1
|
Weiner SG, Little K, Yoo J, Flores DP, Hildebran C, Wright DA, Ritter GA, El Ibrahimi S. Opioid Overdose After Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Initiation Following Hospitalization or ED Visit. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2423954. [PMID: 39037812 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Hospitalizations related to opioid use disorder (OUD) represent an opportunity to initiate medication for OUD (MOUD). Objective To assess whether starting MOUD after a hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visit is associated with the odds of fatal and nonfatal opioid overdose at 6 and 12 months. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based cohort study used data from the Oregon Comprehensive Opioid Risk Registry, which links all payer claims data to other administrative health datasets, for individuals aged 18 years or older who had diagnosis codes related to OUD recorded at an index ED visit or hospitalization from January 2017 to December 2019. Data were analyzed between May 2023 and January 2024. Exposures Receipt of MOUD within the 7 days after an OUD-related hospital visit. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was fatal or nonfatal overdose at 6 and 12 months after discharge. Sample characteristics, including age, sex, insurance plan, number of comorbidities, and opioid-related overdose events, were stratified by receipt or nonreceipt of MOUD within 7 days after an OUD-related hospital visit. A logistic regression model was used to investigate the association between receipt of MOUD and having an opioid overdose event. Results The study included 22 235 patients (53.1% female; 25.0% aged 25-39 years) who had an OUD-related hospital visit during the study period. Overall, 1184 patients (5.3%) received MOUD within 7 days of their ED visit or hospitalization. Of these patients, 683 (57.7%) received buprenorphine, 463 (39.1%) received methadone, and 46 (3.9%) received long-acting injectable naltrexone. Patients who received MOUD within 7 days after discharge had lower adjusted odds of fatal or nonfatal overdose at 6 months compared with those who did not (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.97). At 12 months, there was no difference in adjusted odds of fatal or nonfatal overdose between these groups (AOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.08). Patients had a lower risk of fatal or nonfatal overdose at 6 months associated with buprenorphine use (AOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.95) but not with methadone use (AOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.28-1.17). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of individuals with an OUD-related hospital visit, initiation of MOUD was associated with reduced odds of opioid-related overdose at 6 months. Hospitals should consider implementing programs and protocols to offer initiation of MOUD to patients with OUD who present for care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott G Weiner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jiah Yoo
- Comagine Health, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | | | | | - Sanae El Ibrahimi
- Comagine Health, Portland, Oregon
- School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Feeney ME, Law AC, Walkey AJ, Bosch NA. Variation in Use of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Critically Ill Patients Across the United States. Crit Care Med 2024; 52:e365-e375. [PMID: 38501933 PMCID: PMC11176030 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe practice patterns surrounding the use of medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) in critically ill patients. DESIGN Retrospective, multicenter, observational study using the Premier AI Healthcare Database. SETTING The study was conducted in U.S. ICUs. PATIENTS Adult (≥ 18 yr old) patients with a history of opioid use disorder (OUD) admitted to an ICU between 2016 and 2020. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of 108,189 ICU patients (658 hospitals) with a history of OUD, 20,508 patients (19.0%) received MOUD. Of patients receiving MOUD, 13,745 (67.0%) received methadone, 2,950 (14.4%) received buprenorphine, and 4,227 (20.6%) received buprenorphine/naloxone. MOUD use occurred in 37.9% of patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation. The median day of MOUD initiation was hospital day 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3) and the median duration of MOUD use was 4 days (IQR 2-8). MOUD use per hospital was highly variable (median 16.0%; IQR 10-24; range, 0-70.0%); admitting hospital explained 8.9% of variation in MOUD use. A primary admitting diagnosis of unintentional poisoning (aOR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.38-0.45), presence of an additional substance use disorder (aOR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.64-0.68), and factors indicating greater severity of illness were associated with reduced odds of receiving MOUD in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS In a large multicenter, retrospective study, there was large variation in the use of MOUD among ICU patients with a history of OUD. These results inform future studies seeking to optimize the approach to MOUD use during critical illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anica C. Law
- Department of Medicine, The Pulmonary Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Allan J. Walkey
- Department of Medicine, The Pulmonary Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Nicholas A. Bosch
- Department of Medicine, The Pulmonary Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hauser CD, Bell CM, Zamora RA, Mazur J, Neyens RR. Characterization of Opioid Use in the Intensive Care Unit and Its Impact Across Care Transitions: A Prospective Study. J Pharm Pract 2024; 37:343-350. [PMID: 36259532 DOI: 10.1177/08971900221134553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study is to characterize opioid intensity in the intensive care unit (ICU) and its association with opioid utilization across care transitions. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study. Medically ill ICU patients with complete medication histories who survived to discharge were included. Opioid intensity was characterized based on IV morphine milligram equivalents (IV MME). Primary outcomes were opioid prescribing upon ICU and hospital discharge. Results: Opioids were prescribed to 34.1% and 31.1% of patients upon ICU and hospital discharge. Within the ≥50 mean IV MME/ICU day cohort, 64.7% of patients received opioids after ICU discharge compared to 45.8% and 13.6% in the 1-49 mean IV MME/ICU day and no opioid groups (P < .05). Within the ≥50 mean IV MME/ICU day cohort, 70.6% of patients were prescribed opioids after hospitalization compared to 37.3% and 13.6% of patients who received less or no opioids. (P < .05). Within the ≥50 mean IV MME/ICU day cohort, 29.4% of patients were opioid naïve and discharged with an opioid, which is over double compared to patients with lower opioid requirements (P < .05). Conclusion: Patients with higher mean daily ICU opioid requirements had increased opioid prescribing across care transitions despite preadmission opioid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Hauser
- Critical Care and Emergency Medicine Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Department of Pharmacy, Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Carolyn M Bell
- Department of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina
| | | | - Joseph Mazur
- Department of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina
| | - Ron R Neyens
- Department of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stern SJ, D’Orazio JL, Work BD, Calcaterra SL, Thakrar AP. Point/counterpoint: Should full agonist opioid medications be offered to hospitalized patients for management of opioid withdrawal? J Hosp Med 2024; 19:339-343. [PMID: 38030816 PMCID: PMC10987259 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sam J. Stern
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Center for Urban Bioethics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joseph L. D’Orazio
- Cooper Center for Healing, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Toxicology and Addiction Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Brian D. Work
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Prevention Point Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Susan L. Calcaterra
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Ashish P. Thakrar
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moyo P, Nishar S, Merrick C, Streltzov N, Asiedu E, Roma C, Vanjani R, Soske J. Perspectives on Admissions and Care for Residents With Opioid Use Disorder in Skilled Nursing Facilities. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2354746. [PMID: 38315484 PMCID: PMC10844991 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are being referred more individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD), even when their medical needs are not directly associated with OUD. Objective To characterize factors that influence SNF admission for individuals with OUD and identify strategies for providing medications for OUD (MOUD) in SNFs. Design, Setting, and Participants In this semistructured qualitative study, interviews were conducted with SNF administrators from 27 SNFs in Rhode Island from November 5, 2021, to April 27, 2022. Data analysis occurred from August 22, 2022, to May 31, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Themes and subthemes on administrator perspectives on admissions and care for people with OUD in SNFs. Audio interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using codebook thematic analysis and guided by community-engaged and participatory research principles. Results The study included 29 participants representing 27 SNFs in Rhode Island. Participant roles were administrators (17 participants [59%]), directors of nursing (6 participants [21%]), directors of admissions (5 participants [17%]), and unit managers (1 participant [3%]). Participants described active substance use, Medicaid insurance, housing instability, and younger age as potential barriers to SNF admission for individuals with OUD. The lack of formal guidelines for OUD management, staff shortages, facility liability, state regulations, and skills and training deficits among staff were cited among challenges of effectively meeting the needs of residents with OUD. Many participants reported inadequate institutional capacity as a source of negative outcomes for people with OUD yet expressed their concerns by characterizing individuals with OUD as potentially violent, nonadherent, or likely to bring undesirable elements into facilities. Participants also shared strategies they used to better serve residents with OUD, including providing transportation to support group meetings in the community, delivery in advance of resident arrival of predosed methadone, and telemedicine through the state's hotline to prescribe buprenorphine. Conclusions and Relevance In this qualitative study of administrator perspectives about admissions and care for individuals with OUD in SNFs, gaps in institutional capacity overlapped with stigmatizing beliefs about OUD; such beliefs perpetuate discrimination of individuals with OUD. Adequate SNF funding and staffing combined with OUD-specific interventions (eg, antistigma training, community partnerships for MOUD and recovery support) could incentivize SNFs to serve individuals with OUD and facilitate OUD care consistent with practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patience Moyo
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Shivani Nishar
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Charlotte Merrick
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Nicholas Streltzov
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Emmanuella Asiedu
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Corinne Roma
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Rahul Vanjani
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
- Amos House, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jon Soske
- Division of Addiction Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bettinger JJ, Friedman BC. Opioids and Immunosuppression: Clinical Evidence, Mechanisms of Action, and Potential Therapies. Palliat Med Rep 2024; 5:70-80. [PMID: 38435086 PMCID: PMC10908329 DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In addition to the more well-known adverse effects of opioids, such as constipation, mounting evidence supports underlying immunosuppressive effects as well. Methods In this study, we provide a narrative review of preclinical and clinical evidence of opioid suppression of the immune system as well as possible considerations for therapies. Results In vitro and animal studies have shown clear effects of opioids on inflammatory cytokine expression, immune cell activity, and pathogen susceptibility. Observational data in humans have so far supported preclinical findings, with multiple reports of increased rates of infections in various settings of opioid use. However, the extent to which this risk is due to the impact of opioids on the immune system compared with other risk factors associated with opioid use remains uncertain. Considering the data showing immunosuppression and increased risk of infection with opioid use, measures are needed to mitigate this risk in patients who require ongoing treatment with opioids. In preclinical studies, administration of opioid receptor antagonists blocked the immunomodulatory effects of opioids. Conclusions As selective antagonists of peripheral opioid receptors, peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor (MOR) antagonists may be able to protect against immune impairment while still allowing for opioid analgesia. Future research is warranted to further investigate the relationship between opioids and infection risk as well as the potential application of peripherally acting MOR antagonists to counteract these risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J. Bettinger
- Pain Management, Saratoga Hospital Medical Group, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA
| | - Bruce C. Friedman
- JM Still Burn Center, Doctors Hospital of Augusta, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dhillon JS, Feulner L, Beitollahi A, Kossen K, Galarneau D. At a Crossroads: Opioid Use Disorder, the X-Waiver, and the Road Ahead. Ochsner J 2024; 24:108-117. [PMID: 38912181 PMCID: PMC11192224 DOI: 10.31486/toj.23.0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone) is widely considered the first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), which causes significant morbidity and mortality in the United States, but prior to 2023, practitioners interested in prescribing buprenorphine/naloxone for OUD needed a special Drug Enforcement Administration certification (the X-Waiver) that imposed a patient cap and other limitations. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 considerably decreased the restrictions on prescribing practitioners. Buprenorphine/naloxone can now be prescribed like any other prescription opioid, excluding methadone. The historic context for the opioid crisis, OUD, the X-Waiver, and additional initiatives that may be needed beyond legislative change to effectively address OUD are the subjects of this review. Methods: To develop this review of the opioid crisis, OUD, and OUD treatment, we conducted a literature search of the PubMed database and constructed a timeline of the opioid crisis and changes in OUD treatment, specifically the X-Waiver, to characterize the historic context of OUD and the X-Waiver against the background of the opioid crisis. Results: The opioid crisis has had pervasive public health and economic impacts in the United States. Major changes to the treatment of OUD have occurred as a result of the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 that imposed the X-Waiver and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 that repealed the X-Waiver. Conclusion: The repeal of the X-Waiver is predicted to increase the accessibility of buprenorphine/naloxone in the United States. However, additional work beyond legislative change, including institutional support and reduction of stigma and disparities, is needed to substantially improve outcomes for OUD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leah Feulner
- The University of Queensland Medical School, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
| | - Ariya Beitollahi
- The University of Queensland Medical School, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
| | - Kelly Kossen
- The University of Queensland Medical School, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
| | - David Galarneau
- The University of Queensland Medical School, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
- Department of Psychiatry, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alrawashdeh M, Rhee C, Klompas M, Larochelle MR, Poland RE, Guy JS, Kimmel SD. Association of Early Opioid Withdrawal Treatment Strategy and Patient-Directed Discharge Among Hospitalized Patients with Opioid Use Disorder. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:2289-2297. [PMID: 36788169 PMCID: PMC10406767 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08059-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical hospitalizations for people with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently result in patient-directed discharges (PDD), often due to untreated pain and withdrawal. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between early opioid withdrawal management strategies and PDD. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using three datasets representing 362 US hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients hospitalized between 2009 and 2015 with OUD (as identified using ICD-9-CM codes or inpatient buprenorphine administration) and no PDD on the day of admission. INTERVENTIONS Opioid withdrawal management strategies were classified based on day-of-admission receipt of any of the following treatments: (1) medications for OUD (MOUD) including methadone or buprenorphine, (2) other opioid analgesics, (3) adjunctive symptomatic medications without opioids (e.g., clonidine), and (4) no withdrawal treatment. MAIN MEASURES PDD was assessed as the main outcome and hospital length of stay as a secondary outcome. KEY RESULTS Of 6,715,286 hospitalizations, 127,158 (1.9%) patients had OUD and no PDD on the day of admission, of whom 7166 (5.6%) had a later PDD and 91,051 (71.6%) patients received some early opioid withdrawal treatment (22.3% MOUD; 43.4% opioid analgesics; 5.9% adjunctive medications). Compared to no withdrawal treatment, MOUD was associated with a lower risk of PDD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.73, 95%CI 0.68-0.8, p < .001), adjunctive treatment alone was associated with higher risk (aOR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.01-1.26, p = .031), and treatment with opioid analgesics alone was associated with similar risk (aOR 0.95, 95%CI: 0.89-1.02, p = .148). Among those with PDD, both MOUD (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.17-1.3, p < .001) and opioid analgesic treatments (aIRR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.34-1.45, p < .001) were associated with longer hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS MOUD was associated with decreased risk of PDD but was utilized in < 1 in 4 patients. Efforts are needed to ensure all patients with OUD have access to effective opioid withdrawal management to improve the likelihood they receive recommended hospital care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Alrawashdeh
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
- Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
| | - Chanu Rhee
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Klompas
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marc R Larochelle
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Russell E Poland
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- HCA Healthcare, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Simeon D Kimmel
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Puzhko S, Eisenberg MJ, Filion KB, Windle SB, Hébert-Losier A, Gore G, Paraskevopoulos E, Martel MO, Kudrina I. Effectiveness of Interventions for Prevention of Common Infections Among Opioid Users: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. Front Public Health 2022; 10:749033. [PMID: 35273933 PMCID: PMC8901608 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.749033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The North American opioid crisis is marked by high opioid-related mortality and morbidity, including opioid use-associated infections (OUAIs). Users of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical opioids are at an increased risk of acquiring hepatitis C (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and other infections. No high-level evidence, however, has been synthesized regarding effectiveness of interventions to prevent OUAIs in legal, and illegal/mixed opioid users. The aim of the study is to synthesize available systematic review (SR)-level evidence on the scope and effectiveness of interventions to prevent OUAIs among opioid users. Methods A SR of SRs approach was applied. We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos and Google Scholar from inception to September 2020. Data selection and extraction were performed independently by three researchers. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the AMSTAR2 tool. Results were narratively synthesized. Strength of evidence for each category was reported. Results Eleven of twelve identified SRs included interventions to prevent HCV/HIV transmission in persons who inject drugs (PWID), including opioids. One SR evaluated interventions to prevent recurrent infectious endocarditis. There was sufficient and tentative SR of SRs-level evidence for the effectiveness of opioid substitution therapy (OST) in preventing HIV and HCV, respectively. We found tentative evidence to support effectiveness of needle/syringe exchange programs (NSP) in HIV prevention, and sufficient evidence to support effectiveness of the combined OST and NSP in HCV prevention. There was insufficient SR-level evidence to support or discount effectiveness of other interventions to prevent OUAIs. No SR focused on non-PWID populations. Conclusion SR-level evidence supports the use of OST, NSP, and combined interventions for the reduction of HCV and HIV transmission in PWID. More research on prevention of other OUAIs and on prevention of OUAIs in non-PWID populations is urgently needed. Systematic Review Registration Registered in PROSPERO on July 30, 2020. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=195929, identifier: #195929.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetlana Puzhko
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark J Eisenberg
- Jewish General Hospital, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kristian B Filion
- Jewish General Hospital, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarah B Windle
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Andréa Hébert-Losier
- Jewish General Hospital, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Genevieve Gore
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Marc O Martel
- Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Irina Kudrina
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abu Y, Vitari N, Yan Y, Roy S. Opioids and Sepsis: Elucidating the Role of the Microbiome and microRNA-146. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:1097. [PMID: 35163021 PMCID: PMC8835205 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Sepsis has recently been defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the dysregulated host response to an ongoing or suspected infection. To date, sepsis continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality amongst hospitalized patients. Many risk factors contribute to development of sepsis, including pain-relieving drugs like opioids, which are frequently prescribed post-operatively. In light of the opioid crisis, understanding the interactions between opioid use and the development of sepsis has become extremely relevant, as opioid use is associated with increased risk of infection. Given that the intestinal tract is a major site of origin of sepsis-causing microbes, there has been an increasing focus on how alterations in the gut microbiome may predispose towards sepsis and mediate immune dysregulation. MicroRNAs, in particular, have emerged as key modulators of the inflammatory response during sepsis by tempering the immune response, thereby mediating the interaction between host and microbiome. In this review, we elucidate contributing roles of microRNA 146 in modulating sepsis pathogenesis and end with a discussion of therapeutic targeting of the gut microbiome in controlling immune dysregulation in sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaa Abu
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA;
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA;
| | - Nicolas Vitari
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA;
| | - Yan Yan
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA;
| | - Sabita Roy
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA;
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sepsis and the Opioid Crisis: Integrating Treatment for Two Public Health Emergencies. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:2151-2153. [PMID: 34793384 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|