Phenotypic hypersusceptibility to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients: impact on virological response to efavirenz-based therapy

Identification of Adjacent NNRTI Binding Pocket in Multi-mutated HIV1- RT Enzyme Model: An in silico Study

Introduction:

A possible strategy to combat mutant strains is to have a thorough structural evaluation before and after mutations to identify the diversity in the non-nucleoside inhibitor binding pocket and their effects on enzyme-ligand interactions to generate novel NNRTI’s accordingly.

Objective:

The primary objective of this study was to find effects of multiple point mutations on NNRTI binding pocket. This study included the contribution of each individual mutation in NNIBP that propose an adjacent binding pocket which can be used to discover novel NNRTI derivatives.

Methods:

An in Silico model of HIV-1 RT enzyme with multiple mutations K103N, Y181C and Y188L was developed and evaluated. Two designed NNRTI pyridinone derivatives were selected as ligands for docking studies with the homology model through alignment based docking and residue based docking approaches. Binding pockets of wild type HIV-1 RT and multi-mutated homology model were compared thoroughly.

Result and Discussion:

K103N mutation narrowed the entrance of NNRTI binding pocket and forbade electrostatic interaction with α amino group of LYS103. Mutations Y181C and Y188L prevented NNRTI binding by eliminating aromatic π interactions offered by tyrosine rings. Docking study against new homology model suggested an adjacent binding pocket with combination of residues in palm and connection domains. This pocket is approximately 14.46Å away from conventional NNRTI binding site.

Conclusion:

Increased rigidity, steric hindrance and losses of important interactions cumulatively prompt ligands to adapt adjacent NNRTI binding pocket. The proposed new and adjacent binding pocket is identified by this study which can further be evaluated to generate novel derivatives.

Characterization of two HIV-1 infectors during initial antiretroviral treatment, and the emergence of phenotypic resistance in reverse transcriptase-associated mutation patterns

BACKGROUND

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is recommended to control the infection of HIV-1. HIV-1 drug resistance becomes an obstacle to HAART due to the accumulation of specific mutations in the RT coding region. The development of resistance mutations may be more complex than previously thought.

METHODS

We followed two HIV-1 infectors from a HIV-1 drug resistance surveillance cohort in Henan province and evaluated CD4+ T-cell number and viral load thereafter at ten time-periods and characterized their reverse transcriptase-associated mutation patterns at each time point. Then we constructed the recombinant virus strains with these mutation patterns to mimick the viruses and test the phenotypic resistance caused by the mutation patterns on TZM-b1 cells.

RESULTS

CD4+ T-cell number initially increased and then decreased rapidly, while viral load decreased and then dropped sharply during initial antiretroviral treatment. The number of mutations and the combination patterns of mutations increased over time. According to the phenotypic resistance performed by recombinant virus strains, VirusT215Y/V179E/Y181C/H221Y exhibited high levels of resistance to EFV (5.57-fold), and T215Y/V179E-containing virus increased 20.20-fold in AZT resistance (p < 0.01). VirusT215Y/V179E/Y181C increased markedly in EFV resistance (p < 0.01). The IC50 for VirusT215Y/V179E/H221Y was similar to that for VirusT215Y/V179E/Y181C. VirusT215Y/K103N/Y181C/H221Y induced a dramatic IC50 increase of all the four agents (Efavirenz EFV, Zidovudine AZT, Lamivudine 3TC, and Stavudine d4T) (p < 0.01). As for VirusT215Y/K103N/Y181C, only the IC50 of EFV was significantly increased. T215Y/K103N resulted in a 26.36-fold increase in EFV (p < 0.01). T215Y/K103N/H221Y significantly increased the resistance to AZT and 3TC. The IC50 of EFV with T215Y/V179E was lower than with T215Y/K103N (F = 93.10, P < 0.0001). With T215Y/V179E, Y181C significantly increase in EFV resistance, while the interaction between 181 and 221 in EFV was not statistically significant (F = 1.20, P = 0.3052). With T215Y/K103N, neither H221Y nor Y181C showed a significant increase in EFV resistance, but the interaction between 181 and 221 was statistically significant (F = 38.12, P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Data in this study suggests that pathways of viral evolution toward drug resistance appear to proceed through distinct steps and at different rates. Phenotypic resistance using recombinant virus strains with different combination of mutation patterns reveals that interactions among mutations may provide information on the impact of these mutations on drug resistance. All the result provides reference to optimize clinical treatment schedule.

In vitro HIV-1 evolution in response to triple reverse transcriptase inhibitors & in silico phenotypic analysis

BACKGROUND

Effectiveness of ART regimens strongly depends upon complex interactions between the selective pressure of drugs and the evolution of mutations that allow or restrict drug resistance.

METHODS

Four clinical isolates from NRTI-exposed, NNRTI-naive subjects were passaged in increasing concentrations of NVP in combination with 1 µM 3 TC and 2 µM ADV to assess selective pressures of multi-drug treatment. A novel parameter inference procedure, based on a stochastic viral growth model, was used to estimate phenotypic resistance and fitness from in vitro combination passage experiments.

RESULTS

Newly developed mathematical methods estimated key phenotypic parameters of mutations arising through selective pressure exerted by 3 TC and NVP. Concentrations of 1 µM 3 TC maintained the M184V mutation, which was associated with intrinsic fitness deficits. Increasing NVP concentrations selected major NNRTI resistance mutations. The evolutionary pathway of NVP resistance was highly dependent on the viral genetic background, epistasis as well as stochasticity. Parameter estimation indicated that the previously unrecognized mutation L228Q was associated with NVP resistance in some isolates.

CONCLUSION

Serial passage of viruses in the presence of multiple drugs may resemble the selection of mutations observed among treated individuals and populations in vivo and indicate evolutionary preferences and restrictions. Phenotypic resistance estimated here "in silico" from in vitro passage experiments agreed well with previous knowledge, suggesting that the unique combination of "wet-" and "dry-lab" experimentation may improve our understanding of HIV-1 resistance evolution in the future.

Comparison of the Mechanisms of Drug Resistance among HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most prevalent deadly chronic viral diseases. HIV is treated by small molecule inhibitors. HBV is treated by immunomodulation and small molecule inhibitors. HCV is currently treated primarily by immunomodulation but many small molecules are in clinical development. Although HIV is a retrovirus, HBV is a double-stranded DNA virus, and HCV is a single-stranded RNA virus, antiviral drug resistance complicates the development of drugs and the successful treatment of each of these viruses. Although their replication cycles, therapeutic targets, and evolutionary mechanisms are different, the fundamental approaches to identifying and characterizing HIV, HBV, and HCV drug resistance are similar. This review describes the evolution of HIV, HBV, and HCV within individuals and populations and the genetic mechanisms associated with drug resistance to each of the antiviral drug classes used for their treatment.

Effect of natural polymorphisms in the HIV-1 CRF02_AG protease on protease inhibitor hypersusceptibility

Hypersusceptibility (HS) to inhibition by different antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) among diverse HIV-infected individuals may be a misnomer because clinical response to treatment is evaluated in relation to subtype B infections while drug susceptibility of the infecting virus, regardless of subtype, is compared to a subtype B HIV-1 laboratory strain (NL4-3 or IIIB). Mounting evidence suggests that HS to different ARVs may result in better treatment outcome just as drug resistance leads to treatment failure. We have identified key amino acid polymorphisms in the protease coding region of a non-B HIV-1 subtype linked to protease inhibitor HS, namely, 17E and 64M in CRF02_AG. These HS-linked polymorphisms were introduced in the BD6-15 CRF02_AG molecular clone and tested for inhibition using a panel of protease inhibitors. In general, suspected HS-linked polymorphisms did increase susceptibility to specific protease inhibitors such as amprenavir and atazanavir, but the combination of the 17E/64M polymorphisms showed greater HS. These two mutations were found at low frequencies but linked in a sequence database of over 700 protease sequences of CRF02_AG. In direct head-to-head virus competitions, CRF02_AG harboring the 17E/64M polymorphisms also had higher replicative fitness than did the 17E or the 64M polymorphism in the CFR02_AG clone. These findings suggest that subtype-specific, linked polymorphisms can result in hypersusceptibility to ARVs. Considering the potential benefit of HS to treatment outcome, screening for potential HS-linked polymorphisms as well as preexisting drug resistance mutations in treatment-naïve patients may guide the choice of ARVs for the best treatment outcome.

Discovery of a highly synergistic anthelmintic combination that shows mutual hypersusceptibility

The soil-transmitted helminths or nematodes (hookworms, whipworms, and Ascaris) are roundworms that infect more than 1 billion of the poorest peoples and are leading causes of morbidity worldwide. Few anthelmintics are available for treatment, and only one is commonly used in mass drug administrations. New anthelmintics are urgently needed, and crystal (Cry) proteins made by Bacillus thuringiensis are promising new candidates. Combination drug therapies are considered the ideal treatment for infectious diseases. Surprisingly, little work has been done to define the characteristics of anthelmintic combinations. Here, by means of quantitative assays with wild-type and mutants of the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans, we establish a paradigm for studying anthelmintic combinations using Cry proteins and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonists, e.g., tribendimidine and levamisole. We find that nAChR agonists and Cry proteins, like Cry5B and Cry21A, mutually display what is known in the HIV field as hypersusceptibility--when the nematodes become resistant to either class, they become hypersensitive to the other class. Furthermore, we find that when Cry5B and nAChR agonists are combined, their activities are strongly synergistic, producing combination index values as good or better than seen with antitumor, anti-HIV, and insecticide combinations. Our study provides a powerful means by which anthelmintic combination therapies can be examined and demonstrate that the combination of nAChR agonists and Cry proteins has excellent properties and is predicted to give improved cure rates while being recalcitrant to the development of parasite resistance.

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutation I132M confers hypersensitivity to nucleoside analogs

We previously identified a rare mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT), I132M, which confers high-level resistance to the nonnucleoside RT inhibitors (NNRTIs) nevirapine and delavirdine. In this study, we have further characterized the role of this mutation in viral replication capacity and in resistance to other RT inhibitors. Surprisingly, our data show that I132M confers marked hypersusceptibility to the nucleoside analogs lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir at both the virus and enzyme levels. Subunit-selective mutagenesis studies revealed that the mutation in the p51 subunit of RT was responsible for the increased sensitivity to the drugs, and transient kinetic analyses showed that this hypersusceptibility was due to I132M decreasing the enzyme's affinity for the natural dCTP substrate but increasing its affinity for 3TC-triphosphate. Furthermore, the replication capacity of HIV-1 containing I132M is severely impaired. This decrease in viral replication capacity could be partially or completely compensated for by the A62V or L214I mutation, respectively. Taken together, these results help to explain the infrequent selection of I132M in patients for whom NNRTI regimens are failing and furthermore demonstrate that a single mutation outside of the polymerase active site and inside of the p51 subunit of RT can significantly influence nucleotide selectivity.

Bayesian network analyses of resistance pathways against efavirenz and nevirapine

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the role of novel mutations selected by treatment with efavirenz or nevirapine, and investigate the influence of HIV-1 subtype on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nNRTI) resistance pathways.

DESIGN

By finding direct dependencies between treatment-selected mutations, the involvement of these mutations as minor or major resistance mutations against efavirenz, nevirapine, or coadministrated nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is hypothesized. In addition, direct dependencies were investigated between treatment-selected mutations and polymorphisms, some of which are linked with subtype, and between NRTI and nNRTI resistance pathways.

METHODS

Sequences from a large collaborative database of various subtypes were jointly analyzed to detect mutations selected by treatment. Using Bayesian network learning, direct dependencies were investigated between treatment-selected mutations, NRTI and nNRTI treatment history, and known NRTI resistance mutations.

RESULTS

Several novel minor resistance mutations were found: 28K and 196R (for resistance against efavirenz), 101H and 138Q (nevirapine), and 31L (lamivudine). Robust interactions between NRTI mutations (65R, 74V, 75I/M, and 184V) and nNRTI resistance mutations (100I, 181C, 190E and 230L) may affect resistance development to particular treatment combinations. For example, an interaction between 65R and 181C predicts that the nevirapine and tenofovir and lamivudine/emtricitabine combination should be more prone to failure than efavirenz and tenofovir and lamivudine/emtricitabine.

CONCLUSION

Bayesian networks were helpful in untangling the selection of mutations by NRTI versus nNRTI treatment, and in discovering interactions between resistance mutations within and between these two classes of inhibitors.

Novel tight binding PETT, HEPT and DABO-based non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (NNRTIs) are a key component of effective combination antiretroviral therapies for HIV/AIDS. NNRTIs despite their chemical diversity, bind to a common allosteric site of HIV-1 RT, the primary target for anti-AIDS chemotherapy, and noncompetitively inhibit DNA polymerization. NNRTIs currently in clinical use have a low genetic barrier to resistance and therefore, the need for novel NNRTIs active against drug-resistant mutants selected by current therapies is of paramount importance. We describe the chemistry and biological evaluation of highly potent novel phenethylthiazolylthiourea (PETT), 1-[(2-hydroxyethoxy)methyl]-6-(phenylthio)thymine (HEPT) and dihydroalkoxybenzyloxopyrimidine (DABO) derivatives targeting the hydrophobic binding pocket of HIV-1 RT. These NNRTIs were rationally designed by molecular modeling and docking studies using a novel composite binding pocket that predicted how drug-resistant mutations would change the RT binding pocket shape, volume, and chemical make-up and how these changes could affect NNRTI binding. Several ligand derivatization sites were identified for docked NNRTIs that fit the composite binding pocket. The best fit was determined by calculating an inhibition constant (Ludi Ki) of the docked compound for the composite binding pocket. Compounds with a Ludi Ki of <1 microM were identified as the most promising tight binding NNRTIs. These NNRTIs displayed high selective indices with robust anti-HIV-1 activity against the wild-type and drug-resistant isolates carrying multiple RT gene mutations. The high rate of treatment failure due to the emergence of drug resistance mutations makes the discovery of broad-spectrum PETT, HEPT and DABO-based NNRTIs useful as a component of effective combination regimens.

Impact of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor drug resistance mutation interactions on phenotypic susceptibility

The role specific reverse transcriptase (RT) drug resistance mutations play in influencing phenotypic susceptibility to RT inhibitors in virus strains with complex resistance interaction patterns was assessed using recombinant viruses that consisted of RT-PCR-amplified pol fragments derived from plasma HIV-1 RNA from two treatment-experienced patients. Specific modifications of key RT amino acids were performed by site-directed mutagenesis. A panel of viruses with defined genotypic resistance mutations was assessed for phenotypic drug resistance. Introduction of M184V into several different clones expressing various RT resistance mutations uniformly decreased susceptibility to abacavir, lamivudine, and didanosine, and increased susceptibility to zidovudine, stavudine, and tenofovir; replication capacity was decreased. The L74V mutation had similar but slightly different effects, contributing to decreased susceptibility to abacavir, lamivudine, and didanosine and increased susceptibility to zidovudine and tenofovir, but in contrast to M184V, L74V contributed to decreased susceptibility to stavudine. In virus strains with the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations K101E and G190S, the L74V mutation increased replication capacity, consistent with published observations, but replication capacity was decreased in strains without NNRTI resistance mutations. K101E and G190S together tend to decrease susceptibility to all nucleoside RT inhibitors, but the K103N mutation had little effect on nucleoside RT inhibitor susceptibility. Mutational interactions can have a substantial impact on drug resistance phenotype and replication capacity, and this has been exploited in clinical practice with the development of fixed-dose combination pills. However, we are the first to report these mutational interactions using molecularly cloned recombinant strains derived from viruses that occur naturally in HIV-infected individuals.

Genotypic susceptibility scores and HIV type 1 RNA responses in treatment-experienced subjects with HIV type 1 infection

This study compared the role of genotypic susceptibility scores (GSS) as a predictor of virologic response in a group (n = 234) of HIV-infected, protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced subjects. Two scoring methods [discrete genotypic susceptibility score (dGSS) and continuous genotypic susceptibility score (cGSS)] were developed. Each drug in the subject's regimen was given a binary susceptibility score using Stanford inferred drug resistance scores to calculate the dGSS. In contrast to the dGSS, the cGSS model was designed to reflect partial susceptibility to a drug. Both GSS were independent predictors of week 16 virologic response. We also compared the GSS to a phenotypic susceptibility score (PSS) model on a subset of subjects that had both GSS and PSS performed, and found that both models were predictive of virologic response. Genotypic analyses at enrollment showed that subjects who were virologic nonresponders at week 16 revealed enrichment of several mutated codons associated with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) (codons 67, 69, 70, 118, 215, and 219) or PI resistance (codons 10, 24, 71, 73, and 88) compared to subjects who were virologic responders. Regression analyses revealed that protease mutations at codons 24 and 90 were most predictive of poor virologic response, whereas mutations at 82 were associated with enhanced virologic response. Certain NNRTI-associated mutations, such as K103N, were rapidly selected in the absence of NRTIs. These data indicate that GSS may be a useful tool in selecting drug regimens in HIV-1-infected subjects to maximize virologic response and improve treatment outcomes.

Association of efavirenz hypersusceptibility with virologic response in ACTG 368, a randomized trial of abacavir (ABC) in combination with efavirenz (EFV) and indinavir (IDV) in HIV-infected subjects with prior nucleoside analog experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association of efavirenz hypersusceptibility (EFV-HS) with clinical outcome in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of EFV plus indinavir (EFV+IDV) vs. EFV+IDV plus abacavir (ABC) in 283 nucleoside-experienced HIV-infected patients.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Rates of virologic failure were similar in the 2 arms at week 16 (p = .509). Treatment discontinuations were more common in the ABC arm (p = .001). Using logistic regression, there was no association between virologic failure and either baseline ABC resistance or regimen sensitivity score. Using 3 different genotypic scoring systems, EFV-HS was significantly associated with reduced virologic failure at week 16, independent of treatment assignment. In some patients on the nucleoside-sparing arm, the nucleoside-resistance mutation L74V was selected for in combination with the uncommonly occurring EFV-resistance mutations K103N+L100I; L74V was not detected as a minority variant, using clonal sequence analysis, when the nucleoside-sparing regimen was initiated.

CONCLUSION

Premature treatment discontinuations in the ABC arm and the presence of EFV-HS HIV variants in this patient population likely made it difficult to detect a benefit of adding ABC to EFV+IDV. In addition, L74V, when combined with K103N+L100I, may confer a selective advantage to the virus that is independent of its effects on nucleoside resistance.

Mechanisms of resistance to nucleoside analogue inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors can be classified into nucleoside and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors. Nucleoside RT inhibitors are converted to active triphosphate analogues and incorporated into the DNA in RT-catalyzed reactions. They act as chain terminators blocking DNA synthesis, since they lack the 3'-OH group required for the phosphodiester bond formation. Unfortunately, available therapies do not completely suppress viral replication, and the emergence of drug-resistant HIV variants is facilitated by the high adaptation capacity of the virus. Mutations in the RT-coding region selected during treatment with nucleoside analogues confer resistance through different mechanisms: (i) altering discrimination between nucleoside RT inhibitors and natural substrates (dNTPs) (e.g. Q151M, M184V, etc.), or (ii) increasing the RT's phosphorolytic activity (e.g. M41L, T215Y and other thymidine analogue resistance mutations), which in the presence of a pyrophosphate donor (usually ATP) allow the removal of chain-terminating inhibitors from the 3' end of the primer. Both mechanisms are implicated in multi-drug resistance. The excision reaction can be modulated by mutations conferring resistance to nucleoside or nonnucleoside RT inhibitors, and by amino acid substitutions that interfere with the proper binding of the template-primer, including mutations that affect RNase H activity. New developments in the field should contribute towards improving the efficacy of current therapies.

Interactions between non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations: phenotypes and mechanisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiretroviral regimens that combine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors have consistently been the most effective regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. Such combinations have been manufactured in several fixed-dose combinations and are the most commonly used treatments worldwide. The success of these regimens may partly be a result of the synergistic manner in which the two classes of compounds inhibit the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase enzyme.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple synergistic effects have been described in the mechanisms and pathways of drug resistance. This review outlines what is currently known about the interactions between nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance.

SUMMARY

These synergistic interactions are likely to be the driving force behind the potency and durability of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor/non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor combinations used in clinical practice.

Approach to salvage antiretroviral therapy in heavily antiretroviral-experienced HIV-positive adults

Despite dramatic declines in HIV-associated morbidity and mortality as a result of highly active antiretroviral therapy, management of heavily treatment-experienced patients remains complex and challenging. Treatment response rates with subsequent antiretroviral regimens are lower than with initial antiretroviral therapy. Additionally, increased mortality has been associated with multidrug-resistant HIV. We review data relevant to management of such patients and offer a systematic approach to constructing a salvage antiretroviral regimen.

Hypersusceptibility to substrate analogs conferred by mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) contains four structural motifs (A, B, C, and D) that are conserved in polymerases from diverse organisms. Motif B interacts with the incoming nucleotide, the template strand, and key active-site residues from other motifs, suggesting that motif B is an important determinant of substrate specificity. To examine the functional role of this region, we performed "random scanning mutagenesis" of 11 motif B residues and screened replication-competent mutants for altered substrate analog sensitivity in culture. Single amino acid replacements throughout the targeted region conferred resistance to lamivudine and/or hypersusceptibility to zidovudine (AZT). Substitutions at residue Q151 increased the sensitivity of HIV-1 to multiple nucleoside analogs, and a subset of these Q151 variants was also hypersusceptible to the pyrophosphate analog phosphonoformic acid (PFA). Other AZT-hypersusceptible mutants were resistant to PFA and are therefore phenotypically similar to PFA-resistant variants selected in vitro and in infected patients. Collectively, these data show that specific amino acid replacements in motif B confer broad-spectrum hypersusceptibility to substrate analog inhibitors. Our results suggest that motif B influences RT-deoxynucleoside triphosphate interactions at multiple steps in the catalytic cycle of polymerization.

Relative replication fitness of efavirenz-resistant mutants of HIV-1: correlation with frequency during clinical therapy and evidence of compensation for the reduced fitness of K103N + L100I by the nucleoside resistance mutation L74V

Efavirenz resistance during HIV-1 treatment failure is usually associated with the reverse transcriptase mutation K103N. L100I, V108I, or P225H can emerge after K103N and increase its level of efavirenz resistance. K103N + L100I is the most drug-resistant of the double mutants but is the least common clinically. We hypothesized that differences in replication efficiency, or fitness, influence the relative frequencies of these secondary efavirenz resistance mutations in clinical isolates. We measured fitness of each secondary mutant introduced into HIV(NL4-3), alone and in combination with K103N, using growth competition assays in H9 cells. In the absence of efavirenz, the fitness of V108I was indistinguishable from wild type. K103N, L100I, and P225H were minimally, but consistently, less fit than wild type. K103N + L100I had a greater reduction in fitness and was less fit than K103N + V108I and K103N + P225H. The fitness defect of K103N + L100I relative to K103N was completely compensated for by the addition of the nucleoside resistance mutation L74V. In the presence of efavirenz, L100I was less fit than K103N, and K103N + L100I was more fit than K103N + V108I. Our studies suggest the primary driving force behind the selection of secondary efavirenz resistance mutations is the acquisition of higher levels of drug resistance, but the specific secondary mutations to emerge are those with the least cost in terms of replication efficiency. In addition, nucleoside and NNRTI resistance mutations can interact to affect HIV replication efficiency; these interactions may influence which mutations emerge during treatment failure. These studies have important implications for the design of more durable NNRTI-nucleoside combination regimens.

Reverse transcriptase mutations 118I, 208Y, and 215Y cause HIV-1 hypersusceptibility to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

HIV-1 hypersusceptibility to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) improves the response to NNRTI-containing regimens. The genetic basis for NNRTI hypersusceptibility was partly defined in our earlier analyses of a paired genotype-phenotype dataset of viral isolates from treatment-experienced patients, in which we identified reverse transcriptase mutations V118I, H208Y, and T215Y as being strongly associated with NNRTI hypersusceptibility.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the role of these mutations in NNRTI hypersusceptibility by site-directed mutagenesis and phenotypic analysis of HIV-1 recombinants.

METHODS

Drug susceptibility and replication capacity were determined in single cycle assays. Hypersusceptibility was defined by a statistically significant (P < 0.01; Student's t-test) mean fold-change in 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of less than 0.4.

RESULTS

The single mutations V118I, H208Y, and T215Y did not show hypersusceptibility to efavirenz with mean fold-change of 0.58, 0.55, and 0.70, respectively (P < 0.01 and P = 0.12). The H208Y/T215Y and V118I/H208Y/T215Y mutants showed marked hypersusceptibility to efavirenz, having mean fold-change values of 0.27 and 0.20, respectively (P < 0.001). In addition, H208Y/T215Y, V118I/T215Y, and V118I/H208Y/T215Y were hypersusceptible to delavirdine and nevirapine. The V118I/T215Y mutant was not replication impaired; whereas H208Y/T215Y and V118I/H208Y/T215Y had significantly (P < 0.01) reduced replication capacities of 40 and 35% of wild-type, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Different combinations of V118I, H208Y, and T215Y produce NNRTI hypersusceptibility. The V118I/T215Y mutant is hypersusceptible to delavirdine and nevirapine without reduced replication capacity, whereas the H208Y/T215Y and V118I/H208Y/T215Y mutants are hypersusceptible to all NNRTI and show impaired replication. These findings suggest that more than one mechanism is involved in NNRTI hypersusceptibility.

The level of reverse transcriptase (RT) in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particles affects susceptibility to nonnucleoside RT inhibitors but not to lamivudine

We investigated the relationship between the level of reverse transcriptase (RT) in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) particles and susceptibility to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). HIV-1 virions containing different active levels of RT were generated. Susceptibility to the NNRTIs efavirenz and nevirapine was inversely proportional to the level of enzymatically active RT. However, the sensitivity of HIV-1 to the nucleoside analog 3TC was not affected by the level of RT per particle. These data indicate that the susceptibility of HIV-1 to NNRTIs is influenced by RT activity.

Phenotypic drug resistance patterns in subtype A HIV-1 clones with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase resistance mutations

We analyzed the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor (NNRTI) susceptibility of 29 subtype A HIV-1 clones isolated from 10 Ugandan women after single-dose nevirapine (NVP) administration. Six clones had no NNRTI resistance-associated mutations ("wild type"), eight had K103N, nine had Y181C, five had G190A, and one had Y181S. Three clones displayed unexpected phenotypic drug susceptibility/resistance based on their RT genotypes. One wild-type clone had reduced susceptibility to NVP, delavirdine (DLV), and efavirenz (EFV), one clone with K103N was susceptible to all three NNRTIs, and one clone with G190A had extreme hypersusceptibility to DLV. Three unusual HIV-1 RT amino acid substitutions may have contributed to the unexpected phenotypes of the clones: I31T, N136S, and N265D. These polymorphisms were rarely detected among 47,900 HIV-1 genotypes from clinical samples of predominantly United States origin. Further studies are needed to define the genetic correlates of antiretroviral drug resistance in nonsubtype B HIV-1.

Genotypic and phenotypic analyses of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in antiretroviral drug-naive Nigerian patients

We analyzed the subtypes and genotypic and phenotypic drug susceptibility profiles of 18 HIV-1 isolates from treatment-naive patients in Nigeria. A modified gp41-based heteroduplex mobility assay was used to determine the clade designation based on the envelope gene. The protease and most of the reverse transcriptase regions were cloned into a retroviral expression vector and sequenced. Samples were also analyzed phenotypically using a rapid phenotypic assay (PhenoSense HIV, ViroLogic, Inc.). According to the modified gp41-based heteroduplex mobility assay, the patients were infected with either clade G (17 specimens) or clade A (one specimen) isolates. From phylogenetic analyses of 1212 nucleotides of the polymerase gene, 14 of the 18 isolates were strongly grouped with subtype G reference strains. The remaining four isolates were grouped with the CRF_02_AG clade. Within the protease region, all 18 isolates had mutations/polymorphic substitutions at six locations compared to the HIV-1 NL4-3 reference sequence, two of which have been associated with resistance to protease inhibitors (K20I and M36I). At least half of the isolates had mutations/polymorphic substitutions at an additional five positions in the protease region. Within the reverse transcriptase (RT) region, all 18 isolates showed an E291D mutation/polymorphic substitution. Mutations/polymorphic substitutions were also found in at least half of the isolates at 21 positions. The phenotypic profiles of the viruses correlated well with the observed genotypes. Two isolates showed slightly reduced susceptibility to one or two of the five PIs assessed (ritonavir and ritonavir/nelfinavir) and all 18 viruses were susceptible to all NRTIs and NNRTIs analyzed.

Indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg bid and efavirenz 600 mg qd in patients failing treatment with combination nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: 96-week outcomes of HIV-NAT 009

OBJECTIVE

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTI) sparing is a favourable option for patients with NRTI failure or toxicity.

METHODS

Patients judged to be failing NRTI therapy were enrolled in a single-arm, open-label study of indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/r) 800/100 mg twice a day (bid)+efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg once a day (qd). The primary endpoint was the change in time-weighted average HIV RNA from baseline. The initial 48-week protocol was extended to 96 weeks by a single amendment. Analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (23 female) were enrolled in the study. Baseline median inter-quartile range (IQR) NRTI exposure was 4.4 (3.9-4.7) years; baseline median viral load was 4.09 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (range 3.75-4.61 log(10) copies/mL); baseline median CD4 count was 169 cells/microL (range 60-277 cells/microL). The mean (SD) change in time-weighted average HIV RNA from baseline at 48 and 96 weeks was -2.1 (0.7) and -2.1 (0.8) log(10) copies/mL respectively, resulting in 87% and 69% of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL. Sixteen per cent of patients permanently ceased therapy and 26% underwent temporary drug interruptions because of study drug-related adverse events. Fasted-lipid values rose significantly over the 96 weeks of study, as did median blood glucose and median serum creatinine levels. Twelve (20%) patients underwent IDV dose reduction, mainly because of nephrotoxicity (nine of 12 patients). Blood pressure values deteriorated following switch, but markers of nucleoside toxicity improved.

CONCLUSIONS

IDV/r 800/100 mg bid+EFV 600 mg qd gave a potent, durable response in these NRTI failures and was reasonably well tolerated. However, we observed adverse effects on renal, metabolic and blood pressure parameters. Lower doses of boosted IDV might improve toxicity while maintaining efficacy, and this possibility warrants further investigation.

Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor phenotypic hypersusceptibility can be demonstrated in different assays

BACKGROUND

HIV-1 isolates harboring multiple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance mutations are more susceptible ("hypersusceptible") to the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) than isolates lacking NRTI resistance mutations, but this has only been reported with a single-cycle replication phenotypic assay. In fact, there was a report that a commercial multicycle assay did not readily detect hypersusceptibility.

OBJECTIVE

To see whether NNRTI hypersusceptibility can be demonstrated in other types of phenotypic assays, including multicycle assays and enzyme inhibition assays.

METHODS

The susceptibility of HIV-1 clones derived from different patients in multicycle assays was tested in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and in an established cell line. In addition, the reverse transcriptase (RT) of many of these clones was expressed and their susceptibility tested in an RT inhibition assay. Nevirapine and efavirenz susceptibilities were tested and compared with a control wild-type virus or RT.

RESULTS

Hypersusceptibility to nevirapine and efavirenz was detected using each of the methods described above. R values correlating the other methods with single-cycle assay values were between 0.66 and 0.96. In addition to the high correlations, the different methods gave similar numeric results.

CONCLUSIONS

NNRTI hypersusceptibility is readily seen in multicycle susceptibility assays and in enzyme inhibition assays.

Phenotypic hypersusceptibility to multiple protease inhibitors and low replicative capacity in patients who are chronically infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Increased susceptibility to the protease inhibitors saquinavir and amprenavir has been observed in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with specific mutations in protease (V82T and N88S). Increased susceptibility to ritonavir has also been described in some viruses from antiretroviral agent-naive patients with primary HIV-1 infection in association with combinations of amino acid changes at polymorphic sites in the protease. Many of the viruses displaying increased susceptibility to protease inhibitors also had low replication capacity. In this retrospective study, we analyze the drug susceptibility phenotype and the replication capacity of virus isolates obtained at the peaks of viremia during five consecutive structured treatment interruptions in 12 chronically HIV-1-infected patients. Ten out of 12 patients had at least one sample with protease inhibitor hypersusceptibility (change </=0.4-fold) to one or more protease inhibitor. Hypersusceptibility to different protease inhibitors was observed at variable frequency, ranging from 38% to amprenavir to 11% to nelfinavir. Pairwise comparisons between susceptibilities for the protease inhibitors showed a consistent correlation among all pairs. There was also a significant relationship between susceptibility to protease inhibitors and replication capacity in all patients. Replication capacity remained stable over the course of repetitive cycles of structured treatment interruptions. We could find no association between in vitro replication capacity and in vivo plasma viral load doubling time and CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell counts at each treatment interruption. Several mutations were associated with hypersusceptibility to each protease inhibitor in a univariate analysis. This study extends the association between hypersusceptibility to protease inhibitors and low replication capacity to virus isolated from chronically infected patients and highlights the complexity of determining the genetic basis of this phenomenon. The potential clinical relevance of protease inhibitor hypersusceptibility and low replication capacity to virologic response to protease inhibitor-based therapies deserves to be investigated further.

Effects of the G190A substitution of HIV reverse transcriptase on phenotypic susceptibility of patient isolates to delavirdine

BACKGROUND

Cross resistance is common among the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). G190A appears in 5-15% of the patients treated with nevirapine or efavirenz who develop clinical resistance.

OBJECTIVES

In this study we investigated the effect of G190A and other NNRTI substitutions on the phenotypic susceptibility to this class of drugs.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified 15 individuals, who after treatment with NNRTIs (nevirapine or efavirenz; median exposure of 20 months), developed isolated G190A, G190A in combination with K103N, or K103N alone. Phenotypic and genotypic analyses of stored plasma specimens were performed before and after the mutations occurred to assess NNRTI susceptibility.

RESULTS

All isolates that developed only G190A substitution became less susceptible to nevirapine (median: 125-fold) and efavirenz (median: 10-fold) but were 2.5-fold more sensitive to delavirdine (Wilcoxon P = 0.06). In the group with only K103N substitution, acquisition of resistance to all NNRTIs was observed. In the group with the double substitutions, G190A and K103N, delavirdine susceptibility decreased 13-fold, while resistance to nevirapine and efavirenz decreased by 239- and 154-folds, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis H P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that the presence of a G190A substitution attenuates the phenotypic resistance associated with a K103N substitution, although resistance is still present. The in vivo significance of the increased phenotypic susceptibility to delavirdine is not known but could be evaluated in a clinical trial.

Inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcription: basic principles of drug action and resistance

Nucleoside and non-nucleoside analog inhibitors of HIV Type 1 reverse transcriptase are currently used in the clinic to treat infection with this retrovirus. Following their intracellular activation, nucleoside analogs act as chain terminators, while non-nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors bind to a hydrophobic pocket in close proximity to the active site and inhibit the catalytic step. Compounds that belong to the two different classes of drugs are frequently administered in combination to take advantage of the different mechanisms of drug action. However, the development of drug resistance may occur under conditions of continued, residual viral replication, which is a major cause of treatment failure. This review addresses the interaction between different inhibitors and resistance-conferring mutations in the context of combination therapy with drugs that target the reverse transcriptase enzyme. Focus is placed on biochemical mechanisms and the development of future approaches.

Efavirenz for HIV-1 infection in adults: an overview

Efavirenz (Sustiva), Bristol-Myers Squibb) is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that has been used successfully since the late 1990s to treat HIV-1 infection, and has since become a cornerstone of antiretroviral therapy. The efficacy and potency of efavirenz has been established in many clinical trials and cohort studies, where it has been compared with unboosted or ritonavir (Norvir, Abbott Laboratories Ltd)-boosted protease inhibitors, nevirapine (Viramune, Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd); and three nucleoside analog-based regimens. Pharmacokinetics allowing for a convenient once-daily administration make efavirenz one of the first agents to be included in once-daily regimens. Tolerability of efavirenz is satisfactory, although CNS-related toxicity can occur, and is still poorly understood. New insights into the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz could help to manage this unwanted toxicity. This drug profile will examine the principal data concerning the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety that have made efavirenz a standard of care in HIV-1 therapy, and will comment on new data that could change the way efavirenz is used in the near future.

Genetic correlates of efavirenz hypersusceptibility

BACKGROUND

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) hypersusceptibility is seen in approximately 30% of HIV isolates with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance. NNRTI hypersusceptibility has been associated with improved outcomes to NNRTI-based therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the genetic correlates of efavirenz hypersusceptibility.

METHODS

Paired baseline genotypes and phenotypes were obtained from 444 NRTI-experienced, NNRTI-naive patients. Fisher's exact tests, recursive partitioning (classification and regression trees; CART), and stepwise binary regression were used to identify specific reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations associated with efavirenz hypersusceptibility.

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, 26 RT codons were associated with efavirenz hypersusceptibility (P < 0.05), the top five were 215 > 41 > 210 > 118 > 208 (all P < 0.000001). From stepwise model selection, the 215, 208 and 118 mutations remained independently predictive of efavirenz hypersusceptibility. A final binary regression model to predict efavirenz hypersusceptibility included one covariate for the 215 mutation (relative risk 2.6, P < 0.0001) and a second covariate representing either the 208 or 118 mutation (relative risk 1.8, P < 0.0001). Similarly, in a CART analysis, a mutation at codon 215 was the first split selected, followed by mutations at 208 and 118. An efavirenz hypersusceptibility genotypic score using the three mutations 208, 118 and 215 was as accurate at predicting efavirenz hypersusceptibility as a more complex scoring system using 26 mutations.

CONCLUSION

Mutations at 215, 208 and 118 were independently associated with NNRTI hypersusceptibility. After confirmatory studies using other large datasets, incorporating a hypersusceptibility score into genotype interpretation algorithms will improve the prediction of NNRTI hypersusceptibility.

Baseline Resistance and Virological Outcome in Patients with Virological Failure who Start a Regimen Containing Abacavir: Eurosida Study

Objectives

To investigate the ability of several HIV-1 drug-resistance interpretation systems, as well as the number of pre-specified combinations of abacavir-related mutations, to predict virological response to abacavir-containing regimens in antiretroviral therapy-experienced, abacavir-naive patients starting an abacavir-containing regimen in the EuroSIDA cohort.

Patients and methods

A total of 100 HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL) >500 copies/ml who had a plasma sample available at the time of starting abacavir (baseline) were included. Resistance to abacavir was interpreted by using eight different commonly used systems that consisted of rules-based algorithms or tables of mutations. Correlation between baseline abacavir-resistance mutations and month 6 virological response was performed on this population using a multivariable linear regression model accounting for censored data.

Results

The baseline VL was 4.36 log10 RNA copies/ml [interquartile range (IQR): 3.65–4.99 log10 RNA copies/ml] and the median CD4 cell count was 210 cells/μl (IQR: 67–305 cells/μl). Our patients were pre-exposed to a median of seven antiretrovirals (2–12) before starting abacavir therapy. The median (range) number of abacavir mutations (according to the International AIDS Society-USA) detected at baseline was 3.5 (0–8). Overall, the Kaplan–Meier estimate of the median month 6 VL decline was 0.86 log10 RNA copies/ml [95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.45–1.24]. The VL in those patients ( n=31) who intensified treatment by adding only abacavir decreased by a median 0.20 log10 RNA copies/ml (95% CI: -0.18; +0.94). The proportion of patients who harboured viruses fully resistant to abacavir among the eight genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms ranged from 12% [Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS)] to 79% [Stanford HIV RT and PR Sequence Database (HIVdb)]. Some interpretation systems showed statistically significant associations between the predicted resistance status and the virological response while others showed no consistent association. The number of active drugs in the regimen was associated with greater virological suppression (additional month 6 VL reduction per additional sensitive drug=0.51, 95% CI: 0.15–0.88, P=0.006); baseline VL was also weakly associated (additional month 6 VL reduction per log10 higher=0.30, 95% CI: -0.02; +0.62, P=0.06). In contrast, the number of drugs previously received was associated with diminished viral reduction (additional month 6 VL reduction per additional drug=-0.14, 95% CI: -0.28; 0.00, P=0.05).

Conclusions

Our results revealed a high degree of variability among several genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms currently in use for abacavir. Therefore, the interpretation of genotypic resistance for predicting response to regimens containing abacavir remains a major challenge.

Clinically Validated Genotype Analysis: Guiding Principles and Statistical Concerns

Whereas previously the output of HIV resistance tests has been based on therapeutically arbitrary criteria, there is now an ongoing move towards correlating test interpretation with virological outcomes on treatment. This approach is undeniably superior, in principle, for tests intended to guide drug choices. However the predictive accuracy of a given stratagem that links genotype or phenotype to drug response is strongly influenced by the study design, data capture and analytical methodology used to derive it. For genotyping, the most widely used resistance tool in clinical practice, these considerations are further complicated by the range of mutational patterns present in the treated population. There is no definitively superior methodology for generating a genotype-response association for use in interpreting a resistance test, and the various approaches used to date all have their strengths and weaknesses. This review discusses the processes involved in constructing such tools, with particular emphasis on establishing validated mutation score rules, and examines the key issues and confounding factors that influence predictive accuracy outside the originating dataset. Since the size of the sample is a key influence on the statistical power to determine an effect, it is hoped that a greater understanding of the influence of study design and methodology will assist the development of standardized outcome measures and reporting formats that allow data pooling at the international level.

Pharmacodynamics and clinical use of anti-HIV drugs

Antiretroviral drug exposure has been linked to both antiviral efficacy and the development of toxicity and further research in this area is ongoing and necessary. Use of these data may have important implications for TDM of HAART regimens in clinical practice. TDM, in conjunction with an assessment of the patient's viral resistance in the form of an IQ, needs to be examined and validated in large clinical trials.

Virological significance, prevalence and genetic basis of hypersusceptibility to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) are used to treat HIV-infected individuals in combination with nucleoside analogues (NRTI) and protease inhibitors. Long-term treatment with antiretroviral agents results in the emergence of strains with decreased susceptibility (resistance) to the drugs and is one of the major factors in loss of drug efficacy. Conversely, there have been recent reports of HIV strains with increased susceptibility (hypersusceptibility) to NNRTIs. These isolates emerge in patients on long-term antiretroviral therapy particularly in individuals receiving NRTIs. The prevalence of NNRTI hypersusceptibility ranges between 17.5 and 50% in NRTI-treatment experienced compared to 10% in NRTI-naïve patients. There is an inverse correlation between NNRTI hypersusceptibility and phenotypic NRTI resistance and a direct correlation between the number of NRTI resistance mutations present in the HIV reverse transcriptase. Re-sensitisation of phenotypic NNRTI resistance has been reported by NRTI mutations and is not likely to be detected using genotypic resistance assays. Recent studies demonstrate that NNRTI hypersusceptible virus at baseline is likely to predict better virological outcomes in patients on NNRTI-based salvage regimens compared to patients with NNRTI susceptible virus. These studies have implications for the sequence of antiretroviral drug use where patients may benefit from NRTI therapy before the introduction of NNRTIs, however more studies are needed to examine this treatment rationale.

HIV resistance to nevirapine and other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Nevirapine and other members of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) family of anti-HIV-1 drugs are essential components of antiretroviral treatment regimens. Unfortunately, drug resistance has become an important issue with respect to all therapeutic targets in HIV-1. This paper summarizes current knowledge about the mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene of HIV-1 that are responsible for drug resistance and the mechanisms whereby drug resistance develops.

New patterns of HIV-1 resistance during HAART

HIV-1 resistance and subsequent virologic failure occur in a substantial proportion of HIV-infected patients receiving HAART regimens. In the present article, we summarize new data on resistance to current and forthcoming antiretroviral drugs which will help in the interpretation of the results of resistance tests and the individualization of therapy. Nucleoside analog mutations (NAMs) (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F and K219Q/E) are associated with reduced susceptibility to most nucleoside analogs and the nucleotide tenofovir. This recently approved drug has shown a reduced virologic response in the presence of three or more NAMs, including M41L or L210W, as well as in the presence of T69 insertions. Hypersusceptibility (IC50 < 0.5) to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) has recently been described in association with increased resistance to nucleoside analogs, and it seems to enhance the immunologic and virologic reponses in patients receiving efavirenz-containing regimens. New protease inhibitors (PIs) have a lower cross-resistance profile, although more clinical data are needed to establish appropriate PI sequencing to promote sustained virologic success. Cross-resistance between amprenavir (APV) and lopinavir (LPV/r) in the presence of only four APV-related mutations has been described, suggesting that phenotypic tests should be applied before prescribing LPV/r to APV-experienced patients. Resistance to the new entry inhibitor class compound T-20 (enfuvirtide) has also been detected.

Modest Decreases in Nnrti Susceptibility Do Not Influence Virological Outcome in Patients Receiving Initial Nnrti-Containing Triple Therapy

Objective

To assess the prevalence of modest (<10-fold) decreases in baseline non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) susceptibility and their impact on virological response to NNRTI-containing triple therapy in drug-naive individuals.

Methods

Baseline HIV resistance phenotype, genotype and response to therapy were examined retrospectively for all antiretroviral-naive individuals initiating therapy with two nucleoside analogues and an NNRTI in British Columbia, Canada, between 05/1997 and 08/1999 ( n=279), followed until July 31 2001. Time to viral suppression (first of at least two consecutive plasma viral loads <400 copies HIV RNA copies/ml) and viral rebound (to ≥400 copies/ml after first pVL <400 copies HIV RNA copies/ml), were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

Nevirapine was the most commonly prescribed NNRTI (96%). Four- to 10-fold decreased susceptibility to NNRTIs was observed in >30% of untreated individuals at baseline, an observation strongly driven by decreased susceptibility to delavirdine (22.4%). A >10-fold decrease in susceptibility to any NNRTI was observed only rarely (<2%). There was no association between four- and 10-fold decreased baseline susceptibility to NNRTIs and virological outcome ( P>0.05). In multivariate analyses, the strongest predictors of poor virological response to NNRTI-based therapy were baseline plasma viral load and the proportion of time on therapy in the first year of follow-up. There was no relationship between the presence of previously reported mutations associated with decreased NNRTI susceptibility (at codons 135 and 283 in HIV reverse transcriptase) and virological response.

Conclusions

These data suggest that the clinically significant level of resistance to NNRTIs, particularly nevirapine, in drug-naive individuals is likely greater than four- to 10-fold.

Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1: 2003 recommendations of an International AIDS Society-USA Panel

New information about the benefits and limitations of testing for resistance to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (HIV-1) drugs has emerged. The International AIDS Society-USA convened a panel of physicians and scientists with expertise in antiretroviral drug management, HIV-1 drug resistance, and patient care to provide updated recommendations for HIV-1 resistance testing. Published data and presentations at scientific conferences, as well as strength of the evidence, were considered. Properly used resistance testing can improve virological outcome among HIV-infected individuals. Resistance testing is recommended in cases of acute or recent HIV infection, for certain patients who have been infected as long as 2 years or more prior to initiating therapy, in cases of antiretroviral failure, and during pregnancy. Limitations of resistance testing remain, and more study is needed to refine optimal use and interpretation.

The M184V substitution in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase delays the development of resistance to amprenavir and efavirenz in subtype B and C clinical isolates

The M184V substitution in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT), encoding high-level resistance to lamivudine (3TC), results in decreased HIV-1 replicative capacity, diminished RT processivity, and increased RT fidelity in biochemical assays. We assessed the effect of M184V on the development of resistance to the nonnucleoside RT inhibitors efavirenz (EFV) and nevirapine, and to the protease inhibitor amprenavir (APV) in tissue culture. Genotypic analysis revealed differences in EFV resistance-conferring mutations in subtype B (K103N) versus subtype C (V106 M), and the appearance of both was significantly delayed in the M184V-containing variants compared with the wild type (WT). Similarly, there was a marked delay in the emergence of mutations associated with APV resistance (I54 M/L/V) in subtype B viruses harboring M184V compared with paired WT viral isolates.

Phenotypic susceptibility and virological outcome in nucleoside-experienced patients receiving three or four antiretroviral drugs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate phenotypic drug susceptibility and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor hypersusceptibility as predictors of the time to virological failure.

DESIGN

In a randomized clinical trial, phenotypic susceptibility was retrospectively determined among 131 exclusively nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-experienced patients with baseline HIV-RNA levels greater than 2000 copies/ml. Subjects were assigned two NRTI drugs and were randomly assigned to nelfinavir, efavirenz, or both. Virological failure was defined as two HIV-RNA measurements of 2000 copies/ml or greater at or after week 16 and before treatment discontinuation.

METHODS

Using biological cut-offs to define resistance, assigned NRTI and randomized drug regimens, continuous and dichotomous phenotypic susceptibility scores (PSS) were calculated for each virus. Efavirenz hypersusceptibility as a dichotomous value was defined as less than 0.4-fold resistance. Associations between virological failure and continuous and dichotomous PSS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

A higher baseline viral load (P < 0.02) and lower dichotomous or continuous baseline PSS (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively) were independently associated with virological failure. In the 85 subjects who received efavirenz, efavirenz hypersusceptibility (P = 0.042, hazard ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.97) was independently associated with a reduced risk of virological failure.

CONCLUSION

Reduced phenotypic susceptibility was a significant independent risk factor for virological failure. The presence of efavirenz hypersusceptibility appeared to enhance virological responses during treatment with efavirenz in combination with NRTIs. The retrospective calculation of continuous PSS accurately identified treatment regimens containing sufficient drug activity to prevent virological failure.

HIV-1 resistance profile of the novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor beta-D-2',3'-dideoxy-2',3'-didehydro-5-fluorocytidine (Reverset)

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) represent the cornerstone of highly active antiretroviral therapy when combined with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) or HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs). Unlike the NNRTIs and PIs, NRTIs must be successively phosphorylated by cellular kinases to a triphosphate form, which represents the active metabolite possessing antiviral activity. Emergence of viral resistance to NRTIs has severely hampered treatment options for persons infected with HIV-1. As such, there is an urgent need to develop NRTIs capable of suppressing NRTI-resistant strains of HIV-1. We have recently reported that the cytidine analogue D-d4FC (DPC817, Reverset) effectively inhibits clinically prevalent resistant strains of HIV-1. In this report, we have extended these findings and now describe a detailed resistance profile for this novel NRTI. By examining a panel of 50 viruses carrying RTs derived from HIV-1 clinical isolates displaying a wide range of NRTI resistance mutations, we report that the median fold increase in effective antiviral concentration for such a panel of viruses is 3.2, which is comparable to tenofovir (2.8-fold) and didanosine (2.4-fold). D-d4FC is highly effective at inhibiting subsets of lamivudine- and zidovudine-resistant variants but, like other NRTIs, seems less potent against multi-NRTI-resistant viruses, particularly those carrying the Q151M complex of mutations. Finally, in vitro selections for HIV-1 mutants capable of replicating in the presence of D-d4FC yielded a mutant carrying the RT K65R mutation. This mutation confers 5.3- to 8.7-fold resistance to D-d4FC in vitro. These findings suggest that D-d4FC may represent an alternative NRTI for the treatment of individuals infected with lamivudine- and zidovudine-resistant strains of HIV-1.

HIV-1 genotypic and phenotypic resistance

Antiretroviral failure caused by the development of drug resistance in HIV-1 is an increasingly common clinical problem. Two types of resistance assays are available to clinicians. Genotypic assays determine the presence of mutations associated with drug resistance. The interpretation of mutations is often complicated, however, and may require expert opinion. Phenotypic assays provide a direct measure of the drug susceptibility of the virus. The magnitude of increase, however, in viral drug inhibitory concentration that is predictive of clinical drug failure remains unknown for several antiretroviral drugs. The mutational patterns underlying resistance to each antiretroviral drug are often diverse, and cross-resistance patterns within each of the currently available classes are complex. Currently, resistance testing is recommended for patients who have virologic failure on an antiretroviral regimen. Furthermore, testing should also be considered in treatment-native patients when the prevalence of transmitted drug-resistant virus is expected to be high.

Evolving patterns of HIV-1 resistance to antiretroviral agents in newly infected individuals

OBJECTIVE

To assess temporal changes in prevalence of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance in a homogeneous cohort of newly infected individuals.

METHODS

Pretreatment genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance was tested in 154 subjects with primary HIV-1 infection identified between 1995 and 2001 (group A; n = 76) and 1999 and 2001 (group B; n = 78). Sequence analysis was assessed by population-based sequencing. Virus susceptibility to antiretroviral agents was determined by the PhenoSense assay (ViroLogic).

RESULTS

The frequency of resistance-associated mutations in protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) genes increased from 13.2% (1995-1998) to 19.7% (1999-2001). Although the overall prevalence of viruses with phenotypic resistance did not vary (1995-1998, 10.0%; 1999-2001, 10.8%), the distribution of drug classes changed [nucleoside RT inhibitor (NRTI): 8.3% to 2.7%; non-NRTI: 5.0% to 8.1%; protease inhibitors (PI): 1.7% to 5.4%]. The decrease of phenotypic resistance to NRTI in 1999-2001 was caused by the absence of transmitted lamivudine-resistant variants. Phenotypically susceptible variants with aspartic acid or serine residues at position 215 of RT (5.3%; P = 0.04) instead emerged. Hypersusceptibility to PI decreased from 18.3% to 5.4% (P = 0.02) while the amino acid substitutions in PR increased over time: M36I (6.6% to 19.7%) and A71V/T (3.9% to 15.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was an increase in the number of HIV-1 variants with both genotypic and phenotypic resistance to non-NRTI and PI over time. Furthermore, viruses with altered genotypes compatible with thymidine analogue or PI exposure but susceptible phenotypes were seen in 1999-2001. The latter findings suggest transmission of viruses from subjects who have either changed or discontinued therapy.

Pressure of zidovudine accelerates the reversion of lamivudine resistance-conferring M184V mutation in the reverse transcriptase of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

We cultured lamivudine-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variants over an extended period of time in the presence of zidovudine and observed a premature reversion of the resistance-conferring M184V mutation. These data suggest that the presence of ZDV amplifies differences in replication capacity between wild-type HIV-1 and the mutant variant.

Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

There are 16 approved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drugs belonging to three mechanistic classes: protease inhibitors, nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors. HIV-1 resistance to these drugs is caused by mutations in the protease and RT enzymes, the molecular targets of these drugs. Drug resistance mutations arise most often in treated individuals, resulting from selective drug pressure in the presence of incompletely suppressed virus replication. HIV-1 isolates with drug resistance mutations, however, may also be transmitted to newly infected individuals. Three expert panels have recommended that HIV-1 protease and RT susceptibility testing should be used to help select HIV drug therapy. Although genotypic testing is more complex than typical antimicrobial susceptibility tests, there is a rich literature supporting the prognostic value of HIV-1 protease and RT mutations. This review describes the genetic mechanisms of HIV-1 drug resistance and summarizes published data linking individual RT and protease mutations to in vitro and in vivo resistance to the currently available HIV drugs.