Supraspinal and spinal cord opioid receptors are responsible for antinociception following intrathecal morphine injections:

Assessing effects of tamoxifen on tolerance, dependence, and glutamate and glutamine levels in frontal cortex and hippocampus in chronic morphine treatment

Tamoxifen has been shown to reduce glutamate release from presynaptic glutamatergic nerves and reverse tolerance to morphine-induced respiratory depression. Changes in glutamatergic neurotransmission in the central nervous system contribute to morphine tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal. This study, therefore, evaluated effects of tamoxifen on development of analgesic tolerance and dependence, and brain glutamate and glutamine levels in chronic morphine administration. Mice implanted with placebo or morphine pellets were injected with tamoxifen (0.6-2 mg/kg) or vehicle twice daily for 3 days. Nociceptive response was evaluated in the hot plate and tail immersion tests, 4, 48 and 72 h post-implant, and following a challenge dose of morphine (10 mg/kg). Withdrawal signs were determined after naloxone (1 mg/kg) administration. Morphine increased nociceptive threshold which declined over time. At 72 h, acute morphine elicited tolerance to the analgesic effect in the hot plate test in vehicle or tamoxifen administered animals. In the tail immersion test, however, tolerance to morphine analgesia was observed in tamoxifen, but not vehicle, co-administration. Tamoxifen did not reduce withdrawal signs. In contrast to previous reports, glutamate and glutamine levels in the hippocampus and frontal cortex did not change in the morphine-vehicle group. Confirming previous findings, tamoxifen (2 mg/kg) decreased glutamate and glutamine concentrations in the hippocampus in animals with placebo pellets. Both doses of tamoxifen significantly changed glutamate and/or glutamine concentrations in both regions in morphine pellet implanted animals. These results suggest that tamoxifen has no effect on dependence but may facilitate tolerance development to the antinociception, possibly mediated at the spinal level, in chronic morphine administration.

Human OPRM1 and murine Oprm1 promoter driven viral constructs for genetic access to μ-opioidergic cell types

With concurrent global epidemics of chronic pain and opioid use disorders, there is a critical need to identify, target and manipulate specific cell populations expressing the mu-opioid receptor (MOR). However, available tools and transgenic models for gaining long-term genetic access to MOR+ neural cell types and circuits involved in modulating pain, analgesia and addiction across species are limited. To address this, we developed a catalog of MOR promoter (MORp) based constructs packaged into adeno-associated viral vectors that drive transgene expression in MOR+ cells. MORp constructs designed from promoter regions upstream of the mouse Oprm1 gene (mMORp) were validated for transduction efficiency and selectivity in endogenous MOR+ neurons in the brain, spinal cord, and periphery of mice, with additional studies revealing robust expression in rats, shrews, and human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived nociceptors. The use of mMORp for in vivo fiber photometry, behavioral chemogenetics, and intersectional genetic strategies is also demonstrated. Lastly, a human designed MORp (hMORp) efficiently transduced macaque cortical OPRM1+ cells. Together, our MORp toolkit provides researchers cell type specific genetic access to target and functionally manipulate mu-opioidergic neurons across a range of vertebrate species and translational models for pain, addiction, and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Opioid Receptor Regulation of Neuronal Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels

Neuronal voltage-gated calcium channels play a pivotal role in the conversion of electrical signals into calcium entry into nerve endings that is required for the release of neurotransmitters. They are under the control of a number of cellular signaling pathways that serve to fine tune synaptic activities, including G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and the opioid system. Besides modulating channel activity via activation of second messengers, GPCRs also physically associate with calcium channels to regulate their function and expression at the plasma membrane. In this mini review, we discuss the mechanisms by which calcium channels are regulated by classical opioid and nociceptin receptors. We highlight the importance of this regulation in the control of neuronal functions and their implication in the development of disease conditions. Finally, we present recent literature concerning the use of novel μ-opioid receptor/nociceptin receptor modulators and discuss their use as potential drug candidates for the treatment of pain.

Opioid receptors mRNAs expression and opioids agonist-dependent G-protein activation in the rat brain following neuropathy

Potent opioid-based therapies are often unsuccessful in promoting satisfactory analgesia in neuropathic pain. Moreover, the side effects associated with opioid therapy are still manifested in neuropathy-like diseases, including tolerance, abuse, addiction and hyperalgesia, although the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Studies in the spinal cord and periphery indicate that neuropathy alters the expression of mu-[MOP], delta-[DOP] or kappa-[KOP] opioid receptors, interfering with their activity. However, there is no consensus as to the supraspinal opioidergic modulation provoked by neuropathy, the structures where the sensory and affective-related pain components are processed. In this study we explored the effect of chronic constriction of the sciatic nerve (CCI) over 7 and 30 days (CCI-7d and CCI-30d, respectively) on MOP, DOP and KOP mRNAs expression, using in situ hybridization, and the efficacy of G-protein stimulation by DAMGO, DPDPE and U-69593 (MOP, DOP and KOP specific agonists, respectively), using [35S]GTPγS binding, within opioid-sensitive brain structures. After CCI-7d, CCI-30d or both, opioid receptor mRNAs expression was altered throughout the brain: MOP - in the paracentral/centrolateral thalamic nuclei, ventral posteromedial thalamic nuclei, superior olivary complex, parabrachial nucleus [PB] and posterodorsal tegmental nucleus; DOP - in the somatosensory cortex [SSC], ventral tegmental area, caudate putamen [CPu], nucleus accumbens [NAcc], raphe magnus [RMg] and PB; and KOP - in the locus coeruleus. Agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding was altered following CCI: MOP - CPu and RMg; DOP - prefrontal cortex [PFC], SSC, RMg and NAcc; and KOP - PFC and SSC. Thus, this study shows that several opioidergic circuits in the brain are recruited and modified following neuropathy.

Antinociceptive effects of the 6-O-sulfate ester of morphine in normal and diabetic rats: Comparative role of mu- and delta-opioid receptors

This study determined the antinociceptive effects of morphine and morphine-6-O-sulfate (M6S) in both normal and diabetic rats, and evaluated the comparative role of mu-opioid receptors (mu-ORs) and delta-opioid receptors (delta-ORs) in the antinociceptive action of these opioids. In vitro characterization of mu-OR and delta-OR-mediated signaling by M6S and morphine in stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells showed that M6S exhibited a 6-fold higher affinity for delta-ORs and modulated G-protein and adenylyl cyclase activity via delta-ORs more potently than morphine. Interestingly, while morphine acted as a full agonist at delta-ORs in both functional assays examined, M6S exhibited either partial or full agonist activity for modulation of G-protein or adenylyl cyclase activity, respectively. Molecular docking studies indicated that M6S but not morphine binds equally well at the ligand binding site of both mu- and delta-ORs. In vivo analgesic effects of M6S and morphine in both normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats utilizing the hot water tail flick latency test showed that M6S produced more potent antinociception than morphine in both normal rats and diabetic rats. This difference in potency was abrogated following antagonism of delta- but not mu- or kappa (kappa-ORs) opioid receptors. During 9days of chronic treatment, tolerance developed to morphine-treated but not to M6S-treated rats. Rats that developed tolerance to morphine still remained responsive to M6S. Collectively, this study demonstrates that M6S is a potent and efficacious mu/delta opioid analgesic with a delayed tolerance profile when compared to morphine in both normal and diabetic rats.

PERSPECTIVE

This study demonstrates that M6S acts at both mu- and delta-ORs, and adds to the growing evidence that the use of mixed mu/delta opioid agonists in pain treatment may have clinical benefit.

The Physiology, Pathology, and Pharmacology of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels and Their Future Therapeutic Potential

Voltage-gated calcium channels are required for many key functions in the body. In this review, the different subtypes of voltage-gated calcium channels are described and their physiologic roles and pharmacology are outlined. We describe the current uses of drugs interacting with the different calcium channel subtypes and subunits, as well as specific areas in which there is strong potential for future drug development. Current therapeutic agents include drugs targeting L-type Ca(V)1.2 calcium channels, particularly 1,4-dihydropyridines, which are widely used in the treatment of hypertension. T-type (Ca(V)3) channels are a target of ethosuximide, widely used in absence epilepsy. The auxiliary subunit α2δ-1 is the therapeutic target of the gabapentinoid drugs, which are of value in certain epilepsies and chronic neuropathic pain. The limited use of intrathecal ziconotide, a peptide blocker of N-type (Ca(V)2.2) calcium channels, as a treatment of intractable pain, gives an indication that these channels represent excellent drug targets for various pain conditions. We describe how selectivity for different subtypes of calcium channels (e.g., Ca(V)1.2 and Ca(V)1.3 L-type channels) may be achieved in the future by exploiting differences between channel isoforms in terms of sequence and biophysical properties, variation in splicing in different target tissues, and differences in the properties of the target tissues themselves in terms of membrane potential or firing frequency. Thus, use-dependent blockers of the different isoforms could selectively block calcium channels in particular pathologies, such as nociceptive neurons in pain states or in epileptic brain circuits. Of important future potential are selective Ca(V)1.3 blockers for neuropsychiatric diseases, neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease, and resistant hypertension. In addition, selective or nonselective T-type channel blockers are considered potential therapeutic targets in epilepsy, pain, obesity, sleep, and anxiety. Use-dependent N-type calcium channel blockers are likely to be of therapeutic use in chronic pain conditions. Thus, more selective calcium channel blockers hold promise for therapeutic intervention.

Calcium-permeable ion channels in pain signaling

The detection and processing of painful stimuli in afferent sensory neurons is critically dependent on a wide range of different types of voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels, including sodium, calcium, and TRP channels, to name a few. The functions of these channels include the detection of mechanical and chemical insults, the generation of action potentials and regulation of neuronal firing patterns, the initiation of neurotransmitter release at dorsal horn synapses, and the ensuing activation of spinal cord neurons that project to pain centers in the brain. Long-term changes in ion channel expression and function are thought to contribute to chronic pain states. Many of the channels involved in the afferent pain pathway are permeable to calcium ions, suggesting a role in cell signaling beyond the mere generation of electrical activity. In this article, we provide a broad overview of different calcium-permeable ion channels in the afferent pain pathway and their role in pain pathophysiology.

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance: understanding opioid side effects

Opioid-induced pain or opioid tolerance should be considered when opioid therapy fails to provide expected analgesic effects or when there is unexplainable pain exacerbation following opioid treatment. As a result, an increase in the opioid dosage may not be the solution to ineffective opioid therapy for chronic pain management. A decrease in the opioid mass may actually provide pain relief in many instances. At one time, it was anticipated that opioid-induced pain was related to upregulation of NMDA receptors with a downregulation of mu receptors. However, there is growing evidence to suggest the opioid receptor-based hyperalgesic mechanism may be directly modulated by the NMDA receptor. Furthermore, the mechanism that causes opioid tolerance may be the same mechanism that causes opioid-induced pain. Current evidence suggests that opioid-induced pain sensitivity could be prevented by interrupting the cellular and molecular changes associated with the development of opioid tolerance. Continued research may lead the way to a new period in which patients prone to opioid-induced pain could be identified, allowing one to tailor pharmacologic pain therapy to each patient.

A randomised controlled trial of hyperbaric bupivacaine with opioids, injected as either a mixture or sequentially, for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section

It is common practice to mix opioids with hyperbaric bupivacaine in a single syringe before intrathecal injection of the mixture. Mixing these drugs may alter the density of the hyperbaric solution, affecting the spread of local anaesthetic and opioid. Forty-eight women having elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were recruited to this double-blind, randomised trial. Group M (n=24) received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus morphine 100 microg plus fentanyl 15 microg, mixed in a syringe prior to administration. Group S (n=24) received 2 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine through one syringe, followed by morphine 100 microg plus fentanyl 15 microg through a separate syringe. All patients received patient-controlled intravenous morphine for 24 hours postoperatively. Block characteristics, postoperative pain scores and morphine use were noted. The patients in Group M had higher levels of sensory block to cold than those in Group S (median T2 vs. T3) (P = 0.003). Five patients in Group M and none in Group S had a block to cold > or = T1 (P = 0.02). There was no difference between groups in the incidence of hypotension, need for vasopressor or side-effects. Morphine consumption was significantly higher in group M (13.3 +/- 11.2 vs. 6.2 +/- 7.2 mg, P = 0.015). Mixing of fentanyl and morphine with hyperbaric bupivacaine results in a higher level of sensory block than sequential administration of bupivacaine then opioid and may be associated with higher postoperative opioid requirement.

Pharmacological selectivity of CTAP in a warm water tail-withdrawal antinociception assay in rats

RATIONALE

To facilitate in vivo characterization of the mu antagonist Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2) (CTAP), the present study characterized CTAP selectivity in vivo.

OBJECTIVES

CTAP, the classical antagonist naltrexone, the kappa-selective antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (BNI), and the delta-selective antagonist naltrindole were compared as antagonists of representative mu, kappa, and delta agonists in a warm water tail-withdrawal assay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were pretreated with CTAP (0.01 to 10.0 microg, i.c.v.), naltrexone (0.1 to 10 mg/kg s.c.; 0.1 to 10 microg i.c.v.), nor-BNI (1 mg/kg s.c.), or naltrindole (0.01 to 1 microg, i.c.v.) and tested with cumulative doses of agonist in 50 or 55 degrees C tail-withdrawal assays.

RESULTS

At 55 degrees C, morphine and DAMGO produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects that were antagonized by CTAP or naltrexone (s.c. or i.c.v.) in a surmountable, dose-dependent manner. Neither kappa agonists (bremazocine, spiradoline, U69,593; all s.c.) nor the delta agonist DPDPE (i.c.v.) produced antinociception at 55 degrees C, but all produced full antinociception at 50 degrees C. CTAP did not antagonize effects of spiradoline, U69,593, or DPDPE, whereas nor-BNI produced insurmountable antagonism of effects of kappa agonists, and naltrindole produced surmountable antagonism of effects of DPDPE. Apparent pA (2) estimates for naltrexone, CTAP, and naltrindole agreed with published estimates, although Schild slopes diverged from predictions for simple competitive antagonism.

CONCLUSIONS

CTAP produces dose-dependent antagonism selective for mu-agonist effects in a standard 55 degrees C tail withdrawal antinociceptive assay.

Lack of Reciprocity between Opioid and 5-HT3 Receptors for Antinociception in Rat Spinal Cord

We examined the properties of the drug interaction between morphine and 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist at the spinal level. The nociceptive state was induced by subcutaneously injecting formalin solution (5%, 50 microl) into the hindpaw of the rats. Intrathecal morphine and m-CPBG (5-HT(3) receptor agonist) dose-dependently decreased the flinching response during phase 1 and phase 2 in the formalin test. Intrathecal 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists (LY-278,584 and ondansetron) did not reverse the antinociceptive effect of intrathecal morphine. Intrathecal naloxone had little effect on attenuation of the antinociception of intrathecal m-CPBG. Taken together, no reciprocal interaction was noted between 5-HT(3) receptor and opioid receptors at the spinal level. Thus, the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist may be useful to manage opioid-induced emesis at the spinal level.

Morphine tolerance does not develop in mice treated with endothelin-A receptor antagonists

Long-term use of morphine leads to development of antinociceptive tolerance. We provide evidence that central endothelin (ET) mechanisms are involved in development of morphine tolerance. In the present study, we investigated the effect of ET(A) receptor antagonists, BQ123 and BMS182874, on morphine antinociception and tolerance in mice. Mechanism of interaction of ET(A) receptor antagonists with morphine was investigated. BQ123 (3 microg, i.c.v.) and BMS182874 (50 microg, i.c.v.) significantly enhanced antinociceptive effect of morphine (P < 0.05), through an opioid-mediated effect. Treatment with a single dose of BQ123 (3 microg, i.c.v.) reversed tolerance to morphine antinociception in morphine-tolerant mice. BQ123 or BMS182874 did not affect naloxone binding in the brain. Therefore, ET(A) receptor antagonists did not bind directly to opioid receptors. [35S]GTPgammaS binding was stimulated by morphine and ET-1 in non-tolerant mice. Morphine- and ET-1-induced GTP stimulation was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in morphine-tolerant group (33% and 42%, respectively) compared to control group. BQ123 and BMS182874 did not activate binding in non-tolerant mice. BQ123 and BMS182874 significantly increased G protein activation in morphine-tolerant mice (96% and 86%, respectively; P < 0.05). These results provide evidence that uncoupling of G protein occurs in morphine-tolerant mice, and ET(A) antagonists promote coupling of G protein to its receptors, thereby restoring antinociceptive effect. These findings indicate that ET(A) receptor antagonists potentiate morphine antinociception and reverse antinociceptive tolerance in mice, through their ability to couple G proteins to opioid receptors.