Efficacy of prolonged administration of intravenous erythromycin in an ambulatory setting as treatment of severe gastroparesis: one center's experience

Diabetic Gastroparesis

This review covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of diabetic gastroparesis, and more broadly diabetic gastroenteropathy, which encompasses all the gastrointestinal manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Up to 50% of patients with type 1 and type 2 DM and suboptimal glycemic control have delayed gastric emptying (GE), which can be documented with scintigraphy, 13C breath tests, or a wireless motility capsule; the remainder have normal or rapid GE. Many patients with delayed GE are asymptomatic; others have dyspepsia (i.e., mild to moderate indigestion, with or without a mild delay in GE) or gastroparesis, which is a syndrome characterized by moderate to severe upper gastrointestinal symptoms and delayed GE that suggest, but are not accompanied by, gastric outlet obstruction. Gastroparesis can markedly impair quality of life, and up to 50% of patients have significant anxiety and/or depression. Often the distinction between dyspepsia and gastroparesis is based on clinical judgement rather than established criteria. Hyperglycemia, autonomic neuropathy, and enteric neuromuscular inflammation and injury are implicated in the pathogenesis of delayed GE. Alternatively, there are limited data to suggest that delayed GE may affect glycemic control. The management of diabetic gastroparesis is guided by the severity of symptoms, the magnitude of delayed GE, and the nutritional status. Initial options include dietary modifications, supplemental oral nutrition, and antiemetic and prokinetic medications. Patients with more severe symptoms may require a venting gastrostomy or jejunostomy and/or gastric electrical stimulation. Promising newer therapeutic approaches include ghrelin receptor agonists and selective 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonists.

Prokinetics in the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to review the current status of prokinetics and to place it in historical context. Impaired motility and thus propulsion have long been thought to play important roles in the pathogenesis of a number of gastrointestinal disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastroparesis, chronic idiopathic pseudo-obstruction, and constipation. Historically, disordered motility was also thought to contribute to a number of functional gastrointestinal disorders such as functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

RECENT FINDINGS

As we learn more of the pathophysiology of FD, IBS, GERD, constipation, and gastroparesis, the limitations of a therapeutic strategy based on the stimulation of motility (i.e., the use of a prokinetic) have become apparent and the disappointments of the past explained. The development of prokinetic drugs has also been hampered by the non-selective nature of many of the agents studied to date which resulted in some unexpected side effects. There is still an unmet need for an effective and safe prokinetic, but drug development in this area must be mindful of the challenges of the area and the need for selectivity for a given target receptor.

The pharmacodynamics, safety and pharmacokinetics of single doses of the motilin agonist, camicinal, in type 1 diabetes mellitus with slow gastric emptying

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Here we have investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of single doses of camicinal in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients with a history of slow gastric emptying with symptoms consistent with gastroparesis.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, incomplete block, three-period, two-centre crossover study, patients received oral administration of placebo and two of the three possible doses of camicinal (25, 50 or 125 mg). Gastric emptying ((13) C-octanoic acid breath test), pharmacokinetics and safety were primary outcomes.

KEY RESULTS

Nine of the 10 patients enrolled completed the study. Gastric half-emptying time decreased by -95 min (95% CI: -156.8, -34.2) after a single dose of camicinal 125 mg compared with placebo (52 vs. 147 min, P < 0.05), representing a 65% improvement. A decrease of the gastric half-emptying time compared with placebo (approximately 39 min) was observed with camicinal 25 and 50 mg, representing a 27% reduction for both doses (not statistically significant). A positive exposure-response relationship was demonstrated across all doses. The effects of camicinal on gastric half-emptying time were not influenced by fasting glucose levels. Single doses up to 125 mg were well tolerated. Camicinal was well absorbed, exhibiting linear and approximately dose-proportional pharmacokinetic characteristics and a clear exposure-response relationship with gastric emptying.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Camicinal significantly accelerated gastric emptying of solids in T1DM patients following administration of a single oral dose. Camicinal was well tolerated and exhibited similar pharmacokinetic characteristics in diabetic patients to those previously reported in healthy volunteers.

Prokinetics in the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

A variety of common and some not common gastrointestinal syndromes are thought to be based on impaired gut motility. For some, the role of motility is well defined, for others and the functional gastrointestinal disorders, in particular, the role of hypo- or dysmotility remains unclear. Over the years pharmacological and physiological laboratories have developed drugs which stimulate gut motility; many have been evaluated in motility and functional disorders with what can best be described as mixed results. Lack of receptor specificity and resultant expected and unexpected adverse events have led to the demise of some of these agents. Newer, more selective agents offer promise but the heterogeneity of the clinical disorders they target continues to pose a formidable challenge to drug development in this area.

Management of gastrointestinal involvement in scleroderma

Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) commonly affects patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The GI involvement is quite heterogeneous varying from asymptomatic disease to significant dysmotility causing complications like malabsorption, weight loss and severe malnutrition. This review focuses on the management of GI involvement in SSc and has been categorized based on the segment of GIT involved. A brief discussion on the role of patient reported outcome measures in SSc-GI involvement has also been incorporated.

Pharmacological therapy of feed intolerance in the critically ills

Feed intolerance in the setting of critical illness is associated with higher morbidity and mortality, and thus requires promptly and effective treatment. Prokinetic agents are currently considered as the first-line therapy given issues relating to parenteral nutrition and post-pyloric placement. Currently, the agents of choice are erythromycin and metoclopramide, either alone or in combination, which are highly effective with relatively low incidence of cardiac, hemodynamic or neurological adverse effects. Diarrhea, however, can occur in up to 49% of patients who are treated with the dual prokinetic therapy, which is not associated with Clostridium difficile infection and settled soon after the cessation of the drugs. Hence, the use of prokinetic therapy over a long period or for prophylactic purpose must be avoided, and the indication for ongoing use of the drug(s) must be reviewed frequently. Second line therapy, such as total parenteral nutrition and post-pyloric feeding, must be considered once adverse effects relating the prokinetic therapy develop.

Current issues on safety of prokinetics in critically ill patients with feed intolerance

Feed intolerance in the setting of critical illness should be treated promptly given its adverse impact on morbidity and mortality. The technical difficulty of postpyloric feeding tube placement and the morbidities associated with parenteral nutrition prevent these approaches being considered as first-line nutrition. Prokinetic agents are currently the mainstay of therapy for feed intolerance in the critically ill. Current information is limited but suggests that erythromycin or metoclopramide (alone or in combination) are effective in the management of feed intolerance in the critically ill and not associated with significant cardiac, haemodynamic or neurological adverse effects. However, diarrhoea is a very common gastrointestinal side effect, and can occur in up to 49% of patients who receive both erythromycin and metoclopramide. Fortunately, the diarrhoea associated with prokinetic treatments has not been linked to Clostridium difficile infection and settles soon after the drugs are ceased. Therefore, prolonged or prophylactic use of prokinetics should be avoided. If diarrhoea occurs, the drugs should be stopped immediately. To minimize avoidable adverse effects the ongoing need for prokinetic drugs in these patient should be reviewed daily.

Motilin: towards a new understanding of the gastrointestinal neuropharmacology and therapeutic use of motilin receptor agonists

The gastrointestinal hormone motilin has been known about for >40 years, but after identification of its receptor and subsequent development of new tools and methods, a reappraisal of its actions is required. Firstly, it is important to note that motilin and ghrelin receptors are members of the same family (similar genomic organization, gastrointestinal distribution and abilities to stimulate gastrointestinal motility), yet each fails to recognize the ligand of the other; and whereas ghrelin and ghrelin receptors are widespread outside the gastrointestinal tract, motilin and its receptors are largely restricted to the gastrointestinal tract. Secondly, although some studies suggest motilin has activity in rodents, most do not, and receptor pseudogenes exist in rodents. Thirdly, motilin preferentially operates by facilitating enteric cholinergic activity rather than directly contracting the muscle, despite the relatively high expression of receptor immunoreactivity in muscle. This activity is ligand-dependent, with short-lasting actions of motilin contrasting with longer-lasting actions of the non-selective and selective motilin receptor agonists erythromycin and GSK962040. Finally, the use of erythromycin (also an antibiotic drug) to treat patients requiring acceleration of gastric emptying has led to concerns over safety and potential exacerbation of antibiotic resistance. Replacement motilin receptor agonists derived from erythromycin (motilides) have been unsuccessful. New, non-motilide, small molecule receptor agonists, designed to minimize self-desensitization, are now entering clinical trials for treating patients undergoing enteral feeding or with diabetic gastroparesis. Thus, for the translational pharmacologist, the study of motilin illustrates the need to avoid overreliance on artificial systems, on structural information and on animal studies.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Neuropeptides. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.170.issue-7.

Treatments for severe gastroparesis

Severe gastroparesis is a kind of gastroparesis that is refractory to conventional drug therapy and requires nutritional support and frequently emergency hospitalization. The selection of treatment for severe gastroparesis has always been a dilemma for clinicians. Currently, there have been limited reports on the treatment of severe gastroparesis. This article sums up the primary treatments, drug treatments and other kinds of treatments for severe gastroparesis and discusses the prospects for the treatment of this refractory disease.

Regional- and agonist-dependent facilitation of human neurogastrointestinal functions by motilin receptor agonists

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Delayed gastric emptying is poorly managed. Motilin agonists are potential treatments but inadequate understanding into how enteric nerve functions are stimulated compromises drug/dose selection. Resolution is hampered by extreme species dependency so methods were developed to study human gastrointestinal neuromuscular activities and the neurobiology of motilin.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Protocols to study neuromuscular activities were developed for different regions of human stomach and intestine (71 patients) using circular muscle preparations and electrical field stimulation (EFS) of intrinsic nerves. Other tissues were fixed for immunohistochemistry.

KEY RESULTS

EFS evoked contractions and/or relaxations via cholinergic and nitrergic neurons, with additional tachykinergic activity in colon; these were consistent after 154 min (longer if stored overnight). Motilin 1-300 nM and the selective motilin agonist GSK962040 0.1-30 µM acted pre-junctionally to strongly facilitate cholinergic contractions of the antrum (E(max) ≈ 1000% for motilin), with smaller increases in fundus, duodenum and ileum; high concentrations increased baseline muscle tension in fundus and small intestine. There were minimal effects in the colon. In the antrum, cholinergic facilitation by motilin faded irregularly, even with peptidase inhibitors, whereas facilitation by GSK962040 was long lasting. Motilin receptor immunoreactivity was identified in muscle and myenteric plexus predominantly in the upper gut, co-expressed with choline acetyltransferase in neurons.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Motilin and GSK962040 strongly facilitated cholinergic activity in the antrum, with lower activity in fundus and small intestine only. Facilitation by motilin was short lived, consistent with participation in migrating motor complexes. Long-lasting facilitation by GSK962040 suggests different receptor interactions and potential for clinical evaluation.

Anti-emetic and emetic effects of erythromycin in Suncus murinus: role of vagal nerve activation, gastric motility stimulation and motilin receptors

Paradoxically, erythromycin is associated with nausea when used as an antibiotic but at lower doses erythromycin activates motilin receptors and is used to treat delayed gastric emptying and nausea. The aim of this study was to characterise pro- and anti-emetic activity of erythromycin and investigate mechanisms of action. Japanese House musk shrews (Suncus murinus) were used. Erythromycin was administered alone or prior to induction of emesis with abnormal motion or subcutaneous nicotine (10mg/kg). The effects of erythromycin and motilin on vagal nerve activity and on cholinergically mediated contractions of the stomach (evoked by electrical field stimulation) were studied in vitro. The results showed that erythromycin (1 and 5mg/kg) reduced vomiting caused by abnormal motion (e.g., from 10.3 ± 1.8 to 4.0 ± 1.1 emetic episodes at 5mg/kg) or by nicotine (from 9.5 ± 2.0 to 3.1 ± 2.0 at 5mg/kg), increasing latency of onset to emesis; lower or higher doses had no effects. When administered alone, erythromycin 100mg/kg induced vomiting in two of four animals, whereas lower doses did not. In vitro, motilin (1, 100 nM) increased gastric vagal afferent activity without affecting jejunal afferent mesenteric nerve activity. Cholinergically mediated contractions of the stomach (prevented by tetrodotoxin 1 μM or atropine 1 μM, facilitated by l-NAME 300 μM) were facilitated by motilin (1-100 nM) and erythromycin (10-30 μM). In conclusion, low doses of erythromycin have anti-emetic activity. Potential mechanisms of action include increased gastric motility (overcoming gastric stasis) and/ or modulation of vagal nerve pathways involved in emesis, demonstrated by first-time direct recording of vagal activation by motilin.

Spectrum of gastroparesis in children

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis (GP) is characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical outlet obstruction. Symptoms may include nausea, vomiting, bloating, early satiety, abdominal pain, and weight loss. Delayed gastric emptying of a solid-phase meal assessed by radionuclear scintigraphy is the criterion standard for diagnosis. The prevalence of GP is difficult to estimate due to the lack of a validated, widely available diagnostic test that can be applied in primary care. The extent of this problem in children is unknown.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of children with GP diagnosed by radionuclear scintigraphy to identify demographics, symptoms, comorbidities, treatment, and outcomes. A retrospective analysis of 239 patients between ages 0 and 21 years was performed.

RESULTS

The mean age of presentation was 7.9 years, and boys and girls were almost equally affected, that is, 48.5% and 51.5%, respectively. Vomiting was the most frequent presenting symptom (68%), followed by abdominal pain (51%), nausea (28%), weight loss (27%), early satiety (25%), and bloating (7%). Almost 75% of patients responded to intravenous erythromycin administered provocatively during gastric scintigraphy. In a majority of the patients, no cause was identified, that is, idiopathic GP (70%), followed by drugs (18%) and postsurgical (12.5%) causes. Only 4% patients had diabetic GP, and our population was essentially narcotic naïve (2%). After an average of 24 months' follow-up, the most common complication was esophageal reflux (67%). Despite different therapeutic modalities, by the end of the follow-up period, a significant improvement in symptoms was reported by an average of 60%, regardless of sex, age, or degree of emptying delay.

CONCLUSIONS

GP has a good prognosis in childhood despite different etiologies, symptom presentation, and therapy.

The effect of erythromycin on gastrointestinal motility in subtotal gastrectomized patients

Purpose

Our objective was to determine the effect of erythromycin (EM) in improving gastrointestinal motility in subtotal gastrectomized patients. We used radio-opaque Kolomarks as an objective method. We conducted a prospective, controlled clinical trial study of 24 patients.

Methods

All patients underwent subtotal gastrectomy with 3 capsules containing Kolomarks (20 markers per 1 capsule) in the remnant stomach before anastomosis. From the day of the operation to the 2nd postoperative day, patients in the EM group began receiving 200 mg of EM intravenously for 30 minutes continuously. We counted the number of Kolomarks in the stomach, passed by stomach, in rectum, and in stool with serial simple abdominal X-ray films on the first postoperative day up to the 7th postoperative day.

Results

The study population included 14 patients in the control group and 10 patients in the EM group. The two study groups were compared in terms of their characteristics including age, gender, past medical history, cancer stage, and operation type. No significant differences were found for the demographics between the two groups. We only found a significant difference for the number of Kolomarks passed by the stomach on the 3rd postoperative day (P = 0.026).

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated that 200 mg of EM intravenous infusion during the postoperative period induced rapid gastric emptying, although it did not improve gastrointestinal motility for the entire gastrointestinal tract in subtotal gastrectomized patients.

Gastroparesis and Parkinson's disease: a systematic review

Some of the gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms commonly experienced by patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have been attributed to gastroparesis; however, the precise prevalence and relevance of gastric emptying delay in PD is unclear. The definition of gastroparesis varies; currently the most widely accepted definition (from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium) is the presence of appropriate symptoms (including nausea, retching, vomiting, stomach fullness, and inability to finish a meal) for ≥ 12 weeks, together with delayed gastric emptying on scintigraphy and the absence of any obstructive lesions on upper GI endoscopy. In PD patients, gastroparesis has the potential to affect nutrition and quality of life, as well as the absorption of PD medications, including L-dopa. This reduced absorption of L-dopa has implications for the control of the PD motor symptoms for which it is administered. We performed a systematic review of the literature on gastroparesis in PD with the aim of developing an evidence-based approach to its management. Based on this review, we conclude that while gastric emptying has been reported to be frequently delayed in PD, the existing data do not permit definitive conclusions concerning its true prevalence, relationship to the underlying disease process, relevance to PD management, or the optimal therapy of related GI symptoms. Further study of these important issues is, therefore, required.

Advances in the management of gastroparesis

The treatment goals for patients with gastroparesis are to control symptoms; to correct fluid, electrolyte, and nutritional deficiencies; and to identify and treat the underlying cause of gastroparesis. For mild symptoms, dietary modifications and a low-dose antiemetic and/or prokinetic agent might provide satisfactory control of symptoms. Dietary treatments include decreasing the solid food component while increasing the liquid nutrient component of meals. Fat and fiber intake should be minimized. Metoclopramide, despite its potential for neurological side effects, remains a prokinetic treatment for symptomatic patients. In patients with diabetic gastroparesis, careful regulation of glycemic control may help to reduce symptoms. Medical management of patients with gastroparesis who do not respond to initial antiemetic or prokinetic therapy or who develop medication-related side effects involves the use of other prokinetic and antiemetic agents with different mechanisms of action. Combinations of prokinetic and antiemetic agents often are tried in patients with persistent symptoms. In some patients with persistent refractory symptoms and failure to maintain adequate fluid and/or nutritional intake, bypassing the stomach with jejunostomy feedings may be necessary. Gastric electrical stimulation is a treatment for refractory gastroparesis. Based on initial studies showing symptom benefit, especially in patients with diabetic gastroparesis, gastric electrical stimulation was granted humanitarian US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of chronic, refractory nausea and vomiting secondary to idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis. However, which patients are likely to respond, the optimal electrode position, and the optimal stimulation parameters remain areas that need to be addressed.

The hungry stomach: physiology, disease, and drug development opportunities

During hunger, a series of high-amplitude contractions of the stomach and small intestine (phase III), which form part of a cycle of quiescence and contractions (known as the migrating motor complex, MMC), play a "housekeeping" role prior to the next meal, and may contribute toward the development of hunger. Several gastrointestinal (GI) hormones are associated with phase III MMC activity, but currently the most prominent is motilin, thought to at least partly mediate phase III contractions of the gastric MMC. Additional GI endocrine and neuronal systems play even more powerful roles in the development of hunger. In particular, the ghrelin-precursor gene is proving to have a complex physiology, giving rise to three different products: ghrelin itself, which is formed from a post-translational modification of des-acyl-ghrelin, and obestatin. The receptors acted on by des-acyl-ghrelin and by obestatin are currently unknown but both these peptides seem able to exert actions which oppose that of ghrelin, either indirectly or directly. An increased understanding of the actions of these peptides is helping to unravel a number of different eating disorders and providing opportunities for the discovery of new drugs to regulate dysfunctional gastric behaviors and appetite. To date, ghrelin and motilin receptor agonists and antagonists have been described. The most advanced are compounds which activate the ghrelin and motilin receptors which are being progressed for disorders associated with gastric hypomotility.

Pharmacologic Options to Prevent Postoperative Ileus

Objective:

To summarize the evidence on pharmacologic options in preventing postoperative ileus (POI).

Data Sources:

The Cochrane Database of Reviews and OVID databases and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Web site were searched (1950–April 2009) using the term postoperative ileus.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials were included for review. The FDA Web site was searched for clinical reviews and label information for drugs indicated for the prevention of POI.

Data Synthesis:

Three meta-analyses, 2 on gum-chewing and 1 on alvimopan, and 18 clinical trials were identified. Only gum chewing and alvimopan were effective in preventing POI. Gum chewing reduced the time to first flatus and bowel movement (weighted mean difference 21h, p = 0.0006 and 33h; p = 0.0002, respectively). In one meta-analysis, gum chewing significantly reduced length of stay (LOS) by 2.4 days (p < 0.00001) but this was not replicated in the second meta-analysis. Alvimopan shortened the time to reach a composite endpoint of solid food intake, plus/minus flatus, and bowel movement (93 vs 105 h; p < 0.001). A higher incidence of myocardial infarction was observed in a 12-month study of alvimopan for the treatment of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, but not in studies in patients undergoing bowel resection. Alvimopan decreased the time to written hospital discharge order (hazard ratio 1.35; p<0.01), while the significance of a reduction in LOS (0.2–1.3 days) was not reported.

Conclusions:

Gum chewing and alvimopan are effective in preventing POI, but given safety concerns and higher cost with alvimopan, gum chewing may be preferred.

Gastroparesis: Current diagnostic challenges and management considerations

Gastroparesis refers to abnormal gastric motility characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. The most common etiologies include diabetes, post-surgical and idiopathic. The most common symptoms are nausea, vomiting and epigastric pain. Gastroparesis is estimated to affect 4% of the population and symptomatology may range from little effect on daily activity to severe disability and frequent hospitalizations. The gold standard of diagnosis is solid meal gastric scintigraphy. Treatment is multimodal and includes dietary modification, prokinetic and anti-emetic medications, and surgical interventions. New advances in drug therapy, and gastric electrical stimulation techniques have been introduced and might provide new hope to patients with refractory gastroparesis. In this comprehensive review, we discuss gastroparesis with emphasis on the latest developments; from the perspective of the practicing clinician.

Hormones of the gut-brain axis as targets for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal disorders

The concept of the gut forming the centre of an integrated gut-brain-energy axis - modulating appetite, metabolism and digestion - opens up new paradigms for drugs that can tackle multiple symptoms in complex upper gastrointestinal disorders. These include eating disorders, nausea and vomiting, gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. The hormones that modulate gastric motility represent targets for gastric prokinetic drugs, and peptides that modify eating behaviours may be targeted to develop drugs that reduce nausea, a currently poorly treated condition. The gut-brain axis may therefore provide a range of therapeutic opportunities that deliver a more holistic treatment of upper gastrointestinal disorders.

Development of drugs for gastrointestinal motor disorders: translating science to clinical need

Only a small number of new drugs have recently become available for gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. This is partly because we await outcomes of research into functional bowel disorder aetiology (e.g., role of microbiota) and of trials to control stress- related or painful GI symptoms (e.g., via CRF(1) receptors or beta(3) adrenoceptors). Nevertheless, only the ClC-2 channel activator lubiprostone has recently reached the clinic, joining the 5-HT(3) antagonist alosetron and the long-established 5-HT(4) agonist and D(2) antagonist metoclopramide; tegaserod, a non-selective ligand, was withdrawn. Interestingly, each has shortcomings, providing opportunities for molecules with 5-HT(4) or motilin receptor selectivity, and for new biology via guanylate cyclase C or ghrelin receptor activation. For translation into new drugs, the molecule must have appropriate efficacy, selectivity and pharmacodynamic properties. It is argued that the compound must then be evaluated in conditions where changes in motility are known to exist, before considering more difficult symptomatic conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or functional dyspepsia (FD), where relationships with disordered motility are unclear. Thus, it may be better to begin studying a gastric prokinetic in diabetics requiring improved glucose control, rather than in FD. Notably, new 5-HT(4) receptor agonists are being evaluated firstly as treatments of constipation, not IBS. New antidiarrhoeal agents should be developed similarly. Thus, progression of new drugs may require initial studies in smaller patient populations where clinical outcome is better defined. Only then can disease-related ideas be properly tested and drugs brought forward for these disorders (with high clinical need) and then, if successful for IBS and FD.

Motilin, ghrelin and related neuropeptides as targets for the treatment of GI diseases

Motilin and ghrelin are released from the upper gut during fasting, to stimulate gastric motility. Additional actions of ghrelin (e.g. changes in appetite, nausea or endocrine functions) improve the possibility of using ghrelin receptor agonists to treat complex disorders such as functional dyspepsia. However, changes in endocrine functions increase the risk of unacceptable side effects. By comparison, the more restricted prokinetic activity of motilin limits the therapeutic possibilities but improves the risk:benefit ratio. Compounds targeting both receptors are in development. Recently, additional peptides have been identified from preproghrelin (obestatin) and prepromotilin. These exert biological activity but their pathophysiological significance is unknown.

Identification of genes for the ghrelin and motilin receptors and a novel related gene in fish, and stimulation of intestinal motility in zebrafish (Danio rerio) by ghrelin and motilin

In mammals ghrelin has a diverse range of effects including stimulation of gut motility but although present in teleost fish its effects on motility have not been investigated. The present study used bioinformatics to search for fish paralogues of the ghrelin receptor and the closely related motilin receptor, and investigated the effects of ghrelin and motilin on gut motility in zebrafish, Danio rerio. Fish paralogues of the human ghrelin and motilin receptor genes were identified, including those from the zebrafish. In addition, a third gene was identified in three species of pufferfish (the only fish genome completely sequenced), which is distinct from the ghrelin and motilin receptors but more closely aligned to these receptors relative to other G-protein coupled receptors. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated strong ghrelin receptor-like reactivity in the muscle of the zebrafish intestine. In isolated intestinal bulb and mid/distal intestine preparations, ghrelin, motilin, and the motilin receptor agonist erythromycin all evoked contraction; these responses ranged between 9% and 51% of the contractions evoked by carbachol (10(-6) M). There were some variations in the concentrations found to be active in the different tissues, e.g., whereas motilin and rat ghrelin caused contraction of the intestinal bulb circular muscle at concentrations as low as 10(-8) M, human ghrelin (10(-8) to 10(-6) M) was without activity. Neither ghrelin (10(-7) M) nor erythromycin (10(-5) M) affected the contractions evoked by electrical field stimulation. The results suggest that both ghrelin and motilin can regulate intestinal motility in zebrafish and most likely other teleosts, and are discussed in relation to the evolution of these regulatory peptides.

Differences between the abilities of tegaserod and motilin receptor agonists to stimulate gastric motility in vitro

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Motilin or 5-HT4 receptor agonists stimulate gastrointestinal motility. Differences in activity are suggested but direct comparisons are few. A method was devised to directly compare the gastric prokinetic activities of motilin, the motilin receptor agonist, erythromycin, and the 5-HT4 receptor agonist, tegaserod.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Gastric prokinetic-like activity was assessed by measuring the ability to facilitate cholinergically-mediated contractions evoked by electrical field stimulation (EFS) in rabbit isolated stomach. Comparisons were made between potency, maximal activity and duration of responses.

KEY RESULTS

Rabbit motilin (r.motilin) 0.003-0.3 microM, [Nle13]motilin 0.003-0.3 microM, erythromycin 0.3-10 microM and tegaserod 0.1-10 microM caused concentration - dependent potentiation of EFS-evoked contractions. The potency ranking was r.motilin = [Nle13]motilin > tegaserod > erythromycin. The Emax ranking was r.motilin = [Nle13]motilin = erythromycin > tegaserod. Responses to r.motilin and [Nle13]motilin faded rapidly (t1/2 9 and 11 min, respectively) whereas those to erythromycin and tegaserod were maintained longer (t1/2 24 and 28 min). The difference did not appear to be due to peptide degradation. A second application of [Nle13]motilin was excitatory after 60 min contact and fade of the initial response (responses to 0.03 and 0.1 microM [Nle13]motilin were not different from those caused by the first application).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Prokinetic-like activities of the 5-HT4 agonist tegaserod and the motilin receptor agonists were compared by measuring changes in cholinergically-mediated contractions. This novel approach highlighted important differences between classes (greater Emax of motilin, compared with tegaserod) and for the first time, within each class (short t1/2 for motilin, compared with erythromycin).

Delayed gastric emptying: Whom to test, how to test, and what to do

Gastroparesis, or delayed gastric emptying, is a common cause of chronic nausea and vomiting as seen in a gastroenterology practice. Diabetic, postsurgical, and idiopathic causes remain the three most common forms of gastroparesis. In addition to nausea and vomiting, symptoms of gastroparesis may include early satiety, postprandial fullness, and abdominal pain. Physiologic changes that may explain symptoms in patients with gastroparesis, in addition to delayed gastric emptying, include impaired fundic accommodation, antral hypomotility, gastric dysrhythmias, pylorospasm, and perhaps visceral hypersensitivity. Diagnosis of gastroparesis is best determined using a radioisotope-labeled solid meal with scintigraphic imaging for at least 2 hours, and preferably 4 hours, postprandially. Most commonly, a 99mTc sulfur colloid-labeled egg sandwich with imaging at 0, 1, 2, and 4 hours is used. Extension of the gastric emptying test to 4 hours improves the accuracy of the test, but unfortunately, this is not commonly performed at many centers. Emptying of liquids remains normal until the late stages of gastroparesis and is less useful. The aims of treatment should be to control symptoms and maintain adequate nutrition and hydration. Patients should be advised to eat small meals and to limit their intake of fat and fiber. Additional dietary recommendations may include increasing caloric intake in the form of liquids. For diabetic patients, control of blood glucose levels is important, as symptom exacerbation is frequently associated with poor glycemic control. Specific treatment often begins with metoclopramide, 10 mg, up to four times daily, after a discussion of possible side effects with the patient. An antiemetic agent, such as prochlorperazine, 5 to 10 mg orally or 25 mg by suppository, can be added on an as-needed basis every 4 to 6 hours to control nausea. If these antiemetic medications are not effective, or if side effects develop, orally dissolving ondansetron, 8 mg every 8 to 12 hours, can be tried on an as-needed basis. If this regimen is unsuccessful, then alternative prokinetic agents--erythromycin, 125 mg, or tegaserod, 6 mg, prior to meals--can be tried. For cases refractory to these treatments, referral to a center with US Food and Drug Administration permission to use domperidone should be considered. Alternatively, symptom modulators such as low-dose tricyclic antidepressants can be tried to reduce symptoms, but these do not improve gastric emptying. In patients for whom all medical therapy fails, other options that are tried at experienced centers include the injection of botulinum toxin into the pylorus, placement of a feeding jejunostomy, and/or placement of a gastric electrical stimulator.

Gastroparesis: clinical update

Gastroparesis refers to chronically abnormal gastric motility characterized by symptoms suggestive of mechanical obstruction and delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. It may be idiopathic or attributable to neuropathic or myopathic abnormalities, such as diabetes mellitus, postvagotomy, postviral infection, and scleroderma. Dietary and behavioral modification, prokinetic drugs, and surgical interventions have been used in managing patients with gastroparesis. Although mild gastroparesis is usually well managed with these treatment options, severe gastroparesis may be very difficult to control and may require referral to a specialist center if symptoms are intractable despite pharmacological therapy and dietetic support. New advances in drug therapy, botulinum toxin injection, and gastric electrical stimulation techniques have been introduced and might provide new hope to patients with refractory gastroparesis. This article critically reviews the advances in the field from the perspective of the clinician.

Effect of atilmotin on gastrointestinal transit in healthy subjects: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

We studied effects of i.v. atilmotin (BAX-ACC-1638, a novel motilin agonist, circulating t(1/2) < 10 min) on gastrointestinal transit in humans using a randomized, parallel-group, dose-response double-blind study of i.v. atilmotin, 6, 30, 60 microg or vehicle (placebo) given 2 min after standardized breakfast, lunch and dinner. The breakfast meal contained (99m)Tc-eggs and (111)In-milk. Full gastrointestinal transit was measured by scintigraphy. Primary endpoints were % gastric emptying (GE) at 30 min, GE t(1/2), colonic filling (CF) at 6 h, and geometric centre of colonic transit at 24 h. Analysis included adjustment for age, gender and body mass index, with Bonferroni correction applied for multiple comparisons. A significant treatment effect of atilmotin was detected for GE (%) at 30 min for solids and liquids (P < 0.01 for both). There were no significant effects on CF or CT and no significant adverse clinical events. Thus, atilmotin accelerates GE of solids and liquids in healthy humans. These data suggest that, at the doses tested, atilmotin should be considered for treatment of stomach motility disorders.

Idiopathic dyspepsia

Idiopathic dyspepsia refers to pain and/or discomfort perceived in the epigastrium that is not secondary to organic, systemic, or metabolic diseases. Symptoms may overlap with those of gastroesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome. Gastrointestinal motor disorders, hypersensitivity to mechanical or chemical stimuli, and psychosocial factors can act individually or in concert to induce the symptoms of dyspepsia. Accordingly, there is no single therapy, and treatment must be individualized. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection rarely achieves symptom improvement. Treatment of idiopathic dyspepsia should begin by reassuring the patient about the benign nature of the syndrome and educating them on the knowledge that has been achieved in recent years regarding potential causes of the syndrome. Both prokinetic and antisecretory drugs have been reported to improve dyspeptic symptoms, but results are not completely convincing. Although well-designed studies demonstrate superiority of proton pump inhibitors over placebo, it should be noted that patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease were invariably included; when these patients are excluded, the benefit of antisecretory medications is questionable. We suggest that patients with idiopathic dyspepsia be initially treated according to the predominant symptom. Those with epigastric pain/burning should receive a trial with standard doses of proton pump inhibitors for 4 to 8 weeks, whereas prokinetic patients should be prescribed at recommended doses for similar periods of time to patients with nonpainful dyspeptic symptoms such as posprandial fullness, early satiety, nausea, or vomiting. Nonresponders may benefit from combination therapies or short trials with higher doses of drugs. Visceral analgesics and antidepressants can also be prescribed alone or in combinations with other therapeutic strategies. Recent studies demonstrate utility for psychologic therapy and hypnotherapy, although truly controlled studies are difficult in this area. Herbal medicines deserve further evaluation.

Current pharmacological treatment of gastroparesis

The aetiology of gastroparesis differs between children and adults. During childhood, gastroparesis is quite rare, and is mostly seen in preterm infants, with either immaturity of the gastrointestinal tract, or when allergic to cow's milk protein. Acute, delayed gastric emptying may be observed following viral infections. In adults, most patients with gastroparesis are either idiopathic or of diabetic origin. As a consequence, approaches in the treatment of children and adults differ. Metoclopramide, domperidone, cisapride and erythromycin have all been studied. Evidence for benefit is strongest for the latter two drugs, although most studies have methodological shortcomings. From a paediatric perspective, it seems astonishing that more trials with erythromycin analogues have not been performed, as the few data available suggests that these analogues are more powerful, without the side effects of long-term, low-dose administration of antibiotics. Gastric electrical stimulation seems the most promising therapeutic option available at present.

American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the diagnosis and treatment of gastroparesis

This literature review and the recommendations herein were prepared for the American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Committee. The paper was approved by the Committee on May 16, 2004, and by the AGA Governing Board on September 23, 2004.

Effect of the motilin agonist KC 11458 on gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

KC 11458, a motilin agonist without antibiotic properties, accelerates gastric emptying in animals and healthy humans.

AIM

To evaluate the acute effects of KC 11458 on gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients (6 type 1 and 23 type 2) with gastroparesis underwent assessments of: (i) gastric emptying of a solid/liquid meal using scintigraphy, (ii) glycaemic control (blood glucose at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min during the gastric emptying measurement) and (iii) upper gastrointestinal and 'meal-related' symptoms (questionnaire), at baseline and after treatment with KC 11458 in a dose of 8 mg t.d.s., or placebo for 8 days.

RESULTS

KC 11458 had no statistically significant or clinically relevant effect on gastric emptying of either the solid intragastric retention at 100 min (T100) (P = 0.87) or liquid 50% emptying time (T50) (P = 0.17) components of the meal. KC 11458 slightly worsened (P = 0.04) upper gastrointestinal symptoms when compared with placebo. The magnitude of the change in solid gastric emptying correlated with the change in the blood glucose concentration (r = 0.49; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

KC 11458, in a dose of 8 mg t.d.s. for 8 days, does not accelerate gastric emptying in patients with diabetic gastroparesis. The absence of efficacy may relate to an effect of hyperglycaemia.

Erythromycin in the short- and long-term control of dyspepsia symptoms in patients with gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

Few prokinetic drugs are available to treat gastroparesis. Data are limited on short-term and long-term efficacy of erythromycin as a prokinetic drug.

GOALS

Assess efficacy of low-dose erythromycin suspension to treat gastroparesis.

STUDY

Patients with dyspepsia and gastroparesis by gastric emptying study were treated with low-bulk diet and low-dose (50-100 mg 3 times a day and at bedtime) oral erythromycin suspension. Data were collected by retrospective chart review and telephone questionnaire for short- and long-term follow-up, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 25 patients, 18 had short-term follow-up, 18 had longterm follow-up, and 14 had both. On short-term follow-up, 15 patients (83%) experienced some or dramatic improvement, while 3 (17%) experienced worsening or no change in symptoms (P = 0.005). Mean duration of long-term use was 11 +/- 7 months. On long-term followup, 12 (67%) patients noticed some or dramatic improvement, while 6 (33%) experienced worsening or no change in symptoms (P = 0.16). Correlation (0.7) between short- and long-term response was significant (P < 0.005). Of the 3 patients with poor short-term response, none did well long term. Of the 11 patients with some or dramatic response in short-term, 7 continued to have some response long term. There was no relation between gastric emptying time and response to erythromycin suspension.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of gastroparesis with low-dose erythromycin and low-bulk diet results in a dramatic short-term improvement in the majority of patients. Short-term response predicts long-term response. This response may not be as great, possibly due to tachyphylaxis.

Idiopathic and Diabetic Gastroparesis

The management of both diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis often represents a substantial clinical challenge. In formulating recommendations for therapy, it should be recognized that these are based on less than optimal evidence; in particular, there are substantial deficiencies in current knowledge relating to the pathophysiology of gastroparesis, as well as the natural history of gastrointestinal symptoms, and the majority of pharmacologic trials have been short term and associated with methodologic limitations. Although the etiologic factors differ, the overall management principles are similar in the two conditions. Maintenance of adequate nutrition is pivotal, and parenteral nutrition may be required in severe cases associated with malnutrition. In patients with diabetes, rigorous attempts should be made to optimize glycemic control--hyperglycemia slows gastric emptying and may exacerbate symptoms and attenuate the effects of prokinetic drugs. Despite the relatively poor predictive value of symptoms, it is reasonable to suggest a trial of prokinetic therapy for about 4 weeks, rather than initially establishing the diagnosis by measurement of gastric emptying. However, it should be recognized that there is a substantial placebo response, a lack of evidence to support the cost effectiveness of such an approach, and that most patients will require prolonged therapy. In type 1 diabetic patients, prokinetic therapy may potentially benefit glycemic control, and this forms an additional rationale (albeit not established) for therapy. Some patients with diabetes and idiopathic gastroparesis with severe vomiting are unable to tolerate oral medication; in such cases subcutaneous metoclopramide may prove useful. Patients with intractable symptoms should be hospitalized and given intravenous erythromycin. The repertoire of prokinetic agents available in the United States is limited and includes metoclopramide, erythromycin, and cisapride (available by special program from its manufacturer); all of these drugs are associated with side effects. The use of metoclopramide may represent the first choice for chronic oral therapy, although it has been studied less comprehensively than cisapride. Combination therapy may be potentially more efficacious than the use of single agents. Dehydration and metabolic derangements should be corrected. The choice of chronic medical therapy should be individualized, taking factors such as age, presence of diabetes, concurrent medications, and comorbidities into account. In a small number of patients in whom medical treatment fails, surgery should be considered, and, if performed, done in a specialized center. A number of novel therapies, including gastric electrical stimulation, are currently being evaluated.

Gastric emptying in diabetes: clinical significance and treatment

The outcome of recent studies has led to redefinition of concepts relating to the prevalence, pathogenesis and clinical significance of disordered gastric emptying in patients with diabetes mellitus. The use of scintigraphic techniques has established that gastric emptying is abnormally slow in approx. 30-50% of outpatients with long-standing Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes, although the magnitude of this delay is modest in many cases. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms occur frequently and affect quality of life adversely in patients with diabetes, although the relationship between symptoms and the rate of gastric emptying is weak. Acute changes in blood glucose concentration affect both gastric motor function and upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Gastric emptying is slower during hyperglycaemia when compared with euglycaemia and accelerated during hypoglycaemia. The blood glucose concentration may influence the response to prokinetic drugs. Conversely, the rate of gastric emptying is a major determinant of post-prandial glycaemic excursions in healthy subjects, as well as in Type 1 and Type 2 patients. A number of therapies currently in development are designed to improve post-prandial glycaemic control by modulating the rate of delivery of nutrients to the small intestine.

Pharmacological modulation of human gastric volumes demonstrated noninvasively using SPECT imaging

Three-dimensional single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging allows noninvasive measurement of human postprandial gastric accommodation. The aim of this study was to determine whether 99mTCO4-SPECT demonstrates effects on pre- and postprandial gastric volumes of intravenous (i.v.) erythromycin lactobionate and sublingual isosorbide dinitrate, as predicted from previous literature. Twenty volunteers received no medication (controls), while 12 were randomized to either i.v. erythromycin 2 mg kg-1 over 20 min, or 10 mg sublingual isosorbide. After a 10-min preprandial SPECT measurement, a standard 300-mL, 300-kcal liquid meal was ingested, followed by a 20-min postprandial measurement. Gastric images were reconstructed from transaxial images and total volume was measured using the Analyseeth software system. Fasting gastric volume was greater with isosorbide [223 +/- 14 (SE) mL vs. 174 +/- 9 mL, control; P < 0.05], and postprandial volume was lower with erythromycin [393 +/- 27 mL vs. 582 +/- 17 mL, control; P < 0.05]. The ratio of postprandial over fasting volume and mean difference between pre- and postprandial volumes were significantly lower in both drug groups compared to controls. We conclude that 99mTCO4-SPECT imaging is able to semiquantitatively demonstrate pharmacological modulation of fasting gastric volume and postprandial accommodation in humans.

A review of diabetic gastropathy

Diabetes mellitus affects various organs, including the gastrointestinal tract. The stomach is commonly affected, and symptoms related to the upper GI tract are frequently reported. Management of diabetic gastropathy involves dietary modifications, pharmacological agents, and occasionally, alternative feeding methods.

Effects of low doses of erythromycin on the 13C Spirulina platensis gastric emptying breath test and electrogastrogram: a controlled study in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE

Electrogastrography and stable isotope gastric emptying breath tests (GEBTs) are relatively simple, noninvasive tests of gastric motor function that may be useful in monitoring the effects of therapeutic interventions. It was our primary objective to examine the effects of low dose i.v. erythromycin on the results of the 13C Spirulina platensis GEBT and electrogastrography. We were also interested in evaluating the reproducibility of these tests.

METHODS

In 10 healthy subjects (five female, ages 23-37 yr), we simultaneously performed the GEBT, using a prepackaged meal (340 kcal), and electrogastrography on each of four different occasions separated by at least 1 wk. After performance of baseline studies, they were repeated in random order after the infusion of 50 mg of erythromycin (Er50), 100 mg erythromycin (Er100), and a placebo (saline). Breath samples were obtained at baseline and at 75, 90, and 180 min after the meal and T1/2 and Tlag calculated. Electrogastrography recordings began 30 min before the test meal and continued for 2 h after the meal.

RESULTS

Baseline and placebo T1/2 and Tlag were similar. Er50 resulted in a modest acceleration of gastric emptying (T1/2 Er50 vs baseline vs placebo = 104.0 vs 132.7 vs 125.5 min) and reduction in lag time (Tlag Er50 vs baseline vs placebo = 47.2 vs 61.5 vs 56.2 min). A similar decrease was seen in response to Er100. The baseline and placebo fasting and fed electrogastrography parameters were similar. After infusion of Er100, the percentage of normal slow waves in the first postprandial hour decreased relative to baseline and placebo (percent normogastria Er100 vs baseline vs placebo = 64.1+/-7.5 vs 82.4+/-6.4 vs 79.7+/-5.5). This corresponded with an increase in percent tachygastria during the same period and an overall decrease in the mean dominant frequency. Similar but less striking changes were seen after administration of Er50. Replicate GEBTs showed a high degree of reproducibility both within and between individuals for T1/2 and Tlag. In contrast, replicate electrogastrograms revealed moderate to high variability for all parameters except the dominant frequency.

CONCLUSION

The stable isotope GEBT utilizing 13C S. platensis demonstrates responsiveness to the prokinetic effects of low dose i.v. erythromycin and good reproducibility.

Management of the patient with gastroparesis

Gastroparesis may be related to a variety of underlying disorders, but management options are fairly universal. Dietary measures and pharmacologic agents, primarily in the form of prokinetic medications, form the foundation of standard management. Some patients will have refractory symptoms and alternative dosing schemes or drug combinations may be used. An occasional patient will still require venting gastrostomy and/or jejunal feeding. This review addresses the standard dietary and pharmacologic approaches to gastroparesis, as well as issues pertaining to gastrostomy/jejunostomy tubes and to surgical options for refractory cases. Finally, experimental agents and techniques, such as gastric pacing, will be discussed.

Failure of a motilin receptor agonist (ABT-229) to relieve the symptoms of functional dyspepsia in patients with and without delayed gastric emptying: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Motilin-receptor agonists are prokinetics; whether they relieve the symptoms of functional dyspepsia is unknown. We aimed to test the efficacy of the motilin agonist ABT-229 in functional dyspepsia patients with and without delayed gastric emptying.

METHODS

Patients were randomized with postprandial symptoms and documented functional dyspepsia by endoscopy (n=589 in intention-to-treat analysis). Patients were assigned to either the delayed or normal gastric emptying strata, based on a validated 13C octanoic acid breath test. Patients were then further randomized within each strata, to receive one of four doses of ABT-229 (1.25, 2. 5, 5 or 10 mg b.d. before breakfast and dinner) or placebo for 4 weeks, following a 2-week baseline. The primary outcome was the assessment of change in symptom severity over the 2 weeks from baseline to final visit, based on a self-report questionnaire measuring severity on visual analogue scales.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics across the treatment arms were very similar. No significant differences in the upper abdominal discomfort severity score (maximum 800 mm) were observed for any active treatment arm vs. placebo (mean change from baseline -139, -141, -145, -160 and -134 mm for placebo, 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, at 4 weeks by intention-to-treat). More patients on placebo reported a good or excellent global response than patients on 1.25 or 5 mg of active therapy (both P < 0.05). The results were very similar in those with and without delayed gastric emptying. Helicobacter pylori status did not predict response. Excluding patients with any baseline heartburn (total remaining n=240), ABT-229 10 mg was inferior to placebo in relief of upper abdominal discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

ABT-229 was of no value for relief of symptoms in functional dyspepsia, compared with placebo.

Pharmacotherapy of gastroparesis

The evaluation and management of gastric motor dysfunction continues to represent a significant clinical challenge. The very definition of what constitutes a clinically relevant disturbance of gastric motility remains unclear. The spectrum of gastroparesis extends from those with classical symptoms and severe delay of gastric emptying to those with dyspepsia and a mild delay in emptying rate. Indeed, for many patients with dyspepsia, the role of gastric emptying delay in the pathogenesis of symptoms, remains unclear. Any assessment of the efficacy of any therapeutic class in gastroparesis must be mindful, therefore, of these variations in definition. For those individuals with severe established gastroparesis, therapeutic success often remains elusive and i.v. erythromycin and oral dopamine antagonists, or substituted benzamides, remain the best options for acute severe exacerbations and chronic maintenance therapy, respectively. Alternatives, currently under investigation, include a number of 5-HT4 agonists, macrolides devoid of antibiotic activity, CCK antagonists and gastric electrical stimulation. Other novel approaches include strategies to address some of the regional abnormalities in gastric motor function that have been identified in some patients with dyspepsia.

Gastroduodenal motility

Several major themes emerged over the past year in the area of gastroduodenal motility. Mostly, these themes represented extensions of research areas discussed in prior reviews in this series rather than the emergence of completely new concepts. Thus, for example, considerable emphasis has again been placed on regional gastric motor function in dyspepsia and on the role of fundic relaxation and accommodation, in particular. Not surprisingly, basic physiologic research has also shown a keen interest in the regulation of fundic relaxation. One new and exciting development is the recognition of the stomach's role in satiety. The spectrum of gastric motor dysfunction in diabetes mellitus continues to be explored, and the important role of hyperglycemia in regulating gastric function has been further emphasized. More data have been provided on noninvasive alternatives to gastric motor function testing, and several studies have looked at factors that may influence variability in these various tests. There have been few innovations over the past year in the therapeutic arena; rather, the indications and limitations of current therapies have been further developed.