POLYOMAVIRUS NEPHROPATHY: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED?1

Detection of polyomavirus BK reactivation after renal transplantation using an intensive decoy cell surveillance program is cost-effective

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of polyomavirus BK (BKV) after renal transplantation can lead to allograft dysfunction or loss with early detection improving outcomes. Current guidelines recommend quantitative polymerase chain reaction for surveillance; however, urinary decoy cell detection is a potentially cost-effective alternative. We present the outcomes from an early intensive BKV surveillance program using decoy cell detection for initial screening starting 2 weeks after transplantation.

METHODS

Records for all recipients of kidney (n=211) or simultaneous kidney and pancreas (n=102) transplants performed over 2 years in a single center were reviewed. Follow-up was for a minimum of 1 year. Urine cytology screening was performed fortnightly from 0 to 3 months after transplantation, monthly from 3 to 6 months then every 2 months from 6 to 12 months.

RESULTS

Decoy cell positivity occurred in 56 of 313 patients (17.9%) with sustained decoy cell positivity (≥2 positive urine samples >2 weeks apart) present in 32 patients (10.2%). Twenty-four patients (7.6%) became viremic and three patients (1%) developed polyoma virus nephropathy. The median time after transplantation until decoy cell positivity was 78 days, decreasing to 67 days for patients with sustained positivity and 57 days for patients who developed polyoma virus nephropathy. No grafts were lost due to BKV during the study period. Decoy cell screening resulted in savings of approximately £135,000 over 2 years, when compared with routine surveillance by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically significant BKV reactivation occurs early after transplantation and can be reliably detected by decoy cell screening. A surveillance strategy for detecting BKV reactivation based on urine cytology is cost-effective.

Antirejection treatment in kidney transplant patients with BK viruria

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients with BK virus nephropathy or viremia are generally treated with reduction of immunosuppression to facilitate virus eradication.

METHODS

Prompted by biopsy findings interpreted as acute rejection, we administered intravenous bolus steroids to five patients with BK virus in the plasma (BKP) (group 1) and also tried other antirejection therapies in 13 patients with BK virus in the urine (BKU) but no BKP (group 2).

RESULTS

All group 1 patients had continued viremia, whereas two viruric patients in group 2 developed viremia after therapy. Ultimately, after reduced immunosuppression both groups cleared BKP over 53+/-29 days and 50+/-6 days. BKU clearance was not consistently observed. One year postbiopsy, there were no graft failures (0%) in group 1 and 2 (15%) in group 2; however, suboptimal renal function was observed in 40% and 62%, respectively (P=0.6).

CONCLUSION

Cautious antirejection treatment to patients with active BKP or BKU can lead to two possible outcomes: (a) reduction in serum creatinine that is seemingly consistent with a diagnosis of acute rejection and (b) lack of clinical response, which in the absence of overt BK nephropathy, makes it difficult to distinguish between refractory rejection and virus-induced tissue inflammation.

Antirejection treatment in kidney transplant patients with BK viruria

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients with BK virus nephropathy or viremia are generally treated with reduction of immunosuppression to facilitate virus eradication.

METHODS

Prompted by biopsy findings interpreted as acute rejection, we administered intravenous bolus steroids to five patients with BK virus in the plasma (BKP) (group 1) and also tried other antirejection therapies in 13 patients with BK virus in the urine (BKU) but no BKP (group 2).

RESULTS

All group 1 patients had continued viremia, whereas two viruric patients in group 2 developed viremia after therapy. Ultimately, after reduced immunosuppression both groups cleared BKP over 53+/-29 days and 50+/-6 days. BKU clearance was not consistently observed. One year postbiopsy, there were no graft failures (0%) in group 1 and 2 (15%) in group 2; however, suboptimal renal function was observed in 40% and 62%, respectively (P=0.6).

CONCLUSION

Cautious antirejection treatment to patients with active BKP or BKU can lead to two possible outcomes: (a) reduction in serum creatinine that is seemingly consistent with a diagnosis of acute rejection and (b) lack of clinical response, which in the absence of overt BK nephropathy, makes it difficult to distinguish between refractory rejection and virus-induced tissue inflammation.

Quantitation of BK virus DNA for diagnosis of BK virus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

Quantitative measurement of BK virus DNA (Q-BKDNA) has been used for the early diagnosis and monitoring of BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). This study was designed to determine the BKDNA cutoff for the diagnosis of BKVAN. Between June 2005 and February 2007, 64 renal transplant recipients taken renal biopsies due to renal impairment submitted plasma and urine for Q-BKDNA. Eight BKVAN patients (12.5%) had median viral loads of 6.0 log10 copies/mL in plasma and 7.3 log10 copies/mL in urine. Among 56 non-BKVAN patients, 45 were negative for Q-BKDNA; 4 were positive in plasma with a median viral load of 4.8 log10 copies/ mL, and 10 were positive in urine with a median viral load of 4.8 log10 copies/mL. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a cutoff of 4.5 log10 copies/mL in plasma and a cutoff of 5.9 log10 copies/mL in urine had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.4%, respectively. A combined cutoffs of 4 log10 copies/ mL in plasma and 6 log10 copies/mL in urine had better performance with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.2% than each cutoff of urine or plasma. QBKDNA with the combined cutoffs could reliably diagnose BKVAN in renal transplant recipients.

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and chronic allograft tubulointerstitial fibrosis

Chronic allograft tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (TA/IF) is a major cause of late allograft loss. A major challenge to the future of kidney transplantation is to dissect the identifiable causes of chronic allograft TA/IF and to develop cause-specific treatment strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an important event in native and transplant kidney injury, including chronic allograft TA/IF. During EMT, tubular epithelial cells are transformed into myofibroblasts through a stepwise process including loss of cell-cell adhesion and E-cadherin expression, de novo alpha-smooth muscle actin expression, actin reorganization, tubular basement membrane disruption, cell migration, and fibroblast invasion with production of profibrotic molecules such as collagen types I and III and fibronectin. We examined in this review the molecular and cellular pathways of EMT and their involvement in chronic allograft tubulointerstitial fibrosis. We examined the role of alloimmune T cells and oxidative stress in this context and evaluated EMT as a marker of disease progression. Potential therapeutic options are discussed. In conclusion, there is enough evidence demonstrating that EMT is involved in the pathogenesis of chronic allograft tubulointerstitial fibrosis. However, the extent of its contribution to allograft fibrogenesis remains unknown, and only interventional trials will enable us to clarify this question. Furthermore, additional data are required to determine whether EMT may be used as a surrogate marker of disease progression in kidney transplant recipients.

Complications post renal transplantation: literature focus on BK virus nephropathy and diagnostic tools actually available

Clinical diagnosis of kidney transplants related illnesses is not a simple task. Several studies were conducted to define diseases and complications after renal transplantation, but there are no comprehensive guidelines about diagnostic tools for their prevention and detection.

The Authors of this review looked for the medical literature and pertinent publications in particular to understand the role of Human Polyomavirus BK (BKV) in renal failure and to recognize analytical techniques for BK virus associated nephropathy (BKVAN) detection.

Clinical course of kidney transplant patients with acute rejection and BK virus replication following Campath therapy

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients with active BK virus (BKV) replication are generally treated with reduction in immunosuppression to allow a successful immune response against the virus.

METHODS

We inadvertently administered Campath to two patients with BKV viruria, and one patient with BKV nephropathy, since allograft biopsies showed severe tubulitis or intimal arteritis, and results of PCR and in situ hybridization were not available at the time of therapeutic intervention.

RESULTS

Increased viral replication was observed, but not uniformly in all cases, and follow-up biopsies showed nephropathy in one additional case. Extra-renal dissemination did not occur. With subsequent reduction of immunosuppression or antiviral therapy, it was still possible to obtain clearance of viremia in all cases. Serum creatinine fell transiently after Campath in one patient; however, at one yr post-treatment all had increased levels over baseline. One graft was lost to persistent acute rejection that led to interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy.

CONCLUSION

These cases suggest that Campath treatment does not (i) irreversibly deplete cells believed to be important in mounting an immune response against BKV, or (ii) preclude subsequent eradication of viral DNA from the blood.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy risk in kidney transplants: the influence of recipient age and donor gender

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a frequent cause of kidney transplant failure. We determined the risk factors for biopsy-proven PVAN among 1027 recent kidney transplant recipients by univariate and multivariate analyses. The rate of PVAN was determined over an univariate and multivariate analysis over an average of 30 months of follow-up of patients receiving predominantly living donor grafts with antibody induction and sequential surveillance biopsies to detect subclinical graft disease. Seventy-four transplant recipients were diagnosed with PVAN with the finding made on surveillance biopsy in 40 patients. These 40 cases did not differ from the 34 non-surveillance cases with respect to baseline clinical characteristics or initial histological features. Older recipient age and female donor gender were independent risks associated with PVAN. Factors not linked to PVAN risk included the use and type of induction agent, use of tacrolimus vs sirolimus, the number of human lympocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, or the frequency of acute rejection. We conclude that PVAN preferentially affects older age patients and allografts from female donors but is unrelated to immunological risk, choice of immunosuppression, or rejection history.

PCR assays for the early detection of BKV infection in 125 Spanish kidney transplant patients

BK virus (BKV) reactivation arises from immunocompromised conditions and can produce a tubulointerstitial nephropathy (BKVN) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Approximately 5% of KTR develop BKVN, and about 45% of these lose their graft. Therefore, using molecular tools to test for BKV may be helpful in early detection. A series of 125 Spanish KTR, originating from a single transplant center, were studied in relation to BKV infection in the first post-transplant year. First, we carried out a urinary cytological study, looking for decoy cells as a possible marker of virus replication. Secondly, in all positive cytological samples and in some negative cytological samples (selected at random), we performed qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in serum and urine amplifying two different genome regions (LT and VP1). A transcription control region (TCR)-BK polymorphism sequence analysis was also performed in those BK PCR positive cases. Twenty-three of 125 (18.4%) KTR presented decoy cells in at least one urinary cytological sample. Molecular studies revealed that 10 of 125 (8%) KTR were BK PCR-serum positive cases (seven LT+/VP1- and three LT+/VP1+); and 13 of 40 (32.5%) KTR were BK PCR-urine positive cases (five LT+/VP1- and eight LT+/VP1+). When we compared PCR-urine and cytological results in 40 KTR, only 15% (six cases) revealed simultaneous positivity in both studies. In the context of clinical graft dysfunction, three patients demonstrated BK DNA presence in the renal biopsy. Finally, sequence analysis of the TCR was performed in 13 BK-PCR positive cases determining the AS, JL, WW, and WW-like viral variants. TCR sequence analysis, allows us to demonstrate the possible implication of the donor in BK infection studying four BK-PCR positive patients paired by donor.

Chronic allograft nephropathy in paediatric renal transplantation

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is now the leading cause of renal transplant loss in paediatric transplant recipients. Despite improvements in immunosuppression, which have significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection, the rates of chronic kidney loss have remained unchanged in paediatric transplant patients over the last 20 years. Chronic allograft nephropathy is a pathological diagnosis of which the key features are tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. More consistent definitions and grading of these through the Banff classification have allowed more rigorous study of the development of chronic allograft nephropathy along with further identification of specific lesions associated with the underlying aetiologies. While initially thought to be primarily due to immune injury, it is now evident that CAN is the end result of a variety of immune and non-immune injuries including ischaemia reperfusion injury, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity and infections. Protocol biopsy studies have demonstrated rates of CAN development in children similar to those in adults with comparable underlying pathological processes. This review outlines the current knowledge of CAN within the context of paediatric renal transplantation.

Polyoma virus in pediatric renal transplantation

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for children with end-stage renal disease. Patient survival and allograft survival have improved with better immunosuppressant regimes to reduce acute allograft rejection but post-transplant infections have been exacerbated. An emerging problematic virus in the past decade is the polyoma virus BKV. The features of BKV including the clinical features in the general and immune compromised population are reviewed and correlated with pediatric studies in the post-transplant population. These features are placed in context with lessons learned about BKV in relevant adult studies.

Long-term patient survival: strategies to improve overall health

The use of potent immunosuppressant therapy has led to an increase in number of patients with successful long-term kidney transplants. These individuals come to kidney transplantation with varying levels of comorbidity associated with end-stage renal disease and are susceptible to immunologic and nonimmunologic comorbidities that arise late after transplantation, including cardiovascular disease, infection, malignancy, and bone disease, which negatively impact on patient and graft survival. In addition, nonadherence to immunosuppressant regimens increases with time after transplantation, which further augments the risk for late-term graft failure and mortality. Consistent and frequent follow-up of kidney transplant recipients beyond the first year permits early diagnosis and successful treatment of many posttransplantation comorbidities. Implementation of preventive practices and aggressive management of risk factors throughout the life of the transplant improves overall health and long-term outcomes. Establishment and maintenance of close relationships among transplant centers, physicians, patients, and their families improves patient adherence to medications and reduces the risk for morbidity and mortality.

Kidney transplant function and histological clearance of virus following diagnosis of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN)

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is managed by reduced immunosuppression with or without antiviral therapy. Data from 55 patients with biopsy-proven PVAN were analyzed for adverse outcomes and influence of baseline variables and interventions. During 20+/-11 months follow-up, the frequencies of graft loss, major and any functional decline were 15%, 24% and 38%, respectively. Repeat biopsies were performed in 45 patients with persistent PVAN in 47%. Low-dose cidofovir, IVIG and cyclosporine conversion were used in 55%, 20% and 55% of patients. No single intervention was associated with improved outcome. Of the variables examined, only degree of interstitial fibrosis at diagnosis was associated with kidney function decline. In contrast, donor source, interstitial fibrosis, proportion of BKV positive tubules and plasma viral load at diagnosis were all associated with failure of histological viral clearance. This retrospective, nonrandomized analysis suggests that: (i) Graft loss within 2 years of PVAN diagnosis is now uncommon, but ongoing functional decline and persistent infection occur frequently. (ii) Low-dose cidofovir, IVIG and conversion to cyclosporine do not abrogate adverse outcomes following diagnosis. (iii) Fibrosis at the time of diagnosis predicts subsequent functional decline. Further elucidation of the natural history of PVAN and its response to individual interventions will require prospective clinical trials.

Chronic allograft nephropathy: current concepts and future directions

The paradigm that chronic rejection causes all progressive late allograft failure has been replaced by a hypothesis of cumulative damage, where a series of time-dependent immune and nonimmune mechanisms injure the kidney and lead to chronic interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, representing a final common pathway of injury and its consequent fibrotic healing response. Allograft damage is common, progressive, time-dependent, clinically important and modified by immunosuppression. Early after transplantation, tubulointerstitial damage is predominantly related to ischemia reperfusion injury, acute tubular necrosis, acute and subclinical rejection and/or calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, superimposed on preexisting donor disease. Later, cellular inflammation lessens and is replaced by microvascular and glomerular injury from calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, hypertension, immune-mediated fibrointimal vascular hyperplasia, transplant glomerulopathy and capillary injury, polyoma virus and/or recurrent glomerulonephritis. Additional mechanisms of injury include internal architectural disruption of the kidney, cortical ischemia, persistent chronic inflammation, replicative senescence, cytokine excess and fibrosis induced by epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Current understanding of the etiology, pathophysiology and evolution of pathological changes are detailed. An approach to histological assessment of the individual failing graft are presented and a series of postulates are defined for future studies of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Medical Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients after the First Posttransplant Year

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with ESRD. Despite improvements in short-term patient and graft outcomes, there has been no major improvement in long-term outcomes. The use of kidney allografts from expanded-criteria donors, polyoma virus nephropathy, underimmunosuppression, and incomplete functional recovery after rejection episodes may play a role in the lack of improvement in long-term outcomes. Other factors, including cardiovascular disease, infections, and malignancies, also shorten patient survival and therefore reduce the functional life of an allograft. There is a need for interventions that improve long-term outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. These patients are a unique subset of patients with chronic kidney disease. Therefore, interventions need to address disease progression, comorbid conditions, and patient mortality through a multifaceted approach. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative from the National Kidney Foundation, the European Best Practice Guidelines, and the forthcoming Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes clinical practice guidelines can serve as a cornerstone of this approach. The unique aspects of chronic kidney disease in the transplant recipient require the integration of specific transplant-oriented problems into this care schema and a concrete partnership among transplant centers, community nephrologists, and primary care physicians. This article reviews the contemporary aspects of care for these patients.

Genetic variability in BK Virus regulatory regions in urine and kidney biopsies from renal-transplant patients

The human Polyomavirus BK (BKV) contains a hypervariable non-coding control region (NCCR), which regulates DNA replication and RNA transcription. The aim of this study was to characterize BKV NCCR-variants in kidney biopsies and urine samples from renal-transplant patients and to see whether there is any association between NCCR variability and BKV-nephropathy. Kidney biopsies and urine samples were examined from 11 patients with elevated serum creatinine and >5,000 genomic BKV copies per ml of urine. BKV-nephropathy was diagnosed in seven patients. Using PCR, BKV NCCR was amplified from urine from all BKV-nephropathy patients. The dominant NCCR corresponded to the archetype (WWT). In addition, a total of 14 non-archetype NCCR-variants were detected. Thirteen of these NCCR-variants were found in urine from one single BKV-nephropathy patient also suffering from hepatitis C. The NCCR of BKV was amplified from kidney biopsies of six BKV-nephropathy patients. Three patients demonstrated WWT NCCR, while three other patients harbored rearranged NCCR variants. The WWT NCCR was also detected in urine from control patients, except for one patient who harbored two non-archetypal NCCR variants. However, these variants were not resulting from complex rearrangements but instead had a linear NCCR anatomy with deletion(s) in the P-block. No BKV DNA was detected in biopsies from control patients. The results indicate that rearranged BKV NCCR is associated with BKV-nephropathy.

Prevalence of BK virus subtype I in Germany

The primary infection with human polyomavirus BK (BKV) occurs in early childhood and leads to viral latency within the urogenital tract. Up to 90% of the adult population are seropositive. In immunosuppressed patients, the BKV may be reactivated resulting in typical disease patterns like hemorrhagic cystitis and tubulointerstitial nephritis. Based on serological and molecular methods, BKV isolates were classified into four subtypes previously. Sixty specimens obtained from German renal and bone marrow transplant recipients were analyzed to gain data on the prevalence of BKV subtypes in Germany. With 90.9%, BKV subtype I was found to be predominant in both patient groups. 6.1% of BKV strains were classified as subtype IV. This pattern of phylogenetic distribution is similar to that demonstrated previously in England, Tanzania, the United States and Japan. Remarkably, there was one German BKV virus with a sequence which clusters together with strain SB in subtype II. The BKV subtype I was found to consist of at least three subgroups designated as Ia, Ib, and Ic. While the majority of the German sequences represent subgroup Ic, most of the Japanese sequences are clearly distinct. These findings support the hypothesis of distinct geographical prevalence of BKV subgroups. For the genotyping region, a relationship of BKV subgroups to disease patterns like hemorrhagic cystitis or tubulointerstitial nephritis could not be demonstrated.

Immunocytological Urinalysis and Monocyte Chemotactic Peptide-1 in Renal Transplant Recipients With Polyomavirus Replication

In some patients polyomavirus replication induces chronic tubulointerstitial inflammation in the transplanted kidney. The aim of this study was to investigate whether immunocytological urinalysis and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) assays could be used for an early diagnosis of nephropathy for patients with polyomavirus replication. We analyzed 1189 urine sediments from 174 renal allograft recipients who were transplanted between 2000 and 2005. Decoy cells were identified by an immunofluorescence method using specific antibodies (JC/BK monoclonal antibody). A similar method was used to detect CD3(+), CD14(+), and HLA-DR(+) cells with appropriate antibodies. The urinary excretion of MCP-1 was assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The results of urine sediment analysis and MCP-1 concentrations were compared with those of patients with stable graft function (control group n = 65). In 17 patients (10%) decoy cells were identified in urine. In 12 patients polyomavirus DNA was detected in plasma or urine by a polymerase chain reaction method. Polyomavirus nephropathy was diagnosed in eight patients by the presence of intranuclear viral inclusions or immunohistochemical staining with SV40 large T-antigen specimens from a renal biopsy, as well as by clinical and histopathological evidence (group I). Polyomavirus replication was diagnosed in four patients by urinary excretion of decoy cells and polyomavirus DNA detection (group III). In five patients only decoy cells were found. The patients of groups I and II showed an increased number of CD3, CD14, HLA-DR surface antigen-positive cells and greater excretion of MCP-1 compared with the control group (P < .02). The number of excreted cells was higher among patients with more severe infiltration. The results of patients from group III were similar to the control group. In conclusion, increased excretion of cells with CD3, CD14, and HLA-DR surface antigens and of MCP-1 were associated with intragraft tubulointerstitial inflammation in patients with polyomavirus nephropathy. Asymptomatic polyomavirus replication was associated with hidden tubulointerstitial inflammation. Monitoring cell excretion and chemokine content may be utilized for early detection of polyomavirus-induced nephropathy.

Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of BK Virus and Monitoring of BK Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients at the University Hospital La Fe

INTRODUCTION

Reactivation of BK infection occurs in immunocompromised hosts causing tubulointerstitial nephropathy (BKVN). Approximately 5% of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) develop BKVN, special half of whom lose their grafts. However, BKVN morphologic diagnosis on a renal biopsy is complicated, because the cytopathic changes can sometimes mimic rejection. Thus, BKV DNA-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay on serum, urine, and renal tissue is useful for early detection and monitoring of BKV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed routine monthly urine cytologies looking for decoy cells as a marker of virus replication. Then, we performed a qualitative PCR on urine and serum in all recipients (independently of positive or negative cytology). We amplified 3 BK viral genome regions, LT (early transcription region) and VP1 (late transcription region) seeking a more accurate virus detection, and the TCR (control transcription region) region to perform a polymorphism sequence analysis to identify the BK genomic variant. Finally, the BKVN diagnosis was confirmed using renal biopsy.

RESULTS

At present, 132 patients have been monitored. Thirteen of 40 (33%) were PCR-urine-positive cases (5 LT+/VP1- and 8 LT+/VP1+), and 10 of 132 (7.5%) were PCR-serum-positive cases (7 LT+/VP1- and 3 LT+/VP1+). When we compared PCR-urine and cytology results, 11 of 40 (27.5%) patients showed a positive cytology, 6 of whom were PCR- urine-positive (1 LT+/VP1- and 5 LT+/VP1+); whereas, 29 patients showed a negative cytology, 7 of whom were PCR-urine-positive(3 LT+/VP1- and 4 LT+/VP1+). Thus, comparison of PCR- urine and cytology results revealed false-positive and false-negative cases. Finally, TCR sequence analysis was performed in 9 patients to identify the BK genomic variants.

CONCLUSION

Testing for BKV DNA in urine and serum is a noninvasive early detection assay and monitoring tool.

Screening to prevent polyoma virus nephropathy: a medical decision analysis

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is an emerging medical dilemma in kidney transplantation. Methods to screen before clinical disease are available and early immunosuppression reduction may change the natural history of progression. However, the consequences of an increase in rejection may limit the benefits. In a simulation model a 'screen' versus 'no-screen' strategy was compared. Baseline PVN cumulative incidence was assumed to be 4%. Patients with PVN were modeled to have 4-fold higher risk of graft loss. In the screen strategy, patients positive for blood DNA PCR had their immunosuppression reduced. This pre-emptive change was modeled to reduce progression to overt PVN by 80%. Therapy reduction was associated with a 10% risk of precipitating acute rejection and greater risk of chronic allograft loss. In the baseline case, screening saved 1912 dollars (discounted) and produced 0.020 more quality adjusted life years (QALYs) than not screening. Screening resulted in decreased net QALYs if the false positive viremia rate was >9.5% and the PVN incidence was <2.1%. Much of the cost savings of screening relate to savings from immunosuppression reduction in the screened arm. Screening may well be cost-effective if not cost saving in centers with high PVN rates. There remain significant areas of uncertainty.

LT, VP1 and TCR-BKV sequence analysis in a patient with post-transplant BKV nephropathy associated with EBV-related PTLD

A 10-year-old boy kidney transplant recipient (KTR) developed an abdominal post-transplant lymphoproliferative syndrome (PTLD) followed by BK virus nephropathy (BKVN). BK virus (BKV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) were studied in renal and PTLD tissue by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Afterwards, the patient was monitored in relation to BKV in urine and serum; transcription control region (TCR)-BK polymorphism sequence analysis was also performed. In the PCR assay, both early large T antigen (LT) and late (VP1) transcriptional BKV coding regions were found in renal tissue, whereas EBV and only LT-BK were detected in PTLD abdominal tissue. On the other hand, TCR sequence analysis revealed the AS genomic BK variant.

Chronic renal allograft dysfunction

The major causes of renal transplant loss are death from vascular, malignant or infectious disease, and loss of the allograft from chronic renal dysfunction associated with the development of graft fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the histologic description of the fibrosis, vascular and glomerular damage occurring in renal allografts. Clinical programs rely on monitoring change in serum creatinine for identification of patients at risk of CAN, but this change occurs late in the course of the disease, and underestimates the severity of pathologic change. CAN has several causes: ischemia-reperfusion injury, ineffectively or untreated clinical and subclinical rejection, and superimposed calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, exacerbating pre-existing donor disease. Once established, interstitial fibrosis and arteriolar hyalinosis lead to progressive glomerulosclerosis over the subsequent years. There have been a number of approaches to treatment aimed at reducing the impact of CAN, mostly centered around avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors through their elimination in all, or just selected, patients. These immunosuppression strategies combine corticosteroids with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and/or sirolimus and everolimus. Late identification of CAN in individual patients has meant that strategies for intervening to prevent chronic renal allograft dysfunction and subsequent graft loss tend to be "too little and far too late."

Adjuvant low-dose cidofovir therapy for BK polyomavirus interstitial nephritis in renal transplant recipients

BK virus interstitial nephritis (BKVIN) is a serious complication after kidney grafting, necessitating drastic reduction of immunosuppressive therapy in order to enable viral clearance. Despite these measures, progressive graft dysfunction and graft loss occur in the majority of recipients. We diagnosed BKVIN in 21 recipients grafted between 1998 and 2004. Eight of 21 patients were treated with weekly, adjuvant low-dose cidofovir in addition to reduction of immunosuppressive therapy. BKVIN caused irreversible deterioration of graft function in all patients but renal function stabilized after antiviral treatment (creatinine clearance: 51.8-32 mL/min; p=0.001) and no graft loss occurred in cidofovir-treated recipients during 24.8 (8-41) months follow-up. Peak serum cidofovir concentrations were dose-dependent and attained approximately one-tenth of thein vitroEC50 for cidofovir against BK-virus, while pre-treatment with probenecid did not alter peak serum concentrations nor affected the incidence of nephrotoxicity. In fact, no cidofovir-related renal toxicity occurred; few patients had minor transient side effects (nausea, skin rash). In contrast, 9 of 13 patient who received no adjuvant cidofovir therapy lost their graft after median 8 (4-40) months. In this selected group of recipients with BKVIN, the use of adjuvant low-dose cidofovir therapy resulted in prolonged graft survival and stabilized graft function.

Strategies for minimizing immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

Immunosuppression remains the cause of most morbidity following organ transplantation. However, its use is also responsible for the outstanding graft and patient survival rates commonplace in modern transplantation. Thus, the predominant challenge for transplant clinicians is to provide a level of immunosuppression that prevents graft rejection while preserving immunocompetence against environmental pathogens. This review will outline several strategies for minimizing or tailoring the use of immunosuppressive drugs. The arguments for various strategies will be based on clinical trial data rather than animal studies. A distinction will be made between conventional immunosuppressive drug reduction based on over-immunosuppression, and newer induction methods specifically designed to lessen the need for chronic immunosuppression. Based on the available data we suggest that most patients can be transplanted with less immunosuppression than is currently standard.

Workshop on late renal allograft dysfunction

Despite continued improvement in incidence of acute immune injury and short-term graft survival, late allograft dysfunction remains a significant problem in the renal transplant population. Recent reports suggest that rates of renal function decline are quite varied in the overall recipient population, and that individual rates for many recipients may not change substantially over time. Moreover, analyses also reveal distinct predictive factors for both early and late functional decline. Long-term outcome studies for renal transplantation, however, might be significantly limited by incomplete data sets for assessing clinical endpoints. In view of the heterogeneous factors that may cause progressive allograft injury, more routine biopsy sampling would allow a more complete characterization of induced injuries. Elucidating mechanisms of renal fibrosis in response to injury, in experimental systems and humans, is also an important goal in better understanding chronic allograft damage. Regulation of cell senescence genes and epithelial to mesenchymal transition, studied in other models of renal fibrosis, are likely relevant to studies of renal allograft dysfunction. Recent technical advances in analyzing biological samples may play a pivotal role in identifying and validating surrogate markers of allograft function for future interventional trials in transplantation.

BK and JC polyomaviruses are not associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

We sought to determine if the BK and JC polyomaviruses were associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We did not detect the BK or JC polyomaviruses in lung tissue extracts from 33 patients with IPF by using real-time PCR, which suggests that an etiologic association is unlikely.

Specific delineation of BK polyomavirus in kidney tissue with a digoxigenin-labeled DNA probe

The detection of BK polyomavirus (BK virus, BKV) in kidney tissue is hampered by nonspecificity of antibodies suited to immunohistochemistry, and nonspecific background with in situ hybridization. The biotin-labeled DNA probe that is commercially available (Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.) shows good signal, but the intrinsic background in kidney tissue is high. We determined that the intrinsic background is due to endogenous biotin or biotin-binding activity in the renal tubular epithelium. Neither antibody blocking procedures nor an avidin/biotin block were entirely satisfactory for eliminating this background staining. We developed a digoxigenin-labeled DNA probe, and protocol, for detecting BK virus in formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded, kidney tissue obtained at autopsy. The hybridization signal is strong and there is no perceptible background staining. Eleven negative control kidneys all failed to hybridize. Conditions for low stringency hybridization may be employed, detecting both the related JC polyomavirus and BKV. Alternatively, high stringency hybridization conditions may be utilized, detecting BKV only. BK associated tubular necrosis is clearly demonstrated in two cases of BK nephritis.