Assessment of the multiple discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol using an ethanol-pentobarbital-water discrimination in rats

Experimental Models on Effects of Psychostimulants

Psychostimulants are a diverse group of substances that cause an increase in psychomotor activity at least in part through their actions on catecholaminergic systems including the dopaminergic mesolimbic pathways. Animal models used to study addiction are based on the psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. The basics of this theory are that the reinforcing effects and the addition liabilities of the drugs can be predicted from their ability to induce psychomotor activation. This approach focuses on the ability of the drugs to directly control the animal's behavior and to induce psychomotor stimulation, and is consistent with the behavioral definition of addiction and behavioral sensitization. Animal experiments have the advantage over clinical studies of lower variation and fewer confounding effects.

Selective increases of AMPA, NMDA, and kainate receptor subunit mRNAs in the hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex but not in prefrontal cortex of human alcoholics

Glutamate is the main excitatory transmitter in the human brain. Drugs that affect the glutamatergic signaling will alter neuronal excitability. Ethanol inhibits glutamate receptors. We examined the expression level of glutamate receptor subunit mRNAs in human post-mortem samples from alcoholics and compared the results to brain samples from control subjects. RNA from hippocampal dentate gyrus (HP-DG), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DL-PFC) samples from 21 controls and 19 individuals with chronic alcohol dependence were included in the study. Total RNA was assayed using quantitative RT-PCR. Out of the 16 glutamate receptor subunits, mRNAs encoding two AMPA [2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid] receptor subunits GluA2 and GluA3; three kainate receptor subunits GluK2, GluK3 and GluK5 and five NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor subunits GluN1, GluN2A, GluN2C, GluN2D, and GluN3A were significantly increased in the HP-DG region in alcoholics. In the OFC, mRNA encoding the NMDA receptor subunit GluN3A was increased, whereas in the DL-PFC, no differences in mRNA levels were observed. Our laboratory has previously shown that the expression of genes encoding inhibitory GABA-A receptors is altered in the HP-DG and OFC of alcoholics (Jin et al., 2011). Whether the changes in one neurotransmitter system drives changes in the other or if they change independently is currently not known. The results demonstrate that excessive long-term alcohol consumption is associated with altered expression of genes encoding glutamate receptors in a brain region-specific manner. It is an intriguing possibility that genetic predisposition to alcoholism may contribute to these gene expression changes.

Opioid receptors and the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in squirrel monkeys: Mu and delta opioid receptor mechanisms

Mu and delta opioid receptors modulate the reinforcing effects of ethanol, however, their role in the subjective effects of ethanol is not well understood. This study evaluated the contribution of mu and delta opioid receptors to the subjective effects of ethanol using drug discrimination procedures. Monkeys were trained to discriminate ethanol from saline under a schedule of food delivery. In tests, ethanol engendered increases in drug-lever responding, reaching a maximum of >80%. The mu opioid receptor agonists fentanyl and buprenorphine and the delta opioid receptor agonists SNC 80 and SNC 162 did not substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. As pretreatments, the full agonists fentanyl and SNC 80 enhanced the effects of low doses of ethanol and fentanyl attenuated the effects of the ethanol training dose. Although the possibility of pharmacological antagonism of the effects of ethanol cannot be ruled out, a more likely alternative is that the diminished effects of ethanol were due to perceptual masking of the ethanol stimulus. In contrast, the partial agonists buprenorphine and SNC 162 did not alter ethanol's effects. Finally, the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol were attenuated following administration of presumably mu-selective doses of the antagonist naltrexone, but not after administration of the delta opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole. The ability of naltrexone to block the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol likely reflects its capacity to attenuate ethanol-induced increases in endogenous opioids, in particular beta-endorphin, because attenuation of the ethanol stimulus was not accompanied by significant suppression of response rate.

Effects of drugs and drug combinations in pigeons trained to discriminate among pentobarbital, dizocilpine, a combination of these drugs, and saline

Drugs with multiple actions can have complex discriminative-stimulus properties. An approach to studying such drugs is to train subjects to discriminate among drug combinations and individual drugs in the combination so that all of the complex discriminative stimuli are present during training. In the current experiments, a four-choice procedure was used to train pigeons to discriminate among dizocilpine (noncompetitive NMDA receptor blocker), pentobarbital (GABA(A) receptor agonist), a fixed-dose combination of these two drugs, and saline. Following extended training, low doses of pentobarbital or dizocilpine administered alone produced saline-appropriate responding. Higher doses of pentobarbital produced responding on the pentobarbital-appropriate key and higher doses of dizocilpine produced responding on the dizocilpine key. Administering the lowest doses of pentobarbital and dizocilpine together resulted in responding on the saline-appropriate key. Increasing the dose of pentobarbital in the presence of low doses of dizocilpine produced responding primarily on the pentobarbital-appropriate key; increasing the dose of dizocilpine in the presence of the lowest dose of pentobarbital produced responding primarily on the dizocilpine-appropriate key. Combining the higher doses of pentobarbital and dizocilpine resulted in responding primarily on the drug-combination key. Low doses of phencyclidine or ethanol produced responding on the saline-appropriate key, but intermediate doses resulted in individual subjects responding predominately on either the pentobarbital key, the dizocilpine key, or the drug-combination key depending on the subject. After the highest dose of phencyclidine or ethanol, most subjects responded predominantly on the drug-combination key. Low doses of other drugs tested produced responding on the saline-appropriate key. With the highest diazepam doses responding was largely confined to the pentobarbital-appropriate key. The highest doses of dextromethorphan or dextrorphan resulted in responding on the dizocilpine key more frequently than on other keys. Across a range of doses, morphine produced responding predominantly on the saline key. The results using the four-key procedure emphasized the role of both GABA(A) and NMDA receptors in the complex discriminative stimulus properties of phencyclidine and of ethanol.

Differentiating the discriminative stimulus effects of gamma-hydroxybutyrate and ethanol in a three-choice drug discrimination procedure in rats

Anecdotal reports indicate that GHB produces subjective effects similar to those of ethanol. However, recent investigations comparing the discriminative stimulus effects of GHB to those of ethanol suggest that the subjective effects of these substances may differ considerably. To explore further potential differences between GHB and ethanol, 16 male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained in a three-lever drug discrimination procedure to discriminate ethanol (1.0 g/kg, experiment 1; 1.5 g/kg, experiment 2) and GHB (300 mg/kg) from vehicle. Dose-response functions determined with both training compounds revealed a clear dissociation between the discriminative stimulus effects of these drugs. As expected, the GHB precursors gamma-butyrolactone and 1,4-butanediol produced full substitution for GHB. In addition, the GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen substituted for GHB, whereas the benzodiazepine flunitrazepam and the NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine engendered greater responding on the ethanol-lever. GHB's discriminative stimulus effects were blocked by the GABA(B) receptor antagonist CGP-35348 but only partially blocked by the putative GHB receptor antagonist NCS 382. These findings are consistent with previous reports of GHB's discriminative stimulus effects in two-choice drug discrimination procedures and provide additional evidence that these effects are distinct from those of ethanol.

Understanding how the brain perceives alcohol: neurobiological basis of ethanol discrimination

Understanding the neurobiological mechanisms that regulate how the brain perceives the intoxicating effects of alcohol is highly relevant to understanding the development and maintenance of alcohol addiction. The basis for the subjective effects of intoxication can be studied in drug discrimination procedures in which animals are trained to differentiate the presence of internal stimulus effects of a given dose of ethanol (EtOH) from its absence. Research on the discriminative stimulus effects of psychoactive drugs has shown that these effects are mediated by specific receptor systems. In the case of alcohol, action mediated through ionotropic glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and serotonergic receptors concurrently produce complex, or multiple, basis for the discriminative stimulus effects of EtOH. These receptor systems may contribute differentially to the discriminative stimulus effects of EtOH based on the EtOH dose, species differences, physiological states, and genetic composition of the individual. An understanding of the receptor mechanisms that mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of EtOH can be used to develop medications aimed at decreasing the subjective effects associated with repeated intoxication. The goal of this symposium was to present an overview of recent findings that highlight the neurobiological mechanisms of EtOH's subjective effects and to suggest the relevance of these discoveries to both basic and clinical alcohol research.

Differential Neurosensitivity to the Discriminative Stimulus Properties of Ethanol in C57BL/6J and C3H/He Mice

BACKGROUND

A large body of evidence suggests that the interoceptive cue associated with ethanol intoxication is complex and dependent on a number of environmental and biological factors. Despite the fact that mice have been widely used to study genetic influences on sensitivity to various actions of ethanol, few studies have used mice to examine sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in two inbred mouse strains, namely C57BL/6J and C3H/He mice.

METHODS

Adult male C57BL/6J and C3H/He mice were trained to discriminate between ethanol and saline using a two-lever food reinforcement operant procedure. Once criterion discrimination performance was achieved, dose-response functions were determined from generalization tests. Additional experiments were conducted to determine whether differences in discrimination performance were related to differential blood/brain ethanol levels in the two mouse strains.

RESULTS

A greater proportion of C57BL/6J mice acquired the discrimination and required fewer trials to achieve criterion performance compared with C3H/He mice with a 1.0 g/kg ethanol training dose. This deficit in acquisition was overcome when the training dose was increased to 2.0 g/kg for C3H/He mice. In a second experiment, a 1.5 g/kg training dose of ethanol was used for both strains. Again, a greater proportion of C57BL/6J mice acquired the discrimination and required fewer training trials to achieve criterion performance compared with C3H/He mice. Blood ethanol levels did not differ between the strains after administration of the 1.5 g/kg training dose. However, blood and brain ethanol levels did differ between the strains after doses of ethanol were administered that produced equivalent discrimination performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that ethanol discrimination was more readily acquired and maintained in C57BL/6J mice than C3H/He mice. Ethanol dose-response functions generated from generalization tests also clearly demonstrated greater sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol in C57BL/6J mice compared with the C3H/He strain. This differential sensitivity to the interoceptive cue produced by ethanol does not seem to be related to learning or pharmacokinetic differences between the two inbred strains.

Discriminative stimulus effects of 5.6 mg/kg pregnanolone in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J inbred mice

Neurosteroids represent a class of endogenous compounds that exert rapid, nongenomic effects through neurotransmitter receptor systems such as gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)). Two neurosteroids, allopregnanolone (3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one) and pregnanolone (3alpha-hydroxy-5beta-pregnan-20-one), possess anxiolytic and sedative properties and show substitution for ethanol, benzodiazepines, and barbiturates in drug discrimination assays. A previous study examining the discriminative stimulus effects of 10 mg/kg pregnanolone in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice showed pregnanolone's discriminative stimulus to be mediated primarily through GABA(A) positive modulation. This study examined the discriminative stimulus effects of a lower training dose (5.6 mg/kg) of pregnanolone in DBA/2J and C57BL/5J mice. Twelve male DBA/2J mice and 12 male C57BL/6J mice were trained to discriminate 5.6 mg/kg pregnanolone. GABA(A)-receptor positive modulators, neuroactive steroids, NMDA receptor antagonists, and 5-HT(3) receptor agonists were tested for pregnanolone substitution. In DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice benzodiazepine, barbiturate, and GABAergic neuroactive steroids all substituted for pregnanolone. In the DBA/2J mice, NMDA receptor antagonists showed generalization to the discriminative stimulus cues of pregnanolone, an effect not seen in the C57BL/6J mice. 5-HT(3) receptor agonists and zolpidem failed to substitute for pregnanolone's discriminative stimulus in either strain. AlloTHDOC and midazolam were more potent in producing pregnanolone-like discriminative stimulus effects in DBA/2J mice. These results provide a comprehensive look at pregnanolone's discriminative stimulus effects in two commonly used strains of mice. The present data suggest GABA(A)-receptor positive modulation as the predominant receptor mechanism mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of pregnanolone. NMDA receptor antagonism was suggested in the DBA/2J mice and may represent a heterogenous cue produced by the lower training dose of pregnanolone.

Characterization of the Discriminative Stimulus Effects of the Neuroactive Steroid Pregnanolone in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J Inbred Mice

Neurosteroids represent a class of endogenous compounds that exert rapid, nongenomic effects through neurotransmitter receptor systems such as GABA(A). Two neurosteroids, allopregnanolone (3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one) and pregnanolone (3alpha-hydroxy-5beta-pregnan-20-one), possess anxiolytic and sedative properties and show substitution for ethanol, benzodiazepines, and barbiturates in drug discrimination assays. This study aimed to examine the effects of strain and sex on the discriminative stimulus effects of pregnanolone. Twelve male and female DBA/2J mice and 12 male and female C57BL/6J mice were trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg pregnanolone from saline. The male C57BL/6J mice had to be removed from the study due to increased seizures apparently associated with the chronic intermittent pregnanolone administration used in drug discrimination. GABA(A)-positive modulators, neuroactive steroids, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(3) agonists were tested for pregnanolone substitution. In DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice, a benzodiazepine, barbiturate, and GABAergic neuroactive steroids all substituted for the stimulus effects of pregnanolone. NMDA antagonists, 5-HT(3) agonists, and zolpidem failed to substitute for pregnanolone's discriminative stimulus in either sex or strain. Pentobarbital and midazolam were more potent in producing pregnanolone-like discriminative stimulus effects in DBA/2J mice. Differences in sensitivities to neurosteroids between the two strains were not evident. These results provide a comprehensive look at pregnanolone's discriminative stimulus effects in two commonly used strains of mice. The present data suggest that many of the previously documented neurosteroid-induced behavioral differences between the DBA/2J and C57BL/6J are acute effects and are not apparent in a drug discrimination procedure.

Discriminative stimulus effects of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in rats discriminating GHB from baclofen and diazepam

Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is a drug of abuse with actions at GHB and GABA receptors. This study tried to increase the selectivity of the discriminative stimulus effects of GHB by training animals to discriminate GHB from compounds that share pharmacological mechanisms with GHB. In comparison with a previous GHB versus saline discrimination (group 1), rats were trained to discriminate GHB (200 mg/kg) either from saline and the GABA(B) agonist baclofen (3.2 mg/kg) (group 2) or from saline, baclofen, and the positive GABA(A) modulator diazepam (1 mg/kg) (group 3). In all groups, GHB produced more than 80% GHB-appropriate responding. Baclofen produced 84% GHB-appropriate responding in group 1 but less than 30% in groups 2 and 3. Diazepam produced 68% GHB-appropriate responding in group 1, 30% in group 2, and only 5% in group 3. The GABA(B) receptor antagonists CGP35348 [3-[aminopropyl(diethoxymethyl)phosphinic acid] and CGP52432 [3-[[[((3,4-dichlorophenyl)methyl]amino]propyl]diethoxymethyl)phosphinic acid] attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of GHB; CGP35348 did so with similar potency in all groups, but CGP52432 was significantly less potent in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1. In all groups, the GHB antagonist NCS-382 [(2E)-(5-hydroxy-5,7,8,9-tetrahydro-6H-benzo[a][7]annulen-6-ylidene ethanoic acid] partially attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of GHB. The selective GHB receptor ligand UMB86 (4-hydroxy-4-napthylbutanoic acid sodium) tended to attenuate the discriminative stimulus effects of GHB more in group 3 than in the other groups. The finding that animals can discriminate GHB from baclofen is further evidence that the effects of GHB and baclofen are not identical. Effects that GHB does not share with baclofen may involve GHB receptors or differential interactions with GABA(B) receptors.

Effect of 5-HT3 receptor over-expression on the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol

BACKGROUND

Drug discrimination studies using selective antagonists and agonists have suggested that 5-HT3 receptors may modulate ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects. However, conflicting data between laboratories leaves the issue of 5-HT3 receptor involvement in ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects in question. The present study utilized transgenic mice that over-express 5-HT3 receptors in conjunction with traditional pharmacological techniques to examine the contribution of 5-HT3 receptors to ethanol's discriminative stimulus.

METHODS

Ten 5-HT3 over-expressing (5-HT3 OE) and 18 B6SJL wild-type (WT) mice were trained to discriminate 1.5 g/kg ethanol from saline in daily 15 min, milk reinforced operant sessions. After training, ethanol substitution and response-rate suppression dose response curves were determined for ethanol, midazolam, dizocilpine, cocaine, mCPP, MD-354, YC-30 and MDL-72222. Antagonism tests combining ethanol with MDL-72222 and ondansetron were also conducted.

RESULTS

The 5-HT3 OE and WT mice learned the ethanol discrimination in a comparable number of training sessions. Similar patterns of substitution were generated in both groups of mice for most test drugs. 5-HT3 OE mice were more sensitive to the rate suppressing effects of dizocilpine and MDL-72222 than were WT mice. Neither of the 5-HT3 antagonist tested significantly attenuated ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects in either 5-HT3 OE or WT mice.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study are consistent with a minimal role of 5-HT3 receptors in transducing ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects. Over-expression of 5-HT3 receptors does not alter the relative efficacy of GABAA positive modulators or NMDA antagonists for producing ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects. However, 5-HT3 receptor over-expression does appear to modulate the response-rate altering effects of the uncompetitive NMDA antagonist, dizocilpine, and the 5-HT3 antagonist, MDL-72222.

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in rats using a three-choice ethanol???midazolam???water discrimination

Three-choice discrimination procedures are used to characterize how similar the discriminative stimulus effects of two drugs are in relation to each other. This procedure has suggested similarities between ethanol and ligands that positively modulate the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor complex. As an extension to these studies, male Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate midazolam (3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) from ethanol (1.0 g/kg, i.g.) from water (2.3 ml, i.g.) in a three-lever, food reinforced task. Substitution tests were conducted following administration of GABAA-positive modulators, noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, 5-HT1B agonists and isopropanol. Among the GABAA-positive modulators, diazepam was the only drug that completely substituted for midazolam; both pentobarbital and the neurosteroid allopregnanolone showed partial midazolam substitution. The NMDA antagonist dizocilpine substituted for ethanol, while phencyclidine showed no substitution for either ethanol or midazolam. The serotonin agonists tested also showed no substitution for either ethanol or midazolam. Isopropanol was the only other drug that completely substituted for ethanol. These data extend previous findings from an ethanol-pentobarbital-water discrimination and further define training conditions that result in a conditional basis for the ethanol discrimination where only those drugs with pharmacological heterogeneous effects similar to ethanol produce a full ethanol-like effect.

Substitution profiles of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists in ethanol-discriminating inbred mice

C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) inbred mice show pronounced differences in ethanol-induced behaviors, such as loss of righting reflex and locomotor activation, among others. They also differ in measures of conditioned place preference and oral self-administration of ethanol. In the current study, I examined whether B6 and D2 mice differed in their expression of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated component of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. B6 and D2 mice were trained to discriminate ethanol (1.5 g/kg, i.p.) from saline in a two-choice, milk-reinforced operant procedure. After training was completed, substitution and response rate dose-effect curves were generated for ethanol; the uncompetitive NMDA antagonists phencyclidine and ketamine; and the competitive NMDA antagonist D-CPPene. Dose-effect curves were also generated for midazolam, cocaine, m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), morphine, and gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB). B6 and D2 mice learned the ethanol-versus-saline discrimination. Phencyclidine produced near full substitution for ethanol in both strains, whereas ketamine fully substituted for ethanol only in B6 mice. D-CPPene partially substituted for ethanol in both strains. Moderate doses of phencyclidine produced greater response rate-increasing effects in B6 mice than in D2 mice, and high doses of phencyclidine were more potent for suppressing response rates in D2 mice. In contrast, D-CPPene had similar response rate-increasing effects in both strains, but high doses produced more potent response rate-decreasing effects in B6 mice. Among the other drugs tested, only midazolam produced substantial substitution for ethanol. Taken together, these findings seem to indicate that the behavioral effects of NMDA antagonists differ between strains, but that the NMDA-mediated component of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol is similar in B6 and D2 mice.

Neurosteroids and behavior

Neurosteroid production may be a mechanism to counteract the negative effects of stress and return organisms toward homeostasis. Stress induces an increase in neurosteroid production. Neurosteroids affect two of the most widely distributed neurotransmitter and receptor systems in the central nervous system (CNS): gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate. This ability of this class of compounds to affect both the primary excitatory and the inhibitory systems in the CNS allows the modulation of a wide array of behaviors. For example, neurosteroids modulate anxiety, cognition, sleep, ingestion, aggression, and reinforcement. In general, neurosteroids that are positive modulators of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors enhance cognitive performance and decrease appetite. Neurosteroids that are positive modulators of GABAA receptors decrease anxiety, increase feeding and sleeping, and exhibit a bimodal effect on aggression that may be secondary to effects on anxiety and cognition. Some data suggest that neurosteroids have reinforcing effects, which could affect their clinical utility. Drug discrimination studies are helping scientists to dissect more closely the receptor systems affected by neurosteroids at the behavioral level.

Generalisation of ethanol with drug mixtures containing a positive modulator of the GABA(A) receptor and an NMDA antagonist

Ethanol is thought to produce its discriminative stimulus effect by actions on two or more neurotransmitter systems. To test this idea further, rats were trained to discriminate mixtures of two drugs from vehicle in two-lever procedures with food reinforcers presented on a tandem variable-interval fixed ratio schedule. After drug-appropriate responding with the training mixtures reached 85%, generalisation to ethanol was examined in extinction tests. Rats trained to discriminate a mixture of chlordiazepoxide (5.0 mg/kg, s. c.) plus dizocilpine (0.08 mg/kg, i.p.) yielded a mean of 76% drug-appropriate responding when tested with ethanol (3.0 g/kg, i.g. ). However, when rats were trained with an 8.0 mg/kg dose of pentobarbitone in a mixture with 0.08 mg/kg of dizocilpine, the same dose of ethanol produced only 33% drug-appropriate responding. After retraining with pentobarbitone (12 mg/kg) plus dizocilpine (0.04 mg/kg), ethanol (3.0 g/kg, i.g.) produced 75% drug-appropriate responding. Pentobarbitone and dizocilpine administered alone produced full, dose-related generalisation, but there was no generalisation to (+)-amphetamine (0.025-0.8 mg/kg, s.c.). Thus, ethanol substituted for mixtures in which the GABA(A)-modulatory component had equal or greater salience than the NMDA-antagonist component. Doses of ethanol that generalised with the drug mixtures always reduced overall rates of responding as compared with control rates. Nevertheless, these data provide further support for the hypothesis that ethanol produces a compound stimulus comprised of elements resembling the effects of positive modulators of GABA(A) receptors and those of NMDA antagonists.

Influence of training history on ethanol discrimination in rats

The compound stimulus hypothesis of ethanol discrimination predicts that a history of training to discriminate drugs that mimic individual elements of the ethanol stimulus should attenuate stimulus control by other stimulus elements (associative blocking). Rats were trained initially to discriminate either chlordiazepoxide (5 mg / kg s.c., n = 10) or dizocilpine (0.08 mg / kg i.p., n = 10) from vehicle in two-lever procedures with food reinforcers presented on a tandem variable-interval fixed ratio schedule. Control rats received 'sham training' (vehicle injections only, n = 9). All subjects were then trained to discriminate ethanol (1.5 g / kg intragastrically (i.g.)) until discrimination accuracy reached 95%. Chlordiazepoxide (1.25-10.0 mg / kg s.c.) produced more drug-appropriate responding in rats with a previous history of training to discriminate chlordiazepoxide than in either of the other two groups, but stimulus control by dizocilpine was not attenuated. Equivalent results were obtained in rats with a previous history of training to discriminate dizocilpine. Ethanol (0.375-3.0 g / kg i.g.) produced similar dose-related increases in drug-appropriate responding in all three groups. Thus, previous discrimination training modified the characteristics of ethanol discrimination in a way that may be explained by persistence of the original discriminations. The lack of evidence for associative blocking contrasts with results of previous experiments on the discrimination of compound stimuli produced by administering drug mixtures. The findings provide limited support for the hypothesis that ethanol produces a compound stimulus that includes elements of positive modulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptors and of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonism.

Differentiating benzodiazepine- and barbiturate-like discriminative stimulus effects of lorazepam, diazepam, pentobarbital, imidazenil and zaleplon in two- versus three-lever procedures

Previous studies found that animals trained to discriminate pentobarbital show a relatively inclusive generalization profile. They generalize to sedative-hypnotics and anxiolytics, regardless of differences among such drugs in molecular mechanism of action. In contrast, animals trained to discriminate lorazepam have shown a generalization profile that appears selective for compounds with in-vitro profiles as full agonists at the benzodiazepine modulatory site. The present study investigated whether benzodiazepine receptor ligands, to which pentobarbital-trained rats had generalized under a two-lever procedure, would occasion pentobarbital- or lorazepam-appropriate responding when the rats were retrained to discriminate among pentobarbital, lorazepam and the no-drug condition under a three-lever procedure. A second group of rats was trained first to discriminate lorazepam and then retrained under the same three-lever procedure. Under the two-lever procedure, all pentobarbital-trained rats showed dose-dependent generalization to lorazepam, but not all lorazepam-trained rats showed full generalization to pentobarbital. Both groups showed full generalization to diazepam and zaleplon, a novel hypnotic that is selective for alpha, 1-subunit-containing subtypes of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor. Pentobarbital-trained rats, but not all lorazepam-trained rats, generalized to imidazenil. Under the three-lever procedure, dose-dependent generalization to lorazepam and pentobarbital was demonstrated on the appropriate levers. Diazepam shared discriminative effects with pentobarbital, zaleplon shared discriminative effects with lorazepam, and imidazenil shared discriminative effects with lorazepam and pentobarbital. These results show that when the opportunity for finer differentiation of discriminative effects of GABAergic drugs is provided, a generalization profile more in line with differential in-vitro profiles can be revealed.

Strategies for understanding the pharmacological effects of ethanol with drug discrimination procedures

Ethanol appears to produce a stimulus complex, or compound cue, composed of distinct components that are mediated by different receptor systems. In ethanol vs. water discriminations, it appears that ethanol produces a redundant stimulus complex such that separate, receptor-mediated activity can serve as the basis for the discrimination. These discriminations have been termed redundant, because multiple features of the cue could serve as the basis of the discrimination. In ethanol vs. water discriminations, one common feature is the asymmetrical generalizations between components of the ethanol cue and ethanol. There is also evidence for overshadowing of one component by other components of the ethanol stimulus complex. It appears possible to transfer the basis of the ethanol cue from a redundant cue to a conditional cue with specific training procedures. When the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol are juxtoposed with those of one component of the ethanol complex, as in ethanol vs. water vs. pentobarbital discriminations, the ethanol discrimination shifts to a conditional basis. The ability to antagonize an ethanol discrimination may be dependent upon whether the discrimination is based on redundant component stimuli or conditional presence of all component stimuli.

Increased specificity of ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects in an ethanol-pentobarbital-water discrimination in rats

Ethanol's modulation of a number of receptor systems results in a heterogeneous discriminative stimulus complex. A previous study found that these heterogeneous discriminative stimulus effects were seemingly diminished when rats were trained to discriminate ethanol (2.0 g/kg) from pentobarbital (10.0 mg/kg). The present experiment was designed to extend these findings by using a lower training dose of ethanol (1.0 g/kg). Adult male Long-Evans rats (n = 7) discriminated pentobarbital (10.0 mg/kg; intragastric (i.g.)) from ethanol (1.0 g/kg; i.g.) from water (2.3 ml; i.g.) in a 3 lever, food-reinforced task. Substitution tests were conducted following intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of GABA(A) positive modulators, noncompetitive NMDA antagonists, 5-HT1 agonists and isopropanol. The GABA(A) positive modulators diazepam, midazolam and allopregnanolone completely substituted for pentobarbital. Isopropanol completely substituted for ethanol, while the NMDA antagonists dizocilpine and phencyclidine partially substituted for ethanol. The 5-HT agonists RU 24969 and CGS 12066B did not result in complete substitution for ethanol or pentobarbital, although RU 24969 resulted in partial pentobarbital substitution. These data replicate and extend the previous findings that discriminating ethanol from pentobarbital attenuates the ethanol-like effects of GABA(A) positive modulators, NMDA antagonists and 5-HT1 agonists and results in a more specific ethanol cue. The outcome appears to be a conditional basis for the ethanol discrimination, where a full ethanol-like effect is produced only by drugs with pharmacological activity similar to the heterogenous effects of ethanol (e.g. other alcohols).

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol: neuropharmacological characterization

Generally, compounds discriminated by animals possess psychotropic effects in animals and humans. As with many other drugs of abuse, strength of the ethanol discriminative stimulus is dose related. The majority of studies show that doses close to 1.0 g/kg are close to the minimum at which the discrimination can be learned easily. Substitution studies suggest that anxiolytic, sedative, atactic, and myorelaxant effects of ethanol all play an important role in the formation of its intercoeptive stimulus. Low doses of ethanol produce more excitatory cues, similar to amphetamine-like subjective stimuli, whereas higher doses produce rather sedative/hypnotic stimuli similar to those elicited by barbiturates. Substitution studies have shown that the complete substitution for ethanol may be exerted by certain GABA-mimetic drugs acting through different sites within the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor complex (e.g., diazepam, pentobarbital, certain neurosteroids), gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and antagonists of the glutamate NMDA receptor. Among the NMDA receptor antagonists both noncompetitive (e.g., dizocilpine) and competitive antagonists (e.g., CGP 40116) are capable of substituting for ethanol. Further, some antagonists of strychnine-insensitive glycine modulatory sites among the NMDA receptor complex (e.g., L-701,324) dose-dependently substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus. On the other hand, neither GABA-benzodiazepine antagonists nor NMDA receptor agonists produce contradictory effects (i.e., reduce the ethanol discriminative stimulus). There is influence of a particular training dose of ethanol on the substitution pattern of different compounds. For example, 5-HT(1B/2C) agonists substitute for intermediate (1.0 g/kg) but not higher (2.0 g/kg) ethanol training doses. Discrimination studies with ethanol and drugs acting on NMDA and GABA receptors consistently indicate asymmetrical generalization. For example, ethanol is able to generalize to barbiturates and benzodiazepines, but neither the benzodiazepine nor barbiturate response generalizes to ethanol. Only a few drugs are able to antagonize, at least to some extent, the discriminative stimulus of ethanol (e.g., partial inverse GABA-benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-4513 and the opioid antagonist naloxone). The ethanol stimulus effect may be increased (i.e., stronger recognition) by N-cholinergic drugs (nicotine), dopaminergic drugs (apomorphine), and 5-HT3 receptor agonists (m-chlorophenylbiguanide). Thus, the ethanol stimulus is composed of the several components, with the NMDA receptor and GABA(A) receptor complex being of particular importance. This suggests that a drug mixture may be more capable of substituting for ethanol (or block its stimulus) than a single compound. The ability of drugs to substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus is frequently, although not preclusively, associated with the reduction of voluntary ethanol consumption. The examples of positive correlation are gamma-hydroxybutyrate, possibly memantine and certain serotonergic drugs such as fluoxetine. However, it remains uncertain to what extent the discriminative stimulus of ethanol can be seen as relevant in the understanding of the complex mechanisms of dependence.

Analysis of the 5-HT2 receptor ligands dimethoxy-4-indophenyl-2-aminopropane and ketanserin in ethanol discriminations

Previous studies have suggested a modulatory role of the 5-HT2 receptor system in the behavioral effects of ethanol. The present study examined the discriminative stimulus effects of the 5-HT2A/2C agonist (-)-dimethoxy-4-indophenyl-2-aminopropane (DOI) and the 5-HT2A antagonist ketanserin in rats trained to discriminate either 1.5 g/kg of ethanol from water (intragastrically, n = 7) or 2.0 g/kg of ethanol from water (intragastrically, n = 8). In substitution tests, neither DOI (0.3 to 1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) nor ketanserin (3.0 to 17.0 mg/kg, i.p.) produced discriminative stimulus effects similar to either training dose of ethanol, although decreases in rates of responding were significant at the highest doses tested. Likewise, when given in combination with ethanol, neither 5-HT2 ligand shifted the ethanol-dose response determination in either the 1.5 or 2.0 g/kg ethanol training groups. DOI in combination with ethanol did not alter rates of responding, whereas ketanserin in combination with ethanol significantly decreased response rates. Thus, the 5-HT2A receptor ligands do not appreciably affect the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, in contrast to previous results with 5-HT1B ligands.