Metabolic features of patients with and without coronary heart disease but with a superimposable cluster of cardiovascular risk factors

Elevated Glucose Oxidation, Reduced Insulin Secretion, and a Fatty Heart May Be Protective Adaptions in Ischemic CAD

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, and ectopic fat deposition have been implicated in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes, which is common in CAD patients. We investigated whether CAD is an independent predictor of these metabolic abnormalities and whether this interaction is influenced by superimposed myocardial ischemia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied CAD patients with (n = 8) and without (n = 14) myocardial ischemia and eight non-CAD controls. Insulin sensitivity and secretion and substrate oxidation were measured during fasting and oral glucose tolerance testing. We used magnetic resonance imaging/spectroscopy, positron emission and computerized tomography to characterize CAD, cardiac function, pericardial and abdominal adipose tissue, and myocardial, liver, and pancreatic triglyceride contents. Ischemic CAD was characterized by elevated oxidative glucose metabolism and a proportional decline in β-cell insulin secretion and reduction in lipid oxidation. Cardiac function was preserved in CAD groups, whereas cardiac fat depots were elevated in ischemic CAD compared to non-CAD subjects. Liver and pancreatic fat contents were similar in all groups and related with surrounding adipose masses or systemic insulin sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

In ischemic CAD patients, glucose oxidation is enhanced and correlates inversely with insulin secretion. This can be seen as a mechanism to prevent glucose lowering because glucose is required in oxygen-deprived tissues. On the other hand, the accumulation of cardiac triglycerides may be a physiological adaptation to the limited fatty acid oxidative capacity. Our results underscore the urgent need of clinical trials that define the optimal/safest glycemic range in situations of myocardial ischemia.

The Effects of High Dose Pravastatin and Low Dose Pravastatin and Ezetimibe Combination Therapy on Lipid, Glucose Metabolism and Inflammation

OBJECTIVE

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is presently the major cause of mortality and morbidity. Anti-hyperlipidemic treatment is one of the main treatment steps in the management of CAD. Statins are the cornerstones in this treatment. Ezetimibe can be reliably used, when statins prove ineffective in treatment, or to reduce their side effects. In the present study we examined the effects of high-dose pravastatin (40 mg) and low-dose pravastatin (10 mg) + ezetimibe (10 mg) combination therapy on lipid and glucose mechanism, as well as inflammation.

METHODS

This study registered 100 cases. Of the cases, 50 [57.1 +/- 11.1 years (24 (48%) females and 26 (52%) males)] were administered 40 mg/day pravastatin (group 1) and 50 [53.2 +/- 12.2 years (27 (54%) females and 23 (46%) males)] were administered 10 mg pravastatin + 10 mg ezetimibe (group 2).

RESULTS

In group 1, total cholesterol fell from 231.1 +/- 83.5 mg/dl to 211.3 +/- 37.2 mg/dl (p = 0.03), triglyceride from 243.5 +/- 96.8 mg/dl to 190.9 +/- 55.2 mg/dl (p = 0.003), and LDL cholesterol from 165.7 +/- 29.7 mg/dl to 133.4 +/- 26.6 mg/dl (p = 0.02). In group 2, total cholesterol dropped from 250.9 +/- 51.8 mg/dl to 187.9 +/- 34.9 mg/dl (p = 0.001), triglyceride from 270.3 +/- 158.9 mg/dl to 154.6 +/- 60.7 mg/dl (p = 0.001), and LDL cholesterol from 158.1 +/- 47.5 mg/dl to 116.9 +/- 26.4 mg/dl (p = 0.001). Insulin resistance decreased from 4.05 +/- 2.31 to 3.16 +/- 1.90 (p = 0.07) in group 1 and from 2.96 +/- 1.50 to 2.05 +/- 0.55 (p = 0.009) in group 2. High sensitive C-reactive protein fell from 6.69 +/- 6.11 mg/l to 3.02 +/- 1.70 mg/l (p = 0.01) in group 1 and from 6.36 +/- 2.06 mg/l to 2.68 +/- 1.69 mg/l (p = 0.001) in group 2.

CONCLUSION

Both therapy regimes are effective. However, we found that low-dose pravastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy is more effective than high-dose pravastatin therapy on lipid metabolism, glucose metabolism and inflammation.

Insulin resistance and coronary risk factors in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients with definite coronary artery disease

Insulin resistance is known as an important risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, CAD-related mortality in Japanese type 2 diabetics is lower than in Caucasians. To investigate whether insulin resistance is related to CAD in Japanese type 2 diabetics, we measured insulin sensitivity and several coronary risk factors in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes with and without CAD. Thirty-three patients with definite CAD and 33 age- and sex-matched patients without CAD (control) were studied. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by the K index of insulin tolerance test (KITT). Clinical characteristics, classical risk factors, lipoprotein (a), and insulin sensitivity were compared between the two groups. Patients with CAD had a significantly longer duration of diabetes (9.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 5.5 +/- 0.9 years, P < 0.05, respectively), were mostly hypertensive (69.7 vs. 39.4%, P < 0.05), and more likely to be treated with insulin (45.5 vs. 18.2%, P < 0.05) compared with the control. Concerning the metabolic parameters, patients with CAD had a significantly higher insulin resistance than control (2.40 +/- 0.15 vs. 3.23 +/- 0.17%/min, P < 0.01, respectively), higher triglyceride (1.39 +/- 0.10 vs. 1.05 +/- 0.05 mmol/l, P < 0.05), lower HDL cholesterol (1.05 +/- 0.05 vs. 1.28 +/- 0.06 mmol/l, P < 0.05), and higher lipoprotein (a) (27.5 +/- 4.3 vs. 17.4 +/- 2.0 mg/dl, P < 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that hypertension, insulin resistance, high lipoprotein (a) and triglyceride, and low HDL cholesterol were independently related to CAD. Our results suggest that insulin resistance per se is a significant risk factor for CAD in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Insulin resistance versus insulin deficiency in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: problems and prospects

A definitive assessment of the relative roles of insulin resistance and insulin deficiency in the etiology of NIDDM is hampered by several problems. 1) Due to better methodology, data on insulin resistance are generally more accurate and consistent than data on insulin deficiency. 2) In source data, case-control studies are prone to selection bias, while epidemiological associations, whether cross-sectional or longitudinal, are liable to misinterpretation. 3) Insulin secretion and action are physiologically interconnected at multiple levels, so that an initial defect in either is likely to lead with time to a deficit in the companion function. The fact that both insulin resistance and impaired insulin release have been found to precede and predict NIDDM in prospective studies may be in part a reflection of just such relatedness. 4) Direct genetic analysis is effective in rarer forms of glucose intolerance (MODY, mitochondrial mutations, etc.) but encounters serious difficulties with typical late-onset NIDDM. Despite these uncertainties, the weight of current evidence supports the view that insulin resistance is very important in the etiology of typical NIDDM for the following reasons: 1) it is found in the majority of patients with the manifest disease; 2) it is only partially reversible by any form of treatment (117); 3) it can be traced back through earlier stages of IGT and high-risk conditions; and 4) it predicts subsequent development of the disease with remarkable consistency in both prediabetic and normoglycemic states. Of conceptual importance is also the fact that the key cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle insulin resistance (defective stimulation of glucose transport, phosphorylation, and storage into glycogen) have been confirmed in NIDDM subjects by a variety of in vivo techniques [ranging from catheter balance (118) to multiple tracer kinetics (119) to 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (120)], and have been detected also in normoglycemic NIDDM offspring (121). If insulin resistance is a characteristic finding in many cases of NIDDM, insulin-sensitive NIDDM does exist. On the other hand, given the tight homeostatic control of plasma glucose levels in humans, beta-cell dysfunction, relative or absolute, is a sine qua non for the development of diabetes. If insulin deficiency must be present whereas insulin resistance may be present, is this proof that the former is etiologically primary to the latter? If so, do we have convincing evidence that the primacy of insulin deficiency is genetic in nature? The answer to both questions is negative on several accounts. The defect in insulin secretion in overt NIDDM is functionally severe but anatomically modest: beta-cell mass is reduced by 20-40% in patients with long-standing NIDDM (122). Moreover, the insulin secretory deficit is progressively worse with more severe hyperglycemia (123) and recovers considerably upon improving glycemic control (124). These observations indicate that part of the insulin deficiency is acquired (through glucose toxicity, lipotoxicity, or both). In addition, although insulin deficiency is necessary for diabetes, it may not always be sufficient to cause NIDDM. In fact, subtle defects in the beta-cell response to glucose may be widespread in the population (108, 125) and only cause frank hyperglycemia when obesity/insulin resistance stress the secretory machinery. Conceivably, there could be beta-cell dysfunction without NIDDM just as there is insulin resistance without diabetes. Incidentally, any defect in insulin secretion, whether in normoglycemic or hyperglycemic persons, could be due to other factors than primary beta-cell dysfunction: amyloid deposits in the pancreas (126), changes in insulin secretagogues (amylin, GLP-1, GIP, galanin) (127-130), early intrauterine malnutrition (131). Finally, the predictive power of early changes in insulin secretion for the development of typical NIDDM is generally lower than that of insulin

Cardiac and skeletal muscle insulin resistance in patients with coronary heart disease. A study with positron emission tomography

Patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure have been shown to be insulin resistant. Whether in these patients heart muscle participates in the insulin resistance, and whether reduced blood flow is a mechanism for such resistance is not known. We measured heart and skeletal muscle blood flow and glucose uptake during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia (insulin clamp) in 15 male patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease and chronic regional wall motion abnormalities. Six age- and weight-matched healthy subjects served as controls. Regional glucose uptake was measured by positron emission tomography using [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG), blood flow was measured by the H2(15)O method. Myocardial glucose utilization was measured in regions with normal perfusion and wall motion as assessed by radionuclide ventriculography. Whole-body glucose uptake was 37+/-4 micromol x min(-1) x kg(-1) in controls and 14+/-2 mciromol x min(-1) x kg(-1) in patients (P = 0.001). Myocardial blood flow (1.09+/-0.06 vs. 0.97+/-0.04 ml x min(-1) x g(-1), controls vs. patients) and skeletal muscle (arm) blood flow (0.046+/-0.012 vs. 0.043+/-0.006 ml x min(-1) x g(-1)) were similar in the two groups (P = NS for both). In contrast, in patients both myocardial (0.38+/-0.03 vs. 0.70+/-0.03 micromol x min(-1) x g(-1), P = 0.0005) and muscle glucose uptake (0.026+/-0.004 vs. 0.056+/-0.006 micromol x min(-1) x g(-1), P = 0.005) were markedly reduced in comparison with controls. In the whole dataset, a direct relationship existed between insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in heart and skeletal muscle. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction and a low ejection fraction are insulin resistant. This insulin resistance affects both the myocardium and skeletal muscle and is independent of blood flow.