option for patients with end-stage lung disease. The focus of interest has shifted from advances in surgical techniques to improved quality of life for the transplant recipient. A prospective longitudinal repeated measures design was used to determine the impact of lung transplantation on quality of life and life satisfaction. Using 4 measurement points (before transplantation, after 8 weeks, and after 6 and 12 months), 61 patients were followed from before to 1 year after successful lung transplantation. Quality of life was measured using 2 generic (SF-36, Quality of Life Profile for Chronic Diseases) and 1 lung-specific (Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire) questionnaires. All dimensions of the health-related scores improved significantly after transplantation, except bodily pain. Patients reported the most significant improvements until 6 months after transplantation. Lung transplantation had no influence on social functioning or role emotional. The Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire ratings showed similar significantly better scores for transplant recipients at 6 months, and stagnations for most dimensions afterward.
Collapse
|
49
|
Dobbels F, Verleden G, Dupont L, Vanhaecke J, De Geest S. To transplant or not? The importance of psychosocial and behavioural factors before lung transplantation. Chron Respir Dis 2016; 3:39-47. [PMID: 16509176 DOI: 10.1191/1479972306cd082ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The gratifying results of lung transplantation in terms of survival and quality of life stimulate the referral of an ever-increasing number of patients with end-stage lung disease. This in turn compounds the organ shortage, which is the limiting factor in the transplantation rate. In the absence of good alternative treatment modalities, an evidence-based pretransplant screening process is a prerequisite to detennine which patients will benefit most from transplantation. Within this evidence-based screening process, medical selection criteria are well established. There is a growing awareness that psychosocial and behavioural factors may determine outcome after transplantation as well. This paper reviews the available evidence for psychosocial and behavioural factors in the screening process for lung transplantation. The relation of various factors with post-transplant outcome was explored. Psychosocial characteristics before transplantation consist of 1) anxiety and depression, 2) personality disorders, 3) neurocognitive problems, and 4) lack of social support. Pretransplant behavioural factors include 1) noncompliance with medication, 2) alcohol abuse or dependence, 3) smoking, 4) noncompliance with dietary guidelines, and 5) noncompliance with monitoring of vital parameters and infections. It appears that the lack of rigorous studies limit the feasibility of an evidence-based screening process. Prospective studies are crucial to this further investigation of the relationship between psychosocial and behavioural determinants before transplantation and outcomes after transplantation, in terms of compliance, morbidity, and mortality. Identification of modifiable risk factors for poor outcome before transplantation is a first step in developing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Dobbels
- Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Evolution and Determinants of Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Kidney Transplant Patients Over the First 3 Years After Transplantation. Transplantation 2016; 100:640-7. [PMID: 26569063 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) usually improved after kidney transplantation; however, a non-negligible number of patients did not benefit from transplantation in HRQOL. The aims of this cohort study were to describe the evolution of HRQOL in kidney transplant recipients to search for subgroups with distinct time profiles and to investigate these determinants. METHODS Three hundred thirty-seven adult patients were followed up from 1 to 36 months after kidney transplantation. Each patient completed repeated HRQOL assessments (median, 5; range, 2-9). K-means for longitudinal data was used to identify homogeneous clusters of HRQOL time profiles obtained for the mental and physical composite scores (MCS and PCS) and for the 8 dimensions of the short-form 36 scale. Covariates associated with these clusters were investigated using random forest analysis. Magnitude and shape of the HRQOL variations over time were investigated using linear regression mixed models. RESULTS Two longitudinal clusters were identified for the time profiles of PCS and MCS. Patients classified in the higher cluster (ie, 60% of the population) exhibited a steady-state HRQOL, similar on average to the general population, whereas in the lower cluster, PCS and MCS scores were significantly lower than in the general population. Muscular weakness in the first year after transplantation explained 19% of the interpatient variability of PCS 3 months after transplantation, whereas associated with anxiety, it explained 24% of interpatient MCS variability. CONCLUSIONS This work suggests to promote (i) physical rehabilitation programs after transplantation to curb the muscular loss and (ii) systematic attention to the patient's anxiety.
Collapse
|