MK-801 fails to modify the effect of methamphetamine on dopamine release in the rat striatum

Distinct neurochemical adaptations within the nucleus accumbens produced by a history of self-administered vs non-contingently administered intravenous methamphetamine

Methamphetamine is a highly addictive psychomotor stimulant yet the neurobiological consequences of methamphetamine self-administration remain under-characterized. Thus, we employed microdialysis in rats trained to self-administer intravenous (IV) infusions of methamphetamine (METH-SA) or saline (SAL) and a group of rats receiving non-contingent IV infusions of methamphetamine (METH-NC) at 1 or 21 days withdrawal to determine the dopamine and glutamate responses in the nucleus accumbens (NAC) to a 2 mg/kg methamphetamine intraperitoneal challenge. Furthermore, basal NAC extracellular glutamate content was assessed employing no net-flux procedures in these three groups at both time points. At both 1- and 21-day withdrawal points, methamphetamine elicited a rise in extracellular dopamine in SAL animals and this effect was sensitized in METH-NC rats. However, METH-SA animals showed a much greater sensitized dopamine response to the drug challenge compared with the other groups. Additionally, acute methamphetamine decreased extracellular glutamate in both SAL and METH-NC animals at both time-points. In contrast, METH-SA rats exhibited a modest and delayed rise in glutamate at 1-day withdrawal and this rise was sensitized at 21 days withdrawal. Finally, no net-flux microdialysis revealed elevated basal glutamate and increased extraction fraction at both withdrawal time-points in METH-SA rats. Although METH-NC rats exhibited no change in the glutamate extraction fraction, they exhibited a time-dependent elevation in basal glutamate levels. These data illustrate for the first time that a history of methamphetamine self-administration produces enduring changes in NAC neurotransmission and that non-pharmacological factors have a critical role in the expression of these methamphetamine-induced neurochemical adaptations.

Glutamatergic involvement in psychomotor stimulant action

The sympathomimetic psychomotor stimulants, including cocaine, amphetamines, and the phenylethylamine amphetamine-like derivatives, exert actions in mammalian systems that implicate involvement of the excitatory neurotransmitter, glutamate and its receptors. Despite evidence that psychomotor stimulants do not directly stimulate glutamate receptors, blockade of acute lethal, convulsive, circulatory, thermoregulatory, locomotor and stereotypical responses, as well as interference with slowly developing behavioral sensitization and brain monoaminergic neurotoxicities, can be achieved by receptor antagonists at both N-methyl-D-aspartate and AMPA/kainate glutamate receptor subtypes. Alterations in glutamatergic neurobiology, including elevations in extracellular glutamate levels, changes in glutamate receptor properties and glutamatergic neuronal degeneration, have also been attributed to psychomotor stimulant administration. Blockade of glutamate receptors offers therapeutic options in management of psychomotor stimulant toxicity.

The role of excitatory amino acids in behavioral sensitization to psychomotor stimulants

Behavioral sensitization refers to the progressive augmentation of behavioral responses to psychomotor stimulants that develops during their repeated administration and persists even after long periods of withdrawal. It provides an animal model for the intensification of drug craving believed to underlie addiction in humans. Mechanistic similarities between sensitization and other forms of neuronal plasticity were first suggested on the basis of the ability of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists to prevent the development of sensitization [Karler, R., Calder, L. D., Chaudhry, I. A. and Turkanis, S. A. (1989) Blockade of "reverse tolerance" to cocaine and amphetamine by MK-801. Life Sci., 45, 599-606]. This article will review the large number of subsequent studies addressing: (1) the roles of NMDA, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) and metabotropic glutamate receptors in the development and expression of behavioral sensitization, (2) excitatory amino acids (EAAs) and the role of conditioning in sensitization, (3) controversies regarding EAA involvement in behavioral sensitization based on studies with MK-801, (4) the effects of acute and repeated stimulant administration on EAA neurochemistry and EAA receptor expression, and (5) the neuroanatomy of EAA involvement in sensitization. To summarize, NMDA, AMPA metabotropic glutamate receptors all participate in the development of sensitization, while maintenance of the sensitized state involves alterations in neurochemical measures of EAA transmission as well as in the expression and sensitivity of AMPA and NMDA receptors. While behavioral sensitization likely involves complex neuronal circuits, with EAAs participating at several points within this circuitry, EAA projections originating in prefrontal cortex may play a particularly important role in the development of sensitization, perhaps via their regulatory effects on midbrain dopamine neurons. The review concludes by critically evaluating various hypotheses to account for EAA involvement in the development of behavioral sensitization, and considering the question of whether EAA receptors are involved in mediating the rewarding effects of psychomotor stimulants and sensitization of such rewarding effects.

Regulation of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors on striatal acetylcholine release in rats

The effects of dopamine (DA) D1 and D2 receptors on striatal acetylcholine (ACh) releases were investigated by in vivo microdialysis. All drugs were applied via dialysis membrane directly to the striatum. The levels of ACh release were increased by 10(-4) M SKF38393, a D1 receptor agonist. Although 10(-4) M SCH23390, a D1 receptor antagonist, exhibited an increase in the levels of ACh release, the agonist (10(-4) M) induced-increase in the levels of ACh release was suppressed by coperfusion of the antagonist (10(-4) M). In contrast, the levels of ACh release were decreased by the D2 receptor agonist, N-434, in a dose-dependent manner (10(-4) M to 10(-7) M) and increased by the D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride, in a dose-dependent manner (10(-5) M to 10(-7) M). The agonist (10(-5) M) induced-decrease in the levels of ACh release was suppressed by coperfusion of the antagonist (10(-4) M). Coperfusion of D1 (10(-4) M) and D2 (10(-5) M) agonists blocked both effects of respective drug alone. In order to clarify the effect of endogenous DA, two drugs with different mechanisms for enhancing DA concentration in the synaptic cleft, the DA release-inducer methamphetamine, and the DA uptake inhibitor nomifensine were perfused separately. Both (10(-4) M to 10(-5) M) produced a dose- and a time-dependent decrease in the levels of ACh release. Significant higher levels of ACh release were observed in the striatum of the 6-hydroxydopamine (8 micrograms/10 microliters)-treated rats with significant depletion of striatal DA content. These results suggest that in striatal DA-ACh interaction ACh release, as cholinergic interneuron's activity, is tonically inhibited via the D2 receptor, mainly by dopaminergic input, and the D1 receptor probably modifies the effect of the D2 receptor indirectly.

Neurochemical bases of locomotion and ethanol stimulant effects

The locomotor stimulant effect produced by alcohol (ethanol) is one of a large number of measurable ethanol effects. Ethanol-induced euphoria in humans and locomotor stimulation in rodents, a potential animal model of human euphoria, have long been recognized and the latter has been extensively characterized. Since the euphoria produced by ethanol may influence the development of uncontrolled or excessive alcohol use, a solid understanding of the neurochemical substrates underlying such effects is important. Such an understanding for spontaneous locomotion and for ethanol's stimulant effects is beginning to emerge. Herein we review what is known about three neurochemical substrates of locomotion and of ethanol's locomotor stimulant effects. Several lines of research have implicated dopaminergic, GABAergic, and glutamatergic neurotransmitter systems in determining these behaviors. A large collection of work is cited, which strongly implicates the above-mentioned neurotransmitter substances in the control of spontaneous locomotion. A smaller, but persuasive, body of evidence suggests that central nervous system processes utilizing these transmitters are involved in determining the effects of ethanol on locomotion. Particular emphasis has been placed on the mesolimbic ventral tegmental area to nucleus accumbens dopaminergic pathway, and on the ventral pallidum/substantia innominata, where GABA and glutamate have been found to play a role in altering the activity of this dopaminergic pathway. Research on ethanol and drug locomotor sensitization, increased responsiveness to the substance with repeated administration, is also reviewed as a process that may be important in the development of drug addiction.

Protective effects of MK-801 on methamphetamine-induced depletion of dopaminergic and serotonergic terminals and striatal astrocytic response: an immunohistochemical study

It has been shown previously that methamphetamine induces dopaminergic nerve terminal degeneration, serotonin depletion and striatal reactive astrogliosis, and that the noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist MK-801 can block methamphetamine (MA)-induced depletion of dopamine and serotonin and reduction in activity of their synthetic enzymes. In this study, immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the effect of MK-801 on methamphetamine-induced neuropathological alterations of dopaminergic and serotonergic terminals and striatal astrocytic responses. Adult male rats were treated with methamphetamine (4 injections of 10 mg/kg at 2 hour intervals) in conjunction with MK-801 which was administered 15 min before each methamphetamine administration at doses of 1 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg. Brains were examined three days following treatment. MK-801 administration prevented methamphetamine-induced depletion of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HT) terminals in the forebrain and depletion of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive dopaminergic terminals and astrocytic response in the neostriatum in most animals. These results support the concept that excitatory amino acids acting through an NMDA receptor are involved in methamphetamine-induced neuronal damage on dopaminergic and serotonergic terminal fields. A minor depletion of TH-positive terminals and astrogliosis in the neostriatum was seen in three of nine MA-MK-801-treated animals. This indicates that the protective effects of MK-801 on MA-induced dopaminergic terminal degeneration varies among animals with complete protection in most animals and partial protection in the others using the present doses and dosing regimen.

MK-801 does not prevent acute stimulatory effects of amphetamine or cocaine on locomotor activity or extracellular dopamine levels in rat nucleus accumbens

Recent work has shown that the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine, amphetamine, and morphine is prevented by coadministration of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists such as MK-801. This suggests that NMDA receptors mediate long-term changes in neuronal responsiveness essential for the development of behavioral sensitization, similar to their role in other forms of neuronal plasticity. However, other studies, suggesting that NMDA receptor antagonists interfere with acute behavioral effects of psychomotor stimulants, call this interpretation into question and suggest that the ability of NMDA antagonists to prevent sensitization may reflect blockade of the acute effects of psychomotor stimulants. To examine this issue, behavioral and microdialysis studies assessed the effect of pretreatment with 0.1 mg/kg MK-801 on the ability of amphetamine and cocaine to stimulate locomotor activity and elevate extracellular dopamine (DA) levels in nucleus accumbens; this dose of MK-801 prevents sensitization when coadministered repeatedly with these stimulants. MK-801 pretreatment enhanced amphetamine-stimulated horizontal locomotion and stereotyped behavior. MK-801 pretreatment produced a modest attenuation of cocaine-stimulated horizontal locomotion, which may have reflected enhancement by MK-801 of certain components of cocaine-stimulated stereotypy. There was no effect of MK-801 pretreatment on the ability of amphetamine or cocaine to elevate extracellular DA levels in nucleus accumbens. These results suggest that the acute effects of cocaine and amphetamine on locomotor activity and extracellular DA levels are not prevented by MK-801, and that MK-801 must act through other mechanisms to prevent the development of behavioral sensitization.

Methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity: roles for glutamate and dopamine efflux

The neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine (METH) on striatal dopaminergic neurons have been hypothesized to be mediated by excess dopamine (DA) release. In addition, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists block METH-induced DA depletions. This suggests that glutamate also mediates the toxic effects of METH. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that DA and glutamate efflux contribute to METH-induced neurotoxicity. In vivo microdialysis in rats was used to measure extracellular concentrations of striatal DA and glutamate following 3 injections of METH (10 mg/kg, i.p.), each injection given 2 hours apart. One week following the dialysis experiment, rats were sacrificed and the ventral lateral striata were assayed for DA content. Glutamate concentrations in the dialysate increased by over 4-fold after the third METH injection. In these same animals, striatal DA tissue content was significantly depleted. In separate groups of rats, pretreatment with haloperidol (2 mg/kg at the first METH injection) significantly increased METH-induced DA efflux. The haloperidol pretreatment attenuated the extracellular increase in glutamate produced by METH and blocked subsequent neurotoxicity to DA neurons. In contrast, pretreatment with the DA uptake blocker, GBR-12909 (10 mg/kg, 30 min before each METH injection) significantly attenuated the increased DA release produced by METH but did not change glutamate efflux. However, pretreatment with GBR-12909 did protect against the tissue content depletion of DA in the striatum. Based on these findings, it appears that increased DA and glutamate release in the striatum are important and possibly interact in the development of METH-induced neurotoxicity.

Striatal dopamine release in vivo following neurotoxic doses of methamphetamine and effect of the neuroprotective drugs, chlormethiazole and dizocilpine

1. Administration to rats of methamphetamine (15 mg kg-1, i.p.) every 2 h to a total of 4 doses resulted in a neurotoxic loss of striatal dopamine of 36% and of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the cortex (43%) and hippocampus (47%) 3 days later. 2. Administration of chlormethiazole (50 mg kg-1, i.p.) 15 min before each dose of methamphetamine provided complete protection against the neurotoxic loss of monoamines while administration of dizocilpine (1 mg kg-1, i.p.) using the same dose schedule provided substantial protection. 3. Measurement of dopamine release in the striatum by in vivo microdialysis revealed that methamphetamine produced an approximate 7000% increase in dopamine release after the first injection. The enhanced release response was somewhat diminished after the third injection but still around 4000% above baseline. Dizocilpine (1 mg kg-1, i.p.) did not alter this response but chlormethiazole (50 mg kg-1, i.p.) attenuated the methamphetamine-induced release by approximately 40%. 4. Dizocilpine pretreatment did not influence the decrease in the dialysate concentration of the dopamine metabolites dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) produced by administration of methamphetamine while chlormethiazole pretreatment decreased the dialysate concentration of these metabolites still further. 5. The concentration of dopamine in the dialysate during basal conditions increased modestly during the course of the experiment. This increase did not occur in chlormethiazole-treated rats. HVA concentrations were unaltered by chlormethiazole administration. 6. Chlormethiazole (100-1000 microM) did not alter methamphetamine (100 microM) or K+ (35 mM)-evoked release of endogenous dopamine from striatal prisms in vitro. 7. Several NMDA antagonists prevent methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity; however chlormethiazole is not an NMDA antagonist. Inhibition of striatal dopamine function prevents methamphetamine-induced toxicity of both dopamine and 5-HT pathways. Therefore the attenuation of the enhanced dopamine release which occurs in animals given chlormethiazole may be associated with the protective action of this drug against methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity.

The N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist MK-801 protects against serotonin depletions induced by methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and p-chloroamphetamine

The non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK-801 blocks the ability of D-methamphetamine (MA) to deplete striatal dopamine (DA). We now report that MK-801 attenuates decreases in serotonin (5-HT) concentration induced by MA and two other amphetamine analogues, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and p-chloroamphetamine (PCA). Rats were injected with saline (1.0 ml/kg) or MK-801 (0.5, 1.0 or 2.5 mg/kg) followed by either saline (1.0 mg/kg), MA (4, 2 or 1 injection(s); 10.0, 20.0 or 40.0 mg/kg), MDMA (20.0 or 40.0 mg/kg) or PCA (5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg). In some experiments, two injections of MK-801 or saline were used. Seventy-two hours after the last injection rats were sacrificed and concentrations of 5-HT, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and DA were determined in hippocampus and striatum. MA caused a depletion of 5-HT to 33% of control in hippocampus and to 50% of control in striatum after the 4 x 10.0 mg/kg dose regimen. When MK-801 (2.5 mg/kg) was co-administered with MA, concentrations of 5-HT did not differ from control levels in either brain region. MDMA depleted 5-HT to approximately 58% of control in hippocampus and 66% of control in striatum at the 40 mg/kg dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 does not protect against serotonin depletions caused by high doses of DL-fenfluramine

The non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) has been shown to block methamphetamine (MA) induced damage to the dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5HT) systems of the brain. DL-Fenfluramine (FEN) is another potential neurotoxin but its long-term depletions are more selective to the 5HT system. To determine whether MK-801 protects against damage induced by FEN, we treated rats with FEN (4 injections of 12.5 mg/kg, at 1 h intervals) in conjunction with either saline or MK-801 (2 injections of 2.5 mg/kg, administered 15 min before and 90 min after the first FEN injection). Two weeks post-treatment, MK-801 alone caused a small but significant decrease in 5HT tissue concentrations in striatum and amygdala. FEN significantly reduced 5HT in all 8 brain regions studied. MK-801 + FEN did not protect against FEN-induced 5HT depletions in nucleus accumbens/olfactory tubercle, septum, frontal cortex, somatosensory cortex or hippocampus. MK-801 + FEN enhanced 5HT depletions in striatum, hypothalamus and amygdala. The differential protective effect of MK-801 between MA and FEN are discussed in terms of a possible dopaminergic mechanism.