Insulin requirements after liver transplantation and FK-506 immunosuppression

Alterations in carbohydrate metabolism in cirrhotic patients before and after liver transplant

AIM

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate whether carbohydrate metabolism alterations identified in patients with advanced cirrhosis show any improvement after liver transplant.

METHODS

The study included 86 patients who underwent liver transplant between March 2010 and February 2011. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed before the liver transplant, and 6 and 12 months after. Beta cell function and insulin resistance were also calculated, applying formulae that use basal plasma glycaemia and insulin, and plasma glycaemia and insulin during an oral glucose tolerance test. Risk factors for pre- and post-transplant diabetes were also studied. The diagnosis of diabetes was based on an OGTT.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with diabetes before transplant, and at month 6 and 12 after transplant were 70.9%, 48.8% and 39.2%, respectively. Compared to baseline, at month 6 the odds ratio of having diabetes was 0.39 (IC 95% [0.21, 0.73]) and at month 12 it was 0.26 (IC 95% [0.14, 0.50]). The composite insulin sensitivity index values at 6 and 12 months were 1.72 units higher (IC 95% [0.84, 2.58]) and 1.58 units higher (IC 95% [0.68, 2.44)] than baseline. A statistically significant association was found between high MELD values and high body mass index, and risk of pre-transplant diabetes (p=0.001 and p=0.033, respectively). Cirrhosis aetiology did not influence the risk of diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we were able to ascertain that alterations in carbohydrate metabolism typical of advanced cirrhosis improve after liver transplant. This improvement is mainly due to an improvement in insulin resistance.

Major influence of liver function itself but not of immunosuppression determines glucose tolerance after living-donor liver transplantation

Controversial data exists concerning the impact of immunosuppressive therapy on the development of post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Therefore, we investigated glucose metabolism in healthy donors and in recipients of living-donor liver transplants (LD-LTX, n=18) without pre-existing diabetes mellitus before, on day 10, month 6, and month 12 after intervention. The computer-assisted analysis of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles obtained from frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests allows to achieve an integrated view of factors controlling glucose tolerance, i.e., insulin sensitivity (SI), first and second phase insulin secretion (phi1 and phi2). SI of donors declined by day 10 after operation (SI 2.65 +/- 0.41 vs. 4.90 +/- 0.50 10(-4) minute(-1) microU ml(-1), P < 0.01) but returned to values as before after 6 months. Phi1 did not change. Phi(2), however, significantly increased by day 10 (8.57 +/- 0.82 10(9) minute(-1) to 13.77 +/- 1.53 10(9) minute(-1), P < 0.01) but was in the same range as before after 6 months. In parallel to donors SI of recipients progressively increased after LD-LTX. Phi1 did not alter in recipients. Phi2 continuously decreased and was not different from donors by month 12. The extent of liver injury assessed by liver enzyme concentrations and liver function represented by cholinesterase activity, albumin, and INR were closely related with changes of SI in donors and recipients during the first year after intervention. In conclusion, the extent of liver damage plays a predominant role in regulating glucose tolerance. No impact of immunosuppressive therapy on SI, phi1 and phi2 was detected.

Results of one-year follow-up of steroid-free immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplant patients

Renal transplantation in children has traditionally required immunosuppression with multiple medications including glucocorticoids. Data collected over almost 30 yr suggest that although glucocorticoids are efficacious as part of a regimen to minimize the incidence of acute rejection episodes, their use is associated with increased risk for post-transplant hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and reduced growth rates. We desired to reduce these complications and thus used an immunosuppressive protocol including daclizumab, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil and study the efficacy of this protocol in a population with a high percentage of African-American recipients. No patient received glucocorticoids at any time post-transplant. Our results show that at 1 yr post-transplant, glomerular filtration rate, serum glucose, calcium and phosphorous metabolism, serum magnesium, and serum lipids were similar in patients receiving steroid-free and those receiving steroid-based immunosuppression. The incidence of acute rejection was similar in the two groups. Hematocrit and white blood count levels were lower 1 month after transplant in the steroid-free patients but these levels increased within several months. Systolic blood pressure was similar in the two groups, although this was achieved, in part, in the patients who received steroids by the administration of medications to lower blood pressure. Finally, tacrolimus levels were similar in the two groups, but patients receiving steroids required higher doses of tacrolimus at several time points studied during the first post-transplant year. Taken together, our data suggests that at one-year follow-up, steroid-free immunosuppression is safe, and efficacious in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

No influence of immunosuppression on insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in living donor liver transplantation

In liver transplantation alterations of glucose metabolism are common but not well understood. Influence of immunosuppression is widely presumed but has not proven until now. Using a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test with a minimal modeling technique of glucose disappearance we analyzed insulin sensitivity (SI) and beta-cell function (first and second phase of pancreatic beta-cell secretion, Phi 1 and Phi 2) in living donor liver transplantation of the right lobe. Initial immunosuppression in recipients was done with tacrolimus, prednisolone, and basiliximab induction. Donors and recipients were investigated before and 10 days, 6 months, and 1 year after operation. Normal SI of controls (donors before operation) decreased markedly 10 days after right lobectomy to SI 2.22 +/- 0.35 x 10(-4) min(-1) x microU/mL (P < .001); Phi 2 was compensatory increased. All parameters normalized within 1 year. Recipients were insulin-resistant with hyperinsulinemia before transplantation. After transplantation no parameter was significantly different from donors; all normalized equally to donors over 1-year follow-up. Thus, immunosuppression in recipients has no influence on glucose metabolism because liver function itself seems to play a more pronounced role than known until now.

Diabetic ketoacidosis following development of de novo diabetes in renal transplant recipient associated with tacrolimus

Although drugs used in renal transplant recipients such as steroids, cyclosporine, and particularly, tacrolimus have diabetogenic potential, diabetic ketoacidosis is uncommon. There are few data concerning the long-term follow-up of these patients. Diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in a renal transplant recipient following de novo development associated with tacrolimus.

New onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation: the critical role of hepatitis C infection

Epidemiological studies suggest diabetes mellitus (DM) may be an extrahepatic manifestation of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Since diabetes and HCV are common in liver transplant recipients, we sought to examine the unique contribution of HCV infection to risk of de novo diabetes posttransplantation. Using a cohort of 555 liver transplant recipients (median age 49 years, 54% males, 82% Caucasian) without preexisting diabetes from 3 U.S. centers enrolled between 1990 and 1994 and followed for a median duration of 5 years, we determined the incidence of de novo diabetes and the independent predictors of the development of diabetes. De novo diabetes was defined by the use of antidiabetic medications. De novo diabetes developed in 209/555 (37.7%) patients of whom 157 (28.3%) had transient-DM (T-DM) and 52 (9.4%) had persistent-DM (P-DM). Among HCV-infected transplant recipients, de novo T-DM and P-DM developed in 26% and 14%, respectively. HCV was predictive of P-DM (P =.02) but not T-DM. Older age (P =.03) and tacrolimus use (P =.02) were also independent predictors of P-DM. In conclusion, de novo diabetes is common in transplant recipients, but is typically transient in nature. However, among those developing de novo persistent diabetes, HCV is one of the most important risk factors. This adds further support to the epidemiological data linking HCV and diabetes.

Diabetic ketoacidosis in a child on FK506 immunosuppression after a liver transplant

The use of immunosuppressive agents is becoming more widespread, especially in the context of organ transplantation. We report a child with a complication, new-onset diabetes mellitus with diabetic ketoacidosis, associated with the use of one such agent, FK506 (tacrolimus).

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus in pediatric thoracic organ recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a well-known complication of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in both adult and pediatric solid organ recipients. The "natural history" of diabetes in the pediatric thoracic transplant population has not yet been described.

METHODS

We identified all pediatric thoracic transplant patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression who developed PTDM. Medical records were reviewed, with a particular focus on the clinical course of PTDM and its relationship to drug weaning.

RESULTS

Diabetes developed in 24 of 143 (17%) 30-day survivors of heart (12/96, 13%) and heart-lung/lung (12/ 47, 26%) transplantation. In 17 (71%) patients, the immunosuppressive regimen at the onset of PTDM also included maintenance corticosteroids. Seventeen patients demonstrated glucose intolerance before the onset of diabetes. Nine patients (38%) developed diabetes during pulsed corticosteroid therapy. Median time of onset after transplantation was 9.0 months. All patients required s.c. insulin for glucose control. The median follow-up from transplant was 49.9 months. There was a significant decrease in mean tacrolimus dosage (P<0.01), tacrolimus level (P<0.04), and steroid dosage (P<0.02) from onset of PTDM to most recent follow-up. Despite this significant reduction in immunosuppression, only 3/24 (13%) patients were successfully weaned off insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes mellitus is a common complication in pediatric thoracic transplant patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Insulin dependence in our population rarely resolved, even after lowering tacrolimus and steroid doses. Discontinuation of steroids did not guarantee resolution of diabetes.

Regulation of glucose tolerance in patients after liver transplantation: impact of cyclosporin versus tacrolimus therapy

BACKGROUND

We investigated the factors regulating glucose homeostasis in 10 healthy (control) subjects, as well as in stable, long-term, liver-grafted patients receiving monotherapy in the form of either cyclosporin A (n=10) or tacrolimus (n=10).

METHODS

We measured insulin sensitivity, first- and second-phase insulin secretion, with a minimal modeling technique based on the analysis of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles during frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests (FSIGTT). Proinsulin levels, as a marker of beta-cell dysfunction, were measured in the fasting state and during FSIGTT.

RESULTS

Glucose and insulin concentrations before and after glucose loading did not differ in liver transplant patients and in control subjects. Fasting C-peptide levels in both liver-grafted groups were higher than in healthy subjects and remained elevated during FSIGTT (P<0.05). Intravenous glucose tolerance [(K(G)), i.e. the slope of the regression of logarithm of the blood glucose concentrations vs. time], insulin sensitivity, and first-phase insulin secretion did not differ in liver-grafted groups and healthy subjects. Second-phase insulin secretion was about 56% higher in liver-grafted patients than in controls (P<0.05). Body mass index was the overall determinant of insulin sensitivity in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term monotherapy with cyclosporin A or tacrolimus has no deleterious effects on insulin sensitivity, first-phase insulin secretion, and insulin synthesis in liver transplant patients. Normal insulin sensitivity (posthepatic insulin effect) and enhanced second-phase insulin secretion (prehepatic insulin) point to an accelerated hepatic insulin clearance rate in liver transplant patients. Increased hepatic insulin clearance is compensated by enhanced insulin secretion, indicating that insulin clearance is the major determinant of pancreatic function in liver-grafted patients.

Treatment of tacrolimus-related adverse effects by conversion to cyclosporine in liver transplant recipients

When tacrolimus side effects persist despite dose reduction, conversion to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (CyA) is necessary. We characterized tacrolimus side effects that warranted discontinuation of the drug, and outcomes after conversion. Of 388 liver recipients who received tacrolimus as primary immunosuppression, 70 required conversion to CyA. We recorded indication for conversion, whether conversion was early or late after transplantation, tacrolimus dose and trough blood level at conversion, and incidence of rejection after conversion. Conversion was early in 29 patients (41.4%) and late in 41 (58.6%). Indications for early conversion were neurotoxicity (20), (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus (IDDM) (5), nephrotoxicity (3), gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (6), and cardiomyopathy (1), and for late conversion were neurotoxicity (15), IDDM (12), nephrotoxicity (3), GI toxicity (5), hepatotoxicity (6), post-transplant lmphoproliferate disease (PTLD) (2), cardiomyopathy (1), hemolytic anemia (1), and pruritus (1). All early-conversion patients showed improvement/resolution of symptoms. Among late-conversion patients, 37 (90.2%) had improvement/resolution; in 4 (9.8%), adverse effects persisted. The overall rejection rate was 30%. Sixty-two patients (88.6%) are alive with functioning grafts 686 +/- 362 days (range, 154-1433 days) after conversion. When tacrolimus side effects are unresponsive to dose reduction, conversion to CyA can be accomplished safely, with no increased risk of rejection and excellent long-term outcome.

Postprandial hepatic glycogen synthesis in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The liver plays a central role in glucose homeostasis by releasing glucose in the fasting state and by taking up and converting into glycogen part of the glucose absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract after meal ingestion.

METHODS

To determine whether the hepatic denervation that accompanies liver transplantation interferes with these functions, we assessed glucose tolerance to an oral glucose load in seven patients at 2-6 weeks after orthotopic liver transplantation, in six patients after kidney transplantation, and in six healthy controls. Hepatic glycogen synthesis was non-invasively assessed over the 4 hours after ingestion of a glucose load by monitoring hepatic uridine diphosphoglucose turnover with 13C galactose and acetaminophen.

RESULTS

Liver and kidney transplant recipients had increased postprandial glucose concentrations but normal hepatic uridine diphosphoglucose turnover, indicating an unaltered hepatic glycogen synthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that denervated liver transplants have an adequate glucoregulatory function. Postprandial hyperglycemia in liver transplant recipients is therefore not due to alterations of liver glucose metabolism.

Evidence for impaired glucose effectiveness in cirrhotic patients after liver transplantation

To evaluate the impact of acute and chronic liver disease and single immunosuppression (cyclosporine A [CSA] or FK506) on insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness in liver-grafted patients, we performed a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT) in nondiabetic patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with acute liver failure ([ALF] group, n = 9, with CSA therapy), in patients after OLT with chronic liver disease (CSA group, n = 8; FK506 group, n = 8), and in 9 healthy control subjects. Insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness were determined by analyzing glucose and insulin data from the FSIGTT with Bergman's minimal model technique for glucose. The intravenous glucose tolerance index ([KG] ie, the slope of the regression of the logarithm of blood glucose concentration) was not different between the ALF group (2.17 +/- 0.16 min(-1)) and controls (2.29 +/- 0.13 min(-1)), but was lower (P < .05) in both groups with chronic liver disease (CSA group, 1.46 +/- 0.1; FK506 group, 1.61 +/- 0.11 min(-1)) compared with the ALF group (P < .05). A positive relation for the KG and glucose effectiveness was found in all liver-grafted patients and controls. Insulin sensitivity was not different between all liver-grafted patients and controls. The body mass index (BMI) was the overall determinant of insulin sensitivity in all groups. Single immunosuppressive therapy does not impair insulin sensitivity in liver-grafted patients. The lower glucose effectiveness in liver-grafted patients with chronic liver disease but not in patients after ALF points to a defect in the regulation of glucose-mediated glucose uptake in peripheral tissue.

The effects of maintenance doses of FK506 versus cyclosporin A on glucose and lipid metabolism after orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) has gained widespread attention due to the micro and macro-vascular complications that increase the morbidity and mortality of patients receiving solid organs. The higher incidence of PTDM has been mainly attributed to the immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, this study compares the metabolic side effects of low dose maintenance therapy of FK-506 and Cyclosporin A (CsA) in 14 patients 1 year after orthotopic liver transplant and analyzes possible factors that contribute to the development of PTDM.

METHODS

Two groups (n=7) differing in their immunosuppressive regimen (FK506 or CsA) were matched to eight control subjects and compared to each other. The effects of in vivo insulin action were assessed by means of the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. Arginine stimulation tests at normo- (5.5 mM) and hyperglycemic (15 mM) levels were performed and the acute insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon response (2-5 min) to arginine were determined.

RESULTS

Insulin sensitivity (total glucose disposal) was statistically lower in patients treated with FK-506 and CsA (5.05+/-0.47 and 5.05+/-0.42 mg/kg/min) as compared to controls (6.62+/-0.38 mg/kg/min) (P<0.02), with a significantly higher nonoxidative glucose disposal for the control group (P<0.01), and lower free fatty acid levels (P<0.05). Absolute values for acute insulin response were higher but not significantly different for the transplanted groups. The lower percentage of increase of insulin release after arginine stimulation observed in the FK-506 and CsA groups as compared with controls (754%+/-100, 644%+/-102 vs. 1191%+/-174) (P<0.03 and 0.02, respectively), suggests a reduced beta cell secretory reserve in both treated groups. Also, the acute glucagon response to arginine during hyperglycemia declined less in the FK-506 (28%) and CsA groups (29%) compared with controls (48%) (P<0.05) indicating a defect in the pancreatic beta cell-alpha cell axis.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no major metabolic differences on low maintenance doses between FK-506 and CsA. Both immunosuppressant agents contribute to the development of PTDM at different levels.

Glucose intolerance and insulin resistance in cirrhosis are normalized after liver transplantation

Cirrhosis is often associated with insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. We evaluated if these alterations are restored by liver transplantation (LT). Glucose tolerance (oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT]), peripheral insulin sensitivity (euglycemic insulin clamp technique), glucose oxidation (indirect calorimetry), nonoxidative glucose disposal, and insulin secretion (hyperglycemic clamp technique) were measured in 6 patients (Group 1) before and 6 months after LT, in 12 patients (Group 2) who underwent LT 6 to 30 months previously, and in 6 healthy individuals (controls). In Group 1, glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity (3.24 +/- 0.37 mg/kg/min) were normalized after LT (8.6 +/- 0.77 mg/kg/min; P <.0001; P = not significant vs. controls). The improved insulin-mediated glucose uptake was the result of a normalization of nonoxidative glucose disposal. Fasting insulin and C-peptide decreased from 24.6 +/- 3.3 microU/mL and 4.37 +/- 0.46 ng/dL, respectively, to 12.7 +/- 1.9 microU/mL and 2.46 +/- 0.5 ng/dL (controls: 10.0 +/- 3 microU/mL and 1.45 +/- 0.34 ng/dL). The glucose-induced increase of insulin concentration, which was higher before LT, showed a significant reduction, although the first phase of beta-cell secretion remained significantly higher compared with that of controls. All these findings were also confirmed in Group 2. The present data indicate that LT normalizes glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in cirrhotic patients through an improvement of both hepatic glucose clearance and the peripheral glucose disposal. The latter effect may be the result of the correction of chronic hyperinsulinemia. An increased first-phase beta-cell insulin secretion in response to high glucose levels persists, suggesting that a memory of previous insulin resistance is maintained.

Islet cell damage associated with tacrolimus and cyclosporine: morphological features in pancreas allograft biopsies and clinical correlation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of the potent immunosuppressive drugs tacrolimus (FK) and cyclosporine (CSA) has markedly improved the outcome of solid organ transplantation. However, these drugs can cause posttransplantation diabetes mellitus. Abnormalities in the glucose metabolism are of particular significance in pancreas transplantation.

METHODS

We studied 26 pancreas allograft biopsies, performed 1-8 months posttransplantation, from 20 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients, randomized to receive either FK or CSA. The biopsies were studied by light microscopy, immunoperoxidase stains for insulin and glucagon, in situ DNA-end labeling for detection of apoptosis, and electron microscopy. The islet morphology was correlated with the mean and peak levels of CSA and FK in serum, with corticosteroid administration and with glycemia.

RESULTS

On light microscopy cytoplasmic swelling, vacuolization, apoptosis, and abnormal immunostaining for insulin were seen in biopsies from patients receiving either FK or CSA. The islet cell damage was more frequent and severe in the group receiving FK than in the group receiving CSA (10/13 and 5/13, respectively) but the differences were not statistically significant. Significant correlation was seen between the presence of islet cell damage and serum levels of CSA or FK during the 15 days previous to the biopsy, as well as with the peak level of FK. Toxic levels of CSA or FK and administration of pulse steroids were associated with hyperglycemia when these occurred concurrently (P=0.005). Toxic levels of CSA or FK by themselves were associated with hyperglycemia in a minority of cases (8 and 26%, respectively). Electron microscopy showed cytoplasmic swelling and vacuolization, and marked decrease or absence of dense-core secretory granules in beta cells; the changes were more pronounced in patients on FK. Serial biopsies from two hyperglycemic patients receiving FK and evidence of islet cell damage demonstrated reversibility of the damage when FK was discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

The structural damage to beta cells demonstrated in this study is similar to morphological and functional abnormalities previously described in experimental animal models and can at least partially account for the glucose metabolism abnormalities seen in patients receiving these drugs. Toxic levels of CSA or FK and higher steroid doses potentiate each others' diabetogenic effects.

Risk for posttransplant Diabetes mellitus with current immunosuppressive medications

With improvements in the practice of transplantation and the introduction of new immunosuppressive medications, there has been a substantial increase in 1-year allograft survival rates. Consequently, the pool of potential candidates for organ transplants continues to grow and a greater preponderance of older patients with more comorbidities are undergoing transplantation. As a result, there is interest in such medical complications as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) that develop after the transplantation of a successful allograft. PTDM is an undesirable consequence of transplantation because of its associated morbidity and impairment of both patient and graft survival. Although some controversy exists, it is likely that glucose intolerance after transplantation results in both macrovascular and microvascular disease, and there is an increasing risk for infectious and cardiovascular diseases, to which transplant recipients are already at increased susceptibility. Both experimental and clinical observations have shown that immunosuppressive agents currently used in transplantation account for a large degree of the increased risk for PTDM. Consequently, improved understanding of the effects of currently used immunosuppressive medicines on glycemic tolerance is of interest in clinical transplantation.

Plasma somatostatin response to an oral test meal in liver transplant patients

Ten liver transplant patients were studied in basal conditions and after ingestion of a standard mixed test meal. Control groups included 10 normal subjects, 10 patients with nonalcoholic liver cirrhosis, and seven kidney transplant patients. Plasma somatostatin, blood glucose, and plasma insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon were determined before and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes after the start of the meal. In liver transplant patients, basal somatostatin and insulin levels were significantly lower than in cirrhotics and were comparable to those recorded in controls and in kidney transplant patients. The time course of the somatostatin secretory response after the meal was similar in any group, but the increase, evaluated as the incremental area above baseline, was significantly higher in liver transplant patients than in controls and cirrhotics and comparable to that recorded in kidney transplant patients. Insulin incremental areas were also lower than in cirrhotics and comparable to those recorded in controls and kidney transplant patients. The data suggest that in liver transplant patients an increased somatostatin response to a meal may be related to a relative beta-cell secretory defect, which in turn seems consequent to immunosuppressive treatment.

Diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation: prevalence and predictive factors

AIMS/METHODS

To investigate the prevalence and risk factors for the development of diabetes mellitus after orthotopic liver transplantation, we reviewed 27 variables (including previous history of diabetes mellitus, data related to pre-transplant liver disease, and postoperative events) in 102 patients who survived longer than 1 year after orthotopic liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients had diabetes mellitus prior to liver transplantation and all but one were alive 2 and 3 years after transplantation, with all survivors continuing to have diabetes mellitus 1, 2 and 3 years after transplantation. Among the 88 patients without pre-transplant diabetes mellitus, the prevalence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 27% at 1 year, 9% at 2 years and 7% at 3 years, probably related to a significant reduction in the daily prednisone dose (13 +/- 4 mg at 1 year, 7 +/- 6 mg at 2 years and 2 +/- 4 mg at 3 years, p < 0.001). Patients with post-transplant diabetes mellitus 1 year after transplantation had a higher number of rejection episodes during the first postoperative year than those without post-transplant diabetes mellitus (1.5 +/- 1.1 vs 1.1 +/- 0.7, p < 0.05) and also had higher, but not statistically significant, cumulative steroid dose and blood cyclosporine levels. Mortality of patients with post-transplant diabetes mellitus was significantly higher during the second postoperative year in comparison with patients without post-transplant diabetes mellitus: 4/24 vs 2/64 (17% vs 3%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation does not significantly modify pre-transplant diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus frequently develops de novo after liver transplantation, although this complication is usually transient and probably related to immunosuppressive drug administration. The prognosis of patients with post-transplant diabetes mellitus is worse than that of those without this complication.

A multicenter analysis of the first experience with FK506 for induction and rescue therapy after pancreas transplantation

Between May 1, 1993 and April 5, 1995, 154 pancreas allograft recipients at 9 institutions were given FK506 posttransplant. Three groups were studied: (1) recipients given FK506 initially for induction and maintenance therapy (n = 82), (2) recipients switched to FK506 for antirejection or rescue therapy (n = 61), and (3) recipients converted to FK506 for other reasons (n = 11). Of 82 patients in the induction group, 7 (9%) had simultaneous bone marrow (BM) and pancreas-kidney (SPK-BM) transplants, 54 (66%) had SPK transplants without BM, 14 (17%) had pancreas transplants alone (PTA), and 7 (9%) had pancreas after previous kidney transplants (PAK). All but 1 recipient was given quadruple immunosuppression (anti-T cell agents plus azathioprine and prednisone) for induction. The median FK506 starting dose was 4 mg/day p.o.; the median average FK506 blood level, 12 ng/ml. The most common side effects were neurotoxicity (16%), nephrotoxicity (13%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (9%). New-onset diabetes mellitus requiring permanent insulin therapy did not occur. Of 61 transplants in the rescue group, 44 (72%) were SPK, 11 (18%) PTA, and 6 (10%) PAK. All but 3 (95%) of the recipients had been on cyclosporine-azathioprine-prednisone triple immunosuppression before substitution of FK506 for cyclosporine; 46% of the recipients had one, and 54% > or = 2, rejection episodes preconversion. The most common side effects were nephrotoxicity (25%), neurotoxicity (23%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (21%). Two recipients were reconverted to cyclosporine because of transient hyperglycemia, and one recipient is on insulin. In the induction group, patient survival at 6 months was 90% for SPK, 100% for PTA, and 100% for PAK. According to a matched-pair analysis, pancreas graft survival for SPK recipients at 6 months was 87% for FK506 versus 70% for cyclosporine recipients (P = 0.04); for PTA recipients, 84% versus 66% (P = n.s.); and for PAK recipients, 80% versus 14% (P = 0.11). When technical failures and death with functioning grafts were censored, pancreas graft survival remained significantly better in the FK506 group. The incidence of first reversible rejection episodes by 6 months in FK506 recipients was 35% for SPK, 40% for PTA, and 20% for PAK. Of 75 pancreas grafts, 64 are currently functioning; in 5 recipients the pancreas failed (1 from rejection); 6 recipients died with a functioning pancreas graft. There were 3 posttransplant lymphomas (all EBV-positive); 2 recipients died and 1 is alive after subtotal colectomy and transplant pancreatectomy. In the antirejection rescue group, patient survival rates at 6 months were 91% for SPK, 100% for PTA, and 80% for PAK (P = n.s.). Pancreas graft survival rates at 6 months were 90% for SPK, 72% for PTA, and 40% for PAK. The incidence of first reversible rejection episodes after conversion to FK506 at 6 months was 44% in SPK, 54% in PTA, and 50% in PAK. Of 61 pancreas grafts, 51 are currently functioning; in 7 recipients the pancreas failed (5 from rejection); 3 recipients died with a functioning graft. There were no posttransplant lymphomas in the rescue group. This multicenter survey shows that FK506 in pancreas transplantation is associated with (1) a low rate of graft loss from rejection when used for induction therapy, (2) a high rate of graft salvage when used for rescue or rejection therapy, and (3) a very low rate of new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. These encouraging results are tarnished by 3 posttransplant lymphomas in the induction group; a possible explanation is overimmunosuppression, but further (randomized) studies are necessary to analyze the long-term risk-benefit ratio of FK506 after pancreas transplantation.