1
|
Li Y, Luo Y, Peng J, Fan J, Long XT. Clinical effect of operative vs nonoperative treatment on humeral shaft fractures: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. World J Orthop 2024; 15:783-795. [PMID: 39165869 PMCID: PMC11331324 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether operation is superior to non-operation for humeral shaft fracture remains debatable. We hypothesized that operation could decrease the nonunion and reintervention rates and increase the functional outcomes. AIM To compare the clinical efficacy between operative and nonoperative approaches for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases from 1990 to December 2023 for clinical trials and cohort studies comparing the effects of operative and conservative methods on humeral shaft fractures. Two investigators independently extracted data from the eligible studies, and the other two assessed the methodological quality of each study. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk bias or Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The nonunion, reintervention and the overall complications and functional scores were pooled and analyzed using Review Manager software (version 5.3). RESULTS A total of four randomized control trials and 13 cohort studies were included, with 1285 and 1346 patients in the operative and nonoperative groups, respectively. Patients in the operative group were treated with a plate or nail, whereas those in the conservative group were managed with splint or functional bracing. Four studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias, and the other 13 were of a low risk of bias according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane risk bias tool. The operative group had a significantly decreased rate of nonunion [odds ratio (OR) 0.30; 95%CI: 0.23 to 0.40), reintervention (OR: 0.33; 95%CI: 0.24 to 0.47), and overall complications (OR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.49 to 0.78)]. The pooled effect of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score showed a significant difference at 3 [mean difference (MD) -8.26; 95%CI: -13.60 to -2.92], 6 (MD: -6.72; 95%CI: -11.34 to -2.10), and 12 months (MD: -2.55; 95%CI: -4.36 to -0.74). The pooled effect of Visual Analog Scale scores and the Constant-Murley score did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a trend of rapid functional recovery and decreased rates of nonunion and reintervention after operation for humeral shaft fracture compared to conservative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Li
- Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401147, China
| | - Yi Luo
- Department of Orthopedics, Bishan Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 402760, China
| | - Jing Peng
- Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401147, China
| | - Jun Fan
- Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401147, China
| | - Xiao-Tao Long
- Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401147, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muhammad M, Foster JA, Griffin JT, Kinchelow DL, Sierra-Arce CR, Southall WGS, Albitar F, Moghadamian ES, Wright RD, Matuszewski PE, Zuelzer DA, Primm DD, Hawk GS, Aneja A. Nonoperative Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures With Immediate Functional Bracing Versus Coaptation Splinting and Delayed Functional Bracing: A Retrospective Study. J Orthop Trauma 2024; 38:383-389. [PMID: 38527088 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes in nonoperative management of humeral shaft fractures treated initially with coaptation splinting (CS) followed by delayed functional bracing (FB) versus treatment with immediate FB. METHODS DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Academic Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA Patients with closed humeral shaft fractures managed nonoperatively with initial CS followed by delayed FB or with immediate FB from 2016 to 2022. Patients younger than 18 years and/or with less than 3 months of follow-up were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS The primary outcome was coronal and sagittal radiographic alignment assessed at the final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included rate of failure of nonoperative management (defined as surgical conversion and/or fracture nonunion), fracture union, and skin complications secondary to splint/brace wear. RESULTS Ninety-seven patients were managed nonoperatively with delayed FB (n = 58) or immediate FB (n = 39). Overall, the mean age was 49.9 years (range 18-94 years), and 64 (66%) patients were female. The immediate FB group had less smokers ( P = 0.003) and lower incidence of radial nerve palsy ( P = 0.025), with more proximal third humeral shaft fractures ( P = 0.001). There were no other significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics ( P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in coronal ( P = 0.144) or sagittal ( P = 0.763) radiographic alignment between the groups. In total, 33 (34.0%) humeral shaft fractures failed nonoperative management, with 11 (28.2%) in the immediate FB group and 22 (37.9%) in the delayed FB group ( P = 0.322). There were no significant differences in fracture union ( P = 0.074) or skin complications ( P = 0.259) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with immediate functional bracing did not result in significantly different radiographic or clinical outcomes compared to treatment with CS followed by delayed functional bracing. Future prospective studies assessing patient-reported outcomes will further guide clinical decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaz Muhammad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey A Foster
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jarod T Griffin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Daria L Kinchelow
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and
| | | | - Wyatt G S Southall
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and
| | - Ferras Albitar
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and
| | - Eric S Moghadamian
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and
| | - Raymond D Wright
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and
| | - Paul E Matuszewski
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and
| | - David A Zuelzer
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and
| | - Daniel D Primm
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and
| | - Gregory S Hawk
- Dr. Bing Zhang Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Arun Aneja
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Doxey SA, Sorich MM, Abraham SC, Switzer JA, Cunningham BP, McKee MD, Myeroff CM. Iatrogenic open humeral shaft fractures following functional bracing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144:2539-2546. [PMID: 38743112 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05369-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures tends to be successful with functional bracing. Treatment failure due to iatrogenic conversion to an open fracture has not been described in the literature. We present a case series of patients that experienced open humeral shaft fractures after initially being treated with functional bracing for closed humeral shaft fractures and describe what factors are associated with this complication. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective case series performed at three level 1 trauma centers across North America. All nonoperatively treated humeral shaft fractures were reviewed from 2001 to 2023. Patients were included if they sustained a humeral shaft fracture, > 18 years old, were initially treated non-operatively with functional bracing which subsequently converted to an open fracture. Eight patients met inclusion criteria. All included patients were eventually treated with irrigation, debridement, and open reduction and internal fixation. Outcomes assessed included mortality rate, time until the fracture converted from closed to open, need for further surgery, and bony union. Descriptive statistics were used in analysis. RESULTS The eight included patients on average were 65 ± 21.4 years old and had a body mass index (BMI) of 25.6 ± 5.2. Six patients were initially injured due to a fall. Time until the fractures became open on average was 5.2 ± 3.6 weeks. Three patients (37.5%) died within 1.8 ± 0.6 years after initial injury. The average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 4.5 ± 3.4. Three patients (37.5%) had dementia. Common characteristics among this cohort included a history of visual disturbances (50.0%), cerebrovascular accident (50.0%), smoking (50.0%), and alcohol abuse (50.0%). CONCLUSION Conversion from a closed to open humeral shaft fracture after functional bracing is a potentially devastating complication. Physicians should be especially cognizant of patients with a low BMI, history of falling or visual disturbance, dementia, age ≥ 65, decreased sensorimotor protection, and significant smoking or alcohol history when choosing to use functional bracing as the final treatment modality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen A Doxey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, 6500 Excelsior Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN, 55426, USA
| | - Megan M Sorich
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Sarah C Abraham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Julie A Switzer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, 6500 Excelsior Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN, 55426, USA
| | - Brian P Cunningham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, 6500 Excelsior Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN, 55426, USA.
| | - Michael D McKee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Chad M Myeroff
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Graham JG, Davis DE. Augmented Fixation in Transverse Midshaft Humerus Fractures Using a Nitinol Staple: Surgical Technique and Case Series. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2024; 28:80-87. [PMID: 38305354 DOI: 10.1097/bth.0000000000000470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Maintaining the reduction of a transverse humeral shaft fracture can be particularly challenging while applying a compression plate for definitive fixation. Nitinol compression staples are being increasingly utilized in orthopedic surgery due to their unique ability to apply continuous compression between staple legs at body temperature. We have found them to be particularly useful in the maintenance of the reduction of transverse humeral shaft fractures before compression plate application. This simple technique allows for the removal of reduction clamps and precise plate placement. We describe our technique for using nitinol compression staples to augment fracture fixation in transverse humeral shaft fractures as well as our experience using this technique in a case series of 4 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack G Graham
- The Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patel UJ, Holloway MR, Carroll TJ, Soin SP, Ketz JP. No Differences in Clinical, Functional, or Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Trial of Nonoperative Management Before Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2024; 38:214-219. [PMID: 38457769 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To test the hypothesis that primary osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures may lead to more favorable clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes than fixation following a trial of nonoperative management. METHODS DESIGN Retrospective cohort review. SETTING Academic level I trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA Adult patients who presented with humeral shaft fractures and ultimately underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) from May 2011 to May 2021. Patients who underwent ORIF within 2 weeks of injury were grouped into the primary osteosynthesis cohort, and patients who underwent ORIF >4 weeks from the date of injury were grouped into the trial of nonoperative cohort. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS Postoperative complications, elbow arc of motion, time to radiographic union, and patient-reported outcomes were investigated and compared between the primary osteosynthesis and trial of nonoperative management cohorts. RESULTS One hundred twenty-seven patients fit the study criteria, 84 underwent primary osteosynthesis and 43 trialed initial nonoperative treatment. No differences were found in patient demographics between the primary osteosynthesis and trial of nonoperative management cohorts, including age (53 ± 19 vs. 57 ± 18; P = 0.25), sex (39% vs. 44% male, 61% vs. 56% female; P = 0.70), and Body Mass Index (BMI) (30 ± 6 vs. 32 ± 9; P = 0.38). The average time to operative intervention in the primary osteosynthesis group was 4 days (0-14 days) and 105 days (28-332 days) in the trial of nonoperative treatment group ( P < 0.01). No differences were found with regard to intraoperative blood loss, total operative time, time to radiographic union (determined using the Radiographic Union Scores for Humeral scoring system), or overall complication rates, including primary and secondary radial nerve injuries ( P = 0.23 and 0.86, respectively). Patients reported similar patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pain interference ( P = 0.73), depression (D) ( P = 0.99), and physical function ( P = 0.66) scores at their 6-month postsurgical follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS Patients who attempted a trial of nonoperative management for humeral shaft fractures before ORIF had similar clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes as those who underwent primary osteosynthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urvi J Patel
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, Rochester, NY; and
| | - Melissa R Holloway
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, Rochester, NY; and
| | - Thomas J Carroll
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, Rochester, NY; and
| | - Sandeep P Soin
- OrthoIndy Trauma, St. Vincent Trauma Center, St. Vincent Orthopaedics and Spine Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - John P Ketz
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, Rochester, NY; and
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Orapiriyakul W, Apivatthakakul V, Theppariyapol B, Apivatthakakul T. Humerus shaft fractures, approaches and management. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2023; 43:102230. [PMID: 37588079 PMCID: PMC10425411 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Humeral shaft fracture is a common injury which can be treated either conservatively with functional bracing or with surgical fixation. Current evidence shows an increase in the rate of nonunion after conservative treatment, suggesting that indications for conservative treatment may need to be re-examined. This article updates trends in treatment for humeral shaft fracture. Indications for surgery, both for plate osteosynthesis with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) as well as for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are described. Recognition of the advantages and disadvantages of each technique can better define the role of the plate or nail and can aid in the selection of an appropriate surgical approach. ORIF with compression plate continues to have a role in the treatment of simple or AO/OTA type A fractures. The primary goal of minimal invasive osteosynthesis, a surgical technique involving small incisions, closed reduction or mini-open reduction that minimizes soft tissue dissection and helps preserve the periosteal blood supply, is to achieve bone union and the best possible functional outcomes. MIPO of the humerus is now well accepted as being less invasive and providing relative stability to allow indirect (secondary) bone healing with callus formation. MIPO approaches can be performed circumferentially to the humerus, including the proximal, middle and distal shaft. The classic MIPO approach is anterior MIPO, followed by posterior, anterolateral and anteromedial MIPO. IMN is also an option for treating humerus fractures. In the past, IMN was not widely used due to the potential for complications such as shoulder impingement and elbow problems as well as the limited availability of implants and the steep learning curve of this surgical technique. Over the past decade, the launch of a new design of straight antegrade and retrograde IMN with established techniques has encouraged more surgeons to use IMN as an alternative option. Methods of dealing with concomitant and post-treatment radial nerve palsy have also been evolving, including the use of ultrasound for diagnosis of radial nerve conditions. Radial nerves with contusion, entrapment or laceration can be detected using ultrasound with reliability comparable to intraoperative findings. Trends in treatment of radial nerve palsy are described below. Future larger randomized controlled trials comparing conservative and operative management are necessary to further develop appropriate guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wich Orapiriyakul
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand
| | - Varat Apivatthakakul
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| | - Bodin Theppariyapol
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zavras AG, Monahan KT, Winek NC, Pan T, Altman GT, Altman DT, Westrick ER. Conservative Management with Functional Brace Versus Various Surgical Fixation Techniques for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:1112-1122. [PMID: 37224234 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.01374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Historically, humeral shaft fractures have been successfully treated with nonoperative management and functional bracing; however, various surgical options are also available. In the present study, we compared the outcomes of nonoperative versus operative interventions for the treatment of extra-articular humeral shaft fractures. METHODS This study was a network meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which functional bracing was compared with surgical techniques (including open reduction and internal fixation [ORIF], minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis [MIPO], and intramedullary nailing in both antegrade [aIMN] and retrograde [rIMN] directions) for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. The outcomes that were assessed included time to union and the rates of nonunion, malunion, delayed union, secondary surgical intervention, iatrogenic radial nerve palsy, and infection. Mean differences and log odds ratios (ORs) were used to analyze continuous and categorical data, respectively. RESULTS Twenty-one RCTs evaluating the outcomes for 1,203 patients who had been treated with functional bracing (n = 190), ORIF (n = 479), MIPO (n = 177), aIMN (n = 312), or rIMN (n = 45) were included. Functional bracing yielded significantly higher odds of nonunion and significantly longer time to union than ORIF, MIPO, and aIMN (p < 0.05). Comparison of surgical fixation techniques demonstrated significantly faster time to union with MIPO than with ORIF (p = 0.043). Significantly higher odds of malunion were observed with functional bracing than with ORIF (p = 0.047). Significantly higher odds of delayed union were observed with aIMN than with ORIF (p = 0.036). Significantly higher odds of secondary surgical intervention were observed with functional bracing than with ORIF (p = 0.001), MIPO (p = 0.007), and aIMN (p = 0.004). However, ORIF was associated with significantly higher odds of iatrogenic radial nerve injury and superficial infection than both functional bracing and MIPO (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Compared with functional bracing, most operative interventions demonstrated lower rates of reoperation. MIPO demonstrated significantly faster time to union while limiting periosteal stripping, whereas ORIF was associated with significantly higher rates of radial nerve palsy. Nonoperative management with functional bracing demonstrated higher nonunion rates than most surgical techniques, often requiring conversion to surgical fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athan G Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kandemir U, Naclerio EH, McKee MD, Weatherby DJ, Cole PA, Tetsworth K. Humerus fractures: selecting fixation for a successful outcome. OTA Int 2023; 6:e259. [PMID: 37533442 PMCID: PMC10392438 DOI: 10.1097/oi9.0000000000000259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
Current evidence suggests at least one-third of humeral shaft fractures initially managed nonoperatively will fail closed treatment, and this review highlights surgical considerations in those circumstances. Although operative indications are well-defined, certain fracture patterns and patient cohorts are at greater risk of failure. When operative intervention is necessary, internal fixation through an anterolateral approach is a safe and sensible alternative. Determining which patients will benefit most involves shared decision-making and careful patient selection. The fracture characteristics, bone quality, and adequacy of the reduction need to be carefully evaluated for the specific operative risks for individuals with certain comorbid conditions, inevitably balancing the patient's expectations and demands against the probability of infection, nerve injury, or nonunion. As our understanding of the etiology and risk of nonunion and symptomatic malunion of the humeral diaphysis matures, adhering to the principles of diagnosis and treatment becomes increasingly important. In the event of nonunion, respect for the various contributing biological and mechanical factors enhances the likelihood that all aspects will be addressed successfully through a comprehensive solution. This review further explores specific strategies to definitively restore function of the upper extremity with the ultimate objective of an uninfected, stable union.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utku Kandemir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Emily H. Naclerio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Michael D. McKee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ
| | - David J. Weatherby
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, MN
| | - Peter A. Cole
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, MN
- HealthPartners, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Bloomington, MN
| | - Kevin Tetsworth
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; and
- University of Queensland School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:e82-e93. [PMID: 36580054 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim was to compare surgical and nonsurgical management for adults with humeral shaft fractures in terms of patient-reported upper limb function, health-related quality of life, radiographic outcomes, and complications. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry, and OpenGrey (Repository for Grey Literature in Europe) were searched in September 2021. All published prospective randomized trials comparing surgical and nonsurgical management of humeral shaft fractures in adults were included. Of 715 studies identified, five were included in the systematic review and four in the meta-analysis. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. Methodological quality was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Pooled data were analyzed using a random-effects model. RESULTS The meta-analysis comprised 292 patients (mean age 41 [18 to 83] years, 67% male). Surgery was associated with superior Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley scores at 6 months (mean DASH difference 7.6, P = 0.01; mean Constant-Murley difference 8.0, P = 0.003), but there was no difference at 1 year (DASH, P = 0.30; Constant-Murley, P = 0.33). No differences in health-related quality of life or pain scores were found. Surgery was associated with a lower risk of nonunion (0.7% versus 15.7%; odds ratio [OR] 0.13, P = 0.004). The number needed to treat with surgery to avoid one nonunion was 7. Surgery was associated with a higher risk of transient radial nerve palsy (17.4% versus 0.7%; OR 8.23, P = 0.01) but not infection (OR 3.57, P = 0.13). Surgery was also associated with a lower risk of reintervention (1.4% versus 19.3%; OR 0.14, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Surgery may confer an early functional advantage to adults with humeral shaft fractures, but this is not sustained beyond 6 months. The lower risk of nonunion should be balanced against the higher risk of transient radial nerve palsy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I.
Collapse
|
10
|
Eisenberg G, Otremski H, Segev E, Sherman H, Steinberg EL, Tordjman D, Pritsch T, Rosenblatt Y, Atlan F. Rethinking Conservative Treatment of Humeral Diaphyseal Fractures in Elderly Patients With Dementia. J Orthop Trauma 2022; 36:634-638. [PMID: 36399675 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess outcomes and complications of conservatively managed humeral diaphyseal fractures in elderly patients, with an emphasis on the subgroup diagnosed with dementia. DESIGN Retrospective. SETTING Upper extremity surgery unit at an academic Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS Consecutive patients 65 years of age and older who were managed conservatively for humeral diaphyseal fractures between 2007 and 2015. INTERVENTION Conservatively managed humeral diaphyseal fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Complications and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS One-hundred twenty-four patients who were conservatively managed for humeral diaphyseal fractures were identified. Their mean age was 77 (65-92) years, 36 (30%) of them were male and 88 (70%) were female. Fifty-seven (46%) patients experienced complications associated with their treatment, and 33 (27%) patients were eventually treated surgically. Seventeen (14%) patients were diagnosed with dementia. This subgroup had 64% fracture-related complications, and all of them were operated (P-value <0.01 compared with age-matched patients among the other 107 participants in the study). CONCLUSION Conservative management of humeral diaphyseal fractures seems to be associated with greater morbidity in elderly patients, especially in those diagnosed with dementia. Therefore, early surgical treatment should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilad Eisenberg
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and
| | - Hila Otremski
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and
| | - Elad Segev
- Department of Mathematics, Holon Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel
| | - Hagai Sherman
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and
| | - Ely L Steinberg
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and
| | - Daniel Tordjman
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and
| | - Tamir Pritsch
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and
| | - Yishai Rosenblatt
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and
| | - Franck Atlan
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Epidemiology of 936 humeral shaft fractures in a large Finnish trauma center. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 32:e206-e215. [PMID: 36435484 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Humeral shaft fractures are relatively common injuries and are classified according to location and fracture morphology. Epidemiological studies improve understanding of injury patterns and lay foundations for future research. There are only a few published larger epidemiological studies on humeral shaft fractures. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of adult patients having sustained a humeral shaft fracture treated in the Helsinki University Hospital between 2006 and 2016. We recorded patient and fracture characteristics, timing and mechanism of injury, associated injuries, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS We identified 914 patients (489 females, median age = 61.4 years; 425 males, median age = 50.4 years) with 936 fractures. Over 60% of these fractures were sustained from simple falls. The patient age distribution was bimodal, with highest fracture rates in elderly females and young males. We divided the fractures into typical traumatic, periprosthetic, and pathological fractures. Of the 872 typical traumatic fractures, 3.0% were open. In addition, there were 24 (2.6%) periprosthetic and 40 (4.3%) pathological fractures. An associated injury was found in 24% of patients, with primary radial nerve palsy (PRNP) being the most common (10%). PRNPs were more common in distal shaft fractures and high energy injuries. The 1-year mortality was 9.2%. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the most common injury mechanism was a simple fall. The most common associated injury was PRNP. The observed bimodal fracture distribution is consistent with previous literature.
Collapse
|
12
|
Fox HM, Hsue LJ, Thompson AR, Ramsey DC, Hadden RW, Mirarchi AJ, Nazir OF. Humeral shaft fractures: a cost-effectiveness analysis of operative versus nonoperative management. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:1969-1981. [PMID: 35398163 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Humeral shaft fractures can be managed operatively or nonoperatively with functional bracing in the absence of neurovascular injury, open fracture, or polytrauma. A consensus on optimal management has not been reached, nor has the cost-effectiveness perspective been investigated. METHODS A decision tree was constructed describing the management of humeral shaft fractures with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), and functional bracing in a non-elderly population. Probabilities were defined using weighted averages determined from systematic review of the literature. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, measured in cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY were evaluated. RESULTS Eighty-six studies were included. Using bracing as the referent in the health care model, we observed that bracing was the preferred strategy at both incremental cost-effectiveness ratio thresholds. ORIF and IMN had higher overall effectiveness (0.917 QALYs and 0.913 QALYs, respectively) compared with bracing (0.877 QALYs). The cost-effectiveness of bracing was driven by a substantially lower overall cost. In the societal model-accounting for both health care and societal costs-the cost difference narrowed between bracing, ORIF, and IMN. Bracing remained the preferred strategy at the $50,000/QALY threshold; ORIF was preferred at the $100,000/QALY threshold. ORIF and IMN were comparable strategies across a range of probability values in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Functional bracing, with its low cost and satisfactory clinical outcomes, is often the most cost-effective strategy for humeral shaft fracture management. ORIF becomes preferable at the higher willingness-to-pay threshold when societal burden is considered. QALY values for ORIF and IMN were comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry M Fox
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Lauren J Hsue
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Austin R Thompson
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Duncan C Ramsey
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ryan W Hadden
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Adam J Mirarchi
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Omar F Nazir
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Radiographic Scoring of Humeral Shaft Fractures Helps Identify Patients at Risk of Surgery for Delayed Union. J Orthop Trauma 2022; 36:453-457. [PMID: 35149620 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Assessing external validity and clinical relevance of modified radiographic union score (mRUS) to predict delayed union in closed humeral shaft fractures initially treated with conservative management. DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Single urban academic level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS Patients undergoing initial nonoperative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture with a minimum of 3 months follow-up and at least one set of follow-up orthogonal x-rays within 12-weeks of injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the (mRUS) system for humeral shaft fractures, and establishing an mRUS threshold at 6 and 12 weeks postinjury to predict surgery for delayed union. RESULTS mRUS demonstrated substantial interobserver agreement on all assessments. Intraobserver agreement was nearly perfect for all reviewers on repeat assessment. mRUS of ≤7 at 6 ± 1 weeks follow-up was associated with surgery for delayed union with an odds ratio of 4.88 (95% CI, 2.52-9.44, P < 0.01), sensitivity of 0.286, and specificity of 0.924. At 12 ± 1 weeks follow-up, the same threshold demonstrated a stronger association with an odds ratio of 14.7 (95% CI, 4.9-44.1, P < 0.01), sensitivity of 0.225, and specificity of 0.981. CONCLUSIONS The mRUS for humeral shaft fractures is reliable and reproducible providing an objective way to track subtle changes in radiographs over time. An mRUS of ≤7 at 6 or 12 weeks postinjury is highly specific for delayed union. This can be helpful when counseling patients about the risk of nonunion and potential early surgical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
|
14
|
Karimi D, Brorson S, Midtgaard KS, Fjalestad T, Paulsen A, Olerud P, Ekholm C, Wolf O, Viberg B. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)-a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:453. [PMID: 35655280 PMCID: PMC9161482 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06317-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcome of non-surgical treatment is generally good, but the treatment course can be long and painful with approximately a quarter of the patients acquiring a nonunion. Both surgical and non-surgical treatment can have disabling consequences such as nerve injury, infection, and nonunion. The purpose of the study is to compare patient-reported outcomes after surgical and non-surgical treatment for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) is planned with two study groups (SHAFT-Young and SHAFT-Elderly). A total of 287 eligible acute humeral shaft fractures are scheduled to be recruited and randomly allocated to surgical or non-surgical treatment with the option of early crossover due to delayed union. The surgical method within the allocation is decided by the surgeon. The primary outcome is the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at 52 weeks, and is assessor blinded. The secondary outcomes are DASH score, EQ-5D-5L, pain assessed by visual analog score, Constant-Murley score including elbow range of motion, and anchor questions collected at all timepoints throughout the trial. All complications will be reported including; infection, nerve or vascular injury, surgical revisions (implant malpositioning, hardware failure, aseptic loosening, and peri-implant fracture), major adverse cardiovascular events, and mortality. DISCUSSION The SHAFT trial is a pragmatic multicenter RCT, that will compare the effectiveness of the main strategies in humeral shaft fracture treatment. This will include a variety of fracture morphologies, while taking the dilemmas within the population into account by splitting the population by age and providing the orthopedic society with an interval for early crossover surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04574336 . Registered on 5 October 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Karimi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kolding Hospital, Kolding, Denmark.
| | - Stig Brorson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kaare S Midtgaard
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tore Fjalestad
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Aksel Paulsen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Per Olerud
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stockholm South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carl Ekholm
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Olof Wolf
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Orthopedics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Bjarke Viberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kolding Hospital, Kolding, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oliver WM, Searle HKC, Molyneux SG, White TO, Clement ND, Duckworth AD. Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Outcomes Following a Humeral Shaft Fracture: Nonunion Results in a Poorer Outcome Despite Union after Surgical Fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2022; 36:e227-e235. [PMID: 34999623 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The primary aim was to assess patient-reported outcomes ≥1 year following a humeral diaphyseal fracture. The secondary aim was to compare outcomes of patients who united after initial management (operative/nonoperative) with those who united after nonunion fixation (NU-ORIF). DESIGN Retrospective. SETTING University teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION From 2008 to 2017, 291 patients [mean age, 55 years (17-86 years), 58% (n = 168/291) female] were available to complete an outcomes survey. Sixty-four (22%) were initially managed operatively and 227 (78%) nonoperatively. After initial management, 227 (78%) united (n = 62 operative, n = 165 nonoperative), 2 had a delayed union (both nonoperative), and 62 (21%) had a nonunion (n = 2 operative, n = 60 nonoperative). Fifty-two patients (93%, n = 52/56) united after NU-ORIF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES QuickDASH, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D)/EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), 12-item Short Form Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). RESULTS At a mean of 5.5 years (range, 1.2-11.0 years) postinjury, the mean QuickDASH was 20.8, EQ-5D was 0.730, EQ-VAS was 74, PCS was 44.8 and MCS was 50.2. Patients who united after NU-ORIF reported worse function (QuickDASH, 27.9 vs. 17.6; P = 0.003) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EQ-5D, 0.639 vs. 0.766; P = 0.008; EQ-VAS, 66 vs. 76; P = 0.036; PCS, 41.8 vs. 46.1; P = 0.036) than those who united primarily. Adjusting for confounders, union after NU-ORIF was independently associated with a poorer QuickDASH (difference, 8.1; P = 0.019) and EQ-5D (difference, -0.102; P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS Humeral diaphyseal union after NU-ORIF resulted in poorer patient-reported outcomes compared with union after initial management. Targeting early operative intervention to at-risk patients may mitigate the potential impact of nonunion on longer-term outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M Oliver
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ; and
| | - Henry K C Searle
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ; and
| | - Samuel G Molyneux
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ; and
| | - Timothy O White
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ; and
| | - Nicholas D Clement
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ; and
| | - Andrew D Duckworth
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ; and
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Erratum. J Orthop Trauma 2022; 36:e121. [PMID: 35179146 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
17
|
Abstract
Aims The primary aim of this study was to determine the rates of return to work (RTW) and sport (RTS) following a humeral shaft fracture. The secondary aim was to identify factors independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS. Methods From 2008 to 2017, all patients with a humeral diaphyseal fracture were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics and injury characteristics were recorded. Details of pre-injury employment, sporting participation, and levels of return post-injury were obtained via postal questionnaire. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale was used to quantify physical activity among active patients. Regression was used to determine factors independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS. Results The Work Group comprised 177 patients in employment prior to injury (mean age 47 years (17 to 78); 51% female (n = 90)). Mean follow-up was 5.8 years (1.3 to 11). Overall, 85% (n = 151) returned to work at a mean of 14 weeks post-injury (0 to 104), but only 60% (n = 106) returned full-time to their previous employment. Proximal-third fractures (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 14.2); p = 0.029) were independently associated with failure to RTW. The Sport Group comprised 182 patients involved in sport prior to injury (mean age 52 years (18 to 85); 57% female (n = 104)). Mean follow-up was 5.4 years (1.3 to 11). The mean UCLA score reduced from 6.9 (95% CI 6.6 to 7.2) before injury to 6.1 (95% CI 5.8 to 6.4) post-injury (p < 0.001). There were 89% (n = 162) who returned to sport: 8% (n = 14) within three months, 34% (n = 62) within six months, and 70% (n = 127) within one year. Age ≥ 60 years was independently associated with failure to RTS (aOR 3.0 (95% CI 1.1 to 8.2); p = 0.036). No other factors were independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS. Conclusion Most patients successfully return to work and sport following a humeral shaft fracture, albeit at a lower level of physical activity. Patients aged ≥ 60 yrs and those with proximal-third diaphyseal fractures are at increased risk of failing to return to activity. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(3):236–244.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Timothy O. White
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nick D. Clement
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Andrew D. Duckworth
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Daoub A, Ferreira PMO, Cheruvu S, Walker M, Gibson W, Orfanos G, Singh R. Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Literature Review on Current Treatment Methods. Open Orthop J 2022. [DOI: 10.2174/18743250-v16-e2112091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
In this review, we aim to provide a concise yet comprehensive summation of the assessment and management of humeral shaft fractures. These are uncommon but prevalent enough that they are part of any trauma surgeon's scope of practice. They have historically been treated using non-operative methods, including braces and casts, supported by published excellent results in the rate of the bone union. However, recently published studies challenge these results and suggest the outcomes might be better with surgery, but the complications of an operation such as infection and nerve injury can not be overlooked. In summary, non-surgical treatment is still the gold standard in the treatment of these fractures, but the indications for surgical management are now clearer and include early signs of delayed union and patients who are unable to have a brace fitted or are uncompliant. It is likely that these new developments will start to change practice, and therefore the treatment of humeral shaft fractures should be a topic of interest of any clinician who deals with them.
Collapse
|
19
|
Approach to Humeral Shaft Nonunion: Evaluation and Surgical Techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:50-59. [PMID: 34921546 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Humeral shaft fractures account for 1% to 3% of all fractures. Traditional nonsurgical treatment with a functional brace is still the standard treatment of these fractures; however, modern studies have reported that nonunion rates may be as high as 33%. Recent information suggests that the development of nonunion after nonsurgical treatment may be identified as early as 6 to 8 weeks postinjury. Even with surgical treatment, nonunion rates as high as 10% have been reported. Regardless of the original treatment method, nonunion results in poor quality of life for the patient and therefore should be addressed. A thorough preoperative evaluation is important to identify any metabolic or infectious factors that may contribute to the nonunion. In most cases, surgical intervention should consist of compression plating with or without bone graft. Although most patients will achieve union with standard surgical intervention, some patients may require specialized techniques such as cortical struts or vascularized fibular grafts. Successful treatment of humeral shaft nonunion improves function, reduces disability, and improves the quality of life for patients. In this article, we outline our approach to the treatment of humeral shaft nonunion in a variety of clinical settings.
Collapse
|
20
|
Pothmann C, Neuhaus V, Pape HC, Simmen HP, Jensen K. Alternative and off-label use of Titanium Elastic Nail® in acute adult humeral diaphyseal and subcapital fractures. SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2021.100044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
21
|
Entezari V, Olson JJ, Vallier HA. Predictors of traumatic nerve injury and nerve recovery following humeral shaft fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:2711-2719. [PMID: 33964428 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nerve palsy is common after humeral shaft fracture, with the radial nerve being the most commonly injured nerve. Isolated nerve injuries usually recover spontaneously, and operative intervention is rarely indicated. Our goal was to study the predictors of traumatic nerve injury and recovery in a large cohort of patients with humeral shaft fractures. METHODS A total of 376 patients with humeral shaft fracture, including 96 patients with documented traumatic nerve palsy and 280 with intact neurovascular examination on presentation, were retrospectively included in the study. The primary outcome was incidence of a traumatic nerve palsy, and the secondary outcome was nerve recovery. RESULTS Nerve palsy was present in 96 patients (25.5%) at the time of injury. Radial nerve was the most commonly injured nerve (93.6%), followed by the ulnar (5.1%) and axillary (1.2%) nerves. Seventeen patients (17.7%) had multiple nerves palsies. A multivariable regression analysis revealed that the concomitant vascular injury (odds ratio [OR] 52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-480.6), distal one-third fractures (OR 6.3, 95% CI 2.7-14.7), and middle one-third (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2-6.5) vs. proximal fractures, open fracture (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.4), and high-energy trauma (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.9) were independent predictors of nerve palsy. Iatrogenic nerve injury was detected in 7 patients (4.6%), all affecting the radial nerve. Spontaneous recovery of traumatic nerve injuries was detected in 87 patients (91%), with 19% partial and 72% complete recovery. The initial sign of recovery was observed at median times of 7 and 9 weeks for those managed conservatively or fracture fixation. Operative treatment of the fracture had no effect on the outcome of nerve recovery (88.5% vs. 100%, P = .14). Ten patients (14.1%) had transected nerves at the time of exploration and open fractures (22.7% vs. 6.8%, P = .04), and concomitant vascular injury (33.3% vs. 7.3%, P = .02) were associated with nerve transection, portending a worse prognosis for nerve recovery compared with nerves in continuity (40% vs. 95.3%, P = .004). DISCUSSION The incidence of nerve injury after humeral shaft fracture was 25%, reflecting an abundance of high-energy and open injuries in this cohort. Ninety-one percent of patients experienced improvement in their nerve function with a median time to recovery of 7-9 weeks. Operative treatment of the fracture did not change the rate of nerve recovery. Patients with multiple nerve palsies and concurrent vascular insult had worse nerve recovery. We recommend nerve studies if no sign of recovery is observed by 9 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Surgery Program, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heather A Vallier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Predicting the Behavior of Humeral Shaft Fractures: An Independent Validation Study of the Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral Fractures and Value of Assessing Fracture Mobility. J Orthop Trauma 2021; 35:555-559. [PMID: 33480643 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To externally validate the Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral fractures (RUSHU) and to quantify the predictive relationship of fracture motion on physical examination to nonunion. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Single institutional center (University teaching hospital). PATIENTS Ninety-two consecutive patients undergoing nonoperative treatment of a diaphyseal humeral shaft fracture were identified over a 4-year period. The average age of the population was 62 years and 42% of the cohort was men. INTERVENTION Clinical examination for fracture stability was routinely performed on patients by the treating physicians. Radiographic assessment of fracture callus (RUSHU score) at 6 weeks was retrospectively determined. Patients were followed up until union. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Stability was graded as motion at the fracture site or the humerus moving as a single functional unit. RESULTS Fractures with a RUSHU score ≤7 were 14 times more likely to proceed to nonunion at 6 months (78% sensitivity, 80% specificity). The time to union was 49 weeks for a RUSHU score of ≤7 versus 16 weeks for a RUSHU score of ≥8. The number of operations needed to avoid one nonunion was 1.7. Fractures mobile at 6 weeks were 6.5 times more likely to proceed to nonunion at 6 months (77% specificity, 67% sensitivity). Mobile fractures had a longer time to union (41 weeks) than nonmobile fractures (17 weeks). CONCLUSION The RUSHU score and clinical assessment of fracture mobility are effective and valid tools in identifying patients at risk of developing nonunion of humeral shaft fractures and can enhance early decision making in fracture management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
|
23
|
Oliver WM, Searle HKC, Ng ZH, Molyneux SG, White TO, Clement ND, Duckworth AD. Factors associated with humeral shaft nonunion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:2283-2295. [PMID: 33636324 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary aim was to identify patient and injury factors independently associated with humeral diaphyseal fracture nonunion after nonoperative management. The secondary aim was to determine the effect of management (operative/nonoperative) on nonunion. METHODS From 2008-2017, a total of 734 humeral shaft fractures (732 consecutive skeletally mature patients) were retrospectively identified from a trauma database. Follow-up was available for 663 fractures (662 patients, 90%) that formed the study cohort. Patient and injury characteristics were recorded. There were 523 patients (79%) managed nonoperatively and 139 (21%) managed operatively. Outcome (union/nonunion) was determined from medical records and radiographs. RESULTS The median age at injury was 57 (range 16-96) years and 54% (n = 359/662) were female. Median follow-up was 5 (1.2-74) months. Nonunion occurred in 22.7% (n = 119/524) of nonoperatively managed injuries. Multivariate analysis demonstrated preinjury nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; odds ratio [OR] 20.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-199.48; P = .009) and glenohumeral arthritis (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.03-5.77; P = .043) were independently associated with an increased risk of nonunion. Operative fixation was independently associated with a lower risk of nonunion (2.9%, n = 4/139) compared with nonoperative management (OR for nonoperative/operative management 9.91, 95% CI 3.25-30.23; P < .001). Based on these findings, 5 patients would need to undergo primary operative fixation in order to avoid 1 nonunion. CONCLUSIONS Preinjury NSAIDs and glenohumeral arthritis were independently associated with nonunion following nonoperative management of a humeral diaphyseal fracture. Operative fixation was the independent factor most strongly associated with a lower risk of nonunion. Targeting early operative fixation to at-risk patients may reduce the rate of nonunion and the morbidity associated with delayed definitive management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M Oliver
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
| | - Henry K C Searle
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Zhan Herr Ng
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Samuel G Molyneux
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Timothy O White
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Nicholas D Clement
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Andrew D Duckworth
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK; Centre for Population and Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Repair of Humeral Shaft Nonunion With Plate and Screw Fixation and Iliac Crest Bone Graft. J Orthop Trauma 2021; 35:S7-S8. [PMID: 34227589 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
A 58-year-old woman with a proximal 1/3 humeral shaft nonunion presented 2 years after initial injury. We present a technique for nonunion repair, including nonunion site preparation, direct compression of the fracture site using plate osteosynthesis, and iliac crest bone graft harvest and utilization. The purpose of this video is to review humeral shaft nonunion literature and describe our management technique.
Collapse
|
25
|
Rämö L, Paavola M, Sumrein BO, Lepola V, Lähdeoja T, Ranstam J, Järvinen TLN, Taimela S. Outcomes With Surgery vs Functional Bracing for Patients With Closed, Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures and the Need for Secondary Surgery: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the FISH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:2778638. [PMID: 33851991 PMCID: PMC8047733 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Existing evidence indicates that surgery fails to provide superior functional outcome over nonoperative care in patients with a closed humeral shaft fracture. However, up to one-third of patients treated nonoperatively may require secondary surgery. OBJECTIVE To compare the 2-year outcomes of patients who required secondary surgery with the outcomes of patients with successful initial treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This 2-year follow-up of the Finnish Shaft of the Humerus (FISH) randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with nonoperative treatment (functional brace) was completed in January 2020. Enrollment in the original trial was between November 2012 and January 2018 at 2 university hospital trauma centers in Finland. A total of 321 adult patients with closed, displaced humeral shaft fracture were assessed for eligibility. After excluding patients with cognitive disabilities, multimorbidity, or multiple trauma and those refusing randomization, 82 patients were randomized. INTERVENTIONS Interventions were surgery with plate fixation (n = 38; initial surgery group) or functional bracing (n = 44); the latter group was divided into the successful fracture healing group (n = 30; bracing group) and the secondary surgery group (n = 14) with fracture healing problems. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 2 years (range, 0 to 100 points; 0 denotes no disability, 100 extreme disability; minimal clinically important difference, 10 points). RESULTS Of 82 randomized patients, 38 (46%) were female. The mean (SD) age was 48.9 (17.1) years. A total of 74 patients (90%) completed the 2-year follow-up. At 2 years, the mean DASH score was 6.8 (95% CI, 2.3 to 11.4) in the initial surgery group, 6.0 (95% CI, 1.0 to 11.0) in the bracing group, and 17.5 (95% CI, 10.5 to 24.5) in the secondary surgery group. The between-group difference was -10.7 points (95% CI, -19.1 to -2.3; P = .01) between the initial and secondary surgery groups and -11.5 points (95% CI, -20.1 to -2.9; P = .009) between the bracing group and secondary surgery group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Patients contemplating treatment for closed humeral shaft fracture should be informed that two-thirds of patients treated with functional bracing may heal successfully while one-third may experience fracture healing problems that require secondary surgery and lead to inferior functional outcomes 2 years after the injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01719887.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lasse Rämö
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mika Paavola
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bakir O. Sumrein
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vesa Lepola
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Tuomas Lähdeoja
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Teppo L. N. Järvinen
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Simo Taimela
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Capitani P, Chiodini F, Di Mento L, Cavanna M, Bove F, Capitani D, Berlusconi M. Locking compression plate fixation in humeral shaft fractures: A comparative study to literature conservative treatment. Injury 2021; 54 Suppl 1:S2-S8. [PMID: 33757663 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Humeral shaft fractures represent about 3% of all fractures. While there are several treatment options for this type of fractures, there is no evidence in literature showing which is the best one. This study aims at analysing the outcomes for patients with humeral shaft fractures treated with Locking Compression Plate (LCP) fixation in our hospital and comparing them with the outcome for patients conservatively treated (according to data from Pubmed),in order to determine the best treatment option. MATERIALS AND METHODS We treated surgically 220 humeral shaft fractures in our department from February 2005 to March 2012. Seventy-three of them met all the inclusion criteria for this study. All fractures were then classified according to the AO classification. The follow-up considered the radiographic healing of the fracture. All patients were treated with plate fixation (LCP - DePuySynthes Co). At the end of the four-year follow-up, the function was evaluated by means of the DASH score. A systematic review of the literature of the last 20 years was performed on MEDLINE (PubMed). RESULTS We had 2 infections and 8 patients had postoperative nerve palsy which recovered in average time of 6.7 months. In addition, 4 fractures (5.48%) didn't heal within 6 months and they were considered as nonunions and healed after a second surgery. One of these 4 nonunions was infected. The mean DASH score was 18.24±19.18. No malunions were found. We identified 13 studies that were eligible for our systematic review. The mean non-union rate found was 17% in 2517 fractures with a follow-up that ranging from 67% to 100% of patients and a primary radial nerve palsy ranging from 0 to 115 patients. Malalignment rate ranged from 12.7 to 42%. CONCLUSIONS After taking into account both the conservative and the surgical treatment, for humeral shaft fractures we suggest the operative treatment, because the patient's function of the upper limb recovers quickly in the immediate postoperative period and the incidence of malunions may be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Capitani
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Trauma Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - F Chiodini
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, ASST Ovest Milanese - Ospedale di Legnano, Legnano, Italy
| | - L Di Mento
- Trauma Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Cavanna
- Trauma Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - F Bove
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - D Capitani
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - M Berlusconi
- Trauma Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chambers LR, Juels P, Mauffrey C, Parry JA. Initial management of humeral shaft fractures with functional splints versus coaptation splints. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2021; 31:1129-1134. [PMID: 33417045 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02845-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Humerus shaft fractures are commonly acutely immobilized with coaptation splints (CS), which can be difficult to apply and poorly tolerated by the patient. Functional splints (FS), which work on the same principle as functional braces, are an alternative to CS. The purpose of this study was to directly compare CS and FS in terms of application and fracture reduction. METHODS A retrospective review identified humeral shaft fractures managed nonoperatively with initial immobilization in a FS (n = 19) versus a CS (n = 15). In addition, 13 residents completed a blinded survey on splint application. RESULTS The FS and CS groups did not differ in initial fracture angulation and translation on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs. Post-splint application, there was no clinically relevant difference in fracture angulation/translation between groups, and this persisted at the subsequent follow-up visit. All residents reported that the FS was easier to apply and took less time. CONCLUSION This study results demonstrated the FS results in similar reductions in humeral shaft fractures as CS. A survey of residents found that the FS was easier to apply, took less time, and was better tolerated by patients. Subsequently, we prefer the FS over the CS for the acute management of humeral shaft fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori R Chambers
- Department of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical Center, 777 Bannock St, MC 0188, Denver, CO, 80204, USA
| | - Parker Juels
- Department of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical Center, 777 Bannock St, MC 0188, Denver, CO, 80204, USA
| | - Cyril Mauffrey
- Department of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical Center, 777 Bannock St, MC 0188, Denver, CO, 80204, USA
| | - Joshua A Parry
- Department of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical Center, 777 Bannock St, MC 0188, Denver, CO, 80204, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Introduction Humeral shaft fractures account for 3% of adult fractures. Optimal management remains a topic of debate given variable union rates reported in the literature after surgery or functional bracing. The primary aim was to compare these 2 cohorts of patients and their primary fracture union rates. A secondary aim was to identify predictors of nonunion. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 164 adult patients with traumatic humeral shaft fractures was performed. Fractures were classified according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification. Primary outcomes included rate nonunion, including symptomatic fractures requiring conversion to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Secondary outcomes included rates of complications and secondary procedures. Results Ninety-four (57%) patients were treated initially with ORIF. Nonoperative patients were older (47.1 vs. 41.5 years, P = .028) and had more medical comorbidity (62% vs. 43%, P = .017), low-energy trauma (62% vs. 34%, P < .0001), and isolated injuries (74% vs. 32%, P < .0001). All patients with open fractures (23%) were treated with débridement and ORIF, and surgical patients had more nerve injuries on presentation (36% vs. 9%, P < .0001). The overall rate of primary fracture union was 88%, similar after ORIF and nonoperative management (92% vs. 83%, P = .095). Multivariate analysis found alcohol abuse (odds ratio [OR]: 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-11.0, P = .046) and deep infection (OR: 19.9, 95% CI: 2.6-150.5, P = .004) to be significant predictors of nonunion. Chronic liver disease demonstrated a trend toward increased risk of nonunion (OR: 4.1, 95% CI: 0.8-20.9, P = .088). Seventeen operative patients (18%) developed 17 postoperative complications: iatrogenic nerve palsy (5%), deep infection (5%), and implant failure (3%), the most common. Reoperation rate was 10%, primarily for revision ORIF (4%). Conclusion Patients managed nonoperatively were more often older patients with isolated fractures and more medical comorbidity. Surgical candidates were younger, more often with higher energy injuries, and were frequently with concomitant injury. Primary union occurred in 88%, with a trend toward a higher rate after ORIF. Patients with chronic liver disease and/or alcohol abuse are at greater risk for nonunion, irrespective of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Olson
- Study Performed at MetroHealth Medical Center, Affiliated with Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Study Performed at MetroHealth Medical Center, Affiliated with Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Heather A Vallier
- Study Performed at MetroHealth Medical Center, Affiliated with Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Erratum. J Orthop Trauma 2020; 34:e260. [PMID: 32555042 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
30
|
Rämö L, Sumrein BO, Lepola V, Lähdeoja T, Ranstam J, Paavola M, Järvinen T, Taimela S. Effect of Surgery vs Functional Bracing on Functional Outcome Among Patients With Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures: The FISH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2020; 323:1792-1801. [PMID: 32396179 PMCID: PMC7218498 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.3182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Humeral shaft fractures traditionally have been treated nonsurgically, but there has been a steady increase in the rate of surgery over the past 2 decades without high-quality evidence to justify the trend. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment with open reduction and internal plate fixation to nonsurgical treatment with functional bracing in the treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized clinical trial conducted at 2 university hospital trauma centers in Finland, enrollment between November 2012 and January 2018 with a final follow-up of January 2019. A total of 82 adult patients with closed, unilateral, displaced humeral shaft fracture met criteria for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they had cognitive disabilities preventing them from following the protocol or had multimorbidity or multiple trauma. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly assigned to surgical treatment with open reduction and internal plate fixation (n = 38) or to nonsurgical treatment with functional bracing (n = 44). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE The primary outcome was Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 12 months (range, 0 to 100 points, 0 denotes no disability and 100 extreme disability; minimal clinically important difference, 10 points). RESULTS Among 82 patients who were randomized (mean age, 48.9 years; 38 women [46%]; 44 men [54%]), 78 (95%) completed the trial. Thirteen (30%) of the patients assigned to functional bracing underwent surgery during the 12-month follow-up period to promote healing of the fracture. At 12 months, the mean DASH score was 8.9 (95% CI, 4.2 to 13.6) in the surgery group and 12.0 (95% CI, 7.7 to 16.4) in the bracing group (between-group difference, -3.1 points; 95% CI, -9.6 to 3.3; P = .34). Eleven patients (25%) allocated to functional bracing developed fracture nonunion. Three patients (8%) allocated to surgery developed a temporary radial nerve palsy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with closed humeral shaft fracture, internal fixation surgery, compared with nonoperative functional bracing, did not significantly improve functional outcomes at 12 months. However, the substantial amount of treatment crossover from nonoperative to surgical treatment should be considered when interpreting the trial results. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01719887.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lasse Rämö
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bakir O. Sumrein
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vesa Lepola
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Tuomas Lähdeoja
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Mika Paavola
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teppo Järvinen
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Simo Taimela
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|