Monophasic luminal release of prostaglandin E2 in patients with reflux esophagitis under the impact of acid and acid/pepsin solutions. Its potential pathogenetic significance

Does the healing of the esophageal mucosa improve the function of the esophageal submucosal and salivary glands?

The esophageal pre-epithelial barrier encompasses components of secretions from both the esophageal submucosal and salivary glands. We demonstrated, in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE), significantly diminished luminal release of esophageal epidermal growth factor (EGF). The rate of luminal release of esophageal prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂ ) was significantly higher compared with controls and significantly declined after healing of RE. Patients with RE also exhibited significant declines in esophageal mucin secretion; however, after healing of RE with rabeprazole, this rate increased significantly. The rate of salivary EGF and bicarbonate secretion in patients with RE was significantly lower than in controls. We have demonstrated that mastication of tasteless parafilm, which could be substituted with sugarless chewing gum in the clinical scenario, resulted in profound and significant increases in the rate of secretion of salivary protective factors, such as bicarbonate, mucin, protein, EGF, and PGE₂ , in patients with RE. Our data clearly indicate that there is a relationship between the form or the structure of the esophageal mucosa and the secretory function of not only the esophageal submucosal glands but also the salivary glands. Application of masticatory stimulation in a clinical scenario may also have some therapeutic potential.

A distinct salivary secretory response mediated by the esophago-salivary reflex in patients with Barrett's esophagus: its potential pathogenetic implications

PURPOSE

A significantly compromised epidermal growth factor (EGF) secretion by basal parotid saliva may contribute to the development of Barrett's esophagus (BE). The rate of secretion of EGF as well as a wide spectrum of protective factors in total basal and stimulated saliva in BE patients remains to be explored. We therefore studied the rate of secretion of salivary buffers, glycoconjugate, protein, EGF, transforming growth factor α (TGFα) and prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂), evoked by esophago-salivary reflex, in patients with BE and controls (CTRL).

MATERIAL/METHODS

Salivary secretion was collected during basal condition, mastication, and intraesophageal mechanical and chemical stimulations respectively, mimicking the natural gastroesophageal reflux scenario.

RESULTS

Salivary pH in BE was significantly lower than in controls during mechanical (p<0.001) and chemical stimulations (p<0.001). Bicarbonate and protein outputs in BE were significantly lower during mechanical (p<0.05) and chemical stimulations (p<0.01). The non-bicarbonate and glycoconjugate outputs in BE were lower during chemical stimulation (p<0.05) and during mechanical (p<0.05) and chemical stimulations (p<0.05) respectively. The rate of salivary EGF output in BE was significantly lower during mechanical stimulation (p<0.05). We observed a higher TGFα output during mastication (p<0.05) and PGE2 secretion during basal and masticatory condition (p<0.05) in BE.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BE demonstrated significantly compromised salivary pH and rate of secretion of bicarbonate, non-bicarbonate, glycoconjugate, protein and EGF. This impairment could potentially predispose to the development of accelerated esophageal mucosal injury. Potential restoration of this impairment by masticatory stimulation of salivary secretion using sugarless chewing gum justifies further clinical exploration.

Acid-induced COX-2 expression and prostaglandin E2 production via activation of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK in cultured feline esophageal smooth muscle cells

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 is known to play an important role in inflammatory conditions such as reflux esophagitis resulting from acid reflux. In this study, we tested whether an acidic medium (pH 4.0) induces an increase in COX-2 expression or PGE(2) production, and explored the implication of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) activation in these responses in cultured cat esophageal smooth muscle cells. Acidic cytotoxicity was assessed and expression changes in COXs or phosphorylated MAPKs were analyzed by Western blotting. PGE(2) production was measured by immunoassay. No significant decrease in cell viability was observed for 6 h exposure to acidic medium. COX-2 expression and PGE(2) production significantly increased to maximal levels at 6 h exposure to acidic medium. The cells also exhibited significant activation of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK, but not JNK within 10 min under acidic medium. The increments of COX-2 expression and PGE(2) production by acidic medium were decreased by pretreatment with PD98059 or SB202190, respectively. These results suggest that acidic environments may enhance the COX-2 expression and PGE(2) production through activation of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK in the cultured cat esophageal smooth muscle cells.

The role of mucin in GERD and its complications

Acid, pepsin and other noxious material reach the esophageal mucosa and interact with the luminal aspect of the squamous epithelium. The first protective barrier to these potentially injurious substances is the mucus buffer layer that covers the mucosa. In healthy people, the esophagus has a protective surface adherent mucus gel barrier. Levels of mucin glycoprotein are considerably increased in response to acid and pepsin. A wide spectrum of mucin genes are expressed in normal esophageal mucosa, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, Barrett epithelium and esophageal adenocarcinoma. The mucins MUC5AC and MUC6 are expressed to a similar degree in Barrett metaplasia and gastric mucosa, as is MUC2 in Barrett intestinal metaplasia and small bowel mucosa. Increased expression of MUC1 is associated with progression from dysplasia to adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Thus, mucins have an important role in the defense of esophageal mucosa against the acid, pepsin and bile that are present in the refluxate. Changes in the expression of mucins occur in patients with GERD, and might lead to the development of new drugs.

Gastric juice prostaglandins and peptide growth factors as potential markers of chronic atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia and gastric cancer: their potential clinical implications based on this pilot study

BACKGROUND

Gastric secretion can provide valuable information especially when Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection results in chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) preceding adenocarcinoma (AdCa).

AIMS

Looking for a potential biomarker of malignant transformation in the setting of chronic inflammation we studied the levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE(2)), as well as peptide growth factors [epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor α (TGFα)], harbingers of injury and repair, in gastric juice aspirated at endoscopy from patients with CAG, CAG/IM, AdCa, and controls.

METHODS

The PGE(2), EGF and TGFα concentrations in the gastric juice were measured using radioimmunoassays (RIAs).

RESULTS

In patients with AdCa gastric juice PGE(2) increased fivefold versus controls (P < 0.01) and almost threefold versus patients with CAG (P < 0.05). The EGF levels in patients with AdCa were fourfold higher versus controls (P < 0.001) and almost threefold higher versus CAG (P < 0.05). In patients with CAG/IM the EGF levels were also almost 3 times higher versus controls. The TGFα levels in patients with AdCa were half the value of controls and CAG (P < 0.05). In patients with CAG/IM the levels were as low as 1/5 of controls or CAG (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Testing the gastric juice for PGE(2), EGF, and TGFα in patients with endoscopy and biopsy proven CAG, may be helpful in follow up of patients who may potentially progress to IM and ultimately AdCa. This could be considered as an adjunct to histologic assessment especially that even the best surveillance biopsy specimen regimens are inherited with sampling errors.

Significant increase of esophageal mucin secretion in patients with reflux esophagitis after healing with rabeprazole: its esophagoprotective potential

Esophageal mucin secretion in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) is significantly impaired. Rabeprazole augments gastric mucin secretion. We have studied, therefore, the effect of rabeprazole on esophageal mucin secretion in patients with RE. The study was conducted in 15 patients with RE treated with rabeprazole (20 mg QD) for 8 weeks. Esophageal secretions were collected during consecutive infusions of initial NaCl, HCl/Pepsin (HCl/P), and a final NaCl, using a specially designed esophageal catheter, before and after therapy. Mucin was measured using standard methodology. After rabeprazole administration esophageal mucin concentration as well as secretion increased during perfusion with initial saline (P < 0.01), HCl/P (P < 0.02), and concluding saline (P < 0.001). Stimulation of esophageal mucin secretion by rabeprazole may indicate that the mechanisms governing its secretion are similar to those implicated in gastric mucin output. Enhancement of esophageal mucin secretion by rabeprazole may translate into esophagoprotective potential in patients with reflux esophagitis.

Significant enhancement of esophageal pre-epithelial defense by tegaserod: implications for an esophagoprotective effect

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Tegaserod, a serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)4 receptor agonist, is thought to stimulate intestinal secretions. The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of tegaserod vs placebo on salivary and esophageal protective factors in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial in 38 GERD patients treated with tegaserod 6 mg twice a day vs placebo. Salivary samples were collected basally and during mastication. In addition, in 32 GERD patients, salivary and esophageal secretions also were collected during infusion of NaCl, HCl/pepsin, and NaCl in a consecutive fashion using a specially designed esophageal catheter. Saliva and esophageal perfusates were assessed for the pH, volume, content of buffers, protein, mucin, epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor alpha (TGFalpha), and prostaglandin E (PGE)2 and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Salivary flow rates during administration of tegaserod increased over corresponding values during both basal conditions (P < .01) and mastication (P < .001). The rate of secretion of salivary bicarbonate and nonbicarbonate buffers also increased in basal conditions (P < .001 and P < .01, respectively) and during mastication (P < .05 and P = .05). Salivary EGF increased during mastication (P < .05), whereas PGE2 and TGF alpha increased in basal conditions (P < .05 and P < .01). Esophageal perfusate volumes increased during administration of tegaserod in basal conditions (P < .05), whereas esophageal EGF secretion increased after mucosal exposure to HCl/pepsin and subsequent final perfusion with NaCl (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant stimulatory impact of 5-HT4 agonist on several salivary protective factors as well as esophageal EGF secretion may have esophagoprotective implications in patients with GERD and may help to address new therapies in the future.

Expression of proteinase-activated receptor 2 on human primary gastrointestinal myofibroblasts and stimulation of prostaglandin synthesis

It is known that subepithelial myofibroblast-derived prostaglandin (PG)E2 can regulate intestinal epithelial cell functions, and that proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR2) is abundantly expressed in the gastrointestinal tract. Since PAR2 activation has previously been associated with stimulation of PGE2 synthesis, we hypothesized that PAR2 expressed on primary human gastrointestinal myofibroblasts regulates PGE2 synthesis via cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and (or) COX-2, and associated PGE synthases. Primary human myofibroblasts were isolated from the resection tissue of the esophagus, small intestine, and colon. Expression of functional PAR2 was determined by RT-PCR and by calcium mobilization in Fura-2/AM-loaded cells. Trypsin and the selective PAR2-activating peptide (PAR2-AP) SLIGRL-NH2 stimulated PGE2 synthesis in a concentration-dependent manner, as measured by enzyme immunoassay. Selective COX inhibition showed PAR2-induced PGE2 synthesis to be COX-1 dependent in esophageal myofibroblasts and both COX-1 and COX-2 dependent in colonic cells, consistent with the distribution of COX-1 and COX-2 expression. Although both cytosolic and microsomal PGE synthases were expressed in cells from all tissues, microsomal PGE synthases were expressed at highest levels in the colonic myofibroblasts. Activation of PAR2 on gastrointestinal myofibroblasts stimulates PGE2 synthesis via different pathways in the colon than in the esophagus and small intestine.

Overexpression of 5-Lipoxygenase in Rat and Human Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Inhibitory Effects of Zileuton and Celecoxib on Carcinogenesis

PURPOSE

Aberrant arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism, especially through the cyclooxygenase (Cox) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-Lox) pathways, has been suggested to play an important role in the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression of 5-Lox in EAC of a rat model and in human samples as well as the chemopreventive effects of zileuton (a specific 5-Lox inhibitor) and celecoxib (a specific Cox2 inhibitor) in the rat EAC model.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

5-Lox expression in EAC of a rat esophagogastroduodenal anastomosis model and of humans was examined with immunohistochemistry. A chemoprevention study was designed to test whether zileuton and celecoxib could suppress aberrant AA metabolism and esophageal adenocarcinogenesis.

RESULTS

With immunohistochemistry, we found that 5-Lox was overexpressed during esophageal adenocarcinogenesis in our rat model and in humans. In the chemoprevention study, EAC incidence was reduced in a dose-dependent manner from 68.8% (11 of 16) to 44.4% (8 of 18; P > 0.05) and 31.3% (5 of 16; P < 0.05) by 500 and 1,000 ppm zileuton, respectively, and to 33.3% (7 of 21; P < 0.05) and 20% (3 of 15; P < 0.05) by 500 and 1,000 ppm celecoxib, respectively. With isobolographic analysis, zileuton and celecoxib, both at a dose of 500 ppm, had an additive effect by reducing the tumor incidence to 16.7% (3 of 18, P < 0.01). Leukotriene B4 and prostaglandin E2 levels in the esophageal tissues were also significantly reduced by zileuton and celecoxib.

CONCLUSIONS

This study clearly demonstrated that 5-Lox and Cox2 play important roles in the development of EAC. Both zileuton and celecoxib had inhibitory effects on esophageal adenocarcinogenesis through inhibition on their respective enzymes of AA metabolism.

Production of prostaglandinE2 via bile acid is enhanced by trypsin and acid in normal human esophageal epithelial cells

Several reports suggest that duodenogastroesophageal reflux may produce esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal carcinoma. And it is well known that the incidence of adenocarcinoma arising from Barrett's esophagus has been increasing during the past decade. On the other hand, cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandins, produced by the catalytic reaction of cyclooxygenase-2, are considered to relate to carcinogenesis of the digestive tract and other malignant tumors. Recent reports suggest that cyclooxygenase-2 is induced in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal carcinoma. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reaction of cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandinE2 production on normal human esophageal epithelial cells cultured with gastroduodenal components. Normal human esophageal epithelial cells were cultured with chenodeoxycholic acid, trypsin and in acidic condition, individually and with different combinations of these three factors. After culturing, cyclooxygenase-2 expression in the cells and amount of prostglandinE2 in culture media was evaluated by immunoblotting and enzyme-immunoassay, respectively after culturing the cells. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression was up-regulated by bile acid and prostaglandinE2 production was enhanced by bile acid with trypsin, acidic condition or both of these components, without a synergistic effect on cyclooxygenase-2 expression. Production of prostaglandinE2 via these factors was suppressed by the cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitor JTE-522. The results suggest that duodenogastroesophageal reflux may induce cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandinE2 production in esophageal epithelial cells, cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitors may have a chemopreventive effect on esophageal carcinoma.

Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux is a physiological phenomenon, occurring with different severity and duration in different individuals. Reflux occurs when this normal event results in the occurrence of symptoms/signs or complications. The pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux is complex and diverse, since it is influenced by factors that are genetic, environmental (e.g., diet smoking), anatomic, hormonal, and neurogenic. However, many mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Future research should focus on a better understanding of the physiology of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters, and of gastric motility. The afferent and efferent neural pathways and neuropharmacologic mediators of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and gastric dysmotility require further study. The role of anatomic malformations such as hiatal hernia in children has been underestimated. While therapeutic possibilities are greater in number and largely improved, the outcomes of some treatments are far from satisfactory in many cases. In addition to development of new forms of treatment, research should address better use of currently available medical and surgical treatments.

Mechanisms of oesophageal mucosal defence

The integrity of the oesophageal mucosa depends upon an equilibrium between aggressive factors, predominantly acid and pepsin, and protective mechanisms. Protective mechanisms operate within the oesophageal mucosa as pre-epithelial, epithelial and post-epithelial defences. Only the protective components of the oesophageal pre-epithelial defence can be tested in vivo in humans. It has been recently demonstrated that human oesophageal submucosal glands elaborate mucous secretion rich in bicarbonate and non-bicarbonate buffers, mucin, prostaglandin E(2), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor alpha (TGFalpha). This oesophageal secretion, accompanied by similarly protective factors within the swallowed saliva, defines the protective potential of the oesophageal pre-epithelial defence that exists in the form of a mucus-buffer layer covering the oesophageal mucosa and which retards the back-diffusion of hydrogen ions. It has also been demonstrated that patients with severe erosive reflux oesophagitis exhibit qualitative impairment in both the salivary and oesophageal components of the oesophageal pre-epithelial defence. Furthermore, patients with endoscopically negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have a significantly stronger oesophageal pre-epithelial defence than patients with erosive reflux oesophagitis. On the other hand, African-Americans, who are less likely to develop erosive reflux oesophagitis, have a stronger oesophageal pre-epithelial defence than do Caucasians. The salivary component of the oesophageal pre-epithelial defence can be enhanced by mastication and the administration of cisapride, whereas oesophageal secretion can only be significantly augmented by cisapride.

The potential role of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier components in the maintenance of integrity of the esophageal mucosa in patients with endoscopically negative gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) accompanied by erosive reflux esophagitis (RE) exhibit an impairment within the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier protective components that may facilitate the development and/or progression of the mucosal injury. Little is known, however, whether such impairment is a general phenomenon affecting all patients with GERD or whether this is a characteristic feature only of patients with erosive RE. We therefore studied the rate of secretion of esophageal inorganic and organic protective factors in patients with endoscopically negative [E (-)] GERD and compared these results with the corresponding values in asymptomatic volunteers (CTRL).

METHODS

The study was conducted on 33 white asymptomatic volunteers and 10 white patients with a long history of GERD confirmed by 24-h pH monitoring and a grossly negative upper endoscopy. Esophageal secretion was collected during mucosal exposure to NaCl, HCl, HC/pepsin and NaCl using the esophageal perfusion catheter. In collected samples all investigated parameters were measured.

RESULTS

The pH of esophageal secretion and its content of bicarbonate, EGF, and PGE2 in patients with E (-) GERD and asymptomatic volunteers were similar. Unexpectedly, the rate of esophageal glycoconjugate (predominantly mucin) secretion was significantly higher in patients with E (-) GERD than in controls during perfusion with HCl (p < 0.05). Furthermore, secretion of protein in patients with E (-) GERD was significantly higher than in the control group during the mucosal exposure to HCl/Pepsin (p < 0.05). The nonbicarbonate buffer secretion during perfusion with HCl and HCl/Pepsin as well as the rate of esophageal TGFalpha output during infusion of final saline in patients with E (-) GERD were significantly lower than in CTRL group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that patients with E (-) GERD have an esophageal secretory potential, in terms of glycoconjugate and protein, higher than that in asymptomatic controls. This phenomenon in patients with E (-) GERD may, by enhancing the quantity of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier, help to prevent the development of erosive esophagitis. A significantly lower esophageal secretory response in patients with E (-) GERD in terms of nonbicarbonate buffers and TGFalpha may facilitate the development of GERD symptoms and histological changes of GERD, respectively.

Eicosanoids and the esophagus

Eicosanoids are products of arachidonic acid metabolism. Among the products produced are the prostaglandins and leukotrienes, products which are known to play important roles in health and disease of many gastrointestinal tissues. Here, we review current knowledge about eicosanoids in the esophagus, including production in healthy and diseased tissues and potential physiologic and pathophysiologic effects in two important esophageal mucosal disorders, reflux esophagitis and esophageal cancer.

Increased levels of prostaglandins and nitric oxide in esophageal mucosa of children with reflux esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is said to be both protective and detrimental for esophageal mucosal integrity. Nitric oxide (NO) controls several esophageal neuromuscular functions, including relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. The purpose of this study was to verify PGE2 and NO levels in esophageal mucosa of children with reflux esophagitis.

METHODS

The patients were 10 children, age range 7 to 12 years, affected by reflux esophagitis. The control subjects were 10 children, age range 6 to 11 years, with recurrent abdominal pain. Tissue fragments obtained by esophageal biopsies were placed in a culture medium and processed to obtain a cell suspension. Cells were incubated for 24 hours at 37 degrees C. Thereafter, supernatants were collected and divided into aliquots to determine the amounts of PGE2 and NO metabolites.

RESULTS

Esophageal cells obtained from reflux esophagitis patients synthesize and release a significantly higher (p < 0.01) amount of PGE2 and NO (PGE2 1.9 +/- 0.56 ng/10(6) cells per 24 hours; NO 124.94 +/- 18.36 microM/10(6) cells per 24 hours) than did the control group (PGE2 0.66 +/- 0.14 ng/10(6) cells per 24 hours; NO 68.03 +/- 12.3 microM/10(6) cells per 24 hours).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that in esophageal mucosa, PGE2 and NO, in low concentrations, are protective, whereas, at high doses, they can be harmful. Higher amounts of PGE2 and NO in the esophageal mucosa of reflux esophagitis patients suggest that similar noxious stimuli trigger the inducible forms of the respective enzyme.

Role of epidermal growth factor (EGF) in oesophageal mucosal integrity

Oesophageal mucosa has well established protective mechanisms, which operate within pre-epithelial, epithelial and post-epithelial compartments. Since refluxed acid and pepsin always act from the luminal side of the mucosa, protective factors like EGF, operating as a part of pre-epithelial defence, are thought to be pivotal in the maintenance of the integrity of the oesophageal mucosa. The significant contribution of salivary EGF to the quality of the oesophageal mucosal barrier has been demonstrated in an experimental setting and in a clinical scenario. Patients with low salivary EGF levels are predisposed to severe oesophageal damage if they develop gastro-oesophageal reflux and are a high-risk group for development of Barrett's oesophagus. Not only the salivary glands but also the human oesophagus has a profound ability to elaborate and release EGF. Some changes in luminal release of EGF during oesophageal mucosal exposure to intraluminal damaging factors imply its role in the oesophageal protective mechanisms. To exert biological effects within the oesophageal mucosal compartment, EGF requires binding to the ligand-binding domain of its receptor. This process results in receptor dimerisation, autophosphorylation and activation of intracellular signal transduction pathways. EGF receptors are localised on the basolateral and luminal aspect of the mucosal cells playing an important role in fast regeneration of oesophageal epithelium through the high mitotic activity of its proliferative zone. An increase in the rate of salivary EGF secretion during masticatory stimulation suggests its potential therapeutic benefit in the treatment of patients with damaged oesophageal mucosa.

Disorders of the oesophagus and stomach in infants

Pathological processes and disease entities in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, specifically those of the oesophagus and the stomach in infancy, have received a disproportionately small amount of attention until recently when appreciation of their pathophysiology and concordant importance in terms of symptomatology has been highlighted. This is probably a phenomenon secondary to improved diagnostic yield from the recent technical advances in areas such as infant endoscopy and a shift in opinion regarding the pathophysiological origin of ubiquitous symptoms of infancy such as feeding disorders, colic and irritability. In addition, the apparently complex interactions of various aetiological factors such as pH-independent gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR), cow's milk protein intolerance (CMPI), Helicobacter pylori gastritis and upper GI motor disorders have in the past 1-2 years become underlined in terms of aetiopathogenesis and have radically changed thinking regarding diagnosis and therapy of infants with apparent upper-GI-associated symptoms. The contribution to comprehension of infant upper GI disorders of inflammatory paradigms and ontogeny of the upper GI tract is also a recent area worthy of mention. The recent advances in all of these areas and their contribution to the understanding, and subsequent diagnosis and therapy, of upper GI symptoms and their explanation by way of aetiopathogenesis will be explored in this chapter.

Modulatory effect of esophageal intraluminal mechanical and chemical stressors on salivary prostaglandin E2 in humans

As has been demonstrated, infusion of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and pepsin into the human esophageal lumen, which mimics the natural gastroesophageal reflux, results in a significant increase in salivary volume, salivary bicarbonate and epidermal growth factor. However, the impact of intraluminal acid/pepsin solution on salivary prostaglandin E2 (sPGE2), the major protective factor of the upper alimentary tract, has never been explored. Therefore, using the newly developed esophageal perfusion model, the impact of both mechanical and chemical stimuli of the esophagus on sPGE2 secretion in humans was studied. Salivary PGE2 was assessed in saliva collected during basal conditions, chewing of parafilm, placement of intraesophageal tubing, inflation of intraesophageal balloons, and perfusion with sodium chloride, HCl, or HCl/pepsin solutions. The concentration of sPGE2 was measured using the RIA kit from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL) after the solid-phase extraction and derivatization. The concentration of sPGE2 in the basal saliva was (mean +/- standard error of mean) 186 +/- 31 pg/mL and was similar during the chewing of parafilm (171 +/- 32 pg/mL). The placement of intraesophageal tubing, however, resulted in a significant decline of sPGE2 concentration to the value of 91 +/- 22 pg/mL (P < 0.01). This decline was maintained when intraesophageal balloons, which compartmentalized a 7.5 cm perfused segment of the esophagus, were inflated (86 +/- 17 pg/mL; P < 0.01). This decline was potentiated further when subsequent perfusion with saline was implemented to reach the lowest value of 46 +/- 17 pg/mL (P < 0.001 versus basal and P < 0.05 versus tubing and balloon evoked values) at the end of the perfusing procedure. Esophageal perfusion with acid and acid/pepsin solution, however, partly restored the significant decline in sPGE2 concentration observed during prolonged perfusion with saline. The sPGE2 output during basal conditions was 89 +/- 13 pg/min and increased dramatically during stimulation by placement of intraesophageal tubing (241 +/- 48 pg/min; P < 0.01) and inflation of intraesophageal balloons (244 +/- 48 pg/min; P < 0.01). Subsequent esophageal perfusion with saline resulted in a gradual decline of sPGE2 output evoked by mechanical stimuli that reached the final value of 178 +/- 39, which was not significantly different from that observed in the basal condition (P < 0.1 versus basal value). Introduction of HCl and pepsin into the perfusing solution significantly prevented the decline of sPGE2 output observed during perfusion with saline (252 +/- 36 pg/min; P < 0.01 versus basal). The modulatory impact of mechanical and chemical stimulation on sPGE2, demonstrated for the first time in humans, may suggest the potential contribution of salivary prostanoids to the maintenance of the integrity of the esophageal mucosa.

Detrimental impact of acid and pepsin on the rate of luminal release of transforming growth factor alpha. Its potential pathogenetic role in the development of reflux esophagitis

The impact of intraluminal acid and pepsin on the rate of esophageal luminal release of transforming growth factor alpha (TGF alpha), measured by RIA, in 21 asymptomatic volunteers and 26 patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) was investigated. Esophageal secretion was collected, using an esophageal perfusion catheter, during mucosal exposure to NaCl, HCl or HCl/Pepsin and final saline. The basal rate of luminal TGF alpha release in controls was steady throughout the entire four perfusion periods with saline. This rate declined by 71% during mucosal exposure to HCl (p = 0.002) and by 74% during esophageal perfusion with HCl/pepsin (p = 0.011). The basal rate of luminal TGF alpha release in patients with RE was 27% higher than the corresponding value in controls (1.076 +/- 0.140 vs. 0.850 +/- 0.180 ng/min, p = 0.050). Mucosal exposure to acid and acid/pepsin solutions in RE patients also resulted in a significant decline in the luminal release of TGF alpha by 43% (p < 0.001) and by 42% (p < 0.001) respectively. Despite this decline, TGF alpha in patients with RE was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in controls. The decline in esophageal TGF alpha release during HCl and HCl/pepsin exposure may facilitate the development of mucosal damage. The increase in esophageal TGF alpha release in patients with RE may represent a compensatory mechanism developed by the mucosal inflammatory changes.