Impact of Axial Neck Pain on Quality of Life After Laminoplasty

Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Surgical Outcomes Between Three Types of Modified Muscle-Sparing Laminoplasty and Conventional Laminoplasty for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare postoperative pain and surgical outcomes of open-door laminoplasty (LP) and three types of muscle-sparing laminoplasties, namely unilateral muscle-preservation laminoplasty (UL), spinous process splitting double-door laminoplasty (DL) and intermuscular "raising roof" laminoplasty (RL) for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (MDCM).

METHODS

Consecutive MDCM patients underwent LP or modified laminoplasties (UL, DL, RL) in 2022 were enrolled. Patients' preoperative baseline data and surgical characteristics were collected. Postoperative transient pain (TP), the axial pain and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and neck disability index (NDI) at 6-month and 12-month follow-up were documented.

RESULTS

A total of 154 MDCM patients were included and a 12-month follow-up was completed for 148 patients (LP: 36, UL:39, DL: 37, RL:36). No significant difference was observed in the baseline data. Four groups presented favorable and comparable surgical outcome. The RL group reported significantly the least severe TP on the first three days following surgery. However, no significant difference was found in the axial pain and axial symptoms at both follow-ups. After regression analysis, RL group exhibited significantly better efficacy in alleviating Day-1 TP (P = 0.047) and 6-month axial pain (P = 0.040). However, this superiority was not observed at 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

All the three muscle-sparing laminoplasty procedures showed similar short-term surgical outcomes compared to LP. The RL procedure demonstrated superiority in alleviating TP and 6-month axial pain compared to LP. The RL and DL groups showed less C5 palsy compared to LP.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy With Fusion in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative differences in racial and socioeconomic factors in patients undergoing laminoplasty (LP) versus laminectomy and fusion (LF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

DCM is prevalent in the United States, requiring surgical intervention to prevent neurological degeneration. While LF is utilized more frequently, LP is an emerging alternative. Previous studies have demonstrated similar neurological outcomes for both procedures. However, treatment selection is primarily at the discretion of the surgeon and may be influenced by social determinants of health that impact surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Quality Outcome Database (QOD), a national spine registry, was queried for adult patients who underwent either LP or LF for the management of DCM. Covariates associated with socioeconomic status, pain and disability, and demographic and medical history were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess patient factors associated with undergoing LP versus LF.

RESULTS

Of 1673 DCM patients, 157 (9.4%) underwent LP and 1516 (90.6%) underwent LF. A significantly greater proportion of LP patients had private insurance (P<0.001), a greater than high school level education (P<0.001), were employed (P<0.001), and underwent primary surgery (P<0.001). LP patients reported significantly lower baseline neck/arm pain and Neck Disability Index (P<0.001). In the multivariate regression model, lower baseline neck pain [odds ratio (OR)=0.915, P=0.001], identifying as non-Caucasian (OR=2.082, P<0.032), being employed (OR=1.592, P=0.023), and having a greater than high school level education (OR=1.845, P<0.001) were associated with undergoing LP rather than LF.

CONCLUSIONS

In DCM patients undergoing surgery, factors associated with patients undergoing LP versus LF included lower baseline neck pain, non-Caucasian race, higher education, and employment. While symptomatology may influence the decision to choose LP over LF, there may also be socioeconomic factors at play. The trend of more educated and employed patients undergoing LP warrants further investigation.

Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical laminoplasty versus lateral mass screw fixation in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare cervical sagittal parameters and clinical outcomes between patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty(CL) and those undergoing lateral mass screw fixation(LMS).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 67 patients with multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine who underwent lateral mass screw fixation (LMS = 36) and cervical laminoplasty (CL = 31). We analyzed cervical sagittal parameters (C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, C7 slope (C7s), T1 slope (T1s), and spino-cranial angle (SCA)) and clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS], neck disability index [NDI], Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] scores, recovery rate (RR), and minimum clinically significant difference [MCID]). The cervical sagittal parameters at the last follow-up were analyzed by binary logistic regression. Finally, we analyzed the correlation between the cervical sagittal parameters and each clinical outcome at the last follow-up after surgery in both groups.

RESULTS

At the follow-up after posterior decompression in both groups, the mean values of C2-C7 SVA, C7s, and T1s in the LMS group were more significant than those in the CL group (P ≤ 0.05). Compared with the preoperative period, C2-C7 SVA, T1s, and SCA gradually increased, and the C2-C7 Cobb angle gradually decreased after surgery (P < 0.05). The improvement in the JOA score and the recovery rate was similar between the two groups, while the improvement in the VAS-N score and NDI score was more significant in the CL group (P = 0.001; P = 0.043). More patients reached MCID in the CL group than in the LMS group (P = 0.036). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that SCA was independently associated with whether patients reached MCID at NDI postoperatively. SCA was positively correlated with cervical NDI and negatively correlated with cervical JOA score at postoperative follow-up in both groups (P < 0.05); C2-7 Cobb angle was negatively correlated with cervical JOA score at postoperative follow-up (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CL may be superior to LMS in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by OPLL. In addition, smaller cervical SCA after posterior decompression may suggest better postoperative outcomes.

What is the Preferable Method for the C3 and C7 Segments in Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty for Patients Diagnosed with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

BACKGROUND

Traditional C3-C7 unilateral open-door laminoplasty (UOLP) often leads to various postoperative complications as a result of damage of cervical posterior muscles and nuchal ligaments. We aimed to thoroughly evaluate postoperative outcomes after our modified UOLP versus traditional UOLP in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with MCSM who underwent the modified UOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 upper hemilaminectomy (40 patients) or traditional C3-C7 UOLP (36 patients) were included. Preoperative and postoperative cervical radiologic parameters, as well as clinical and surgical outcomes, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores improved significantly more in the modified UOLP group than in the traditional UOLP group (P = 0.028), whereas visual analog scale scores and Neck Disability Index improved similarly in both groups. Follow-up scores for Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale were not significantly different between the 2 groups. At the final follow-up, the C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope increased in the traditional UOLP group and did not change in the modified UOLP group and were unchanged in the modified UOLP group. The C2-C7 Cobb angle decreased significantly in the traditional UOLP group and did not change in the modified UOLP group. The modified UOLP group lost less cervical posterior muscle area compared with the traditional UOLP group (3.72% ± 3.54% vs. 6.67% ± 2.81%; P < 0.001). The range of motion in the modified UOLP group was significantly greater than in the traditional UOLP group at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). Also, the modified UOLP group experienced a notable reduction in operative time, blood loss volume, and postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend performing our modified UOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 upper hemilaminectomy instead of traditional C3-C7 UOLP.

An innovative approach to assess spinal canal expansion following French-door cervical laminoplasty by intraoperative ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of applying intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) to evaluate spinal canal expansion in patients undergoing French-door cervical laminoplasty (FDCL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients who underwent FDCL for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy were prospectively recruited. Formulae describing the relationship between laminoplasty opening angle (LOA) and laminoplasty opening size, the increase in sagittal canal diameter and the spinal canal area were deduced with trigonometric functions. The LOA was measured with IOUS imaging during surgery, and other spinal canal parameters were assessed. Actual spinal canal enlargement was verified on postoperative CT images. Linear correlation analysis and Bland‒Altman analysis were used to evaluate correlation and agreement between the intraoperative and postoperative measurements.

RESULTS

The LOA at C5 measured with IOUS was 27.54 ± 3.12°, and it was 27.23 ± 3.02° on postoperative CT imaging. Linear correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between IOUS and postoperative CT measurements (r = 0.88; p < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between these two methods, with a mean difference of 0.30°. For other spinal canal expansion parameter measurements, correlation analysis showed a moderate to a high degree of correlation (p < 0.01), and Bland-Altman analysis indicated good agreement.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, during the French-door cervical laminoplasty procedure, application of IOUS can accurately evaluate spinal canal expansion. This innovative method may be helpful in improving surgical accuracy by enabling the operator to measure and determine canal enlargement during surgery, leading to ideal clinical outcomes and fewer postoperative complications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The use of intraoperative ultrasonography to assess spinal canal expansion following French-door cervical laminoplasty may improve outcomes for patients undergoing this procedure by providing more accurate measurements of spinal canal expansion.

KEY POINTS

• Spinal canal expansion after French-door cervical laminoplasty substantially influences operative prognosis; insufficient or excessive lamina opening may result in unexpected outcomes. • Prediction of spinal canal expansion during surgery was previously impracticable, but based on this study, intraoperative ultrasonography offers an innovative approach and strongly agrees with postoperative CT measurement. • Since this is the first research to offer real-time canal expansion guidance for cervical laminoplasty, it may improve the accuracy of the operation and produce ideal clinical outcomes with fewer postoperative complications.

Axial Neck Pain after Cervical Laminoplasty with Preserving C7 Spinous Process Using C7 Arcocristectomy: A Prospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

Single-blinded, randomized, single-center, prospective study.

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the radiographical and clinical outcomes between C7 laminoplasty and C7 arcocristectomy, which preserves the C7 spinous process.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Laminoplasty is a widely used surgical method that decompresses the cervical spinal cord. However, axial neck pain is one of the major factors of dissatisfaction, and still, it is not clearly solved the reduction method of postoperative axial neck pain.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy who required C6-C7 level decompression surgery were operated and followed up for 24 months. One group (15 patients) received C7 arcocristectomy without laminoplasty, and the other group (16 patients) received C7 laminoplasty. Flexion, neutral, and extension angles were measured using the Cobb method at C2-C7 to evaluate preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters. Range of motion (ROM), ROM preservation rate of the cervical spine, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 slope were measured using C-spine lateral X-ray. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were used to compare preoperative and postoperative clinical symptoms.

RESULTS

Flexion, neutral, extension angles of the cervical spine, C2-C7 SVA, T1 slope, ROM, ROM preservation rate, and modified JOA score were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). In the C7 arcocristectomy group, the average postoperative VAS for axial neck pain was increased in 13.3% (2/15) of the patients, whereas in the C7 laminoplasty group, the average postoperative VAS was increased in 43.8% (7/16) of the patients (p=0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

C7 arcocristectomy, which preserves the C7 spinous process and posterior structures, is a useful technique for relieving axial neck pain.

Preoperative and Postoperative Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction with Double-Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Introduction

Few articles have investigated patient satisfaction with laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) alone, excluding other diseases, such as ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. In this study, we aimed to investigate patient satisfaction after double-door laminoplasty for CSM and determine the preoperative and postoperative factors that affect patient satisfaction.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed cases of laminoplasty for CSM. We measured sagittal imaging parameters (cervical lordosis [CL], C2-C7 cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA], and T1 slope [T1S]), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as the neck disability index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively. In addition, a multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate factors affecting patient satisfaction.

Results

Ninety patients were included in the analysis. After surgery, CL decreased significantly (p<0.01), whereas cSVA increased significantly (p<0.01). No significant differences were observed in the preoperative and postoperative T1S values (p=0.61). The JOA, NDI, and VAS scores significantly improved postoperatively (p<0.01). The median patient satisfaction was 85 (range, 12-100) at 1 year postoperatively and 80 (range, 25-100) at 3 months postoperatively. In the multiple regression analysis, lower-extremity sensory disorder in the JOA score at 1 year postoperatively (p<0.01) and VAS scores for neck pain preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively (p=0.01 and p<0.01, respectively) were determined as factors affecting patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

Cervical laminoplasty is a useful and satisfactory surgical procedure to restore patient function. However, patients with severe preoperative and postoperative neck pain and those with severe postoperative sensory disorders of the lower extremities may be less satisfied with the procedure. It is important to keep these things in mind when treating patients.

Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery.

METHODS

Patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery treated by duloxetine or non-drug therapy from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed. Duloxetine was administered gradually, with oral administration of 30 mg in the first week and oral administration of 60 mg from the second week. Visual analogue scale (VAS), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) and EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire were used to evaluate the severity of AS at baseline and 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after medication. The occurrence of adverse reactions was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 63 eligible patients who received duloxetine therapy (n = 35) or non-drug therapy (n = 28) were included. All patients were followed up for 6 months. Significant improvements were found in VAS score compared with baseline in both groups (1.87 ± 0.81 vs 6.61 ± 1.16, 3.18 ± 0.67 vs 6.31 ± 1.40; P < 0.05 for all). Meanwhile, the VAS score of the duloxetine group was significantly better than that of the non-drug therapy group at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (P < 0.05). Besides, according to 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), the PCS score and MCS score are significantly higher than before the treatment in duloxetine group (PCS 62.82 ± 6.04 vs 44.36 ± 7.25, MCS 65.50 ± 4.53 vs 55.55 ± 6.06; P < 0.05 for all). And when we compared variables between the two groups, the PCS score of the duloxetine group was significantly better than that of the non-drug therapy group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in MCS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). What's more, EQ-5D score had significant improvements in the duloxetine group compared with the non-drug therapy group at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Oral duloxetine has a better short-term outcome than conventional non-drug therapy in patients with axial symptoms following posterior decompression surgery in the cervical spine.

Indication of C2-C7 Cervical Laminoplasty with Muscle and Ligament Preservation in Patients with Kyphosis

OBJECTIVE

Cervical laminoplasty is generally not indicated in patients with kyphosis because of poor outcomes. Therefore, data on the effectiveness of posterior structure-preserving techniques in patients with kyphosis are limited. This study investigated how laminoplasty with muscle and ligament preservation can benefit patients with kyphosis via risk factor analyses of postoperative complications.

METHODS

Clinicoradiological outcomes of 106 consecutive patients, including patients with kyphosis, who had undergone C2-C7 laminoplasty in a muscle- and ligament-preserving fashion, were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical outcomes, including neurological recovery, were assessed, and sagittal parameters were measured on radiographs.

RESULTS

Surgical outcomes of patients with kyphosis were comparable to outcomes of other patients except for axial pain (AP), which was significantly more frequent in patients with kyphosis. Moreover, AP was significantly associated with alignment loss (AL) >0°. Substantial local kyphosis (local kyphosis angle >10°) and greater value of range of motion (ROM) during flexion minus ROM during extension were identified as risk factors for AP and AL >0°, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated ROM during flexion minus ROM during extension cutoff value of 0.7° for predicting AL >0° in patients with kyphosis (sensitivity: 77%; specificity: 84%). Substantial local kyphosis combined with ROM during flexion minus ROM during extension >0.7° had 56% sensitivity and 84% specificity for predicting AP in patients with kyphosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with kyphosis had a significantly higher incidence of AP, C2-C7 cervical laminoplasty with muscle and ligament preservation may not be contraindicated in selected patients with kyphosis by risk stratification for AP and AL using newly identified risk factors.

Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Axial neck pain is one of the complications of posterior cervical surgeries such as laminoplasty. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of the PainVision apparatus for axial neck pain assessment by comparing it with other methods.

METHODS

This prospective study included 118 patients (90 men and 28 women; average age: 66.9 (32-86) years) with cervical myelopathy who underwent open-door laminoplasty at our medical center between April 2009 and August 2019. Pain degree (PD) measured by PainVision, visual analog scale (VAS), and bodily pain (BP), a subitem of the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF36), were used to evaluate axial neck pain, which was investigated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Comparison of the scores at each evaluation time point found significant improvement between the pre- and post-operative values for all assessment methods. Further, on comparing the amounts of change between pre- and post-operative scores in each pain assessment method, we found significant differences in PD and VAS but not in BP. We also found significant positive correlations between PD and VAS at each time point (all p < 0.001) and significant negative correlations between PD and BP (all p < 0.05) and between VAS and BP (all p < 0.01)  at each time point.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrated that PD and VAS are more sensitive indicators of changes in axial neck pain than BP and also that PD has an excellent correlation with VAS. These results suggest that the PainVision apparatus may be an effective instrument for quantifying axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty, though its superiority over VAS needs to be verified in future studies.

Quantitatively biomechanical response analysis of posterior musculature reconstruction in cervical single-door laminoplasty

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The current trend of laminoplasty is developing toward the goal of muscle preservation and minimum tissue damage. Given this, muscle-preserving techniques in cervical single-door laminoplasty have been modified with protecting the spinous processes at the sites of C2 and/or C7 muscle attachment and reconstruct the posterior musculature in recent years. To date, no study has reported the effect of preserving the posterior musculature during the reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the biomechanical effect of multiple modified single-door laminoplasty procedures for restoring stability and reducing response level on the cervical spine.

METHODS

Different cervical laminoplasty models were established for evaluating kinematics and response simulations based on a detailed finite element (FE) head-neck active model (HNAM), including ① C3 - C7 laminoplasty (LP_C37), ② C3 - C6 laminoplasty with C7 spinous process preservation (LP_C36), ③ C3 laminectomy hybrid decompression with C4 - C6 laminoplasty (LT_C3 + LP_C46) and ④ C3 - C7 laminoplasty with unilateral musculature preservation (LP_C37 + UMP). The laminoplasty model was validated by the global range of motion (ROM) and percentage changes relative to the intact state. The C2 - T1 ROM, axial muscle tensile force, and stress/strain levels of functional spinal units were compared among the different laminoplasty groups. The obtained effects were further analysed by comparison with a review of clinical data on cervical laminoplasty scenarios.

RESULTS

Analysis of the locations of concentration of muscle load showed that the C2 muscle attachment sustained more tensile loading than the C7 muscle attachment, primarily in flexion-extension (FE) and in lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR), respectively. Simulated results further quantified that LP_C36 primarily produced 10% decreases in LB and AR modes relative to LP_C37. Compared with LP_C36, LT_C3 + LP_C46 resulted in approximately 30% decreases in FE motion; LP C37 + UMP also showed a similar trend. Additionally, when compared to LP_C37, LT_C3 + LP_C46 and LP C37 + UMP reduced the peak stress level at the intervertebral disc by at most 2-fold as well as the peak strain level of the facet joint capsule by 2-3-fold. All these findings were well correlated with the result of clinical studies comparing modified laminoplasty and classic laminoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified muscle-preserving laminoplasty is superior to classic laminoplasty due to the biomechanical effect of the posterior musculature reconstruction, with a retained postoperative ROM and loading response levels of the functional spinal units. More motion-sparing is beneficial for increasing cervical stability, which probably accelerates the recovery of postoperative neck movement and reduces the risk of the complication for eventual kyphosis and axial pain. Surgeons are encouraged to make every effort to preserve the attachment of the C2 whenever feasible in laminoplasty.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of modified laminoplasty with preservation of muscle group inserted into C2 and C7 spinous processes versus conventional C3-C7 laminoplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and noninferior of performing modified double-door laminoplasty (MDDL) (C4-C6 laminoplasty plus C3 laminectomy, alongside a dome-like resection of the inferior part of the C2 lamina and the superior part of the C7 lamina) in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) is equivocal. A randomized, controlled trial is warranted.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and noninferior of MDDL compared with traditional C3-C7 double-door laminoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

METHODS

A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in which patients who with MCSM with greater than or equal to 3 levels of spinal cord compression from the C3 to the C7 vertebral levels were enrolled and assigned to undergo either MDDL group or conventional double-door laminoplasty (CDDL) group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the change in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score from baseline to 2-year follow-up. The secondary outcomes included changes in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck pain, and imaging parameters. Operative complications were also collected and reported. The outcome measures were compared between the groups at 3 months, 1 year, or 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients (mean age 67 years, 39.8% women) underwent randomization. Of these patients, 93 completed 3-month follow-up, 79 completed 1-year follow-up, and 66 completed 2-year follow-up. The changes in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score did not differ significantly between the study groups at the three time points after surgery. With respect to amelioration of neck pain and disability related to neck pain, patients in the MDDL group had a significantly greater decrease in the VAS and NDI component summary score than did those in the CDDL group at 1-year (VAS: -2.5 vs. -3.2, difference -0.7, 95% CI -1.1 to -0.2, P =0.0035; NDI: -13.6 vs. -19.3, difference -5.7, 95% CI -10.3 to -1.1, P =0.0159) and 2-years (VAS: -2.1 vs. -2.9, difference -0.8, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.2, P =0.0109; NDI: -9.3 vs. -16.0, difference -6.7, 95% CI -11.9 to -1.5, P =0.0127). The changes in the range of motion (ROM), the C2-C7 Cobb angle, and the cervical sagittal vertical axis in the MDDL group were significantly less than those in the CDDL group (ROM: -9.2±6.4 vs. -5.0±6.0, P =0.0079; C2-C7 Cobb angle: -7.9±7.8 vs. -4.1±6.2, P =0.0345; cervical sagittal vertical axis: 0.6±0.9 vs. 0.2±0.6, P =0.0233). The MDDL group had less blood loss (428.1 vs. 349.1, P =0.0175) and a lower rate of axial symptoms (27.3 vs. 6.1%, P =0.0475) than the CDDL group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with MCSM, the MDDL produced similar cervical cord decompression compared with the conventional C3-C7 double-door laminoplasty. The modified laminoplasty was associated with meaningful improvement in amelioration of neck discomfort, maintaining a better cervical ROM and sagittal alignment, decreasing blood loss, and reducing the incidence of axial symptoms.

Is Severe Neck Pain a Contraindication to Performing Laminoplasty in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical outcomes in a cohort of patients with severe preoperative axial neck pain undergoing laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No study has investigated whether patients with severe axial symptoms may achieve satisfactory neck pain and disability outcomes after laminoplasty.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 91 patients undergoing C4-6 laminoplasty for CSM at a single academic institution between 2010 and 2021. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) Neck, and VAS Arm, were recorded preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were stratified as having mild pain if VAS neck was 0-3, moderate pain if 4-6, and severe pain if 7-10. PROMs were then compared between subgroups at all the perioperative time points.

RESULTS

Both the moderate and severe neck pain subgroups demonstrated a substantial improvement in VAS neck from preoperative to 6 months postoperatively (-3.1±2.2 vs. -5.6±2.8, respectively; P <0.001), and these improvements were maintained at 1 year postoperatively. There was no difference in VAS neck between subgroups at either the 6-month or 1-year postoperative time points. Despite the substantially higher mean NDI in the moderate and severe neck pain subgroups preoperatively, there was no difference in NDI at 6 months or 1 year postoperatively ( P =0.99). There were no differences between subgroups in the degree of cord compression, severity of multifidus sarcopenia, sagittal alignment, or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with moderate and severe preoperative neck pain undergoing laminoplasty achieved equivalent PROMs at 6 months and 1 year as patients with mild preoperative neck pain. The results of this study highlight the multifactorial nature of neck pain in these patients and indicate that severe axial symptoms are not an absolute contraindication to performing laminoplasty in well-aligned patients with CSM.

Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of open-door laminoplasty vs. laminectomy and instrumentation in kyphotic multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine whether the sagittal lordotic alignment, clinical outcomes and axial symptoms (AS) could be improved by kyphotic correction through the posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy (CDM) and to further analyze the changes of cervical spinal alignment parameters after correction of kyphosis. The hypothesis was that correction of kyphosis can improve the severity of AS and neurological recovery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 109 patients who suffered from multilevel CDM combined with kyphosis. The patients had undergone open-door laminoplasty (Group LP, 53 patients) and laminectomy with instrumentation (Group LI, 56 patients) between January 2014 and December 2018. Cervical spinal alignment parameters, including curvature index (CI), T1 slope, C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 SVA, were measured on the pre- and postoperative lateral radiographs. The recovery rate was calculated based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. AS severity was quantified using Neck Disability Index (NDI). A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

Analyses of postoperative follow-up data showed significant differences (P < 0.001) in CI, correction of CI, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, C2-7 SVA and NDI between Group LP and LI, but no significant differences in JOA score (P = 0.23) and recovery rate (P = 0.13). There were significant differences (P < 0.001) in CI, T1 slope, C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 SVA, JOA score, and NDI between pre- and postoperative follow-up in both groups. Correction of CI showed negative correlation with AS severity (r = -0.51, P < 0.001), and no association with recovery rate (r = 0.14, P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfied neurological improvement was achieved by LP and LI for multilevel CDM combined with kyphosis. Cervical kyphotic correction produced significant improvement of AS and increase of T1 slope and C2-7 SVA. However, the kyphotic correction may not be associated with better neurological recovery in the short-term postoperative period.

Determinants of quality of life in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of chronic, progressive spinal cord impairment worldwide. Patients experience substantial pain, functional neurological decline and disability. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) appears to be particularly poor, even when compared to other chronic diseases. However, the determinants of HRQoL are poorly understood. The objective was to perform a systematic review of the determinants of quality of life of people with DCM.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42018115675). Full-text papers in English, exclusively studying DCM, published before 26 March 2020 were eligible for inclusion and were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Study sample characteristics, patient demographics, cohort type, HRQoL instrument utilised, HRQoL score, and relationships of HRQoL with other variables were qualitatively synthesised.

RESULTS

A total of 1176 papers were identified; 77 papers and 13,572 patients were included in the final analysis. A total of 96% of papers studied surgical cohorts and 86% utilised the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) as a measure of HRQoL. HRQoL determinants were grouped into nine themes. The most common determinant to be assessed was surgical technique (38/77, 49%) and patient satisfaction and experience of pain (10/77, 13%). HRQoL appeared to improve after surgery. Pain was a negative predictor of HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

Current data on the determinants of HRQoL in DCM are limited, contradictory and heterogeneous. Limitations of this systematic review include lack of distinction between DCM subtypes and heterogenous findings amongst the papers in which HRQoL is measured postoperatively or post-diagnosis. This highlights the need for greater standardisation in DCM research to allow further synthesis. Studies of greater precision are necessary to account for HRQoL being complex, multi-factorial and both time and context dependent.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy with severe axial neck pain: is anterior or posterior approach better?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) is superior for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and high preoperative neck pain.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data using the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM module. Patients who received a subaxial fusion of 3 or 4 segments and had a visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain score of 7 or greater at baseline were included. The 3-, 12-, and 24-month outcomes were compared for patients undergoing ACDF with those undergoing PCLF.

RESULTS

Overall, 1141 patients with CSM were included in the database. Of these, 495 (43.4%) presented with severe neck pain (VAS score > 6). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we compared 65 patients (54.6%) undergoing 3- and 4-level ACDF and 54 patients (45.4%) undergoing 3- and 4-level PCLF. Patients undergoing ACDF had worse Neck Disability Index scores at baseline (52.5 ± 15.9 vs 45.9 ± 16.8, p = 0.03) but similar neck pain (p > 0.05). Otherwise, the groups were well matched for the remaining baseline patient-reported outcomes. The rates of 24-month follow-up for ACDF and PCLF were similar (86.2% and 83.3%, respectively). At the 24-month follow-up, both groups demonstrated mean improvements in all outcomes, including neck pain (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, there was no significant difference in the degree of neck pain change, rate of neck pain improvement, rate of pain-free achievement, and rate of reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in neck pain between the two groups (adjusted p > 0.05). However, ACDF was associated with a higher 24-month modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) score (β = 1.5 [95% CI 0.5-2.6], adjusted p = 0.01), higher EQ-5D score (β = 0.1 [95% CI 0.01-0.2], adjusted p = 0.04), and higher likelihood for return to baseline activities (OR 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.4], adjusted p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe neck pain is prevalent among patients undergoing surgery for CSM, affecting more than 40% of patients. Both ACDF and PCLF achieved comparable postoperative neck pain improvement 3, 12, and 24 months following 3- or 4-segment surgery for patients with CSM and severe neck pain. However, multilevel ACDF was associated with superior functional status, quality of life, and return to baseline activities at 24 months in multivariable adjusted analyses.

Extension of decompression to C2 doesn't affect the spinal sagittal parameters compared with standard open-door laminoplasty

We modified and extended laminoplasty to the upper cervical spine on patients with canal stenosis associated with upper cervical spinal ossified lesions. However, whether the extended decompression range of laminoplasty can cause further effects on cervical stability is rarely studied at present. A retrospective study to analyze the relationship between the surgical levels and cervical sagittal parameters effects was performed in patients with cervical spondylosis myelopathy who had undergone posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty with/without extending to C2. In total, 64 patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical levels. Radiologic outcomes of occipito-cervical angle (C0-2 Cobb angle), CL C27 Cobb angle, cervical sagittal vertical alignment, T1-Slope (T1S), T1S minus CL (T1S-CL), spino-cranial angle and center of the sella turcica-C7 SVA (St-SVA) were evaluated on lateral X-rays of the cervical spine at pre-operation, post-operation, and 2-year follow-up. The patient's health-related quality of life was obtained including neck disability index, Japanese orthopaedic association scores, and visual analog scale. Changes in sagittal parameters were observed in both groups after surgery. T1S, cervical sagittal vertical alignment, and T1S-CL significantly increased and CL decreased in 2 groups of patients postoperative. After a 2-year follow-up period, the C0-2 Cobb angle was found to increase compared to preoperative records. In addition, there were no significant differences in spino-cranial angle and st-SVA between preoperative and 2 years follow-up measurements. Health-related quality of life was improved in both groups and was not significantly different. Herein, the parameters indicated a tilting forward of the lower cervical spine and a more lordotic upper cervical spine to maintain a horizontal gaze in patients. However, C2 to 7 laminoplasty was performed to achieve satisfactory clinical results without significantly changing the spinal sagittal parameters.

Minimally invasive laminar lift and posterior cervical laminoplasty via the intermuscular approach: a canine model study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a minimally invasive surgical procedure for laminar lift and posterior cervical laminoplasty via the intermuscular approach using a canine model.

METHODS

Six Alaskan dogs were used for developing the surgical approach. The bilateral laminae of C3-7 were cut with an ultrasonic osteotome and fixed with bilateral plates to maintain the lamina lifting and reshape a wider spinal canal. The important structures, such as ligaments, supraspinous ligaments, interspinous ligaments, and ligamentum flavum were preserved. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by preoperative and postoperative imaging results and neck mobility.

RESULTS

The surgical procedures were all successfully performed in the 6 animals. All the dogs survived well within 1 year of postoperative follow-up. The postoperative neck mobility was as good as the preoperative one. Computed tomography results showed that the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal was successfully enlarged and maintained well.

CONCLUSIONS

The minimally invasive surgical procedure for laminar lift and posterior cervical laminoplasty via the intermuscular approach was feasible in a canine model, which might be applied in clinical practice.

Factors contributing to neck pain in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: A prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

Although the understanding of the mechanisms of low back pain due to spinopelvic sagittal imbalance has strengthened, the understanding of the mechanisms of neck pain remains insufficient. Thus, this study aimed to identify the factors associated with preoperative and postoperative neck pain in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy who underwent laminoplasty.

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter study, we prospectively enrolled patients who were scheduled for laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy. The associations between different variables and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) scores for neck pain were investigated using univariate and multiple linear regression models.

RESULTS

In total, 92 patients were included in the current study. The univariate analysis showed that age, sex, cervical lordosis in neutral and extension, and thoracic kyphosis were significantly associated with the preoperative NRS score for neck pain; moreover, preoperative cervical lordosis in extension and range of motion and postoperative cervical lordosis in neutral, flexion, and extension were significantly associated with the postoperative NRS Scale score for neck pain. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the independent factors contributing to preoperative neck pain were preoperative cervical lordosis in extension, sex, and age. The independent preoperative predictor and contributor to postoperative neck pain were preoperative cervical lordosis in extension and postoperative cervical lordosis in extension, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical lordosis in extension showed significant association with neck pain in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Therefore, when performing laminoplasty for patients with a low cervical lordosis in extension, attention should be paid to residual postoperative neck pain.

Cervical Myelopathy: Diagnosis, Contemporary Treatment, and Outcomes

Cervical myelopathy is a clinical syndrome caused by compression of the spinal cord between the levels of the C1 and T1 vertebrae. Its clinical presentation can mimic other degenerative and neurological pathologies, making diagnosis challenging. Diagnosis is confirmed with appropriate imaging studies carefully correlated with history and physical examination. Treatment options are focused on decompression of the spinal canal from an anterior, posterior, or combined anterior and posterior surgical approach depending on the location of compression and patient factors. Outcomes are favorable if treatment is performed prior to severe symptom onset.

A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Intervention Effect of Early Exercise Therapy on Axial Pain after Cervical Laminoplasty

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Two Modified Open-door Laminoplasties Based on a Novel Paraspinal Approach for Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control study.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of two modified laminoplasties (LPs) based on a novel paraspinal approach for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No laminoplasty through a natural intermuscular plane mimicking Wiltse approach to minimize intraoperative injury to extensor muscles has ever been developed and studied.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients were enrolled, including patients treated with either modified LP and patients treated with concurrent conventional LP. Operation time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by VAS, JOA scores, and recovery rate. Cervical sagittal alignment was measured on cervical radiographs. Spinal canal expansion was assessed on CT scans. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and atrophy rate (AR) of cervical deep extensors were evaluated on MRI.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration was 33.05, 31.55, 33.02, and 32.52 months, respectively in each group. Compared to concurrent conventional procedure, unilateral muscle-preserving procedure displayed similar, whereas bilateral muscle-preserving procedure showed significantly increased operation time and blood loss; each modified procedure resulted in comparable and satisfied perioperative clinical scores, spinal canal expansion while achieving significantly lower axial pain incidence, better cervical lordosis maintenance, and better deep extensor preservation. AR of deep extensors on the open side was significantly lower than that on the hinge side. Bilateral paraspinal approach demonstrated significantly better muscle-preservation on the open side and increased operation duration, with similar clinical scores, axial pain incidence, cervical lordosis maintenance, and spinal canal expansion compared to unilateral paraspinal approach. Loss of cervical lordosis was strongly correlated with AR of deep extensors.

CONCLUSION

Paraspinal approach is a good manner to protect deep extensor muscles; the two modified LPs have similar effects on clinical outcomes.Level of Evidence: 3.

A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Psychometric Properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale for Use in People With Neck Pain

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic search and synthesis of evidence about the measurement properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) as patient-reported outcome measures in neck pain research.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

CINAHL, Embase, PsychInfo, and MedLine databases were searched to identify studies evaluating the psychometric properties of the NPRS and the VAS used in samples of which >50% of participants were people with neck pain. Quality and consistency of findings were synthesized to arrive at recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 46 manuscripts were included. Syntheses indicated high-to-moderate-quality evidence of good-to-excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.58 to 0.93) test-retest reliability over an interval of 7 hours to 4 weeks. Moderate evidence of a clinically important difference of 1.5 to 2.5 points was found, while minimum detectable change ranged from 2.6 to 4.1 points. Moderate evidence of a moderate association (r=0.48 to 0.54) between the NPRS or VAS and the Neck Disability Index. Findings from other patient-reported outcomes indicated stronger associations with ratings of physical function than emotional status. There is limited research addressing the extent that these measures reflect outcomes that are important to patients.

DISCUSSION

It is clear NPRS and the VAS ratings are feasible to implement, provide reliable scores and relate to multi-item patient-reported outcome measures. Responsiveness (meaningful change) of the scales and interpretation of change scores requires further refinement. The NPRS can be a useful single-item assessment complimenting more comprehensive multi-item patient-reported outcome measures in neck pain research and practice.

Incidence of Chronic Periscapular Pain After Adult Thoracolumbar Deformity Correction and Impact on Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Extension of the posterior upper-most instrumented vertebra (UIV) into the upper thoracic (UT) spine allows for greater deformity correction and reduced incidence of proximal junction kyphosis (PJK) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. However, it may be associated with chronic postoperative scapular pain (POSP). The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between UT UIV and persistent POSP, describe the pain, and assess its impact on patient disability.

METHODS

ASD patients who underwent multilevel posterior fusion were retrospectively identified then administered a survey regarding scapular pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), by telephone. Univariate and multivariate analysis were utilized.

RESULTS

A total of 74 ASD patients were included in the study: 37 patients with chronic POSP and 37 without scapular pain. The mean age was 70.5 years, and 63.9% were women. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics, including mechanical complications (PJK, pseudarthrosis, and rod fracture) or reoperation between groups. Patients with persistent POSP were more likely to have a UT than a lower thoracic UIV (p = 0.018). UT UIV was independently associated with chronic POSP on multivariate analysis (p = 0.022). ODI score was significantly higher in patients with scapular pain (p = 0.001). Chronic POSP (p = 0.001) and prior spine surgery (p = 0.037) were independently associated with ODI on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

A UT UIV is independently associated with increased odds of chronic POSP, and this pain is associated with significant increases in patient disability. It is a significant clinical problem despite solid radiographic fusion and the absence of PJK.

Expansion of Spinal Canal with Lift-Open Laminoplasty: A New Method for Compression Cervical Myelopathy

OBJECTIVE

This study is to introduce lift-open laminoplasty and verify the increase of the spinal canal area following this surgical technique according to the preoperative anatomical measurement.

METHODS

There are 82 patients (43 male and 39 female) analyzed in our study from January 2019 to December 2020. The average age was 63.2 ± 3.21 years (from 41 to 84 years). All of them were treated with open-door laminoplasty, with a decompression segment range from C3 to C6. The increase of the spinal canal area after open-door laminoplasty was measured on postoperative CT images of the patients, and the distances between both lamina-facet junctions and lamina length was measured on preoperative CT images. Using the Pythagorean theorem for the equation of calculation area after the expansile open-door laminoplasty. Based on previous measurement parameters, spinous process length, lateral mass width, distance between osteotomy line and lamina-facet junctions line were additionally measured on preoperative CT images. Pythagorean theorem was used for calculating the area after the expansile lift-open laminoplasty. The results were recorded and a statistical analysis was undertaken. Then, there were six patients (five male and one female) treated with lift-open laminoplasty on C6, open-door on C3-C5, who suffer from cervical spondylotic myelopathy from December 2020 to January 2021. The average age was 60.3 ± 1.7 years (from 56 to 71 years). Operation time, blood loss, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score recovery rate were recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed.

RESULTS

The increase of the spinal canal area after open-door laminoplasty measured on postoperative CT images was 123.01 ± 17.06 mm² and the calculation of the increase of the spinal canal areausing the Pythagorean theorem after open-door laminoplasty was 122.86 ± 15.86 mm² . A comparison of the actual value with calculative value showed no significant difference (T value = 0.057, P value = 0.955). The calculation of the increase of the spinal canal area after lift-open laminoplasty was 183.57 ± 62.99 mm² , which was larger than that after open-door laminoplasty (T value = 8.462, P value < 0.001). Mean operation time was 153.3 min and operative blood loss was 600 mL of the six patients treated with lift-open laminoplasty. At 1 month follow-up, all patients had recovered well. JOA score recovery rate was 37.6% and no intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Lift-open laminoplasty could preserve nearly 100% of extensor muscle, avoid damaging C7 paraspinal muscles and C6-7 posterior muscle-ligament complex, reconstruct the spinous process firmly in the midline, and expand adequate spinal canal area after operation. These advantages could reduce the incidence rate of complications and bring better clinical results than traditional laminoplasty.

Laminoplasty with selective fusion at unstable segment versus laminectomy with fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a case-control study

Background

Segmental cervical instability is a risk factor for the progression of osteophytic bone spurs and development of myelopathy, and is treated as a relative contraindication of cervical laminoplasty. The aim of this study was to compare laminoplasty with selective fixation (LPSF) versus laminectomy with fusion (LCF) in patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy accompanied by segmental instability.

Methods

A case-control study was conducted by reviewing data from 63 patients who underwent LPSF (n = 30) or LCF (n = 33). Cervical alignment, range of motion (ROM), neurologic status and axial symptom severity pre-operation, 3-days after operation, and at the final follow-up (minimum 24 months) were measured and compared between groups.

Results

Postoperation, patients in the LPSF group lost 31.1 ± 17.3 % of cervical lordosis and 43.2 ± 10.9 % cervical ROM while patients in the LCF group lost 5.7 ± 8.2 % and 67.9 ± 15.5 %, respectively. Both LPSF and LCF groups significantly improved neurologic status and axial symptom severity at the final follow-up with similar between-group results(P > 0.05). Blood loss, operation time, hospital stay, and medical cost in the LPSF group were significantly less than in the LCF group(P < 0.05).

Conclusions

In 2 years of clinical observation, LPSF was effective in maintaining the stability of the cervical spine with less sacrifice of mobility and surgical trauma for multilevel myelopathy with segmental instability compared to LCF.

Ten-Year Long-term Results of Modified Cervical Double-door Laminoplasty With C3 Laminectomy Preserving the Semispinalis Cervicis Inserted Into the Axis Compared With Those of Conventional Cervical Laminoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes between conventional double-door laminoplasty (LP) (group A) and cervical LP with C3 laminectomy (group B).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical LP with C3 laminectomy preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into the axis decreased the patients' postoperative axial pain and muscle atrophy, prevented interlaminar bony fusion, decreased limitations of daily living activity, including reduced postoperative neck mobility, and maintained the cervical range of motion (ROM) more effectively than conventional cervical LP reattaching the semispinalis cervicis in the short-term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Group A included 14 patients with an average age of 56.6 years at the time of surgery (follow-up rate 58.1%), and group B included 21 patients with an average age of 56.3 years at the time of surgery (follow-up rate 29.1%). We evaluated the clinical results, which included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiologic results, including C2-C7 ROM, number of interlaminar bony fusions and presence of new spondylolisthesis at C3.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative JOA scores, recovery rate of JOA score, and JOACMEQ. Significantly fewer patients in group B experienced interlaminar bony fusion at C2-C3 compared with those in group A. There was no significant difference in the presence of new spondylolisthesis at C3. In patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, the rate of decrease of C2-C7 ROM was significantly less in group B than in group A. In patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, there was no significant difference in the rate of decrease of C2-C7 ROM between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

C3 laminectomy prevented interlaminar bony fusion at C2-C3. C3 laminectomy maintained cervical ROM in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. There were no adverse events due to C3 laminectomy at 10 years postsurgery.

Comparative Five-Year Surgical Outcomes of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Objective

To compare the five-year surgical outcomes between Open-Door laminoplasty (ODL) and French-Door laminoplasty (FDL) in the management of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

Methods

Sixty patients with MCSM, who were operated by ODL or FDL, were included in this study and followed up for at least 5 years. The average follow-up period was 69.2 ± 3.2 months. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score and radiological assessments including the Cobb angle and cervical range of motion (ROM) were evaluated and compared before surgery and at the final follow-up. The incidence of postoperative complications and medical costs were also compared.

Results

Both ODL and FDL groups achieved significant improvements of the mJOA score in postoperative 5 years; the average recovery rate (RR) of the mJOA score in the ODL and FDL groups was 72.14 ± 6.97% and 69.53 ± 7.51%, respectively. No statistically significant differences regarding the pre- and postoperative mJOA score, the RR of the mJOA score, the loss and the loss rate of the Cobb angle, and the incidence of postoperative complications existed between ODL and FDL. The mean loss and the loss rate of cervical ROM in the FDL group (18.70 ± 8.91°, 41.08 ± 11.17%) were significantly higher than those of the ODL group (13.81 ± 8.62°, 31.47 ± 12.43%) (P < 0.05). FDL reduced medical costs more greatly than ODL (33014.37 ± 3424.12 China Yuan versus 82096.62 ± 7093.07 China Yuan, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Both ODL and FDL are effective for MCSM. The 5-year neurological results are similar between the two groups. ODL trends to be superior to FDL in postoperative preservation of cervical ROM while FDL reduced medical costs more greatly.

C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty and in situ reconstruction of the midline structures maintained cervical sagittal balance: a retrospective matched-pair case-control study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Open-door laminoplasty often results in postoperative complications such as loss of cervical lordosis, limitations of cervical motion, and axial symptoms. However, current modified laminoplasty techniques such as muscle-sparing type or spinous process splitting technique are not as effective as expected.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty (preservation of posterior muscle-ligament complex and reconstruction of the midline structures) versus traditional open door laminoplasty in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred and eleven patients with multilevel cord compression and myelopathic symptoms.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome parameters were operation time, blood loss volume, complications, osseous fusion status, C0-C2 and C2-C7 Cobb angles, T1 slope, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical curvature index (CCI), range of motion (ROM), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the semispinalis cervicis, axial symptoms, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and neck disability index (NDI).

METHODS

We matched 37 patients who underwent modified laminoplasty with 74 patients treated by traditional open door laminoplasty (ratio, 1:2) according to age, sex, body mass index, compromised level, and radiographic characteristics. Preoperative and postoperative cervical parameters, namely, the C2-C7 Cobb angle, ROM, and CCI were measured on X-ray films. The CSA of the semispinalis cervicis was assessed on magnetic resonance images, and osseous fusion status of the hinge side and the osteotomy site was evaluated by computed tomography. We used the JOA and VAS scores, and the NDI to evaluate clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period in the modified group was 24.1 months (range, 18-37 months) compared with 24.7 months (range, 18-38 months) in the control group. At the final follow-up, C0-C2 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and cSVA increased in the control group and were unchanged in the modified group. The C2-C7 Cobb angle decreased significantly in the control group and did not change in the modified group. ROM and CCI loss rate did not change in the modified group but decreased significantly in the control group. The CSA loss in the semispinalis cervicis was 222.90±79.56 mm² in the control group and 49.11±75.93 mm² in the modified group, with a significant difference (p<.001). The final CSA of the semispinalis cervicis at C2 and C4-C7 levels showed no significant difference in the modified group and decreased significantly in the control group compared with preoperation. Changes in the C2-C7 Cobb angle and cSVA were both correlated with the CSA loss of the semispinalis cervicis (r=0.282, p=.003; r=0.267, p=.005, respectively). Moreover, the CSA loss of the semispinalis cervicis also correlated with the CCI loss rate and the changes in ROM (r=0.312, p=.001; r=0.287, p=.002, respectively). Clinical outcomes such as VAS and NDI scores, improved significantly more in the modified group versus the controls (p<.001 and p=.005, respectively), while JOA scores improved similarly in both groups (p=.132). The incidence of axial symptoms was significantly lower in the modified group versus controls (5.4% vs 9.5%, respectively; p=.023).

CONCLUSIONS

C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty is effective for treating patients with multilevel cord compression. This modified technique reconstructs the midline structures and may lead to improved alignment and less axial pain.

Ten-Year Surgical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for French-Door Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Objective

To analyze the ten-year surgical outcomes and postoperative complications of French-Door laminoplasty (FDL) in the management of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) and analyze the prognostic factors for FDL in treating MCSM.

Methods

64 patients with MCSM, who were operated by FDL, were included in this study and followed up for at least 10 years. Clinical assessments including modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, age at surgery, preoperative symptom duration, operative time, blood loss and postoperative complications, radiological assessments including Cobb angle, cervical range of motion (ROM), intramedullary signal intensity on T2W MRI, canal narrowing ratio (CNR), and maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC). mJOA score, Cobb angle, cervical ROM, intramedullary signal intensity on T2W MRI, and CNR were assessed before surgery and at the final follow-up.

Results

The average mJOA score was significantly improved from preoperative 10.32 ± 1.63 points to 15.10 ± 0.62 points at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The average RR of the mJOA score at the final follow-up was 69.10 ± 7.32%. The cervical Cobb angle and ROM decreased significantly at the final follow-up. Patients with high intramedullary signal intensity of T2W MRI or CNR more than 50% showed a lower RR of the mJOA score. Correlation analysis revealed that preoperative symptom duration and intramedullary signal intensity of T2W MRI, CNR, MSCC, and blood loss were significantly correlated with the RR of the mJOA score. Gender, operative method, and age at surgery were significantly correlated with the preservation rate of ROM. Operative time was significantly correlated with the incidence of axial symptoms.

Conclusions

The ten-year clinical outcomes of FDL were satisfactory. Higher intramedullary signal intensity of T2W MRI and a greater CNR predicted poorer prognoses.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Modified Unilateral Open-door Laminoplasty with Posterior Muscle-Ligament Complex Preservation for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

MINI: The surgical results of modified and traditional open-door laminoplasties were retrospectively compared. There were no differences in neurological outcomes and postoperative complications. However, compared with traditional laminoplasty, modified laminoplasty was associated with better maintenance of cervical curvature and ROM, as well as a lower incidence of postoperative axial symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of modified unilateral open-door laminoplasty with posterior muscle-ligament complex preservation in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The prevalence of axial symptoms after open-door laminoplasty ranges from 5% to 86%. Current modified laminoplasty techniques cannot satisfactorily reduce postoperative axial symptoms.

METHODS

From June 2014 to July 2016, 36 patients with CSM underwent modified laminoplasty with posterior muscle-ligament complex preservation (modified group) and 27 patients underwent traditional laminoplasty (control group). The demographics, operation duration, blood loss volume, cervical curvature, cervical curvature index (CCI), range of motion (ROM), cervical posterior muscle volume on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), axial symptoms, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and complications were recorded and analyzed before operation, after operation, and at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Cervical flexion curvature, cervical curvature, ROM, and CCI were better in the modified group than in controls at the final follow-up (P < 0.01). Postoperative VAS and NDI scores were significantly reduced in the modified group compared with controls (1.15 ± 0.76 vs. 2.63 ± 1.06, 5.67 ± 2.57 vs. 8.89 ± 5.37, respectively) (P < 0.01). Posterior muscle volume at the hinge side in the modified group was not different at final follow-up relative to that before the operation, whereas it was reduced in controls (P < 0.01). Finally, the incidence of axial symptoms was significantly lower in the modified group than in controls (6% vs. 22%) (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Modified unilateral open-door laminoplasty with posterior muscle-ligament complex preservation is effective for treating CSM with good recovery of neurological functions and satisfactory maintenance of cervical curvature and ROM. Furthermore, it reduces the incidence of postoperative axial symptoms compared with conventional open-door laminoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Development and Achievement of Cervical Laminoplasty and Related Studies on Cervical Myelopathy

Cervical laminoplasty (CL) is one of the surgical methods via the posterior approach for treating patients with multilevel affected cervical myelopathy (CM). The main purpose of CL is to decompress the cervical spinal cord by widening the narrowed spinal canal, combined with preserving the posterior anatomical structures to the degree possible and preserving the widened space stably. During the development and improvement of spine surgeries including CL, various studies on CM have progressed and useful achievements have been obtained: (1) posterior cervical spine fixation systems that can be used in combination with CL simultaneously have been developed; (2) various materials to stably maintain the enlarged spinal canal have been developed; (3) the main influential factors on the surgical results are the inner factors of the patients, such as the patient's age and the disease duration; (4) various surgical methods to preserve the function of the posterior cervical muscles have been tried to avoid postoperative kyphotic changes of the cervical spine; (5) postoperative complications, such as C5 palsy and axial pain, have been examined, and the countermeasures have been tried; (6) K-line on lateral X-ray films has been applied to evaluate the indication of CL in patients with CM due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) preoperatively; and (7) the method and idea of CL have been adapted to surgeries at the thoracic and lumbar spine. However, some issues remain to be resolved, such as the deterioration of neurological findings, especially in patients with continuous or mixed-type OPLL, the postoperative kyphotic-directional alignment change of the cervical spine, C5 palsy, and axial pain.

Clinical and radiologic outcomes of bone grafted and non-bone grafted double-door laminoplasty, the modified Kirita-Miyazaki method, for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Five-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To clarify whether there is any difference in mid-term clinical and radiologic outcomes between bone-grafted laminoplasty (BG LAMP) and non-bone-grafted laminoplasty (non-BG LAMP) when used to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND

Conventional BG LAMP includes bone grafting at the lamina hinge site to prevent closure of the lamina postoperatively, but it often results in segmental fusion and sometimes causes loss of cervical mobility and lordotic alignment. Non-BG LAMP can now be performed to address this problem and preserve mobility postoperatively. However, there have been no studies comparing BG LAMP and non-BG LAMP to date.

METHODS

Forty-one patients who underwent BG LAMP (n = 24) or non-BG LAMP (n = 17) and had 5 years of follow-up were enrolled in the study. Neurological status was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was used to assess neck pain after surgery at the final visit. Radiographic parameters were evaluated at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Postoperative segmental fusion was defined as the level at which the segmental flexion-extension range of motion was <1°.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in JOA score or recovery rate between the groups. NRS score was significantly lower in the BG group, indicating less neck pain (P < .01). The lordotic angle and range of motion at C2-C7 were significantly decreased in the BG group (P < .05). The segmental fusion was evident from 1 year postoperatively in both groups, but the fusion rate was significantly higher in the BG group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic outcomes were similar between the two groups, whereas axial symptom was lower in the BG group than in the non-BG group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Ⅳ.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neurosurgery: A Review of the Current Literature

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) play an important role in the evaluation of health outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction, and have been successfully utilized in many areas of clinical medicine and surgical practice. The prevalence of PROMs in neurosurgery is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To review the PROMs that have been utilized in the published neurosurgery literature to date.

METHODS

Articles were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, PsycARTICLES, and PsycINFO using search terms related to neurosurgery and PROMs, published from 1806 to August 2016. A total of 268 articles were identified that were stratified by the inclusion and exclusion criteria leading to a total of 137 articles. Twenty-six PROMs, involving both adult and pediatric populations, were identified.

RESULTS

A large number of generic and disease-specific PROMs are used in the neurosurgical literature. Generic PROMs are usually nonspecific measures of health status. Disease-specific PROMs may not address issues relevant to neurosurgical procedures. There are very few neurosurgery-specific PROMs that take into account the impact of a neurosurgical procedure on a specific condition.

CONCLUSION

PROMs that currently feature in the neurosurgical literature may not address the specific outcomes relevant to neurosurgical practice. There is an emergent need for generic and disease-specific PROMs to be validated in neurosurgical patients and neurosurgery-specific PROMs developed to address unmet needs of patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures.

Long-term results of a prospective study of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with laminoplasty for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND

There have been no prospective studies comparing anterior surgery and posterior method in terms of long-term outcomes. The purposes of this study is to clarify whether there is any difference in long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

Ninety-five patients were prospectively treated with ADF or LAMP for CSM in our hospital from 1996 through 2003. On alternate years, patients were enrolled to receive ADF (1997, 1999, 2001, and 2003: ADF group, n = 45) or LAMP (1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002: LAMP group, n = 50). We excluded 19 patients who died during follow-up, and 25 who were lost to follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups. Sagittal alignment of the C2-7 lordotic angle and range of motion (ROM) in flexion and extension on plain X-ray were measured.

RESULTS

Mean age at the time of surgery was 58.3 years in the ADF group and 57.9 years in the LAMP group. Mean preoperative JOA score was 10.0 and 10.5, respectively. Mean recovery rate of the JOA score at 3-5 years postoperatively was significantly higher in the ADF group (p < 0.05). Reoperation was required in 1 patient for pseudarthrosis and in 1 patient for recurrence of myelopathy in the ADF group; no patient in the LAMP group underwent a second surgery. There was a significant difference in maintenance of the lordotic angle in the ADF group compared with the LAMP group (p < 0.05), but not in ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ADF and LAMP provided similar good outcomes at 10-year time-point whereas ADF could achieve more satisfactory outcomes and better sagittal alignment at the middle-term. However, the incidence of reoperation and complication in the ADF group were higher than those in the LAMP group.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective comparative study (not randomized).

Predictors of Persistent Axial Neck Pain After Cervical Laminoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospective data.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to reveal baseline predictors of persistent postlaminoplasty neck pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Axial neck pain is one of the most common complications after cervical laminoplasty; however, baseline predictors of persistent postlaminoplasty neck pain are unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 156 patients who completed a 2-year follow-up after double-door laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy. Patients rated the average intensity of axial neck pain in the last month using an 11-point numerical rating scale preoperatively and at the 2-year follow-up. The dependent variable was the presence of moderate-to-severe neck pain (numerical rating scale ≥4) at the 2-year follow-up. The independent variables included patient characteristics, baseline radiological parameters, surgical variables, baseline axial neck pain intensity, and baseline functions, which were measured by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and the Short Form-36 survey (SF-36). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of moderate-to-severe neck pain after laminoplasty.

RESULTS

At the 2-year follow-up, 51 patients (32%) had moderate-to-severe neck pain, and 106 patients (68%) had no or mild pain. Univariate analysis revealed that the ratio of cervical anterolisthesis, ratio of current smoking, baseline neck pain intensity, and baseline SF-36 Mental Component Summary differed significantly between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that independent predictors of moderate-to-severe neck pain at the 2-year follow-up include the presence of anterolisthesis, current smoking, moderate-to-severe baseline neck pain, and lower SF-36 Mental Component Summary. The presence of anterolisthesis and moderate-to-severe baseline neck pain were also associated with significantly poorer physical function after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The presence of anterolisthesis was associated not only with the highest odds ratio of persistent neck pain but also with significantly poorer functional outcomes. Indications for cervical laminoplasty should be carefully determined in patients with cervical anterolisthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Laminoplasty Does not Lead to Worsening Axial Neck Pain in the Properly Selected Patient With Cervical Myelopathy: A Comparison With Laminectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if laminoplasty (LP) is associated with worsening axial neck pain in patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy, and to compare neck pain, clinical outcomes, and radiographic measures in a group undergoing laminectomy and fusion (LF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Postoperative new or worsening axial neck pain is commonly cited as a major disadvantage of laminoplasty. However, there remains a paucity of corroborative data from large series.

METHODS

Following institutional review board approval, we reviewed the medical records, radiographs, and prospective clinical outcomes database of 85 patients undergoing LP and 52 patients undergoing LF for cervical myelopathy with minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up and average clinical follow-up of 18.5 months. LP was performed in those with neutral to lordotic C2-7 alignment and who did not complain of diffuse axial pain. Otherwise, LF was performed. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue score (VAS)-neck pain, VAS-total pain, neck disability index (NDI), short form 36, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), and several radiographic parameters.

RESULTS

VAS-neck did not worsen in LP (-0.2, P = 0.54) and did improve in LF (-2.0, P = 0.0013). VAS-total improved significantly in both groups (LF -1.04 ± 0.52, P = 0.05; LP -1.4 ± 0.51, P = 0.008). NDI improved in both groups, but was significant in only LP (LP decreased 6.79 ± 2.25, P = 0.0032; LF decreased 4.01 ± 3.05, P = 0.19). mJOA scores improved significantly in both groups (LP improved 2.89 ± 0.27, P < 0.0001; LF improved 2.45 ± 0.33, P < 0.0001). There was a small loss of cervical lordosis in both groups that was significant in LP (LP 2.92° loss, P = 0.0181; LF 1.25° loss, P = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

In a carefully selected group of myelopathic patients without significant diffuse axial pain preoperatively and appropriate sagittal alignment, laminoplasty did not lead to worsening axial neck pain, and it was associated with significant improvements in other clinical and myelopathy outcomes. Although laminoplasty is not indicated in every myelopathic patient, this study exemplifies its efficacy as a non-fusion operation in the appropriately selected patient and assuages concerns regarding worsening axial neck pain in such patients following surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Impact of wedge-shaped resection of the posterior bony arch on postoperative outcomes after open door laminoplasty in the cervical spine: a 2-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Open door laminoplasty (ODLP) can also lead to significant postoperative motion restriction that further increases over time, for which one of the possible factors is the bony impingement between neighboring posterior bony arches. Previously, we reported this phenomenon and modified technique of ODLP, wedge-shaped resection of the posterior bony arch that produced greater range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine and less posterior neck pain compared with conventional ODLP (cODLP) in 1-year follow-up time, but no longer follow-up outcomes of the surgical technique has been reported.

PURPOSE

The study aimed to thoroughly evaluate the impact of posterior bony impingement following ODLP on postoperative cervical motion and related outcomes, and to compare postoperative outcomes of conventional ODLP (cODLP with those of modified ODLP (mODLP) in 2-year follow-up times.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective comparative study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 145 patients who underwent cODLP or mODLP and were followed up for at least 2 years were classified into two groups: Group A (cODLP, 79 patients) and Group B (mODLP, 66 patients).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was ROM of the cervical spine. Secondary outcome measures included (1) patient satisfaction, (2) radiological outcomes, including the rate of bony impingement and spontaneous fusion, and bone regrowth of the resection site, (3) clinical outcomes based on pain intensity and scores on the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) and neck disability index (NDI), (4) surgical outcomes, and (5) surgery-related complications.

METHODS

We compared baseline data in both groups. To evaluate the impact of our surgical modification on postoperative outcome after ODLP, we compared the outcome measures in 2-year follow-up times. No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

RESULTS

The ROM of the cervical spine was significantly greater in Group B 2 years after surgery than in Group A (p=.001). Patient satisfaction (p=.02) at 2 years after surgery and pain intensity of the posterior neck at 1 (p=.01) and 2 years (p<.01) after surgery were better in Group B than in Group A. Radiological evidence of posterior bony impingement and spontaneous fusion between ODLPsegments were definitely fewer less in Group B than in Group A (p<.001 and<0.001, respectively). The mean value of bone regrowth was 1.2 mm (range, 0-3 mm). The NDI and SF-12 scores did not differ significantly between groups. Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that posterior bony impingement can be a factor in ROM restriction after cODLP surgery and that wedge-shaped resection during ODLP can be a reliable option for preserving cervical ROM and improving postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes.

Minimum Clinically Important Difference: Current Trends in the Spine Literature

STUDY DESIGN

Review of the 2011 to 2015 minimum clinically important difference (MCID)-related publications in Spine, Spine Journal, Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine, and European Spine Journal.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the various determinations of MCID and to analyze its usage in the spine literature of the past 5 years in order to develop a basic reference to help practitioners interpret or utilize MCID.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MCID represents the smallest change in a domain of interest that is considered beneficial to a patient or clinician. The many sources of variation in calculated MCID values and inconsistency in its utilization have resulted in confusion in the interpretation and use of MCID.

METHODS

All articles from 2011 to 2015 were reviewed. Only clinical science articles utilizing patient reported outcome scores (PROs) were included in the analysis. A keyword search was then performed to identify articles that used MCID. MCID utilization in the selected papers was characterized and recorded.

RESULTS

MCID was referenced in 264/1591 (16.6%) clinical science articles that utilized PROs: 22/264 (8.3%) independently calculated MCID values and 156/264 (59.1%) used previously published MCID values as a gauge of their own results. Despite similar calculation methods, there was a two- or three-fold range in the recommended MCID values for the same instrument. Half the studies recommended MCID values within the measurement error. Most studies (97.2%) using MCID to evaluate their own results relied on generic MCID. The few studies using specific MCID (MCID calculated for narrowly defined indications or treatments) did not consistently match the characteristics of their sample to the specificity of the MCID. About 48% of the studies compared group averages instead of individual scores to the MCID threshold.

CONCLUSION

Despite a clear interest in MCID as a measure of patient improvement, its current developments and uses have been inconsistent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Which Technique Is Better Option for C3 Segment in Multilevel Open-Door Laminoplasty of the Cervical Spine?: Laminectomy Versus Laminoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

A post-hoc comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate postoperative clinical, radiological, and surgical outcomes after laminoplasty (LP) involving the C3 segment and to compare outcomes with those of patients who underwent LP with C3 laminectomy (LN).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In many of the pathologies that require LP involving C3 segment, most spine surgeons perform LP at C3 and other cervical segments. Considering the peculiarities of the C2-C3 level, spine surgeons should take into account those in LP involving the C3 segment, but the particular aspects of the C2-C3 levels have not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

Of 93 patients, 66 patients (39 in group A, LP involving C3; 27 in group B, LP with C3 LN) were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity of the posterior neck measured with visual analog scale. Secondary endpoints included the following: (1) radiologic outcomes based on the cervical range of motion and rate of bony impingement and spontaneous fusion between C2 and C3, (2) clinical outcomes based on the 12-item short-form health survey and Japanese Orthopedic Association scale, and (3) surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

The primary end-point of the present study, posterior neck pain, exhibited a greater improvement in the group with C3 LN than in the group with C3 LP at 6 months and 1 year after surgery (P = 0.03 and 0.01, respectively). The cervical range of motion of C3 LN group was significantly greater than C3 LP group at postoperative 1 year (P = 0.02). Radiologic evidences of bony impingement and spontaneous fusion between C2 and C3 were significantly greater in C3 LP group than in C3 LN group. Clinical outcomes and surgical outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

We recommend performing LN instead of LP for the C3 segment in cases requiring multilevel LP surgery involving C3.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Wedge-Shaped Resection of the Posterior Bony Arch During Open Door Laminoplasty to Prevent Postoperative Motion Limitation

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized double-arm noninferiority study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an additional surgical procedure (wedge-shaped resection of the cranial portion of the posterior bony arch) during open-door laminoplasty (ODLP), and to compare the outcomes with those of conventional ODLP surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In clinical practice, spine surgeons sometimes encounter patients who show bony impingement on lateral radiographs after ODLP; bony impingement may lead to reduced motion of the cervical spine and posterior neck pain. However, this problem has not been well studied, and no methods have been developed to prevent it.

METHODS

Of total 79 patients, 75 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either group A (additional procedure in ODLP, n = 38) or group B (ODLP alone, n = 37). The primary outcome measure was range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine. Secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes based on pain intensity, 12-item short form health survey (SF-12), and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scale; presence of bony impingement on dynamic lateral radiographs; surgical outcomes; and surgery-related complications.

RESULTS

ROM of the cervical spine was significantly greater at 6 months (P = 0.04) and 1 year (P = 0.02) postoperative in group A than in group B. Pain intensity at the posterior neck was significantly lower 1 year after surgery in group A than in group B (P = 0.03). In lateral radiographs 1 year after surgery, the presence of posterior bony impingement was 0% in group A and 32.4% in group B (P <0.01). Clinical outcomes and surgery-related complications were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Performing wedge-shaped resection of the cranial portion of the posterior bony arch in ODLP surgery can lead to better outcomes than ODLP alone in terms of preservation of cervical ROM, prevention of posterior bony impingement, and amelioration of posterior neck pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.