Effects of ABCB1 (multidrug resistance transporter) gene mutations on disposition and central nervous effects of loperamide in healthy volunteers

Vitamins E and A increase the passing of the P-gp substrate ivermectin into the brain in mice

This study aimed to determine the effect of administration of oral vitamins A and E at different doses on plasma and brain concentrations of ivermectin in mice. The study was carried out on 174 Swiss Albino male mice aged 8-10 weeks. After leaving six mice for method validation, the remaining mice were randomly divided into seven groups with equal numbers of animals. Mice received ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg, subcutaneous) alone and in combination with low (vitamin A: 4000 IU/kg; vitamin E: 35 mg/kg) and high (vitamin A: 30 000 IU/kg; vitamin E: 500 mg/kg) oral doses of vitamins A and E. The plasma and brain concentrations of ivermectin were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detector. We determined that high doses of vitamins A and E and their combinations increased the passing ratio of ivermectin into the brain significantly. The high-dose vitamin E and the combination of high-concentration vitamins E and A significantly increased the plasma concentration of ivermectin (P < 0.05). The high-dose vitamins E and A and their high-dose combination increased the brain concentration of ivermectin by 3, 2, and 2.7 times, respectively. This research is the first in vivo study to determine the interaction between P-gp substrates and vitamins E and A.

Genetic risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain in children: A narrative review

Genetic risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain in adults have been established, but little is known whether the same associations exist in children. It is even less clear how much influence single nucleotide polymorphisms can exert on the phenotypic expression of chronic postsurgical pain in children in general. To this effect, a search was made for original articles which met the following criteria: evaluation of postsurgical pain in children with known genetic mutations or, conversely, evaluation of atypical pain trajectories of postsurgical children assessing for possible genetic mutations that may explain the phenotype. All titles and abstracts retrieved were reviewed for suitability for inclusion. The references of the selected articles were also checked for additional relevant papers. To assess the transparency and quality of the genetic studies both STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies scores and Q-Genie scores were applied. Overall, there is a paucity of information regarding the link between genetic mutations and eventual chronic postsurgical pain development although there is some information on acute postoperative pain. Evidence has shown that the contribution of genetic risk factors to chronic postsurgical pain development appears to be minor, with its clinical relevance yet to be described. More advanced techniques in systems biology (proteomics, transcriptomics) suggest promising avenues for investigating the disease.

HALT-D: a randomized open-label phase II study of crofelemer for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and a taxane

PURPOSE

To assess whether crofelemer would prevent chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID) diarrhea in patients with HER2-positive, any-stage breast cancer receiving trastuzumab (H), pertuzumab (P), and a taxane (T; docetaxel or paclitaxel), with/without carboplatin (C; always combined with docetaxel rather than paclitaxel).

METHODS

Patients scheduled to receive ≥ 3 consecutive TCHP/THP cycles were randomized to crofelemer 125 mg orally twice daily during chemotherapy cycles 1 and 2 or no scheduled prophylactic medication (control). All received standard breakthrough antidiarrheal medication (BTAD) as needed. The primary endpoint was incidence of any-grade CID for ≥ 2 consecutive days. Secondary endpoints were incidence of all-grade and grade 3/4 CID by cycle/stratum; time to onset and duration of CID; stool consistency; use of BTAD; and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Patients With Diarrhea [FACIT-D] score).

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were randomized to crofelemer (n = 26) or control (n = 25). There was no statistically significant difference between arms for the primary endpoint; however, incidence of grade ≥ 2 CID was reduced with crofelemer vs control (19.2% vs 24.0% in cycle 1; 8.0% vs 39.1%, in cycle 2). Patients receiving crofelemer were 1.8 times more likely to see their diarrhea resolved and had less frequent watery diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

Despite the choice of primary endpoint being insensitive, crofelemer reduced the incidence and severity of CID in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving P-based therapy. These data are supportive of further testing of crofelemer in CID.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02910219, prospectively registered September 21, 2016.

ABCB1, ABCG2, ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCC3 drug transporter polymorphisms and their impact on drug bioavailability: what is our current understanding?

INTRODUCTION

Interindividual differences in drug response are a frequent clinical challenge partly due to variation in pharmacokinetics. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are crucial determinants of drug disposition. They are subject of gene regulation and drug-interaction; however, it is still under debate to which extend genetic variants in these transporters contribute to interindividual variability of a wide range of drugs.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the current literature on the impact of genetic variants in ABCB1, ABCG2 as well as ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCC3 on pharmacokinetics and drug response. The aim was to evaluate if results from recent studies would increase the evidence for potential clinically relevant pharmacogenetic effects.

EXPERT OPINION

Although enormous efforts have been made to investigate effects of ABC transporter genotypes on drug pharmacokinetics and response, the majority of studies showed only weak if any associations. Despite few unique results, studies mostly failed to confirm earlier findings or still remained inconsistent. The impact of genetic variants on drug bioavailability is only minor and other factors regulating the transporter expression and function seem to be more critical. In our opinion, the findings on the so far investigated genetic variants in ABC efflux transporters are not suitable as predictive biomarkers.

Binding Site Interactions of Modulators of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein, Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2, and P-Glycoprotein Activity

ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-transporters protect tissues by pumping their substrates out of the cells in many physiological barriers, such as the blood–brain barrier, intestine, liver, and kidney. These substrates include various endogenous metabolites, but, in addition, ABC transporters recognize a wide range of compounds, therefore affecting the disposition and elimination of clinically used drugs and their metabolites. Although numerous ABC-transporter inhibitors are known, the underlying mechanism of inhibition is not well characterized. The aim of this study is to deepen our understanding of transporter inhibition by studying the molecular basis of ligand recognition. In the current work, we compared the effect of 44 compounds on the active transport mediated by three ABC transporters: breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP and ABCG2), multidrug-resistance associated protein (MRP2 and ABCC2), and P-glycoprotein (P-gp and ABCB1). Eight compounds were strong inhibitors of all three transporters, while the activity of 36 compounds was transporter-specific. Of the tested compounds, 39, 25, and 11 were considered as strong inhibitors, while 1, 4, and 11 compounds were inactive against BCRP, MRP2, and P-gp, respectively. In addition, six transport-enhancing stimulators were observed for P-gp. In order to understand the observed selectivity, we compared the surface properties of binding cavities in the transporters and performed structure–activity analysis and computational docking of the compounds to known binding sites in the transmembrane domains and nucleotide-binding domains. Based on the results, the studied compounds are more likely to interact with the transmembrane domain than the nucleotide-binding domain. Additionally, the surface properties of the substrate binding site in the transmembrane domains of the three transporters were in line with the observed selectivity. Because of the high activity toward BCRP, we lacked the dynamic range needed to draw conclusions on favorable interactions; however, we identified amino acids in both P-gp and MRP2 that appear to be important for ligand recognition.

Transporter-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions and Their Significance

Drug transporters are considered to be determinants of drug disposition and effects/toxicities by affecting the absorption, distribution, and excretion of drugs. Drug transporters are generally divided into solute carrier (SLC) family and ATP binding cassette (ABC) family. Widely studied ABC family transporters include P-glycoprotein (P-GP), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs). SLC family transporters related to drug transport mainly include organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs), organic anion transporters (OATs), organic cation transporters (OCTs), organic cation/carnitine transporters (OCTNs), peptide transporters (PEPTs), and multidrug/toxin extrusions (MATEs). These transporters are often expressed in tissues related to drug disposition, such as the small intestine, liver, and kidney, implicating intestinal absorption of drugs, uptake of drugs into hepatocytes, and renal/bile excretion of drugs. Most of therapeutic drugs are their substrates or inhibitors. When they are comedicated, serious drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may occur due to alterations in intestinal absorption, hepatic uptake, or renal/bile secretion of drugs, leading to enhancement of their activities or toxicities or therapeutic failure. This chapter will illustrate transporter-mediated DDIs (including food drug interaction) in human and their clinical significances.

Effects of aripiprazole on pupillometric parameters related to pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics after single oral administration to healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Pupillometry is used for the detection of autonomic dysfunction related to numerous diseases and drug administration. Genetic variants in cytochrome P450 ( CYP2D6, CYP3A4), dopamine receptor ( DRD2, DRD3), serotonin receptor ( HTR2A, HTR2C) and ATP-binding cassette subfamily B ( ABCB1) genes were previously associated with aripiprazole response.

AIMS

Our aim was to evaluate if aripiprazole affects pupil contraction and its relationship with pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics.

METHODS

Thirty-two healthy volunteers receiving a 10 mg single oral dose of aripiprazole were genotyped for 15 polymorphisms in ABCB1, CYP2D6, DRD2, DRD3, HTR2A and HTR2C genes by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole plasma concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Pupil examination was performed by automated pupillometry.

RESULTS

Aripiprazole caused pupil constriction and reached the peak value at C_max. HTR2A rs6313 T allele carriers and HTR2C rs3813929 C/T subjects showed higher maximum constriction velocity and maximum pupil diameter. Besides, Gly/Gly homozygotes for DRD3 rs6280 showed significantly lower maximum constriction velocity values. A/G heterozygotes for DRD2 rs6277 showed higher total time taken by the pupil to recover 75% of the initial resting size values. CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers showed higher area under the curve, C_max and T_1/2 than extensive metabolisers. ABCB1 G2677T/A A/A homozygotes had greater T_1/2 in comparison with C/C homozygotes. ABCB1 C3435T T allele carriers and C1236T C/T subjects showed greater area under the curve than C/C homozygotes.

CONCLUSIONS

Aripiprazole affects pupil contraction, which could be a secondary effect through dopamine and serotonin receptors. Pupillometry could be a useful tool to assess autonomic nervous system activity during antipsychotic treatment.

Clinical Review: Loperamide Toxicity

Loperamide is a nonprescription opioid widely used for the treatment of diarrhea. Although it is relatively safe at therapeutic doses, increasing reports describe its misuse and abuse at very high doses either for euphoric effects or to attenuate symptoms of opioid withdrawal. Life-threatening loperamide toxicity can result from the relatively new clinical syndrome of loperamide-induced cardiac toxicity. These patients are often young and may present in cardiac arrest or with unheralded, recurrent syncope in conjunction with ECG abnormalities, including marked QT-interval prolongation, QRS-interval widening, and ventricular dysrhythmias. Features of conventional opioid toxicity may also be present. The mainstays of treatment include advanced cardiac life support and supportive care, although selected patients may be candidates for overdrive pacing, intravenous lipid emulsion, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In patients who survive loperamide toxicity, consideration should be given to the treatment of an underlying opioid use disorder, if present.

Association of Single-Nucleotide Polymorhism C3435T in the ABCB1 Gene with Opioid Sensitivity in Treatment of Postoperative Pain

BACKGROUND

The minimal effective analgesic concentration of opioids required for satisfactory analgesia may differ significantly among the patients. Genetic factors may contribute to the variable response to opioids by affecting their pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.

METHODS

Ninety nine patients undergoing abdominal surgery with colorectal anastomosis because of colorectal carcinoma were enrolled in the present study. C34535T was genotyped in all subjects and the patients were divided into three groups according to their genotype: CC-wild type homozygous, CT-mutant heterozygous and TT-mutant homozygous. Intravenous fentanyl, patient controlled analgesia was provided postoperatively for pain control in the first 24 hour after surgery. Opioid consumption, pain scores and the adverse side effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

Our main result is that the patients in the CC genotype group consumed significantly more fentanyl (375.0 μg ± 43.1) than the patients in the TT group (295.0 μg ± 49.1) and the CT (356.4 μg ± 41.8) group in the treatment of postoperative pain. The patients in the TT group had lower VAS scores at 6h, 12h, 18 h and 24h postoperatively. There were no significant differences in the side effects among the three groups regarding the vomiting and the sedation score. The patients in the TT group had more frequently nausea score 1, than the patients in the other two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that the C3435T SNPs of the ABCB1 gene is associated with differences in the opioid sensitivity. The ABCB1 polymorphism may serve as an important genetic predictor to guide the acute pain therapy in postoperative patients.

[Drug interactions in pain therapy]

BACKGROUND

Pain is one of the most common reasons for consulting a physician. Chronic pain patients often suffer from a variety of comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety and they are therefore often simultaneously treated with more than one drug. The probability of drug interactions increases with every additional drug.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic internet and literature search up to February 2015 was carried out. Systematic lists were included. In addition, the drug prescription information sheets were used and an internet search via Pubmed and google.com was carried out for drugs alone and in combination in order to find substance-specific interactions.

RESULTS

A differentiation is made between pharmaceutical, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Pharmaceutical interactions are caused by chemical, physical or physicochemical incompatibility of drugs or adjuvants used. These can even occur outside the body and during concomitant administration via the same route. A pharmacodynamic interaction in pain management is for example the additive sedative effect of opioids and benzodiazepines when taken together. Pharmacokinetic interactions occur during the absorption, distribution, metabolism and in the elimination phases.

CONCLUSION

Many drug interactions can be avoided by careful and continuous evaluation of pharmacotherapy and if necessary its adaptation; however, a sound knowledge of the underlying pharmacological mechanisms and the properties of currently used analgesics is necessary.

Effects of HM30181, a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of loperamide in healthy volunteers

AIMS

HM30181 is a third generation P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor currently under development. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of a single dose of HM30181 on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of loperamide, a P-gp substrate, and to compare them with those of quinidine.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy male subjects were administered loperamide alone (period 1) or with loperamide plus quinidine or HM30181 in period 2 or 3, respectively. In period 3, subjects randomly received one of three HM30181 doses: 15, 60 or 180 mg. Changes in pupil size, alertness, oxygen saturation and the oral bioavailability of loperamide were assessed in each period. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of HM30181 were determined.

RESULTS

Pupil size, alertness and oxygen saturation did not change over time when loperamide alone or loperamide plus HM30181 was administered while HM30181 significantly increased the systemic exposure to loperamide, i.e. the geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of AUC(0,tlast ) for loperamide with and without HM30181 was 1.48 (1.08, 2.02). Co-administered quinidine significantly increased the systemic exposure to loperamide 2.2-fold (1.53, 3.18), which also markedly reduced pupil size, resulting in a decrease of 24.7 mm h in the area under the effect curve of pupil size change from baseline compared with loperamide alone.

CONCLUSIONS

HM30181 inhibits P-gp mainly in the intestinal endothelium, which can be beneficial because pan-inhibition of P-gp, particularly in the brain, could lead to detrimental adverse events. Further studies are warranted to investigate adequately the dose-exposure relationship of HM30181, along with its duration of effect.

ABCC3 and OCT1 genotypes influence pharmacokinetics of morphine in children

AIM

Large interindividual variability in morphine pharmacokinetics could contribute to variability in morphine analgesia and adverse events.

METHODS

Influence of weight, genetic polymorphisms, race and sex on morphine clearance and metabolite formation from 220 children undergoing outpatient adenotonsillectomy was studied. A nonlinear mixed effects model was developed in NONMEM to describe morphine and morphine glucuronide pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Children with ABCC3 -211C>T polymorphism C/C genotype had significantly higher levels of morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine-3-glucuronide formation (∼40%) than C/T+T/T genotypes (p < 0.05). In this extended cohort similar to our earlier report, OCT1 homozygous genotypes (n = 13, OCT1*2-*5/*2-*5) had lower morphine clearance (14%; p = 0.06), and in addition complementing lower metabolite formation (∼39%) was observed. ABCB1 3435C>T TT genotype children had lower levels of morphine-3-glucuronide formation though no effect was observed on morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that besides bodyweight, OCT1 and ABCC3 genotypes play a significant role in the pharmacokinetics of intravenous morphine and its metabolites in children.

Assessment of a candidate marker constituent predictive of a dietary substance-drug interaction: case study with grapefruit juice and CYP3A4 drug substrates

Dietary substances, including herbal products and citrus juices, can perpetrate interactions with conventional medications. Regulatory guidances for dietary substance-drug interaction assessment are lacking. This deficiency is due in part to challenges unique to dietary substances, a lack of requisite human-derived data, and limited jurisdiction. An in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) approach to help address some of these hurdles was evaluated using the exemplar dietary substance grapefruit juice (GFJ), the candidate marker constituent 6',7'-dihydroxybergamottin (DHB), and the purported victim drug loperamide. First, the GFJ-loperamide interaction was assessed in 16 healthy volunteers. Loperamide (16 mg) was administered with 240 ml of water or GFJ; plasma was collected from 0 to 72 hours. Relative to water, GFJ increased the geometric mean loperamide area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) significantly (1.7-fold). Second, the mechanism-based inhibition kinetics for DHB were recovered using human intestinal microsomes and the index CYP3A4 reaction, loperamide N-desmethylation (KI [concentration needed to achieve one-half kinact], 5.0 ± 0.9 µM; kinact [maximum inactivation rate constant], 0.38 ± 0.02 minute(-1)). These parameters were incorporated into a mechanistic static model, which predicted a 1.6-fold increase in loperamide AUC. Third, the successful IVIVE prompted further application to 15 previously reported GFJ-drug interaction studies selected according to predefined criteria. Twelve of the interactions were predicted to within the 25% predefined criterion. Results suggest that DHB could be used to predict the CYP3A4-mediated effect of GFJ. This time- and cost-effective IVIVE approach could be applied to other dietary substance-drug interactions to help prioritize new and existing drugs for more advanced (dynamic) modeling and simulation and clinical assessment.

Polymorphisms of the drug transporters ABCB1, ABCG2, ABCC2 and ABCC3 and their impact on drug bioavailability and clinical relevance

INTRODUCTION

Human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters act as translocators of numerous substrates across extracellular and intracellular membranes, thereby contributing to bioavailability and consequently therapy response. Genetic polymorphisms are considered as critical determinants of expression level or activity and subsequently response to selected drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Here the influence of polymorphisms of the prominent ABC transporters P-glycoprotein (MDR1, ABCB1), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP, ABCG2) and the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 2 (ABCC2) as well as MRP3 (ABCC3) on the pharmacokinetic of drugs and associated consequences on therapy response and clinical outcome is discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

ABC transporter genetic variants were assumed to affect interindividual differences in pharmacokinetics and subsequently clinical response. However, decades of medical research have not yielded in distinct and unconfined reproducible outcomes. Despite some unique results, the majority were inconsistent and dependent on the analyzed cohort or study design. Therefore, variability of bioavailability and drug response may be attributed only by a small amount to polymorphisms in transporter genes, whereas transcriptional regulation or post-transcriptional modification seems to be more critical. In our opinion, currently identified genetic variants of ABC efflux transporters can give some hints on the role of transporters at interfaces but are less suitable as biomarkers to predict therapeutic outcome.

Restricting CNS penetration of drugs to minimise adverse events: role of drug transporters

Some drug discovery approaches can benefit from restricting the access of compounds to the central nervous system (CNS) to minimise the risk of side-effects. Designing compounds that act as substrates for efflux transporters in the blood–brain barrier can achieve CNS restriction without significantly impairing absorption in the intestine. In vitro assays can be deployed to optimise a balance between passive permeability and active efflux via the ABC family transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP, ABCG2) whilst in vivo estimates of distribution of unbound concentrations of drug are needed to understand pharmacologically relevant exposure in peripheral and central compartments. This strategy can deliver significant CNS restriction whilst retaining good oral bioavailability, cell penetration and pharmacological activity. The possible risks of targeting P-gp and BCRP in orally delivered drugs are discussed.

P-glycoprotein is a major determinant of norbuprenorphine brain exposure and antinociception

Norbuprenorphine is a major metabolite of buprenorphine and potent agonist of μ, δ, and κ opioid receptors. Compared with buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine causes minimal antinociception but greater respiratory depression. It is unknown whether the limited antinociception is caused by low efficacy or limited brain exposure. Norbuprenorphine is an in vitro substrate of the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (Mdr1), but the role of P-glycoprotein in norbuprenorphine transport in vivo is unknown. This investigation tested the hypothesis that limited norbuprenorphine antinociception results from P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux and limited brain access. Human P-glycoprotein-mediated transport in vitro of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, and their respective glucuronide conjugates was assessed by using transfected cells. P-glycoprotein-mediated norbuprenorphine transport and consequences in vivo were assessed by using mdr1a(+/+) and mdr1a(-/-) mice. Antinociception was determined by hot-water tail-flick assay, and respiratory effects were determined by unrestrained whole-body plethysmography. Brain and plasma norbuprenorphine and norbuprenorphine-3-glucuronide were quantified by mass spectrometry. In vitro, the net P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux ratio for norbuprenorphine was nine, indicating significant efflux. In contrast, the efflux ratio for buprenorphine and the two glucuronide conjugates was unity, indicating absent transport. The norbuprenorphine brain/plasma concentration ratio was significantly greater in mdr1a(-/-) than mdr1a(+/+) mice. The magnitude and duration of norbuprenorphine antinociception were significantly increased in mdr1a(-/-) compared with mdr1a(+/+) mice, whereas the reduction in respiratory rate was similar. Results show that norbuprenorphine is an in vitro and in vivo substrate of P-glycoprotein. P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux influences brain access and antinociceptive, but not the respiratory, effects of norbuprenorphine.

Loperamide, an FDA-approved antidiarrhea drug, effectively reverses the resistance of multidrug resistant MCF-7/MDR1 human breast cancer cells to doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity

Loperamide is an FDA-approved antidiarrhea drug which acts on the μ-opioid receptors in the mesenteric plexus of large intestine and exhibits limited side effects. We hypothesized that loperamide might reverse the multidrug resistance (MDR) of human cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. MCF-7/MDR1 cells express high level of MDR1 and are resistant to doxorubicin. We found that loperamide significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin to MCF-7/MDR1 cells in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, loperamide reversed the resistance of MCF-7/MDR1 cells to doxorubicin, suggesting that chemotherapy in combination with loperamide may benefit patients with MDR tumors once applied in clinic.

Loperamide and P-glycoprotein inhibition: assessment of the clinical relevance

OBJECTIVES

Loperamide is a peripherally acting mu opioid receptor agonist and an avid substrate for P-glycoprotein. This may give rise to drug-drug interactions and increased risk for central adverse effects. The objective of this study was to re-evaluate the predictability of non-clinical data using loperamide as a probe P-glycoprotein substrate. We searched the literature for papers containing data on drug-drug interactions of loperamide-containing products in humans. We also reviewed the internal worldwide safety database of Johnson & Johnson for spontaneous case reports suggestive of a central opioid effect after coadministration of loperamide with a P-glycoprotein inhibitor or substrate.

KEY FINDINGS

Only one of the ten studies in our review supported the finding that inhibition of P-glycoprotein is associated with clinically relevant signs or symptoms of central nervous system (CNS) depression/opioid toxicity of loperamide. None of the 25 spontaneous case reports of interest were suggestive of signs or symptoms of CNS depression/opioid toxicity due to coadministration of loperamide and a P-glycoprotein inhibitor or substrate.

SUMMARY

Based on a review of the literature and a cumulative review of the spontaneous case reports, there is insufficient evidence that an interaction between loperamide and a P-glycoprotein inhibitor or substrate is associated with clinical symptoms of CNS depression/opioid toxicity when loperamide is taken at the recommended dose.

P-glycoprotein: tissue distribution, substrates, and functional consequences of genetic variations

P-glycoprotein (ABCB1, MDR1) belongs to the ABC transporter family transporting a wide range of drugs and xenobiotics from intra- to extracellular at many biological interfaces such as the intestine, liver, blood-brain barrier, and kidney. The ABCB1 gene is highly polymorphic. Starting with the observation of lower duodenal protein expression and elevated digoxin bioavailability in relation to the 3435C>T single nucleotide polymorphism, hundreds of pharmacokinetic and outcome studies have been performed, mostly genotyping 1236C>T, 2677G>T/A, and 3435C>T. Though some studies pointed out that intracellular concentrations of anticancer drugs, for example, within lymphocytes, might be affected by ABCB1 variants resulting in differential outcome, current knowledge of the functional significance genetic variants of ABC membrane transporters does not allow selection of a particular SNP to predict an individual's pharmacokinetics.

Importance of P-glycoprotein for drug-drug interactions

P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) is one of the most extensively studied transporters regarding drug resistance and drug-drug interactions. P-glycoprotein is expressed in multiple key organs in drug disposition such as small intestine, blood-brain barrier, kidney, and liver. Therefore, P-glycoprotein mediated drug-drug interactions can occur at various organs and tissues. This chapter will mainly focus on drug-drug interactions that are mediated by the intestinal P-glycoprotein.During the last decade, many in vitro and in vivo studies reported that the induction or inhibition of P-glycoprotein can lead to drug-drug interactions. For instance, induction of the intestinal P-glycoprotein activity can cause reduced bioavailability of orally administered drugs and decreased therapeutic efficacy. On the other hand, the inhibition of the intestinal P-glycoprotein activity can lead to increased bioavailability, thus leading to an increased risk of adverse side effects.

P-glycoprotein related drug interactions: clinical importance and a consideration of disease states

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is the most characterized drug transporter in terms of its clinical relevance for pharmacokinetic disposition and interaction with other medicines. Clinically significant P-gp related drug interactions appear restricted to digoxin. P-gp may act as a major barrier to current and effective drug treatment in a number of diseases including cancer, AIDS, Alzheimer's and epilepsy due to its expression in tumors, lymphocytes, cell membranes of brain capillaries and the choroid plexus.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review summarizes the current understanding of P-gp structure/function, clinical importance of P-gp related drug interactions and the modulatory role this transporter may contribute towards drug efficacy in disease states such as cancer, AIDS, Alzheimer's and epilepsy.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain an understanding that the clinical relevance of P-gp in drug interactions is limited. In certain disease states, P-gp in barrier tissues can modulate changes in regional distribution.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

P-gp inhibition in isolation will not result in clinically important alterations in systemic exposure; however, P-gp transport may be of significance in barrier tissues (tumors, lymphocytes, brain) resulting in attenuated efficacy.

Evaluation of in vivo P-glycoprotein phenotyping probes: a need for validation

Drug transporters are involved in clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an efflux transporter that displays genetic polymorphism. Phenotyping permits evaluation of real-time, in vivo P-gp activity and P-gp-mediated drug-drug interactions. Digoxin, fexofenadine, talinolol and quinidine are commonly used probe drugs for P-gp phenotyping. Although current regulatory guidance documents highlight methodologies for evaluating transporter-based drug-drug interactions, whether current probe drugs are suitable for phenotyping has not been established, and validation criteria are lacking. This review proposes validation criteria and evaluates P-gp probes to determine probe suitability. Based on these criteria, digoxin, fexofenadine, talinolol and quinidine have limitations to their use and are not recommended for P-gp phenotyping.

[Role of genetics in anaesthesia-related variability]

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses variability among patients in anesthesia, due to genetic polymorphisms.

DATA SOURCES

Articles in French and English languages were retrieved from PubMed database. The initial request was "anesth* and (genotyp* or polymorphism* or genetic*)".

STUDY SELECTION

Original articles, general reviews and one case report. Letters were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Rare genetic diseases were excluded from the scope of this review. We stressed on frequent genetic polymorphisms that may have a daily impact in anesthesiology.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Most results were related to pain studies. We selected various examples to describe how genetic polymorphisms impacts the pharmacology of a given drug, and what are the clinical consequences.

CONCLUSION

There is a growing field of pharmacogenetic related evidences in anesthesiology. The results from various animal and human studies underline the genetic origin of variability among individuals. How anaesthesists have to integrate these parameters for their daily practice is still unclear, but pharmacogenetic will obviously be a leading field of anesthesia research in the future.

Evaluation of the P-glycoprotein (Abcb1) affinity status of a series of morphine analogs: comparative study with meperidine analogs to identify opioids with minimal P-glycoprotein interactions

One of the major shortcomings of many commonly used opioids is the fact that they are P-gp substrates, which represents a major obstacle towards effective pain management. P-gp can affect opioids' oral absorption, CNS accumulation, systemic clearance, antinociceptive activity, and tolerance development to their analgesic effects. Moreover, P-gp can be the locus of drug-drug interactions between opioids and other concomitantly administered drugs that are P-gp substrates/inhibitors. The objective of this study was to identify opioids that are non-P-gp substrates to overcome some of the mentioned shortcomings. We evaluated the P-gp affinity status (substrate, non-substrate, or inhibitor) of a series of morphine analogs (10 opioid agonist and 2 opioid antagonists) and compared them to previously reported meperidine analogs. The fold stimulation of the morphine analogs ranged from 1.01 to 1.54 while for the meperidine analogs the fold stimulation ranged from 1.10 to 3.66. From each series (morphine and meperidine analogs) we selected potential candidate opioids that are non-P-gp substrates and conducted in vivo assessments of their antinociceptive effects using P-gp knockout and P-gp competent mice. 6-Desoxymorphine, meperidine and N-phenylbutyl normeperidine did not significantly (p>0.05) stimulate the basal P-gp ATPase activity, where, the fold stimulations of the basal P-gp ATPase activity were 1.01+/-0.11, 1.51+/-0.29 and 1.10+/-0.23, respectively. Evaluation of the influence of P-gp ablation on their antinociceptive effects indicated that P-gp did not significantly (p>0.05) affect their antinociceptive effects. Among the evaluated opioids in vivo, 6-desoxymorphine showed high potency and induced no apparent toxicity upon low- and high-dose administration. 6-Desoxymorphine is therefore an ideal lead compound to create a library of opioids that have negligible P-gp affinity for better management of pain.

Drug interactions at the blood-brain barrier: fact or fantasy?

There is considerable interest in the therapeutic and adverse outcomes of drug interactions at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB). These include altered efficacy of drugs used in the treatment of CNS disorders, such as AIDS dementia and malignant tumors, and enhanced neurotoxicity of drugs that normally penetrate poorly into the brain. BBB- and BCSFB-mediated interactions are possible because these interfaces are not only passive anatomical barriers, but are also dynamic in that they express a variety of influx and efflux transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes. Based on studies in rodents, it has been widely postulated that efflux transporters play an important role at the human BBB in terms of drug delivery. Furthermore, it is assumed that chemical inhibition of transporters or their genetic ablation in rodents is predictive of the magnitude of interaction to be expected at the human BBB. However, studies in humans challenge this well-established paradigm and claim that such drug interactions will be lesser in magnitude but yet may be clinically significant. This review focuses on current known mechanisms of drug interactions at the blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers and the potential impact of such interactions in humans. We also explore whether such drug interactions can be predicted from preclinical studies. Defining the mechanisms and the impact of drug-drug interactions at the BBB is important for improving efficacy of drugs used in the treatment of CNS disorders while minimizing their toxicity as well as minimizing neurotoxicity of non-CNS drugs.

Influence of adenosine triphosphate and ABCB1 (MDR1) genotype on the P-glycoprotein-dependent transfer of saquinavir in the dually perfused human placenta

BACKGROUND

The ATP-dependent drug-efflux pump, P-glycoprotein (P-gp) encoded by ABCB1 (MDR1), plays a crucial role in several tissues forming blood-tissue barriers. Absence of a normally functioning P-gp can lead to a highly increased tissue penetration of a number of clinically important drugs.

METHODS

We have studied the dose-response effect of exogenous ATP on the placental transfer of the well-established P-gp substrate saquinavir in 17 dually perfused human term placentas. We have also studied the influence of the ABCB1 polymorphisms 2677G>T/A and 3435C>T on placental P-gp expression (n = 44) and the transfer (n = 16) of saquinavir.

RESULTS

The present results indicate that the addition of exogenous ATP to the perfusion medium does not affect the function of P-gp as measured by saquinavir transfer across the human placenta. The variant allele 3435T was associated with significantly higher placental P-gp expression than the wild-type alleles. However, neither polymorphism affected placental transfer of saquinavir nor there was any correlation between P-gp expression and saquinavir transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that addition of exogenous ATP is not required for ATP-dependent transporter function in a dually perfused human placenta. Although the ABCB1 polymorphism 3435C>T altered the expression levels of P-gp in the human placenta, this did not have any consequences on P-gp-mediated placental transfer of saquinavir.

Pharmacogenetics of analgesics: toward the individualization of prescription

The use of analgesics is based on the empiric administration of a given drug with clinical monitoring for efficacy and toxicity. However, individual responses to drugs are influenced by a combination of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors that can sometimes be regulated by genetic factors. Whereas polymorphic drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters may affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs, polymorphic drug targets and disease-related pathways may influence the pharmacodynamic action of drugs. After a usual dose, variations in drug toxicity and inefficacy can be observed depending on the polymorphism, the analgesic considered and the presence or absence of active metabolites. For opioids, the most studied being morphine, mutations in the ABCB1 gene, coding for P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and in the µ-opioid receptor reduce morphine potency. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 mutations influence the analgesic effect of codeine and tramadol, and polymorphism of CYP2C9 is potentially linked to an increase in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced adverse events. Furthermore, drug interactions can mimic genetic deficiency and contribute to the variability in response to analgesics. This review summarizes the available data on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of known polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, drug targets and other nonopioid biological systems on central and peripheral analgesics.

The consequence of concomitantly present functional genetic variants for the identification of functional genotype-phenotype associations in pain

Genetics-based personalized approaches to pain management have received a setback because of the nonreproducibility of functional genetic associations such as the pain-modulatory effect of the catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) gene 472G>A single-nucleotide polymorphism. Given that many of the pain-relevant genetic variants are common (allelic frequencies of 10-50%), we hypothesized that a major reason for difficulties in reproducing demonstrations of genetic influences on pain is the concomitant presence in a single individual of several functional genetic polymorphisms that act as confounders.

Genetic mutations that prevent pain: implications for future pain medication

Part of the interindividual variability in pain therapy has been associated with genetic polymorphisms. Several genetic variants prevent or at least decrease pain in their carriers as compared with carriers of the respective wild-type or common alleles by impeding the generation, transmission and processing of nociceptive information or by increasing the local availability of active analgesics or their pharmacodynamic effects. Complete prevention of pain has so far been seen in six distinct rare hereditary syndromes, namely the ‘channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain’, caused by 13 currently identified variants in the SCN9A gene coding for the α-subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel, and five maladies belonging to the hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy (HSAN) I–V syndromes, caused by various mutations in several genes. Reduced pain in the average population has been associated with frequent variants in the µ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1), catechol-O-methyltransferase gene (COMT), guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase 1/dopa-responsive dystonia gene (GCH1), transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 1 gene (TRPV1) or the melanocortin-1 receptor gene (MC1R). Duplications/amplifications of the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) gene leading to increased enzyme function may cause intense opioid effects of codeine up to toxicity. The COMT V158M variant has been associated with decreased morphine requirements for analgesia. Inactivating MC1R variants have been associated with increased opioid analgesia of the µ-opioid receptor agonist morphine-6-glucuronide and, in women only, of κ-opioid agonists. Finally, variants in the P-glycoprotein gene (ABCB1) conferring decreased transporter function have been associated with increased respiratory depressive effects of fentanyl. In summary, a finite number of genetic variants that prevent pain by decreasing nociception or increasing analgesia have been identified. Given the complex biological and psychological nature of pain, we will see in the near future how much of the interindividual variance in pain and analgesia is due to identifiable genetic causes, and to what extent genetics enters clinical pain therapy.

Association of ABCB1/MDR1 and OPRM1 Gene Polymorphisms With Morphine Pain Relief

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine are under the control of several polymorphic genes, which can account for part of the observed interindividual variation in pain relief. We focused on two such genes: ABCB1/MDR1, a major determinant of morphine bioavailability, and OPRM1, which encodes for the mu-opioid receptor, the primary site of action for morphine. One hundred and forty-five patients of Italian origin undergoing morphine therapy were genotyped for the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) C3435T of ABCB1/MDR1 and for the A80G SNP of OPRM1. Pain relief variability was significantly (P<0.0001) associated with both polymorphisms. Combining the extreme genotypes of both genes, the association between patient polymorphism and pain relief improved (P<0.00001), allowing the detection of three groups: strong responders, responders, and non-responders, with sensitivity close to 100% and specificity more than 70%. This study provides a good example of the possible clinical use of pharmacogenetics.

Relative contribution of peripheral versus central opioid receptors to antinociception

Opioid effects are mediated by central and peripheral opioid receptors. Here we examine the relative contribution of each receptor population to antinociception elicited by systemically administered centrally penetrating opioids, and by loperamide (a peripherally restricted opioid). Nociception (abdominal writhes) was induced by intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected 0.6% acetic acid in mice. We analyzed opioid receptor expression in peritoneum by immunohistochemistry, antinociception after i.p. injected agonists at mu (morphine, loperamide)-, delta (SNC80)- and kappa (U50488)-receptors, and its reversibility by subcutaneously (s.c.) administered centrally penetrating antagonists beta-funaltrexamine (mu), naltrindole (delta) and nor-binaltorphimine (kappa), and by the peripherally restricted antagonist naloxone methiodide (NLXM). NLXM was also injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) before i.p. loperamide. Mu-, kappa- and, to a lesser degree, delta-receptors were expressed on peripheral nerve terminals in the peritoneum. The anatomical distribution of the opioid receptor staining was very similar to the staining for calcitonin gene-related peptide, a marker of sensory neurons. Morphine, U50488 and, to a lesser degree, SNC80 blocked acetic and acid induced writhes. These effects were reversed by beta-funaltrexamine, nor-binaltorphimine and naltrindole, respectively. NLXM (s.c.) reversed antinociceptive effects of morphine, SNC80 and U50488 by 57%, 80% and 47%, respectively. Loperamide (0.05 mg/kg)-induced antinociception was reversed by s.c. beta-funaltrexamine and NLXM. Loperamide (0.1 mg/kg)-induced antinociception was completely blocked by s.c. beta-funaltrexamine but was only attenuated (by 50%) by s.c. or i.c.v. NLXM. In conclusion, systemically administered centrally penetrating mu-, delta- and kappa-agonists produced a substantial part of antinociception through peripheral opioid receptors. Higher dose loperamide-induced antinociception involved also central opioid receptors.