Mechanisms underlying arginine vasopressin-induced relaxation in monkey isolated coronary arteries

Interplay of Angiotensin Peptides, Vasopressin, and Insulin in the Heart: Experimental and Clinical Evidence of Altered Interactions in Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus

The present review draws attention to the specific role of angiotensin peptides [angiotensin II (Ang II), angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-(1-7)], vasopressin (AVP), and insulin in the regulation of the coronary blood flow and cardiac contractions. The interactions of angiotensin peptides, AVP, and insulin in the heart and in the brain are also discussed. The intracardiac production and the supply of angiotensin peptides and AVP from the systemic circulation enable their easy access to the coronary vessels and the cardiomyocytes. Coronary vessels and cardiomyocytes are furnished with AT1 receptors, AT2 receptors, Ang (1-7) receptors, vasopressin V1 receptors, and insulin receptor substrates. The presence of some of these molecules in the same cells creates good conditions for their interaction at the signaling level. The broad spectrum of actions allows for the engagement of angiotensin peptides, AVP, and insulin in the regulation of the most vital cardiac processes, including (1) cardiac tissue oxygenation, energy production, and metabolism; (2) the generation of the other cardiovascular compounds, such as nitric oxide, bradykinin (Bk), and endothelin; and (3) the regulation of cardiac work by the autonomic nervous system and the cardiovascular neurons of the brain. Multiple experimental studies and clinical observations show that the interactions of Ang II, Ang(1-7), AVP, and insulin in the heart and in the brain are markedly altered during heart failure, hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus, especially when these diseases coexist. A survey of the literature presented in the review provides evidence for the belief that very individualized treatment, including interactions of angiotensins and vasopressin with insulin, should be applied in patients suffering from both the cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.

Use of vasopressin in neonatal hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: case series

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of vasopressin on arterial blood pressure in infants with neonatal hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case study in Neonatal ICU involving six infants; five born to mothers with diabetes mellitus (mean gestational age 37.5 ± 0.9 weeks). Vasopressin infusion was started at a mean dose of 0.3 ± 0.2 mU/kg/min.

RESULT

Initiation of vasopressin was followed by improved mean (p = 0.004), systolic (p = 0.028), and diastolic (p = 0.009) arterial pressure within 2 h. Heart rate (p = 0.025) and oxygen requirement (p = 0.021) also declined after initiation. Serum sodium declined initially and recovered by 72 h (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Although there is limited experience with vasopressin use in neonatal HOCM, our case series suggests it may be beneficial for improving systemic hypotension and stabilization of hemodynamics. The potential for hyponatremia is high, necessitating careful fluid/electrolyte management. A prospective randomized trial is necessary to confirm safety and efficacy of vasopressin treatment in neonatal HOCM.

Concurrent Use of Calcium Chloride and Arginine Vasopressin Infusions in Pediatric Patients with Acute Cardiocirculatory Failure

Acute heart failure (AHF) can cause low cardiac output and poor end-organ perfusion. Inotropic agents along with vasodilators can improve organ perfusion. Arginine vasopressin (AVP) and calcium chloride (CaCl) infusions are increasingly being used in low cardiac output states in pediatric AHF. We retrospectively reviewed 77 patients (0-18 years) with AHF admitted between January 2014 and May 2017 who received concurrent AVP and CaCl infusions. Surrogates of cardiac output and organ perfusion included hemodynamic vital signs, laboratory parameters, and urine output (UO). Organ dysfunction and vasopressor inotropic scores were also calculated. Median (IQR) age was 0.88 years (0, 3.75), and median weight was 6.62 kg (3.5, 13.7). Congenital heart disease was present in 70% (46/77) patients. Univentricular physiology was present in 25% (25/77) patients. None of the patients were in the immediate postoperative period. Median durations of AVP and CaCl were 2 days (1, 3) and 3 days (2, 6), respectively. Using Wilcoxon-signed rank test and Bonferroni correction, post hoc comparison showed that at 8 h post infusion, all systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) results, and UO were greater than those 1 h prior to infusion. Median SBP increased from 79 mm Hg (71, 92) 1 h prior to 97 mm Hg (84, 107) 8 h post. Median DBP increased from 44 mm Hg (35, 52) 1 h prior to 54 mm Hg (44, 62) 8 h post. Heart rate showed a decrease between measurements 1 h prior to infusion and 8 h post, with median scores 146 (127, 162) and 136 (114, 150) beats per minute, respectively. Within first 8 h, median UO continuously increased from 6 mL/h. (0, 25) at 1 h post infusion to 20 mL/h. (2, 62) at 8 h post infusion. Median pediatric logarithmic organ dysfunction scores on days 4 through 7 post infusion were lower compared to day 1; median vasopressor inotropic scores on day 2 through 7 post infusion were lower compared to day 1. Serum lactate level, arterial pH, and base excess all showed favorable trend. Concurrent use of AVP and CaCl infusions may improve surrogates of cardiac output, and intensive care outcomes, and prevent organ dysfunction in children with AHF.

Combined use of high doses of vasopressin and corticosteroids in a patient with Crohn's disease with refractory septic shock after intestinal perforation: a case report

BACKGROUND

In this article, we present a clinical case of refractory septic shock resulting from intestinal perforation treated with high doses of vasopressin and hydrocortisone during emergency surgery. The use of such high doses of vasopressin for this type of shock is not described in the literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 49-year-old white woman with grade III obesity, Crohn's disease, and an intestinal perforation presented with refractory septic shock. Initially, a low dose of vasopressin was used. Then, the dosage was increased to 0.4 U/minute; in the literature, this is defined as "salvage therapy." This therapy consists of an initial load followed by a continuous infusion of hydrocortisone.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant increase in her cardiac index and stroke volume index resulted in an improvement in peripheral resistance, gas exchange, and urine output and a decrease in her heart rate, interleukin-6 level, and tumor necrosis factor-α level. The administration of high doses of vasopressin and corticosteroids was demonstrated to be safe for the immune system, to reduce the systemic inflammatory response, and to have direct cardiovascular effects. Further studies are required to examine the use of vasopressin as an initial vasopressor as well as its use in high dosages and in combination with corticosteroids.

The Role of Terlipressin in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Review of the Literature and Personal Experience

Vasopressin and its synthetic analog terlipressin are potent vasopressors that could be useful in vasodilatory septic shock. In septic adults, vasopressin/terlipressin have been shown to increase mean arterial pressure and to decrease the necessity for catecholamines. Moreover, low doses of vasopressin (or terlipressin) increase urine output and ameliorate oxygenation. Although pediatric septic shock is more often hypodynamic, both vasopressin and terlipressin have proved to be effective in restoring blood pressure or increasing the diuresis in this setting. The purpose of this review is to summarize the physiology of vasopressin and to report the available evidence for the use of vasopressin or terlipressin in pediatric septic shock in order to make best use in this population. We also report our experience with the continuous infusion of terlipressin in two pediatric patients who developed catecholamine refractory septic shock.

Vasopressin attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury via reduction of oxidative stress and inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening in rat hearts

Aim of this study was to investigate the involvement of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) and oxidative stress in the cardioprotective effect of vasopressin (AVP) on ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Anesthetized male wistar rats were subjected to regional 30 min ischemia and 120 min reperfusion and randomly divided into nine groups: (1) Control; saline was administered intravenously before ischemia, (2) vasopressin was administrated 10 min prior to ischemia, (3, 4) Atractyloside as MPTP opener, was injected 5 min prior to reperfusion without and with vasopressin, (5, 6) Cyclosporine A as a MPTP closer, was injected 5 min prior to reperfusion without and with vasopressin, (7) mitochondria were isolated from control group and CaCl2 was added as MPTP opener and swelling inducer, (8) isolated mitochondria from Control hearts was incubated with Cyclosporine A before adding the CaCl2 (9) CaCl2 was added to isolated mitochondria from vasopressin group. Infusion of vasopressin decreased infarct size (18.6±1.7% vs. control group 37.6±2.4%), biochemical parameters [LDH (Lactate Dehydrogenase), CK-MB (Creatine Kinase-MB) and MDA (Malondialdehyde) plasma levels, PAB (Prooxidant-antioxidant balance)] compared to control group. Atactyloside suppressed the cardioprotective effect of vasopressin (32.5±1.9% vs. 18.6±1.7%) but administration of the Cyclosporine A without and with vasopressin significantly reduced infarct size to 17.7±4% (P<0.001) and 22.7±3% (P<0.01) respectively, vs. 37.6±2.4% in control group. Also, vasopressin, similar to Cyclosporine A, led to decrease in CaCl2-induced swelling. It seems that vasopressin through antioxidant effect and MPTP inhibition has created a cardioprotection against ischemia/reperfusion injuries.

Vasopressin as an adjunct therapy for pulmonary hypertension: a case report

Vasopressin is emerging as a therapeutic adjunct option towards treatment of shock states in the pediatric population. Its effects on pulmonary vasculature are less well understood. This report describes a 5-month-old infant with nitric oxide-unresponsive pulmonary hypertension, oxygenation failure, and systemic hypotension. Vasopressin therapy improved oxygenation and blood pressure and biventricular function, allowing weaning of nitric oxide and inotropic support. No decrease in coronary flow was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasopressin could be considered as an adjunct option in infants with pulmonary hypertension and systemic hypotension. Echocardiographic monitoring during treatment is recommended.

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of VAsopressin versus Noradrenaline as Initial therapy in Septic sHock (VANISH)

INTRODUCTION

Vasopressin is an alternative vasopressor in the management of septic shock. It spares catecholamine use but whether it improves outcome remains uncertain. Current evidence suggests that it may be most effective if used early and possibly in conjunction with corticosteroids. This trial will compare vasopressin to noradrenaline as initial vasopressor in the management of adult septic shock and investigate whether there is an interaction of vasopressin with corticosteroids.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre, factorial (2×2), randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 412 patients will be recruited from multiple UK intensive care units and randomised to receive vasopressin (0-0.06 U/min) or noradrenaline (0-12 µg/min) as a continuous intravenous infusion as initial vasopressor therapy. If maximum infusion rates of this first study drug are reached, the patient will be treated with either hydrocortisone (initially 50 mg intravenous bolus six-hourly) or placebo, before additional open-label catecholamine vasopressors are prescribed. The primary outcome of the trial will be the difference in renal failure-free days between treatment groups. Secondary outcomes include need for renal replacement therapy, survival rates, other organ failures and resource utilisation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial protocol and information sheets have received a favourable opinion from the Oxford A Research Ethics Committee (12/SC/0014). There is an independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee and independent membership of the Trial Steering Committee including patient and public involvement. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN 20769191 and EudraCT 2011-005363-24.

Age dependency of vasopressin pulmonary vasodilatory effect in rats

BACKGROUND

Vasopressin is a systemic vasoconstrictor. Its pulmonary vasodilatory effect is controversial, and limited data are available on its use in neonates with pulmonary hypertension. Hypothesizing that the vasopressin-induced pulmonary vasodilation is developmentally regulated, we evaluated its pulmonary and systemic arterial response in newborn and adult rats.

METHODS

Vessels were mounted on a wire myograph, and the vasopressin-induced changes in vasomotor tone measured. The vessel- and age-dependent differences in vasopressin V1a and V2 receptors' expression were evaluated by western blotting.

RESULTS

Vasopressin induced a dose-dependent increase in mesenteric arterial tone at both ages, but of greater magnitude in adult vessels (P < 0.01). At lower concentrations, vasopressin induced pulmonary vasodilation in adult vessels and vasoconstriction in newborn arteries. The adult vasopressin-induced pulmonary vasodilation was inhibited by ibuprofen, suggesting that the response is prostaglandin mediated. Pulmonary tissue V1a receptor protein expression was higher in adult, when compared with newborn arteries (P < 0.01). The adult vessels V1a expression predominated in the pulmonary arteries, and V2 was only detected in mesenteric arteries.

CONCLUSION

The vasopressin-induced pulmonary vasodilation is absent in newborn rats likely due to the lower tissue V1a expression early in life. These animal data challenge the therapeutic use of vasopressin in neonatal pulmonary hypertension.

Vasopressin as a rescue therapy for refractory pulmonary hypertension in neonates: case series

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of vasopressin therapy on the efficacy of oxygenation and arterial pressure in infants with severe persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.

DESIGN

Retrospective case study.

SETTING

Neonatal ICU, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

SUBJECTS

Neonates with severe persistent pulmonary hypertension.

INTERVENTION

Intravenous infusion of vasopressin.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ten infants satisfied the inclusion criteria. Inhaled nitric oxide was used for median (interquartile range) duration of 15 hours (11-28 hr) prior to vasopressin commencement. Vasopressin was initiated at a mean dose of 0.0002 ± 0.0002 U/kg/min for a median (interquartile range) duration of 49 hours (13-95 hr). Administration of vasopressin was associated with an improvement in oxygenation index, peak effect 6 hours after drug initiation (p = 0.01), and a reduction in inhaled nitric oxide dose (p < 0.05). There was a concomitant improvement in blood pressure (p < 0.05) and urine output (p < 0.05), without drop in the serum sodium level or worsening in serum lactate level.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is limited experience of vasopressin use in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn infants, our case series suggests it to be a potential adjunctive therapy for improving the efficacy of oxygenation and systemic hypotension. A prospective randomized trial is needed to confirm its efficacy and safety in the management of severe persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.

Cardiac ischemia in patients with septic shock randomized to vasopressin or norepinephrine

Introduction

Cardiac troponins are sensitive and specific biomarkers of myocardial necrosis. We evaluated troponin, CK, and ECG abnormalities in patients with septic shock and compared the effect of vasopressin (VP) versus norepinephrine (NE) on troponin, CK, and ECGs.

Methods

This was a prospective substudy of a randomized trial. Adults with septic shock randomly received, blinded, a low-dose infusion of VP (0.01 to 0.03 U/min) or NE (5 to 15 μg/min) in addition to open-label vasopressors, titrated to maintain a mean blood pressure of 65 to 75 mm Hg. Troponin I/T, CK, and CK-MB were measured, and 12-lead ECGs were recorded before study drug, and 6 hours, 2 days, and 4 days after study-drug initiation. Two physician readers, blinded to patient data and drug, independently interpreted ECGs.

Results

We enrolled 121 patients (median age, 63.9 years (interquartile range (IQR), 51.1 to 75.3), mean APACHE II 28.6 (SD 7.7)): 65 in the VP group and 56 in the NE group. At the four time points, 26%, 36%, 32%, and 21% of patients had troponin elevations, respectively. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were similar between patients with positive versus negative troponin levels. Troponin and CK levels and rates of ischemic ECG changes were similar in the VP and the NE groups. In multivariable analysis, only APACHE II was associated with 28-day mortality (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.14; P = 0.033).

Conclusions

Troponin elevation is common in adults with septic shock. We observed no significant differences in troponin, CK, and ECGs in patients treated with vasopressin and norepinephrine. Troponin elevation was not an independent predictor of mortality.

Trial registration

Controlled-trials.com ISRCTN94845869

Therapeutic applications of vasopressin in pediatric patients

CONTEXT

Reports of successful use of vasopressin in various shock states and cardiac arrest has lead to the emergence of vasopressin therapy as a potentially major advancement in the management of critically ill children.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of physiology of vasopressin, rationale of its use and dose schedule in different disease states with special focus on recent advances in the therapeutic applications of vasopressin.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE search (1966-September 2011) using terms vasopressin, terlipressin, arginine-vasopressin, shock, septic shock, vasodilatory shock, cardiac arrest, and resuscitation for reports on vasopressin/terlipressin use in children and manual review of article bibliographies. Search was restricted to human studies. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, evaluation studies, case series, and case reports on vasopressin/terlipressin use in children (preterm neonates to 21 years of age) were included. Outcome measures were analysed using following clinical questions: indication, dose and duration of vasopressin/terlipressin use, main effects especially on systemic blood pressure, catecholamine requirement, urine output, serum lactate, adverse effects, and mortality.

RESULTS

51 reports on vasopressin (30 reports) and terlipressin (21 reports) use in pediatric population were identified. A total of 602 patients received vasopressin/terlipressin as vasopressors in various catecholamine-resistant states (septic - 176, post-cardiotomy - 136, other vasodilatory/mixed shock - 199, and cardiac arrest - 101). Commonly reported responses include rapid improvement in systemic blood pressure, decline in concurrent catecholamine requirement, and increase in urine output; despite these effects, the mortality rates remained high.

CONCLUSION

In view of the limited clinical experience, and paucity of randomized controlled trials evaluating these drugs in pediatric population, currently no definitive recommendations on vasopressin/terlipressin use can be laid down. Nevertheless, available clinical data supports the use of vasopressin in critically ill children as a rescue therapy in refractory shock and cardiac arrest.

Bench-to-bedside review: Vasopressin in the management of septic shock

This review of vasopressin in septic shock differs from previous reviews by providing more information on the physiology and pathophysiology of vasopressin and vasopressin receptors, particularly because of recent interest in more specific AVPR1a agonists and new information from the Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial (VASST), a randomized trial of vasopressin versus norepinephrine in septic shock. Relevant literature regarding vasopressin and other AVPR1a agonists was reviewed and synthesized. Vasopressin, a key stress hormone in response to hypotension, stimulates a family of receptors: AVPR1a, AVPR1b, AVPR2, oxytocin receptors and purinergic receptors. Rationales for use of vasopressin in septic shock are as follows: first, a deficiency of vasopressin in septic shock; second, low-dose vasopressin infusion improves blood pressure, decreases requirements for norepinephrine and improves renal function; and third, a recent randomized, controlled, concealed trial of vasopressin versus norepinephrine (VASST) suggests low-dose vasopressin may decrease mortality of less severe septic shock. Previous clinical studies of vasopressin in septic shock were small or not controlled. There was no difference in 28-day mortality between vasopressin-treated versus norepinephrine-treated patients (35% versus 39%, respectively) in VASST. There was potential benefit in the prospectively defined stratum of patients with less severe septic shock (5 to 14 μg/minute norepinephrine at randomization): vasopressin may have lowered mortality compared with norepinephrine (26% versus 36%, respectively, P = 0.04 within stratum). The result was robust: vasopressin also decreased mortality (compared with norepinephrine) if less severe septic shock was defined by the lowest quartile of arterial lactate or by use of one (versus more than one) vasopressor at baseline. Other investigators found greater hemodynamic effects of higher dose of vasopressin (0.06 units/minute) but also unique adverse effects (elevated liver enzymes and serum bilirubin). Use of higher dose vasopressin requires further evaluation of efficacy and safety. There are very few studies of interactions of therapies in critical care - or septic shock - and effects on mortality. Therefore, the interaction of vasopressin infusion, corticosteroid treatment and mortality of septic shock was evaluated in VASST. Low-dose vasopressin infusion plus corticosteroids significantly decreased 28-day mortality compared with corticosteroids plus norepinephrine (44% versus 35%, respectively, P = 0.03; P = 0.008 interaction statistic). Prospective randomized controlled trials would be necessary to confirm this interesting interaction. In conclusion, low-dose vasopressin may be effective in patients who have less severe septic shock already receiving norepinephrine (such as patients with modest norepinephrine infusion (5 to 15 μg/minute) or low serum lactate levels). The interaction of vasopressin infusion and corticosteroid treatment in septic shock requires further study.

Vasoactive support in the optimization of post-cardiac arrest hemodynamic status: from pharmacology to clinical practice

As a critical component of post-resuscitation care, prompt optimization of hemodynamic status by means of targeted interventions is vital in order to maximize the likelihood of good outcome. Vasoactive agents play an essential role in the supportive care of post cardiac arrest patients. The administration of these agents is associated with serious side-effects and therefore they should be used in the minimal dose necessary to achieve low-normal mean arterial pressure and adequate systematic perfusion. Careful and frequent serial evaluation of the patient is important primarily to assess volume status and adequacy of circulatory support. Continuous monitoring of blood pressure and laboratory parameters is essential both to accurately titrate therapy and because inotropes and vasopressors have the potential to induce life-threatening side-effects. The clinical efficacy of inotropes and vasopressors has been largely investigated through examination of their impact on hemodynamic end points, and clinical practice has been driven in part by expert opinion, extrapolation from animal studies, and physician preference. Clearly these agents should all be considered as supportive measures to stabilize the patient prior to some form of definitive therapy.

The cellular mechanisms underlying the inhibitory effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on arginine vasopressin-induced vasoconstriction

PURPOSE

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is a potent vasoconstrictor that is sometimes used for the treatment of refractory vasodilatory shock. AVP constricts vascular smooth muscle by increasing both intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) and myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity. However, the modulation of AVP-mediated vasoconstriction by volatile anesthetics remains to be determined. This study investigates the effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on AVP-induced vasoconstriction and elucidates the underlying mechanisms, with an emphasis on the Ca(2+)-mediated pathways and Ca(2+) sensitization pathways of rat aortic smooth muscle.

METHODS

The effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on AVP-induced vasoconstriction and on the AVP-induced increase in [Ca(2+)](i) and Rho activity in rat aorta were investigated by isometric force recording, by measuring [Ca(2+)](i) using fluorescence dye, and by Western blotting techniques.

RESULTS

Arginine vasopressin (10⁻⁷M) elicited a transient contractile response that was inhibited by isoflurane and sevoflurane in a concentration-dependent manner. AVP (10⁻⁷ M) induced a transient increase in intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)). Isoflurane and sevoflurane also inhibited an AVP-induced increase in [Ca(2+)](i) in a concentration-dependent manner. AVP (10⁻⁷ M) increased the Rho activity that was attenuated by 2 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane (P < 0.01), but not by an equipotent concentration of isoflurane.

CONCLUSION

Arginine vasopressin-induced vasoconstriction is mediated by an increase in [Ca(2+)](i) and by the activation of the Rho-Rho kinase pathway in rat aortic smooth muscle. Although both isoflurane and sevoflurane, at clinically relevant concentrations, attenuate AVP-induced contraction, the cellular mechanisms of their inhibitory effects appear to differ.

The use of vasopressin in the setting of recalcitrant hypotension due to calcium channel blocker overdose

Treatment of hypotension caused by calcium channel blocker overdose (CCB) remains a challenge. We describe the successful use of vasopressin in two patients with massive CCB overdoses in whom hypotension was unresponsive to calcium, glucagon, insulin, and conventional vasopressor therapies. While various modes of treatments have been used to treat the hypotension of CCB overdose, this is the first report to our knowledge of the successful use of vasopressin in this clinical setting.

Vasopressin, when added to norepinephrine, was not associated with increased predicted mortality after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Arginin vasopressin (AVP) is a potent vasoconstrictor which has been used in vasodilatory shock when therapy with catecholamines and fluids has failed. In this study we evaluated the association of AVP with organ failure and mortality in cardiac surgical patients suffering from vasodilatory shock refractory to norepinephrine (NE) treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cardiac surgical patients who received AVP in addition to NE (N=33, AVP-group) and 33 control patients (NE group) who were treated with an equal dose of NE compared with AVP patients when AVP infusion started. Data on preoperative risk factors according to EuroSCORE and predicted mortality calculated by logistic EuroSCORE were collected preoperatively. Data on hemodynamics, organ dysfunctions, length of intensive care unit stay and mortality were collected.

RESULTS

EuroSCORE did not differ between the groups, AVP:10.4 +/- 3.9 vs. NE 8.9 +/- 4.0. Observed 30 day mortality was lower than predicted in both groups, AVP: 7 (21.7%) vs. predicted mortality 25.9% and NE: 2 (6.1%) vs. 16.0%, respectively. There were more renal complications (36.4% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.008) and infections (30.3% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.003) in patients receiving AVP. Cardiovascular complications did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospectively observed cohort of cardiac surgical patients, AVP did not increase mortality predicted by Euroscore. Anyhow renal and infection complications were common.

Vasopressin vs. terlipressin in the treatment of cardiovascular failure in sepsis

BACKGROUND

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) and terlipressin (TP) are increasingly used as adjunct vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock. Despite important pharmacological differences between the two drugs (e.g., receptor selectivity, effective half-life) the use of either substance is determined mainly by local availability and institutional inventory. We briefly describe the pathophysiology and pharmacology of septic shock relevant to the treatment with vasopressin analogues. In addition, differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics between AVP and TP are discussed.

DISCUSSION

The current literature suggests that neither AVP nor TP should be administered in high doses in patients with septic shock. Furthermore, increasing evidence indicates that early administration of vasopressin analogues may improve outcome as compared to a last-resort treatment. Low-dose infusion of AVP (0.6-2.4 U/h) has been demonstrated to be a safe adjunct in the management of septic shock. The V2 agonistic effects of AVP may exert favorable effects on hepatosplanchnic, renal, pulmonary, and coronary perfusion. However, the higher V1 receptor selectivity of TP may prove more potent in restoring arterial blood pressure and avoiding rebound hypotension, while carrying the risk of sustained global and regional vasoconstriction after bolus injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from experimental studies and initial clinical reports suggests that continuous low-dose infusion of TP may stabilize hemodynamics in septic shock with reduced side effects. However, randomized, controlled trials are necessary to determine the role of bolus or continuous infusion of TP in the treatment of septic shock before this approach can be recommended for routine clinical use.

Arginine vasopressin during sinus rhythm: effects on haemodynamic variables, left anterior descending coronary artery cross sectional area and cardiac index, before and after inhibition of NO-synthase, in pigs

We have shown previously that arginine vasopressin (AVP) given during sinus rhythm increases mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery cross sectional area. AVP was assumed to result in vasodilatation via activation of the endothelial nitric oxide system. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects of AVP before and after NO-inhibition. Nine domestic pigs were instrumented for measurement of haemodynamic variables using micromanometer-tipped catheters, and measurement of LAD coronary artery cross sectional area employing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Haemodynamic variables, LAD coronary artery cross sectional area and cardiac output were measured at baseline, 90 s and 5, 15, and 30 min after AVP (0.4 U kg (-1) IV) before and after blockade of nitric oxide synthase with N(G)-nitro L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Compared with baseline, AVP significantly increased MAP after 90 s (89+/-4 versus 160+/-5 mm Hg), increased LAD coronary artery cross sectional area (11.3+/-1 versus 11.8+/-1 mm(2)) and decreased cardiac index (138+/-6 versus 53+/-6 mL/min kg(-1)). After blockade of nitric oxide synthase, AVP significantly increased MAP after 90 s (135+/-4 versus 151+/-3 mm Hg), increased LAD coronary artery cross sectional area (8.7+/-1 versus 8.9+/-1 mm(2)), and significantly decreased cardiac index (95+/-6 versus 29+/-4 mL/min kg (-1)).

IMPLICATIONS

During sinus rhythm, AVP increased MAP and LAD coronary artery cross sectional area, but decreased cardiac index.

Vasopressin: mechanisms of action on the vasculature in health and in septic shock

BACKGROUND

Vasopressin is essential for cardiovascular homeostasis, acting via the kidney to regulate water resorption, on the vasculature to regulate smooth muscle tone, and as a central neurotransmitter, modulating brainstem autonomic function. Although it is released in response to stress or shock states, a relative deficiency of vasopressin has been found in prolonged vasodilatory shock, such as is seen in severe sepsis. In this circumstance, exogenous vasopressin has marked vasopressor effects, even at doses that would not affect blood pressure in healthy individuals. These two findings provide the rationale for the use of vasopressin in the treatment of septic shock. However, despite considerable research attention, the mechanisms for vasopressin deficiency and hypersensitivity in vasodilatory shock remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize vasopressin's synthesis, physiologic roles, and regulation and then review the literature describing its vascular receptors and downstream signaling pathways. A discussion of potential mechanisms underlying vasopressin hypersensitivity in septic shock follows, with reference to relevant clinical, in vivo, and in vitro experimental evidence.

DATA SOURCE

Search of the PubMed database (keywords: vasopressin and receptors and/or sepsis or septic shock) for articles published in English before May 2006 and manual review of article bibliographies.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS

The pathophysiologic mechanism underlying vasopressin hypersensitivity in septic shock is probably multifactorial. It is doubtful that this phenomenon is merely the consequence of replacing a deficiency. Changes in vascular receptors or their signaling and/or interactions between vasopressin, nitric oxide, and adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels are likely to be relevant. Further translational research is required to improve our understanding and direct appropriate educated clinical use of vasopressin.

The effect of vasopressin on organ blood flow in an endotoxin-induced rabbit shock model

The effects of vasopressin on the vasculature differ from those of other vasopressors, and its effects on the coronary artery remain debatable. This study was undertaken to examine the effects of vasopressin in a rabbit endotoxin-induced shock model and to compare these effects with those of norepinephrine. Thirty rabbits were divided into four study groups: a normal control group (group I, n = 5), a shock control group (group II, n = 5), a vasopressin group (group III, n = 10), and a norepinephrine group (group IV, n = 10). Shock was induced by intravenously infusing lipopolysaccharide (Escherichia coli O111:B4) in groups II, III, and IV. In groups III and IV, systemic blood pressure was maintained to the level of group I by adjusting vasopressin and norepinephrine doses. Left ventricle, right ventricle, ventricular septum, kidney, liver, spleen, and skeletal muscle blood flows were measured using radioisotope tagged microspheres at baseline and 2 h after initial blood flow measurement. No difference in organ blood flows were observed between groups I and II, and coronary blood flow in the left ventricle, right ventricle, and ventricular septum was similar in all study groups. However, renal blood flow was significantly lower in group IV than in group III (p < .05) and hepatic arterial blood flow was significantly lower in group III than in group IV (p < .05). Thus, effect of vasopressin on organ blood flow is organ dependent. Vasopressin increased renal blood flow and decreased hepatic arterial blood flow in this endotoxin-induced shock model, whereas norepinephrine did not. However, coronary blood flow was not changed by shock status or vasopressor type.

Vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and different shock states: a review of the literature

Vasopressin administration may be a promising therapy in the management of various shock states. In laboratory models of cardiac arrest, vasopressin improved vital organ blood flow, cerebral oxygen delivery, the rate of return of spontaneous circulation, and neurological recovery compared with epinephrine (adrenaline). In a study of 1219 adult patients with cardiac arrest, the effects of vasopressin were similar to those of epinephrine in the management of ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity; however, vasopressin was superior to epinephrine in patients with asystole. Furthermore, vasopressin followed by epinephrine resulted in significantly higher rates of survival to hospital admission and hospital discharge. The current cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines recommend intravenous vasopressin 40 IU or epinephrine 1mg in adult patients refractory to electrical countershock. Several investigations have demonstrated that vasopressin can successfully stabilize hemodynamic variables in advanced vasodilatory shock. Use of vasopressin in vasodilatory shock should be guided by strict hemodynamic indications, such as hypotension despite norepinephrine (noradrenaline) dosages >0.5 mug/kg/min. Vasopressin must never be used as the sole vasopressor agent. In our institutional routine, a fixed vasopressin dosage of 0.067 IU/min (i.e. 100 IU/50 mL at 2 mL/h) is administered and mean arterial pressure is regulated by adjusting norepinephrine infusion. When norepinephrine dosages decrease to 0.2 microg/kg/min, vasopressin is withdrawn in small steps according to the response in mean arterial pressure. Vasopressin also improved short- and long-term survival in various porcine models of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. In the clinical setting, we observed positive effects of vasopressin in some patients with life-threatening hemorrhagic shock, which had no longer responded to adrenergic catecholamines and fluid resuscitation. Clinical employment of vasopressin during hemorrhagic shock is experimental at this point in time.

Effects of dobutamine, norepinephrine, and vasopressin on cardiovascular function in anesthetized neonatal foals with induced hypotension

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of dobutamine, norepinephrine, and vasopressin on cardiovascular function and gastric mucosal perfusion in anesthetized foals during isoflurane-induced hypotension.

ANIMALS

6 foals that were 1 to 5 days of age.

PROCEDURES

6 foals received 3 vasoactive drugs with at least 24 hours between treatments. Treatments consisted of dobutamine (4 and 8 Sang/kg/min), norepinephrine (0.3 and 1.0 Sang/kg/min), and vasopressin (0.3 and 1.0 mU/kg/min) administered IV. Foals were maintained at a steady hypotensive state induced by a deep level of isoflurane anesthesia for 30 minutes, and baseline cardiorespiratory variables were recorded. Vasoactive drugs were administered at the low infusion rate for 15 minutes, and cardiorespiratory variables were recorded. Drugs were then administered at the high infusion rate for 15 minutes, and cardiorespiratory variables were recorded a third time. Gastric mucosal perfusion was measured by tonometry at the same time points.

RESULTS

Dobutamine and norepinephrine administration improved cardiac index. Vascular resistance was increased by norepinephrine and vasopressin administration but decreased by dobutamine at the high infusion rate. Blood pressure was increased by all treatments but was significantly higher during the high infusion rate of norepinephrine. Oxygen delivery was significantly increased by norepinephrine and dobutamine administration; O2 consumption decreased with dobutamine. The O2 extraction ratio was decreased following norepinephrine and dobutamine treatments. The gastric to arterial CO2 gap was significantly increased during administration of vasopressin at the high infusion rate.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Norepinephrine and dobutamine are better alternatives than vasopressin for restoring cardiovascular function and maintaining splanchnic circulation during isoflurane-induced hypotension in neonatal foals.

Vasopressin improves outcome in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation of ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia: a observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

An increasing body of evidence from laboratory and clinical studies suggests that vasopressin may represent a promising alternative vasopressor for use during cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Current guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommend the use of adrenaline (epinephrine), with vasopressin considered only as a secondary option because of limited clinical data.

METHOD

The present study was conducted in a prehospital setting and included patients with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia undergoing one of three treatments: group I patients received only adrenaline 1 mg every 3 minutes; group II patients received one intravenous dose of arginine vasopressin (40 IU) after three doses of 1 mg epinephrine; and patients in group III received vasopressin 40 IU as first-line therapy. The cause of cardiac arrest (myocardial infarction or other cause) was established for each patient in hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients who suffered nontraumatic cardiac arrest were included in the study. The rates of restoration of spontaneous circulation and subsequent hospital admission were higher in vasopressin-treated groups (23/53 [45%] in group I, 19/31 [61%] in group II and 17/27 [63%] in group III). There were also higher 24-hour survival rates among vasopressin-treated patients (P < 0.05), and more vasopressin-treated patients were discharged from hospital (10/51 [20%] in group I, 8/31 [26%] in group II and 7/27 [26%] group III; P = 0.21). Especially in the subgroup of patients with myocardial infarction as the underlying cause of cardiac arrest, the hospital discharge rate was significantly higher in vasopressin-treated patients (P < 0.05). Among patients who were discharged from hospital, we found no significant differences in neurological status between groups.

CONCLUSION

The greater 24-hour survival rate in vasopressin-treated patients suggests that consideration of combined vasopressin and adrenaline is warranted for the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. This is especially the case for those patients with myocardial infarction, for whom vasopressin treatment is also associated with a higher hospital discharge rate.

Effects of intravenous arginine vasopressin on epicardial coronary artery cross sectional area in a swine resuscitation model

Although arginine vasopressin (AVP) has been shown to be a promising drug during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), concern has been raised about the potential for AVP-mediated vasoconstriction of the coronary arteries. In a prospective, randomized laboratory investigation employing an established porcine model, the effects of AVP on haemodynamic variables, left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery cross sectional area employing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and return of spontaneous circulation were studied. During sinus rhythm, the LAD coronary artery cross sectional area was measured by IVUS at baseline, and 90 s and 5 min after AVP (0.4 U/kg IV). Following a 60 min recovery, ventricular fibrillation was induced. At 4 min, chest compressions were initiated; AVP (0.4 U/kg IV) was injected at 5.5 min, and defibrillation performed at 8 min. LAD coronary artery cross sectional area was measured by IVUS at the pre-arrest baseline, 90 s after drug injection during CPR, and 5 min after return of spontaneous circulation. Compared with baseline, the mid-LAD coronary artery cross sectional area increased significantly (P<.05) 90 s and 5 min after AVP administration (9.2+/-.5mm2 versus 10.7+/-.6mm2 versus 11.7+/-.6mm2, respectively) during normal sinus rhythm. Similarly during ventricular fibrillation and CPR plus AVP, the mid-LAD coronary artery cross sectional area increased at 90 s after AVP compared with baseline (9.5+/-.6mm2 versus 11.0+/-.7mm2; P<.05). Moreover, the cross sectional area increased further 5 min after return of spontaneous circulation (9.5+/-.6mm2 versus 14.0+/-.8mm2, P<.05). In conclusion, in this experimental model with normal coronary arteries, AVP resulted in significantly increased LAD coronary artery cross sectional area during normal sinus rhythm, during ventricular fibrillation with CPR, and after return of spontaneous circulation.

Vasopressin and terlipressin: pharmacology and its clinical relevance

Vasopressin and its analogue, terlipressin, are potent vasopressors that may be useful therapeutic agents in the treatment of cardiac arrest, septic and catecholamine-resistant shock and oesophageal variceal haemorrhage. The aim of this article is to review the physiology and pharmacology of vasopressin and summarise its efficacy and safety in clinical trials and its subsequent therapeutic use. Recent studies indicate that the use of vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may improve the survival of patients with asystolic cardiac arrest. Vasopressin deficiency can contribute to refractory shock states associated with sepsis, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. Low doses of vasopressin and terlipressin can restore vasomotor tone in conditions that are resistant to catecholamines, with preservation of renal blood flow and urine output. They are also useful in reducing bleeding and mortality associated with oesophageal variceal haemorrhage. The long-term outcome of the use of these drugs is not known.

Clinical review: Vasopressin and terlipressin in septic shock patients

Vasopressin (antidiuretic hormone) is emerging as a potentially major advance in the treatment of septic shock. Terlipressin (tricyl-lysine-vasopressin) is the synthetic, long-acting analogue of vasopressin, and has comparable pharmacodynamic but different pharmacokinetic properties. Vasopressin mediates vasoconstriction via V₁ receptor activation on vascular smooth muscle. Septic shock first causes a transient early increase in blood vasopressin concentrations; these concentrations subsequently decrease to very low levels as compared with those observed with other causes of hypotension. Infusions of 0.01–0.04 U/min vasopressin in septic shock patients increase plasma vasopressin concentrations. This increase is associated with reduced need for other vasopressors. Vasopressin has been shown to result in greater blood flow diversion from nonvital to vital organ beds compared with adrenaline (epinephrine). Of concern is a constant decrease in cardiac output and oxygen delivery, the consequences of which in terms of development of multiple organ failure are not yet known. Terlipressin (one or two boluses of 1 mg) has similar effects, but this drug has been used in far fewer patients. Large randomized clinical trials should be conducted to establish the utility of these drugs as therapeutic agents in patients with septic shock.

Comparative effects of vasopressin, norepinephrine, and L-canavanine, a selective inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase, in endotoxic shock

Norepinephrine (NE), a standard of care, AVP, an alternative candidate, and L-canavanine (LC), a selective inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase, were compared for efficacy and innocuousness on global and regional hemodynamics, plasmatic and tissue lactate-to-pyruvate ratio (L/P), tissue high-energy phosphates, renal function, and tissue capillary permeability in a rat model of endotoxic normokinetic shock. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased ( approximately 35%) but aortic blood flow increased during endotoxin infusion (P < 0.05 vs. control). Additionally, there was a decrease in mesenteric (MBF) and renal (RBF) blood flows along with regional-to-systemic ratio (P < 0.05 vs. control). All tested drugs restored MAP to basal levels but slightly decreased abdominal aortic flow; however, RBF and MBF remained unchanged. Endotoxin significantly decreased diuresis and inulin clearance ( approximately 3- to 4-fold), whereas AVP or LC attenuated this drop (P < 0.05 vs. control). In contrast, NE did not improve endotoxin-induced renal dysfunction. Endotoxin induced gut and lung hyperpermeability (P < 0.05 vs. control). Endotoxin-induced gut hyperpermeability was inhibited by AVP, LC, and NE. Endotoxin-induced lung hyperpermeability was further worsened by NE ( approximately 2-fold increase) but not AVP infusion (P < 0.05 vs. endotoxin). LC significantly improved endotoxin-induced pulmonary hyperpermeability. Endotoxin increased renal lactate and decreased renal ATP. NE did not change renal lactate or renal ATP. AVP and LC decreased renal lactate and normalized renal ATP. Finally, endotoxin was associated with increased lactate levels and L/P ( approximately 2- and 1.5-fold increases vs. control, respectively), whereas AVP and LC, but not NE, normalized both parameters after endotoxin challenge. These results suggest that, in a short-term endotoxic shock model, AVP improves systemic hemodynamics without side effects and has particular beneficial effects on renal function.

[Indications of vasopressin in the management of septic shock]

OBJECTIVE

Vasopressin (antidiuretic hormone) is emerging as a potentially major advancement in the treatment of septic shock. Vasopressin is both a vasopressor and an antidiuretic hormone. It also has haemostatic, gastrointestinal, and thermoregulatory effects. This article reviews the physiology of vasopressin and all the relevant clinical literature on its use in the treatment of septic shock.

DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION

Extraction from Pubmed database of French and English articles on the physiology and clinical use of vasopressin. The following key words were selected: vasodilatory shock, vasopressin, septic shock, catecholamines, norepinephrine, renal function, diuresis, mesenteric haemodynamic. The collected articles were reviewed and selected according to their quality and originality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Vasopressin mediates vasoconstriction via V1-receptor activation on vascular smooth muscle. Septic shock causes first a transient early increase in blood vasopressin concentrations that decreases later to very low concentrations compared to other causes of hypotension. Vasopressin infusion of 0.01-0.04 U min(-1) in septic shock patients increases plasma vasopressin concentrations. This increase is associated with a lesser need for other vasopressors. Vasopressin has been shown to produce greater blood flow diversion from non-vital to vital organ beds than does adrenaline. A large randomized clinical trial should be performed to assess its place as a therapeutic agent of septic shock patient.

Science Review: Vasopressin and the cardiovascular system part 2 - clinical physiology

Vasopressin is emerging as a rational therapy for vasodilatory shock states. In part 1 of the review we discussed the structure and function of the various vasopressin receptors. In part 2 we discuss vascular smooth muscle contraction pathways with an emphasis on the effects of vasopressin on ATP-sensitive K+ channels, nitric oxide pathways, and interaction with adrenergic agents. We explore the complex and contradictory studies of vasopressin on cardiac inotropy and coronary vascular tone. Finally, we summarize the clinical studies of vasopressin in shock states, which to date have been relatively small and have focused on physiologic outcomes. Because of potential adverse effects of vasopressin, clinical use of vasopressin in vasodilatory shock should await a randomized controlled trial of the effect of vasopressin's effect on outcomes such as organ failure and mortality.

Science review: Vasopressin and the cardiovascular system part 1--receptor physiology

Vasopressin is emerging as a rational therapy for vasodilatory shock states. Unlike other vasoconstrictor agents, vasopressin also has vasodilatory properties. The goal of the present review is to explore the vascular actions of vasopressin. In part 1 of the review we discuss structure, signaling pathways, and tissue distributions of the classic vasopressin receptors, namely V₁ vascular, V₂ renal, V₃ pituitary and oxytocin receptors, and the P₂ class of purinoreceptors. Knowledge of the function and distribution of vasopressin receptors is key to understanding the seemingly contradictory actions of vasopressin on the vascular system. In part 2 of the review we discuss the effects of vasopressin on vascular smooth muscle and the heart, and we summarize clinical studies of vasopressin in shock states.

Arginine vasopressin in advanced vasodilatory shock: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Vasodilatory shock is a potentially lethal complication of severe disease in critically ill patients. Currently, catecholamines are the most widely used vasopressor agents to support blood pressure, but loss of catecholamine pressor effects is a well-known clinical dilemma. Arginine vasopressin (AVP) has recently been shown to be a potent vasopressor agent to stabilize cardiocirculatory function even in patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-eight patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock were prospectively randomized to receive a combined infusion of AVP and norepinephrine (NE) or NE infusion alone. In AVP patients, AVP was infused at a constant rate of 4 U/h. Hemodynamic, acid/base, single-organ, and tonometrically derived gastric variables were reported before the study and 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours after study entry. For statistical analysis, a mixed-effects model was used. AVP patients had significantly lower heart rate, NE requirements, and incidence of new-onset tachyarrhythmias than NE patients. Mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, stroke volume index, and left ventricular stroke work index were significantly higher in AVP patients. NE patients developed significantly more new-onset tachyarrhythmias than AVP patients (54.3% versus 8.3%). Gastrointestinal perfusion as assessed by gastric tonometry was better preserved in AVP-treated patients. Total bilirubin concentrations were significantly higher in AVP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined infusion of AVP and NE proved to be superior to infusion of NE alone in the treatment of cardiocirculatory failure in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock.

Management of vasodilatory shock: defining the role of arginine vasopressin

The rationale for an arginine vasopressin (argipressin) infusion was put forward after it was discovered that patients in shock states might have an endogenous arginine vasopressin deficiency. Subsequently, several investigations impressively demonstrated that arginine vasopressin can successfully stabilise haemodynamics even in advanced vasodilatory shock. We report on physiological and pharmacological aspects of arginine vasopressin, and summarise current clinical knowledge on employing a continuous arginine vasopressin infusion in critically ill patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock of different aetiologies. In view of presented experimental evidence and current clinical experience, a continuous arginine vasopressin infusion of approximately 2 to approximately 6 IU/h can be considered as a supplemental strategy to vasopressor catecholamines in order to preserve cardiocirculatory homeostasis in patients with advanced vasodilatory shock. Because data on adverse effects are still limited, arginine vasopressin should be reserved for patients in whom adequate haemodynamic stabilisation cannot be achieved with conventional vasopressor therapy or who have obvious adverse effects of catecholamines that result in further significant haemodynamic deterioration. For the same reasons, arginine vasopressin should not be used as a single, alternative vasopressor agent instead of catecholamine vasopressors. Future prospective studies will be necessary to define the exact role of arginine vasopressin in the therapy of vasodilatory shock.

Effects of vasopressin on right ventricular function in an experimental model of acute pulmonary hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Arginine vasopressin is a promising systemic vasopressor in settings such as vasodilatory shock and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The evidence that arginine vasopressin may also have a pulmonary vasodilatory effect makes it an attractive drug for the treatment of circulatory shock secondary to right ventricular failure and pulmonary hypertension. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of arginine vasopressin on right ventricular function and ventriculovascular coupling in the setting of moderate acute pulmonary hypertension and compared these effects with those of phenylephrine.

DESIGN

Prospective laboratory investigation using an established model of acute pulmonary hypertension.

SETTING

University hospital laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Seven adult beagle dogs weighing 8-14 kg.

INTERVENTIONS

After acute instrumentation to measure right ventricular pressure and volume with the conductance technique and pulmonary artery flow and pressure with high-fidelity transducers, the stable thromboxane analogue U46619 was infused continuously to obtain stable pulmonary hypertension. Phenylephrine and arginine vasopressin were administered consecutively in continuous infusions at doses titrated to achieve a 25% increase in aortic pressure.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Phenylephrine and arginine vasopressin both increased total pulmonary vascular resistance and arterial elastance without influencing characteristic impedance. Both drugs decreased cardiac output and stroke volume. Right ventricular hydraulic power output was reduced by arginine vasopressin but not by phenylephrine. Most importantly, arginine vasopressin caused a 31% decrease in right ventricular contractility measured as the slope of the preload recruitable stroke work relationship, whereas contractility was preserved during phenylephrine infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present model, arginine vasopressin causes pulmonary vascular constriction and exerts an important negative inotropic effect on the right ventricle. These findings suggest that one should be cautious in the use of arginine vasopressin when right ventricular function is compromised.

Placental transfer of SR49059 in the human dually perfused cotyledon in vitro

SR49059 is an antagonist of vasopressin V(1a)receptors currently developed as a tocolytic drug. We investigated the transplacental transfer of SR49059 in vitro using the single pass dually perfused human cotyledon model. Thirteen placentae were collected from normal term pregnancies immediately after delivery. The placental transfer of SR49059 was tested at steady state at three different concentrations (100 ng/ml, 200 ng/ml and 500 ng/ml) along with that of antipyrine 20 mg/l as a reference substance. Concentrations were assayed by liquid chromatography with UV (antipyrine) or mass spectrometry (SR49059) detection. At steady state, the mean+/-s.d. fetal transfer rate of SR49059 was 10.80+/-4.33 per cent, 9.34+/-4.41 per cent, and 11.78+/-3.26 per cent at 100 ng/ml, 200 ng/ml and 500 ng/ml, respectively. The corresponding clearance indices were 0.29+/-0.14, 0.25+/-0.08, and 0.31+/-0.06, respectively. The absence of saturation kinetics is consistent with a passive mechanism of transfer. Moderate amounts of SR49059 are transferred from the maternal to the fetal circulation. The clearance index of SR49059 appeared to be very similar to that of ritodrine, which is currently used as a tocolytic.

Physiology of vasopressin relevant to management of septic shock

Vasopressin is emerging as a rational therapy for the hemodynamic support of septic shock and vasodilatory shock due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome. The goal of this review is to understand the physiology of vasopressin relevant to septic shock in order to maximize its safety and efficacy in clinical trials and in subsequent therapeutic use. Vasopressin is both a vasopressor and an antidiuretic hormone. It also has hemostatic, GI, and thermoregulatory effects, and is an adrenocorticotropic hormone secretagogue. Vasopressin is released from the axonal terminals of magnocellular neurons in the hypothalamus. Vasopressin mediates vasoconstriction via V1-receptor activation on vascular smooth muscle and mediates its antidiuretic effect via V2-receptor activation in the renal collecting duct system. In addition, vasopressin, at low plasma concentrations, mediates vasodilation in coronary, cerebral, and pulmonary arterial circulations. Septic shock causes first a transient early increase in blood vasopressin concentrations that decrease later in septic shock to very low levels compared to other causes of hypotension. Vasopressin infusion of 0.01 to 0.04 U/min in patients with septic shock increases plasma vasopressin levels to those observed in patients with hypotension from other causes, such as cardiogenic shock. Increased vasopressin levels are associated with a lesser need for other vasopressors. Urinary output may increase, and pulmonary vascular resistance may decrease. Infusions of > 0.04 U/min may lead to adverse, likely vasoconstriction-mediated events. Because clinical studies have been relatively small, focused on physiologic end points, and because of potential adverse effects of vasopressin, clinical use of vasopressin should await a randomized controlled trial of its effects on clinical outcomes such as organ failure and mortality.

Terlipressin for treating intraoperative hypotension: can it unmask myocardial ischemia?

IMPLICATIONS

After administration of terlipressin to treat hypotension related to induction of general anesthesia, profound hypertension occurred in association with myocardial ischemia and occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. The authors emphasize cautious use of this drug because of such adverse events.

The effects of vasopressin on systemic hemodynamics in catecholamine-resistant septic and postcardiotomy shock: a retrospective analysis

We retrospectively investigated the effects of continuous arginine vasopressin (AVP) infusion on systemic hemodynamics, acid/base status, and laboratory variables in patients (mean age [mean +/- SD]= 66.3 +/- 10.1 yr) with catecholamine-resistant septic (n = 35) or postcardiotomy shock (n = 25). Hemodynamic and acid/base data were obtained before; 30 min after; and 1, 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after the start of AVP infusion. Laboratory examinations were recorded before and 24, 48, and 72 h after the start of AVP infusion. For statistical analysis, a mixed-effects model was used. The overall intensive care unit mortality was 66.7%. AVP administration caused a significant increase in mean arterial pressure (+29%) and systemic vascular resistance (+56%), accompanied by a significant decrease in heart rate (-24%) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (-11%) without any change in stroke volume index. Norepinephrine requirements could be reduced by 72% within 72 h. During AVP infusion, a significant increase in liver enzymes and total bilirubin concentration and a significant decrease in platelet count occurred. Arginine vasopressin was effective in reversing systemic hypotension. However, adverse effects on gastrointestinal perfusion and coagulation cannot be excluded.

IMPLICATIONS

In this retrospective analysis, the influence of a continuous infusion of an endogenous hormone (arginine vasopressin) on systemic hemodynamics and laboratory variables was assessed in patients with vasodilatory shock unresponsive to conventional therapy. Arginine vasopressin was effective in reversing systemic hypotension. However, adverse effects on gastrointestinal perfusion and coagulation cannot be excluded.