Indirect allorecognition in acquired thymic tolerance: induction of donor-specific tolerance to rat cardiac allografts by allopeptide-pulsed host dendritic cells

Innate immune cellular therapeutics in transplantation

Successful organ transplantation provides an opportunity to extend the lives of patients with end-stage organ failure. Selectively suppressing the donor-specific alloimmune response, however, remains challenging without the continuous use of non-specific immunosuppressive medications, which have multiple adverse effects including elevated risks of infection, chronic kidney injury, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Efforts to promote allograft tolerance have focused on manipulating the adaptive immune response, but long-term allograft survival rates remain disappointing. In recent years, the innate immune system has become an attractive therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of transplant organ rejection. Indeed, contemporary studies demonstrate that innate immune cells participate in both the initial alloimmune response and chronic allograft rejection and undergo non-permanent functional reprogramming in a phenomenon termed "trained immunity." Several types of innate immune cells are currently under investigation as potential therapeutics in transplantation, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells, dendritic cells, regulatory macrophages, natural killer cells, and innate lymphoid cells. In this review, we discuss the features and functions of these cell types, with a focus on their role in the alloimmune response. We examine their potential application as therapeutics to prevent or treat allograft rejection, as well as challenges in their clinical translation and future directions for investigation.

Cell Therapy in Solid Organ Transplantation

Transplantation is the only cure for end-stage organ failure. Current immunosuppressive drugs have two major limitations: 1) non antigen specificity, which increases the risk of cancer and infection diseases, and 2) chronic toxicity. Cell therapy appears to be an innovative and promising strategy to minimize the use of immunosuppression in transplantation and to improve long-term graft survival. Preclinical studies have shown efficacy and safety of using various suppressor cells, such as regulatory T cells, regulatory B cells and tolerogenic dendritic cells. Recent clinical trials using cellbased therapies in solid organ transplantation also hold out the promise of improving efficacy. In this review, we will briefly go over the rejection process, current immunosuppressive drugs, and the potential therapeutic use of regulatory cells in transplantation.

Tolerogenic dendritic cells in organ transplantation

Dendritic cells (DCs) are specialized cells of the innate immune system that are characterized by their ability to take up, process and present antigens (Ag) to effector T cells. They are derived from DC precursors produced in the bone marrow. Different DC subsets have been described according to lineage-specific transcription factors required for their development and function. Functionally, DCs are responsible for inducing Ag-specific immune responses that mediate organ transplant rejection. Consequently, to prevent anti-donor immune responses, therapeutic strategies have been directed toward the inhibition of DC activation. In addition however, an extensive body of preclinical research, using transplant models in rodents and nonhuman primates, has established a central role of DCs in the negative regulation of alloimmune responses. As a result, DCs have been employed as cell-based immunotherapy in early phase I/II clinical trials in organ transplantation. Together with in vivo targeting through use of myeloid cell-specific nanobiologics, DC manipulation represents a promising approach for the induction of transplantation tolerance. In this review, we summarize fundamental characteristics of DCs and their roles in promotion of central and peripheral tolerance. We also discuss their clinical application to promote improved long-term outcomes in organ transplantation.

State of the Art: Role of the Dendritic Cell in Induction of Allograft Tolerance

Despite decades of research, the induction and maintenance of long-term allograft tolerance without immunosuppression remains an elusive goal in the field of solid organ and cell transplantation. Immunosuppressive medications frequently prevent or minimize acute cellular rejection but have failed to halt antidonor antibody production and chronic organ rejection. Past efforts aimed at promoting lasting allograft tolerance have focused primarily on peripheral T-cell depletion, augmentation of regulatory T cells, or induction via simultaneous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and facilitation of donor chimerism. So far, none of these methods have led to consistently safe, feasible and long lasting donor organ acceptance. Over the course of the past 4 decades, the study of a unique population of antigen-presenting cells known as dendritic cells has shown promise for breaking new ground in achieving indefinite allograft survival without immunosuppression and its associated adverse effects. In this review, we discuss the discovery and early investigations of dendritic cells and chronicle some of the key studies demonstrating their role in transplantation, particularly in indirect allorecognition, the immunologic pathway thought to drive chronic rejection and perhaps tolerance induction.

Update on Dendritic Cell-Induced Immunological and Clinical Tolerance

Dendritic cells (DCs) as highly efficient antigen-presenting cells are at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity. As such, they are key mediators of immunity and antigen-specific immune tolerance. Due to their functional specialization, research efforts have focused on the characterization of DCs subsets involved in the initiation of immunogenic responses and in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. Tolerogenic DCs (tolDCs)-based therapies have been designed as promising strategies to prevent and control autoimmune diseases as well as allograft rejection after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Despite successful experimental studies and ongoing phase I/II clinical trials using autologous tolDCs in patients with type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and in SOT recipients, additional basic research will be required to determine the optimal DC subset(s) and conditioning regimens for tolDCs-based treatments in vivo. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of human DCs and recent advances in their classification, as well as the role of DCs in immune regulation and their susceptibility to in vitro or in vivo manipulation for the development of tolerogenic therapies, with a focus on the potential of tolDCs for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and the prevention of allograft rejection after SOT.

iPSC-Derived Regulatory Dendritic Cells Inhibit Allograft Rejection by Generating Alloantigen-Specific Regulatory T Cells

Regulatory dendritic cell (DCregs)-based immunotherapy is a potential therapeutic tool for transplant rejection. We generated DCregs from murine induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which could remain in a “stable immature stage” even under strong stimulation. Harnessing this characteristic, we hypothesized that iPS-DCregs worked as a negative vaccine to generate regulatory T cells (Tregs), and induced donor-specific allograft acceptance. We immunized naive CBA (H-2K^k) mice with B6 (H-2K^b) iPS-DCregs and found that Tregs (CD4⁺CD25⁺FOXP3⁺) significantly increased in CBA splenocytes. Moreover, immunized CBA recipients permanently accepted B6 cardiac grafts in a donor-specific pattern. We demonstrated mechanistically that donor-type iPS-DCregs triggered transforming growth factor β1 secretion, under which the donor-antigen peptides directed naive CD4⁺ T cells to differentiate into donor-specific FOXP3⁺ Tregs instead of into effector T cells in vivo. These findings highlight the potential of iPS-DCregs as a key cell therapy resource in clinical transplantation.

•

iPS-DCregs keep in stable immature stage that makes them a powerful cellular vaccine

•

Donor-type iPS-DCregs lead to permanent acceptance of allogeneic cardiac grafts

•

iPS-DCregs reduce CTL and downregulate proinflammatory cytokine

•

iPS-DCregs enhance Tregs transmigration capability in a TGF-β1-dependent manner

Effects of Adoptive Transfer of Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells on Allograft Survival in Organ Transplantation Models: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Objective. To dissect the efficacy of Tol-DC therapy with or without IS in multiple animal models of transplantation. Methods and Results. PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for reviews published up to April 2015. Six systematic reviews and a total of 61 articles were finally included. Data were grouped by organ transplantation models and applied to meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis shows that Tol-DC therapy successfully prolonged allograft survival to varying extents in all except the islet transplantation models and with IS drugs further prolonged the survival of heart, skin, and islet allografts in mice, but not of heart allografts in rats. Compared with IS drugs alone, Tol-DC therapy with IS extended islet allograft survival in rats but failed to influence the survival of skin, small intestine, and heart allografts in rats or of heart and skin allografts in mice. Conclusion. Tol-DC therapy significantly prolonged multiple allograft survival and further prolonged survival with IS. However, standardized protocols for modification of Tol-DC should be established before its application in clinic.

Quantitative Analysis of OX62-Positive Dendritic Cell Distribution in the Rat Laryngeal Complex

Objectives:

Dendritic cells (DCs) are key instigators of rejection after transplantation. Their distribution has not been systematically characterized in all locations of the larynx and its surrounding tissues.

Methods:

Rat larynges were stained with monoclonal antibodies identifying DCs. These cells were then enumerated by a new combination of techniques including immunofluorescence, confocal microscopy, and imaging software.

Results:

The vast majority of DCs were located in the epithelium and subepithelium of the airway; the mean DC density ranged from 9 cells per square millimeter (0.2% of cells) to 645 cells per square millimeter (10.3% of cells). Their density in the epithelium was 3 to 11 times higher than that in the subepithelium. Non-airway sites (thyroid, parathyroid, muscle, fat) had mean DC densities varying from 3 cells per square millimeter (0.2%) to 57 cells per square millimeter (0.8%). No DCs were detected in cartilage.

Conclusions:

Dendritic cells are concentrated in the laryngotracheal epithelium and subepithelium and represent a much smaller proportion in the other sites studied. A baseline for laryngeal DC population studies has been established, and a computerized model for consistent quantitation using confocal microscopy has been developed. This unique method will serve as a foundation for investigating DC trafficking after rat laryngeal transplantation.

Immunosuppressive therapy in allograft transplantation: from novel insights and strategies to tolerance and challenges

Immunosuppression therapy is the key to successful post-transplantation outcomes. The need for ideal immunosuppression became durable maintenance of long-term graft survival. In spite of current immunosuppressive therapy regimens advances, surgical procedures, and preservation methods, organ transplantation is associated with a long-term poor survival and significant mortality. This has led to an increased interest to optimize outcomes while minimizing associated toxicity by using alternative methods for maintenance immunosuppression, organ rejection treatment, and monitoring of immunosuppression. T regulatory (Treg) cells, which have immunosuppressive functions and cytokine profiles, have been studied during the last decades. Treg cells are able to inhibit the development of allergen-specific cell responses and consequently play a key role in a healthy immune response to allergens. Mature dendritic cells (DCs) play a crucial role in the differentiation of Tregs, which are known to regulate allergic inflammatory responses. Advance in long-standing allograft outcomes may depend on new drugs with novel mechanisms of action with minimal toxicity. Newer treatment techniques have been developed, including using novel stem cell-based therapies such as mesenchymal stem cells, phagosomes and exosomes. Immunoisolation techniques and salvage therapies, including photopheresis and total lymphoid irradiation have emerged as alternative therapeutic choices. The present review evaluates the recent clinical advances in immunosuppressive therapies for organ transplantation.

Tissue engineering tools for modulation of the immune response

Tissue engineering scaffolds have emerged as a powerful tool within regenerative medicine. These materials are being designed to create environments that promote regeneration through a combination of: (i) scaffold architecture, (ii) the use of scaffolds as vehicles for transplanting progenitor cells, and/or (iii) localized delivery of inductive factors or genes encoding for these inductive factors. This review describes the techniques associated with each of these components. Additionally, the immune response is increasingly recognized as a factor influencing regeneration. The immune reaction to an implant begins with an acute response to the injury and innate recognition of foreign materials, with the subsequent chronic immune response involving specific recognition of antigens (e.g., transplanted cells) by the adaptive immune response, which can eventually lead to rejection of the implant. Thus, we also describe the impact of each component on the immune response, and strategies (e.g., material design, anti-inflammatory cytokine delivery, and immune cell recruitment/transplantation) to modulate, yet not eliminate, the local immune response in order to promote regeneration, which represents another important tool for regenerative medicine.

Advancing islet transplantation: from engraftment to the immune response

The promise and progress of islet transplantation for treating type 1 diabetes has been challenged by obstacles to patient accessibility and long-term graft function that may be overcome by integrating emerging technologies in biomaterials, drug delivery and immunomodulation. The hepatic microenvironment and traditional systemic immunosuppression stress the vulnerable islets and contribute to the limited success of transplantation. Locally delivering extracellular matrix proteins and trophic factors can enhance transplantation at extrahepatic sites by promoting islet engraftment, revascularisation and long-term function while avoiding unintended systemic effects. Cell- and cytokine-based therapies for immune cell recruitment and reprogramming can inhibit local and systemic immune system activation that normally attacks transplanted islets. Combined with antigen-specific immunotherapies, states of operational tolerance may be achievable, reducing or eliminating the long-term pharmaceutical burden. Integration of these technologies to enhance engraftment and combat rejection may help to advance the therapeutic efficacy and availability of islet transplantation.

Current state of type 1 diabetes immunotherapy: incremental advances, huge leaps, or more of the same?

Thus far, none of the preclinically successful and promising immunomodulatory agents for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has conferred stable, long-term insulin independence to diabetic patients. The majority of these immunomodulators are humanised antibodies that target immune cells or cytokines. These as well as fusion proteins and inhibitor proteins all share varying adverse event occurrence and severity. Other approaches have included intact putative autoantigens or autoantigen peptides. Considerable logistical outlays have been deployed to develop and to translate humanised antibodies targeting immune cells, cytokines, and cytokine receptors to the clinic. Very recent phase III trials with the leading agent, a humanised anti-CD3 antibody, call into question whether further development of these biologics represents a step forward or more of the same. Combination therapies of one or more of these humanised antibodies are also being considered, and they face identical, if not more serious, impediments and safety issues. This paper will highlight the preclinical successes and the excitement generated by phase II trials while offering alternative possibilities and new translational avenues that can be explored given the very recent disappointment in leading agents in more advanced clinical trials.

Tolerogenic dendritic cells and their role in transplantation

The pursuit of clinical transplant tolerance has led to enhanced understanding of mechanisms underlying immune regulation, including the characterization of immune regulatory cells, in particular antigen-presenting cells (APC) and regulatory T cells (Treg), that may play key roles in promoting operational tolerance. Dendritic cells (DC) are highly efficient APC that have been studied extensively in rodents and humans, and more recently in non-human primates. Owing to their ability to regulate both innate and adaptive immune responses, DC are considered to play crucial roles in directing the alloimmune response towards transplant tolerance or rejection. Mechanisms via which they can promote central and peripheral tolerance include clonal deletion, the induction of Treg, and inhibition of memory T cell responses. These properties have led to the use of tolerogenic DC as a therapeutic strategy to promote organ transplant tolerance. In rodents, infusion of donor- or recipient-derived tolerogenic DC can extensively prolong donor-specific allograft survival, in association with regulation of the host T cell response. In clinical transplantation, progress has been made in monitoring DC in relation to graft outcome, including studies in operational liver transplant tolerance. Although clinical trials involving immunotherapeutic DC for patients with cancer are ongoing, implementation of human DC therapy in clinical transplantation will require assessment of various critical issues. These include cell isolation and purification techniques, source, route and timing of administration, and combination immunosuppressive therapy. With ongoing non-human primate studies focused on DC therapy, these logistics can be investigated seeking the optimal approaches. The scientific rationale for implementation of tolerogenic DC therapy to promote clinical transplant tolerance is strong. Evaluation of technical and therapeutic logistic issues is an important next step prior to the application of tolerogenic DC in clinical organ transplantation.

Tolerogenic dendritic cells and their potential applications

Dendritic cells (DCs) play a pivotal role in regulating the balance between immunity and tolerance of the immune system. Recent advancements in DC biology and techniques for manipulating the function of these cells have shown their immense therapeutic potential for treating a variety of immune disorders. Theoretically, antigen-specific tolerogenic DCs can be generated in vitro and delivered to patients to correct the dysfunctional immune responses that attack their own tissues or over-react to innocuous foreign antigens. However, DCs are a heterogeneous population of cells with differences in cell surface makers, differentiation pathways and functions. Studies are needed to examine which subset of DCs can be used for what type of applications. Furthermore, most of the information on tolerogenic DCs has been obtained from animal models and translational studies are needed to examine how a DC therapeutic strategy can be implemented clinically to modulate immunity.

Induction of pathogenic cytotoxic T lymphocyte tolerance by dendritic cells: a novel therapeutic target

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Dendritic cells (DCs) have an important role, both direct and indirect, in controlling the expansion and function of T cells. Of the different subsets of T cells, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs/CD8(+) T cells) have been implicated in the pathogenesis and development of many diseases, including various forms of autoimmunity and transplant rejection. It may therefore be of therapeutic benefit to control the function of CTL in order to modulate disease processes and to ameliorate disease symptoms. Currently, pharmacological approaches have been employed to either directly or indirectly modulate the function of T cells. However, these treatment strategies have many limitations. Many experimental data have suggested that it is possible to alter CTL activity through manipulation of DC.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Novel strategies that condition DCs to influence disease outcome through manipulation of CTL activity, both directly and indirectly. This includes the modulation of co-stimulation, negative co-stimulation, as well as manipulation of the cytokine milieu during CTL generation. Furthermore, DCs may also impact CTL activity through effects on effector and regulatory cells, along with manipulation of bioenergetic regulation, apoptotic-cell mediated tolerance and through the generation of exosomes. The implications of related interventions in the clinical arena are in turn considered.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Insight into such indirect methods of controlling CTL activity allows for an understanding of how disease-specific T cells may be regulated, while also sparing other aspects of adaptive immunity for normal physiological function. Such an approach towards the treatment of disease represents an innovative therapeutic target in the clinical arena.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

There are numerous innovative methods for using DCs to control CTL responses. Manipulation of this interaction is thus an attractive avenue for the treatment of disease, particularly those of immune dysregulation, such as seen in autoimmunity and transplantation. With the number of studies moving into clinical stages constantly increasing, further advances and successes in this area are inevitable.

Dendritic cell-based therapy in Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Dendritic cell (DC) immunotherapy is a clinical reality. Despite two decades of considerable data demonstrating the feasibility of using DCs to prolong transplant allograft survival and to prevent autoimmunity, only now are these cells entering clinical trials in humans. Type 1 diabetes is the first autoimmune disorder to be targeted for treatment in humans using autologous-engineered DCs. This review will highlight the role of DCs in autoimmunity and the manner in which they have been engineered to treat these disorders in rodent models, either via the induction of immune hyporesponsiveness, which may be cell- and/or antigen-specific, or indirectly by upregulation of other immune cell networks.

Dendritic cells and regulation of alloimmune responses: relevance to outcome and therapy of organ transplantation

Dendritic cells are uniquely well-equipped for antigen capture, processing and presentation. They are highly-efficient antigen-presenting cells that induce and regulate T-cell reactivity. Due to their inherent tolerogenicity, immature dendritic cells offer considerable potential as candidate cellular vaccines for negative regulation of immune reactivity/promotion of tolerance. Both classic myeloid and, more recently, characterized plasmacytoid dendritic cells, exhibit tolerogenic properties. Manipulation of dendritic cells differentiation/ maturation in the laboratory using cytokines, pharmacologic agents or genetic engineering approaches can render stably immature dendritic cells that promote organ transplant tolerance in rodents. There are also indications from human studies of the ability of dendritic cells to promote T-cell tolerance and induce T-regulatory cells, with potential for therapeutic application in organ transplantation. In addition, recent clinical observations suggest that modulation of dendritic cell function (e.g., by immunosuppressive drugs) affects the outcome of transplantation. The challenge confronting applied dendritic cell biology is the identification of optimal strategies and therapeutic regimens to allow the potential of these powerful immune regulatory cells to be realized in the clinic.

Immune tolerance induction by integrating innate and adaptive immune regulators

A diversity of immune tolerance mechanisms have evolved to protect normal tissues from immune damage. Immune regulatory cells are critical contributors to peripheral tolerance. These regulatory cells, exemplified by the CD4(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T (Treg) cells and a recently identified population named myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), regulate immune responses and limiting immune-mediated pathology. In a chronic inflammatory setting, such as allograft-directed immunity, there may be a dynamic "cross-talk" between the innate and adaptive immunomodulatory mechanisms for an integrated control of immune damage. CTLA4-B7-based interaction between the two branches may function as a molecular "bridge" to facilitate such "cross-talk." Understanding the interplays among Treg cells, innate suppressors, and pathogenic effector T (Teff) cells will be critical in the future to assist in the development of therapeutic strategies to enhance and synergize physiological immunosuppressive elements in the innate and adaptive immune system. Successful development of localized strategies of regulatory cell therapies could circumvent the requirement for very high number of cells and decrease the risks associated with systemic immunosuppression. To realize the potential of innate and adaptive immune regulators for the still elusive goal of immune tolerance induction, adoptive cell therapies may also need to be coupled with agents enhancing endogenous tolerance mechanisms.

Dendritic cell therapy in composite tissue allotransplantation

Dendritic cells (DCs) are bone marrow-derived, professional antigen-presenting cells, with inherent tolerogenic function. The ability of immature or maturation-resistant DCs to regulate alloantigen-specific T-cell responses and to promote tolerance induction has been well demonstrated in organ and bone marrow transplantation. Recent data suggest that DCs can also promote long-term survival of composite tissue allografts in the absence of continued immunosuppressive drug therapy.

Regulation of rat and human T-cell immune response by pharmacologically modified dendritic cells

BACKGROUND

The central function of dendritic cells (DC) in inducing and preventing immune responses makes them ideal therapeutic targets for the induction of immunologic tolerance. In a rat in vivo model, we showed that dexamethasone-treated DC (Dex-DC) induced indirect pathway-mediated regulation and that CD4+CD25+ T cells were involved in the observed effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate the mechanisms underlying the acquired immunoregulatory properties of Dex-DC in the rat and human experimental systems.

METHODS

After treatment with dexamethasone (Dex), the immunogenicity of Dex-DC was analyzed in T-cell proliferation and two-step hyporesponsiveness induction assays. After carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester labeling, CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell expansion was analyzed by flow cytometry, and cytokine secretion was measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

In this study, we demonstrate in vitro that rat Dex-DC induced selective expansion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells, which were responsible for alloantigen-specific hyporesponsiveness. The induction of regulatory T-cell division by rat Dex-DC was due to secretion of interleukin (IL)-2 by DC. Similarly, in human studies, monocyte-derived Dex-DC were also poorly immunogenic, were able to induce T-cell anergy in vitro, and expand a population of T cells with regulatory functions. This was accompanied by a change in the cytokine profile in DC and T cells in favor of IL-10.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that Dex-DC induced tolerance by different mechanisms in the two systems studied. Both rat and human Dex-DC were able to induce and expand regulatory T cells, which occurred in an IL-2 dependent manner in the rat system.

New strategies in immune tolerance induction

Induction of tolerance in clinical organ transplantation that will obviate the use of chronic immunosuppression and preserve host immune response to other antigens remains the goal of transplant research. The thymus plays a critical role in the ability of the immune system to discriminate between self- and nonself-antigens or harmful and harmless alloantigens. We now know that multiple factors determine how the immune system responds to a self-antigen or foreign antigen. These determinants include developmental stage of the host, stage of T-cell maturity, site of antigen encounter, type and maturity of antigen-presenting cells, and presence and type of costimulatory molecules. Our understanding of the mechanisms of T-cell interactions with peptide/ major histocompatibility complex in peripheral lymphoid organs has led to experiments that translate into peripheral T-cell tolerance. The induction of high-avidity peripheral alloreactive T cells in the early phase of organ transplantation makes it difficult to achieve long-term alloantigen-specific tolerance without the use of transient perioperative immunosuppression. Therefore, protocols that induce robust tolerance in rodent and nonhuman primate models involve the use of donor antigen combined with a short course of perioperative immunosuppression. These studies suggest that the underlying mechanisms of peripheral tolerance include deletion, anergy, immune deviation, and regulatory T cells. This review focuses on recent advances in tolerance induction in experimental animal models and discusses their relevance to the development of protocols for the induction and maintenance of clinical transplant tolerance.

Alloantigen-pulsed host dendritic cells induce T-cell regulation and prolong allograft survival in a rat model of hindlimb allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Composite tissue allotransplantation is restricted due to the risks presented by long-term therapeutic immunosuppression. This study is conducted to investigate whether treatment with recipient immature dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with donor alloantigens can prolong allograft survival and induce T-cell regulation in a rodent model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Orthotopic hindlimb transplants from Brown-Norway (RT1(n)) to Lewis (RT1(1)) rats were performed (day 0). DCs were propagated from the recipient bone marrow and pulsed with the donor alloantigen lysate. Group 1 (control group) did not receive any treatment. Groups 2 and 3 received cyclosporine A (CsA) at a concentration of 10 and 16 mg.kg(-1).day(-1), respectively, on days 0-20 following composite tissue allotransplantation. Group 4 received antilymphocyte serum (i.p. administered 4 d before and 1 d after transplantation) therapy. Group 5 received combined treatment with CsA (10 mg.kg(-1).day(-1), days 0-20) and donor alloantigen-pulsed recipient DCs (i.v. administered on days 7, 14, and 21). Group 6 received combined treatment with CsA (10 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) on days 0-20), antilymphocyte serum (administered i.p. 4 d before and 1 d after transplantation), and DCs (administered i.v. on days 7, 14, and 21). Graft rejection was defined as epidermolysis/desquamation of the donor skin. The mixed lymphocyte reaction was performed to determine the donor T-cell reactivity. Tissue samples were biopsied to analyze the histological changes, and flow cytometry was performed to quantify the donor T-cells.

RESULTS

Allograft survival was significantly prolonged (>200 d) in Group 6 when compared with the other groups (P < 0.001). The mixed lymphocyte reaction performed for Group 6 revealed hyporesponsiveness of the T-cells to donor alloantigens. Flow cytometric analysis in Group 6 revealed a significant increase in the percentage of CD4(+)/CD25(+) and CD4(+)/foxP3(+) T-cells expression, and significant increase in the percentage of donor cells (RT1(n)) in the recipient peripheral blood. Immunohistochemical staining of allo-skin revealed a significant increase in the proportion of CD25(+) cells in the subcutaneous and dermis layers in Group 6, as compared to other groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with donor alloantigen-pulsed recipient immature DCs in combination with transient immunosuppression prolongs allograft survival and induced tolerance by inducing T-cell hyporesponsiveness to donor alloantigens and increasing the CD4(+)/CD25(+) T-cell population.

Use of dendritic cells in drug selection, development and therapy

BACKGROUND

Dendritic cells (DC) have the unique ability to induce immunity against tumors and various pathogens or to promote tolerance in autoimmunity and transplantation. Hence, they are central to the regulation of immune responses.

OBJECTIVE/METHODS

Due to the unique tolerogenic ability of DC, understanding some of the key molecules that regulate DC function may help with targeting the relevant signals in DC as therapeutic options for many disease conditions. DC are also targets of drugs, and many of the anti-inflammatory and pharmaceutical agents used to prevent autoimmunity or inhibit graft rejection interfere with DC function.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

The drug-induced changes in DC may provide information for the selection of drugs and further drug discovery along with the use of DC as adjuvant in the treatment of autoimmunity and prevention of graft rejection in transplantation.

Rapamycin-conditioned, alloantigen-pulsed dendritic cells promote indefinite survival of vascularized skin allografts in association with T regulatory cell expansion

Clinically-applicable protocols that promote tolerance to vascularized skin grafts may contribute to more widespread use of composite tissue transplantation. We compared the properties of alloantigen (Ag)-pulsed, rapamycin (Rapa)-conditioned and control bone marrow-derived host myeloid dendritic cells (DCs) and their potential, together with transient immunosuppression (anti-lymphocyte serum+cyclosporine), to promote long-term, vascularized skin graft survival in Lewis rats across a full MHC barrier. Both types of DCs expressed low levels of CD86, but Rapa DC expressed lower levels of MHC II and CD40 and were less stimulatory in MLR. While both Rapa and control DCs produced low levels of IL-12p70 and moderate levels of IL-6 and IL-10 following TLR ligation, Rapa DC secreted significantly lower levels of IL-6 and IL-10 in response to LPS. Donor Ag-pulsed Rapa DC, but not control DC, induced long-term skin graft survival (median survival time >133 days) when administered 7 and 14 days post-transplant. Circulating T cells in hosts with long-surviving grafts were hyporesponsive to donor alloAg stimulation, but proliferated in response to third-party stimulation and produced IFN-gamma and IL-10. When recipients of long-surviving grafts were challenged with skin grafts, donor but not third-party grafts were prolonged, suggesting underlying regulatory mechanisms. Both flow cytometry and immunohistochemical analysis revealed that donor Ag-pulsed Rapa DC infusion expanded CD4+ Foxp3+ Treg in recipients' spleens, graft-associated lymph nodes and the graft. These data demonstrate for the first time that pharmacologically-modified, donor Ag-pulsed host DC administered post-transplant can promote indefinite vascularized skin graft survival, associated with Treg expansion.

Immunoregulatory dendritic cells to prevent and reverse new-onset Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Herein, the authors provide an overview of where dendritic cells lie in the immunopathology of autoimmune Type 1 diabetes mellitus and how dendritic cell-based therapy may be usefully translated to treat and reverse the disease. The immunopathology of Type 1 diabetes mellitus offers a number of windows at which immunotherapy can be applied to delay, stop and even reverse the autoimmune processes, especially in light of the recent antibody-based accomplishment of improvement in residual beta-cell mass function. As in almost all cell-specific inflammatory processes, dendritic cells are central regulators of diabetes onset and progression. This realisation, along with accumulating data confirming a role for dendritic cells in maintaining and inducing tolerance in multiple therapeutic settings, has prompted a line of investigation to identify the most effective embodiments of dendritic cells for diabetes immunotherapy.

Tolerogenic dendritic cells and the quest for transplant tolerance

In recent years, there has been a shift from the perception of dendritic cells (DCs) solely as inducers of immune reactivity to the view that these cells are crucial regulators of immunity, which includes their ability to induce and maintain tolerance. Advances in our understanding of the phenotypical and functional plasticity of DCs, and in our ability to manipulate their development and maturation in vitro and in vivo, has provided a basis for the therapeutic harnessing of their inherent tolerogenicity. In this Review, we integrate the available information on the role of DCs in the induction of tolerance, with a focus on transplantation.

Enhanced immune reconstitution by sex steroid ablation following allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation

Delayed immune reconstitution in adult recipients of allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) is related to age-induced thymic atrophy. Overcoming this paucity of T cell function is a major goal of clinical research but in the context of allogeneic transplants, any strategy must not exacerbate graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) yet ideally retain graft-vs-tumor (GVT) effects. We have shown sex steroid ablation reverses thymic atrophy and enhances T cell recovery in aged animals and in congenic bone marrow (BM) transplant but the latter does not have the complications of allogeneic T cell reactivity. We have examined whether sex steroid ablation promoted hemopoietic and T cell recovery following allogeneic HSCT and whether this benefit was negated by enhanced GVHD. BM and thymic cell numbers were significantly increased at 14 and 28 days after HSCT in castrated mice compared with sham-castrated controls. In the thymus, the numbers of donor-derived thymocytes and dendritic cells were significantly increased after HSCT and castration; donor-derived BM precursors and developing B cells were also significantly increased. Importantly, despite restoring T cell function, sex steroid inhibition did not exacerbate the development of GVHD or ameliorate GVT activity. Finally, IL-7 treatment in combination with castration had an additive effect on thymic cellularity following HSCT. These results indicate that sex steroid ablation can profoundly enhance thymic and hemopoietic recovery following allogeneic HSCT without increasing GVHD and maintaining GVT.

Cellular Therapies for Prolongation of Composite Tissue Allograft Transplantation

Complex musculoskeletal defects resulting from cancer, congenital absence, and trauma represent a unique reconstructive challenge. Autologous tissue is often unavailable to reconstruct these deformities. Composite tissue allograft transplantation represents a unique solution for these clinical problems. Face, hand, or limb transplants can be performed in a single procedure. However, the use of chronic nonspecific systemic immunosuppression can lead to side effects such as drug toxicity, opportunistic infections, and malignancies. This article explores various cell-based therapies that represent promising modalities to reduce chronic immunosuppression and alter the risk/benefit ratios for the prospect of composite tissue allograft transplantation.

Regulatory dendritic cell therapy in organ transplantation

Dendritic cells (DCs) are uniquely well equipped antigen (Ag)-presenting cells. Their classic function was thought to be that of potent initiators of innate and adaptive immunity to infectious organisms and other Ags (including transplanted organs). Evidence has emerged, however, that DCs have a central and crucial role in determining the fate of immune responses toward either immunity or tolerance. This dichotomous function of DCs, coupled with their remarkable plasticity, renders them attractive therapeutic targets for immune modulation. In transplantation, much recent work has focused on the ability of DCs to silence immune reactivity in an Ag-specific manner in the hope of preventing rejection and diminishing reliance on potentially harmful immunosuppressive agents. Experimental strategies have included in vivo targeting of DCs, as well as ex vivo generation of regulatory (or tolerogenic) DCs with subsequent reinfusion (i.e. cell therapy). Different approaches to 'program' DC toward tolerogenic properties include genetic (transgene insertion), biologic (differential culture conditions, anti-inflammatory cytokine exposure) and pharmacologic manipulation. Recent data suggest a promising role for pharmacologic treatment as a means of generating potent regulatory DCs and have further stimulated speculation regarding their potential clinical application. Herein, we discuss evidence that the potential of regulatory DC therapy is considerable and that there are compelling reasons to evaluate it in the setting of organ transplantation in the near future.

Dendritic cells as promoters of transplant tolerance

Dendritic cells (DCs) play a crucial role during the initiation of immune responses against non-self antigens. Following organ transplantation, activated donor- and recipient-derived DCs participate actively in graft rejection by sensitising recipient T cells via the direct or indirect pathways of allorecognition, respectively. There is increasing evidence that immature/semi-mature DCs induce antigen-specific unresponsiveness or tolerance to self antigens, both in central lymphoid tissue and in the periphery, through a variety of mechanisms (deletion, anergy and regulation). In the past few years, DC-based therapy of experimental allograft rejection has focused on ex vivo biological, pharmacological and genetic engineering of DCs to mimic/enhance their natural tolerogenicity. Successful outcomes in rodent models have built the case that DC-based therapy may provide a novel approach to transplant tolerance. Ongoing research into the role that DCs play in the induction of tolerance should allow for its clinical application in the near future.

Donor-Specific Allograft Tolerance by Administration of Recipient-Derived Immature Dendritic Cells and Suboptimal Immunosuppression

We recently showed that injection of recipient-type immature bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (iBMDCs) the day before transplantation induced a significant prolongation of allograft survival. This study aimed at improving the administration protocol to induce allograft tolerance. Various amounts of iBMDCs were administered to syngeneic LEW.1A rats before and after transplantation of an allogeneic LEW.1W heart, with or without additional suboptimal immunosuppression. Allograft survival was not improved by repeated injections of syngeneic iBMDCs or by additional treatment with low-dose rapamycin. Combining injections of iBMDCs and LF 15-0195 showed a striking synergistic effect and induced definitive allograft acceptance in 92% of recipients. Tolerant recipients accepted donor-type, but not third-party type skin grafts, suggesting the development of regulatory mechanisms capable of maintaining donor-specific tolerance. The reported findings may contribute to the development of new therapeutic strategies to induce transplantation tolerance in humans.

Rapamycin-treated, alloantigen-pulsed host dendritic cells induce ag-specific T cell regulation and prolong graft survival

Tolerogenic properties of dendritic cells (DC), particularly those in the immature state, and their therapeutic potential are increasingly being recognized. Among several distinct approaches to generate stably immature DC, pharmacologic manipulation stands out as a promising and clinically applicable option. We have shown recently that the immunophilin ligand rapamycin (Rapa) can inhibit DC maturation and their effector functions. Here, we examined the impact of Rapa exposure on subsequent alloantigen (Ag) presentation by myeloid DC via the indirect pathway. Rapa-treated, allogeneic lysate-pulsed host DC (Rapa-DC) were inferior stimulators of syngeneic T cells, compared to lysate-pulsed control DC. Rapa exposure did not block alloAg uptake by DC nor impair their in vivo homing to splenic T cell areas after adoptive transfer. T cells primed by Rapa-treated, alloAg-pulsed DC showed decreased capacity to produce IL-2 and IFNgamma, and were hyporesponsive to subsequent challenge via both the direct and indirect pathways, in an Ag-specific manner. When infused 1 week before transplantation, these Rapa-DC significantly prolonged alloAg-specific heart graft survival. This effect was reversed by systemic IL-2 administration but enhanced by either repeated infusion of the cells or a short post-transplant course of FK506. These therapeutic effects, achieved by targeting both major pathways of allorecognition, provide the basis for a clinically applicable strategy to suppress graft rejection.

Prolongation of heart allograft survival by immature dendritic cells generated from recipient type bone marrow progenitors

Recent studies suggest that particular dendritic cells (DC) subpopulations may be tolerogenic. To test the capacity of different DC subpopulations to modulate allograft rejection, we generated two distinct populations of rat bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDC) with low doses of GM-CSF and IL-4. The non-adherent population (nBMDC), which are the 'classical' DCs was able to stimulate naive allogeneic T cells and could be induced to completely mature using various stimuli. In contrast, the adherent population (aBMDC), which displayed an immature phenotype, was unable to stimulate T cells and was more resistant to maturation. We found that syngeneic aBMDCs, injected one day before transplantation, induced significant prolongation of heart allograft survival and decreased anti-donor humoral and cellular responses. Similarly, syngeneic aBMDCs inhibited T-cell responses to KLH in the spleen but not in lymph node in a KLH immunization model without graft. This effect was not antigen specific and could be reversed using an inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase. This compartmentalized inhibition could be in part explained by the fact that the majority of syngeneic adherent cells administered intravenously were found in the spleen with some of them reaching the T-cell areas. These data suggest that syngeneic aBMDCs can modulate immune responses.

Prolonged survival of donor-specific rat intestinal allograft by administration of bone-marrow-derived immature dendritic cells

It has been reported that intraportal administration of donor antigens induced donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. We studied here the effects of transplantation of BM-derived immature dendritic cells (imDCs) and mature DCs (mDCs) via portal vein on rat small intestinal allograft survival. This study comprised four treatment groups: 1) untreated controls; 2) FK506 alone; 3) intraportal donor-specific BM-derived imDCs transplantation+FK506; 4) mDCs/Tx+FK506. Allograft survival was minimal in control group (5.2+/-0.8 days) and maximal in imDC+FK506 group (28.4+/-3.0 days). The rats in mDC+FK506 group showed systemic inflammatory reaction due to GVHR, and died within 10 days after transplantation. The in vitro MLR reaction using imDCs was also strongly inhibited both in direct and indirect recognition pathways. The impact of imDCs for the specific induction of transplant tolerance may suggest that immunization with donor-specific imDCs has therapeutic potential in organ transplantation.

ROLE OF THE THYMUS IN TRANSPLANTATION TOLERANCE IN MINIATURE SWINE: IV. THE THYMUS IS REQUIRED DURING THE INDUCTION PHASE, BUT NOT THE MAINTENANCE PHASE, OF RENAL ALLOGRAFT TOLERANCE1

BACKGROUND

The authors' laboratory previously demonstrated that long-term tolerance to class I-disparate renal allografts in miniature swine can be induced by a short course of cyclosporine A (CsA), and that this stable tolerance is dependent on the presence of an intact thymus. In the present study, the authors have examined the requirement for a thymus during the pretransplant, induction, and maintenance phases of tolerance.

METHODS

Twenty-two miniature swine underwent class I major histocompatibility complex-mismatched renal transplantation, with a 12-day course of CsA. Thymectomies were performed on days -21, 0, +8, +21, and greater than or equal to +42, in relation to the day of transplantation. Historical controls consisted of euthymic and sham-thymectomized recipients.

RESULTS

Euthymic, sham-thymectomized, and day-greater than or equal to +42 thymectomized recipients demonstrated stable renal function and minimal anti-donor cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses. In contrast, day -21 and day 0 thymectomized recipients demonstrated allograft dysfunction, marked cellular infiltrates, with severe vasculitis and glomerular changes, and strong anti-donor CTL responses. Animals thymectomized on days +8 and +21 did not undergo severe rejection, but likewise did not demonstrate a stable clinical course.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that the requirement for thymic function in the induction of rapid and stable tolerance is greatest during the first 8 days and then diminishes over the next 2 weeks posttransplant. Failure of thymectomy to affect the course of tolerance after day +21 suggests that thymic function is not required for the maintenance of tolerance. Understanding the role of the thymus in establishing tolerance may permit the development of tolerance induction strategies, especially for pediatric transplant recipients.

Dendritic cells: regulators of alloimmunity and opportunities for tolerance induction

Dendritic cells (DCs) are uniquely well-equipped antigen-presenting cells (APCs) regarded classically as sentinels of the immune response, which induce and regulate T-cell reactivity. They play critical roles in central tolerance and in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance in the normal steady state. Following cell or organ transplantation, DCs present antigen to T cells via the direct or indirect pathways of allorecognition. These functions of DCs set in train the rejection response, but they also serve as potential targets for suppression of alloimmune reactivity and promotion of tolerance induction. Much evidence from various model systems now indicates that DCs can induce specific T-cell tolerance. Although underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated, the capacity to induce T-regulatory cells may be an important property of tolerogenic or regulatory DCs. Efforts to generate "designer" DCs with tolerogenic properties in the laboratory using specific cytokines, immunologic or pharmacologic reagents, or genetic engineering approaches have already met with some success. Alternatively, targeting of DCs in vivo (e.g. by infusion of apoptotic allogeneic cells) to take advantage of their inherent tolerogenicity has also demonstrated exciting potential. The remarkable heterogeneity and plasticity of these important APCs present additional challenges to optimizing DC-based therapies that may lead to improved tolerance-enhancing strategies in the clinic.

Marked inhibition of transplant vascular sclerosis by in vivo-mobilized donor dendritic cells and anti-CD154 mAb

BACKGROUND

Combination of donor dendritic cells (DC) and anti-CD40 Ligand (L) (CD154) monoclonal antibody (mAb) markedly prolongs heart or skin allograft survival, but the influence of this strategy in models of chronic rejection is unknown. Our aim was to ascertain the influence of in vivo-mobilized immature donor DC plus anti-CD40L mAb on vascular sclerosis in functional murine aortic allografts.

METHODS

C3H He/J (C3H;H2k) mice received 2 x 106 freshly isolated, immunobead-purified (>90%) fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand-mobilized C57BL/10 (B10;H2b) CD11c+ DC intravenously (IV), together with 500 microg of anti-CD40L mAb (MR1) intraperitoneally (IP) on days -7, 0, 4, and 10. Controls received either no donor cells, no mAb, or were untreated. B10 aortic grafts were transplanted in the abdominal aorta on day 0. At day 30, antidonor T-cell proliferative and cytotoxic responses and both complement fixing and immunoglobulin (Ig)G alloantibody levels were determined. Grafts were harvested on days 30 and 60 and examined by histology and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

DC infusion alone enhanced ex vivo antidonor proliferative and cytotoxic T-cell activity. By contrast, complement-fixing alloantibody levels were reduced. Anti-CD40L mAb alone strongly suppressed each of these responses. Graft inflammatory cell infiltration, intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation, fibrosis, and elastic lamina disruption observed in untreated animals were reduced in response to anti-CD40L mAb or donor DC alone. Antidonor immune reactivity, including IgG levels, and intimal proliferation were all markedly suppressed to an overall greater extent in mice given both treatments.

CONCLUSION

Whereas blockade of the CD40-CD40L pathway ameliorated transplant vasculopathy, preservation of near-normal vessel architecture was achieved by simultaneous administration of donor DC. This strategy represents a novel application of DC for suppression of chronic rejection.

CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells mediate acquired transplant tolerance

The Holy Grail of clinical organ transplantation is the safe induction of allograft tolerance. Transplant tolerance has been successfully induced in animal models. Since T cells play a pivotal role in graft rejection, modulating T cell function has been the primary focus of studies aimed at inducing transplant tolerance. Rodent models of transplant tolerance induction include central deletion and peripheral mechanisms involving activation-induced cell death (AICD), anergy, immune deviation, and production of regulatory T cells. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive. Although clonal deletion and anergy limit self-reactive T cells in the thymus, these mechanisms alone are not sufficient for controlling self-reactive T cells in the periphery. There is now evidence that the adult animal harbors two functionally distinct populations of CD4(+) T cells; one mediates autoimmune disease and the other dominantly inhibits it. The latter cells express CD4, CD25 and CTLA-4. These thymus-derived T cells have recently been shown to mediate the induction and maintenance of transplant tolerance. These CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells are similar in origin, phenotype, and function to those that maintain natural self-tolerance and T cell homeostasis in the periphery. Against this background, is it possible that alloantigen specific regulatory T cells might be generated and expanded ex vivo before organ transplantation and then infused to induce long-term tolerance, perhaps without the need for chronic immunosuppression?

Role of CD41CD251 regulatory T cells from naive host thymus in the induction of acquired transplant tolerance by immunization with allo-major histocompatibility complex peptide

BACKGROUND

Immunization with allo-major histocompatibility complex peptide induces operational tolerance, whereas thymectomy abrogates this effect. We hypothesized that recent thymic emigrants with regulatory function are important in the induction of acquired transplant tolerance in this system.

METHODS

In this study, we examined the possibility of restoring transplant tolerance to thymectomized (TMX) ACI recipients with concomitant adoptive transfer of syngeneic T cells indirectly primed with a single immunodominant Wistar Furth allo-major histocompatibility complex class I peptide (peptide 5, residues 93-109) and unmodified thymocytes or CD4+CD25+ thymic T cells.

RESULTS

Co-transfer of in vivo allopeptide-primed T cells and naive syngeneic thymic T cells on day -7 restored permanent acceptance of cardiac allografts to 70% of transiently antilymphocyte serum-immunosuppressed TMX recipients. Similarly, the adoptive transfer of allopeptide-primed T cells led to 100% donor-specific permanent graft acceptance among transiently antilymphocyte serum-immunosuppressed TMX recipients with renal subcapsular syngeneic thymic grafts. To demonstrate the role of regulatory T cells among new thymic emigrants in the induction of tolerance, we showed that the co-transfer of CD4+CD25+ but not CD4+CD25- thymic T cells with allopeptide-primed syngeneic T cells restored tolerance to TMX recipients. It seems that the induction of transplant tolerance in this system is dependent on the presence of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells among the recent thymic emigrants.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells specific for the induction of transplant tolerance are similar in origin, phenotype, and function to those involved in the maintenance of self-tolerance and the prevention of autoimmunity.

Induction of thymic tolerance as possibility in prevention of recurrent spontaneous abortion

A major process through which the immune system becomes tolerant to self-proteins involves the deletion of self-reactive cells in the thymus and/or inhibition of specific Th(1) cells clones. Deletion process includes two selection mechanisms in which the thymus eliminates unwanted thymocytes are known as positive selection and negative selection. The thymus is an antigenically privileged site, mainly for it is discrete by blood-thymus barrier. Many researches were shown that intrathymic inoculation of any antigen resulted in specific tolerance induction. The embryo/fetus and placenta are an allograft to which the mother must remain immunologically tolerant in order for the fetus to survive. Today, there is much interest focused on the immunology of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA). Up to 50% of RSA may be mediated by the immune system via inadequate maternal anti-paternal response. Nature of this maternal-fetal disturbance represents disbalance in Th(1)/Th(2) activity. Contra-shift in Th(1)/Th(2) activity is the basis for immunotherapy with paternal leukocyte immunization (PLI). PLI induce some kind of peripheral tolerance on embryonic/fetal/trophoblast antigens, but problems of central tolerance are still open. Intrathymic inoculation of fetal or paternal cells (like leukocyte, thymic dendritic cells, trophoblast cells) or paternal set of MHC molecules may cause central specific tolerance and may be a new possibility for immunotherapy in RSA patients.

Failure of blood-thymus barrier as a mechanism of tumor and trophoblast escape

A major process through which the immune system becomes tolerant to self-proteins involves the deletion of self-reactive clones in the thymus, but clonal deletion is not single mechanisms of thymic tolerance. There is now much evidence that intrathymic antigen expression results in anergy induction of T helper type-1 (Th1) clones in the periphery. Blood-thymus barrier is most important structure for prevention of unwanted penetration of antigens into the thymus. Impermeability of the barrier restrain induction of acquired thymic tolerance on unwanted antigens like microbes and tumor cells. Nevertheless, one of most important mechanism of tumor and trophoblast escape is in anergy of Th1 cells and in Th2 cells domination. Many mechanisms are included in disarrangement of Th1/Th2 balance in pregnancy and tumor bearers, but one of possibility is in failure of blood-thymus barrier. Possible consequences of blood-thymus barrier failure are trophoblast-specific or tumor-specific antigens penetrate into the thymus, deletion or anergy of antigen-specific clones and acquired thymic tolerance induction. Blood-thymus barrier is variable structure in anatomical and functional sense so that in certain condition foreign antigens probably can permeate across the barrier. Probability that some factors like hormones, cytokines, prostaglandine and neuromediators can affect blood-thymus barrier permeability and contribute in mechanisms of trophoblast and tumor escape is real but relatively unexplored.

Immature rat myeloid dendritic cells generated in low-dose granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor prolong donor-specific rat cardiac allograft survival

BACKGROUND

Because the differential polarization of T cells in response to antigen presentation is dependent on the maturational state of dendritic cells (DCs), we hypothesized that the adoptive transfer of immature myeloid DCs (iMDCs) would prolong graft survival.

METHODS

To evaluate this hypothesis, we studied the effects of transfer of iMDCs and mature myeloid DCs (mMDCs) on rat cardiac allograft survival.

RESULTS

Whereas iMDCs that do not express costimulatory molecules induce allogeneic T-cell hyporesponsiveness in coculture studies, mMDCs that express high levels of major histocompatibility complex class II costimulatory and maturation molecules induce a robust allostimulatory T-cell response. Adoptive transfer of Wistar Furth iMDCs, unlike mMDCs, 7 days before cardiac transplantation significantly prolonged graft survival. It was important that adoptive transfer of iMDCs combined with 0.5 mL antilymphocyte serum (ALS) transient immunosuppression on day -7 led to donor-specific permanent graft survival in 50% of recipients. In contrast, adoptive transfer of mMDCs combined with ALS led to graft survival similar to that in recipients treated with ALS alone. Stimulation of CD4 T cells isolated from the spleen of unresponsive allograft recipients with donor antigen resulted in donor-specific hyporesponsiveness and production of interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor-beta but not IL-4 and interferon-gamma. The tolerant T-cell unresponsiveness was reversed by the addition of IL-2.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirming the immunoregulatory effect of immature DCs indicate that induction of transplant tolerance by iMDCs is partly dependent on in vivo generation of regulatory T cells. This finding suggests that immunization with immature donor DCs has therapeutic potential for the induction of transplant tolerance and treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Delayed low-level calcineurin inhibition promotes allospecific tolerance induction by posttransplantation donor leukocyte infusion

BACKGROUND

Donor lymphocytes infused after organ transplantation can have strong immunoregulatory effects. Application of such protocols for transplant tolerance induction in a clinical setting will, however, require combination of specific immunomodulatory strategies with nonspecific immunosuppressive medication for safety reasons. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of immunosuppressive treatment on tolerance induction protocols by posttransplantation donor lymphocyte infusion.

METHODS

The interaction of postoperative donor leukocyte infusion with different types, dosage, and timing of immunosuppressive drugs were studied in a rat model of heart transplantation.

RESULTS

Tolerance could be achieved if donor cell infusion was combined with delayed, but not immediate, low-dose cyclosporine treatment, and this was associated with activation and apoptosis of host lymphocytes. In contrast, combinations with an antibody against the interleukin 2 receptor led to long-term graft survival but severe chronic rejection, and combinations with high-dose cyclosporine or sirolimus led to acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative donor leukocyte infusion is a potential way for tolerance induction, but the type, dose, and timing of medication are highly critical for its efficacy.