Learning Through Listening: A Scoping Review of Podcast Use in Medical Education

A podcast to teach medical humanities at medical school: a text-mining study of students' lived experience

The teaching of medical humanities is increasingly being integrated into medical school curricula. We developed a podcast called Le Serment d'Augusta (Augusta's Oath), consisting of six episodes tackling hot topics in the modern world of healthcare related to the patient-doctor relationship, professionalism, and ethics. This podcast aimed to provide scientific content in an entertaining way, while promoting debate among medical students. The Le Serment d'Augusta podcast was proposed as one of the various optional modules included in the second- to fifth-year curriculum at the School of Medicine of Sorbonne University (Paris). We asked students to report their lived experience of listening to the podcast. We then used a text-mining approach focusing on two main aspects: i) students' perspective of the use of this educational podcast to learn about medical humanities; ii) self-reported change in their perception of and knowledge about core elements of healthcare after listening to the podcast. 478 students were included. Students were grateful for the opportunity to participate in this teaching module. They greatly enjoyed this kind of learning tool and reported that it gave them autonomy in learning. They appreciated the content as well as the format, highlighting that the topics were related to the very essence of medical practice and that the numerous testimonies were of great added value. Listening to the podcast resulted in knowledge acquisition and significant change of perspective. These findings further support the use of podcasts in medical education, especially to teach medical humanities, and their implementation in the curriculum.

Finding the right combination for self-directed learning: A focus group study of residents' choice and use of digital resources to support their learning

BACKGROUND

There has been a shift in postgraduate medical education towards digital educational resources-podcasts, videos, social media and other formats consumed asynchronously and apart from formal curricula. It is unclear what drives residents to select and use these resources. Understanding how and why residents choose digital resources can aid programme directors, faculty and residents in optimising residents' informal learning time.

METHOD

This focus group study was conducted with residents at two US internal medicine residency programmes. The authors used the framework approach to content analysis using self-determination theory as guide for deductive coding and iteratively assessing connections among codes and identifying themes. Trustworthiness was addressed through use of analytic memos, reflexive practice and member checking.

RESULTS

The authors conducted eight virtual focus groups (n = 23) from 5/27/20 to 6/11/20. Residents described that a feeling of 'should know' drove initial choices towards self-directed learning outside of work. Regular use of a resource was influenced by how the resource fit into a resident's lifestyle, the personal cognitive energy and the perceived 'activation energy' of using a particular resource. Familiarity, increased confidence and in-person social networks gained from digital resources served to reinforce and further guide resource choice.

CONCLUSIONS

The selection of digital resources for self-directed learning is driven by multiple factors, suggesting an interdependent relationship between the learning environment and a residents' cognitive capacity. Understanding these interconnections can help residents and clinical educators explicitly choose resources that fit their lifestyle and learning needs.

Listening "At the Bedside": Podcasts as an Emerging Tool for Medical Ethics Education

Medical ethics education is crucial for medical students and trainees, helping to shape attitudes, beliefs, values, and professional identities. Exploration of ethical dilemmas and approaches to resolving them provides a broader understanding of the social and cultural contexts in which medicine is practiced, as well as the ethical implications of medical decisions, fostering critical thinking and self-reflection skills imperative to providing patient-centered care. However, exposure to medical ethics topics and their clinical applications can be limited by curricular constraints and the availability of institutional resources and expertise. Podcasts, among other Free Open Access Medical Education (FOAMed) resources, are a novel educational tool that offers particular advantages for self-directed learning, a process by which learners engage in asynchronous educational opportunities outside of traditional academic or clinical settings. Podcasts can be readily distributed to wide audiences and played at any time, reducing barriers to access and offering a level of flexibility that is not possible with traditional forms of education and is well-suited to busy schedules. Podcasts can also use real voices and storytelling to make the content memorable and eminently human. This paper describes the development, production process, and impact of Core IM's "At the Bedside," a podcast focusing on issues in medical ethics and the medical humanities, intending to supplement standard bioethics curricula in an accessible, relevant, and engaging way. The authors advocate for broad incorporation of podcasts into medical ethics education.

Co-design and evaluation of an audio podcast about sustainable development goals for undergraduate nursing and midwifery students

BACKGROUND

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are universally recognised targets designed to combat poverty, inequality, and climate change. However, there exists limited awareness and understanding of these goals among nursing and midwifery students. To address this knowledge gap, a co-designed audio podcast was introduced as an educational tool to enhance students' comprehension of SDGs and their relevance to the healthcare profession.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at Queen's University Belfast, involving 566 first-year nursing and midwifery students. A 60-minute SDG podcast, co-designed with students and stakeholders, was made accessible within the university's learning management system. Pre- and post-test questionnaires were administered to assess changes in students' knowledge levels and attitudes toward SDGs. Additionally, 37 participants engaged in focus group interviews six months after listening to the podcast to explore their experiences and reflections. Quantitative data was analysed using paired t-tests and descriptive statistics, while qualitative data was analysed thematically.

RESULTS

The podcast significantly increased students' awareness of SDGs and their understanding of the goals' relevance to their profession and personal lives. Post-test scores showed substantial improvements across all three sub-scales: knowledge, professional relevance, and personal relevance. Moreover, participants rated the podcast as a valuable learning resource with high acceptability, although some expressed uncertainty about replay intentions. Focus group interviews revealed three themes, including 1) More than you know', which described how participants developed new knowledge and understanding about SDGs, 2) 'Nurse-Midwife Nudges', which illuminated how participants made minor changes to their behaviour and 3) 'Fitting Format', which highlighted how participants favoured the use of an audio podcast to learn about SDGs.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates the potential of audio podcasts as an effective and engaging tool for increasing awareness and understanding of SDGs among nursing and midwifery students. The results suggest that such interventions can positively impact students' knowledge, attitudes, and behavioural intentions regarding the SDGs. The findings also emphasise the importance of co-design in developing educational resources tailored to the specific needs and preferences of students.

The Endocrine Feedback Loop Podcast: Past, Present, and Future

In June 2024, the Endocrine Feedback Loop podcast recorded its fiftieth episode at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society. Launched in May 2020, the podcast serves as a way for listeners to hear a critical analysis of recent and impactful research studies published in clinical journals of the Endocrine Society. The podcast follows methods proven effective in traditional journal clubs and adapts them to reach a wide audience with different levels of expertise in endocrinology. This Perspective outlines the history of the podcast, the process of producing a monthly episode, and the topics covered, as well as an assessment of the experience of producing the podcast and future plans for the Endocrine Feedback Loop.

"Like and Subscribe": A Compendium of Infectious Diseases Audio Podcasts

In little more than 15 years, the podcast has gone from being virtually unknown to becoming a multibillion-dollar industry. There are an estimated half-billion podcast listeners worldwide. Podcasts are available for various interests, from entertainment to news, politics, sports, hobbies, and education. Podcasting in medicine has similar origins, beginning with journals and academic/educational institutions wishing to share information on new clinical trials or publications, as well as by those who wanted to promote the free and open access model of online education. The COVID-19 outbreak led to a renaissance in the availability of infectious diseases-oriented audio podcasts, due to the need for regular information about SARS-CoV-2 and the pandemic-related preference for virtual learning. However, many in the infectious diseases community have not yet been introduced to available infectious diseases podcast resources. In this article, we highlight 38 of the most popular infectious diseases-oriented audio podcasts.

Large-scale education in respiratory medicine: content versus delivery

The respiratory literature, both written and in online formats, is growing exponentially. Capturing quality content, to meet the learning needs of those working in all fields of respiratory medicine and delivering it in a palatable, accessible format is challenging but paramount. In this article we discuss ways to determine the information content and review different methods of delivering this content to those who need it.

Engaging Medical Students as Teachers in the Spoonful of Sugar Medical Education Podcast

Spoonful of Sugar is a medical education podcast that utilizes an innovative approach to undergraduate medical education by engaging medical students as teachers. This report describes the podcast, the benefits of engaging students as teachers, and future directions to improve the platform and formally study its impact.

A Media Advocacy Toolkit for the Allergist-Immunologist

For clinicians involved in improving healthcare for patients with allergic and immunologic conditions, advocacy on a broader level through public outreach is key to advancing value-based care. In this article, we provide a toolkit of strategies and resources that can be used to raise public awareness of important issues through various mediums, including podcasts and social media, newspapers, testimonies, presentations, and interviews. A simple approach to effective media interactions is described using the acronym "RATIO," which stands for Research, Audience, Targeted topic, Interview rephrasing, and Optimism. The acronym also reminds the person who is presenting information that only a fraction of what is discussed will be recalled, and an even smaller proportion will be implemented. Key points should be made early. Examples of key talking points are provided for selected topics, including food allergy, anaphylaxis, asthma, rhinitis, and broader healthcare advocacy.

How to use podcasts in neurology

Virtual learning resources such as podcasts and social media are increasingly used in medical education. Podcasts are one example of virtual learning, where prerecorded audio files are available to stream or download from the internet, usually without a fee and at any time. This gives listeners flexibility in when and where they engage with the educational material, enabling learning to be better tailored to individual needs. Podcasts are often enjoyed for their relaxed and conversational style. However, listeners must be aware of the lack of external peer review and incomplete coverage of information. There are also risks inherent to distant learning, including depersonalisation of medical education. We describe the roles that podcasts now play in neurological education, exploring some of the ways that they can be used to enhance neurological training both as a learner and educator and giving our top tips, based on our own experiences, for anyone keen to add to the expanding field of available podcasts.

Listen to your heart: a critical analysis of popular cardiology podcasts

Purpose

Podcasts are an increasingly popular medium for medical education in the field of cardiology. However, evidence suggests that the quality of the information presented can be variable. The aim of our study was to assess the quality of the most popular cardiology podcasts on existing podcast streaming services, using tools designed to grade online medical education.

Results

We analyzed the five most recent episodes from 28 different popular cardiology podcasts as of 20th of September, 2022 using the validated rMETRIQ and JAMA scoring tools. The median podcast length was 20 min and most episodes were hosted by professors, subspecialty discussants or consultant physicians (87.14%). Although most episodes had only essential content (85%), only a small proportion of episodes provided detailed references (12.9%), explicitly identified conflicts of interest (30.7%), described a review process (13.6%), or provided a robust discussion of the podcast's content (13.6%). We observed no consistent relationship between episode length, seniority of host or seniority of guest speaker with rMETRIQ or JAMA scores.

Conclusions

Cardiology podcasts are a valuable remote learning tool for clinicians. However, the reliability, relevance, and transparency of information provided on cardiology podcasts varies widely. Streamlined standards for evaluation are needed to improve podcast quality.

The National Sexually Transmitted Disease Curriculum Podcast as a Method to Increase Sexually Transmitted Infection Education for Health Care Professionals

BACKGROUND

Podcasts are a valuable educational tool that are convenient and provide on-demand learning. We launched the National Sexually Transmitted Disease Curriculum (NSTDC) Podcast in 2020 to educate health care professionals on sexually transmitted infections with an emphasis on content from peer-reviewed literature relevant to clinical practice.

METHODS

We describe the reach and usage data for 31 podcast episodes produced during the first 29 months. Information was obtained via Google Analytics, Apple Podcasts, the podcast hosting platform Buzzsprout, and the Health Professional Application for Training form for listeners who were registered on the NSTDC website.

RESULTS

There were more than 21,000 downloads, with an average of 686 downloads per episode. Although 85% of downloads occurred in the United States, podcast visitors were located in 57 countries. The 3 most reported professions/disciplines were registered nurse (39.0%), advanced practice nurse (22.5%), and physician (11.3%). Forty-eight percent of visitors had a primary programmatic focus of sexually transmitted diseases, 24% HIV/AIDs, and 18% primary care.

CONCLUSION

The NSTDC Podcast is a highly utilized resource for mobile and on-demand learning for health care professionals who want to expand their knowledge on sexually transmitted infections.

Using Learning Analytics to Evaluate the Clinical Education Podcast Format

Learning analytics has been rigorously applied to various forms of e-learning, but not to the evaluation of clinical education podcasts. We created a podcast series using the Anchor by Spotify platform, uploading an episode every 2 weeks starting on March 30, 2021. We examined analytics data using a censoring date of November 1, 2022. Based on 29,747 total plays, average audience retention declined 10%/minute until an inflection point at 2.5 minutes, followed by a steady decline of 1.8%/minute. With a maximum episode length of 17 minutes, we did not identify a limit on learner attention for short-form podcasts.

What About Empathy? A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of a Podcast as an Asynchronous Empathy Teaching Tool

Purpose

Though medical education podcasts are fast gaining popularity, they are overwhelmingly focused on teaching the medical expert role of physicians. We explored how medical learners and educators engaged with and learned from an empathy and communication-focused podcast and sought their recommendations for integrating the podcast into medical curricula.

Methods

Six virtual, semi-structured focus groups were conducted with educators and learners within a large urban hospital and university setting. Participants were asked to listen to pre-selected episodes of the About Empathy podcast in advance. Thematic analysis was used to explore experiences and perceptions of empathy teaching and learning.

Results

There were 24 participants. We identified six themes related to the podcast and empathy learning: (1) forging connection through stories, (2) creating space to reflect on empathy, (3) shifting perspectives and biases, (4) feeling validated and enabling self-compassion, (5) gaining knowledge and building skills through empathetic communication, and (6) translating new knowledge and skills into practice. Participants highlighted that the podcast's portability and asynchronous nature allowed them to be more fully present, reflective, and intentional in their learning.

Discussion

The About Empathy podcast was experienced as a flexible, just-in-time tool that promoted self-agency over one's learning, reflective practice, and knowledge and skill acquisition, particularly with respect to empathic communication. Benefits of asynchronous e-learning tools such as podcasts support a shift to a blended learning model. Challenges finding a curricular home for this empathy-focused podcast require further consideration.

Teaching prudent antibiotic use on the go: a descriptive report on development, utilization and listener satisfaction of an educational podcast format for medical students and young professionals

BACKGROUND

An important component in fostering the responsible use of antibiotics is training of new and future prescribers in this interdisciplinary topic. Because podcasts are playing an increasing role in medical education, we aimed to develop and evaluate a podcast format with practice and guideline-oriented learning content on antibiotic therapy for medical students and young medical professionals.

METHODS

We developed the concept for the podcast with the direct involvement of medical students and medical experts with teaching experience. We used video conferencing when recording the episodes in order to have quick, easy, and nationwide access to the experts involved. We released an episode every 2 to 4 weeks on the popular podcast platforms. The podcast was promoted through mailing lists, social and print media, and at conferences. The evaluation of episodes was based on user data provided by the platforms and an anonymous feedback questionnaire linked to each episode in the podcast notes.

RESULTS

Between December 2021 and December 2022 19 episodes of InfectEd: der Antibiotika-Podcast were released. The mean duration of an episode was 91 min. By March 9, 2023, a total of 38,829 downloads and streams had been recorded. The majority of users listened to the podcast on a mobile device. The average playing time per episode was 65%. The feedback questionnaire was completed 135 times. 60.7% of respondents were female, 38.5% male. The majority of respondents were in their twenties and thirties (66.7%). 31.1% were medical students, 25.9% were residents, and 25.2% were specialists. Listeners were asked to rate episodes on a scale from 1 to 6, where 1 was "very good" and 6 was "insufficient." Ratings did not differ significantly between female and male respondents or between medical students and others. 118 respondents (87.4%) reported an increase in knowledge. Free-text feedback frequently emphasized clinical and also exam relevance.

CONCLUSION

Our podcast format, developed with a user-centered approach, was broadly distributed and has been well accepted by both medical students and physicians alike. It provides a large number of learners with low-threshold access to current, guideline-orientated content and could be a useful supplement to conventional teaching formats.

Twelve tips for integrating podcasts into medical education curricula

Engagement with medical education podcasts among health professions learners has been increasing steadily over the last several years. Prior '12 Tips' publications have focused on helping medical educators create and publish their own podcasts. However, there is a gap in available resources to help educators incorporate an already existing and growing library of medical education podcasts into their curriculum rather than create their own. In this paper, the authors provide medical educators '12 Tips' on how to integrate podcasts into their teaching sessions grounded in fundamental principles of curriculum development, cognitive science, and accessibility.

A Randomized Trial Assessing the Effect of Exercise on Residents' Podcast Knowledge Acquisition and Retention

PURPOSE

Podcasts are commonly used by residents as part of their learning, with many listening concomitantly with other activities (e.g., driving and exercise). The effects of exercise on learning are controversial, with some suggesting potential benefit and others suggesting impaired learning. This study examined whether exercise influences knowledge acquisition and retention among resident physicians listening to a podcast while exercising versus those with undistracted listening.

METHOD

This multicenter, randomized, crossover trial assessed emergency medicine residents across 5 U.S. institutions from September 2022 to January 2023. Residents were randomized to a group that listened to one 30-minute podcast while seated or a group that listened to a 30-minute podcast while engaging in 30 minutes of continuous aerobic exercise, with stratification by site and postgraduate year. Within 30 minutes of completing the podcast, they completed a 20-question multiple-choice test. They subsequently crossed over to the other intervention and listened to a different 30-minute podcast followed by another 20-question test. Each podcast focused on emergency medicine-relevant journal articles that had not been covered in journal club or curriculum at any sites. Residents also completed a 40-question delayed recall test with separate questions on both podcasts at 30 days.

RESULTS

Ninety-six residents were recruited for the study, with 95 (99.0%) completing the initial recall portion and 92 (97.0%) completing the delayed recall tests. No statistically significant differences were found between the exercise and seated cohorts on initial recall (74.4% vs 76.3%; d = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.33 to 0.08; P = .12) or delayed recall (52.3% vs 52.5%; d = -0.01; 95% CI, -0.22 to -0.19; P = .46).

CONCLUSIONS

Exercising while listening to podcasts did not appear to meaningfully affect knowledge acquisition or retention at 30 days when compared with listening while seated and undistracted.

Utility of a Novel Trainee-Level Hematology/Oncology Podcast in Graduate Medical Education: a Pilot Study

Asynchronous learning continues to gain popularity in medical education. One medium to facilitate asynchronous learning is the podcast. Currently, there are a limited number of hematology/oncology (H/O) podcasts geared towards residents and fellows ("trainees"). To address this need, we created a series of podcasts covering fundamental H/O topics for H/O fellows and internal medicine residents rotating on H/O services. We evaluate the effectiveness of this approach in this pilot study. Between September 2022 and February 2023, residents received recommended episodes via email prior to their rotation. Following their rotation, they received a survey. H/O fellows were encouraged to listen to any available episodes during the study period, after which they also received a survey. The survey collected baseline user information and included a 5-point Likert scale to determine if the podcast episodes were effective educational tools. Summary description was performed by the authors. In total 7 internal medicine residents (27 eligible) and 13 H/O fellows (18 eligible) completed the survey, for a total group of 20 respondents. The trainees found that the podcast helped with inpatient and outpatient management, was clinically relevant, and helped with clinical decision-making. They also agreed that the fundamentals of H/O are amenable to the podcast platform and are likely to continue to use podcasts as learning tools in H/O. This pilot study suggests that podcasts are an effective supplemental learning tool for the fundamentals of H/O in graduate medical education. The use of podcasts as educational tools should be encouraged for trainees.

Podcast-Based Medical Education and Content Alignment with National Education Bodies

Introduction

Despite the rapid expansion of medical education podcasts in the past decade, there are few efforts to characterize the landscape of available content for specific medical specialties. We trialed a method of rigorous characterization for the field of neurology.

Materials and Methods

Using a censoring date of July 25, 2022, we queried the top three podcast platforms for neurology education podcasts: Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts. We characterized podcasts based on total number of episodes, episode release frequency, target audience, and affiliation type. We characterized individual episodes by length and primary content area as defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN). We compared content availability with content recommendations from these education bodies.

Results

We identified 30 podcasts sharing 1772 episodes and totaling 46,287 min. The ACGME subspecialties most frequently covered were vascular neurology (5082 total min, 11%), neuroimmunology (4,406, 10%), and neuromuscular diseases (3,771, 8%). Subjects that were underrepresented included palliative neurology (89 min, 0.2%), neuropathology (95 min, 0.2%), and bioethics (171 min, 0.4%). The coverage of ABPN examination topics varied substantially from the content distribution for the examination.

Discussion

The current landscape of neurology education podcasts features heterogeneous coverage of topics and varies considerably from recommended distribution of content by national education bodies. As podcasts have tremendous potential in supplementing neurology education, characterizing available content may help various stakeholders in the neurology education pipeline optimize the use of this e-learning modality.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01971-0.

Evaluating a Health Equity Podcast for Provider Practice Change: A Cross-sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Podcasts are effective tools for disseminating health education. This study aimed to disseminate a health equity curriculum on best practices.

METHOD

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted as part of the Health Equity in Pediatrics podcast series between May and June 2023. Listeners were surveyed following each episode, and both quantitative and qualitative responses of voluntary respondents were analyzed.

RESULTS

Episodes were downloaded 4,095 times. Survey respondents (n = 66) reported increased knowledge and intended practice change inspired by the podcast. Qualitative responses included themes surrounding knowledge, appreciation, and practice change.

DISCUSSION

Podcasts are easily disseminated to wide audiences and can improve health equity knowledge while inspiring practice change. This style can help listeners identify practices that suggest implicit bias and implement more equitable best practices. Future research should examine implicit bias training and standardization of health equity education using podcasts.

Modalities for teaching responsible and ethical conduct of research online: Lessons learned from an undergraduate workshop in Utah

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted scientific research, teaching, and learning in higher education and forced many institutions to explore new modalities in response to the abrupt shift to remote learning. Accordingly, many colleges and universities struggled to provide the training, technology, and best practices to support faculty and students, especially those at historically disadvantaged and underrepresented institutions. In this study we investigate different remote learning modalities to improve and enhance research education training for faculty and students. We specifically focus on Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research (RECR) and research mentoring content to help address the newly established requirements of the National Science Foundation for investigators. To address this need we conducted a workshop to determine the effectiveness of three common research education modalities: Live Lecture, Podcast, and Reading. The Live Lecture sessions provided the most evidence of learning based on the comparison between pre- and post-test results, whereas the Podcast format was well received but produced a slight (and non-significant) decline in scores between the pre- and post-tests. The Reading format showed no significant improvement in learning. The results of our workshop illuminate the effectiveness and obstacles associated with various remote learning modalities, enabling us to pinpoint areas that require additional refinement and effort, including the addition of interactive media in Reading materials.

Educational Podcasts in Plastic Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Content, Metrics, and Target Audiences

BACKGROUND

Podcasts provide an efficient means for asynchronous learning. However, no study to date has thoroughly assessed the landscape of educational podcasts in plastic surgery. Thus, this study aims to evaluate and characterize current educational plastic surgery podcasts to ultimately inform future efforts.

METHODS

Three platforms were queried for educational plastic surgery podcasts: Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts. Podcast descriptions and episodes were then independently reviewed to determine primary target audiences, performance metrics, and content categories.

RESULTS

There were a total of 163 plastic surgery podcasts. 145 of these 163 podcasts were targeted toward a nonmedical audience. The remaining 18 podcasts met inclusion criteria as educational plastic surgery podcasts. Of all educational podcast episodes, 8.8% targeted a medical student audience, 33.8% targeted trainees (residents/fellows), and 57.4% targeted practicing surgeons or emphasized recent research in the field. Episode content categories included breast (14.2%), cosmetic (11.8%), experimental (0.5%), hand/peripheral nerve (8.6%), pediatric/craniofacial (8.2%), reconstructive (15.6%), practice management (14.8%), residency (6.6%), and others (19.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the large number of plastic surgery podcasts available, few podcasts focus on educating a medical audience. Within this small subset, there is a paucity of content targeted towards medical students interested in plastic surgery. While there is a wide breadth of content available, there is significant room for growth and refinement in the podcast sector for plastic surgery education.

'SurgTalk': The Educational Outcomes Associated With Development of a Surgical Podcast for Undergraduate Medical Students

OBJECTIVE

Educational podcast series are becoming increasingly popular as free open access medical education (FOAMed) resources, however, the educational benefit associated with their use is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the educational outcomes associated with the implementation of a surgical podcast series for undergraduate medical students.

METHODS

Two conversational case-based podcast episodes were recorded covering 2 common surgical presentations. Final-year medical students were recruited prospectively in January 2023 and underwent a baseline multiple choice question (MCQ) test covering the material within the podcast episodes. Participants were then provided with the episode files through encrypted Google Drive links. Two weeks following baseline assessment, students repeated the initial MCQ test and completed a postpodcast reaction survey. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, multivariable regression analyses, and simple descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Fifty students were enrolled in the study. All participants undertook the baseline assessment. About 98% completed the postpodcast MCQ, while 94% completed the postpodcast reaction survey. All participants who undertook the reaction survey (n = 47) found the podcast helpful in explaining surgical concepts, 92% of participants found the podcast enjoyable to listen to. The most commonly reported activity undertaken while listening was "commuting/driving" (n = 24, 48%). The mean baseline MCQ score was 44.6%. The mean postpodcast MCQ score was 65.51%. There was a mean absolute increase in test score of 20.2% from baseline which was statistically significant (95%CI 14.67-25.6, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of this podcast series was associated with a statistically significant improvement in mean test score from baseline, reflecting knowledge acquisition. There was a positive user reaction and students were able to listen while performing other activities. Further evaluation of the educational outcomes associated with podcast use, particularly the effects on knowledge retention and clinical competence, is required.

Performance Analysis of a Radiation Oncology Educational Podcast

PURPOSE

Asynchronous podcast education is a popular supplementary tool, with up to 88% of medical residents reporting its use. Radiation oncology podcasts remain scarce. The authors analyzed the early performance, listenership, and engagement of the first education-specific radiation oncology medical podcast.

METHODS

Episode data and listener demographics were gathered from Spotify and Apple Podcasts. Episodes were case based, categorized by disease subsite, and reviewed by a board-certified radiation oncologist. Listenership was defined by the number of plays per day (ppd) on unique devices, averaged up to 60 days from publication. Episode engagement was defined as a percentage of plays on unique devices playing >40% of an episode within a single session. Quantitative end points included episode engagement and listenership. Pearson's correlation coefficient calculations were used for analysis.

RESULTS

From July 2022 to March 2023, 20 total episodes had 13,078 total plays over 227 days. The median episode length was 13.8 min (range, 9.2-20.1 min). Listener demographics were as follows: 54.4% men, 44.0% women, 1.3% not specified, and 0.3% nonbinary, with ages 18 to 22 (1%), 23 to 27 (13%), 28 to 34 (58%), 35 to 44 (22%), 45 to 59 (4%), and ≥60 (2%) years. Episodes were played in 53 countries, with the most plays in North America (71.5%), followed by Asia (10.2%), Europe (8.2%), Oceania (8.0%), Africa (1.5%), and South America (0.5%). There was a 585.2% increase in listenership since initiation, with median growth of 46.0% per month. Median listenership and engagement were 11.3 ppd (interquartile range, 10.3-13.8 ppd) and 81.4% (interquartile range, 72.0%-84.2%) for all episodes, respectively. A significant negative relationship between episode length and engagement was observed (r[20] = -0.51, P = .02). There was no statistically significant relationship between ppd and episode length (r[20] = -0.19, P = .42).

CONCLUSIONS

The significant rise in listenership, high episode engagement, and large international audience support a previously unmet need in radiation oncology medical education that may be supplemented by podcasts.

The Influence of Individualized Three-Dimensional Holographic Models on Patients' Knowledge Qualified for Intervention in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)

We sought to determine the role of the patient-specific, three-dimensional (3D) holographic vascular model in patient medical knowledge and its influence on obtaining a more conscious informed consent process for percutaneous balloon angioplasty (PTA). Patients with peripheral arterial disease who had been scheduled for PTA were enrolled in the study. Information regarding the primary disease, planned procedure, and informed consent was recorded in typical fashion. Subsequently, the disease and procedure details were presented to the patient, showing the patients their individual model. A patient and medical supervisor equipped with mixed reality headsets could both simultaneously manipulate the hologram using gestures. The holographic 3D model had been created on a scale of 1:1 based on computed tomography scans. The patient's knowledge was tested by the completion of a questionnaire before and after the interaction in a mixed reality environment. Seventy-nine patients manipulated arterial holograms in mixed reality head-mounted devices. Before the 3D holographic artery model interaction, the mean ± standard deviation score of the knowledge test was 2.95 ± 1.21 points. After the presentation, the score had increased to 4.39 ± 0.82, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0000) between the two scores. Using a Likert scale from 1 to 5, the patients had scored the use of the 3D holographic model at 3.90 points regarding its usefulness in comprehending their medical condition; at 4.04 points regarding the evaluation of the holograms as helpful in understanding the course of surgery; and rated the model at 1.99 points in reducing procedure-related stress. Using a nominal scale (know or don't know), the patients had self-assessed their knowledge of the procedure before and after the 3D model presentation, with a score of 6.29 ± 2.01 and 8.39 ± 1.54, respectively. The study group tolerated the use of head-mounted devices. Only one patient had nausea and dizziness, while four patients experienced transient eye pain. The 3D holographic arterial model aided in the understanding of patients' knowledge regarding the disease and procedure, making the informed consent process more conscious. The holograms improved the patient's self-consciousness. Mixed reality headset-related complications were rare and within acceptable rates.

Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching -randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In the digitalized world, there is a need for developing new online teaching and learning methods. Although audio and video recordings are increasingly used in everyday learning, little scientific evidence is available on the efficacy of new online methods. This randomized trial was set out to compare the learning outcomes of online and classroom teaching methods in training healthcare students to diagnose breathing difficulties in children.

METHODS

In total, 301 students of medicine (N = 166) and nursing (N = 135) volunteered to participate in this total sampling study in 2021-2022. The students were randomized into four groups based on teaching methods: classroom teaching (live, N = 72), streamed classroom teaching (live-stream, N = 77), audio recording (podcast, N = 79) and video recording (vodcast, N = 73). Each 45-minute lesson was taught by the same teachers and used the same protocol. The students participated an online test with their own electronic device at three distinct time points: prior to any teaching (baseline), immediately after teaching (final test), and five weeks later (long-term memory test). The test consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions on recognizing breathing difficulties from real-life videos of breathing difficulties in pre-school age. The test results scale ranged from - 26 to 28 points. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA multiple comparison and multiple regression tests.

RESULTS

The mean scores (SD) of the final tests were 22.5 (5.3) in the vodcast, 22.9 (6.1) in the live, 20.0 (5.6) in the podcast (p < 0.05 vs. live) and 20.1 (6.8) in the live-stream group. The mean difference of test scores before and after the lesson improved significantly (p < 0.05) in all study groups, with 12.9 (6.5) in the vodcast, 12.6 (5.6) in the live, 10.9 (7.0) in the live-stream and 10.4 (6.9) in the podcast group. The improvement in test scores was significantly higher in the vodcast (p = 0.016) and the live (p = 0.037) groups than in the podcast group. No significant differences were found between the other groups. However, there was a nonsignificant difference towards better results in the vodcast group compared to the live-stream group.

CONCLUSIONS

While the new online teaching methods produce learning, only video learning is comparable to team teaching in classrooms.

Hunting for Pearls: A Qualitative Analysis of the Reflections of Students Creating Psychiatric Podcasts

Purpose

This paper aims to explore medical student experiences of creating a peer-to-peer psychiatry educational podcast.

Methods

During psychiatry placement, ten year-4 University of Bristol medical students created peer-educational multi-episode podcasts on psychiatric topics. Following completion, they submitted reflective essays on their experiences. Qualitative thematic analysis of these essays was completed by two independent authors. Following data familiarisation, authors independently generated codes that were collated into relevant themes. Upon reaching thematic saturation, findings were collated, and member checking was carried out to confirm the validity of findings.

Results

Themes included effective preparation, choosing content, podcast production, enhancing learning, the weight of responsibility and creating educational support networks. All students found podcast creation to be beneficial for personal learning.

Conclusion

Exploration of students' experiences creating podcasts can support clearer guidance for medical podcast production, providing opportunities for educators to optimise podcast creation efficiency and educational effectiveness.

Evaluation of a co-designed Parkinson's awareness audio podcast for undergraduate nursing students in Northern Ireland

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a common neurological condition that often causes stiffness, tremor and slow movement. People living with PD are likely to encounter nursing students throughout their journey from pre-diagnosis to death. Despite this, there is a paucity of evidence about current practice in PD education amongst nursing students. The present study provides an evaluation of a co-designed Parkinson's Awareness audio podcast amongst nursing students in Northern Ireland.

METHODS

Following co-design of an audio podcast about PD, a mixed methods evaluation was carried out. 332 student nurses completed pre-/post-test questionnaires about their knowledge and perceptions of PD before and after listening to the audio podcast. Further to this, 35 student nurses participated in focus-group interviews six months following listening to explore how the podcast influenced practice.

RESULTS

Student nurses posted a mean score of 52% before listening to the audio podcast. This mean increased to 80% post-test. These findings were statistically significant (p < 0.001), demonstrating significant increases in PD awareness after listening. Findings from the focus groups suggested that the audio podcast improved empathy and practice towards people with PD. The findings also suggested that students perceived audio podcasts to be a good way to learn about PD.

CONCLUSION

Provision of a co-designed audio podcast about PD has the potential to improve student nurse knowledge and practice related to PD as evidenced in this study.

Continuing Education Evaluations of an Internal Medicine and a Pediatric Podcast

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to characterize practitioners who use podcasts as a form of continuing education (CE), evaluate attitudes regarding podcasting as a medium for CE, and assess intended practice change after listening to podcasts for CE.

METHODS

We examined CE data from a mandatory postpodcast evaluation collected between February 2021 and August 2021 for two free podcasts. We analyzed linked episode data containing podcast downloads.

RESULTS

Listeners downloaded 972,691 episodes and claimed 8182 CE credits (less than 1% of total downloads) over 7 months. CE credit was claimed by physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and pharmacists. Most listeners claiming CE credit were not affiliated with an academic institution. Motivation for listening to episodes included a topic of interest, relevance to a patient, and a topic of less comfort. Of individuals obtaining CE, 98% intended to implement change after listening.

DISCUSSION

Although only a small number of podcast listeners claim CE credit, those who claim credit represent a diverse and interprofessional audience. Listeners select podcasts to fill self-identified learning needs. Overwhelmingly, listeners report podcast CE changes intended practice. Podcasts may be an effective modality for CE and practice change; further research should focus on facilitators and barriers to CE uptake and on patient health outcomes.

Digital learning: The reach of podcasts and YouTube on trauma surgery education

BACKGROUND

Physicians, medical students, and health care professionals are charged with staying current throughout their training. No studies have examined the scope of trauma surgery-related podcasts and videos. Our goal was to characterize and evaluate the growing number of trauma-related podcasts and YouTube channels.

METHODS

We conducted a search across 3 podcasting platforms (Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify) and 1 video-sharing site (YouTube) for podcasts published up to November 11, 2022. We queued platforms for "Trauma" and "Trauma Surgery." We included podcasts or video channels in English that focused on trauma surgery or trauma survivorship and recovery. Descriptive analyses were used to determine the characteristics of podcasts and YouTube channels, reported as counts.

RESULTS

We identified 91 podcasts and 103 YouTube channels dedicated to trauma recovery and/or trauma surgery. The longest running podcast was the "TraumaCast," and the oldest YouTube channel was "TraumaPro." The podcast with the most episodes was "Trauma Therapist," and the YouTube channel with the most episodes was the Arizona Trauma Association. Podcasts were aimed at public audiences, whereas YouTube channels focused on providers. A large proportion of content is not created by licensed professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that popular trauma-focused podcasts target the general population, not health care professionals. The content creators behind these digital platforms seek to educate the public on the recovery process after traumatic injury. We must better understand the advantages and pitfalls of these ubiquitous resources.

Quality of podcasts recorded by nursing lecturers as pre-class learning material for students: An observational study

AIM

To evaluate the quality of podcasts produced by lecturers as pre-class learning material; to verify lecturers' buy-in, after a specific workshop, regarding the practice of producing and using podcasts.

BACKGROUND

The teaching-learning process has undergone significant changes in recent years with the proposal of the flipped classroom strategy, which places the student at the center of the learning process and uses technology that requires adaptation of lecturers, both inside and outside the classroom. Pre-class learning material is one of the features of the flipped classroom model. It provides basic concepts for problem solving in small group discussion in classroom. Podcasts for this educational purpose are a recent technology and their innovative characteristics require deeper understanding in terms of their influence and usability.

DESIGN

Prospective, descriptive and quantitative study.

SETTING AND POPULATION

A workshop on the production of educational podcasts was offered to 23 lecturers on the Nursing course.

METHODS

Data were collected in the second semester of 2021 and the quality analysis was based on criteria available in the literature.

RESULTS

Eighteen professors (78 %) participated in the study and 46 podcasts were produced. Most professors being nurses (61 %), followed by biologists (28 %). Most have a doctorate degree (72 %). These podcasts were available for a mean of five days before the classes and their mean access rate by students was 58 %. There was no correlation between the access rate and the period of availability before the relative class. Most podcasts were informative (100 %) and monologues (98 %). The average duration was 6.2 min, which is within the ideal duration recommended in the literature. All of the podcasts included a description of the learning objectives at the beginning and most of them also included a closing message at the end.

CONCLUSION

The nursing lecturers were able to produce their podcasts, which met quality criteria and reached the standards suggested by experts in the field.

The #ObGynInternChallenge: Reach, Adoption, Implementation, and Effectiveness of a Microlearning SMS-Distributed Curriculum

PROBLEM

While many medical schools have implemented bootcamps or specialized curricula to prepare medical students for residency, these programs are neither universal nor consistent in their content.

APPROACH

The authors created an electronic, multimodal, short messaging service (SMS)-distributed curriculum, called the #ObGynInternChallenge, to improve learners' medical knowledge, based on the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology educational objectives. The curriculum was open to all fourth-year medical students who matched into obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn). Daily messages were delivered to participants' mobile devices via SMS for 25 consecutive weekdays, May 3-June 4, 2021. Each day's message included an introduction with key facts, an infographic, a website link with a podcast and additional reference materials, and at least one question. The authors assessed its reach, adoption, implementation, and effectiveness.

OUTCOMES

For reach and adoption, total enrollment for the curriculum was 1,057 (72.0%) of 1,469 filled Ob/Gyn residency positions in the 2021 Match. The total cost of the intervention was $2,503.20 or $2.37 per participant. For implementation, all participants who signed up for the course received the daily messages, and 858/1,057 (81.2%) completed the course. Participants felt the curriculum was an excellent resource for studying (391/426, 91.8%) and the course was enjoyable to use (395/424, 93.2%). For effectiveness, mean score improvement was 11.6% (pre-test: 62.4%, post-test: 74.0%; P < .001). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, high podcast ( P = .02) and website use ( P = .002) were associated with greater score improvement. High social media use was associated with less improvement ( P = .02).

NEXT STEPS

This study suggests promise for a low-cost, largely satisfying SMS-distributed curriculum in terms of offering some benefit for short-term knowledge gain. Next steps include expanding such a curriculum to meet standard learning objectives for all fourth-year medical students entering residency.

The ACCRAC podcast: an innovative educational tool for trainee and staff development

The Anesthesia and Critical Care Reviews and Commentary (ACCRAC) Podcast provides stimulating lectures on a broad range of educational topics within the realms of anesthesia and critical care. Though not intended as a primary learning tool, it can be used as part of a multidisciplinary developmental approach for both trainees and staff clinicians. This short commentary provides a brief overview of its contents and describes its relevance to board preparation and career-focused continuing education.

Which digital learning strategies do undergraduate dentistry students favor? A questionnaire survey at a German university

Background

The development in teaching dental education toward ever greater digitization has gained enormous momentum in the last 2 years due to the pandemic. However, acceleration is not synonymous with improvement, especially from the learners' point of view. Therefore, the aim of this survey among students of dentistry was to determine which digital learning strategies and which media are preferred.

Method

Undergraduate students of clinical semesters (6th to 9th) in dental medicine during at the University of Freiburg participated in an online-survey. Questions were asked about personal learning strategies for and experience with using digital media for private and educational reasons. Furthermore, students were asked which digital learning formats they preferred for different learning phases.

Results

Students (N=148) are experienced in using digital media for learning. They prefer classical media (such as textbooks and lectures) for acquiring basic theoretical knowledge and mention digital teaching formats more in relation to practical training and complex treatment procedures. 67% prefer learning alone and 90% rate visualizations as helpful for learning. 78% report, that they feel well supported in the learning process by digital media and 83% agree that e-learning offerings are a quality factor for university teaching. 82% state e.g. that the growing range of online content allows a more flexible approach to face to face-teaching, enriches classroom teaching (78%) and helps organize one's own study (79%).

Conclusion

Students have a positive attitude towards the use of digital media, especially when it comes to having more time available for practical exercises. They also see an advantage in the fact that through the use of digital media, lectures can be organized more flexibly and also the organization of their studies can be optimized. New digital teaching media should be created based on these results. It is important to consider which digital formats seem suitable for which content during different semesters.

HIV Matters: an educational podcast series to improve outcomes for people living with HIV

The growth of podcasting since its development in 2004 has been phenomenal. Within health education, it has become an innovative way of broadcasting information on a wide range of subjects. Podcasting offers creative ways to support learning and share best practice. The aim of the article is to explore the use of podcasting as an educational tool to improve outcomes for people living with HIV.

Innovative digital technology adapted in nursing education between Eastern and Western countries: a mini-review

Advanced digital technologies have overcome the limitation of on-site teaching, especially after the COVID-19 epidemic. Various newly-developed digital technologies, such as e-learning, virtual reality, serious games, and podcasts, have gained renewed interest and come into the spotlight. Podcasts are becoming increasingly popular in nursing education as they provide a convenient and cost-effective way for students to access educational content. This mini-review article provides an overview of the development of podcasts in nursing education in Eastern and Western countries. It explores potential future trends in the use of this technology. The literature review demonstrates that nursing education in Western countries has already integrated podcasts into curriculum design, using the podcast to convey nursing education knowledge and skills and to improve students' learning outcomes. However, few articles address nursing education in Eastern countries. The benefits of integrating podcasts into nursing education appear far greater than the limitations. In the future, the application of podcasts can serve not only as a supplement to instructional methodologies but also as a tool for clinical practicing students in nursing education. In addition, with the aging population increasing in both Eastern and Western countries, podcasts have the potential to serve as an effective delivery modality for health education in the future, particularly for the older adult, whose eyesight declines with age, and those populations with visual impairments.

The Triple-S framework: ensuring scalable, sustainable, and serviceable practices in educational technology

Educational institutions are increasingly investing into digital delivery, acquiring new devices, and employing novel software and services. The rising costs associated with maintenance, in combination with increasing redundancy of older technologies, presents multiple challenges. While lesson content itself may not have changed, the educational landscape constantly evolves, where tertiary institutions are incorporating new modes of content delivery, hybrid-style learning, and interactive technologies. Investments into digital expansions must be taken with caution, particularly prior to the procurement of technology, with a need for the proposed interventions' scalability, sustainability, and serviceability to be considered. This article presents the Triple-S framework for educators, administrators, and educational institutions, and outlines examples of its application within curricula. The paper synthesises research evidence to provide the foundation underlying the key principles of the Triple-S framework, presenting a useful model to use when evaluating digital interventions. Utilising the framework for decisions regarding the acquisition of educational technology, devices, software, applications, and online resources can assist in the assurance of viable and  appropriate investments.

Online educational interventions in pediatric intensive care medicine

Background

Online education has experienced explosive growth, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored the current state of the evidence base for online education targeted towards healthcare professionals working in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), to report how we are using online education in our field.

Materials and Methods

We performed a literature review by systematically generating a list of publications indexed in PubMed describing online educational interventions in the PICU, using Medical Subject Header (MeSH)-based search terms and the following inclusion criteria: studies published after 2005 that describe online educational interventions aimed at healthcare professional working in the PICU. We reviewed the full text of all included articles, and summarized the study aims, design, and results.

Results

Our initial search yielded 1,071 unique articles. After screening abstracts and titles, then full texts, eight articles were included in the review. Many online learning modalities are represented, including websites, self-study modules, videos, videoconferencing, online self-assessment with feedback, virtual patient cases, screen-based simulation, and podcasts. Three studies focused on residents, two studies on nurses, two studies on a multidisciplinary team, and one study on transport nurses and paramedics. Most studies utilized participant surveys to assess satisfaction, and half included pre- and post-intervention multiple-choice question tests. Only one study included a patient-related outcome measure.

Conclusions

Despite growth in online medical educational intervention research, there are relatively few published studies in pediatric critical care, and only one study evaluated the impact of online learning on patient outcomes. There remain significant opportunities for PICU educators to assess the impact of online educational interventions, especially related to clinician behaviors and patient outcomes.

A Narrative Review of Key Studies in Medical Education in 2021: Applying Current Literature to Educational Practice and Scholarship

To remain at the forefront of clinical practice and pedagogy, pediatric medical educators must stay informed of the latest research. Yet familiarization with the growing body of literature in both pediatrics and medical education is a near-impossible task for the busy medical educator. The purpose of this annotated bibliography is to summarize key manuscripts in medical education published in 2021 that have the potential to significantly influence a pediatric medical educator's practice. Using a 2-staged iterative process, discrete author pairs reviewed 1599 abstracts from 16 medical education and specialty journals. In summary, 16 manuscripts were selected and grouped into the following 6 domains: assessment and feedback, USMLE Step 1 changes, communication, wellness, diversity and inclusion, and professional development. The authors provide abridged summaries and high-yield take-aways from these manuscripts that may impact educational practices in pediatrics. This year, we also provide a 6-year retrospective review of the journals that have had selected articles for this annotated bibliography since inception.

Podcasts as a Method to Deliver Education on Stigma Surrounding Opioid Use Disorder

The objective of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of a podcast miniseries to reduce stigma surrounding opioid use disorder (OUD) among student pharmacists. Students in their second and third professional years from two schools of pharmacy listened to five, 10-23 min podcasts incorporated into their coursework. The podcasts highlighted: (1) interviews with OUD professionals and those with lived experiences; (2) types of stigma and how it affects health outcomes; (3) OUD disease state processes, and (4) harm reduction strategies. Surveys assessed changes in perception of OUD and its associated stigma and included free-response and Likert scale questions. Subjects (n = 121) who completed a pre- and post-podcast survey were included. Paired t-tests assessed changes in survey responses from baseline and a content analysis was performed on all free-responses. There was a statistically significant change from baseline for each survey question, demonstrating a decrease in stigma towards OUD. Free-responses were categorized into four learning domains: (1) Impact of stigma on access to care; (2) Compassion and empathy; (3) Resources and support; and (4) Call to action. Podcasts can be an effective tool to reduce student pharmacist stigma associated with OUD.

A Fork in the Road for Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Blogs and Podcasts: Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Free open-access meducation (FOAM) refers to open-access, web-based learning resources in medicine. It includes all formats of digital products, including blogs and podcasts. The number of FOAM blog and podcast sites in emergency medicine and critical care increased dramatically from 2002 to 2013, and physicians began to rely on the availability of these resources. The current landscape of these FOAM sites is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to (1) estimate the current number of active, open-access blogs and podcasts in emergency medicine and critical care and (2) describe observed and anticipated trends in the FOAM movement using the Theory of Disruptive Innovation by Christensen as a theoretical framework.

METHODS

The authors used multiple resources and sampling strategies to identify active, open-access blogs and podcasts between April 25, 2022, and May 8, 2022, and classified these websites as blogs, podcasts, or blogs+podcasts. For each category, they reported the following outcome measures using descriptive statistics: age, funding, affiliations, and team composition. Based on these findings, the authors projected trends in the number of active sites using a positivist paradigm and the Theory of Disruptive Innovation as a theoretical framework.

RESULTS

The authors identified 109 emergency medicine and critical care websites, which comprised 45.9% (n=50) blogs, 22.9% (n=25) podcasts, and 31.2% (n=34) blogs+podcasts. Ages ranged from 0 to 18 years; 27.5% (n=30) sold products, 18.3% (n=20) used advertisements, 44.0% (n=48) had institutional funding, and 27.5% (n=30) had no affiliation or external funding sources. Team sizes ranged from 1 (n=26, 23.9%) to ≥5 (n=60, 55%) individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a sharp decline in the number of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts in the last decade, dropping 40.4% since 2013. The initial growth of FOAM and its subsequent downturn align with principles in the Theory of Disruptive Innovation by Christensen. These findings have important implications for the field of medical education.

Distribution of core content coverage among three popular emergency medicine podcasts: A 10-year analysis

Objective

Podcasts are increasingly utilized as educational tools within emergency medicine (EM). As EM residency programs seek to incorporate asynchronous educational material, it is important to ensure we are covering the full breadth of EM core content. This study sought to describe the distribution of EM core content among three popular EM podcasts.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of the distribution of podcast topics among three popular EM podcasts from July 2011 to June 2021. We evaluated the podcast episode content and alignment with the EM core content, as defined by the Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine (MCPEM) and American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) examination distribution. Data are presented descriptively.

Results

We identified 2759 podcast episodes, consisting of 7413 total topics and 2498.7 hours of content. The most frequently covered topics were "signs, symptoms, and presentations" (20.1% of total hours vs. 7.9% of MCPEM and 10.0% of ABEM exam) and "procedures and skills integral to the practice of emergency medicine" (14.8% of total hours vs. 8.1% of MCPEM and 8.0% of ABEM exam). The least frequently covered topics was were "immune system disorders"(0.5% of total hours vs. 2.0% of MCPEM and 2.0% of ABEM exam),"environmental disorders"(0.8% of total hours vs. 2.4% of MCPEM and 2.0% of ABEM exam), "obstetrics and gynecology" (1.0% of total hours vs. 5.4% of MCPEM and 3.0% of ABEM exam), and "cutaneous disorders" (0.9% of total hours vs. 4.3% of MCPEM and 3.0% of ABEM exam).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest an imbalance of MCPEM core content in three popular EM podcasts.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Podcasts: Current Status

Background: Podcasting has become a primary delivery model for medical content among various specialties. Although this model is still growing, it has become an essential tool for many learners, educators, and institutions. Because of this rapid growth, there is an unknown availability of podcasts for each specialty.

Objectives: This paper aimed to evaluate the podcasts currently available in the subspecialty of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM).

Methods: The investigators sought to evaluate the prevalence of PEM podcasts from the end-user's (medical students, residents, etc.) perspective. This was completed by performing a simple internet search using the term “podcasts in pediatric emergency medicine.” Using Google Search, the first 50 results were analyzed.

Results: For PEM, there were only eight podcasts found, five of which were active.

Conclusion: PEM podcasts in comparison to other specialties are currently underrepresented and lacking in this important resource. The authors call on PEM physicians, educators, and organizations to consider creating content in this educational space.