Improving the Accuracy of Cardiovascular Component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score*:

External validation of a modified cardiovascular sequential organ failure assessment score in patients with suspected infection using the MIMIC-IV database

We developed a modified cardiovascular (CV) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score using an emergency department-based cohort data, incorporating norepinephrine equivalent dose and lactate to represent current clinical practice patterns for vasopressor utilization and the diagnostic significance of lactate, respectively. In this study, we sought to validate this modified CV-SOFA score in intensive care unit patients with suspected infection using the Marketplace for Medical Information in Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. This was a retrospective study that utilized data from the MIMIC-IV database. Modified CV/total SOFA score and original CV/total SOFA score were compared for predicting in-hospital mortality. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the calibration curve were employed to evaluate discrimination and calibration, respectively. A total of 29,618 ICU patients with suspected infections was analyzed. The in-hospital mortality rate was 12.4% (n = 3,675). Modified CV-SOFA score (AUROC 0.667; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.657-0.677 vs. 0.663; 95% CI 0.654-0.673; p = 0.283) and modified total SOFA score (0.784 [95% CI 0.776-0.793] vs. 0.785 [95% CI 0.777-0.793], p = 0.490) did not differ significantly from the original CV-SOFA score and original total SOFA score, respectively. The calibration curve of the original CV-SOFA score was inferior to that of the modified CV-SOFA score. The modified CV- and total SOFA scores were better calibrated than the original CV- and total SOFA scores, but their discriminative performance was not significantly different. Further studies of the modified CV-SOFA score in different settings and populations are required to assess the generalizability of this score.

Noradrenaline dose cutoffs to characterise the severity of cardiovascular failure: Data-based development and external validation

BACKGROUND

The vasopressor dose needed is a common measure to assess the severity of cardiovascular failure, but there is no consensus on the ranges of vasopressor doses determining different levels of cardiovascular support. We aimed to identify cutoffs for determining low, intermediate and high doses of noradrenaline (norepinephrine), the primary vasopressor used in intensive care, based on association with hospital mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a binational registry study to determine cutoffs between low, intermediate and high noradrenaline doses. We required the cutoffs to be statistically rational and practical (rounded to the first decimal and easy to remember), and to result in increasing mortality with increasing doses. The highest noradrenaline dose in the first 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission was used. The cutoffs were developed using data from 8079 ICU patients treated in the ICU at Kuopio University Hospital, Finland, between 2013 and 2019. Subsequently, the cutoffs were validated in the eICU database, including 39,007 ICU admissions to 29 ICUs in the United States of America in 2014-2015. The log-rank statistic, with the Contal and O'Quigley method, was used to determine the cutoffs resulting in the most significant split between the noradrenaline dose groups with regard to hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The two most prominent peaks in the log-rank statistic corresponded to noradrenaline doses 0.20 and 0.44 μg/kg/min. Accordingly, we determined three dose ranges: low (<0.2 μg/kg/min), intermediate (0.2-0.4 μg/kg/min) and high (>0.4 μg/kg/min). Mortality increased, whereas the number of patients decreased consistently with increasing noradrenaline doses in both cohorts. In the development cohort, hospital mortality was 6.5% in the group without noradrenaline administered and 14.0%, 26.4% and 40.2%, respectively, in the low-dose, intermediate-dose and high-dose groups. Compared to patients who received no noradrenaline, the hazard ratio for in-hospital death was 1.4 for the low-dose group, 4.0 for the intermediate-dose group and 7.5 for the high-dose group in the validation cohort (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The highest noradrenaline dose is a useful measure for quantifying circulatory failure. Cutoffs 0.2 and 0.4 μg/kg/min seem to be suitable for defining low, intermediate and high doses.

Shock Severity Classification and Mortality in Adults With Cardiac, Medical, Surgical, and Neurological Critical Illness

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Classification could perform risk stratification in a mixed cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, similar to its validation in patients with acute cardiac disease.

METHODS

We included 21,461 adult Mayo Clinic ICU patient admissions from December 1, 2014, to February 28, 2018, including cardiac ICU (16.7%), medical ICU (37.4%), neurosciences ICU (27.7%), and surgical ICU (18.2%). The SCAI Shock Classification (a 5-stage classification from no shock [A] to refractory shock [E]) was assigned in each 4-hour period during the first 24 hours of ICU admission.

RESULTS

The median age was 65 years, and 43.2% were female. In-hospital mortality occurred in 1611 (7.5%) patients, with a stepwise increase in in-hospital mortality in each higher maximum SCAI Shock stage overall: A, 4.0%; B, 4.6%; C, 7.0%; D, 13.9%; and E, 40.2%. The SCAI Shock Classification provided incremental mortality risk stratification in each ICU, with the best performance in the cardiac ICU and the worse performance in the neurosciences ICU. The SCAI Shock Classification was associated with higher adjusted in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.32 per each stage; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.41; P<.001); this association was not observed in the neurosciences ICU when considered separately.

CONCLUSION

The SCAI Shock Classification provided incremental mortality risk stratification beyond established prognostic markers across the spectrum of medical and surgical critical illness, proving utility outside its original intent.

Quality Improvement Projects and Anesthesiology Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review

Quality improvement (QI) projects are essential components of graduate medical education and healthcare organizations to improve patient outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature on QI projects in anesthesiology graduate medical education programs to assess whether these projects are leading to publications. A literature search was conducted in July 2023, using PubMed, Embase, and the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for articles describing QI initiatives originating within the United States and applicable to anesthesiology residency training programs. The following data were collected: intervention(s), sample size (number of participants or events), outcome metric(s), result(s), and conclusion(s). One hundred and fifty publications were identified, and 31 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2,259 residents and 72,889 events were included in this review. Educational modalities, such as simulation, training sessions, or online curricula, were the most prevalent interventions in the included studies. Pre-intervention and post-intervention assessments were the most common outcome metrics reported. Our review of the literature demonstrates that few QI projects performed within anesthesiology training programs lead to published manuscripts. Further research should aim at increasing the impact of required QI projects within the sponsoring institution and specialty.

Clinical success of anti-infective combination therapy compare to monotherapy in patients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: a 10-years retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection has become a major public health concern. The recommendations for monotherapy and combination therapy in the current guidelines lack sufficient evidence to support them. The primary objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of anti-Infective combination therapy compared to monotherapy in achieving clinical success in patients with CRPA infection and risk factors of clinical failure of monotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective study from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) was conducted. We included adults with infections caused by CRPA. The outcomes of this study were clinical success, complete clinical success, and 28-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 279 subjects were finally enrolled. The rate of clinical success for combination therapy was higher than that for monotherapy (73.1% versus 60.4%, p=0.028). Compared to clinical failure patients, patients in the clinical success group were more likely to die within 28 days after CRPA was found (48.3% versus 3.6%, p<0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, monotherapy was found to be significantly correlated with clinical success (OR, 0.559, 95% CI, 0.321-0.976; p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy is more effective for CRPA infection patients, especially those whose SOFA score is ≥ 2 or whose Charlson comorbidity index is ≥ 6.

Vasoactive Inotropic Score compared to the sequential organ failure assessment cardiovascular score in intensive care

BACKGROUND

The cardiovascular component of the sequential organ failure assessment (cvSOFA) score may be outdated because of changes in intensive care. Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS) represents the weighted sum of vasoactive and inotropic drugs. We investigated the association of VIS with mortality in the general intensive care unit (ICU) population and studied whether replacing cvSOFA with a VIS-based score improves the accuracy of the SOFA score as a predictor of mortality.

METHODS

We studied the association of VIS during the first 24 h after ICU admission with 30-day mortality in a retrospective study on adult medical and non-cardiac emergency surgical patients admitted to Kuopio University Hospital ICU, Finland, in 2013-2019. We determined the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the original SOFA and for SOFAVISmax , where cvSOFA was replaced with maximum VIS (VISmax ) categories.

RESULTS

Of 8079 patients, 1107 (13%) died within 30 days. Mortality increased with increasing VISmax . AUROC was 0.813 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.800-0.825) for original SOFA and 0.822 (95% CI: 0.810-0.834) for SOFAVISmax , p < .001.

CONCLUSION

Mortality increased consistently with increasing VISmax . Replacing cvSOFA with VISmax improved the predictive accuracy of the SOFA score.

RIGHT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION IN SEPSIS: AN UPDATED NARRATIVE REVIEW

ABSTRACT

Sepsis is a multisystem disease process, which constitutes a significant public health challenge and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Among other systems, sepsis is known to affect the cardiovascular system, which may manifest as myocardial injury, arrhythmias, refractory shock, and/or septic cardiomyopathy. Septic cardiomyopathy is defined as the reversible systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction of one or both ventricles. Left ventricle dysfunction has been extensively studied in the past, and its prognostic role in patients with sepsis is well documented. However, there is relatively scarce literature on right ventricle (RV) dysfunction and its role. Given the importance of timely detection of septic cardiomyopathy and its bearing on prognosis of patients, the role of RV dysfunction has come into renewed focus. Hence, through this review, we sought to describe the pathophysiology of RV dysfunction in sepsis and what have we learnt so far about its multifactorial nature. We also elucidate the roles of different biomarkers for its detection and prognosis, along with appropriate management of such patient population.

Ability of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score to predict mortality among sepsis patients in a resource-limited setting

Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society ofCritical Care MedicineThis is an Open Access article distributedunder the terms of Creative Attributions Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/li-censes/by-nc/4.0/) which permitsunrestricted noncommercial use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided theoriginal work is properly cited.https://www.accjournal.org 363INTRODUCTIONSepsis is a life-threatening condition and constitutes major health care problems around the world [1,2]. Sepsis was associated with nearly 20% of all global deaths, and the majority of sepsis cases occurred in low- or middle-income countries [1]. In 2017, the World Health Organization recommended actions to reduce the global burden of sepsis [2]. Sepsis has been defined as acute life-threatening organ dysfunction due to dysregulation of host responses toBackground: Some variables of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score are not routinely measured in sepsis patients, especially in countries with limited resources. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the modified SOFA (mSOFA) and compared its ability to predict mortality in sepsis patients to that of the original SOFA score.Methods: Sepsis patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit of Songklanagarind Hospital between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality.Results: A total of 1,522 sepsis patients were enrolled. The mean SOFA and mSOFA scores were 9.7±4.3 and 8.8±3.9, respectively. The discrimination of the mSOFA score was significantly higher than that of the SOFA score for all-cause in-hospital mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.891 [95% confidence interval, 0.875–0.907] vs. 0.879 [0.862–0.896]; P<0.001), all-cause intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (0.880 [0.863–0.898] vs. 0.871 [0.853–0.889], P=0.01) and all-cause 28-day mortality (0.887 [0.871–0.904] vs. 0.874 [0.856–0.892], P<0.001). The ability of mSOFA score to predict all-cause in-hospital and 28-day mortality was higher than that of the SOFA score within the subgroups of sepsis according to age, sepsis severity and serum lactate levels. The mSOFA score was demonstrated to have a performance similar to the original SOFA score regarding the prediction of mortality in sepsis patients with cirrhosis or hepatic dysfunction.Conclusions: The mSOFA score was a good alternative to the original SOFA core in predicting mortality among sepsis patients admitted to the ICU.

Predictive accuracy of the modified SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for uroseptic shock after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

The purpose of this study was to determine the plausibility and utility of utilizing a modified SOFA (mSOFA) score for predicting uroseptic shock after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A cohort of 707 patients who received mini-PCNL from August 2019 to December 2020 was retrospectively evaluated. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare the predictive value of septic shock between mSOFA, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and qSOFA. Among 707 patients, 24 patients experienced uroseptic shock after mini-PCNL. Compared with the no uroseptic shock group, the proportion of females and rates of preoperative urine culture, renal pelvis urine culture and stone culture positivity were higher in the uroseptic shock group, with high levels of preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and postoperative procalcitonin (PCT). In the uroseptic shock group, the mSOFA score increased by two or more points in 83.3%; 79.2% had at least two SIRS criteria, and 100% had a qSOFA score of at least one point. mSOFA score (AUROC = 0.866, 95% CI: 0.779-0.954) exhibited greater discrimination for uroseptic shock after PCNL than SIRS (AUROC = 0.838, 95% CI: 0.742-0.943) and qSOFA (AUROC = 0.851, 95% CI: 0.811-0.892). In conclusion, the predictive value of the modified SOFA score for uroseptic shock after mini-PCNL was greater than that of the qSOFA score or SIRS.

A Clinical Update on Vasoactive Medication in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock

This is a focused review looking at the pharmacological support in cardiogenic shock. There are a plethora of data evaluating vasopressors and inotropes in septic shock, but the data are limited for cardiogenic shock. This review article describes in detail the pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock, the mechanism of action of different vasopressors and inotropes emphasizing their indications and potential side effects. This review article incorporates the currently used specific risk-prediction models in cardiogenic shock as well as integrates data from many trials on the use of vasopressors and inotropes. Lastly, this review seeks to discuss the future direction for vasoactive medications in cardiogenic shock.

Shock Severity Assessment in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Mixed Septic-Cardiogenic Shock

We sought to validate the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) cardiogenic shock classification for mortality risk stratification in patients with sepsis and concomitant cardiovascular disease or mixed septic-cardiogenic shock. We conducted a single-center retropective cohort study of cardiac intensive care unit patients with an admission diagnosis of sepsis. We used clinical, vital sign, and laboratory data during the first 24 hours after admission to assign SCAI shock stage. We included 605 patients with a median age of 69.4 years (interquartile range, 57.9 to 79.8 years), 222 of whom (36.7%) were female. Acute coronary syndrome or heart failure was present in 480 patients (79.3%), and cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest was present in 271 patients (44.8%). The median day 1 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) cardiovascular subscore was 1.5 (interquartile range, 1 to 4), and the admission SCAI shock stage distribution was stage B, 40.7% (246); stage C, 19.3% (117); stage D, 32.9% (199); and stage E, 7.1% (43). In-hospital mortality occurred in 177 of the 605 patients (29.3%) and increased incrementally with higher SCAI shock stage. After multivariable adjustment, admission SCAI shock stage was associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio per stage, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.88; P=.003). Admission SCAI shock stage had higher discrimination for in-hospital mortality than the day 1 SOFA cardiovascular subscore (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.68 vs 0.64; P=.04 by the DeLong test). Admission SCAI shock stage was associated with 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio per stage, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.37; P=.02). The SCAI shock classification provides improved mortality risk stratification over the day 1 SOFA cardiovascular subscore in cardiac intensive care unit patients with sepsis and concomitant cardiovascular disease or mixed septic-cardiogenic shock.

Current Utility of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score: A Literature Review and Future Directions

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is commonly used in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to evaluate, prognosticate and assess patients. Since its validation, the SOFA score has served in various settings, including medical, trauma, surgical, cardiac, and neurological ICUs. It has been a strong mortality predictor and literature over the years has documented the ability of the SOFA score to accurately distinguish survivors from non-survivors on admission. Over the years, multiple variations have been proposed to the SOFA score, which have led to the evolution of alternate validated scoring models replacing one or more components of the SOFA scoring system. Various SOFA based models have been used to evaluate specific clinical populations, such as patients with cardiac dysfunction, hepatic failure, renal failure, different races and public health illnesses, etc. This study is aimed to conduct a review of modifications in SOFA score in the past several years. We review the literature evaluating various modifications to the SOFA score such as modified SOFA, Modified SOFA, modified Cardiovascular SOFA, Extra-renal SOFA, Chronic Liver Failure SOFA, Mexican SOFA, quick SOFA, Lactic acid quick SOFA (LqSOFA), SOFA in hematological malignancies, SOFA with Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale and Pediatric SOFA. Various organ systems, their relevant scoring and the proposed modifications in each of these systems are presented in detail. There is a need to incorporate the most recent literature into the SOFA scoring system to make it more relevant and accurate in this rapidly evolving critical care environment. For future directions, we plan to put together most if not all updates in SOFA score and probably validate it in a large database a single institution and validate it in multisite data base.

A time-sensitive analysis of the prognostic utility of vasopressor dose in septic shock

It is unclear whether the association between vasopressor dose and mortality is affected by duration of administration. We examined whether prognostication in septic shock is feasible through the use of daily median vasopressor doses. We undertook a single-centre retrospective cohort study. We included patients with a diagnosis of septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK, between April 2016 and July 2019. The primary outcome measure was 90-day mortality. We defined vasopressor dose as the median norepinephrine equivalent dose (equivalent infusion rates of all vasopressors and inotropes) recorded for each day, for the first four days of septic shock. We divided patients into groups by vasopressor dose quintiles and calculated their 90-day mortality rate. We examined area under the receiver operator characteristic curves for prognostic ability. In total, 844 patients were admitted with septic shock and had a 90-day mortality of 43% (n = 358). Over the first four days, median vasopressor dose decreased in 93% of survivors and increased in 56% of non-survivors. The mortality rate associated with a given vasopressor dose quintile increased on sequential days of septic shock. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves of daily median vasopressor dose against mortality increased from day 1 to day 4 (0.67 vs. 0.86, p < 0.0001). By day 4, a median daily vasopressor dose > 0.05 μg.kg^-1 .min^-1 had an 80% sensitivity and specificity for mortality. The prognostic utility of vasopressor dose improved considerably with shock duration. Prolonged administration of small vasopressor doses was associated with a high attributable mortality.

Vasoactive-Inotropic Score as an Early Predictor of Mortality in Adult Patients with Sepsis

Vasoactive and inotropic medications are essential for sepsis management; however, the association between the maximum Vasoactive-Inotropic score (VISmax) and clinical outcomes is unknown in adult patients with sepsis. We investigated the VISmax as a predictor for mortality among such patients in the emergency department (ED) and compared its prognostic value with that of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. This single-center retrospective study included 910 patients diagnosed with sepsis between January 2016 and March 2020. We calculated the VISmax using the highest doses of vasopressors and inotropes administered during the first 6 h on ED admission and categorized it as 0–5, 6–15, 16–30, 31–45, and >45 points. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. VISmax for 30-day mortality was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. The mortality rates in the five VISmax groups were 17.2%, 20.8%, 33.3%, 54.6%, and 70.0%, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of VISmax to predict 30-day mortality was 31. VISmax had better prognostic value than the cardiovascular component of the SOFA score and initial lactate levels. VISmax was comparable to the APACHE II score in predicting 30-day mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that VISmax 16–30, 31–45, and >45 were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. VISmax in ED could help clinicians to identify sepsis patients with poor prognosis.

Multiple organ injury on admission predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19

Multiorgan injury has been implicated in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). We aim to assess the impact of organ injury (OI) on prognosis according to the number of affected organs at admission. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with confirmed COVID‐19 in Wuhan Third Hospital & Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University from February 17 to March 22, 2020. We classified the patients according to the presence and number of damaged organs (heart, liver, and kidney). The percentage of patients with no, one, two, or three organs affected was 59.75%, 30.46%, 8.07%, and 1.72%, respectively. With the increasing number of OI, there is a tendency of gradual increase regarding the white blood cell counts, neutrophil counts, levels of C‐reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase, D‐dimer, and fibrinogen as well as the incidence of most complications. In a Cox regression model, individuals with OI, old age, and an abnormal level of CRP were at a higher risk of death compared with those without. Patients with three organ injuries had the highest mortality rate (57.9%; hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI] vs. patients without OI: 22.31 [10.42–47.77], those with two [23.6%; HR = 8.68, 95% CI = 4.58–16.48], one [8.6%; HR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.7–5.7], or no OI [2.6%]; p < .001). The increasing number of OI was associated with a high risk of mortality in COVID‐19 infection.

Natriuretic Peptides to Predict Short-Term Mortality in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Data are conflicting regarding the optimal cutoffs of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to predict short-term mortality in patients with sepsis. We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus) for English-language reports of studies evaluating adult patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock with BNP/NT-proBNP levels and short-term mortality (intensive care unit, in-hospital, 28-day, or 30-day) published from January 1, 2000, to September 5, 2017. The average values in survivors and nonsurvivors were used to estimate the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using a parametric regression model. Thirty-five observational studies (3508 patients) were included (median age, 51-75 years; 12%-74% males; cumulative mortality, 34.2%). A BNP of 622 pg/mL had the greatest discrimination for mortality (sensitivity, 0.695 [95% CI, 0.659-0.729]; specificity, 0.907 [95% CI, 0.810-1.003]; area under the ROC, 0.766 [95% CI, 0.734-0.797]). An NT-proBNP of 4000 pg/mL had the greatest discrimination for mortality (sensitivity, 0.728 [95% CI, 0.703-0.753]; specificity, 0.789 [95% CI, 0.710-0.867]; area under the ROC, 0.787 [95% CI, 0.766-0.809]). In prespecified subgroup analyses, identified BNP/NT-proBNP cutoffs had higher discrimination if specimens were obtained 24 hours or less after admission, in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, in patients enrolled after 2010, and in studies performed in the United States and Europe. There was inconsistent adjustment for renal function. In this hypothesis-generating analysis, BNP and NT-proBNP cutoffs of 622 pg/mL and 4000 pg/mL optimally predicted short-term mortality in patients with sepsis. The applicability of these results is limited by the heterogeneity of included patient populations.

Modification of sequential organ failure assessment score using acute kidney injury classification

PURPOSE

To assess the predictive validity of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, of which the renal component was replaced with Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a prospective cohort study on AKI in Japan, we replaced the renal component of SOFA score with AKI stages according to the KDIGO criteria except that initiation of renal replacement therapy was assigned four points. We assessed the predictive validity of KDIGO-based SOFA score for hospital and ICU mortality by comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) derived from logistic regression models with that of the original SOFA score.

RESULTS

2292 patients were registered. Overall hospital mortality was 11.6%, and ICU mortality was 5.1%. KDIGO-based SOFA score was moderately correlated with APACHE II score (rho = 0.476). The AUC for hospital and ICU mortality of KDIGO-based and the original SOFA score were 0.749 vs 0.745 (p = .393) and 0.790 vs 0.791 (p = .900).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic performance of KDIGO-based SOFA score was not superior but comparable to that of the original SOFA score.

Development and performance of a novel vasopressor-driven mortality prediction model in septic shock

Background

Vasoactive medications are essential in septic shock, but are not fully incorporated into current mortality prediction risk scores. We sought to develop a novel mortality prediction model for septic shock incorporating quantitative vasoactive medication usage.

Methods

Quantitative vasopressor use was calculated in a cohort of 5352 septic shock patients and compared using norepinephrine equivalents (NEE), cumulative vasopressor index and the vasoactive inotrope score models. Having best discrimination prediction, log₁₀NEE was selected for further development of a novel prediction model for 28-day and 1-year mortality via backward stepwise logistic regression. This model termed ‘MAVIC’ (Mechanical ventilation, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation-III, Vasopressors, Inotropes, Charlson comorbidity index) was then compared to Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation-III (APACHE-III) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores in an independent validation cohort for its accuracy in predicting 28-day and 1-year mortality.

Measurements and main results

The MAVIC model was superior to the APACHE-III and SOFA scores in its ability to predict 28-day mortality (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.73 vs. 0.66 and 0.60) and 1-year mortality (AUROC 0.74 vs. 0.66 and 0.60), respectively.

Conclusions

The incorporation of quantitative vasopressor usage into a novel ‘MAVIC’ model results in superior 28-day and 1-year mortality risk prediction in a large cohort of patients with septic shock.

Validation of a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score using Electronic Health Record Data

The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score is a scoring system commonly used in critical care to assess severity of illness. Automated calculation of the SOFA score using existing electronic health record data would broaden its applicability. We performed a manual validation of an automated SOFA score previously developed at our institution. A retrospective analysis of a random subset of 300 patients from a previously published randomized trial of critically ill adults was performed, with manual validation of SOFA scores from the date of initial intensive care unit admission. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, weighted Cohen's kappa, and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between manual and electronic versions of SOFA scores and between manual and electronic versions of their individual components. There was high agreement between manual and electronic SOFA scores (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.93). Renal and respiratory components had lower agreement (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.73 for renal; weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.77, 95% CI 0.70-0.84 for respiratory). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for 30-day in-hospital mortality was 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.84) for manual SOFA scores and 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.83) for automated SOFA scores. Automatic calculation of SOFA scores from the electronic health record is feasible and correlates highly with manually calculated SOFA scores. Both have similar predictive value for 30-day in-hospital mortality.

Use of Cold Fluids in Postcardiac Arrest Therapeutic Hypothermia: A Safety Analysis

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) has been part of the standard care of postresuscitation patients for more than a decade. Multiple cooling methods are available, including the administration of cold intravenous (IV) fluids. Although this method is widely used, the safety of administration of large volumes of cold IV fluids has not been clearly demonstrated in the literature, and recent evidence points to potential deleterious effects associated with administration of large IV fluid volumes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients who have been treated with TH after cardiac arrest between November 2011 and November 2013 at a tertiary care hospital in Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. The primary outcome was the effect of IV fluid quantity on the 28-day survival rate. We reviewed 29 cases, with a total 28-day surviving rate of 51.7%. After adjusting for confounding variables, 28-day surviving rate was not significantly associated with the amount of fluids administrated (odds ratio = 1.034; confidence interval 95% [0.741-1.464]; p = 0.85). The amount of fluids did not influence the variation of the pulmonary component of the sequential organ failure assessment score between days 1 and 3 (ρ = -0.2, p = 0.34). Despite a small sample of patients, cold IV fluids in TH appear safe in the postcardiac arrest population. These findings should be reproduced in a larger, prospective study.

Clinical profile and outcomes of acute cardiorenal syndrome type-5 in sepsis: An eight-year cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical features and outcomes of acute cardiorenal syndrome type-5 in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

METHODS

Historical cohort study of all adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) at Mayo Clinic Rochester from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2014. Patients with prior renal or cardiac dysfunction were excluded. Patients were divided into groups with and without cardiorenal syndrome type-5. Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) was defined by both serum creatinine and urine output criteria of the AKI Network and the cardiac injury was determined by troponin-T levels. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, and one-year survival.

RESULTS

Of 602 patients meeting the study inclusion criteria, 430 (71.4%) met criteria for acute cardiorenal syndrome type-5. Patients with cardiorenal syndrome type-5 had higher severity of illness, greater vasopressor and mechanical ventilation use. Cardiorenal syndrome type-5 was associated higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and lower one-year survival. When adjusted for age, gender, severity of illness and mechanical ventilation, cardiorenal syndrome type-5 was independently associated with 1.7-times greater odds of in-hospital mortality (p = .03), but did not predict one-year survival (p = .06) compared to patients without cardiorenal syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

In sepsis, acute cardiorenal syndrome type-5 is associated with worse in-hospital mortality compared to patients without cardiorenal syndrome.

Impact of clinical context on acute kidney injury biomarker performances: differences between neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and L-type fatty acid-binding protein

Application of acute kidney injury (AKI) biomarkers with consideration of nonrenal conditions and systemic severity has not been sufficiently determined. Herein, urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), L-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) and nonrenal disorders, including inflammation, hypoperfusion and liver dysfunction, were evaluated in 249 critically ill patients treated at our intensive care unit. Distinct characteristics of NGAL and L-FABP were revealed using principal component analysis: NGAL showed linear correlations with inflammatory markers (white blood cell count and C-reactive protein), whereas L-FABP showed linear correlations with hypoperfusion and hepatic injury markers (lactate, liver transaminases and bilirubin). We thus developed a new algorithm by combining urinary NGAL and L-FABP with stratification by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score, presence of sepsis and blood lactate levels to improve their AKI predictive performance, which showed a significantly better area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC-ROC 0.940; 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.793–0.985] than that under NGAL alone (AUC-ROC 0.858, 95% CI 0.741–0.927, P = 0.03) or L-FABP alone (AUC-ROC 0.837, 95% CI 0.697–0.920, P = 0.007) and indicated that nonrenal conditions and systemic severity should be considered for improved AKI prediction by NGAL and L-FABP as biomarkers.