Serial casting as a delay tactic in the treatment of moderate-to-severe early-onset scoliosis

Bracing in severe skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does a holding strategy change the surgical plan?

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess the changes in flexibility during night-time bracing in skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with curves in the surgical range.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included a consecutive cohort of 89 AIS patients with curves ≥ 45° and an estimated growth potential. All patients were eventually treated with fusion surgery, and all patients had side-bending radiographs prior to both bracing and surgery. Curves were classified as structural or non-structural curves according to Lenke at both timepoints.

RESULTS

The main curve progressed by a mean of 12 ± 10° and the secondary curve by 8 ± 8°. Flexibility of the main curve decreased from 50 ± 19% to 44 ± 19% (p = 0.001) and the underlying curve from 85 ± 21% to 77 ± 22% (p = 0.005). In 69 patients (79%), the Lenke category did not progress during bracing. In 14 patients (15%), the progression in Lenke type occurred in the thoracic region (i.e., Lenke type 1 to type 2), while six patients (7%) progressed in the lumbar region (i.e., type 1 to type 3). In the 69 patients that did not progress, we found that the last touched vertebra moved distally by one or two levels in 26 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to describe that curve flexibility decreases during bracing in severe AIS. However, this had only a modest impact on the surgical strategy. Bracing as a holding strategy can be applied, but the risk of losing flexibility in the lumbar spine should be outweighed against the risks of premature fusion surgery.

Minimally Invasive Controlled Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis-A Surgical Technique Video

BACKGROUND

Spinal deformities in children and adolescents can be easily divided into those occurring and diagnosed before the age of 10-early-onset scoliosis-and those occurring and diagnosed after the age of 10-late-onset scoliosis. When the curvature continues to progress and exceeds a Cobb angle of more than 60-65 degrees, surgical treatment should be considered. The most common treatment procedure for EOS is the surgical correction of the deformity using standard growing rods (SGRs), and in the case of congenital defects with additional hemivertebrae, it is the resection of the hemivertebra and short fusion. Minimally invasive controlled growing rods (MICGRs) need to be distracted every 6-9 months through a minimally invasive approach that involves sedation and neuromonitoring to obtain the best possible correction while minimizing complications. The aim of our study is to present a less-invasive surgical technique for MICGR implantation based on a two-case presentation-early-onset idiopathic scoliosis and congenital kyphosis. The surgical technique is the less-invasive percutaneous and subfascial implantation of MICGRs without long incisions in the back.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MICGRs is an alternative and safe surgical technique for patients undergoing surgical treatment for EOS. Without the risk of metallosis, like in other implant systems, and the need for replacement after 2 years of use, like in using magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), the MICGR system can be used as a less-invasive procedure, allowing for the avoidance of many periodic invasive procedures in children with a wider opening of the spine (like in using standard growing rods), minimizing the number of planned hospitalizations, reducing the length of hospital stays, and reducing the physical and mental burdens on young patients, parents, and families.

The efficacy of bracing in the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis

Serial casting as one of the applications to treat early-onset scoliosis has been reported efficiently to improve deformity, but no report has focused on the efficacy of braces in the treatment of congenital early-onset scoliosis and comparison with progressive idiopathic early-onset scoliosis. Patients with progressive EOS treated with braces in our institution with a minimum of 4 years follow-up were reviewed. Two groups according to the etiological diagnosis were analyzed and compared: the congenital scoliosis (CS) group and idiopathic scoliosis (IS) group. The success cases and the failure cases were also compared. 27 patients with an average main Cobb angle of 38.19° (20-55) underwent initial bracing at an average age of 55.7 months (24-108), the average follow-up time was 76.19 months (49-117). In IS group the main Cobb angle was corrected to 18.69 ± 12.06° (48.61%) following the first bracing; the final Cobb angle was 23.08 ± 22.15°(38.76%) after brace removal. In CS group the main Cobb angle was corrected to 33.93 ± 10.31°(17.1%) following the first bracing and 37.93 ± 14.74°(3.53%) after brace removal. Both coronal chest width and T1-T12 height increased dramatically from pre-bracing to the last follow-up. Patients diagnosed as IS tended to have a better result in main Cobb angle correction than that of CS (P = 0.049). By the time of last follow-up, 8 patients had undergone surgery, and the operation time was postponed by 68.88 ± 26.43 months. For patients with progressive early-onset scoliosis, bracing is an efficient nonsurgical alternative to casting, and some of them can be cured; if not, eventual surgical intervention can be delayed for a period of time without restrictions on the thoracic cavity.

Institutional Variability in Anesthesia Time for Mehta Casting in Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS)

PURPOSE

Mehta casting is a potentially curative intervention for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) that typically requires multiple anesthetics. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that >3 hours of anesthesia under the age of 3 years old may alter brain development; however, no standard exists for the duration of anesthesia during casting. The purpose of this study is to quantify the variability in anesthesia during Mehta casting. We hypothesize that significant institutional variability exists and may be attributed to modifiable factors.

METHODS

An EOS registry was used to identify patients who underwent at least one Mehta casting procedure. Anesthesia exposure was quantified, and site variability was assessed by patient characteristics, cast placement, procedure type, and equipment used.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 208 patients from 5 institutions (age 2.6±1.4 y). There were 1097 Mehta casting procedures, with 5.4±3.6 castings per patient. Of these patients, 106 (51%) were female, with an average age of 2.11±1.29 years old at the time casting was initiated. Patient etiologies included 154 idiopathic (74.0%), 22 syndromic (10.6%), 18 congenital (8.7%), 11 neuromuscular (5.3%), and 3 unknown (1.4%). Anesthesia time was 69±31 minutes and varied significantly between sites (59±14 to 117±46 min; P <0.001). Cumulative anesthesia time for patients under 3 years was 320±197 minutes with 120/161 (74.5%) patients exceeding 3 hours. Anesthesia time was lower after the FDA warning in 2016 compared with pre-2016 (71±30 vs. 66±32, P =0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing Mehta casting are at significant risk of exceeding 3 hours of anesthesia, which the FDA has stated may be harmful for children <3 years. Significant site variability indicates that standardization protocols should be developed to encourage best practices and minimize anesthetic times.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II.

Paediatric syndromic scoliosis: proceedings of the half-day course at the 57th annual meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society

There are some syndromes that present with unique manifestations pertaining to the spinal column. A good working understanding of these common syndromes is useful for the spinal deformity surgeons and related healthcare providers. This review attempts to encompass these unique features and discuss them in three broad groups: hypermobility syndromes, muscle pathology-related syndromes, and syndromes related to poor bone quality. This review explores the features of these syndromes underpinning the aspects of surgical and medical management. This review represents the proceedings of the Paediatric Half-Day Course at the 57th Annual Meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society.

Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in early onset scoliosis: A current concept review

Substantial advances in the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) over the past two to three decades have resulted in significant improvements in health-related quality of life of affected children. In addition to classifications that address the marked heterogeneity of this patient population, increasing understanding of the natural history of the disease, and new implants and treatment techniques have resulted in innovations unlike any other area of pediatric orthopedics. The growing understanding of the interaction between spinal and thoracic growth, as well as dependent lung maturation, has had a lasting impact on the treatment strategy of this potentially life-threatening disease. The previous treatment approach with early corrective fusion gave way to a growth-friendly concept. Despite the steady development of new growth-friendly surgical treatment options, whose efficacy still needs to be validated, as well as a revival of conservative growth control with serial casts and/or braces, the psychosocial burden of the long lasting and complication-prone treatments remains high. As a consequence, EOS still represents one of the greatest pediatric orthopedic challenges.

Predictors of Rod Length Gain and Sagittal Alignment Change After Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Lengthening

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

There are preoperative characteristics that predict rod lengthening of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). The lengthening of MCGR will lead to increased kyphosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The amount of length gained by MCGR is variable, and predictors are lacking. Similarly, sagittal plane changes over the MCGR lengthening period have not been investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with MCGR and a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified and those with previous spine surgery were excluded. Preimplantation, postimplantation, and last follow-up postlengthening radiographs were examined. Multiple linear regression analyses were used for rod length gain predictors.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with early-onset scoliosis met inclusion criteria: nine idiopathic, five congenital, 14 neuromuscular, 20 syndromic, and eight skeletal dysplasia patients. No difference was seen between subtypes of early-onset scoliosis for rod length gain ( P =0.62). Shorter preoperative T1-T12 height and higher curve correction rate after implantation were significant predictors for rod length gain ( P <0.001). Preoperative major curve magnitude and kyphosis were not significant predictors. Flattening of the spine around the actuator and compensative increase in T1-T5 kyphosis were seen secondarily after MCGR implantation. Maximum sagittal kyphosis, T1-T5 kyphosis, and T5-T12 kyphosis did not change during lengthening. Lumbar lordosis significantly decreased postimplantation (first erect) but then increased during lengthening. Pelvic incidence and sacral slope both increased during lengthening, but this may be age related.

CONCLUSION

Patients who gained the most rod length with MCGR were those with an initially shorter T1-T12 height and better initial curve correction at implantation, likely representing that implants work best in small patients with flexible curves. Diagnosis, preoperative curve magnitude, and thoracic kyphosis were not related to rod length gain. Thoracic kyphosis did not deteriorate over the lengthening phase.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Early Onset Scoliosis and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Review of the Literature and Correlations With Pulmonary Dysfunction

In the management of early onset scoliosis (EOS) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), orthopedic surgeons are tasked with considering the effects that curves and their treatment can have on the respiratory system, possibly the most relevant being pulmonary dysfunction due to thoracic cage changes. The pulmonary impairment that occurs as a result of scoliosis varies widely and requires a multimodal response, including physiologic testing, such as pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and consistent psychosocial monitoring of the patient. This forces healthcare providers to consider all factors affecting the patient's quality of life (QOL) and not just the primary pathology they are treating. One method that could be utilized to ensure a more holistic approach to treatment is the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess the QOL domains. Thus, this review serves to highlight the importance of addressing and correcting pulmonary dysfunction in the care of children with EOS and AIS in a holistic manner.

Minimum 5-Year Results of Elongation Derotation Flexion Casting for Early Onset Scoliosis: The Story Is Not Over Until Skeletal Maturity

BACKGROUND

Early conservative treatment for patients with idiopathic infantile scoliosis (IIS) with elongation derotation flexion (EDF) casting and subsequent serial bracing has become widely utilized. However, the long-term outcomes of patients treated with EDF casting are limited.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who had undergone serial elongation derotation flexion casting and subsequent bracing for scoliosis presenting at a single large tertiary center. All patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years or until surgical intervention.

RESULTS

Our study included 21 patients diagnosed with IIS and treated with EDF casting. At a mean 7-year follow-up, 13 of the 21 patients were considered successfully treated with a mean final major coronal curvature of 9 degrees compared to a pretreatment coronal curve of 36 degrees. These patients, on average, began casting at 1.3 years old and spent 1 year in a cast. Patients that did not have substantial improvement began casting at mean 4 years old and remained in a cast for 0.8 years. Three patients initially had substantial improvement with the correction to <20 degrees at a mean age of 7; however, their curves worsened in adolescence with poor brace compliance. All 3 patients will require surgical intervention. Of the patients not successfully treated with casting, 7 required surgery at a mean 8.2 years of age, 4.3 years after initiation of casting. A significant predictor of treatment failure was older age of cast initiation (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

EDF casting can be an effective cure for IIS patients if initiated at a young age with 15 of 21 patients successfully treated (76%). However, 3 patients had a recurrence in adolescence resulting in an overall success rate of only 62%. Casting should be initiated early to maximize the likelihood of treatment success and periodic monitoring should be continued through skeletal maturity as recurrence during adolescence can occur.

Physician collections are 71% less for early onset scoliosis casting than for growing rod instrumentation: A retrospective cohort study

Growing rod (GR) instrumentation and the elongation, derotation, and flexion (EDF) casting technique are 2 alternatives for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. Our purpose was to investigate the cost of these treatment options. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with early-onset scoliosis treated at 2 institutions from 2007 to 2014 with either GR instrumentation or EDF casting. Patients with <2 years of follow-up were excluded. Physician and hospital charges and collections, total procedures, and procedure times until final follow-up or time of fusion were compared. Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria; 8 in the GR group and 11 in the EDF casting group. There were no significant differences between the groups in age (P = .23), public versus private insurance (P = 1.0), or major curve (P = .21) at the initiation of treatment. Excluding final fusion, the EDF casting patients had an average of 2.1 (range: 0.7-6.6) procedures/year while the GR patients had an average of 1.5 (range: 0.8-2.7) procedures/year. The average procedure time for the EDF group was 104.2 minutes; the average procedure time for the GR group, excluding the index procedure, was 62.40 minutes (P = .001). Physician charges were 85% less for the EDF group (EDF= $1892.75, GR= $12,354.53, P < .001). Physician collections were 71% less for the EDF group (EDF= $731.10, GR= $2554.88, P = .001). Hospital charges and collections were similar between the groups (P = .82, P = .42). Physician charges for casting were approximately 18% of that of GRs. Compared to GRs, physician collections were 71% less for EDF casting patients per year.

Effects of spinal deformities on lung development in children: a review

Scoliosis before the age of 5 years is referred to as early-onset scoliosis (EOS). While causes may vary, EOS can potentially affect respiratory function and lung development as children grow. Moreover, scoliosis can lead to thoracic insufficiency syndrome when aggravated or left untreated. Therefore, spinal thoracic deformities often require intervention in early childhood, and solving these problems requires new methods that include the means for both deformity correction and growth maintenance. Therapeutic strategies for preserving the growing spine and thorax include growth rods, vertically expandable titanium artificial ribs, MAGEC rods, braces and casts. The goals of any growth-promoting surgical strategy are to alter the natural history of cardiorespiratory development, limit the progression of underlying spondylarthrosis deformities and minimize negative changes in spondylothorax biomechanics due to the instrumental action of the implant. This review further elucidates EOS in terms of its aetiology, pathogenesis, pathology and treatment.

Less-Invasive Approach to Early-Onset Scoliosis—Surgical Technique for Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) Based on Treatment of 2-Year-Old Child with Severe Scoliosis

Background: Spinal deformities in children can be caused by various etiologies, such as congenital, syndromic, neuromuscular, or idiopathic. Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is diagnosed before the age of ten years, and when the curvature continues to progress and exceeds a Cobb angle of 60–65 degrees, surgical treatment should be considered. Initial minimally invasive surgery and the implantation of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) allows for the noninvasive distraction of the spine, growing, and avoids multiple operations associated with the classic distractions of standard growing rods. Case presentation: A 2-year-old girl was admitted to our clinic with rapidly progressive thoracic scoliosis. The major curve of the thoracic spine Cobb angle was 122° at 30 months. No congenital deformities were detected. The surgical technique was the less-invasive percutaneous and subfascial implantation of MCGRs, without long incisions on the back and the non-invasive ambulatory lengthening of her spine over the next 4 years. Conclusions: MCGR is a safe procedure for EOS patients. It is extremely effective at correcting spinal deformity; controlling the growth and curvature of the spine as the child develops during growth; reducing the number of hospitalizations and anesthesia; and minimizing the physical and mental burden of young patients, parents, and their families.

Does Transitioning to a Brace Improve HRQoL After Casting for Early Onset Scoliosis?

BACKGROUND

Serial casting is favored for the initial treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS), but there is concern about significant morbidity and caregiver burden. Studies have examined the utility of bracing as an alternative to casting, but little is known about differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between treatments. We hypothesized that patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic EOS experience an improvement in HRQoL when transitioning from serial casting to bracing as measured by the 24-Item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ).

METHODS

Subjects with idiopathic EOS were retrospectively identified from a multicenter database. EOSQ scores were compared before treatment, after index casting, after transition out of cast to brace, and at the most recent follow-up. Available major curve magnitudes were also compared during these time points. Data were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Sixty-six subjects met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-seven (56%) subjects were male and the average age at the time of index treatment was 1.9 (0.37-6.4) years. The average follow-up was 3.2 (0.90-6.8) years. In 57 subjects, the major curve magnitude improved from a mean of 33 (CI 28-37) degrees before treatment initiation to 27 (CI 23-30) degrees after casting and to 24 (CI 20-29) degrees at the most recent follow-up. The HRQoL subdomain showed a significant decrease in HRQoL during casting treatment 75.7 (CI 72.9-78.5) from pre-index treatment 84.9 (CI 81.4-88.5), during brace treatment 84.8 (CI 81.8-88.0) and at most recent follow-up 87.0 (CI 83.6-90.3) ( P <0.001). The parental impact subdomain improved from the beginning to the end of treatment (77.7 to 87.7, P =0.001) (n=64). Satisfaction improved from casting to bracing (73.4 to 86.7, P <0.001) (n=63) and to the most recent follow-up (73.4 to 87.9, P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with casting for EOS experience reversible declines in HRQoL. After patients transition from casting to bracing, EOSQ scores recover to pretreatment baseline levels and are maintained at follow-up. This information must be balanced with the effectiveness of treatment for EOS with either method and customized for each patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Re-evaluating consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for early onset scoliosis: a 10-year update

PURPOSE

Consensus and uncertainty in early onset scoliosis (EOS) treatment were evaluated in 2010. It is currently unknown how treatment preferences have evolved over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for EOS patients to understand how they compare to 10 years ago.

METHODS

11 pediatric spinal surgeons (similar participants as in 2010) were invited to complete a survey of 315 idiopathic and neuromuscular EOS cases (same cases as in 2010). Treatment options included the following: conservative management, distraction-based methods, growth guidance/modulation, and arthrodesis. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement, and uncertainty was < 70%. Associations between case characteristics and consensus for treatments were assessed via chi-squared and multiple regression analyses. Case characteristics associated with uncertainty were described.

RESULTS

Eleven surgeons [31.7 ± 7.8 years of experience] in the original 2010 cohort completed the survey. Consensus for conservative management was found in idiopathic patients aged ≤ 3, whereas in 2010, some of these cases were selected for surgery. There is currently consensus for casting idiopathic patients aged 1 or 2 with moderate curves, whereas in 2010, there was uncertainty between casting and bracing. Among neuromuscular cases with consensus for surgery, arthrodesis was chosen for patients aged 9 with larger curves.

CONCLUSION

Presently, preferences for conservative management have increased in comparison to 2010, and casting appears to be preferred over bracing in select infantile cases. Future research efforts with higher levels-of-evidence should be devoted to elucidate the areas of uncertainty to improve care in the EOS population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Innovative technique for early-onset scoliosis casting using Jackson table

PURPOSE

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) can have harmful effects on pulmonary function. Serial elongation, derotation, and flexion (EDF) casting can cure EOS or delay surgical intervention. Most described casting techniques call for specialized tables, which are not available at many institutions. We describe an innovative technique for EDF casting utilizing a modified Jackson table (MJ) and compare results to a Risser frame (RF).

METHODS

All patients who underwent EDF casting at our institution between January 2015 and January 2019 were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by type of table used and clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared. Standard descriptive statistics were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 25 patients who underwent 77 casting events, 11 on an MJ table and 14 on a RF. Mean follow-up was 32 months (range 11-61 months). 28% of patients had idiopathic scoliosis. There was no significant difference in age at initiation of casting (P = 0.3), initial Cobb angle (equivalence, P = 0.009), or rate of idiopathic scoliosis between the MJ and RF groups. There was no significant difference in initial coronal Cobb angle percent correction (equivalence, P = 0.045) or percent correction at 1-year follow-up (equivalence, P = 0.010) between the two groups. There was no difference in cast related complications. There was a significant difference in surgical time, with the MJ group 11 min shorter than the RF (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The MJ table is a safe and effective alternative for applying EDF casts under traction without the need for a specialized table.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Trends in the Utilization of Implants in Index Procedures for Early Onset Scoliosis From the Pediatric Spine Study Group

INTRODUCTION

Because of the relative rarity of Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) cases, patient registries were developed to combine clinical information from multiple institutions to maximize patient care and outcomes. This study examines the history and trends regarding the use of growth-friendly devices for index surgical procedures in EOS patients within the Pediatric Spine Study Group database.

METHODS

All index growth-friendly implants were queried from registry inception until October 2020. EOS etiology, device/implant type, and geographic area/institution for each procedure were recorded.

RESULTS

From 1994 to 2020, 2786 patients underwent index surgery at a mean age of 6.2±2.9 years. There were 908 traditional growing rods (TGR) (32.3%), 922 vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib devices (VEPTR) (33.1%), 5 hybrid VEPTR/TGR (0.18%), and 951 magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) (34.2%) index implants. Fifty-six different institutions reported an index implant, and 5 accounted for 823 (30%) of the cases during the study period. Institutions in the Northeast accounted for more index implants than other regions of the United States. There was a 40% increase in index implant insertions annually when comparing 1994 (3 implants/1 center) to 2018 (234 implants/56 centers), ( P <0.001). Beginning in 2009, there was a 90.9% decrease in the number of TGR/VEPTR procedures (2009: 156 implants/32 centers; 2019: 22 implants/49 centers P =0.001), and a 479% increase in MCGR (2009: 1 implant/1 center; 2018: 197 implants/34 centers ( P =0.005). The overall number of growth-friendly index procedures performed in 2019 (150/49 centers) decreased 34.5% when compared to 2018 (234/48 centers).

CONCLUSION

The number of growth-friendly implants reported in the Pediatric Spine Study Group registry as the initial surgical management of EOS increased markedly over the past 20 years. MCGR is currently the predominant type of device utilized for index surgical procedures by group members, surpassing the use of VEPTR and TGR in 2014. There was a significant decrease in index growth-friendly procedures in 2019 compared to 2018.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Weight gain and gastrostomy tube safety during serial body casting for early onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

Serial casting has been shown to improve curve deformity for patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). However, despite prior literature demonstrating the importance of weight and nutrition in EOS patients, there is limited information regarding complications and weight gain ability for children undergoing serial casting. Additionally, parents of patients undergoing serial casting often have concerns regarding weight gain and patient comfort, which tend to be amplified in patients with gastrostomy tubes (g-tubes). We aim to understand changes in weight, g-tube complications, and cast-related complications in patients being treated with serial casting.

METHODS

A single center retrospective review of all EOS patients less than 6 years old treated with serial casting was performed. Patient weight out of cast throughout their treatment was converted to a percentile based on CDC growth charts. Patients with documented calls regarding cast concerns, complications requiring cast removal, or g-tube procedures were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients treated with serial casting were included with four having g tubes. Overall, the average weight percentile increased from pre-casting to post-casting (27-38%, p < 0.001) with 21 patients showing an increase. Of the 22 patients with a starting weight below the 25th percentile, 14 (64%) demonstrated an increase. Patients with g tubes increased an average of 4.2 kg during casting compared to 3.0 kg in patients without g tubes (p = 0.588). 18 parents registered a cast concern during the treatment and 5 patients required at least one early cast removal. No difference in cast concerns (p = 0.597) or cast removals (p = 0.488) was observed when comparing patients with g tubes to those without. There were no instances of g-tube dysfunction during casting.

CONCLUSION

While the average weight percentile for patients initiating serial casting is below average, the majority increased their weight percentile during treatment. Patients with and patients without g tubes were able to maintain or gain weight during casting treatment. While it was common for parents to contact providers with cast concerns, patients with g tubes did not appear to have a greater risk of cast or g tube-related complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

When Will You Succeed Casting Patients With Early-onset Scoliosis? Prospective Evaluation of Predictive Radiographic Parameters

BACKGROUND

In a recent retrospective study, in cast correction of the major curve correlated with final curve size in patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with casting. We therefore sought to perform a prospective study with controlled methodology to determine if there are parameters associated with reduction of coronal deformity.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was conducted between 2014 and 2019 at selected sites willing to comply with a standard radiographic and follow-up protocol. Radiographic data was collected at time points of precast, in traction, initial in-cast, and at minimum 1 year follow-up. Multivariate linear regression models were utilized to control for potential confounders using a stepwise procedure. Twenty-nine patients met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis, traction major curve (P=0.043) and initial in-cast (P=0.011) major curve Cobb angles were independently associated with final out of cast major curve Cobb angle. The only factor that was independently associated with failure to cure (<15-degree major curve) was traction major curve Cobb angle (P=0.046). A threshold traction major curve Cobb angle of 20 degrees was found to have good accuracy with 81% sensitivity and 73% specificity (receiver operator curve area: 0.869, P<0.001). A traction major curve Cobb angle over 20 degrees would accurately predict failure of casting treatment to cure scoliosis in 79% of cases. A threshold in-cast major curve Cobb angle of 21 degrees was found to have slightly less accuracy than traction with 69% sensitivity, 82% specificity, and 74% accuracy (receiver operator curve area: 0.830, P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic measurements in traction and initially in the cast are predictive of curve size at follow-up for children with early-onset scoliosis treated with casting. The standardization and utility of traction films should be further explored.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

The Spring Distraction System for Growth-Friendly Surgical Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis: A Preliminary Report on Clinical Results and Safety after Design Iterations in a Prospective Clinical Trial

Background: The Spring Distraction System (SDS) is a dynamic growth-friendly implant to treat early onset scoliosis (EOS). Previous SDS studies showed promising results in terms of curve correction and complication profile. Nevertheless, complications did occur, which led to modifications in the implant design. The main iterations were a larger rod diameter and a more sagittal stable sliding mechanism. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of these iterations. Methods: All patients treated with the modified SDS and >1 year follow-up were included. Radiographic outcomes, severe adverse events (SAEs), unplanned returns to the operating room (UPRORs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were investigated. Results: Seventeen EOS patients (three congenital, four idiopathic, nine neuromuscular, one syndromic) were included. Mean age at surgery was 9.5 ± 2.5 years. Similar to the first generation SDS, about 50% initial correction was achieved and maintained, and spinal growth was near physiological. Most importantly, SAEs and UPRORs were diminished and favorable with 0.10/patient/year. In addition, HRQoL increased during the first year postoperatively, indicating the implant was well accepted. Conclusion: These preliminary results indicate that the iterations of the SDS are effective in terms of reducing SAEs and UPRORs and increasing HRQoL in patients with EOS.

Elongation-Derotation-Flexion Casting Treatment of Early-Onset Progressive Scoliosis in Skeletal Dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Early-onset scoliosis in children with skeletal dysplasia is progressive, contributing to cardiopulmonary restrictive disease. Serial elongation-derotation-flexion (EDF) casting, used in other etiologies of scoliosis to delay curve progression, may be beneficial in maximizing spine growth. Our hypothesis is serial EDF casting can be safely used as a temporary alternative to surgery, delaying progression and preserving growth, to treat scoliosis in skeletal dysplasia.

METHODS

All patients with skeletal dysplasia treated at a single institution with serial EDF casting for scoliosis were reviewed retrospectively. Radiographic parameters: Cobb angle of major and minor curves, curve location, thoracic height, thoracolumbar height, space available for lung, and rib vertebra angle difference were measured before casting (C1), in first casting (C2), in last casting (C3), and out of last casting (C4). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) values were monitored and recorded during the casting application.

RESULTS

Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria (mean 9.7 castings). The mean duration of EDF serial casting was 35 months. The mean major Cobb angles were 54 degrees° (C1), 30 degrees (C2), 37 degrees (C3), and 49 degrees (C4) with no statistically significant differences. The mean minor Cobb angles were 35 degrees (C1), 25 degrees (C2), 33 degrees (C3), and 51 degrees (C4) with no statistically significant differences. The mean thoracic heights were 130 mm (C1), 155 mm (C2), 173 mm (C3), and 160 mm (C4). The 19-mm mean difference between C2 and C3 represents spinal growth. The PIP-1, PIP-2, and PIP-3 mean values were 15, 27, and 18 cmH2O, respectively. Changes in PIP-1 and PIP-2 and PIP-2 and PIP-3 were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Serial EDF casting can delay surgical scoliosis correction in children younger than 7 years with a diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia. Our study showed that serial casting controls progression of the major curve and allows longitudinal growth of the spine with possible expansion of lung volume for nearly 3 years. During cast application, PIP increased with molding and traction, and improved until windowing and trimming of the cast.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-retrospective study.

A comparison of the post-fusion outcome of patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with traditional and magnetically controlled growing rods

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), who had undergone spinal fusion after distraction-based spinal growth modulation using either traditional growing rods (TGRs) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs).

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of skeletally mature patients who had undergone fusion for an EOS, which had been previously treated using either TGRs or MCGRs. Measured outcomes included sequential coronal T1 to S1 height and major curve (Cobb) angle on plain radiographs and any complications requiring unplanned surgery before final fusion.

RESULTS

We reviewed 43 patients (63% female) with a mean age of 6.4 years (SD 2.6) at the index procedure, and 12.2 years (SD 2.2) at final fusion. Their mean follow-up was 8.1 years (SD 3.4). A total of 16 patients were treated with MCGRs and 27 with TGRs. The mean number of distractions was 7.5 in the MCGR group and ten in the TGR group (p = 0.471). The mean interval between distractions was 3.4 months in the MCGR group and 8.6 months in the TGR group (p < 0.001). The mean Cobb angle had improved by 25.1° in the MCGR group and 23.2° in TGR group (p = 0.664) at final follow-up. The mean coronal T1 to S1 height had increased by 16% in the MCGR group and 32.9% in TGR group (p = 0.001), although the mean T1 to S1 height achieved at final follow-up was similar in both. Unplanned operations were needed in 43.8% of the MCGR group and 51.2% of TGR group (p = 0.422).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective, single-centre review, there were no significant differences in major curve correction or gain in spinal height at fusion. Although the number of planned procedures were fewer in patients with MCGRs, the rates of implant-related complications needing unplanned revision surgery were similar in the two groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):257-264.

Halo-gravity traction followed by definitive fusion in severe early onset scoliosis: results of a trunk analysis based on biplanar 3D reconstructions

PURPOSE

Definitive fusion can be considered in early onset scoliosis (EOS) around triradiate cartilage closure. Halo-gravity traction (HGT) is an old strategy that can help lengthen and balance the spine before fusion. The postoperative changes of the trunk have never been investigated to date with modern imaging. The goal of this study was to analyze the 3D radiological outcomes, and the associated pulmonary function, of a cohort of severe EOS patients treated by definitive posterior fusion prepared by HGT.

METHODS

All consecutive EOS patients with severe (> 85°) and stiff (flexibility < 25%) curves, treated by HGT followed by posterior fusion, were followed. 3D radiological measurements and pulmonary function were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-nine EOS patients underwent fusion, with a mean follow-up of 4 years (± 1). Age at surgery averaged 13.5 years old. HGT protocol reached on average 41% of body weight. Mean preoperative 3D Cobb angle was 95° (± 10) and final correction averaged 68.4% after surgery. 3D T4T12 kyphosis was reduced after surgery (11°, p < 0.01), while the apical vertebral rotation was improved by 27.8% (p = 0.06). 3D thoracic volume increased after surgery (p = 0.02), with a 3D T1T12 height gain averaging 3.7 cm (± 2). Both parameters were significantly correlated with total lung capacity improvement. Seven complications (14.2%) were reported, and 5 patients (10.6%) underwent unplanned revision.

CONCLUSION

HGT is a safe and efficient strategy to prepare posterior fusion in severe EOS patients. The 3D trunk analysis demonstrated significant postoperative gains in thoracic and spinal lengths, as well as in thoracic volume.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical Results of Corrective Cast and Brace Treatment for Early-onset Scoliosis: The Effectiveness of Long-term Cast Treatment That Extends into Children's Schooldays

BACKGROUND

Cast and brace treatment is a conservative treatment for early-onset scoliosis (EOS). We analyzed the clinical results of this treatment when extended into patients' schooldays.

METHODS

Twenty-two children with EOS underwent alternatively repetitive cast and brace treatment (ARCBT). Cast was applied under general anesthesia and remained for some weeks, and the brace was continuously worn, which was repeatedly applied when scoliosis progressed. The change in the major curve angle, requirement for surgical intervention, and complications of ARCBT were analyzed.

RESULTS

Six patients had idiopathic scoliosis (IS), 9 had syndromic scoliosis (SS), and 7 had neuromuscular scoliosis. Cast treatment started at 4.9±2.1 years of age, and the patients were followed up for 8.3 years. The average total number of cast applications was 5.5 per patient. The mean major scoliosis angle was 45.4±12.5 degrees at the first visit; this was corrected to 26.5±8.7 degrees at the first cast application and progressed to 75.4±22.1 degrees at the final visit. Nine patients whose scoliosis progressed finally underwent surgery. The mean age at surgery was 11.0 years (range, 8.8 to 13.1 y), and the mean period from first cast application to surgery was 6.1 years (range, 5.0 to 8.9 y). Four patients' IS rapidly progressed after 9 years of age, and all of them underwent final fusion surgery with a correction rate of 56.9%. Among patients with SS, 1 final fusion, and 2 growth-friendly surgeries were performed at a mean age of 9.2 years; the correction rate was 21.5%. Among patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, 2 final fusion surgeries were performed at a mean age of 11.3 years; the correction rate was 30.7%. The cast-related complication rate was 5.0%, and most complications were skin problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term ARCBT extended into schooldays might be effective for IS. This should be considered as a time-saving treatment option for EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Growth-friendly surgery results in more growth but a higher complication rate and unplanned returns to the operating room compared to single fusion in neuromuscular early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Compare radiographic outcomes, complications, and QoL in neuromuscular early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with single posterior spinal fusion (PSF) versus growth-friendly surgery and definitive fusion (GFDF).

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, children with neuromuscular EOS, age 8-11 years at index surgery with PSF or GF devices, with minimum 2-year follow-up after final fusion were identified from a multicenter database.

RESULTS

16 PSF and 43 GFDF patients were analyzed. Demographics were similar except PSF patients were older at index surgery and had shorter follow-up. PSF patients had greater percentage major curve correction (62% vs 38%, p = 0.001) and smaller major curve at final follow-up (23° vs 40°, p = 0.005). The GFDF group underwent over five times more surgeries (8.7 vs 1.6, p = 0.0001). Four PSF patients (25%) experienced ten complications, resulting in five unplanned returns to the operating room (UPROR) in three patients (19%). 36 GFDF patients (84%) experienced 83 complications, resulting in 45 UPRORs in 24 patients (56%). Poisson regression adjusted for age showed that the GFDF group had more complications (p = 0.001) and UPRORs (p = 0.01). Although the GFDF patients had smaller preoperative T1-T12 and T1-S1 lengths, these were similar to the PSF patients at final follow-up, indicating that the GFDF patients had greater spinal growth. PSF patients had better postoperative EOSQ-24 Financial Impact and Family Burden scores.

CONCLUSION

While there was a difference in age at index surgery, PSF may be more effective than GFDF at controlling neuromuscular EOS. GFDF patients achieved more spinal growth but eight times more complications and nine times more UPRORs.

Role of Body Cast Application for Scoliosis Associated With Prader-Willi Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare genetic syndrome, with a prevalence of infantile scoliosis of ~23%. These curves are likely related to severe hypotonia. Approximately 15% of children with PWS will need surgical intervention for their scoliosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of curing or controlling moderate and severe infantile scoliosis curves in children with PWS.

METHODS

This single institution, retrospective study of patients with PWS and infantile scoliosis reviewed 34 consecutive children with >24 months follow-up from initiation of serial spinal casting. Cobb angle comparison measurements of radiographs taken precasting, during treatment, and at follow-up were performed. Rib-vertebral angle difference, Nash-Moe rotation, and space available for lung measurements were followed. Outcomes were stratified as "Cured," "Braced," and "Surgery."

RESULTS

Average age for first cast for the entire study was 32 months (range, 14 to 64), undergoing 8 casts (range, 3 to 18) over 25 months (range, 9 to 57) for an initial curve of 54 degrees (range, 27 to 106 degrees), which improved to 27 degrees (range, 11 to 78 degrees). In total, 12 patients (35%) were in the Cured group, following 6 casts over 17 months, with an initial curve of 44±14 degrees improving to 17±5 degrees at the end of treatment, and 20±18 degrees at 68-month follow-up. In total, 18 patients were in the Braced group, with curves initially improving from 55±14 degrees to 35±14 degrees, but at 47±20 degrees at 51-month follow-up. Four patients needed surgery, with initial curves 85 degrees (range, 54 to 106 degrees), but surgery could be postponed 56 months (range, 40 to 73) by casting. Rib-vertebral angle difference was not prognostic.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial spinal casting is effective in for treating infantile scoliosis in children with PWS. One third of patients had their curve resolved, at least temporarily, where they were braced and cast free. The others were able to delay surgery for a number of years. Initial curves <50 degrees in children <3 years of age seem to have the best prognosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Understanding the implant performance of magnetically controlled growing spine rods: a review article

PURPOSE

Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS) (defined as a curvature of the spine ≥ 10° with onset before 10 years of age) if not properly treated, can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Traditionally Growing Rods (TGRs), implants fixated to the spine and extended every 6-8 months by surgery, are considered the gold standard, but Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods (MCGRs) avoid multiple surgeries. While the potential benefit of outpatient distraction procedure with MCGR is huge, concerns still remain about its risks, up to the release of a Medical Device Alert (MDA) by the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advising not to implant MCGRs until further notice. The aim of this literature review is to (1) give an overview on the use of MCGRs and (2) identify what is currently understood about the surgical, implant and patient factors associated with the use of MCGRs.

METHODS

Systematic literature review.

RESULTS

Surgical factors such as use of single rod configuration or incorrect rod contouring might affect early failure of MCGRs. Patient's older age and higher BMI are correlated with rod slippage. Wear debris and distraction mechanism failure may result from implant design and iteration.

CONCLUSION

Despite the complications reported, this technology still offers one of the best solutions to spine surgeons dealing with severe EOS. Lowering the complication rate by identifying risk factors for failure is possible and further studies in this direction are required. Once the risk factors are well described, some of these can be addressed enabling a safer use of MCGRs.

A report of two conservative approaches to early onset scoliosis: serial casting and bracing

PURPOSE

Previous reports have demonstrated the effectiveness of casting for EOS. Brace treatment for EOS has not been studied. The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to compare radiographic outcomes, complications, and rates of conversion to surgery in children with EOS treated with casting or bracing.

METHODS

Children aged 2-6 years with idiopathic or neuromuscular EOS treated with casting or bracing with minimum follow-up of 2 years were identified.

RESULTS

68 patients (36 cast, 32 brace) were analyzed. Diagnosis, age at start of treatment, and duration of follow-up were similar. Although the cast patients had a larger pre-treatment major curve magnitude (50° vs 31°, p < 0.001), both groups had a similar major curve magnitude at most recent follow-up (36° vs 32°, p = 0.456). T1-T12 and T1-S1 length increased in both groups. The cast and brace patients had similar complications and conversions to surgery. Sub-analysis showed that while casting resulted in curve improvement regardless of etiology, bracing was able to prevent curve progression in patients with idiopathic EOS but not in patients with non-idiopathic EOS (Δ- 15° vs 27°, p = 0.006). Regression analysis (significance p = 0.10) controlling for baseline age, major curve magnitude, and T1-T12 and T1-S1 length showed that treatment method was associated with difference in major curve magnitude (p = 0.090) and T1-T12 length (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

In our study, serial casting led to curve improvement in children with idiopathic and neuromuscular EOS, whereas brace treatment appeared to prevent curve progression in patients with idiopathic EOS but did not appear to control the curve in neuromuscular EOS.

Minimum 5-Year Follow-up on Graduates of Growing Spine Surgery for Early Onset Scoliosis

INTRODUCTION

After discontinuation of growth friendly (GF) surgery for early onset scoliosis, patients undergo spinal fusion or continued observation. This last planned treatment is colloquially called "definitive" treatment, conferring these patients as "graduates" of a growing program. The 5-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of this cohort are unknown.

METHODS

An international pediatric spine database was queried for patients from a GF program (spine or rib-based) with minimum 5-year follow-up from last planned surgery (GF or spinal fusion). Radiographs and charts were reviewed for main coronal curve angle and maximum kyphosis as well as occurrence of secondary surgery.

RESULTS

Of 580 graduates, 170 (29%) had minimum 5-year follow-up (37% male). Scoliosis etiology was congenital in 41 (24%), idiopathic 36 (21%), neuromuscular 51 (30%), and syndromic 42 (25%). Index surgery consisted of spine-based growing rods in 122 (71%) and rib-based distraction in 48 (29%). Mean age at index surgery was 6.8 years, and patients underwent an average of 5.4 lengthenings over an average of 4.9 years (range, 6 mo to 11 y). Last planned treatment was at an average age of 11.8 years (range, 7 to 17 years). Last planned treatment consisted of spinal fusion in 114 patients, 47 had growing implants maintained, 9 had implants removed. Average follow-up was 7.3 years (range, 5 to 13 y).When compared from postdefinitive treatment to 2-year follow-up, there was noted progression of the coronal curve angle (46±19 to 51±21 degrees, P=0.046) and kyphosis (48±20 to 57±25 degrees, P=0.03). However, between 2 and 5 years, no further progression occurred in the coronal (51±21 to 53±21 degrees, P=0.26) or sagittal (57±25 to 54±28 degrees, P=0.93) planes. When stratified based on etiology, there was no significant coronal curve progression between 2- and 5-year follow-up. When comparing spinal fusion patients to those who had maintenance of their growing construct, there was also no significant curve progression.Thirty-seven (21%) underwent at least 1 (average, 1.7; range, 1 to 7) revision surgery following graduation, and 15 of 37 (41%) underwent 2 or more revision surgeries. Reason for revision was implant revision (either GF or spinal fusion) in 34 patients, and implant removal in 3. On an average, the first revision was 2.5 years after the definitive treatment plan (range, 0.02 to 7.4 y). In total, 15 of 37 (41%) revisions occurred over 2 years following the final decision for treatment plan, and 7 of 37 (19%) occurred 5 or more years after the definitive treatment.Patients who underwent spinal fusion as a definitive treatment strategy were more likely to undergo revision surgery (27%) than patients who had their GF implants maintained (11%) (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Five years following "graduation" from growing surgery for early onset scoliosis, there is progression of curve magnitude in both the coronal and sagittal planes up to 2 years, with no further progression at 5 years. A total of 21% of patients undergo at least 1 revision surgery, and average time to revision surgery is over 2 years from last planned surgery. Risk of revision surgery was higher in patients who underwent a spinal fusion as their definitive treatment strategy.

LEVEL EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative.

TYPE OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic.

Proper positioning of mice for Cobb angle radiographic measurements

Background

There is no recommended standard for positioning of a mouse for radiographic assessment of the spine. This is necessary to have reproducible radiographic data and avoid false positive results. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of various postures on Cobb angle measurements and to set up a positioning standard for imaging mouse spines.

Methods

This study was conducted in three parts. Firstly, we identified the problem of lack of posture standardization for radiographs. We collected 77 C57BL/6 J mice for spine radiographs and found a scoliosis prevalence of 28.6% with large variations in curve magnitude. Secondly, 24 C57BL/6 J mice underwent 4 consecutive weekly radiographs and observed high variations (relative standard deviation: 125.3%) between radiographs. Thirdly, we collected another 82 C57BL/6 J mice and designed 14 different postures that could take place during imaging. These postures were related to curling of the limbs, and head, pelvic and tail tilting.

Results

The results showed that head and pelvic tilting significantly affects the curve magnitude with effect size (Glass’s delta) over 1.50. Avoiding these incorrect positions during radiographs is warranted. The standard recommended posture for mouse imaging entails positioning the snout, interorbital space, neck and whole spine in one line, and with the limbs placed symmetrical to the trunk, whilst avoiding stretching the body of the mouse.

Conclusions

Our work exemplified the importance of standard protocol during imaging when using an animal model in the scoliosis study. We recommend utilizing this standard in studying various disorders of the spine to avoid technical causes for the appearance of a curve.

Serial casting for early onset scoliosis and its effects on health-related quality of life during and after discontinuation of treatment

INTRODUCTION

Serial body casting plays an important role in the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS), serving as a safer method compared to surgical intervention. There is no published evidence documenting the impact of casting on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients and their caregivers. The purpose of this study was to utilize the 24-Item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) to compare the HRQoL of patients with EOS and the burden of care for their caregivers before, during, and after treatment with Mehta casting.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, two EOS databases were queried for patients with EOS who underwent serial casting from 2005 to 2016. Patients who had treatment prior to their initial cast application, including bracing or surgical intervention, were excluded from the study. Patients were stratified into two subgroups and analyzed separately: those with idiopathic etiology, and those with non-idiopathic etiology. HRQoL and burden of care were assessed using the EOSQ-24 completed before, during, and after cast treatment.

RESULTS

91 patients were identified in this study (mean age at the index casting: 2.1 ± 1.2 years, mean age at final cast removal: 4.1 ± 1.3 years). 59 (64.8%) had EOS of idiopathic etiology, while 32 (35.2%) had EOS of non-idiopathic etiology, including 10 congenital, 6 neuromuscular, and 16 syndromic. Idiopathic patients and non-idiopathic patients experienced an improvement in the coronal deformity from 45° pre-cast to 26° post-cast, and from 59° pre-cast to 34° post-cast, respectively. Patients with idiopathic scoliosis experienced a decrease from baseline in nearly all EOSQ-24 sub-domain scores except for general health. Furthermore, even after the removal of the cast, patients with idiopathic etiology suffered residual negative effects of casting on emotion and transfer sub-domains. Among patients with non-idiopathic etiology, decreased scores from baseline were observed only in transfer and emotion sub-domains during the casting intervention. After brace removal, patients with non-idiopathic etiology had increased scores compared to their baseline scores in most sub-domains.

DISCUSSION

Serial body casting can prevent curve correction in patients with EOS. However, the psychosocial stresses secondary to this non-operative intervention can have significant negative impacts on HRQoL for both idiopathic and non-idiopathic patients during the course of treatment. Although non-idiopathic patients experience improved HRQoL following treatment, idiopathic patients do not seem to exhibit much improvement in HRQoL from baseline even years after the final cast removal.

Treatment of early-onset scoliosis: techniques, indications, and complications

The treatments for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) remain great challenges for spine surgeons. This study aimed to comprehensively review the treatments for EOS, especially the advancements made in the last decade. Current studies on EOS were retrieved through a search on PubMed, UpToDate, the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus were reviewed. The most pertinent information related to the current treatments for EOS was collected. The foci of treatments for EOS have included creating a well-developed thoracic cavity, improving lung volume, and improving pulmonary function. Conservative treatments include bracing, casting, halo-gravity traction, and physiotherapy. Serial casting is the most effective conservative treatment for EOS. Surgical treatments mainly include growth-friendly techniques, which are generally classified into three types according to the amount of correction force applied: distraction-based, compression-based, and growth-guided. The distraction-based systems include traditional or conventional growing rods, magnetically controlled growing rods, and vertical expandable prosthesis titanium ribs. The compression-based systems include vertebral body stapling and tethering. The growth-guided systems include the Shilla system and modern Luque trolley. In addition, some newer techniques have emerged in recent years, such as posterior dynamic deformity correction (ApiFix). For EOS patients presenting with sharp deformities in a long, congenital spinal deformity, a hybrid technique, one-stage posterior osteotomy with short segmental fusion and dual growing rods, may be a good choice. Hemivertebra resection is the gold standard for congenital scoliosis caused by single hemivertebra. Although the patient's growth potential is preserved in growth-friendly surgeries, a high complication rate should be expected, as well as a prolonged treatment duration and additional costs. Knowledge about EOS and its treatment options is rapidly expanding. Conservative treatments have specific limitations. For curves requiring a surgical intervention, surgical techniques may vary depending on the patients' characteristics, the surgeon's experience, and the actual state of the country.

Spinal Casting for the Treatment of Severe Early Onset Scoliosis: Utilization of a Nonsurgical Health Care Provider for Cast Application

BACKGROUND

Spinal casting with the aim of delaying surgical intervention is a widely accepted but resource intensive conservative management strategy used by spine surgeons to treat severe early onset scoliosis. Opting to use a nonsurgical health care provider for cast application may be an effective use of human resources if the quality of care is not compromised. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of spinal cast treatment utilizing a nonsurgical health care provider for cast application.

METHODS

This is a chart and radiographic review of all 30 patients that initiated spinal cast treatment between 2007 and 2018 and have at least 2-year follow-up. A spine surgeon applied all casts before July 14; a physical therapist (PT) applied all subsequent casts. Comparative analyses were performed for baseline data and the amount of correction achieved in initial cast. Complications and delay time to surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

The PT cast 16 patients (12 female, 10 idiopathic, 64 casts total), average age 3.8±1.4 years and mean major curve of 63±18 degrees. Similarly the spine surgeon cast 14 patients (11 female, 8 idiopathic, 53 casts total), average age 4.4±1.7 years (P=0.30) and mean major curve of 63±11 degrees (P=0.93). In the initial cast the PT obtained 55%±13% (28±12 degrees) correction and the surgeon 44%±12% (36±12 degrees, P=0.09). The average number of casts was similar (4.0 vs. 3.8, P=0.7). The PT had 1 patient develop superior mesenteric artery syndrome, which resolved with cast removal, and the surgeon had 2 patients require extra care related to skin breakdown. With average follow-up of 4.15 years (range, 2.0 to 5.8 y) 11/14 PT patients demonstrate curve improvement compared with their initial presentation and 2 patients have undergone surgical intervention (3.2 and 4.3 y after first cast). The surgeon's average delay time to surgery was 4.3 years (range, 1.8 to 8.7 y after first cast, n=10).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support our current model of care utilizing a nonsurgical health care practitioner for spinal cast application.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative.

Serial Casting in Neuromuscular and Syndromic Early-onset Scoliosis (EOS) Can Delay Surgery Over 2 Years

BACKGROUND

The primary goal in managing early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is delaying/preventing surgical intervention while allowing improved spinal growth and chest wall and lung development to improve life expectancy. The effectiveness of serial casting for patients with neuromuscular and syndromic EOS is unclear.

METHODS

Patients from 2 multicenter registries who underwent serial casting for nonidiopathic scoliosis (NIS) were reviewed retrospectively. Comparisons were made between precasting and postcasting major and compensatory curves and spine height. The need for surgical intervention and any treatment complications were documented. Risk factors for major curve progression from baseline to casting cessation were evaluated via univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (23 females; 21 males) with NIS (26 syndromic, 18 neuromuscular) and a mean age of 3.2 years at baseline were included. Mean follow-up and casting duration was 3.9 and 2.0 years, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between mean precasting and postcasting major curve (55 vs. 60 degrees; P=0.348), minor curve (31 vs. 33 degrees; P=0.510), or rib-vertebra angle difference (18 vs. 29 degrees; P=0.840). However, thoracic height (15.5 vs. 16.8 cm; P=0.031) and lumbar height (8.9 vs. 9.8 cm; P=0.013) were significantly greater upon casting cessation. Currently, 13 patients (30%) have had successful casting (improvement of major curve ≥10 degrees) while 24 patients (55%) experienced major curve progression (worsening), and 19 patients (43%) required surgical intervention. Mean time from first casting to surgery was 34.5±15.1 months. There were no statistically significant predictors for major curve progression on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal deformity progression despite casting and the subsequent need for surgical intervention for NIS were significantly higher compared with those reported for idiopathic EOS. However, serial casting did afford a substantial delay in surgical intervention. Ultimately, serial casting for neuromuscular or syndromic EOS is an effective strategy for delaying surgical intervention, despite suboptimal radiographic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

What Is the Cost of a "Cast Holiday" in Treating Children With Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) With Elongation Derotation Flexion (EDF, "Mehta") Casting?

INTRODUCTION

Serial casting of children with early onset scoliosis (EOS) is an established treatment option. A break from cast treatment often called a "cast holiday," (CH) is often allowed by some centers, particularly over the summer months. The impact of CHs on treatment duration or outcome has not been examined.

METHODS

Institution review board approved retrospective review of children treated for EOS with elongation derotation flexion ("Mehta") casting at a children's hospital between 2001 and 2016 with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. A CH was defined as a minimum of 4 weeks out of the cast, braced, or unbraced.The analysis was performed to determine the impact of a CH within the first 18 months of treatment. Separate analyses were performed for the entire cohort of children castedduring the study period, and then separately looking at idiopathic EOS in isolation. The impact of a CH was assessed in terms of the likelihood of achieving scoliosis <15 degrees at the final follow-up ("success"). Odds ratios were used to assess group differences between "success" ratios, and Student t tests assessed group differences for parametric data.

RESULTS

Ninety children met inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 of whom took a CH during the first 18 months of treatment (34%). This included 59 patients with idiopathic EOS (66%), 18 with syndromic EOS, 5 congenital, and 1 neuromuscular. There were no statistically significant differences between CH and no CH groups.Forty-four percent of the no CH group achieved scoliosis <15 degrees at final follow-up, as opposed to 13% of the CH group, an odds ratio of 5.3 for success without a CH. When limited to children with idiopathic EOS, 56% achieved success in the no CH, versus only 22% in the group that took a CH, an odds ratio of 4.4 for success with no CH.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that children treated for EOS with serial casting who take a CH within the first 18 months of treatment are less likely to achieve scoliosis <15 degrees than those who persist with treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Evolution of casting techniques in early-onset and congenital scoliosis

Casting is being utilized as a therapeutic strategy in some mild to moderate cases obviating surgical intervention for management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Bracing, another conservative modality, applies comparable correcting forces on chest wall and axial skeleton. But cast application carries additional advantage of sustained restorative force which bypasses issue of compliance seen with brace wear. There is no specific blanket treatment, conservative or surgical, for the early-onset spinal deformities. Serial cast application provides near total correction of less severe curves (less than 500 to 600) if treatment is initiated before age of 2 yrs. In this review article, we will assess the evolution of plaster cast application in management of EOS and also describe technique of EDF (Elongation- Derotation- Flexion) casting.

Casting in infantile idiopathic scoliosis as a temporising measure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective:

Treatment of infantile idiopathic scoliosis remains vague. Because implantation of temporary telescopic devices carries a high risk of complications, interest in the older technique of serial casting is growing as a temporising measure before invasive procedures. The goal of this review was to meta-analyse studies examining the effect and safety of casting in infantile idiopathic scoliosis.

Methods:

Two reviewers independently searched for relevant studies in PubMed and Embase databases through November 2018. The studies included were limited to infantile idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent casting, had a mean Cobb angle of 20 or more and written in English. The methodological quality of the chosen studies was assessed. The primary outcome was the difference in Cobb angle means from before and after casting. The secondary outcome was adverse events of casting. Heterogeneity was explored and a funnel plot was drawn.

Results:

Of the 366 studies screened, 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis (243 subjects) and all were non-randomised. The casting was consistently associated with a reduction in the mean Cobb angle. The pooled mean difference was 24.85° (95% confidence interval: 19.25 to 30.46, p < 0.001). A number of reversible adverse events were reported, most commonly skin irritation and transient pulmonary symptoms. Heterogeneity between studies was high. In the meta-regression analysis, the starting Cobb angle did not influence Cobb angle change, but there was an inverse correlation between the mean difference in Cobb angle and mean age.

Conclusion:

Casting seems to be effective and safe in decreasing Cobb angle even in high curve magnitudes. In older patients, casting showed less Cobb angle correction.

Magnetic Controlled Growth Rods in the Treatment of Scoliosis: Safety, Efficacy and Patient Selection

Early-onset scoliosis is defined as a spinal curvature greater than 10° in children prior to 10 years of age. Untreated EOS may lead to progressively severe spinal deformity, impaired pulmonary development, restrictive lung disease, and both increased morbidity and mortality. Limitations of established conservative treatments include inability to correct severe deformity, as well as challenges with compliance when casting and bracing is applied. In addition, surgical treatment in the form of traditional growing rods requires regular surgical lengthenings and is associated with complications inherent with repeated invasive procedures and exposure to general anesthesia. MAGEC is an evolving magnetically controlled growing rod system for the treatment of EOS. After initial implantation, lengthening is achieved non-invasively by using magnetic external remote control. MAGEC offers the potential to control moderate and severe EOS, while avoiding repeated surgical procedures and associated complications. In this review, we examine the results from clinical, radiological and explant studies following the use of MAGEC, in the context of other established and emerging treatments for EOS.

Early onset scoliosis and current treatment methods

OBJECTIVE

Provide an update of the management options for early onset scoliosis patients, including general assessment, conservative and surgical options.

METHODS

We included the updated information about the assessment and management options of Early Onset Scoliosis, taking into consideration the non-fusion methods, including the burden on the patient and their family.

RESULTS

With the heterogeneity of this population, it is difficult to get a consensus about a unified protocol for management. Accordingly, the surgeon dealing with these cases needs to be aware of the broad range of surgical and non-surgical methods when treating these patients.

CONCLUSION

The main aim of early onset scoliosis treatment is to gain a flexible spine associated with normal lung development and thoracic growth. Management needs to be individualized between the surgeon and patient in relation to the etiology and patient conditions.

Prospectively collected surgeon indications for discontinuation of a lengthening program for early-onset scoliosis

INTRODUCTION

At some point after children with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) undergo implantation of a distraction construct to control deformity and promote growth, a decision is made to discontinue lengthening. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgeon indications for discontinuation of a lengthening program and to evaluate patient outcomes.

METHODS

As a part of a multicenter database, surgeons prospectively completed a questionnaire at the completion of growth-friendly treatment. Surgeon indications for discontinuation included patient age, pain/functional status, implant status, and spinal deformity parameters. Patient demographics, scoliosis type, deformity parameters, and length of time in a growing program were queried. Patients were treated with a final fusion or observation, and rate of secondary surgeries was analyzed.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were completed on 121 patients (61% female). EOS etiology was 31% neuromuscular, 43% congenital, 16% idiopathic, and 10% syndromic. Average age at initiation of growing program was 6.8 ± 3.1 years, and average age at discontinuation was 12.7 ± 2.5 years. The most commonly cited indications for discontinuation of a lengthening program included bone age/skeletal maturity (n = 46), patient age (n = 33), and diminishing returns with expansions (n = 33). A larger coronal Cobb angle was found in patients who underwent definitive fusion (65°) when compared with continued observation (55°, p = 0.001). Twenty-nine (24%) patients were initially treated with observation after completion of a growing construct. In this subgroup, at a minimum of 2 years' (average 3.8 years') follow-up, 26/29 (90%) patients remained stable with observation alone; whereas, three (10%) underwent delayed final fusion surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common surgeon-cited indications for discontinuation of a lengthening program in EOS patients are skeletal maturity and patient age. The majority of patients (76%) underwent definitive spinal fusion after discontinuation of a lengthening program; whereas, those treated with observation alone had a survivorship of 90% at a minimum follow-up of two years.

Serial elongation derotation flexion casting in children with infantile and juvenile scoliosis

Infantile (IS) and juvenile scoliosis (JS) are among the most challenging conditions pediatric orthopedic surgeons are facing in the present days. However, the best treatment of IS and JS is still debated and it remains controversial, at least for some aspects. Untreated early onset spinal deformities may lead to pulmonary and heart compromise. Growth friendly surgical techniques imply multiple distractions with increased risk of auto-fusion, infection and curve stiffening. Serial casting has been proven to be a valuable option to treat children with early onset scoliosis (EOS) in an attempt to delay surgery (in most cases) or to cure the disease (in few cases). More than five decades ago, Cotrel and Morel from France, introduced the Elongation-Derotation-Flexion (EDF) casting technique. EDF cast is a custom-made thoracolumbar cast that corrects the deformed spine three-dimensionally. Serial EDF casting is able to modulate spinal growth and it can-at least in some cases-prevent the progression of the spinal deformity. Today, serial EDF casting technique has become one of the accepted treatment options for the management of children with IS and JS. The main objective of this work is to describe the EDF serial casting technique for the treatment of children with IS and JS, as well as to highlight its advantages and its limits by providing a review of the most recent literature.

Standard and magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis

Distraction based spinal instrumentation represents the most common and standard surgical technique to correct early onset scoliosis (EOS), i.e., scoliosis which has been diagnosed before the age of 10 years. Surgical treatment of EOS aims at controlling spinal deformity while maintaining spinal growth which is mandatory for the development of normal lung capacity. To achieve these goals the spinal instrumentation needs to be distracted to facilitate spinal growth during treatment. Distraction can be obtained by repeated surgical lengthenings (traditional growing rods, TGRs) or using magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), which can be lengthened using external remote controller on an outpatient basis. The outcomes of TGR instrumentation for EOS are well described with follow-up until skeletal maturity: normal spinal growth can be maintained, 40-50% of the scoliosis can be corrected, but there is an over 50% risk of complications including deep wound infection, rod failure, and instrumentation pull-out. MCGR instrumentation may reduce the risk of wound related complications, provides similar deformity correction, but may not provide as much spinal growth. Metallosis around the instrumentation necessitates MCGR removal and definitive final instrumented fusion at the end of growth friendly management. Even severe EOS can be treated using distraction based spinal instrumentation.

Use of a distraction-to-stall lengthening procedure in magnetically controlled growing rods: A single-center cohort study

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) using a standardized distraction procedure with intended distraction-to-stall and to compare the outcomes between idiopathic and nonidiopathic patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study. Conversion cases were excluded. Distractions were performed with 2- to 3-month intervals with the intention of distraction-to-stall on both rods. Distraction length was measured on X-rays every 6 months. Spinal height was assessed using T1-T12 and T1-S1 annual increase.

RESULTS

19 patients (eight idiopathic and 11 nonidiopathic) were included. Mean age at surgery was 9.7 ± 1.9 years, and median follow-up was 1.9 years (interquartile range (IQR): 1.3-2.2). Major curve improved from median 76° (IQR: 64-83) preoperatively to 42° (IQR: 32-51) postoperatively ( p < 0.001) corresponding to a curve correction of 43% (IQR: 33-51). Correction was maintained at 1- and 2-year follow-up. Median annual T1-T12 and T1-S1 height increase were 10 mm (IQR: 6-16) and 11 mm (IQR: 7-33), respectively. A total of 159 distraction procedures were performed; 83.5% of these were distracted-to-stall, and 16.5% were stopped due to discomfort. Median rod distraction per procedure was 2.0 mm (IQR: 1.6-2.7) for the concave side and 1.7 mm (IQR: 1.4-2.5) for the convex side. Five patients had implant-related complications. Patients with nonidiopathic etiology were significantly younger and had lower flexibility compared with idiopathic patients ( p ≤ 0.040). However, we found no statistically significant difference in curve correction, spinal height increase, distraction length, or complications between the two groups ( p ≥ 0.109).

CONCLUSION

MCGR effectively corrected the deformity and increased spinal height using a distraction procedure with intended distraction-to-stall. Five of 19 patients had implant-related complications, and we found no difference in the outcomes between idiopathic and nonidiopathic patients.

Minimum 5-Year Follow-up of Mehta Casting to Treat Idiopathic Early-Onset Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

With the exception of Mehta's 2005 report on her experience treating early-onset scoliosis with serial casting, all subsequent studies have had limited follow-up. This current study sought to assess the results of serial casting at a minimum 5-year follow-up and to identify the predictors of the sustained resolution of scoliosis.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of children treated for idiopathic early-onset scoliosis with serial casting at a children's hospital between 2001 and 2013 with a minimum 5-year follow-up. A Cobb angle of ≤15° and a decrease in the Cobb angle of >20° at the most recent follow-up were separately assessed. The differences between groups based on these criteria were tested with Student t tests with alpha = 0.05.

RESULTS

Fifty-four children were treated during the study period; of these, 38 had at least 5 years of follow-up and comprised the study sample. The mean follow-up (and standard deviation) was 8 ± 2 years (range, 5 to 13 years). The mean patient age at the time of the first cast was 24 ± 15.1 months (range, 9 to 63 months), with a mean Cobb angle of 56.2° ± 20.1° (range, 22° to 109°). Forty-nine percent of children had scoliosis of ≤15° at the time of the most recent follow-up, and 73% of children were improved by at least 20°. Children with ≤15° scoliosis, compared with children with >15° scoliosis, had significantly lower initial Cobb angle (48.2° compared with 63.7°; p = 0.016), supine traction Cobb angle (22.5° compared with 33.2°; p = 0.048), first-in-cast Cobb angle (24.1° compared with 37.6°; p = 0.01), and first-in-cast rib-vertebral angle difference (12.8° compared with 26.2°; p < 0.01). Age at the time of the first cast, initial rib-vertebral angle difference, flexibility, and body mass index were not significantly different (p > 0.05) between the groups. Three children who initially achieved scoliosis of ≤15° after casting substantially relapsed.

CONCLUSIONS

At a minimum follow-up of 5 years, the initial Cobb angle, first-cast Cobb angle, rib-vertebral angle difference, and traction Cobb angle were all predictive of sustained scoliosis of ≤15°. However, with continued growth, relapse of scoliosis was seen in 3 patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Growth Friendly Surgery and Serial Cast Correction in the Treatment of Early-onset Scoliosis for Patients With Prader-Willi Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients can present with scoliosis which can be treated with serial cast correction (SCC) or with growth friendly surgery (GFS). This study's purpose was to describe the results of SCC as well as GFS for PWS patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS).

METHODS

PWS patients were identified from 2 international multicenter EOS databases. Scoliosis, kyphosis, spine height (T1-S1), right/left hemithoracic heights/widths (RHTH, LHTH, RHTW, LHTW) were measured pretreatment, postoperation, and at 2-year follow-up. Complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 patients with 2-year follow-up were identified. Pretreatment; patients treated with SCC (n=10) had mean age of 1.8±0.6 years; body mass index (BMI), 16±1.5 kg/m; scoliosis, 45±18 degrees; kyphosis, 56±9 degrees; T1-S1, 22.4±2.4 cm; RHTH, 8.0±2.0 cm; LHTH, 8.5±1.7 cm; RHTW, 6.6±1.3 cm; and LHTW, 8.0±1.0 cm. Patients treated with GFS (n=13) had mean age of 5.8±2.6 years; BMI, 21±5.4 kg/m; scoliosis, 76±14 degrees; kyphosis, 59±25 degrees; T1-S1, 24.1±3.6 cm; RHTH, 10.0±1.6 cm; LHTH, 10.6±1.6 cm; RHTW, 9.4±2.5 cm; and LHTW, 8.1±2.8 cm. At 2-year follow-up, patients treated with SCC had mean scoliosis 37±11 degrees (18% correction, P=0.06); kyphosis, 42±6 degrees (NS); T1-S1, 26.4±2.1 cm (P<0.01); RHTH, 9.0±1.1 cm (13%; P=0.30); LHTH, 10.0±1.5 cm (18%, P<0.01); RHTW, 7.4±1.1 cm (12%, P<0.01); and LHTW, 8.0±1.0 cm (0%, P=0.34). At 2-year follow-up, patients treated with GFS had mean scoliosis 42±13 degrees (45% correction, P<0.000001); kyphosis, 53±13 degrees (10%, P=0.19); T1-S1, 31.5±5.4 cm (P<0.00001); RHTH, 12.0±2.4 cm (20%; P<0.01); LHTH, 12.0±1.7 cm (13%; P<0.01); RHTW, 9.8±1.3 cm (4%; P=0.27); and LHTW, 7.9±2.3 cm (3%;P=0.11). As an entire group, patients with a BMI>17 kg/m² had more device-related than disease-related complications (P=0.09). Patients treated with SCC had 0.9 complications per patient. Patients treated with GFS had 2.2 complications per patient [≤5 y more often had ≥2 complications (P=0.05)].

CONCLUSIONS

At 2-year follow-up, SCC and GFS were both effective in treating EOS in PWS patients. Patients treated with SCC had significant improvements in spine height and LHTH. Patients treated with GFS had significant improvements in scoliosis magnitude, spine height, RHTH, and LHTH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-therapeutic study.

The Natural History of Early-onset Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is defined as the diagnosis of a spinal deformity before the age of 5 years. It can be divided into idiopathic, neuromuscular/syndromic, and congenital etiologies.

METHODS

The literature on the natural history of EOS was summarized.

RESULTS

The natural history varies with the etiology of EOS. Idiopathic curves may benefit from early serial casting. The natural history of neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis is highly dependent on the natural history of the underlying disorder. Congenital scoliosis has a variable prognosis depending on the location and extent of the congenital malformations.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of children with EOS is customized to the particular disorder. While lack of treatment has been shown to lead to increased mortality, extensive early definitive fusion may lead to thoracic insufficiency. Delaying definitive surgery and the use of growing instrumentation may provide benefit in maintaining pulmonary health.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Potential disturbance of growth must be considered in the treatment of young children with scoliosis.

Brace treatment can serve as a time-buying tactic for patients with congenital scoliosis

Background

Infantile patients with congenital scoliosis (CS) can be confronted with increasing risk of mortality and morbidity. To date, the effectiveness of conservative treatment in CS has not been sufficiently investigated. We aimed to evaluate the bracing outcome in patients with CS and to investigate whether wearing brace can effectively delay the surgical procedures.

Methods

A total of 39 braced CS patients including 25 boys and 14 girls were reviewed for the eligibility to be included in this study. Radiographic parameters including curve magnitude and T1 to T12 height were evaluated for each patient at the initiation of the treatment and at the final follow-up (FU), respectively. Duration of the follow-up and requirement of surgical interventions were also recorded. The student t test was used to compare the radiographic parameters between the initial visit and the last FU.

Results

The mean initial age at bracing was 4.1 ± 2.3 years, and 7.5 ± 1.8 brace modifications were performed during a mean FU period of 42.1 ± 26.5 months. The mean curve magnitude before bracing was 44.1 ± 12.2°, which was corrected to 41.3 ± 13.5° at the final visit (p = 0.33). T1-T12 height increased from 13.4 ± 2.5 to 17.1 ± 2.8 cm during the treatment (P < 0.001). Nine patients underwent surgical intervention due to the curve progression more than 5°, with the time of surgery delayed for 32.1 ± 18.2 months.

Conclusions

Brace treatment is an effective time-buying modality for CS patients, which may help maintain the body growth and delay the surgical intervention.

Thoracic proportions in children without scoliosis

PURPOSE

Scoliosis is a condition of abnormal growth resulting in 3D deformity of both the spine and thoracic cage. The aim of this study is to use chest radiographs of healthy children to define normal thoracic proportions so as to provide a useful normal reference range against which children with spinal deformity can be compared.

METHODS

Three independent reviewers assessed posteroanterior and lateral chest radiographs of 184 normal children aged between two and 15 years. Duplicate assessments were undertaken by all three raters on 36 of these radiographs. We measured the T1 to T12 length, sternal length, chest depth at T6, chest width at T3, chest width at T6 and maximum chest width. Ratios of thoracic dimensions were calculated to define the normal proportions of the thorax. Inter- and intra-rater variance was estimated for all dimensions and dimension ratios.

RESULTS

The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was excellent with intra-class-correlation coefficients values > 80% and both intra- and inter-rater coefficients of variance < 9% for all parameters. All measured dimensions of the thorax and spine progressed linearly with respect to age. The mean proportions of T1 to 12 length of the sternal length, chest depth at T6, chest width at T3, chest width at T6 and maximum chest width were 0.5, 0.4, 0.7, 0.9 and 1.0, respectively.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to accurately and reproducibly measure the dimensions of the thoracic cage and spine on plain film radiology. The ratios of T1 to T12 length with respect to sternal length, chest depth at T6, chest width at T3, chest width at T6 and maximum chest remain constant with increasing age. Thoracic dimensions in children progress linearly with increasing age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Surgical and Health-related Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Growing Rod "Graduates" With Severe versus Moderate Early-onset Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter database.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare surgical and quality-of-life outcomes at the end of growing rod treatment in patients with severe versus moderate early-onset scoliosis (EOS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Knowledge of the outcomes of severe EOS after growth-friendly treatment is limited because this condition is uncommon.

METHODS

We identified 40 children with severe EOS (major curve ≥90°) treated with growing rods before age 10 with minimum 2-year follow-up after last lengthening or final fusion. From the same registry, we matched 40 patients with moderate EOS (major curve < 90°). Twenty-seven patients in the severe group and 12 in the moderate group underwent final fusion (P < 0.001).

RESULTS

Mean preoperative curves were 102° (range, 90°-139°) in the severe group and 63° (range, 33°-88°) in the moderate group (P < 0.001). At final follow-up, mean curves were 56° (range, 10°-91°) and 36° (range, 12°-89°), respectively (P < 0.001). Fourteen (35%) children in the severe group and 32 (80%) in the moderate group had scoliosis of < 45° at final follow-up [risk ratio (RR), 0.44; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.20-0.57]. At final follow-up, 30 (75%) children in the severe group and 35 (88%) in the moderate group had achieved T1-T12 length of ≥18 cm (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.09). Thirty-five children in the severe group and 26 in the moderate group had at least one complication (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.73). Mean 24-Item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire scores were similar between groups at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Delaying surgery until the major curve has progressed beyond 90° is associated with larger residual deformity and more complications than treating at a lesser curve magnitude. Quality-of-life outcomes were similar between those with severe and moderate EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.