Controlled study of the effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition versus calcium-entry blockade on insulin sensitivity in overweight hypertensive patients: Trandolapril Italian Study (TRIS)

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy and colorectal cancer risk

BACKGROUND

Laboratory data suggest a role of angiotensin II in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Whether angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and/or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use reduces the risk of colorectal neoplasia remains unclear. Given their widespread use, we sought to determine whether exposure to these agents would have a secondary benefit on CRC incidence.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was conducted using EPIC's General Practice Research Database (1987-2002). The study cohort consisted of hypertensive patients. Case patients were those diagnosed with CRC after the diagnosis of hypertension. Each case patient was matched to up to 10 control subjects on age, sex, and both calendar year and duration of follow-up using incidence density sampling. The association between CRC and ACE-I/ARB exposure was assessed with conditional logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Two thousand eight-hundred forty-seven case patients were matched with 28239 control subjects. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of CRC were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 0.98; P = .03) for or more years of ACE-I/ARB therapy and 0.75 (95% CI = 0.58 to 0.97; P = .03) for 5 or more years of exposure. The strength of this association increased with high-dose exposure (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.79; P = .003 for ≥3 years of high-dose exposure). Among patients receiving antihypertensive medications, the association with long-term therapy was no longer statistically significant for ≥5 years), but the benefit of high-dose therapy remained (OR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.89; P = .01 for ≥3 years of high-dose exposure).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term/high dose exposure to ACE-Is/ARBs may be associated with a decreased incidence of CRC.

Valsartan restores inflammatory response by macrophages in adipose and hepatic tissues of LPS-infused mice

Inflammation involving adipose tissue is regarded as one of the major molecular mechanisms underlying obesity-related insulin resistance. Recent studies have suggested a series of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) to improve insulin resistance or protect against the development of diabetes mellitus. We previously demonstrated that valsartan suppresses the inflammatory response of macrophages. Interestingly, however, this effect did not occur via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ or the AT1a receptor. This suppression appears to secondarily lead to amelioration of insulin resistance and reductions in abnormal gene expressions in adipocytes. In addition to these in vitro findings, we herein demonstrate the in vivo effects of valsartan, using mice constitutively infused with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 4 weeks. Oral administration of valsartan to LPS-infused mice normalized the increased expressions of inflammatory cytokines in adipose and liver tissues. These results raise the possibility that valsartan not only contributes to normalization of obesity-related insulin resistance, but is also beneficial for the treatment of other diseases with inflammation related to the metabolic syndrome such as atherosclerosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Further study is necessary to clarify these issues.

Effects of losartan on whole body, skeletal muscle and vascular insulin responses in obesity/insulin resistance without hypertension

AIMS

Renin-angiotensin system antagonists have been found to improve glucose metabolism in obese hypertensive and type 2 diabetic subjects. The mechanism of these effects is not well understood. We hypothesized that the angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan would improve insulin-mediated vasodilation, and thereby improve insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle of insulin-resistant subjects.

METHODS

We studied subjects with obesity and insulin resistance but without hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia or dysglycaemia [age 39.0 ± 9.6 yr (mean ± SD), body mass index (BMI) 33.2 ± 5.9 kg/m(2) , BP 115.8 ± 12.2/70.9 ± 7.2 mmHg, LDL 2.1 ± 0.5 mmol/l]. Subjects were randomized to 12 weeks' double-blind treatment with losartan 100 mg once daily (n = 9) or matching placebo (n = 8). Before and after treatment, under hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp conditions we measured whole-body insulin-stimulated glucose disposal, insulin-mediated vasodilation, and insulin-stimulated leg glucose uptake by the limb balance technique.

RESULTS

Whole-body insulin-stimulated glucose disposal was not significantly increased by losartan. Insulin-mediated vasodilation was augmented following both treatments [increase in leg vascular conductance: pretreatment 0.7 ± 0.3 l/min/mmHg (losartan, mean ± SEM) and 0.9 ± 0.3 (placebo), posttreatment 1.0 ± 0.4 (losartan) and 1.3 ± 0.6 (placebo)] but not different between treatment groups (p = 0.53). Insulin's action to augment nitric oxide (NO) production and to augment endothelium-dependent vasodilation was also not improved. Leg glucose uptake was not significantly changed by treatments, and not different between groups (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings argue against the hypothesis that losartan might improve skeletal muscle glucose metabolism by improving insulin-mediated vasodilation in normotensive insulin-resistant obese subjects. The metabolic benefits of angiotensin receptor blockers may require the presence of hypertension in addition to obesity-associated insulin resistance.

Valsartan, independently of AT1 receptor or PPARγ, suppresses LPS-induced macrophage activation and improves insulin resistance in cocultured adipocytes

Macrophages are integrated into adipose tissues and interact with adipocytes in obese subjects, thereby exacerbating adipose insulin resistance. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the insulin-sensitizing effect of the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) valsartan, as demonstrated in clinical studies. Insulin signaling, i.e., insulin receptor substrate-1 and Akt phosphorylations, in 3T3-L1 adipocytes was impaired markedly by treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) or in the culture medium of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophages, and valsartan had no effects on these impairments. However, in contrast, when cocultured with RAW 264.7 cells using a transwell system, the LPS-induced insulin signaling impairment in 3T3-L1 adipocytes showed almost complete normalization with coaddition of valsartan. Furthermore, valsartan strongly suppressed LPS-induced productions of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and TNFα with nuclear factor-κB activation and c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase phosphorylation in RAW 264.7 and primary murine macrophages. Very interestingly, this effect of valsartan was also observed in THP-1 cells treated with angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) siRNA or a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) antagonist as well as macrophages from AT1a receptor-knockout mice. We conclude that valsartan suppresses the inflammatory response of macrophages, albeit not via PPARγ or the AT1a receptor. This suppression appears to secondarily improve adipose insulin resistance.

Angiotensin II blockade: a strategy to slow ageing by protecting mitochondria?

Protein and lipid oxidation-mainly by mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS)-was proposed as a crucial determinant of health and lifespan. Angiotensin II (Ang II) enhances ROS production by activating NAD(P)H oxidase and uncoupling endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Ang II also stimulates mtROS production, which depresses mitochondrial energy metabolism. In rodents, renin-angiotensin system blockade (RAS blockade) increases survival and prevents age-associated changes. RAS blockade reduces mtROS and enhances mitochondrial content and function. This suggests that Ang II contributes to the ageing process by prompting mitochondrial dysfunction. Since Ang II is a pleiotropic peptide, the age-protecting effects of RAS blockade are expected to involve a variety of other mechanisms. Caloric restriction (CR)-an age-retarding intervention in humans and animals-and RAS blockade display a number of converging effects, i.e. they delay the manifestations of hypertension, diabetes, nephropathy, cardiovascular disease, and cancer; increase body temperature; reduce body weight, plasma glucose, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor-1; ameliorate insulin sensitivity; lower protein, lipid, and DNA oxidation, and mitochondrial H(2)O(2) production; and increase uncoupling protein-2 and sirtuin expression. A number of these overlapping effects involve changes in mitochondrial function. In CR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) seem to contribute to age-retardation partly by regulating mitochondrial function. RAS inhibition up-regulates PPARs; therefore, it is feasible that PPAR modulation is pivotal for mitochondrial protection by RAS blockade during rodent ageing. Other potential mechanisms that may underlie RAS blockade's mitochondrial benefits are TGF-β down-regulation and up-regulation of Klotho and sirtuins. In conclusion, the available data suggest that RAS blockade deserves further research efforts to establish its role as a potential tool to mitigate the growing problem of age-associated chronic disease.

Blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to prevent diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing around the world, and the public health impact of DM, driven largely by cardiovascular disease complications, underpins the importance of continued efforts toward primary prevention of DM. Only a few interventions have been shown to prevent DM, with none of them yet proven to improve cardiovascular risk commensurately. Accumulating evidence suggest that drugs that block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), many of which have proven cardiovascular disease (CVD) benefit, also have favourable effects on parameters of glucose metabolism and incident diabetes. Here we review the evidence accumulated to date from animal studies, clinical mechanistic studies and clinical trials regarding the effect of RAAS inhibition and incident DM.

Bosentan: a review of its use in pulmonary arterial hypertension and systemic sclerosis

Bosentan (Tracleer), an orally administered dual endothelin (ET)(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonist, is indicated in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The efficacy of oral bosentan 125 mg twice daily in improving exercise capacity has been demonstrated in well designed trials in adult patients with idiopathic PAH or PAH associated with connective tissue disease or congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts, and in other trials in patients with idiopathic PAH or PAH associated with congenital heart disease or HIV infection. The beneficial effects of first-line bosentan treatment may be maintained for up to 1 year in patients with idiopathic PAH or PAH associated with connective tissue disease. Despite the potential for treatment-related teratogenicity and hepatotoxicity, long-term data indicate that bosentan is generally well tolerated at the approved dosages. Although well designed trials are required to establish the efficacy of bosentan versus or in combination with other specific PAH therapies, especially sildenafil, the convenient oral administration and lack of serious injection-related adverse effects may render bosentan preferable to other PAH therapies. Preliminary data indicate that bosentan may be effective in pediatric PAH patients, although randomized trials are required. Furthermore, bosentan may be a useful option for the prevention of digital ulcer development in patients with systemic sclerosis. Thus, in accordance with current clinical guidelines, bosentan is a convenient, effective, and generally well tolerated agent for use in the first-line treatment of class III PAH or second-line treatment of class IV PAH.

Effect of short-term ACE inhibitor treatment on peripheral insulin sensitivity in obese insulin-resistant subjects

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

This study was designed to investigate the effect of short-term ACE inhibitor treatment on insulin sensitivity and to examine possible underlying metabolic and haemodynamic effects in obese insulin-resistant subjects.

METHODS

A randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial was performed in 18 obese insulin-resistant men (age, 53 +/- 2 years; BMI, 32.6 +/- 0.8 kg/m(2); homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, 5.6 +/- 0.5; systolic blood pressure [SBP], 140.8 +/- 3.2; diastolic blood pressure [DBP], 88.8 +/- 1.6 mmHg), who were free of any medication. The aim was to examine the effects of 2 weeks of ACE inhibitor treatment (ramipril, 5 mg/day) on insulin sensitivity, forearm blood flow, substrate fluxes across the forearm, whole-body substrate oxidation and intramuscular triacylglycerol (IMTG) content.

RESULTS

Ramipril treatment decreased ACE activity compared with placebo (-22.0 +/- 1.7 vs 0.2 +/- 1.1 U/l, respectively, p < 0.001), resulting in a significantly reduced blood pressure (SBP, -10.8 +/- 2.1 vs -2.7 +/- 2.0 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.01; DBP, -10.1 +/- 1.3 vs -4.2 +/- 2.1 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.03). Ramipril treatment had no effect on whole-body insulin-mediated glucose disposal (before: 17.9 +/- 2.0, after: 19.1 +/- 2.4 micromol kg body weight(-1) min(-1), p = 0.44), insulin-mediated glucose uptake across the forearm (before: 1.82 +/- 0.39, after: 1.92 +/- 0.29 micromol 100 ml forearm tissue(-1) min(-1), p = 0.81) and IMTG content (before: 45.4 +/- 18.8, after: 48.8 +/- 27.5 micromol/mg dry muscle, p = 0.92). Furthermore, the increase in carbohydrate oxidation (p < 0.001) and forearm blood flow (p < 0.01), and the decrease in fat oxidation (p < 0.001) during insulin stimulation were not significantly different between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Short-term ramipril treatment adequately reduced ACE activity and blood pressure, but had no significant effects on insulin sensitivity, forearm blood flow, substrate fluxes across the forearm, whole-body substrate oxidation and IMTG content in obese insulin-resistant subjects.

Diabetes and hypertension, the deadly duet: importance, therapeutic strategy, and selection of drug therapy

Large, placebo-controlled RCTs that involve only diabetic patients who have hypertension have not been performed. Subgroup analyses of hyper-tension control from several recent RCTs un-equivocally demonstrated greater benefit in diabetic populations (see Table 3) with ACE inhibitors, TDs, and CCBs. Treatment with fBs(atenolol) also was beneficial in diabetic patients who had hypertension in the actively-controlled UKPDS. The results of three RCTs support intensive BP control in diabetic patients (see Table 4). In these trials, diabetic patients gained more benefit than nondiabetic patients. Such an effect is consistent with the fact that diabetics are at higher risk for CV events. Although there are limited data from RCTs with head-to-head comparison of newer agents (eg,ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCBs) to show that these drugs are better than diuretics and betaBs in reducing CV events by treating hypertension in the diabetic population, the available data support ACE inhibitors (and ARBs if ACE inhibitors are not tolerated) as an initial drug of choice in diabetic,hypertensive patients (see Table 5). Most diabetic patients require three or four drugs to control their BP to target range; as such, it is not necessary to justify the choice of any single class of drug. Tight BP control is cost-effective and is more rewarding than hyperglycemic control in diabetic,hypertensive patients. The optimal goal in diabetics should be to achieve BP that is less than 130/80 mm Hg. Appropriate action should be taken if BP is greater than 140/85 mm Hg. In subjects who have diabetes and renal insufficiency,the BP should be decreased to less than 125/75 mm Hg to delay the progression of renal failure. Limited data suggest that an ACE inhibitor or an ARB is the agent of choice, especially in patients who have proteinuria or renal insufficiency. betaBs can be the first-line agent in diabetics who have CAD. TDs and CCBs are the second line drugs.AAAs should be avoided. Most hypertensive patients require more than one agent to adequately control their BP. There is no evidence to support one combination regimen over the others, nevertheless, the combination of an ACE inhibitor with a TD or a fPB may be more beneficial and cost effective than other combinations in the diabetic population. Large outcome studies that compare different combination therapies in hypertensive,diabetic patients are needed.

Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus through inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin system

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is becoming a major health problem associated with excess morbidity and mortality. As the prevalence of type 2 diabetes is rapidly increasing, prevention of the disease should be considered as a key objective in the near future. Besides lifestyle changes, various pharmacological treatments have proven their efficacy in placebo-controlled clinical trials, including antidiabetic drugs such as metformin, acarbose and troglitazone, or antiobesity agents such as orlistat. Arterial hypertension, a clinical entity in which insulin resistance is common, is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes and may precede the disease by several years. While antihypertensive agents such as diuretics or beta-adrenoceptor antagonists may worsen insulin resistance and impair glucose tolerance, newer antihypertensive agents exert neutral or even slightly positive metabolic effects. Numerous clinical trials have investigated the effects of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARAs) on insulin sensitivity in hypertensive patients, with or without diabetes, with no consistent results. Almost half of the studies with ACE inhibitors in hypertensive nondiabetic individuals demonstrated a slight but significant increase in insulin sensitivity as assessed by insulin-stimulated glucose disposal during a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp, while the other half failed to reveal any significant change. The effects of ARAs on insulin sensitivity are neutral in most studies. Mechanisms of improvement of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity through the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) are complex. They may include improvement of blood flow and microcirculation in skeletal muscles and, thereby, enhancement of insulin and glucose delivery to the insulin-sensitive tissues, facilitating insulin signalling at the cellular level and improvement of insulin secretion by the beta cells. Six recent large-scale clinical studies reported a remarkably consistent reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes in hypertensive patients treated with either ACE inhibitors or ARAs for 3-6 years, compared with a thiazide diuretic, beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, the calcium channel antagonist amlodipine or even placebo. The relative risk reduction averaged 14% (p = 0.034) in the CAPPP (Captopril Prevention Project) with captopril compared with a thiazide or beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist, 34% (p < 0.001) in the HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) study with ramipril compared with placebo, 30% (p < 0.001) in the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) with lisinopril compared with chlortalidone, 25% (p < 0.001) in the LIFE (Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study) with losartan compared with atenolol, and 25% (p = 0.09) in the SCOPE (Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly) with candesartan cilexetil compared with placebo, and 23% (p < 0.0001) in the VALUE (Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation) trial with valsartan compared with amlodipine. All these studies considered the development of diabetes as a secondary endpoint, except the HOPE trial where it was a post hoc analysis. These encouraging observations led to the initiation of two large, prospective, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials whose primary outcome is the prevention of type 2 diabetes: the DREAM (Diabetes REduction Approaches with ramipril and rosiglitazone Medications) trial with the ACE inhibitor ramipril and the NAVIGATOR (Nateglinide And Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research) trial with the ARA valsartan. Finally, ONTARGET (ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial) will also investigate as a secondary endpoint whether it is possible to prevent the development of type 2 diabetes by blocking the RAS with either an ACE inhibitor or an ARA or a combination of both. Thus, the recent consistent observations of a 14-34% reduction of the development of diabetes in hypertensive patients receiving ACE inhibitors or ARAs are exciting. From a theoretical point of view, they emphasise that there are many aspects of the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes that still need to be uncovered. From a practical point of view, they may offer a new strategy to reduce the ongoing epidemic and burden of type 2 diabetes.

Impact of the renin-angiotensin system on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is intended to provide an update of the impact of the renin-angiotensin system on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and of its relationship with adipose-tissue and skeletal muscle activities.

RECENT FINDINGS

The components of the renin-angiotensin system are fully represented in the adipose tissue and appear to be upregulated in obesity--a condition associated with enhanced circulating angiotensinogen levels. The local renin-angiotensin system plays a role in adipocyte differentiation and possibly in body-fat accumulation. In humans, angiotensin II produced by mature adipocytes appears to inhibit the differentiation of adipocyte precursors, thus decreasing the percentage of small insulin-sensitive adipocytes. In turn, the lipid-storage capacity of adipose tissue could become reduced and triglycerides might accumulate in liver and skeletal muscle, contributing to insulin resistance. Randomized controlled trials indicating that pharmacological renin-angiotensin system blockade improves insulin sensitivity and reduces the risk of type 2 diabetes are in keeping with this possibility. The local renin-angiotensin system in skeletal muscle may affect exercise performance and the individual response to different types of muscular performance. The concept that the local renin-angiotensin system plays a role in body-fat storage and in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism is further supported by genetic studies showing that susceptibility to weight gain and possibly insulin resistance is greater in individuals carrying certain renin-angiotensin system allelic variants associated with alterations in systemic and local angiotensinogen levels and angiotensin-converting enzyme activity.

SUMMARY

In summary, the aforementioned data imply that the renin-angiotensin system plays a substantial role in obesity, insulin resistance and the associated increase in blood pressure.

Trandolapril: a newer angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Trandolapril is a newer angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor that is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hypertension and for use in stable patients who have evidence of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction or symptoms of chronic heart failure within the first 2 days after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The fixed-dose combination of trandolapril and verapamil extended release (ER) is approved for the treatment of hypertension only.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article was to review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of trandolapril as monotherapy and in fixed-dose combination with verapamil ER.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through a MEDLINE/PubMed search of the English-language literature published between January 1983 and August 2002 and a review of the bibliographies of identified articles.

RESULTS

Trandolapril has a sufficient duration of inhibition of plasma ACE activity to allow once-daily dosing. It is converted by esterases to the active trandolaprilat metabolite, with mean terminal disposition half-lives of < 1 and approximately 75 hours for the prodrug and metabolite, respectively. In comparative trials in the management of hypertension, trandolapril 1 to 4 mg/d was statistically indistinguishable from or superior to captopril 100 mg/d, enalapril 10 or 20 mg/d, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg/d, nifedipine ER 30 or 40 mg/d, nitrendipine 20 mg/d, perindopril 4 mg/d, and verapamil ER 120 to 240 mg/d. In the Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation, trandolapril also significantly reduced all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, sudden death, and progression to severe chronic heart failure in patients with evidence of LV systolic dysfunction after AMI. In comparative trials in the management of hypertension, the combination of trandolapril 1 or 2 mg/d and verapamil ER 180 mg/d was statistically indistinguishable from or superior to the combinations of atenolol 50 or 100 mg/d plus chlorthalidone 12.5 or 25 mg/d, captopril 50 mg/d plus HCTZ 25 mg/d, lisinopril 20 mg/d plus HCTZ 12.5 mg/d, and metoprolol 100 mg/d plus HCTZ 12.5 mg/d. The most common adverse effects of trandolapril monotherapy in clinical trials of < or = 1 year's duration included cough, dizziness, and diarrhea (frequency < or = 1.9%). The most common adverse effects of trandolapril/verapamil ER therapy in clinical trials of < or = 1 year's duration included first-degree atrioventricular block, bradycardia, constipation, cough, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, and dyspnea (frequency < or = 4.6%). Based on the literature search, there are no published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of trandolapril alone or combined with verapamil ER in the US health care setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the literature, trandolapril is a well-tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent, whether used alone or in combination with verapamil ER. These products may be valuable in patients with LV systolic dysfunction after AMI, although the combination product is approved for the management of hypertension only.

Transcapillary insulin transfer in human skeletal muscle

BACKGROUND

Transcapillary insulin transfer is considered a rate-limiting step in insulin action at supraphysiological insulin concentrations. However, it remains unclear whether this concept also applies for physiological conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present study we set out to characterize transcapillary insulin transfer by measuring insulin concentrations in plasma and interstitial space fluid of skeletal muscle during an oral glucose tolerance test and euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp conditions, respectively. For this purpose we employed in vivo microdialysis of skeletal muscle in conjunction with an ultrasensitive insulin assay in eight healthy lean male volunteers (aged 25 +/- 1 years).

RESULTS

Insulin concentrations at baseline were 48 +/- 8 pmol x L(-1) in plasma and 19 +/- 4 pmol x L(-1) in the interstitium (P = 0.002). The mean interstitium to plasma ratio at baseline was 0.48 +/- 0.09 pmol x L(-1). During the oral glucose tolerance test the interstitium to plasma ratio remained unchanged (0.43 +/- 0.12, P = NS vs. baseline), but was significantly reduced during euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp conditions at steady-state hyperinsulinaemia (0.12 +/- 0.01, P = 0.01 vs. baseline).

CONCLUSION

In summary there is a substantial transcapillary insulin gradient in healthy human skeletal muscle under baseline and glucose-stimulated conditions. Our findings support the hypothesis of a saturable transcapillary insulin transport representing a partly rate-limiting step for insulin action.

ACE Inhibition with moexipril: a review of potential effects beyond blood pressure control

ACE inhibitors induce metabolic changes and exert cardioprotective and vasoprotective properties, some of which cannot be attributed to their antihypertensive effect per se. Moexipril is an ACE inhibitor with a lipophilicity in the same range as quinapril, benazepril or ramipril, and so can readily penetrate lipid membranes and thus target tissue ACE in addition to plasma ACE. Evidence from animal studies shows similar and significant (p < 0.05) reductions in tissue ACE activity for moexipril and quinapril. Moexipril may improve endothelial dysfunction; moexiprilat and ramiprilat have demonstrated greater activity than captopril, enalaprilat and quinaprilat in isolated endothelium-denuded segments of the rabbit jugular vein where bradykinin elicits a constrictor response, mediated by activation of the bradykinin B(2) receptor. ACE inhibitors, including moexipril, may exert neuroprotective effects. Moexipril promoted neuronal survival in vitro and it is thought that this neuroprotective effect is due to free radical scavenging properties of the drug. ACE inhibitors can also decrease progression of renal insufficiency in patients with various underlying renal diseases. Moexipril may also have a renoprotective effect as it increased the ultrafiltration coefficient and normalized urinary protein excretion in rat models. Preclinical studies indicate that the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system may play a role in the regulation of bone resorption and moexipril had no adverse effects on bone metabolism in animal models and the drug did not hamper the osteoprotective effects of estrogen. Reduction in left ventricular mass with moexipril in patients with hypertension was similar in magnitude to the effect of other ACE inhibitors. When investigated in hypertensive patients with an elevated cardiovascular risk, moexipril increased arterial distensibility and demonstrated antioxidative properties in addition to efficiently controlling blood pressure. Moexipril does not adversely affect serum levels of uric acid, lipids, blood glucose levels and plasma insulin levels and can be co-administered with hormone replacement therapy. Moreover, quality-of-life data suggest favorable effects of moexipril treatment in a patient population at high cardiovascular risk.

ACE inhibitor improves insulin resistance in diabetic mouse via bradykinin and NO

Improvement of insulin resistance by ACE inhibitors has been suggested; however, this mechanism has not been proved. We postulated that activation of the bradykinin-nitric oxide (NO) system by an ACE inhibitor enhances glucose uptake in peripheral tissues by means of an increase in translocation of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4), resulting in improvement of insulin resistance. Administration of an ACE inhibitor, temocapril, significantly decreased plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in type 2 diabetic mouse KK-Ay. Mice treated with temocapril showed a smaller plasma glucose increase after glucose load. We demonstrated that temocapril treatment significantly enhanced 2-[3H]-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) uptake in skeletal muscle but not in white adipose tissue. Administration of a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, Hoe140, or an NO synthase inhibitor, L-NAME, attenuated the enhanced glucose uptake by temocapril. Moreover, we observed that translocation of GLUT4 to the plasma membrane was significantly enhanced by temocapril treatment without influencing insulin receptor substrate-1 phosphorylation. In L6 skeletal muscle cells, 2-DG uptake was increased by temocaprilat, and Hoe140 inhibited this effect of temocaprilat but not that of insulin. These results suggest that temocapril would improve insulin resistance and glucose intolerance through increasing glucose uptake, especially in skeletal muscle at least in part through enhancement of the bradykinin-NO system and consequently GLUT4 translocation.

The effects of valsartan on insulin sensitivity in patients with primary hypertension

Insulin resistance is an important risk factor of cardiovascular disease. This study was performed to determine the effects of valsartan on insulin sensitivity in patients with primary hypertension. In this study, non-obese subjects with primary hypertension and a reference group of healthy subjects matched by age, sex and body mass index were evaluated; patients with any other causes of peripheral insulin resistance and hyperlipidaemia were excluded. The effect of valsartan on insulin resistance, assessed by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR), fasting serum insulin levels, determined by radioimmunoassay, and fasting blood glucose concentrations, measured by the glucose oxidase method, were evaluated. All obtained data were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis. Before valsartan treatment, the fasting serum insulin levels were significantly elevated in the 20 hypertensive patients with primary hypertension compared with the 20 subjects in the reference group (19.6 +/- 7.1 versus 8.7 +/- 1.9 microIU/ml). The fasting serum insulin levels correlated with HOMA-IR. Correlation analysis also showed a significant relationship between HOMA-IR and both systolic and diastolic blood pressures (r = 0.71 and r = 0.77, respectively). In our study, we showed that patients with primary hypertension have a decreased insulin sensitivity that was reflected in high serum fasting insulin levels. Anti-hypertensive treatment with valsartan increases insulin sensitivity.

What should the role of ACE inhibitors be in the treatment of diabetes? Lessons from HOPE and MICRO-HOPE

Experimental and clinical evidence suggest that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition may reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk by directly affecting endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis and thrombus formation. These direct effects are in addition to effects on vascular tone or pressure. The Health Outcomes and Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study assessed the role of an ACE inhibitor ramipril in reducing CV events in 9297 patients > or = 55 years who were at high risk of CV events but did not have left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or high blood pressure at the time of study entry. In the overall HOPE population, the risk of the primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) was reduced by 22% (p < 0.001), and in patients with diabetes plus one other CV risk, it was reduced by 25% (p = 0.0004). Ramipril treatment achieved risk reduction in patients with mild renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > or = 1.4 mg/dl). Ramipril treatment did not increase adverse events in patients with renal insufficiency. The Study to Evaluate Carotid Ultrasound changes in patients treated with Ramipril and Vitamin E (SECURE) demonstrated that ramipril 10 mg significantly reduced the rate of carotid intimal medial thickening, suggesting a direct effect on atherosclerotic progression.

Pharmacotherapy of hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus

The co-existence of hypertension and diabetes dramatically and synergistically increases the risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Overwhelming evidence supports aggressive treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients. However, only a small percentage of diabetic hypertensive patients reach their treatment goal of blood pressure (BP) < 130/80 mmHg. Tight BP control is not only cost-effective but also more rewarding than glycaemic control. The optimal goal of BP control in diabetics should be 130/80 mmHg. In subjects with diabetes and renal insufficiency, the BP should be lowered to 125/75 mmHg to delay the progression of renal failure. The choice of an antihypertensive agent should be based on proven effects on morbidity and mortality rather than on surrogate parameters such as lipid or glucose. Limited data suggests that an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) is the agent of choice, especially in those with proteinuria or renal insufficiency. beta-blockers (betaBs) can be the first-line agent in diabetics with coronary heart disease, while thiazide diuretics (TD) and calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) are the second-line drugs. Angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) may be proven to be as effective as ACEIs in diabetics with hypertension. alpha-adrenergic antagonists (AAAs) should be avoided. Most hypertensive patients require more than one agent to control their BP. There is no evidence to support one combination regimen over others; nevertheless, a combination of an ACEI with a TD or a betaB may be the most cost-effective regimens compared to other combinations.

Acute effect of the dual angiotensin-converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase 24-11 inhibitor mixanpril on insulin sensitivity in obese Zucker rat

The aim of this study was to determine whether acute dual angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)/neutral endopeptidase 24-11 (NEP) inhibition could improve whole body insulin-mediated glucose disposal (IMGD) more than ACE inhibition alone and whether this effect was mediated by the kinin-nitric oxide (NO) pathway activation. We therefore compared in anaesthetized obese (fa/fa) Zucker rats (ZOs) the effects of captopril (2 mg kg(-1), i.v.+2 mg kg(-1) h(-1)), retrothiorphan (25 mg kg(-1), i.v. +25 mg kg(-1) h(-1)), a selective NEP inhibitor, and mixanpril (25 mg kg(-1), i.v. +25 mg kg(-1) h(-1)), a dual ACE/NEP inhibitor, on IMGD using hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp technique. The role of the kinin-NO pathway in the effects of mixanpril was tested using a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist (Hoe-140, 300 microg kg(-1)) and a NO-synthase inhibitor (N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, L-NAME, 10 mg kg(-1) i.v. +10 mg kg(-1) h(-1)) as pretreatments. Insulin sensitivity index (ISI) was lower in ZO controls than in lean littermates. Increases in ISI were observed in captopril- and retrothiorphan-treated ZOs. In mixanpril-treated ZOs, ISI was further increased, compared to captopril- and retrothiorphan-treated ZOs. In ZOs, Hoe-140 and L-NAME alone did not significantly alter and slightly reduced the ISI respectively. Hoe-140 and L-NAME markedly inhibited the ISI improvement induced by mixanpril. These results show that in obese insulin-resistant Zucker rats, under acute conditions, NEP or ACE inhibition can improve IMGD and that dual ACE/NEP inhibition improves IMGD more effectively than does either single inhibition. This effect is linked to an increased activation of the kinin-NO pathway.

The metabolic syndrome and related cardiovascular risk

The metabolic syndrome is a complex association of several risk factors including insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and essential hypertension. Insulin resistance has been associated with sympathetic activation and endothelial dysfunction, which are the main mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of hypertension and its related cardiovascular risk. According to the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee, and guidelines of the World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension, the presence of multiple risk markers suggests that both hypertension and risk factors should be aggressively managed in order to obtain a better outcome. Primary prevention of obesity at different levels--individual, familial, and social-- starting early in childhood has proven to be cost effective, and will be mandatory to reduce the world epidemic of obesity and its severe consequences.