Two-dose daclizumab regimen in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients: primary endpoint analysis of a multicenter, randomized study

First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations

The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

Challenges of calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal following combined pancreas and kidney transplantation: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial

In a phase 2 multicenter open-label randomized trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients were randomized to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppressive regimen (tacrolimus) (n = 21), or an investigational arm using low-dose CNI plus costimulation blockade (belatacept) with intended CNI withdrawal (n = 22). Both arms included induction therapy with rabbit ATG, mycophenolate sodium, or mycophenolate mofetil and rapid withdrawal of steroids. Enrollment and CNI withdrawal were stopped after 43/60 planned subjects had been enrolled. At that time, the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) of the pancreas was low in both groups until CNI was withdrawn, with four of the five pancreas rejections occurring during or after CNI withdrawal. The rate of BPAR of kidney allografts was low in both control (9.5%) and investigational (9.1%) arms. Pancreas graft survival at 52 weeks, defined by insulin independence, was 21 (100%) in the control group and 19 (86%) in the investigational arm. One subject in the investigational arm died with functioning pancreas and kidney grafts. Renal function at week 52 was similar in both arms. Costimulation blockade with belatacept did not provide sufficient immunosuppression to reliably prevent pancreas rejection in SPK transplants undergoing CNI withdrawal.

Pancreatic Transplantation: Evaluation and Management

More than 2 million people in the United States have type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pancreatic transplantation has emerged as the single most effective means of achieving normal glucose homeostasis in this patient population. Newer immunosuppressive agents and surgical techniques continue to evolve, resulting in improved long-term graft and patient survival. Herein, an understanding of the evaluation, technical aspects, and perioperative management of pancreas transplantation is outlined.

Immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation with an emphasis on antibody induction strategies: review and perspective

A review of recent literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with respect to immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation (PTX). In the past decade, the majority of PTXs were performed with depleting antibody induction, particularly in the setting of either calcineurin inhibitor minimization, corticosteroid withdrawal or both. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of predominantly tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolatemofetil, TAC/mycophenolic acid or TAC/sirolimus with or without corticosteroids. Depending on PTX category, donor and recipient risk factors, case mix and immunosuppressive regimen, the 1-year incidence of acute rejection has decreased to 5-20%. Current 1-year rates of immunological pancreas graft loss range between 1.8 and 6%. Depleting antibody induction and either TAC/mycophenolatemofetil or TAC/sirolimus maintenance therapy with early steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of immunosuppression in PTX. However, the development of non-nephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimens is highly desirable to improve quality of life in all solid organ transplant recipients.

Risk of serious opportunistic infections after solid organ transplantation: interleukin-2 receptor antagonists versus polyclonal antibodies. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate and quantify the risk of serious opportunistic infections after induction with polyclonal antibodies versus IL-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2RAs) in randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were followed and random-effects models were performed.

RESULTS

70 randomized clinical trials (10,106 patients) were selected: 36 polyclonal antibodies (n = 3377), and 34 IL-2RAs (n = 6729). Compared to controls, polyclonal antibodies showed higher risk of serious opportunistic infections (OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.34-2.80; p < 0.0001); IL-2RAs were associated with lower risk of serious opportunistic infections (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.94; p = 0.009). Polyclonal antibodies were associated with higher risk of bacterial (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.00-2.50; p = 0.049) and viral infections (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.60-3.49; p < 0.0001), while IL-2RAs were associated with lower risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.97; p = 0.032). Adjusted indirect comparison: compared to polyclonal antibodies, IL-2RAs were associated with lower risk of serious opportunistic infections (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.34-0.49; p < 0.0001), bacterial infections (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.39-0.67; p < 0.0001) and CMV disease (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34-0.98; p = 0.043). Results remained consistent across allografts.

CONCLUSION

The risk of serious opportunistic infections, bacterial infections and CMV disease were all significantly decreased with IL-2RAs compared to polyclonal antibodies.

Alemtuzumab induction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab (AZ) is a monoclonal anti-CD52 antibody used as an induction agent in organ transplantation. Few studies have analyzed this agent in the context of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPKT).

METHODS

We examined US registry data of SPKT recipient outcomes from January 2002 to October 2009 stratified by induction agent including AZ, other T-cell-depleting agents combined (T cell), IL2 receptor blockade (IL-2RAb), and no induction (none).

RESULTS

Of 6860 SPKT recipients, induction therapy was AZ in 10%, T cell in 49%, IL-2RAb in 18%, and none in 22%. On multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in overall patient survival, pancreas or renal allograft survival, or delayed renal graft function for the three induction groups compared with no induction. Rehospitalization within six months of transplantation occurred more often with AZ (51%) T cell (52%), and IL-2RAB (45%) compared with none (41%; p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, there was a significant higher odds of six-month rehospitalization with AZ (aOR 1.40, 95%CI 1.14-1.71), IL-2RAb (aOR 1.20, 95%CI 1.01-1.42-1.20), and other T-cell-depleting agents (aOR 1.50, 95%CI 1.31-1.73) compared with none. Median length of stay was significantly shorter in the AZ (8 d) compared with the IL-2RAb (9 d), T cell (10 d), and none (10 d) groups (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There are no differences in patient, pancreas or renal allograft survival using AZ induction. AZ may confer an advantage in the perioperative period as evidenced by a decreased hospital length of stay. However, this benefit may be lost due to more frequent rehospitalizations.

Monitoring of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drugs in patients with lung disease and lung transplant recipients: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Immunosuppressive pharmacologic agents prescribed to patients with diffuse interstitial and inflammatory lung disease and lung transplant recipients are associated with potential risks for adverse reactions. Strategies for minimizing such risks include administering these drugs according to established, safe protocols; monitoring to detect manifestations of toxicity; and patient education. Hence, an evidence-based guideline for physicians can improve safety and optimize the likelihood of a successful outcome. To maximize the likelihood that these agents will be used safely, the American College of Chest Physicians established a committee to examine the clinical evidence for the administration and monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs (with the exception of corticosteroids) to identify associated toxicities associated with each drug and appropriate protocols for monitoring these agents.

METHODS

Committee members developed and refined a series of questions about toxicities of immunosuppressives and current approaches to administration and monitoring. A systematic review was carried out by the American College of Chest Physicians. Committee members were supplied with this information and created this evidence-based guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped that these guidelines will improve patient safety when immunosuppressive drugs are given to lung transplant recipients and to patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease.

Current status of pancreas transplantation

Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage diabetes mellitus. Over the last four decades, many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, which contributed to increased number of indications and improved allograft survival. Pancreas transplantation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure with a relatively higher complication rate, and lifelong immunosuppression. Therefore, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy such as islet transplantation have been in progress. This article summarizes the current understanding of pancreas transplantation-associated indications, donor selection, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and rejection.

Factors influencing outcome of simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation: a 23-year single-center clinical experience

INTRODUCTION

Simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has become an effective treatment for patients who have diabetes mellitus type I with advanced nephropathy. This study assesses the progress of the SKPT program at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, and evaluates prognostic factors for graft survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 1986 and September 2009, we performed 113 SKPT. The immunosuppression protocols changed over time and are defined as era 1, cyclosporine (CyA), atzathioprine (AZA) and steroids (C/A/S); era 2, C/A/S with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction (C/A/S/A); era 3, CyA, mycophenolate mofetic (MMF), steroids and ATG induction (C/M/S/A); era 4, tacrolimus (TAC), MMF, steroid, and ATG induction (T/M/S/A) and era 5, TAC, MMF, steroids and basiliximab induction (T/M/S/B). We analyzed donor/recipient/operative and postoperative variables to assess their influence on pancreas graft and patient survivals.

RESULTS

The overall 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survivals were 95.5%, 84.1%, and 65.5%, respectively. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall pancreas graft survivals were 77.6%, 58.4%, and 48.4%. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year pancreas graft survivals in SKPT patients transplanted between October 1997 and September 2009. (T/M/S/A and T/M/S/B; eras 4 and 5) were 95.3%, 72.7%, and 63.1%, respectively, which was significantly better than those of patients transplanted between February 1986 and September 1997 (era, 1 through 3) (P < 0.01, P < 0.0001, respectively). The quadruple regimen with TAC and MMF (eras 4 and 5) decreased the incidence of acute rejection episodes compared with eras 1 through 3 (P < 0.0001). Basiliximab induction (T/M/S/B; era 5) reduced the CMV infection rate compared with eras 1 through 4 (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that donor age (younger than 40 years), immunosuppressive regimen with TAC and MMF (eras 4 and 5), and absence of acute rejection episodes independently affected pancreas graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate a superiority of the quadruple protocol with T/M/S/B for graft and patient survival with a decreased incidence of CMV infection after SKPT.

Interleukin-2 receptor blockade with humanized monoclonal antibody for solid organ transplantation

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Induction therapy has reduced the incidence of acute rejection compared with historical standards. The potency of currently available induction immunosuppression is not without risk and should be carefully considered. Induction with daclizumab, an IL-2 receptor antagonist, has been used safely and effectively for over 10 years across different transplant types. As a result of daclizumab use, transplant centers are able to implement steroid-sparing or calcineurin minimization protocols. Unfortunately, the manufacturing costs have resulted in withdrawal of this agent from the market reducing the options for patients undergoing transplantation.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review will update the reader on recently published daclizumab studies in adult solid organ transplant recipients, focusing on comparative studies with other induction agents.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This paper will provide a summary of comparative studies between daclizumab and other induction therapies focusing on their efficacy and safety.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Novel applications, such as long-term use in combination with calcineurin-inhibitor dose reduction and its value in the treatment of acute or chronic rejection have yet to be explored. Since daclizumab has been withdrawn from the market, future IL-2 receptor blockade will have to be achieved with basiliximab, which is a chimeric, monoclonal antibody directed against the same epitope.

Immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: progress to date

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal failure due to type 1 diabetes mellitus. With advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression management, outcomes have improved, with current 1- and 10-year pancreas graft survival rates of 86% and 53%, respectively. Induction therapy with either alemtuzumab or rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus appears to be safe and effective in the setting of rapid steroid withdrawal (RSW), with excellent graft survival and low rejection rates. There are no large randomized trials between alemtuzumab and rATG to determine whether one is better than the other. Anti-interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antibody induction and no induction in combination with a CNI, MMF or sirolimus, and prednisone have demonstrated excellent graft survival rates but are associated with a higher incidence of acute rejection. The efficacy of anti-IL-2 receptor antibodies or no induction in the setting of RSW is unproven. Both of the CNIs, ciclosporin and tacrolimus, are effective in preventing acute rejection in SPKT recipients; however, pancreas allograft survival may be better with tacrolimus. MMF is more effective than azathioprine in preventing acute rejection. Sirolimus appears to be effective in preventing acute rejection, but the combination of sirolimus with a CNI may accentuate the nephrotoxicity of the CNI. RSW with induction therapy is safe and effective in SPKT recipients, but longer follow-up data on outcomes are needed. Recent analysis of registry data shows that most transplant centres are using an induction agent followed by a combination of tacrolimus, MMF and corticosteroids in SPKT recipients.

Induction Immunosuppression for Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: A Review

Objectives

To describe the appropriateness and safety of induction immunosuppression for patients at risk for fatal rejection, and to describe the safety and effectiveness profiles of the induction regimens available in the United States.

Data Sources

MEDLINE/PubMed database, EMBASE database, Google Scholar; references from pertinent articles were also reviewed to identify additional data.

Study Selection

A systematic literature review from January 1, 1980, through June 30, 2008, was performed. Included articles ranged from case series to prospective randomized controlled double-blind placebo-controlled trials that detailed the following topics with respect to induction immunosuppression: risk of fatal rejection, renal sparing, malignancy, OKT3, rabbit or equine antithymocyte globulin, daclizumab, basiliximab, and alemtuzumab.

Results

Patients at highest risk for fatal rejection experienced a survival benefit from induction immunosuppression, whereas all other patients experienced no benefit or harm. Most of the early data detail positive experiences with polyclonal antibody regimens. Several newer trials compare the use of polyclonal strategies with the use of anti-CD25 targeted monoclonal antibodies. Few researchers have assessed the usefulness of an anti-CD52 approach. Overall, induction therapy remains a poorly studied and widely variable practice among the major US heart transplant centers.

Conclusion

At present, the unrestricted use of induction for all patients does not seem prudent. Induction should be individualized for each patient on the basis of a well-designed protocol, careful analysis of the transplant center's demographics, and the effectiveness and safety profiles of the regimens used.

Two-dose daclizumab induction in pediatric renal transplantation

DCZ, an IL-2 receptor antagonist, has been widely used for induction therapy in pediatric and adult solid organ transplantation. Originally, it was recommended as a five-dose regimen; however, fewer doses may be efficacious and less costly for prevention of rejection. There is limited experience with the use of fewer doses in pediatric renal transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 26 primary pediatric renal transplants performed at a single center between June 2004 and May 2007 receiving induction therapy with two-dose DCZ (1.5 mg/kg preoperatively and day seven post-transplant). Maintenance immunosuppression included tacrolimus, MMF, and prednisone in all patients. Forty-six percent were African American and 92% were deceased-donor transplants. After a mean follow-up of 17.8 +/- 7.5 months, acute rejection was noted in 11.5% and graft survival was 92.3%. CMV infection occurred in 11.5%, but no case of BK nephropathy or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder was observed. Our preliminary results suggest that induction therapy with two-dose DCZ was convenient, economical, and effective in preventing rejection episodes without an increase in adverse events or hospital stay. Larger randomized clinical trials with longer duration of follow-up are needed to more fully validate the use of this regimen in pediatric renal transplantation.

Pancreas transplantation

Since the introduction of pancreas transplantation more than 40 years ago, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy have been in progress, yet this surgical procedure still remains the treatment of choice for diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure. Many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, both of which have contributed to an increasing number of indications for pancreas transplantation. This operation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure and lifelong immunosuppression. The various indications, categories, and outcomes of patients having a pancreas transplant are discussed, particularly with reference to the effect on long-term diabetic complications.

Minimization protocols in pancreas transplantation

Diagnosis of immunologic injury (acute and chronic) is much more difficult in pancreas transplants when compared with transplants of other organs. Currently, the immunosuppressive regimen for induction involves calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), antimetabolites and corticosteroids (Cs). This strong and nonspecific regimen does not take into consideration pancreas specificities (i.e. the need to avoid diabetogenic compounds). For obvious reasons, CNI might be calling for review, if permanently indicated in recipients of solitary pancreas with mild renal dysfunction. CNI as well as corticosteroids may induce hyperglycemia and contribute to differential diagnosis of a rejection process. However, in spite of the benefits accruing from withdrawal of above immunosuppressive agents, minimization or avoidance of these drugs could be dangerous and may end up with graft loss (i.e. antibody-mediated process). Long-term results of pancreas transplantation are now achieving comparable survival rates similar to the transplant of traditional organs such as kidney and liver. As a consequence, the physicians' objectives are to prolong the patient's quality of life and organ function as long as possible. Weaning strategies in regard to CNI and steroids are tested. Sirolimus, everolimus, CTLA-4 Ig, etc, are agents known to be either both nonnephrotoxic and nondiabetogenic or less so when compared with CNI. Their impact on pancreas transplantation is beginning to be evaluated. Large randomized trials in all pancreas categories, with long-term clinical and histologic results, are mandatory to establish new guidelines for immunosuppressive regimens for pancreas transplantation.

The long-term survival of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant with basiliximab induction therapy

Interleukin-2 receptor (IL2R) antibody has emerged as an attractive induction therapy for organ transplant. However, the long-term outcome of basiliximab induction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant remains speculative. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term survivals of 91 consecutive SPK recipients with basiliximab as induction, combination of steroid, tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate acid (MFA)--either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sodium mycophenolate (myfortic) as maintenance. At one, three, five, and seven-yr, the actual patient survival rate were 91.2%, 90.3%, 88.1%, and 88.2%, respectively; kidney graft survivals were 90.1%, 84.7%, 78.6%, and 70.6%, respectively; and pancreas graft survivals were 86.8%, 80.6%, 71.4%, and 58.8% respectively. There was a low incidence of rejection and CMV infection. Basiliximab induction with TAC, MFA, and steroid maintenance therapy can provide excellent long-term outcome for SPK recipients.

A comparison of long-term survivals of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant between African American and Caucasian recipients with basiliximab induction therapy

African Americans (AA) have traditionally been thought to have higher immunologic risk than Caucasians (CA) for rejection and allograft loss. The impact of ethnicity on the outcome of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant with basiliximab induction has not been reported. In this study, we retrospectively analyze the long-term results of 36 AA and 55 CA recipients of primary SPK. The actual patient survival rates of AA and CA groups were 91.7% vs. 90.1% at 1 year, 93.3% vs. 88.1% at 3 years, and 94.4% vs. 83.3% at 5 years. The actual kidney survival of AA and CA were 91.7% vs. 89.1% at 1 year, 90% vs. 81% at 3 years, and 83.3% vs. 75% at 5 years. The actual pancreas survival of AA and CA were 88.9% vs. 85.5% at 1 year, 83.3% vs. 78.6% at 3 years and 72.2% vs. 70.8% at 5 years. Death-censored analyses also found no difference in pancreas and kidney graft survival rates over 5 years. Higher rejection rate, but the same low CMV infection, and comparable quality of graft function were noted in AA group. AA may not have worse long-term outcomes than CA recipients of SPK with basiliximab induction and tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate acid (MFA) and steroid maintenance immunotherapy.

Pancreas transplantation utilizing thymoglobulin, sirolimus, and cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

This study aims to determine the impact of thymoglobulin-sirolimus-cyclosporine immunosuppression on the alloimune response of pancreas-kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Thirty-six pancreas transplant recipients received an induction protocol of thymoglobulin, sirolimus, reduced-dose cyclosporine, and corticosteroids. Ten recipients were also enrolled in a study to measure immune responsiveness. Flow PRA determined HLA antibody, donor-specific flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM), T-cell subset, and suppressor cell assays were performed during the first posttransplant year.

RESULTS

One-year patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survivals were 97%, 94%, and 92%, respectively. There was one death and three graft losses. There were no acute rejection episodes. Recipients in the immune-monitoring study (n=10) displayed>80% depression of CD3, CD4, and CD8 (+) cell counts up to 3 months posttransplant. At transplantation 9/10 patients displayed<10% class I and no class II HLA antibody. By 3 months, 7/10 monitored recipients showed a transient elevation in class I HLA antibodies, including 2 patients who expressed>80% Flow PRA. One patient was pretransplant FCXM positive, whereas by 3 months posttransplant 2/10 patients demonstrated a positive FCXM. There were no clinical consequences of the presence of HLA antibody or the positive FCXMs. By 6 months, 7/9 patients demonstrated immunoregulatory suppressor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of acute rejection events was likely due to inhibition of donor-specific immunity by the immunosuppressive regimen. Seventy percent of patients demonstrated an early, non-donor-directed HLA antibody response that had no adverse effect on graft function and 78% of the monitored patients displayed immunoregulatory cells probably contributing to the successful outcomes.

Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1995-2004

This article examines OPTN/SRTR data on kidney and pancreas transplantation for 2004 and the previous decade, and discusses recent changes in kidney-pancreas (KP) allocation policy and emerging issues in kidney donation after cardiac death (DCD). Although the number of kidney donors continues to increase, new waiting list registrations again outpaced the number of kidney transplants performed, rising by 11% between 2003 and 2004 and contributing to a 1-year increase of 8% in the number of patients active on the waiting list. DCD has increased steadily since 2000; 39% more DCD transplants were performed in 2004 than 2003. Both deceased donor and living donor kidney graft survival rates remain excellent and are improving. The number of people living with a functioning kidney transplant doubled between 1995 and 2004, to 101,440 with a functioning kidney-alone and 7213 with a functioning KP. Health care providers in all settings are more likely to be exposed to these transplant recipients. Patient survival following simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation is excellent and has improved incrementally since 1995; death rates in the first year fell from 60 per 1000 patient-years at risk in 2001 to 45 in 2003. The number of solitary pancreas transplants increased dramatically in 2004.

A prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of daclizumab compared to no antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation: results at 3 years

This is a report of outcomes at 36 months of a prospective, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of daclizumab with no antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) patients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. A total of 298 SKPT patients were randomized into one of three groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for 5 doses (group 1, n = 107); daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose for 2 doses (group 2, n = 113); and no antibody induction (group 3, n = 78). There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the three groups, and results were analyzed by an intent-to-treat analysis. The incidence of composite events (acute rejection [AR], any allograft lost, or death) at 3 years was 49%, 43%, and 55% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = .278). The cumulative incidences of AR were not statistically different among the three groups (P = .178). The mean time to first AR was delayed in groups 2 (288 days) and 1 (245 days) compared to group 3 (145 days, P = .07). There were no differences in patient or allograft survival rates among the three groups, and the rates of serious adverse events, infections, and hospital readmissions were also comparable. Excellent dual graft function in patients with surviving grafts was observed in all three groups at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The alternative 2-dose regimen of daclizumab was as safe and effective as the conventional 5-dose regimen compared to no antibody induction in SKPT patients, but no long-term benefits were noted.

An evidence-based analysis of simultaneous pancreas-kidney and pancreas transplantation alone

While pancreas transplantation has evolved within two decades from a frustrating and poorly-accepted therapeutic option to a highly successful procedure, the respective benefits of the successive surgical and immunosuppressive developments have remained unclear. The aim of this study was to determine using an evidence-based methodology, which novel approaches have contributed to the current results and whether pancreas transplantation is cost-effective. Out of 2481 articles, 102 analyzed either surgical or immunosuppressive aspects of pancreas transplantation. Urological complications were more frequent in bladder over enteric drainage (range: 62-63% vs. 12-20%, p = 0.0001), but without significant difference in patient or graft survival. Portal drainage was associated with a trend toward fewer complications and better hyperinsulinemia control over systemic drainage in retrospective studies. Immunosuppression combining induction therapy, a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mophetil (MMF) and corticosteroids were associated with a 40% decreased incidence of rejection (p = 0.01) and an increase in graft survival above 90% at 1 year (p < 0.05). Pancreas transplantation is highly cost-effective compared to conservative alternatives. We conclude that despite a paucity of large studies, enteric drainage should be recommended but the benefits of portal venous drainage remain debated. Quadruple immunosuppression protocols including induction therapy should be the standard regimen.

Risk Factors and Outcomes Analyses at 36 Months of a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Trial of Daclizumab Induction in Simultaneous Kidney–Pancreas Transplant Recipients

The purpose of this study was to analyze risk factors for acute rejection (AR) and long-term outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study of daclizumab (DAC) versus no antibody induction.

METHODS

A total of 298 SKPT patients were randomized into three groups and categorized based on an intent to treat analysis, and factors associated with AR and survival were identified using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

There were no differences in patient or allograft survival or rejection rates among the three groups at 36 months follow-up. Delayed (kidney) graft function (DGF) was a risk factor for subsequent kidney AR (odds ratio = 2.79, P = .002). The presence of kidney AR was also a risk factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.1, P = .003) for kidney graft loss, whereas risk factors for pancreas graft loss (censored for graft loss within 30 days or death with functioning graft) included pancreas AR (HR = 1.97, P = .012), kidney AR (HR = 1.61, P = .042), CMV serostatus donor +/recipient - (HR = 1.62, P = .026), and HLA-B mismatch (HR = 1.58, P = .01). Kidney graft loss (HR = 5.5, P = .02) was the only predictor of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

At 36 months, no significant differences in outcomes were noted in the three study groups. DGF was the major risk factor for kidney AR, kidney AR was the major risk factor for kidney graft loss, and kidney graft loss was the major determinant of mortality. Prevention of kidney DGF and AR in SKPT recipients may play a pivotal role in optimizing long-term outcomes.

Inferior Late Functional and Metabolic Outcomes in African American Simultaneous Kidney-Pancreas Recipients

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of ethnicity on the major endpoints of a prospective, multi-center, randomized trial of 2 dosing regimens of daclizumab compared with no antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT). A total of 298 patients were randomized into 3 groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for 5 doses (Group I, n = 107), daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for 2 doses (Group II, n = 113), and no antibody induction (Group III, n = 78). All patients received tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids. Thirty-seven patients (12.4%) were African American (AA) and 261 were non-African American (NAA). Demographic and transplant characteristics were comparable between AA and NAA patients. At 3 years, there were no differences in patient, kidney, or pancreas graft survival rates. Rejection rate was similar between AA and NAA. Although mean serum creatinine (SCr) levels at 1 year were comparable between AA and NAA patients (AA 1.5 mg/dL vs NAA 1.3 mg/dL; P = .23), by 3 years AA patients had higher mean SCr levels (AA 2.1 mg/dL vs NAA 1.5 mg/dL; P < .0001) and lower calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (AA 45 mL/min vs NAA 56 mL/min; P = .01). Mean HgbA1C, total cholesterol, and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were higher in AA patients at 3 years, compared with NAA patients. In conclusion, in this study, AA patients had worse late functional and metabolic outcomes after SKPT compared with NAA patients. Further longitudinal follow-up is needed to determine the ultimate impact of these findings on long-term patient and graft survival.

Use of different immunosuppressive strategies in recipients of kidneys from nonheart-beating donors

In nonheart-beating donor (NHBD) kidney transplants, immunosuppressive management is difficult mainly because of the high incidence of acute tubular necrosis. This has meant that since the start of our NHBD transplant program, several immunosuppression regimes have been used. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results obtained over 7 years using different treatment protocols. A total of 172 consecutive NHBD transplants performed between April 1996 and December 2002 were treated as follows: G-I (n = 21), cyclosporine (8 mg/kg/day) plus azathioprine plus steroids; G-II (n = 65), low-dose cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/day) plus mycophenolate plus steroids; G-III (n =17), low-dose tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg/day) plus mycophenolate plus steroids; and G-IV (n = 69), daclizumab plus low-dose tacrolimus plus mycophenolate plus steroids. Delayed graft function rates were 76.2%, 72.3%, 76.5%, and 42%, respectively, for the four groups (P = 0.000). Rejection-free patient rates were 76.2%, 46.2%, 35.3%, and 71% (P < 0.001). Vascular rejection rates were 19%, 30.8%, 52.9%, and 18.8%, (P = 0.025). Two-year graft survival was 71.4% in group I, 95.4% in group II, 94.1 in group III, and 93.8% in group IV (P =0.004). Patient survival was worse in group I (75.2% in group I, 100% in group II, 100% in group III, and 96.7% in group IV at 2 years; P < 0.001). The use of daclizumab and low-dose tacrolimus could be effective at lowering the incidence of delayed graft function in NHBDT, with no negative repercussions on acute rejection.

Management of hyperglycaemia after pancreas transplantation: are new immunosuppressants the answer?

Pancreas transplantation is considered the optimal therapy for patients with diabetes mellitus who reach end-stage renal disease. Despite achievement of euglycaemia after this procedure, the progression to impaired pancreatic function and metabolic exhaustion still represents one of the major concerns that increase the risk of graft loss. This paper reviews the possible mechanisms that can induce post-transplant hyperglycaemia, including those related to immunosuppression and those non-related, and the new strategies available for minimising or preventing this complication. Different aetiologies can induce pancreatic dysfunction. Technical complications, acute pancreatitis and delayed graft function, mostly related to impaired insulin secretion, are considered the early causes for abnormal glucose control. In general, acute rejection does not affect the endocrine portion of the pancreas graft because islet destruction occurs later than the inflammation of the exocrine components. Hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance represent the main concern for the progression of blood glucose intolerance. The anastomotic techniques of the exocrine portion of the pancreas and the immunosuppressive regimens are of critical importance for the development of impaired glucose metabolism. Hyperinsulinaemia, as a result of the fact that systemic-enteric or systemic-bladder drainages reducing the hepatic clearance of insulin, has led to the introduction of more physiological techniques using portal drainage of the endocrine secretions. Experimental and clinical data have shown that many of the current immunosuppressants account, to a large degree, for the increased risk of the development of post-transplant hyperglycaemia. The most common maintenance regimen in pancreatic transplantation still consists of triple therapy with a combination of corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors (either ciclosporin [cyclosporine] or tacrolimus), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).The diabetogenic effects of corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors have resulted in the need for protocols able to minimise their use. Recent studies have shown the safety and efficacy of steroid-sparing or -free regimens. Sirolimus has shown powerful immunosuppressive potency in absence of nephrotoxicity and diabetogenicity. Multicentre and single-centre reports have demonstrated that both calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal and avoidance were possible when sirolimus was used in a concentration-controlled fashion, with low-dose corticosteroids and MMF. Although the experience with sirolimus in pancreatic transplantation is still limited, the results are promising. Patients affected by diabetic gastroparesis seem to better tolerate a regimen with sirolimus and low-dose tacrolimus than one with tacrolimus in combination with MMF.For successful, long-term results of pancreatic transplantation, it is crucial to combine donor selection, technical aspects, modified anastomotic techniques and new therapeutic approaches designed to minimise the metabolic and non-metabolic adverse effects of the immunosuppressive regimens.

Effect of donor-recipient cytomegalovirus serologic status on outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

Diabetic patients undergoing simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) may be at high risk for developing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. To study this issue, we analyzed 297 SKPT patients enrolled into a multicenter trial of two daclizumab dosing strategies versus no antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Complete donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV serology values were available in 294 cases and were distributed as follows: 86 (29%) D+/R-. Eighty-six (29%) D+R+; 45 (16%) D-/R+; 77 (26%) D-/R-; CMV antiviral prophylaxis was center specific, but 98% of patients received either ganciclovir or acyclovir. No differences existed in demographic or transplant characteristics or immunosuppressive regimens among the four groups except that more African-American SKPT recipients were CMV positive at transplant (P <.001). At 6 months, no differences were seen in patient and graft survival rates (GSR) and the incidence of acute rejection (AR) among the groups. However, the CMV D+/R- group had a significantly higher incidence of CMV infection/disease (14%) than the other groups collectively (4%, P <.05). Most cases of CMV infection/disease occurred greater than 3 months posttransplant when prophylaxis was discontinued. In the D-/R- group, the pancreas GSR was higher (94% vs 86% in the remaining three groups) and the incidence of AR was lower (16% vs 25% in the remaining three groups, both P =.09). Primary CMV exposure remains a major risk factor for CMV infection/disease, but does not have an adverse impact on short-term outcomes. Conversely, protective CMV seronegative matching may have a beneficial effect on outcomes.

Does surgical technique influence outcomes after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation?

Since 1995, many centers have switched from bladder to enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT). Enteric exocrine drainage may be performed with either systemic (systemic-enteric [S-E]) or portal (portal-enteric [P-E]) venous delivery of insulin. Controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical technique. From March 1999 to May 2001, a total of 297 SKPT patients were enrolled into a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative trial of two daclizumab dosing strategies versus no-antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids in SKPT recipients. Surgical techniques were center specific. A total of 171 patients (58%) underwent SKPT with S-E drainage, 96 (32%) with P-E drainage, and 30 (10%) with systemic-bladder (S-B) drainage. The two groups randomized to daclizumab induction were similar with regard to surgical technique (64% S-E, 25% P-E, 11% S-B drainage). Demographic and transplant characteristics and immunosuppression were similar among the three groups, except that more patients with P-E drainage did not receive antibody induction. At 6 months, no differences were seen in patient and graft survival rates, surgical complications including pancreas thrombosis, rates of rejection or infection, readmissions, and kidney and pancreas allograft function among the three different surgical techniques. The 6-month results of this multicenter study suggest no significant differences in outcomes in SKPT recipients according to surgical technique.

Daclizumab induction in solid organ transplantation

Antibody induction therapy is used in solid organ transplantation to prevent rejection in the early postoperative period. It is especially useful in high-risk groups such as retransplants, patients with delayed graft function to delay the initiation of nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporin), highly sensitised recipients and African-American recipients. Historically, antibody induction has been associated with a high incidence of adverse effects and a complicated administration regimen. Daclizumab is a monoclonal antibody that exerts its effect by binding to the alpha subunit (CD25) of the human interleukin (IL)-2 receptor on the surface of activated lymphocytes, thus preventing the binding of IL-2. It is used for induction therapy and is well-tolerated with easy administration. Although originally studied as a five-dose regimen, there is a growing accumulation of data that fewer doses (two or three) are efficacious and less costly for preventing rejection.

A Multicenter Analysis of the Significance of HLA Matching on Outcomes After Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of HLA matching on outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) recipients in a multicenter trial. From March 1999 to May 2001, a total of 297 SKPT recipients were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial of 2 daclizumab dosing strategies versus no antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids in SKPT recipients. Subanalyses using both univariate and multivariate models were performed at 1 year to identify factors associated with acute rejection, graft loss, or death. Potential risk factors evaluated were treatment group, African American ethnicity, HLA-A mismatches (MM), HLA-B MM, HLA-DR MM, total HLA MM, surgical technique, cytomegalovirus status of donor and recipient, and delayed graft function (DGF). Univariate analyses revealed that treatment group, HLA-A MM, HLA-B MM, total HLA MM >3, and DGF were significantly associated with acute rejection. These variables were then entered into logistic and Cox regression analyses. HLA-A MM and DGF were the only variables that remained significantly associated with acute rejection in the multivariate model. The relative risk for acute rejection in recipients with HLA-A MM was 1.56 (P = .02). In conclusion, despite contemporary immunosuppression, the degree of HLA MM, particularly HLA-A, and DGF are associated with an increased risk for acute rejection in SKPT recipients at 1 year. Less rejection was noted in patients with 0 MM at all 3 HLA loci and in patients with total HLA-MM <3. However, none of these factors affected short-term patient or graft survival rates.

Daclizumab is Associated With Decreased Rejection and No Increased Mortality in Cardiac Transplant Patients Receiving MMF, Cyclosporine, and Corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Sparse published data exist on outcomes in daclizumab-treated cardiac transplant patients. One trial observed an increased mortality risk 6 and 12 months posttransplant in patients receiving daclizumab plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine, and steroids. This study further investigates the safety profile of daclizumab with this same immunosuppressive regimen from a large registry.

METHODS

Data obtained at hospital discharge on all adult cardiac transplants performed in the USA between January 1998 and October 2003 for patients receiving MMF plus cyclosporine and steroids were accessed from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Patients were selected based on induction treatment: daclizumab (n = 684) or no induction (n = 2525). Outcomes were evaluated at 6 months, 12 months, and 3 years posttransplant. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox models were used to evaluate the effect of treatment on outcomes. Patient survival and infectious death were the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included rejection within the first year posttransplant (acute rejection; AR) and total rejection episodes over time. The two treatment groups shared similar demographics and transplant procedure details.

RESULTS

Daclizumab (vs no induction) patients had no increased risk of patient death nor infectious death. Daclizumab patients had a lower incidence of AR at 6 months (P = .005) and 12 months (P < .001); the adjusted risk for AR at 12 months (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.77; P = .89) and over 3 years (HR 0.83, P = .006) was also lower in daclizumab-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In cardiac transplant patients, daclizumab (vs no induction) does not result in increased mortality or infectious death, and is associated with a lower incidence of AR.

Effect of up-front daclizumab when combined with steroids for the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: results of a randomized trial

The standard initial therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is corticosteroids. Daclizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against the interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor expressed on activated T lymphocytes. Because of daclizumab's favorable toxicity profile and response rate in steroid-resistant GVHD, a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized study of corticosteroids with or without daclizumab for initial treatment of acute GVHD was conducted. A total of 102 evaluable subjects of the targeted 166 were enrolled at 5 participating sites. Methylprednisolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg or daily equivalent was given in conjunction with daclizumab 1 mg/kg or placebo on study days 1, 4, 8, and weekly as long as clinically indicated. The groups were balanced for clinical characteristics. GVHD response rates by study day 42 were similar (53% vs 51%; P =.85). The study was halted after a planned interim analysis showed a significantly worse 100-day survival in the group receiving corticosteroids plus daclizumab (77% vs 94%; P =.02). Overall survival at 1 year was also inferior in the combination arm (29% vs 60%; P =.002). Both relapse- and GVHD-related mortality contributed to the increased mortality in the combination group. The combination of corticosteroids and daclizumab should not be used as initial therapy of acute GVHD.

Steroid-withdrawal at 3 days after renal transplantation with anti-IL-2 receptor alpha therapy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study

Steroids have been included in most immunosuppressive regimens after renal transplantation, but are feared for their side-effects. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to investigate whether it is feasible to withdraw steroids early after transplantation with the use of anti-IL-2Ralpha induction, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). A total of 364 patients were randomized to receive either two doses of daclizumab (1 mg/kg) and, for the first 3 days, 100 mg of prednisolone (daclizumab group n = 186), or steroids (tapered to 0 mg at week 16; controls n = 178). All patients received tacrolimus and MMF. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months was not different between the daclizumab group (15%) and the controls (14%) (95% confidence interval of difference: -6 to + 8%, NS). Graft survival at 12 months was comparable in the two groups (daclizumab group: 91%; controls: 90%). Mean arterial blood pressure, serum lipids, and incidence of patients with hyperglycemia were temporary lower in the daclizumab group compared with controls. The immunosuppressive regimen of the daclizumab group was associated with increased costs. In conclusion, with the use of anti-IL-2Ra induction and daily therapy with tacrolimus and MMF it is feasible to withdraw steroids at 3 days after renal transplantation.

African-American ethnicity is no longer a risk factor for early adverse outcomes in simultaneous kidney–pancreas transplantation with contemporary immunosuppression

The influence of ethnicity on the outcome of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of ethnicity on the major endpoints of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of two dosing regimens of daclizumab compared to no-antibody induction in SKPT. A total of 297 patients were randomized into three groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for five doses (group I, n = 107); daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for two doses (group II, n = 112), and no-antibody induction (group III, n = 78). All patients received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids for maintenance immunosuppression. Thirty-seven patients (12.5%) were African-American (AA) and 260 were non-African-American (NAA). Demographics and transplant characteristics were comparable between AA and NAA patients. At 1 year, no differences were seen in patient survival (97% AA, 96% NAA), kidney graft survival (94% AA, 93% NAA), and pancreas graft survival (84% AA, 85% NAA). Rejection rate and incidence of adverse events were similar between AA and NAA subjects. Kidney graft function was comparable between AA and NAA patients at 1 year; however, mean HgbA1C was higher, C-peptide was lower, and oral hypoglycemic use was more common in AA subjects. Thus, in this prospective multicenter study, AA ethnicity was not associated with an increased risk of early adverse outcomes in SKPT. Follow-up will be required to determine whether long-term outcomes remain equivalent, particularly with regard to pancreas graft function.

The impact of delayed graft function of the kidney on the pancreas allograft in simultaneous Kidney–Pancreas transplantation

It is unclear whether delayed graft function (DGF) of the kidney has any influence on pancreas graft function following simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT). A subgroup analysis was conducted using data from a multicenter study to determine the impact of DGF of the kidney on pancreas graft function following SKPT.

METHODS

Of the 297 SKPT patients, 24 (8%) had DGF of the kidney, defined as the need for dialysis during the first week posttransplant. Clinical parameters including patient and graft survival, incidence of acute rejection, and pancreas and renal function were compared between patients with and without DGF at 1 week, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months posttransplant.

RESULTS

Demographic and transplant characteristics were similar between the two groups except for longer kidney and pancreas cold ischemia times, more males, and more primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) exposure in the DGF group (P <.05). No differences were seen in patient and graft survival rates, but the incidence of acute renal rejection was higher in patients with DGF (42%) than in those without DGF (15%, P =.001). More patients with DGF (25%) received oral hypoglycemic agents at 1-year posttransplant than in those without DGF (5%, P <.01). At 1 year, the mean serum creatinine was 1.8 mg/dL and 1.4 mg/dL in patients with and without DGF, respectively (P <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with DGF of the kidney had a higher incidence of acute renal rejection and received oral hypoglycemic agents more often during the first year posttransplant compared to those who did not have DGF following SKPT.

One-year outcomes in simultaneous kidney–pancreas transplant recipients receiving an alternative dosing regimen of daclizumab

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimen of daclizumab with no-antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.

METHODS

A total of 297 SKPT patients were enrolled into this prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study. The patients were randomized into three groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for five doses (group I, n = 107), daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for two doses (group II, n = 112), and no-antibody induction (group III, n = 78).

RESULTS

There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the three groups, except for a higher proportion of African-Americans in group II. The incidence of composite events (acute rejection, graft loss, or death) at 1 year was 36.4%, 32.7%, and 48.7% for groups I, II, and III, respectively (P <.05, group II vs group III). The incidence of acute rejection was highest in group III (34.6%) compared to groups I and II (22.4% and 22.1%, respectively, P <.05). The mean time to acute rejection was delayed in group II (96 days) compared to 23 days in group I and 20 days in group III (P <.05). The adverse-event profiles were comparable among the three groups, except for a higher incidence of infection and readmissions in group III.

CONCLUSIONS

Daclizumab was safe and effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection when compared to no induction. The alternative two-dose regimen of daclizumab was as effective as the conventional five-dose regimen and is logistically more desirable.

Anti-Interleukin-2 Receptor Antibodies in Transplantation

Two monoclonal antibody preparations against the alpha-chain of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Ralpha) are available for use, basiliximab and daclizumab, a chimeric and a humanised antibody, respectively. The first clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of these agents as induction therapy to reduce the rate of acute rejection after organ transplantation. Basiliximab and daclizumab have a similar effect on prevention of acute rejection. Likewise, incidence of infections and malignancies are not different between the two treatment options. Anti-IL-2Ralpha therapy was very well tolerated in clinical trials. Phase III studies with basiliximab have been undertaken with a two-dose regimen, consisting of two doses of 20mg, in an attempt to saturate the IL-2Ralpha on peripheral blood T lymphocytes for an average of 4-6 weeks. In contrast, the daclizumab dose is corrected for bodyweight and the goal is to achieve IL-2Ralpha blockade for 12 weeks. Phase III efficacy trials with daclizumab have, therefore, been developed with five doses of 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks in the first 2 months after transplantation. Whether or not it is a benefit to have blockade of the IL-2Ralpha for 10-12 weeks (daclizumab) compared with 4-6 weeks (basiliximab) remains unknown. Assuming 4-6 weeks would be sufficient for prevention of acute rejection, many centres have changed the protocol of daclizumab administration to two doses, the first dose given at the time of transplantation, the second 10 or 14 days after, with good success. Therefore, it seems feasible to limit the dose of daclizumab, which increases the ease of administration and probably also the cost effectiveness of this agent. There are no controlled studies comparing basiliximab and daclizumab, nor have different dose regimens been directly compared in renal transplantation. The data available suggest the differences are small, if present at all, and it is unlikely that such a trial will ever be done. With both compounds, a significant reduction in the number of acute rejection episodes following solid organ transplantation can be obtained without an increase in adverse effects or infectious complications.