Cisapride therapy for gastrointestinal disease

Cisapride for intestinal constipation

BACKGROUND

Cisapride is a propulsive agent, withdrawn from most of the world's health institutes because of its recorded fatalities in addition to serious side effects such as severe arrhythmias. However it is widely available in third world countries and can be easily purchased through the Internet.  We did a systematic review to assess its efficacy and safety in relieving constipation.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective is to assess Cisapride's role and safety as a prokinetic drug in the management of constipation and constipation predominant Irritable bowel syndrome (C-IBS).The secondary objective is to assess Cisapride's efficacy in improving symptoms of constipation and IBS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Cochrane methodology was followed to find available RCTs that assessed the efficacy of cisapride. Electronic databases searched November 2009:Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library 2009 issue 4MEDLINE (from 1966)EMBASE (from 1980)

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs comparing cisapride to placebo or to active comparators were included. We included patients of all ages who had functional constipation or C-IBS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eight RCTs were included, comparing cisapride to a placebo on patients with constipation or C-IBS. The studies were pooled and analysed and a combined effect was calculated using meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

8 trials included in the review for a total 424 patients who were randomised to Cisapride or placebo, of which 157 were children and 284 were female. Intervention duration was 8 to 12 weeks. Dosage of Cisapride in the adult and children trials were 5mg TDS and 0.2mg/kg/dose TDS respectively.Cisapride showed significant benefit in investigators' assessment of clinical improvement (OR: 0.45, P=0.03), likelihood of passing daily stools (OR: 0.22, P<0.001), passage of normal stools (OR: 0.06, P<0.001) and total gastrointestinal transit time (MD: -19.47, P<0.00001). However Cisapride showed no benefit in global improvement of symptoms (MD: 0.11, P=0.99), abdominal pain (MD: 1.94, P=0.56), stool frequency: weekly (MD: 3.36, P=0.11), visual analogue scale (MD: -0.23, P=0.66), stool consistency (MD: 0.32, P=0.50), bloating (MD: 3.93, P=0.44), persistent bloating(OR: 1.11, P=0.83), 'feeling of incomplete evacuation' (MD: -3.80, P=0.08), straining (MD -0.95, p=0.19).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No clear benefit can be demonstrated with cisapride. We do not feel that cisapride can be justifiably used for chronic constipation or irritable bowel disease given its side effects of arrhythmia and associated 175 recorded deaths.

STW 5 (Iberogast) and its individual herbal components modulate intestinal electrophysiology of mice

STW 5 (Iberogast), a phytomedicine agent consisting of a fixed combination of nine individual plant extracts, is widely used in the treatment of dyspepsia and motility related disorders. Little if anything is known on the possible influence on electrophysiological properties of intestinal smooth muscle by which STW 5 causes its beneficial effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether herbal extracts influence electrophysiological parameters of large and small intestine. For this purpose intracellular recordings of smooth muscle cell (SMC) of the circular muscle layer of different parts of mouse intestine were performed using standard microelectrode techniques. The resting membrane potential (RMP), excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission in proximal colon, the frequency and the amplitude of slow waves in small intestine were investigated. The RMP of SMC was -46.4+/-3.8 mV, n=11 in the colon and -59+/-1.3 mV, n=15 in small intestine. STW 5 significantly depolarized the RMP of colonic (16.6+/-2.2 mV, n=6, p<0.05) and jejunal (9.6+/-1.6 mV, n=7, p<0.05) SMC. This depolarizing effect can be mainly attributed to the constituents of chamomile flower, Angelica root and greater celandine herb. Following the electrical field stimulations (EFSs), junction potentials are influenced in a distinct manner. Excitatory junctions potentials (EJPs) of the colon were not significantly reduced (13.1+/-4.8 vs. 10.1+/-2.8 n.s., n=6) but fast (fIJP) and slow (sIJP) inhibitory junction potentials of the murine colon are reduced significantly by STW 5 (fIJP: 21.6+/-8.1 vs. 11.6+/-2.1 and sIJP: 12.1+/-3.3 vs. 6.1+/-1.3 n=6, p<0.05). The basal frequency of small intestinal slow waves was 39.5+/-1.4 min(-1) and the amplitude was 23.1+/-0.9 mV, n=15. STW 5 significantly reduced amplitude and frequency of the slow waves (11.7+/-0.8 mV; 33.5+/-3.4 min(-1), n=6, p<0.05). This effect on slow waves represents the summation of effects of the nine individual phytoextracts. Whereas Angelica root and chamomile flower completely blocked the slow wave activity, bitter candy tuft increased the frequency and amplitude, greater celandine herb reduced frequency and amplitude of the slow wave, peppermint leaf reduced frequency and left amplitude unchanged and liquorice root, caraway fruit and lemon balm leaf had no effects in basic electrophysiological properties of SMC. This study demonstrates that STW 5 causes changes in SMC RMP, excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission and slow wave rhythmicity. These effects represent a summation effect of different constituents of this phytotherapeuticum and prove that STW 5 has characteristic effects on intestinal electrophysiology.

Usage of the claim database of national health insurance programme for analysis of cisapride-erythromycin co-medication in Taiwan

PURPOSE

This study aimed to use the National Health Insurance Research Database, Taiwan for risk analysis of concomitant use of cisapride and erythromycin.

METHODS

The sample consisted of subjects identified in the Outpatient Sampling Database (OSD) and Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 (LHID 2000), derived from the original claim data of the National Health Insurance Research Database, Taiwan.

RESULTS

According to the LHID 2000, a total of 464 individuals experienced 685 episodes of cisapride-erythromycin co-medication prescribed by 295 physicians, revealing a prevalence of 4.5% concomitant use, with higher prevalence in clinics (9.2%) than in other medical institutes (3.7-5.4%). Among the co-medication episodes, 81.9% and 61.2% were prescribed from the same health institutes and by the same physicians, respectively. No medical record of cardiac arrhythmias was found among these patients in 2001 and 2002, probably due to the fact that 78.9% of the 464 individuals were under age 16, 84.0% had short exposure duration (1-4 days) and 98.0% of the episodes were prescribed with a cisapride dose of less than 0.8 mg/kg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study suggest that there exists an urgent need for accreditation in terms of pharmacovigilance of clinical sites and their practicing physicians for the prevention of irrational concomitant prescription in Taiwan. Our findings also indicate that it is necessary to investigate other possible conditions of potentially dangerous co-medication in Taiwan and other developing countries.

Electrogastrography reveals post-prandial gastric dysmotility in children with cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Cystic fibrosis patients have a wide spectrum of gastrointestinal disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the function of gastroenteric neuromusculature and its response to a prokinetic.

METHODS

14 CF children aged 8.6 + 1.3 years were studied by electrogastrography and compared to 10 age-matched controls. A second recording was performed in CF patients after administration of cisapride (0.3 mg/kg). Parameters analyzed were percentage of normal gastric rhythm (2.0 to 4.0 cpm), percentage of tachygastria (4.0 to 9.0 cpm), dominant frequency instability coefficient and power ratio.

RESULTS

CF and control groups were not different in age, height or weight. A significant post-prandial increase in percentage of tachygastria (26.7 + 4.5 versus 12.4 + 2.6; P < 0.05) was seen in CF patients, which was not corrected by cisapride. The power ratio showed a statistical increase in 3 cpm (3.7 + 0.8 versus 1.6 + 0.3; P < 0.05) and in tachygastria (5.3 + 1.2 versus 1.7 + 0.4; P < 0.03) in CF compared with controls. Cisapride had an effect on tachygastria power ratio (3.0 + 0.5; P < 0.04). Analysis of normal rhythm and the dominant frequency instability coefficient were not statistically different in CF and controls.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence of gastric dysmotility in CF patients.

Primary duodenogastric reflux in children and adolescents

Primary duodenogastric reflux is a rare disorder in adults which has not yet been documented in children. Six young patients, aged 4.5 to 16.5 years (median 13.5 years) presented with atypical reflux symptoms persisting from 1 to 84 months (median 8 months) and unresponsive to classical antacid therapy. In all six patients, 24 h gastric bilimetry showed excessive bile exposures for absorbances ranging from 0.25 to 0.60. The fraction of time (supine period) above the 0.25 absorbance threshold ranged from 30% to 75% while the 95th percentile value for healthy adults is 31%. In all patients tested, hepato-iminodiacetic acid scintigraphy revealed the occurrence of a massive duodenogastric reflux and four out of five patients had an alkaline shift (fraction of time pH >8 on 24 h lower oesophageal pH monitoring) ranging from 4.2% to 20% (control values 0.0% to 2.9%). Endoscopic findings included abundant bilious gastric leak (6/6) and chronic prepyloric Helicobacter pylorinegative gastritis (2/6). Daily administration of cisapride, sucralfate with or without omeprazole resulted in an improvement of symptoms in five patients within 15 days. This treatment was ineffective in one patient who became symptom-free only after a surgical duodenal switch with fundoplication was performed.

CONCLUSION

primary duodenogastric reflux is a rare foregut disorder of unknown origin occurring in late childhood. If suspected, 24 h intragastric bilimetry appears to be a useful investigation to confirm the diagnosis.

QTc interval in infants receiving cisapride

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of cisapride on the corrected QT (QTc) interval in infants over a 14-day period.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study of infants receiving cisapride (0.8 mg/kg per day). Twelve-lead electrocardiograms were obtained before and 3, 5, 7, and 14 days after cisapride initiation.

RESULTS

Fifty infants completed the study; none had arrhythmias. Fifteen of 50 infants (30%) developed QTc interval > or =450 msec; QTc interval normalized in 13 of 15 infants. Infants with QTc interval on day 3 > or =2 standard deviations above the mean baseline QTc interval (401+40 msec) were more likely to develop prolonged QTc interval (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

QTc interval prolongation was noted in 30% of infants. Subsequently, the majority of those infants had QTc interval normalization by day 14 of cisapride therapy. QTc interval 3 days following cisapride initiation may identify infants at risk for transient QTc interval prolongation. With appropriate monitoring, hospitalized infants receiving cisapride may have improved gastrointestinal motility without cardiac morbidity.

The effect of cisapride on the corrected QT interval and QT dispersion in premature infants

BACKGROUND

Cisapride is used frequently in premature neonates as a gastrointestinal prokinetic drug. Concerns exist, however, about its safety because of its effect on the QT interval. Premature infants could be at higher risk for side effects because of their immaturity. This prospective study investigated the pharmacokinetics of cisapride and its effects on corrected QT interval (QTc) and QT dispersion in premature infants.

METHODS

Electrocardiogram examination was performed just before and after 72 hours of treatment with cisapride (0.2 mg/kg per dose, four times daily) in 10 premature infants. Trough and anticipated peak plasma level of cisapride and norcisapride were quantified after 72 hours of treatment. Results were compared with a cohort of 41 term infants aged 0 to 3 months receiving cisapride treatment.

RESULTS

The QTc interval increased significantly from 423 ms to 461 ms after 72 hours of treatment (P = 0.0007). No effect was seen on QT dispersion (44.3 ms vs. 45.9 ms). The change in QTc interval was inversely related to postnatal age (R2 = 0.52; P = 0.02), whereas there was no correlation with gestational age or plasma levels of cisapride or norcisapride. Trough and anticipated peak plasma levels of cisapride and norcisapride were significantly higher in the premature infants compared with the term infants aged 0 to 3 months (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Premature infants less than 1 month of age could be at higher risk for cardiac side effects of cisapride when used in the same dosage as in older infants. The daily dose should be reduced (0.1 mg/kg per dose, maximum four times daily), and the QTc interval should be monitored closely. The benefits and safety of cisapride in premature infants less than 1 month of age should be reconsidered.

Does cisapride influence cardiac rhythm? Results of a United States multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled pediatric study

BACKGROUND

Major concerns about serious cardiac side effects underlie the recent decision by the FDA and Janssen Pharmaceutica (Titusville, NJ) to make cisapride available only through a limited access program. Concerns have grown despite the fact that most instances of prolonged QTc and other ventricular arrhythmias occurred while the drug was used concomitantly with contraindicated drugs. This study sought to analyze electrocardiograms (ECGs) from a multicenter pediatric study and to identify abnormalities in QTc interval associated with cisapride use.

METHODS

Children between 6 months and 4 years of age were enrolled if they manifested symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux not responding to medical therapy for at least 6 weeks. In 49 subjects, ECGs obtained before and after randomization to receive 0.2 mg/kg dose three times daily or placebo were reviewed independently and blindly by two pediatric cardiologists. Placebo and active drug groups were compared for QTc and for change in QTc from baseline values after 3 to 8 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Mean QTc among patients taking the drug was 408+/-18 ms. None was higher than 450 ms. Change between baseline and subsequent QTc at 3 to 8 weeks of treatment was 2+/-20 ms.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study group of children without underlying cardiac disease or electrolyte imbalance, cisapride was found to have no significant effect on cardiac electrical function compared with placebo. These results are consistent with the drug's record of exceedingly infrequent cardiac events. Because the availability of this prokinetic is threatened, its safety and the safety and efficacy of alternative treatment options (including surgery) should be studied further.

Gastroesophageal reflux medications in the treatment of apnea in premature infants

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether medications commonly used in the management of gastroesophageal reflux reduce the frequency of apnea in premature infants.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed the medical records of all infants </=36 weeks' gestational age at birth who were treated in 2 neonatal intensive care units from 1990 through 1999 and identified those who received the antireflux medications cisapride or metoclopramide in association with apnea. We averaged the frequency of apnea during the 5 days before and the 5 days after antireflux treatment was started and compared these 2 periods by paired analysis.

RESULTS

There were 164 separate courses of treatment with either cisapride or metoclopramide in 132 patients. There were 3.6 +/- 3.2 apneic episodes per day during the 5 days before treatment and 4.0 +/- 3.4 apneic episodes per day during the 5 days after treatment (P =.048). When evaluated separately, neither cisapride nor metoclopramide reduced the frequency of apnea. Stratification for documented reflux (by radiographic contrast or by pH probe analysis), concomitant use of methylxanthines or ranitidine, developmental age, feeding volume, and respiratory support did not identify a subgroup of patients whose apnea improved with antireflux treatment.

CONCLUSION

Antireflux medications do not reduce the frequency of apnea in premature infants.

Mechanisms of oesophageal mucosal defence

The integrity of the oesophageal mucosa depends upon an equilibrium between aggressive factors, predominantly acid and pepsin, and protective mechanisms. Protective mechanisms operate within the oesophageal mucosa as pre-epithelial, epithelial and post-epithelial defences. Only the protective components of the oesophageal pre-epithelial defence can be tested in vivo in humans. It has been recently demonstrated that human oesophageal submucosal glands elaborate mucous secretion rich in bicarbonate and non-bicarbonate buffers, mucin, prostaglandin E(2), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor alpha (TGFalpha). This oesophageal secretion, accompanied by similarly protective factors within the swallowed saliva, defines the protective potential of the oesophageal pre-epithelial defence that exists in the form of a mucus-buffer layer covering the oesophageal mucosa and which retards the back-diffusion of hydrogen ions. It has also been demonstrated that patients with severe erosive reflux oesophagitis exhibit qualitative impairment in both the salivary and oesophageal components of the oesophageal pre-epithelial defence. Furthermore, patients with endoscopically negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have a significantly stronger oesophageal pre-epithelial defence than patients with erosive reflux oesophagitis. On the other hand, African-Americans, who are less likely to develop erosive reflux oesophagitis, have a stronger oesophageal pre-epithelial defence than do Caucasians. The salivary component of the oesophageal pre-epithelial defence can be enhanced by mastication and the administration of cisapride, whereas oesophageal secretion can only be significantly augmented by cisapride.

Reflux in children

Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is an extremely common paediatric problem that often runs a harmless and self-limited course. Physiological GOR however can lead to marked parental anxiety, many unnecessary investigations and often unwarranted and potentially harmful therapeutic interventions. Our ability to better define GOR and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) has improved in the past 15 years with a better understanding of the pathophysiology in infants and children due to the development and wider use of flexible endoscopy, 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring and, more recently, the use of micromanometric methods for studying oesophageal motility. This will be further enhanced in the future with the development of non-invasive breath testing to study gastrointestinal motility and the use of electrical impedance to study fluid movement. Our therapeutic interventions have also improved particularly in the areas of acid suppression, improved surgical techniques and most recently laparoscopic fundoplication. This chapter reviews these advances in the paediatric area especially with regard to pathophysiology, diagnostic testing and therapeutic intervention.

Role of drug therapy in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disorder in children

Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is the effortless passage of gastric contents into the distal oesophagus. It can be classified as functional (or symptomatic), in which the infant remains free from disease, or a pathological (GOR disease, GORD), in which gastrointestinal, respiratory or neurobehavioural signs occur with intraoesophageal acidification and the development of oesophagitis. Functional or symptomatic GOR is successfully treated by conservative measures and does not require investigative diagnostic tools; however, both drug administration and an investigative approach are mandatory in patients with GORD. There is currently a great range of proven therapeutic options for GORD that are directed at counteracting the pathogenetic components of the disorder. In this report we discuss the role of different drug classes for treating GORD in children. The choice of therapy for GORD depends upon the severity of signs and the degree of oesophagitis. The presence of oesophagitis, as documented by endoscopy, suggests the use of antisecretory drugs; H2 receptor antagonists are the first-line agents. Nevertheless, individuals with refractory disease or those patients requiring potent inhibition of acid secretion (for example, GORD with respiratory involvement) can be given proton pump inhibitors. Other groups of patients who need potent inhibition of acid secretion are children with neurological dysfunction and those with Barrett's oesophagus. It is still unclear whether patients with frequent relapses are candidates for long term administration of antisecretory drugs or for surgical fundoplication.

Cisapride for the treatment of constipation in children: A double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether cisapride is effective in the treatment of children with constipation.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which children with chronic constipation were randomly assigned to treatment with cisapride or placebo for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty children were enrolled, and 36 completed the therapy. Treatment successes occurred in 13 of 17 (76%) subjects in the cisapride group and 8 of 19 (37%) subjects in the placebo group (P <.03). The odds ratio for response after cisapride administration was 8.2 times higher (95% CI 1.3 to 49.4). During cisapride therapy, there was a significant improvement in number of spontaneous bowel movements per week (from 0.9 +/- 0.1 to 4.1 +/- 1.1), and there was a significant decrease in number of fecal soiling episodes per day (1.8 +/- 0.5 to 0.08 +/- 0.4), percent with encopresis (82% vs 23%), number of laxative doses per week (from 10.3 +/- 2.6 to 0.8 +/- 0.6), percent using laxatives (77% to 24%), and total gastrointestinal transit time (from 115.0 +/- 3.7 hours to 77.0 +/- 11.1 hours). With placebo, there were no significant changes in the number of spontaneous bowel movements (from 1.0 +/- 0.8 to 2.2 +/- 0.6), percent with encopresis (74% vs 47%), or total gastrointestinal transit time (from 112.5 +/- 4.9 hours to 95.4 +/- 9.8 hours); but there was a significant decrease in number of fecal soiling episodes per day (from 1.3 +/- 0.4 to 0.4 +/- 0.2) and number of laxative doses used per week (from 11.5 +/- 2.9 to 2.05 +/- 0.7). The final number of spontaneous bowel movements, fecal soiling episodes, laxatives used, or percent patients with encopresis was not different when patients receiving cisapride were compared with those receiving placebo.

CONCLUSION

Cisapride was effective in the treatment of children with constipation.

Colonic motility in children with repaired imperforate anus

Following surgical correction of imperforate anus, voluntary bowel control is frequently poor because of abnormal anorectal function. Using colonic manometry we investigated the role of colonic motility in the pathogenesis of fecal soiling in children following imperforate anus repair. Thirteen children with repaired imperforate anus and fecal soiling underwent motility testing 2-12 years after anoplasty. All had fecal incontinence unresponsive to conventional medical treatment. Colonic manometry was performed using water-perfused catheters. Anorectal manometry was undertaken in 10 patients. Motility study results, treatment and outcomes were compared. All patients had high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs) with an average of 80% propagation into the neorectum. There was no correlation between HAPC number or morphology and any variable. Internal anal sphincter resting pressure was low in 6/10 patients. Relaxation of the internal anal sphincter was present in 6/10 children. Only 1 of 5 patients able to cooperate was capable of generating a normal maximal squeeze pressure. Therapeutic regimens were changed in 11 patients with clinical improvement in five. Fecal soiling in patients with repaired imperforate anus is a multifactorial problem including propagation of excessive numbers of HAPCs into the neorectum as well as internal anal sphincter dysfunction. Colonic manometry in conjunction with anorectal manometry aids in the understanding of the pathophysiology of fecal soiling and guides clinical management in children with repaired imperforate anus.

Duodenogastric reflux: clinical and therapeutic aspects

BACKGROUND

Duodenogastric reflux is believed to cause damage to gastric mucosa. Most reports on this disorder concern adult patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

1120 children with abdominal pain were studied; endoscopic features of duodenogastric reflux were found in 92 patients. To confirm the diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux, cholescintigraphy (Tc99-HEPIDA) was performed. Children with confirmed duodenogastric reflux by scintigraphy were given a prokinetic drug (cisapride).

RESULTS

Endoscopic features of duodenogastric reflux were found in 92 children; the diagnosis was confirmed by scintigraphy in 59 patients. There was no significant difference in the severity of inflammation in gastric mucosa compared with the control group, whereas significantly fewer of these patients were infected with Helicobacter pylori. There was no correlation between regions of isotope accumulation and inflammatory lesions in the stomach. The prokinetic drug (cisapride) helped eliminate or greatly reduce duodenogastric reflux in children.

CONCLUSIONS

When endoscopic features of duodenogastric reflux are found the final diagnosis should be based on an examination that does not itself influence the motility of the gastrointestinal tract: cholescintigraphy seems to be a useful method. However, because the use of milk as a test meal affects the scintigraphic image, there was no correlation between the area of isotope accumulation and the localisation of inflammatory lesions in the stomach. Duodenogastric reflux seems to be less important as a cause of inflammatory lesions than other factors (such as genetic predisposition, stress, etc). Prokinetic drugs have a beneficial influence on treatment results in children with inflammatory lesions of gastric mucosa with duodenogastric reflux.

The role of cisapride in the treatment of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux. The European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

BACKGROUND

Cisapride is a gastrointestinal prokinetic agent that is used worldwide in the treatment of gastrointestinal motility-related disorders in premature infants, full-term infants, and children. Efficacy data suggest that it is the most effective commercially available prokinetic drug.

METHODS

Because of recent concerns about safety, a critical and in-depth analysis of all reported adverse events was performed and resulted in the conclusions and recommendations that follow.

RESULTS

Cisapride should only be administered to patients in whom the use of prokinetics is justified according to current medical knowledge. If cisapride is given to pediatric patients who can be considered healthy except for their gastrointestinal motility disorder, and the maximum dose does not exceed 0.8 mg/kg per day in 3 to 4 administrations of 0.2 mg/kg (not exceeding 40 mg/d), no special safety procedures regarding potential cardiac adverse events are recommended. However, if cisapride is prescribed for patients who are known to be or are suspected of being at increased risk for drug-associated increases in QTc interval, certain precautions are advisable. Such patients include those:(1) with a previous history of cardiac dysrhythmias, (2) receiving drugs known to inhibit the metabolism of cisapride and/or adversely affect ventricular repolarisation, (3) with immaturity and/or disease causing reduced cytochrome P450 3A4 activity, or (4) with electrolyte disturbances. In such patients, ECG monitoring to quantitate the QTc interval should be used before initiation of therapy and after 3 days of treatment to ascertain whether a cisapride-induced cardiac adverse effect is present.

CONCLUSIONS

With rare exceptions, the total daily dose of cisapride should not exceed 0.8 mg/kg divided into 3 or 4 approximately equally spaced doses. If higher doses than this are given, the precautions above are advisable. In any patient in whom a prolonged QTc interval is found, the dose of cisapride should be reduced or the drug discontinued until the ECG normalizes. If the QTc interval returns to normal after withdrawal of cisapride, and the administration of cisapride is considered to be justified because of its efficacy and absence of alternative treatment options, cisapride can be restarted at half dose with control of the QTc interval. Unfortunately, at present, normal ranges of QTc interval in children are unknown. However, a critical analysis of the literature suggests that a duration of less than 450 milliseconds can be considered to be within the normal range and greater than 470 milliseconds as outside it.

Cisapride in the control of symptoms in infants with gastroesophageal reflux: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of cisapride in the treatment of uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux in children younger than 36 months of age.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 95 patients satisfied the entry criteria and were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either cisapride (n = 50), 0.2 mg/kg 4 times daily, or placebo (n = 45) for 2 weeks. At the end of the 2-week treatment period, symptom diary and parental evaluation with repeat 24-hour pH study were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients completed the trial (38 in the cisapride group and 30 in the placebo group). There were no significant differences in the symptoms of crying, vomiting, or gagging; the overall symptom intensity score; or parental global evaluations. There was a significant difference (P <.03) in the percent time pH <4, the number of reflux episodes lasting more than 5 minutes, and the duration of the longest episode. No significant difference was demonstrated for the number of episodes with pH <4 or the reflux score.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisapride was no better than placebo for relief of symptoms in children with uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux. A beneficial effect was demonstrated in the cisapride group in relation to the measured parameters for esophageal acid exposure time.

Cisapride: a survey of the frequency of use and adverse events in premature newborns

OBJECTIVE

This survey estimated the frequency of use and adverse events associated with cisapride treatment of premature newborns in intensive care units. It was initiated in response to a warning issued in Canada cautioning against cisapride treatment of premature infants of <36 weeks' gestation and <3 months of age.

METHODOLOGY

Surveys were mailed to 105 neonatology training program directors to obtain the total number of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, the number of admissions of infants of <36 weeks' gestation, the number of years that cisapride had been used, the estimated percent/number of premature patients treated with cisapride per year, and the frequency and nature of arrhythmias or other adverse events associated with cisapride treatment. Of 105 programs, 46 responded to a single mailing of the first survey. A second survey mailed to the 45 respondents to the first survey sought to determine the indications, diagnostic tests, and dosages used with cisapride treatment of premature newborns. Of the 45 programs, 26 responded to the second survey.

RESULTS

More than 58 000 premature newborns of <36 weeks' gestation were admitted to the NICUs we surveyed, and approximately 19% were treated with cisapride. No deaths attributable to cisapride were reported among >11 000 preterm newborns treated. Three nonfatal arrhythmias were reported; two associated with 10-fold dosing errors and one with co-treatment with erythromycin, a macrolide antibiotic that reduces the metabolism of cisapride. Diarrhea was reported in 12 patients, and reversible liver enzyme changes were noted in one patient. Typically, cisapride treatment was started in dosages of 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg/dose, repeated every 6 to 8 hours. Treatment usually was begun empirically, without a preceding study to document gastroesophageal reflux. The most frequent indications for cisapride treatment were choking or gagging, with associated apnea, bradycardia, and desaturation. Approximately 50% of patients had discontinued cisapride treatment before discharge. Eighty-four percent of clinicians judged cisapride to be effective for the problems being treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisapride treatment of premature infants of <36 weeks' gestation and <3 months of age in NICUs appears to be widespread in the United States. Complications and adverse events were seen when cisapride was administered in excessive dosages or in combination with a drug that inhibits its metabolism and leads to increased serum concentrations. Severe toxicities such as arrhythmias were reported with a frequency of <1/11 000 NICU admissions. However, in a retrospective survey, episodes of toxicity, including mortality, attributable to cisapride may not have been recognized or reported.

Randomised controlled trial of cisapride in feed intolerance in preterm infants

AIM

To assess the efficacy of cisapride in reducing the time required to establish enteral feeds in preterm infants.

METHODS

A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial was conducted of 34 infants of < or = 32 weeks of gestation, assigned to receive either cisapride 0.2 mg/kg/dose four times daily (n = 18) or placebo (n = 16).

RESULTS

The time taken by the babies to tolerate full enteral feeds was not significantly different between the groups (median 9.5 days vs 10 days). There was a significantly lower incidence of large gastric residuals and regurgitation in the treated group compared with the placebo group. The number of episodes of large gastric residuals per infant was also significantly less. No adverse effects were noted.

CONCLUSION

The routine use of cisapride in preterm infants cannot be recommended to decrease the time to establish enteral feeds. Its use may be justified for clinically significant gastric stasis or regurgitation.

Gastroesophageal reflux in children

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a common disorder in infants and children with a high rate of spontaneous resolution. Some children, however, will continue to have problems and progress from functional GER to pathogenic GER. In children with functional GER, diagnostic testing and pharmacologic treatment is unnecessary. In more involved cases, there are a number of tests available that help to quantify and qualify the extent of disease. Treatment begins with conservative measures and progresses to acid neutralization/supression and medications to enhance motility. Should medical management fail to control the consequences of reflux disease, surgical intervention is warranted.